Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M909217199 on June 13, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 32701-32707, October 20, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/42/32701    most recent
M909217199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chopin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Malecha, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chopin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Malecha, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Therostasin, a Novel Clotting Factor Xa Inhibitor from the Rhynchobdellid Leech, Theromyzon tessulatum*

Vincent ChopinDagger §, Michel SalzetDagger §, Jean-luc Baert||, Franck VandenbulckeDagger , Pierre-Eric SautièreDagger , Jean-Pierre Kerckaert**, and Jean MalechaDagger

From the Dagger  Laboratoire d'Endocrinologie des Annélides, UPRES-A 8017 CNRS, SN3, Université des Sciences et Technologie de Lille, F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cédex, France, the || Institut de Biologie de Lille, CNRS-UMR 8526, rue du Professeur Calmette, F-59019 Lille, France, and the ** Laboratoire d'Oncohématologie, Unité 524, INSERM, place de Verdun, F-59045 Lille, France

Received for publication, November 15, 1999, and in revised form, June 8, 2000


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Therostasin is a potent naturally occurring tight-binding inhibitor of mammalian Factor Xa (Ki, 34 pM), isolated from the rhynchobdellid leech Theromyzon tessulatum. Therostasin is a cysteine-rich protein (8991 Da) consisting of 82 amino acid residues with 16 cysteine residues. Its amino acid sequence has been determined by a combination of techniques, including Edman degradation, enzymatic cleavage, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) on the native and s-beta -pyridylethylated compound. Sequence analysis reveals that it shares no significant homology with other Factor Xa inhibitors except for the putative reactive site. Moreover, it contains a signature pattern for proteins of the endothelin family, potent vasoconstrictors isolated in mammal and snake venom. Therostasin cDNA (825 bp) codes for a polypeptide of 82 amino acid residues preceded by 19 residues, representing a signal peptide sequence. As for the other known inhibitors of Factor Xa, therostasin is expressed and stored in the cells of the leech salivary glands.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

During blood vessel injury, the recruitment of platelets necessary for the clot depends on the local production of thrombin. A vascular lesion stimulates the production of thrombin by initiating both a tissue factor and an intrinsic activation pathway of Factor Xa, one of the final proteinases of the blood coagulation cascade. Clinically, the specific inhibition of Factor Xa would minimize the risk of hemorrhage. Thus, the direct use of Factor Xa inhibitors is a most promising route for clinical anticoagulant therapy, because it does not present any anti-homeostatic risk.

The first Factor Xa inhibitor found in leeches was antistasin, a 15-kDa protein isolated from the salivary glands of the Mexican leeches, Hementeria officinalis (1) and Hementeria ghilianii (2). Antistasin is a protein consisting of 119 amino acid residues, of which residues 1-55 (domain I) are 56% similar to residues 56-110 (domain II). Of the nine C-terminal amino acids (residues 111-119, domain III), four are positively charged (3). The reactive site is located in domain I (4). The cDNA has been cloned (5), and the recombinant protein has been produced in an insect baculovirus host-vector system (5). Pharmaceutical studies on dogs have been performed, and the data show that the protein is still active 30 h after injection. Moreover, when tested in different thrombosis models, antistasin was found superior to heparin. However, its clinical development was stopped because of its strong immunogenicity. Instead, as the active site is in domain I, chimeric peptides with only domain I have been tested (5). These studies have shown that neither domain II nor III contains any intrinsic Factor Xa inhibitory activity, nor do they contribute to the activity of domain I. The most potent synthetic peptide derived from antistasin corresponded to amino acids 27-49, with a disulfide bridge linking acids 29-47. This peptide inhibited Factor Xa with a Ki of 35 µM and increased plasma clotting time more than 4-fold, at a concentration of 33 µM (6). The shortest peptide displaying anticoagulant activity was D-RCRVHCP, which increased clotting times by 50% at micromolar concentrations (6). Based on these results and the understanding of the molecular mechanisms implicated in Factor Xa inhibition, new anticoagulants such as DX-9065a have been produced (6). The tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of these novel molecules are currently being evaluated (7).

We report here the biochemical characterization and cDNA cloning of a novel Factor Xa inhibitor isolated from the rhynchobdellid leech Theromyzon tessulatum. Its biological activity toward several serine proteases has also been investigated. This molecule is the most potent Factor Xa inhibitor found to date in leeches.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Leeches-- Starved T. tessulatum leeches were maintained in our laboratory as described elsewhere in detail (8).

Materials-- Chromogenic substrates S-2765 for chymotrypsin, S-2238 for trypsin and Factor Xa, and S-2586 for thrombin were purchased from Kabi Diagnostica (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Acetonitrile (HPLC grade) was obtained from J. T. Baker Inc. Trifluoroacetic acid, porcine pancreatic elastase (EC 3.4.21.11), chymotrypsin (EC 3.4.21.1), trypsin (EC 3.4.21.4), cathepsin G (EC 3.4.21.20), thrombin (EC 3.4.21.5), and chromogenic substrates (benzoyl-arginine p-nitroanilide, N-succinyl Ala-Ala-Ala p-nitroanilide, N-succinyl Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe) were obtained from Sigma. Molecular weight calibration markers for SDS-PAGE were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. All other reagents were of analytical grade.

Isolation and Characterization of Therostasin-- After anesthetizing the animals using 0.01% chloretone, the anterior parts of starved T. tessulatum stage 2 were excised (8). They were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 °C. Eight-gram aliquots were thawed and placed in 25 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4 (200 mM NaCl), and homogenized at 4 °C with a Polytron (Bioblock Scientific, Villeneuve d'ascq, France) (five 15-s bursts on setting 9). After centrifugation (30 min at 10,000 × g on a Beckman JA-20 rotor at 4 °C), the pellet was re-extracted twice with Tris/NaCl. Supernatants were combined, concentrated in a vacuum centrifuge (Savant), and filtered on nitrocellulose membranes (0.45 µm pore size, Millipore). The extract was applied onto a fast protein liquid chromatography column (Superdex G75, 16/60, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech; equilibrated with Tris/NaCl) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min and eluted with the same buffer. The column effluent was monitored by UV absorbance (Beckman) at 280 nm. All column fractions (1 ml) were assayed for protease inhibitor activity against Factor Xa. Pooled active fractions were loaded onto a Mono Q column (fast protein liquid chromatography, HR 5/5, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8). The column was washed with the same buffer and eluted with a discontinuous linear gradient of 0.2 to 1.5 M NaCl over 60 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min.

Active fractions were applied to a C8 Lichrosphere RP100 column (250 × 4.6 mm, Merck) with a linear gradient of 1% acetonitrile/min in water acidified with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. All HPLC purifications were performed with a Beckman Gold HPLC system equipped with a Beckman 168 photodiode array detector.

To follow the purification, chromogenic assays were used. Enzyme assays were carried out at room temperature in 96-well microtiter plates (Dynatec). The color developed from the hydrolysis of peptide-nitroanilide (pNA) substrates was monitored at 405 nM on a Dynatec MR-5000 microtiter reader. The concentration of the purified Factor Xa inhibitor was estimated by the Bradford procedure using gamma -globulin as a standard (9). Typically, the assay included 3 µM proteolytic enzyme in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.4 (0.2 M NaCl), and an aliquot of selected column fractions in a total volume of 100 µl. After 15 min of incubation, substrate was added for 5 min and then stopped with 50% acetic acid, and the residual activity was determined. At different stages of purification, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of reduced and denatured proteins was performed in 10-25% polyacrylamide gradient gels in the presence of beta -mercaptoethanol, as described by Laemmli (10).

Finally, before microsequencing, the purity of the peptide was evaluated by capillary electrophoresis. Samples were injected for 5 s under vacuum into a 270A-HT capillary electrophoresis system (Applied Biosystems) equipped with a 72-cm long fused silica capillary. Separation from the anode to the cathode was carried out in 20 mM citrate buffer (pH 2.5) using a voltage of 20 kV at 30 °C. Capillary effluent was monitored by its absorption at 200 nm. Purified peptide (1 µl) was then deposited on a thin layer of alpha -cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid crystals made by fast evaporation of a saturated solution in acetone. The droplet was allowed to air-dry before being introduced into the mass spectrometer. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) measurement was performed in a Bruker BIFLEXTM system (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) operating in the positive linear mode. Before microsequencing, 50 pM inhibitor was dissolved in 40 µl of reduction solution containing 0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, and 0.1 M dithiothreitol. The sample was flushed with nitrogen and incubated at 45 °C for 1 h in the dark. Freshly distilled 4-vinylpyridine (2 µl) was added, and incubation was continued for an additional 10 min. The pyridylethylated peptide was then separated by reversed-phase HPLC. Automated Edman degradation of the purified peptide and detection of phenylthiohydantoin (PTH-Xaa) derivatives were performed on a pulsed liquid automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, model 473A). A combination of enzymic digestion, separation, and Edman degradation finally allowed us to obtain the complete sequence of therostasin. In this case, an aliquot of the s-beta -pyridylethylated peptide was digested with endoproteinase Glu-C (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) or endoproteinase Arg-C (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). Digestions were carried out at 37 °C in the conditions recommended by the manufacturer. The digestion was stopped with acidified water (0.1% trifluoroacetic acid). The peptide mixture resulting from the enzymatic digestion was applied to a RP100 C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, Merck) equilibrated with acidified water as above. Elution was performed with a linear gradient of 0-80% acetonitrile in acidified water over 80 min at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. Emerging peaks were concentrated in a vacuum centrifuge (Savant) before sequencing.

Determination of Equilibrium Constants-- To determine the specificity of therostasin, its inhibitory activity toward different serine-proteases was compared using established chromogenic assay methods. Equilibrium dissociation constants (Ki) for the complexes of therostasin with individual proteases were determined essentially as described by the method of Henderson (12) and simplified by Bieth (13). Briefly, increasing amounts of therostasin were incubated with a constant amount of protease in Tris/NaCl (pH 8.4) for 30 min at 37 °C, and the remaining protease activity was measured by the addition of the chromogenic substrate. The remaining protease activity was monitored by UV absorbance at 405 nM. Graphical analysis yielded an apparent Ki using the equation: [I]/(1 - a) Kiapp(1/a) + [P], where [I] and [P] are the initial concentrations of inhibitor and protease, respectively, and a is the remaining fractional protease activity (100% control activity = fractional activity of 1.0).

Molecular Cloning of Therostasin-- Total RNA was extracted from anterior parts of T. tessulatum using the guanidinium isothiocyanate/cesium chloride centrifugation method (11). First-strand cDNAs were prepared from these total RNAs using standard procedures (11). A probe homologue used for screening a lambda gt11 library, synthesized from anterior parts of T. tessulatum at stage 2, was prepared by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with first-strand cDNA as a template. The standard PCR condition involves initial heating at 94 °C for 5 min followed thereafter by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, primer annealing at 48 °C for 2 min, and primer extension at 72 °C for 2 min. The cycles were followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The final PCR mixtures (10 µl) were analyzed on 2% (w/v) agarose gel. The PCR products were ligated into the PCR-II vector according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). Dideoxy sequencing reactions of the recombinant plasmids were analyzed with the T7 sequencing kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. The homologous probe was then used to clone the complete cDNA from the lambda gt11 library. The nucleotide sequences were analyzed by the dideoxy chain termination method.

In Situ Hybridization-- A HindIII/BamHI fragment of approximately 900 bp, containing the entire coding region of therostasin, was used to prepare cRNA probes. Digoxigenin-11-UTP-labeled antisense and sense riboprobes were generated by in vitro transcription using the DIG RNA labeling kit and T3 RNA polymerase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). BamHI plus T3 polymerase gave a sense probe, and HindIII with T7 polymerase produced the antisense probe. The synthesis was carried out for 2 h at 37 °C followed by a 15-min incubation with 20 units of RNase-free DNase I to remove the template. The transcript was lithium chloride-precipitated and pelleted by centrifugation, and the pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, dried, and resuspended in RNase-free water. The probe concentration was evaluated on a 0.8% agarose gel.

Animals were anesthetized with 0.01% chloretone. They were fixed overnight at 4 °C by immersion in a solution of 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, embedded in paraffin wax, and serially sectioned at 8 µm. Sections were collected onto polylysine-coated slides and stored at 4 °C until used for in situ hybridization. After removal of paraffin with toluene, sections were placed into 0.1 M glycine (0.2 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4), for 10 min prior to treatment with proteinase K (1 µg/ml in 100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 50 mM EDTA) for 15 min at 37 °C. Slides were then rinsed in water followed by fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 15 min at 20 °C. Slides were treated with 0.1 M triethanolamine (pH 8.0) for 10 min followed with 0.25% acetic anhydride for 10 min. The sections were rinsed again in water, dehydrated by graded alcohols, and allowed to air dry. The digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes were diluted in hybridization buffer (approximately 20-50 ng RNA/section). The hybridization buffer contained 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 10× Denhardt's solution, 0.5 mg/ml Escherichia coli tRNA, 100 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA. Tissue sections were apposed to the diluted probe with coverslips and placed in a hybridization chamber containing Whatman filter paper moistened with 4× SSC (sodium saline citrate buffer) and 50% formamide. The hybridization boxes were then sealed and placed in a 55 °C oven overnight. The slides were then washed twice (2 × 30 min) with 2× SSC. After treatment with RNase A (20 µg/ml in 2× SSC) for 30 min at 37 °C, sections were subsequently rinsed in 1× SSC containing 0.07% 2-mercaptoethanol, in 0.5× SSC, 0.07% 2-mercaptoethanol, and in 0.1× SSC 0.07% 2-mercaptoethanol (10 min each). Sections were then immersed in 0.1× SSC containing 2-mercaptoethanol (2 × 30 min) at 55 °C and rinsed in 0.1× SSC at room temperature. Sections were washed in DIG buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl) for 10 min at room temperature and then incubated in the same buffer containing 0.05% Triton X-100 and 2% normal sheep serum for 1 h at room temperature. After two washes with DIG buffer for 10 min, the slides were incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated sheep anti-digoxigenin antibody (1:1000, Roche Molecular Biochemicals). This was carried out in DIG buffer containing 1% normal sheep serum and 0.05% Triton X-100 in a humid chamber for 16 h at 20 °C. The slides were washed sequentially with DIG buffer (3 × 10 min) and 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.5, 50 mM MgCl2 (1 × 10 min). Bound antibody was visualized by incubation with a chromogen solution containing 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.5), 50 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, 375 µg/ml nitro blue tetrazolium, 188 µg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate, 1 mM levamisole, and 1.3% dimethyl sulfoxide for 6 h in the dark at room temperature. The chromogen reaction was halted by rinsing the slides in DIG buffer (2 × 15 min). The slides were then rapidly dehydrated, rinsed in toluene, and covered with coverslips using XAM (Merck) mounting medium. Replacing the antisense riboprobe with the sense riboprobe carried out control for in situ hybridization.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Biochemical Characterization of Therostasin-- T. tessulatum takes three blood meals during its life. After the third blood meal, apoptosis of the salivary gland occurs (8, 15). To obtain the maximum amount of Factor Xa inhibitor present in T. tessulatum, an extract of the anterior part of hungry leeches was prepared from animals at stage 2 of their life cycle (Table I). The crude extract was then fractionated on a gel filtration column (Superdex G75, 16/60, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). In the collected fractions, inhibitory activity toward Factor Xa was found for proteins with a molecular size of less than 30 kDa as determined by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions (Fig. 1C, lane b). The inhibitor was then purified by anion exchange chromatography on a Mono Q column using a stepwise gradient of NaCl from 0.2 to 1.5 M. The Factor Xa inhibitor was eluted from the column at a NaCl concentration ranging between 0.5 and 0.75 M (Fig. 1A). SDS-PAGE controls revealed several protein bands at a molecular mass of around 15 kDa (Fig. 1C, lane c). Finally, this peptide was purified to homogeneity by reversed-phase HPLC on a C8 Lichrosphere column using a linear gradient of acetonitrile in acidified water (Fig. 1B). Most of the inhibitory activity eluted in one peak at 31% acetonitrile with a molecular mass of 14 kDa in SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1C, lane d). Mass measurement in MALDI-TOF MS of the purified fraction confirmed a single protein with a mass of 8991 kDa (data not shown). Comparison of the mass of this native molecule and that of s-beta -pyridylethylated (8991 versus 10698.7 Da) demonstrated the presence of 16 cysteine residues in the molecule.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Purification of therostasin
Eight grams of leech extract was used as starting material. One inhibition unit (IU) was defined as the amount (µg) of protease inhibited at 100% (see "Experimental Procedures").


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Elution profiles of therostasin following purification steps. A, elution profile on Mono Q column. B, final step of purification on C8 reversed-phase column. The solid bars indicate the fractions containing therostasin. C, a photomicrograph of the fractions containing the therostasin separated by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions: lane a, crude extract; lane b, after Superdex G75 column separation; lane c, after Mono Q column separation; lane d, after the final step of purification on C8 reversed-phase column.

The primary structure of the T. tessulatum Factor Xa inhibitor was established by N-terminal sequencing followed by enzymatic cleavages (Endoproteinase Arg C and Glu C) (Fig. 2). The peptide contains 82 amino acid residues with a molecular mass of 8990 Da, which is in perfect agreement with the molecular mass measured by MALDI-TOF MS (8991 Da). This Factor Xa inhibitor, designated therostasin, is a cysteine-rich peptide without post-translational modifications.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Amino acid sequence of therostasin. The sequence (82 amino acid residues) results from the analysis of s-beta -pyridylethylated therostasin, which provided good yields for 46 residues on a pulse liquid automatic sequenator (Applied Biosystems, model 473). Three arginyl-endopeptidase fragments and an overlapping region with three peptides from a Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease digestion were isolated by fractionating digested peptides using reversed-phase HPLC on a Lichrosphere C8 column. The sequences of these peptides were used to obtain the complete sequence.

Sequence Comparison-- Compared with other inhibitors characterized from T. tessulatum (16), therostasin shows 70 and 47% sequence identity with theromin, a thrombin inhibitor (16), and tessulin (17), a trypsin-chymotrypsin inhibitor, respectively.

A comparison of therostasin with other leech Factor Xa inhibitors revealed about 20% sequence identity with the inhibitory potency domain of ghilanten (domain I) (2) and antistasin (domain I) (1). Moreover, therostasin shows 31% sequence identity with the internal repeats 4 and 5 of Hydra antistasin, a Factor Xa inhibitor isolated from Hydra (18). In addition, therostasin shows 26- 37% sequence identity with antistasin-type proteins isolated from leeches including guamerin (19), hirustasin (20), and piguamerin (21). Sequence alignment of therostasin with these peptides revealed that identity is observed mainly in the C terminus of these inhibitors (Fig. 3). By sequence similarity with antistasin, the putative active site (P1-P1') of therostasin is expected to be at position 36-37 and would be RI versus RV for antistasin.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Sequence alignment of therostasin, domain I of antistasin and ghilanten (fragments 1-60), hydra antistasin (internal repeats 4 and 5 corresponding to amino acids 119-182), guamerin, piguamerin, and hirusatin using Clustal W 1.8 software. Positions that are identical or conserved in at least four sequences are shaded with black or gray boxes, respectively. The solid bar indicates the position of the active site (P4-P4') in antistasin and the arrow the P1 residue.

Biological Activity-- Therostasin is highly specific for Factor Xa (Ki: 34 pM). As antistasin, it also inhibits trypsin in a weaker manner (Ki: 7 nM) but does not inhibit other serine proteases such as chymotrypsin, elastase, cathepsin G, or thrombin (Table II). This is in contrast to Kunitz inhibitors, which do inhibit these proteases (22).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Biological activity of therostasin and antistasin
phi , no inhibition; N.D., not determined.

Therostasin Molecular Cloning-- Based on the first 33 amino acids of the therostasin N-terminal sequence, two degenerated oligonucleotide primers, (5'-TCTAGACCCGGGCA(A/G)GA(C/T)TG (C/T)GA(A/G)GA(A/G)AA(C/T)AC3-' and 5'-GAATTCGAGCTC(C/T)TGCT(T/G)(A/C/G/T)GC(A/G)TC(A/G)TTC(A/G)CA-3'), were used in PCR, with first-strand cDNA generated by reverse transcription. A PCR-amplified oligonucleotide of 132 bp was obtained. Its sequence analysis showed an open reading frame following oligonucleotide 1 that extends through the known therostasin sequence (data not shown). Two positive clones (T1alpha and T12) of approximately 2 × 106 phage lysates from the T. tessulatum lambda gt11 library were identified using the 132-bp oligo probe. After EcoRI digestion of the purified recombinant phage T1alpha or T12, a single band (approximately 900 bp) with a similar size was identified. After subcloning in pBluescript II KS vector, the nucleotide sequence of T12 cDNA insert was determined. This finding revealed that this clone contains an uninterrupted open reading frame of 303 nucleotides preceded by a 180- nucleotide 5'-untranslated sequence and followed by a 342-nucleotide 3'-untranslated region (Fig. 4). The first hexanucleotide AATAAA consensus signal for polyadenylation was found at position 740 (Fig. 4). Translation of the open reading frame gives a 101-amino acid residue sequence that matches the sequence of the mature protein (Fig. 4). A 19-amino acid pre-peptide beginning with the Met residue precedes the N-terminal Asp residue of mature therostasin. This 19-amino acid sequence contains a hydrophobic core of 17 amino acids. cDNA sequence comparison revealed no homology with any cDNA known, demonstrating that the therostasin cDNA sequence is also completely new.


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of therostasin. Nucleotides and amino acid residues are numbered in the right column. Amino acids are numbered from the first methionine residue and identified with single-letter codes. The peptide signal is underlined, and an asterisk indicates the stop codon (TAA) of the open reading frame. Possible polyadenylation signals are double-underlined.

Therostasin Cellular Localization-- In situ hybridization with DIG-labeled riboprobes was used to detect the therostasin messages in leech paraffin sections. A relatively intense signal was detected in the salivary glands (Fig. 5A). Not all cells were stained. No signal was observed in sections hybridized with the therostasin sense strand (Fig. 5B). Using an antibody performed against the N-terminal part of synthetic therostasin on serial sections of T. tessulatum, a relatively weak, but specific, immunolabeling was found in salivary glands (data not shown), confirming that the protein is stored in these cells.


View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Detection of therostasin messages in T. Tessulatum., stage 2. Sections were hybridized with digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes followed by immunodetection as described under "Experimental Procedures." A, on paraffin sections hybridized with the antisense probe, strong labeling was observed in the salivary gland (Sg). Note that not all cells were stained. Lm, longitudinal muscles. B, on sections hybridized with the sense probe, no labeling was evident.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have purified a novel Factor Xa inhibitor from the rhynchobdellid leech T. tessulatum, designated therostasin. This consists of an 82-amino acid residue peptide preceded by 19 residues, representing a signal peptide sequence, localized in the salivary glands of the leech. Therostasin is a novel and highly specific Factor Xa inhibitor (Ki: 34 pM) isolated from leeches. For the Factor Xa "family" inhibitors isolated from leeches, two molecules consisting of 119 amino acid residues with anti-metastasic activity, antistasin and ghilianten, have been isolated in the Glossiphoniidae leeches Hementeria officinalis (1) and Hementeria ghilianii, respectively (2). These native molecules are slow, tight-binding inhibitors with estimated dissociation constants ranging between 0.31 and 0.62 nM (2).

Factor Xa inhibitor has been isolated from other invertebrates. For example, in the hookworm Ancylostoma caninum, a small molecule with a molecular mass of 8.7 kDa, and a high intrinsic Ki (323.5 pM), has been found (23). In the insect Ornithodoros moubata, a tick anticoagulant peptide with a reversible and potent Factor Xa inhibition (Ki: 0.18-0.59 nM) has been also reported (24). However, the sequence of therostasin revealed no homology with the hookworm or the tick molecule. Factor Xa inhibitor has also been found in prokaryotes. Ecotin has been characterized as a periplasmatic protein in Escherichia coli (25). This 18-kDa protein inhibits trypsin, chymotrypsin, and rat mast cell chymase. Its activity toward Factor Xa is very high with a Ki around 54 pM. This molecule seems to play a role in protecting bacteria from exogenous proteases found in the mammalian gut. Ecotin was considered the most potent Factor Xa inhibitor described to date. We report here a novel molecule, therostasin, that is smaller than ecotin but as active, and it is even more specific in inhibiting Factor Xa.

Based on its primary sequence as well as its cDNA, therostasin is a novel molecule. The 25-39 amino acid sequence (CLCKGCNDAQCRIYC) of therostasin contains a consensus pattern C-X-C-X4-D-X2-C-X2-(F/Y)-C found in proteins belonging to the endothelin family. This signature pattern detected in sarafotoxins and bibrotoxin, potent vasoconstrictors isolated from Atractaspis snakes (26, 27), has never been observed in protease inhibitors. In leeches, among the different anticoagulant molecules involved in the inhibition of the coagulation cascade, three substances have been investigated in detail. These are hirudin (thrombin inhibitor) (28), antistasin (Factor Xa inhibitor) (1), and decorsin (antagonist of platelet membrane glycoprotein IIb-IIIa) (29). Although these molecules differ in their amino acid sequences and inhibitory activities, their three-dimensional structures share the same conformational motif with that of the leech antihemostatic protein (C-X6-12-C-X-C-X3-6-C-X3-6-C-X8-14) (30). Therostasin did not share this leech antihemostatic protein conformational motif. Nevertheless, some homology was observed with antistasin, particularly in the active site domain (P4-P4', VRCRVHCP). By similarity, we speculate that the active site of therostasin (P4-P4', AQCRIYCP) will be at position 33-40. In this context the P1 residue, which most often reflects the specificity of the protease that is being inhibited, e.g. lysine or arginine residues for trypsin-like enzymes and phenylalanine or leucine for chymotrypsin-like enzymes, would be an arginine in therostasin the same as for the Factor Xa inhibitors antistasin and ghilanten. However, in addition to the P1 residue, the P3 residue in antistasin (Arg 32) is particularly important for the interaction of the inhibitor with Factor Xa (31). In therostasin, this residue is replaced by Glu as in the putative active site of Hydra antistasin. Furthermore, it must also be noted that a putative exosite binding region has been defined in the N-terminal domain of antistasin, which explains the specificity and inhibitory potency of antistasin toward Factor Xa (31). This exosite binding region in position 15-17 (EGS) observed in ghilanten is not conserved in therostasin (DED). Because the spacing of cysteine residues in therostasin is somewhat different than in antistasin, it may be that the overall structures of antistasin and therostasin differ, leading to differences in the inhibitory mechanism.

When therostasin is compared with the other serine proteases inhibitors found in the same species of leech, T. tessulatum, the sequence comparison reveals a high degree of sequence similarity. Therostasin shows 70 and 47% sequence identity with theromin, a thrombin inhibitor (16), and tessulin (17), a trypsin-chymotrypsin inhibitor, respectively. More particularly, the N-terminal parts (Cys2-Lys28) of these three inhibitors are highly conserved (16). These results are of particular interest, as this conserved amino acid sequence among protease inhibitors with different specificities has never been observed previously in leeches. These similarities could be the result of an evolutionary divergence from an ancestral gene, arising after gene duplication, able to generate several peptides acting toward the specific substrates Factor Xa, thrombin, trypsin, and chymotrypsin (16, 17). This provides this leech species a high diversity of molecules acting at different points in its life cycle, such as coagulation, modulation of inflammation, storage, and preservation of blood and host-parasite communication. Because of its localization in the salivary glands, therostasin, like other protease inhibitors, may prevent blood clotting when biting and during subsequent storage in its foregut over several months. Nevertheless, storing blood requires the inhibition of proteases present in host leukocytes because lysis of these cells could induce an untimely and uncontrolled digestion (32). We have previously demonstrated that the other protease inhibitors isolated in T. tessulatum are implicated synergistically in the inhibition of immunocyte activity (16, 17). We have also shown that therostasin is capable of inhibiting human leukocyte activation, similar to aprotinin, another serine protease inhibitor isolated from sea anemone (data not shown).

In conclusion, leeches have developed a panoply of molecules that may interfere with the coagulation cascade and host communication (33-35). We speculate that when biting, leeches inject substances able to block pain and inflammation and to induce vasodilatation in the victim. Nociceptive stresses from injury will normally lead to an inflammatory response with a great deal of leukocyte activation. We speculate that leeches try to avoid this scenario. We therefore hypothesize that the challenge for leeches is to block peripheral nociception and local inflammation during the bite. In this context, the production of therostasin and other serine protease inhibitors, in conjunction with endocannabinoids, opiates known to be anti-nociceptive and neuro-signaling molecules, is a successful survival strategy to escape host-immune defense systems (33-35).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. A. Van Dorsselaer (Laboratoire de spectrométrie de masse bioorganique, UA31 CNRS, Strasbourg, France) for mass spectrometry determination and Pr. George B. Stefano (Neuroscience Research Institute, Old Westbury, MA) for the immunocyte studies. The technical assistance of M. P. Hildebrandt is kindly acknowledged.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by the Federal European Development Economic Regional, Conseil Régional Nord-Pas de Calais, CNRS, Agence National pour la Valorisation de la Recherche, and by National Institutes of Health-Fogarty International Grant 00045.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF239803.

The nucleotide sequence reported in this paper has been submitted to the Swiss Protein Database under Swiss-Prot accession no. P82355.

§ Denotes equal contributions by these authors.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Membre de l'institut Universitaire de France, Laboratoire d'Endocrinologie des Annélides, UPRES-A CNRS 8017, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, SN3, F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq Cédex, France. Tel.: 33-3-2043-6839; Fax: 33-3-2004-1130; E-mail: michel.salzet@univ-lille1.fr.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 13, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M909217199

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography; MALDI-TOF MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); DIG, digoxigenin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Tuszynski, G. P., Gasic, T., and Gasic, G. J. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 9718-9723
2. Brankamp, R. G., Blankenship, D. T., Sunkara, P. S., and Cardin, A. D. (1990) J. Lab. Clin. Med. 115, 89-97
3. Nutt, E., Gasic, T., Rodkey, J., Gasic, G. J., Jacobs, J. W., Friedman, P. A., and Simpson, E. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 10162-10167
4. Theunissen, H. J., Dijkema, R., Swinkels, J. C., de Poorter, T. L., Vink, P. M., and Van Dinther, T. G. (1994) Thromb. Res. 75, 41-50
5. Han, J. G., Law, S. W., Keller, P. M., Kniskern, P. J., Silberklang, M., Tung, J. S., Gasic, G. J., Fiedman, P. A., and Ellis, R. W. (1989) Gene 75, 47-57
6. Ohta, N., Brush, M., and Jacobs, J. W. (1994) Thromb. Haemost. 72, 825-830
7. Whitlow, M., Arnaiz, D. O., Buckman, B. O., Davey, D. D., Griedel, B., Guilford, W. J., Koovakkat, S. K., Liang, A., Mohan, R., Phillips, G. B., Seto, M., Shaw, K. J., Xu, W., Zhao, Z., Light, D. R., and Morrissey, M. M. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 1394-1404
8. Malecha, J., Verger-Bocquet, M., and Tramu, G. (1989) Can. J. Zool. 67, 636-640
9. Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254
10. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
11. Maniatis, T., Frisch, E. F., and Sambrook, J. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed., Vol. 1 , pp. 7.19-7.23, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
12. Henderson, P. (1972) Biochem. J. 127, 321-333
13. Bieth, J. G. (1980) Bull. Eur. Physiopathol. Respir. 16, 183-195
14. Deleted in press
15. Sawyer, R. T. (1986) Leech Biology and Behavior , Vol. I , Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford
16. Salzet, M., Chopin, V., Baert, J., Matias, I., and Malecha, J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30774-30780
17. Chopin, V., Stefano, G. B., and Salzet, M. (1998) Eur. J. Biochem. 256, 662-668
18. Holstein, T. W., Mala, C., Kur, E., Bauer, K., Greber, M., and David, C. N. (1992) FEBS Lett. 309, 288-292
19. Jung, H. I., Kim, S. I., Ha, K.-S., Joe, C. O., and Kang, K. W. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13879-13884
20. Söllner, C., Mentele, R., Eckerskorn, C., Fritz, H., and Sommerhoff, C. P. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 219, 937-943
21. Kim, D. R., and Kang, K. W. (1998) Eur. J. Biochem. 254, 692-697
22. Laskowski, M., and Kato, I. (1980) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 593
23. Capello, M., Vlasuk, G. P., Bergum, P. W., Huang, S., and Hotez, P (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 6152-6156
24. Waxman, L., Smith, D. E., Arcuri, K. E., and Vlasuk, G. P. (1990) Science 248, 593-596
25. Seymour, J. L., Lindquist, R. N., Dennis, M. S., Moffat, B., Yansura, D., Reilly, D., Wessinger, M. E., and Lazarus, R. A. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 3949-3958
26. Kloog, Y., and Sokolovsky, M. (1989) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 10, 212-214
27. Sokolovsky, M. (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 261-264
28. Markwardt, F. (1957) Hoppe-Seyler Z. Physiol. Chem. 308, 147-156
29. Seymour, J. L., Hensel, W. J., Nevins, B., Stults, J. T., and Lazarus, R. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 10143-10147
30. Krezel, A. M., Wagner, G., Seymour-Ulmer, J., and Lazarus, R. A. (1994) Science. 264, 1944-1947
31. Lapatto, R., Krengel, U., Schreuder, H. A., Arkema, A., de Boer, B., Kalk, K. H., Hol, W. G., Grootenhuis, P. D., Mulders, J. W., Dijkema, R., Theunissen, H. J., and Dijkstra, B.W. (1997) EMBO J. 17, 5151-5161
32. Roter, F., and Zebe, E. (1992) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 162, 85-92
33. Stefano, G. B., and Salzet, M. (1999) Int. Rev. Cytol. 187, 261-286
34. Salzet, M., Bisogno, T., Breton, C., and Di Marzo, V. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 4917-4927
35. Salzet, M., Capron, A., and Stefano, G. B. (2000) Parasitol. Today, in press


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/42/32701    most recent
M909217199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chopin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Malecha, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chopin, V.
Right arrow Articles by Malecha, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement