|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005288200 on August 2, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 41, 31805-31812, October 13, 2000
Regulation of the Promoter Activity of Interferon Regulatory
Factor-7 Gene
ACTIVATION BY INTERFERON AND SILENCING BY HYPERMETHYLATION*
Runqing
Lu ,
Wei-Chun
Au ,
Wen-Shuz
Yeow ,
Nathan
Hageman , and
Paula M.
Pitha §¶
From the Oncology Center and § Department
of Molecular Biology and Genetics, The Johns Hopkins University School
of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21231
Received for publication, June 18, 2000, and in revised form, July 25, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The molecular mechanism by which virus induces
expression of the early inflammatory genes has not yet been completely
elucidated. Previous studies indicated that the virus-mediated
transcription of type I interferon (IFN) genes required activation of
two members of IFN regulatory factor (IRF) family, IRF-3 and IRF-7,
where the expression of IRF-7 was found to be indispensable for the induction of IFNA genes. To determine the factors that
regulate expression of IRF-7 gene, as well as its
inducibility by type I IFNs, we have isolated and characterized the
promoter and first intron of the human IRF-7 gene. This
region shows a presence of two potential interferon-sensitive response
elements (ISRE/IRF-E). However, only the ISRE present in the first
intron was functional and conferred interferon inducibility in a
transient transfection assay. Using a pull-down assay with an
oligodeoxynucleotide corresponding to this ISRE immobilized to magnetic
beads, we have demonstrated that this ISRE binds ISGF3 complex and
IRF-1 from the extract of IFN-treated cells but not from the untreated
cells. We have further shown that the previously observed lack of
expression of IRF-7 in 2fTGH fibrosarcoma cell line, correlated with
hypermethylation of the CpG island in the human IRF-7
promoter. The repression of the promoter activity was relieved by
treatment with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor
5-aza-deoxycytidine. In vitro methylation of
IRF-7 promoter silenced IRF-7 directed expression of
luciferase gene in HeLa cells that express endogenous IRF-7
gene. Whether silencing of IRF-7 by methylation is
instrumental for the process of tumorigenesis remains to be determined.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Expression of eukaryotic genes is regulated at multiple levels
including the accessibility of promoter DNA for binding of basic
transcriptional machinery or the specific transcription factors and
chromatin structure around the potential promoters. The molecular
mechanism by which virus activates expression of the early inflammatory
genes has not yet been completely elucidated. It was shown, however,
that activation of the NF B family of transcription factors in
infected cells plays a critical role in the transcriptional activation
of many cytokine and chemokine genes, since large number of these genes
contains NF B-binding sites in their promoters. Recently the
importance of another family of transcription factors as the mediators
of virus induced signaling has emerged. These factors designated
interferon (IFN)1 regulatory
factors (IRF) were shown to play an important role in the induction of
the early inflammatory genes in infected cells as well as in
development of cells of lymphoid lineage (1, 2).
The IRF-3 and IRF-7 have been identified as direct transducers of virus
mediated signaling and were shown to play a critical role in the
induction of Type I IFN genes (3-7). In infected cells, these factors
are phosphorylated on C-terminal serines and majority of the
phosphorylated IRFs was localized in the nucleus (8-11). There are,
however, differences in their expression. IRF-3 is expressed
constitutively in most of the cells examined and its expression is
enhanced neither by viral infection or IFN treatment (3, 12). In
contrast, human IRF-7 is expressed effectively only in lymphoid
tissues, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and some cell lines
of lymphoid origin and its transcription can be further stimulated by
treatment with IFN . However, none or very little expression of IRF-7
could be detected in established cell lines of fibroblast or epithelial
origin (4). Recent studies demonstrated the critical role of IRF-7 in
the virus-mediated induction of IFNA genes both in human and
mouse cells and closely correlated the virus mediated, cell
type-specific expression of IFN genes with the presence of
IRF-7 in the cells (13-15). Thus, the cells that were not able to
express IFNA genes upon viral infection were able to do so
upon reconstitution of IRF-7 expression (13, 14). The role of
IRF-7 was also implied in virus-mediated induction of
IFNB and RANTES genes (7, 16). Furthermore, the
levels of IRF-7 were found to be an important determinant in the
regulated expression of the EBV-encoded EBNA-1 gene, where the silencing of Qp promoter, that regulates expression of
EBNA-1 gene in EBV-associated tumors, was correlated with
the expression of IRF-7 (17, 18). These results indicated that the
levels of IRF-7 in the cells may not only modulate the virus-mediated inflammatory responses but may also affect the EBV-associated malignancies.
The hereditary silencing of gene expression can occur by mutational and
epigenetic pathways. The silencing of gene expression by methylation of
the CpG dinucleotides, especially those located in the CpG clusters,
has been shown to occur relatively frequently in immortalized and
transformed cells (19). The aberrant methylation has been associated
with the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in human cancers and
may also play a role in the control of cell type-specific gene
expression. Recent studies have shown that the methyl-CpG-binding
protein can bind transcriptional co-repressor Sin3A and recruits
histone deacetylase to methylated DNA (20). This results in
deacetylation of the chromatin and formation of a transcriptionally
repressive chromatin around the methylated DNA. What determine the
methylation status of CpG islands is still not clear. Several DNA
methyltransferases (DNMT) were identified. The DNMT-1 was shown to
preferentially methylate hemimethylated DNA and is therefore believed
to function as maintenance methyltransferase (21). Elevated levels and
activity of DNMT-1 were observed in cancer cells in vitro
(22). However, the knock-out studies (23) suggested that two other
methyltransferase, DNMT-3a and DNMT-3b, are responsible for
de novo DNA methylation and mutations in DNMT-3b gene are
associated with the ICF immunodeficiency syndrome (23, 24).
The aim of the present study was to determine the critical factors that
regulate type I IFN-stimulated expression of IRF-7 gene as
well as the mechanism by which expression of IRF-7 gene is
silenced in some cell lines. To this effect we have isolated the
promoter of the human IRF-7 gene and have shown by deletion and mutation analyses that it contained two interferon-stimulated response element (ISRE)/IRF-E like elements. However, only one of them
was functionally active and able to confer the IFN- mediated activation of IRF-7 promoter. Furthermore, we have shown
that hypermethylation of the CpG island in the IRF-7
promoter is responsible for the silencing of the IRF-7
gene in 2fTGH fibrosarcoma line. Expression of IRF-7 gene
and stimulation by IFN could be rescued in non-expressing cells by
treatment with 5-aza-deoxycytidine (5-AzaC).
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Reagents--
Human cells HeLa, 2fTGH, and U2A
were cultivated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Jurkat T cells were
cultivated in RPMI plus 10% FBS. Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against
IRF-1 (C-20), IRF-2 (C-19), STAT 1 (E-23), STAT 2 (N-17), and ISGF-3
(C-20) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies.
Isolation of IRF-7 Genomic DNA--
DASH II genomic library
containing the BamHI genomic DNA fragment of human lung
carcinoma NCI H157 cell line, was screened by hybridization with
full-length IRF-7 cDNA probe for the phage harboring the
IRF-7 genomic DNA. Two plaques (from 2.50 × 105 plated) showing positive hybridization with
IRF-7 cDNA probe were purified by three rounds of
purification. The corresponding phage DNA was purified (Qiagen phage DNA isolation kit) and digested with various restriction enzymes
to construct a restriction map. The result indicated that the insert
containing genomic DNA was about 12 kb (data not shown). The
EcoRI-digested genomic DNA fragments were then cloned into
pBluescript vector (Stratagene). The clone containing EcoRI
insert with IRF-7 sequences was identified by colony
hybridization, and PCR amplification. The insert DNA was sequenced and
the sequences were compared with the IRF-7 cDNA sequence.
Transient Transfection and Luciferase Assay--
Cells were
transfected in 60-mm dishes by Superfect transfection method (Qiagen).
One microgram of the reporter plasmid DNA and 0.1 µg of
-galactosidase expressing plasmid (internal control) were used for
each transfection. In a co-transfection experiment, 1:1 ratio of the
reporter and expression plasmid (1 µg of each) were used. The final
concentration of transfected DNA was kept constant in all
co-transfection assays. Transfected cells were split 12 h after
transfection into 35-mm 6-well plates, and incubated for another 6 h after which the medium was replaced with DMEM containing 2% FBS and
recombinant IFN- 2 (500 units/ml). After an additional 12 h, the
cells were harvested, lysed, and luciferase activity was measured as
described previously (25). Experiments were repeated at least three times.
Reporter Constructs Containing IRF-7 Promoter and Its
Mutants--
A 1.6-kb fragment of IRF-7 promoter containing
the TATA box and the first intron was amplified by PCR, using primer
set RL1S, RL1AS (see Table I), and
EcoRI fragment of IRF-7 genomic DNA as template. The
fidelity of PCR transcription was confirmed by sequencing and the
amplified fragment was inserted into XhoI and HindIII sites of pGL3-basic vector (Invitrogen). This
plasmid (designated RL1) was used as the parental plasmid to generate (by PCR) a serial of mutation and deletion constructs (Fig.
2B). A PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis method (26) was
used to mutate ISRE/IRF-E sites in IRF-7 promoter. The
primers IRF-EMS and IRF-EMAS (Table I) were used for mutation of the
IRF-E site (RL2 plasmid). The primers ISRE-MS and ISRE-MAS were used to
mutate the ISRE site (RL3 plasmid). The deletion construct RL5 was
generated using RL5S and RL1AS primers and RL1S and RL6AS primers were
used to construct RL6. The plasmids containing IRF-E or ISRE sites and
their flanking sequences (RL7, RL7M, RL8, and RL8M plasmids) were
generated by inserting the respective double stranded
oligodeoxynucleotide fragments into XhoI and
HindIII sites of pGL3-promoter vector (Invitrogen). The
oligonucleotides used for generation of RL7 plasmid were IRF-ES and
IRF-EAS; for RL7M plasmid, IRF-EMS, and IRF-E1MAS; for RL8 plasmid,
ISRE-S, and ISRE-AS; and for RL8M plasmid ISRE-MS and ISRE-MAS (Table
I).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Primers and oligonucleotides
Primers and oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized at Life Technologies
CustomePrimers. The mutated nucleotides were underlined.
|
|
5-AzaC Treatment and Northern Blot Analysis--
HeLa cells were
cultivated in the presence of 5 µM 5-AzaC for 4 days in
DMEM and 10% FBS with fresh drug added every 24 h. Control cells
were grown under identical conditions in medium without 5-AzaC. At day
5, cells were either treated with 500 units/ml interferon- for
6 h or only incubated for additional 6 h. Total RNA from
control and stimulated cells was analyzed by Northern blot.
Northern blot analysis was done as described before (4) with 10 µg of
total RNA isolated with TRIZOL (Life Technologies, Inc.). Random-primed
32P-labeled human IRF-7 cDNA encoding the entire open
reading frame was used as a probe.
Oligodeoxynucleotide Pull-down and Immunoblot
Assays--
Biotinylated antisense oligonucleotides (IRF-EAS and
ISRE-AS) containing IRF-E/ISRE sites were synthesized (Life
Technologies. Inc.) and then annealed with the corresponding sense
oligodeoxynucleotides. Biotinylated DNA (4 µg) was then mixed with
100 µg of DynaBeads M-280 streptavidin (Dynal) in 200 µl of binding
buffer I containing 20 mM Tris, pH 8, 1 mM
EDTA, and 0.1 M NaCl. After 1 h incubation at room
temperature, the beads were washed three times with binding buffer I
and then resuspended in 330 µl of binding buffer II (10% glycerol,
12 mM HEPES, 5 mM MgCl2, 60 mM KCl, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). Nuclear extracts were prepared as described before (13) from control cells and cells stimulated with 500 units/ml interferon- for 2 h. Then
150 µg of nuclear extracts were incubated with 40 µl of
DNA-conjugated beads, containing either IRF-E or ISRE
oligodeoxynucleotides in binding buffer II, for 2 h at 4 °C.
The beads were washed with binding buffer II three times before the
bound proteins were eluted from the beads by boiling in sample buffer.
The proteins were resolved on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, and transferred to membranes. The membranes were
blocked by 10% skim milk in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1%
of Tween 20. The individual proteins were identified by immunoblotting
with antibodies against IRF-1, IRF-2, P48/IRF-9, STAT 1, and STAT 2 used at a dilution of 1:1000. The signals on the blots were
visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system. (ECL,
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
Sodium Bisulfite Modification--
Genomic DNA was prepared as
described (27). One microgram of DNA was denatured in 50 µl of 0.2 M NaOH for 10 min at 37 °C. For the chemical
modification of DNA, 520 µl of 3 M sodium bisulfite (Sigma) and 30 µl of 10 mM hydroquinone (Sigma) were
added to the DNA solution and the samples were incubated for 16 h
at 50 °C. Modified DNA was purified on Wizard purification resin
(Promega) and eluted in water (50 µl). As a final step, NaOH was
added to a final concentration of 0.3 M and the samples
were incubated for 5 min at room temperature. DNA was precipitated by
ethanol and resuspended in water.
Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and Genomic DNA
Sequencing--
DNA methylation status in the CpG islands of
IRF-7 promoter was analyzed by treatment with sodium
bisulfite and subsequent PCR amplification (MSP). The rationale of
using MSP method to detect methylation status of the CpG-rich region is
based on the conversion of cytosine to uracil after bisulfite treatment
of DNA and has been previously validated for number of methylated genes
(27). The sodium bisulfite treatment of DNA and MSP were performed as
described previously (27). The primer sequences for the amplification
of methylated and unmethylated DNA fragments are listed in Table I. The
size of amplified DNA fragment using these primers is 226 bp. PCR
conditions for the amplification of methylated and ummethylated DNA
were as follows: reaction was started at 94 °C for 5 min
before the addition of Taq polymerase (Promega).
Amplification was 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min,
and 72 °C for 1 min. The final extension was done at 72 °C for 7 min. Controls without DNA were performed for each set of
amplifications. Amplified products were resolved on a 2% agarose gel,
and visualized after staining with ethidium bromide. The amplified DNA
was purified using a GENECLEAN kit II (BIO-101) and sequenced.
In Vitro DNA Methylation and Stable Transfection--
Plasmid
DNA isolated from RL1 plasmid, containing a CpG island (as determined
by GeneTool program) was methylated in vitro using
SssI methylase (1 units/µg; New England Biolabs), which methylates every CpG site. Complete methylation was verified by digestion with the methylation sensitive restriction enzyme
HpaII. Only plasmids that showed a complete protection from
HpaII digestion were used in the transfection experiments.
To establish stably transfected cell lines, HeLa cells plated in
100-mm dishes were transfected with 10 µg of either the methylated or
unmethylated RL1 plasmid together with 1 µg of -galactosidase
expressing plasmid, used as an internal control, and
pSV2neo vector which confers resistance to G418 (1 µg).
The transfectants were selected in medium containing 800 µg/ml G418,
and surviving colonies were pooled after 4 weeks. The pooled cells were
treated with recombinant IFN alpha (500 units/ml) for 12 h and
luciferase activity was measured in cell lysated prepared from treated
and untreated cells.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of IRF-7 Genomic DNA Containing the 5'-Untranslated
Region--
Using the full-length IRF-7 cDNA as probe we have
screened the human genomic library (see "Experimental Procedures"),
and isolated a 3-kb fragment of genomic IRF-7 DNA containing
5'-flanking DNA and the first intron of IRF-7 gene. The
sequence of the 1.3-kb fragment containing the promoter region and the
first intron of the IRF-7 gene are shown in Fig.
1 (GenBank accession number AF277159). Using TRANSFAC data base and TESS-String-based search, we have identified the TATA box in this sequence and several potential transcription factor-binding sites such as NF B, STAT6, C/EBP, NF-IL2A, and sterol response element-binding protein, SREBP,
that may be involved in the modulation of the transcriptional activity of IRF-7 promoter. In addition, we have identified two
IRF-E/ISRE elements: one is located 5' of the TATA box and the other in
the first intron. The translation start sites for the two spliced variants of IRF-7, IRF-7A, and IRF-7H, as well as the beginning of the
second intron are marked by arrows in Fig. 1.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The human IRF-7
promoter. IRF-7 genomic DNA was isolated from DASH II genomic
library derived from human lung carcinoma NCI H157 cell line, using
full-length IRF-7 cDNA as hybridization probe. The fragment
containing 5'-flanking region and the first intron of the
IRF-7 gene was isolated as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The IRF-7 promoter sequence was analyzed
using TRANSFAC data base and the sequence of a 1.3-kb fragment of the
IRF-7 promoter region including the first intron (boxed) is
shown. The TATA box and some potential transcriptional factor-binding
sites are highlighted, including one ISRE site and one IRF-E site. The
transcriptional initiation site, and the transcriptional start sites of
two IRF-7 isoforms: IRF-7H, IRF-7A, as well as the beginning of the
second intron are marked with arrows.
|
|
Identification of Functional ISRE That Confers IFN Inducibility to
IRF-7 Gene--
Sequence analysis of the 1.6-kb fragment containing
the IRF-7 promoter and the first intron shows a presence of
two potential ISRE/IRF-E-binding sites (Table
II). One is in the 5'-flanking region of
the IRF-7 gene and its sequence closely resembles the IRF-E
site, the second one that is closely related to ISRE is in the first
intron of the IRF-7 gene (Fig. 1). In order to determine the
role of the IRF-E and ISRE sites in the IFN- mediated stimulation of
IRF-7 gene, we have constructed reporter plasmids containing either the entire 1.6-kb region (RL1) or its deletion (RL5 and 6) and
mutation fragments (RL2, -3, and -4) inserted 5' of the luciferase gene
in the pGL-3 vector (Fig. 2B).
The transcriptional activities of these promoters were analyzed in a
transient transfection assay in HeLa cells before and after induction
with IFN- . We have chosen HeLa cells for these studies because these
cells express IRF-7 gene constitutively (IRF-7 mRNA can
be detected in these cells by RT-PCR, data not shown) and its levels
can be further enhanced by treatment with IFN- (Fig. 2A).
Furthermore, the transfection efficiency of these cells is consistently
high. As can be seen in Fig. 2C, transfection of RL1
plasmid, that contains an entire 1.6-kb fragment of the 5' end flanking
region and the first intron, resulted in a significant level of
luciferase activity that was about 6 times higher than when the
promoterless pGL-3 vector was transfected. These results indicated that
in HeLa cells this promoter is activated constitutively which
correlated with the observed constitutive expression of the endogenous
IRF-7 gene. Treatment of the transfected cells with IFN-
for 12 h resulted in about 3.5-fold increase in luciferase
activity. The mutation in the IRF-E site that is localized in the
promoter region (RL2 plasmid) resulted only in a slight decrease in
both constitutive and inducible promoter activity (81 and 72% of RL1
activity, respectively). These results suggested that this IRF-E alone
cannot confer IFN inducibility. In contrast, mutation of the ISRE site
that is present in the first intron (RL3 plasmid) essentially abolished
the response to IFN- while it had little effect on the constitutive
expression of this promoter. These results suggested that ISRE is the
functional element that confers the response to IFN- . The RL4
plasmid in which both IRF-E and ISRE were mutated had the same activity
as RL3, supporting the observation that ISRE is the functional element that confers the IFN- -mediated stimulation.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Comparison of IFN-responsive DNA sequences within the promoter of human
IRF-7 gene with ISRE and IRF-E consensus sequences
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A, identification of functional ISRE
site that confers IFN- inducibility to IRF-7 gene.
A, time course induction of the IRF-7 gene in
HeLa cells by IFN- . HeLa cells were cultivated in DMEM plus 10% FBS
and stimulated with 500 units/ml IFN- for the indicated times. Total
RNA was isolated from IFN-treated cells and controls and analyzed on
Northern blots as described before. Ethidium bromide (E.B.)
staining of total RNA was used as an internal loading control.
B, IRF-7 promoter constructs. Schematic
representation of the 1.6-kb IRF-7 promoter region (top) and
the mutation (RL2, RL3, and RL4) and deletion constructs (RL5 and RL6)
that were inserted into pGL-3 basic vector upstream of a luciferase
reporter gene (Luc), The mutation sites are marked by a . Wild type
and mutated ISRE (RL8 and RL8M) as well as IRF-E (RL7 and RL7M)
oligodeoxynucleotides were inserted into pGL-Promoter vector.
C, activation of IRF-7 promoter constructs in
HeLa cells by IFN- . The IRF-7 promoter constructs were
co-transfected with plasmid encoding -galactosidase into HeLa cells
as described under "Experimental Procedures." In all transfection
assays the levels of luciferase activity were normalized to a constant
level of -galactosidase that served as an internal control. The
result are presented as percentage of a luciferase activity of the RL1
construct in IFN- -treated cells that is considered 100%. The
error bars represent the S.D. of three independent
experiments.
|
|
To further confirm our findings with the mutated plasmids we
constructed several deletion mutants and analyzed their expression. In
the RL-5 plasmid we have deleted the 5'-upstream region of RL1
including the IRF-E and inserted the remaining 600-bp fragment that
contains the ISRE site into pGL3 plasmid. When transfected into HeLa
cells the overall transcription activity of this plasmid was lower than
that of RL1 but the ability to respond to IFN treatment was preserved
and the luciferase activity was increased by about 3 fold upon IFN-
stimulation. The RL6 plasmid contains only the 5'-flanking region of
IRF-7 promoter and has the first intron including the ISRE
site deleted. This construct had only low constitutive activity and did
not respond to IFN- . Thus, the deletion analysis supports the
finding that only the ISRE site is able to mediate the response to
IFN.
Finally, we wanted to further confirm our findings and to examine
whether either IRF-E or ISRE can, alone, confer the stimulation by
IFN- . We therefore inserted IRF-E or ISRE element together with the
respective flanking sequences (about 35 bp in length) into
pGL3-promoter vector, 5' of a basic SV40 promoter and luciferase gene.
As a control, we inserted into this vector the same fragments, which
contained mutations in the respective IRF-E/ISRE sites. These plasmids
were transfected into HeLa cells and their expression was analyzed
before and after IFN stimulation. The results showed that RL7 plasmid
as well as its mutated analogue did not respond to IFN stimulation. In
contrast, expression of RL8 plasmid was significantly increased
(8-fold) in IFN-treated cells. Mutation in the ISRE site (RL8M)
completely abolished the IFN-mediated stimulation. Thus, altogether,
these data indicate that ISRE is the functional element that mediates
the response of IRF-7 gene to IFN- . These data also
indicate that this element alone is able to confer IFN inducibility
indicating that it functions as an enhancer in IFN-treated cells.
Activation of IRF-7 Promoter Is Mediated by ISGF3 Complex--
We
have demonstrated the importance of the ISRE domain in response of
IRF-7 promoter to IFN- stimulation. It was shown that the
stimulation of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) promoters by IFN-
and - is generally mediated by ISGF3 complex, although IRF-1 was
also implicated in the induction of several ISGs (30-33). We have
therefore examined the factors that bind to ISRE in IFN-treated cells
and compared these with factors that bound to nonfunctional IRF-E. For
this analysis the biotin-labeled ISRE or IRF-E coupled to magnetic
beads were incubated with nuclear extracts from IFN-treated and
untreated HeLa cells, and the specifically bound proteins were eluted,
separated on SDS gels, and identified by Western blotting. As shown in
Fig. 3A no proteins bound to
magnetic beads alone and the binding was prevented by the presence of
100-fold excess of free ISRE oligodeoxynucleotide. When the nuclear
extracts from IFN-treated cells were incubated with the beads
containing the ISRE oligodeoxynucleotide, binding of p48 (IRF-9), STAT
1, and STAT 2 was detected, while none of these proteins, which form the tertiary complex ISGF-3, bind to IRF-E containing beads. Formation of ISGF-3 complex was also observed in gel retardation assay where ISRE
oligodeoxynucleotide was used (data not shown). In addition, a
significant binding of IRF-1 to ISRE oligodeoxynucleotide was also
detected in IFN-treated cells, while in untreated cells very little
IRF-1 bound. Binding of IRF-1 from the IFN-treated cells to IRF-E was
also detected, but the binding was much weaker and the signal was
detectable only after a long exposure. The increased binding of IRF-1
in IFN-treated cells corresponded to the increase levels of IRF-1 in
the lysates of IFN-treated cells (data not shown). Expression of IRF-1
was shown to be up-regulated in IFN-treated cells and to stimulate
expression of several ISGs (33). Thus the observed binding of IRF-1 to
ISRE may implicate a potential role of IRF-1 in virus-mediated
induction of IRF-7 promoter. In addition to IRF-1 we have
also observed binding of IRF-2 to both ISRE and IRF-E elements, but the
binding was much stronger in the extracts from uninduced cells than
from induced cells. Since IRF-2 is known to act as a repressor, which
antagonizes the action of IRF-1 (34), the decreased binding of IRF-2 to
ISRE site in IFN-treated cells, together with the binding of IRF-1 and
ISGF3 suggested a possible competition between binding of IRF-2 and the
other IRF factors.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Activation of IRF-7 promoter
by IFN- is mediated by ISGF3 complex.
A, analyses of the binding profile of IRF family proteins to
ISRE and IRF-E sites of IRF-7 promoter. Biotinylated
oligodeoxynucleotides containing IRF-E and ISRE sites coupled to
DynaBeads M-280 streptavidin were incubated with nuclear extracts of
IFN- -treated and control HeLa cells. The bound proteins were eluted
from the beads by boiling in sample buffer and analyzed by Western blot
analysis with antibodies against IRF-1, IRF-2, p48, STAT 1, and STAT 2. The signals were visualized by the ECL kit. B, restoration
of a response to IFN- in U2A cells by co-transfection with p48/IRF-9
plasmid. U2A cells, which do not contain functional p48/IRF-9, were
transfected with RL8 plasmid and induced by IFN- as described under
"Experimental Procedures." In co-transfection experiments, 1 µg
of each plasmid was used for transfection and the total amount of
transfected DNA was kept constant. The results are presented as
percentage of IFN-stimulated luciferase activity of RL8 construct when
co-transfected with p48/IRF-9 plasmid. The error bars
represent the S.D. of three independent experiments.
|
|
In order to be able to distinguish between the contribution of IRF-1
and ISGF3 complex in the IFN mediated activation of IRF-7 promoter, we have examined the activity of ISRE containing plasmid RL8
in U2A cells that are lacking the functional p48/IRF-9. As shown in
Fig. 3B in U2A cells expression of RL8 was not stimulated by
IFN treatment. Overexpression of IRF-1 or IRF-7 in these cells did not
restore IFN stimulation. However, when RL8 was transfected together
with p48 expressing plasmid the IFN-mediated stimulation of ISRE was
restored. These data indicated that ISGF3 is a critical determinant in
IFN-mediated stimulation of IRF-7 promoter and confirmed the previous
observation of the importance of p48/IRF-9 in the expression of
IRF-7 gene in mice (14). Although IRF-1 was not able to
restore IFN inducibility of IRF-7 promoter in U2A cells, the
result of co-transfection assay of IRF-1 and RL1 expression plasmids
indicated that IRF-1 could further stimulate activity of
IRF-7 promoter in IFN-treated HeLa and 2fTGH cells (data not
shown). These data suggested that IRF-1 may contribute to the
activation of IRF-7 promoter by IFN.
5-AzaC Treatment Restores IRF-7 Expression in 2fTGH Cells--
We
have shown previously that 2fTGH cells do not express IRF-7
constitutively nor can IFN- treatment stimulate expression of IRF-7
in these cells (4, 13). Surprisingly, however, transfected RL1 plasmid
that contains 1.6 kb of IRF-7 promoter was constitutively expressed in these cells and its expression was further stimulated by
treatment with IFN- (data not shown). These data indicated that
2fTGH cells do not have a defect in the basal transcription machinery
that is required for the expression of the IRF-7 gene. Since
no obvious genetic defect in the IRF-7 gene could be
identified in 2fTGH cells (data not shown) we explored the possibility
that the expression of this gene is modified epigenetically by
methylation. Silencing of a number of genes in immortalized and
transformed cell lines as well as in primary tumors has been shown to
be mediated by promoter hypermethylation (19). To examine the
possibility that methylation is involved in the silencing of the
IRF-7 gene in 2fTGH cells, we treated these cells with
5-AzaC, a cytosine analogue which is a suicidal inhibitor of
methyltransferase and can be used to reverse the inhibitory effect of
methylation on gene expression. IRF-7 expression was analyzed 4 days
after the initial addition of the drug. As shown in Fig.
4, in the absence of 5-AzaC, 2fTGH cells
failed to express IRF-7 mRNA even after IFN- stimulation.
However, after 5-AzaC treatment, IRF-7 mRNA could be detected by
RT-PCR (data not shown) suggesting that 5-AzaC treatment alone was
sufficient to elicit basic levels of IRF-7 expression and further
enhancement could be seen in IFN- -treated cells (Fig. 4).
Furthermore, upon virus infection, 5-AzaC-treated cells were able to
synthesize biologically active IFN- , while no IFN- production
could be detected in infected, untreated 2fTGH cells (data not
shown).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
5-AzaC treatment restores
IRF-7 expression in 2fTGH cells. 2fTGH cells were
cultivated in DMEM with 10% FBS in the presence of 5 µM
5-AzaC for 4 days, with fresh drug added every 24 h. IFN- was
added at day 5 into 5-AzaC-treated and non-treated 2fTGH cells and
total RNA was isolated 6 h later. Northern blot analysis was
performed using the full-length IRF-7 cDNA as a probe. Epstein-Barr
(E.B.) staining of total RNA was used as internal loading
control. The experiment was repeated at least three times.
|
|
The IRF-7 Promoter Contains a Putative CpG Island, Which Is
Methylated in 2fTGH Cells--
The restoration of IRF-7
gene expression by 5-AzaC treatment could be due to a direct
demethylation of the IRF-7 gene or another gene, which
expression is required for IRF-7 activation. Genes silenced by
methylation generally contain CpG islands in their promoters, which are
targeted by methylation. In general, CpG islands are rare in mammalian
DNA with a typical expected:observed ratio of 0.3 or lower. In
promoters with CpG islands, this ratio is 0.6 or higher. The 1.6-kb
fragment of the IRF-7 promoter showed a presence of one CpG island
(Fig. 5A) located around the
TATA box spanning from 271 to +382 bp which has CpG frequency higher than 1.0. The methylation status of this CpG island was analyzed by MSP
analysis (27). This method uses primers that are able to distinguish
methylated from unmethylated DNA in bisulfite-modified DNA. Bisulfite
treatment of DNA converts the unmethylated cytosine residues to uracil,
while the methylated cytosine in CpG dinucleotides remain unchanged.
The primer sequences chosen provided maximal discrimination between
methylated and unmethylated CpG island of the IRF-7 promoter
region (Table I). We first used these primers to amplify sequences from
bisulfite-treated genomic DNA isolated from IRF-7 nonexpressing cell
2fTGH and IRF-7 expressing HeLa cells. As seen in Fig. 5B,
methylation specific primers (MS1, MAS1) amplified a strong band from
DNA of 2fTGH cells while the umethylated primers (UMS1, UMAS1) did not
amplify any band. In contrast, the unmethylated primers amplified a
strong band from HeLa cells. These data show that in nonexpressing
cells, 2fTGH, the IRF-7 promoter is hypermethylated while it
is hypomethylated in expressing cells. Interestingly, methylated
primers also amplified a weak band from HeLa cells suggesting a low
occurrence of hypermethylated alleles in the population of HeLa cells
used. To further confirm the findings from MSP analysis we cloned and
sequenced the amplified fragments. The sequences of the first 110 bp of
the amplified 226-bp fragments from the bisulfite-treated DNA of 2fTGH
and HeLa cells are shown in Fig. 5C. There are 13 CpG
islands present in this region. The fragment amplified by the
unmethylated primers from HeLa cells DNA shows that all CpG cytosines
were converted to uracil, confirming the hypomethylated state of this
CpG island in HeLa cells. In contrast when DNA from 2fTGH cells was
analyzed, every cytosine in CpG dinucleotide remained unchanged by
bisulfite treatment, indicating that these cytosines are methylated.
Thus, these results directly identified the methylated CpG islands in the promoter region of IRF-7.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The promoter of
IRF-7 is methylated in 2fTGH cells. A,
quantitation of CpG ratio (observed/expected) in the IRF-7
promoter region. CpG frequency was analyzed over a 1.5-kb region of
IRF-7 promoter using GeneTool program (BioTools Inc.), where
CpG island is defined as a region with a CpG ratio of 0.6 or higher.
B, methylation-specific PCR. Genomic DNA was isolated from
HeLa and 2fTGH cells and modified by sodium bisulfite treatment. PCR
amplification of methylated and unmethylated IRF-7 fragments
were conducted as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
amplified products were resolved on 2% agarose gels. C,
sequence of bisulfite-modified DNA from HeLa and 2fTGH cells. The
sequence of the first 110-bp of the PCR-amplified 226-bp fragments from
bisulfite-treated and untreated genomic DNA from 2fTGH (2fTGH B.S.) and
HeLa (HeLa B.S). The methylated cytosines are marked by an
asterisk, while the unmethylated cytosines are boxed.
D, sequence of ISRE site along with the flanking region of
bisulfite modified DNA from 2fTGH cell. The ISRE site is
underlined.
|
|
Since there is a CpG dinucleotide present in the ISRE site, we further
examined the region flanking ISRE site using methylation-specific primers (MS2, MAS2) from 2fTGH cells and sequenced the amplified product. The partial sequence of amplified product, that contains the
ISRE site (underlined), is shown in Fig. 5D. As expected, every cytosine in CpG dinucleotide remained unchanged in
bisulfite-treated DNA, indicating that they are methylated.
In Vitro Methylation of IRF-7 Promoter Blocks Its Expression in
HeLa Cells--
To determine whether the methylation of
IRF-7 promoter is sufficient to silence its expression in
the cells that can express the endogenous IRF-7 gene, the
RL1 plasmid that contains the entire CpG island was methylated in
vitro by SssI, an enzyme that methylates every CpG
dinucleotide. The methylated and unmethylated RL1 plasmids were
transfected into HeLa cells together with a plasmid conferring resistance to neomycin and stably transfected clones were selected by
growth in G418 and pooled. Luciferase activity in cell lysates of the
transfected cells was determined before and after IFN- treatment. As
shown in Fig. 6, cells transfected with
RL1 plasmid showed a constitutive luciferase activity that was further
increased by treatment with IFN- . In contrast, the expression level
of methylated RL1 was 100-fold lower than that of their unmethylated counterpart. Furthermore, after IFN- treatment no further
stimulation of the promoter activity could be detected. However,
treatment with 5-AzaC (5 µM) for 4 days could restore the
activity of IRF-7 promoter and further stimulation (2-fold)
was observed after IFN treatment (data not shown). -Galactosidase
activity was detected in all transfected cells and was used as internal
control to normalize the luciferase activity. These results showed that
methylation of CpG dinucleotides in IRF-7 promoter blocks
its expression even in the cells that can express endogenous
IRF-7 gene.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
In vitro methylated
IRF-7 promoter is silenced in HeLa cells. RL1
plasmid which contains IRF-7 promoter with the entire CpG
island, was methylated in vitro using SssI
methylase. Permanently transfected HeLa cells containing either
methylated or unmethylated RL1 plasmid were generated as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The transfected cells were pooled
and treated with IFN- (500 units/ml) overnight or left untreated.
Luciferase activity was determined in lysates of both IFN- -treated
and untreated cells. The error bars represent the S.D. of
three independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have cloned, in this study, the promoter region of the human
IRF-7 gene and analyzed the molecular basis of
IFN- -mediated transcriptional activation. In contrast to
functionally related IRF-3, which is expressed constitutively, IRF-7 is
expressed predominantly in cells of lymphoid origin and its expression
is stimulated by IFN (4, 15). Consistent with this pattern of
expression, IRF-7 promoter shows several common
characteristics with the promoters of other inducible genes. It has the
conserved canonic TATA box that is absent in the promoter of human
IRF-1, IRF-2, IRF-3, and p48/IRF-9 genes. Upstream of the TATA box there is a NF B
site which overlaps with the STAT 6-binding site and Sp-1 site. Since the IRF-7 gene is transcriptionally activated by type I IFNs
the presence of the ISRE site in the promoter was expected. The
sequence analysis revealed the presence of GAAAAGCGAAACTC domain
similar to the IRF-E consensus sequence (28) localized about 260 bp upstream of the TATA box. However, the deletion analyses as well as
mutation analyses of this IRF-E site showed that this IRF-E did not
confer the IFN stimulated activation. In contrast, the GTTTCGCTTTC
sequence, present in the first intron of the IRF-7 gene,
that closely resembles the ISRE site (29) of ISG genes responded to IFN
mediated signaling and its deletion or mutation abolished the
stimulation of the IRF-7 promoter in IFN-treated cells. The
fact that a single copy of this element was able to mediate response to
IFN- indicated that this ISRE functions as an enhancer in
IFN- -treated cells. Accordingly binding of both IRF-1 and ISGF3
complex to this ISRE was detected in IFN- -treated cells. However, no
activation of IRF-7 promoter was observed in a cell line
that was defective in p48/IRF-9 (U2A cells). Since reconstitution of
p48/IRF-9 expression, but not overexpression of IRF-1, restored the
response to IFN- , we concluded that the stimulation is mediated by
ISGF3 complex. These data are consistent with previous observations
that the expression of IRF-7 gene is stimulated by Type I
IFNs but not by IFN- , since the ISGF3 complex is assembled only in
IFN- -treated cells (29). The importance of p48/IRF-9 in the
expression of IRF-7 gene was suggested by the results in
p48/IRF-9 / mice, which shown that the fibroblasts
derived from these mice were not able to express IFNA after viral
infection and the defect was related to the absence of IRF-7 (14). Only
after the reconstitution of IRF-7 expression could IFNA expression be
rescued. However, the results of transient transfection assay indicated
that the human IRF-7 promoter has a low constitutive
activity. Furthermore, we have detected low levels of constitutive
expression of IRF-7 gene in lymphoid tissues (4) as well as
in primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells, macrophages, and
dendritic cells.2 Thus, it is
likely that the transcription activities of the mouse and human
IRF-7 promoter are not identical.
The role of NF B site in IRF-7 promoter remains to be
clarified. Recently it was shown that IRF-7 is expressed at high levels in some EBV-transformed B cell lines and it was suggested that the
EBV-encoded integral membrane protein, LMP-1, which activates NF B,
stimulated the expression of the IRF-7 gene (17). However, co-transfection of the reporter RL1 plasmid with LMP-1 expression plasmid to HeLa cells did not result in significant activation of
IRF-7 promoter (data not shown). These results suggested
that the LMP-1 mediated activation of IRF-7 may be cell
type-specific and that NF B activation may require cooperation with
other transcription factors. Thus, further studies are needed to
determine the role of the NF B site in the transcriptional activity
of IRF-7 in infected cells.
Previous finding from several laboratories, including ours, indicated
that there is a close correlation between the induction of
IFNA genes expression in infected cells and the ability of this cell to synthesize IRF-7 (13-15). The inability of the virus to
induce expression of IFNA genes in fibrosarcoma cell line
2fTGH was directly related to the inability of these cells to express both the constitutive and IFN- -mediated expression of IRF-7. Since
IRF-7 is a critical determinant for the induction of IFNA genes and
perhaps other cytokine and chemokine genes as well, we were interested
to determine what is the molecular mechanism which silences the
expression of this gene in 2fTGH cells. The observation that the cloned
transfected IRF-7 promoter was transcriptionally active in
2fTGH cells, which have an intact IRF-7 gene but was not
able to express it, as well as the identification of a CpG cluster
close to the transcription initiation site indicated that this gene may
be silenced epigenetically by methylation. Several results indicated
that it is indeed the case. First, the expression of the
IRF-7 gene and inducibility of IFNA genes were
restored in these cells by treatment with methyltransferase inhibitor
5-AzaC. Second, the MSP analysis of the bisulfite-modified DNA and
sequencing of the amplified CpG island demonstrated that the cytosine
residue in CpG dinucleotides are methylated. Third, the expression of in vitro methylated IRF-7 promoter was silenced
in cells that could express endogenous IRF-7 gene. The
silencing of the IRF-7 gene by methylation was also observed
in three out of six cancer cell lines examined, thereby indicating that
it is not a rare phenomenon in cancer cells (data not shown). Although
it was originally thought that DNA methylation prevents binding of the
transcription factors to their respective recognition sites, recent
evidence indicates that this direct interference plays a minor role in gene silencing (35). The DNA methylation produces a general effect on
chromatin and results in a direct exclusion of the transcriptional machinery from the methylated promoters (35). Methylation is a common
mechanism of gene imprinting on inactive X chromosome in females and
there is growing evidence that tumor suppressor genes can be silenced
by hypermethylation in cancer cells. The selective advantage for a
cancer cell to lose tumor suppressor function either by
hypermethylation or mutation in the coding region seems to be
identical and mutually exclusive (19). In addition to tumor suppressor
genes such as VHL and MLH1 genes (36, 37), other genes have been shown
to be silenced by hypermethylation in cancer cells. These are genes
that control cell cycle, such as p15INK and
p16INK, DNA repair enzyme O-methylguanosine
methyltransferase, and genes involved in apoptosis such as DAP kinase
(38-41). Previous studies suggested that the loss of IRF-1 function
may be related to the development of human leukemias and the deletion
of 5q31, a region where IRF-1 is located, is often found in acute
myeloid leukemia (42). In addition, mice with a null mutation of IRF-8
developed chronic myelogenous leukemia-like syndrome (43). Although
cell lines overexpressing IRF-7 show slower growth rate (data not
shown), when compared with the parental lines, very little is presently known about the functions of IRF-7 in uninfected cells. While it is
still premature to speculate whether IRF-7 is a tumor suppressor gene,
the observation that DNA damaging agents and UV irradiation can
activate IRF-7 (44) suggests that IRF-7 may play a role in the
maintenance of genomic stability. Thus, clearly further studies are
needed to establish whether IRF-7 is instrumental for tumorigenesis or
its progression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Jasper E. Manning Jr. for technical
assistance, and Drs. J. Herman for valuable advice on the analysis
of hypermethylated regions, and G. Stark for the 2fTGH and U2A cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant R01 AI19737-17 (to P. M. P.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Oncology Center,
The Bunting and Blaustein Cancer Research Building, Rm. 351, 1650 Orleans St., Baltimore, MD 21231. Tel.: 410-955-8900; Fax: 410-955-0840; E-mail: parowe@jhmi.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 2, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005288200
2
R. Lu, W.-C. Au, W.-S. Yeow, N. Hageman, and
P. M. Pitha, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IFN, interferon;
5-AzaC, 5'-aza-deoxycytidine;
DNMT, DNA methyltransferase;
EBV, Epstein-Barr virus;
IRF, interferon regulatory factor;
IRF-E, IRF
binding element;
ISG, interferon-stimulated gene;
ISRE, interferon-stimulated response element;
MSP, methylation specific
polymerase chain reaction;
RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase-polymerase
chain reaction;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
FBS, fetal
bovine serum;
kb, kilobase(s);
bp, base pair(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Pitha, P. M.,
Au, W.-C,
Lowther, W.,
Juang, Y. T.,
Schafer, S. L.,
Burysek, L.,
Hiscott, J.,
and Moore, P. A.
(1998)
Biochimie (Paris)
80,
651-658
|
| 2.
|
Nguyen, H.,
Hiscott, J.,
and Pitha, P. M.
(1997)
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
8,
293-312
|
| 3.
|
Au, W.-C.,
Moore, P. A.,
Lowther, W.,
Juang, Y. T.,
and Pitha, P. M.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11657-11661
|
| 4.
|
Au, W.-C.,
Moore, P. A.,
LaFleur, D. W.,
Tombal, B.,
and Pitha, P. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29210-29217
|
| 5.
|
Schafer, S. L.,
Lin, R.,
Moore, P. A.,
Hiscott, J.,
and Pitha, P. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2714-2720
|
| 6.
|
Juang, Y.,
Lowther, W.,
Kellum, M.,
Au, W.-C.,
Lin, R.,
Hiscott, J.,
and Pitha, P. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
18,
9837-9842
|
| 7.
|
Wathelet, M. G.,
Lin, C. H.,
Parekh, B. S.,
Ronco, L. V.,
Howley, P. M.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
507-518
|
| 8.
|
Lin, R.,
Heylbroeck, C.,
Genin, P.,
Pitha, P. M.,
and Hiscott, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
959-966
|
| 9.
|
Weaver, B. K.,
Kumar, K. P.,
and Reich, N. C.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
1359-1368
|
| 10.
|
Yoneyama, M.,
Suhara, W.,
Fukuhara, Y.,
Fukuda, M.,
Nishida, E.,
and Fujita, T.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1087-1095
|
| 11.
|
Kumar, K. P.,
McBride, K. M.,
Weaver, B. K.,
Dingwall, C.,
and Reich, N. C.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
4159-4168
|
| 12.
|
Lowther, W. J.,
Moore, P. A.,
Carter, K. C.,
and Pitha, P. M.
(1999)
DNA Cell Biol.
18,
685-692
|
| 13.
|
Yeow, W.-S.,
Au, W.-C.,
Juang, Y. T.,
Fields, C. D.,
Dent, C. L.,
Gewert, D. R.,
and Pitha, P. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6313-6320
|
| 14.
|
Sato, M.,
Hata, N.,
Asagiri, M.,
Nakaya, T.,
Taniguchi, T.,
and Tanaka, N.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
441,
106-110
|
| 15.
|
Marie, I.,
Durbin, J. E.,
and Levy, D. E.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
6660-6669
|
| 16.
|
Genin, P.,
Algarte, M.,
Roof, P.,
Lin, R.,
and Hiscott, J.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
5352-5361
|
| 17.
|
Zhang, L.,
and Pagano, J. S.
(2000)
J. Virol.
74,
1061-1068
|
| 18.
|
Zhang, L.,
and Pagano, J. S.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
5748-5757
|
| 19.
|
Baylin, S. B.,
and Herman, J. G.
(2000)
Trends Genet.
16,
168-174
|
| 20.
|
Nan, X.,
Ng, H. H.,
Johnson, C. A.,
Laherty, C. D.,
Turner, B. M.,
Eisenman, R. N.,
and Bird, A.
(1998)
Nature
393,
386-389
|
| 21.
|
Bird, A.
(1999)
Science
286,
2287-2288
|
| 22.
|
Bakin, A. V.,
and Curran, T.
(1999)
Science
283,
387-390
|
| 23.
|
Okano, M.,
Bell, D. W.,
Haber, D. A.,
and Li, E.
(1999)
Cell
99,
247-257
|
| 24.
|
Hansen, R. S.,
Wijmenga, C.,
Luo, P.,
Stanek, A. M.,
Canfield, T. K.,
Weemaes, C. M.,
and Gartler, S. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14412-14417
|
| 25.
|
Ye, J.,
Xu, R. H.,
Taylor-Papadimitriou, J.,
and Pitha, P. M.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6178-6189
|
| 26.
|
Deyrup, A. T.,
Krishnan, S.,
Cockburn, B. N.,
and Schwartz, N. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9450-9456
|
| 27.
|
Herman, J. G.,
Graff, J. R.,
Myohanen, S.,
Nelkin, B. D.,
and Baylin, S. B.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9821-9826
|
| 28.
|
Tanaka, N.,
Kawakami, T.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4531-4538
|
| 29.
|
Darnell, J. E., Jr.,
Kerr, I. M.,
and Stark, G. R.
(1994)
Science
264,
1415-1421
|
| 30.
|
Kawakami, T.,
Matsumoto, M.,
Sato, M.,
Harada, H.,
Taniguchi, T.,
and Kitagawa, M.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
358,
225-229
|
| 31.
|
Harada, H.,
Matsumoto, M.,
Sato, M.,
Kashiwazaki, Y.,
Kimura, T.,
Kitagawa, M.,
Yokochi, T.,
Tan, R. S.,
Takasugi, T.,
Kadokawa, Y.,
Schindler, C.,
Schreiber, R. D.,
Noguchi, S.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(1996)
Genes Cells
1,
995-1005
|
| 32.
|
Kimura, T.,
Kadokawa, Y.,
Harada, H.,
Matsumoto, M.,
Sato, M.,
Kashiwazaki, Y.,
Tarutani, M.,
Tan, R. S.,
Takasugi, T.,
Matsuyama, T.,
Mak, T. W.,
Noguchi, S.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(1996)
Genes Cells
1,
115-24
|
| 33.
|
Reis, L. F.,
Harada, H.,
Wolchok, J. D.,
Taniguchi, T.,
and Vilcek, J.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
185-193
|
| 34.
|
Harada, H.,
Fujita, T.,
Miyamoto, M.,
Kimura, Y.,
Maruyama, M.,
Furia, A.,
Miyata, T.,
and Taniguchi, T.
(1989)
Cell
58,
729-739
|
| 35.
|
Bird, A. P.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(1999)
Cell
99,
451-454
|
| 36.
|
Kane, M. F.,
Loda, M.,
Gaida, G. M.,
Lipman, J.,
Mishra, R.,
Goldman, H.,
Jessup, J. M.,
and Kolodner, R.
(1977)
Cancer Res.
1,
808-811
|
| 37.
|
Herman, J. G.,
Latif, F.,
Weng, Y.,
Lerman, M. I.,
Zbar, B.,
Liu, S.,
Samid, D.,
Duan, D. S.,
Gnarra, J. R.,
Linehan, W. M.,
and Baylin, S. B.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9700-9704
|
| 38.
|
Merlo, A.,
Herman, J. G.,
Mao, L.,
Lee, D. J.,
Gabrielson, E.,
Burger, P. C.,
Baylin, S. B.,
and Sidransky, D.
(1995)
Nat. Med.
1,
686-692
|
| 39.
|
Esteller, M.,
Toyota, M.,
Sanchez-Cespedes, M.,
Capella, G.,
Peinado, M. A.,
Watkins, D. N.,
Issa, J. P.,
Sidranski, D.,
Baylin, S. B.,
and Herman, J. G.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
2368-237
|
| 40.
|
Cameron, E. E.,
Baylin, S. B.,
and Herman, J. G.
(1999)
Blood
94,
2445-2451
|
| 41.
|
Katzenellenbogen, R. A.,
Baylin, S. B.,
and Herman, J. G.
(1999)
Blood
93,
4347-4353
|
| 42.
|
Boultwood, J.,
Fidler, C.,
Lewis, S.,
MacCarthy, A.,
Sheridan, H.,
Kelly, S.,
Oscier, D.,
Buckle, V. J.,
and Wainscoat, J. D.
(1993)
Blood
82,
2611-2616
|
| 43.
|
Holtschke, T.,
Lohler, J.,
Kanno, Y.,
Fehr, T.,
Giese, N.,
Rosenbauer, F.,
Lou, J.,
Knobeloch, K. P.,
Gabriele, L.,
Waring, J. F.,
Bachmann, M. F.,
Zinkernagel, R. M.,
Morse, H. C., 3rd,
Ozato, K.,
and Horak, I.
(1996)
Cell
87,
307-317
|
| 44.
|
Kim, T. K.,
Kim, T.,
Kim, T. Y.,
Lee, W. G.,
and Yim, J.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
1153-1156
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg |