|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M910132199 on July 14, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 40, 31444-31450, October 6, 2000
Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF)-2 Directly Stimulates Mature
Osteoclast Function through Activation of FGF Receptor 1 and
p42/p44 MAP Kinase*
Daichi
Chikazu §,
Yoshiyuki
Hakeda¶,
Naoshi
Ogata ,
Ken
Nemoto ,
Akira
Itabashi ,
Tsuyoshi
Takato§,
Masayoshi
Kumegawa¶,
Kozo
Nakamura , and
Hiroshi
Kawaguchi **
From the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and
§ Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of
Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan, the ¶ Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry,
Meikai University, Sakado, Saitama 350-0248, Japan, and the
Clinical Laboratory, Saitama Medical School, Iruma,
Saitama 350-0495, Japan
Received for publication, December 21, 1999, and in revised form, June 2, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We previously reported that fibroblast growth
factor-2 (FGF-2) acts not only on osteoblasts to stimulate osteoclastic
bone resorption indirectly but also on mature osteoclasts directly. In
this study, we investigated the mechanism of this direct action of
FGF-2 on mature osteoclasts using mouse and rabbit osteoclast culture
systems. FGF-2 stimulated pit formation resorbed by isolated rabbit
osteoclasts moderately from low concentrations
( 10 12 M), whereas at high
concentrations ( 10 9 M) it showed
stimulation on pit formation resorbed by unfractionated bone cells very
potently. FGF-2 ( 10 12 M) also increased
cathepsin K and MMP-9 mRNA levels in mouse and rabbit osteoclasts.
Among FGF receptors (FGFR1 to 4) only FGFR1 was detected on isolated
mouse osteoclasts, whereas all FGFRs were identified on mouse
osteoblasts. FGF-2 ( 10 12 M)
up-regulated the phosphorylation of cellular proteins, including p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase, and increased the
kinase activity of immunoprecipitated FGFR1 in mouse osteoclasts. The
stimulation of FGF-2 on mouse and rabbit osteoclast functions was
abrogated by PD-98059, a specific inhibitor of p42/p44 MAP kinase.
These results strongly suggest that FGF-2 acts directly on mature
osteoclasts through activation of FGFR1 and p42/p44 MAP kinase, causing
the stimulation of bone resorption at physiological or pathological concentrations.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Among many growth factors regulating bone metabolism, fibroblast
growth factor-2 (FGF-2 or basic
FGF)1 is recognized as a
potent mitogen for a variety of mesenchymal cells (1). Several genetic
diseases with severe impairment of bone and cartilage formation, such
as achondroplasia (2-4) and thanatophoric dysplasia type II (5), have
recently been shown to be caused by mutations of FGF receptors (FGFRs).
In bone tissues, FGF-2 is produced by cells of osteoblastic lineage, is accumulated in bone matrix, and acts as an autocrine/paracrine factor
for bone cells (6-10). We and others have reported that the exogenous
application of FGF-2 has stimulatory effects on bone formation in
several in vivo models as a pharmacological action of FGF-2
(11-17). On the other hand, in vitro studies revealed that
high concentrations of FGF-2 (10 9-10 8
M) stimulated osteoclastogenesis in bone marrow culture
(18) and bone resorption in bone organ cultures (19, 20). This stimulatory effect of FGF-2 on bone resorption is known to be mediated
at least in part by cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) induction and
prostaglandin production (18, 20), which cause the expression of
osteoclast differentiation factor (RANKL/ODF), a key
membrane-associated molecule that regulates osteoclast differentiation,
in osteoblastic cells (21). Other than this indirect action through the
mediation of osteoblasts, we recently reported that FGF-2 acts directly on mature osteoclasts to stimulate bone resorption (22).
There are four structurally related high affinity receptors (FGFR1 to
4) belonging to receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) that have an intrinsic
protein-tyrosine kinase activity and elicit tyrosine
autophosphorylation of the receptor (23, 24). Because it is located
downstream of the autophosphorylation of FGFRs, mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase has been reported to be the
major signaling pathway in neuronal and endothelial cells (25-27). In
osteoblasts, MAP kinase activation followed by the autophosphorylation of FGFR1 and 2 is also involved in FGF-2 signaling (28, 29). Osteoclastic bone resorption is regulated by two different
steps: one is the recruitment and differentiation of osteoclasts and
the other is the activation of mature osteoclast function. Although a
number of signaling pathways through the mediation of osteoblasts for
osteoclast differentiation have been clarified, little is known about
the signaling to stimulate mature osteoclast function directly. A
recent study of random sequence analysis of PCR-amplified
cDNA clones identified 14 distinct kinase-related genes in purified
rabbit mature osteoclasts (30). Eight of these genes were identified as
RTKs: Tie, c-Kit, Fms, Met,
Axl, Tyro3, INS-R, and
FGFR1.
In this study, we investigated the molecular mechanism whereby FGF-2
stimulates mature osteoclast function using mouse and rabbit osteoclast
culture systems. Studies on the signaling pathway were performed using
isolated mouse osteoclasts; however, for those on the resorbing
activity, isolated rabbit osteoclasts were used because mouse
osteoclasts do not have enough potency to resorb bone after being isolated.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Neonatal, 5-week-old, and 8-week-old male ddY
mice were purchased from the Shizuoka Laboratories Animal Center
(Shizuoka, Japan). 10-day-old male Japanese white rabbits were
purchased from Saitama Experimental Animal Co. (Saitama, Japan). Human
recombinant FGF-2 was kindly provided by Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
(Chiba, Japan) and NS-398 by Taisho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Tokyo,
Japan). -modified minimum essential medium ( MEM) was purchased
from Life Technologies, Inc. (Rockville, MD), and fetal bovine serum (FBS) was from the Cell Culture Laboratory (Cleveland, OH). Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) was from Austral Biologicals (San
Ramon, CA). Bacterial collagenase, 1,25(OH)2 vitamin
D3, and ISOGEN were purchased from Wako Pure Chemicals Co.
(Osaka, Japan), and dispase from Nitta Gelatin Co. (Osaka). Polyclonal rabbit antibody against phosphotyrosine was obtained from UBI (Lake
Placid, NY), and monoclonal mouse antibody against p60v-src
(monoclonal antibody 327) was obtained from Oncogene Research Products
(Cambridge, MA). This antibody recognizes specifically both
p60v-src and p60c-src and has been used to
determine the expression of p60c-src in various primary
cells and clonal cell lines. Polyclonal rabbit antibodies against mouse
FGFR1 through 4 and nonimmune IgG, as well as blocking peptides for
respective antibodies, were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Polyclonal rabbit antibodies against
phospho-p44/42 MAP kinase, phospho-p38 MAP kinase, phospho-c-Jun
N-terminal protein kinase (JNK), and 2'-amino-3'-methoxyflanone
(PD-98059) were obtained from New England BioLabs, Inc.
(Beverly, MA).
4-(4-Fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)-1H-imidazole (SB-203580) and Pronase were purchased from Calbiochem-Novobiochem Co.
(La Jolla, CA). [32P]dCTP and [ -32P]ATP
were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Other chemicals were
obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).
Resorbed Pit Formation Assay by Purified Mature Osteoclasts and
Unfractionated Bone Cells from Rabbit Long Bones--
Purified mature
osteoclasts were prepared using 10-day-old rabbits as described
previously (31). Briefly, long bones from 10-day-old rabbits were
minced with scissors and agitated with a vortex mixer. An aliquot of
unfractionated bone cells was seeded onto 0.24% collagen gel (Nitta
Gelatin, Tokyo) coated on 100-mm tissue culture dishes and incubated.
2 h later, nonadherent cells were washed off and osteoclasts were
then removed from the gels with 0.1% collagenase solution (Wako Pure
Chemicals Co.). By staining with tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase
(TRAP), we ascertained that more than 99% of isolated cells were pure
osteoclasts. Purified osteoclasts (150 cells/well) or unfractionated
bone cells (5 × 104 cells/well) were cultured on a
dentine slice placed in each well of 96-well dishes containing 0.1 ml
of MEM/5% FBS. FGF-2 (10 11 M), NS-398 (1 µM), PD-98059 (1, 3, 10, and 30 µM), and
SB-203580 (30 µM) were added 1 h after the seeding.
After 24 h of culture, cells on the dentine slices were removed
with 1 N NH4OH solution, and stained with 0.5%
toluidine blue for 1 min. The total area of pits was estimated under a
light microscope with a micrometer to assess osteoclastic bone
resorption using an image analyzer (System Supply Co., Nagano, Japan).
Isolation of Rabbit Osteoclasts on Plastic Dishes--
Rabbit
osteoclasts were isolated on plastic dishes as described previously
(32). Briefly, the above unfractionated bone cells from rabbit long
bones were plated on 100-mm tissue culture dishes at 1 × 108 living cells per dish. After an overnight culture, the
cells were incubated with 0.001% Pronase and 0.02% EDTA in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. By this incubation, cells other than osteoclasts became detached from the dishes and were washed off. After
the Pronase E and EDTA treatment, more than 99% of the adherent cells
were ascertained to be osteoclasts by TRAP-positive results and
multinucleated. After purification, osteoclasts were further incubated
for 2 h with MEM containing 5% FBS.
Isolation of Mouse Osteoclasts on Plastic
Dishes--
Osteoclasts were prepared using ddY mice as described
previously (33). Briefly, primary mouse osteoblastic cells were
prepared from calvariae of neonatal ddY mice and bone marrow cells
prepared from tibiae of 8-week-old male ddY mice. Osteoblastic cells
(2 × 106 cells/dish) and bone marrow cells (2 × 107 cells/dish) were co-cultured in 100-mm tissue culture
dishes containing MEM with 10% FBS and 1,25(OH)2
vitamin D3 (10 8 M) for 7 days
with a medium change every 2 days. After 7 days of culture, 2-4 × 104 osteoclasts/dish were usually yielded. The dishes
were then treated with 0.001% Pronase and 0.02% EDTA in PBS for 10 min to remove osteoblastic cells. More than 99% of the adherent cells
prepared were TRAP-positive and multinucleated. These cells were
incubated for 2 h with MEM containing 10% FBS.
Northern Blot Analysis for Cathepsin K, Matrix Metalloproteinase
(MMP)-9, and MMP-14--
Total RNA from isolated mouse or rabbit
osteoclasts was extracted using ISOGEN, and 5 µg of total RNA was run
on a 1.2% agarose-2.2 M formaldehyde gel, transferred to a
nitrocellulose membrane by positive pressure, and fixed to the membrane
by ultraviolet irradiation. After 1 h of prehybridization in GMC
buffer (0.5 M Na2HPO4, 1% bovine
serum albumin, 1 mM EDTA, and 7% SDS, pH 7.2) at 60 °C, filters were hybridized overnight in GMC buffer at 65 °C with a
random primer [32P]dCTP-labeled cDNA probe for
cathepsin K, MMP-9, or MMP-14. A cDNA fragment from rabbit
osteoclasts was used as a probe for cathepsin K (34). cDNA probes
for MMP-9 and -14 were generated by RT-PCR with the total RNA from
mouse osteoclasts. The primers for MMP-9 were: sense,
5'-CTGTCCAGACCAAGGGTACAGCCT-3'; antisense, 5'-GTGGTATAGTGGGACACATAGTGG-3'. The primers for MMP-14 were: sense, 5'-GAGATCAAGGCCAATGTTCGGAGG-3'; antisense,
5'-TTAGATCCTCATTTTGGACAGTCC-3'. PCR consisted of 25 cycles of
denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 60 °C for
45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 60 s. The PCR products
for MMP-9 and -14 were 263 bp and 382 bp, respectively. Filters were
washed in 1× SSC (0.15 M NaCl, 15 mM
Na3 citrate, pH 7.0)/0.1% SDS twice for 15 min at
65 °C, then once for 15 min in 0.1× SSC/0.1% SDS at 65 °C.
Signals were quantitated by densitometry (Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Richmond, CA), and optical densities for cathepsin K, MMP-9, and MMP-14
were normalized to the corresponding values for G3PDH.
Analysis of Osteoclast Survival--
To obtain viable mouse
osteoclasts formed in the co-culture, a collagen gel culture was
performed as described previously (32). Briefly, primary mouse
osteoblastic cells and bone marrow cells were co-cultured on 100-mm
culture dishes coated with 0.2% collagen gel matrix (Nitta Gelatin) in
MEM containing 10% FBS and 1,25(OH)2 vitamin
D3 (10 8 M) for 6 days, with a
medium change every 2 days, and for 1 additional day in MEM/10%
FBS. After culture for 7 days, dishes were treated with 4 ml of 0.2%
bacterial collagenase in MEM for 20 min at 37 °C. Cells released
from the dishes were collected by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 min
and suspended in 5 ml of MEM containing 10% FBS. An aliquot of
crude osteoclast preparation (0.1 ml) was replaced in 24-well dishes,
and further cultured. After incubation for 2 h, the plates were
treated with 0.001% Pronase E and 0.02% EDTA for 10 min to remove
osteoblastic cells. After purification, osteoclasts were cultured in
the presence or absence of FGF-2 (10 11 or
10 8 M) or M-CSF (2000 units/ml) for various
periods up to 48 h, fixed with citrate-acetone-formaldehyde
fixative for 30 s, and stained with trypan blue and TRAP. Trypan
blue-negative and TRAP-positive osteoclasts were counted.
RT-PCR for FGF Receptors--
Total RNA was extracted from mouse
osteoclasts and osteoblasts using ISOGEN following the manufacturer's
instructions, and 2 µg of RNA was reverse-transcribed and amplified
by PCR. The primers for FGFR1 through 4 were as follows: FGFR1: sense,
5'-TGGAGTTCATGTGCAAGGTG-3'; antisense, 5'-ATAGAGAGGACCATCCTGTG-3',
FGFR2: sense, 5'-AAATACCAAATCTCCCAACC-3'; antisense,
5'-GCCGCTTCTCCATCTTCT-3', FGFR3: sense, 5'-ACTGTACTCAAGACTGCAGG-3'; antisense, 5'-GTCCTTGTCAGTCGCATCAT-3', FGFR4: sense,
5'-CTGTTGAGCATCTTTCAGGG-3'; antisense, 5'-CGTGGAAGGCCTGTCCATCC-3'. PCR
consisted of 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s,
annealing at 53 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for
120 s. The PCR products for FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 were 856, 373, 635, and 550 bp, respectively.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
Mouse
osteoclasts and osteoblasts were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and
lysed with TNE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM
NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF, 2 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM
aminoethyl-benzenesulfonyl fluoride, and 10 µg/ml aprotinin). The
protein concentration in the cell lysate was measured using a Protein
Assay Kit II (Bio-Rad). Immunoprecipitation was performed using
antibodies either noncovalently bound or conjugated to protein
G-Sepharose (Life Technologies, Inc.). Equivalent amounts (100 µg) of
cell lysates were incubated with coupled antibody for 4 h at
4 °C, and the beads were washed three times with a lysis buffer and
boiled in 3× Laemmli sample buffer before electrophoresis. Each
immunoprecipitant was electrophoresed by 8% SDS-PAGE, and transferred
to a nitrocellulose membrane. After blockage of nonspecific binding
with 5% skim milk, membranes were incubated with polyclonal anti-mouse
FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 or nonimmune IgG. Immunoreactive bands were stained
using the ECL chemiluminescence reaction (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
following the manufacturer's instructions. After this visualizing, the
antibodies on the membrane were stripped in a buffer consisting of 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.7), 2% SDS, and 100 mM
2-mercaptoethanol at 50 °C for 40 min. To ascertain the
specificity of these blots, the stripping membrane was further
immunoreacted with each polyclonal anti-FGFR and respective blocking
peptide, and the immunoreactive bands were again visualized under the
same conditions as above. The immunoreactivity to each anti-FGFR was
not lost by this stripping procedure.
Assay for Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Cellular
Proteins--
Osteoblastic cells and bone marrow cells were
co-cultured on 100-mm tissue culture dishes in MEM containing 10%
FBS and 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 (10 8
M) for 6 days, with a medium change at 2 days, and then for
1 more day in MEM/0.1% FBS. After mouse and rabbit osteoclasts were
isolated as described above, they were precultured for 2 h with
MEM/0.1% FBS and treated with FGF-2 (10 12
M) for various periods (2-30 min). The cells were quickly
washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed with TNE buffer. Cell lysates containing equal amounts of protein (10 µg) were subjected to 8%
SDS-PAGE, and proteins separated in the gel were subsequently electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. After blocking with
5% bovine serum albumin, the membranes with mouse osteoclast lysates
were incubated with polyclonal rabbit antibody against phosphotyrosine
(UBI, Lake Placid, NY) and subsequently with peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG antibody. Phosphotyrosine-containing proteins were
visualized using the ECL chemiluminescence reaction following the
manufacture's instructions. After the antibody was stripped from the
membrane, to block nonspecific binding, membranes were incubated with
5% skim milk and then with monoclonal mouse antibody against
p60v-src, polyclonal rabbit antibodies against
phospho-p44/42 MAP kinase, -JNK, and -p38 MAP kinase, and the
immunoreactive bands were visualized as described above.
In Vitro Kinase Assay--
Isolated mouse osteoclasts were
incubated with and without FGF-2 (10 12 M) for
various periods (1-10 min). The cells were quickly washed twice with
ice-cold PBS and lysed with TNE buffer, and equal amounts of protein
(100 µg) were immunoprecipitated with 1 µg of polyclonal rabbit
anti-FGFR1. The immune complex was washed three times with TNE buffer
and three times with kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES-NaOH (pH
7.4), and 10 mM MgCl2); the samples were then
resuspended in 60 µl of kinase buffer with 1 µCi (37 kBq) of
[ -32P]ATP and incubated for 15 min at 30 °C. The
reaction was stopped by adding 20 µl of 4× sample buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 8 mM EDTA, 12% SDS, 500 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 15% glycerol, and 0.01% bromphenol
blue) and subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions followed
by autoradiography.
Statistical Analysis--
Means of groups were compared by ANOVA
and significance of differences was determined by post-hoc testing
using Bonferroni's method.
 |
RESULTS |
Direct and Indirect Effects of FGF-2 on Isolated Rabbit Osteoclast
Function--
To examine the direct action of FGF-2 on osteoclasts,
the effect of FGF-2 on resorbed pit formation on a dentine slice by purified osteoclasts was compared with that by unfractionated bone
cells from rabbit long bones (Fig. 1).
FGF-2 at 10 12-10 8 M stimulated
resorbed pit formation by isolated mature osteoclasts with a maximal
effect of 1.9-fold at 10 11 M, and no further
stimulations were observed at higher concentrations (Fig.
1A). This stimulation was not due to the increase in the number of osteoclasts but to the activation of each osteoclast function, because the area of each pit (the total pit area per number
of pits) was similarly increased by FGF-2 ( 10 12
M, data not shown). Because previous reports have shown
that the bone resorptive effect of FGF-2 is mediated at least in part by COX-2 induction in osteoblastic cells (18, 20-22), the contribution of COX-2 to the direct action was examined by adding NS-398 (1 µM), a specific inhibitor of COX-2, to the culture of
isolated osteoclasts. NS-398 did not alter the FGF-2 action on isolated osteoclasts, indicating that the direct action is not mediated by COX-2
induction or by PG production (Fig. 1A). On the other hand,
FGF-2 at 10 9 and 10 8 M further
stimulated resorbed pit formation by unfractionated bone cells up to
7.5-fold (Fig. 1B). This stimulatory effect of high
concentrations of FGF-2 on pit formation by unfractionated bone cells
was 70-80% inhibited by NS-398. Because we have previously shown that
COX-2 is expressed in cells of osteoblastic lineage but not in cells of
osteoclastic lineage (22), the target cells of FGF-2 to induce COX-2
are those of osteoblastic lineage as reported previously (20, 21).
These results confirm our previous report (22) and suggest that FGF-2
at low concentrations ( 10 12 M) moderately
stimulates bone resorption through its direct action on osteoclasts,
whereas at high concentrations ( 10 9 M) it
potently stimulates bone resorption through its indirect action
mediated by COX-2 induction in osteoblastic cells.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Dose response of effects of FGF-2 on resorbed
pit formation by isolated osteoclasts (A) and
unfractionated bone cells (B) from rabbit long bones
in the presence or absence of NS-398. Bone cells were extracted
from long bones of 10-day-old rabbits and were seeded onto collagen
gel. Nonadherent cells were washed off, and osteoclasts were then
removed from the gels. Purified osteoclasts (>99% in purity, 150 cells/well) or unfractionated bone cells (5 × 104
cells/well) were cultured on a dentine slice in the presence or absence
of FGF-2 (10 16-10 8 M) and/or
NS-398 (1 µM). After 24 h of culture, the total area
of pits on the dentine slice was measured. Data are expressed as means
(symbols) ± S.E. (error bars) for 8 cultures/group. *p < 0.01, significant stimulation by
FGF-2; #p < 0.01, significant inhibition by
NS-398.
|
|
Effects of FGF-2 on mRNA Levels of Proteinases in Isolated
Mouse and Rabbit Osteoclasts--
Because mouse osteoclasts do not
have enough potency to resorb bone after being isolated, functional
analysis was carried out by measuring mRNA levels of proteinases,
which have been reported to be produced by osteoclasts (Fig.
2, upper panel). Cathepsin K
is an osteoclast-selective cysteine proteinase that plays a key role in
matrix degradation during bone resorption (34-37). Among MMPs,
important proteinases of matrix degradation, MMP-9 and MMP-14 (MT1-MMP)
have also been reported to be produced by osteoclasts (38-41).
Northern blot analysis of the dose response of FGF-2 revealed that at
10 12-10 8 M it stimulated
steady-state mRNA levels of cathepsin K and MMP-9, but not that of
MMP-14, at 3 h of culture. Similar regulation of cathepsin K and
MMP-9 mRNA levels were seen in isolated rabbit osteoclasts,
although FGF-2 effects were not as strong as those on mouse osteoclasts
(Fig. 2, lower panel). This may be because the basal
expression levels of these proteinases in the control cultures were
much higher in rabbit osteoclasts than in mouse osteoclasts. In both
cultures, the maximum stimulation was seen at 10 11 or
10 10 M, and no further stimulation was
observed at higher concentrations, showing a good correspondence with
the effect of FGF-2 on pit formation by isolated rabbit osteoclasts
(Fig. 1A).

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Dose response of effects of FGF-2 on mRNA
levels of cathepsin K, MMP-9, and MMP-14 in isolated mouse and rabbit
osteoclasts. Mouse osteoclasts were isolated from the co-culture
of mouse osteoblastic cells and bone marrow cells, and rabbit
osteoclasts were from 10-day-old rabbit long bones. More than 99% of
isolated mouse and rabbit cells were ascertained to be osteoclasts by
TRAP staining. After incubation for 2 h, cells were cultured in
the presence or absence of FGF-2 (10 14-10 8
M) for 3 h. Steady-state mRNA levels were examined
by Northern blot analysis. The number under each band is the
treated/control ratio of the intensity of each band normalized to that
of G3PDH measured by densitometry.
|
|
Effects of FGF-2 on the Survival of Isolated Mouse
Osteoclasts--
To investigate the effect of FGF-2
(10 11 M) on their survival, isolated mouse
osteoclasts were cultured in a plastic dish for up to 48 h (Fig.
3). The survival rates decreased with
time similarly in the control and FGF-2-treated cultures. At 24 h
27% and 32% of initially surviving cells still adhered to the dish in
control and FGF-2-treated cultures, respectively, and by 48 h all
cells had died in both cultures. Similar results were seen when a
higher concentration of FGF-2 (10 8 M) was
used (data not shown). On the contrary, M-CSF (2000 units/ml), a
positive control, maintained the survival of osteoclasts: the survival
rates were 76% at 24 h and 21% at 48 h, as reported
previously (42).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of FGF-2 and M-CSF on the survival of
isolated mouse osteoclasts. Mouse osteoclasts formed in the
co-culture were further cultured in the presence or absence of FGF-2
(10 11 M) or M-CSF (2000 units/ml) for various
periods up to 48 h. Trypan blue-negative and TRAP-positive
osteoclasts were counted as live osteoclasts. Similar results were seen
when a higher concentration of FGF-2 (10 8 M)
was used (data not shown). Data are expressed as means
(symbols) ± S.E. (error bars) for 6 cultures/group. *p < 0.01, significant difference from
control culture at each time point.
|
|
FGF Receptors (FGFR1-4) on Mouse Osteoclasts and
Osteoblasts--
The molecular mechanism of the signal transduction of
FGF-2 in osteoclasts was further investigated using isolated mouse
osteoclasts. mRNA and protein levels of FGFRs on osteoclasts were
studied and compared with those on osteoblasts from neonatal mouse
calvariae by RT-PCR and Western blotting analyses, respectively. Only
FGFR1 was detected on osteoclasts, whereas all FGFR1 through 4 were identified on osteoblasts both in mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 4). This difference in distribution of
FGFRs between osteoclasts and osteoblasts might explain the difference
of affinities and concentrations of FGF-2 affecting these cells as seen
in bone resorptive activity in rabbit cell cultures (Fig. 1,
A and B).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
mRNA and protein levels of FGF receptors
(FGFR1-4) on mouse osteoblasts (OB) and osteoclasts
(OC). Steady-state mRNA was analyzed by
RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from isolated mouse osteoclasts and
neonatal mouse calvarial osteoblasts as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The PCR products for FGFR1, 2, 3, and 4 were 856, 373, 635, and 550 bp, respectively. Similar results were obtained in four
other separate experiments, and the increases in template amounts or
cycles did not reveal the expressions of FGFR2-4 in osteoclasts.
Protein levels were analyzed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
with antibodies against FGFR1-4 as well as nonimmune IgG. Cellular
proteins extracted with TNE buffer were immunoprecipitated, subjected
to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with polyclonal anti-mouse FGFR
antibodies or nonimmune IgG as described under "Experimental
Procedures." To confirm the specificity of these blots, stripped
membranes were immunoreacted with each polyclonal anti-FGFR and
respective blocking peptide.
|
|
Phosphorylation of FGFR1 and Intracellular Proteins in Mouse and
Rabbit Osteoclasts--
Fig.
5A shows the time course of
effects of FGF-2 on tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins in
isolated mouse osteoclasts. Several proteins were selectively
phosphorylated by FGF-2 (10 12 M) as early as
2 min. The c-Src signal in each lane indicates a quantitative internal
control. Western blot analyses using antibodies against specific
proteins related to MAP kinase revealed that phosphorylation of p42/p44
MAP kinase was induced at 5 min, reached maximum at 10 min, and was
maintained for more than 30 min (Fig. 5A). Phosphorylations
of p38 and JNK MAP kinases were slightly induced just at 10 min. To
investigate the autophosphorylation of FGFR1 by FGF-2, kinase activity
of immunoprecipitated FGFR1 was examined by in vitro kinase
assay. FGF-2 induced the kinase activity of FGFR1 at 1 min, which
reached maximum at 2 min, and decreased considerably after 10 min (Fig.
5B). Similar regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation of
cellular proteins by FGF-2 was observed in isolated rabbit osteoclasts,
and intracellular proteins were phosphorylated at 2 min (Fig.
5C). However, further studies on signaling molecules in
rabbit osteoclasts could not be carried out, because antibodies against
rabbit proteins were not available.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of FGF-2 on phosphorylation of
cellular proteins and autophosphorylation of FGFR1 in isolated
osteoclasts. A, Western blotting of phosphotyrosine proteins
and MAP kinase-related proteins in isolated mouse osteoclasts. Mouse
osteoclasts formed in the co-culture were cultured with and without
FGF-2 (10 12 M) for various periods (2-30
min) and lysed with TNE buffer. 10 µg of cell lysates was subjected
to 8% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with polyclonal antibodies against
phosphotyrosine, p60v-src, phospho-p44/42 MAP kinase,
phospho-p38 MAP kinase, and phospho-JNK as described under
"Experimental Procedures." B, tyrosine kinase activity
of immunoprecipitated FGFR1 in isolated mouse osteoclasts. Isolated
mouse osteoclasts were cultured with and without FGF-2
(10 12 M) for various periods (1-10 min) and
lysed with TNE buffer, and 100 µg of cell lysates was
immunoprecipitated with polyclonal anti-FGFR1 antibody. The samples
were incubated in kinase buffer with [ -32P]ATP and
subjected to SDS-PAGE. C, Western blotting of
phosphotyrosine proteins in isolated rabbit osteoclasts. Rabbit
osteoclasts were cultured with and without FGF-2 (10 12
M) for 2 min and lysed with TNE buffer. 10 µg of cell
lysates was subjected to 8% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with polyclonal
antibodies against phosphotyrosine.
|
|
Functional Relevance of MAP Kinase Activation in Rabbit and Mouse
Osteoclasts--
To examine the functional relevance of the activation
of p42/p44 and p38 MAP kinases by FGF-2 in osteoclasts, PD-98059, a specific inhibitor of the upstream kinase of p42/p44 MAP kinase (43,
44), and SB-203580, a specific inhibitor of p38 MAP kinase (45, 46),
were added to the cultures of rabbit and mouse osteoclasts. PD-98059
dose dependently inhibited the stimulation of FGF-2 on pit
formation resorbed by isolated rabbit osteoclasts to the levels of the
control culture, while SB-203580 (30 µM) did not affect the FGF-2 stimulation (Fig.
6A). PD-98059 also inhibited
the FGF-2 stimulation on cathepsin K and MMP-9 mRNA levels in
isolated mouse osteoclasts, and this inhibition was not seen by
SB-203580 nor NS-398 (Fig. 6B). Although PD-98059 at the
highest concentration (30 µM) did not decrease the
resorbed pit formation or proteinase mRNA levels in the control
culture, inhibitors of src kinase, herbimysin (1 µM) and
PP-1 (10 µM), abrogated both of these osteoclast functions not only in FGF-2-stimulated cultures but also in control cultures (data not shown), suggesting the essential role of src kinase
signaling in the basal function of osteoclasts.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Involvement of MAP kinase activation in the
functions of isolated rabbit and mouse osteoclasts. A,
effects of PD-98059 (PD) and SB-203580 (SB) on
resorbed pit formation by isolated rabbit osteoclasts in the presence
or absence of FGF-2. Purified mature rabbit osteoclasts were prepared
as described under "Experimental Procedures" and seeded onto
dentine slices. FGF-2 (10 11 M), PD-98059 (1, 3, 10, and 30 µM), and SB-203580 (30 µM)
were added to the culture at 1 h after the seeding. After 24 h of culture, the total area of pits was measured. Data are expressed
as means (bars) ± S.E. (error bars) for 8 cultures/group. *p < 0.01, significant stimulation by
FGF-2; #p < 0.01, significant inhibition by PD-98059.
B, effects of PD-98059 (PD), SB-203580
(SB), and NS-398 (NS) on mRNA levels of
cathepsin K and MMP-9 in the presence or absence of FGF-2 in isolated
mouse osteoclasts. Mouse osteoclasts were isolated as described under
"Experimental Procedures." After incubation for 2 h, cells
were cultured in the presence or absence of FGF-2 (10 11
M), PD-98059 (10 and 30 µM), SB-203580 (30 µM), and NS-398 (1 µM) for 3 h.
Steady-state mRNA levels were examined by Northern blot analysis.
The number under each band is the treated/control ratio of
the intensity of each band normalized to that of G3PDH measured by
densitometry.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the present study, we confirmed our previous report that FGF-2
directly stimulated the bone resorptive activity of rabbit osteoclasts
and further demonstrated that it induced the expression of proteinases
in mouse and rabbit osteoclasts. These actions were mediated by the
autophosphorylation of FGFR1, the only subtype of FGFRs expressed on
osteoclasts, and the subsequent phosphorylation of cellular proteins,
including p42/p44 MAP kinase.
Although it is ideal to use a single culture system for functional and
molecular analyses, two different osteoclast cultures were employed in
this study: one is the culture of isolated rabbit osteoclasts and the
other is that of mouse osteoclasts. The isolated rabbit osteoclasts are
capable of resorbing dentine and maintaining their survival on
dentine slices even in the absence of bone-derived osteoblastic/stromal cells (31). Thereby, direct actions of osteotropic hormones and local factors on mature osteoclasts in vitro can be precisely estimated without the influence of
nonosteoclastic cells. However, the lack of molecular
information about nucleotide and protein sequences expressed in rabbits
and antibody availability for rabbit proteins restricts studies in the
rabbit osteoclast culture system. To overcome this disadvantage, the
mouse osteoclast culture system may aid researchers, because much
molecular information has already been accumulated. Isolated mouse
osteoclasts, on the other hand, essentially require the presence of
bone-derived osteoblastic/stromal cells for their bone resorbing
activity and survival. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 3, only a part of
isolated mouse osteoclasts remained alive after 24 h of culture.
Recently, mouse osteoclasts formed from cultured bone marrow cells in
the presence of M-CSF: M-CSF-dependent bone marrow
macrophages (M-BMM ) (47) and M-CSF-dependent bone marrow
cells (MDBM cells) (48), have been reported to exhibit the potency to
resorb the dentine slice even in the absence of osteoblastic/stromal
cells. However, tumor necrosis factor- (TNF- ) or RANKL/ODF, in
addition to M-CSF, is essential for these mouse osteoclasts to form
resorbed pits. Although our preliminary studies revealed that FGF-2
(10 11 M) increased the resorbed pit formation
by mouse osteoclasts both in M-BMM and MDBM cell cultures in the
presence of TNF- and M-CSF, the effects in both cultures were weaker
(1.3- to 1.4-fold over the culture with TNF- and M-CSF alone) than
seen in the rabbit osteoclast culture. Because both M-BMM and MDBM
cell cultures still contain osteoclast precursors in much higher
concentrations than the rabbit osteoclast culture, we cannot deny the
possibility that these stimulations by FGF-2 may not be due to the
direct action on mature osteoclast function but to the action on
osteoclast differentiation. In addition, FGF-2 might affect the
signaling of M-CSF through some cross-talk mechanism, because both
their receptors, FGFR1 and Fms, are RTKs. In fact, we have reported that the direct action of FGF-2 on osteoclast precursor differentiation was inhibitory and that the tyrosine phosphorylation of several cellular proteins induced by M-CSF was inhibited by FGF-2 using the
osteoclast precursor cell line C7 cell culture (49). Hence, these mouse
osteoclast culture systems appear not to be suitable for this study
that investigated the direct action of FGF-2 on mature osteoclasts.
Given the above circumstances, we properly used the rabbit and mouse
osteoclast cultures to study the function of FGF-2 on bone resorbing
activity and its molecular mechanism, respectively.
Another issue is the relationship between the stimulation of pit
formation and the up-regulation of proteinases. Because a previous
report showed that cathepsin K antisense oligodeoxynucleotide inhibited
the resorbed pit formation by isolated rabbit osteoclasts using the
same system as this study (36), the induction of cathepsin K in
osteoclasts is likely to contribute to the FGF-2 stimulation of
osteoclastic bone resorption. On the other hand, BB94, a nonselective MMP inhibitor (50), did not affect the FGF-2 stimulation on resorbed
pit formation on the dentine slice by rabbit osteoclasts but inhibited
that on the dentine slice coated with
collagen.2 These results
indicate that MMPs are important for the migration of osteoclasts
through the unmineralized osteoid to reach the mineralized bone
surface, but not for the bone resorbing activity of osteoclasts as
previously reported (41).
Signaling pathways through RTKs on osteoclasts were studied on M-CSF,
which stimulates motility and cytoplasmic spreading in osteoclasts
(51). FGF-2 and M-CSF, although receptors of both are RTKs expressed on
osteoclasts (30), showed different actions on osteoclast function.
FGF-2 did not maintain the survival of osteoclasts but M-CSF did (Fig.
3). Contrarily, M-CSF itself did not stimulate resorbing activity of
osteoclasts but FGF-2 did. Regarding signal transduction, M-CSF induced
the autophosphorylation of its receptor, Fms, and
c-src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of selected
proteins, including Grb2-binding protein. c-Src, a ubiquitous cellular
tyrosine kinase, which is highly expressed in osteoclasts, is essential
for osteoclasts to form a ruffled border and to resorb bone (52), and
the contribution of c-src kinase to FGF-2 signaling has been suggested
in endothelial cells and fibroblasts (27, 53, 54). In this study,
inhibitors of the src family kinases, herbimysin and PP1,
abrogated the osteoclast function in control cultures as well as in
FGF-2-stimulated cultures. Hence, we assume that the src kinase signal
may be essential for the basal osteoclast function, whereas p42/p44 MAP
kinase is the major pathway for the FGF-2 action. To our knowledge,
this study is the first indicating that the activation of p42/p44 MAP
kinase causes the stimulation of osteoclast function.
Regarding the physiological relevance of the direct action of FGF-2 on
osteoclasts, we recently reported that endogenous FGF-2 in the synovial
fluid contributes to joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis patients
(55). The concentration of FGF-2 in the synovial fluid was positively
correlated to the severity of joint destruction in these patients.
However, the concentrations of FGF-2 were lower, on the order of
10 13-10 11 M, than other
cytokines such as interleukin-6 and soluble interleukin-6 receptor, on
the order of 10 11-10 10 M.
These levels of FGF-2 are not enough to induce COX-2 in osteoblastic cells (18-22) but possibly affect mature osteoclasts directly. Although these effects are small compared with the COX-2-mediated effects, they occur at a concentration of FGF-2 that is likely to be
important in vivo. Thus, FGF-2 in the synovial fluid might play a role in the final step of osteoclastic bone resorption in
rheumatoid arthritis joint destruction that is preceded by recruitment
and differentiation of osteoclasts by other factors. Other than the
well-known pharmacological action of FGF-2 on bone formation,
endogenous FGF-2 might function in the pathogenesis of bone resorptive
diseases through its direct action on osteoclasts. Further studies will
reveal the contribution of FGF-2 to the pathophysiology of osteopenic
disorders like rheumatoid arthritis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific
research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture (12470303), by the Uehara Memorial Foundation, and by a
Bristol-Myers Squibb/Zimmer unrestricted research grant.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Orthopaedic
Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. Tel.: 81-3-3815-5411 (ext. 33376 or
33375); Fax: 81-3-3818-4082; E-mail:
kawaguchi-ort@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 14, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M910132199
2
M. Uchida and H. Kawaguchi, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
FGF-2, fibroblast
growth factor-2;
FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor;
COX-2, cyclooxygenase 2;
RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase;
MAP, mitogen-activated
protein;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
MEM, -modified essential
medium;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating
factor;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
TRAP, tartrate-resistant acid
phosphatase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
MMP, matrix
metalloproteinase;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
bp, base pair(s);
G3PDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
PP-1, 4-amino-5-(4-methylphenyl)-1-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
M-BMM , M-CSF-dependent bone marrow macrophages;
TNF, tumor
necrosis factor;
PD-98059, 2'-amino-3'-methoxyflanone;
SB-203580, 4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-(4-methylsulfinylphenyl)-5-(4-pyridyl)- 1H-imidazole.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rifkin, D. B.,
and Moscatelli, D.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
1-6
|
| 2.
|
Rousseau, F.,
Bonaventure, J.,
Legeal-Mallet, L.,
Pelet, A.,
Rozet, J.-M.,
Maroteaux, P.,
Le Merrer, M.,
and Munnich, A.
(1994)
Nature
371,
252-254
|
| 3.
|
Shiang, R.,
Thompson, L. M.,
Zhu, Y.-Z.,
Church, D. M.,
Fielder, T. J.,
Bocian, M.,
Winokur, S. T.,
and Wasmuth, J. J.
(1994)
Cell
78,
335-342
|
| 4.
|
Deng, C.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
Zhou, F.,
Kuo, A.,
and Leder, P.
(1996)
Cell
84,
911-921
|
| 5.
|
Webster, M. K.,
D'Avis, R. Y.,
Robertson, S. C.,
and Donoghue, D. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
4081-4087
|
| 6.
|
Canalis, E.,
Centrella, M.,
and McCarthy, T. L.
(1988)
J. Clin. Invest.
81,
1572-1577
|
| 7.
|
Globus, R. K.,
Plouet, J.,
and Gospodarowicz, D.
(1989)
Endocrinology
124,
1539-1547
|
| 8.
|
Rodan, S. B.,
Wesolowski, G.,
Kyonggeun, Y.,
and Rodan, G. A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19934-19941
|
| 9.
|
Hurley, M. M.,
Abreu, C.,
Harrison, J. R.,
Lichtler, A. C.,
Raisz, L. G.,
and Kream, B. E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5588-5593
|
| 10.
|
Hurley, M. M.,
Abreu, C.,
Gronowicz, G. A.,
Kawaguchi, H.,
and Lorenzo, J. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9392-9396
|
| 11.
|
Aspenberg, P.,
and Lohmander, L. S.
(1989)
Acta Orthop. Scand.
60,
473-476
|
| 12.
|
Kawaguchi, H.,
Kurokawa, T.,
Hanada, K.,
Hiyama, Y.,
Tamura, M.,
Ogata, E.,
and Matsumoto, T.
(1994)
Endocrinology
135,
774-781
|
| 13.
|
Nakamura, T.,
Hanada, K.,
Tamura, M.,
Shibanushi, T.,
Nigi, H.,
Tagawa, M.,
Fukumoto, S.,
and Matsumoto, T.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
1276-1284
|
| 14.
|
Nakamura, K.,
Kawaguchi, H.,
Aoyama, I.,
Hanada, K.,
Hiyama, Y.,
Awa, T.,
Tamura, M.,
and Kurokawa, T.
(1997)
J. Orthop. Res.
15,
307-313
|
| 15.
|
Kato, T.,
Kawaguchi, H.,
Hanada, K.,
Aoyama, I.,
Hiyama, Y.,
Kuzutani, T.,
Tamura, M.,
Kurokawa, T.,
and Nakamura, K.
(1998)
J. Orthop. Res.
16,
654-659
|
| 16.
|
Nakamura, T.,
Hara, Y.,
Tagawa, M.,
Tamura, M.,
Yuge, T.,
Fukuda, H.,
and Nigi, H.
(1998)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
13,
942-949
|
| 17.
|
Okazaki, H.,
Kurokawa, T.,
Nakamura, K.,
Matsushita, T.,
Mamada, K.,
and Kawaguchi, H.
(1999)
Calcif. Tissue Int.
64,
542-546
|
| 18.
|
Hurley, M. M.,
Lee, S. K.,
Raisz, L. G.,
Bernecker, P.,
and Lorenzo, J.
(1998)
Bone
22,
309-316
|
| 19.
|
Simmons, H. A.,
and Raisz, L. G.
(1991)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
6,
1301-1305
|
| 20.
|
Kawaguchi, H.,
Pilbeam, C. C.,
Gronowicz, G.,
Abreu, C.,
Fletcher, B. S.,
Herschman, H. R.,
Raisz, L. G.,
and Hurley, M. M.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
923-930
|
| 21.
|
Nakagawa, N.,
Yasuda, H.,
Yano, K.,
Mochizuki, S.,
Kobayashi, N.,
Fujimoto, H.,
Shima, N.,
Morinaga, T.,
Chikazu, D.,
Kawaguchi, H.,
and Higashio, K.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
265,
158-163
|
| 22.
|
Kawaguchi, H.,
Chikazu, D.,
Nakamura, K.,
Kumegawa, M.,
and Hakeda, Y.
(2000)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
15,
466-473
|
| 23.
|
Coughlin, S. R.,
Barr, P. J.,
Cousens, L. S.,
Fretto, L. J.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
988-993
|
| 24.
|
Johnson, D. E.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1993)
Adv. Cancer Res.
60,
1-41
|
| 25.
|
Klint, P.,
Kanda, S.,
and Claesson-Welsh, L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23337-23344
|
| 26.
|
Kouhara, H.,
Hadari, Y. R.,
Spivak-Kroizman, T.,
Schilling, J.,
Bar-Sagi, D.,
Lax, I.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1997)
Cell
89,
693-702
|
| 27.
|
Klint, P.,
Kanda, S.,
Kloog, Y.,
and Claesson-Welsh, L.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
3354-3364
|
| 28.
|
Suzuki, A.,
Shinoda, J.,
Kanda, S.,
Oiso, Y.,
and Kozawa, O.
(1996)
J. Cell. Biochem.
63,
491-499
|
| 29.
|
Kozawa, O.,
Tokuda, H.,
Matsuno, H.,
and Uematsu, T.
(1999)
J. Cell. Biochem.
74,
479-485
|
| 30.
|
Nakamura, Y. S.,
Hakeda, Y.,
Takakura, N.,
Kameda, T.,
Hamaguchi, I.,
Miyamoto, T.,
Kakudo, S.,
Nakano, T.,
Kumegawa, M.,
and Suda, T.
(1998)
Stem Cells.
16,
229-238
|
| 31.
|
Kameda, T.,
Miyazawa, K.,
Mori, Y.,
Yuasa, T.,
Shiokawa, M.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Mano, H.,
Hakeda, Y.,
Kameda, A.,
and Kumegawa, M.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
220,
515-519
|
| 32.
|
Tezuka, K.,
Sato, T.,
Kamioka, H.,
Nijweide, P. J.,
Tanaka, K.,
Matsuo, T.,
Ohta, M.,
Kurihara, N.,
Hakeda, Y.,
and Kumegawa, M.
(1992)
Bone Miner.
17,
347-359
|
| 33.
|
Akatsu, T.,
Tamura, T.,
Takahashi, N.,
Udagawa, N.,
Tanaka, S.,
Sasaki, T.,
Yamaguchi, A.,
Nagata, N.,
and Suda, T.
(1992)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
7,
1297-1306
|
| 34.
|
Tezuka, K.,
Tezuka, Y.,
Maejima, A.,
Sato, T.,
Nemoto, K.,
Kamioka, H.,
Hakeda, Y.,
and Kumegawa, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1106-1109
|
| 35.
|
Inaoka, T.,
Bilbe, G.,
Ishibashi, O.,
Tezuka, K.,
Kumegawa, M.,
and Kobubo, T.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
206,
89-96
|
| 36.
|
Inui, T.,
Ishibashi, O.,
Inaoka, T.,
Origane, Y.,
Kumegawa, M.,
Kokubo, T.,
and Yamamura, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8109-8112
|
| 37.
|
Votta, B. J.,
Levy, M. A.,
Barger, A.,
Bradbeer, J.,
Dodds, R. A.,
Lames, I. E.,
Thompson, S.,
Bossard, M. J.,
Carr, T.,
Connor, J. R.,
Tomaszek, T. A.,
Szewczuk, L.,
Drake, F. H.,
Veber, D. F.,
and Gowen, M.
(1997)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
12,
1396-1406
|
| 38.
|
Tezuka, K.,
Nemoto, K.,
Tezuka, Y.,
Sato, T.,
Ikeda, Y.,
Kobori, M.,
Kawashima, H.,
Eguchi, H.,
Hakeda, Y.,
and Kumegawa, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15006-15009
|
| 39.
|
Okada, Y.,
Naka, K.,
Kawamura, K.,
Matsumoto, T.,
Nakanishi, I.,
Fujimoto, N.,
Sato, H.,
and Seiki, M.
(1995)
Lab. Invest.
72,
311-322
|
| 40.
|
Sato, T.,
Ovejero, M. C.,
Hou, P.,
Heegaard, A. M.,
Kumegawa, M.,
Foged, N. T.,
and Delaisse, J. M.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
589-596
|
| 41.
|
Sato, T.,
Foged, N. T.,
and Delaisse, J. M.
(1998)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
13,
59-66
|
| 42.
|
Jimi, E.,
Shuto, T.,
and Koga, T.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
808-811
|
| 43.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
Cuenda, A.,
Cohen, P.,
Dudley, D. T.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27489-27494
|
| 44.
|
Dudley, D. T.,
Pang, L.,
Decker, S. J.,
Bridges, A. J.,
and Saltiel, A. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7686-7689
|
| 45.
|
Lee, J. C.,
Laydon, J. T.,
McDonnell, P. C.,
Gallagher, T. F.,
Kumar, S.,
Green, D.,
McNulty, D.,
Blumenthal, M. J.,
Heys, J. R.,
Landvatter, S. W.,
Strickler, J. E.,
McLaughlin, M. M.,
Siemens, I. R.,
Fisher, S. M.,
Livi, G. P.,
White, J. R.,
Adams, J. L.,
and Young, P. R.
(1994)
Nature
372,
739-746
|
| 46.
|
Cuenda, A.,
Rouse, J.,
Doza, Y. N.,
Meier, R.,
Cohen, P.,
Gallagher, T. F.,
Young, P. R.,
and Lee, J. C.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
364,
229-233
|
| 47.
|
Kobayashi, K.,
Takahashi, N.,
Jimi, E.,
Udagawa, N.,
Takami, M.,
Kotake, S.,
Nakagawa, N.,
Kinosaki, M.,
Yamaguchi, K.,
Shima, N.,
Yasuda, H.,
Morinaga, T.,
Higashio, K.,
Martin, T. J.,
and Suda, T.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
275-286
|
| 48.
|
Azuma, Y.,
Kaji, K.,
Katogi, R.,
and Kudo, A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
4858-4864
|
| 49.
|
Chikazu, D.,
Ogasawara, T.,
Hakeda, Y.,
Kumegawa, M.,
Hayashi, S. I.,
Takato, T.,
Tanaka, S.,
Nakamura, K.,
and Kawaguchi, H.
(1999)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
14 Suppl. 1,
S306 (abstr.)
|
| 50.
|
Schwartz, M. A.,
and Van Wart, H. E.
(1992)
Prog. Med. Chem.
29,
271-334
|
| 51.
|
Insogna, K. L.,
Sahni, M.,
Grey, A. B.,
Tanaka, S.,
Horne, W. C.,
Neff, L.,
Mitnick, M.,
Levy, J. B.,
and Baron, R.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
2476-2485
|
| 52.
|
Baron, R.
(1996)
Rev. Rhum. Osteoartic.
63,
633-638
|
| 53.
|
Landgren, E.,
Blume-Jensen, P.,
Courtneidge, S. A.,
and Claesson-Welsh, L.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
2027-2035
|
| 54.
|
Zhan, X.,
Plourde, C.,
Hu, X.,
Friesel, R.,
and Maciag, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20221-20224
|
| 55.
|
Manabe, N.,
Oda, H.,
Nakamura, K.,
Kuga, Y.,
Uchida, S.,
and Kawaguchi, H.
(1999)
Rheumatology
38,
714-720
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Goto, H. Komaba, and M. Fukagawa
Pathophysiology of parathyroid hyperplasia in chronic kidney disease: preclinical and clinical basis for parathyroid intervention
NDT Plus,
August 1, 2008;
1(suppl_3):
iii2 - iii8.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yang, Y. Xia, S. Q. Lu, T. W. Soong, and Z. W. Feng
Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor-induced Neuronal Differentiation of Mouse Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Requires FGFR-1, MAPK/ERK, and Tr | |