|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M001346200 on June 30, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 40, 31107-31114, October 6, 2000
Drosophila Arginase Is Produced from a
Nonvital Gene That Contains the elav Locus within Its Third
Intron*
Marie-Laure
Samson
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-4525 and
the Laboratoire d'Embryologie Moléculaire et
Expérimentale, UPRES-A 8080, Université Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay, CEDEX France
Received for publication, February 18, 2000, and in revised form, June 28, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A Drosophila gene encoding a
351-amino acid-long predicted arginase (40% identity with vertebrate
arginases) is reported. Interestingly, the third intron of the
arginase gene includes the elav locus, whose
coding sequence is on the complementary DNA strand to that of the
arginase. Terrestrial vertebrates produce two arginases
from duplicated genes. One form, essentially present in the liver, is a
key enzyme of the urea cycle and eliminates excess ammonia through the
excretion of urea. The function of the extrahepatic arginase, more
ubiquitous, is not well understood. In macrophages, arginase competes
with nitric-oxide synthase, which converts arginine into nitric oxide.
Most organisms, including insects, produce only one type of arginase,
whose function is not centered on ammonia detoxification. A
Drosophila cDNA encoding a predicted arginase was
isolated. It produces a 1.3-kilobase transcript present with
highest levels toward the end of embryogenesis and thereafter. During
embryogenesis, the arginase transcripts localize to the fat
body. The first mutant allele of the Drosophila arginase
gene was identified. It is predicted to produce a 199-amino acid-long
C-terminally truncated protein, likely to be inactive. Preliminary
characterization of the mutation shows that this recessive allele
causes a developmental delay but does not affect viability.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Large scale eucaryotic genome sequencing and the generation of
expressed sequence tags, including those from the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (1), the nematode
Caenorhabditis elegans (2, 3), and the fruit fly
Drosophila melanogaster (4-6), are providing a great deal
of information about gene organization and genome evolution.
Twenty-three years ago, with the discovery of splicing, the basic idea
of a gene as a "block" of DNA was challenged. Today, exciting new
observations are being made. What initially seemed peculiar oddities,
such as operons in nematodes and genes nested within genes in fruit
flies, are turning out to be more general phenomena. About 25% of
C. elegans genes are in operons (for a review see Ref. 7),
and one estimate suggests that 7% of D. melanogaster genes
may be nested within others (5).
In this paper, I describe a Drosophila gene coding for an
arginase that contains within its third intron the entire locus elav,1 a well characterized
13-kb-long gene that encodes an
RNA-binding protein specifically present in all neurons (for a review
see Ref. 8). The first identified so-called nested gene
(Pcp) encodes a Drosophila pupal cuticule protein
and maps within the intron of the adenosine 3 gene encoding
guanine-adenosine ribosyl transferase (9). Since then, more than 30 nested genes have been identified in Drosophila (10). The
recent sequencing of 2.7 megabases of DNA in the Adh
region revealed 17 new ones (5). Nested genes are not specific to
Drosophila, and examples are known in humans (11, 12) and in
mice (13). Among the 49 identified Drosophila nested genes,
37 are transcribed in the direction opposite to the direction of
transcription of the gene into which they are inserted (5).
The gene that is described in this paper encodes a predicted
polypeptide that shares 40-41% amino acid identity with human arginases (for a review see Ref. 14). It will be referred to as the
arginase gene, or arg. Arginases convert arginine
into urea and ornithine. Sequence analysis of arginase and
arginase-like sequences suggests that arginase was probably present in
the primordial ancestor, before the divergence of eucaryotes and
procaryotes, and that a gene duplication occurred before the divergence
of mammals and amphibians from their most recent common ancestor (14-16).
In terrestrial vertebrates (ureotelic), two forms of the enzyme are
produced, arginase I (A-I), a cytosolic form specific for liver and red
cells, and arginase II (A-II), a ubiquitous mitochondrial form found in
particular in kidneys and brain. A-I is a key enzyme for the hydrolysis
of arginine in the urea cycle, producing urea that enables the
elimination of excess ammonia. The A-I form contributes 98% of the
arginase activity in liver and is absent in clinical arginemia.
Patients with arginemia have low levels of arginase activity in red
cells, accumulate arginine in their blood and spinal fluid, and have
higher than normal blood levels of ammonia. Accumulation of ammonia has
very toxic effects in animals, and although patients with moderate
decreases of A-I levels respond well to dietary treatments, severe A-I
deficiencies cause severe mental and psychomotor retardation, mental
disorders, epileptic seizures, coma, and early death.
The effect of alteration in the activity of extrahepatic A-II has not
been described. It has been proposed to be involved in the synthesis of
polyamines, amino acids, and neurotransmittors and competes with
nitric-oxide synthase in macrophages, but its role remains poorly
defined (for reviews see Refs. 14 and 17). It has been suggested that
the mitochondrial A-II is the surviving form of the ancestral arginase,
because the cytosolic A-I is restricted to a subset of more recently
evolved species (14).
Aside from ureotelic organisms, most others produce only one form of
arginase. In particular, in S. cerevisiae, arginase is encoded by the CAR1 gene, which has been extensively
characterized (18, 19). CAR1 encodes a cytosolic arginase
that converts arginine to urea and ornithine. Although S. cerevisiae produces all the enzymes required to complete the urea
cycle, compartmental separation of metabolic pathways and sophisticated
regulation lead to the absence of a functional urea cycle. Sequencing
of the S. cerevisiae genome did not reveal any additional
arginase-related sequences (1). In C. elegans, whose entire
genome has also been sequenced (2, 3), only one gene showing
significant relationship with known arginase genes has been
identified (20). No biological information is available yet on the
function of this gene.
Animals have evolved pathways adapted to their lifestyle for the
excretion of urea, uric acid, or ammonia as the major nitrogeneous end
product. The excretion of urea produced through the urea cycle is
specific for ureotelic organisms. Insects (uricotelic) convert most of
their excess ammonia to uric acid, an oxidized purine, via an
arginase-independent pathway. Thus, the arginase function in uricotelic
organisms, and more generally in organisms that do not have a
functional urea cycle, is not centered on ammonia detoxification and
remains poorly understood. Analysis of the arginase gene of
Drosophila, amenable to molecular and genetic analysis,
should give insights into this other aspects of arginase activity.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Screening of the cDNA Library--
A Drosophila
head cDNA library in the gt11 vector (a gift from Paul
Salvaterra; Ref. 21) was screened with a genomic probe corresponding to
a mixture of two radiolabeled BamHI restriction fragments
(kb 8-18 on the scale in Fig. 1) to obtain elav cDNAs clones. Among the cDNAs isolated in this screen, one clone
(cDNA-30h) originated from a transcription unit different from
elav. Its analysis is reported in this paper.
Characterization of cDNA-30h--
cDNA-30h phage lysates
were prepared on plates and used to generate PCR products corresponding
to the cDNA insert. Amplification mixtures were as per
Taq DNA polymerase manufacturer's specifications (Promega),
with 2 µl of lysate/25-µl reaction, using a pair of primers
hybridizing to regions flanking the cDNA insert in gt11, respectively gt11F (5'-GGTGGCGACGAGTCCTGGAGC) and gt11R
(5'-GACACCAGACCAACTGGTAAT). Amplification yield was not affected by the
lysate titer in the 108-1011 plaque-forming
unit/ml range. Taq polymerase addition to the PCR mixture
was performed after the initial step of hot start (95 °C for 1 min
and 80 °C for 15 min). Amplification was performed with 30 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1.5 min, and 72 °C for
1.5 min. After purification on the Wizard PCR preps purification system
(Promega), the PCR product was sequenced using gt11 primers and
subsequently primers hybridizing in the cDNA sequence.
When cDNA-30h was originally characterized, the genomic sequence
upstream of the BamHI restriction site at position 1 (see Fig. 1) had not yet been determined. To verify the predicted structure of cDNA-30h and determine the distance between 3' elav
genomic sequences and the genomic region corresponding to cDNA-30h,
genomic PCR (with DNA from the wild type strain CantonS) were
performed, using oligonucleotides ARG2 (5'-GTCGCGCTCGCTGCCTAG) and ARG3
(5'-GATAGGCACTCCAGCGAAC), as shown on Fig. 1. Amplification mixtures
included 50 ng of genomic DNA in a 25-µl reaction. Enzyme addition to
the PCR mixture was performed after the initial step of hot start
(95 °C for 1 min). Amplification was performed with 30 cycles of
95 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1.5 min, and 72 °C for 1.5 min.
Sequence determination of phage and genomic PCR products were performed
by the University of Nebraska Medical Center/Eppley molecular
biology core facility on Applied Biosystems and Li-Cor sequencers. The sequence of the Drosophila arginase is
available from GenBankTM under accession number AF228517.
Sequence analysis and comparisons were performed with the Wisconsin
Package (version 10.0; Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI).
Protein Sequence Alignments--
Protein sequences were obtained
from the following Swiss Protein Data Base accession numbers: P78540
(A-II Homo sapiens), O08691 (A-II Mus musculus),
Q91553 (A-II Xenopus laevis), P05089 (A-I H. sapiens), Q61176 (A-I M. musculus), X69820 (A-I
X. laevis), P00812 (S. cerevisiae), and
GenBankTM accession numbers: AF228517 (D. melanogaster) and U56959 (C. elegans). The Wisconsin
Package was used to generate sequence alignments.
RNA Analysis--
Total CantonS RNA was prepared from frozen
tissues by the guanidine-HCl method (22) for developmental Northern
blot analysis. Total RNAs produced from arg and
elav mutants stocks was purified from whole flies with
TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). Northern blot analysis was
performed as described in Ref. 8.
In Situ Hybridization--
In situ hybridization was
performed with digoxigenin-substituted dUTP, essentially as in Ref. 23,
using cDNA-30h as a template for transcription.
Drosophila Stocks and Genetic Analysis--
All crosses were
maintained on standard cornmeal medium at 25 °C. Stock
elav4 w/FM6,
w/Dp(1;Y)y+sc was obtained from
the Bloomington Stock Center. It carries a double mutation
(elav4) affecting both elav and
arg, FM6 is a X chromosome balancer, and
Dp(1;Y)y+sc is a Y chromosome
carrying a translocation of the distal region of the X chromosome
including elav. Mutant arg stocks
(elav4/elav4/Y;
350-83-1/350-83-1) were built with standard
genetic techniques by combining the double mutation
elav4 with a transposon (350-83-1, Ref. 24)
carrying a functional elav gene, but no arg
coding sequence. elave5 is a loss of function
elav allele (8). Transposon 353-66-2, similar to
350-83-1 carries a functional elav gene but no
arg coding sequence (24).
Developmental delay of the flies carrying the arginase
mutation was shown by crossing females
elav4/elav4;
350-83-1/350-83-1 with males y w sn.
Recombination occurs in the resulting y w
sn/elav4; 350-83-1/+ daughters,
providing an opportunity to separate elav4
(hence arg ) from other possible alterations on
the X chromosome and thus homogenizing the genetic background. These
females were crossed with y w/Y; Tf (2)DmORF3/T
(2;3)apXa males, where Tf (2)DmORF3 is a
transposon providing elav+ function (25) but no
arg function and T (2;3)apXa is a
balancer. The parents were removed from the vials after 4 days. The
latter cross yields hemizygous arg and
arg+ males, homozygous
arg+/arg+ and
heterozygous arg /arg+
females, all segregant brothers and sisters. The yellow
(y) and elav genes are very closely spaced on the
X chomosome (about 150 kb apart, based upon data from Ref. 6) and are
at the same coordinates (1-0.0) on the genetic map (10). They
recombine at a frequency significantly inferior to 1%. Thus, in the
vast majority, y+ male progeny are
elav4 (arg ), whereas y
males progeny are elav+
(arg+). Heterozygous
arg+/arg females were
identified as y+ females and homozygous
arg+/arg+ females as
y females.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of a Head cDNA arginase Clone--
A head cDNA
library was screened with a genomic probe corresponding to the
presumptive 3'-untranslated region of the elav gene (kb
8-18 on the scale in Fig. 1). Sequencing
of the cDNA clones recovered in the screen identified a new
transcription unit. The cDNA corresponding to the new transcription
unit (cDNA-30h) is 1170 base pairs long. It contains a
349-amino acid-long open reading frame (nucleotides 2-1051), which
begins with a tryptophan, indicating that the 5' region of the mRNA
is truncated in cDNA-30h. Searches of protein sequence data bases
with the ORF present in cDNA-30h revealed its similarity with
arginases.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Structure of the
arginase-elav region. The
restriction map of the genomic region is shown as a continuous
line. The entire region has been sequenced (accession numbers
AF047180, AL009147, AL022139, and M21153). The scale in kb at the
bottom of the figure shows coordinates as previously defined (24, 49).
Nucleotide 1 corresponds to the first nucleotide of the
BamHI restriction site on the extreme left, nucleotide 18433 corresponds to the last nucleotide of the BamHI site on the
extreme right. Position of primers ARG2 (nucleotides 1481 to 1464)
and ARG3 (nucleotides 70-88) used to generate a genomic PCR product
(see text) are shown with the small arrows. The structure
and splicing pattern of cDNA-30h (arginase) and
cDNA-1 (elav) are indicated, with open boxes
corresponding to noncoding sequences, whereas gray boxes
include the ORFs. The arrows on the cDNA diagrams
indicate the direction of transcription. cDNA-1 is a 3'-truncated
elav cDNA. As shown, elav transcripts span
over 13 kb (Ref. 8 and this report), but their precise structure has
not been determined. B, BamHI; E,
EcoRI; H, HindIII; P,
PstI; S, SmaI; X,
XbaI.
|
|
The arginase sequences of ureotelic (H. sapiens, M. musculus, and X. laevis) and nonureotelic (S. cerevisiae and C. elegans) organisms were compared with
the Drosophila putative arginase sequence. Arginases contain
about 300 amino acids. They include three conserved regions (arginase
signatures 1, 2, and 3 from the N terminus to the C terminus) with
charged residues involved in the binding of two manganese ions to
histidines and aspartic acids in the motifs (26). Comparison of protein
sequences highlights the presence of these three arginase family
signatures in the Drosophila sequence (Fig.
2). The motifs are present in all the compared sequences, and all the invariant residues of the signatures are present. However some positions do not match the defined signature sequences. First, in arginase signature 1, Cys is found in C. elegans where Leu, Ile, Val, Met, or Thr is expected, and Gly is
found in D. melanogaster where Ser, Thr, Ala, or Val is
expected. Second, in arginase signature 3, Ser is found in D. melanogaster and Val is found in C. elegans where Pro,
Ala, or Gln is expected. Extensive alignments of arginase sequences
from different species highlight invariant residues (14, 20). Sequences
from 19 arginases from vertebrates and procaryotic/eucaryotic
unicellular organisms share 37 invariant amino acids (20), with 36 of
them present in the D. melanogaster arginase and 27 of them
present in the C. elegans arginase-related sequence (Fig.
2).

View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Protein sequence alignments between the
virtual translation of cDNA-30h (D. melanogaster
arginase) and representative arginase sequences from the data
base. H.s., H. sapiens; Mm,
M. musculus; X.l., X. laevis;
D.m., D. melanogaster; S.c., S. cerevisiae; C.e., C. elegans. The
predicted N-terminal of the D. melanogaster arginase ORF
includes two additional amino acids (M and W) upstream of cDNA-30h
ORF (see text), shown in parentheses. Below the alignment, a
consensus sequence (plurality 7) is shown, where residues present in
all nine compared species are in bold type. The three
black boxes frame the arginase family signatures. Residues
are circled at the positions (in the D. melanogaster and C. elegans sequences) that do not
match the signatures consensus. The 37 positions marked with
asterisks are strictly conserved in 19 arginases from
procaryotes and eucaryotes (20). Respectively 1 and 10 of these
positions highlighted with small shadowed caps differ in
D. melanogaster and C. elegans. The
vertical arrow separates the N-terminal region of the
Drosophila arginase (encoded by sequences downstream of the
elav transcription unit) from its C-terminal region (encoded
by sequences upstream of the elav transcription unit).
|
|
Pairwise comparisons (Fig. 3) of
vertebrate A-II show that their sequences are 71-85% identical. A-I
arginases are 64-87% identical. However, comparisons between the A-I
and A-II arginases shows a lower degree of similarity, with 54-67%
identity. This is consistent with the model of an arginase
gene duplication giving rise to the genes for A-I and A-II (15, 20). In
contrast, the three proteins from invertebrates similarly resemble
hepatic and nonhepatic vertebrate arginases, the identity levels with vertebrate arginases being, respectively, 39-40% for D. melanogaster arginase, 40-45% for S. cerevisiae, and
26-31% for C. elegans. This is consistent with a
duplication of the arginase gene giving rise to the genes
producing hepatic and extrahepatic arginases after divergence between
the vertebrates and the invertebrates (15, 20).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Matrix of the percentages of amino acid
identity between the arginases aligned in Fig. 2. Percentages were
calculated with the GAP program of GCG, as specified under
"Experimental Procedures." Species names symbols are as defined in
Fig. 1.
|
|
The Arginase Gene Spans about 20 kb, and Its Third Intron Contains
the elav Gene--
Alignment of cDNA-30h with genomic sequence
shows that it derives from regions that flank the elav gene
(Fig. 1). Based upon the polarity of the arg ORF in
cDNA-30h, complementary strands of DNA are transcribed to give rise
to the elav and arg transcripts. Limited sequence
information was available when the cDNA was first identified (kb
0-18 on scale in Fig. 1; GenBankTM Accession Number
AF047180; Ref. 27),2
and the data suggested that the 3' end of cDNA-30h derived from a
region of DNA upstream of the elav gene. Genomic PCR of
D. melanogaster DNA using primers ARG2 (designed according
to cDNA-30h sequence) and ARG3 (designed according to the genomic
sequence, see Fig. 1) was performed to demonstrate that elav
is within an arg intron. A 1-kb-long PCR product was
obtained and sequencing of its ends proved its specificity (not shown).
Subsequent genomic sequencing of the entire region (6), with data from
cosmid 171D11 (accession AL009147) and from cosmid 65F1 (accession
AL022139) around position kb 14 of the scale in Fig. 1, is in agreement
with these data.
The cDNA-30h clone is truncated at its 5' end, because the ORF that
it contains begins with a tryptophan at nucleotide 2 of the sequence.
Four arg expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from
Drosophila adult head tissues have been reported (4). ESTs
are sequences of the 5' or 3' end of a cDNA that are generated to
rapidly identify expressed genes in the genome. None of these ESTs
overlaps the junction between exon 3 and 4, but they provide useful
information about the 5' and 3' ends of the arg RNA. Two of
the reported 5' ESTs (GH02581 and GH02569) begin 99 nucleotides
upstream of the first nucleotide of cDNA-30h, where their sequence
is colinear with genomic DNA sequence. They are likely to define the
actual 5' end of the transcript, which generated CDNA-30 h. Their
structure was taken into account to predict the true N terminus of the
arg ORF, which includes two amino acids (methionine
initiation codon, then tryptophan) upstream of the cDNA-30h ORF, as
shown in Fig. 1.
The ORF in cDNA-30h is followed by 119 nucleotides, ending with a
stretch of eight A residues, likely corresponding to the complete
3'-untranslated region of the mRNA. This is consistent with the
structure of the 481-base pair-long arg 3' EST (GH02581), which identifies the same 3' end for the arg RNA.
Developmental Expression of the Arginase Gene--
The expression
of arg was examined during the course of development using
single-stranded RNA probes on Northern transfers. A single 1.3-kb-long
arg transcript was identified (Fig.
4) whose size is consistent with
cDNA-30h sequencing and EST data. arg transcripts start
accumulating during the last stages of embryogenesis (16-h-old
embryos), quickly reach a plateau at 20 h of development, and are
thereafter found at relatively high levels. Not surprisingly, the
arg transcript is present, but not significantly enriched, in adult head RNA extracts (Fig. 4, lanes 10 and
11), consistent with the fact that cDNA-30h and the four
arginase ESTs derive from head cDNA libraries.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Developmental Northern blot analysis of
arginase expression in D. melanogaster
using a cDNA-30h antisense RNA probe. About 5 µg of
total RNA per lane was used. Lane 1, 0-4 h embryos;
lane 2, 4-8 h embryos; lane 3, 8-12 h embryos;
lane 4, 12-16 h embryos; lane 5, 16-20 h
embryos; lane 6, 20-24 h embryos; lane 7, first
instar larvae; lane 8, third instar larvae; lane
9, pupae; lane 10, adults; lane 11, adult
heads. RP49 is a loading control. Sizes are in kb.
|
|
The Structure of the Mature elav and arginase mRNAs Are Not
Overlapping--
The arg and elav mRNAs
arise from transcription of the same genomic region in opposite
directions. Based upon data from cDNA-30h, genomic DNA, and the
arg ESTs, the structure of the mature arg mRNA is well defined. In contrast, multiple developmentally
regulated elav mRNA are produced from the
elav gene (8, 28), and their precise structure has not been
determined. Thus, it is unclear how much overlap may exist between
mature transcripts of arg and elav.
An attempt was made to re-evaluate the proposal (based upon Northern
blot analysis using double-stranded DNA probes) that the 3' region of
one form of elav mRNA derives from the 2.3-kb BamHI genomic fragment (kb 16-18 on the scale Fig. 1; Refs.
25, 27, and 28) to where the 5' region of arg maps. Northern
blot analysis was performed using single-stranded RNA probes
corresponding to the 2.3-kb BamHI genomic fragment. It shows
that no transcripts are detected by the RNA probe colinear to antisense
elav RNA (Fig. 5B),
whereas two transcripts, respectively 1.3 and 5.5 kb long, are detected
by the RNA probe colinear to antisense arg RNA (Fig. 5C). The 1.3-kb-long transcript detected in Fig.
5C is the expected arg transcript, similarly
detected by the cDNA-30h antisense probe (Fig. 5A). The
5.5-kb-long transcript migrates similarly to one of the major
elav transcripts (Fig. 5D) but is produced from
the DNA strand complementary to the one transcribed in elav.
It must arise from a gene located 3' to the elav gene,
transcribed from the opposite DNA strand, but different from the
arg gene (Fig. 5). A good candidate is the silver
gene, which maps upstream of the arg gene (10), whose
largest transcript is estimated to be 6-7 kb (29). Thus, the proposal
that the elav gene extends into the region constituting the
5' of the arg gene is not supported by my analysis.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Northern blot analysis of transcripts from
the 2.3-kb BamHI genomic fragment (16168-18428 on
scale Fig. 1). A, arginase cDNA-30h
antisense RNA probe. B, single-stranded RNA probe
corresponding to the 2.3-kb BamHI genomic fragment,
arginase sense. C, single-stranded RNA probe
corresponding to the 2.3-kb BamHI genomic fragment,
arginase antisense. D, elav cDNA-1
antisense RNA probe. About 5 µg of total RNA per lane was used.
Lane 1, 0-24 h embryos; lane 2, first instar
larvae; lane 3, third instar larvae; lane 4,
pupae; lane 5, adults. A was obtained after
rehybridization of the filter used for the experiment shown in
B. Probes were used at the same concentration (and had the
same specific activities, inherent to the labeling method), and the
probes used in B and C detected plasmid fragments
equally well on Southern blot (not shown). Sizes are in kb.
|
|
Arginase Transcripts Localize to the Fat Body in
Embryos--
Given the arrangement of the arg and
elav genes, mutual regulation of the two loci could occur if
transcription occurs in the same cells. This is a distinct possibility,
because elav transcripts are exclusively present in all
neurons (30), and arginase transcripts are found in
Drosophila heads (Fig. 4). In rats, arginase activity has
been reported in neuronal and glial brain cells (31). To determine
whether the arginase gene is transcribed in neurons, we
examined its expression in Drosophila embryos by in
situ hybridization using an antisense arginase probe.
Consistent with the developmental Northern, arg transcripts
appear late during embryogenesis, first detected around stage 12 in
dorso-lateral cells present in the most prosterior two-thirds of the
embryo. As development proceeds, the labeling intensifies, spreads more
anteriorly, and highlights a structure
with clefts and holes in stage 16 embryos (see Fig. 6). At this stage,
the pattern of arginase transcripts is similar to the
pattern of expression of early fat body markers (32, 33). Note that the
nervous system, where elav is specifically expressed (30),
remains unlabeled by the arg antisense probe, as may be seen
for instance in Fig. 6A, where the ventral chord of the
nervous system is free of hybridization.

View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
arg transcripts localize to the
fat body in developing embryos. Detection of arg
transcripts by in situ hybridization to
Drosophila embryos (stage 16) using an antisense
arg probe. A, lateral vue. The ventral cord of
the nervous system lies between the two arrows.
B, dorsal view. Anterior is at left. The
antisense control showed no signal.
|
|
A Mutation Deleting the Region of the Arginase Gene Downstream of
Its Third Intron Is Homozygous Viable--
The
elav4 lethal mutation is a chromosomal inversion
with breakpoints near 1A6-1B1 and 1B5-9 (28). Because of the
organization of the elav region (Fig.
7), it was likely that this
elav allele was also an arg mutation. I reasoned
that if this was the case, I could generate a fly stock specifically
mutant for arg function by combining the
elav4 allele with an elav transgene
(350-83-1), which fully rescues elav function but which
carries no sequences from the arg ORF (24). Such individuals
(elav4/elav4/Y;
350-83-1/350-83-1) are functionally normal for
elav but mutant for arg. They develop as fertile
adults. The arg transcripts produced in
elav4 mutants were analyzed by Northern blot
analysis, and RNA both from heterozygous flies
(elav4/elav+) or from the
arg mutant stock
elav4/elav4/Y;
350-83-1/350-83-1 was examined. Consistent with the
molecular structure of the arg mutation, truncated
arg RNA is present in these flies (Fig.
8). It is predicted to generate a
truncated arginase missing the 152 C-terminal amino acids (Fig. 2).

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Structure of the chromosomal aberration in
elav4 mutants. The distal breakpoint
is positioned 35 kb to the yellow gene in position 1B1 of
the cytological map and the proximal breakpoint in the elav
gene at position 1B8 (28). The sequence of the whole region has been
determined (6). Allowing estimation of the size of the inverted
chromosomal region as approximately 190 kb.
|
|
Another lethal elav allele (elave5)
has been extensively used in the analysis of elav function.
This allele was generated by the excision of a P element inserted 518 base pairs upstream of the elav transcription initiation
site (approximately kb 2 on the scale Fig. 1), which removed the entire
elav ORF (8). It seemed crucial to determine if
arg expression was also affected in this elav
mutant. Examination of the arg transcripts in
elave5 mutants reveals that they are unaffected
(Fig. 8), indicating that the P element
excision does not remove sequences found in the arg
mature transcripts. In addition, the alteration of arg intron 3 has no apparent effect on the processing of the transcripts. Thus the elave5 mutation, unlike
elav4, is specific to elav and does
not affect arg expression.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Northern blot analysis of D. melanogaster arginase transcripts using a cDNA-30h
antisense RNA probe. The copy number of
arg+ alleles (elav+ or
elave5) and arg alleles
(elav4) in the tested stocks are indicated above
each lane. About 5 µg of total fly RNA per lane was used. Lanes
1 and 2,
elav4/elav4/Y;
350-83-1/350-83-1 (two independently constructed
stocks); lane 3, y w/y w/Y;
350-83-1/350-83-1; lane 4,
elav4 w/FM6,
w/Dp(1;Y)y+sc; lane
5, y w; lane 6,
elave5/FM6l/Dp(1;Y)y+sc;
lane 7,
elave5/elave5/Y;
353-66-2/353-66-2; lane 8, y
w/y w/Y;
353-66-2/353-66-2. Sizes are in kb.
|
|
Flies Producing a C-terminally Truncated Form of Arginase Live but
Develop More Slowly Than Normal--
Individuals carrying the
arg mutation
(elav4/elav4/Y;
350-83-1/350-83-1) develop as fertile adults and
do not show any specific morphological defects. To determine whether
deficiency for arginase would affect the rate of development, the
developmental profile of the progeny of a cross yielding
arg flies and their siblings was examined. I
found that arg males
(elav4/Y; 350-83-1/+ and
elav4/Y; Tf (2)DmORF3/+)
start hatching about 2 days later than their siblings (Fig.
9). Consistently, 50% of the flies
carrying a normal arg gene are already hatched at
days 12-13 following the beginning of egg laying, whereas it takes 2 additional days for 50% of the arg males to
hatch, at days 14-15. Ultimately, all categories of progeny are
obtained at levels that are not significantly different from the
predicted numbers (Fig. 9). The developmental delay is the consequence
of abnormal gene function, exclusive of elav, in a
chromosomal region linked to the yellow gene. This delay is
likely to be a consequence of defective arginase
function.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Delayed emergence of
arg males. The cross between
y w sn/elav4; 350-83-1/±
females and y
w/Y;Tf(2)DmORF3/T(2;3)apXa males
yields hemizygous arg males
(elav4/Y, and the 350-83-1 or
Tf(2)DmORF3 minigenes that provide elav
function), hemizygous arg+ males
(elav+), homozygous
arg+/arg+ females, and
heterozygous arg+/arg
females. The different categories can be identified because of the
tight genetic linkage of y, elav, and
arg as detailed under "Experimental Procedures." The
cumulative number of adult progeny obtained from the cross was plotted
as a function of the time of eclosion. Expected progeny numbers were
calculated as a fraction (predicted by Mendelian rules) of the total
progeny. Hence, arg males were expected to be
of the total progeny (the
elav4/Y;
±/T(2;3)apXamales do not hatch), and each of
the three other categories of flies were expected to represent
of the total progeny.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The Drosophila Genome Contains One Arginase Gene--
I identified
a cDNA encoding a predicted arginase, based upon its similarity
with arginases of other organisms, including the presence of conserved
regions implicated in the binding of manganese ions typically found in
arginases and required for their enzymatic activity. The putative
arginase of D. melanogaster is similarly related to the
terrestrial vertebrates arginases that were examined and to S. cerevisiae and C. elegans arginases, sharing 37-41%
sequence identity with them. In addition, 36 of the 37 residues
strictly conserved in arginases from 19 species of procaryotes and
eucaryotes are conserved in the 351-amino acid-long D. melanogaster putative arginase. Clearly, the D. melanogaster cDNA clone that was identified encodes a
bona fide arginase.
Arginase is a widely distributed enzyme in living organisms, found in
bacteria, yeast, plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates. It catalyzes
the hydrolysis of arginine into urea and ornithine. Most organisms that
do not have a functional urea cycle (in contrast to terrestrial
vertebrates) apparently produce only one arginase. The
arginase gene duplication that gave rise to the two
arginase genes in ureotelic organisms is relatively recent,
having occurred after the separation of vertebrates and invertebrates.
The search of the Drosophila genome (6) for
arginase-related sequences indicates that the
arginase gene described here is unique.
The Drosophila arginase cDNA clone originates from an
adult head cDNA library. Northern blot analysis confirms that a
1.3-kb transcript is present in the head and further indicates that it is not restricted to this structure. Indeed, arg transcripts
start accumulating late in embryogenesis, at which stage they localize to the differentiated fat body and are apparently excluded from the
nervous system. The insect fat body is the major organ of metabolic
activity, often thought of as the functional equivalent of the
vertebrate liver (34).
The Third Intron of the Drosophila Arginase Gene Includes an
Essential Locus--
The arginase cDNA was identified
during the course of screening for cDNAs corresponding to the
elav gene. elav encodes an RNA binding protein
present in the nucleus of all neurons throughout development and is
essential for normal differentiation and maintenance of neurons (24,
27, 35). The selection of the arginase cDNA in my screen
is due to the close proximity of the two genes and the use of a genomic
probe that overlapped both of them. Indeed, this paper shows that the
13-kb elav locus is entirely included within the third
intron of the arg gene, the two genes being transcribed from
complementary DNA strands. Furthermore, the genomic sequences producing
the mature elav and arg mRNAs are
nonoverlapping. Consistent with the new molecular data showing that
elav mRNAs do not extend into a region corresponding to
arg, elav minigenes corresponding to the 15.5-kb
genomic fragment flanked by PstI and BamHI sites (approximate coordinates kb 1-16 on the scale Fig. 1) provide normal
elav function (24). Finally, an elav cDNA
whose polyadenylation site is included in the 15.5-kb genomic fragment
has been identified.2 Together, the data demonstrate that
the distance between the site of initiation of elav
transcription and the 3' splice site of arg intron 3 is 3284 base pairs and that 197 base pairs lie between the polyadenylation site
of elav and the 5' splice site of arg intron 3.
Conserved coding regions of the arg gene are split by an
intron containing elav. This suggests that the
elav gene, which encodes a function that appeared more
recently than the arginase function during evolution, was somehow
inserted into the arginase gene. This organization seems to
be different in humans, because mapping of the two arginase
genes and the four identified elav homologues indicates that
these loci map to distinct regions of the genome (36). Although
not a general feature of nested genes, conservation of the nested
organization of the gene encoding a metalloproteinase inhibitor within
the synapsin gene has been reported for Drosophila and
humans (37). Understanding the phenomena that led to nested gene
organization would be of interest in the context of genome evolution.
The Conserved Drosophila Arginase Gene Is Nonessential--
A
mutation of the arg gene predicted to generate a form of
arginase missing the 152 C-terminal amino acids was identified and
analyzed. Northern blot analysis confirms that truncated arg transcripts are produced from the mutant flies
(elav4/elav4/Y;
350-83-1/350-83-1). Provided that the truncated
RNA is actually translated, the mutant would produce a form of
Drosophila arginase missing the 152 C-terminal amino acids.
The determination of the crystal structure of rat hepatic arginase A-I
reveals the presence of a 25-residue oligomerization motif at the C
terminus (26). In humans, naturally occurring mutant A-I missing the
most C-terminal 32 amino acids that include the trimerization domain
provides only 0.6% of normal arginase activity (38). Thus, it seems
likely that the mutant form of Drosophila arginase provides
very low levels of enzymatic activity, if any. Flies carrying this
mutation survive normally, indicating that the arginase gene
of Drosophila does not provide a vital function. However, a
significant developmental delay (16% increase) is associated with the
mutation. Analysis of additional alleles of the arginase
gene will be necessary to further the analysis, in particular to
determine what processes are affected by the alteration of arginase activity.
Arginase is widely distributed in living organisms, indicating
that it plays an important function. Accordingly, one might have
expected that the arginase mutation described here would cause a severe phenotype. However, it has modest effects. Genome analysis has revealed that only 24-30% of the genes from D. melanogaster are vital (5, 39). Two models have been proposed to
explain the lack of observable phenotype in an organism carrying a null allele of a gene. The traditional view suggests that the gene in
question has a function in environmental conditions different from that
of the laboratory, or in situations such as stress, that are normally
not encountered in the laboratory. Recently, it has been proposed that
this type of gene rather encodes a function that makes a small but
significant contribution to the fitness of the organism, hence the
"marginal benefit" hypothesis (40). Under this hypothesis,
mutations would not lead to observable phenotypes but rather alter the
efficiency/reliability of basic cellular processes, leading to the
selective maintenance of the normal allele of the gene. Experimental
evidence that yeast strains carrying null mutations that lead to no
apparent phenotype are counter-selected has been presented (40). Based
upon my observations and consistent with the hypothesized roles for
arginase (see below), it seems possible that arginase
function in Drosophila is of the marginal benefit
type, i.e. nonessential, but critical enough that it has
been maintained during evolution. Many diverse roles have been proposed
for extrahepatic arginases, such as participation in the metabolism of
polyamines (small molecules implicated in many essential cellular
processes), roles in neurotransmitter synthesis (glutamate and GABA),
amino acid synthesis (glutamate and proline, which is a principal
source of energy for insect flight metabolism), and function in nitric
oxide synthesis (reviewed in Ref. 14).
Interest in arginases has increased with the demonstration of their
influence on the synthesis of nitric oxide in macrophages, where
arginase competes with nitric-oxide synthase, an enzyme of ancient
evolutionary lineage (41) that converts arginine to nitric oxide and
citrulline (reviewed in Ref. 17). Nitric oxide is a diffusible gas that
serves as an intercellular effector modulating diverse aspects of
mammalian physiology, such as vascular tone, neurotransmission, and
immune system function, through the activation of macrophages (42).
Induction of apoptosis by high levels of nitric oxide has been reported
in human monocytes and in murine macrophage-like cells (43, 44).
Many aspects of the relationship between nitric oxide metabolism
and arginases are under investigation. In Drosophila, nitric oxide has been shown to regulate cell proliferation versus
differentiation as well as axon pathfinding (45-47). The analysis of
possible genetic interactions with the nitric-oxide synthase gene from
Drosophila (47) might thus prove useful for the study of
potential competition between arginase and nitric-oxide synthase in
cells other than vertebrate macrophages.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
I thank Jean-Luc Boucher for helpful
suggestions, Leonard Rabinow and Jean-Pierre Muller for critical
reading of the manuscript, Kathy Matthews for providing stocks from the
Bloomington Stock Center, Chad Price for help with manipulation of GCG,
and Claudia Borgeson for excellent technical help.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Basic Research Grant
FY96-0995/FY97-0605 from the March of Dimes Birth Defect Foundation. Sequencing was performed at the Eppley Cancer Center Molecular Biology
Core Facility at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Sequence
analysis was accomplished through the use of the Genetic Sequence
Analysis Facility at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and the
Wisconsin Package software from the Genetics Computer Group.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Present address:
Laboratoire d'Embryologie Moléculaire et Expérimentale,
UPRES-A 8080, Bâtiment 445, Université Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay, CEDEX France. Tel.: 33-1-69-15-75-85; Fax: 33-1-69-15-68-02;
E-mail: Marie- Laure.Samson@emex.u-psud.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 30, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M001346200
2
M.-L. Samson, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
elav, embryonic lethal abnormal visual system;
kb, kilobase(s);
A-I, arginase I (hepatic form);
A-II, arginase II (nonhepatic form);
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
ORF, open reading frame;
EST, expressed
sequence tag.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Mewes, H. W.,
Albermann, K.,
Bahr, M.,
Frishman, D.,
Gleissner, A.,
Hani, J.,
Heumann, K.,
Kleine, K.,
Maierl, A.,
Oliver, S. G.,
Pfeiffer, F.,
and Zollner, A.
(1997)
Nature
387 (suppl.),
7-65
|
| 2.
|
C. elegans Genome Sequencing Consortium.
(1999)
Trends Genet.
15,
51-58
|
| 3.
|
C. elegans Genome Sequencing Consortium.
(1998)
Science
282,
2012-2018
|
| 4.
|
Adams, M. D.,
Celniker, S. E.,
Holt, R. A.,
Evans, C. A.,
Gocayne, J. D.,
Amanatides, P. G.,
Scherer, S. E.,
Li, P. W.,
Hoskins, R. A.,
Galle, R. F.,
George, R. A.,
Lewis, S. E.,
Richards, S.,
Ashburner, M.,
Henderson, S. N.,
et al..
(2000)
Science
287,
2185-2195
|
| 5.
|
Ashburner, M.,
Misra, S.,
Roote, J.,
Lewis, S. E.,
Blazej, R.,
Davis, T.,
Doyle, C.,
Galle, R.,
George, R.,
Harris, N.,
Hartzell, G.,
Harvey, D.,
Hong, L.,
Houston, K.,
Hoskins, R.,
Johnson, G.,
Martin, C.,
Moshrefi, A.,
Palazzolo, M.,
Reese, M. G.,
Spradling, A.,
Tsang, G.,
Wan, K.,
Whitelaw, K.,
Kimmel, B.,
Celniker, S.,
and Rubin, G. M.
(1999)
Genetics
153,
179-219
|
| 6.
|
Rubin, G. M.,
Hong, L.,
Brokstein, P.,
Evans-Holm, M.,
Frise, E.,
Stapleton, M.,
and Harvey, D. A.
(2000)
Science
287,
2222-2224
|
| 7.
|
Blumenthal, T.
(1998)
Bioessays
20,
480-487
|
| 8.
|
Yao, K.-M.,
Samson, M.-L.,
Reeves, R.,
and White, K.
(1993)
J. Neurobiol.
24,
723-739
|
| 9.
|
Henikoff, S.,
Keene, M. A.,
Fechtel, K.,
and Fristrom, J. W.
(1986)
Cell
44,
33-42
|
| 10.
|
FlyBase Consortium.
(1999)
Nucleic Acid Res.
27,
85-88
|
| 11.
|
Xu, G. F.,
O'Connell, P.,
Viskochil, D.,
Cawthon, R.,
Robertson, M.,
Culver, M.,
Dunn, D.,
Stevens, J.,
Gesteland, R.,
and White, R.
(1990)
Cell
62,
599-608
|
| 12.
|
Levinson, B.,
Kenwrick, S.,
Lakich, D.,
Hammonds, G. J.,
and Gitschier, J.
(1990)
Genomics
7,
1-11
|
| 13.
|
Cawthon, R. M.,
O'Connell, P.,
Buchberg, A. M.,
Viskochil, D.,
Weiss, R. B.,
Culver, M.,
Stevens, J.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Copeland, N. G.,
and White, R.
(1990)
Genomics
7,
555-565
|
| 14.
|
Jenkinson, C. P.,
Grody, W. W.,
and Cederbaum, S. D.
(1996)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
114,
107-132
|
| 15.
|
Patterton, D.,
and Shi, Y. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
25328-25334
|
| 16.
|
Ouzounis, C. A.,
and Kyrpides, N. C.
(1994)
J. Mol. Evol.
39,
101-104
|
| 17.
|
Boucher, J. L.,
Moali, C.,
and Tenu, J. P.
(1999)
Cell Mol. Life Sci.
55,
1015-1028
|
| 18.
|
Jauniaux, J. C.,
Dubois, E.,
Vissers, S.,
Crabeel, M.,
and Wiame, J. M.
(1982)
EMBO J.
1,
1125-1131
|
| 19.
|
Green, S. M.,
Eisenstein, E.,
McPhie, P.,
and Hensley, P.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
1601-7
|
| 20.
|
Perozich, J.,
Hempel, J.,
and Morris, S. M. J.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
15,
23-37
|
| 21.
|
Itoh, N.,
Salvaterra, P.,
and Itakura, K.
(1985)
Drosophila Information Service
61,
89
|
| 22.
|
Cox, R. A.
(1968)
Methods Enzymol.
12,
120-129
|
| 23.
|
Tautz, D.,
and Pfeifle, C.
(1989)
Chromosoma
98,
81-85
|
| 24.
|
Samson, M.-L.
(1998)
Genetics
150,
723-733
|
| 25.
|
Yao, K.-M.,
and White, K.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
2994-3000
|
| 26.
|
Kanyo, Z. F.,
Scolnick, L. R.,
Ash, D. E.,
and Christianson, D. W.
(1996)
Nature
383,
554-557
|
| 27.
|
Robinow, S.,
Campos, A. R.,
Yao, K.-M.,
and White, K.
(1988)
Science
242,
1570-1572
|
| 28.
|
Campos, A. R.,
Rosen, D. R.,
Robinow, S. N.,
and White, K.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
425-431
|
| 29.
|
Settle, S. H., Jr.,
Green, M. M.,
and Burtis, K. C.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9470-9474
|
| 30.
|
Robinow, S.,
and White, K.
(1991)
J. Neurobiol.
22,
443-461
|
| 31.
|
Braissant, O.,
Gotoh, T.,
Loup, M.,
Mori, M.,
and Bachmann, C.
(1999)
Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.
70,
231-241
|
| 32.
|
Zinke, I.,
Kirchner, C.,
Chao, L. C.,
Tetzlaff, M. T.,
and Pankratz, M. J.
(1999)
Development
126,
5275-5284
|
| 33.
|
Riechmann, V.,
Rehorn, K.-P.,
Reuter, R.,
and Leptin, M.
(1998)
Development
125,
713-723
|
| 34.
|
Rizki, T.
(1978)
in
The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila
(Ashburner, M.
, and Wright, T., eds)
, Academic Press, New York
|
| 35.
|
Campos, A. R.,
Grossman, D.,
and White, K.
(1985)
J. Neurogenet.
2,
197-218
|
| 36.
|
Maglott, D. R.,
Katz, K. S.,
Sicotte, H.,
and Pruitt, K. D.
(2000)
Nucleic Acids Res.
28,
126-128
|
| 37.
|
Pohar, N.,
Godenschwege, T. A.,
and Buchner, E.
(1999)
Genomics
15,
293-296
|
| 38.
|
Ash, D. E.,
Scolnick, L. R.,
Kanyo, Z. F.,
Vockley, J. G.,
Cederbaum, S. D.,
and Christianson, D. W.
(1998)
Mol. Genet. Metab.
64,
243-249
|
| 39.
|
Miklow, G. L. G.,
and Rubin, G. M.
(1996)
Cell
86,
521-529
|
| 40.
|
Thatcher, J. W.,
Shaw, J. M.,
and Dickinson, W. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
253-257
|
| 41.
|
Durner, J.,
Gow, A. J.,
Stamler, J. S.,
and Glzebrook, J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14206-14207
|
| 42.
|
Ignarro, L., and Murad, F.
(eds)
(1995)
Nitric Oxide: Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Therapeutic Implications
, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
|
| 43.
|
Rouzaut, A.,
Subira, M. L.,
de Miguel, C.,
Domingo-de-Miguel, E.,
Gonzalez, A.,
Santiago, E.,
and Lopez-Moratalla, N.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1451,
319-333
|
| 44.
|
Gotoh, T.,
and Mori, M.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
427-434
|
| 45.
|
Enikolopov, G.,
Banerji, J.,
and Kuzin, B.
(1999)
Cell Death Differ.
6,
956-963
|
| 46.
|
Gibbs, S. M.,
and Truman, J. W.
(1998)
Neuron
20,
83-93
|
| 47.
|
Kuzin, B.,
Roberts, I.,
Peunova, N.,
and Enikolopov, G.
(1996)
Cell
87,
639-649
|
| 48.
|
Regulski, M.,
and Tully, T.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad U. S. A.
92,
9072-9076
|
| 49.
|
Samson, M.-L.,
Lisbin, M. J.,
and White, K.
(1995)
Genetics
141,
1101-1111
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. Borgeson and M.-L. Samson
Shared RNA-binding sites for interacting members of the Drosophila ELAV family of neuronal proteins
Nucleic Acids Res.,
November 10, 2005;
33(19):
6372 - 6383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Wright, A. Campbell, R. L. Morgan, A. G. Rosenberger, and B. W. Murray
Dogmas and controversies in the handling of nitrogenous wastes: Expression of arginase Type I and II genes in rainbow trout: influence of fasting on liver enzyme activity and mRNA levels in juveniles
J. Exp. Biol.,
May 15, 2004;
207(12):
2033 - 2042.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Etienne, K. Fortunat, and V. Pierce
Mechanisms of urea tolerance in urea-adapted populations of Drosophila melanogaster
J. Exp. Biol.,
January 8, 2001;
204(15):
2699 - 2707.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
| |