|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006133200 on August 4, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 32559-32565, October 20, 2000
Complete Protection by -Crystallin of Lens Sorbitol
Dehydrogenase Undergoing Thermal Stress*
Isabella
Marini,
Roberta
Moschini,
Antonella
Del Corso, and
Umberto
Mura
From the Università di Pisa, Dipartimento di Fisiologia e
Biochimica, Laboratorio di Biochimica, via S. Maria 55, 56100 Pisa,
Italy
Received for publication, July 12, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Sorbitol dehydrogenase
(L-iditol:NAD+ 2-oxidoreductase,
E.C. 1.1.1.14) (SDH) was significantly protected from thermally induced inactivation and aggregation by bovine lens -crystallin. An
-crystallin/SDH ratio as low as 1:2 in weight was sufficient to
preserve the transparency of the enzyme solution kept for at least
2 h at 55 °C. Moreover, an -crystallin/SDH ratio of 5:1
(w/w) was sufficient to preserve the enzyme activity fully at 55 °C
for at least 40 min. The protection by -crystallin of SDH activity
was essentially unaffected by high ionic strength (i.e. 0.5 M NaCl). On the other hand, the transparency of the protein
solution was lost at a high salt concentration because of the
precipitation of the -crystallin/SDH adduct. Magnesium and calcium
ions present at millimolar concentrations antagonized the protective
action exerted by -crystallin against the thermally induced
inactivation and aggregation of SDH. The lack of protection of
-crystallin against the inactivation of SDH induced at 55 °C by
thiol blocking agents or EDTA together with the additive effect of NADH
in stabilizing the enzyme in the presence of -crystallin suggest
that functional groups involved in catalysis are freely accessible in
SDH while interacting with -crystallin. Two different adducts
between -crystallin and SDH were isolated by gel filtration chromatography. One adduct was characterized by a high
Mr of approximately 800,000 and carried exclusively
inactive SDH. A second adduct, carrying active SDH, had a size
consistent with an interaction of the enzyme with monomers or low
Mr aggregates of -crystallin. Even
though it had a reduced efficiency with respect to -crystallin,
bovine serum albumin was shown to mimic the chaperone-like activity of
-crystallin in protecting SDH from thermal denaturation. These
findings suggest that the multimeric structural organization of
-crystallin may not be a necessary requirement for the stabilization
of the enzyme activity.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
-Crystallin, which represents approximately 35% of lens
soluble proteins, is a multiaggregate of two different 20-KDa subunits, A and B, which have a high degree of sequence homology. Believed to be strictly a lens-specific protein, -crystallin has now been found in several cells and non-lenticular tissues (1, 2). Both A and
B chains have a conserved domain, called the " -crystallin domain," which is peculiar to the
SHSP1 family (3, 4).
Like SHSP, -crystallin subunits can be induced by heat and other
stress conditions (5) and appear to be involved in the pathogenesis of
various degenerative diseases (6, 7) and in apoptosis (8).
The chaperone-like action of -crystallin, which was assumed from the
observed sequence homology between -crystallin subunits and the SHSP
gene of Drosophila (9), was then confirmed by the
strong in vitro anti-aggregation effect of -crystallin on denaturating thermally stressed proteins (10). In fact, the effectiveness of -crystallin as an anti-aggregant is often used as a
simple assay for in vitro assessments of molecular chaperone power (11). The thermally induced precipitation of - and
-crystallin (12, 13) and several enzymes (14, 15) was efficiently prevented by -crystallin present at variable ratios with respect to
the target protein. Enzymes undergoing thermal stress were protected by
-crystallin from aggregation but generally not from inactivation,
except for the restriction enzyme NdeI (16) and for bovine
liver catalase in which activity was only slightly protected by
-crystallin (17). The situation was different when the enzyme was
subjected to different post-translational modifications, such as
glycation, carbamylation, and steroid-induced inactivation where
-crystallin was shown to protect the enzyme activity (17).
In this work, we studied the chaperone-like activity of -crystallin
on sorbitol dehydrogenase (L-iditol:NAD+
2-oxidoreductase, E.C. 1.1.1.14) (SDH), purified from bovine lens. SDH
is a heat labile tetrameric enzyme that requires Zn2+ and
NADH as cofactors for its activity (18) and is the only known mechanism
responsible for the removal of sorbitol in the cell. SDH was protected
by bovine lens -crystallin not only from thermally induced
aggregation but also from inactivation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Calf eyes were obtained from a local abattoir
soon after slaughtering; the lenses were removed and frozen at
20 °C until used. Molecular weight markers for SDS-PAGE and gel
filtration, dithiothreitol, NAD+,
-D( )fructose, and D-sorbitol were from
Sigma-Aldrich. NADH was supplied by Roche Molecular Biochemicals, EDTA
by Serva Feinbiochemica, and YM30 ultrafiltration membrane by Amicon.
The electrophoretic equipment was from Bio-Rad. Sepharose CL-4B and
Sepharose 6B, were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Spectra/Por
molecular porous membrane tubing (cut off 60KDa) was from Spectrum. All
other chemicals were of reagent grade.
Enzyme Purification and Assay--
Sorbitol dehydrogenase was
purified to electrophoretic homogeneity as described previously (19).
The final enzyme preparation (approximately 1 mg/ml) with a specific
activity of 51 units/mg was stored at 4 °C in 10 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 7 (S-buffer) supplemented with 2 mM
dithiothreitol and 0.1 mM NADH. The purified enzyme stored
in the above preservative mixture was dialyzed against S-buffer just
before use.
The assay of enzyme activity was performed at 37 °C as described
previously (19) by following the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm in a
reaction mixture (0.5 ml final volume) containing 0.24 mM
NADH and 0.4 M D-fructose in a 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4. The rate of NADH oxidation
measured in a parallel assay in which the substrate was omitted was
subtracted as a blank. One unit of enzyme activity is the amount of SDH
that catalyzes the oxidation of 1 µmol/min of NADH.
-Crystallin Isolation--
All procedures were carried out at
4 °C unless stated otherwise. Frozen lenses were suspended (1.5 g/10
ml) in S-buffer and homogenized in a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer. The
suspension was then centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 30 min. An aliquot of the resulting supernatant was applied to a Sepharose
6B column (1.5 × 65 cm), and the elution was performed with
S-buffer at a flow rate of 3 ml/h. Eluted fractions (1 ml) containing
low molecular weight -crystallin were pooled and concentrated on an
Amicon YM30 membrane. The concentrated protein solution was
chromatographed on a Sephadex S200 column (1.6 × 60 cm)
equilibrated with S-buffer. The eluted fractions containing
-crystallin were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, pooled, and then stored at
20 °C in an S-buffer until use at a final protein concentration of
approximately 2 mg/ml.
Protein Aggregation Assay--
The thermal denaturation of SDH
both in the absence and presence of -crystallin was followed by
monitoring, as an index of turbidity, the absorbance at 360 nm in a
Beckman DU-6 spectrophotometer. Incubations of SDH (0.1-0.3 mg/ml)
were performed at 55 °C both in S-buffer and in 50 mM
Tris-HCl buffer pH 7.4, using a water bath at a controlled temperature.
Gel Filtration Chromatography--
Gel filtration analyses of
SDH/ -crystallin mixtures were carried out both at 25 and 55 °C by
Sepharose CL-4B on a XK16/70 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
equipped with a thermostatic jacket. Elution was performed with
S-buffer at a flow rate of 60 ml/h, and fractions of 1 ml were
collected. The following standards were used for apparent molecular
weight calibration: apoferritin, Mr 443,000;
-amylase, Mr 200,000; alcohol dehydrogenase, Mr 150,000. The relative elution volume
(Rf) is expressed as Rf = (Vs Vo)/(Vb Vo), where Vs,
Vo, and Vb refer to the sample
elution volume, the column exclusion volume (as determined by the
elution of a dextran blue standard), and the resin bed volume, respectively.
Analysis of the Kinetic Data--
SDH initial velocity
measurements were performed spectrophotometrically as described above.
For each set of measurements, data were analyzed by double reciprocal
plots. Rate measurements in each set of assays were in duplicate with a
reproducibility of 5%, and each plot was repeated at least twice.
Km and Vmax values measured
for fructose and NADH were determined by non-linear regression with a
relative standard deviation of 5%.
Other Methods--
Protein concentration was determined by the
Coomassie Blue binding assay (20), using bovine serum albumin as a
standard. SDH and -crystallin localizations in the elution profiles
of chromatographic analyses were carried out by SDS-PAGE according to
Laemmli (21) using 12% acrylamide slab gels, 0.75-mm thick. The
following standards were used for apparent molecular weight calibration: bovine serum albumin, Mr 66,000;
ovalbumin, Mr 45,000; glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase, Mr 36,000; human erythrocytes
carbonic anhydrase, Mr 29,000, trypsinogen,
Mr 24,000, and trypsin inhibitor, Mr 20,000. Gels were stained by the silver stain
technique (22).
To test the ability of low Mr -crystallin
aggregates to protect SDH, the enzyme (50 µg/ml in 3.8 ml of
S-buffer) was incubated at 50 °C in the presence of a dialysis bag
(cut-off, 60 KDa) containing -crystallin (1 mg/ml in 0.4 ml of
S-buffer). At different times, SDH activity was measured on 2-µl
aliquots. Control measurements were performed by incubating SDH, under
the same experimental conditions, in the presence of a dialysis bag containing only 0.4 ml of S-buffer.
 |
RESULTS |
Thermal Inactivation of Sorbitol Dehydrogenase--
A progressive
inactivation of SDH was observed by incubating the enzyme at increasing
temperatures. The pseudo-first order inactivation rate constant
increased from 3.51 × 10 4 ± 0.29 × 10 4 s 1 to
1.40 × 10 3 ± 0.07 × 10 3 s 1 when the
incubation temperature of SDH (0.01 mg/ml) was raised from 25 °C to
60 °C. The inactivation process was affected by the protein
concentration, nature, and concentration of the buffer and by the
presence of the pyridine cofactor.
NADH, up to 0.1 mM, partially protected the enzyme against
thermal inactivation. However, for all the temperatures tested the
NADH-dependent protection led to a SDH activity that was
never more than 20% higher than the control values. The time course of
SDH inactivation at 55 °C with different final enzyme
concentrations, ranging from 0.01 to 0.3 mg/ml, showed that after 15 min of incubation the residual activity was increased from
approximately 25 to 70%, respectively. However, incubations of SDH in
the concentration range of 0.1-0.3 mg/ml performed at 55 °C for
more than 15 min led to protein precipitation (see below). The
precipitation phenomena at long incubation times were affected by the
nature and concentration of the buffer. Although the 10 mM
phosphate buffer, pH 7, appeared to protect the protein from
precipitation, the Tris-HCl buffer used in this study (50 mM, pH 7.4) appeared to magnify the susceptibility of SDH
to thermal aggregation. Moreover, the concentration of the Tris buffer
affected the enzyme's stability. At 55 °C, the residual
activity of SDH (0.01 mg/ml) after 40 min of incubation rose from
approximately 20 to 40% when the buffer concentration was increased
from 10 to 50 mM (data not shown). The changes in the
nominal pH values occurring in the buffer in the temperature range from
25 to 55 °C (pH from 7.4 to 6.3) did not affect the enzyme
inactivation (data not shown).
Protective Effect of -Crystallin against the Thermal Aggregation
and Inactivation of SDH--
When SDH was thermally stressed in the
presence of -crystallin, both enzyme inactivation and precipitation
were prevented. -Crystallin present in the incubation at a ratio as
low as 1:2 (w/w) with SDH prevented protein aggregation when the enzyme
(0.3 mg/ml, final concentration) was incubated at 55 °C (Fig.
1). High ionic strength interfered with
the anti-aggregation capability of -crystallin; this is shown by the
increase in turbidity observed when transparent -crystallin/SDH
mixtures, but not -crystallin alone, were supplemented at 55 °C
with NaCl ranging from 0.2 to 0.5 M. The effect exerted by
0.5 M NaCl is shown in Fig. 1. Under these conditions, the
rate of the increase in absorbance at 360 nm was inversely proportional
to the -crystallin/SDH ratio in the mixture.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of
-crystallin on thermal aggregation of SDH.
Purified SDH (0.3 mg/ml) was incubated in S-buffer at 55 °C alone
( ) and in the presence of 0.3 ( ) or 0.15 mg/ml ( )
-crystallins. , refers to an incubation of -crystallins (0.3 mg/ml) performed in the absence of SDH. At the time indicated by the
arrow, NaCl was added to the incubation mixtures to a 0.5 M final concentration. The inset shows the
SDS-PAGE analysis of the -crystallin/SDH mixture ( ) before the
addition of the salt (lane a) and the precipitate generated
by the salt addition (lane b). See "Experimental
Procedures" for details.
|
|
To determine whether the precipitation induced by high ionic strength
in -crystallin/SDH mixtures involved only SDH or both target and
protector proteins, the precipitate formed after NaCl addition was
collected by centrifugation, washed three times by warmed
(i.e. 55 °C) 0.5 M NaCl in Tris-HCl buffer,
and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The results, shown in the
inset of Fig. 1, indicate that both SDH and -crystallin
are present in the precipitate in a proportion comparable with the
original composition of the mixture (compare lanes a and
b of Fig. 1, inset).
The ability of -crystallin to protect enzyme activity was evaluated
at various temperatures. The residual SDH activity was measured during
incubation in the absence or presence of -crystallin at a ratio with
the enzyme of 5:1 (w/w) (Fig. 2). In all
cases up to 55 °C, the presence of -crystallin fully protected
the enzyme for at least 40 min of incubation. Prolonged incubations at
55 °C led to a gradual decline in SDH activity. The remaining enzyme
activity after 3 h of incubation at 55 °C of 0.15 mg/ml SDH
with 1:5 (w/w) -crystallin was 75-80% of the initial activity (data not shown). At a higher temperature (i.e. 60 °C),
-crystallin was only partially active. In fact, as shown in Fig. 2,
after 40 min of incubation at 60 °C, although SDH alone was
completely inactive, 50% of the initial activity was still detectable
when -crystallin was present with the enzyme.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of
-crystallin on thermal inactivation of bovine lens
SDH. Purified SDH (0.01 mg/ml) was incubated at different
temperatures in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, alone
(open symbols) and in the presence of 0.05 mg/ml
-crystallin (closed symbols). The incubation was
performed at 18 (circles), 45 (diamonds), 55 (squares), and 60 °C (triangles). At different
times, samples were cooled, and the enzyme activity was measured under
standard assay conditions.
|
|
When under the above conditions (5:1, w/w -crystallin/SDH mixtures
at 0.1 mg/ml SDH, 55 °C), the ionic strength of -crystallin/SDH mixtures was increased by the the addition of 0.5 M NaCl, a
rather modest effect on the stabilizing ability of -crystallin
toward SDH activity was observed. A recovery of approximately 75% of the control value was detected 45 min after the addition of the salt.
Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on the
Chaperone-like Activity of -Crystallin--
Calcium and magnesium
ions interfere with the protective action of -crystallin against
both thermal inactivation and aggregation of SDH. Both metal ions at
millimolar concentrations induced protein aggregation when added to
clear mixtures of SDH and -crystallin at 55 °C. After 40 min of
incubation at 55 °C, the SDH present in a transparent mixture (0.1 mg/ml) containing -crystallin 1:1 (w/w) was readily precipitated
following the addition of 2 mM Ca2+ or 5 mM Mg2+ (Fig.
3A). No precipitation was
observed when both metal ions were added at 55 °C to a solution
containing -crystallin alone (data not shown).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of CaCl2 and
MgCl2 on the protective action of
-crystallin on SDH. Panel A, the effect
on thermally induced enzyme aggregation. Purified SDH (0.1 mg/ml) was
incubated at 55 °C in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, both alone ( ) and in the presence of an equivalent amount (w/w) of
-crystallin ( ), and the absorbance at 360 nm was measured at
different times. At the time indicated by the arrow,
aliquots of the -crystallin/SDH mixture were supplemented with
either 2 mM CaCl2 ( ) or 5 mM
MgCl2 ( ). Panel B, the effect on thermally
induced enzyme inactivation. SDH (0.01 mg/ml) was incubated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, at 55 °C both alone ( ) and in
the presence of an equivalent amount (w/w) of -crystallin ( ). At
different times, samples were cooled and the enzyme activity measured
under standard assay conditions. After 15 min of incubation, aliquots
of the -crystallin/SDH mixture were supplemented with either 0.5 mM CaCl2 ( ) or 1 mM
MgCl2 ( ), and at different times the enzyme activity was
measured as described for panel A. The inset
shows the percentage of SDH inactivation measured after 20 min of
incubation after the addition of CaCl2 ( ) and
MgCl2 ( ) at the indicated concentrations.
|
|
A concentration-dependent action of Ca2+ and
Mg2+ in antagonizing the stabilization exerted by
-crystallin on SDH activity is reported in Fig. 3B. The
strongest effect of Ca2+ was observed at concentrations
between 0.1 and 1 mM, whereas the strongest effect of
Mg2+ was between 0.5 and 3 mM. The increase in
the -crystallin/SDH ratio resulted in a reduced efficiency for both
of the metal ions to induce enzyme inactivation. In particular, when
the ratio of -crystallin/SDH was increased from 1:1 to 5:1, the
residual activity measured after 20 min at 55 °C from the addition
of the metal ion (either 2 mM Ca2+ or 5 mM Mg2+) increased from approximately 50 to
80% (data not shown).
ATP, Mg2+, and KCl were necessary for the GroE
system to exert its chaperone action (23). Moreover, ATP, in the
presence of Mg2+, KCl, and -crystallin, elicited the
partial recovery of citrate synthase activity after the enzyme had been
previously denatured by guanidinium chloride (24). In contrast, in our
study, the presence of 5-10 mM ATP and 2 mM
KCl neither improved the stabilization exerted by -crystallin on SDH
nor interfered with the antagonism to the stabilization process exerted
by Mg2+.
SDH and -Crystallin Form Two Sizes of Complexes--
The
elution profiles of a size exclusion chromatography of a mixture of
-crystallin and SDH (5:1, w/w) after incubation and separation at 25 and 55 °C are shown in Fig. 4,
panels A and B, respectively. In Fig.
4C, the profile of a chromatographic analysis at 25 °C of
SDH in the absence of -crystallin is also reported. The elution
profile at 280 nm reported in Fig.4A revealed two peaks, one
of which at a Rf of 0.71 (low Mr peak) was associated with SDH activity. SDS-PAGE analysis
(inset) revealed that whereas SDH was indeed exclusively in
the low Mr peak, -crystallin, mainly present at a
Rf of 0.45 (high Mr
peak), was distributed in a wide range of elution volumes
overlapping the peak of SDH activity. The staining intensity of the
-crystallin bands in the fractions containing active SDH was higher
when compared with fractions eluting immediately before the SDH
activity peak (compare lanes c and b in Fig.
4A, inset). Moreover, no -crystallin bands
were detectable by SDS-PAGE in fractions with elution volumes
corresponding to low Mr peak of
chromatographic runs performed at 25 °C (data not shown) in which
-crystallin was analyzed in the absence of SDH (compare lanes
c and d in Fig. 4A, inset). The
elution profile of the chromatographic separation performed at 55 °C
(Fig. 4B) revealed that the low Mr peak
of 280 nm absorbing material was lost. Nevertheless, a symmetrical peak
of active SDH (Rf = 0.65) was detectable. The
SDS-PAGE analysis of the eluted fractions (Fig. 4B, inset) revealed that, as occurs for the chromatographic separation at 25 °C, -crystallin co-eluted with active SDH. In fact, also in this case, the staining intensity of the -crystallin bands in the
fractions containing active SDH was higher than that observed in
fractions eluting immediately before the activity peak (compare lanes c and b in Fig. 4B, inset). When
-crystallin was subjected to gel filtration at 55 °C in the
absence of SDH (data not shown), the analysis by SDS-PAGE of fractions
corresponding to the active SDH peak (Rf = 0.65)
revealed -crystallin bands of a very weak intensity (compare
lanes c and d in Fig. 4B, inset). The
main difference, as revealed by SDS-PAGE analysis, between the
chromatographic separations performed at the two different temperatures
is that at 55 °C inactive SDH coeluted with -crystallin in the
high Mr region (Rf = 0.47).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Size exclusion chromatography on Sepharose
CL-4B of the SDH/ -crystallin mixtures at 25 and 55 °C. Panel A, purified SDH (0.17 mg/ml) was
incubated in Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, at 25 °C for 15 min in the presence
of -crystallin (0.85 mg/ml) and then chromatographed at the same
temperature. Panel B, the same as described in panel
A, except the temperature of pre-incubation and separation was 55 instead of 25 °C. Panel C, purified SDH (0.17 mg/ml) was
chromatographed as described above at 25 °C in the absence of
-crystallin. In each of the panels, the continuous
line and the closed circles refer to the absorbance at
280 nm and to SDH activity (units/ml), respectively. Insets
for each panel show the SDS-PAGE analysis of the eluted
fractions as follows: lanes a, b, and
c refer to the fractions marked by arrows a, b,
and c, respectively; lane d refers to the
SDS-PAGE analysis of the fractions, equivalent to arrow c
coming from a chromatographic analysis (not shown) performed at 25 (A) and 55 °C (B) in the absence of SDH.
O and F in the insets refer to the
origin and the front of the electrophoretic migration, respectively.
The Rf values of standard proteins are indicated by
numbered arrows as follows: 1, apoferritin;
2, -amylase; 3, alcohol dehydrogenase.
|
|
The elution volume of active SDH in the chromatographic analysis
performed at 25 °C on an -crystallin/SDH mixture (Fig.
4A) is slightly lower than that observed for SDH analyzed in
the absence of -crystallin (Rf = 0.73, Fig.
4C). However, such a decrease (approximately 3 ml,
corresponding to an increase of 30 KDa) is too small to attempt any
specific evaluation of the Mr of the
-crystallin/SDH complex. A further decrease in the elution volume of
active SDH was observed when the -crystallin/SDH mixture was
analyzed at 55 °C. However, in such a condition, even though high
Mr -crystallin aggregate and active SDH were
separated (see inset, Fig. 4B), a slight delay in
-crystallin elution was also observed (differential
Rf = 0.02). This finding would seem to indicate a
modest but still detectable change in the resolution power of the
column at 55 °C. Because of the difficulties in finding suitable
standard proteins, no calibration of the column could be done at
55 °C.
The possibility that low Mr aggregates of
-crystallin subunits might protect SDH from thermal inactivation was
tested by measuring at different times the enzyme activity of SDH kept at 50 °C in the presence of a dialysis bag containing -crystallin (see "Experimental Procedures"). Under those conditions, it was possible to measure a residual activity of approximately 90% after 1 h of incubation. When -crystallin were not present in the
dialysis bag, a residual activity of approximately 70% was measured.
Accessibility of the Active Site of SDH while Interacting with
-Crystallin--
The ability of -crystallin to protect SDH
activity against thiol blocking agents and metal chelators was tested
at 55 °C in mixtures containing -crystallin and SDH in a ratio of
5:1 (w/w).
Both iodoacetamide and iodoacetic acid led to a complete inactivation
of SDH. When 0.01 mg/ml bovine lens SDH was incubated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, buffer at 55 °C with 0.5 mM of either iodoacetamide or iodoacetic acid, an
inactivation occurred at the same rate (with a pseudo-first order rate
constant of 2.5 × 10 3 ± 0.6 × 10 3 s 1)
irrespective of the presence of -crystallin. The presence of 0.1 mM NADH significantly delayed (k = 6.5 × 10 4 ± 1 × 10 4 s 1) but did not
prevent the loss of enzyme activity. Bovine lens SDH, which contains
Zn2+ as a prosthetic group (18), is inactivated by EDTA and
recovers its activity upon treatment with ZnSO4 (19). When
0.01 mg/ml SDH was treated with 100 µM EDTA at 55 °C,
no reactivation occurred upon addition of the Zn2+.
-Crystallin, 5:1 (w/w) with the enzyme, did not protect SDH at
55 °C from the rapid and complete loss of activity induced by EDTA.
However, the inactivation was completely reversed when the inactive
protein mixture, following thermal treatment, was incubated at 25 °C
in the presence of 100 µM ZnSO4 (data not
shown). NADH, which has been shown to protect SDH at 37 °C from
EDTA-induced inactivation (19), was also able at 55 °C to protect
SDH from EDTA in the presence of -crystallin.
Kinetic Features of SDH Following Thermal Stress--
The
effectiveness of SDH as a catalyst of the NADH-dependent
reduction of fructose was tested after the thermal treatment of the
enzyme. Reaction rates were measured at 37 °C at different substrate
concentrations by using 0.01 mg/ml SDH pre-incubated at 55 °C for
different times (0-40 min) both in the absence and in the presence of
-crystallin in a ratio of 5:1 (w/w) with respect to the enzyme. No
changes in Km values with respect to the untreated
SDH for both fructose (200 ± 3 mM) and NADH
(0.049 ± 0.001 mM) were observed, either for the
thermally stressed enzyme stabilized by -crystallin (205 ± 4 and 0.046 ± 0.005 mM for fructose and NADH,
respectively) or for the enzyme undergoing inactivation in the absence
of -crystallin (200 ± 3 and 0.049 ± 0.001 mM
for fructose and NADH, respectively). Moreover,
Vmax measured for the enzyme previously heated
at 55 °C in the presence of -crystallin (0.068 ± 0.008 µmol/min/mg of protein) was essentially identical to the one measured
under the same conditions on the native unstressed enzyme (0.064 ± 0.005 µmol/min/mg of protein).
BSA Mimics the Chaperone-like Activity of -Crystallin--
To
assess the specificity of action of -crystallin, we made use of BSA,
a thermally stable protein, which shows a completely different
structural organization with respect to -crystallin (25). The
molecular chaperone-like activities of BSA and -crystallin were
compared by evaluating their ability to stabilize SDH activity (0.01 mg/ml of enzyme) at protector/target ratios ranging from 0 to 1 (data
not shown). The results indicated that at low protector/target protein
ratios, -crystallin was the most effective protective agent. 50% of
initial enzyme activity was still detectable after 40 min of incubation
at 55 °C at an -crystallin/SDH ratio of 0.1. To achieve the same
protection, a ratio of BSA/SDH of at least 0.4 was required. However,
at high protector/target ratios (higher than 0.7), -crystallin and
BSA were equivalent as protective agents, both being able to almost
completely preserve SDH activity. When the anti-aggregation action was
evaluated, no protection against SDH precipitation at 55 °C was
observed when -crystallin was substituted by an equivalent
concentration (mg/ml) of BSA under the conditions adopted in Fig. 1.
However, a significant delay before precipitation (approximately 50 min) and a 50% reduction in the maximal extent of protein
precipitation were observed when the BSA/SDH ratio was increased from
0.5 to 1.0 (data not shown).
 |
DISCUSSION |
After incubation at 55 °C, SDH purified from bovine lens
aggregated and -crystallin, present at a ratio of 2:1 in weight with
the enzyme, completely suppressed precipitation phenomena, subsequently
keeping the solution transparent for at least two h. A new target
protein, SDH, thus confirms the ability of -crystallin to prevent
thermally induced protein aggregation and insolubilization. Moreover,
unlike what was observed for other target proteins (10), besides being
protected from thermal aggregation, SDH activity was completely
stabilized by -crystallin even in terms of enzyme activity. Indeed,
at an -crystallin/SDH ratio of 5:1, a full retention of SDH activity
for at least a 40-min incubation at 55 °C was observed (Fig. 2).
Because it is a multimeric protein, in which activity is linked to a
pyridine cofactor and to a bound metal ion (i.e.
Zn2+) acting as a prostetic group, SDH may undergo
inactivation by a variety of triggering events, which probably occur
through different unfolding pathways. It is, therefore, not surprising
that SDH is quite sensitive to heat and appeared to lose activity at
relatively low temperatures (Fig. 2). The protein concentration
considerably affects the rate of inactivation. A significant increase
in the residual activity (from 25 to 70%) was observed following
incubation of the enzyme for 15 min at 55 °C when the protein
concentration was raised from 0.01 to 0.3 mg/ml (data not shown). This
fact suggests that protein-protein interaction is an important factor for SDH stability. The pyridine cofactor too is able to partially protect the enzyme from thermally induced inactivation at all of the
temperatures tested. However, neither the high protein concentration
nor the pyridine cofactor was able to completely counteract thermal
stress. On the other hand, the protection by -crystallin was
complete in the entire range of temperatures up to 55 °C. At higher
temperatures, the protective effectiveness of -crystallin decreased
considerably. At 60 °C, for instance, despite the presence of
-crystallin, the residual activity after 40 min of incubation
dropped from 100 to approximately 50% of initial activity (Fig.
2).
It is currently accepted that the chaperone-like action of
-crystallin is because of its ability to bind hydrophobic regions of
the target protein with the generation of soluble adducts (26, 27).
Nevertheless, the increase in ionic strength (from 0.2 to 0.5 M NaCl), although having no effect on the solubility of -crystallin present alone at 55 °C, induced protein precipitation in mixtures of -crystallin/SDH. Thus, the protective action of -crystallin against protein precipitation failed either because of
the release of SDH from the complex or because of the precipitation of
the complex itself. Indeed, SDS-PAGE analysis of the precipitate, obtained upon the addition of 0.5 M NaCl (Fig. 1), revealed
the presence of both SDH and -crystallin in the same ratio as in the
mixture before the addition of the salt (Fig. 1, inset). In this regard, the reduced rate of precipitation observed at higher -crystallin/SDH ratios could be explained by a stabilization effect
exerted by -crystallin on the adduct. This interpretation is
consistent with the fact that in conditions unfavorable to protein precipitation (i.e. high -crystallin/SDH ratios
at absolute low protein concentrations), the increase in ionic strength
had only a modest effect on the protection exerted by -crystallin on
SDH activity.
Calcium and magnesium ions were able to antagonize the protective
action of -crystallin against the thermally induced aggregation of
SDH as shown previously for aldose reductase and -crystallin (28,
29). In fact, both metal ions added at a millimolar level at 55 °C
to a transparent mixture of SDH and -crystallin led to protein
precipitation (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, Ca2+ and
Mg2+ impaired the protective action exerted by
-crystallin on SDH activity in conditions of thermal stress. The
effects of different concentrations of both Ca2+ and
Mg2+ on the protective ability of -crystallin meant that
an optimal level of effectiveness could be defined for both metal ions
(Fig. 3B, inset). It is worth noting that all our attempts
to modify the effectiveness of -crystallin to act as chaperone-like
protein by the addition of ATP failed both in the presence and absence of Mg2+ ion (data not shown). If the occurrence of an
ATP-driven process can be ruled out, the chaperone-like action of
-crystallin should be explained exclusively in terms of the
intrinsic properties of its structure. In other words, the interaction
alone between protector and target protein should be sufficient to
provide protection. In this regard, the effectiveness of -crystallin
to prevent SDH precipitation was compared with that of BSA, a
hydrophobic protein (25) that, as occurs with -crystallin, is
resistant to thermally induced precipitation. When BSA was present at a
ratio of 1:2 in weight with SDH, which in the case of -crystallin
led to full protection (Fig. 1), protein precipitation occurred to the
same extent and with the same kinetics as control incubations performed in the absence of the protector protein (data not shown). However, as
the BSA/SDH ratio was increased to 1:1, protection against precipitation, even though not complete, was observed. Thus, BSA may
intervene in the SDH aggregation process. The potential of a
chaperone-like action of BSA appeared to be more evident in the
protection exerted by the protein toward thermally induced SDH
inactivation. Therefore, the chaperone-like action did not appear to be
a specific feature of -crystallin, although -crystallin was more
effective than BSA in protecting SDH. This result differs from those
previously reported for the restriction enzyme NdeI and
catalase (16, 17), whose limited protection by -crystallin against
thermally induced inactivation did not find a comparable protection by
BSA. The protective action exerted on SDH by BSA, which is not as
structurally organized as -crystallin, raises the question of the
relevance of the multimeric structure of -crystallin in determining
its chaperone-like activity. The apparent specificity of action of
-crystallin, at least in the case of SDH, appears to be confined to
rather low protector/target protein ratios.
The ability of -crystallin to protect the catalytic activity of SDH
provides an additional tool in the study of its interaction with the
target protein. We thus attempted to take advantage of this behavior to
gain a better understanding of the features of the protein-protein
interaction. A comparison of the kinetic parameters of the enzyme
thermally stressed in the presence of -crystallin with those of the
native SDH and with those of the enzyme undergoing thermal inactivation
in the absence of the protector protein revealed no differences. This
fact ruled out the possibility of using the measurement of the enzyme
activity to follow the complex formation. Nevertheless, this result
suggests the occurrence of two possible situations. (i) The interaction
between -crystallin and the target protein ceases at temperatures
lower than those inducing stress. In this case, a decrease from 55 to
37 °C (the temperature at which the enzyme assay was performed)
would have been sufficient for the release of an active SDH, which
would at that point be indistinguishable from the native enzyme. (ii)
The interaction between -crystallin and SDH is kept at a low
temperature, but it does not involve functional groups at the active
site. In this case, the enzyme could freely express catalysis while it
is bound to -crystallin.
The first hypothesis is consistent with the previously reported effect
of temperature on the -crystallin structure (30, 31). In fact, a
structural change in -crystallin that occurs at around 55 °C has
been proposed as necessary for -crystallin to be active as a protein
stabilizer. However, in studies on the anti-aggregation activity of
-crystallin, it has also been shown that once the complex between
-crystallin and the target protein had been formed, it remained
stable at lower temperatures. In particular, this was shown when
the anti-aggregation activity of -crystallin was tested toward ALR2
(28) and carbonic anhydrase (14), which were protected by
-crystallin against aggregation but not against inactivation. In
these cases, the gel filtration analysis of the -crystallin/target
mixtures previously subjected to thermal stress revealed that both ALR2
(Mr 34,000) and carbonic anhydrase
(Mr 31,000) co-eluted as inactive enzymes with
-crystallin in the high molecular weight region (~Mr 800,000). If this was also the case for SDH,
one would expect to find a high Mr complex between
-crystallin and the enzyme in which SDH could express its catalytic
activity. Such an event would be consistent with the second hypothesis
presented above, which assumes that the active site on the
-crystallin-bound SDH is freely accessible. The occurrence of an
active -crystallin-SDH adduct is supported by the results of SDH
inactivation induced by thiol blocking agents or EDTA. In particular,
while at 25 °C the inactivation of SDH induced by EDTA was reversed
by the addition of ZnSO4, at 55 °C the loss of enzyme
activity could be recovered by ZnSO4 only when
-crystallin was present with SDH during treatment with EDTA. This
fact is a further indication that the microenvironmental conditions of
SDH undergoing inactivation by EDTA when -crystallin was present
were different from those in which SDH was inactivated in the absence
of -crystallin. This is likely because of the binding between the
protector/target enzyme. It is worth noting that in the presence of
-crystallin, NADH protected the SDH from EDTA-induced inactivation
in a manner similar to that previously reported when the enzyme was
subjected to EDTA treatment at a lower temperature (19). Thus,
even if SDH were bound to -crystallin, its cofactor site would be
freely accessible.
The hypothesis that a stable active adduct was generated between SDH
and -crystallin was tested by gel filtration chromatography performed both at 25 °C and under thermal stress conditions
(i.e. 55 °C). The chromatographic separation of a mixture
of SDH/ -crystallin performed at 55 °C revealed that some SDH
co-migrated with -crystallin in the range of high
Mr fractions but that no activity was associated
with that enzyme population (Fig. 4B and lane a of the inset). The occurrence of such an adduct between
-crystallin and the target enzyme may well represent the basis of
the potent chaperone-like action of -crystallin against protein
aggregation phenomena. However, the lack of SDH activity in the high
Mr complex raises the question of how SDH is
protected against thermal inactivation.
The interaction between active SDH and -crystallin both at 25 and
55 °C is indicated by the evident enrichment in the
-crystallin content of the eluted fractions containing the active
enzyme (Fig. 4, A and B, insets). The retention
volumes of active SDH separated from -crystallin both at 25 and
55 °C appeared smaller than the elution volume of SDH analyzed alone
at 25 °C in the absence of -crystallin. The differences, however,
were too small to predict any specific Mr for the
active-SDH/ -crystallin adduct. Thus, the interaction between
the active enzyme and the protector protein should occur with isolated
-crystallin subunits or with oligomeric -crystallin aggregates
whose size would be so small as to not significantly alter the elution
volume of SDH upon binding.
Another possibility that would explain the elution profile and
electrophoretic analysis of Fig. 4 is that the stabilization of SDH
activity occurred through a weak interaction between the enzyme and
aggregates of -crystallin subunits of a size comparable with SDH. In
this regard, it is interesting to note the recently proposed structural
organization for -crystallin, which would appear to arise from an
aggregation of four decameric substructural units (32). In this case,
the formation of the hypothesized oligomeric -crystallin aggregate
must be induced by the presence of SDH. In fact, when the
chromatographic analysis was performed both at 25 and at 55 °C on
-crystallin samples in which SDH was absent, the SDS-PAGE of
fractions in which molecular species of 150-200 KDa should elute, none
or only a very modest amount of -crystallin was revealed at 25 and
at 55 °C, respectively (see lane d in the
insets of Fig. 4, A and B). The
chromatographic evidence of an interaction between low molecular weight
aggregates of -crystallin subunits and SDH was supported by the even
partial protection exerted by -crystallin against SDH inactivation
observed while protector and target proteins were kept at 50 °C,
segregated from each other by a 60-kDa cut-off dialysis membrane.
It is worth noting that the active-SDH/ -crystallin
interaction does not require any thermal stress to occur. In fact, an increase in the relative content of -crystallin in the fractions containing active SDH is observed in the chromatographic analysis performed at 25 °C (Fig. 4A, inset, lanes
a-c). This fact explains the protective action exerted by
-crystallin against SDH inactivation even at low temperatures (Fig.
2). The results presented indicate that the overall stabilizing action
exerted by -crystallin on SDH (i.e. anti-aggregation and
enzyme activity preservation) occurs with the generation of at least
two different interactive complexes between the protector and target proteins.
It is not clear so far whether the pathways leading to the generation
of the two complexes are part of the same interactive mechanism.
However, the remarkable sensitivity of both processes to
Ca2+ and Mg2+ would at least suggest the
existence of specific common features. In fact, the two divalent
cations were able to interfere with both antiaggregation and enzyme
activity stabilization at concentrations low enough to indicate
specific interactions with the molecular components of the
SDH/ -crystallin complexes. Whether the generation of the
active-SDH/ -crystallin complex represents a preliminary, obligatory
step of a general interactive pathway between the protector and the
target protein, leading at the end to very stable high Mr adducts, or is occasionally confined to
the peculiar features of the target protein used in the present study
cannot be assessed at this point, and further investigation will be required.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are indebted to Dr. Nando Benimeo
(Industria Alimentare Carni, Castelvetro, Modena, Italy) for the
kind supply of bovine lenses and to Dr. Giovanni Sorlini and the
veterinary staff of INALCA for their valuable cooperation with the
bovine lens collection.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a grant from Pisa University and
from the Italian Board of Education (MURST).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 39-050-500292;
Fax: 39-050-502583; E-mail: umura@dfb.unipi.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 4, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006133200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SHSP, small heat
shock proteins;
SDH, sorbitol dehydrogenase;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kato, K.,
Shinohara, H.,
Kurube, N.,
Inaguma, Y.,
Shimizu, K.,
and Oshima, K.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1074,
201-208
|
| 2.
|
Srinivasan, A. N.,
Nagineni, C. N.,
and Bhat, S. P.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
23337-23341
|
| 3.
|
Boelens, W. C.,
and de Jong, W. W.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Reports
21,
75-80
|
| 4.
|
Merck, K. B.,
Groenen, P. T. J. A.,
Voorter, C. E. M.,
de Haard-Hoekman, W. A.,
Horwitz, J.,
Bloemendal, H.,
and de Jong, W. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1046-1052
|
| 5.
|
Head, M. W.,
Hurwitz, L.,
and Goldman, J. E.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
1029-1039
|
| 6.
|
Iwaki, T.,
Wisniewski, T.,
Iwaki, A.,
Corbin, E.,
Tomokane, N.,
Tateishi, J.,
and Goldman, J. E.
(1992)
Am. J. Pathol.
140,
345-356
|
| 7.
|
Van Noort, J. M.
(1996)
J. Mol. Med.
74,
285-296
|
| 8.
|
Mehlen, P.,
Schultze-Osthoff,
and Arrigo, A. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16510-16514
|
| 9.
|
Ingolia, T. D.,
and Craig, E. A.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
2360-2364
|
| 10.
|
Horwitz, J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
10449-10453
|
| 11.
|
Derham, B. K.,
and Harding, J. J.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1336,
187-194
|
| 12.
|
Boyle, D.,
and Takemoto, L.
(1994)
Exp. Eye Res.
58,
9-16
|
| 13.
|
Wang, K.,
and Spector, A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13601-13608
|
| 14.
|
Rao, P. V.,
Horwitz, J.,
and Zigler, J. S., Jr.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
190,
786-793
|
| 15.
|
Carver, J. A.,
Aquilina, J. A.,
Cooper, P. G.,
Williams, G. A.,
and Truscott, R. J. W.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1204,
195-206
|
| 16.
|
Hess, J. F.,
and Fitzgerald, P. G.
(1998)
Mol. Vis.
15,
4-29
|
| 17.
|
Hook, D. W. A.,
and Harding, J. J.
(1998)
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
22,
295-306
|
| 18.
|
Jeffery, J.,
and Jornvall, H.
(1988)
Adv. Enzymol.
61,
47-106
|
| 19.
|
Marini, I.,
Bucchioni, L.,
Borella, P.,
Del Corso, A.,
and Mura, U.
(1997)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
340,
383-391
|
| 20.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
|
| 21.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 22.
|
Wray, W.,
Boulikas, T.,
Wray, V. P.,
and Hancock, R.
(1981)
Anal. Biochem.
118,
197-203
|
| 23.
|
Martin, J.,
Mayhew, M.,
Langer, T.,
and Hartl, F. U.
(1993)
Nature
366,
228-233
|
| 24.
|
Muchowski, P. J.,
and Clark, J. I.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
1004-1009
|
| 25.
|
Peters, T.
(1985)
Adv. Protein Chem.
37,
161-245
|
| 26.
|
Carver, J. A.,
Guerreiro, N.,
Nicholls, K. A.,
and Truscott, R. J.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1252,
251-260
|
| 27.
|
Das, K. P.,
and Surewicz, W. K.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
369,
321-325
|
| 28.
|
Marini, I.,
Bucchioni, L.,
Voltarelli, M.,
Del Corso, A.,
and Mura, U.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
212,
413-420
|
| 29.
|
Koretz, J. F.,
Doss, E. W.,
and LaButti, J. N.
(1998)
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
22,
283-294
|
| 30.
|
Raman, B. R.,
and Rao, C. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27264-27268
|
| 31.
|
Raman, B. R.,
and Rao, C. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23559-23564
|
| 32.
|
Smulders, R. H P. H.,
van Boekel, M. A. M.,
and de Jong, W. W.
(1998)
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
22,
187-196
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us |