|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003499200 on July 27, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 40, 31051-31060, October 6, 2000
Proximal Promoter of the Surfactant Protein D Gene
REGULATORY ROLES OF AP-1, FORKHEAD BOX, AND GT BOX BINDING
PROTEINS*
Yanchun
He ,
Erika C.
Crouch §,
Kevin
Rust ,
Elyse
Spaite , and
Steven L.
Brody¶
From the Departments of Pathology and Immunology and
¶ Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine,
St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Received for publication, April 25, 2000, and in revised form, July 6, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Surfactant protein D (SP-D) plays roles in
pulmonary host defense and surfactant homeostasis and is increased
following lung injury. Because AP-1 proteins regulate cellular
responses to diverse environmental stimuli, we hypothesized that the
conserved AP-1 motif (at 109) and flanking sequences in the human
SP-D promoter contribute to the regulation of SP-D expression. The AP-1
sequence specifically bound to fra-1, junD, and
junB in H441 lung adenocarcinoma nuclear extracts.
Mutagenesis of the AP-1 motif in a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter construct containing 285 base
pairs of upstream sequence nearly abolished promoter activity,
and co-transfection of junD significantly increased wild
type but not mutant promoter activity. The sequence immediately
downstream of the AP-1 element contained a binding site for HNF-3
(FOXA), and simultaneous mutation of this site
(fox-d) and an upstream FoxA binding site ( 277, fox-u) caused a 4-fold reduction in chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase activity. Immediately upstream of the AP-1-binding
site, we identified a GT box-containing positive regulatory element.
Despite finding regions of limited homology to the thyroid
transcription factor 1-binding site, SP-D promoter activity did not
require thyroid transcription factor 1. Thus, transcriptional
regulation of SP-D gene expression involves complex interactions with
ubiquitous and lineage-dependent factors consistent with
more generalized roles in innate immunity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Pulmonary surfactant protein D
(SP-D)1 is a member of the
collectin (collagenous lectin) subfamily of mammalian C-type lectins, which includes pulmonary surfactant protein A (SP-A), serum
mannose-binding lectin, and at least two bovine serum lectins
related to SP-D, conglutinin and CL-43 (1, 2). The genes for both lung
collectins and mannose-binding lectin are encoded in close proximity on
human chromosome 10q. The pulmonary collectins, like the homologous serum proteins, are believed to contribute to innate (nonclonal) immunity and the host response to microorganisms (2). In addition, both
SP-A and SP-D may contribute to the regulation of surfactant lipid
homeostasis under certain circumstances in vivo (3-5).
SP-A and SP-D are secreted into the distal airways and pulmonary
alveoli by Clara cells and type II pneumocytes. The expression of SP-A
and SP-D by these cells is increased following many forms of pulmonary
injury (2), and the rapid increase in SP-A and SP-D accumulation
following intratracheal instillation of bacterial endotoxin suggests
that they contribute to a pulmonary acute phase response (6). However,
the regulation of these responses is not understood. We have previously
shown that DNA sequences within 285 bp of the start site of
transcription of the human SP-D promoter are able to confer
glucocorticoid-responsive gene expression in H441 human lung
adenocarcinoma cells but not liver HepG2 cells (7), suggesting that the
proximal sequence contains information sufficient to direct
lung-restricted expression. Sequence analysis of the proximal promoter
suggested potential regulatory roles for a variety of ubiquitous and
lung-restricted transcription factors.
In considering the potential contributions of these regulatory motifs
to SP-D gene regulation, we initially focused our attention on the AP-1
consensus (5'-TGAGTCA-3') at 109 bp relative to the start site of
transcription (7). Preliminary footprinting assays showed preferential
protection of this motif and its contiguous flanking sequences by
nuclear extracts from H441 cells. In addition, an identical AP-1 motif
is spatially conserved in the rat and mouse promoters (7, 8) and in the
promoter of the homologous bovine conglutinin gene (9, 10) (Fig.
1). Because alterations in the
composition of the AP-1 complex regulate a wide variety of
transcriptional events associated with cellular differentiation and the
response to environmental stimuli including cell injury, inflammation,
and the systemic acute phase response, we hypothesized that the AP-1
motif plays important roles in the regulation of SP-D expression.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Top panel, schematic diagram of the
proximal promoter of the human SP-D gene. The positions of restriction
nuclease cleavage sites used for the generation of the CAT reporter
constructs and the TATA box (CATAA) are identified. The approximate
positions of the AP-1, upstream and downstream forkhead box sequences
(fox-u and fox-d), and the GT box are also
identified. Bottom panel, the AP-1 motifs and flanking
sequences of the human SP-D gene (hSP-D) ( 135 to 87
relative to the start site of transcription) are aligned with
corresponding regions of the bovine conglutinin gene and mouse
(mSP-D) and rat genes (rSP-D). The locations of
cis-acting elements identified in the current study are
shown below the alignment in bold type. The
position of a putative TTF-1-binding site, which shows limited homology
with the SP-Bf1 site, is indicated above the alignment (17).
The E box (CANNTG), GATA (GATAA), and AP-1 (TGAGTCA) motifs are
boxed. The positions of protected sequences on DNA
footprints of hSP-D DNA with H441 nuclear proteins are indicated by
brackets above; sequence 5' to the GATA motif was poorly
visualized because of a hypersensitive cleavage site in this
region.
|
|
The flanking regions of the conserved AP-1 motif also contain sequences
resembling binding sites for factors known to regulate respiratory
epithelial cell differentiation and the expression of various secreted
lung proteins including Clara cell-specific protein (CCSP) and SP-A,
-B, and -C (11). These include potential binding sites for the
homeodomain-containing protein, thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1),
and the forkhead/winged helix transcription factors, such as HNF-3
(FOXA). Previous studies have shown that TTF-1 and HNF-3 can
act in combinatorial fashion with other ubiquitous and cell-specific
transcription factors to regulate lung-specific genes (12, 13). Because
pulmonary cells known to express TTF-1 and forkhead box proteins
secrete SP-D in vivo, we hypothesized that these nuclear
factors similarly contribute to the regulation of SP-D expression.
To characterize the regulatory role(s) of the putative AP-1 element and
other potential regulatory motifs in its conserved flanking sequences,
we examined the interactions of oligomers containing these sequences
with H441 nuclear proteins using electrophoretic mobility shift and
antibody supershift assays. We also selectively mutated these sequences
and compared the activity of wild type and mutant constructs in
transient transfection assays. These studies are the first to
demonstrate specific cis-acting elements in the human SP-D
gene. The regulatory profile is consistent with more generalized roles
in pulmonary and nonpulmonary host defense.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Genomic Clones and Sequencing--
An approximately
7-kilobase EcoRI fragment of the previously described
human genomic clone (H5), designated H5E7, containing 5' hSP-D sequence
was isolated and subcloned into pGEM3Z as described previously (7).
Most studies employed a XbaI/SacI fragment of the
hSP-D gene containing 285 bp immediately upstream of the start site of
transcription (XS285 or XS) (Fig. 1).
Cells--
NCI-H441 human lung adenocarcinoma cells were
obtained as a gift from Dr. A. Gazdar (University of Texas Medical
Center, Dallas, TX) and propagated as described previously (7). HeLa
(CCL-2), A549 (CCL-185), and HepG2 (HB-8065) cell lines were obtained
from the American Type Culture Collection and maintained under
recommended conditions of cell culture.
Oligomers--
Several wild type and mutant oligomers were
synthesized (DNA International) for this study (see Table I). In
addition, oligomers corresponding to the CCSP upstream and/or
downstream HNF-3-binding sites (14), FREAC2 (15), TTR-S (16), and wild
type and mutant TTF-1 (17) were synthesized based on published
sequences. The GT box oligomer corresponds to the GT box-binding site
in human SP-A (18). Commercial consensus oligomers to AP-1 and AP-2
were purchased from Promega, and commercial Sp1, E box, and GATA (1-6) oligomers were obtained from Santa Cruz. The oligomers and their reverse complements were annealed and used in electrophoretic mobility
shift assays (EMSAs) as described below.
Mutagenesis by Overlap Extension--
XS285 (Fig. 1) was
subcloned into pGEM-3Z (Promega) and used for thermal cycling-coupled
mutagenesis. Forward and reverse directed oligomers were synthesized,
each containing a mutated consensus sequence. pXS was linearized
outside the multiple cloning site by digestion with ScaI and
used as template for thermal cycling reactions. Approximately 200 ng of
template DNA, 200 ng of forward or reverse mutagenesis oligomer, and
200 ng of an oligomer directed to the appropriate SP6 or T7 RNA
polymerase site in pGEM were combined with 200 µM dNTPs
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and 1 unit of Taq polymerase
(Fisher) in buffer supplied with the enzyme. 20-25 cycles were
performed, each consisting of 1 min at 95 °C (denaturing), 1 min at
45 °C (annealing), and 2 min at 70 °C (extension). Resultant DNA
fragments were gel purified using the QIA Quick Gel extraction kit
(Qiagen). The 5' and 3' fragments of the mutated promoter DNA were
joined together by extension thermal cycling, using an overlapping
internal oligomer sequence and oligomers to the flanking SP6 and T7
sites for amplification. The wild type or final mutated fragment was
subcloned into pSK-CAT as described previously (7) or pBLCAT3 (plasmid
backbone of pTK-CAT), and the orientation was verified by restriction
digestion and sequencing. All SP-D sequences terminated at a
SacI site within the untranslated first exon and were
numbered from the start site of transcription (7).
Nuclear Extracts--
Nuclear extracts were prepared from
cultured cell lines using a rapid mini-extraction technique (19).
Briefly, cells were scraped into 7 ml of Tris-buffered saline, pH 7.5, and centrifuged. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of Tris-buffered
saline, transferred to a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube, and
recentrifuged. The resultant pellet was thoroughly resuspended in 400 µl of ice-cold Buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 4 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2 µg/ml aprotinin) and incubated
on ice for 15 min. Nonidet P-40 (Sigma) was then added to a final
concentration of 0.625%, and the sample was vortexed for 10 s
prior to microcentrifugation at 1350 rpm in a Hermle Z233M centrifuge
for 30 s at 4 °C. The resultant nuclear pellet was resuspended
in 50 µl of cold Buffer C (20% glycerol, 400 mM NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
EGTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 4 µg/ml leupeptin, and 2 µg/ml
aprotinin). The pellet was vigorously agitated on a rocker platform for
15 min at 4 °C and then clarified by centrifugation for 15 min at
4 °C in a microcentrifuge (12,000 rpm). The supernatant was
transferred to a chilled fresh tube, and the protein content was
analyzed by dye binding assay. Yields were in the range of 300-500
µg/75-cm2 flask. Once quantified, the extract was frozen
in liquid nitrogen and stored at 70 °C.
EMSAs--
Gel retardation assays were performed by a
modification of a method employed by Bingle and co-workers (20).
Briefly, 5-10 µg of nuclear extract in the absence or presence of
50-100-fold excess of competitive inhibitor was incubated for 10 min
at 18 °C in a buffer consisting of 1 mM
MgCl2, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 40 mM
KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mM EGTA, 4%
(w/v) Ficoll (Sigma), and 50 µg/ml poly(dI-dC) (Sigma). Approximately
1.75 pmol of kinase-labeled double-stranded oligomer were then added,
and the incubation was continued for 10 min. For supershift experiments
purified antibodies were then added to samples at the optimal
concentration and incubated for an additional 10 min. Antibodies to
jun or fos proteins, GATA-6, Sp1, and Sp3 were from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology; antibodies to HNF-3 and HNF-3 were
from Dr. Robert Costa (University of Illinois, Chicago, IL), and the
antibody to TTF-1 was provided by Dr. Roberto Di Lauro (Stazione
Zoologica "Anton Dohrn," Naples, Italy). Prior to loading on
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, volume of loading
buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.2% bromphenol blue,
0.2% xylene cyanol, and 40% glycerol) was added to each sample.
Complexes were resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2.5-3
h, 250 V, 4 °C) using nondenaturing 4% bisacrylamide, 2.5% glycerol gels, and 0.5× TBE running buffer. Gels were dried to 3MM
paper (Whatman) and exposed to X-Omat AR film (Eastman Kodak) for a
period of 1 h to 1 week with an intensifying screen.
Transient Transfection--
In brief, for experiments
characterizing the promoter activity of 5' deletion or mutant
constructs, H441 target cells (5 × 105) were plated
on 35-mm plates in RPMI medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented
with 10% (v/v) newborn calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.), allowed
to attach overnight, and washed twice with RPMI devoid of phenol red
(7). The cells were transfected with 2 µg of CAT reporter construct
and 1 µg of pCMV- -gal (Promega) using LipofectAMINE (Life
Technologies, Inc.) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in the
absence of serum. Parallel transfections were performed using pSK-CAT
vector controls and/or a glucocorticoid-responsive control promoter,
pMSG-CAT (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Concentrated serum-containing
medium was then added, and the cells were incubated overnight. Cells
were harvested at various times up to 48 h with one medium
change at 24 h when needed. Where indicated, a previously optimized concentration of dexamethasone (Dex; final concentration, 50 nM) was added to the concentrated medium and with the
succeeding medium change. All assays were performed on duplicate or
triplicate plates. For some experiments, similar studies were performed
using HeLa or HepG2 cells.
CAT Assays--
Cell layers were harvested, and transient
transfection assays were performed using protein equivalent amounts of
cell extract using and CAT promoter constructs as described previously
(7). Prior to each transfection the quality of the plasmids was
reassessed by gel electrophoresis. CAT activity was measured by phase
partitioning and thin layer chromatography, followed by
autoradiography. To quantify relative acetylation, gels were exposed to
a phosphorimaging screen (Storage phosphor Screen GP; Eastman Kodak
Co.) and scanned using a STORM image reader (Molecular Dynamics). To
prepare figures the data files were imported to ImageQuant (Molecular
Dynamics) and transferred to Illustrator (Adobe) as unmanipulated TIFF
files. Each assay was performed in duplicate, and each figure is
representative of at least three experiments. When indicated,
conversion data were normalized to -galactosidase activity as
described previously (7).
Cotransfections with Nuclear Factor Expression Vectors--
The
junD expression plasmid (HA1-junD) was a gift of
Dr. Lester Lau (University of Illinois). The fra-1 cDNA
was kindly provided by Dr. Thomas Curran (St. Jude's Hospital,
Memphis, TN). Expression plasmids for c-fos and
c-jun were a gift of Dr. G. Doyle (University of Wisconsin,
Madison, WI). These were constructed by inserting the nuclear factor
cDNA in the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA; contains
the cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter, a polylinker, and
the bovine growth hormone polyadenylation sequence). The pCMV-human HNF-3 cDNA (21) and TTF-1 cDNA (20) were gifts from Dr.
Colin Bingle (University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK). Dr. James Darnell (Rockefeller University, New York, NY) kindly provided the rat HNF-3 and HNF-3 cDNAs. Transfections were
performed using up to 1 µg of pcDNA3 containing the desired
cDNA or an equivalent weight of the pcDNA3 vector. For some
experiments, expression of mRNA or protein encoded by the
cotransfected plasmid was confirmed by Northern hybridization or gel
supershift assays, respectively.
 |
RESULTS |
H441 Nuclear Proteins Bind to the AP-1 Motif in SP-D--
A
labeled SP-D oligomer (20-mer) containing the AP-1 sequence (Table
I, Oligo1) showed binding to proteins in
H441 nuclear extracts (Fig.
2A, lane 2). The
major complex was specific as demonstrated by competition with
unlabeled Oligo1 (Fig. 2A, lane 3) or a
commercial AP-1 oligomer (Promega pAP-1; Fig. 2A, lane 4). There was no competition by a mutant oligomer with base
substitutions at six of seven positions (Fig. 2A, lane
5; Oligo1m, Table I) or an unrelated oligomer (AP-2; Fig.
2A, lane 6) with a similar base composition.

View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Nuclear proteins bind to the AP-1
consensus. A, a radiolabeled oligomer containing the
SP-D AP-1 sequence (Oligo1, Table I) bound to proteins in H441 nuclear
extracts. The single major complex is specific as demonstrated
by competition with Oligo1 or a commercial AP-1 consensus oligomer
(pAP-1). There was no competition by an unrelated oligomer (AP-2), and
Oligo1 with a mutated AP-1 consensus (Oligo1m) was ineffective as a
competitor. B, parallel experiments were performed using a
radiolabeled commercial AP-1 oligomer (pAP-1).
|
|
Because surrounding sequences can influence the binding of specific
AP-1 proteins (22), we also examined the interactions of H441 nuclear
proteins with a commercial AP-1 consensus oligomer (pAP-1) (Fig.
2B). Binding was competed by Oligo1 or pAP-1 (Fig. 2B, lanes 3 and 4), but not by Oligo1m
or AP-2 (Fig. 2B, lanes 5 and 6).
Binding was also competed with a smaller SP-D AP-1 oligomer (Oligo 2, Table I) (data not shown). Thus, the data demonstrate that the SP-D
AP-1 motif can specifically bind to nuclear proteins expressed by H441
cells. Complexes of comparable mobility were also identified using
nuclear extracts of an SP-D producing lung adenocarcinoma cell line
(NCI-H969) (23) and freshly isolated rat type II cells (data not shown).
AP-1 Proteins Bind to the AP-1 Sequence--
AP-1 complexes
consist of homodimers of two jun family members
(c-jun, junB, and junD), or
heterodimers of one jun family member with c-fos or one of
the fos-related proteins (fosB, fra-1, and fra-2) (24). Supershift assays using pan-fos
and pan-jun antibodies and radiolabeled Oligo1 incubated
with H441 nuclear extracts demonstrated binding of components
immunologically related to jun and fos family
members (Fig. 3, lanes 2 and
6). In other experiments, stronger supershift bands were
obtained with the pan-jun antibody (data not shown).
Supershift assays with antibodies for specific fos and
jun proteins demonstrated relatively strong and specific
supershift bands with antibodies to junB, junD,
and fra-1 (lanes 3, 5, and 9) and much
weaker bands for c-jun, c-fos, or
fra-2 (lanes 4, 7, and 10), and no
detectable signal for fosB (lane 8). The
fra-1, junD, and junB supershift bands
comigrated with the major bands detected using the pan-fos
and pan-jun antibodies but had a reproducibly lower mobility
than the faint complexes formed with antibodies to c-fos and
c-jun. Consistent with the finding shown in Fig. 2, binding
was blocked by competition with the commercial AP-1 oligomer or Oligo1
but not by Oligo1m (data not shown).

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Representative supershift assays using
antibodies for specific fos and jun
proteins. Strong supershift bands are observed in the
presence of antibodies to fra-1, junB, and
junD (arrow). Although the pan-fos
antibody gave a similarly strong band, the pan-jun antibody
gave a much weaker signal in this particular experiment. Binding to
H441 nuclear proteins was blocked by competition with the commercial
AP-1 oligomer or Oligo1, but not by Oligo1m (not shown).
|
|
Thus, the data indicate that selected AP-1 family members are binding
to the SP-D sequence and suggest that the binding of fra-1,
junD, and junB reflects the predominating species
of AP-1 proteins in H441 cells rather than an intrinsic property of the AP-1-binding sequence. Because prior studies have described
fra-1 and junB but not junD in H441
cells (25), we performed Northern hybridization assays to further
confirm the presence of junD. Although there was a
predominance of junB message, junD mRNA was also identified (data not shown).
Site-directed Mutagenesis of the Conserved AP-1 Consensus Decreases
SP-D Promoter Activity--
To study the potential functional
consequences of AP-1 binding, we employed a transient transfection
assay utilizing H441 lung adenocarcinoma cells in conjunction with wild
type and mutant CAT reporter constructs. Mutagenesis of the conserved
AP-1 motif in pXS (pXSm) resulted in a marked decrease in both basal
and promoter activity (Fig.
4A). The reduction in
normalized basal activity was 3.9 ± 0.9 in five separate
experiments. Decreases in promoter activity were also observed when the
mutation was examined within the context of two shorter restriction
fragments, pPS and pFS (Fig. 1; data not shown).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Mutagenesis of the conserved AP-1 sequence
decreases basal and junD-stimulated promoter
activity. A, mutagenesis of the conserved AP-1-binding
site in pXS (pXSm) resulted in a marked decrease in basal and
Dex-stimulated promoter activity in transient transfection assays using
H441 cells. The activity of pXS-CAT and pXSm-CAT are compared in this
representative experiment. Dex significantly increased the activity of
the pMSG-CAT, which contains known glucocorticoid response elements,
but not the activity of the vector control, pSK-CAT. B, H441
cells were cotransfected with the CAT reporter construct and a cDNA
encoding junD in the absence or presence of Dex. A
representative experiment is shown. Co-transfection with
junD increased pXS-CAT activity, and this effect was
markedly decreased with pXSm-CAT.
|
|
Dex increases the production of SP-D in lung tissue in vivo
and in vitro, and these effects are mediated at the level of
transcription (7). However, the stimulation of pXS activity achieved
with Dex is indirect (e.g. requires 24-48 h for maximal
stimulation) and does not involve direct interactions of glucocorticoid
receptor with classical response elements in the proximal promoter (7). We therefore sought to determine whether mutation of the AP-1 could
inhibit the 2-3-fold higher levels of promoter activity observed in
the presence of glucocorticoids. As shown in Fig. 4A,
mutation of the AP-1 element (pXSm) markedly decreased promoter activity in the absence or presence of Dex. Although the residual activity of pXSm showed a detectable increase in the presence of Dex,
the pSK vector control often showed a similar increase (Fig.
4A, compare pSK with pXSm). We occasionally observed a
slight decrease in mobility and intensity of the complexes formed on Oligo1 in the presence of Dex; however, there were no major or reproducible effects on AP-1 binding (data not shown). Thus, the effects of Dex do not appear to be secondary to increased occupancy of
the AP-1 site.
Overexpression of AP-1 Proteins Modulates SP-D Promoter
Activity--
To further examine the potential modulatory roles of
specific AP-1 proteins we performed cotransfection studies using the selected CAT reporter constructs and jun and fos
expression constructs. The activities of pXS were increased 3-4-fold
by cotransfection with junD cDNA in the absence or
presence of Dex, and mutation of the AP-1 site markedly decreased basal
and glucocorticoid stimulated expression (Fig. 4B). The
effects of junD and Dex appeared additive rather than
synergistic. Cotransfection with junD did not alter the
activity of a pMSG-CAT control plasmid, which lacks a known AP-1 site,
consistent with specific stimulation. Slightly lower specific
stimulation was observed with fra-1 cotransfection, but inhibition was reproducibly observed with c-fos or
c-jun (data not shown).
Plasmids containing the mutated AP-1 showed some residual modulation by
co-transfected AP-1 proteins under conditions where there was no
significant alteration in the activity of control plasmids (Fig.
4B and data not shown). However, the only other sequence in
the proximal promoter with significant homology to an AP-1 consensus
( 215, TGAGTTCA) (7) did not bind AP-1 proteins in supershift assays
using either pan-jun or pan-fos antibodies (data
not shown), suggesting that the residual modulatory effects are
secondary to interactions of AP-1 proteins with components of the
transcriptional initiation complex (26) or other potential regulatory
factors such as C/EBP (27).
Because phorbol esters such as
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) activate protein
kinase C and can modulate the expression of AP-1 family members, we
examined the effects of TPA. Interestingly, TPA showed no reproducible
effect on the proximal promoter activity of SP-D constructs in H441
cells and no obvious alteration in AP-1 DNA binding as detected by EMSA
(data not shown). This is consistent with the failure of phorbol to
stimulate SP-D production in human fetal lung explants (28). Thus,
protein kinase C-independent signal transduction pathways appear
to regulate the AP-1-dependent promoter activity.
The Proximal Promoter Contains a HNF-3 (FOXA)-binding Site
Downstream of the AP-1 Element--
The AP-1 element partially
overlaps with a downstream sequence (fox-d) that shows
homology to the forkhead-binding site consensus, RARYMAAYAWT (Fig. 1)
(29). Close inspection reveals that this region contains two partially
overlapping regions of forkhead box binding motif homology: cAATAAAgAAg
(8/11), which begins at 104, and AAGaAAATtgc (7/11), which begins at
96. The latter sequence is spatially conserved between the known SP-D
and conglutinin promoter sequences (Fig. 1).
When radiolabeled oligomers containing the entirety of the forkhead box
sequence (fox-d, Table I) were incubated with nuclear extracts from H441 cells, a single complex was observed (Fig. 5A, left panel,
lane 2). The binding is specific as shown by competition with unlabeled oligomer (left panel, lanes 3 and
5) but not by oligomers with a mutated forkhead motif
(lane 4A, Table I). The binding was similarly competed by an
upstream HNF-3 sequence from CCSP (CCSPu, lane 7), as well
as a downstream CCSP site and a FREAC2 (FOXF2)
consensus oligomer (15) (data not shown). The complex formed using H441
nuclear extracts was supershifted with anti-HNF-3 (Fig.
5B, lane 4) but not control Igs (Fig.
5B, lane 3) and was competed by unlabeled
fox-d (Fig. 5B, lane 5). To further confirm these results, HeLa cells, which do not express significant amounts of HNF-3 , were co-transfected with HNF-3 cDNA. A
specific supershift complex with the same mobility was observed in the co-transfected but not the mock co-transfected cells (data not shown).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Nuclear proteins and HNF3-
bind to downstream forkhead motifs. A, a labeled
oligomer containing the downstream forkhead-binding site
(fox-d) gave a single specific complex when incubated with
H441 nuclear extracts. Two separate experiments are shown in the
left and right panels. The complex is efficiently
competed by unlabeled oligomer but not by oligomer containing a mutated
forkhead site (fox-d-m). Binding was not competed by Oligo1,
which contains the 5' end of the region of forkhead homology.
B, a specific supershift band was visualized using antibody
to HNF-3 using H441 nuclear extracts (lane 4) or extracts
from HeLa cells co-transfected with HNF-3 (data not shown).
|
|
Oligo1, which contains the AP-1 sequence and 8 residues from the 5' end
of the region of forkhead homology, did not compete for binding to
fox-d (Fig. 5A, right panel,
lane 5). This is consistent with the absence of a second
(i.e. forkhead containing) complex in mobility shift assays
using this oligomer (Fig. 2). However, a 26-mer that included the AP-1
element and the entirety of the downstream forkhead box
(AP-1/fox-d, Table I) showed at least three specific
complexes (Fig. 6, lane 2)
that were efficiently competed with unlabeled oligomer (lane
3). Complexes 1 and 2 were also competed with the SP-D AP-1
(Oligo1) (lane 4), and complex 3 was competed with
fox-d but not by Oligo1 (lane 5). However, only
complex 1 was competed with commercial AP-1 consensus oligomer or Oligo
2 or was altered in the presence of pan-jun or
pan-fos antibodies (lanes 6 and 7). None of the
complexes were competed by both Oligo1 and fox-d, and the
same three complexes were observed even when much larger amounts of
nuclear extract were incubated with the smallest possible concentration
of a high specific activity probe (data not shown). Thus, the AP-1 and
fox-d sites each bind a unique protein or protein complex,
and the sites are not simultaneously occupied under the conditions of
assay. In addition, complexes 2 and 4 contain as yet unidentified
nuclear proteins.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
AP-1 and forkhead box proteins bind
independently to the AP-1 element and downstream forkhead-binding
sites. A labeled oligomer containing the AP-1 element and the
downstream forkhead-binding site (fox-d) gave at least three
specific complexes when incubated with H441 nuclear extracts.
Complexes 1 and 2 are efficiently competed by
Oligo1, whereas complex 3 is specifically competed by
fox-d. Only complex 1 was competed by Oligo2 or a
consensus AP-1 oligomer (pAP-1) or altered in the presence of
pan-fos or pan-jun antibody, indicating that
complex 2 does not contain AP-1. None of the specific
complexes were competed with both AP-1 and fox-d. The
identities of the nuclear proteins participating in complexes
2 and 4 are unknown.
|
|
The Proximal Promoter Also Contains an Upstream HNF-3
(FOXA1)-binding Site--
The proximal promoter contains an
additional forkhead motif upstream at 277 (fox-u) that
matches the forkhead box consensus at 7 of 11 positions
(5'-ctATAAATAca). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays using labeled
fox-u oligomer (Table I) gave two specific complexes that
were competed by unlabeled fox-u (Fig. 7A). The larger of the two
complexes was efficiently competed by CCSP oligomers containing HNF-3
forkhead motifs (lanes 4-6, left; CCSPu, CCSPd,
combined) but not by a mutant oligomer (fox-um, Table I)
(data not shown). Interestingly, the downstream and upstream SP-D sites
were ineffective cross-competitors (e.g. Fig. 5A,
left panel, lane 6). Similar to the downstream
site, radiolabeled fox-u showed a specific supershift
complex when incubated with H441 nuclear extracts and antibody to
HNF-3 (Fig. 7B, arrow).

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Nuclear proteins and HNF3-
bind to upstream forkhead motifs. A, a labeled
oligomer containing the upstream forkhead-binding site
(fox-u) gave two specific complexes when incubated with H441
nuclear extracts. The upper complex (arrow) is efficiently
competed by unlabeled oligomers containing forkhead-binding sites from
CCSP. B, a specific supershift band (arrow) was
visualized using antibody to HNF-3 using H441 nuclear
extracts.
|
|
The Upstream and Downstream Forkhead Sites May Interact with Other
Forkhead Box Proteins--
Although HNF-3 binds to the
fox-d and fox-u sites, several additional
observations suggest that binding is not specific for HNF-3 (or
HNF-3 ) and that the complexes contain other forkhead proteins. For
example, nuclear extracts from A549 type II-like cells, which
predominantly express HNF-3 , give specific complexes of identical
mobility (data not shown). In addition, TTR-S, which corresponds to a
high affinity HNF-3 site in the transthyretin promoter that binds with
high affinity to HNF-3 , -3 , and -3 (16), only weakly
inhibits the binding of H441 or A549 nuclear proteins to
fox-u and fox-d, and the SP-D sequences are
inefficient competitors of the complexes formed on radiolabeled TTR-S
(data not shown).
Mutagenesis of the Forkhead Sites Decreases the Activity of pXS-CAT
in H441 Cells--
Mutagenesis of downstream site within the context
of pXS and the same residue substitutions used for the mutated oligomer (Table I, fox-dm) gave a slight but detectable inhibition in transient transfection assays using H441 cells (Fig.
8). By contrast, selective mutagenesis of
the upstream site gave a slight but reproducible stimulation suggesting
an associated inhibitory element. Notably, simultaneous mutation of
both sites resulted in a significant, 3-4-fold decrease in CAT
activity (Fig. 8).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Mutagenesis of the HNF3-binding sites alters
promoter activity. Simultaneous mutation of the upstream and
downstream forkhead sites (fox-um + fox-dm)
significantly decreased the promoter activity of pXS-CAT in transient
transfection assays using H441 cells. The data are shown as the means
and standard deviations for five separate experiments. Independent
mutations of the upstream (fox-um) or downstream
(fox-um) forkhead motifs had a minimal effect on promoter
activity; arepresentative CAT assay is shown in the top
panel.
|
|
HNF-3 cDNAs Do Not Transactivate SP-D Promoter Constructs in
H441 Cells--
Numerous attempts to specifically transactivate
pXS-CAT with human HNF-3 or rat HNF-3 or - cDNAs were
unsuccessful. No activation was observed over a wide range of plasmid
concentrations, with both cytomegalovirus and SV40-driven expression
vectors, and in H441 or HeLa cells (data not shown). Although
suppression was sometimes observed, consistent with the stimulation of
promoter activity observed following mutagenesis of the upstream
forkhead box, there was no reproducible inhibition under conditions
where the activity of control promoters was unaltered. Similar results were obtained with pPS-CAT or pFS-CAT, which lack fox-u
(Fig. 1).
A G/C-rich Sequence Upstream of the AP-1 Element Is a Functional GT
Box-like Element--
Sequences immediately upstream of the AP-1
element in the human SP-D gene contain several potential
cis-acting elements. These include at least three partially
overlapping motifs that approximate the most 5' protected region
identified in Fig. 1. The first is an E box motif (CANNTG), which is a
recognition site for basic helix-loop-helix-zipper transcription
factors; E boxes have been identified as core sequences in the upstream
and downstream regulatory elements of the rabbit SP-A gene (30, 31).
Immediately downstream of the E box is a potential GATA-binding motif
(gGATAA) homologous to those recently implicated in the regulation of
TTF-1, SP-A, and SP-C expression by GATA-6 (32). Overlapping both of
these potential binding sites is a conserved GT box, which has been identified as an important regulatory element in the human SP-A2 gene
and potential binding site for zinc finger transcription factors such
as lung Kruppel-like factor and Sp1-related proteins (18).
To determine whether these sites bind to nuclear proteins, we examined
the interactions of H441 nuclear proteins with two nested oligomers.
The first, designated Oligo3, contains the overlapping E box, GT box,
and GATA motifs and sequences immediately upstream of the AP-1 element
(Table I). The second, designated Oligo4, contains only the GATA motif
and sequence contiguous with the AP-1 (Table I). EMSAs using the
labeled Oligo3 oligomer showed a single, major specific complex (Fig.
9, lane 2) that was
efficiently competed by unlabeled oligomer (lane 3). Binding
was also competed by a GT box oligomer (lanes 6 and
10) or by Oligo3 oligomers containing site-specific
substitutions in the E box or GATA motifs (data not shown). This
complex was not efficiently competed by Oligo3 m1, which contained
site-directed substitutions in the GT box motif (lane 4), by
consensus oligomers containing the GATA (lane 7) or E box
(lane 8) motifs, or by Oligo4 (data not shown), and there was only
partial competition by an SP-1 consensus oligomer (lane 9).
Antibodies to Sp1 and Sp3 specifically supershifted complexes formed on
radiolabeled Sp1 oligomer but not the major complex formed on Oligo3
(data not shown).

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Nuclear proteins bind to a GT box motif
upstream of the AP-1 element. Labeled Oligo3, which contains the E
box, GT box, GATA motif, and sequence upstream of the AP-1 (Table I),
gave a specific complex when incubated with H441 nuclear extracts
(lane 2, arrow) and a prominent nonspecific band
(NS). The specific complex was efficiently competed by
unlabeled Oligo3 (lane 3) and a GT box consensus oligomer
(lanes 6 and 10) but not by Oligo3 m1, which
contains substitutions in the GT box motif (Table I). Oligo3 m2, which
contains substitutions in the GATA motif but partially overlaps with
the GT box, was a less efficient competitor (lane 5). The
complex was not competed by the commercial GATA consensus oligomer
(lane 7), a commercial E box containing sequence (lane
8), and was minimally competed with a commercial Sp1 oligomer
(lane 9). In a parallel experiment radiolabeled Oligo3 m1
(substitutions in the GT box) was incubated with H441 nuclear extracts;
no specific complex was identified (lane 11). The figure is
a composite from three separate experiments: lanes 1-6,
lanes 7-10, and lane 11, respectively.
|
|
Consistent with these results, no major specific complex was observed
using labeled Oligo3 m1 (mutated GT box motif, lane 11). In
addition, assays using a labeled GT box consensus oligomer showed a
single major complex that was efficiently competed by unlabeled probe
or by Oligo3 (data not shown). Mobility shift assays using the labeled
Oligo4 showed only a single faint specific complex that migrated much
more rapidly than the specific complexes observed with Oligo3 (data not
shown). This complex was not competed by the commercial GATA oligomer
or other available oligomers. Together the data strongly suggest that
nuclear proteins are binding to the GT box but not the GATA motif.
The GT Box Is a Positive Regulatory Element--
The functional
role of protein binding to the GT motif was examined in transient
transfection assays using H441 cells. Site-directed mutagenesis of the
GT box using the same substitutions as in the Oligo3 m1 showed a
significant decrease in promoter activity as compared with a wild type
pXS-CAT (Fig. 10). The decrease,
although reproducible, was approximately 2-fold less than observed for pXSm, which contained substitutions in the AP-1 element. Site-directed mutagenesis of the GATA motif gave an apparent but insignificant decrease in promoter activity (not shown). Thus, the combined data
indicate a specific and functional interaction of H441 nuclear proteins
with the GT box motif.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Mutagenesis of the GT box-containing binding
site. Mutagenesis of the GT box using the same substitutions as
for Oligo3 m1 significantly decreased the promoter activity of pXS-CAT
in transient transfection assays using H441 cells. Results are compared
with parallel transfections with substitutions in the AP-1 element.
Data are expressed as the means and standard deviations for three
separate experiments.
|
|
TTF-1 Is Not Required for SP-D Gene Expression in Cell
Lines--
Cell-specific gene expression in some lung epithelial cells
is subject to regulation by TTF-1 (11). TTF-1-binding sites, which can
show considerable degeneracy, are usually present in multiple copies
within a few hundred base pairs of the transcription start site of
TTF-1-responsive genes (13). Although the near distal promoter in the
region of 300-700 bp upstream of the start site of transcription
contains several regions of limited TTF-1 homology, only a single
region was identified by computer-assisted analysis of the proximal
promoter fragment, using consensus sequences compiled for
thyroid-specific genes (CCACTCAAGTG) and SP-B (GCNCTNNAG) (17). This
sequence (5'-GAACGCAGGTGGGG-3'; Fig. 1) shows limited homology (7 of
14), with a known TTF-1-binding site in SP-Bf1 (5'-GCCTCCAGGTGCTT-3'),
which contains a core CAGG-binding motif (17). Consistent with the
absence of dyad symmetry or contiguous regions of TTF-1 homology, there
was no evidence of TTF-1 binding to the SP-D sequence by EMSA using
H441 nuclear extracts, cells known to express TTF-1 (data not shown).
More significantly, when TTF-1 cDNA was overexpressed in HeLa
cells, the resulting nuclear extracts gave specific complexes that were
efficiently competed with oligomers containing TTF-1-binding sites from
the thyroglobulin gene and CCSP (Fig.
11A, lanes 3 and
6) and that were supershifted with antibody to TTF-1 (data
not shown). By contrast, oligomers containing the putative SP-D-binding
site (lane 5) or mutated TTF-1-binding sites showed no
evidence of competition (lanes 4 and 8).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
TTF-1 binding is not required for pXS
activity. A, a labeled TTF-1 oligomer corresponding to
the binding sequence from the thyroglobulin promoter gave one specific
complex when incubated with HeLa extracts transfected with TTF-1
cDNA (lane 2); no complexes were observed with extract
from untransfected cells (lane 1). The complex was
efficiently competed with unlabeled TTF-1 oligomer (lane 3)
or a TTF-1-binding site from the CCSP promoter (lane 6) but
not by a TTF-1 consensus oligomer with a mutated consensus (TTF-1m,
lane 4), the putative SP-D-binding site for TTF-1 (TTF-1
SP-D, lane 5), or a CCSP oligomer containing a mutated
TTF-1-binding site (TTF-1 CCSPm, lane 8). B, H441
cells were cotransfected with XS in pSK-CAT or pBLCAT3 vector (pTK-CAT)
reporter constructs and 0.5 or 1.0 µg/ml of TTF-1 cDNA. A
representative experiment with XS is shown; identical results were
obtained with a construct containing 700 bp of upstream sequence,
pSS700 (data not shown). Although the pSK-CAT constructs showed
apparent transactivation (top panel), the increase in
activity was not dependent on SP-D promoter sequence (data not shown).
There was no evidence of transactivation when the corresponding SP-D
promoter fragments were inserted in pTK-CAT (bottom
panel).
|
|
Because such studies cannot exclude TTF-1 binding to other degenerate
or more upstream sites, we also co-transfected TTF-1 cDNA with SP-D
promoter reporter constructs containing up to 700 bp of upstream
sequence in H441 or HeLa cells. Although initial experiments using
pSK-CAT showed apparent activation, increased activity was also
observed with a minimal SP-D promoter or promoterless controls. The
same promoter sequences in pBLCAT3 (the backbone of pTK-CAT) showed no
increase in activity in the presence of TTF-1 (Fig. 11B).
While performing these experiments, we also observed that HeLa cells,
which lack TTF-1, could support the activity of pXS (data not shown).
Thus, the preferential expression of SP-D promoter constructs by H441
cells, as compared with HepG2 cells, is not dependent on
transactivation by TTF-1, and TTF-1 is not required for proximal
promoter activity in this system.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Little is known about the transcriptional regulation of members of
the collectin family of host defense proteins. These studies are the
first to identify specific cis-acting elements and
trans-regulatory proteins that may contribute to the
regulation of the SP-D gene and its response to environmental stimuli.
Our previous studies have shown that sequences within 285 bp of the
transcription start site support basal, glucocorticoid-activated, and
cell type-restricted activity. Here, we focus on a highly conserved
region of the proximal promoter ( 85 to 135) that contains a dense
cluster of protected, protein-binding sites. We demonstrate that this
region interacts with ubiquitous and lineage-dependent, but
not lung-specific, transcription factors that are required for SP-D
promoter activity.
Our studies indicate that a conserved, canonical AP-1 sequence within
the proximal promoter of the human SP-D gene is a functional AP-1
element. Oligomers containing the SP-D AP-1 sequence formed specific
complexes containing fra-1, junD, and
junB consistent with the binding of fra-1/junD or
fra-1/junB heterodimers (33) and/or jun
homodimers. Mutation of the AP-1 element greatly decreased the ability
of junD and other co-transfected AP-1 proteins to modulate
promoter activity. This strongly suggests that AP-1 proteins play
important roles in the transcriptional regulation of SP-D gene
expression in lung epithelial cells, consistent with recent studies
that have implicated a more upstream and nonconserved AP-1 sequence in
the basal regulation of the bovine conglutinin gene (34).
Relatively little is known about the regulation of respiratory
epithelial cell proteins, such as surfactant proteins or CCSP, by AP-1.
An AP-1 element is present downstream of the start site of
transcription of the human SP-B gene (35), and AP-1 motifs or binding
sites have been identified in the promoters for rat CCSP (25) and SP-A.
Recent studies have demonstrated two functionally distinct AP-1 sites
at 18 and 370 within the mouse SP-B gene (36). The proximal
sequence of SP-B binds to junB and junD in MLE-15
mouse epithelial cell nuclear extracts. Interestingly, co-transfection
with junD stimulated proximal promoter activity by
approximately 2-fold, whereas c-jun decreased promoter
activity, in part through interactions with the distal binding site. We observed similar specific inhibition by c-jun and
c-fos. Thus, the composition of the AP-1 complex may
determine the functional activity of protein binding.
Mutagenesis of the AP-1 element markedly decreased
glucocorticoid-stimulated and basal promoter activity. However, we
observed no increase in occupancy of the AP-1 element using nuclear
extracts from Dex-treated H441 cells. Although more subtle alterations in the composition or state of post-translational phosphorylation of
AP-1 proteins could contribute to the stimulatory effects of glucocorticoids, we have no evidence to support this possibility. Instead, we speculate that glucocorticoids exert their indirect effects
through the expression of other transactivating factors, such as
C/EBP (37), that may bind to the proximal promoter and/or
modulate AP-1-dependent promoter activity.
Immediately downstream to the AP-1 element was a HNF3-binding motif.
Proteins related to the Drosophila homeotic gene,
forkhead, and the rat HNF-3 family share a homologous
DNA-binding domain (forkhead box) and are now designated by
standardized genetic nomenclature as fox (f box) genes. Fox
proteins contribute to the regulation of the expression of
lung-restricted proteins and to the expression of proteins by
nonpulmonary epithelial cell types, particularly cells of endodermal
derivation (11, 12, 29, 38). At least two forkhead-binding elements
were identified in the proximal promoter, fox-d and
fox-u. Although mutation of the individual sites gave slight
inhibition or stimulation, respectively, mutagenesis of both sites
decreased promoter activity by approximately 4-fold. Similar complex,
modulatory effects of HNF-3 and interactions among separate
HNF-3-binding sites have been described for a number of promoters,
including the rat CCSP gene (39).
Our many attempts to activate or specifically inhibit transcription by
cotransfecting HNF-3 cDNAs were unsuccessful, using either H441 or
HeLa cells. Some investigators, but not all, have observed
transactivation or specific inhibition of gene expression in
cotransfection experiments using H441 cells (25, 39-41). In other
promoters, HNF-3 has been observed to decrease gene expression by
blocking the binding of other transactivating proteins (42). Thus, the
activity of the expressed proteins could be gene-dependent and/or could be regulated by the availability of specific forkhead proteins or other transactivating factors. We considered the
possibility that our studies were confounded by a superimposition of
the stimulatory and inhibitory effects mediated by the upstream and
downstream binding sites; however, cotransfection with 5' deletion
mutants lacking the upstream element (Fig. 1; pPS or pFS) did not show activation. Another possibility is that the net stimulatory effect of
the interacting sites is masked by competition of HNF-3 for AP-1
occupancy of the AP-1/fox-d site, which could be consistent with our inability to identify simultaneous occupancy of the AP-1 and
fox-d sites in the AP-1/fox-d oligomer.
On the other hand, there is increasing evidence that the forkhead box
proteins are not necessarily acting as classical transregulatory proteins but as mediators of chromatin remodeling with reversal of
chromatin-mediated repression. Chromatin repression occurs in
vivo but can also occur in vitro in association with
transiently expressed DNA (43). A role of HNF-3 in chromatin remodeling is consistent with its role in nucleosome positioning over the albumin
enhancer (44, 45) and the structural homology of HNF-3 with linker
histone molecules (46). Thus, the SP-D promoter fragment may be
"constitutively derepressed," obviating at least part of the
necessity for forkhead binding. The inhibition in promoter activity
observed following mutagenesis of the forkhead-binding sites may
reflect more subtle effects on DNA structure such as DNA bending (15,
47) and the binding of other regulatory molecules, consistent with the
observed "interaction" between the upstream and downstream sites.
Epithelial cell types known to synthesize SP-D express several forkhead
proteins from at least three subfamilies. Nonciliated bronchiolar cells
(Clara cells) express HNF-3 , HNF-3 , HNF-3 , HFH-11 (38), and
lun (human homolog of FREAC2) (48). Of these, HNF-3 , HFH-11,
and lun are expressed by human type II pneumocytes. The
fox-u and fox-d sites bind to HNF-3 in H441
nuclear extracts, which contain HNF-3 and HNF-3 and little if any
HNF-3 (25, 49). However, our data suggest that these cell lines have
even greater heterogeneity in forkhead box proteins. In this regard, the HNF-3 homolog HFH-11 (FoxM1A) was recently identified in HeLa, H441, and A549 cells (38). Consistent with differences in the core and
flanking sequences of the upstream and downstream forkhead-binding sequences, fox-u oligomers did not efficiently cross-compete
for nuclear protein binding to fox-d (Fig. 6A),
even though both oligomers participate in the formation of complexes
that are competed with FREAC2 and CCSP oligomers and contain HNF-3 .
This could reflect differences in the affinity of binding of HNF-3
to the two sites, interactions with other forkhead proteins, or
interactions with other nuclear proteins.
The close apposition of AP-1 and forkhead box-binding elements is of
particular interest. Although a similar arrangement of these motifs is
present in the rat CCSP gene (25), the AP-1 motif is not conserved in
the human CCSP gene, and mutation of the site did not inhibit promoter
activity. On the other hand, the promoter of the hepatic transthyretin
gene contains a nearly identical AP-1/forkhead motif. Here, the AP-1
and forkhead proteins bind independently to the overlapping AP-1 and
HNF-3 sites, and there is circumstantial evidence that changes in the
relative abundance of HNF-3 and -3 modulate AP-1 binding and
contribute to the regulation of the acute phase response (16). There is also ample evidence that forkhead proteins are regulated
post-developmentally in the setting of inflammation or tissue injury.
For example, partial hepatectomy or systemic endotoxin administration
alters the hepatic expression of HNF-3 proteins (16), and
-interferon increases the transcription of HNF-3 mRNA in the
mouse mtCC1-2 Clara cell line (50). Thus, modulation of AP-1 and
forkhead box protein binding may lead to alterations in SP-D expression in the setting of lung injury.
Upstream of the AP-1 element we identified a G/C-rich sequence that is
important for promoter activity in H441 cells. Nuclear protein binding
to this region does not involve interactions with the E box or GATA
motifs, consistent with their lack of conservation among the
conglutinin and SP-D genes (Fig. 1) and supporting a role for
regulation by the Cys2-His2 (Sp) family of zinc
finger transcription factors (51). The CCSP/rabbit uteroglobin genes have functional binding sites for Sp1 and Sp3 within the proximal promoter (20, 41). However, binding to Oligo3 was inefficiently competed with a GC box-containing Sp1 oligomer, and the complexes were
not supershifted with antibodies to Sp1 or Sp3, suggesting that other
family members are involved. A conserved GT box contributes to the
regulation of SP-A2 promoter activity by type II pneumocytes (18), and
there is circumstantial evidence that the SP-A2 GT box binds to lung
Kruppel-like factor (52). Interestingly, Sp family members interact
combinatorially with HNF-3 - and -3 -binding sites in the rabbit
uteroglobin/CCSP gene (41), and interactions between Sp1 and binding
sites for AP-1 have been described (53).
In contrast to other surfactant proteins and CCSP, the activity of SP-D
promoter constructs does not require TTF-1. Promoter fragments
containing up to 700 bp of upstream sequence are not transactivated by
co-transfection of TTF-1 cDNA in H441 or HeLa cells. Although
initial studies using pSK-CAT reporter constructs suggested
transactivation by TTF-1 cDNA, this proved to be mediated by the
plasmid backbone. There was no effect of co-transfection on
corresponding SP-D constructs in pTK-CAT, despite transactivation with
junD, suggesting that TTF-1 binding is not required for
promoter activity. Furthermore, the SP-D promoter constructs showed
significant activity in HeLa cells, which lack TTF-1 and do not support
significant activity of reporter constructs for other surfactant
protein or CCSP in the absence of cotransfected TTF-1 cDNA
(54-57). In summary, the proximal promoter supports cell-restricted
but not lung-specific activity in transient transfection assays, and
the findings are consistent with the lack of dependence of SP-D
promoter activity on TTF-1 binding.
Despite limitations inherent in deducing gene regulatory mechanisms
based on in vitro studies using reporter plasmids, these data support the conclusion that the regulation of SP-D is distinct from that of other surfactant proteins. Although the lung appears to be
a major site of SP-D expression, there is growing evidence that SP-D is
also synthesized by epithelial cells in the upper respiratory tract,
gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary system, and various mucosal sites
(58). Thus, the potential regulatory mechanisms identified in these
studies are consistent with pulmonary and extrapulmonary expression and
a more generalized role in innate mucosal immunity.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Richard Pierce (Washington
University School of Medicine) for helpful technical advice early in
this project. We also thank Drs. Lester Lau and Thomas Curran for
providing the AP-1 expression constructs and Dr. Colin Bingle for
providing various expression plasmids, the rat CCSP and SP-A promoter
constructs, and technical advice. In addition with thank Drs. James
Darnell, Robert Costa, and Roberto Di Lauro for providing
antibodies. Finally, we thank Janet North for excellent secretarial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HL-29594, HL-44015, and HL-56244.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology and
Immunology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, North, Surgical Pathology Mailstop
90-31-649, 216 S. Kingshighway Blvd., Rm. 2457, St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-454-8462; Fax: 314-454-5505; E-mail:
crouch@path.wustl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003499200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SP-D, surfactant
protein D;
SP-A, surfactant protein A;
bp, base pair(s);
CCSP, Clara
cell-specific protein;
TTF-1, thyroid transcription factor 1;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase;
Dex, dexamethasone;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.
 |
REFERENCES |
|