|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003505200 on June 26, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 32783-32792, October 20, 2000
Regulation of Prostaglandin E2 Biosynthesis by
Inducible Membrane-associated Prostaglandin E2 Synthase
That Acts in Concert with Cyclooxygenase-2*
Makoto
Murakami §,
Hiroaki
Naraba§¶,
Toshihiro
Tanioka §,
Natsuki
Semmyo ,
Yoshihito
Nakatani ,
Fumiaki
Kojima¶,
Tomomi
Ikeda¶,
Mai
Fueki¶,
Akinori
Ueno¶,
Sachiko
Oh-ishi¶, and
Ichiro
Kudo
From the Department of Health Chemistry, School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai,
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8555 and the ¶ Department of Pharmacology,
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Shirokane
5-9-1, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0072, Japan
Received for publication, April 24, 2000, and in revised form, May 25, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Here we report the molecular identification of
membrane-bound glutathione (GSH)-dependent prostaglandin
(PG) E2 synthase (mPGES), a terminal enzyme of the
cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-mediated PGE2 biosynthetic pathway.
The activity of mPGES was increased markedly in macrophages and
osteoblasts following proinflammatory stimuli. cDNA for mouse and
rat mPGESs encoded functional proteins that showed high homology with
the human ortholog (microsomal glutathione S-transferase-like 1). mPGES expression was markedly
induced by proinflammatory stimuli in various tissues and cells and was
down-regulated by dexamethasone, accompanied by changes in COX-2
expression and delayed PGE2 generation. Arg110,
a residue well conserved in the microsomal GSH
S-transferase family, was essential for catalytic function.
mPGES was functionally coupled with COX-2 in marked preference to
COX-1, particularly when the supply of arachidonic acid was limited.
Increased supply of arachidonic acid by explosive activation of
cytosolic phospholipase A2 allowed mPGES to be coupled with
COX-1. mPGES colocalized with both COX isozymes in the perinuclear
envelope. Moreover, cells stably cotransfected with COX-2 and mPGES
grew faster, were highly aggregated, and exhibited aberrant morphology.
Thus, COX-2 and mPGES are essential components for delayed
PGE2 biosynthesis, which may be linked to inflammation,
fever, osteogenesis, and even cancer.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The two kinetically distinct prostaglandin
(PG)1 biosynthetic responses,
the immediate and delayed phases, imply the recruitment of different
sets of the biosynthetic enzymes whose expression and activation are
tightly regulated by post-receptor transmembrane signaling. In
immediate PG biosynthesis, which occurs within several minutes after
stimulation with agonists that increase cytoplasmic Ca2+
levels, cytosolic phospholipase A2 (cPLA2) is a
prerequisite for supplying arachidonic acid (AA) to the constitutive
cyclooxygenase (COX) isozyme, COX-1 (1-6). Delayed PG biosynthesis,
which proceeds gradually over a long term period after a
proinflammatory stimulus, is accompanied by de novo
induction of COX-2, which is an absolute requirement irrespective of
the coexistence of COX-1 (2-4, 6-10). cPLA2 and several
inducible secretory phospholipase A2 isozymes cooperatively
contribute to supplying AA to COX-2 (1, 2, 4-9, 11-13). The
preference of COX-2 over COX-1 in the delayed response is explained, at
least in part, by the ability of COX-2 to metabolize lower levels of AA
to PGH2 than those required for COX-1-directed catalysis
(2, 14, 15). When cells are first treated with proinflammatory stimuli
and subsequently exposed to Ca2+ mobilizers, the inducible
COX-2 can also promote the immediate response (priming or induced
immediate response) (7, 16).
Understanding COX-2-dependent biological responses has
received much attention in the past few years, because numerous
pharmacological, biological and genetic studies have suggested that
this inducible COX isozyme is involved in various human diseases,
including inflammation and cancer (10, 17-24). In many cells, the main
PG species produced during the delayed response is PGE2.
Indeed, among the several PGs produced by macrophages, only the level
of PGE2 was increased during the delayed response (7, 25,
26). Moreover, in vivo studies have shown that COX-2
inhibitors reduce PGE2 more profoundly than other PGs (17).
Thus, the COX-2-dependent pathway may be more selectively
linked to the terminal PGE2 synthase (PGES). More
importantly, several recent studies have suggested that PGES activity
is increased during the period when COX-2-dependent delayed PGE2 generation is ongoing (7, 26).
PGES activity has been detected in both cytosolic and
membrane-associated fractions of various cells and tissues (27-30). In most cases the enzyme requires glutathione (GSH) for catalytic activity
(27, 28, 30). In an effort to identify PGES isoforms, we have succeeded
in identification of the GSH-dependent cytosolic PGES
(cPGES/p23), as shown in an accompanying paper (31). However, this
enzyme is constitutively expressed in a wide variety of cells and
tissues and shows preferential functional coupling with COX-1. The
linkage between the three constitutive enzymes of the biosynthetic cascade (i.e. cPLA2, COX-1, and cPGES/p23)
implies that this pathway is crucial for the production of the
PGE2 required for maintenance of tissue homeostasis.
In view of the fact that PGE2 is often produced via the
COX-2-dependent pathway (1, 2, 3, 7-9, 11, 12, 16, 17,
26), we looked for another PGES that is induced by proinflammatory stimuli and shows selective coupling with COX-2. While this study was
under way, Jakobsson et al. (30) reported that human
microsomal GST-like 1 (MGST-L1), a member of the MAPEG
(membrane-associated proteins
involved in eicosanoid and GSH metabolism)
superfamily (32), exhibits significant PGES activity. Moreover, the
expression of this enzyme has been shown to increase after stimulation
with interleukin (IL)-1 in A549 cells (30). In the present study, we
show that MGST-L1 is identical to the membrane-associated PGES (mPGES),
which we have originally detected in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated macrophages (7). mPGES/MGST-L1 expression is strongly
induced in several cells and tissues related to the inflammatory
response in vitro and in vivo. Coexpression
experiments clearly demonstrate that mPGES/MGST-L1 is preferentially
linked with COX-2, promoting delayed and induced immediate
PGE2 biosynthesis. Furthermore, sustained expression of
both COX-2 and mPGES/MGST-L1 leads to aberrant cell growth. Our results
indicate the presence of two segregated PGE2-biosynthetic
routes, the cPLA2-COX-1-cPGES/p23 and
cPLA2-COX-2-mPGES/MGST-L1 pathways, in the same cell.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Animals--
Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice were
purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan). Rabbits (New Zealand
White, 1-kg body weight, female) were from Saitama Experimental Animal Supply (Saitama, Japan).
Materials--
The goat anti-human COX-2 and rabbit anti-human
cPLA2 antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz. The rabbit
anti-rat hematopoietic PGD2 synthase (hPGDS) antibody was a
generous gift from Dr. Y. Urade (Osaka Bioscience Institute, Osaka,
Japan). cDNA probes for human COX-1, human COX-2, and mouse COX-2
were described previously (2, 3). Human cPGES/p23 cDNA was
described in the accompanying paper (31). Rat thromboxane synthase
(TXS) cDNA was obtained by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain
reaction (RT-PCR) using rat platelet mRNA as a template using 5'-
and 3'-primers corresponding the N- and C-terminal 23-base pair
nucleotide sequences. The touchdown PCR condition was 94 °C for
30 s and then 30 cycles of 94 °C for 5 s and 68 °C for
4 min using Advantage cDNA polymerase mix
(CLONTECH). Superscript II RNase H-reverse
transcriptase, RNase H, Taq DNA polymerase, dNTP mixture,
LipofectAMINE Plus reagent, Opti-MEM, RPMI 1640 medium, and TRIzol
reagent were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc.. Bacterial LPS
(E. coli O111:B4), dexamethasone, fetal calf serum (FCS),
GSH, and mouse anti-FLAG epitope monoclonal antibody were purchased
from Sigma. Freund's complete and incomplete adjuvants, thioglycollate, and bactopeptone were from Difco Laboratories. PGH2, rabbit anti-human COX-1, and anti-mouse COX-2
polyclonal antibodies, and the enzyme immunoassay kits for
PGE2 and TXB2 were from Cayman Chemical. AA was
purchased from NuChek Prep. Oligonucleotide primers were from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. The plasmid pGEM-T easy was purchased from Promega.
Geneticin, hygromycin, zeocin, and the mammalian expression vectors
pCR3.1, pCDNA3.1/hyg(+), and pCDNA3.1/zeo(+) were from
Invitrogen. A23187 was purchased from Calbiochem. Human and mouse
interleukin (IL)-1 s and mouse tumor nectoris factor (TNF) were
from Genzyme. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat
anti-mouse IgG, FITC-rabbit anti-goat IgG, and FITC-goat anti-rabbit
IgG antibodies, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit and
mouse IgGs were purchased from Zymed Laboratories Inc.
Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody was from Chemicon. Other
reagents were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries.
Computational analysis on the isolated cDNAs and related sequences
were performed using the GENETYX program (Software Development).
Culture of human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells (1, 2), mouse
osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells (8) and rat calvaria osteoblasts (33) was
described previously.
Preparation and Activation of Rat and Mouse Peritoneal
Macrophages--
To prepare macrophages, 5% (w/v) Bactopeptone in
saline (5 ml/100 g of body weight) was injected intraperitoneally into
Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats and 4% thioglycollate (w/v) solution was
injected intraperitoneally into C57BL/6 mice (1 ml/20 g body weight).
The peritoneal exudate cells of rats and mice were collected on day 4 by washing the cavity with ice-cold
Ca2+/Mg2+-free Hanks' balanced salt solution.
The cells were washed twice and plated onto six-well plastic plates
(Corning) at a density of 4.5 × 106 cells/well in 2 ml of RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% (v/v) FCS. After 2 h of
incubation at 37 ?C in a humidified atmosphere of 5%
CO2 and 95% air, non-adherent cells were removed by
rinsing. Then RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS was added to the
adherent cells and used as macrophages. The cells were incubated in the
medium with or without 10 µg/ml LPS for up to 24 h. After
incubation, PGE2 and TXB2 accumulated in the
supernatants were measured by the enzyme immunoassay kits, and
PGD2 was quantified by high performance liquid
chromatography, as described previously (26). In some experiments, the
cells were incubated with LPS in the presence of 10 µM dexamethasone.
Molecular Cloning of Mouse and Rat mPGESs--
Total RNA was
extracted from mouse and rat peritoneal macrophages incubated with LPS
for 12 h by using TRIzol reagent. The RT reaction was carried out
by using the Superscript preamplification system (Life Technologies)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA (1 µg) was mixed
with 1 µl of 50 µg/ml random hexamer oligonucleotides and 200 units
of reverse transcriptase in a total volume of 20 µl, and incubated
for 50 min at 42 °C. The PCR primers 5'-ATC AAG ATG TAC GTG GTG
GC-3' (sense) and 5'-GAG CTG GGC CAG GGT GTA GG-3' (antisense),
designed on the basis of the reported cDNA sequence of human mPGES
(MGST-L1) (30), were used for PCR amplification. PCR was performed by
adding both primers (0.2 µM for each) and an appropriate
amount of template DNA to 25 µl of PCR buffer (20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM
MgCl2, and 0.05% W-1) containing 0.5 units of
Taq DNA polymerase and 0.2 mM dNTP. The reaction was carried out with 36 cycles of 30 s of denaturation at
94 °C, 30 s of annealing at 58 °C, and 45 s of
extension at 72 °C using a DNA thermal cycler (PerkinElmer Life
Sciences). The amplified DNA fragments were directly subcloned into the
TA cloning vector pGEM and sequenced by an autofluorometric DNA
sequencer DSQ-1000L (Shimadzu) using the Thermo Sequenase cycle
sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
The cDNA fragments flanking the 3'-end regions of mouse and rat
PGES cDNAs were obtained by the 3'-RACE method. The first strand
cDNA from the total RNA isolated from LPS-treated macrophages was
synthesized by the RT reaction as follows. After denaturation at
70 °C for 10 min, 1.2 µg of RNA was mixed with 500 nM
(dT)17-adaptor primer (5'-GGC CAC GCG TCG ACT AGT
AC(dT)17-3') and 200 units of reverse transcriptase (Life
Technologies, Inc.) and incubated for 50 min at 42 °C in 20 µl of
reaction mixture (20 mM Tris, pH 8.4, 50 mM
KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM dNTP, and
10 mM dithiothreitol). After heating at 70 °C for 15 min, the reaction mixture was further incubated with 2 units of RNase H
at 37 °C for 20 min. The materials obtained were used for nested PCR
amplification with the adapter primer (5'-GGC CAC GCG TCG ACT AGT
AC-3') and the gene-specific primers for mouse (5'-TGT CAT CAC AGG CCA
GAT-3') or rat (5'-TGT CAT CAC AGG CCA AGT-3') mPGES. These
gene-specific primers were designed on the basis of the nucleotide
sequence data of the partial cDNA fragments obtained above.
3'-RACE-PCR was performed by 36 cycles of 30 s of denaturation at
94 °C, 30 s of annealing at 54 °C, and 45 s of
extension at 72 °C. The nested PCR products were subcloned into the
pGEM vector and sequenced.
5'-RACE was conducted using the 5'-RACE system version 2.0 (Life
Technologies, Inc) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The
5'-gene-specific primers used for this RACE were based on the
nucleotide sequence data obtained above (5'-TCG ATT AAG GCG TGG GCT-3'
for mouse and 5'-GGA GCG AAT GCG GGG-3' for rat). Total RNAs (0.5 µg)
from LPS-treated mouse and rat macrophages were reverse-transcribed
using 5'-gene-specific primers as described above for the 3'-RACE. The
first strand products were isolated using a GlassMax DNA isolation spin
cartridge (Life Technologies, Inc.). A 10-µl portion of cDNA was
heated at 94 °C for 2 min and incubated with 0.4 units of terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase at 37 °C for 10 min in 25 µl of
reaction mixture (10 mM Tris, pH 8.4, 25 mM
KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.2 mM dCTP).
The first PCR was carried out using the 5'-gene-specific primers for
mouse (5'-TTG TCT CCA TGT CGT TGC-3') or rat (5'-TCG TCT CCA TGT CGT
TGC-3') mPGES and the anchor primer (5'-CUA CUA CUA CUA GGC CAC GCG TCG ACT AGT ACG GGI IGG GII GGG IIG-3') under the same amplification condition as for the 3'-RACE. Subsequently, a 1-µl aliquot of the
first PCR product was subjected to the second PCR amplification using
the upstream 5'-gene-specific primers (5'-ATC TGG CCT GTG ATG ACA-3'
for mouse and 5'-ACT TGG CCT GTG ATG ACA-3' for rat) and the universal
amplification primer (5'-CUA CUA CUA CUA GGC CAC GCG TCG ACT AGT
AC-3'). The PCR products were subcloned into the pGEM vector and sequenced.
The cDNA encoding the open reading frame of human PGES was
amplified by RT-PCR as described above using total RNA obtained from
human umbilical vein endothelial cells as a template and the following
oligonucleotide primers designed from the human mPGES (MGST-L1)
cDNA sequence (30): sense, 5'-ATG CCT GCC CAC AGC CTG-3'; and
antisense, 5'-TCA CAG GTG GCG GGC CGC-3'. To obtain the C-terminally
FLAG-epitope-tagged human mPGES cDNA, PCR was conducted using the
sense primer (see above) and the antisense primer 5'-TCA
CTT GTC ATC GTC
GTC CTT GTA GTC CAG GTG
GCG GGC CGC TTC-3' (the underlined sequence corresponds to the FLAG
epitope). The amplified product was subcloned into pCR3.1 and sequenced.
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
Site-specific mutations were
introduced by mismatched primer PCR reactions with Advantage cDNA
polymerase mix using human mPGES cDNA as a template, as described
previously (34). In order to obtain the R110S mutant, a product
obtained from the PCR using the mutated sense primer 5'-CTC GTG GGC
AGT GTG GCA CAC-3', in which Arg110 was
replaced by Ser at the underlined site, and the C terminus antisense
primer that was tagged with the FLAG epitope (underlined) 5'-TCA
CTT GTC ATC GTC
GTC CTT GTA GTC CAG GTG
GCG GGC CGC T-3' (C-FLAG primer) was mixed with another product
obtained from the PCR using the N terminus sense primer 5'-ATG CCT GCC
CAC AGC CTG-3' (N-primer) and the mutated antisense primer 5'-GTG TGC
CAC ACT GCC CAC GAG-3'. After annealing, the second PCR was
carried out using the N-primer and C-FLAG primer. The mutants R70S
(Arg70 replaced by Ser) and Y117F (Tyr117
replaced by Phe) were prepared by using the same strategy. The sequences of the mutated primers for them were as follows: sense 5'-CGC
TGC CTC AGC GCC CAC CGG-3' and antisense 5'-CCG GTG GGC GCT GAG GCA GCG-3' for R70S and sense 5'-ACC GTG GCC
TTC CTG GGG AAG-3' and antisense 5'-CTT CCC CAG
GAA GGC CAC GGT-3' for Y117F. Each PCR product was ligated
into the pCR3.1 vector and sequenced.
Expression of mPGES in 293 Cells--
The cDNAs flanking the
entire open reading frames of mouse and rat mPGESs were amplified by
PCR using the Expand high fidelity PCR system (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) with cDNA reverse-transcribed from total RNAs
obtained from mouse and rat peritoneal macrophages as templates and the
appropriate combinations of the following oligonucleotide primers:
mouse sense primer 5'-ATG CCT TCC CCG GGC CTG-3', rat sense primer
5-ATG ACT TCC CTG GGT TTG-3', and mouse and rat antisense primer 5'-TCA
CAG ATG GTG GGC CAC-3'. The amplified cDNAs were directly subcloned
into the mammalian expression vector pCR3.1 and sequenced.
Human, mouse, and rat mPGES cDNAs subcloned into PCR3.1 were each
transfected into 293 cells using LipofectAMINE Plus according to the
manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, 1 µg of each plasmid was mixed
with 4 µl of LipofectAMINE and 6 µl of Plus reagent in 200 µl of
Opti-MEM, left for 15 min, and then added to cells that had attained
70% confluence in six-well plates (Corning) in 1 ml of Opti-MEM. After
incubation for 4 h, 2 ml of fresh culture medium was added. After
18 h, the medium was replaced with 2 ml of fresh medium, and
culture was continued for 3 days. In order to establish stable
transfectants, cells transfected with each cDNA were cloned by
limiting dilution in 96-well plates in culture medium supplemented with
800 µg/ml Geneticin. After culture for 2 weeks, wells containing a
single colony were chosen, and the expression of PGES was assessed by
PGES enzymatic activity and Northern blotting, as described below.
Cotransfection of mPGES and COXs in 293 Cells--
Establishment
of 293 cells stably overexpressing human COX-1 or COX-2 has been
described previously (2). These cells were transiently transfected with
mouse or rat mPGES cDNAs in pCR3.1 together with the marker plasmid
pGL-1 (Life Technologies, Inc.), which contains cDNA for green
fluorescent protein, using LipofectAMINE Plus. Briefly, the plasmid
containing mPGES and pGL-1 (0.5 µg for each) was mixed with 6 µl of
LipofectAMINE and 10 µl of Plus reagent in 200 µl of Opti-MEM, left
for 15 min, and then added to cells that had attained 70% confluence
in six-well plates in 1 ml of Opti-MEM. After incubation for 2 h,
2 ml of fresh culture medium was added. After 16 h, the medium was
replaced with 2 ml of fresh medium. After 36 h, the cells were
used for the experiments. Green fluorescent protein fluorescence was
measured in cell lysates using fluorometer at excitation wavelength of
475 nm.
In order to establish 293 transfectants stably coexpressing human mPGES
and either of the COX isozymes, cells expressing each COX were
subjected to the second transfection with human mPGES cDNA
subcloned into pCDNA3.1/hyg(+). After selection in culture medium
containing 50 µg/ml hygromycin in 96-well plates, single colonies
were picked up and expanded. Expression of mPGES and each COX was
assessed by Western and Northern blotting, as described below.
Activation of 293 Cells--
All procedures were described in
our previous reports (1, 2). Briefly, 293 cells (5 × 104/ml) were seeded into each well of 24- or 48-well plates
in 1 and 0.5 ml of culture medium, respectively. After culture for 4 days, the cells were washed once with culture medium and then incubated
with 250 µl (24-well plate) or 100 µl (48-well plate) of various
concentrations of AA or 10 µM A23187 in medium containing 1% FCS for 30 min or 1 ng/ml IL-1 in medium containing 10% FCS for
4 h. The supernatants were subjected to the PGE2
enzyme immunoassay.
Preparation of Antibody against mPGES Peptide--
A synthetic
peptide (CRSDPDVERCLRAHRN, which corresponds to human mPGES 59-74) was
covalently conjugated with poly-L-lysine-coated beads, a
500-µl portion of which (100-µg peptide equivalent) was mixed with
an equal volume of Freund's complete adjuvant and injected into
rabbits. Immunization was repeated every 3 weeks with the same amounts
of the antigen mixed with an equal volume of Freund's incomplete
adjuvant. Serum titers were checked by Western blotting using a lysate
of 293 cells stably overexpressing human mPGES.
Western Blotting--
The cells were lysed in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS) containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 1 × 107 cells/ml, applied to SDS-polyacrylamide gels (10% for
COXs and 15% for mPGES and hPGDS), and electrophoresed as reported
previously (34). Then proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes with a semidry blotter (MilliBlot-SDE system; Millipore). The
membranes were blocked for 1 h in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T), and
3% skim milk. After washing the membranes with TBS-T, antibodies
against cPLA2, COX-1, COX-2, hPGDS, and mPGES were added at
a 1:5,000, 1:10,000, 1:5,000, 1:5,000, and 1:1,000 dilution,
respectively, in TBS-T and incubated for 2 h. After washing the
membranes three times with TBS-T, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
goat anti-rabbit IgG (for cPLA2, COX-1, hPGDS, and mPGES)
or rabbit anti-goat IgG (for COX-2) was added at a 1:5,000 dilution in
TBS-T and incubated for 1 h. After six washes with TBS-T, protein
bands were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting
detection reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
RNA Blotting--
Approximately equal amounts (~10 µg) of
the total RNAs obtained from the cells were applied to separate lanes
of 1.2% (w/v) formaldehyde-agarose gels, electrophoresed, and
transferred to Immobilon-N membranes (Millipore). The resulting blots
were then probed with the respective cDNA probes that had been
labeled with [32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) by
random priming (Takara Biomedicals). All hybridizations were carried
out as described previously (34).
Assay of Enzymatic Activity of PGES--
PGES activities in cell
lysates were measured by assessment of conversion of PGH2
to PGE2 as reported previously (7). The cells were scraped
off from the dishes and disrupted by sonication (10 s, three times,
1-min interval) in 400 µl of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. After centrifugation of the sonicates at 1,700 × g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were used as the enzyme source. An
aliquot of each lysate (100-µg protein equivalents) was incubated with 2 µg of PGH2 for 30 s at 24 °C in 0.1 ml of
1 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 2 mM GSH.
After terminating the reaction by the addition of 100 mM
FeCl2, PGE2 contents in the supernatants were
quantified by use of the enzyme immunoassay kit.
Immunofluorescent Microscopic Analysis--
293 cells
coexpressing human mPGES-FLAG and either of the two COX isozymes were
seeded onto collagen-coated cover glasses (Iwaki Glass) at 5 × 104 cells/ml and cultured for 2 days. After removing the
supernatants, the cells were fixed with 2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in
PBS for 30 min at 4 °C. The cells were then treated sequentially at
room temperature with 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin containing 1%
(w/v) saponin for 30 min in PBS to block nonspecific binding and to permeabilize the membranes, appropriate first antibodies against FLAG
epitope, COX-1 and COX-2 (1:500 dilution for each) in PBS containing
1% albumin for 2 h, and FITC- and/or Cy3-conjugated second
antibodies (1:100 dilution for each) in PBS containing 1% albumin for
1 h. The coverslips were mounted on glass slides using Perma Fluor
(Japan Tanner) and examined using a Fluoview laser fluorescence
microscope (Olympus).
Statistical Analysis--
Data were analyzed by Student's
t test. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E., with
p = 0.05 as the limit of significance.
 |
RESULTS |
Molecular Cloning of Mouse and Rat mPGESs--
We have previously
demonstrated that, when rat peritoneal macrophages were cultured with
LPS, COX-2-dependent generation of PGE2, but
not of TXB2 and PGD2, from endogenous AA
proceeded over 3-12 h, accompanied by increase in PGES activity (7,
26). The inducible PGES activity in LPS-stimulated macrophages was tightly associated with membrane, whereas PGES activity in the cytosol
was unchanged (Fig. 1A). The
membrane-associated activity showed strict dependence on GSH and,
unlike cPGES/p23 (31), was almost insensitive to
1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (Fig. 1B). Increase in PGES
activity was also observed in LPS-stimulated mouse macrophages (data
not shown) and IL-1 -stimulated mouse osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells
(Fig. 1C), accompanied by delayed PGE2
generation.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Detection of inducible mPGES.
A, PGES activity in the cytosol and membrane fractions of
rat macrophages after incubation with or without 10 µg/ml LPS for
12 h. B, PGES activity in lysates of rat macrophages
treated for 12 h with LPS was measured in the presence or absence
of 1 mM GSH and 1 mM chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene
(CDNB). C, changes in the activity of PGES in the
lysates (left) and accumulation of PGE2 in the
culture supernatants (right) of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts after
culture for the indicated periods with 5 ng/ml IL-1 . A
representative result of three independent experiments is shown.
|
|
Because of the stimulus inducibility and GSH dependence,
membrane-associated PGES detected in macrophages and osteoblasts are
likely to be orthologs of human MGST-L1, which has been shown to
exhibit PGES activity (30). In order to confirm this, we attempted to
clone mouse and rat MGST-L1 ortholog cDNAs from LPS-stimulated macrophages. RT-PCR was performed using mRNA prepared from
LPS-stimulated mouse and rat macrophages as templates with several sets
of primers designed on the basis of the reported sequence of human
MGST-L1 (30). Using one set of the primers described under
"Experimental Procedures," a 280-base pair fragment, which showed a
high degree of sequence identity to the corresponding portion of human
MGST-L1 (84% for mouse and 82% for rat), was amplified from both
species. Based on these sequences, 5'- and 3'-RACE PCRs were carried
out to obtain the full-length cDNAs (see "Experimental
Procedures"). The deduced mouse (GenBankTM accession no. AB041997)
and rat (GenBankTM accession no. AB041998) cDNAs had 820 and 710 nucleotides, respectively, each of which contained an open reading
frame coding for the predicted protein of 153 amino acids (Fig.
2). Since the proteins encoded by these
cDNAs were functionally active (see below), we hereafter designate
them as mouse and rat mPGESs (m stands for
membrane-bound).

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Amino acid sequences of mPGES. Alignment
of amino acid sequences of mouse, rat, and human mPGES is shown.
Conserved amino acids are boxed.
|
|
Alignment of the mPGES proteins of the three species revealed a high
degree of sequence homology; mouse and rat mPGES proteins showed 79 and
80% sequence identity to human mPGES, respectively, and mouse and rat
mPGESs were highly homologous (94%) (Fig. 2). A search of the DNA and
protein data bases revealed up to 38% homology between the cloned
mouse and rat mPGESs and the family of MGSTs, as well as several EST
genes that had been obtained from the human genome project or cDNA
libraries from specific tissues and tumors. An EST gene (GenBankTM
accession no. AA178132) contained an entire open reading frame for
mouse mPGES, although no function was described for this gene product.
Enzymatic Characterization of mPGES--
To ascertain that the
cDNA clones thus obtained encode functional mouse and rat mPGES
proteins, their cDNAs, as well as human mPGES cDNA, were
subcloned into a mammalian expression vector and transfected into 293 cells. PGES activities in the lysates of cells transfected with mouse
(Fig. 3A), rat (Fig.
3B), and human (Fig. 3C) cDNAs were increased
markedly in the presence of GSH compared with parental cells. This
activity was tightly associated with the membrane fraction (data not
shown), and was insensitive to 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (Fig.
3C). No other PGs were formed under the same conditions
(data not shown).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Enzymatic characterization of recombinant
mPGES. cDNAs for mouse (A), rat (B), and
human (C) mPGES subcloned into pCR3.1 and empty vector were
transfected into HEK293 cells. After 3 days, PGES activity in cell
lysates was measured in the presence of 2 mM GSH
(A and B) or in the presence or absence of 2 mM GSH and 1 mM chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene
(CDNB) (C).
|
|
Alignment of the known MAPEG family members, which are subdivided into
four classes (32), demonstrates that Arg110 in mPGES is
strictly conserved (Fig. 4A).
Replacement Arg110 by Ser abrogated the catalytic function
of mPGES (Fig. 4B), implying an essential role of this
residue. Arg51 in LTCS is crucial for catalytic function,
being presumed to open the epoxide ring of leukotriene A4
for the conjugation with the thiolate anion of the reduced GSH (36).
This speculation is supported by the fact that
5-lipoxygenase-activating protein FLAP, which is most similar to LTCS
in overall structures but does not exhibit enzymatic function (37),
lacks Arg in this position (Fig. 4A). However, replacement
of Arg70 (corresponding to Arg51 in LTCS (Fig.
4A)) by Ser did not change the activity of mPGES, suggesting
that the catalytic mechanisms between the class I and II MAPEG enzymes
are distinct.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Site-directed mutagenesis of human
mPGES. A, alignment of amino acid sequences of two
conserved regions of the MAPEG family members, which are subdivided
into four subgroups (I-IV). Residues well conserved among
the members are indicated by bold letters.
Asterisks show the residues replaced by site-directed
mutagenesis. B, catalytic activity of mPGES mutants.
Wild-type (WT) mPGES and its mutants R70S, R110S, and Y117F
were transfected into HEK293 cells and PGES activity in cell lysates
was measured. Expression levels of mPGES-WT and mutants were comparable
as assessed by immunoblotting (data not shown).
|
|
The Tyr residue is essential for catalytic activity of cytosolic GSTs
(38), hPGDS (belonging to the class of cytosolic GST) (39), and
cPGES/p23 (31), where a Tyr residue near the N terminus acts as the GSH
binding site. Tyr93 in LTCS plays such a role (36), yet
this residue is not present in the corresponding position of the class
I MAPEG enzymes. Since Tyr117 in mPGES is conserved in all
known members of the mammalian MAPEG enzymes, we expected that this Tyr
might be crucial. However, replacement of Tyr117 by Phe did
not alter the catalytic activity of mPGES (Fig. 4B). Consistently, this Tyr residue is dispensable for the function of
MGST-1 (40) and does not exist in the class IV bacterial MGSTs (Fig.
4A) (32). Moreover, all Tyr to Phe substitutions in MGST-1
results in mutants with activities similar to that of the native enzyme
(40), suggesting that the class I MAPEG enzymes may display an
alternate stabilization of the thiolate anion of GSH other than through
interaction with the phenolic hydroxyl group of Tyr residue.
Induction of mPGES Expression--
RNA blot analysis demonstrated
that both mPGES and COX-2 transcripts in rat macrophages were barely
detectable before culture, were markedly induced during 3-12 h, and
then declined by 24 h following LPS stimulation (Fig.
5A). Immunoblotting using an
antibody raised against a human mPGES-derived synthetic peptide showed that the kinetic change in mPGES protein expression correlated with
that of mPGES mRNA (Fig. 5A) and that of PGES enzymatic
activity in cell lysates (Fig. 5B). The levels of TXS, as
assessed by Northern blotting, and hPGDS, as assessed by Western
blotting, were almost constant during culture with LPS (Fig.
5A), consistent with the fact that the production of
TXB2 and PGD2 was changed only minimally (7,
26). mPGES mRNA was also detected in mouse macrophages (data not
shown) and rat calvaria osteoblasts (Fig. 5C), in which mPGES was markedly up-regulated by proinflammatory stimuli. More sensitive RT-PCR analysis revealed that mPGES mRNA was expressed in
various cell types, where it also underwent
stimulus-dependent induction (data not shown). Although the
expression of mPGES mRNA was barely detectable in normal rat
tissues as assessed by RNA blotting, it increased markedly in brain,
lung, spleen, stomach, kidney, and testis 6-12 h after LPS
administration, and then declined (Fig. 5D).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Induction of mPGES expression by
proinflammatory stimuli. A, expression of mRNAs for
COX-2, mPGES, cPGES/p23 and TXS, as assessed by RNA blotting, and
proteins for mPGES and hPGDS, as assessed by immunoblotting, in rat
peritoneal macrophages after stimulation with LPS for the indicated
periods. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) was visualized by ethidium bromide
staining. B, kinetic changes in PGES activity in macrophages
with (close circles) or without (open circles)
LPS treatment. C, expression of mPGES and cPGES mRNAs in
rat calvaria osteoblasts after 24 h of culture with or without 1 ng/ml IL-1 and 100 units/ml TNF . D, expression of
mPGES mRNA in various tissues of rats before and after LPS
injection was assessed by RNA blotting. A representative result of
three independent experiments is shown.
|
|
Effect of Dexamethasone--
The increase of PGE2
generation from endogenous AA (Fig.
6A) and that of PGES
activities (Fig. 6B) in rat macrophages, assessed 12 h
after LPS stimulation, were suppressed almost completely by
dexamethasone. Dexamethasone not only suppressed the induced expression
of COX-2 mRNA (Fig. 6C), as demonstrated by several investigators (3, 10, 41-43), it also markedly reduced that of mPGES
mRNA (Fig. 6C). The effects of dexamethasone on COX-2 and mPGES expression were already evident 3-6 h after the addition of
LPS (data not shown). Expression of cPGES/p23, which was constant during LPS stimulation (Fig. 5A), was not affected by
dexamethasone (Fig. 6C). Similarly, dexamethasone markedly
suppressed the induced expression of mPGES in mouse macrophages and
osteoblasts (data not shown).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of dexamethasone
(Dex) on mPGES expression in rat macrophages.
Effect of 10 µM Dex on accumulation of PGE2
in the supernatants (A), PGES activity in cell lysates
(B), and expression of mRNAs for cPGES/p23, mPGES and
COX-2 (C) after 12 h of culture with LPS. The
means ± S.E. (A, B) and a representative result
(C) of three independent experiments are shown.
|
|
Functional Coupling between mPGES and COXs--
That coordinate
induction of COX-2 and mPGES was accompanied by accumulation of
PGE2 in LPS-stimulated macrophages (see above) argues that
both enzymes are functionally linked. To explore this, we cotransfected
mPGES and either of the two COX isozymes into HEK293 cells and their
functional coupling was reconstituted.
Cotransfection of human mPGES and COX-2, the expression of which was
confirmed by RNA blotting and immunoblotting (Fig.
7A), into HEK293 cells
resulted in a dramatic increase in the conversion of exogenous AA to
PGE2, which reached a maximal level at 2-5 µM AA and then a plateau (Fig. 7B). An
increase in PGE2 production was also observed in cells
cotransfected with human mPGES and COX-1, yet their coupling became
apparent only when a high concentration (10 µM) of AA was
added (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Functional coupling between COXs and
mPGES. A, the expression levels of COX-1, COX-2, and
human mPGES in HEK293 cells stably transfected with their cDNAs
alone or in combination were assessed by RNA blotting and
immunoblotting. B, conversion of exogenous AA to
PGE2 by HEK293 transfectants. Control cells (open
squares), cells expressing either COX alone (open
circles), and cells coexpressing human mPGES and either COX
(filled circles) were incubated for 30 min with the
indicated concentrations of AA. C, the transfectants shown
in panel A were stimulated for 30 min with 10 µM A23187 (left) or for 4 h with 1 ng/ml
human IL-1 (right). D, the expression levels
of cPLA2, COX-1, COX-2 and human mPGES in HEK293 stable
transfectants were assessed by RNA blotting (mPGES) and immunoblotting
(cPLA2 and COXs). E, the transfectants shown in
panel D were stimulated for 30 min with A23187
(left) or for 4 h with IL-1 (right).
F, conversion of exogenous AA to PGE2 by HEK293
cells stably transfected with either COX alone (open
circles) and those with both mouse mPGES and either COX
(filled circles). A representative result
(B, C, and F) and the means ± S.E. (E) of more than three experiments are shown.
|
|
When these cells were stimulated for 30 min with A23187 (immediate
response) or for 4 h with IL-1 (delayed response), a marked
increase in PGE2 generation was observed in
COX-2/mPGES-coexpressing cells, whereas the increase in
PGE2 generation by COX-1/mPGES-coexpressing cells was only
modest, albeit significant (Fig. 7C). Supplying more
endogenous AA by further transfection of cPLA2, the
expression of which is shown in Fig. 7D, led to a marked
increase in A23187-induced production of PGE2 via COX-1 and
mPGES (Fig. 7E), consistent with the fact that COX-1/mPGES
coupling requires a high concentration of AA (Fig. 7B). In
contrast to the A23187-dependent event, IL-1-dependent PGE2 generation was increased
only slightly in cPLA2/COX-1/mPGES triple transfectants
(Fig. 7E), probably because the amount of AA gradually
released by cPLA2 during the IL-1-initiated response is
still insufficient to go through the COX-1/mPGES pathway. The
cPLA2/COX-2/mPGES triple transfectants produced more
PGE2 than did the double transfectants expressing
cPLA2/COX-2 or COX-2/mPGES in both the A23187- and
IL-1-dependent responses (Fig. 7E).
COX-2 preference was not restricted to human mPGES, but was also
observed with its mouse (Fig. 7F) and rat (data not shown) counterparts. Thus, 293 cells cotransfected with mouse mPGES and COX-2
produced a large amount of PGE2 from exogenous AA, which was evident at 5 µM AA (Fig. 7F). In contrast,
PGE2 generation by cells coexpressing COX-1 and mouse mPGES
was not increased significantly at 5 µM AA, and elevated
only modestly at 10 µM (Fig. 7F). The
expression levels of mPGES in both cells, assessed by PGES activity in
cell lysates, were comparable (data not shown).
Subcellular Distribution--
In order to determine the
subcellular localization of mPGES, confocal immunofluorescent
microscopic analysis was performed. COX-1- or COX-2-expressing HEK293
cells were transiently transfected with the C-terminally FLAG-tagged
human mPGES, and mPGES and each COX were visualized by anti-FLAG and
anti-COX-1 or -COX-2 antibodies. As shown in Fig.
8, mPGES colocalized with the perinuclear
COX-1 and COX-2.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Confocal microscopic analyses of subcellular
localization of mPGES and either of the COX isozymes. HEK293 cells
stably expressing COX-1 or COX-2 were transfected with C-terminally
FLAG-tagged mPGES. After 3 days, the cells were subjected to
indirect immunofluorescent microscopy as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The yellow areas
indicate the regions where COXs and mPGES colocalized.
|
|
Combination of COX-2 and mPGES Affects Cellular Growth and
Morphology--
We unexpectedly found that 293 transfectants stably
coexpressing COX-2 and mPGES grew faster than those expressing the
single enzymes alone, those coexpressing COX-1 and mPGES, and the
control cells (Fig. 9A,
top). The rapid proliferation of the COX-2/mPGES cotransfectants was accompanied by accumulation of a large amount of
PGE2 in the culture supernatants (Fig. 9A,
bottom), and correlated with the expression levels of COX-2
and mPGES (Fig. 9A, bottom). Moreover, the
COX-2/mPGES stable cotransfectants were highly aggregated, piled up,
and exhibited aberrant round-shape morphology (Fig. 9B,
right), in contrast to those coexpressing COX-1 and mPGES, which, like control cells or cells coexpressing cPGES/p23 and COX-2
(data not shown), showed a typical fibroblastic shape (Fig. 9B, left).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Coexpression of COX-2 and mPGES affects cell
proliferation and morphology. A, several independent
HEK293 transfectants stably expressing with COX-1, COX-2, and human
mPGES, alone or in combination, were cultured for 4 days, and cell
number (upper panel) and PGE2 accumulated in the
supernatants (lower panel) were assessed. Expression levels
of each enzyme, assessed by Western and Northern blotting, is shown in
the bottom. B, cellular morphology of the
transfectants stably expressing COX-1/mPGES (left) and
COX-2/mPGES (right).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Our current studies have suggested that the two COX isozymes,
which exert segregated functions in different phases of the PGE2-biosynthetic response, are functionally coupled with
the two distinct downstream PGES enzymes (Fig.
10). cPGES/p23, a constitutive enzyme
expressed in a wide variety of cells and tissues, is predominantly linked with COX-1 to promote the immediate response, during which relatively high concentrations of AA are released in a short period (31). Coupling with COX-1 indicates that the physiological role of
cPGES/p23 may be to produce the PGE2 required for the
maintenance of homeostasis. mPGES, an inducible perinuclear enzyme, is
preferentially coupled with the inducible COX-2 to promote delayed
PGE2 generation and, if COX-2 already exists in cells, also
regulates immediate PGE2 generation (likely to be a
reflection of the priming response). The striking induction of mPGES in
tissues and cells related to the inflammatory response suggests its
crucial role in the process of inflammation, as well as in other
chronic diseases in which COX-2 is involved. mPGES may also participate
in fever and osteogenesis, where PGE2 acts as an endogenous
mediator (44, 45). Moreover, our present study has raised the
intriguing possibility that mPGES, in concert with COX-2, is involved
in cellular transformation.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
A schematic model for functional coupling
between the two COXs and two PGESs. In the immediate response
elicited by Ca2+ agonists, AA rapidly released by
cPLA2 is metabolized to PGE2 via the
constitutive enzymes COX-1 and cPGES/p23. In the delayed response
induced by proinflammatory stimuli, AA gradually released by
cPLA2 is metabolized to PGE2 via the two
inducible enzymes COX-2 and mPGES. mPGES is capable of producing
PGE2 via COX-1 only when explosive activation of
cPLA2 occurs.
|
|
Mouse, rat, and human mPGESs show a high degree of sequence homology to
one another, and at least one residue, Arg110, which is
conserved in the MGST family members (32), is essential for catalytic
function. They exhibit a GSH-dependent catalytic activity,
which is a common feature of this enzyme family (32). Coexpression
experiments clearly demonstrated that mPGES is functionally coupled
with COX-2 in marked preference to COX-1 irrespective of the source of
AA (i.e. exogenous and endogenous) (Fig. 7). Coupling
between COX-1 and mPGES occurs only when a large amount of AA is
supplied exogenously, or if burst activation of cPLA2 takes
place, endogenously. The mechanisms whereby mPGES favors COX-2 over
COX-1 cannot be explained simply by their subcellular localizations
(Fig. 8), although the presence of microdomains, in which mPGES is
located in closer proximity to COX-2 than to COX-1, within the
perinuclear compartment cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, since
subcellular location of mPGES was examined only by overexpression
experiments, it would be necessary to examine the localization of
endogenous enzyme in a future study.
Of importance, mPGES is an inducible enzyme, the expression of which is
markedly increased in various cells and tissues following proinflammatory stimuli (Fig. 5). The selective increase in
PGE2 relative to TXB2 and PGD2 in
LPS-stimulated rat macrophages (7, 26) is probably because expression
of mPGES, but not TXS and hPGDS, is up-regulated by LPS. The
observations that the kinetic change in PGES activity was well
correlated with that in mPGES mRNA and protein expression (Fig. 5)
and that dexamethasone blunted both PGES activity and mPGES expression
almost completely (Fig. 6) imply that most of the PGES activity
detected in LPS-stimulated macrophages is ascribed to mPGES. Thus,
preferential coupling between the two inducible biosynthetic enzymes,
COX-2 and mPGES, represents a well controlled cellular system that
facilitates ongoing PGE2 biosynthesis in synergy.
Furthermore, striking dexamethasone sensitivity of mPGES implies that
all three enzymatic steps in the delayed PGE2-biosynthetic
pathway (PLA2s (Refs. 46 and 47), COX-2 (Refs. 3, 10, and
41-43), and mPGES) are potential targets for the anti-inflammatory
actions of glucocorticoids.
A number of pharmacological, biochemical, and genetic studies have
documented the involvement of COX-2 in the development of cancer
(19-22, 48-53). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce the size
and number of colorectal tumors (49-51). This action of these drugs
has been reported to result from COX-2-dependent (21) and
-independent (54, 55) mechanisms. In support of the former, COX-2
expression is elevated in tumors (52, 53) and inactivation of the
COX-2 gene in mice markedly reduces the development of
intestinal tumorigenesis (21). In the present study, we have shown that
mPGES, when combined with COX-2, has the potential to affect cellular
proliferation and morphology. This remarkable aspect was observed only
in 293 cells stably, but not transiently,
cotransfected with COX-2 and mPGES. In our preliminary studies,
however, addition of indomethacin to the culture of COX-2/mPGES stable
cotransfectants did not reverse their proliferation and morphology and
addition of PGE2 to parental 293 cells for at least 2 weeks
did not affect their growth. We therefore speculate that sustained
production of abnormal amounts of PGE2 or some other
additional metabolites via the COX-2-mPGES pathway in the restricted
intracellular compartment over a long period may affect cellular states
of proliferation and differentiation. In order to confirm the possible
involvement of mPGES in cancer, several criteria on cellular
transformation, such as growth factor-independent growth, loss of
contact inhibition, anchorage-independent growth, and tumor formation
when transplanted in nude mice are now under investigation.
Nevertheless, our data provide strong support for the hypothesis that
functional segregation of the two COXs could be regulated by at least
two steps. In agreement with previous reports (2, 14, 15), COX-1
requires higher concentrations of AA for its optimal function than does
COX-2, implying that the amount of AA supplied by cPLA2
critically influences which COX isozymes are utilized. Our preliminary
study has shown that several inducible sPLA2 isozymes are
also capable of supplying AA to the COX-2/mPGES pathway through the
transcellular route.2
Moreover, each COX is selectively coupled with a distinct PGES that
shows distinct tissue and subcellular distribution and transcriptional regulation. The factors that define the coupling selectivity between each COX and PGES need to be elucidated. Finally, the two PGESs will
constitute novel targets for therapeutic and prophylactic drugs for
inflammation, osteoporosis, and possibly cancer.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants-in-aid for scientific
research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan and special coordination funds for promoting science and technology from the Science and Technology Agency.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AB041997 and AB041998.
§
These authors contributed equally to this work.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
81-3-3784-8196; Fax: 81-3-3784-8245; E-mail:
kudo@pharm.showa-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, June 26, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003505200
2
M. Murakami and I. Kudo, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PG, prostaglandin;
PGES, prostaglandin E2 synthase;
mPGES, membrane-bound
prostaglandin E2 synthase;
cPGES, cytosolic prostaglandin
E2 synthase;
COX, cyclooxygenase;
cPLA2, cytosolic phospholipase A2;
TXS, thromboxane synthase;
hPGDS, hematopoietic prostaglandin D2 synthase;
LTCS, leukotriene C4 synthase;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
GSH, glutathione;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
MGST, microsomal GST;
MGST-L1, microsomal glutathione
S-transferase-like 1;
MAPEG, membrane-associated proteins
involved in eicosanoid and GSH metabolism;
AA, arachidonic acid;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
IL, interleukin;
TNF, tumor necrosis factor;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
HEK, human embryonic kidney;
FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate;
RT, reverse transcriptase;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends;
TBS-T, Tris-buffered saline plus Tween 20.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Murakami, M.,
Shimbara, S.,
Kambe, T.,
Kuwata, H.,
Winstead, M. V.,
Tischfield, J. A.,
and Kudo, I.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14411-14423
|
| 2.
|
Murakami, M.,
Kambe, T.,
Shimbara, S.,
and Kudo, I.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3103-3115
|
| 3.
|
Murakami, M.,
Matsumoto, R.,
Austen, K. F.,
and Arm, J. P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22269-22275
|
| 4.
|
Kuwata, H.,
Nakatani, Y.,
Murakami, M.,
and Kudo, I.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1733-1740
|
| 5.
|
Uozumi, N.,
Kume, K.,
Nagase, T.,
Nakatani, N.,
Ishii, S.,
Tashiro, F.,
Komagata, Y.,
Maki, K.,
Ikuta, K.,
Ouchi, Y.,
Miyazaki, J.,
and Shimizu, T.
(1997)
Nature
390,
618-621
|
| 6.
|
Fujishima, H.,
Sanchez Mejia, R. O.,
Bingham, C. O.,
Lam, B. K.,
Sapirstein, A.,
Bonventre, J. V.,
Austen, K. F.,
and Arm, J. P.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4803-4808
|
| 7.
|
Naraba, H.,
Murakami, M.,
Matsumoto, H.,
Shimbara, S.,
Ueno, A.,
Kudo, I.,
and Oh-ishi, S.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
2974-2982
|
| 8.
|
Murakami, M.,
Kuwata, H.,
Amakasu, Y.,
Shimbara, S.,
Nakatani, Y.,
Atsumi, G.,
and Kudo, I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19891-19897
|
| 9.
|
Murakami, M.,
Kambe, T.,
Shimbara, S.,
Higashino, K.,
Hanasaki, K.,
Arita, H.,
Horiguchi, M.,
Arita, M.,
Arai, H.,
Inoue, K.,
and Kudo, I.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
31435-31444
|
| 10.
|
Smith, W. L.,
Garavito, R. M.,
and DeWitt, D. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33157-33160
|
| 11.
|
Roshak, A.,
Sathe, G.,
and Marshall, L. A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
25999-6005
|
| 12.
|
Shinohara, H.,
Balboa, M. A.,
Johnson, C. A.,
Balsinde, J.,
and Dennis, E. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12263-12268
|
| 13.
|
Nakatani, Y.,
Tanioka, Y.,
Sunaga, S.,
Murakami, M.,
and Kudo, I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1161-1168
|
| 14.
|
Kulmacz, R. J.,
and Wang, L.-H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24019-24023
|
| 15.
|
Shitashige, M.,
Morita, I.,
and Murota, S.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1389,
57-66
|
| 16.
|
Chen, Q.-R.,
Miyaura, C.,
Higashi, S.,
Murakami, M.,
Kudo, I.,
Saito, S.,
Hiraide, T.,
Shibasaki, Y.,
and Suda, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5952-5968
|
| 17.
|
Harada, Y.,
Hatanaka, K.,
Kawamura, M.,
Saito, M.,
Ogino, M.,
Majima, M.,
Ohno, T.,
Ogino, K.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Taketani, Y.,
Yamamoto, S.,
and Katori, M.
(1996)
Prostaglandins
51,
19-33
|
| 18.
|
Langenbach, R.,
Morham, S. G.,
Tiano, H. F.,
Loftin, C. D.,
Ghanayem, B. I.,
Chulada, P. C.,
Mahler, J. F.,
Lee, C. A.,
Goulding, E. H.,
Kluckman, K. D.,
Ledford, A.,
Lee, C. A.,
and Smithies, O.
(1995)
Cell
83,
483-92
|
| 19.
|
Tsujii, M.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1995)
Cell
83,
493-501
|
| 20.
|
Tsujii, M.,
Kawano, S.,
Rsuji, S.,
Sawaoka, H.,
Hori, M.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1998)
Cell
93,
705-716
|
| 21.
|
Oshima, M.,
Dinchuk, J. E.,
Kargman, S. L.,
Oshima, H.,
Hancock, B.,
Kwong, E.,
Trzaskos, J. M.,
Evans, J. F.,
and Taketo, M. M.
(1996)
Cell
87,
803-809
|
| 22.
|
Lim, H.,
Paria, B. C.,
Das, S. K.,
Dinchuk, J. E.,
Langenbach, R.,
Trzaskos, J. M.,
and Dey, S. K.
(1997)
Cell
91,
197-208
|
| 23.
|
Smith, C. J.,
Zhang, Y.,
Koboldt, C. M.,
Muhammad, J.,
Zweifel, B. S.,
Shaffer, A.,
Talley, J. J.,
Masferrer, J. L.,
Seibert, K.,
and Isakson, P. C.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
13313-13318
|
| 24.
|
Warner, T. D.,
Giuliano, F.,
Vojnovic, I.,
Bukasa, A.,
Mitchell, J. A.,
and Vane, J. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7563-7568
|
| 25.
|
Fournier, T.,
Fadok, V.,
and Henson, P. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31065-31072
|
| 26.
|
Matsumoto, H.,
Naraba, H.,
Murakami, M.,
Kudo, I.,
Yamaki, K.,
Ueno, A.,
and Oh-ishi, S.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
230,
110-114
|
| 27.
|
Watanabe, K.,
Kurihara, K.,
and Hayaishi, O.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
235,
148-152
|
| 28.
|
Ogorochi, T.,
Ujihara, M.,
and Narumiya, S.
(1987)
J. Neurochem.
48,
900-909
|
| 29.
|
Watanabe, K.,
Kurihara, K.,
and Suzuki, T.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1439,
406-414
|
| 30.
|
Jakobsson, P.-J.,
Thoren, S.,
Morgenstern, R.,
and Samuelsson, B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7220-7225
|
| 31.
|
Tanioka, T.,
Nakatani, Y.,
Semmyo, N.,
Murakami, M.,
and Kudo, I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
32775-32782 | |