Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C000553200 on August 23, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 41, 31563-31566, October 13, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/41/31563    most recent
C000553200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babenko, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babenko, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Hetero-concatemeric KIR6.X4/SUR14 Channels Display Distinct Conductivities but Uniform ATP Inhibition*

Andrey P. BabenkoDagger, Gabriela C. Gonzalez, and Joseph Bryan

From the Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030

Received for publication, August 15, 2000


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

KIR6.1 and KIR6.2 are the pore-forming subunits of KNDP, the nucleotide-diphosphate-activated KATP channels, and classical KATP channels, respectively. "Hybrid" channels, in which the structure is predetermined by concatemerizing KIR6.1 and KIR6.2, exhibit distinct conductivities specified by subunit number and position. Inclusion of one KIR6.2 is sufficient to open KIR6.X-X-X-X/SUR14 in the absence of nucleotide stimulation through sulfonylurea receptor-1 (SUR1). ATP inhibited the spontaneous bursting of hybrid channels with an IC50(ATP) ~10-5 M, similar to that of KIR6.24-containing channels. These findings and a transient increase in KNDP channel activity following rapid wash-out of MgATP suggested that KIR6.1 is not ATP-insensitive as previously believed. We propose that SUR-dependent, inhibitory ATP-enhanced interactions of the cytoplasmic domains of both KIR6.1 and KIR6.2 stabilize a closed form of the M2 bundle in the gating apparatus.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Combinations of KIR6.1 or KIR6.2 with SUR1,1 SUR2A, or SUR2B determine the classic subtypes of (KIR6.X/SUR)4 channels (1). The association of the KIR tetramer with four SURs masks endoplasmic reticulum retention signals on both subunits, permitting surface expression of tetradimeric KATP channels (2).

Current evidence indicates the extracellular loops of KIR6.X specify an ~2-fold difference in the unitary conductance, g, of KIR6.1 versus KIR6.2-based channels, whereas the KIR cytoplasmic domains determine the nucleotide and Mg2+ requirements for channel opening (3-5). KIR6.1-based channels are closed in the absence of nucleotides, but are strongly activated by Mg2+-nucleotide-diphosphates (maximally by ~10 mM MgUDP) and have been termed KNDP channels (6). The substantial activity of KNDP channels in millimolar MgATP suggested that KIR6.1, in contrast to KIR6.2, does not interact with inhibitory ATP (7, 8), although the analysis of inhibition of these channels by ATP is complicated by a requirement for stimulatory Mg2+-nucleotides. Unlike KNDP, KIR6.2-based channels burst continuously in nucleotide-free solutions, and homomeric KIR6.2 channels (9), lacking the RKR retention sequence, reach the surface in the absence of SUR exhibiting an open channel probability (Po) < 0.1 (10) that is inhibited by low affinity Mg2+-independent ATP binding to an unidentified site(s) (9). SUR increases the Po of KIR6.2 channels in the absence of nucleotides and decreases the apparent KD for inhibitory ATP through separable interactions with the KIR (10, 11). The activity of homomeric KIR6.1 channels has not been demonstrated, and SUR is apparently required to stimulate channel activity.

The possible functional significance and even existence of hybrid (KIR6.1/KIR6.2)/SUR complexes is controversial. Although over-expression of KIR6.1 in Xenopus oocytes reduced surface expression of KIR6.2 lacking the RKR motif (2) indicating co-assembly, expression of a dominant negative KIR6.1 construct with KIR6.2 and SURs in A549 cells or in ventricular cardiomyocytes failed to provide evidence for heteromultimerization (12).

To determine the properties of hybrid channels, we generated KIR6.X-X-X-X concatemers that assemble functional channels with SUR1. Analysis of these channels shows their conductivity is specified both by the ratio of KIR6.1 to KIR6.2 and by the subunit order. Unexpectedly, inclusion of one KIR6.2 subunit was sufficient to produce spontaneous bursting in the absence of ATP, and all of the possible hybrid channels exhibited a uniform sensitivity to inhibitory ATP that was indistinguishable from KIR6.2-2-2-2-based channels.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Molecular Biology-- Using oligonucleotide primers and standard PCR methods, we engineered two parental plasmids encoding human KIR6.1 and human KIR6.2 (in pECE) (13). A BglII site followed by an SGGGA linker was inserted before the ATG start codon, and a BamHI site followed by a GGGS linker was inserted at the 3'-end. The 5'-KIR6.2 primer was 5'-GAGAAGATCTGGTGGAGGTGCCATGCTGTCCCGCAAGGGCATC-3'. The 3'-KIR6.2 primer was 5'-TCTCGGATCCTCCACCGGACAGGGAATCTGGAGAGA-3'. The 5'-KIR6.1 primer was 5'-GAGAAGATCTGGAGGCGGTGCCATGTTGGCCAGAAAGAGTAT-3'. The 3'-KIR6.1 primer was 5'-TCTGGATCCTCCACCTGATTCCGATGTGTTTTGAT-3'. These parental cDNAs were used to construct a series of plasmids expressing concatenated KIR6.X subunits. For example, a KIR6.2-KIR6.1 dimer was constructed by opening the KIR6.2 parental plasmid with BamHI, treating the restricted DNA with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and then subcloning in the BglII-BamHI fragment encoding KIR6.1. The BglII (AGATCT) and BamHI (GGATCC) sites are compatible, producing two orientations; the correct orientation eliminates the restriction site and was established by restriction digests and/or by sequencing. Using these parental plasmids, it was possible to concatenate any combination of KIR6.X subunits. In all cases, the resulting concatemeric protein begins with the correct methionine, has an eight-amino acid linker, GGGSGGGA, between each subunit and has additional four amino acids, GGGS, at the C terminus. Monomeric or concatenated KIR were transfected with human SUR1 (13) and a green fluorescent protein marker into COSm6 cells.

Electrophysiology-- Cell culture, patch clamp recording, single-channel kinetics, and steady-state ATP inhibition analysis were done as described previously (14). The pipette solution contained (in mM): KCl, 145; MgCl2, 1; CaCl2, 1; HEPES, 10; pH 7.4 (KOH). The "intracellular" bath solution contained: KCl, 140; MgCl2, 1; EGTA, 5; HEPES, 5; KOH, 10, pH 7.2. The [Mg2+]i was kept at a quasi-cytosolic level of ~0.7 mM by adding MgCl2 to account for the Mg2+ binding to nucleotides. The Mg2+-free internal solution contained (in mM): KCl, 140; EDTA, 5; HEPES, 5; KOH, 10, pH 7.2. Intracellular nucleotides and possible open channel blockers such as Na+ did not significantly affect the amplitude of the inwardly directed unitary KIR current, i. A moderate density of reconstituted channels allowed measurement of i in the cell-attached configuration and determination of the mean NPo, which was normalized to the maximal NPo in the in-out configuration to provide an accurate measure of the relative activity of channels in the cell. The i value was determined from the difference between peaks of a multi-Gaussian fit to the all-points single-channel current amplitude histogram. In those cases in which channels spend either a very low or very high fraction of their time in long-lived intervals, intervals were added to obtain all-points i-histograms with comparable areas under the two peaks. The lack of subconductance state(s) resolvable at 2-5 kHz and 500 mV*pA-1 simplified the determination of i. The conductance, g, for each construct was determined by linear regression analysis of averaged I -Vm data points between -80 and -20 mV using the standard deviation as the statistical weight. The precision of the g values is ~0.1 picosiemens and is not limited by the digital resolution of i or the accuracy of the voltage Vm clamp (the junction potential was <1 mV). To correct g values for the effects of possible slow solution and/or temperature changes we normalized g for each construct to the g value of KIR6.2-2-2-2/SUR4 channels tested in parallel. Differences in averaged values (mean ± S.D.) with p < 0.05 (unpaired Student's t test) were considered significant. In Fig. 7, the horizontal dotted lines show the zero-KATP channel current level; downward deflections correspond to the inward current direction, isolation of inside-out patches is marked by i-o at the vertical arrows, and error bars show ±S.D.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Co-expression of the parental KIR6.1GGGS and KIR6.2GGGS constructs with SUR1 produced channels that were indistinguishable from native, and recombinant KNDP and KATP channels in terms of their nucleotide responsiveness and an ~2-fold difference in their g values (Fig. 1A). KNDP channels were active in cell-attached patches, and the transition to a nucleotide-free intracellular solution in the inside-out configuration resulted in a transient increase in their activity before they closed. These KNDP channels remained in an operational state and could be activated by MgUDP, known to be an effective stimulator but a poor inhibitor of KIR6.2/SUR1 channels (15), which does not reactivate run-down channels like MgATP (16)). The rapid wash-out of ATP applied in the presence of Mg2+ resulted in a transient increase in KNDP channel activity similar to that observed upon transition to the inside-out configuration. By contrast, the spontaneous steady-state activity of KIR6.2/SUR1 channels in an inside-out patch was dramatically reduced by sub-millimolar MgATP and inhibited by ATP in Mg2+-free internal solution with an IC50(ATP) of 6.1 ± 0.4 µM (n = 5, not shown). This value was indistinguishable from that of wild type beta -cell KATP channels determined under similar conditions (10, 11), verifying that there is no effect of the GGGS tail on ATP-inhibitory gating.


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Properties of "classical" versus hybrid-6.X4/SUR14channels. A, a, responses of KIR6.1GGGS/SUR1 (upper trace) and KIR6.2GGGS/SUR1 (lower trace) channels to rapid changes in nucleotides at the inner face of a membrane patch held at -40 mV. The break in the upper trace is ~1 min. b, comparison of g of KIR6.1 (upper trace and I-Vm relationship)-containing versus KIR6.2 (lower trace and I-Vm relationship)-containing channels in the solutions used in a. The best fit to a linear function (dashed line) gives a g value of 34.2 and 68.1 picosiemens for KIR6.1- and KIR6.2-based channels, respectively. The 95% confidence limits are given by the dotted lines (n = 4 for each channel). B, a, KIR6.2-2-2-2/SUR1 (top) and KIR6.1-1-1-2/SUR1 (bottom) channel currents recorded at -60 mV under the conditions used in A except for the Mg2+-free internal solution with ATP. b, ATP dose responses with fitted pseudo-Hill inhibitory curves (IC50(ATP) = 17.9 µM and h = 1.25 for the dotted line versus IC50(ATP) = 14.4 µM and h = 1.49 for the solid line) and the i histograms for the KIR6.2-2-2-2/SUR1 and KIR6.1-1-1-2/SUR1 channels observed in a. Here and in C, KIR6.1, KIR6.2, and SUR1 are shown as white, black, and gray circles, respectively. C, summary of the relative g and IC50(ATP) determinations for different hybrid channels. The relative g values are different (p < 0.05), whereas the IC50(ATP) values are not (even at p = 0.1). The h values for the best-fit ATP-inhibitory curves varied between 1.23 and 1.49; n = 3-5. The IC50(ATP) for KIR6.2-2-2-2/SUR1 channels was 14.2 ± 2.4 µM (h = 1.3; n = 19).

On the basis of the different characteristics of the parental channels, we expected hybrid channels to have intermediate properties, and we determined g, ability to burst spontaneously, and ATP sensitivity of KIR6.X-X-X-X concatemers co-expressed with SUR1. Co-expression of KIR6.2-2-2-2 with SUR1, but not the concatemer alone, generated spontaneously active channels, which were inhibited by ATP with an IC50(ATP) ~10-5 M (Fig. 1B), verifying that linking the pore forming subunits did not compromise inhibitory nucleotide binding. Co-expression of KIR6.1-1-1-1 with SUR1 generated channels with negligible activity in nucleotide- and/or Mg2+-free internal solutions that were maximally activated by 10 mM MgUDP. Finally, co-expression of each KIR6.1-X-X-2 with SUR1 generated nucleotide-sensitive K+ channels. As illustrated in Fig. 1B, KIR6.1-1-1-2/SUR1 channels produced currents after wash-out of UDP and Mg2+, which were half-maximally inhibited by ~10-5 M ATP. To support the assertion that these currents were through hybrid pores and not through KIR6.24 pores assembled from multiple concatemers, we collected first-level openings from records of multi-channel currents partially inhibited by ATP over a time interval sufficient to accumulate a statistically significant number of single-channel openings. Segments of the resulting traces for KIR6.1-1-1-2 versus KIR6.2-2-2-2-containing channels are shown to the right in Fig. 1Ba. The all-points current amplitude histograms constructed from these traces (Fig. 1Bb, right) revealed a single i peak corresponding to a g intermediate between that of KIR6.14 and KIR6.24 pores. The uniform intermediate, g, was derived from a similar test with millimolar MgATP, which will maintain low Po openings of channels with any KIR composition. The results illustrate the homogeneity of these hybrid channels and demonstrate that one KIR6.2/tetrameric pore is sufficient to ensure spontaneous bursting and confer classical KATP channel-like sensitivity to inhibitory ATP. Similar measurements on all of the other channels generated by co-expression of KIR6.1-2-1-2, KIR6.1-1-2-2, or KIR6.1-2-2-2 with SUR1 (3-5 independent transfections for each combination with >103 channels observed) led to the conclusion that each concatemer specified one hybrid channel type in which characteristics were determined uniquely by concatemer composition. This finding permitted determination of statistically representative values of relative g versus IC50(ATP) for all possible types of spontaneously bursting hybrid KATP channels in Mg2+-free internal solution (Fig. 1C). The results show four types of channels with distinguishable intermediate g values, consistent with the concatemers specifying subunit composition and order in tetrameric pores. Two KIR6.1 subunits reduce the conductivity more when they are "across the pore" than when they are adjacent to each other, consistent with observations in KV channels (17). In contrast to the differences in g, the IC50(ATP) values are statistically indistinguishable, and we conclude that all of the hybrid KIR6.X-X-X-X/SUR4 channels are as highly sensitive to inhibitory ATP as KIR6.2-2-2-2/SUR4 channels.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Although the existence of true hybrid KIR6.1/KIR6.2 channels is problematic (see (Refs. 2 and 12), our results show that concatemerized subunits form functional, regulated, hybrid KATP channels when co-expressed with SUR1, demonstrating that the interactions involved in gating are preserved. The characteristics of these hybrid channels are determined by the KIR6.1/KIR6.2 ratio and subunit position in the concatemers consistent with a single concatemer forming a pore. The results imply that a search for hybrid KATP channels in native cells is reasonable and that measurements of i and IC50(ATP) from the same single channel patch will allow verification of the KIR composition of these presumably rare KIR/SUR channels in mammalian cells.

The different hybrid channels exhibit distinguishable intermediate g values, although the H5 regions of KIR6.1 and KIR6.2 are identical. Our results are in agreement with the report by Repunte et al. (5) that amino acids in the M1-H5 loop or "turret" (positions 123-125 and 113-115 for KIR6.1 and KIR6.2, respectively) and in the H5-M2 loop (position 148 and 138 for KIR6.1 and KIR6.2, respectively) specify the difference in g between KIR6.1- and KIR6.2-based channels. Hybrid pores containing greater numbers of KIR6.2 extracellular loops have higher g values. The result is consistent with the smaller volume of the amino acid side chain of Val138 versus Met148 in KIR6.2 versus KIR6.1. We see a positional effect of adjacent versus diagonal extracellular loops on g, which could be the result of limiting diffusion of K+ through the outer vestibule of the pore and/or from nonequivalent interactions between the different KIR6.X subunits affecting the molecular dynamics of the K+ selectivity filter. The first possibility is supported by a prediction from a KIR6.2 tetramer model (5) based on the KcsA crystal structure (18) that two Met148 side chains of KIR6.1 will restrict the diffusion of K+ through the external vestibule more than the less bulky Val138 side chain of KIR6.2 when they are across the pore rather than adjacent to each other. A similar idea, based on the hydrodynamic theory of Dwyer et al. (19), has been used to explain a qualitatively similar effect of subunit order on g of heteromeric cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (20). With regard to possible effects on the dynamics of the selectivity filter, we note that the potential intersubunit salt bridges between the conserved R and E following the K+ channel signature G(Y/F)G sequence are unlikely as pKA calculations, based on a homology model of the KIR6.2 tetramer embedded into a lipid bilayer (21), indicate that these E are protonated. Intersubunit H-bonds equivalent to those between Trp68 in the pore helix and Tyr78 in the signature motif of adjacent subunits in KcsA (22) are also unlikely because phenylalanines occupy the corresponding positions in KIR6.X. We note, however, that Glu104 and Glu108, at the extracellular mouth of the KIR6.2 tetramer (21), are in the variable M1-H5 turret region of KIR6.X. Repunte et al. (5) have suggested that this region does not contribute to the g difference, but possible differential interactions between adjacent residues in KIR6.1 and KIR6.2 might result from the longer extracellular linker in KIR6.1 and contribute to the effects of subunit order on g. Molecular dynamics simulations of hybrid KATP channels may aid our understanding of the possible biophysical mechanisms behind the observed conductivity differences in KIR6.X4 hybrids that result from the asymmetrical contributions of subunits to the permeation properties of heteromultimeric KIR (23).

The substitution of one KIR6.2 into a KIR6.1-6.1-6.1-6.1 concatemer was sufficient to destabilize the permanently closed state of KNDP channels seen in the absence of Mg2+- and nucleotide-dependent stimulation by SUR1. This gain-of-function, spontaneous opening of KIR6.1-containing channels allowed determination of the ATP sensitivity of hybrid KIR in the absence of the magnesium nucleotides required to open KIR6.1/SUR channels. The IC50(ATP) values for hybrid channels were indistinguishable from the ~10-5 M value for KIR6.2-2-2-2/SUR14 channels. One interpretation of these results is consistent with the idea that KIR6.1 does not interact with inhibitory nucleotides (7), in which case occupation of the cytoplasmic domain(s) of one KIR6.2 stabilizes the closed pore as strongly as occupation of four domains. However, this interpretation is in poor agreement with the differences in the ATP dose response observed for KATP channels with different numbers of KIR6.2 subunits with C-terminal mutations (our preliminary data2 and the preliminary report of Li et al. (31)). An alternative interpretation, that KIR6.1 has a low affinity inhibitory ATP binding site(s) similar to KIR6.2, is consistent with the fact that the C-terminal residues of KIR6.2 in which mutation produces the most dramatic increases in the IC50(ATP) for KATP channels, i.e. the double mutant Arg50/Lys185 (24), Ile182, and Gly334 (25) are conserved in KIR6.1. Moreover, the transient increases in KNDP channel currents induced by rapid wash-out of MgATP in conventional patches with "fast" diffusion access (Fig. 1Aa) provide semiquantitative evidence that the KIR6.1 tetramer is as sensitive to inhibitory ATP as the KIR6.2 tetramer assembled with the same SUR. We interpret this transient response as follows. During its application, millimolar MgATP binds to both SUR1 and KIR6.X. Nucleotide-bound SUR1 stimulates KIR6.1/SUR1 more efficiently than KIR6.2/SUR1 channels, thus better masking the inhibitory action of ATP on the KNDP channels (Fig. 1Aa). Upon nucleotide removal, unbinding of nucleotide(s) from the low affinity inhibitory ATP site(s) on the KIR produces a quasi-sigmoidal rise in current, which can be resolved if nucleotide unbinding is not limited by its "desorption" (26) (departure) from the cytoplasmic surface of the patch. This kinetic phenomenon can be resolved best in conventional "flat" patches by rapid solution exchange but not in "invaginated" macro-patches with solution exchange times of >10 ms. In parallel, but independently, a slower relaxation of the magnesium-nucleotide-activated KIR/SUR complex, due to nucleotide unbinding from SUR (upon or independently of ATP-hydrolysis), results in decay of channel activity. The observed <10-2 ratio of the mean NPo of KNDP channels at quasi-cytosolic [Mg-ATP] to the NPo during the transient peak after wash-out suggests a submillimolar IC50(ATP) for KNDP channels. If we assume there is a common mechanism coupling inhibitory ligand binding to closure of the M2 bundle, the postulated "inner gate" of KIR (15, 27, 28) based on the proposed function of this bundle in KcsA channels (18, 29, 30), then the uniform IC50(ATP) hybrid channel values are a reflection of similar low affinity ATP binding loci in both KIR6.1 and KIR6.2 in which the KD for inhibitory ATP binding is decreased by SUR (10, 11). Validation of this hypothesis will require direct comparison of ATP binding to purified KIR6.1 and KIR6.2 in the presence of versus absence of SUR and determination of ATP dose responses of KIR6.14-based channels.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Li-Zhen Song for excellent technical assistance with cell culture and transfections.

    FOOTNOTES

* The work was supported by grants from the American Heart Association (to A. P. B.) and the National Institutes of Health (to J. B.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 713-798-4996; Fax: 713-790-0545; E-mail: ababenko@bcm.tmc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 23, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000553200

2 A. P. Babenko, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: SUR, sulfonylurea receptor; g, unitary conductance; IC50(ATP), IC50 value for ATP; KNDP, nucleotide-diphosphate-activated KATP channels; Po, mean open channel probability.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Babenko, A. P., Aguilar-Bryan, L., and Bryan, J. (1998) Annu. Rev. Physiol. 60, 667-687
2. Zerangue, N., Schwappach, B., Jan, Y. N., and Jan, L. Y. (1999) Neuron 22, 537-548
3. Kondo, C., Repunte, V. P., Satoh, E., Yamada, M., Horio, Y., Matsuzawa, Y., Pott, L., and Kurachi, Y. (1998) Receptors Channels 6, 129-140
4. Takano, M., Xie, L. H., Otani, H., and Horie, M. (1998) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 512, 395-406
5. Repunte, V. P., Nakamura, H., Fujita, A., Horio, Y., Findlay, I., Pott, L., and Kurachi, Y. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 3317-3324
6. Beech, D. J., Zhang, H., Nakao, K., and Bolton, T. B. (1993) Br. J. Pharmacol. 110, 573-582
7. Ammala, C., Moorhouse, A., and Ashcroft, F. M. (1996) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 494, 709-714
8. Yamada, M., Isomoto, S., Matsumoto, S., Kondo, C., Shindo, T., Horio, Y., and Kurachi, Y. (1997) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 499, 715-720
9. Tucker, S. J., Gribble, F. M., Zhao, C., Trapp, S., and Ashcroft, F. M. (1997) Nature 387, 179-183
10. Babenko, A. P., Gonzalez, G., Aguilar-Bryan, L., and Bryan, J. (1999) FEBS Lett. 445, 131-136
11. Babenko, A. P., Gonzalez, G., and Bryan, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11587-11592
12. Seharaseyon, J., Sasaki, N., Ohler, A., Sato, T., Fraser, H., Johns, D. C., O'Rourke, B., and Marban, E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17561-17565
13. Aguilar-Bryan, L., Clement, J. P. T., Gonzalez, G., Kunjilwar, K., Babenko, A., and Bryan, J. (1998) Physiol. Rev. 78, 227-245
14. Babenko, A. P., Gonzalez, G., Aguilar-Bryan, L., and Bryan, J. (1998) Circ. Res. 83, 1132-1143
15. Babenko, A. P., Gonzalez, G., and Bryan, J. (1999) FEBS Lett. 459, 367-376
16. Furukawa, T., Virag, L., Furukawa, N., Sawanobori, T., and Hiraoka, M. (1994) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 479, 95-107
17. Zheng, J., and Sigworth, F. J. (1998) J. Gen. Physiol. 112, 457-474
18. Doyle, D. A., Morais Cabral, J., Pfuetzner, R. A., Kuo, A., Gulbis, J. M., Cohen, S. L., Chait, B. T., and MacKinnon, R. (1998) Science 280, 69-77
19. Dwyer, T. M., Adams, D. J., and Hille, B. (1980) J. Gen. Physiol. 75, 469-492
20. Liu, D. T., Tibbs, G. R., and Siegelbaum, S. A. (1996) Neuron 16, 983-990
21. Capener, C. E., Shrivastava, I. H., Ranatunga, K. M., Forrest, L. R., Smith, G. R., and Sansom, M. S. (2000) Biophys. J. 78, 2929-2942
22. Berneche, S., and Roux, B. (2000) Biophys. J. 78, 2900-2917
23. Silverman, S. K., Lester, H. A., and Dougherty, D. A. (1998) Biophys. J. 75, 1330-1339
24. Babenko, A. P., Gonzalez, G., and Bryan, J. (1999) Biochem. Cell Biol. 255, 231-238
25. Drain, P., Li, L., and Wang, J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 13953-13958
26. Crank, J. (1975) The Mathematics of Diffusion , 2nd Ed. , Clarendon Press, Oxford
27. Babenko, A. P., Gonzalez, G., and Bryan, J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 717-720
28. Loussouarn, G., Makhina, E. N., Rose, T., and Nichols, C. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 1137-1144
29. Perozo, E., Cortes, D. M., and Cuello, L. G. (1999) Science 285, 73-78
30. Yellen, G. (1998) Q. Rev. Biophys. 31, 239-295
31. Li, L., Wang, J., and Drain, P. (1999) Biophys. J. 76, A77, (abstr.)


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
N. Teramoto, H.-L. Zhu, A. Shibata, M. Aishima, E. J. Walsh, M. Nagao, and W. C. Cole
ATP-sensitive K+ channels in pig urethral smooth muscle cells are heteromultimers of Kir6.1 and Kir6.2
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): F107 - F117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. Wheeler, C. Wang, K. Yang, K. Fang, K. Davis, A. M. Styer, U. Mirshahi, C. Moreau, J. Revilloud, M. Vivaudou, et al.
Coassembly of Different Sulfonylurea Receptor Subtypes Extends the Phenotypic Diversity of ATP-sensitive Potassium (KATP) Channels
Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2008; 74(5): 1333 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
K. W. Chan, A. Wheeler, and L. Csanady
Sulfonylurea Receptors Type 1 and 2A Randomly Assemble to Form Heteromeric KATP Channels of Mixed Subunit Composition
J. Gen. Physiol., December 31, 2007; 131(1): 43 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
J. C. Koster, M. A. Permutt, and C. G. Nichols
Diabetes and Insulin Secretion: The ATP-Sensitive K+ Channel (KATP) Connection
Diabetes, November 1, 2005; 54(11): 3065 - 3072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
J. Bryan, W. H. Vila-Carriles, G. Zhao, A. P. Babenko, and L. Aguilar-Bryan
Toward Linking Structure With Function in ATP-Sensitive K+ Channels
Diabetes, December 1, 2004; 53(suppl_3): S104 - S112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
J. H. Sim, D. K. Yang, Y. C. Kim, S. J. Park, T. M. Kang, I. So, and K. W. Kim
ATP-sensitive K+ channels composed of Kir6.1 and SUR2B subunits in guinea pig gastric myocytes
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): G137 - G144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Cui, J. P. Giblin, L. H. Clapp, and A. Tinker
A mechanism for ATP-sensitive potassium channel diversity: Functional coassembly of two pore-forming subunits
PNAS, December 28, 2000; (2000) 11370498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. P. Babenko and J. Bryan
A Conserved Inhibitory and Differential Stimulatory Action of Nucleotides on KIR6.0/SUR Complexes Is Essential for Excitation-Metabolism Coupling by KATP Channels
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2001; 276(52): 49083 - 49092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Cui, J. P. Giblin, L. H. Clapp, and A. Tinker
A mechanism for ATP-sensitive potassium channel diversity: Functional coassembly of two pore-forming subunits
PNAS, January 16, 2001; 98(2): 729 - 734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/41/31563    most recent
C000553200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Babenko, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Babenko, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bryan, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement