Cell Type-specific Regulation of B-Raf Kinase by cAMP and
14-3-3 Proteins*
Wansong
Qiu
§,
Shunhui
Zhuang
,
Friederike C.
von Lintig,
Gerry R.
Boss, and
Renate B.
Pilz¶
From the Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, University of
California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0652
Received for publication, April 17, 2000, and in revised form, July 31, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cyclic AMP can either activate or inhibit the
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in different cell
types; MAPK activation has been observed in B-Raf-expressing cells and
has been attributed to Rap1 activation with subsequent B-Raf
activation, whereas MAPK inhibition has been observed in cells lacking
B-Raf and has been attributed to cAMP-dependent protein
kinase (protein kinase A)-mediated phosphorylation and
inhibition of Raf-1 kinase. We found that cAMP stimulated MAPK activity
in CHO-K1 and PC12 cells but inhibited MAPK activity in C6 and NB2A
cells. In all four cell types, cAMP activated Rap1, and the 95- and
68-kDa isoforms of B-Raf were expressed. cAMP activation or inhibition
of MAPK correlated with activation or inhibition of endogenous and
transfected B-Raf kinase. Although all cell types expressed similar
amounts of 14-3-3 proteins, approximately 5-fold less 14-3-3 was
associated with B-Raf in cells in which cAMP was inhibitory than in
cells in which cAMP was stimulatory. We found that the cell
type-specific inhibition of B-Raf could be completely prevented by
overexpression of 14-3-3 isoforms, whereas expression of a dominant
negative 14-3-3 mutant resulted in partial loss of B-Raf activity. Our data suggest that 14-3-3 bound to B-Raf protects the enzyme from protein kinase A-mediated inhibition; the amount of 14-3-3 associated with B-Raf may explain the tissue-specific effects of cAMP on B-Raf
kinase activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The serine/threonine protein kinases of the Raf family (Raf-1,
A-Raf, and B-Raf) are key regulators of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis in eukaryotic cells (1). They are activated by a large
number of membrane receptors that stimulate Raf kinases indirectly,
through small GTP-binding proteins of the Ras family (1-3).
Activated Raf kinases phosphorylate and activate the dual specificity
kinases MEK-1 and -2, which in turn phosphorylate and activate the
mitogen-activated protein kinases
(MAPKs)1 Erk-1 and -2. Raf-1
is expressed ubiquitously, but A-Raf and B-Raf are differentially
expressed with highest levels in urogenital tissues and brain,
respectively (1). The Raf kinases differ in their response to upstream
signals and their ability to activate the MAPK pathway (4-8). Raf-1
activation requires phosphorylation on Ser338 and
Tyr340 subsequent to Ras·GTP binding; binding of
Rap1·GTP to Raf-1 does not lead to activation (6, 9-12). In B-Raf,
the serine residue equivalent to Ser338 of Raf-1 is
constitutively phosphorylated, and the residue equivalent to
Tyr340 of Raf-1 is an aspartate, leading to high basal
activity of B-Raf compared with Raf-1; B-Raf can be activated fully by
binding to Ras·GTP or Rap·GTP (4, 6, 12-14). Although both B-Raf
and Raf-1 are expressed and activated by growth factors in neuronal cells, B-Raf seems to be the major MEK activator in these cells and
possibly also in other cell types (4, 7, 15-18). Two major isoforms of
B-Raf of 68 and 95 kDa differ by 115 amino acids at the N terminus;
alternative splicing of exons 8 and 10 yields additional isoforms that
differ in their tissue distribution, basal MEK kinase activity, and
oncogenic properties (15, 19).
In many cell types, including fibroblasts, glial cells, smooth muscle
cells, and epithelial tumor cells, MAPK signaling is inhibited by drugs
and hormones that increase the intracellular cAMP concentration
(20-27). This has been attributed to phosphorylation of two serine
residues in Raf-1 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (protein
kinase A): Ser43 phosphorylation near the Ras-binding
domain of Raf-1 inhibits Ras·GTP binding and may effectively uncouple
Raf-1 from Ras, and Ser621 phosphorylation in the catalytic
domain can inhibit catalytic activity (28-31). However, a recent
report suggests that protein kinase A inhibits growth factor-induced
Raf-1 activation in 293 human embryonal kidney cells independently of
direct Raf-1 phosphorylation (32).
In other cell types, including neuronal cells, COS-7 kidney cells, and
S49 lymphoma cells, increased intracellular cAMP stimulates MAPK
activity (27, 33-38). In different strains of Chinese hamster ovary
(CHO) cells, cAMP has been reported to either activate or inhibit MAPK
activity (39-41). From studies of PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells and
NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, Vossler et al. (33) suggested that cAMP
activates MAPK in cells expressing the 95-kDa isoform of B-Raf, whereas
cAMP inhibits MAPK in cells lacking this B-Raf isoform. In this model,
cAMP activates Rap1, which then activates B-Raf; cAMP activation of
Rap1 may occur through guanine nucleotide exchange factors, which are
regulated either directly by cAMP binding or indirectly by a mechanism
requiring protein kinase A phosphorylation (33, 42-45). However,
several reports showed that cAMP inhibits B-Raf activity in PC12 cells
expressing both 95- and 68-kDa B-Raf, with one report showing that cAMP
inhibits B-Raf in serum-starved cells but not in cells maintained in
serum-containing medium (18, 34, 35, 46). Inhibition of B-Raf by cAMP
was also described in unstimulated and phorbol ester-stimulated NIH3T3 cells and in chemoattractant-stimulated neutrophils; cAMP-mediated activation of a 68-kDa B-Raf isoform was observed in CHO cells and
correlated with Rap1 activation (5, 39, 47). These results suggest that
B-Raf regulation by cAMP may differ depending on growth conditions,
expression of different B-Raf isoforms, and the presence of cell
type-specific factors.
Protein kinase A phosphorylates B-Raf in vitro and in
vivo, although the phosphorylation sites have not been mapped (46, 48). B-Raf has no equivalent of Raf-1 Ser43, but
Ser728 in B-Raf (numbers correspond to the 95-kDa isoform)
corresponds to Ser621 of Raf-1, and the surrounding
sequences are highly homologous suggesting that B-Raf
Ser728 may also be a target for protein kinase A
phosphorylation (19, 49). In co-transfection experiments, protein
kinase A activated full-length B-Raf but inhibited the isolated
catalytic domain expressed in PC12 cells; when incubated with B-Raf
in vitro, protein kinase A had no effect on the activity of
the full-length enzyme but reduced the activity of the catalytic
domain, suggesting that the N-terminal regulatory domain of B-Raf
prevents protein kinase A from inhibiting B-Raf catalytic activity
(48).
The family of 14-3-3 proteins includes at least seven isoforms that are
abundantly expressed in most tissues and bind as homo- or heterodimers
to phosphoserine residues in the consensus sequence RSXpSXP (50-52). Raf-1 contains at least
three 14-3-3 binding sites: one in the cysteine-rich domain between
amino acids 136 and 187, a second surrounding Ser259, and a
third surrounding Ser621 (50, 53-55). Mutations in the two
N-terminal sites that prevent 14-3-3 binding lead to Raf-1 activation
(54, 55); Ras·GTP and phosphatidylserine binding near these sites
displaces bound 14-3-3 allowing full activation of Raf-1 via
phosphorylation of Ser338 and Tyr340, and
reassociation of 14-3-3 may be involved in returning Raf-1 to the
inactive form (52, 56-58). In contrast, binding of 14-3-3 to
Ser621 of Raf-1 appears to be required for basal kinase
activity, because: (i) mutation of Ser621 to any other
residue destroys catalytic activity; (ii) removal of 14-3-3 from the
catalytic domain of Raf-1 using specific detergents or competitive
phospho-peptides completely abrogates kinase activity which is restored
upon adding 14-3-3; and (iii) expression of a dominant negative 14-3-3 results in inhibition of the Raf-1 catalytic domain (53). These data
have led to a model in which 14-3-3 binding to Raf-1 is necessary to
keep the enzyme in an inactive but activation-competent conformation
(56, 59, 60). Some investigators have reported that overexpression of
14-3-3 potentiates Raf-1 activation, whereas others have found no
effect (53, 54, 56, 60). All three 14-3-3 binding sites of Raf-1 are
highly conserved in B-Raf, and intracellularly, B-Raf appears to exists
in a high molecular weight complex with 14-3-3 proteins, HSP90, and
MEK-1 and -2 (8, 49, 50, 61-63). Ser728 of B-Raf is a
14-3-3 binding site that appears to be necessary for the biological
activity of B-Raf; a Ser728 to Ala substitution in the
isolated B-Raf catalytic domain dramatically reduces the ability of the
enzyme to induce Xenopus oocyte maturation or PC12 cell
differentiation, although the mutant enzyme retains significant
catalytic activity in vitro (64). B-Raf purified from
Xenopus oocytes is synergistically activated by a
combination of 14-3-3 and Ras·GTP (14).
We hypothesized that the variable results concerning cAMP regulation of
B-Raf could be secondary to cell type-specific factors and, therefore,
studied the effect of cAMP on B-Raf and MAPK activity in CHO-K1, PC12,
C6 glioma, and NB2A neuroblastoma cells. In all four cell types, the
95-kDa isoform of B-Raf was expressed and membrane-permeable cAMP
analogs increased the activation state of Rap1. However, the cAMP
analogs stimulated B-Raf and MAPK activity in CHO-K1 and PC12 cells
while inhibiting B-Raf and MAPK activity in C6 and NB2A cells. We found
that inhibition of B-Raf by cAMP correlated with significantly lower
amounts of enzyme-associated 14-3-3, and the cAMP-mediated inhibition
was completely prevented by overexpression of 14-3-3; expression of a
dominant negative 14-3-3 resulted in partial loss of B-Raf kinase
activity. Our data suggest a model in which 14-3-3 protects B-Raf from
protein kinase A inhibition and may explain the varying response of
B-Raf to cAMP in different cell types.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and DNA Constructs--
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies
specific for Erk-1/2 (C16, SC93), for B-Raf kinase (C19, SC166), for
Rap1 (121, SC65), and for 14-3-3 (K19, SC629) were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, as was recombinant MEK-1. An anti-active MAPK antibody
(V803A) was from Promega, an actin-specific antibody (A2066) was from
Sigma, and a Raf-1 phospho-Ser621-specific antibody was
from A. S. Shaw (53). The glutathione S-transferase
(GST)-tagged peptide encoding the Rap-binding domain of Ral-GDS (RBD
peptide) was purified from bacteria transformed with the expression
plasmid pGEX-RGF97 (provided by J. L. Bos; Ref. 65). The
membrane-permeable cAMP analogs 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)cAMP (8-pCPT-cAMP) and 8-bromo-cAMP were from Biolog, and forskolin was from
Calbiochem. LipofectAMINE PlusTM and LipofectAMINE
2000TM were from Life Technologies, Inc. An expression
vector encoding the 95-kDa isoform of B-Raf but lacking exons 8b and 10 was from P. J. S. Stork (pcDNA3-Braf; Ref. 33). Either
full-length B-Raf or the catalytic domain of B-Raf (amino acids
385-765) was fused in frame to GST in the vector pCMV-GST using
BamHI (66). Wild type 14-3-3
,14-3-3
, and the
dominant negative mutant 14-3-3(R56, 60A) were from A. S. Shaw
(53). The reporter plasmid pGAL4-Luc was from M. Karin, and pElk-Gal4
was from G. L. Johnson (67).
Cell Lines and Transfections--
CHO-K1 and PC12 cells were
from the American Type Culture Collection, and C6 and NB2A cells were
provided by M. H. Ellisman and E. Koo, respectively. CHO-K1 and
NB2A cells were grown in F-12K medium (Life Technologies, Inc.)
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS); C6 and PC12 cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with
10% or 5% FBS plus 5% horse serum, respectively. Cells were
transfected using 9 µl of LipofectAMINE PlusTM and 1.2 µg of DNA (for C6, CHO-K1, and PC12 cells) or 9 µl of LipofectAMINE
2000TM and 1.2 µg of DNA (for NB2A cells) in 1 ml of
OptiMEMTM medium according to the manufacturer's protocol.
After 5 h of transfection, cells were placed for 1 h in
serum-containing medium and then some of the cells were
transferred to medium containing 0.1% FBS and 0.1% bovine serum
albumin (referred to as "low serum-containing medium").
Assessment of MAPK Activation--
Cells were cultured for
48 h in either full (10%) serum-containing medium or in low
serum-containing medium prior to adding 250 µM 8-CPT-cAMP
for the indicated time. Cells were lysed in SDS-polyacrylamide
electrophoresis (PAGE) sample buffer, and Western blots were generated
as described previously (68) using an anti-active MAPK antibody that
specifically recognizes the dually phosphorylated, active form of Erk-1
and -2 (69). Equal loading of protein was verified by reprobing the
blot with an Erk-1 and -2-specific antibody. Western blots were
developed using horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies and
enhanced chemiluminescence. In some experiments, MAPK activity was
measured in Erk-1/2 immunoprecipitates using myelin basic protein as
substrate (68).
Measurement of Rap1-bound GTP and Total Rap1-bound Guanine
Nucleotides--
Rap1·GTP was captured using RBD peptide (65) and
GTP eluted from the isolated Rap was measured as described
previously (70); total Rap1-bound guanine nucleotides were measured
after converting Rap·GDP to Rap·GTP in half of the sample. This
method, which has been described recently (71), correlated well with
the method of Franke et al. (65) in which Rap1·GTP bound
to RBD peptide is assessed by immunoblotting using a Rap1-specific
antibody. Briefly, ~3 × 106 cells were
extracted in a HEPES-based buffer containing 0.92% Triton X-114 and
0.08% Triton X-45; to one half of the sample was added 20 mM MgSO4, and to the other half was added 10 µM GTP and 10 mM EDTA to fully exchange GDP
for GTP (72). After shaking 10 min at 4 °C, extracts were warmed to
15 °C for 1 min and centrifuged at room temperature at 10,000 × g for 2 min to generate an aqueous and detergent phase.
The detergent phase, containing >95% of the Rap1, was diluted 10-fold
with lysis buffer lacking detergent but containing 20 mM
MgSO4, and the phase separation was repeated one more time.
The diluted detergent phase was then added to glutathione-Sepharose beads preloaded with 80 µg of GST-tagged RBD peptide, and the mixture
was shaken gently for 1 h at 4 °C to allow quantitative binding
of Rap1·GTP to the RBD peptide (65, 71). The beads were washed four
times and then heated for 3 min at 100 °C to elute the GTP bound to
Rap1, which was measured using a coupled enzymatic assay (70). The
affinity of the RBD peptide for Rap·GDP is undetectably low, and we
showed that the Ras·GTP present in cell lysates does not interfere
with the Rap1 assay, probably because the affinity of RBD for
Rap1·GTP is 100-fold higher than for Ras·GTP (71, 73). In control
experiments using purified Rap1, we found that the in vitro
GTP exchange reaction was complete under the described conditions (71).
The activation state of Rap1 was calculated as the amount of GTP bound
to Rap1 determined in the sample that did not undergo exchange, divided
by the total amount of nucleotide-bound Rap1determined in the sample
subjected to the exchange reaction.
DNA Determination--
DNA was measured in the nuclear fraction
by a standard fluorescence method using the fluorescent dye
bisbenzimidazole (74).
Immunoprecipitation and B-Raf Kinase Assay--
Cells were
cultured in full serum-containing medium or in low serum-containing
medium for 48 h before harvesting and were lysed in a HEPES-based
buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, protease and phosphatase
inhibitors. B-Raf was either immunoprecipitated using a B-Raf-specific
antibody and protein A-agarose beads as described previously (68), or
for cells transfected with GST-tagged B-Raf, the protein was isolated
by incubation with glutathione-Sepharose beads. After washing the
beads, they were incubated with 300 ng of recombinant MEK-1 and 125 µM [
-32PO4]ATP for 5 min at 30 °C as described previously (68); control experiments
indicated the assay was linear with respect to lysate input and time.
Reaction products were subjected to SDS-PAGE, electroblotted onto
polyvinylidene fluoride membranes, and exposed to x-ray film. The
amount of B-Raf present in the precipitates was determined by
immunoblotting with a B-Raf-specific antibody. Control reactions were
performed using precipitates obtained either with protein A and control
rabbit immunoglobulin or with glutathione-Sepharose and
mock-transfected cells.
Determination of 14-3-3 Association with B-Raf--
Cells were
transfected with pcDNA3-BRaf or pCMV-GST-Braf, and after 48 h
of culture in full serum-containing media, cells were lysed and B-Raf
was immunoprecipitated or isolated on glutathione-Sepharose beads as
described above. Beads were washed four times in lysis buffer and
eluted in SDS-PAGE sample buffer. Proteins eluted from the beads and
5% of the input cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE/Western blotting. For untagged B-Raf immunoprecipitates, blots were first developed using an antibody that recognizes all major 14-3-3 isoforms and then reprobed with a B-Raf-specific antibody. For GST-tagged B-Raf,
blots were simultaneously developed with 14-3-3- and B-Raf-specific antibodies.
 |
RESULTS |
Cell Type-specific Regulation of the MAPK Pathway by
8-pCPT-cAMP--
Vossler et al. (33) were the first to
explain cAMP activation of the MAPK pathway by a model in which cAMP
activation of Rap1 can lead to B-Raf activation and subsequent MAPK
activation in cells expressing the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform; results in
support of this model have been published subsequently (27). However, other results suggest negative regulation of B-Raf by cAMP in different
cell types (5, 18, 34, 35, 46, 47). We therefore decided to examine
regulation of the MAPK pathway in four different cell lines that
express the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform (see Fig. 3, described below). Because
Erhardt et al. (34) found that regulation of B-Raf by cAMP
in PC12 cells was different under high or low serum concentrations in
the culture medium, we examined the effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP on MAPK
activity under both conditions. Fig. 1
shows MAPK phosphorylation in the different cell lines at various times
after adding 250 µM 8-pCPT-cAMP; the blots were developed
with an antibody specific for the dually phosphorylated, active from of
MAPK (Fig. 1, upper half of each panel) with
equal protein loading demonstrated by reprobing the blots with an
antibody that recognizes Erk-1 and -2 irrespective of their
phosphorylation state (Fig. 1, lower half of each
panel). In C6 rat glioma cells and NB2A murine neuroblastoma
cells, MAPK phosphorylation was significantly inhibited within 5 min of
adding 8-pCPT-cAMP; the inhibition was somewhat more pronounced in low
serum-containing medium compared with full serum-containing medium and
lasted for at least 60 min. On the other hand, in CHO-K1 Chinese
hamster ovary cells and PC12 cells, MAPK phosphorylation was stimulated within 5 min of adding 8-pCPT-cAMP. The stimulation was similar in
media containing low or high serum concentrations and lasted for 10-20
min in CHO-K1 cells and for at least 20-60 min in PC12 cells; these
results are similar to the cAMP-mediated MAPK stimulation in CHO and
PC12 cells reported by others (33, 34, 39, 41). Assays in which Erk-1
and -2 were immunoprecipitated from cells and MAPK activity was
determined using myelin basic protein as substrate confirmed the
results shown in Fig. 1 (data not shown). The effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP was
maximal at 250 µM and 1 mM 8-bromo-cAMP or 20 µM forskolin yielded similar results (data not
shown).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cell type-specific regulation of MAPK by
8-pCPT-cAMP. C6, CHO-K1, NB2A, and PC12 cells were cultured either
in low serum or full serum-containing media for 48 h prior to
adding 250 µM 8-pCPT-cAMP for the indicated times (0-60
min) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Western blots
were probed with an antibody specific for active Erk-1 and -2 dually
phosphorylated on Thr and Tyr (P-MAPK) (69). To demonstrate
equal loading, blots were reprobed with an antibody recognizing Erk-1
and -2 irrespective of their phosphorylation state
(MAPK).
|
|
Effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP on Rap1 Activation--
MAPK activation by
cAMP in PC12 cells may be mediated by Rap1, but Rap1 activation by cAMP
appears to be cell type-specific (75, 76). Because differential
activation of Rap1 by cAMP could explain differences in MAPK regulation
by cAMP, we measured the effect of 8-CPT-cAMP on Rap1 activation in the
four cell types under study using a novel, quantitative enzymatic
method (71). Fig. 2 shows that treating
C6, CHO-K1, or NB2A cells with 250 µM 8-pCPT-cAMP for 5 min increased the amount of GTP bound to Rap1 by 2-3-fold
(open and filled bars represent data obtained in
the absence and presence of cAMP, respectively). All three cell types
contained similar amounts of total nucleotide-bound Rap1/µg of
cellular DNA (Fig. 2, striped bars), indicating similar absolute amounts of Rap1·GTP when the cells were treated with cAMP.
These results are in agreement with recent reports of Rap1 activation
by cAMP in CHO10001 cells and C6 cells, which used semiquantitative
Western blot analysis of RBD-bound Rap1·GTP (27, 39, 42). In PC12
cells, the activation state of Rap1 increased from 8.6 ± 1.5% in
untreated cells to 18.6 ± 2% in cAMP-treated cells, confirming
previous reports that 8-pCPT-cAMP increased the amount of GTP bound to
transfected His-tagged Rap1 by about 2-fold in
32PO4-labeled PC12 cells (33, 77). Thus,
although Rap1 activation by cAMP correlated with MAPK activation in
CHO-K1 and PC12 cells, a similar degree of Rap1 activation in C6 and
NB2A cells did not result in MAPK activation.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP on Rap1
Activation. C6, CHO-K1, and NB2A cells were cultured in serum-free
medium for 48 h and either left untreated (open bars)
or were treated with 250 µM 8-pCPT-cAMP for 5 min
(filled bars). The activation state of Rap1 was determined
as described under "Experimental Procedures" and is
(Rap1·GTP/total Rap1-bound guanine nucleotides) ×100 (left
panel). Total guanine nucleotides bound to Rap1 are shown in the
right panel for cAMP-treated cells (hatched bars)
and are expressed as fmol of guanine nucleotides/µg of cellular DNA;
similar results were obtained for untreated cells (not shown). The data
are the means ± S.D. of at least three independent experiments
performed in duplicate.
|
|
B-Raf Expression--
Multiple, alternatively spliced B-Raf
isoforms have been described that may vary in their ability to activate
MEK and, therefore, MAPK (15, 19, 49, 78). We compared endogenous B-Raf
expression in the different cell types by Western blotting (Fig.
3, upper panel). Although the
amounts of the 95- and 68-kDa B-Raf isoforms differed to some extent
between the different cell lines, the 95-kDa isoform was present in all
four cell lines with NB2A and PC12 cells expressing similar levels.
Duplicate blots were probed with an antibody to actin (Fig. 3,
middle panel) and with an antibody that recognizes all major
isoforms of 14-3-3 (Fig. 3, lower panel); these blots
demonstrated equal protein loading and comparable levels of 14-3-3 in
all lanes, respectively. Treating cells for 15 min with 8-pCPT-cAMP did
not affect B-Raf or 14-3-3 levels (Fig. 3). Apparently, not all C6
cells express B-Raf (27), and in different strains of CHO and PC12
cells varying amounts of the 68- or 95-kDa B-Raf isoform are present
(33, 35, 39, 79).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
B-Raf expression. Logarithmically
growing C6, CHO-K1, NB2A, and PC12 cells were left untreated ( ) or
were treated for 15 min with 250 µM 8-pCPT-cAMP (+).
Cells were lysed, and equal amounts of protein were subjected to
Western blotting with a B-Raf-specific antibody that recognizes both
the 95- and 68-kDa isoforms (top panel). Duplicate blots
were probed with an antibody that recognizes the conserved C terminus
of actin (middle panel) and with an antibody that recognizes
all major isoforms of 14-3-3 (bottom panel). Note that at
least two different 14-3-3 isoforms were resolved on this 10%
acrylamide gel.
|
|
Cell Type-specific Regulation of B-Raf by 8-pCPT-cAMP--
We
examined the effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP on B-Raf activity measured in B-Raf
immunoprecipitates using recombinant MEK-1 and
[
-32PO4]ATP. In C6 and NB2A cells,
B-Raf activity was inhibited by cAMP, whereas in CHO-K1 and PC12 cells,
B-Raf activity was stimulated by cAMP; the effects of 8-pCPT-cAMP were
noticeable at 5 min and maximal by 10 min (Fig.
4, upper panels; the
lower panels show comparable amounts of the 95-kDa B-Raf
isoform in the immunoprecipitates of cAMP-treated and untreated cells;
the 68-kDa B-Raf isoform was obscured by the immunoglobulin heavy
chain). The effect of cAMP on B-Raf activity was similar in cells
cultured in either 0.1% or 10% serum-containing media (data not
shown). Thus, the effects of cAMP on endogenous B-Raf activity
reflected its effects on MAPK activity in all four cell types. Our
results also indicate that Rap1 activation is not sufficient to
activate B-Raf in C6 and NB2A cells. Similarly, Rap1 activation is not
associated with B-Raf activation in phorbol ester-stimulated Rat-1
cells and bombesin-treated NIH3T3 cells (75, 80).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Cell type-specific regulation of B-Raf by
8-pCPT-cAMP. C6, CHO-K1, NB2A, and PC12 cells were cultured in
full serum-containing medium and treated with 250 µM
8-pCPT-cAMP for the indicated times (0-20 min). Cell lysates were
prepared from one (CHO-K1, NB2A, and PC12) or two (C6) plates and
subjected to immunoprecipitation using a B-Raf-specific antibody that
recognizes both the 95- and 68-kDa isoforms. Immunoprecipitates were
incubated in the presence of MEK-1 and
[ -32PO4]ATP for 5 min and subjected
to SDS-PAGE/electroblotting and autoradiography to assess MEK
phosphorylation as described under "Experimental Procedures"
(P-MEK, upper half of each panel). The
blots were later probed with a B-Raf-specific antibody to determine the
amount of B-Raf present in the immunoprecipitates (lower
half of each panel; only the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform is
shown because the 68-kDa isoform was obscured by the immunoglobulin
heavy chain). No signal was observed on the autoradiographs when
control rabbit immunoglobulin was substituted for the B-Raf-specific
antibody, indicating that MEK auto-phosphorylation was not detectable
under the conditions used (not shown).
|
|
Effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP on the MAPK Pathway in Cells Transfected with
the 95-kDa B-Raf Isoform--
The cell type-specific differences in
cAMP regulation of B-Raf and MAPKs could be due to the presence of
different B-Raf isoforms. To eliminate this variable, we measured the
effect of cAMP on the MAPK pathway in cells transfected with the 95-kDa
B-Raf isoform, which is positively regulated by cAMP in PC12 cells
(33). Using the transcription factor Elk-1 as a physiological target of
Erk-1 and -2, we measured activation of a Gal4-dependent
reporter gene by a chimeric Elk-Gal4 construct (33, 67). In the absence of exogenous B-Raf, 8-pCPT-cAMP inhibited Elk-Gal4 activity by >50%
in C6 and NB2A cells, and cAMP increased Elk-Gal4 activity 2.9-fold in
CHO-K1 cells (Fig. 5, open and
filled bars represent data in the absence and presence of
cAMP, respectively). These results reflect the effects of cAMP on
endogenous Erk activators and are similar to the short-term effects of
cAMP shown in Fig. 1. When cells were co-transfected with the 95-kDa
B-Raf isoform, Elk-Gal4 activity increased approximately 3-fold in C6
and NB2A cells and 7-fold in CHO-K1 cells (only relatively small
amounts of B-Raf were transfected to avoid artifacts that could occur with extremely high B-Raf expression). Treating cells with 8-pCPT-cAMP inhibited Elk-Gal4 activity by >50% in B-Raf-transfected C6 cells and
by >80% in NB2A cells, whereas cAMP increased Elk-Gal4 activity 3.4-fold in B-Raf-transfected CHO-K1 cells. We obtained similar results
in PC12 cells as shown for CHO-K1 cells, confirming previous work with
PC12 cells (33). Thus, regulation of the MAPK pathway by cAMP was
similar in cells transfected with the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform as in cells
expressing endogenous B-Raf, and the effect of cAMP on the 95-kDa B-Raf
isoform was cell type-specific.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP on the MAPK pathway in
cells transfected with the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform. C6, NB2A, and
CHO-K1 cells were transfected with 1 ng of expression vector encoding
the chimeric transcription factor Elk-Gal4, 50 ng of the reporter
pGAL4-Luc, 50 ng of pRSV- Gal (internal control) and either 10 ng of expression vector encoding full-length B-Raf or empty vector as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were cultured in
low serum-containing medium for 24 h after transfection and were
either left untreated (open bars) or were treated with 250 µM 8-pCPT-cAMP (filled bars). The cells were
harvested 8 h later, and luciferase and -galactosidase
activities were measured as described under "Experimental
Procedures." For each cell type, the ratio of luciferase to
-galactosidase activity in untreated cells transfected with Elk-Gal4
alone was assigned the value of one. The data represent the means ± S.D. of at least three independent experiments performed in
duplicate.
|
|
Association of 14-3-3 with B-Raf Kinase--
B-Raf and Raf-1 are
tightly associated with proteins of the 14-3-3 family, and 14-3-3 proteins appear to be necessary to keep Raf-1 in an
activation-competent conformation (56, 59, 61). Mutation of
Ser728 in the B-Raf catalytic domain prevents 14-3-3 binding and interferes with B-Raf biological functions in intact cells
(64), and B-Raf activity is synergistically enhanced by adding 14-3-3 and Ras·GTP in vitro (14). Because 14-3-3 binding to B-Raf
could alter the regulation of B-Raf by cAMP, we examined the amount of
14-3-3 associated with B-Raf in C6, CHO-K1, NB2A, and PC12 cells. All four cell types expressed comparable amounts of total 14-3-3 proteins (Fig. 3, lower panel).
Immunoprecipitation of endogenous B-Raf from the different cell types
resulted in co-immunoprecipitation of small amounts of 14-3-3, which
were difficult to quantitate (Fig.
6A, C6 and CHO-K1 cells
transfected with empty vector are shown in lane 1); we
therefore expressed the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform to produce higher but
comparable B-Raf levels in the different cell types. For both C6 and
CHO-K1 cells, immunoprecipitates from cells expressing transfected
B-Raf contained increased amounts of 14-3-3 compared with
immunoprecipitates from control cells (Fig. 6A, for both cell types compare lanes 2 and 3, cells
transfected with B-Raf vector to lane 1, cells transfected
with empty vector). When the amount of 14-3-3 protein present in the
immunoprecipitates was compared with the amount of 14-3-3 present in
the cell lysates, it became clear that more 14-3-3 was associated with
B-Raf in CHO-K1 cells than in C6 cells (Fig. 6A, lanes
4-6 show 5% of the cell lysates used for B-Raf
immunoprecipitation).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Association of 14-3-3 with B-Raf kinase.
A, to achieve comparable B-Raf expression, C6 cells were
transfected with 0.6 or 1.2 µg of a B-Raf expression vector, and
CHO-K1 cells were transfected with 0.2 or 0.4 µg of the B-Raf vector
(lanes 2 and 5 or lanes 3 and
6, respectively). Total DNA was adjusted to 1.2 µg with
empty vector. In lanes 1 and 4 are shown cells
transfected with empty vector alone. After 48 h in full
serum-containing medium, cell lysates were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with a B-Raf-specific antibody. Lanes
1-3 show the washed immunoprecipitates, and lanes 4-6
show 5% of the cell lysate input. Western blots were probed first with
an antibody recognizing all major 14-3-3 isoforms (lower
blot) and then reprobed with a B-Raf-specific antibody
(upper blot). B, C6, CHO-K1, NB2A, and PC12 cells
were transfected with 0.1-0.8 µg of an expression vector encoding
GST-tagged full-length B-Raf, and 48 h later, cell lysates were
incubated with glutathione-agarose beads. Proteins bound to the washed
beads were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies specific for
B-Raf and 14-3-3 simultaneously. C6 and PC12 cells were transfected
with 0.4 µg (lanes 1 and 7) or 0.8 µg of
pCMV-GST-BRaf (lanes 2 and 8), and CHO-K1 and
NB2A cells were transfected with 0.1 µg (lanes 3 and
5) or 0.2 µg of pCMV-GST-BRaf (lanes 4 and
6). In lanes 9 and 10 are shown
mock-transfected CHO-K1 cells and CHO-K1 cells transfected with 0.3 µg of pCMV-GST-BRaf, respectively. C, experiments were
performed as described for B; autoradiographs in the linear
range of exposure were analyzed by laser densitometry, and the ratio of
the 14-3-3 signal intensity to the B-Raf signal intensity was
calculated. The data represent the means ± S.D. of three
independent experiments.
|
|
To confirm these results, we transfected C6, CHO-K1, NB2A, and PC12
cells with increasing amounts of an expression vector encoding
GST-tagged full-length B-Raf and isolated the enzyme on
glutathione-Sepharose beads. Proteins bound to the washed beads were
analyzed by Western blots developed simultaneously with B-Raf- and
14-3-3-specific antibodies (Fig. 6B). We chose cell lysates that contained comparable amounts of GST-tagged B-Raf for the pull-down
assay and found significantly more 14-3-3 associated with B-Raf in
CHO-K1 and PC12 cells compared with C6 and NB2A cells (Fig.
6B). The differences in the amounts of 14-3-3 associated with B-Raf were not due to differences in B-Raf expression in successfully transfected cells, because transfection efficiencies were
similar for C6 and PC12 cells and for CHO-K1 and NB2A cells, respectively (data not shown). Results of three independent
experiments, in which the signal intensities for B-Raf and 14-3-3 were
quantitated by laser densitometry, indicate that about 5-fold more
14-3-3 protein was associated with B-Raf in cells in which cAMP
stimulated B-Raf activity compared with cells in which cAMP inhibited
B-Raf activity, although the amount of total 14-3-3 protein expressed was similar in all cell types studied (Figs. 3 and 6C).
Effect of 14-3-3 on the Regulation of B-Raf Activity by
8-pCPT-cAMP--
To measure the effects of 8-pCPT-cAMP and 14-3-3 on
the activity of the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform directly, we transfected C6
and CHO-K1 cells with a GST-tagged full-length B-Raf construct,
isolated B-Raf on glutathione-Sepharose beads and incubated the washed beads with MEK-1 and [
-32PO4]ATP.
Similar to the results shown for endogenous B-Raf in Fig. 4, activity
of the transfected B-Raf was inhibited 75% by cAMP in C6 cells,
whereas it was increased 2.3-fold by cAMP in CHO-K1 cells (Fig.
7A shows a typical experiment,
and Fig. 7B summarizes the results of three independent
experiments). Co-transfection of expression vectors encoding either
14-3-3
or 14-3-3
with GST-tagged B-Raf increased B-Raf
activity in both C6 and CHO-K1 cells and completely prevented the
inhibitory effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP in C6 cells (in Fig. 7, the effects of
14-3-3
are shown only for C6 cells). In contrast,
transfecting CHO-K1 cells with a dominant negative form of 14-3-3 (14-3-3mut (R56,60A)), which shows impaired Raf-1 binding and forms
heterodimers with endogenous wild type 14-3-3 (53), significantly
decreased B-Raf activity (Fig. 7). When MEK phosphorylation was
normalized to the amount of B-Raf present, no significant cAMP
stimulation of B-Raf could be demonstrated in C6 cells transfected with
wild type 14-3-3 and in CHO-K1 cells transfected with 14-3-3mut (R56,
60A) (Fig. 7B). For comparison, overexpression of wild type
14-3-3 increases the activity of Raf-1 in HeLa, NIH3T3, and COS cells,
whereas expression of the dominant negative 14-3-3 mutant inhibits
Raf-1 in 293 cells (53, 56, 60).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of 14-3-3 on regulation of B-Raf
activity by 8-pCPT-cAMP. A, C6 cells and CHO-K1 cells
were transfected with 50 ng of an expression vector encoding
full-length GST-tagged B-Raf; cells were co-transfected with 100 ng of
expression vectors encoding 14-3-3 , 14-3-3 , a dominant
negative mutant form of 14-3-3 (14-3-3mut (R56,60A)), or empty
pcDNA3 expression vector (first two lanes) as indicated.
The total amount of transfected DNA was adjusted to 1.2 µg by adding
pGem3Z. After 48 h of culture in full serum-containing medium,
cells were treated for 15 min with 250 µM 8-pCPT-cAMP as
indicated. Cell lysates were prepared, and GST-tagged B-Raf was
isolated on glutathione agarose beads; the beads were incubated with
recombinant MEK-1 and [ -32PO4]ATP
for 5 min and subjected to SDS-PAGE/electroblotting/autoradiography to
assess MEK phosphorylation as described under "Experimental
Procedures" (upper half of each panel). The
blots were probed with a B-Raf-specific antibody to quantitate the
amount of B-Raf on the beads (lower half of each
panel). Control experiments demonstrated expression of the
wild type and mutant 14-3-3 forms by Western blotting of cell lysates
(not shown). B, experiments were performed as described for
A; autoradiographs in the linear range of exposure were
scanned by laser densitometry, and the amount of MEK phosphorylation
was normalized to the amount of B-Raf. The amount of MEK
phosphorylation in untreated cells without transfected 14-3-3 was
assigned a value of one. The data represent the means ± S.D. of
three independent experiments.
|
|
In PC12 cells, protein kinase A inhibits the activity of the B-Raf
catalytic domain, whereas it stimulates the activity of full-length
B-Raf (48). When we transfected the B-Raf catalytic domain into C6 and
CHO-K1 cells, we found that 8-pCPT-cAMP inhibited its activity in both
cell types, although inhibition was more pronounced in C6 cells than in
CHO-K1 cells; co-transfection of a 14-3-3
expression vector
prevented the inhibition in both cell types (Fig.
8). Overexpression of 14-3-3 increased
the amount of B-Raf catalytic domain in several independent
experiments, suggesting that 14-3-3 may stabilize the protein. We found
that co-transfection of the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A
inhibited the catalytic domain of B-Raf in both C6 and CHO-K1 cells and inhibited full-length B-Raf in C6 cells but not in CHO-K1 cells similar
to the results shown for 8-pCPT-cAMP (data not shown). Thus, the cell
type-specific activation of B-Raf by cAMP/protein kinase A requires the
N-terminal regulatory domain of B-Raf that mediates Ras/Rap binding,
whereas the isolated catalytic domain is subject to inhibition by
cAMP/protein kinase A in all cell types examined. However,
overexpression of 14-3-3 can protect both full-length and isolated
catalytic domain of B-Raf from cAMP-mediated inhibition.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of 14-3-3 on the catalytic domain of
B-Raf. C6 cells (left panels) and CHO-K1 cells
(right panels) were transfected with 50 ng of an expression
vector encoding the GST-tagged catalytic domain of B-Raf; cells were
co-transfected with 100 ng of 14-3-3 vector (lanes
5-7) or empty pcDNA3 vector (lanes 2-4) as
indicated. Cells were treated with 8-pCPT-cAMP for the indicated time,
the GST-tagged catalytic domain of B-Raf was isolated, and MEK
phosphorylation was determined as described in the legend to Fig. 7. In
the lanes labeled C (lanes 1), cells were
transfected with pCMV-GST empty vector instead of the B-Raf catalytic
domain vector, and cell lysates were processed in parallel with the
samples shown in the other lanes. Blots probed with a B-Raf-specific
antibody are shown in the lower half of each
panel. Similar results were obtained in one other
experiment.
|
|
Effect of cAMP and 14-3-3 on B-Raf Ser728
Phosphorylation--
Ser728 in the catalytic domain of
B-Raf is required for 14-3-3 binding and represents a potential protein
kinase A phosphorylation site; Ser728 in B-Raf is analogous
to Ser621 in Raf-1 that binds 14-3-3 and can be
phosphorylated by protein kinase A (28, 30, 49, 64). Because the
sequences surrounding these two sites are nearly identical, we used an
anti-Raf-1 phospho-Ser621-specific antibody to examine the
effect of cAMP on B-Raf Ser728 phosphorylation (53). Very
low amounts of Ser728 phosphorylation were detectable on
GST-tagged B-Raf isolated from untreated C6 and CHO-K1 cells, and
treating cells with 8-pCPT-cAMP increased the signal modestly in both
cell types (Fig. 9, upper panels). Overexpression of 14-3-3
significantly
increased the amount of Ser728 phosphorylation in both cell
types with cAMP treatment inducing a further modest increase in
phosphorylation (Fig. 9). Western blots demonstrated that similar
amounts of B-Raf were present in the absence and presence of cAMP and
that co-transfection of the 14-3-3 vector increased the amount of
14-3-3 associated with B-Raf (Fig. 9, lower panels). When
Figs. 7 and 9 are compared, the amount of Ser728
phosphorylation did not correlate with B-Raf activity. B-Raf activity
may be differentially influenced by Ser728 phosphorylation
in the presence and absence of bound 14-3-3; the modest degree of
cAMP-induced Ser728 phosphorylation suggests that
Ser728 may not be the major target for protein kinase A
inhibition of B-Raf.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effect of 8-pCPT-cAMP and 14-3-3 on B-Raf
Ser728 phosphorylation. C6 cells (left
panels) and CHO-K1 cells (right panels) were
transfected with an expression vector encoding full-length GST-tagged
B-Raf and co-transfected with either empty pcDNA3 vector
(lanes 1 and 2) or an expression vector encoding
14-3-3 (lanes 3 and 4) as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Cells were cultured in low
serum-containing medium and treated for 15 min with 250 µM 8-pCPT-cAMP as indicated. GST-tagged B-Raf was
isolated on glutathione agarose beads, and the beads were subjected to
SDS-PAGE/electroblotting as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The blot was probed first with an antibody specific for
phospho-Ser621 of Raf-1, with Ser621 of Raf-1
corresponding to Ser728 in the catalytic domain of B-Raf
(upper panel, designated
Ser728-P) (19, 49, 53). The blot was
reprobed with a B-Raf antibody that does not distinguish phospho- and
dephospho-forms and an 14-3-3 antibody (lower panel).
Similar results were obtained in two other experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The model developed by Vossler et al. (33) describing
cAMP activation of MAPKs via activation of Rap1 and B-Raf in PC12 cells
has been difficult to reconcile with reports by other workers of
cAMP-mediated inhibition of B-Raf activity in PC12 cells (18, 34, 35)
and in other cell types (5, 47); the differences in cAMP response have
been attributed to variable expression of the 95- and 68-kDa B-Raf
isoforms (33). However, transfection of the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform into
B-Raf-deficient cells resulted in MAPK stimulation by cAMP in NIH3T3
but not in Rat-1 fibroblasts (33, 34); transfection of this B-Raf
isoform into B-Raf-deficient C6 cells increased basal MAPK activity,
which was inhibited by the protein kinase A inhibitor HA120, but cAMP
activation was not demonstrated (27). On the other hand,
Rap1-dependent activation of a 68-kDa B-Raf isoform by cAMP
has been described in CHO cells but not in Rat-1 fibroblasts (39, 81).
These results from different laboratories suggest that differential
expression of the 95- and 68-kDa B-Raf isoforms may not be sufficient
to explain cAMP activation or inhibition of B-Raf in different cells.
We hypothesized that B-Raf regulation may be modulated by cell
type-specific factors and found that: (i) cAMP activation of Rap1 was
not sufficient to activate B-Raf in all cells; (ii) cAMP activation or
inhibition of the 95-kDa B-Raf isoform correlated with high or low
amounts of 14-3-3 associated with the enzyme; and (iii) overexpression of 14-3-3 protected both full-length and the catalytic domain of B-Raf
from cAMP-mediated inhibition.
Our finding that cAMP activation of Rap1 was not sufficient to activate
B-Raf in C6 and NB2A cells is in agreement with previous observations
that Rap1 activation in phorbol ester-stimulated Rat-1 cells and
bombesin-stimulated NIH3T3 cells does not lead to B-Raf activation (75,
80). Activation of B-Raf by Rap1 may require tissue-specific
co-activators, or there may be mechanisms that interfere with Rap1
activation of B-Raf. Although purified Rap1·GTP activates purified
B-Raf in vitro in the absence of added co-factors, 14-3-3 proteins present in B-Raf preparations may be important for this effect
of Rap1, similar to 14-3-3 proteins synergistically enhancing B-Raf
activation by Ras·GTP (13, 14, 60, 61). Thus, the amount of 14-3-3 associated with B-Raf in intact cells could potentially influence the
ability of Rap1 to activate B-Raf; however, overexpression of 14-3-3 in
C6 cells was not sufficient for cAMP to activate B-Raf. Cell
type-specific differences in the subcellular localization of Rap1 and
B-Raf could account for the cell type-specific ability of Rap1 to
activate B-Raf. More work is necessary to determine the factor(s)
required for B-Raf activation by Rap1·GTP in vivo.
The cAMP/protein kinase A-mediated inhibition of B-Raf may involve
direct phosphorylation, because B-Raf is phosphorylated by protein
kinase A in vitro and in vivo with protein kinase
A phosphorylation of the catalytic domain of B-Raf inhibiting its activity both in vitro and in vivo (46, 48). The
modest increase in Ser728 phosphorylation in cAMP-treated
cells did not correlate with B-Raf activity; overexpression of 14-3-3 led to increased Ser728 phosphorylation of B-Raf and
increased kinase activity. Similarly, overexpression of 14-3-3 in HeLa
cells leads to increased Ser621 phosphorylation of Raf-1,
which is associated with increased kinase activity, but protein kinase
A phosphorylation of Ser621 has been reported to inhibit
Raf-1 activity (28, 30, 53). Protein kinase A is probably not the major
kinase phosphorylating Ser621 of Raf-1 in vivo,
and the effect of Ser621 phosphorylation on Raf-1 activity
remains controversial (28, 32, 82). The amount of 14-3-3 bound to
phospho-Ser621/Ser728 may determine Raf-1/B-Raf
kinase activity rather than the amount of
Ser621/Ser728 phosphorylation per
se. This way, protein kinase A phosphorylation of B-Raf
Ser728 may be inhibitory in C6 cells with low amounts of
14-3-3 bound to B-Raf, whereas cells with high amounts of 14-3-3 bound
to B-Raf (CHO cells or C6 cells overexpressing 14-3-3) were protected
from the inhibitory effect. However, Ser728 may not be the
major target for protein kinase A phosphorylation, and other potential
protein kinase A phosphorylation sites include Ser429 and
Ser446, both located at the N terminus of the catalytic
domain (19, 49). Alternatively, it is possible that protein kinase A
phosphorylation of other proteins could alter their interaction with
B-Raf. Although most 14-3-3 isoforms contain a potential protein kinase
A phosphorylation site, they are not protein kinase A substrates (83),
and we found that the amount of 14-3-3 associated with B-Raf was not detectably altered in cAMP-treated cells (Fig. 9).
Binding of 14-3-3 to target proteins, which often is dependent on
serine phosphorylation, may result in activation, inhibition, translocation or association of the target protein with other proteins
(50, 51, 84). For example, phosphorylation of the pro-apoptotic protein
BAD by Akt-1/protein kinase B promotes 14-3-3 binding, which prevents
the heterodimerization of BAD with the anti-apoptotic proteins BCL-2
and BCL-XL, and 14-3-3 binding to the phosphorylated form
of the mitotic inducer Cdc25 leads to cytoplasmic retention and nuclear
export (85, 86). 14-3-3 proteins may also function as adaptor proteins
that mediate the association of different proteins, as in the example
of Raf-1 and BCR (52, 87). Through the use of dominant negative forms of 14-3-3 it has been demonstrated that inhibition of apoptosis is an
important function of 14-3-3 proteins; this effect of 14-3-3 proteins
is mediated partially by the regulation of MAPK pathways (88). Several
investigators have demonstrated that 14-3-3 association with Raf-1 is
required to maintain basal Raf-1 catalytic activity and to stabilize
Raf-1 in an "activation-competent conformation"; mutation of the
14-3-3 binding site in the catalytic domain of Raf-1
(Ser621) leads to a virtually inactive enzyme (53, 56, 57,
59). Mutation of the analogous site in B-Raf (Ser728) leads
to only 50-60% loss of in vitro kinase activity but
results in almost complete loss of biological activity in
vivo, suggesting that14-3-3 binding at this site is required to
couple B-Raf to its downstream effectors (64). Our results suggest a
model in which 14-3-3 bound to B-Raf prevents the inhibitory effects of protein kinase A phosphorylation and add a new aspect to the growing list of 14-3-3 functions. Because the catalytic domain of B-Raf is
inhibited by cAMP, even in cells in which full-length B-Raf is
stimulated, it appears that higher amounts of 14-3-3 are required to
protect the isolated catalytic domain from cAMP-mediated inhibition compared with the full-length enzyme. Binding of 14-3-3 to
N-terminal sites in B-Raf may contribute to keeping B-Raf in an active
conformation, and it may be necessary, albeit not sufficient, to allow
positive interaction of Rap1 with the N terminus.
The amount of 14-3-3 associated with B-Raf appears to be regulated by
cell type-specific factors. Similar amounts of total 14-3-3 were
present in the four cell lines we studied, but significantly less
14-3-3 was associated with B-Raf in cells in which cAMP inhibited B-Raf
compared with cells in which cAMP simulated B-Raf. Only a small amount
of total cellular 14-3-3 was associated with B-Raf even in PC-12 or
CHO-K1 cells in which B-Raf was overexpressed. Cell type-specific
differences in the subcellular localization of B-Raf and 14-3-3 could
potentially limit association of the two proteins (6, 9, 51). Numerous
other 14-3-3 target proteins, including the protein kinase BCR and the
death agonist BAD, may compete with B-Raf for 14-3-3 binding (52, 85).
Recently, the product of the early response gene BRF1 has been
demonstrated to interact tightly with 14-3-3
and 14-3-3
and to interfere with the binding of 14-3-3 to Raf-1 (89). Thus, B-Raf
association with 14-3-3 proteins may vary between different cell types
because of the expression of proteins that enhance or diminish 14-3-3 binding to B-Raf or because of expression of different 14-3-3 isoforms
that vary in their affinities for specific target proteins (51, 89).
More work is clearly necessary to examine the factors that influence
14-3-3 association with B-Raf and the mechanism(s) by which 14-3-3 proteins modulate B-Raf functions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank J. L. Bos for providing the RBD
expression vector, M. H. Ellisman and E. Koo for C6 and NB2A
cells, and G. L. Johnson and M. Karin for the Elk-Gal4 and
GAL4-luciferase constructs. We are grateful to A. S. Shaw for the
generous gift of the phospho-Ser621-specific antibody and
the 14-3-3 expression vectors and to J. S. Stork for providing the
full-length B-Raf expression vector. We also thank Dr. A. S. Shaw
for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Public Health Service Grants
R01-GM55586 (to R. B. P.) and R21-CA81115 (to G. R. B.) and by Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program Grant 91T-0069 (to
R. B. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
§
Present address: Bellevue Hospital Center, Dept. Pathology,
1st Avenue at 27th St., New York, NY 10016.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
858-534-8805; Fax: 858-534-1421; E-mail: rpilz@ucsd.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 7, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003327200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
8-pCPT-cAMP, 8-(4-chlorophenylthio)cAMP;
RBD, Rap-binding domain;
PAGE, polyacrylamide electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hagemann, C.,
and Rapp, U. R.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
253,
34-46
|
| 2.
|
Daum, G.,
Eisenmann-Tappe, I.,
Fries, H.-W.,
Troppmair, J.,
and Rapp, U. R.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
474-480
|
| 3.
|
Morrison, D. K.,
and Culter, R. E., Jr.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
174-179
|
| 4.
|
Jaiswal, R. K.,
Moodie, S. A.,
Wolfman, A.,
and Landreth, G. E.
(1994)
Mol. Cell Biol.
14,
6944-6953
|
| 5.
|
Reuter, C. W. M.,
Catling, A. D.,
Jelinek, T.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7644-7655
|
| 6.
|
Marais, R.,
Light, Y.,
Paterson, H. F.,
Mason, C. S.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4378-4383
|
| 7.
|
Pritchard, C. A.,
Samuels, M. L.,
Bosch, E.,
and McMahon, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell Biol.
15,
6430-6431
|
| 8.
|
Moodie, S. A.,
Paris, M. J.,
Kolch, W.,
and Wolfman, A.
(1994)
Mol. Cell Biol.
14,
7153-7162
|
| 9.
|
Jelinek, T.,
Dent, P.,
Sturgill, T. W.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell Biol.
16,
1027-1034
|
| 10.
|
Hu, C.-D.,
Kariya, K.,
Kotan, G.,
Shirouzu, M.,
Yokoyama, S.,
and Kataoka, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11702-11705
|
| 11.
|
Zhang, X.-F.,
Settleman, J.,
Kyriakis, J. M.,
Takeuchi-Suzuki, E.,
Elledge, S. J.,
Marshall, M. S.,
Bruder, J. T.,
Rapp, U. R.,
and Avruch, J.
(1993)
Nature
364,
308-313
|
| 12.
|
Mason, C. S.,
Springer, C. J.,
Cooper, R. G.,
Superti-Furga, G.,
Marshall, C. J.,
and Marais, R.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
2137-2148
|
| 13.
|
Ohtsuka, T.,
Shimizu, K.,
Yamamori, B.,
Kuroda, S.,
and Takai, Y.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
1258-1261
|
| 14.
|
Shimizu, K.,
Kuroda, S.,
Yamamori, B.,
Matsuda, S.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
Yamauchi, T.,
Isobe, T.,
Irie, K.,
Matsumoto, K.,
and Takai, Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22917-22920
|
| 15.
|
Papin, C.,
Denouel-Galy, A.,
Laugier, D.,
Calothy, G.,
and Eychene, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24939-24947
|
| 16.
|
Catling, A. D.,
Reuter, C. W. M.,
Cox, M. E.,
Parsons, S. J.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30014-30021
|
| 17.
|
Eychene, A.,
Dusanter-Fourt, I.,
Barnier, J. V.,
Papin, C.,
Charon, M.,
Gisselbrecht, S.,
and Calothy, G.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
1159-1165
|
| 18.
|
Lange-Carter, C. A.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1994)
Science
265,
1458-1461
|
| 19.
|
Stephens, R. M.,
Sithanandam, G.,
Copeland, T. D.,
Kaplan, D. R.,
Rapp, U. R.,
and Morrison, D. K.
(1992)
Mol. Cell Biol.
12,
3733-3742
|
| 20.
|
Hordijk, P. L.,
Verlaan, I.,
Jalink, K.,
van Corven, E. J.,
and Moolenaar, W. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
3534-3538
|
| 21.
|
Cook, S. J.,
and McCormick, F.
(1993)
Science
262,
1069-1071
|
| 22.
|
Wu, J.,
Dent, P.,
Jelinek, T.,
Wolfman, A.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(1993)
Science
262,
1065-1068
|
| 23.
|
Graves, L. M.,
Bornfeldt, K. E.,
Raines, E. W.,
Potts, B. C.,
Macdonald, S. G.,
Ross, R.,
and Krebs, E. G.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10300-10304
|
| 24.
|
Chen, J.,
and Iyengar, R.
(1994)
Science
263,
1278-1281
|
| 25.
|
Matousovic, K.,
Grande, J. P.,
Chini, C. C. S.,
Chini, E. N.,
and Dousa, T. P.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
96,
401-410
|
| 26.
|
Chen, J.,
Bander, J. A.,
Santore, T. A.,
Chen, Y.,
Ram, P. T.,
Smit, M. J.,
and Iyengar, R.
(1998)
Pharmacology
95,
2648-2652
|
| 27.
|
Dugan, L. L.,
Kim, J. S.,
Zhang, Y.,
Bart, R. D.,
Sun, Y.,
Holtzman, D. M.,
and Gutmann, D. H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25842-25848
|
| 28.
|
Mischak, H.,
Seitz, T.,
Janosch, P.,
Eulitz, M.,
Steen, H.,
Schellerer, M.,
Philipp, A.,
and Kolch, W.
(1996)
Mol. Cell Biol.
16,
5409-5418
|
| 29.
|
Chuang, E.,
Barnard, D.,
Hettich, L.,
Zhang, X.-F.,
Avruch, J.,
and Marshall, M. S.
(1994)
Mol. Cell Biol.
14,
5318-5325
|
| 30.
|
Häfner, S.,
Adler, H. S.,
Mischak, H.,
Janosch, P.,
Heidecker, G.,
Wolfman, A.,
Fippig, S.,
Lohse, M.,
Ueffing, M.,
and Kolch, W.
(1994)
Mol. Cell Biol.
14,
6696-6703
|
| 31.
|
Kikuchi, A.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
588-594
|
| 32.
|
Sidovar, M. F.,
Kozlowski, P.,
Lee, J. W.,
Collins, M. A.,
He, Y.,
and Graves, L. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
28688-28694
|
| 33.
|
Vossler, M. R.,
Yao, H.,
York, R. D.,
Pan, M.-G.,
Rim, C. S.,
and Stork, P. J. S.
(1997)
Cell
89,
73-82
|
| 34.
|
Erhardt, P.,
Troppmair, J.,
Rapp, U. R.,
and Cooper, G. M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell Biol.
15,
5524-5530
|
| 35.
|
Vaillancourt, R. R.,
Gardner, A. M.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6522-6530
|
| 36.
|
Englaro, W.,
Rezzonico, R.,
Durand-Clement, M.,
Lallemand, D.,
Ortonne, J.-P.,
and Ballotti, R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24315-24320
|
| 37.
|
Wan, Y.,
and Huang, X.-Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14533-14537
|
| 38.
|
Faure, M.,
Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T. A.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
7851-7854
|
| 39.
|
Seidel, M. G.,
Klinger, M.,
Freissmuth, M.,
and Höller, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25833-25841
|
| 40.
|
Sevetson, B. R.,
Kong, X.,
and Lawrence, J. C., Jr.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10305-10309
|
| 41.
|
Verheijen, M. H. G.,
and Defize, L. H. K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3423-3429
|
| 42.
|
De Rooij, J.,
Wittinghofer, A.,
Verheijen, M. H. G.,
Cool, R. H.,
Nijman, S. M. B.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1998)
Nature
396,
474-477
|
| 43.
|
Kawasaki, H.,
Springett, G. M.,
Mochizuki, N.,
Toki, S.,
Nakaya, M.,
Matsuda, M.,
Housman, D. E.,
and Graybiel, A. M.
(1998)
Science
282,
2275-2279
|
| 44.
|
Altschuler, D. L.,
Peterson, S. N.,
Ostrowski, M. C.,
and Lapetina, E. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10373-10376
|
| 45.
|
Hata, Y.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
Kawamura, S.,
Hiroyoshi, M.,
Shirataki, H.,
and Takai, Y.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
6571-6577
|
| 46.
|
Peraldi, P.,
Frödin, M.,
Barnier, J. V.,
Calleja, V.,
Scimeca, J.-C.,
Filloux, C.,
Calothy, G.,
and van Obberghen, E.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
357,
290-296
|
| 47.
|
Buhl, A. M.,
Avdi, N.,
Worthen, G. S.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
9190-9194
|
| 48.
|
MacNicol, M. C.,
and MacNicol, A. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13193-13197
|
| 49.
|
Sithanandam, G.,
Kolch, W.,
Duh, F.-M.,
and Rapp, U. R.
(1990)
Oncogene
5,
1775-1780
|
| 50.
|
Muslin, A. J.,
Tanner, J. W.,
Allen, P. M.,
and Shaw, A. S.
(1996)
Cell
84,
889-897
|
| 51.
|
Aitken, A.,
Jones, D.,
Soneji, Y.,
and Howell, S.
(1995)
Biochem. Soc. Transct.
23,
605-611
|
| 52.
|
Burbelo, P. D.,
and Hall, A.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
95-96
|
| 53.
|
Thorson, J. A., Yu, L. W. K.,
Hsu, A. L.,
Shih, N.-Y.,
Graves, P. R.,
Tanner, J. W.,
Allen, P. M.,
Piwnica-Worms, H.,
and Shaw, A. S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell Biol.
18,
5229-5238
|
| 54.
|
Michaud, N. R.,
Fabian, J. R.,
Mathes, K. D.,
and Morrison, D. K.
(1995)
Mol. Cell Biol.
15,
3390-3397
|
| 55.
|
Clark, G. J.,
Drugan, J. K.,
Rossman, K. L.,
Carpenter, J. W.,
Rogers-Graham, K.,
Fu, H.,
Der, C. J.,
and Campbell, S. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20990-20993
|
| 56.
|
Hancock, J. F.,
Roy, S.,
McPherson, R. A.,
Appoloni, A.,
Yan, J.,
Lane, A.,
and Clyde-Smith, J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell Biol.
18,
3947-3955
|
| 57.
|
McPherson, R. A.,
Harding, A.,
Roy, S.,
Lane, A.,
and Hancock, J. F.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
3862-3869
|
| 58.
|
Rommel, C.,
Radziwill, G.,
Moelling, K.,
Noeldeke, J.,
Heinicke, T.,
Jones, D.,
and Aitken, A.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
609-619
|
| 59.
|
Tzivion, G.,
Luo, Z.,
and Avruch, J.
(1998)
Nature
394,
88-92
|
| 60.
|
Li, S.,
Janosch, P.,
Tanji, M.,
Rosenfeld, G. C.,
Waymire, J. C.,
Mischak, H.,
Kolch, W.,
and Sedivy, J. M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
685-696
|
| 61.
|
Yamamori, B.,
Kuroda, S.,
Shimizu, K.,
Fukui, K.,
Ohtsuka, T.,
and Takai, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11723-11726
|
| 62.
|
Jaiswal, R. K.,
Weissinger, E.,
Kolch, W.,
and Landreth, G. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23626-23629
|
| 63.
|
Papin, C.,
Eychene, A.,
Brunet, A.,
Pages, G.,
Pouyssegur, J.,
Calothy, G.,
and Barnier, J. V.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
1647-1651
|
| 64.
|
MacNicol, M. C.,
Muslin, A. J.,
and MacNicol, A. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3803-3809
|
| 65.
|
Franke, B.,
Akkerman, J.-W.,
and Bos, J. L.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
252-259
|
| 66.
|
Tsai, R. Y. L.,
and Reed, R. R.
(1997)
BioTechniques
23,
794-800
|
| 67.
|
Johnson, N. L.,
Gardner, A. M.,
Diener, K. M.,
Lange-Carter, C. A.,
Gleavy, J.,
Jarpe, M. B.,
Minden, A.,
Karin, M.,
Zon, L. I.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3229-3237
|
| 68.
|
Suhasini, M.,
Li, H.,
Lohmann, S. M.,
Boss, G. R.,
and Pilz, R. B.
(1998)
Mol. Cell Biol.
18,
6983-6994
|
| 69.
|
Payne, D. M.,
Rossomando, A. J.,
Martino, P.,
Erickson, A. K.,
Her, J.-H.,
Shabanowitz, J.,
Hunt, D. F.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Sturgill, T. W.
(199 |