|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.R000016200 on August 8, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 41, 31555-31558, October 13, 2000
MINIREVIEW
Glucose Regulation of Gene Transcription*
Sophie
Vaulont ,
Mireille
Vasseur-Cognet, and
Axel
Kahn
From the Institut Cochin de Génétique
Moléculaire, U.129 INSERM, Université René Descartes,
75014 Paris, France
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Nutrient gene regulation is an important
adaptation allowing survival on intermittent food supplies. This
adaptative process exists in all species from yeast to mammals.
Glucose, the most abundant monosaccharide in nature, provides a very
good example of how organisms have developed regulatory mechanisms to
cope with a fluctuating level of nutrient supply. In yeast, glucose facilitates its own use by inducing expression of genes involved in its
metabolism while repressing that of those involved in the utilization
of alternative carbon sources (for review, see Ref. 1). The mechanisms
by which glucose affects gene expression in yeast are now relatively
well understood.
In mammals the response to dietary glucose is more complex because it
combines effects related to glucose metabolism itself and effects
secondary to glucose-dependent hormonal modifications, mainly pancreatic stimulation of insulin secretion and inhibition of
glucagon secretion. In the pancreatic cells, glucose is the primary
physiological stimulus for the regulation of insulin synthesis and
secretion. In the liver, glucose, in the presence of insulin, induces
expression of genes encoding glucose transporters and glycolytic and
lipogenic enzymes, e.g. L-type pyruvate kinase (L-PK),1 acetyl-CoA
carboxylase (ACC), and fatty acid synthase, and represses genes
of the gluconeogenic pathway, such as the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene (for review, see Refs. 2-4). Although insulin and
glucagon were long known as critical in regulating gene expression, it
is only recently that carbohydrates also have been shown to play a key
role in transcriptional regulation (3-5). DNA sequences and DNA
binding complexes involved in the glucose-regulated gene expression
have been characterized recently in liver and cells.
 |
The Glucose Signaling Pathway |
In most glucose-sensitive tissues, glucose entry is mediated
through specific glucose transporters; these include GLUT2, in the
liver and cells, and GLUT4, an insulin-sensitive transporter, in
adipocytes and muscle (6). It seems likely that the main role of GLUT2
in gluconeogenic tissues, such as the liver, is to allow for a rapid
equilibrium between intra- and extracellular glucose, in particular an
easy secretion of glucose under gluconeogenic conditions. In hepatoma
cells devoid of GLUT2 and cultured without glucose, the concentration
of intracellular glucose 6-phosphate remains high, thus explaining the
continuous stimulation of glucose-sensitive genes and consequent loss
of glucose responsiveness (7). Accordingly, in GLUT2 / mice the
intracellular glucose 6-phosphate concentration is high in fasting
animals (8, 9); and in patients with mutation in the GLUT2 gene (the
Fanconi-Bickel syndrome), there is an associated accumulation of
intrahepatic glycogen (10). Transcription of the gene for L-PK
is also abnormally stimulated in the liver of fasted GLUT2 / mice.
Transfer of a GLUT2 transgene reestablishes a normal inhibition of
glucose utilization by fasting and stimulation by carbohydrate feeding
(9).
Guillemain et al. (11) have recently suggested that the
large intracytoplasmic loop of GLUT2 could also play the role of a
signaling molecule. Indeed, hyperexpression of this loop in mhAT3F
hepatoma cells (7) abrogates glucose responsiveness.
After its entry into liver, adipocytes, and cells, glucose has to
be metabolized to generate an intracellular signal that allows for
transcriptional regulation of metabolic genes. Although it is now clear
that the first step of glycolysis, namely phosphorylation of glucose to
glucose 6-phosphate, is instrumental for glucose-dependent regulation (either positive or negative), the subsequent steps are
still disputed and the exact nature of the active intermediate remains
obscure (3, 5). In the liver, glucose 6-phosphate can be used in
glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, glycogen synthesis, and
hexosamine synthesis. Work from our laboratory using xylitol, an
intermediate of the pentose phosphate pathway, has suggested that in
hepatocytes in primary culture the glucose signal could be generated
through the non-oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway (12).
This result has been further extended in vivo by Massillon
et al. (13), who noted that xylitol mimics the effect of
hyperglycemia on glucose-regulated genes without a change in
intracellular glucose 6-phosphate concentration in the liver.
Alternatively, there are several reports suggesting that glucose
6-phosphate itself is a signaling molecule (3, 14). According to
Mourrieras et al. (15), only production of glucose
6-phosphate correlates accurately with the induction of
glucose-regulated genes. Finally, for a specific subset of genes
regulated by glucose through its metabolism in muscle and fat, the
hexosamine biosynthetic pathway was reported to mediate the
transcriptional effects of glucose on gene expression (16, 17).
 |
Kinase Cascade and Role of AMPK |
It is likely that a phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cycle is
involved in signaling the availability of glucose to the
transcriptional machinery. In this regard, protein phosphatase
inhibitors prevent the effects of glucose on L-PK gene
expression2 and other
glucose-regulated genes (18-20). The involvement of the
cAMP-dependent protein kinase in regulating the
glucose-dependent signaling pathway is well documented (4,
21, 22). More recently, another protein kinase, the AMP-activated
protein kinase (AMPK), has been suggested to play a key role in
transmission of the glucose signal for transcription. AMPK is a
serine/threonine kinase acting as a key metabolic "master switch"
by phosphorylating target proteins involved in carbohydrate and fat
metabolism in response to changes in cellular energy charge. AMPK is
activated by stresses that deplete ATP, leading to a rise in the
AMP/ATP ratio within the cell (23). AMPK is a heterotrimeric complex of
a catalytic ( ) and two regulatory subunit ( and ) proteins. Proteins related to all three subunits have been characterized in the
yeast Snf1p complex (24). There are two catalytic subunit isoforms
encoded by two different genes, namely 1 and 2 (23). Interestingly, although 1-containing complexes are exclusively cytoplasmic, 2 complexes are found both in the nucleus and cytoplasm (25, 26).
AMPK activity was first reported to be decreased in cell lines
incubated in elevated glucose concentrations (26, 27). We and others
have shown that the AMPK activator, 5-amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide riboside, inhibits the glucose-dependent activation
of several genes in hepatocytes in primary culture (19, 28). Thus,
inactivation of AMPK may restore the transcriptional activity of
glucose-responsive genes. To test this hypothesis, the group of Rutter
in collaboration with our laboratory (26) used the single-cell antibody
microinjection strategy, coupled with dynamic imaging of luciferase
reporter constructs. These studies demonstrated that microinjection of antibodies against 2, but not the 1 AMPK catalytic subunit, mimics the effects of elevated glucose on the L-PK and preproinsulin promoters in MIN6 cells. Interestingly, in each case the effects were only observed when antibody injection was performed both in the
nucleus and the cytosol, indicating the importance of either a
cytosolic phosphorylation event and/or the subcellular localization of
the 2 subunits. Incubation with 5-amino-4-imidazolecarboxamide riboside diminished, but did not abolish, the effect of glucose on
preproinsulin transcription (26). These data suggest that glucose-induced changes in AMPK activity are necessary and sufficient for the regulation of the L-PK gene by this sugar (see Fig. 1) and that
they play an important role in the regulation of the preproinsulin gene
promoter. This result is of interest with regard to what is known about
yeast. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Snfp kinase complex
is activated by glucose removal, which results in
phosphorylation-dependent inactivation of transcription
factors involved in gene repression, such as Mig1 (1, 24). In mammalian cells, AMPK seems to have the opposite effect on gene expression; instead of inhibiting a repressor, AMPK inhibits an activator or
activates a repressor (Fig. 1). Possible
targets of AMPK are currently being investigated in our laboratory, and
the generation of AMPK knock-out mice is in progress.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Role of AMPK in the regulation by glucose of
the L-PK gene transcription in pancreatic cell. When cultured under low glucose conditions, AMPK
activity is elevated and L-PK gene transcription is low. AMPK activity
is inhibited by an elevated glucose concentration leading to an
increase in L-PK gene transcription. Microinjection of antibodies to
the 2 subunit of AMPK mimics the effects of elevated
glucose on the L-PK promoter activity (26).
|
|
 |
The Glucose Response Elements of L-PK and S14
Genes |
To assess the effect of glucose on gene transcription, our
laboratory has extensively studied the regulation of the rat L-PK gene
expression by glucose. We defined a DNA sequence responsible for
mediating the positive response to glucose ex vivo and
in vivo (29-32). This sequence, termed the glucose response
element (GlRE), is closely related to the carbohydrate response element (ChoRE) described by the group of Towle (33, 34) in the regulatory region of the S14 gene. A similar glucose-activatable region has been
recently identified in the promoter of the gene for the glucagon receptor (35). The complex that binds to the GlRE/ChoRE of the L-PK and
S14 genes cooperates with an adjacent DNA binding site, termed the
auxiliary site, to confer strong glucose responsiveness (29, 31, 34).
However, oligomerized GlRE/ChoRE sequences placed in front of a
heterologous promoter are sufficient, in absence of the auxiliary site,
to confer the carbohydrate response (29, 31, 34).
The L-PK GlRE consists of two palindromic non-canonical E boxes
(CANNTG) separated by 5 base pairs. These E boxes bind the upstream
stimulatory factors (USFs), which are members of the basic
helix-loop-helix leucine zipper family (31, 34). We have shown that in
the liver, as well as in most tissues tested, USF binding activity is
mainly accounted for by the USF1/USF2 heterodimer (36). Our results
using cells and gene knock-out mice indicate that the endogenous USFs
are important for a kinetically normal activation of various
diet-dependent genes by glucose (32, 37-39). However,
these factors cannot, by themselves, explain the transcriptional
regulation of glucose-responsive genes by glucose. Indeed, most genes
whose promoters include USF-binding E boxes are not regulated by
glucose. In addition, the glucose responsiveness conferred by
GlREs/ChoREs is not parallel to their affinity for USFs (40). Finally,
USF synthesis as well as DNA binding activity do not appear to be
regulated by the diet. We therefore sought novel partners of the
glucose response complex using the one-hybrid system in yeast. We
identified, in addition to USF, chicken ovalbumin upstream
promoter-transcription factor II (COUP-TFII), an orphan nuclear
receptor of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. COUP-TFII
binds to the GlRE in vitro, and COUP-TF-containing complexes that interact with the GlRE are present in liver nuclear extracts (41).
The COUP-TF and USF binding sites are overlapping, and binding
of one factor interferes with binding of the other. Consequently, overexpression of COUP-TFII inhibits USF-dependent
transactivation of the L-PK gene promoter and also represses its
stimulation by glucose in hepatocytes in primary culture. Furthermore,
a mutated GlRE binding site with very low affinity for COUP-TFII
impaired the glucose response because of increased activity under low
glucose conditions (41). We propose that COUP-TFII-containing dimers are involved in a glucose sensor system abrogating transactivation by
USFs in the absence of glucose. This sensor complex could be regulated
by interaction with other partner(s) sensitive to glucose, that we are
currently looking for.
 |
Other Putative Partners of the GlRE/ChoRE of L-PK and
S14 |
There are several recent reports concerning GlRE DNA-binding
proteins. Hasegawa et al. (42) reported that carbohydrate
refeeding resulted in an increase in the concentration of a novel L-PK
GlRE binding activity in the liver. They excluded USF, Sp1, c-Myc, and
HNF4 as being involved in this activity. So far, the cognate DNA-binding proteins have not been purified. Yamada et al.
(43) described the purification of two novel GlRE-binding proteins that
may be related to COUP-TFII. Finally, Koo and Towle (44) have recently
characterized a new ChoRE binding activity that correlates with
glucose-dependent transcriptional activity. This DNA
binding activity is only recovered with oligonucleotides capable of
conferring a glucose response and not with mutants of the sites that
are inactive in supporting the glucose response. This binding activity
does not seem to be regulated by dietary glucose. The authors proposed
a new model for the ChoRE consisting of two E box half-sites related to
CACG motifs.
Recently, the sterol response element-binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c)
(45, 46) was also proposed as a mediator of glucose induction of genes
encoding proteins of glycolytic and lipogenic pathways, including L-PK
and S14 genes (47). However, this effect of SREBP-1c on
glucose-responsive genes is likely to reflect the role of SREBP-1c as a
mediator of insulin action (as discussed in detail in the third
minireview of this series by Osborne (81)) rather than its direct
involvement in the glucose signaling pathway. Indeed, the L-PK GlRE has
a very low affinity for SREBP (44), which is, in addition, a very poor
transactivator of the L-PK gene promoter (48, 49). Accordingly,
complete SREBP-1 deficiency in knock-out mice results only in a partial
abrogation of L-PK gene expression in response to carbohydrate
refeeding, whereas insulin-responsive genes such as glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase and glycerol 3-phosphate acyltransferase are totally
unresponsive (50). In fact, the impaired glucose response of the L-PK
gene in the liver of SREBP1 / mice could result from the deficiency in glucokinase, the gene transcription of which is
insulin/SREBP-1c-dependent (51). Indeed, glucokinase
induction by insulin/SREBP-1c is needed for glucose phosphorylation to
glucose 6-phosphate, an indispensable intermediate of
glucose-dependent gene activation.
A summary of the role of glucose and insulin in the transcriptional
regulation of glycolytic and lipogenic genes in the liver is presented
in Fig. 2.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Role of glucose and insulin in the
transcriptional regulation of glycolytic and lipogenic genes in the
liver. The involvement of the PI3K/protein kinase B
(PKB) pathway in the insulin-dependent
activation of the glucokinase gene transcription has been demonstrated
recently (80). An overview of the functional DNA element ( 144 to
172 base pairs from the start site of transcription of the rat L-PK
gene) involved in the glucose-dependent regulation of the
L-PK gene transcription is presented. The E boxes and direct repeat
(DR1 and DR7) elements in the GlRE are indicated.
PPP, pentose phosphate pathway.
|
|
 |
Transcriptional Factors of the Sp1 Family Are
Involved in Glucose Responsiveness |
Several reports have suggested that the ubiquitously expressed
transcription factor Sp1 may also provide a mechanism for glucose responsiveness. This was first reported for the ACC gene in adipocytes where glucose was able to induce an increase of Sp1 binding activity (52). This induction was not due to an increase in the amount of Sp1
but to dephosphorylation of the existing Sp1 in the nucleus. Glucose
treatment increases the amount of protein phosphatase 1 catalytic
subunit resulting in the activation of Sp1 binding activity on the ACC
promoter (18). A glucose-dependent Sp1 dephosphorylation resulting in a higher DNA binding activity has been confirmed (53).
Members of the Sp1 family have also been proposed to be required for
glucose-dependent induction of the plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 gene (54) and the transforming growth factor (16) gene
through the glucosamine pathway in vascular muscle cells. Finally,
factors of the Sp1 family were reported to be somehow involved in
regulation of glucose/insulin-dependent genes encoding leptin, fatty acid synthase, and ATP citrate-lyase (55, 56). In the
case of ATP citrate-lyase, the level of expression of Sp1 and Sp3
factors was reported to be directly regulated by glucose (57). It is
interesting to note that in the absence of adequate nutrition, Sp1
becomes hypoglycosylated and thereby subject to proteolytic degradation
(58).
 |
Transcriptional Regulation of Insulin Gene Expression
in Pancreatic Cells: Role of PDX1 |
An impressive breakthrough in the field of gene regulation by
glucose involves the control of the insulin gene promoter by the
transcription factor pancreatic duodenum
homeobox protein, PDX1 (IPF-1/STF-1/IUF-1/IDX-1), in
pancreatic cells. PDX1 was first described as a key factor for
lineage determination of the developing endocrine pancreas (59, 60).
Strong evidence now supports a role for this homeodomain transcription
factor in the mechanism whereby glucose stimulates insulin gene
transcription in cells. Increased glucose concentration in the
mature islet leads to PDX1 phosphorylation and subsequent translocation
into the nucleus, where it binds to the insulin gene promoter resulting in its transcriptional activation (61, 62).
Glucose-dependent activation of PDX1 nuclear translocation
occurs through a cell signaling pathway involving PI3K. Today,
involvement of p38/SAPK2 in the downstream pathway is disputed (62,
63). Other metabolizable nutrients that induce insulin release
(including fructose, pyruvate, and xylitol), as well as insulin itself,
were also shown to activate PDX1 DNA binding activity and insulin
promoter activity through PI3K (64). Further experiments are now needed
to determine whether the effects of insulin and glucose are additive or
whether glucose acts as an insulin secretagogue, whereas PDX1 and
proinsulin gene activation are triggered by insulin (65). A schematic
view of glucose and insulin regulation of PDX1 DNA binding and insulin gene promoter activity is presented in Fig.
3.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Role of glucose and insulin in the
stimulation of PDX1 DNA binding activity and insulin gene transcription
in the pancreatic cell. Both insulin and
glucose were shown to activate insulin gene transcription via a pathway
involving PI3K and stress-activated protein kinase 2 (SAPK2)
(64). However, whether glucose is able to activate PI3K independently
of stimulating insulin secretion has not been determined.
|
|
The pivotal role of PDX1 in the nutrient regulation of insulin mRNA
production was further assessed using pancreatic cell lines. These
studies showed that impaired glucose-regulated insulin secretion and
insulin content are associated with dysregulated PDX1 expression (66,
67). The role of PDX1 in diabetes has been increasingly documented over
the past several years. A dominant negative mutation in PDX1 was shown
to cause maturity-onset diabetes of the young; MODY4 is an autosomal
dominant form of type 2 diabetes characterized by an early onset and a
primary defect of insulin secretion (68, 69). Furthermore, new
mutations in PDX1 that may predispose to type 2 diabetes in humans were
reported, their phenotype depending upon the nature of the mutation
(70, 71). Very recently, Ferber et al. (72, 73) have
demonstrated that in vivo transduction of hepatocytes with a
recombinant adenovirus-PDX1 vector reactivates the silent proinsulin
gene, as well as genes for proconvertases PC1/PC3; this reinforces the
view that PDX1 is a major transactivator of cell-specific genes.
Other glucose-dependent genes, such as the L-PK (26,
74), are also regulated in cells, and the mechanisms underlying their regulation are under investigation. Recently, Josefsen et al. (75) using a subtraction cloning strategy isolated the zinc finger transcription factor Egr-1 and demonstrated that its expression is up-regulated in primary islet cells in response to glucose. In view
of the close homology of Egr-1 with transcription factors that regulate
carbohydrate metabolism in yeast, the authors propose that Egr-1 might
play a pivotal role in response to sustained glucose stimulation. The
genes regulated by Egr-1 in cells are currently unknown.
 |
Conclusions |
There are clearly different mechanisms of gene activation in
mammalian tissues induced by dietary carbohydrate. Some genes are
mainly activated by insulin, whose secretion is increased by glucose;
this is the case for SREBP1 and glucokinase in the liver (Fig. 2) and
may also be true for the proinsulin gene in cells. Hepatic SREBP1
and PDX1 in cells appear to be major insulin-dependent
transactivators of gene transcription. Some genes are also inhibited by
insulin and the role of different winged helix transcription factors or
forkhead; a family of transcription factors such as FKHR has been well
documented recently (76-78). The insulin signaling pathways, mediating
either positive or negative effects on the transcriptional machinery,
mainly pass through PI3K activation (79, 80).
Other genes are regulated by glucose itself in the presence of
glucose-phosphorylating enzymes, namely glucokinase, where the role of
AMPK has been demonstrated in both the liver and cells. However,
the transcription factors involved in the glucose response differ
according to the regulated genes and currently remain elusive. In fact,
it is probable that there is no single regulator of gene expression by
glucose but rather that glucose-dependent cues allow the
cross-talk between factors and most likely regulatory co-factors to
determine the transcriptional activation in a cell-specific manner. The
specificity of the response could be achieved through post-translational modifications, mainly phosphorylation of various tissue-specific or ubiquitous factors. Nuclear translocation, as
exemplified for PDX1 in cells and Mig1 in yeast, offers an additional level of regulation. Alternatively, the concentration of
transcription factors could be directly regulated by glucose. We
predict that progress in deciphering the mechanisms of
glucose-dependent gene regulation will quickly follow those
made in the last several years for insulin control of gene transcription.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This minireview will be reprinted
in the 2000 Minireview Compendium, which
will be available in December, 2000. This is the second article of three in the
"Nutrient Control of Gene Transcription Minireview Series."
To whom correspondence should be addressed: ICGM, INSERM U.129,
24, rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, 75014 Paris, France. Tel.: 33-1-44-41-24-08; Fax: 33-1-44-41-24-21; E-mail: vaulont@cochin. inserm.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 8, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.R000016200
2
B. Doiron, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
L-PK, L-type
pyruvate kinase;
ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase;
S14, spot 14;
AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase;
GlRE, glucose response element;
ChoRE, carbohydrate response element;
COUP-TF, chicken ovalbumin upstream
promoter-transcription factor;
USF, upstream stimulatory factor;
SREBP, sterol response element-binding protein;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase;
PDX1, pancreatic duodenum homeobox 1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Johnston, M.
(1999)
Trends Genet.
15,
29-33
|
| 2.
|
Vaulont, S.,
and Kahn, A.
(1994)
FASEB J.
8,
28-35
|
| 3.
|
Girard, J.,
Ferre, P.,
and Foufelle, F.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
17,
325-352
|
| 4.
|
Towle, H. C.,
Kaytor, E. N.,
and Shih, H. M.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
17,
405-433
|
| 5.
|
Scott, D. K.,
O'Doherty, R. M.,
Stafford, J. M.,
Newgard, C. B.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24145-24151
|
| 6.
|
Olson, A. L.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Nutr.
16,
235-256
|
| 7.
|
Antoine, B.,
Lefrançois-Martinez, A. M.,
Le Guillou, G.,
Leturque, A.,
Vandewalle, A.,
and Kahn, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17937-17943
|
| 8.
|
Guillam, M. T.,
Burcelin, R.,
and Thorens, B.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12317-12321
|
| 9.
|
Burcelin, R.,
del Carmen Munoz, M.,
Guillam, M. T.,
and Thorens, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
10930-10936
|
| 10.
|
Santer, R.,
Schneppenheim, R.,
Dombrowski, A.,
Gotze, H.,
Steinmann, B.,
and Schaub, J.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
17,
324-326
|
| 11.
|
Guillemain, G.,
Loizeau, M.,
Pincon-Raymond, M.,
Girard, J.,
and Leturque, A.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
841-847
|
| 12.
|
Doiron, B.,
Cuif, M. H.,
Chen, R.,
and Kahn, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
5321-5324
|
| 13.
|
Massillon, D.,
Chen, W.,
Barzilai, N.,
Prus-Wertheimer, D.,
Hawkins, M.,
Liu, R.,
Taub, R.,
and Rossetti, L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
228-234
|
| 14.
|
Goya, L.,
de la Puente, A.,
Ramos, S.,
Martin, M. A.,
Escriva, F.,
and Pascual-Leone, A. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
24633-24640
|
| 15.
|
Mourrieras, F.,
Foufelle, F.,
Foretz, M.,
Morin, J.,
Bouche, S.,
and Ferré, P.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
326,
345-349
|
| 16.
|
Sayeski, P. P.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15237-15243
|
| 17.
|
Wang, J.,
Liu, R.,
Hawkins, M.,
Barzilai, N.,
and Rossetti, L.
(1998)
Nature
393,
684-688
|
| 18.
|
Daniel, S.,
Zhang, S.,
DePaoli-Roach, A. A.,
and Kim, K. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14692-14697
|
| 19.
|
Foretz, M.,
Carling, D.,
Guichard, C.,
Ferré, P.,
and Foufelle, F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14767-14771
|
| 20.
|
Datta, U.,
Wexler, I. D.,
Kerr, D. S.,
Raz, I.,
and Patel, M. S.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1447,
236-243
|
| 21.
|
Viollet, B.,
Kahn, A.,
and Raymondjean, M.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4208-4219
|
| 22.
|
Gourdon, L.,
Lou, D. Q.,
Raymondjean, M.,
Vasseur-Cognet, M.,
and Kahn, A.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
459,
9-14
|
| 23.
|
Hardie, D. G.,
Carling, D.,
and Carlson, M.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
821-855
|
| 24.
|
Carlson, M.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
560-564
|
| 25.
|
Salt, I.,
Celler, J. W.,
Hawley, S. A.,
Prescott, A.,
Woods, A.,
Carling, D.,
and Hardie, D. G.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
334,
177-187
|
| 26.
|
da Silva Xavier, G.,
Leclerc, I.,
Salt, I. P.,
Doiron, B.,
Hardie, D. G.,
Kahn, A.,
and Rutter, G. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
4023-4028
|
| 27.
|
Salt, I. P.,
Johnson, G.,
Ashcroft, S. J. H.,
and Hardie, D. G.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
335,
533-539
|
| 28.
|
Leclerc, I.,
Kahn, A.,
and Doiron, B.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
431,
180-184
|
| 29.
|
Bergot, M. O.,
Diaz-Guerra, M. J.,
Puzenat, N.,
Raymondjean, M.,
and Kahn, A.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1871-1877
|
| 30.
|
Cuif, M. H.,
Porteu, A.,
Kahn, A.,
and Vaulont, S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
13769-13772
|
| 31.
|
Diaz-Guerra, M. J.,
Bergot, M. O.,
Martinez, A.,
Cuif, M. H.,
Kahn, A.,
and Raymondjean, M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
7725-7733
|
| 32.
|
Lefrancois-Martinez, A. M.,
Martinez, A.,
Antoine, B.,
Raymondjean, M.,
and Kahn, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2640-2643
|
| 33.
|
Shih, H. M.,
and Towle, H. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
13222-13228
|
| 34.
|
Shih, H.-M.,
Liu, Z.,
and Towle, H. C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21991-21997
|
| 35.
|
Portois, L.,
Maget, B.,
Tastenoy, M.,
Perret, J.,
and Svoboda, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8181-8190
|
| 36.
|
Viollet, B.,
Lefrancois-Martinez, A. M.,
Henrion, A.,
Kahn, A.,
Raymondjean, M.,
and Martinez, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1405-1415
|
| 37.
|
Vallet, V. S.,
Henrion, A. A.,
Bucchini, D.,
Casado, M.,
Raymondjean, M.,
Kahn, A.,
and Vaulont, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21944-21949
|
| 38.
|
Vallet, V. S.,
Casado, M.,
Henrion, A. A.,
Bucchini, D.,
Raymondjean, M.,
Kahn, A.,
and Vaulont, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
20175-20179
|
| 39.
|
Casado, M.,
Vallet, V.,
Kahn, A.,
and Vaulont, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2009-2013
|
| 40.
|
Kaytor, E. N.,
Shih, H.,
and Towle, H. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7525-7531
|
| 41.
|
Lou, D. Q.,
Tannour, M.,
Selig, L.,
Thomas, D.,
Kahn, A.,
and Vasseur-Cognet, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28385-28394
|
| 42.
|
Hasegawa, J. I.,
Osatomi, K.,
Wu, R. F.,
and Uyeda, K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1100-1107
|
| 43.
|
Yamada, K.,
Tanaka, T.,
and Noguchi, T.
(1999)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
257,
44-49
|
| 44.
|
Koo, S. H.,
and Towle, H. C.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
5200-5207
|
| 45.
|
Tontonoz, P.,
Kim, J. B.,
Graves, R. A.,
and Spiegelman, B. M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4753-4759
|
| 46.
|
Yokoyama, C.,
Wang, X.,
Briggs, M. R.,
Admon, A.,
Wu, J.,
Hua, X.,
Goldstein, J. L.,
and Brown, M. S.
(1993)
Cell
75,
187-197
|
| 47.
|
Foretz, M.,
Pacot, C.,
Dugail, I.,
Lemarchand, P.,
Guichard, C.,
Le Liepvre, X.,
Berthelier-Lubrano, C.,
Spiegelman, B.,
Kim, J. B.,
Ferre, P.,
and Foufelle, F.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3760-3768
|
| 48.
|
Mater, M. K.,
Thelen, A. P.,
Pan, D. A.,
and Jump, D. B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
32725-32732
|
| 49.
|
Moriizumi, S.,
Gourdon, L.,
Lefrancois-Martinez, A. M.,
Kahn, A.,
and Raymondjean, M.
(1998)
Gene Expr.
7,
103-113
|
| 50.
|
Shimano, H.,
Yahagi, N.,
Amemiya-Kudo, M.,
Hasty, A. H.,
Osuga, J.,
Tamura, Y.,
Shionoiri, F.,
Iizuka, Y.,
Ohashi, K.,
Harada, K.,
Gotoda, T.,
Ishibashi, S.,
and Yamada, N.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35832-35839
|
| 51.
|
Foretz, M.,
Guichard, C.,
Ferre, P.,
and Foufelle, F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
12737-12742
|
| 52.
|
Daniel, S.,
and Kim, K. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1385-1392
|
| 53.
|
Schafer, D.,
Hamm-Kunzelmann, B.,
and Brand, K.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
417,
325-328
|
| 54.
|
Chen, Y. Q.,
Su, M.,
Walia, R. R.,
Hao, Q.,
Covington, J. W.,
and Vaughan, D. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8225-8231
|
| 55.
|
Fukuda, H.,
Noguchi, T.,
and Iritani, N.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
464,
113-117
|
| 56.
|
Fukuda, H.,
and Iritani, N.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
455,
165-169
|
| 57.
|
Moon, Y. A.,
Kim, K. S.,
Cho, U. H.,
Yoon, D. J.,
and Park, S. W.
(1999)
Exp. Mol. Med.
31,
108-114
|
| 58.
|
Han, I.,
and Kudlow, J. E.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
2550-2558
|
| 59.
|
Guz, Y.,
Montminy, M. R.,
Stein, R.,
Leonard, J.,
Gamer, L. W.,
Wright, C. V.,
and Teitelman, G.
(1995)
Development
121,
11-18
|
| 60.
|
Jonsson, J.,
Carlsson, L.,
Edlund, T.,
and Edlund, H.
(1994)
Nature
371,
606-609
|
| 61.
|
Rafiq, I.,
Kennedy, H. J.,
and Rutter, G. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23241-23247
|
| 62.
|
Macfarlane, W. M.,
McKinnon, C. M.,
Felton-Edkins, Z. A.,
Cragg, H.,
James, R. F. L.,
and Docherty, K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1011-1016
|
| 63.
|
Rafiq, I.,
da Silva Xavier, G.,
Hooper, S.,
and Rutter, G. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
15977-15984
|
| 64.
|
Wu, H.,
MacFarlane, W. M.,
Tadayyon, M.,
Arch, J. R.,
James, R. F.,
and Docherty, K.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
344,
813-818
|
| 65.
|
Leibiger, I. B.,
Leibiger, B.,
Moede, T.,
and Berggren, P. O.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
933-938
|
| 66.
|
MacFarlane, W. M.,
Chapman, J. C.,
Shepherd, R. M.,
Hashmi, M. N.,
Kamimura, N.,
Cosgrove, K. E.,
O'Brien, R. E.,
Barnes, P. D.,
Hart, A. W.,
Docherty, H. M.,
Lindley, K. J.,
Aynsley-Green, A.,
James, R. F.,
Docherty, K.,
and Dunne, M. J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34059-34066
|
| 67.
|
Seijffers, R.,
Ben-David, O.,
Cohen, Y.,
Karasik, A.,
Berezin, M.,
Newgard, C. B.,
and Ferber, S.
(1999)
Endocrinology
140,
3311-3317
|
| 68.
|
Stoffers, D. A.,
Ferrer, J.,
Clarke, W. L.,
and Habener, J. F.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
17,
138-139
|
| 69.
|
Stoffers, D. A.,
Stanojevic, V.,
and Habener, J. F.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
102,
232-241
|
| 70.
|
Hani, E. H.,
Stoffers, D. A.,
Chevre, J. C.,
Durand, E.,
Stanojevic, V.,
Dina, C.,
Habener, J. F.,
and Froguel, P.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
41-48
|
| 71.
|
Macfarlane, W. M.,
Frayling, T. M.,
Ellard, S.,
Evans, J. C.,
Allen, L. I.,
Bulman, M. P.,
Ayres, S.,
Shepherd, M.,
Clark, P.,
Millward, A.,
Demaine, A.,
Wilkin, T.,
Docherty, K.,
and Hattersley, A. T.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
104,
33-39
|
| 72.
|
Ferber, S.,
Halkin, A.,
Cohen, H.,
Ber, I.,
Einav, Y.,
Goldberg, I.,
Barshack, I.,
Seijffers, R.,
Kopolovic, J.,
Kaiser, N.,
and Karasik, A.
(2000)
Nat. Med
6,
568-572
|
| 73.
|
Kahn, A.
(2000)
Nat. Med.
6,
505-506
|
| 74.
|
Marie, S.,
Diaz-Guerra, M. J.,
Miquerol, L.,
Kahn, A.,
and Iynedjian, P. B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23881-23890
|
| 75.
|
Josefsen, K.,
Sorensen, L. R.,
Buschard, K.,
and Birkenbach, M.
(1999)
Diabetologia
42,
195-203
|
| 76.
|
Ayala, J. E.,
Streeper, R. S.,
Desgrosellier, J. S.,
Durham, S. K.,
Suwanichkul, A.,
Svitek, C. A.,
Goldman, J. K.,
Barr, F. G.,
Powell, D. R.,
and O'Brien, R. M.
(1999)
Diabetes
48,
1885-1889
|
| 77.
|
Guo, S.,
Rena, G.,
Cichy, S.,
He, X.,
Cohen, P.,
and Unterman, T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17184-17192
|
| 78.
|
Tang, E. D.,
Nunez, G.,
Barr, F. G.,
and Guan, K. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16741-16746
|
| 79.
|
Shepherd, P. R.,
Withers, D. J.,
and Siddle, K.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
333,
471-490
|
| 80.
|
Fleischmann, M.,
and Iynedjian, P. B.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
349,
13-17
|
| 81.
|
Osborne, T. F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32379-32382
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Han, J. Wang, L. Li, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, and Z. Pan
The role of insulin and glucose in goose primary hepatocyte triglyceride accumulation
J. Exp. Biol.,
May 15, 2009;
212(10):
1553 - 1558.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-T. Pang, W.-C. Hsieh, C.-K. Chuang, C.-H. Chao, W.-H. Weng, and H.-H. Juang
Thioredoxin-interacting protein: an oxidative stress-related gene is upregulated by glucose in human prostate carcinoma cells
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
March 1, 2009;
42(3):
205 - 214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hartley, J. Brumell, and A. Volchuk
Emerging roles for the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy in pancreatic {beta}-cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
January 1, 2009;
296(1):
E1 - E10.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Perilhou, C. Tourrel-Cuzin, I. Kharroubi, C. Henique, V. Fauveau, T. Kitamura, C. Magnan, C. Postic, C. Prip-Buus, and M. Vasseur-Cognet
The Transcription Factor COUP-TFII Is Negatively Regulated by Insulin and Glucose via Foxo1- and ChREBP-Controlled Pathways
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 1, 2008;
28(21):
6568 - 6579.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. G. Tsatsos, L. B. Augustin, G. W. Anderson, H. C. Towle, and C. N. Mariash
Hepatic Expression of the SPOT 14 (S14) Paralog S14-Related (Mid1 Interacting Protein) Is Regulated by Dietary Carbohydrate
Endocrinology,
October 1, 2008;
149(10):
5155 - 5161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Davies, B. L. O'Callaghan, and H. C. Towle
Glucose Activates ChREBP by Increasing Its Rate of Nuclear Entry and Relieving Repression of Its Transcriptional Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2008;
283(35):
24029 - 24038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Santt, T. Pfirrmann, B. Braun, J. Juretschke, P. Kimmig, H. Scheel, K. Hofmann, M. Thumm, and D. H. Wolf
The Yeast GID Complex, a Novel Ubiquitin Ligase (E3) Involved in the Regulation of Carbohydrate Metabolism
Mol. Biol. Cell,
August 1, 2008;
19(8):
3323 - 3333.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Jansen, M. Pantaleon, and P. L Kaye
Characterization and Regulation of Monocarboxylate Cotransporters Slc16a7 and Slc16a3 in Preimplantation Mouse Embryos
Biol Reprod,
July 1, 2008;
79(1):
84 - 92.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. D. Humphrey and S. G. Rudrappa
Increased Glucose Availability Activates Chicken Thymocyte Metabolism and Survival
J. Nutr.,
June 1, 2008;
138(6):
1153 - 1157.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Jason Collier, P. Zhang, K. B. Pedersen, S. J. Burke, J. W. Haycock, and D. K. Scott
c-Myc and ChREBP regulate glucose-mediated expression of the L-type pyruvate kinase gene in INS-1-derived 832/13 cells
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
July 1, 2007;
293(1):
E48 - E56.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Guillemain, G. Filhoulaud, G. Da Silva-Xavier, G. A. Rutter, and R. Scharfmann
Glucose Is Necessary for Embryonic Pancreatic Endocrine Cell Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 18, 2007;
282(20):
15228 - 15237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M J Moreno-Aliaga, M M Swarbrick, S Lorente-Cebrian, K L Stanhope, P J Havel, and J A Martinez
Sp1-mediated transcription is involved in the induction of leptin by insulin-stimulated glucose metabolism
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
May 1, 2007;
38(5):
537 - 546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Ma, Y. Y. Sham, K. J. Walters, and H. C. Towle
A critical role for the loop region of the basic helix-loop-helix/leucine zipper protein Mlx in DNA binding and glucose-regulated transcription
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 12, 2007;
35(1):
35 - 44.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Choi, M. Lee, A. L. Shiu, S. J. Yo, and G. W. Aponte
Identification of a protein hydrolysate responsive G protein-coupled receptor in enterocytes
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
January 1, 2007;
292(1):
G98 - G112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Iizuka, B. Miller, and K. Uyeda
Deficiency of carbohydrate-activated transcription factor ChREBP prevents obesity and improves plasma glucose control in leptin-deficient (ob/ob) mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
August 1, 2006;
291(2):
E358 - E364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Xu, B. Christian, and D. B. Jump
Regulation of Rat Hepatic L-Pyruvate Kinase Promoter Composition and Activity by Glucose, n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids, and Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-{alpha} Agonist
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 7, 2006;
281(27):
18351 - 18362.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Dentin, P.-D. Denechaud, F. Benhamed, J. Girard, and C. Postic
Hepatic Gene Regulation by Glucose and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids: A Role for ChREBP
J. Nutr.,
May 1, 2006;
136(5):
1145 - 1149.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Desvergne, L. Michalik, and W. Wahli
Transcriptional Regulation of Metabolism
Physiol Rev,
April 1, 2006;
86(2):
465 - 514.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Guigas, L. Bertrand, N. Taleux, M. Foretz, N. Wiernsperger, D. Vertommen, F. Andreelli, B. Viollet, and L. Hue
5-Aminoimidazole-4-Carboxamide-1-{beta}-D-Ribofuranoside and Metformin Inhibit Hepatic Glucose Phosphorylation by an AMP-Activated Protein Kinase-Independent Effect on Glucokinase Translocation.
Diabetes,
April 1, 2006;
55(4):
865 - 874.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M. Gronning, R. Tingsabadh, K. Hardy, K. T. Dalen, P. S. Jat, L. Gnudi, and P. R. Shepherd
Glucose induces increases in levels of the transcriptional repressor Id2 via the hexosamine pathway
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
April 1, 2006;
290(4):
E599 - E606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-Y. Hwang and F. Ismail-Beigi
Control of Glut1 promoter activity under basal conditions and in response to hyperosmolarity: role of Sp1
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
February 1, 2006;
290(2):
C337 - C344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Nayak, P. Xie, S. Akagi, Q. Yang, L. Sun, J. Wada, A. Thakur, F. R. Danesh, S. S. Chugh, and Y. S. Kanwar
Modulation of renal-specific oxidoreductase/myo-inositol oxygenase by high-glucose ambience
PNAS,
December 13, 2005;
102(50):
17952 - 17957.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Allagnat, D. Martin, D. F. Condorelli, G. Waeber, and J.-A. Haefliger
Glucose represses connexin36 in insulin-secreting cells
J. Cell Sci.,
November 15, 2005;
118(22):
5335 - 5344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Iguchi, Y. Ikeda, M. Okamura, T. Tanaka, Y. Urashima, H. Ohguchi, S. Takayasu, N. Kojima, S. Iwasaki, R. Ohashi, et al.
SOX6 Attenuates Glucose-stimulated Insulin Secretion by Repressing PDX1 Transcriptional Actvity and Is Down-regulated in Hyperinsulinemic Obese Mice
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 11, 2005;
280(45):
37669 - 37680.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhu, M. Casado, S. Vaulont, and K. Sharma
Role of Upstream Stimulatory Factors in Regulation of Renal Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1
Diabetes,
July 1, 2005;
54(7):
1976 - 1984.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Carriere, M. Le Gall, F. Gouyon-Saumande, D. Schmoll, E. Brot-Laroche, V. Chauffeton, J. Chambaz, and M. Rousset
Intestinal Glucose-dependent Expression of Glucose-6-phosphatase: INVOLVEMENT OF THE ARYL RECEPTOR NUCLEAR TRANSLOCATOR TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 20, 2005;
280(20):
20094 - 20101.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Minn, C. Hafele, and A. Shalev
Thioredoxin-Interacting Protein Is Stimulated by Glucose through a Carbohydrate Response Element and Induces {beta}-Cell Apoptosis
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2005;
146(5):
2397 - 2405.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Ma, N. G. Tsatsos, and H. C. Towle
Direct Role of ChREBP{middle dot}Mlx in Regulating Hepatic Glucose-responsive Genes
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 25, 2005;
280(12):
12019 - 12027.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sakowicz, A. Szutowicz, and T. Pawelczyk
Differential effect of insulin and elevated glucose level on adenosine transport in rat B lymphocytes
Int. Immunol.,
February 1, 2005;
17(2):
145 - 154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ishii, K. IIzuka, B. C. Miller, and K. Uyeda
Carbohydrate response element binding protein directly promotes lipogenic enzyme gene transcription
PNAS,
November 2, 2004;
101(44):
15597 - 15602.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. E. Thomas and T. J. Thekkumkara
Glucose Mediates Transcriptional Repression of the Human Angiotensin Type-1 Receptor Gene: Role for a Novel Cis-acting Element
Mol. Biol. Cell,
October 1, 2004;
15(10):
4347 - 4355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Mosley, J. A. Corbett, and S. Ozcan
Glucose Regulation of Insulin Gene Expression Requires the Recruitment of p300 by the {beta}-Cell-Specific Transcription Factor Pdx-1
Mol. Endocrinol.,
September 1, 2004;
18(9):
2279 - 2290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Kuhn, G. Thaller, A. Winter, O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds, B. Kaupe, G. Erhardt, J. Bennewitz, M. Schwerin, and R. Fries
Evidence for Multiple Alleles at the DGAT1 Locus Better Explains a Quantitative Trait Locus With Major Effect on Milk Fat Content in Cattle
Genetics,
August 1, 2004;
167(4):
1873 - 1881.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Merla, C. Howald, S. E. Antonarakis, and A. Reymond
The subcellular localization of the ChoRE-binding protein, encoded by the Williams-Beuren syndrome critical region gene 14, is regulated by 14-3-3
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
July 15, 2004;
13(14):
1505 - 1514.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Iizuka, R. K. Bruick, G. Liang, J. D. Horton, and K. Uyeda
From The Cover: Deficiency of carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) reduces lipogenesis as well as glycolysis
PNAS,
May 11, 2004;
101(19):
7281 - 7286.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Collier and D. K. Scott
Sweet Changes: Glucose Homeostasis Can Be Altered by Manipulating Genes Controlling Hepatic Glucose Metabolism
Mol. Endocrinol.,
May 1, 2004;
18(5):
1051 - 1063.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Weigert, K. Brodbeck, M. Sawadogo, H. U. Haring, and E. D. Schleicher
Upstream Stimulatory Factor (USF) Proteins Induce Human TGF-{beta}1 Gene Activation via the Glucose-response Element-1013/-1002 in Mesangial Cells: UP-REGULATION OF USF ACTIVITY BY THE HEXOSAMINE BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAY
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 16, 2004;
279(16):
15908 - 15915.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Stoeckman, L. Ma, and H. C. Towle
Mlx Is the Functional Heteromeric Partner of the Carbohydrate Response Element-binding Protein in Glucose Regulation of Lipogenic Enzyme Genes
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 9, 2004;
279(15):
15662 - 15669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Duran-Sandoval, G. Mautino, G. Martin, F. Percevault, O. Barbier, J.-C. Fruchart, F. Kuipers, and B. Staels
Glucose Regulates the Expression of the Farnesoid X Receptor in Liver
Diabetes,
April 1, 2004;
53(4):
890 - 898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Sauvaget, V. Chauffeton, S. Dugue-Pujol, A.-D. Kalopissis, I. Guillet-Deniau, F. Foufelle, J. Chambaz, A. Leturque, P. Cardot, and A. Ribeiro
In Vitro Transcriptional Induction of the Human Apolipoprotein A-II Gene by Glucose
Diabetes,
March 1, 2004;
53(3):
672 - 678.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Green, J. M. Rumberger, C. A. Stuart, and M. S. Ruhoff
Stimulation of Lipolysis by Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} in 3T3-L1 Adipocytes Is Glucose Dependent: Implications for Long-Term Regulation of Lipolysis
Diabetes,
January 1, 2004;
53(1):
74 - 81.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Okitsu, N. Kobayashi, H.-S. Jun, S. Shin, S.-J. Kim, J. Han, H. Kwon, M. Sakaguchi, T. Totsugawa, M. Kohara, et al.
Transplantation of Reversibly Immortalized Insulin-Secreting Human Hepatocytes Controls Diabetes in Pancreatectomized Pigs
Diabetes,
January 1, 2004;
53(1):
105 - 112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Massillon, I. J. Arinze, C. Xu, and F. Bone
Regulation of Glucose-6-phosphatase Gene Expression in Cultured Hepatocytes and H4IIE Cells by Short-chain Fatty Acids: ROLE OF HEPATIC NUCLEAR FACTOR-4{alpha}
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2003;
278(42):
40694 - 40701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Yim, S. M. Choi, Y. Choi, N. Lee, J. Chung, and H. Park
Insulin and Hypoxia Share Common Target Genes but Not the Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1{alpha}
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 3, 2003;
278(40):
38260 - 38268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Averous, A. Bruhat, S. Mordier, and P. Fafournoux
Recent Advances in the Understanding of Amino Acid Regulation of Gene Expression
J. Nutr.,
June 1, 2003;
133(6):
2040S - 2045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Moore, E. A. Park, and J. B. McMillin
Upstream Stimulatory Factor Represses the Induction of Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase-Ibeta Expression by PGC-1
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 2003;
278(19):
17263 - 17268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kabashima, T. Kawaguchi, B. E. Wadzinski, and K. Uyeda
Xylulose 5-phosphate mediates glucose-induced lipogenesis by xylulose 5-phosphate-activated protein phosphatase in rat liver
PNAS,
April 29, 2003;
100(9):
5107 - 5112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Moore, L. Zhou, F. Rolland, Q. Hall, W.-H. Cheng, Y.-X. Liu, I. Hwang, T. Jones, and J. Sheen
Role of the Arabidopsis Glucose Sensor HXK1 in Nutrient, Light, and Hormonal Signaling
Science,
April 11, 2003;
300(5617):
332 - 336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Taegtmeyer
Improving Energy Metabolism in the Postischemic Heart-The Story of GIK
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia,
March 1, 2003;
7(1):
67 - 76.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Collier, T.-T. T. Doan, M. C. Daniels, J. R. Schurr, J. K. Kolls, and D. K. Scott
c-Myc Is Required for the Glucose-mediated Induction of Metabolic Enzyme Genes
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 14, 2003;
278(8):
6588 - 6595.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Pagliassotti, Y. Wei, and M. E. Bizeau
Glucose-6-Phosphatase Activity Is Not Suppressed but the mRNA Level Is Increased by a Sucrose-Enriched Meal in Rats
J. Nutr.,
January 1, 2003;
133(1):
32 - 37.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ozcan
Two Different Signals Regulate Repression and Induction of Gene Expression by Glucose
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 27, 2002;
277(49):
46993 - 46997.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bidder, J.-S. Shao, N. Charlton-Kachigian, A. P. Loewy, C. F. Semenkovich, and D. A. Towler
Osteopontin Transcription in Aortic Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Is Controlled by Glucose-regulated Upstream Stimulatory Factor and Activator Protein-1 Activities
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 8, 2002;
277(46):
44485 - 44496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Medvedev, J. Robidoux, X. Bai, W. Cao, L. M. Floering, K. W. Daniel, and S. Collins
Regulation of the Uncoupling Protein-2 Gene in INS-1 beta -Cells by Oleic Acid
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 1, 2002;
277(45):
42639 - 42644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Stoeckman and H. C. Towle
The Role of SREBP-1c in Nutritional Regulation of Lipogenic Enzyme Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 19, 2002;
277(30):
27029 - 27035.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-C. Gevrey, M. Cordier-Bussat, E. Nemoz-Gaillard, J.-A. Chayvialle, and J. Abello
Co-requirement of Cyclic AMP- and Calcium-dependent Protein Kinases for Transcriptional Activation of Cholecystokinin Gene by Protein Hydrolysates
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 14, 2002;
277(25):
22407 - 22413.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Young, P. McNulty, and H. Taegtmeyer
Adaptation and Maladaptation of the Heart in Diabetes: Part II: Potential Mechanisms
Circulation,
April 16, 2002;
105(15):
1861 - 1870.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. B. Jump
The Biochemistry of n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 8, 2002;
277(11):
8755 - 8758.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Smih, P. Rouet, S. Lucas, A. Mairal, C. Sengenes, M. Lafontan, S. Vaulont, M. Casado, and D. Langin
Transcriptional Regulation of Adipocyte Hormone-Sensitive Lipase by Glucose
Diabetes,
February 1, 2002;
51(2):
293 - 300.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kawaguchi, K. Osatomi, H. Yamashita, T. Kabashima, and K. Uyeda
Mechanism for Fatty Acid "Sparing" Effect on Glucose-induced Transcription. REGULATION OF CARBOHYDRATE-RESPONSIVE ELEMENT-BINDING PROTEIN BY AMP-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 1, 2002;
277(6):
3829 - 3835.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Towle
Glucose and cAMP: Adversaries in the regulation of hepatic gene expression
PNAS,
November 20, 2001;
98(24):
13476 - 13478.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Mathupala, A. Rempel, and P. L. Pedersen
Glucose Catabolism in Cancer Cells. IDENTIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A MARKED ACTIVATION RESPONSE OF THE TYPE II HEXOKINASE GENE TO HYPOXIC CONDITIONS
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 9, 2001;
276(46):
43407 - 43412.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Hornbuckle, D. S. Edgerton, J. E. Ayala, C. A. Svitek, J. K. Oeser, D. W. Neal, S. Cardin, A. D. Cherrington, and R. M. O'Brien
Selective tonic inhibition of G-6-Pase catalytic subunit, but not G-6-P transporter, gene expression by insulin in vivo
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
October 1, 2001;
281(4):
E713 - E725.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Rodriguez-Melendez, S. Cano, S. T. Mendez, and A. Velazquez
Biotin Regulates the Genetic Expression of Holocarboxylase Synthetase and Mitochondrial Carboxylases in Rats
J. Nutr.,
July 1, 2001;
131(7):
1909 - 1913.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. V. Medvedev, S. K. Snedden, S. Raimbault, D. Ricquier, and S. Collins
Transcriptional Regulation of the Mouse Uncoupling Protein-2 Gene. DOUBLE E-BOX MOTIF IS REQUIRED FOR PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR-ACTIVATED RECEPTOR-gamma -DEPENDENT ACTIVATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2001;
276(14):
10817 - 10823.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. O'Callaghan, S.-H. Koo, Y. Wu, H. C. Freake, and H. C. Towle
Glucose Regulation of the Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase Promoter PI in Rat Hepatocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 4, 2001;
276(19):
16033 - 16039.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|