|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M004560200 on July 13, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 32793-32799, October 20, 2000
Novel RING Finger Proteins, Air1p and Air2p, Interact with Hmt1p
and Inhibit the Arginine Methylation of Npl3p*
Koichi
Inoue ,
Takayuki
Mizuno §,
Kazuhiro
Wada , and
Masatoshi
Hagiwara ¶
From the Department of Functional Genomics, Medical
Research Institute, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan and § SEEDS
Laboratory, Institute of Drug Discovery Research, Yamanouchi
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 21 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba-shi,
Ibaraki 305-8585, Japan
Received for publication, May 26, 2000, and in revised form, June 29, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins
(hnRNPs) are involved in the mRNA processing and export and are
post-translationally modified by methylation at arginine residues in
their arginine-glycine-rich (RGG) domains. We screened the factors that
can interact with the RGG domain of Npl3p only in the presence of Hmt1p
with the two-hybrid system in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. An
isolated clone, YIL079, encodes a novel RING finger protein
that was not directly bound to Npl3p but associated with the N terminus
of Hmt1p. Thus, we designated the gene product Air1p
(arginine methyltransferase-interacting RING finger protein). Air1p inhibited the Hmt1p-mediated
methylation of Npl3p in vitro. Overexpression of Air1p
repressed the Hmt1p-dependent growth of cells. Since
homology searches indicate that the YDL175 gene product has
significant identity (45%) with Air1p, we designated the gene
AIR2. Air2p also has a RING finger domain and was bound to
Hmt1p. Although single disruption of either gene gave no effect on the
cell growth, cells lacking Air1p and Air2p grew at an extremely slow
rate with accumulated poly(A)+ RNA in the nucleus. Thus,
Air1p and Air2p may affect mRNA transport by regulating the
arginine methylation state of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Various types of protein modifications, such as phosphorylation,
acetylation, glycosylation, and myristoylation, are now
recognized in a number of eukaryotic proteins, and their functional
significance has been exhibited. A potential role of protein
methylation as a post-translational modification in signal
transduction, however, has not been explored with the same breadth and
intensity that protein phosphorylation has enjoyed in recent years. The
methyl group, donated by
SAM,1 is transferred to
carboxyl groups or to the side chain nitrogens of the amino acid
lysine, arginine, or histidine (1). Evidence for the post-translational
methylation of arginine residues in proteins was first provided by the
presence of radioactive species chromatographing at positions near that
of arginine in acid hydrolysates of isolated calf thymus nuclei
incubated with [methyl-14C]SAM (2). The
products of the methylation reaction were determined to be
NG-monomethylarginine and
NG,NG-dimethylarginine
(3). Type I protein arginine methyltransferases methylate arginine
residues to form asymmetric
NG,NG-dimethylarginine
residues, and type II enzymes catalyze the formation of symmetric
NG,N'G-dimethylarginine
residues. Genes encoding type I methyltransferases have been identified
in yeast (4, 5), rats (6), and humans (7), although type II protein
arginine methyltransferases have not been cloned. In addition to these
classical members, a coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase
1 (CARM1) was recently cloned as a binding protein to p160
coactivators that include SRC1, GRIP/TIF2, and
pCIP/RAC3/ACTR/AIB1/TRAM1 by using the yeast two-hybrid system to
screen a mouse embryo cDNA library (8).
Although histones and myelin basic proteins were initially used as
substrates to determine the arginine methyltransferase activity, hnRNPs
are now known to be more efficient for substrates (9). hnRNPs are
abundant RNA-binding proteins, and more than 20 different hnRNPs,
designated A-U, have been identified (10, 11). hnRNPs are associated
with nascent polymerase II transcripts and involved in many steps of
mRNA processing and nuclear transport (10-12). In
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, temperature-sensitive mutants of
one such protein, Npl3p, display defects in export of mRNA from the
nucleus (13-15). Npl3p is a yeast homologue of the prototypical hnRNP,
A1, which has two RNA recognition motifs of 90 residues each and an
arginine-glycine-rich C-terminal domain termed the "RGG box" (10).
In addition to the ability of RNA recognition motifs, the RGG box
domain (or RGG domain) has been shown to mediate RNA-protein
interactions (16, 17), and arginine methylation typically occurs within
the regions with the RGG domain in hnRNP A1 and Npl3p (6, 9, 18).
Several other potential substrates for the enzyme including fibrillarin
and nucleolin have a similar RGG methylation consensus: (G/F)GGRGG(G/F)
(19).
Although the significance of arginine methylation in the RGG domain has
not been revealed fully, Shen et al. (20) recently reported that Npl3p cannot exit the nucleus efficiently in cells lacking a major arginine methyltransferase, Hmt1p/Rmt1p, and
overexpression of Hmt1p enhances Npl3p export. The export of
another RNA-binding protein known to shuttle from the nucleus to the
cytoplasm, Hrp1p, is also impaired when HMT1 is missing (20,
21). Thus, the efficient export of at least two shuttling hnRNPs
implicated in RNA processing and export requires arginine methylation
in the RGG domain.
These findings gave us the idea that unidentified protein(s) may
interact with the RGG domain in a methylation-dependent
manner as a regulator of the hnRNP shuttling. In support of this
possibility, Michael et al. (22) reported that a part of
C-terminal RGG domain is sufficient for its nuclear export when hnRNP
A1 shuttles from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. In this report, we
performed yeast two-hybrid screening with the C-terminal region (amino
acids 281-414) of Npl3p as a bait and isolated several clones.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Microorganisms and Plasmids--
The genotypes and sources of
S. cerevisiae strains used in this study are listed in Table
I. Yeast strains were grown in standard
YPDA (1% Bacto-yeast extract, 2% Bacto-peptone, 2% glucose, and
0.004% adenine sulfate) or synthetic complete media lacking the
appropriate amino acids (23). Sporulation medium was purchased from Bio
101.
The plasmids used for yeast in this study are listed in Table
II. A PCR product of 0.4 kb
encoding amino acid residues 281-414 of Npl3p was inserted into the
BamHI-PstI gap of pBTM116 (25), named
pBTM116NPL3S. A 1.0-kb PCR-amplified fragment containing the
Air2p-coding region was inserted into the
NcoI-XhoI gap of pACTII (26), designated
pACTIIAIR2. A PCR-amplified 1.1-kb fragment containing the Air1p-coding
region was inserted into the BamHI-XhoI gap of
pYES2 (Invitrogen), designated pYES2AIR1. Three genes described above
were PCR-amplified from the genome of S. cerevisiae strain S288C. pCgURA3 and pCgTRP1, plasmids for gene disruption in yeast, were
kindly provided by Arisawa (27).
pGEX-HMT1 was kindly supplied by Silver (4). The DNA sequences encoding
amino acid residues 1-207, 56-207, and 56-348 of Hmt1p were
PCR-amplified as BamHI-XhoI fragments by using
pGEX-HMT1 as a template. These fragments were inserted into the
BamHI-XhoI gap of pGEX5X-3 (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) and designated pGEX-HMT1 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
pET28HMT1 was constructed by inserting a PCR-amplified 1.1-kb
EcoRI-NotI fragment from pGEX-HMT1 into the
EcoRI-NotI gap of pET28a (Novagen). A 1.2-kb PCR
product containing full-length Npl3p-coding sequence was inserted into
the SalI-NotI gap of pGEX5X-3 and named
pGEX-NPL3. A PCR-amplified 1.1-kb fragment containing the Air1p-coding
region from the genome of S. cerevisiae strain S288C was
inserted into the BamHI-XhoI gap of pET28a,
designated pET28AIR1.
Two-hybrid Screening--
The yeast strain L40 was transformed
with pBTM116NPL3S as a bait. After that, the strain was transformed
with the library containing cDNA fragments fused to the
GAL4 activation domain (28). In total, ~7.0 × 105 transformants were obtained, in which about 200 colonies grew on synthetic complete plates lacking tryptophan, leucine,
and histidine (SC-Trp-Leu-His). As for the colonies, plasmids were recovered and transformed into an Escherichia coli strain
MC1066 (29). Using the strain, the activation domain plasmids from the
library were isolated by their ability to complement an E. coli
leuB mutation as a result of the presence of the plasmid-borne LEU2 gene. To confirm that transcriptional activation was
dependent on the presence of both gene fusions, the isolated library
plasmids were retransformed into the original L40 strain with either
pBTM116NPL3S or pBTM116a, which expresses only the LexA DNA-binding
domain.2 In each case, the
two transformants and the strain containing pBTM116NPL3S and pACTII
were streaked on SC-Trp-Leu-His plates. The colonies, which grew with
the pBTM116NPL3S and did not with pBTM116a on SC-Trp-Leu-His plates,
were selected. The plasmids were recovered again and sequenced. Data
base searches were performed by use of the Yeast Proteome Database, the
Saccharomyces Genome Database, and the NCBI BLAST program.
Expression of Proteins in Bacteria--
E. coli
DH5 carrying the pGEX fusion constructs was grown in Luria-Bertani
medium at 37 °C and induced with 0.5 mM for 5-6 h at
30 °C. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and lysed in
resuspension buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, and 1% Triton X-100). The
cells were ruptured by sonication on ice, using an ultrasonic disruptor
(UD-201; TOMY). Sonication (five pulses of 1 min each) was carried out
at 50% duty cycle. After centrifugation at 6,000 × g
for 30 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was mixed with glutathione beads
at 4 °C overnight. The protein-bound beads were washed repeatedly
with the same resuspension buffer. GST fusion proteins were then eluted
a few times with 30 mM reduced glutathione in the
resuspension buffer and dialyzed overnight against dialysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM PMSF, and 20% glycerol) at 4 °C. Proteins were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and appropriate fractions were stored at
80 °C.
pET28 fusion constructs were transformed with BL21(DE3), and
purification was performed in much the same manner as for the pGEX fusion proteins with the following differences. Resuspension buffer containing 20 mM imidazole was used during
sonication or washing, and 30 mM reduced glutathione was
replaced with 200 mM imidazole.
GST Pull-down Experiments--
For in vitro
protein-protein interaction assay, 3 µg of GST or GST fusion proteins
were incubated for 1.5 h at 4 °C with 10 µl of
glutathione-Sepharose beads in the binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1% Triton X-100). After
washing with the binding buffer once, the beads were incubated for
6 h at 4 °C with 0.5 µg of T7-tagged proteins in the binding
buffer. The beads were then washed five times with the binding buffer,
and retained proteins were eluted with 30 mM reduced
glutathione in the binding buffer.
Protein Analysis--
The aliquots of GST pull-down experiments
were boiled in loading buffer and electrophoresed on sodium
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Separated proteins on SDS-PAGE were transferred
to nitrocellulose membranes, which were then blocked in 5% dry milk in
phosphate-buffered saline and probed with anti-GST rabbit serum (Z-5;
Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) or anti-T7 antibody
(Novagen). After washing in phosphate-buffered saline five times, the
membranes were probed with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibody (Zymed Laboratories
Inc.), respectively. After washing with Tris-buffered saline with
Tween 20 five times, proteins were visualized.
For the staining of HA-tagged proteins in yeast extracts, anti-HA
polyclonal antibody (Medical and Biological Laboratories) was used.
Yeast Protein Extraction--
Yeast proteins were extracted as
described (30). Each yeast strain was grown at 30 °C in
galactose-containing synthetic medium. Cells were harvested to the
optical density of 1.0 at 600 nm in the medium (1 ml), resuspended in
100 µl of sample buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 10%
glycerol, 2% SDS, 5% -mercaptoethanol, and 0.0025% bromphenol
blue), and heated immediately at 95 °C for 5 min. The extracted
proteins were obtained in the supernatants following the centrifugation
of the extracts, and the aliquots were analyzed.
Gene Disruptions--
Disruption of the HMT1 gene was
performed as described (31). Briefly, two oligonucleotides were
synthesized: olis146 and olis147 (see below). Oligonucleotide olis147
contains 50 nucleotides of the HMT1 5'-untranslated sequence
followed by 20 nucleotides of the sequence from the 3'-end of
CgURA3 (27). Oligonucleotide olis146 contains 50 nucleotides
of the translated sequences of the HMT1 followed by 21 nucleotides from the 5'-end of CgURA3. The PCR products were
amplified with pCgURA3 as a template and olis146 and olis147 as primers
and transformed in ETM43. We selected Ura+ transformants, and the
structure of the disrupted genes was verified by PCR.
To construct a null mutant of AIR1 or AIR2, we
used two pairs of oligonucleotides, olis454-455 (see below) or
olis451-452 (see below), as primers and pCgURA3 or pCgTRP1 as
templates, respectively. Diploid strain W303 was transformed with the
PCR products. Sporulation and tetrad analysis yielded a haploid strain
containing air1::CgURA3 or
air2::CgTRP1, designated ETM52 or ETM56,
respectively. To create the parental strain of double disruption mutant
air1::CgURA3 and air2::CgTRP1, ETM52 was mated with ETM56. The
diploids were selected, tetrads were dissected, and Trp+/Ura+ spores
were selected, as ETM159.
The primers used for gene disruption were olis146
(5'-CACCATATAATTCTCTCATTTTCTATTTTATACTGTATAATGAATCTTTTACAGCTATGACATGATTACG-3'), olis147
(5'-ATGAATGGAGCACTTGTCGGGAAAGATCAGACCGCCTTCTACCAAATAGTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAA-3'), olis451
(5'-TTATTACCATCAAATGTATTCATGATCCGGGTAGTGCCTTTTTTTCCTTCCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAA-3'), olis452
(5'-GACCTGTAATGACCCACCTCATCACACTTTGAACACTGGATAGCCTTCGGACAGCTATGACATGATTACG-3'), olis454
(5'-AAGTGACTTCCATAGGCGCTTGTCCTTTGTCTTTGTTTCTTGCTACTGTTACCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAA-3'), and olis455
(5'-AAGCGTGCAGAACACCTTCTTCCATTTATGAGGACACTGTGATTTATAACAGCTATGACATGATTACG-3').
Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization--
Each strain was grown to
midlog phase in YPDA at 30 °C. The cells were then subjected to
in situ hybridization as described (32) with some
modification. Fixation of the cells was done with freshly prepared 4%
paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0)
for 1 h at room temperature. After washing three times in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, 106 cells were
treated with 2 µl of -mercaptoethanol and 20 µl of 2 mg/ml
Zymolyase 100T (Seikagaku Corp.) in 200 µl of sorbitol buffer (1.2 M sorbitol, 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer) for
20-30 min at 37 °C. Resultant spheroplasts were washed three times
in ice-cold sorbitol buffer and were put into the wells of Teflon-faced multiwell slides (Nalge Nunc International) coated with
poly-L-lysine (Mr 150,000-300,000;
Sigma). After 30 min, nonadhered cells were removed by aspiration, and
the slides were plunged into 70, 90, and 100% ethanol for 5 min
successively. The slides were then dried completely to avoid
condensation and incubated in prehybridization buffer containing 4×
SSC, 5× Denhardt's solution, and 1 mg/ml tRNA at room temperature for
30 min. Hybridization was carried out with the same buffer containing
2.5 pM Cy3-labeled oligo(dT)50 for 12-16 h at
42 °C in a moisture chamber. Following hybridization, cells were
washed four times in 4× SSC at 42 °C for 1 h each and counterstained with 1 µg/ml of 4',6-diamido-2-phenylindole. The slides were mounted with a mounting medium (90% glycerol, 10% phosphate-buffered saline) and were examined under BX-50 (Olympus).
In Vitro Methylation Assay--
In vitro methylation
assay was done as described (4) with some modification. 1 µg of
GST-Npl3p was incubated at 30 °C for 45 min in a 20-µl reaction
containing 50 mM Na-MOPS (pH 7.2), 300 mM NaCl,
2 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin,
10% glycerol, 0.5 µg of GST-Hmt1p, 0.4 mM
[methyl-3H]SAM (specific activity of 1.3 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science Products), and the indicated quantities of
T7-Air1p or BSA (as a control). The reactions were terminated by
adding SDS sample buffer and boiling for 5 min. 50% of each reaction
solution was then loaded onto 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected
to electrophoresis. Gels were stained with Coomassie Blue R-250
to visualize protein bands and then fluorographed. The results
represent 2-day exposures at 80 °C.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of Npl3p-interacting Proteins by Two-hybrid
Screening--
We screened ~7 × 105
transformants of yeast cDNA library using a bait of RGG domain of
Npl3p (Fig. 1A) as described
under "Experimental Procedures." The results yielded nine different
genes summarized in Table III. One clone
is, as expected, Hmt1p/Rmt1p, and seven clones encode RNA-interacting
proteins. Moreover, five of seven have the regions with RGG repeats,
the RGG domain. High frequencies of the RGG proteins can be explained
by the interaction between the RGG domains, since Cartegni et
al. (44) reported that hnRNP A1 proteins interact with each
other with the RGG domain. The other clone is the YIL079
gene, which encodes an unknown open reading frame. According to the
data of the Yeast Proteome Database, the open reading frame is 1080 nucleotides in length, encoding a basic (predicted pI = 9.2)
protein of 360 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of
41.647 kDa. Analysis of the predicted amino acid sequence of the gene
product indicates that it contains the RING finger domain near the N
terminus (45).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, schematic representation of
full-length Npl3p (top) or the C terminus of Npl3p
(bottom), the latter of which is used as a bait in the
two-hybrid screening. B, dot-spot analysis for comparison of
interaction in wild-type host or hmt1-deprived host
between Npl3p and the clones segregated in a two-hybrid assay. On each
plate, the upper two spots
represent interactions in wild-type host, and the lower
two spots represent interactions in the
hmt1-deprived host. Precultures were diluted in growth
medium, and equivalent amounts of cells (diluted in
10 1 steps) were spotted onto synthetic
complete medium plates lacking tryptophan and leucine or lacking
tryptophan, leucine, and histidine. Plates were incubated for 3 days at
30 °C. In the clones, only YIL079 and SUB2 (a
control for comparison with the case of YIL079) were
shown.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Summary of Two-hybrid data
As a bait, pBTM116NPL3S was prepared, in which the C terminus of Np13p
was fused in frame to LexA in the vector pBTM116 (25), and we screened
the yeast cDNA library with the vector in a yeast two-hybrid assay.
Asterisks indicate genes encoding protein with RGG repeats. aa, amino
acids; RRM, RNA recognition motif.
|
|
Next, we examined the interaction of the listed proteins with Npl3p in
an hmt1 disruptant as a host for two-hybrid system to test
their Hmt1p-dependent interaction. The growth of the
hmt1 disruptant was similar to or even faster than that of
the wild-type strain on a synthetic complete plate lacking histidine,
when eight of the nine clones were introduced as preys (Fig.
1B and data not shown), indicating their Hmt1p-independent
interaction with Npl3p. In contrast, the hmt1-deprived
strain introducing NPL3 (nuclear
protein localization 3) and
YIL079 could not survive in the medium lacking histidine,
suggesting that the YIL079 gene product can interact with
Npl3p only in the presence of Hmt1p (Fig. 1B).
YIL079 Gene Product Interacts with Hmt1p but Not with Npl3p in
Vitro--
The observation shown in Fig. 1B that the
interaction of Npl3p with the YIL079 gene product, Yil079p,
depends on the presence of Hmt1p implies two possibilities: (i) Npl3p
interacts with Yil079p mediated by Hmt1p, or (ii) the methylated state
of Npl3p mediated by Hmt1p is required for interaction with Yil079p. To
determine which is the truth, physical interactions of Hmt1p, Npl3p,
and Yil079p were examined in vitro. As shown in Fig.
2A, T7-tagged Hmt1p bound to
GST-Npl3p but not to GST alone (Fig. 2A, lanes 1 and 3). T7-tagged Yil079p, however, did not
bind to GST-Npl3p (Fig. 2A, lane 4).
Instead, this protein bound to GST-Hmt1p, but not to GST alone (Fig.
2A, lanes 2 and 5).
Although we tried to detect the possibility of
methylation-dependent interaction of Npl3p and Yil079p, we
could not find any direct interaction between them even after
methylation (data not shown). Thus, we designated the YIL079
gene product Air1p (arginine
methyltransferase-interacting RING finger
protein).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Air1p binds to Hmt1p in
vitro. A, 0.5 µg of T7-tagged proteins
were suspended in binding buffer and incubated with
glutathione-Sepharose beads bound to 3 µg of GST or GST fusion
proteins. The beads were washed, and T7-tagged proteins were analyzed
by 15% SDS-PAGE and visualized. B, schematic representation
of wild-type (WT) and deletion mutants of Hmt1p used in
C. WT Hmt1p is the full-length 348-amino acid protein (4,
5). Shaded boxes (I, post
I, II, and III) indicate conserved
regions within most of the SAM-dependent methyltransferases
(46). The numbers in parentheses indicate amino
acids present in the deletion mutants. C, differential
in vitro binding of Air1p to wild-type and deletion mutants
of Hmt1p. The indicated GST fusion proteins (shown by the
arrowheads) were immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose resin
and analyzed for T7-Air1p binding as shown in A. The
proteins were detected by Western blot analysis.
|
|
To identify the portion of Hmt1p required for binding to Air1p, we
prepared deletion mutants of Hmt1p fused to GST (Fig. 2B). Hmt1p is one of the SAM-dependent methyltransferases, and
motifs I, post-I, II, and III are conserved among most of them
(46). The mutant constructs were analyzed in vitro in a GST
pull-down assay as mentioned under "Experimental Procedures" (Fig.
2C). The lower panel of Fig.
2C shows GST fusion proteins stained with anti-GST rabbit
serum, and the upper panel shows the precipitated T7-Air1p recognized with anti-T7 antibody. T7-Air1p was allowed to bind
to wild type and 1 (residues 1-207), but not to 2 (residues 56-348) and 3 (residues 56-207), indicating that the N terminus of
Hmt1p is essential for the binding to Air1p.
Air1p Inhibits Methylation of Npl3p Mediated by Hmt1p--
To
examine the effect of Air1p on the methyltransferase activity of Hmt1p,
GST-Hmt1p and GST-Npl3p were incubated with
[methyl-3H]SAM with the indicated amount of
recombinant T7-Air1p or BSA, and the status of arginine methylation of
GST-Npl3p was examined. The methylation of Npl3p was inhibited by
T7-Air1p in a dosage-dependent manner, whereas BSA did not
affect the methylation of Npl3p (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Inhibition of effect of Hmt1p by Air1p.
A, inhibition of methylation status of Npl3p by Air1p
in vitro. Purified GST-Npl3p (1 µg), GST-Hmt1p (1 µg),
and 15 mM [methyl-3H]SAM were
incubated (4) with T7-Air1p or BSA in the absence or presence of
peptides at the indicated quantities. The methylation status of
GST-Npl3p was evaluated by fluorography. B, inhibition of
Hmt1p-dependent suppression of npl3
temperature-sensitive mutant. npl3-17 strain (13) was
co-transformed with either pNB1HA-HMT1 or pNB1 (control vector) under
the control of the ADH promoter and either pYES2AIR1 or
pYES2 (control vector) under the control of the GAL1
promoter. C, effect of Air1p on the expression of Hmt1p.
npl3-17 strains containing an HA-Hmt1p expression vector,
pNB1HA-HMT1, were grown in the presence or absence of overexpression of
Air1p. The same amounts of extract proteins from yeast transformants
were resolved on SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane,
and visualized with anti-HA antibody.
|
|
Next, we examined whether Air1p would inhibit the function of Hmt1p
even in vivo. The growth of an npl3 mutant
strain, npl3-17, was arrested at the sensitive temperature
(34.5 °C) (Fig. 3B). As Shen et al. (20) have
reported, the growth defect of the npl3-17 strain was
rescued by overexpression of Hmt1p, suggesting that hypermethylation by
Hmt1p complements the function of mutated Npl3p. However, when Air1p
was overexpressed with Hmt1p in the npl3-17 strain, the
growth rescue by Hmt1p disappeared (Fig. 3B). Although we
examined the effect of Air1p overexpression on the expression level of
Hmt1p in an npl3-17 strain, the expression of Hmt1p was not
affected by Air1p (Fig. 3C). These indicated that Air1p
could antagonize the methylation of Npl3p by Hmt1p both in
vitro and in vivo.
YDL175 Gene Product Is a Homologue of Air1p in S. cerevisiae--
Homology searches using BLAST 2.0 indicate that
YDL175 gene product in S. cerevisiae has
significant identity (45%) with Air1p (Fig.
4A). The gene product also has
the RING finger domain, and a cysteine-rich region at the N terminus
side including the RING finger domain is highly homologous to amino
acid residues 32-217 of Air1p (68%). There were no other clearly
homologous proteins in any species in our homology search. In
two-hybrid system, cells that expressed Npl3p as a bait and the
YDL175 gene product as a prey could grow up in the medium
lacking histidine only in the presence of Hmt1p (Fig. 4, B
and C), indicating that the interaction of the gene product
with Npl3p requires Hmt1p. Indeed, the gene product also bound
to Hmt1p in vitro (data not shown). So we designated it as
Air2p.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Comparison between Air1p and Air2p.
A, the amino acid sequence alignment of Air1p and
Air2p. The positions of identical or similar amino acids between these
two proteins are indicated by asterisks or dots,
respectively. Gaps (-) were introduced to optimize the alignment, which
was performed using a Lipman-Peason method algorithm and GENTYX-MAC
version 10.0 software. The conserved cysteines or histidine in the RING
finger domain are underlined. Amino acid positions are
indicated on the left. B, two-hybrid interactions
between Npl3p and Air2p. Npl3p+ or Npl3p
indicates LexA fused to the C terminus of Npl3p or LexA only as
bait, respectively. Air2p was fused in frame to the Gal4p activation
domain in the vector pACTII (26). Individual transformants grown in
synthetic complete medium plate lacking tryptophan and leucine
(SC-WL) were selected and streaked on synthetic complete
medium plates lacking tryptophan, leucine, and histidine
(SC-WLH). C, alteration of the interaction
between Npl3p and Air2p. Upper two
spots stand for interaction in host with
HMT1, and the lower spots show the
interaction without HMT1 as shown in Fig.
1B.
|
|
Air1p and Air2p Have Functional Redundancy on Cell Growth--
To
clarify the physiological role of Air1p and Air2p, we examined the
growth of air1, air2, and air1 air2
disruptant strains. The air1::CgURA3 and
air2::CgTRP1 constructs were targeted to the
AIR1 and AIR2 chromosomal loci in the diploid
W303 by homologous recombination, respectively, and correct
replacements were verified by PCR (data not shown). After sporulation
and tetrad dissection, the transformed diploid yielded four viable
spores with normal growth from each tetrad, with two being prototrophic
and two auxotrophic for uracil and tryptophan, respectively. Single
disruption of either AIR1 or AIR2 had no effect
on cell growth (Fig. 5). To test whether
Air1p and Air2p act redundantly, we obtained the air1 air2
double disruptant. The diploid was constructed by air1 and
air2 single disruptants, and tetrad analysis was conducted. Deletion of both AIR1 and AIR2 caused a strong
growth defect of cells at 30 °C (Fig. 5).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Growth phenotype of wild-type strain,
air1 or air2 single disruptant
strains, and air1 air2 double disruptant strain.
The strains with air1 or air2 single disruption
and the air1 air2 double disruption were constructed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Below
are shown double disruptants segregated independently. Cells were
streaked and grown on YPDA plates at 30 °C for 2 days.
|
|
To find the reason for the growth defect of the double disruptants, we
analyzed the subcellular localization of poly(A)+ RNA in
the wild-type or mutant strains by in situ hybridization using Cy3-labeled oligo(dT)50. However, while each single
disruptant showed the similar cytosolic poly(A)+ RNA
localization (Fig. 6, H and
J) as that of wild type (Fig. 6B), clear nuclear
accumulation of mRNA was observed in the air1 air2
double disruptants (Fig. 6E).

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Localization of poly(A)+
RNA in wild type and various disruptants. Cultures of W303-1A,
ETM52, ETM56, and ETM159 grown to the midlog phase at 30 °C were
prepared for hybridization with oligo(dT)50 as a probe as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Then they were inspected
by phase-contrast (A, D, G, and
I) and fluorescence microscopy for detecting
poly(A)+ RNA (B, E, H, and
J). Nuclei were marked with 4',6-diamido-2-phenylindole
(DAPI) (C and F). A-C
display wild-type cells. G and H show
air1 cells. I and J show
air2 cells. D-F show air1 and
air2 cells.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Since the post-translational methylation of protein arginine
residues was revealed (2), their activity has been researched (46). Type I protein arginine N-methyltransferases methylate protein arginine residues to form
NG,NG-dimethylarginine
residues (asymmetric). Hmt1p/Rmt1p was isolated from S. cerevisiae as a protein arginine methyltransferase that catalyzes
both the NG-monomeric and
NG,NG-asymmetric
dimethylation of arginine residues (4, 5). Hmt1p may be the one and
only type I protein arginine N-methyltransferase present in
the yeast, because the mutation of the gene of S. cerevisiae eliminates many
NG,NG-dimethylarginine
residues (5). In contrast to the yeast, at least two active type
I arginine N-methyltransferases, PRMT1 and PRMT3, have been
identified in mammals (6, 7, 47). One of the fundamental observations
reported in recent years, as mentioned in the Introduction, is the
possibility of facilitating mRNA export from the nucleus into the
cytoplasm. In the process of the revelation of mRNA export, we
cloned HMT1 and AIR1 using Npl3p as a bait in the
two-hybrid screening. An in vitro binding assay showed that
Air1p interacts with the RGG domain of Npl3p bridged by Hmt1p. McBride
et al. (48) reported that the N-terminal E18V substitution of Hmt1p affected methylation of Npl3p but not of other substrates and
suggested that Glu18 is involved in substrate
binding or positioning. In support of this finding, the N-terminal
deletion mutant of Hmt1p used in this study, 2 (residues 56-348),
could not methylate Npl3p in vitro (data not shown).
The inhibitory effect of Air1p on the enzyme activity of Hmt1p was
detected by in vitro methylation assay of Npl3p. The
methylation of Npl3p is blocked by Air1p in a
dose-dependent manner, and overexpression of Air1p
inhibited the Hmt1p-dependent growth in vivo. In
this case, it is possible that Air1p suppresses the expression of Hmt1p followed by the elimination of the rescue by Hmt1p in an
npl3-17 strain. However, since overproduction of Air1p did
not affect the amount of exogenous Hmt1p introduced by a high copy
plasmid, the suppression of Hmt1p-dependent rescue by
overproduction of Air1p is not due to the reduced expression of Hmt1p.
Hmt1p has been shown to facilitate the export of Npl3p in
nucleocytoplasmic transport (20). Our observation that growth and
mRNA transport were affected in cells lacking
AIR1 and AIR2 suggests to us that the regulated
methylation of Npl3p may be crucial for mRNA transport. When we
checked the localization of the GFP-Npl3p in wild type and air1
air2 double disruptant, GFP-Npl3p was localized in the nucleus in
both strains, and any difference of the expression pattern was not
observed (data not shown). The regulatory mechanism of Air1p and Air2p
on mRNA transport should be further elucidated.
It should be noted that Liu and Dreyfuss (9) reported that arginine
methylation was not observed in yeast extracts when recombinant hnRNP
A1 was used as a substrate, the contrary to the extensive in
vivo methylation of hnRNPs in HeLa cells. The inconsistent
observations could be explained by the presence of endogenous
inhibitory factors like Air1p and Air2p in yeast. An unidentified
signal transduction system could be involved in the regulation of
protein methylation mediated by Hmt1p as suggested in mammalian cells
(1). PRMT1 has been reported to interact with interferon receptor and
to affect the proliferation induced by interferon (49). PRMT1 also
interacts with TIS21 and BTG1, which are immediate early genes and have
an antiproliferative effect, and the methylation activity was modulated
by the interaction (6).
Air1p and Air2p have sequence similarity, especially in their
N-terminal RING finger domain. The RING finger domain consisting of the
amino acid sequence
Cys-X2-Cys-X9-39-Cys-X1-3-His2-3-Cys-X2-Cys-X4-48-Cys-X2-Cys is a cysteine-rich zinc-binding domain ubiquitous in species ranging from plants to mammals and has been found in several proteins, which
have important physiological roles in various biological phenomena
(44). The RING finger domain is now believed to be a motif for
protein-protein interaction. We could not detect any homologous
proteins in data bases of other species, but some proteins have
conserved cysteine and histidine over the RING finger domain. Identification of the mammalian homologues of Air1p or Air2p may pave
the way to understand the signal-mediated regulation of
methyltransferases in mammals.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank P. A. Silver for the
npl3-17 strain and plasmid pGEX-HMT1 and for the expression
vector of GFP-Npl3p; M. Arisawa for plasmids of yeast selection
markers; N. Hayashi for the yeast cDNA library for two-hybrid
screening; Y. Mukai and S. Harashima for S. cerevisiae
strains and plasmids; T. Tani, E. Noguchi, T. Zama, and J. Nakabayashi
for useful technical comments; and H. Nakayama and S. Hashimoto for
helpful comments while preparing the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
A part of this work was performed in the SEEDS Laboratory of
Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. as a part of the research and
development project of the Industrial Science and Technology Program
supported by NEDO (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development).
This work was supported in part by the Research for the Future Program,
the Inamori Foundation, Nissan Science Foundation, the Mitsubishi
Foundation, and Grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and
Culture in Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
m.hagiwara.end@mri.tmd.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 13, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M004560200
2
Y. Mukai, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SAM, S-adenosyl-L-methionine;
hnRNP, heterogeneous
nuclear ribonucleoprotein;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
HA, hemagglutinin;
MOPS, 4-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
kb, kilobase(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aletta, J. M.,
Cimato, T. R.,
and Ettinger, M. J.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
89-91
|
| 2.
|
Paik, W. K.,
and Kim, S.
(1967)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
29,
14-20
|
| 3.
|
Lee, H. W.,
Kim, S.,
and Paik, W. K.
(1977)
Biochemistry
16,
78-85
|
| 4.
|
Henry, M. F.,
and Silver, P.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3668-3678
|
| 5.
|
Gary, J. D.,
Lin, W.-J.,
Yang, M. C.,
Herschman, H. R.,
and Clarke, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12585-12594
|
| 6.
|
Lin, W.-J.,
Gary, J. D.,
Yang, M. C.,
Clarke, S.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15034-15044
|
| 7.
|
Scott, H. S.,
Antonarakis, S. E.,
Lalioti, M. D.,
Rossier, C.,
Silver, P. A.,
and Henry, M. F.
(1998)
Genomics
48,
330-340
|
| 8.
|
Chen, D.,
Ma, H.,
Hong, H.,
Koh, S. S.,
Huang, S.-M.,
Schurter, B. T.,
Aswad, D. W.,
and Stallcup, M. R.
(1999)
Science
284,
2174-2177
|
| 9.
|
Liu, Q.,
and Dreyfuss, G.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2800-2808
|
| 10.
|
Dreyfuss, G.,
Matunis, M. J.,
Pinol-Roma, S.,
and Burd, C. G.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62,
289-321
|
| 11.
|
Krecic, A. M.,
and Swanson, M. S.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
363-371
|
| 12.
|
Amero, S. A.,
Raychaudhuri, G.,
Cass, C. L.,
van Venrooij, W. J.,
Habets, W. J.,
Krainer, A. R.,
and Beyer, A. L.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
8409-8413
|
| 13.
|
Lee, M. S.,
Henry, M.,
and Silver, P. A.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1233-1246
|
| 14.
|
Bossie, M. A.,
DeHoratius, C.,
Barcelo, G.,
and Silver, P. A.
(1992)
Mol. Biol. Cell
3,
875-893
|
| 15.
|
Kadowaki, T.,
Chen, S.,
Hitomi, M.,
Jacob, E.,
Kumagai, C.,
Liang, S.,
Schneiter, R.,
Singleton, D.,
Wisniewska, J.,
and Tartakoff, A. M.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
649-659
|
| 16.
|
Kiledjian, M.,
and Dreyfuss, G.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
2655-2664
|
| 17.
|
Mears, W. E.,
and Rice, S. A.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
7445-7453
|
| 18.
|
Siebel, C. W.,
and Guthrie, C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13641-13646
|
| 19.
|
Najbauer, J.,
Johnson, B. A.,
Young, A. L.,
and Aswad, D. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10501-10509
|
| 20.
|
Shen, E. C.,
Henry, M. F.,
Weiss, V. H.,
Valentini, S. R.,
Silver, P. A.,
and Lee, M. S.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
679-691
|
| 21.
|
Kessler, M. M.,
Henry, M. F.,
Shen, E.,
Zhao, J.,
Gross, S.,
Silver, P. A.,
and Moore, C. L.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2545-2556
|
| 22.
|
Michael, W. M.,
Choi, M.,
and Dreyfuss, G.
(1995)
Cell
83,
415-422
|
| 23.
|
Adams, A.,
Gottschling, D.,
Kaiser, C. A.,
and Stearns, T.
(1997)
Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 24.
|
Thomas, B. J.,
and Rothstein, R.
(1989)
Cell
56,
619-630
|
| 25.
|
Bartel, P. L.,
and Fields, S.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
254,
241-263
|
| 26.
|
Segref, A.,
Sharma, K.,
Doye, V.,
Hellwig, A.,
Huber, J.,
Luhrmann, R.,
and Hurt, E.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
3256-3271
|
| 27.
|
Kitada, K.,
Yamaguchi, E.,
and Arisawa, M.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
165,
203-206
|
| 28.
|
Durfee, T.,
Becherer, K.,
Chen, P. -L.,
Yeh, S.-H.,
Yang, Y.,
Kilburn, A. E.,
Lee, W.-H.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
555-569
|
| 29.
|
Williams, B. A.,
Sillaots, S.,
Tsang, A.,
and Storms, R.
(1996)
Curr. Genet.
30,
305-311
|
| 30.
|
Horvath, A.,
and Riezman, H.
(1994)
Yeast
10,
1305-1310
|
| 31.
|
Baudin, A.,
Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, O.,
Denouel, A.,
Lacroute, F.,
and Cullin, C.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3329-3330
|
| 32.
|
Tani, T.,
Derby, R. J.,
Hiraoka, Y.,
and Spector, D. L.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
1515-1534
|
| 33.
|
Bohm, S.,
Frishman, D.,
and Mewes, H. W.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
2464-2469
|
| 34.
|
Anderson, J. T.,
Wilson, S. M.,
Datar, K. V.,
and Swanson, M. S.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
2730-2741
|
| 35.
|
Wilson, S. M.,
Datar, K. V.,
Paddy, M. R.,
Swedlow, J. R.,
and Swanson, M. S.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1173-1184
|
| 36.
|
Lin, J.-J.,
and Zakian, V. A.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4906-4913
|
| 37.
|
Konkel, L. M. C.,
Enomoto, S.,
Chamberlain, E. M.,
McCune-Zierath, P.,
Iyadurai, S. J. P.,
and Berman, J.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5558-5562
|
| 38.
|
Girard, J. -P.,
Bagni, C.,
Caizergues-Ferrer, M.,
Amelric, F.,
and Lapeyre, B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18499-18506
|
| 39.
|
Barta, I.,
and Iggo, R.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
3800-3808
|
| 40.
|
Lee, W.-C.,
Zabetakis, D.,
and Melese, T.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
3865-3871
|
| 41.
|
Stanley, J. P.,
and Guthrie, C.
(1998)
Cell
92,
315-326
|
| 42.
|
Shirotori, A.,
Shibata, T.,
Arisawa, M.,
Hanaoka, F.,
Murakami, Y.,
and Eki, T.
(1999)
Yeast
15,
219-253
|
| 43.
|
Pan, C.,
and Mason, T. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8165-8171
|
| 44.
|
Cartegni, L.,
Maconi, M.,
Morandi, E.,
Cobianchi, F.,
Riva, S.,
and Biamonti, G.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
259,
337-348
|
| 45.
|
Borden, K. L.,
and Freemont, P. S.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
6,
395-401
|
| 46.
|
Gary, J. D.,
and Clarke, S.
(1998)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
61,
65-131
|
| 47.
|
Tang, J.,
Gary, J. D.,
Clarke, S.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16935-16945
|
| 48.
|
McBride, A. E.,
Weiss, V. H.,
Kim, H. K.,
Hogle, J. M.,
and Silver, P. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3128-3136
|
| 49.
|
Abramovich, C.,
Yakobson, B.,
Chebath, J.,
and Revel, M.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
260-266
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Bachand
Protein Arginine Methyltransferases: from Unicellular Eukaryotes to Humans
Eukaryot. Cell,
June 1, 2007;
6(6):
889 - 898.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Wessels, T. Srikantha, S. Yi, S. Kuhl, L. Aravind, and D. R. Soll
The Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond syndrome gene encodes an RNA-binding protein that localizes to the pseudopod of Dictyostelium amoebae during chemotaxis
J. Cell Sci.,
January 15, 2006;
119(2):
370 - 379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Savchenko, N. Krogan, J. R. Cort, E. Evdokimova, J. M. Lew, A. A. Yee, L. Sanchez-Pulido, M. A. Andrade, A. Bochkarev, J. D. Watson, et al.
The Shwachman-Bodian-Diamond Syndrome Protein Family Is Involved in RNA Metabolism
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 13, 2005;
280(19):
19213 - 19220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F.-M. Boisvert, J. Cote, M.-C. Boulanger, and S. Richard
A Proteomic Analysis of Arginine-methylated Protein Complexes
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
December 1, 2003;
2(12):
1319 - 1330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. Drees, B. Sundin, E. Brazeau, J. P. Caviston, G.-C. Chen, W. Guo, K. G. Kozminski, M. W. Lau, J. J. Moskow, A. Tong, et al.
A protein interaction map for cell polarity development
J. Cell Biol.,
August 6, 2001;
154(3):
549 - 576.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|