|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003619200 on July 18, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 32391-32397, October 20, 2000
Isolation and Characterization of a Novel Conus
Peptide with Apparent Antinociceptive Activity*
J. Michael
McIntosh §¶,
Gloria O.
Corpuz§,
Richard
T.
Layer ,
James E.
Garrett ,
John D.
Wagstaff ,
Grzegorz
Bulaj§,
Alexandra
Vyazovkina§,
Doju
Yoshikami§,
Lourdes
J.
Cruz§**, and
Baldomero M.
Olivera§
From the Departments of Psychiatry and
§ Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, Cognetix, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, and ** Marine
Science Institute, University of the Philippines,
Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Phillipines
Received for publication, April 27, 2000, and in revised form, July 5, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Cone snails are tropical marine mollusks that
envenomate prey with a complex mixture of neuropharmacologically active
compounds. We report the discovery and biochemical characterization of
a structurally unique peptide isolated from the venom of Conus
marmoreus. The new peptide, mr10a, potently increased withdrawal
latency in a hot plate assay (a test of analgesia) at intrathecal doses that do not produce motor impairment as measured by rotarod
test. The sequence of mr10a is NGVCCGYKLCHOC, where O is
4-trans-hydroxyproline. This sequence is highly divergent
from all other known conotoxins. Analysis of a cDNA clone encoding
the toxin, however, indicates that it is a member of the recently
described T-superfamily. Total chemical synthesis of the three possible
disulfide arrangements of mr10a was achieved, and elution studies
indicate that the native form has a disulfide connectivity of Cys1-Cys4
and Cys2-Cys3. This disulfide linkage is unprecedented among conotoxins
and defines a new family of Conus peptides.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Conus is a genus of predatory marine gastropods that
envenomate their prey. Prey capture is accomplished through a
sophisticated arsenal of peptides that target specific ion channel and
receptor subtypes. Each Conus venom appears to contain a
unique set of 50-200 peptides. The structure and function of only a
small minority of these peptides have been determined to date. For
peptides where function has been determined, three classes of targets
have been elucidated: voltage-gated ion channels, ligand-gated ion
channels, and G-protein-linked receptors.
Conus peptides that target voltage-gated ion channels
include those that delay the inactivation of sodium channels as well as
blockers specific for sodium channels, calcium channels, and potassium
channels. Peptides that target ligand-gated ion channels include
antagonists of N-methyl-D-aspartate and
serotonin receptors as well as competitive and non-competitive
nicotinic receptor antagonists. Peptides that act on G protein
receptors include neurotensin and vasopressin receptor agonists. The
unprecedented targeting selectivity of conotoxins derives from specific
disulfide bond frameworks combined with hypervariable amino acids
within disulfide loops (see Ref. 1 for review). Due to the high potency and exquisite selectivity of the conopeptides, several are in various
stages of clinical development for treatment of human disorders
(2).
In this report we describe the isolation of a new peptide from the
venom of the marble cone, Conus marmoreus. C. marmoreus is
found in the Indo-Pacific, from India to the Marshall Islands and Fiji.
It preys upon various gastropods including other cone snails (3). We
previously reported the isolation and characterization of a peptide
from this venom that potently inhibits voltage-gated sodium channels
(4). In this report, we describe the isolation of a novel peptide that
appears antinociceptive and likely represents a defining member of a
new family of Conus peptides.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and HPLC1
Conditions
The venom of C. marmoreus was obtained from snails
collected in the Philippines. The venom was lyophilized and stored at
70 °C until use. Crude venom was extracted using previously
described methods (5). Reverse phase HPLC purification was accomplished with an analytical (4.6 mm internal diameter × 25 cm) Vydac
C18 column. Column pore size was 300 Å. Additional
conditions are described in Fig. 1.
Reduction, Alkylation, and Peptide Sequencing
The peptide was reduced, and cysteines were carboxymethylated as
described previously (6). The alkylated peptide was purified with a
Vydac C18 analytical column using a linear gradient of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and 0.092% trifluoroacetic acid in 60% acetonitrile. Alkylated peptide was sequenced by Edman degradation at
the Peptide Core Facility at the University of Utah.
Mass Spectrometry
Electrospray ionization mass spectra were measured using a
Micromass Quattro II Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer with Micromass MassLynx operating system. The samples (~100 pmol) were resuspended in 0.1 ml of 50% acetonitrile with 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid and
automatically infused with a flow rate of 0.05 ml/min in the same
solvent system. The instrument was scanned over the
m/z range 50-2,000 with a capillary voltage of
2.95 kV and a cone voltage of 64 V. The resulting data were analyzed
using MassLynx software.
Chemical Synthesis
Peptides were synthesized, 0.45 mmol/g, on a RINK amide resin
(Fmoc-Cys(Trityl)-Wang, Novabiochem (04-12-2050)) using Fmoc (N-(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarboxyl) chemistry and standard side
chain protection except on cysteine residues. Cys residues were
protected in pairs with either S-trityl or
S-acetamidomethyl groups. Amino acid derivatives were from
Advanced Chemtech (Louisville, KY). All three possible disulfide forms
of the peptide were synthesized. The peptides were removed from the
resin and precipitated, and a two-step oxidation protocol was used to
selectively fold the peptides as described previously (7).
mr10a Precursor cDNA Cloning
The sequence of the mr10a peptide was used to design degenerate
oligonucleotide primers for use in 5' and 3' RACE amplification of the
mr10a precursor cDNA. A 3' RACE forward primer (mr10a-F, CAGGATCC
AA(T/C) GGI GT(C/T/G) TG(T/C) TG(T/C) GG) was based on the peptide
sequence NGVCCG. A 5' RACE reverse primer (mr10a-R, CTGGATCC GG (A/G)TG
(A/G)CA (C/A/G)A(G/A) (T/C)TT (G/A)TA ICC) was based on the peptide
sequence GYKLCHP. C. marmoreus venom duct RNA was prepared,
and cDNA appended with 3' and 5' adapter sequences was synthesized
by standard methods (8). To facilitate cloning of the RACE
amplification products, the mr10a primers incorporated BamHI
sites, and the 3' and 5' adapter primers contained XhoI
sites. RACE amplifications were performed using a "touchdown" cycling protocol consisting of an initial denaturation of 95 °C for
30 s followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s , 65 °C
for 15 s, decreasing 0.5 °C each cycle, 72 °C for 10 s,
then 15 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 50 °C for 10 s, and
72 °C for 10 s. Polymerase chain reaction amplifications were
performed using Taq polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA), and amplification reactions were analyzed by
electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels. RACE amplification products were
isolated from the gel (Qiaex II DNA purification resin; Qiagen, Inc.,
Santa Clarita, CA), digested with BamHI and XhoI,
and cloned into the plasmid vector pBluescript II SK
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). Plasmids containing inserts of the appropriate size were selected and sequenced on an ABI Prism 373 Fluorescent DNA Sequencer.
Experimental Animals
Adult male CF-1 mice (25-35 g) were used for all experiments.
Mice were housed five per cage, maintained on a 12-h light/dark cycle,
and allowed free access to food and water.
Hot Plate Test
Analgesic activity was assessed by placing mice in a plexiglass
cylinder (10.2-cm diameter × 30.5 cm high) on a hot plate (Mirak
model HP72935, Barnstead/Thermolyne, Dubuque, IA) maintained at
55 °C. Thirty minutes before the hot plate test, animals were treated with a dose of mr10a or vehicle (0.9% saline) by free-hand intrathecal injection (9) in a volume of 5 µl. The time from being
placed on the plate until each mouse either licked its hind paws or
jumped was recorded with a stopwatch by a trained observer unaware of
the treatments. An arbitrary cut-off time of 60 s was adopted to
minimize tissue injury. Hot plate test data were analyzed by analysis
of variance followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparison,
with p < 0.05 considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, CA). Shortly after the hot plate test, mice were placed on a
3-cm-diameter rotarod turning at 6 rpm (model 7650, Ugo Basile,
Comerio, Italy). Mice were considered impaired if they fell three
times in 1 min.
Electrophysiological Assays
Rana pipiens, 2.5 to 3 inches long, were used. The
dissected preparation consisted of the 9th and 10th spinal nerves and
their continuation down the sciatic nerve to the posterior crural
nerve, freed from the skin that it innervates (see e.g. Ref.
10). Each spinal nerve was severed from the spine several millimeters
proximal to its sympathetic ramus such that it could be electrically
stimulated without activating sympathetic axons (see e.g.
Ref. 11).
For extracellular stimulation and recording, the preparation was placed
in a chamber fabricated from the silicone elastomer Sylgard (Dow
Corning). The chamber was essentially a series of wells, each separated
from its closest neighbor by about 1 mm. The proximal ends of the 9th
and 10th nerves were placed in separate wells; the sciatic portion lay
in a third well, whereas the attached lateral crural nerve spanned two
additional wells, each 4 mm in diameter. All wells were filled with
frog Ringer's solution (111 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl,
1.8 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Na-HEPES (pH
7.2)). All portions of the nerve that draped over the partitions
between wells and otherwise exposed to air were covered with Vaseline. One of a pair of stainless steel wire stimulating electrodes was placed
in the well on either side of the Vaseline gap covering a spinal nerve.
One of a pair of stainless steel wire recording electrodes was placed
in the well on either side of the Vaseline gap covering the lateral
crural nerve. Thus for both stimulation and recording, one electrode
was in the same well that containing a cut end of the nerve, whereas
its counterpart was in the well containing the portion of the nerve
just distal (stimulation) or proximal (recording) to the cut end. The
stimulating electrodes led to a Grass SIU5 stimulus isolation unit
connected to a Grass S-88 stimulator. The recording electrode in the
most distal well, containing the cut end of the posterior crural nerve,
led to the positive input of a Grass P-55 differential preamplifier,
whereas its counterpart, led to the negative input. Recordings were
made with a preamplifier gain of 1000, RC-filtered (1 Hz alternating current and 1 kHz low pass) and digitized at a sampling rate of 4 kHz
with a National Instruments Lab-NB board in a Macintosh Quadra 840 computer. Homemade virtual instruments (National Instruments LabVIEW)
were used for data acquisition and analysis.
Supramaximal stimuli (1 ms, ~30 V) were applied to a spinal nerve
once a minute while recording propagated compound action potentials
(CAPs) reaching the other end of the preparation. Conopeptide was
introduced into the well just proximal to that containing the distal
cut end of the posterior crural nerve.
Oocyte Assays
Xenopus oocytes were injected with cRNA encoding
human nAChR subunits as described previously (12, 13). Oocytes injected with 4 2 subunits were placed in a
recording chamber (~30 µl), voltage-clamped, and assessed for
expression of receptor using a 1-s pulse of 300 µM
acetylcholine (see Lu et al. (14) for details). Peptide was
then added to the bath to achieve a final concentration of 10 µM.
Receptor Binding Assays
-Conotoxin GVIA Binding--
-Conotoxin GVIA was
iodinated by previously described methods (15). The binding protocol
was a modification of that described in Hillyard et al.
(16). Crude brain membranes from Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were
prepared as described by Catterall (17), with modifications in
buffer components as described in Cruz and Olivera (15). The binding of
125I-labeled -conotoxin GVIA to rat brain membrane was
measured in a 200-µl assay mix that contained approximately 10 µg
of membrane protein, 100,000 cpm of carrier-free
-[125I]conotoxin GVIA (approximately 150 pm), 0.2 mg/ml lysozyme, 0.32 M sucrose, 100 mM
NaCl, and 5 mM HEPES/Tris (pH 7.4). Nonspecific binding was
measured by preincubating the membrane preparation with 1 µM unlabeled -conotoxin GVIA for 30 min on ice before the addition of -[125I]conotoxin GVIA. mr10a was
assessed for activity by preincubating the toxin for 30 min on ice. The
final assay mix was then incubated at room temperature for 30 min and
diluted with 1.5 ml of wash buffer containing 160 mM NaCl,
1.5 mM CaCl2, 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, 5 mM HEPES/Tris (pH 7.4). Membranes were collected on glass
fiber filters (Whatman GF/C soaked in 0.1% polyethyleneamine) using a
Brandell apparatus model M-24 and washed with 1.5 ml of wash buffer
four times. The amount of radioactivity in the filters was then measured.
4 2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor
Binding--
The procedure of Pabreza et al. (18) was used.
[3H]Cytisine (15-40 Ci/mmol) was from PerkinElmer Life
Sciences. Rat forebrain membrane was incubated for 75 min at
4 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0 at room temperature)
containing 120 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 2.5 mM
CaCl2. Nonspecific binding was defined with 10 µM nicotine.
The remaining assays were carried out under contract with
Novascreen (Hanover, Maryland). The essentials of the procedures used are summarized below.
Adrenergic 1 Binding Assay--
Rat forebrain membranes were
incubated with 0.3 nM [3H]prazosin (70-87
Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.7) at 25 °C for 60 min. Prazosin (1.0 µM) was used
to define nonspecific binding (19, 20).
Adrenergic 2 Binding Assay--
Rat cortical membranes were
incubated with 1.0 nM [3H]RX821002 (40-67
Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.4) at 25 °C for 75 min. RX821002 (0.1 µM) was used
to define nonspecific binding (20, 21).
Adrenergic 1 Binding Assay--
Rat cortical membranes were
incubated with 0.2 nM ( )[125I]iodopindolol
(2200 Ci/mmol) and 120 nM ICI-118,551 (to block adrenergic 2 receptors). Reactions were carried out in 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM ascorbate at
37 °C for 60 min. Alprenolol HCl (10 µM) was used to
define nonspecific binding (22, 23).
GABAA Agonist Site Binding Assay--
Bovine
cerebellar membranes were incubated with 5.0 nM
[3H]GABA (70-90 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) at 0-4 °C for 60 min. GABA (1.0 µM) was used to define nonspecific binding (24, 25).
Glutamate, N-Methyl--
D-aspartate Agonist Site
Binding Assay Rat forebrain membranes were incubated with 2.0 nM [3H[CGP 39653 (25-60 Ci/mmol). Reactions
were carried out in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) at 0-4 °C
for 60 min. N-Methyl-D-aspartate (1.0 mM) was used to define nonspecific binding (26, 27).
Glycine, Strychnine-sensitive Binding Assay--
Rat spinal cord
membranes were incubated with 16.0 nM
[3H]strychnine (15-40 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried
out in 50 mM Na2HPO4 and 50 mM KH2PO4 (pH 7.1) containing 200 mM NaCl at 0-4 °C for 60 min. Strychnine nitrate (1.0 mM) was used to define nonspecific binding (28, 29).
Histamine H1 Binding Assay--
Bovine cerebellar
membranes were incubated with 2.0 nM
[3H]pyrilamine (15-25 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried
out in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) at 25 °C for 60 min.
Triprolidine (10 µM) was used to define nonspecific
binding (30-32).
Muscarinic Central Binding Assay--
Rat cortical membranes
were incubated with 0.15 nM
[3H]quinuclidinylbenzilate (30-60 Ci/mmol). Reactions
were carried out in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) at 25 °C for
75 min. Atropine (0.1 µM) was used to define nonspecific
binding (33-35).
Neurotensin Binding Assay--
Rat forebrain membranes were
incubated with 2.0 nM [3H]neurotensin
(70-120 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 0.04% bacitracin, 0.1% bovine serum
albumin, and 1 mM Na2EDTA at 25 °C for 60 min. Neurotensin (1.0 µM) was used to define nonspecific
binding (36, 37).
Opiate 1 Binding Assay--
Rat forebrain membranes were
incubated with 1.0 nM [3H]deltorphin
II (30-60 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) at 25 °C for 90 min.
[D-Pen2,
D-Pen5]-enkephalin (1.0 µM) was
used to define nonspecific binding (38, 39).
Opiate 1 Binding Assay--
Guinea pig cerebellar membranes
were incubated with 0.75 nM [3H]U-69593
(40-60 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in 50 mM HEPES
(pH 7.4) at 30 °C for 120 min. U-69593 (1.0 µM) was
used to define nonspecific binding (40-42).
Opiate µ Binding Assay--
Rat forebrain membranes were
incubated with 1.0 nM
[3H]Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-N-methyl-Phe-Gly-ol
(DAMGO) (30-60 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) at 25 °C for 90 min. Naloxone (1.0 µM) was used to define nonspecific binding (43, 44).
Norepinephrine Transporter Binding Assay--
Rat forebrain
membranes were incubated with 1.0 nM
[3H]nisoxetine (60-85 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried
out in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 300 mM NaCl and 5 mM KCl at 0-4 °C for 4 h. Desipramine (1.0 µM) was used to define nonspecific
binding (45, 46).
Serotonin 5HT3 Binding Assay--
N1E-115 cells were
incubated with 0.35 nM [3H]GR65630 (30-70
Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in 20 mM HEPES (pH
7.4) containing 150 mM NaCl at 25 °C for 60 min.
MDL-72222 (1.0 µM) was used to define nonspecific binding
(47-49).
Serotonin Transporter Binding Assay--
Rat forebrain membranes
were incubated with 0.7 nM [3H]citalopram
(70-87 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried out in 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 120 mM NaCl and 5 mM KCl at 25 °C for 60 min. Imipramine (10 µM) was used to define nonspecific binding (50, 51).
Dopamine Transporter Binding Assay--
Guinea pig striatal
membranes were incubated with 12.0 µM
[3H]WIN,35,428 (60-87 Ci/mmol). Reactions were carried
out in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 120 mM NaCl at 0-4 °C for 2 h. GBR-12909 (0.1 µM) was used to define nonspecific binding (52, 53).
 |
RESULTS |
Purification and Sequencing of mr10a--
Extracted crude venom
from C. marmoreus was initially size-fractionated using a
Sephadex G-25 column (see Fig. 1). Column fractions eluting in a range corresponding to small peptides were further purified using reverse phase HPLC utilizing conditions described under "Methods and Methods" and in Fig. 1. Throughout subsequent purification, HPLC fractions were assayed by means of
intracerebral ventricular injection into mice (54). Intracerebral ventricular injection of fractions containing mr10a produced
hypokinetic "sluggish" symptoms. The venom fraction was initially
purified using a trifluoroacetic/acetonitrile gradient system. To
obtain further purification, the new fractions were lyophilized and
resuspended in 0.05% heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA) and run on a
reverse phase C18 column using a 0.05% HFBA, acetonitrile
gradient. Further purification was obtained using strong cation
exchange chromatography. The fraction was then desalted using reverse
phase HPLC. Final purified product is shown in Fig.
2, panel B.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Purification of mr10a. A,
crude venom extract was size-fractionated using a column (2.54-cm
diameter × 188-cm length) packed with Sephadex G-25 (dry bead
diameter 20-80 µm). Elution buffer was 1.1% acetic acid at 4 °C.
Flow rate was ~18.3 ml/h. B, fractions from the indicated
area in panel A (bracket) were combined,
lyophilized, and resuspended in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and purified
on a Vydak C-18 column (see "Experimental Procedures") using a
linear 1% buffer B/min gradient where buffer A is 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid and buffer B is 0.092% trifluoroacetic acid, 60%
acetonitrile. The gradient began at 10% buffer B. C, the
material indicated in panel B (arrow) was
lyophilized and resuspended in 0.05% heptafluorobutyric acid. It was
then purified on a Vydac C-18 column using a linear 1% buffer B/min
gradient where buffer A is 0.05% HFBA and buffer B is 0.05% HFBA,
60% acetonitrile. The gradient began at 30% buffer B. D,
the material indicated in panel C (arrow) was
lyophilized and dissolved in 10 mM
NaH2PO4, 50% CH3CN (pH 2.5)
(buffer A). The material was then purified using a Vydac
protein-SCX (strong cation exchange) column (0.75 × 5 cm)
using a linear 1% B/min gradient where buffer B is the same as buffer
A but with the addition of 250 mM NaCl. The flow rate was 1 ml/min in panels B, C, and D.
Absorbance was monitored at 233, 214, 214, and 220 nm in panels
A, B, C, and D,
respectively.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Elution studies of mr10a. A,
~200 pmol each of the three possible disulfide forms of synthetic
mr10a were chromatographed using reverse phase HPLC. The disulfide
connectivities are: 1, Cys1-Cys3, Cys2-Cys4; 2,
Cys1-Cys4, Cys2-Cys3; 3, Cys1-Cys2, Cys3-Cys4. B,
100 pmol of native mr10a. C, ~200 pmol each of synthetic
Cys1-Cys3, Cys2-Cys4 and native mr10a. D, ~200 pmol each
of synthetic Cys1-Cys4, Cys2-Cys3 and native mr10a. Note that the two
materials co-elute. E, ~200 pmol each of synthetic
Cys1-Cys2, Cys3-Cys4 and native mr10a. In all HPLC runs, buffer A = 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and buffer B = 0.092%
trifluoroacetic acid, 60% acetonitrile. The gradient began at 15% B
and increased 1% B/min. The column was an analytical C-18 (see
"Experimental Procedures"). The flow rate was 1 ml/min. Absorbance
was monitored at 220 nm.
|
|
The disulfide bonds of the purified peptide were reduced, and Cys
residues were carboxymethylated. The alkylated peptide was then
chemically sequenced and yielded NGVCCGYKLCHOC, where O is 4-trans-hydroxyproline. Mass spectrometry of the peptide
verified the sequence and indicated that Cys residues are present as
disulfides and the C terminus is the free carboxyl (monoisotopic
MH+ (Da): calculated, 1408.5; observed, 1408.5).
Peptide Synthesis--
The sequence of the peptide was
independently confirmed by preparation of synthetic peptide as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The mr10a peptide has
four Cys residues and, therefore, three possible disulfide linkages.
All three disulfide bond linkages were synthesized to unequivocally
identify the native configuration. Peptides were initially synthesized
in linear form using pairwise protection of Cys residues (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Acid cleavage from resin removed
trityl-protecting groups, and ferricyanide oxidation was used to close
the first disulfide bridge. Iodine oxidation was subsequently used to
remove S-acetamidomethyl protection groups and close the
second bridge. Using this method, each possible disulfide arrangement
was synthesized, i.e. Cys1-Cys2, Cys3-Cys4; Cys1-Cys3,
Cys2-Cys4, and Cys1-Cys4, Cys2-Cys3. Final purified yields of each
peptide were 12.5, 5.2, and 12.4%, respectively. Synthesis of each
isomer was confirmed with mass spectrometry (calculated monoisotopic
MH+, 1408.5; observed, 1408.6, 1408.7, and 1408.6, respectively). The three forms of the peptide were distinguishable
using reverse phase HPLC based on elution time. In addition, they were
distinguishable by peak width, with the (Cys1-Cys4, Cys2-Cys3) form
having the narrowest peak width (Fig. 2). Both the elution time and
peak shape of the (Cys1-Cys4, Cys2-Cys3) disulfide form match that of
the native peptide. Additionally, co-injection of each synthetic form
indicates that native mr10a co-elutes only with synthetic peptide of
the (Cys1-Cys4, Cys2-Cys3) configuration, providing unambiguous
evidence for this disulfide linkage being native (Fig. 2).
mr10a Precursor Structure--
The mr10a peptide sequence was used
to design degenerate polymerase chain reaction primers for 3' and 5'
RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) amplification of the
complete mr10a precursor cDNA. The polymerase chain reaction
primers were designed to yield overlapping 3' and 5' RACE products,
allowing the complete cDNA sequence to be assembled from the two
sequences. Amplification of C. marmoreus cDNA gave
specific products of 610 base pairs in the 3' RACE and 300 base pairs
in the 5' RACE reactions. These polymerase chain reaction products were
cloned, and multiple clones of both the 5' and 3' RACE products were
isolated and sequenced. For both the 5' and 3' RACE products, the
multiple clones all represented the same sequence, and the appropriate
segments of the mr10a peptide sequence were represented by the cloned
sequence. The 5' and 3' RACE product sequences were assembled to give
the complete mr10a prepropeptide precursor cDNA sequence (Fig.
3). The first ATG start codon encountered
from the 5' end of the cDNA initiates an open reading frame of 61 amino acids, encoding a protein with a structure typical of a conotoxin
prepropeptide. The first 24 N-terminal amino acids compose a
hydrophobic signal sequence region. The mature mr10a peptide sequence
is located at the C-terminal end of the precursor sequence, immediately
preceded by a basic amino acid (Arg) signaling proteolytic peptide
processing. The stop codon is immediately downstream of the last
cysteine residue of the mr10a peptide. A 3'-untranslated region of
~500 base pairs is terminated by a typical poly(A)+
addition signal (AATAAA) and a poly(A) tail.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The Mr10.1 cDNA and encoded protein are
shown. The signal sequence and mature toxin regions are
underlined. The putative proteolytic processing site
(R) is indicated.
|
|
The mr10a precursor exhibits significant sequence homology to a
previously identified family of conotoxin genes, the T-superfamily, although the mature mr10a peptide is distinct from any of the previously isolated T-superfamily conotoxins (Fig.
4). Previously isolated T-superfamily
conotoxins all share the cysteine framework CC-CC (7). The
cysteine framework of the mr10a conotoxin is similar to that of the
-conotoxins, a large family of nicotinic receptor antagonists, yet
the sequence alignment of the prepropeptides clearly indicates that
mr10a and -conotoxins are derived from completely unrelated
precursors (Fig. 4). The occurrence of the mr10a conotoxin within the
T-superfamily provides a demonstration of the ability of
Conus species to evolve novel toxin peptide frameworks
within the same conotoxin superfamily.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The mr10a prepropeptide sequence is shown
aligned with representative members of the T-superfamily of conotoxins
(Gm5.1, Gm5.2, Im5.1, Tx5.1), along with two examples of
-conotoxin precursors
( -SI, -GI). The
mr10a precursor has substantial sequence homology with T-superfamily
precursor sequences, although the mature peptide has a distinct
cysteine pattern, and there is little amino acid similarity. Although
the mr10a conotoxin has a cysteine pattern similar to that of
-conotoxins, the mr10a precursor is unrelated to the -conotoxin
prepropeptide, and the mature toxins have no amino acid similarities
other than the cysteine residues.
|
|
Biological Activity--
The biological activity of many
Conus peptides can be grouped into three major categories:
those that produce excitotoxic shock, those that produce paralysis, and
those that inhibit sensory circuits. Intraperitoneal injection of 30 nmol of mr10a into three mice produced neither neuromuscular excitation
nor muscle paralysis. We next tested the peptide for analgesic activity
using mice in a hot plate assay. Native peptide (2 nmol) injected
intrathecally into three mice produced a latency to first hind paw lick
(a nociceptive response) of 39.5 ± 13.5 s, suggestive of
potent analgesic activity. Due to a limited quantity of native
material, a complete dose-response study could not be performed, and
all further tests were performed with synthetic peptide.
Intrathecal administration of synthetic mr10a produced a
dose-dependent (0.1-10 nmol) increase in the latency to
first hind paw lick (F(3,15) = 7.5, p < 0.01)
in the hot plate test. At doses of 1 and 10 nmol, mr10a significantly
increased the latency to lick the hind paw in this test (Fig.
5).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
mr10a produces dose-dependent
analgesia in the hot plate test. Male CF-1 mice were injected
intrathecally (i.t.) with either vehicle (0.9% saline) or
mr10a. Thirty minutes later mice were placed on the hot plate and
latency to first hind paw lick was recorded. Each bar shows
the mean ± S.E. of 3-6 mice per group; *,
p < 0.05, and **, p < 0.01 versus vehicle-treated control group.
|
|
Motor impairment was assessed in all injected mice by means of a
rotarod test (see "Experimental Procedures"). Motor impairment was
not seen in any mouse injected either intrathecally or
intraperitoneally. Injection of high doses of mr10a (25 nmol) by
intracerebral ventricular administration resulted in akinesia and
seizures in two mice tested. Further testing by intracerebral
ventricular administration was not performed.
Molecular Target--
mr10a was tested in a number of
electrophysiological and binding assays (see "Experimental
Procedures") in an effort to define its molecular target. To test
effects on Na+ channels, we used a frog peripheral nerve
preparation containing sensory fibers. mr10a (100 µM)
produced no appreciable effects on CAPs recorded from the posterior
crural nerve, which innervates the skin (Fig.
6). Clearly evident in the traces are
fast-conducting A - and A -CAPs as well as much slower conducting
C-CAPs. The A-CAPs and C-CAPs in the posterior crural nerve are
tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant,
respectively,2 just like
those seen in the frog sciatic nerve (cf. Refs. 55 and 56).
It is notable that many, but not all, of the CAPs in the
posterior crural nerve are sensitive to
other conotoxins known to affect action potentials,3 for
example -conotoxin PVIA, which targets Na+
channels (57), and A-conotoxin SIVA, which targets
K+ channels (58). mr10a also was without effect on
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, the site of action of
-conotoxins. Ten µM mr10a does not activate 4 2
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed in Xenopus
oocytes, nor does it compete for [3H]cytisine binding to
putative 4 2 receptors in rat brain membranes.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
mr10a does not affect CAPs in the posterior
crural nerve innervating skin. Control response (lower
trace) and that following 17-min exposure to 100 µM
mr10a (upper trace) are very similar, and small differences
in amplitudes of the CAPs in these two traces are likely due to fluid
evaporation at the Vaseline gap across which the CAPs were recorded.
Resolution of fast A - and A -CAPs (first two major peaks) in the
same sweep that displays C-CAPs (multi-peaked waveform at
t > 100 ms) is achieved by use of a logarithmic time
base (cf. Ref. 66). Time-axis units are ms, and traces are
displaced from each other by 1.5 mV. Stimulus (duration 1 ms) was
applied at t = 20 ms, resulting in the artifact seen as
the initial small deflection (see arrow) preceding the large
twin A-CAP peaks.
|
|
mr10 also failed to compete for binding to many other receptor targets
associated with analgesia including N-type calcium channels
(the binding site of -conotoxins GVIA and MVIIA), neurotensin receptors (the molecular target of contulakin-G), 1, 2, or 1 adrenergic receptors, GABAA, glycine or histamine 1, central muscarine, 1-, 1-, or µ-opiate receptors, or
5HT3 receptors and did not compete for binding to
norepinephrine, serotonin, or dopamine transporters.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We describe the characterization of a novel peptide with apparent
potent antinociceptive activity isolated from the venom of the
mollusk-hunting species, C. marmoreus. Like many
Conus peptides, mr10a is rich in disulfides, with 4 of 13 residues being Cys residues. Two other groups of Conus
peptides were previously shown to have four Cys residues, the
-conotoxins (59) and T-superfamily conotoxins (7). All
-conotoxins and T-superfamily conotoxins characterized to date (1,
7, 60) have Cys1-Cys3, Cys2-Cys4 connectivity. In contrast, mr10a has
Cys1-Cys4, Cys2-Cys3 connectivity, a pattern unprecedented among
Conus peptides. In addition to the novel disulfide bond
connectivity, mr10a bears little if any sequence similarity to the
-conotoxins or other T-superfamily peptides, and clearly represents
a new class of Conus peptide (Table
I).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Conus peptides and disulfide bridge patterns
, -carboxyglutamate; W+, bromotryptophan; T§,
O-glycosylated threonine; *, C-terminal
amidation.
|
|
Conus peptides are initially translated from mRNA as
prepropeptide precursors that are subsequently processed into the small mature neuroactive toxins. Conopeptides can be grouped into
superfamilies based on the signal sequences of the precursors and on
the disulfide framework of the mature toxin. Thus, in the O-superfamily
for example there are -conotoxins (Ca2+ channel
antagonists), µO-conotoxins (Na+ channel blockers),
-conotoxins (peptides that delay inactivation of Na+
channels), and -conotoxins (K+ channel blockers).
Peptides in these four families share a highly conserved signal
sequence as well as the same disulfide framework. Thus, the
polypeptides belonging to the same superfamily can be processed to
mature conotoxins that are biochemically and pharmacologically diverse.
The mr10a peptide described in this report provides a new twist to this
paradigm. Analysis of a cDNA clone of mr10a clearly indicated that
this peptide is a member of the T-superfamily. In members of the
O-superfamily, although there is hypermutation of toxin sequences, the
disulfide connectivity is conserved. In contrast, the previously
identified T-superfamily conotoxins versus mr10a have both a
divergent arrangement of Cys residues and, most surprisingly, a
different disulfide bond linkage. This is the first known example of
such a divergent disulfide connectivity within members of a
Conus peptide superfamily. Thus, the mr10A peptide defines a
distinct branch of the T-conopeptide superfamily clearly different from
T-superfamily peptides previously characterized. It seems likely that
more than one pharmacological family of Conus peptides will
compose each branch.
Although the purpose for which C. marmoreus employs mr10a is
unknown, it is possible that this is an example of a peptide that
inhibits specific neuronal circuits in prey. We demonstrate in this
report that mr10a produces inhibition of withdrawal response when
tested in a mouse hot plate assay at intrathecal doses that do not
produce gross motor impairment or impair performance on the rotarod
test. We have postulated elsewhere that a "nirvana cabal" of
peptides is used to inhibit sensory circuitry of the fish prey of
piscivorous Conus species that use a net strategy (61); the
discovery of the mr10a peptide raises the possibility that the
mollusk-hunting C. marmoreus uses a similar nirvana
cabal strategy.
Due to the potency and selectivity of Conus peptides,
several are now in various stages of clinical trials. Two
Conus peptides are being developed for the treatment of
pain. The most advanced is -conotoxin MVIIA (ziconotide), an
N-type calcium channel blocker (62). -Conotoxin MVIIA,
isolated from Conus magus, is approximately 1000 times more
potent than morphine, yet does not produce the tolerance or addictive
properties of opiates. -Conotoxin MVIIA has completed Phase III
clinical trials in humans and now awaits FDA approval as a new
therapeutic agent. -Conotoxin MVIIA is introduced into human
patients by means of an implantable, programmable pump with a catheter
threaded into the intrathecal space. Preclinical testing is being
carried out on another Conus peptide, contulakin-G, isolated
from Conus geographus (63); contulakin is an agonist of
neurotensin receptors but, interestingly, appears significantly more potent than neurotensin in inhibiting pain in in vivo
assays. Contulakin-G is being investigated for use in post-surgical
pain. For a review of conotoxins and therapeutic applications, see
Jones and Bulaj (2) and Adams et al. (65). The
mechanism of action of mr10a is unknown, but results of the present
study indicate that its mechanism is distinct from -, -, -, or
A-conotoxins as well as contulakin-G. In addition, it fails to act
at numerous other receptor sites associated with analgesia.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants GM48677 and MH53631. Electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry analysis was performed in the Mass Spectrometry Facility in the Chemistry Department at the University of Utah, supported by the National Science Foundation (CHE-9708413) and the University of Utah
Institutional Funds Committee.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biology,
University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112-0840. Tel.: 801-585-3622; Fax: 801-581-4668; E-mail:
mcintosh@biology.utah.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 18, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003619200
2
D. Yoshikami, unpublished information.
3
S. D. Abbaszadeh and D. Yoshikami,
unpublished information.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HPLC, high
performance liquid chromatography;
RACE, rapid amplification of
cDNA ends;
CAP, compound action potential;
HFBA, heptafluorobutyric
acid;
GABA, -aminobutyric acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
McIntosh, J. M.,
Olivera, B. M.,
and Cruz, L. J.
(1998)
Methods Enzymol.
294,
605-624
|
| 2.
|
Jones, R. M.,
and Bulaj, G.
(2000)
Curr. Pharmaceutical Des.
6,
1249-1255
|
| 3.
|
Röckel, D.,
Korn, W.,
and Kohn, A. J.
(1995)
Manual of the Living Conidae I: Indo-Pacific Region
, Verlag Christa Hemmen, Wiesbaden, Germany
|
| 4.
|
McIntosh, J. M.,
Hasson, A.,
Spira, M. E.,
Gray, W. R.,
Li, W.,
Marsh, M.,
Hillyard, D. R.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16796-16802
|
| 5.
|
McIntosh, J. M.,
Olivera, B. M.,
Cruz, L. J.,
and Gray, W. R.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
14343-14346
|
| 6.
|
Gray, W. R.
(1993)
Protein Sci.
2,
1732-1748
|
| 7.
|
Walker, C.,
Steel, D.,
Jacobsen, R. B.,
Lirazan, M. B.,
Cruz, L. J.,
Hooper, D.,
Shetty, R.,
DelaCruz, R. C.,
Nielsen, J. S.,
Zhou, L.,
Bandyopadhyay, P.,
Craig, A.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30664-30671
|
| 8.
|
Frohman, M. A.
(1990)
in
PCR Protocols
(Innis, M. A., ed)
, pp. 28-45, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
|
| 9.
|
Hylden, J.,
and Wilcox, G.
(1980)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
67,
313-316
|
| 10.
| Ecker, A. (1889) The Anatomy of the Frog, (Haslam,
G. H., translator) Oxford at the Clarendon Press, Oxford
|
| 11.
|
Dodd, J.,
and Horn, J. P.
(1983)
J. Physiol.
334,
255-268
|
| 12.
|
Luo, S.,
Kulak, J. M.,
Cartier, G. E.,
Jacobsen, R. B.,
Yoshikami, D.,
Olivera, B. M.,
and McIntosh, J. M.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
8571-8579
|
| 13.
|
McIntosh, J. M.,
Gardner, S.,
Luo, S.,
Garrett, J. E.,
and Yoshikami, D.
(2000)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
393,
205-208
|
| 14.
|
Lu, Y.,
Grady, S.,
Marks, M. J.,
Picciotto, M.,
Changeux, J. P.,
and Collins, A. C.
(1998)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
287,
648-657
|
| 15.
|
Cruz, L. J.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
6230-6233
|
| 16.
|
Hillyard, D. R.,
Monje, V. D.,
Mintz, I. M.,
Bean, B. P.,
Nadasdi, L.,
Ramachandran, J.,
Miljanich, G.,
Azimi-Zoonooz, A.,
McIntosh, J. M.,
Cruz, L. J.,
Imperial, J. S.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1992)
Neuron
9,
69-77
|
| 17.
|
Catterall, W. A.
(1980)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
20,
15-43
|
| 18.
|
Pabreza, L. A.,
Dhawan, S.,
and Kellar, K. J.
(1991)
Mol. Pharmacol.
39,
9-12
|
| 19.
|
Timmermans, P.,
Ali, F. K.,
Kwa, H. Y.,
Schoop, A. M. C.,
Slothorst-Grisdijk, F. P.,
and van Zwieten, P. A.
(1981)
Mol. Pharmacol.
20,
295-301
|
| 20.
|
Reader, T. A.,
Briere, R.,
and Grondin, L.
(1987)
J. Neural Transm.
68,
79-95
|
| 21.
|
O'Rourke, M. F.,
Blaxall, H. S.,
Iversen, L. J.,
and Bylund, D. B.
(1993)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
263,
1362-1367
|
| 22.
|
Minneman, K. P.,
Hegstrand, L. R.,
and Molinoff, P. B.
(1979)
Mol. Pharmacol.
16,
34-46
|
| 23.
|
Kalaria, R. N.,
Andorn, A. C.,
Tabaton, M.,
Whitehouse, P. J.,
Harik, S. I.,
and Unnerstall, J. R.
(1989)
J. Neurochem.
53,
1772-1781
|
| 24.
|
Enna, S. J.,
Collins, J. F.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1977)
Brain Res.
124,
185-190
|
| 25.
|
Falch, E.,
Hedegaard, A.,
Nielsen, L.,
Jensen, B. R.,
Hjeds, H.,
and Krogsgaard-Larsen, P.
(1986)
J. Neurochem.
47,
898-903
|
| 26.
|
Murphy, D. E.,
Schneider, J.,
Boehm, C.,
Lehmann, J.,
and Williams, M.
(1987)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
240,
778-784
|
| 27.
|
Lehmann, J.,
Hutchinson, A. J.,
McPherson, S. E.,
Mondadori, C.,
Schmutz, M.,
Sinton, C. M.,
Tsai, C.,
Murphy, D. E.,
Steel, D. J.,
and Williams, M.
(1988)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
246,
65-75
|
| 28.
|
Young, A. B.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1974)
Mol. Pharmacol.
10,
790-809
|
| 29.
|
Ruiz-Gomez, A.,
Garcia-Calvo, M.,
Vazquez, J.,
Marvizon, J. C.,
Valdivieso, F.,
and Mayor, F. J.
(1988)
J. Neurochem.
52,
1775-1780
|
| 30.
|
Chang, R. S.,
Tran, V. T.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1979)
J. Neurochem.
32,
1653-1663
|
| 31.
|
Haaksma, E. E. J.,
Leurs, R.,
and Timmerman, H.
(1990)
Pharmacol. Ther.
47,
73-104
|
| 32.
|
Martinez-Mir, M. I.,
Pollard, H.,
Moreau, J.,
Arrang, J. M.,
Ruat, M.,
Traiffort, E.,
Schwartz, J. C.,
and Palacios, J. M.
(1990)
Brain Res.
526,
322-327
|
| 33.
|
Yamamura, H. I.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1974)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
71,
1725-1729
|
| 34.
|
Luthin, G. R.,
and Wolfe, B. B.
(1984)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
228,
648-655
|
| 35.
|
Luthin, G. R.,
and Wolfe, B. B.
(1984)
Mol. Pharmacol.
26,
164-169
|
| 36.
|
Goedert, M.,
Pittaway, K.,
Williams, B. J.,
and Emson, P. C.
(1984)
Brain Res.
304,
71-81
|
| 37.
|
Gully, D.,
Canton, M.,
Boigegrain, R.,
Jeanjean, F.,
Molimard, J. C.,
Poncelet, M.,
Gueudet, C.,
Heaulme, M.,
Leyris, R.,
and Brouard, A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
65-69
|
| 38.
|
Akiyama, K.,
Gee, K. W.,
Mosberg, K. W.,
and Yamamura, H. I.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
2543-2547
|
| 39.
|
Sofuoglu, M.,
Protoghese, P. S.,
and Takemori, A. E.
(1992)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
216,
273-277
|
| 40.
|
Lahti, R. A.,
Mickelson, M. M.,
McCall, J. M.,
and Von Voigtlander, P. F.
(1985)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
109,
281-284
|
| 41.
|
Kinouchi, K.,
and Pasternak, G. W.
(1991)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
207,
135-141
|
| 42.
|
Rothman, R. B.,
Bykov, V.,
Xue, B. G.,
Xu, H.,
De Costa, B. R.,
Jacobson, A. E.,
Rice, K. C.,
Kleinman, J. E.,
and Brady, L. S.
(1992)
Peptides (Orlando)
13,
977-987
|
| 43.
|
Gillan, M. G. C.,
and Kosterlitz, H. W.
(1982)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
77,
461-469
|
| 44.
|
Goldstein, A.,
and Naidu, A.
(1989)
Mol. Pharmacol.
36,
265-272
|
| 45.
|
Langer, S. Z.,
Raisman, R.,
and Briley, M.
(1981)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
72,
423-424
|
| 46.
|
Raisman, R.,
Sette, M.,
Pimoule, C.,
Briley, M.,
and Langer, S. Z.
(1982)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
78,
345-351
|
| 47.
|
Hoyer, D.,
and Neijt, H. C.
(1988)
Mol. Pharmacol.
33,
303-309
|
| 48.
|
Lummis, S. C. R.,
and Kilpatrick, G. J.
(1990)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
189,
223-227
|
| 49.
|
Tyers, M. B.
(1991)
Therapie (Paris)
46,
431-435
|
| 50.
|
Brown, N. L.,
Sirugue, O.,
and Worcel, M.
(1986)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
123,
161-165
|
| 51.
|
D'Amato, R. J.,
Largent, B. L.,
Snowman, A. M.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1987)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
242,
364-371
|
| 52.
|
Javitch, J. J.,
Blaustein, R. O.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1984)
Mol. Pharmacol.
26,
35-44
|
| 53.
|
Madras, B. K.,
Spealman, R. D.,
Fahey, M. A.,
Neumeyer, J. L.,
Saha, J. K.,
and Milius, R. A.
(1989)
Mol. Pharmacol.
36,
518-524
|
| 54.
|
Clark, C.,
Olivera, B. M.,
and Cruz, L. J.
(1981)
Toxicon
19,
691-699
|
| 55.
|
Buchanan, S.,
Harper, A. A.,
and Elliott, J. R.
(1996)
Neurosci. Lett.
219,
131-134
|
| 56.
|
Kobayashi, J.,
Ohta, M.,
and Terada, Y.
(1996)
Neurosci. Lett.
221,
9-12
|
| 57.
|
Terlau, H.,
Shon, K.,
Grilley, M.,
Stocker, M.,
Stühmer, W.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1996)
Nature
381,
148-151
|
| 58.
|
Craig, A. G.,
Zafaralla, G.,
Cruz, L. J.,
Santos, A. D.,
Hillyard, D. R.,
Dykert, J.,
Rivier, J. E.,
Gray, W. R.,
Imperial, J.,
DelaCruz, R. G.,
Sporning, A.,
Terlau, H.,
West, P. J.,
Yoshikami, D.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
16019-16025
|
| 59.
|
McIntosh, J. M.,
Santos, A. D.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
68,
59-88
|
| 60.
|
Rigby, A. C.,
Lucas-Meunier, E.,
Kalume, D. E.,
Czerwiec, E.,
Hambe, B.,
Dahlqvist, I.,
Fossier, P.,
Baux, G.,
Roepstorff, P.,
Baleja, J. D.,
Furie, B. C.,
Furie, B.,
and Stenflo, J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
5758-5763
|
| 61.
|
Olivera, B. M.,
and Cruz, L. J.
(2000)
Toxicon
39,
7-14
|
| 62.
|
Heading, C.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. CPNS Invest. Drugs
1,
153-166
|
| 63.
|
Craig, A. G.,
Norberg, T.,
Griffin, D.,
Hoeger, C.,
Akhtar, M.,
Schmidt, K.,
Low, W.,
Dykert, J.,
Richelson, E.,
Navarro, V.,
Macella, J.,
Watkins, M.,
Hillyard, D.,
Imperial, J.,
Cruz, L. J.,
and Olivera, B. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
13752-13759
|
| 64.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 65.
|
Adams, D. J.,
Alewood, P. F.,
Craik, D. J.,
Drinkwater, R. D.,
and Lewis, R. J.
(1999)
Drug Dev. Res.
46,
219-234
|
| 66.
|
Erlanger, J.,
and Gasser, H. S.
(1937)
Electrical Signs of Nervous Activity
, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Olivera
Conus Peptides: Biodiversity-based Discovery and Exogenomics
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 20, 2006;
281(42):
31173 - 31177.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Corbetta, S. Gualdoni, C. Albertinazzi, S. Paris, L. Croci, G. G. Consalez, and I. de Curtis
Generation and Characterization of Rac3 Knockout Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
July 1, 2005;
25(13):
5763 - 5776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|