Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005275200 on August 4, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 41, 31826-31832, October 13, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/41/31826    most recent
M005275200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kapadia, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kapadia, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Regulation of the Bovine Kidney Microsomal Chloride Channel p64 by p59fyn, a Src Family Tyrosine Kinase*

John C. EdwardsDagger and Shefalee Kapadia

From the Renal Division, Department of Medicine, St. Louis University and the St. Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63106

Received for publication, June 16, 2000, and in revised form, August 1, 2000


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

p64 is a chloride channel of intracellular membranes which is present in regulated secretory vesicles. Mechanisms by which the p64 channel could be regulated are largely unknown. p59fyn is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase of the Src family that has been implicated in a variety of intracellular signaling events. The N-terminal portion of p64 has several potential binding sites for Src family SH2 domains. In this paper, we demonstrate that p64 becomes tyrosine phosphorylated when co-expressed with p59fyn in HeLa cells. We show that co-expression of p64 with p59fyn renders p64 a ligand for the SH2 domain of p59fyn and this SH2 binding is eliminated by treating p64 with alkaline phosphatase. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we find that tyrosine 33 in the p64 sequence is necessary for SH2 binding. We also characterized p64-p59fyn interactions using native material from bovine kidney. We found that a small fraction of native kidney p64 can bind Fyn SH2 in vitro. Immunoprecipitation of p64 from solubilized kidney membranes yields a kinase activity with the same mobility by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as authentic bovine p59fyn. Finally, we demonstrate that co-expression of p64 and p59fyn in HeLa cells results in enhanced p64-associated chloride channel activity.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

p64 is a chloride channel protein originally discovered by purification of chloride channel activity from bovine kidney microsomes (1). cDNA encoding p64 was subsequently cloned (2). p64 was found to be a 428-amino acid protein consisting of a hydrophilic N-terminal domain comprising about half the protein and a C-terminal domain containing two hydrophobic stretches. Expression of p64 in HeLa cells results in increased chloride permeability of membranes isolated from these cells and in the appearance of a novel chloride channel as detected in a planar lipid bilayer (3).

p64 is normally expressed at high levels in intracellular vesicles of renal proximal tubule cells (4). In cultured cells, p64 is expressed in the limiting membranes of intracellular dense core vesicles which redistribute to the periphery in response to phorbol ester and calcium ionophore but not forskolin. Thus, p64 is a candidate for the chloride channel activity known to be present in certain regulated secretory vesicles. The contents of the p64-associated regulated secretory vesicles are not known.

P64 has subsequently been discovered to be a member of a family of related proteins which to date includes 7 members (5-13). This family has been named the CLIC family for chloride intracellular channel (9). Chloride channel activity has been attributed to several of these p64 homologs (5, 7, 10, 11, 13). Each of the CLIC family members shows high homology to the C-terminal half of p64 containing the hydrophobic domains. In contrast, none of the other CLIC family members have a region with significant homology to the long hydrophilic N-terminal domain of p64. The channel activity of CLIC family proteins must reside in the portion of the molecule which is shared among the CLIC family members, i.e. the C-terminal half. The non-conserved N-terminal domain of p64 may confer some specific regulation or targeting to the channel forming C-terminal domain (2, 4).

The N-terminal domain of p64 in fact contains sequences which are candidates for sites of protein-protein interaction. Within this domain lies a multiply repeated, acidic, proline-rich motif which contains the core PXXP consensus for binding to SH3 domains (14-16). Deletion of this motif was shown to have a dramatic effect on the subcellular distribution of p64 (4). A binding partner for this region has not yet been identified.

In addition, within the N-terminal domain of p64 are a number of tyrosine residues which lie within consensus sequences for binding by various families of SH2 domains (17). SH2-containing proteins carry out a variety of regulatory functions within cells and SH2 interactions have been shown to be important in the regulation of a least one other ion channel (18, 19).

p59fyn is a member of the Src family of tyrosine kinases which have been implicated as key regulatory molecules in a variety of intracellular pathways (20-22). Like other members of the Src family, p59fyn contains both SH2 and SH3 domains that are critical to the various regulatory functions of the protein. p59fyn is expressed in kidney cells (20, 24) and is known to be present in membrane fractions in cells in which it is expressed (25).

In this paper, we show that co-expression of p64 and p59fyn in HeLa cells leads to tyrosine phosphorylation of p64 and that tyrosine-phosphorylated p64 is a ligand for the SH2 domain of Fyn. We demonstrate that tyrosine 33 in the p64 sequence is necessary for binding to the SH2 domain of Fyn. We go on to demonstrate that native bovine kidney p64 is a ligand for the SH2 domain of Fyn and that immunoprecipitation of p64 from solubilized bovine kidney membranes brings down a tyrosine kinase activity indistinguishable from Fyn. Finally, we demonstrate that co-expression of Fyn with p64 in HeLa cells leads to increased chloride channel activity compared with expression of p64 alone.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cells, DNA, and General Methods-- Plasmid pNHDelta P encoding p64 downstream of a T7 promoter has been previously described (1). HeLa cells, recombinant vaccinia encoding T7 RNA polymerase (26), and plasmids encoding mouse Fyn (pBS-Fyn) (27, 28), glutathione S-transferase (GST1; pGEX-KG) (29), and GST-Fyn fusion proteins (30) were obtained from Dr. Andrey Shaw, Washington University, St. Louis, MO. Protein assays were performed with the BCA kit from Pierce Biochemical, Rockford IL.

Preparation of Bovine Kidney Membranes-- Fresh bovine kidney from a slaughterhouse was chilled on ice. Two grams of cortical slices were minced and suspended in 20 ml of 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaVO4, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 8.0. The suspension was homogenized with 20 strokes in a glass tissue grinder, then 20 strokes in a Teflon Dounce homogenizer on ice. The suspension was centrifuged at 1,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C in an SS34 rotor. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged 4,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C in the same rotor. The supernatant again was collected and centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for 1 h in a Beckman Ti70.1 rotor. The pellet was solubilized in 5 ml of 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.l mM NaVO4, 1.0% Triton X-100, pH 8.0. After mixing for 10 min at 4 °C, the solution was again centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for 1 h at 4 °C. The supernatant was used as solubilized bovine kidney membrane protein.

Expression of Proteins in HeLa cells-- p64 and Fyn were expressed in HeLa cells using a vaccinia-T7 system as described previously (3, 26). Cultures on 3.5-cm dishes were transfected with a 3.75 µg of pNHDelta P and 1.25 µg of pBS-Fyn. For those samples which did not receive both Fyn and p64 encoding plasmids, the missing DNA was replaced with the parent plasmid, pBluescript SK- (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). After transfection, cultures were incubated for 10 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Cell lysates were prepared by solubilizing a culture in 500 µl of 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaVO4, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 8.0 (solubilization buffer).

Preparation of Immobilized GST-Fyn Fusion Proteins-- GST, GST-Fyn SH3 fusion protein, and GST-Fyn SH2 fusion protein were purified from bacteria as described (27). The fusion proteins were immobilized on Affi-Gel 15 beads (Bio-Rad) using methods recommended by the manufacturer.

SH2 Binding-- Five hundred micrograms of solubilized bovine kidney membrane protein or 200 µl of solubilized HeLa cell protein were mixed with 20 µl of a 50% suspension of beads carrying the appropriate fusion protein in a total volume of 750 µl of solubilization buffer. The mixture was incubated at 4 °C for 1 h with gentle mixing. Beads were then collected by centrifugation. Unbound proteins were removed by 4 washes at 4 °C in 750 µl of solubilization buffer. Samples from HeLa cells were then suspended in SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Samples from bovine kidney were subjected to a further wash with 50 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM vanadate, followed by a wash with 500 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM vanadate, before suspension in SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Samples were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, blotted to nitrocellulose, and probed with AP95 antibody specific for p64 (2, 4), and detected on x-ray film using the SuperSignal system (Pierce Biochemical).

For the alkaline phosphatase experiment, cells from a 3.5-cm dish were lysed by homogenization in 1 ml of 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM MgCl2. The sample was divided into two 250-ml aliquots. Fifteen units of alkaline phosphatase (Promega, Madison, WI) were added to one of the samples and both samples incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Two-hundred fifty microliters of 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 2% Triton X-100, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was added to each and SH2 binding assessed as above.

Immunoprecipitation-in Vitro Kinase-- Two-hundred fifty micrograms of solubilized bovine kidney protein were brought to 500 µl volume with solubilization buffer. Five microliters of non-immune rabbit serum and 40 µl of 50% suspension of protein A-agarose beads were added and the sample mixed at 4 °C for 3 h. The beads were removed by centrifugation. Two and one-half microliters of pre-immune rabbit serum, rabbit serum raised against p64 (2), or rabbit serum raised against p59fyn (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) were added and the samples mixed at 4 °C overnight. Twenty microliters of protein A-agarose bead suspension were added, the samples incubated at 4 °C for 2 h, and the beads then collected by centrifugation and washed with four 10-min exchanges of solubilization buffer. After the last wash, the supernatant was removed as completely as possible and the beads were suspended in 10 µl of 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM MnCl2, and 0.1 mM NaVO4. One microliter of [gamma -32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mM, 10 mCi/ml) was added and the mixture incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Fifteen microliters of 2 × SDS-PAGE loading buffer were added, the samples separated by SDS-PAGE, and detected by autoradiography.

Mutagenesis-- Mutants were generated in the p64 coding region of plasmid NHDelta P using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with mutagenic primer oligonucleotides. For each mutant, a pair of overlapping sense and antisense primers were obtained which introduced the desired mutation along with a new unique restriction endonuclease site. The sense mutagenic primer was paired with an antisense primer from downstream of the end of the p64 coding region, the mutagenic antisense primer was paired with a sense primer from upstream the coding region, and PCR was carried out by standard methods. The resulting PCR products were cloned in the PCRII cloning vector (InVitrogen) and sequences determined. The separate clones encoding the two halves of the molecule were then put together using the novel restriction site generated by the mutagenic oligonucleotides. CsCl-purified plasmid DNA was used for the HeLa-vaccinia expression experiments.

Chloride Permeability Assays-- HeLa cells were infected/transfected as described above except the cultures were scaled up to 6-cm dishes. Ten hours after transfection, cells were rinsed with PBS and then scraped into ice-cold 250 mM sucrose, 10 mM imidazole, pH 7.0, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM NaVO4, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The suspension was homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer for 30 strokes on ice, centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C, the supernatant collected and centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for 1 h at 4 °C. The pellet was dissolved in 250 µl of the homogenization solution supplemented with 1.4% N-octylglucoside and the concentration of protein determined. One hundred micrograms of solubilized protein in 0.9 ml of 1.4% N-octylglucoside were added to 0.1 ml of 100 mg/ml asolectin, 90 mg/ml n-octylglucoside and then dialyzed against 200 mM KCl, 2 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 1 mM dithiothreitol at 4 °C for 36 h with three exchanges. Resulting vesicles were passed 15 times through a 200-nm pore membrane to yield a homogeneous population of unilamellar vesicles.

For the alkaline phosphatase experiment, infected/transfected cells from two 6-cm culture dishes were homogenized in 2 ml of 10 mM Tris, pH 8, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol. Homogenates were divided into two 1-ml fractions. One fraction received 30 units of alkaline phosphatase, one fraction received EDTA (2 mM final) and NaVO4 (0.1 mM final). Both were incubated at room temperature for 30 min prior to isolation of membranes by centrifugation as described in the preceding paragraph.

The chloride efflux assay was performed as described previously (3). In brief, 200 µl of vesicles were passed through a Bio-Gel P-6 (Bio-Rad) spin column that had been equilibrated with 400 mM sucrose. The effluent from the column was added to 2 ml of 400 mM sucrose and the extravesicular chloride concentration was continuously monitored with a chloride selective electrode. Valinomycin was added to 1 µM final concentration to initiate voltage-dependent chloride efflux. Triton X-100 was then added to 0.1% final concentration to release any remaining intravesicular chloride. The initial rate of fractional chloride release after addition of valinomycin is taken as the chloride permeability of the reconstituted vesicles. Efflux rates pooled from several independent expression-reconstitution experiments for each group are reported as mean ± S.E. Comparisons between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance (31).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We initially looked for p64-Fyn interactions in a cell culture expression system. p64 and p59fyn were expressed separately or together in HeLa cells using a vaccinia T7-driven system as we have previously reported for the functional expression of p64 (3). Using this expression system, we determined the tyrosine phosphorylation status of p64 when expressed alone or with p59fyn. Cells expressing p64 or p64 plus p59fyn were solubilized in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors. Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted, and probed with antibodies specific for phosphotyrosine (Fig. 1A). There were no major tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in cells expressing p64 alone. In cells expressing both p64 and p59fyn, two major tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins are apparent: one the size of p59fyn and one the size of p64 (Fig. 1A, lanes 1 and 2). To determine whether the larger tyrosine-phosphorylated protein is indeed p64, the cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with p64 antisera and probed with phosphotyrosine antibodies or with antibodies directed at p64. The upper tyrosine-phosphorylated band is precipitated with anti-p64 antisera and this band co-migrates with p64 itself (Fig. 1A, lanes 3-8). Thus, we conclude that co-expression of p64 with p59fyn results in tyrosine phosphorylation of p64.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, p64 is tyrosine phosphorylated when co-expressed with Fyn. HeLa cells expressing p64 alone (lanes 1, 3, and 5) or p64 plus p59fyn (lanes 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8) were solubilized. Total protein (lanes 1 and 2) or immunoprecipitates with pre-immune serum (labeled P; lanes 3, 4, and 7) or with antiserum raised against p64 (labeled I; lanes 5, 6, and 8) were separated, blotted, and probed with antibodies specific for phosphotyrosine (lanes 1-6) or p64 (lanes 7 and 8). The positions of p64 and p59fyn are marked with arrows. The dense bands present in all immunoprecipitated lanes represent IgG heavy chain. B, p64 becomes a ligand for the SH2 domain of Fyn when co-expressed with Fyn. HeLa cells expressing p64 alone (lanes 1 and 3-5) or p64 plus p59fyn (lanes 2 and 6-8) were solubilized. Total protein (lanes 1 and 2) or protein which bound to immobilized GST fusion proteins (lanes 3-8) were separated, blotted, and probed with affinity-purified anti-p64 antisera. The immobilized fusion proteins were GST itself (labeled C; lanes 3 and 6), GST-fynSH3 (labeled SH3; lanes 4 and 7), or GST-Fyn SH2 (labeled SH2; lanes 5 and 8). C, phosphatase treatment eliminates p64 binding to the Fyn-SH2 domain. p64 and p59fyn were co-expressed in HeLa cells and cell lysates prepared. Total protein (lane 1) or protein which bound to immobilized GST-Fyn SH2 fusion protein (lanes 2 and 3) was separated and probed with affinity purified anti-p64 antisera. Prior to binding to fusion protein, the lysate was treated with alkaline phosphatase (lane 3) or subjected to identical incubation in the absence of added phosphatase (lane 2). In panels B and C, the arrows mark the migration position of p64.

We determined whether p64 is a ligand for the SH2 or SH3 domains of Fyn, either when expressed in the absence or presence of p59fyn. p64 was expressed in HeLa cells either alone or with p59fyn. Cells were solubilized and proteins allowed to bind to immobilized GST (control), GST-Fyn SH3 fusion protein, or GST-Fyn SH2 fusion protein. Bound proteins were separated, blotted, and probed with p64 antibodies (Fig. 1B). When p64 is expressed in the absence of p59fyn, it does not bind to either SH2 or SH3 domains of Fyn. However, when co-expressed with p59fyn, p64 binds to GST-Fyn SH2 but not GST-Fyn SH3.

Typical SH2 binding requires tyrosine phosphorylation of the SH2 ligand (17, 18). To determine whether phosphorylation state effects the ability of p64 to bind to Fyn-SH2 domain, p59fyn and p64 were coexpressed in HeLa cells and lysates prepared. Lysates were either treated with alkaline phosphatase or kept as control prior to exposure to immobilized Fyn-SH2. Bound proteins were separated and probed as before (Fig. 1C). Phosphatase pretreatment of the solubilized membranes from cells co-expressing p64 and p59fyn eliminates the SH2 binding by p64. Taken together, these experiments indicate that 1) co-expression of p64 with p59fyn results in tyrosine phosphorylation of p64, and 2) tyrosine phosphorylation of p64 renders it a ligand for the SH2 domain of Fyn.

There are a number of tyrosines within the p64 sequence which could serve as sites for phosphorylation and SH2 binding. A consensus for SH2 binding to Src family tyrosine kinases has been described. This consensus sequence is comprised of a phosphorylated tyrosine plus the 3 amino acids immediately C-terminal to it, the consensus sequence being Tyr(Glu, Asp, or Thr)(Glu, Asn, or Asp)(Ile, Val, Met, or Leu) (17). Within the N-terminal half of p64, tyrosines at positions 20 (Tyr-Glu-Asp-Ser), 33 (Tyr-Asp-Glu-Val), and 56 (Tyr-Asp-Ser-Val) all show some similarity to this consensus, tyrosine 33 fitting most closely. Using site-directed mutagenesis, the codons for each of these tyrosines was changed to encode alanine in separate constructs, named p64(Y20A), p64(Y33A), and p64(Y56A), respectively. The resulting mutants were co-expressed with p59fyn in HeLa cells and Fyn-SH2 binding was assessed (Fig. 2). We found that mutation of tyrosine 33 eliminates binding of p64 to Fyn-SH2 while mutation of tyrosines 20 and 56 have no effect on SH2 binding.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Tyrosine 33 is necessary for p64 binding to Fyn SH2. Normal p64 or each of the tyrosine mutants were co-expressed with p59fyn in HeLa cells and cell lysates prepared. Twenty-five micrograms of total cell lysate protein (panel A) or those proteins which bound to immobilized GST-Fyn SH2 (panel B) were separated, blotted, and probed with affinity purified anti-p64 antisera. Each panel contains material from cells expressing normal p64 (lane 1), p64(Y33A) (lane 2), p64(Y20A) (lane 3), and p64(Y56A) (lane 4). On each panel, migration positions of molecular weight standards are marked (from the top: 97, 66, 45, and 31 kilodaltons, respectively).

Proteins from cells expressing either p64 or the p64(Y33A) mutant with or without co-expression of p59fyn were assessed for expression of p64 and p59fyn, for SH2 binding by p64, and for tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 3). In each panel of Fig. 3, lanes 1 and 2 are from cells not expressing p64, lanes 3-5 are from cells expressing wild type p64, and lanes 6 and 7 are from cells expressing p64(Y33A). Lanes 1, 3, and 6 are from cells without exogenous p59fyn, lanes 2, 4, and 7 are from cells expressing normal p59fyn, and lane 5 is from cells expressing a kinase-defective mutant of p59fyn (28). Total protein probed for p64 (panel A) and p59fyn (panel B) demonstrate the expected patterns of expression. In panel C, solubilized protein which bound to immobilized GST-Fyn SH2 fusion protein were separated, blotted, and probed for p64. As expected, only wild type p64 expressed with active p59fyn shows SH2 binding (lane 4). Panel D shows total proteins from each set of cells probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. In these experiments, a low level of an endogenous tyrosine-phosphorylated protein was detectable in the 60,000 dalton range in cells which were not expressing exogenous p59fyn. In cells expressing active p59fyn, an abundant tyrosine-phosphorylated band corresponding to p59fyn is present (lanes 2, 4, and 7). There is no increase in tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in cells expressing the kinase-defective p59fyn (lane 5). As in Fig. 1, a band corresponding to p64 is tyrosine phosphorylated when p64 and active p59fyn are expressed together (lane 4). The p64 band is also apparent in cells expressing p64(Y33A) and p59fyn (lane 7). Thus, although tyrosine 33 is essential for the tyrosine phosphorylation leading to Fyn SH2 binding by p64, other tyrosines within the p64 sequence become phosphorylated as well and phosphorylation of those sites was not prevented by mutation of tyrosine 33. 


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   SH2 binding and tyrosine phosphorylation of p64 when expressed with p59fyn. Various combinations of p64 and p59fyn were expressed in HeLa cells and lysates prepared. Each panel contains material from cells expressing neither exogenous p64 nor p59fyn (lane 1), p59fyn without p64 (lane 2), p64 without p59fyn (lane 3), p64 with p59fyn (lane 4), p64 with the kinase inactive form of p59fyn (lane 5), p64(Y33A) without p59fyn (lane 6), and p64Y33A with p59fyn (lane 7). A, 25 µg of total lysate protein were separated, blotted, and probed with affinity purified antibody to p64. B, 25 µg of lysate protein were probed with antisera to p59fyn. C, protein which bound to immobilized GST-Fyn SH2 fusion protein was separated, blotted, and probed for p64. D, 2 µg of total protein were separated, blotted, and probed with antibodies for phosphotyrosine. The arrowheads mark the migration position of p64 and p59fyn.

The experiments using p64 and p59fyn overexpressed in HeLa cells show that the interactions between p59fyn and p64 are possible. To determine whether these interactions are relevant to the normal function of p64, we looked for evidence for p64- p59fyn interactions using native material from bovine kidney. Bovine kidney membranes were solubilized in Triton X-100 in the presence of phosphatase inhibitors and solubilized protein was allowed to bind to immobilized GST (control) or GST-Fyn SH2 fusion protein. After extensive washing, protein was eluted from the beads, separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted, and probed with antibodies to p64 (Fig. 4A). We found a fraction of the total p64 in solubilized bovine kidney membranes binds to immobilized SH2 domain of Fyn.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Native bovine p64 and Fyn. A, 20 µg of solubilized kidney membrane protein (lane 1) or those proteins which bound to immobilized GST (lane 2) or GST-Fyn SH2 fusion protein (lane 3) were separated, blotted, and probed with affinity purified anti-p64 antisera. The arrow marks the migration position of p64. B, solubilized kidney membrane protein was immunoprecipitated with antisera raised against p64 (lane 1), with non-immune serum (lane 2), or with antisera raised against p59fyn (lane 3). Immunoprecipitates were allowed to self-phosphorylate using [gamma -32P]ATP. Products were separated by SDS-PAGE and results detected by autoradiography. The arrow marks the expected migration position of p59fyn. In both panels A and B, the migration position of molecular weight standards (in kilodaltons) is marked.

To determine whether p64 may be stably associated with p59fyn in vivo, solubilized bovine kidney membranes were subjected to an immunoprecipitation-in vitro kinase assay as shown in Fig. 4B. Solubilized bovine kidney membranes were immunoprecipitated with anti-p64 antisera (lane 1), non-immune sera (lane 2), or anti-Fyn antisera (lane 3). The immune complexes were collected on protein A beads, washed, and allowed to self-phosphorylate with [gamma -32P]ATP. The proteins were then solubilized, separated by SDS-PAGE, and detected by autoradiography. Within such immunoprecipitates, p59fyn and other Src family tryosine kinases can phosphorylate themselves (32, 33). As expected, the Fyn antibody brought down an activity which phosphorylates a protein of about 59 kDa, consistent with the expected band of p59fyn itself. The p64 antibody brought down an activity that labels a protein indistinguishable from the p59fyn band, indicating that p59fyn is stably associated with p64 in solubilized bovine kidney membranes. Of note, there is no apparent phosphorylation of p64 or of other proteins in these immunoprecipitates.

Many proteins are known to be ligands for various SH2 and SH3 containing proteins. In many cases, the functional significance of these interactions are unknown. To determine whether interaction with p59fyn could have an effect on p64 channel activity, we expressed p64 in HeLa cells either alone or in combination with p59fyn. Cells were lysed, membranes prepared, solubilized, reconstituted, and chloride channel activity assayed as described previously. In brief, the initial rate of valinomycin-dependent efflux of chloride from reconstituted vesicles is taken as the chloride permeability. We had previously demonstrated a small but significant increase in chloride permeability from vesicles reconstituted from p64-expressing cells as compared with control (3).

The results are shown in Fig. 5A. Reconstituted vesicles from control HeLa cells expressing neither exogenous p59fyn nor p64 had a low rate of chloride efflux (0.628 ± 0.068%/s, n = 9). Expression of p59fyn alone had no detectable effect on chloride efflux rate of reconstituted vesicles (0.601 ± 0.065%/s, n = 11). As noted previously (3), vesicles reconstituted with membrane protein from cells expressing p64 had a slightly elevated rate of efflux (0.755 ± 0.058%/s, n = 18) which, however, did not achieve statistical significance in these experiments. In contrast, reconstitution of membrane proteins from cells expressing both p59fyn and p64 had a dramatically increased rate of chloride efflux (1.099 ± 0.141%/s, n = 17) which was significantly greater than that of vesicles reconstituted from cells either expressing p64 alone or no p64 (p < 0.01 in comparison with all other groups). Expression of p64(Y33A) resulted in no apparent increase in chloride permeability (efflux rate 0.6545 ± 0.054%/s, n = 11) and there was no effect on chloride permeability by co-expression of p64(Y33A) with p59fyn (efflux rate 0.602 ± 0.057%/s, n = 11). The data from cells without p64 and with cells expressing p64(Y33A) data were each pooled from three independent expression-reconstitution experiments. The data from cells expressing normal p64 were pooled from five independent experiments. Each experiment contributed 3-4 data points to each group.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Co-expression of p64 with Fyn results in increased p64-associated chloride channel activity. A, chloride efflux rates were determined using vesicles reconstituted with membrane protein from cells expressing various combinations of p64 and p59fyn as marked. The rates of efflux for each sample are given in the text (* denotes p < 0.01 in comparison with each of the other groups). B, chloride efflux rates were determined using vesicles reconstituted with membrane protein from cells expressing p64 without p59fyn, p64 with p59fyn, and p64 with the kinase inactive form of p59fyn (D-fyn) as labeled (* denotes p < 0.02 in comparison with the other groups). C, chloride efflux rates were determined using vesicles reconstituted from cells expressing no exogenous protein (control), p64, or p64 and p59fyn, with or without treatment of the crude cell lysate with alkaline phosphatase as marked (* denotes p < 0.05 between plus and minus alkaline phosphatase groups). con, control.

To further explore the requirements for activation of p64, p64 was expressed alone, with p59fyn, or with the kinase-defective mutant of Fyn. Vesicles were prepared from cells, solubilized, reconstituted, and assayed for chloride permeability. The results are shown in Fig. 5B. Vesicles reconstituted from cells expressing p64 alone yielded an efflux rate of 0.817 ± 0.102%/s (n = 7). As before, co-expression of p64 with p59fyn led to increased chloride permeability of reconstituted vesicles (efflux rate = 1.237 ± 0.13%/s, n = 7, p < 0.02 in comparison with the other groups). This enhanced activity was not seen with co-expression of p64 with the kinase defective p59fyn (efflux rate = 0.839 ± 0.080%/s, n = 8). Thus, the increased efflux was dependent on the kinase activity of p59fyn, not simply the presence of its binding sites. These data were pooled from two independent expression-reconstitution experiments.

To confirm that phosphorylation was critical to the enhanced chloride permeability of vesicles reconstituted from cells expressing p64 and p59fyn, HeLa cell extracts were treated with phosphatase inhibitors or with alkaline phosphatase prior to isolation of membrane fractions, solubilization, reconstitution, and chloride permeability assay. As presented in Fig. 5C, alkaline phosphatase treatment had no effect on chloride permeability of vesicles reconstituted from cells expressing no p64, or from cells expressing p64 in the absence of p59fyn. In contrast, alkaline phosphatase treatment of the whole cell lysate did decrease chloride permeability of vesicles reconstituted from cells expressing both p64 and p59fyn. Absolute rates of chloride efflux were: control 0.352 ± 0.32%/s, n = 4; control plus alkaline phosphatase, 0.363 ± 0.064%/s, n = 4; p64, 0.366 ± 0.032%/s, n = 5; p64 plus alkaline phosphatase, 0.374 ± 0.078%/s, n = 5; p64 + Fyn, 0.493 ± 0.029%/s, n = 5; and p64 + Fyn plus alkaline phosphatase, 0.323 ± 0.018%/s, n = 5. These results are from a single experiment.

A significant fraction of both native p64 in bovine kidney and exogenous p64 expressed in HeLa cells is present in a soluble, non-membrane associated form. It has been recently proposed that regulation of one p64 homolog could be partially due to redistribution of the protein from a soluble to a membrane inserted form (13). We carried out initial experiments to determine whether the increased chloride channel activity conferred by Fyn could be due to redistribution of p64. In one set of experiments, HeLa cells expressing either p64 alone or p64 plus p59fyn were fractionated and membrane and soluble fractions separated and probed for p64. We found no shift in distribution of p64 from the soluble to membrane-associated compartment when co-expressed with p59fyn (not shown). In a second set of experiments, a stable transfected cell line expressing p64 (4) was transfected with a Fyn expression construct and the distribution of p64 determined using confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. Again, we detected no convincing redistribution of p64 in response to p59fyn (not shown).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this paper, we have explored the relationship between the Src family tyrosine kinase, p59fyn, and the bovine intracellular chloride channel, p64. We demonstrated that both native p64 from bovine kidney and exogenous p64 expressed in HeLa cells can interact with p59fyn via SH2 binding, and that co-expression of p64 and p59fyn results in enhanced p64-dependent chloride channel activity. These results identify a new type of protein-protein interaction for CLIC family proteins and provide new insights into how the channel activity of p64 might be regulated in vivo.

p64 and p59fyn in the HeLa Cell Overexpression System-- We have shown that p64 becomes tyrosine phosphorylated when co-expressed with p59fyn in HeLa cells and that when co-expressed with p59fyn, p64 is a ligand for the SH2 domain of Fyn. p64 binding to Fyn-SH2 is phosphatase sensitive, consistent with the idea that tyrosine phosphorylation of p64 is necessary for p64 binding to Fyn-SH2.

We mapped the p64 domain necessary for Fyn-SH2 binding using directed mutagenesis and found that a single tyrosine residue at position 33 in the p64 sequence is necessary for p64 to be competent to bind Fyn-SH2. This tyrosine is the closest fit to the previously described consensus sequence for Src family SH2 binding partners. Taken together, this data strongly supports the notion that p64 can be phosphorylated at tyrosine 33 and that this phosphorylation renders p64 a ligand for the SH2 domain of Fyn.

Although tyrosine 33 is necessary for SH2 binding, it is apparent that other sites on the p64 molecule are tyrosine phosphorylated as well in the presence of p59fyn. There are multiple other tyrosine residues in p64, some of which would fit the consensus for binding to other known SH2 domains. Whether these sites take part in binding interactions with SH2-containing proteins other than Fyn remains to be seen.

Our data show that p64 becomes tyrosine phosphorylated when co-expressed with p59fyn but we do not know whether p59fyn itself is directly responsible for phosphorylation of p64. p59fyn is known to activate cascades of kinases within cells and the phosphorylation of p64 could be carried out by an endogenous kinase which is activated directly or indirectly by the presence of p59fyn.

In addition to potential SH2 binding sequences, we had noted repeated PXXP motifs in p64 which could be SH3-binding sites. In all the PXXP copies in p64, the XX residues are acidic, inconsistent with the known consensus for binding by Src family SH3 domains (14, 15). Nonetheless, we looked to see whether p64 could bind Fyn-SH3. As predicted, we found no binding. Whether the PXXP motifs of p64 are binding partners for other SH3 domains with distinct binding specificity is unknown.

The expression system used for these studies produces very high levels of both p64 and p59fyn in a short time in cells that are undergoing cytopathologic changes related to the vaccinia infection. Furthermore, the SH2 and SH3 binding experiments use high concentrations of both immobilized protein and soluble ligand. These conditions could drive low affinity interactions which might not be relevant to normal intracellular physiology. Therefore, the results from the HeLa expression system must be interpreted to mean that these interactions can happen, not that these interactions are necessarily significant under more normal conditions. Because of these considerations, we also looked for evidence of p64-p59fyn interactions using material from bovine kidney.

Native p64 and p59fyn in Bovine Kidney-- We found that a fraction of the p64 in freshly solubilized bovine kidney membranes shows affinity for Fyn-SH2. Thus, the ability of p64 to act as an SH2 ligand is not limited to the overexpression system, but takes place with native material in a normal kidney. In contrast to the experiments with the overexpression system, the experiments with native material required larger amounts of starting material and more extensive washing of the beads to detect the results. In addition, Western blots of p64 immunoprecipitates from bovine kidney probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody did not detect phosphotyrosine in p64. This sort of experiment is particularly difficult since p64 runs only slightly larger than IgG heavy chain which would interfere with any Western blot signal. We interpret these results to mean that a smaller fraction of p64 is tyrosine phosphorylated and capable of SH2 binding in the native state than when overexpressed with p59fyn in HeLa cells.

Coupled immunoprecipitation-in vitro kinase labeling is an exquisitely sensitive method for detecting interactions between proteins and tyrosine kinases (32, 33). We found that immunoprecipitation of p64 from solubilized bovine kidney membranes brings down a kinase activity which labels a protein indistinguishable by SDS-PAGE mobility from authentic p59fyn brought down with anti-Fyn antisera. The simplest interpretation of this result is that a small fraction of p64 in bovine kidney membranes is associated with p59fyn. The failure of the co-immunoprecipitated kinase to label p64 in these immunoprecipitates could indicate that only p64 which is already phosphorylated is stably associated with p59fyn.

Although the labeled band in the p64 immunoprecipitate co-migrates with p59fyn on SDS-PAGE, we cannot be certain this band in fact represents p59fyn. It could be another kinase of approximately the same molecular weight, or it could be a non-kinase protein which is the substrate for some other kinase, both of which were co-immunoprecipitated with p64. Because of its low abundance and the fact that it is almost the same size as IgG heavy chain, we have not been able to characterize this labeled protein in the p64 immunoprecipitation further. In light of all the data, our simplest explanation remains that this protein represents p59fyn which is stably associated with p64 in normal kidney membranes.

Fyn and p64-related Channel Activity-- Expression of p64 in HeLa cells has been shown to result in the appearance of a novel chloride channel activity and a small increase in chloride permeability of whole cell membranes. In this study, we have shown that co-expression of p64 with p59fyn in HeLa cells leads to a dramatic increase in the p64-dependent chloride permeability. This result is dependent on the presence of both active Fyn tyrosine kinase and on the presence of tyrosine 33 in the p64 sequence.

Non-receptor tyrosine kinases and various SH2/SH3 interactions have now been implicated in regulation of a number of ion channels through a variety of mechanisms (19, 34-39). In general, non-receptor tyrosine kinases of the Src family are capable of interacting with other proteins in at least three ways, each of which could conceivably result in changes of activity of the target protein (20-23). The target protein may be directly phosphorylated by the tyrosine kinase and phosphorylation could directly alter activity or targeting of the protein. Second, phosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues within the sequence could render the target protein a ligand for other proteins containing an appropriate SH2 domain and this protein-protein interaction could alter target protein activity or targeting. Third, the kinase could bind to the protein directly via the kinase's SH3 domain, or, in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent way, via the kinase's SH2 domain, potentially altering activity or targeting. In both the SH2 and SH3 binding paradigm, activity or targeting could be directly effected by interaction with the kinase itself, or by clustering via the kinase with other regulatory molecules.

Our initial data provides some clues as to how Fyn might lead to increased p64 activity. Coexpression of p64 with normal p59fyn resulted in enhanced channel activity while coexpression with a p59fyn mutant which has lost its tyrosine kinase activity but retains capacity for SH2 and SH3 binding failed to enhance channel activity. Thus, the presence of intact Fyn-SH2 or -SH3 binding sites in the absence of the kinase is not sufficient to cause activation of p64. Second, treatment of cell lysates with alkaline phosphatase both eliminates the SH2 binding by p64 and eliminates the enhanced chloride permeability conferred by co-expression of p59fyn with p64, further supporting the importance of phosphorylation. However, alkaline phosphatase will act on many proteins in the cell lysate, and we cannot be certain that it is the dephosphorylation of p64 itself which is critical for the phosphatase effect on activity. Third, mutation at tyrosine 33 both eliminates the ability of p64 to bind to Fyn-SH2 domain when co-expressed with p59fyn, and eliminates the Fyn-dependent activation of p64. These data indicate that phosphorylation of p64 at tyrosine 33 is necessary for Fyn-dependent activation of p64, but cannot distinguish whether phosphorylation alone is sufficient or whether subsequent binding of phosphorylated p64 to the Fyn-SH2 domain is also necessary for activation. Another possibility is that mutation of tyrosine 33 eliminates the activity of p64 altogether, independent of any effect of p59fyn. Because of the low level of activity due to expression of p64 without Fyn in these experiment, we cannot eliminate this possibility. Finally, we did not find evidence for Fyn-dependent redistribution of p64, either assessing the fraction of p64 which is associated with membranes, or by confocal immunofluorescent microscopy. These data strongly suggest that Fyn-dependent increased p64 channel activity is most likely due to a change in intrinsic activity of the protein rather than a change in distribution or targeting of p64. Our data cannot rule out a subtle shift in distribution, but we can be confident there is no large scale redistribution of p64 in the presence of p59fyn.

Thus, activation of channel activity by p59fyn requires the presence of active Fyn tyrosine kinase and phosphorylation of p64 at tyrosine 33. Furthermore, this activation is not due to some large scale redistribution of p64, but is likely due to direct activation of the channel itself.

In conclusion, we have found a novel mechanism by which p64 could be regulated in vivo. This information is of particular interest in that it links regulation of p64 and perhaps exocytosis or acidification of the regulated secretory vesicles in which it resides with one of the key regulatory cascades of the cell.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Andrey Shaw and Stephane Richard, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, for assistance, reagents, and many helpful discussions in the early stages of this work.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK46212 and AR44838 and by a grant from the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Renal Division 657/111-JC, St. Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 915 N. Grand Ave., St. Louis, MO 63106. Tel.: 314-289-6485; Fax: 314-289-7012; E-mail: John.Edwards3@med.va.gov.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 4, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005275200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GST, glutathione S-transferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; SH2, Src homology domain 2.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Landry, D. W., Akabas, M. H., Redhead, C. R., Edelman, A., Cragoe, E. J., Jr., and Al-Awqati, Q. (1989) Science 244, 1469-1472
2. Landry, D. W., Sullivan, S., Nicolaides, M., Redhead, C., Edelman, A., Field, M., Al-Awqati, Q., and Edwards, J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14948-14955
3. Edwards, J. C., Tulk, B., and Schlesinger, P. H. (1998) J. Membr. Biol. 163, 119-127
4. Redhead, C. R., Sullivan, S. K., Kosecki, C., Fujiwara, K., and Edwards, J. C. (1997) Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 691-704
5. Valenzuela, S. M., Martin, D. K., Por, S. B., Robbins, J. M., Warton, K., Bootcov, M. R., Schofield, P. R., Campbell, T. J., and Breit, S. N. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 12575-12582
6. Tulk, B. M., and Edwards, J. C. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. 274, F1140-F1149
7. Duncan, R. R., Westwood, P. K., Boyd, A., and Ashley, R. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 23880-23886
8. Edwards, J. C. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 276, F398-F408
9. Heiss, N. S., and Poustka, A. (1997) Genomics 45, 224-228
10. Qian, Z., Okuhara, D., Abe, M. K., and Rosner, M. R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1621-1627
11. Schlesinger, P. H., Blair, H. C., Teitelbaum, S. L., and Edwards, J. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 18636-18643
12. Fernandes-Salas, E., Sagar, M., Cheng, C., Yuspa, S. H., and Weinberg, W. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36488-36497
13. Nishizawa, T., Nagao, T., Iwatsubo, T., Forte, J. G., and Urushidani, T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11164-11173
14. Yu, H., Chen, J. K., Feng, S., Dalgarno, D. C., Brauer, A. W., and Schreiber, S. L. (1994) Cell 76, 933-945
15. Alexandropoulos, K., Cheng, G., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 3110-3114
16. Mayer, B. J., and Eck, M. J. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 364-367
17. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chauudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., Birge, R. B., Fajardo, J. E., Chou, M. M., Hanafusa, H., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1993) Cell 72, 767-778
18. Pawson, T., and Gish, G. D. (1992) Cell 71, 359-362
19. Sobko, A., Peretz, A., and Attali, B. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4723-4734
20. Brickell, P. M. (1992) Crit. Rev. Oncogen. 3, 401-446
21. Courtneidge, S. A., Fumagali, S., Koegl, M., Superti-Furga, G., and Twamley-Stein, G. M. (1993) Development 1993 Suppl. 57-64
22. Kefalas, P., Brown, T. R., and Brickell, P. M. (1995) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 27, 551-563
23. Resh, M. D. (1998) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 30, 1159-1162
24. Tang, H., Zhao, Z. J., Huang, X. Y., Landon, E. J., and Ingami, T. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12401-12407
25. Shenoy-Scaria, A. M., Gauen, L. K., Kwong, J., Shaw, A. J., and Lublin, D. M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6385-6392
26. Fuerst, T. T., Niles, E. G., Studier, F. W., and Moss, B. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 8122-8126
27. Gauen, L. T., Kong, A. N., Samelson, L. E., and Shaw, A. S. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5438-5446
28. Wang, L. L., Richard, S., and Shaw, A. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 2010-2013
29. Guan, K., and Dixon, J. E. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 192, 262-267
30. Richard, S., Yu, D., Blumer, K. J., Hausladen, D., Olszowy, M. W., Connelly, P. A., and Shaw, A. S. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 186-197
31. Armitage, P. (1971) Statistical Methods in Medical Research , pp. 189-207, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford
32. Veillette, A., Bookman, M. A., Horak, E. M., and Bolen, J. B. (1988) Cell 55, 301-308
33. Chellaiah, M., Fitzgerald, C., Filardo, E. J., Cheresh, D. A., and Hruska, K. A. (1996) Endocrinology 137, 2432-2440
34. Seigelbaum, S. A. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 242-245
35. Wang, Y. T., and Salter, M. W. (1994) Nature 369, 233-235
36. Rotin, D., Bar-Sagi, D., O'Brodovich, H., Merilainen, J., Lehto, V. P., Canessa, C. M., Rossier, B. C., and Downey, G. P. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4440-4450
37. Kohr, S., and Seeburg, P. H. (1996) J. Physiol. 492, 445-452
38. Yu, X., Askalan, R., Keil, G. J., and Salter, M. W. (1997) Science 275, 674-678
39. Staub, O., and Rotin, D. (1997) Curr. Opin. Neph. Hyperten. 6, 447-454


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K. S. Suh, M. Mutoh, T. Mutoh, L. Li, A. Ryscavage, J. M. Crutchley, R. A. Dumont, C. Cheng, and S. H. Yuspa
CLIC4 mediates and is required for Ca2+-induced keratinocyte differentiation
J. Cell Sci., August 1, 2007; 120(15): 2631 - 2640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. C. Edwards, C. Cohen, W. Xu, and P. H. Schlesinger
c-Src Control of Chloride Channel Support for Osteoclast HCl Transport and Bone Resorption
J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 28011 - 28022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Reinehr, S. Becker, J. Braun, A. Eberle, S. Grether-Beck, and D. Haussinger
Endosomal Acidification and Activation of NADPH Oxidase Isoforms Are Upstream Events in Hyperosmolarity-induced Hepatocyte Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., August 11, 2006; 281(32): 23150 - 23166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. S. Suh, M. Mutoh, K. Nagashima, E. Fernandez-Salas, L. E. Edwards, D. D. Hayes, J. M. Crutchley, K. G. Marin, R. A. Dumont, J. M. Levy, et al.
The Organellular Chloride Channel Protein CLIC4/mtCLIC Translocates to the Nucleus in Response to Cellular Stress and Accelerates Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4632 - 4641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Xu, H. Zhao, W. Tian, K. Yoshida, J.-B. Roullet, and D. M. Cohen
Regulation of a Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channel by Tyrosine Phosphorylation. SRC FAMILY KINASE-DEPENDENT TYROSINE PHOSPHORYLATION OF TRPV4 ON TYR-253 MEDIATES ITS RESPONSE TO HYPOTONIC STRESS
J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2003; 278(13): 11520 - 11527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
E. Fernandez-Salas, K. S. Suh, V. V. Speransky, W. L. Bowers, J. M. Levy, T. Adams, K. R. Pathak, L. E. Edwards, D. D. Hayes, C. Cheng, et al.
mtCLIC/CLIC4, an Organellular Chloride Channel Protein, Is Increased by DNA Damage and Participates in the Apoptotic Response to p53
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2002; 22(11): 3610 - 3620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]