![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 41, 32066-32070, October 13, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Cell Biology Program and Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
10021
Received for publication, July 20, 2000
Recently, the oncoprotein MDM-2 was implicated in
the transforming growth factor- Transforming growth factor- Recently, MDM-2 has been implicated in the TGF- Cell Culture and Transfection--
The human MDM-2 cDNA was
cloned into the XbaI site of the pUHD10-3 hygromycin vector
(17). The mink lung epithelial cell line, Mv1Lu-tTA (17), was
maintained in minimal essential medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum (FBS) plus 0.5 mg/ml G418. Mv1Lu-tTA cells were
transfected with pUHD10-3 hygromycin-MDM-2 using the Lipofectin
procedure according to the manufacturer's protocol (Life Technologies,
Inc.). MDM-2-inducible clones were selected as described previously
(17). Two clones, TMDMA and TMDMB, were further subcloned by
end-dilution to obtain the cell lines analyzed in this study. The TM2
cells, expressing c-Myc, have been previously described (4). Tet
cell lines were selected and maintained in minimal essential medium
plus 10% FBS, 0.5 mg/ml G418, 0.3 mg/ml hygromycin, and 1 µg/ml tetracycline.
Immunoblotting and Kinase Assays--
Antibodies against human
MDM-2 (sc-965) and p53 (sc-99) were obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology. Antibodies against Cdk4, Cdk2, and p27 have been
described previously (4, 17, 18). The TMDM cell lines were grown to
near confluence and then split 1:3 into medium plus or minus 1 µg/ml
tetracycline. After a 20-h incubation, the cells were harvested by
trypsinization. Cell pellets from tet cells were lysed according
to published procedure (19). They were immunoprecipitated with the
appropriate antibodies for 3-16 h at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitates
or aliquots (0.2 mg protein) of cell lysate were separated on
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride (Immobilon-P) membranes. The blots were
probed with the appropriate primary antibody followed by an anti-mouse
IgG secondary antibody (Pierce) prior to visualization by enhanced
chemiluminescence (ECL or ECLplus, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Alternatively, the immunoprecipitates were used in RB kinase assays as described previously (4).
Cell Cycle Analysis--
After a 20-h incubation with or without
1 µg/ml tetracycline, the cells were treated for 20 more hours with
TGF- Reporter Assays--
As reporters we used p3TP-lux (20) and the
pSBE4-lux (21), shown to respond to TGF- Indirect Immunofluorescence--
Cells were fixed in 4%
paraformaldehyde for 15 min and permeabilized in 0.2% Trition X-100 in
PBS for 10 min. They were incubated with 10% FBS/PBS for 20 min before
being incubated with 1 µg/ml affinity-purified Smad2/3 antibody (23)
in 3% bovine serum albumin/PBS for 1 h. The cells were washed
with PBS and incubated with biotin-conjugated goat anti-rabbit
secondary antibody at 5 µg/ml for 45 min. After more PBS washes, they
were incubated with streptavidin/fluorescein isothiocyanate at 20 µg/ml for 15 min. Coverslips were mounted with Vectashield (Vector).
Colony Formation Assay--
4000 cells were seeded in 6-well
dishes into medium with or without tetracycline. 24 h later, cells
were treated with 0 or 50 pM TGF- Mv1Lu derivatives expressing a human MDM-2 cDNA under negative
control of the tetracycline transactivator (24) were generated, and two
independent clones (TMDMA and TMDMB) that expressed exogenous MDM-2 in
tetracycline-free medium were chosen for further analysis (Fig.
1A). To verify that the
exogenously expressed MDM-2 was functional, we examined the levels of
endogenous p53 after induction of MDM-2 (Fig. 1B). In both
clones, the level of p53 in the presence of MDM-2 was approximately
one-third the level seen in its absence, suggesting that the exogenous
MDM-2 was expressed to levels sufficient to elicit a biological
response.
The addition of TGF- As FACS analysis only enabled us to examine the cell cycle profile at a
fixed time point, we assayed for [125I]deoxyuridine
incorporation in order to examine the rate of DNA synthesis (Fig.
2A). In the presence of
tetracycline (MDM-2 and c-Myc off states), TGF-
Different Sensitivity of the Transforming Growth Factor-
Cell
Cycle Arrest Pathway to c-Myc and MDM-2*
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(TGF-
) growth inhibitory pathway
by the finding that prolonged, constitutive expression of MDM-2 in mink lung epithelial cells could overcome the antiproliferative effect of
TGF-
(Sun, P., Dong, P., Dai, K., Hannon, G. J., and Beach, D. (1998) Science 282, 2270-2272). However, using
Mv1Lu cells conditionally expressing MDM-2, we found that MDM-2 does
not overcome TGF-
-mediated growth arrest. No detectable changes were
observed in various TGF-
responses, including cell cycle arrest,
activation of transcriptional reporters, and
TGF-
-dependent Smad2/3 nuclear accumulation. This
finding was in direct contrast to the effect of forcing c-Myc
expression, a bona fide member of the TGF-
growth inhibitory pathway, which renders cells refractory to TGF-
-induced cell cycle arrest. Our results suggest that an
MDM-2-dependent increase in cell cycle progression may
allow the acquisition of additional mutations over time and that these
alterations then allow cells to evade a TGF-
-mediated growth arrest.
Our conclusion is that, whereas c-Myc down-regulation by TGF-
is a
required event in the cell cycle arrest response of epithelial cells,
MDM-2 is not a direct participant in the normal TGF-
antiproliferative response.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(TGF-
)1 inhibits cell
proliferation in many cell types by blocking progression through the
G1 phase of the cell cycle (1-3). This antimitogenic
response generally involves inhibition of G1-phase
cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdk2, Cdk4, and Cdk6) and
rapid down-regulation of c-Myc expression. Although the specific
mechanisms that inactivate G1 Cdks appear to vary between
cell types, the down-regulation of c-Myc is observed in most cell types
(1, 4). c-Myc has a short half-life, and the
TGF-
-dependent down-regulation of c-Myc RNA results in a
rapid loss of protein (5-7), as well as the ability of c-Myc to act as
a transcriptional activator of genes required for the G1-S
phase transition (reviewed in Refs. 8-10). The importance of c-Myc
down-regulation is highlighted by the observation that exogenous c-Myc
expression renders a cell resistant to the antiproliferative action of
TGF-
(1, 4). c-Myc down-regulation has been linked directly with
G1 Cdk inactivation, as enforced c-Myc expression in mink
lung epithelial cells (Mv1Lu) blocks the TGF-
-dependent induction of the Cdk4/6 inhibitor, p15 (4).
pathway by the
finding that prolonged, ectopic expression of MDM-2 in cell culture
could overcome the antiproliferative effect of TGF-
(11). In this
assay, MDM-2 appeared to allow Mv1Lu cells to survive prolonged TGF-
exposure to permit colony formation. This resistance appeared to occur
in a p53-independent manner, which correlated with increased RB protein
phosphorylation and reduced function of the E2F transcription factor.
MDM-2 is a negative regulator of p53, known to directly interact with
and mediate the degradation of this tumor suppressor gene product (12,
13). Overexpression of MDM-2 has been shown to stimulate the
transactivation functions of E2F, presumably through its direct
interactions with RB or E2F/DP1 (14, 15). Thus, MDM-2 appears to be an
important regulator of both the p53 and the RB cell cycle regulatory
pathways (13, 16). We wanted to ascertain whether, similar to c-Myc,
MDM-2 was a bona fide member of the TGF-
growth
inhibitory pathway or whether other affects by MDM-2 on the cell cycle
were the cause of this apparent resistance to TGF-
-mediated growth
suppression. By analyzing inducible MDM-2 cell lines, we demonstrate
that, unlike c-Myc, MDM-2 is not a direct participant in the TGF-
antiproliferative response, suggesting that the resistance to
TGF-
-mediated growth suppression might be secondary to other MDM-2
effects on cell cycle progression.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(R & D Systems, Minneapolis) in the presence of 10% FBS. The
preparation of stained nuclei was carried out by hypotonic lysis of
cells in 0.03% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mg/ml sodium
citrate, plus ethidium bromide (25 µg/ml) and RNase (10 µg/ml) at
room temperature for 30 min. After the addition of 80 mM
citric acid, 250 mM sucrose, and 40 µg/ml ethidium
bromide, nuclei were either analyzed immediately using a FACScan
(Becton Dickinson) or stored at 4 °C for later analysis. Parallel
cell cultures were assayed for [125I]deoxyuridine
incorporation during the last 3 h. Data are the averages of
triplicate determinations and are plotted as a percentage relative to
the cpm incorporated in the presence of 1 µg/ml tetracycline and no
TGF-
.
and Smad2/3 signaling,
respectively. TMDM and TM2 cells were transiently transfected with
p3TP-lux and pSBE4-lux using DEAE-dextran as described previously (22). Cells were split 24 h later into medium with or without
tetracycline and then treated 16 h later plus or minus TGF-
in
10% serum. Luciferase assays were carried out 24 h later using
the Promega luciferase assay kit and a Berthold luminometer.
. The medium was
replaced every other day for 8 days, and then the cells were stained
with methylene blue. The post-tet passage cells were derived
from the parental cells maintained for several passages in the absence
of tetracycline. The colony formation assay was then repeated using
these cells.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Mv1Lu cell lines with inducible MDM-2
expression and initial analysis of cell cycle progression.
A, clonal tet-MDM2 cell lines (TMDMA and TMDMB) were
maintained in medium containing 1 µg/ml tetracycline and then grown
in the absence of tetracycline for 18 h before harvesting. Lysates
were immunoprecipitated with anti-human MDM-2 antibodies followed by
anti-human MDM-2 Western immunoblotting. Parental Mv1Lu cells were also
analyzed in the presence and absence of tetracycline. B,
lysates were analyzed by direct Western immunoblotting with anti-p53
antibodies and quantitated by densitometry. C, TMDMA and TM2
cells were grown in the absence of tetracycline (MDM-2 on
and Myc on) or in the presence of 1 µg/ml tetracycline
(MDM-2 off and Myc off) for 18 h before the
addition of 200 pM TGF-
in the presence of 10% FBS.
Cells were harvested for flow cytometric analysis of DNA content after
18 h in the presence or absence of TGF-
. The percentage of
cells in the G1 phase at this time is indicated.
to Mv1Lu cells caused G1 arrest as
detected by FACS analysis (Fig. 1C). A similar
G1 arrest by TGF-
was seen in the TMDM cells (Fig.
1C and data not shown), maintained in the presence of
tetracycline (MDM-2 off). In the absence of tetracycline
(MDM-2 on), a decrease in the G1 population of
the TMDM cells was observed, suggesting that the overexpression of MDM-2 altered the typical cell cycle distribution of Mv1Lu cells. However, the addition of TGF-
in the absence of tetracycline still
caused G1 arrest. As a control, we compared the effects of
TGF-
on TM2 cells, a Mv1Lu derivative which expresses exogenous human c-Myc under tetracycline control (4). Enforced expression of
c-Myc in the TM2 cells rendered them fully refractory to the antiproliferative affects of TGF-
(Fig. 1C), as had been
shown previously (4). In the absence of tetracycline, the TM2 cells also had a reduced G1 content, suggesting that c-Myc
expression also altered the typical cell cycle distribution.
inhibited
[125I]deoxyuridine incorporation in Mv1Lu, TMDMA, TMDMB,
and TM2 cells. In the absence of tetracycline (MDM-2 and c-Myc on
states), the TMDMA, TMDMB, and to a lesser extent, TM2 cells all had
increased [125I]deoxyuridine incorporation, suggesting an
increase in proliferative activity under these conditions. More
importantly, [125I]deoxyuridine incorporation in the
TMDMA and TMDMB cells with MDM-2 on was still inhibited by the addition
of TGF-
, whereas TM2 cells with c-Myc on were not inhibited even at
TGF-
concentrations as high as 500 pM (Figs.
2A and 4).

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Cell cycle analysis of Mv1Lu, TMDM, and TM2
cell lines. A, TMDMA, TMDMB, and TM2 cells were grown in the
presence (MDM-2 off and Myc off) or absence (MDM-2 on and Myc
on) of 1 µg/ml tetracycline for 18 h before the addition of the
indicated concentrations of TGF-
in the presence of 10% FBS. Cell
cultures were assayed for [125I]deoxyuridine
(125I DU) incorporation during the last
3 h. Data are the means ± standard deviations of triplicate
determinations and are plotted as percentage relative to the cpm
incorporated in the presence of 1 µg/ml tetracycline and no TGF-
.
Parental Mv1Lu cells were also analyzed in the absence of tetracycline.
B, TMDMA grown in the presence (MDM-2 OFF) or
absence (MDM-2 ON) of 1 µg/ml tetracycline for 18 h
before the addition of 200 pM TGF-
. Cells were harvested
and lysates were immunoblotted for p27, Cdk4, and Cdk2 and quantitated
by densitometry. cdk2* is the active, phosphorylated form of
the kinase. In parallel, Cdk2 immunoprecipitates were used in RB kinase
assays.
The above described results suggest that the expression of human MDM-2 is able to affect the cycling of the TMDM cells. The cells may pass through G1 faster, resulting in a larger S phase population at any given time point. To investigate this phenomenon, we examined a variety of G1 cell cycle components in the TMDM cells in the presence and absence of tetracycline (Fig. 2B and data not shown). Although the levels of p27 and Cdk4 were unchanged, the level of Cdk2 in the absence of tetracycline was increased. Additionally, the amount of the active, phosphorylated form of Cdk2 (Fig. 2B, cdk2*) was increased in the absence of tetracycline by approximately 3-fold. This increase correlated with a corresponding 3-fold increase in Cdk2-associated RB kinase activity, which could account for the faster transit through G1 by the TMDM cells. Cyclin E-Cdk2 complexes appear rate-limiting for G1 progression, and forced expression of cyclin E has been shown to induce premature S-phase entry (25-27). Although c-Myc has been reportedly able to activate cyclin E-Cdk2 complexes by as-yet-debated mechanisms (28), the level of Cdk2 and the amount of Cdk2-associated RB kinase activity appears unchanged in TM2 cells as previously shown (4), suggesting a difference between the c-Myc and MDM-2-dependent increase in cell cycle transit in Mv1Lu cells.
Despite the increase in Cdk2-associated RB kinase activity detected in
TMDM cells in the absence of tetracycline, the addition of TGF-
under these conditions inhibited this kinase activity (Fig.
2B). Thus, unlike the TM2 cells, the TMDM cells were not able to overcome TGF-
-mediated arrest, suggesting that MDM-2 does
not directly interfere with the TGF-
antiproliferative response. To
further clarify this point, we examined other TGF-
responses to
ascertain whether they were perturbed by MDM-2 expression (Fig. 3). The function of the TGF-
signal
transduction proteins, Smad2 and Smad3, as transcription factors
requires their accumulation in the nucleus in response to TGF-
.
Recently, it was suggested that overexpression of MDM-2 might inhibit
the nuclear import of ectopically expressed Smad proteins (29).
However, these observations were made with overexpressed proteins in
the absence of TGF-
. As determined by Smad2/3 indirect
immunofluorescence of TMDM cell lines, the TGF-
-induced nuclear
accumulation of endogenous Smad2/3 appears unperturbed by MDM-2
overexpression, suggesting that MDM-2 does not affect this central
event in TGF-
signal transduction (Fig. 3A)
|
Two different transcriptional reporter constructs, p3TP-lux and
pSBE4-lux, were used to assess TGF-
transcriptional activation (Fig.
3B). p3TP-lux contains three repeats of a PAI-1 sequence responsive to TGF-
and is a classical reporter used to assess TGF-
activation (20). pSBE4-lux contains eight repeats of a four-base pair sequence that binds TGF-
-activated Smad3 and Smad4, and thus it is a specific indicator of Smad activation (21). In TMDMA
and TMDMB cells maintained in the presence or absence of tetracycline,
the addition of 100 pM TGF-
stimulated the p3TP-lux reporter by approximately 10-fold (Fig. 3B, left). TGF-
also stimulated the pSBE4-lux reporter in these cells to similar
extents in the presence or absence of tetracycline, albeit the fold
simulation was somewhat higher in the TMDMA cells (Fig. 3B,
right). Expression of c-Myc in the TM2 cells reduced the induction
of both reporters by half when compared with the induction observed in
its absence.
Thus, in the TMDM cells expressing levels of MDM-2 sufficient to elicit
an effect on p53 levels and cell cycle progression, no detectable
changes were observed in various TGF-
responses, including cell
cycle arrest, activation of transcriptional reporters, and
TGF-
-dependent Smad2/3 nuclear accumulation. This
finding was in direct contrast to the effect of forcing c-Myc
expression in the TM2 cells, which, in addition to altering cell cycle
progression, renders cells refractory to TGF-
-induced cell cycle
arrest. In contrast to previous results (11), we did not obtain any
colonies in long-term TMDMA or TMDMB cultures overexpressing MDM2 in
the presence of TGF-
(Fig. 4 and data
not shown); this was consistent with our previous results, suggesting
that the TMDM cells were not refractory to TGF-
-mediated growth
inhibition. In fact, the TMDM cells were indistinguishable from
parental Mv1Lu cells maintained in the presence and absence of TGF-
(Fig. 4). Despite the fact that cells expressing c-Myc are resistant to
short term TGF-
exposure (48 h or less), as described above, the
number of TM2 colonies obtained in the colony formation assay in the
presence or absence of TGF-
during the 8-day time frame was very low
(Fig. 4). This finding was also in direct contrast to previous results (11), where cells overexpressing c-Myc grew to confluency during the
course of their experiment and numerous TGF-
-resistant colonies were
detected. Our results, however, were not unexpected, as others have
shown that prolonged exposure to high levels of c-Myc causes apoptosis
unless the cells acquire additional mutations in the p19ARF
or p53 genes, which are, coincidentally, the upstream
and downstream members of the MDM-2 pathway (30, 31). The results with
c-Myc suggest that the difference between the two studies may be
because of the use of constitutive versus inducible
expression systems. Our cell lines that conditionally express c-Myc or
MDM-2 are always maintained in the presence of tetracycline (c-Myc and MDM-2 off states), thus decreasing the selective pressure for mutations
that might arise through prolonged exposure to c-Myc or MDM-2. Similar
to c-Myc, we propose that an MDM-2-dependent increase in
cell cycle progression may allow the cell lines used in the previous
study (11) to acquire mutations during prolonged exposure to
overexpressed MDM-2, which might secondarily circumvent TGF-
cell
cycle arrest signals.
|
To verify this hypothesis, we maintained our TM2 and TMDMA
cultures for several passages in the absence of tetracycline (c-Myc and
MDM-2 on states), effectively converting them to constitutive c-Myc- or
MDM-2 expressing lines. We then repeated the colony formation assay
(Fig. 4, bottom). Significant apoptosis was observed in the
TM2 cells during the initial 8-day passaging, with 90% of the cells
dying (data not shown). However, the resulting population was now able
to survive high levels of c-Myc expression and grow to confluency as a
population exhibiting resistance to TGF-
(Fig. 4). Expression of
MDM-2 was now capable of colony formation in the presence of TGF-
at
a frequency of roughly 5 × 10
4
colonies/plated cell. Recently, it was shown that expression of MDM-2
extended the life span of primary mouse embryo fibroblasts, causing the
cells to become immortal at a similar frequency of 5 × 10
4 colonies/plated cell (32). Continued
MDM-2 expression may allow the acquisition of other defects, one of
which might be the loss of TGF-
signaling. As both high levels of
MDM-2 protein and the loss of TGF-
signaling are frequently detected
in tumor cells, MDM-2-driven mutation of the TGF-
signaling cascade
may be a natural event in cancer progression. However, we conclude that whereas c-Myc down-regulation by TGF-
is a required event in the
cell cycle arrest response of epithelial cells, MDM-2 is not a direct
participant in the normal TGF-
antiproliferative response.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank N. Pavletich for the human MDM-2 cDNA.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Special Fellow of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society.
§ Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, P. O. Box 116, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Tel.: 212-639-8975; Fax: 212-717-3298; E-mail: j-massague@ski.mskcc.org.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006496200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
TGF-
, transforming growth factor-
;
Cdk, cyclin-dependent
kinase;
Mv1Lu, mink lung epithelial cells;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell
sorter;
RB, retinoblastoma protein;
Tet, tetracycline.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Alexandrow, M. G., and Moses, H. L. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 1452-1457 |
| 2. | Massagué, J. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 753-791 |
| 3. | Polyak, K. (1996) Biochim. Biophysica 1242, 185-199 |
| 4. | Warner, B. J., Blain, S. W., Seoane, J., and Massagué, J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 5913-5922 |
| 5. | Malliri, A., Yeudall, W. A., Nikolic, M., Crouch, D. H., Parkinson, E. K., and Ozanne, B. (1996) Cell Growth Differ. 7, 1291-1304 |
| 6. | Iavarone, A., and Massagué, J. (1997) Nature 387, 417-422 |
| 7. | Pietenpol, J. A., Stein, R. W., Moran, E., Yacuik, P., Schlegel, R., Lyons, R. M., Pittelkow, R. M., Münger, K., Howley, P. M., and Moses, H. L. (1990) Cell 61, 777-785 |
| 8. | Henriksson, M., and Luscher, B. (1996) Adv. Cancer Res. 68, 109-182 |
| 9. | Amati, B., and Land, H. (1994) Curr. Opin. Genet. 4 |
| 10. | Dang, C. V. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 1-11 |
| 11. | Sun, P., Dong, P., Dai, K., Hannon, G. J., and Beach, D. (1998) Science 282, 2270-2272 |
| 12. | Prives, C. (1998) Cell 95, 5-8 |
| 13. | Yap, D. B. S., Hsieh, J.-K., Ghan, F. S. G., and Lu, X. (1999) Oncogene 18, 7681-7689 |
| 14. | Xiao, Z.-X., Chen, J., Levine, A. J., Modjtahedi, N., Xing, J., Sellers, W. R., and Livingston, D. M. (1009) Nature 375, 694-697 |
| 15. | Martin, K., Trouche, D., Hagemeier, C., Sorensen, T. S., La Thangue, N. B., and Kouzarides, T. (1995) Nature 375, 691-694 |
| 16. | Hsieh, J.-K., Chan, F. S. G., O'Connor, D. J., Mittnacht, S., Zhong, S., and Lu, X. (1999) Mol. Cell. 3, 181-193 |
| 17. | Reynisdóttir, I., Polyak, K., Iavarone, A., and Massagué, J. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1831-1845 |
| 18. | Reynisdóttir, I., and Massagué, J. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 492-503 |
| 19. | Matsushime, H., Quelle, D. E., Shurtleff, S. A., Shibuya, M., Sherr, C. J., and Kato, J.-Y. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2066-2076 |
| 20. | Cárcamo, J., Weis, F. M., Ventura, F., Wieser, R., Wrana, J. L., Attisano, L., and Massagué, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 3810-3821 |
| 21. | Zawel, L., Le Dai, J., Buckhaults, P., Zhou, S., Kinzler, K. w., Vogelstein, B., and Kern, S. E. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 611-617 |
| 22. | Attisano, L., Cárcamo, J., Ventura, F., Weis, F. M. B., Massagué, J., and Wrana, J. L. (1993) Cell 75, 671-680 |
| 23. | Kretzschmar, M., Doody, J., Timokhina, I., and Massagué, J. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 804-816 |
| 24. | Gossen, M., and Bujard, H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 5547-5551 |
| 25. | Connell-Crowley, L. S., Elledge, S. J., and Harper, J. W. (1998) Curr. Biol. 8, 65-68 |
| 26. | Lukas, J., Herzinger, T., Hansen, K., Moroni, M. C., Resnitzky, D., Helin, K., Reed, S. I., and Bartek, J. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 1479-1492 |
| 27. | Ohtsubo, M., Theodoras, A. M., Schumacher, J., Roberts, J. M., and Pagano, M. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2612-2624 |
| 28. | Obaya, A. J., Mateyak, M., and Sedivy, J. M. (1999) Oncogene 18, 2934-2941 |
| 29. | Yam, C. H., Siu, W. Y., Arooz, t., Chiu, C. H. S., Lau, A., Wang, X. Q., and Poon, R. Y. C. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 5075-5078 |
| 30. | Eischen, C., Weber, J., Roussel, M., Sherr, C., and Cleveland, J. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 2658-2669 |
| 31. | Schmitt, C. A., McCurrach, M. E., de Stanchina, E., Wallace-Brodeur, R. R., and Lowe, S. W. (1999) Genes Dev. 2670-2677 |
| 32. | Carnero, A., Hudson, J. D., Price, C. M., and Beach, D. H. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 148-155 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Kannemeier, R. Liao, and P. Sun The RING Finger Domain of MDM2 Is Essential for MDM2-mediated TGF-beta Resistance Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2007; 18(6): 2367 - 2377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Wilkinson, S. K. Ogden, S. A. Stratton, J. L. Piechan, T. T. Nguyen, G. A. Smulian, and M. C. Barton A Direct Intersection between p53 and Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Pathways Targets Chromatin Modification and Transcription Repression of the {alpha}-Fetoprotein Gene Mol. Cell. Biol., February 1, 2005; 25(3): 1200 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. P. Deb Cell Cycle Regulatory Functions of the Human Oncoprotein MDM2 Mol. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 1(14): 1009 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ganguli and B. Wasylyk p53-Independent Functions of MDM2 Mol. Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 1(14): 1027 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. C. Blobe, X. Liu, S. J. Fang, T. How, and H. F. Lodish A Novel Mechanism for Regulating Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGF-beta ) Signaling. FUNCTIONAL MODULATION OF TYPE III TGF-beta RECEPTOR EXPRESSION THROUGH INTERACTION WITH THE PDZ DOMAIN PROTEIN, GIPC J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 39608 - 39617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Piek, W. J. Ju, J. Heyer, D. Escalante-Alcalde, C. L. Stewart, M. Weinstein, C. Deng, R. Kucherlapati, E. P. Bottinger, and A. B. Roberts Functional Characterization of Transforming Growth Factor beta Signaling in Smad2- and Smad3-deficient Fibroblasts J. Biol. Chem., June 1, 2001; 276(23): 19945 - 19953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |