|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002458200 on July 27, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 32491-32498, October 20, 2000
Autocrine Gastrins in Colon Cancer Cells Up-regulate Cytochrome
c Oxidase Vb and Down-regulate Efflux of Cytochrome
c and Activation of Caspase-3*
Hai
Wu,
Gadiparthi N.
Rao,
Bosong
Dai, and
Pomila
Singh
From the Department of Anatomy and Neurosciences, University of
Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1043
Received for publication, March 23, 2000, and in revised form, June 28, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Suppression of the gastrin gene in human colon
cancer cells by stably expressing antisense (AS) gastrin RNA results in
significant growth suppression of AS cells. To understand mechanisms
mediating the growth effects of autocrine gastrins, differential
expression of transcripts by AS and control (C) clones of a
representative cell line (HCT-116) was analyzed to identify target
genes of autocrine gastrins. Six differentially expressed transcripts
were confirmed and sequenced. Of these, the RNA and protein levels of
cytochrome c oxidase (COX) Vb were significantly higher in
C versus AS cells. The expression of COX Vb by colon cancer
cells was proportional to the expression of gastrin. Higher levels of
COX Vb coprecipitated with cytochrome c in the mitochondria
of C versus AS cells. Treatment of mitochondria with
digitonin resulted in a 2-fold higher release of cytochrome
c from AS versus C mitochondria. As a
corollary, the cytosolic levels of cytochrome c were
significantly higher in AS versus C cells, which correlated
with ~2- and ~3-fold higher activation of caspase-9 and -3, respectively, in AS versus C cells in response to
camptothecin. Thus, autocrine gastrins may support growth/survival of
cells by up-regulating COX Vb, which may decrease the sensitivity of
the cancer cells to apoptotic stimuli by increasing retention of
cytochrome c in mitochondria.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Gastrins are peptide hormones that play an important role in acid
secretion from the stomach (1). Circulating gastrins play an equally
important role in the growth of gastrointestinal mucosa (2). Recent
studies with gastrin gene knockout mice confirmed an important role of
circulating gastrins in the growth of colonic mucosa (3).
Growth-promoting effects of amidated gastrins on mouse and human colon
cancer cells have also been demonstrated in vitro and
in vivo (4-8). Colon cancer cells additionally express the
gastrin gene (9-11). We and others demonstrated that down-regulation
of gastrin gene expression significantly reduces the proliferative and
tumorigenic potential of human colon cancer cell lines (12) and a mouse
colonic cell line (13), indicating a significant growth-promoting role
of autocrine gastrins in colon cancer cells. Although amidated gastrins
are the major forms of gastrins present in circulation, non-amidated
gastrins (progastrin and Gly-extended gastrin) are the predominant
forms of gastrins expressed by colon cancer cells (14-16). We now know
that non-amidated gastrins are biologically active and exert
significant growth-promoting effects on several cell types, including
human and mouse colon cancer cells (13, 14, 17, 18). In experiments
with transgenic mice that overexpress progastrin or Gly-extended
gastrin, a growth-promoting role of non-amidated gastrins for colonic
mucosa was reported (19, 20). Thus, studies with colon cancer cells and
transgenic mice confirmed that non-amidated gastrins exert significant
growth effects on both normal and cancerous colonic mucosas. Our recent studies indicated that non-amidated gastrins can also function as
co-carcinogens in chemical colon carcinogenesis; amidated gastrins were
less effective as co-carcinogens for unknown reasons
(21-23).
Several receptor subtypes and intracellular mechanisms are believed to
mediate the growth-promoting effects of endocrine (circulating) gastrins (reviewed in Ref. 23). However, intracellular mechanisms mediating the growth-promoting effects of autocrine gastrins (which are
largely composed of non-amidated gastrins) are as yet unknown (23). The
goal of this study was to identify target genes/pathways that may
mediating the growth-promoting effects of autocrine gastrins on human
colon cancer cells. To achieve this goal, we used a representative human colon cancer cell line (HCT-116) that is dependent on autocrine gastrins for maintaining its growth in vitro and in
vivo (12, 24). In a previous study, we demonstrated that
overexpression of antisense
(AS)1 gastrin significantly
suppresses growth of AS-HCT-116 cells compared with that of control (C)
HCT-116 cells (12). We postulated that differential expression of
transcripts by AS versus C clones of HCT-116 cells will
allow us to identify target genes/pathways that are perhaps regulated
directly or indirectly by autocrine gastrins. Using the method of
differential display, we identified at least 35 transcripts that were
differentially expressed; six were confirmed by reverse slot blot
analysis. Sequence analysis confirmed one of the transcripts to be a
well known gene, mitochondrial (MT) cytochrome c oxidase
(COX) Vb. In this study, we have investigated the significance of this
rather unexpected finding. Our results suggest that COX Vb may be one
of the target genes of autocrine gastrins in human colon cancer cells,
the RNA levels of which correlate with gastrin expression. A novel
observation made was that the suppression of endogenous gastrin caused
down-regulation of COX Vb, resulting in efflux of cytochrome
c (cyt c) from MT and activation of caspase-9 and
-3. Our findings suggest that endogenous growth factors such as
autocrine gastrins can enhance cancer cell growth via up-regulation of
COX Vb, which may not only support the higher energy requirements of
cancer cells, but may also indirectly play a role in the survival of
the cancer cells due to its association with cyt c.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Aprotinin, benzamidine, digitonin, camptothecin,
menadione, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, sodium orthovanadate, EDTA,
HEPES, and EGTA were obtained from Sigma. C2-ceramide was
obtained from BIOMOL Research Labs Inc. (Plymouth Meeting, PA).
Monoclonal anti-COX Vb Abs (A-6456) were purchased from Molecular
Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR). Monoclonal anti-cyt c Abs
(65981A) were from Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). Polyclonal anti-cyt
c Abs (sc-7159) and protein A/G Plus-agarose beads were
procured from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Anchored
oligo(dT) primers and arbitrary primers were obtained from GenHunter
Corp. (Nashville, TN). [ -32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol) and
[ -33P]dATP (3000 Ci/mmol) were from ICN (Costa Mesa,
CA). The random primer DNA labeling kit was from Life Technologies,
Inc. The PCR 2.1-Topo plasmid and TA cloning kit were obtained
from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
Cell Culture--
The human colon cancer cell lines Colo-205,
Colo-320, HCT-116, HT-29, DLD-1, and CaCo-2 were obtained and
maintained in culture as described previously (12, 25). AS and C clones
of HCT-116 cells, which overexpressed either the antisense gastrin RNA
or the control vector, respectively, were generated as described previously (12). We have previously reported the growth and gastrin
expression characteristics of various AS and C clones of HCT-116 cells
(12). For the present studies, we chose a representative antisense
clone (AS-2) that demonstrated significant suppression of endogenous
gastrin expression and negligible secretion of gastrin gene products in
the conditioned medium of the cells (12). A representative
control clone (C-2) that demonstrated gastrin expression and growth
characteristics very similar to those of the wild-type, non-transfected
cells was used. The antisense and control clones were maintained in
hygromycin-containing growth medium as described previously (12).
Identification of Differentially Expressed Transcripts by
AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 Cells--
Total cellular RNA was isolated
from AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells using the TRI reagent
(Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) following the
manufacturer's instructions. RNA was cleared from DNA using a Message
Clean kit (GenHunter Corp.). The RNA was reverse-transcribed using
three different 1-base-anchored H-T11M primers
(where M may be G, A, or C; provided by GenHunter Corp.) at 65 °C
for 5 min, at 37 °C for 60 min, and at 75 °C for 5 min. Ten min
after incubation at 37 °C, Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse
transcriptase (100 units) was added, and incubation was continued for
another 50 min. The reverse-transcribed cDNA samples were
PCR-amplified using H-T11M primers in conjunction with eight different primers (Ap1-Ap8; GenHunter Corp.) and
[ -32P]dATP following the manufacturers' instructions.
The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 6% denaturing
polyacrylamide gels. The bands that were found to be differentially
expressed in AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells were cut out of the gel,
eluted, and reamplified by PCR using the above H-T11M and
Ap1-Ap8 primers, and subjected to reverse slot blot analysis.
Reverse Blot Analysis--
Total cellular RNA was prepared from
AS and C cells as described above. Ten µg of RNA from AS and C cells
were reverse-transcribed into 32P-labeled cDNA using 5 µl of [ -32P]dCTP (50 µCi) in the reaction buffer.
Reverse transcription was carried out as described previously (26), and
a quick-spin column was used to remove the unincorporated
[32P]dCTP. Thirty µl of the PCR products were purified
and prepared for blotting. The PCR products were boiled for 5 min with
5 µl of 2 N NaOH to denature the DNA, followed by
neutralization with 5 µl of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.0)
in a total volume of 105 µl of distilled H2O. Fifty µl
of each cDNA sample thus prepared were slot-blotted in duplicate on
nylon membranes (Micron Separations, Westborough, MA) and
UV-cross-linked at 254 nm using a UCV-515 ultraviolet multilinker, and
the membrane was rinsed in 6× SSC buffer before prehybridization.
Prehybridization of the membranes was carried out at 65 °C for
1 h, followed by hybridization with the radiolabeled cDNA
probes, prepared from the RNA samples (as described above), for 2 h using Rapid-Hyb buffer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) following the
manufacturer's instructions.
The confirmed cDNAs were cloned into PCR-II plasmids using the TA
cloning kit and subjected to nucleotide sequencing using an automated
DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) as described
previously (26). The sequences were screened against the cDNA data
base using the GeneTool software program (Life Science Software
Resources, Long Lake, MN).
Northern Blot Analysis--
Total cellular RNA was isolated from
CaCo-2, Colo-205, Colo-320, DLD-1, AS-HCT-116, C-HCT-116, and HT-29
cells using TRI reagent. Equal amounts of RNA (20 µg/lane) were
separated on 2.2 mM formaldehyde-containing 1.2% agarose
gel and transferred to nylon membranes as described previously (12, 25,
26). The confirmed cDNA fragments were subcloned into PCR-II
vectors, restriction-digested, purified, and used as probes for
Northern blot analysis following our published procedures (25).
Briefly, the cDNA fragments were labeled with [ -32P]dCTP using the random primer DNA labeling kit
and hybridized with the RNA blots using Rapid-Hyb buffer according to
the supplier's instructions.
Fractionation of MT and Cytosolic Fractions from AS and C Cells
and Treatment with Digitonin--
Subconfluent AS-HCT-116 and
C-HCT-116 cells cultured in complete growth medium containing
10% fetal calf serum (12) were washed twice with cold
phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in buffer A (20 mM
HEPES (pH 8.0), 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 250 mM sucrose, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 mM benzamidine, and 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate) for 30 min on ice at a
concentration of 107 cells/ml of lysis buffer A. The
cell lysates were collected in homogenization tubes and subjected to
homogenization using a Dounce homogenizer B pestle. The cell lysates
were cleared by centrifugation twice at 2500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C
in a Beckman CS-15R centrifuge. The cell pellets were discarded, and
the supernatant was subjected to another centrifugation at 13,000 rpm
for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant and pellets were collected. At
this stage, the supernatant was further centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for
1 h at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was labeled the
cytosolic fraction and used as such. The pellet from the 13,000 rpm
centrifugation was resuspended in buffer A and recentrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was discarded, and
the pellet containing the MT fraction was either treated with digitonin
or lysed further for protein extraction as described below. Protein
concentrations in the cytosolic and MT fractions were determined using
BCA reagent (Pierce), and aliquots containing 50 µg/tube were stored
at 70 °C.
Preparation of Protein Extracts from MT Fractions--
For
Western blot experiments, the MT fractions were lysed for preparation
of protein extracts by suspending the MT pellets (prepared as described
above) in buffer B (10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and
1 mM sodium orthovanadate) for 30 min on ice; MT from
107 cells/100 µl of lysis buffer B were used. The
lysate was centrifuged at 4 °C for 30 min at 13,000 rpm in a
microcentrifuge, and the supernatant was labeled as the MT protein
extract. The protein concentrations in the MT extracts were measured as
described above, and aliquots were stored at 70 °C.
Western Blot Analysis of MT Protein Extracts and Cytosolic
Fractions--
Cytosolic fractions and MT extracts prepared as
described above were used in immunoprecipitation experiments and for
Western immunoblotting with specific Abs. Equal amounts of protein (50 µg) from the cytosolic and MT extracts were separated by
electrophoresis on 0.1% SDS and 15% polyacrylamide gels following our
published procedures (25). The protein was transferred
electrophoretically to a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) and blocked in 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0)
containing 150 µM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, and 5% (w/v)
nonfat dry milk as described previously (25). Complete transfer of
proteins was confirmed by Coomassie Blue staining of the gels following
our published procedures (25). To confirm equal loading of the
proteins, duplicate sets of gels were stained with Coomassie Blue, and
the relative concentration of proteins, across the lanes, was analyzed
densitometrically (as described below). In all cases, the majority of
the protein bands, separated by 15% polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis, were present in equal amounts in the AS and C samples
(data not shown). The membranes were subjected to Western immunoblot
analysis using the specific primary Abs (anti-cyt c Ab, 1 µg/ml; and anti-COX Vb Ab, 3 µg/ml), followed by incubation with
the appropriate peroxidase-conjugated Ab (1:2000 dilution) according to
our published procedures (25). The specificities of the anti-cyt
c (27-29) and anti-COX Vb (30, 31) Abs used in these
studies have been reported. The antigen-Ab complexes were detected
using a chemiluminescence reagent kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The
relative density of the bands was densitometrically analyzed
with the Documentation @ Analysis system (Model
AlphaImagerTM 2000, Alpha Innotech Corp., San Leandro, CA).
In a few experiments, the MT and cytosolic protein extracts were
subjected to immunoprecipitation with specific Abs as described below.
Immunoprecipitation--
Equal amounts of protein (100 µg;
from either cytosolic or MT extracts) were incubated with anti-cyt
c Ab (2 µg/ml) overnight at 4 °C with gentle rocking
using the Red Rocker (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco,
CA). Protein A/G Plus-agarose beads (40 µl) were added to each tube,
and incubation was continued for another 2 h at 4 °C with
gentle rocking. The beads were pelleted by centrifugation at 4000 rpm
for 5 min and washed four times with buffer A and once with
phosphate-buffered saline. The pellets were then boiled in 40 µl of
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis samples for 5 min, followed by
centrifugation at 4000 rpm. The samples were loaded onto
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and processed for gel electrophoresis and
Western blot analysis as described above.
Treatment of AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 Cells with Pro-apoptotic
Agents (Camptothecin, Ceramide-2, and Menadione) and Analysis of
Caspase-3 and -9 Activities--
Camptothecin (an extract of the
Chinese tree Camptotheca acuminata) is a potent inhibitor of
topoisomerase-1, a molecule required for DNA synthesis (32).
Camptothecin has been shown to induce apoptosis in a
dose-dependent manner in vitro (33) and is used generally for inducing apoptosis (34). Ceramide functions as a second
messenger in the induction of apoptosis by tumor necrosis factor- ,
Fas ligand, and other agents (35). The specific mechanisms mediating
the apoptotic effects of ceramides appear to involve ceramide-activated
serine/threonine protein kinase and a cytosolic ceramide-activated
phosphoprotein phosphatase (36). Menadione is a known potent oxidant
and causes depolarization of mitochondrial membranes, which is believed
to result in the release of cytochrome c and the initiation
of apoptosis. Subconfluent AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells growing
logarithmically in 60-mm cell culture plates in complete growth medium
containing 10% fetal calf serum were treated with 5 µM
camptothecin in <0.1 mM Me2SO, with 50 µM C2-ceramide, or with 50 µM menadione for 5 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubators. Control cells were treated with an
equivalent concentration of Me2SO. At the end of the
treatment, cells were washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered
saline, collected by scraping with a rubber policeman as described
previously (25), and subjected to fractionation for cytosolic
preparation as described above. Equal amounts of cytosolic protein (50 µg) from treated AS and C cells were analyzed by Western
immunoblotting using 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
the caspase-3-specific Abs (1:2000 dilution) as described above.
Treatment of MT Pellets from AS and C Cells with
Digitonin--
Digitonin is a steroid and a detergent that
permeabilizes the outer MT membrane at low concentrations (<150
µg/ml) (37) and has been shown to effectively release cyt
c from the intermembrane spaces in the MT by disruption of
the outer membrane (37). We therefore used digitonin to release the
unbound or freely available cyt c from the intermembrane
spaces as follows.
The MT fractions (pellets; prepared as described above) from AS-HCT-116
and C-HCT-116 cells, containing equal amounts of protein (100 µg),
were treated with digitonin (100 µg of digitonin/mg of MT protein) in
buffer A for 5 min on ice. The mixture was centrifuged to separate the
MT fraction from the soluble fraction at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at
4 °C. The supernatant, representing extramitochondrial medium, was
collected and subjected to Western blot analysis with specific Abs
against cyt c as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
To identify differences in RNA expression by colon cancer cells
that were expressing high versus low levels of gastrin, we chose C and AS clones of HCT-116 cells for reasons described under the
Introduction. Differential expression of RNA transcripts by a
representative antisense clone (AS-2) and a representative control clone (C-2) was determined as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Thirty-five transcripts were identified as being
differentially expressed in the C and AS clones. All 35 cDNA bands
were further amplified by PCR, subcloned, and subjected to reverse slot
blot analysis for confirmation. Only six bands were confirmed by
reverse slot blot analysis; the differential display of the six
positive bands is shown in Fig. 1. The
cDNAs thus positively confirmed were subjected to sequencing as
described under "Experimental Procedures," and the nucleotide
sequences were screened against the cDNA data base from
GenBankTM using the BLAST program and GeneTool
software. Four cDNAs were for known genes, Bruton's tyrosine
kinase (BTK), high mobility group 2 protein
(HMG-2), Y12F7F12, and COX Vb; and two were for unknown
genes (Fig. 1). BTK, HMG-2, COX Vb, and an
unknown gene were down-regulated in antisense compared with control
cells. In contrast, Y12F7F12 and an unknown gene were significantly
up-regulated in AS versus C cells (Fig. 1).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Autoradiographs of differentially expressed
RNA transcripts in AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells. Total cellular
RNA from AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells was isolated and processed for
differential display analysis as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The differentially expressed transcripts, as represented
by the various cDNA bands, separated on 6% denaturing
polyacrylamide gel are shown. The arrows indicate the bands
that were differentially expressed in AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells
and that were confirmed by reverse slot blot analysis as described
under "Experimental Procedures" and "Results." The nucleotide
sequences of the corresponding cDNAs were determined to represent
the indicated genes as described under "Results."
UN,unknown gene.
|
|
Of the four known genes, the biological functions of MT COX are well
described. COX is the terminal complex of the respiratory chain and
plays an important role in the biosynthesis of ATP (31, 38). It
consists of 13 subunits, the larger components (I-III) of which are
encoded by the MT DNA, and the rest are smaller in size and are encoded
by the genome in the nucleus (38, 40). Although the larger subunits
(I-III) are involved in the catalytic activity of COX, the smaller
subunits are important in its regulation (38). COX Vb, one of the
smaller subunits of the COX complex, has been reported to be important
in the regulation of COX activity (41). In view of its importance in
energy metabolism, we chose to focus on this unexpected finding and
examined the biological significance of COX Vb expression in relation
to gastrin expression by colon cancer cells.
Differential Expression of COX Vb RNA by Human Colon Cancer Cells
in Relation to Gastrin Expression--
To determine if the
steady-state levels of COX Vb RNA correlate with endogenous gastrin
levels, total cellular RNA was isolated from several human colon cancer
cells that are known to express different levels of endogenous gastrin
RNA and was analyzed by Northern blotting for COX Vb transcripts.
Northern blot data from a representative experiment (of a total of
three experiments) are shown in Fig.
2A. Colon cancer cells
expressing high levels of gastrin RNA (more than three to five copies
of gastrin RNA/cell) (11, 12) are labeled H, and colon
cancer cells expressing relatively lower levels of gastrin RNA (less
than one to two copies of gastrin RNA/cell) (11, 12) are labeled
L. The ratio of COX Vb RNA to 18 S RNA was determined by
densitometric analysis of the Northern blot data, and the results
obtained from three separate experiments are shown in a bar graph in
Fig. 2B. As shown in Fig. 2B, the relative levels
of COX Vb RNA were ~4-fold higher in C-HCT-116 cells than in
AS-HCT-116 cells, and the difference was statistically significant
(p < 0.05). Similarly, all cell lines expressing
relatively low (L) levels of gastrin RNA (HT-29, Colo-320,
and CaCo-2) expressed significantly lower levels of COX Vb RNA compared
with colon cancer cells expressing high (H) levels of
gastrin (Colo-205, DLD-1, and C-HCT-116) (Fig. 2B).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Northern blot analysis of COX Vb RNA in human
colon cancer cells expressing different levels of endogenous
gastrin. A, total cellular RNA was isolated from the
indicated cell lines expressing different levels of endogenous gastrin
or AS gastrin RNA. Equal amounts of RNA (20 µg) from each cell line
were analyzed by Northern blotting for COX Vb transcripts using the
corresponding 32P-labeled cDNA as a probe. The membrane
was reprobed with 32P-labeled 18 S rRNA (provided by Dr.
Chen, Department of Microbiology, University of Texas Medical Branch)
as a control for equal loading. B, the bands in A
were densitometrically analyzed, and the ratio of COX Vb RNA to 18 S
RNA is plotted in a bar graph as described under "Results." Values
are the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments. H,
cells expressing relatively high levels of endogenous gastrin (more
than three to five copies of gastrin RNA/cell) (11, 12); L,
cells expressing relatively lower levels of endogenous gastrin (less
than one to two copies of gastrin RNA/cell) (11, 12). *,
p < 0.05 versus C values; **,
p < 0.05 versus high gastrin values.
Kb,kilobases.
|
|
Relative Levels of COX Vb Protein in the MT of AS-HCT-116 Versus
C-HCT-116 Cells--
To confirm the RNA results at the protein level,
cytosolic and MT protein extracts were prepared from AS-HCT-116 and
C-HCT-116 cells, and equal amounts of protein were analyzed by Western
immunoblotting using anti-COX Vb Abs as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Western blot data from a representative experiment of a
total of several experiments is shown in Fig.
3A. The relative levels of COX
Vb protein were determined by densitometric analysis of three separate
blots from three experiments, and the resulting data are presented in a
bar graph in Fig. 3B. The densitometric units measured for C
samples were arbitrarily assigned a 100% value, and the densitometric
units for the AS samples are presented as a percent of those measured
for the C samples in Fig. 3B. As expected, COX Vb was
present only in the MT samples, and no band was seen in the cytosolic
samples (Fig. 3A), confirming the specificity of the
anti-COX Vb Abs used in these studies. Consistent with Northern blot
results, COX Vb protein levels were also found to be significantly
lower (~5-fold less) in AS versus C cells.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Western blot analysis of COX Vb in AS-HCT-116
and C-HCT-116 cells. A, the MT protein extracts
(MIT) and cytosolic proteins (CYT) were prepared
from AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells as described under "Experimental
Procedures" and processed for Western immunoblotting with COX
Vb-specific Abs. Each lane contains 50 µg of protein. Anti-COX Vb Abs
were used at 3 µg/ml as suggested by the manufacturer. The
arrows indicate the 10.7-kDa COX Vb protein. B,
the Western blot data in A were densitometrically analyzed,
and C values were arbitrarily assigned a 100% value. The densitometric
units for the AS samples are presented as a percent of those measured
for the C samples. Each bar represents the means ± S.E. of three separate experiments. *, p < 0.05 versus C value.
|
|
Association of COX Vb with Cytochrome c in the MT of AS-HCT-116 and
C-HCT-116 Cells--
Cytochrome c is an important substrate
for the MT COX enzymes, but it is not known if cyt c exists
as a bound complex with the COX Vb subunit. Cytochrome c not
only plays an important role in the oxidative respiratory pathway as a
substrate for the COX enzymes, it also plays an important role in the
apoptotic pathway for most epithelial cells (28, 41, 43). The
association of cyt c with higher levels of COX Vb in
gastrin-expressing colon cancer cells could then potentially make it
less available for initiating apoptotic events in the cytosol. It was
therefore important to first establish if cyt c existed as a
bound complex with the COX Vb subunit in MT. MT and cytosolic lysates
were prepared from AS and C cells as described under "Experimental
Procedures," and equal amounts of MT and cytosolic proteins were
immunoprecipitated with anti-cyt c Ab. The anti-cyt
c immunoprecipitates were analyzed by sequential
immunoblotting with specific Abs against COX Vb and cyt c.
Immunoblot data from a representative experiment of two separate
experiments are shown in Fig.
4A. As shown in Fig. 4A, the anti-cyt c immunoprecipitates of the MT
proteins from both AS and C cells clearly coprecipitated with COX Vb,
indicating an association of cyt c with the COX Vb subunit
in the MT of the cells. More importantly, the levels of COX Vb
associated with cyt c were significantly higher (>3 times)
in the MT of C versus AS cells. Once again, as expected, no
COX Vb was immunoprecipitated with cyt c using cytosolic
samples, confirming the specificity of the Ab and the
immunoprecipitation reaction (Fig. 4A).

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
A, Western immunoblots of
immunoprecipitates. MT protein extracts (MIT) and cytosolic
proteins (CYT) were prepared from AS-HCT-116
(AS) and C-HCT-116 cells (C) and subjected to
immunoprecipitation with anti-cyt c Abs as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The immunoprecipitated proteins were
processed for immunoblotting with anti-COX Vb Abs (upper
panel) and anti-cyt c Abs (lower panel). The
arrows indicate the 10.7-kDa COX Vb and 15.3-kDa cyt
c proteins. B and C, effect of
digitonin on cyt c release from the MT. MT pellets were
prepared from AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The MT pellets (equivalent to
107 cells) were treated with digitonin (100 µg/mg of MT
protein), followed by separation of the MT pellets from the
extramitochondrial (incubation) medium. The medium was processed for
immunoblotting with anti-cyt c Abs as described under
"Experimental Procedures." In B are shown the cyt
c immunoblots for a representative set of AS and C samples
from three separate experiments. The relative release of cyt
c from the MT into the incubation medium can be appreciated
from the relative density of the AS versus C bands. The
autoradiographic data in B were densitometrically analyzed,
and the relative density of the bands in the AS samples was arbitrarily
assigned a 100% value. The relative values in the C samples are
presented as a percent of those measured for the AS samples in
C. The data in the bar graph represent the means ± S.E. of results obtained from three separate experiments. *,
p < 0.05 versus AS values.
|
|
The relative levels of cyt c protein were significantly
higher (by ~2-fold) in the cytosol of AS versus C cells
(Fig. 4A). We hypothesized that higher levels of cyt
c in the cytosol of AS cells reflected lower levels of COX
Vb in the MT of AS versus C cells and hence lower retention
of cyt c in the MT of AS cells. To test this possibility, we
conducted the following experiments with digitonin.
MT pellets were prepared from AS and C cells as described under
"Experimental Procedures" and treated with an optimal concentration of digitonin (100 µg/ml). The release of cyt c from MT
into the extramitochondrial medium was analyzed by immunoblot analysis using anti-cyt c Ab. The results from a representative
experiment of two separate experiments are shown in Fig. 4B.
The immunoblot data from Fig. 4B were densitometrically
analyzed, and the densitometric units measured for the AS samples was
arbitrarily assigned a 100% value. The densitometric units measured
for the C samples are presented as a percent of AS levels, and the data
are shown as a bar graph in Fig. 4C. As shown in Fig. 4
(B and C), significantly higher levels of cyt
c were released from MT in response to digitonin in AS
versus C samples. These results confirm the possibility that
high levels of COX Vb in the gastrin-expressing C cells may have been
more effective in retaining cyt c within the MT, whereas lower levels of COX Vb in AS cells may have allowed for a significantly higher release of cyt c from MT into the medium by AS
samples. To confirm if cyt c levels were also significantly
different in C versus AS cells in the MT and cytosolic
fractions, the following experiments were conducted.
Cytochrome c Protein Levels in the MT and Cytosol of AS-HCT-116 and
C-HCT-116 Cells--
Protein extracts were prepared from the MT and
cytosolic fractions of AS and C cells, and equal amounts of protein
from the two fractions were analyzed by Western immunoblotting with cyt c-specific Abs as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Immunoblot data from a representative experiment (of a
total of four separate experiments) are shown in Fig.
5A. The blots from all
experiments were densitometrically analyzed, and the densitometric
units for the cytosolic samples from AS cells were arbitrarily assigned a 100% value. The densitometric units for the MT samples from AS and C
cells and for the cytosolic samples from C cells are expressed as a
percent of those measured for AS cytosolic samples, and the data are
presented in Fig. 5B. Cytochrome c levels were ~2-fold higher in the cytosol of AS versus C cells.
Cytochrome c levels were significantly higher in the MT of C
versus AS cells, further confirming the possibility that
higher levels of COX Vb in the MT of C cells may have retained higher
levels of cyt c in the MT of C cells.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Relative levels of cyt c in
the cytosolic and MT fractions of AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells.
MT (MIT) and cytosolic (CYT) extracts were
prepared from AS and C cells as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Equal amounts of protein (50 µg) from the MT and
cytosol extracts were processed for Western immunoblotting with
anti-cyt c Abs as described under "Experimental
Procedures." A representative autoradiograph of a Western immunoblot
is shown in A. The arrows indicate the 15.3-kDa
cyt c protein band in the samples. The bands in A
were densitometrically analyzed, and the relative density of cyt
c bands in the cytosol of the AS samples was arbitrarily
assigned a 100% value. The densitometric readings for all other bands
are represented as a percent of those measured for the cytosol of the
AS samples in B. Black bars represent MT values,
and gray bars represent cyt c in cytosolic
fractions. *, p < 0.05 versus cyt
c in cytosolic fractions; **, p < 0.05 versus the corresponding cyt c values in the MT
fractions.
|
|
It is now known that cyt c is released from MT in response
to apoptotic stimuli and is one of the several factors required for
activation of caspase-3, which is believed to be an important initiating event in the pathway to apoptosis (28, 41, 43). We therefore
hypothesized that less availability of cyt c in the cytosol
of gastrin-expressing C cells (due to higher retention of cyt
c in the MT of C cells, as suggested by the results
presented in Figs. 4, B and C) may result in
lower activation of caspase-3 in response to apoptotic stimuli. To
investigate this possibility, the following experiment was conducted.
Effect of Camptothecin Treatment on Activation of Caspase-3 and -9 in AS-HCT-116 Versus C-HCT-116 Cells--
AS and C cells were treated
with an optimal dose of camptothecin as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Twenty-four h post-treatment, the cells were washed, and
cytosolic protein was prepared. Equal amounts of cytosolic protein were
analyzed by Western immunoblotting with anti-caspase-9 and -3 Abs.
Immunoblot data from a representative experiment (of a total of three
experiments) are presented in Fig. 6
(A and C). Six immunoblots of each from the three
experiments were densitometrically analyzed, and the densitometric
units for the AS samples were arbitrarily assigned a 100% value. The
densitometric units for the C samples are presented as a percent
of those measured for the AS samples, and the data are shown as bar
graphs in Fig. 6 (B and D). Camptothecin (a
potent apoptotic stimulus) caused an ~2-fold increase in the levels
of activated caspase-9 and a 3-4-fold increase in the levels of
activated caspase-3 in AS versus C samples. On the other
hand, procaspase-3 and -9 levels were similar in AS and C cells (Fig.
6).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of camptothecin on activation of
caspase-9 and -3 in AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells. The AS and C
cells were treated with an optimal dose of camptothecin (5 µg/dish)
as described under "Experimental Procedures." The cytosol was
prepared and subjected to immunoblot analysis with specific Abs against
caspase-9 or -3 at a dilution of 1:2000. Representative immunoblots are
shown in A and C. As shown, the anti-caspase Ab
detected the procaspase forms and the activated forms of the enzyme
with the indicated molecular masses. The data in A and
C for the active caspase bands were densitometrically
analyzed, and the values for the AS samples were arbitrarily assigned a
100% value. The relative levels in the C samples are presented as a
percent of those measured for the AS samples, and the results are shown
in bar graphs in B and D. The data in
B and D represent the means ± S.E. of six
separate blots from three experiments for each. *, p < 0.05 versus AS samples.
|
|
Relative Effects of Pro-apoptotic Agents on Activation of Caspase-3
in AS-HCT-116 Versus C-HCT-116 Cells--
To confirm the increased
sensitivity of AS-HCT-116 versus C-HCT-116 cells to
apoptotic stimuli, we conducted additional studies with two other known
pro-apoptotic stimuli, C2-ceramide and menadione, as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The experiment was carried out as described above for camptothecin, and the data were
analyzed similarly. The data from three separate experiments are
presented in Table I. Treatment of the
cells with camptothecin once again resulted in a significantly higher
activation of caspase-3 (~3-fold higher) in AS versus C
samples. Menadione was slightly less effective than camptothecin, but
similarly caused a significant increase in the levels of activated
caspase-3 (~2-fold higher) in AS versus C samples.
C2-ceramide was the least effective of the three
pro-apoptotic agents, but the difference in the levels of activated
caspase-3 in the AS versus C samples was once again statistically significant. The pro-apoptotic efficacy of
C2-ceramide is critically dependent on the reciprocal
influence of sphingoid bases and diglycerides on protein kinase C
activity (44). In other words, the efficacy of ceramide-driven
apoptosis depends upon the balance between relative levels of ceramides
and diglycerides (which oppose ceramide action) (44). It is thus
possible that HCT-116 cells have a high concentration of the opposing
molecules (such as diglycerides), resulting in the relatively lower
efficacy of C2-ceramide in the present studies.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Relative levels of active caspase-3 (17 kDa) measured by Western blot
analysis in AS-HCT-116 and C-HCT-116 cells after stimulation with
camptothecin, C2-ceramide, or menadione
Values represent the means ± S.E. of three experiments. The
densitometric units measured in the AS samples were arbitrarily
assigned a 100% value, and the densitometric units of the
corresponding C samples are presented as a percent of AS values.
|
|
Our results suggest that a significant increase in COX Vb RNA levels in
gastrin-expressing colon cancer cells may result in a reduced efflux of
cyt c from the MT into the cytosol in response to apoptotic
stimuli, causing reduced activation of caspase-9 and -3. It is proposed
that the above described events may explain the increased
growth/survival of gastrin-expressing colon cancer cells.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we have for the first time identified at least six
target genes that appear to be regulated directly or indirectly by
autocrine gastrins in human colon cancer cells. Two of these (Y12F7F12
and an unknown gene) were negatively regulated, whereas four
(BTK, HMG-2, COX Vb, and an unknown gene) were
positively regulated in response to autocrine gastrins. At the present
time, we do not know if this regulation is at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level. Since the biological function of the COX
enzyme is well described, we examined the significance of this rather
unexpected finding. COX is the terminal enzyme complex of the electron
transfer chain (38) and oxidizes cyt c with transfer of
electrons to generate ATP by oxidative phosphorylation (38). Mammalian
COX is composed of three major catalytic subunits (COX I-III), which
are encoded by the MT genome (38). In addition, at least 10 smaller
regulatory subunits, which are encoded by the nuclear genome, form part
of the complex eukaryotic COX enzyme (45, 46). The nuclear subunits are
synthesized as precursor proteins, transported into the MT, and
processed, and the complex is assembled (36, 46). Although the specific
functional role for many of the nuclear subunits has yet to be
established, biochemical analysis of the COX mutants in yeast indicated
that the nuclear subunits are critically required for COX function or
assembly (46, 47). There are significant species and tissue differences in the relative expression of the nuclear subunits (31, 41). The
nuclear subunits are differentially regulated by environmental and
developmental signals, which allows the tissues to adjust to different
energy demands (reviewed in Refs. 38 and 47).
The gene for COX Vb (COX5B) is located on chromosome 2 (48),
and oxygen regulates expression of the V isoforms in yeast (49). The Va
isoform is expressed under aerobic (O2 > 0.5 µM) conditions, and the Vb isoform is expressed under
anaerobic (O2 < 0.5 µM) conditions (49),
wherein the Vb isoform has a higher turnover rate and a higher
intramolecular transfer rate than the Va isoform. Isoforms of COX V
significantly affect the binuclear reaction center around the catalytic
subunits I and II and alter the kinetics of interaction with the
isoforms of cyt c (49). The results of the present study
demonstrate that COX Vb in colon cancer cells can be immunoprecipitated
with anti-cyt c Ab, suggesting that the COX Vb subunit is
physically associated with cyt c within the holoenzyme.
Although specific binding sites for the COX II subunit are located on
cyt c (38), it is not known if COX Vb has specific binding
sites for cyt c.
The fact that COX Vb is specifically up-regulated under anaerobic
conditions of low oxygen tension is especially relevant to
tumorigenesis, wherein hypoxia within the tumors may provide the
necessary feedback for specific elevation of COX Vb protein in cancer
cells. Our present studies further suggest that up-regulation of
autocrine growth factors such as gastrin gene products may provide yet
another mechanism for elevating COX Vb levels and thus support the
increasing energy demands of rapidly growing cancer cells.
The majority of the colon cancer cell lines, including HCT-116 cells,
which express significant concentrations of autocrine gastrins, are
largely unresponsive to exogenous gastrins (23). To confirm a role of
gastrins in regulating COX Vb levels, we have therefore been using
intestinal epithelial cell lines (IEC-6 and IEC-18) that are known to
be responsive to exogenous gastrins (50). In preliminary studies, we
examined the activation of the COX Vb promoter using transient
transfection assays with the COX Vb promoter-chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase plasmid (obtained from Dr. Margaret Lomax). We
measured a significant increase in the COX Vb promoter activity in
response to 1 nM
gastrin.2
Significant changes in the expression of specific subunits of the
MT COX holoenzyme in cancer versus benign/normal cells from various tissues have been reported using the method of differential display (51-53). The COX VIc subunit was significantly up-regulated in
human prostate carcinoma versus normal human prostate
tissues (51). Other authors have reported overexpression of either COX II (52) or COX Va (53) in breast carcinoma specimens versus normal breast tissue, suggesting that tumors originating from different
tissues may up-regulate specific subunits of the COX holoenzyme,
resulting in increased COX catalytic activity. Mechanisms mediating
up-regulation of COX subunits are as yet unknown, but are likely to be
cancer cell-specific. In the case of gastrin-dependent human colon cancers, our present studies suggest that up-regulation of
autocrine gastrins results in overexpression of COX Vb. Recently, COX
VIIa was identified as an estrogen-responsive gene using the genomic
binding site cloning method (54), suggesting that estrogens directly
regulate expression of specific subunits of the COX holoenzyme. It
remains to be seen if autocrine gastrins can similarly, directly or
indirectly, regulate COX Vb gene expression. The intracellular pathways
that mediate the growth/survival effects of autocrine gastrins may
potentially regulate expression of COX Vb RNA. Raf-1, a cytoplasmic
Ser/Thr protein kinase that plays an important role in
mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase
kinase and that is up-regulated in many cancers, was recently shown to up-regulate expression of the COX II subunit (55). Up-regulation of the COX II gene in head and neck squamous carcinoma cells contributes to resistance of the cells to platinum-derived cytotoxic drugs (56). Somatic mutations in MT COX genes are commonly
present in human colorectal tumors (57). The specific functional effect
of these mutations has yet to be identified, however. It is
likely that the combined effect of mutations in MT COX genes and the
up-regulation of specific nuclear subunits in response to
cancer-specific growth factors results in the increased catalytic
activity of the COX holoenzyme.
Augenlicht and co-workers (58) hypothesized that MT play a pivotal role
in coordinating proliferation and apoptosis in rapidly renewing tissues
such as colonic mucosa. By virtue of the fact that COX Vb is involved
in regulating the binding affinity of cyt c for the
catalytic subunits I and II (47), the importance of up-regulation of
COX Vb in gastrin-dependent human colon cancers (as shown
in the present studies) highlights a possible role of COX Vb in the
survival of human colon cancer cells. Recent reports confirmed that COX
activity may be related to apoptotic potential of cells (59). For
example, cell death was induced in hematopoietic cells by
down-regulating MT respiratory enzymes (59). Similarly, treatment of
human leukemia cells with adriamycin resulted in loss of expression of
COX II and IV genes and promotion of apoptosis (60). Virulent
Mycobacterium tuberculosis caused apoptotic death of
macrophages by apparently down-regulating the COX VIIc subunit (61).
These reports thus suggest that down-regulation of one or more specific
COX subunits somehow translates into initiation of apoptotic events.
Our present studies indicate that increased release of cyt c
in AS cells, expressing suppressed levels of the gastrin gene and COX
Vb, represents one such mechanism that significantly enhances the
sensitivity of the cell to apoptotic stimuli, resulting in increased
activation of the caspase enzymes. Recent reports from other
laboratories support our current findings (62, 63). In one such report,
Bax-induced growth effects on yeast cells were believed to be
directly related to a decrease in the amount of COX holoenzyme and a
dramatic increase in the release of cyt c to the cytosol
(62). Treatment of Chinese hamster ovary cells with cAMP-elevating
agents significantly inhibited COX activity with a concomitant release
of cyt c into the cytosol (63), almost mimicking the results
of the present studies with gastrin-dependent human colon
cancer cells. Importantly, the regulatory subunit of protein kinase A
interacted with COX Vb in regulating COX activity and cyt c
release in Chinese hamster ovary cells with elevated cAMP (63). Thus,
COX Vb may play a critical role in specific cancer cell types in
regulating COX activity, which can then result in the differential
release of cyt c into the cytosol, as discussed above.
The release of cyt c is a requirement for initiating
apoptosis (28, 45). Microinjection experiments with cyt c
have confirmed the important role of this MT protein in the initiation
of the apoptotic pathway via activation of the caspase enzymes (64). The sequence of activation of the caspases is now believed to include
the release of cyt c from MT, followed by its binding to
apoptotic protease-activating factor-1, which triggers the activation of caspase-9, followed by the activation of caspase-3, which
is then followed by the activation of at least four other caspases
(caspase-2, -6, -8, and -10) (65). Thus, both caspase-9 and -3 represent critical and penultimate molecules that are required for
initiation of apoptosis in response to cyt c release.
However, several other pathways impinge upon this activation process,
wherein cyt c, released into the cytosol, plays an important
permissive role that sensitizes the cells to potent apoptotic stimuli
(Refs. 66-68 and this study). Several potent apoptotic stimuli have
been described in the literature in recent years (34), including topoisomerase-1 inhibitors (such as camptothecin) (32, 33) and p53 (39,
66). The differential display method was used to identify target genes
of overexpression of wild-type p53 in a leukemia cell line (66). One
gene identified was cyclin G1, which co-immunoprecipitated
with the COX II subunit and which apparently resulted in activation of
the caspase-3 enzyme (66). Overexpression of wild-type p53 in SAOS-2
cells resulted in bax expression and cyt c
release accompanied by activation of caspase-3 (39). In our present
studies, we observed that suppression of gastrin gene regulation
resulted in down-regulation of COX Vb expression, which resulted in an
increased release of cyt c, triggering an increased
activation of caspase-9 and -3 in response to camptothecin and other
apoptotic stimuli. It remains to be seen if the p53-mediated pathway is
somehow connected to the observed effects in response to
down-regulation of the gastrin gene in human colon cancer cells.
Just as we observed a significant increase in the sensitivity of the
colon cancer cells overexpressing antisense gastrin RNA to
pro-apoptotic stimuli, overexpression of c-myc was
similarly shown to sensitize the cells to pro-apoptotic stimuli via
release of MT cyt c into the cytosol, which was blocked by
the survival factor insulin-like growth factor I (42). The
c-Myc-initiated apoptosis was not mediated via the p53 or CD95/Fas
signaling pathway (42). It was concluded that although c-Myc promotes
apoptosis by releasing cyt c, its ability to activate
apoptosis was critically dependent upon other signals (42). We
similarly measured a significant increase in the activation of
caspase-9 and -3 in AS cells only in response to pro-apoptotic stimuli,
confirming the notion that pathways mediating the increased release of
cyt c in response to either loss of gastrin gene expression
in colon cancer cells (this study) or overexpression of c-Myc in growth
factor-starved fibroblasts (42) result only in sensitizing the cells to
more potent pro-apoptotic stimuli, thus making the cells less able to
survive under hostile conditions. Our present studies thus for the
first time demonstrate an important link between gastrin gene
expression, expression of the COX Vb subunit, cyt c release, and regulation of sensitivity to pro-apoptotic stimuli.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are thankful to A. Owlia for
technical help.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants CA72992 and CA60087 (to P. S.). Preliminary accounts of this work have been published in abstract form (Wu, H., Dai, B., and Singh,
P. (May 16-19) Proceedings of the Digestive Diseases Week, Orlando, FL, 1999, p. 801, Abstr. 4411; Wu, H.,
Rao, G. N., Dai, B., and Singh, P. (2000)
Gastroenterology 118, Suppl. 1, 2435).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Anatomy and
Neurosciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Rte. 1043, Galveston, TX 77555-1043. Tel.: 409-772-4842; Fax:
409-772-1861; E-mail: posingh@utmb.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002458200
2
H. Wu and P. Singh, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AS, antisense;
C, control;
MT, mitochondrial/mitochondria;
COX, cytochrome c
oxidase;
cyt c, cytochrome c;
Ab, antibody;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Walsh, J. H.
(1994)
in
Gut Peptides
(Dockray, G. J., ed)
, pp. 75-121, Raven Press Ltd., New York
|
| 2.
|
Johnson, L. R.
(1981)
Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract
, pp. 169-196, Raven Press Ltd., New York
|
| 3.
|
Wang, T. C.,
and Dockray, G. J.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
G6-G11
|
| 4.
|
Watson, S. A.,
Durrant, L. G.,
and Morris, D. L.
(1988)
Br. J. Surg.
75,
342-345
|
| 5.
|
Guo, Y. S.,
Baijal, M.,
Jin, G. F.,
Townsend, C. M., Jr.,
and Singh, P.
(1990)
In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim.
26,
871-877
|
| 6.
|
Smith, J. P.,
and Solomon, T. E.
(1988)
Gastroenterology
95,
1541-1548
|
| 7.
|
Singh, P.,
Walker, J. P.,
Townsend, C. M., Jr.,
and Thompson, J. C.
(1986)
Cancer Res.
46,
1612-1616
|
| 8.
|
Singh, P.,
Le, S.,
Beauchamp, R. D.,
Townsend, C. M., Jr.,
and Thompson, J. C.
(1987)
Cancer Res.
47,
5000-5004
|
| 9.
|
Baldwin, G. S.,
and Zhang, O. X.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
2261-2267
|
| 10.
|
Finley, G. G.,
Koski, R. A.,
Melhem, M. F.,
Pipas, J. M.,
and Meisler, A. L.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
2919-2926
|
| 11.
|
Xu, Z.,
Dai, B.,
Dhruva, B.,
and Singh, P.
(1994)
Life Sci.
54,
671-678
|
| 12.
|
Singh, P.,
Owlia, A.,
Varro, A.,
Dai, B.,
Rajaraman, S.,
and Wood, T.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
4111-4115
|
| 13.
|
Hollande, F.,
Imdahl, A.,
Mantamadiotis, T.,
Ciccotosto, G.,
Shulkes, D.,
and Baldwin, G. S.
(1997)
Gastroenterology
113,
1576-1588
|
| 14.
|
Singh, P.,
Xu, Z.,
Dai, B.,
Rajaraman, S.,
and Dhruva, B.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
G459-G468
|
| 15.
|
Kochman, M. L.,
DelValle, J.,
Dickinson, C. J.,
and Boland, C. R.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
189,
1165-1169
|
| 16.
|
Nemeth, J.,
Taylor, B.,
Pauwels, S.,
Varro, A.,
and Dockray, G. J.
(1993)
Gut
34,
90-95
|
| 17.
|
Seva, C.,
Dickinson, C.,
and Yamada, T.
(1994)
Science
265,
410-412
|
| 18.
|
Singh, P.,
Owlia, A.,
Espeijo, R.,
and Dai, B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8429-8438
|
| 19.
|
Wang, T. C.,
Koh, T. J.,
Varro, A.,
Cahill, R.,
Dangler, C. A.,
Fox, J. A.,
and Dockray, G. J.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
1918-1929
|
| 20.
|
Koh, T.,
Dockray, G.,
Varro, A.,
Cahill, R.,
Dangler, C.,
Fox, J.,
and Wang, T.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
3,
1119-1126
|
| 21.
|
Singh, P.,
Velasco, M.,
Given, R.,
Wargovich, M.,
Varro, A.,
and Wang, T. C.
(2000)
Am. J. Physiol.
278,
G390-G399
|
| 22.
|
Singh, P.,
Velasco, M.,
Given, R.,
Varro, A.,
and Wang, T. C.
(2000)
Gastroenterology
119,
162-171
|
| 23.
|
Singh, P.,
Dai, B.,
Wu, H.,
and Owlia, A.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol.
16,
68-77
|
| 24.
|
Hoosein, N. M.,
Kiener, P. A.,
Curry, R. C.,
Rovati, L. C.,
McGilbra, D. K.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
7179-7183
|
| 25.
|
Singh, P.,
Dai, B.,
Yallampalli, C.,
and Xu, Z.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
267,
G608-G617
|
| 26.
|
Dai, B.,
Widen, S.,
Mifflin, R.,
and Singh, P.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
332-343
|
| 27.
|
Goshorn, S. C.,
Betzel, E.,
and Jemmerson, R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
2134-2142
|
| 28.
|
Liu, X.,
Kim, C. N.,
Yang, J.,
Jemmerson, R.,
and Wang, X.
(1996)
Cell
86,
147-157
|
| 29.
|
Jemmerson, R.,
Johnson, J. G.,
Burrell, E.,
Taylor, P. S.,
and Jenkins, M. K.
(1991)
Eur. J. Immunol.
21,
143-151
|
| 30.
|
Taanman, J.-W.,
Burton, M. D.,
Marusich, M. F.,
Kennaway, N. G.,
and Capaldi, R. A.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1315,
199-207
|
| 31.
|
Vijayasarathy, C.,
Biunno, I.,
Lenka, N.,
Yang, M.,
Basu, A.,
Hall, I. P.,
and Avadhani, N. G.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1371,
71-82
|
| 32.
|
Rothenberg, M. L.
(1997)
Ann. Oncol.
8,
837-855
|
| 33.
|
Johnson, N.,
Ng, T. T. C.,
and Parkin, J. M.
(1997)
Leuk. Res.
21,
961-972
|
| 34.
|
Pharmingen.
(1998)
Apoptosis, Applied Reagents and Technologies
, 2nd Ed.
, San Diego, CA
|
| 35.
|
Pronk, G. J.,
Ramer, K.,
Amiri, P.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1996)
Science
271,
808-810
|
| 36.
|
Jarvis, W. D.,
Kolesnick, R. N.,
Fornari, F. A.,
Traylor, R. S.,
Gerwirtz, D. A.,
and Grant, S.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
73-77
|
| 37.
|
Nobumoto, M.,
Yamada, M.,
Song, S.,
Inouye, S.,
and Nakazawa, A.
(1998)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
123,
128-135
|
| 38.
|
Capaldi, R. A.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
59,
569-596
|
| 39.
|
Schuler, M.,
Bossy-Wetzel, E.,
Goldstein, J. C.,
Fitzgerald, P.,
and Green, D. R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7337-7342
|
| 40.
|
Capaldi, R. A.
(1990)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
280,
252-262
|
| 41.
|
Basu, A.,
Lenka, N.,
Mullick, J.,
and Avadhani, N. G.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5899-5908
|
| 42.
|
Juin, P.,
Heuber, A.-O.,
Littlewood, T.,
and Littlewood, G. E.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1367-1381
|
| 43.
|
Reed, J. C.
(1997)
Cell
91,
559-562
|
| 44.
|
Jarvis, W. D.,
Fornari, F. A., Jr.,
Traylor, R. S.,
Martin, H. A.,
Kramer, L. B.,
Erukulla, R. K.,
Bittman, R.,
and Grant, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8275-8284
|
| 45.
|
Kluck, R. M.,
Bossy-Wetzel, E.,
Green, D. R.,
and Newmeyer, D. D.
(1997)
Science
275,
1132-1136
|
| 46.
|
Capaldi, R. A.,
Marusich, M. F.,
and Taanman, J.-W.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
260,
117-132
|
| 47.
|
Poyton, R. O.,
and McEwen, J. E.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
563-607
|
| 48.
|
Bachman, N. J.,
Yang, T. L.,
Dasen, J. S.,
Ernst, R. E.,
and Lomax, M. I.
(1996)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
333,
152-162
| |