|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C000538200 on August 31, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 32906-32910, October 20, 2000
Clastogenic Effect of the Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type I Tax
Oncoprotein Correlates with Unstabilized DNA Breaks*
Franca
Majone § and
Kuan-Teh
Jeang
From the Department of Biology, University of Padova,
Padova 35131 Italy and the Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology,
NIAID, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, August 10, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Expression of the human T-cell leukemia virus
type I (HTLV-I) Tax oncoprotein rapidly engenders DNA damage as
reflected in a significant increase of micronuclei (MN) in cells. To
understand better this phenomenon, we have investigated the DNA content
of MN induced by Tax. Using an approach that we termed FISHI,
fluorescent in situ
hybridization and incorporation, we attempted
to characterize MN with centric or acentric DNA fragments for the
presence or absence of free 3'-OH ends. Free 3'-OH ends were defined as
those ends accessible to in situ addition of
digoxigenin-dUTP using terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase. MN were also assessed for centromeric sequences
using standard fluorescent in situ
hybridization (FISH). Combining these results, we
determined that Tax oncoprotein increased the frequency of MN
containing centric DNA with free 3'-OH and decreased the frequency of
MN containing DNA fragments that had incorporation-inaccessible
3'-ends. Recently, it has been suggested that intracellular DNA breaks
without detectable 3'-OH ends are stabilized by the protective addition
of telomeric caps, while breaks with freely detectable 3'-OH are
uncapped and are labile to degradation, incomplete replication, and
loss during cell division. Accordingly, based on increased detection of
free 3'-OH-containing DNA fragments, we concluded that HTLV-I Tax
interferes with protective cellular mechanism(s) used normally for
stabilizing DNA breaks.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
It remains incompletely understood as to what are the minimal
requirements needed to transform a mammalian cell (1). Despite this, it
suffices to say that salient hallmarks of cancer cells include genetic
and phenotypic instability. Hence, not surprisingly, it has been
suggested that human tumors may contain 100,000 or more mutations (2)
with genomic instability in cancers arising from two broad mechanisms:
loss of mismatch repair function and infidelity of chromosomal
segregation (reviewed in Ref. 3). In view of the link between mutations
and cancers, it is attractive to consider that perhaps transforming
viruses exert pathology through increasing cellular mutability.
Human T-cell leukemia virus type I
(HTLV-I)1 and the leukemia
engendered by this virus, adult T-cell leukemia (ATL), describe an
important model system for studying human cancers. ATL cells are well
known for heightened burden of damaged DNA (reviewed in Ref. 4).
Previously, we have implicated the HTLV-I-encoded oncoprotein, Tax, in
cellular DNA damage by correlating increased formation of micronuclei
(MN) in cells (5, 6) with the synthesis of this viral protein.
MN are small nuclei-like bodies found outside the main nucleus produced
as consequences of chromosomal damage (7, 8). They exist at a low
prevalence in cells ambiently and can be induced ex vivo by
genotoxic compounds with different mechanisms of action. Aneuploidogenic agents produce MN with whole chromosomes or centric chromosomal fragments, while clastogenic compounds induce MN that contain acentric fragments (8). MN induced by HTLV-I Tax was previously
verified by fluorescent stainings with human antikinetochore antibodies
(5) to contain both aneuploidogenic (i.e. kinetochore(+)) and clastogenic (i.e. kinetochore( )) changes (5). One
interpretation of these results is that this viral oncoprotein affects
both the mismatch repair (clastogenic) and the fidelity of chromosomal segregation (aneuploidogenic) functions postulated to be deficient in
human cancers. Mechanistically, the aneuploidogenic effect of Tax was
recently proposed to stem from its abrogation in cells of a human
mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint (9). As yet, the clastogenic effect
of Tax remains molecularly unexplained.
In yeast, several proteins, such as yKu (10) and SIR (11), have
recently been shown to associate with telomeric TG-rich repeats. These
proteins serve to protect the termini of eukaryotic chromosomes from
degradation and end-end fusion. Ku and SIR proteins can be released
from telomeres and be recruited rapidly to new breaks in chromosomes,
suggesting a role for these proteins also in the stabilization and
preservation of DNA ends generated by unexpected (and perhaps
exogenously induced) cleavages (11, 12). Indeed, yeast strains
deficient for yKu and SIR proteins are hypersensitive to clastogenic
agents (11, 12). One corollary of these observations is that termini of
new breaks unprotected by telomeres with associated Ku, SIR, and/or
other factors are labile. Such ends may not be efficiently repaired and
may progress to larger lesions ultimately resulting in gross
chromosomal aberrations which could provide the initiating basis for
transformation (3).
To explain its clastogenic effect, we asked here whether DNA breaks
found in the presence of Tax exist with unprotected (free 3'-OH) or
telomere-capped ends. Using in situ cytogenetic techniques (FISH and FISHI) and probes specific for centromeres or telomeres (13,
14), we have characterized the nature of damaged DNA in Tax-expressing
cells. Our finding that Tax disproportionately induces unprotected
(free 3'-OH) DNA ends provides a molecular explanation for the
clastogenic effect of this oncoprotein.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Cultures--
HeLa cells were cultured as monolayers in
Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (Life Technologies, Inc.)
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) and
were maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at
37 °C. Suspension T-cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 with 10%
fetal calf serum.
Micronuclei Assay--
For MN assay, suspensions of cells were
prepared by trypsinization of log-phase culture of a HeLa clone
permanently transfected with a cytomegalovirus-Tax-expressing
plasmid. Cells were divided into 40-mm dishes with each dish receiving
8 × 105 cells in 10 ml of medium. The cells were
collected 48 h later by trypsinization and were washed in
phosphate-buffered saline and fixed in Carnoy's fixative
(methanol/acetic acid 3:1, v/v) for 15 min. Interphase
preparations were obtained following the procedures described
previously (7, 8).
FISH to Detect Centromeres and Telomeres--
Centromeric probe
(5'-TTG AGG CCC TTC GTT GGA AAC GGG AAT ATC TTG AGG CCC TTC GTT GGA AAC
GGG AAT ATC; Ref. 13) was synthesized and labeled with DIG-dUTP.
Telomeric probe was either purchased commercially (Oncor) or
synthesized as six repetitive copies of the 5'-TTAGGG-3' hexamers in
sense or antisense orientations. Two-color FISH was applied to detect
simultaneously centromeric and telomeric DNA sequences in interphase
preparations of HeLa cells. Cells cultured on slides were fixed in 70%
formamide in 2× SSC (20× SSC = 0.3 M trisodium
citrate dihydrate and 3 M NaCl) at 70 °C for 2 min. The
samples were then chilled in 70% ethanol at 20 °C. After
dehydration and air drying, 30 µl of denaturated (heated at 70 °C
for 5 min) hybridization mixture (50% formamide in 2× SSC) containing
2 ng/µl DIG-labeled probe were layered onto each slide.
Coverslips were applied and sealed with rubber cement, and
hybridization was carried out for 16 h at 37 °C in a moist chamber. Afterward, the slides were washed in 50% formamide in 2× SSC
at 43 °C (15 min) and then in 2× SSC at 37 °C (8 min) followed by brief washing in TNT (0.1M Tris-HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, pH
7.5, 0.05% Tween 20) and treatment with 100 µl of TNB (0.1 M Tris-HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.5, 0.5% blocking
reagent; Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Milan, Italy) for 30 min
at 37 °C to prevent nonspecific antibody binding. After coverslip
removal, DIG-labeled sequences were detected using a fluorescence-based
amplification of signal. This was achieved by incubation with mouse
monoclonal anti-DIG antibody (0.5 µg/ml), DIG-conjugated sheep
anti-mouse antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, 2 µg/ml) and
FITC-conjugated sheep anti-DIG antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals,
2 µg/ml). Final 3 × 5-min washes with TNT were followed by
dehydration of the slides with ethanol. Slides were counterstained with
0.5 µg/ml propidium iodide in an antifade solution and visualized using wavelength-specific filters (Zeiss, filter set 25). DIG-labeled centromeric DNA sequences (15 ng) and biotinylated telomeric DNA probe (15 ng) were simultaneously hybridized to interphase spreads. The
DIG-labeled centromeric probe was detected with TRITC (red) following the amplification procedure described above. The biotinylated telomeric probe was labeled with FITC (green) by incubation with FITC-conjugated avidin (Sigma, Milan, Italy) and up to three rounds of
amplification by biotinylated anti-avidin (Oncor). Nuclei and micronuclei were counterstained using DAPI (blue) in an antifade solution and viewed through specific filter (Zeiss, filter set 25). The
three fluorescent dyes (FITC, TRITC, and DAPI) could be simultaneously
viewed and photographed through a triple bandpass filter (Zeiss, filter
set 25). Photographs of nuclei and micronuclei were taken on Kodak P
1600 color slide film (5-10-s exposure) on a Zeiss Axiosce microscope
using a 100 × 1.3 n.a. objective. For each hybridization,
more than 3000 samplings were scored.
FISHI--
FISHI detects simultaneously a DNA probe (visualized
by standard FISH) and the presence of free 3'-OH DNA ends (visualized by in situ incorporation of DIG-dUTP). We used a
biotinylated centromeric DNA probe, an oligomeric DNA probe labeled
with biotin, and terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase enzyme. For some
experiments, the 3'-end of the probe was blocked with cordycepin
(3'-deoxyadenosine). FISHI was performed as described above for FISH up
to the post-hybridization wash steps. At that point, the slides were
washed in PBD (phosphate-buffered detergent, Oncor) and were then
treated for in situ incorporation using terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase enzyme (TdT). As substrates for TdT,
DIG-11-dUTP, and DIG-dATP were used. This incorporation reaction
contained the following: 10 µl of a buffer with 1 M
potassium cacodylate (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 125 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.6 (4 °C), 1.25 µg/ml bovine serum albumin, 10 mM CoCl2; 0.2 µl of a solution (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) containing TdT (25 units/µl), 1 mM EDTA, 4 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50% glycerol (v/v), pH 6.6 (4 °C); 1 µl of DIG-11-dUTP (1 mM)
mixture (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and 38 µl of distilled water
to a final volume of 50 µl. Cells were incubated in this reaction
buffer at 37 °C for 1 h in a Hepes-buffered saline moist
environment. Then the slides were treated with Hepes-buffered saline
containing 0.1% Triton X-100, and 0.5% bovine serum albumin
visualization of DIG-dUTP was obtained by incubation (30 min at room
temperature) with anti-DIG antibody (1:50) labeled with FITC (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). Finally 3 × 5-min washes with 0.1%
Triton and 0.5% bovine serum albumin in Hepes-buffered saline were
performed. Visualization of biotinylated centromeric DNA probe was
obtained by incubation with Texas Red-conjugated avidin (Sigma)
followed by three rounds of amplification using biotinylated
anti-avidin (Oncor). Slides were counterstained with DAPI in an
antifade solution and photographed through specific filters. For each
data point, over 3000 samplings were counted; all points were
replicated in at least two independent experiments. Statistical
analyses on the frequencies of cytogenetic effects between control, and
cells expressing Tax were quantitated using the G test (15).
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Characterization of Centromere- and Telomere-specific
Probes--
To characterize the nature of DNA damage induced by Tax
(i.e. centric, acentric, telomeric, nontelomeric fragments),
we first assessed probes to be used in FISH. Fig.
1 (top) shows HeLa cells in
metaphase stained with propidium iodide (left) followed by FISH with a centromere-specific oligonucleotide (right). The
DNA probe contained alphoid sequences, which specifically recognize the
centromeres of human and mouse chromosomes (13). Hybridization by probe
was expected to produce a signal for every chromosome, and indeed the
visualized signals were located at precise positions expected for
centromeres (Fig. 1, top right). Next, we
verified our telomere probe. Consistent with that previously reported
(14), the telomere probe provided two clearly unambiguous telomeric signals for virtually all chromosomes (98% of expected telomeres were
identified; Fig. 1, bottom right).

View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
In situ characterization of
centromeric and telomeric probes. Top, metaphase
chromosomes of HeLa cells after FISH with a centromeric DNA probe
( CEN-B) labeled with DIG-dUTP were counterstained with propidium
iodide (0.3 µg/ml); left, visualization of propidium
iodide; right, fluorescent visualization of centromeric
probe (yellow). Bottom, metaphase HeLa cells
stained with propidium iodide and processed for FISH with a telomeric
DNA probe; left, visualization of propidium iodide;
right, fluorescent visualization of telomeric signals (dots
at the ends of chromosomes).
|
|
FISHI of Cells--
FISH can reveal whether damaged DNA
contains/lacks centromeres and/or telomeres. In addition to this
information, we wanted to understand more about the state of DNA breaks
in Tax-associated MN. Recent findings in eukaryotic systems (11, 12,
16-19) suggest that a normal response by cells to de novo
DNA strand breakages is to stabilize breaks by the addition of a
telomeric cap, which contains both telomere repeats and
telomere-associated proteins. Telomeric capping could be envisioned as
a first step in the repair process, protecting new breaks from further
instabilities and progressive enlargements. Based on previous knowledge
of clastogenic damage produced by Tax (5, 6), we surmised that this
oncoprotein could subvert the protective telomeric capping mechanism.
To address the above hypothesis, we asked whether it could be
determined if DNA breaks are/are not capped. We reasoned that capped
ends might be relatively refractory to incorporation of DIG-dUTP by
TdT, while noncapped ends would be more accessible. If one could couple
incorporation of DIG-dUTP with standard FISH analysis (i.e.
FISHI), potentially one could define whether DNA fragments are centric,
acentric, telomere-containing, or telomere-free, as well as whether the
broken ends might be capped or uncapped. Currently, to our
knowledge, simultaneous visualization of FISH with TdT end
incorporation (i.e. FISHI) has not been done. To establish
conditions for FISHI, a biotin-dUTP-labeled probe for detecting
acrocentric chromosomes was hybridized to metaphase HeLa nucleus (Fig.
2B). The same nucleus was then
subjected to DIG-dUTP incorporation using TdT (Fig. 2C) to
label free 3'-OH associated with the ends of the hybridized probes (see
schematic, Fig. 2, top). A merged visualization of
probe-specific signal with DIG-specific signal showed tight
co-localization (Fig. 2D), verifying that FISHI technique
(TdT incorporation performed simultaneously with FISH) could indeed
specifically identify free 3'-OH DNA ends.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Verification of FISHI technique. A
biotin dUTP-labeled probe to detect acrocentric chromosomes coupled
with DIG-dUTP incorporation using terminal transferase to detect 3'-OH
DNA free ends was used on metaphase HeLa cells. Top,
schematic representation of the detection procedure. Fluorescent
labeled probe is expected to hybridize in a sequence-specific manner to
chromosomes. The free 3'-OH end of the probe can then be additionally
detected by terminal transferase-mediated incorporation of DIG-dUTP.
Presence of the DIG moiety can be visualized independently.
A, staining of the metaphase cell by DAPI. B, the
same cell after sequence-specific hybridization of probe and
visualization of the probe by avidin Texas Red conjugate
(red fluorescence). C, in situ
terminal transferase-mediated incorporation of DIG-dUTP and
visualization by anti-DIG antibody labeled with FITC (green
fluorescence). D, merged image using a specific filter of
the signals from B and C. Since the acrocentric
centromeric probe has a free 3'-OH end, one can observe an overlap
between the signal from the biotin-labeled probe (B) and the
signal from the in situ incorporated DIG-dUTP
(C). White arrowheads serve as reference
points.
|
|
More than the ability to detect 3'-OH ends associated with probes used
for FISH, our goal was to visualize intrachromosomal breaks with
accessible 3'-OH. To distinguish probe-associated from intrachromosomal
TdT signals, we next "sealed" each hybridizing oligonucleotide with
one molecule of cordycepin (3'-deoxyadenosine) at its 3'-end. The
presence of an H instead of an OH group in cordycepin effectively
eliminates incorporation at the 3'-ends of probes. Hence, TdT-mediated
incorporation of DIG-dUTP, if any, would occur elsewhere, presumptively
at damaged cellular DNA with free 3'-OH (Fig.
3, top schematic).
Accordingly, we performed FISHI using cordycepin-sealed biotin-labeled
centromeric DNA probe on interphase HeLa nuclei (Fig. 3). Here,
incorporated DIG-dUTP appeared as green spots, while centromeric probe
signal was yellow. Consistent with the inability of cordycepin probes
to incorporate DIG-dUTP, the green and yellow signals did not overlap
(Fig. 3B). These results established an ability to
characterize intracellular DNA by FISH and TdT end incorporation
(FISHI) simultaneously.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
FISHI technique using a centromeric
biotin-labeled DNA probe on nuclei of interphase HeLa cells. The
probe was constructed to have one molecule of cordycepin
(3'-deoxyadenosine) at its 3'-end. An H instead of an OH group in
cordycepin at the 3'-end of the probe effectively prevents further
incorporation to this end and ensures that terminal
transferase-mediated incorporation of DIG-dUTP takes place elsewhere,
presumably at damaged cellular DNA ends with free 3'-OH.
Top, diagrammatic representation of the incorporation
schema. A, DAPI-stained nuclei. B, visualization
of the same nuclei after probe hybridization and terminal
transferase-mediated incorporation of DIG-dUTP. DIG signal is
green, and centromeric probe signal is yellow.
Consistent with the inability of cordycepin-capped probes to
incorporate DIG-dUTP, the green and yellow
signals do not overlap. Open and filled
arrowheads point to yellow and green spots,
respectively.
|
|
We next ascertained that our TdT-mediated DIG-dUTP incorporation assay
could quantitatively reflect intracellular DNA breaks. Treatment of
cells with clastogenic agents should produce strand breakages, which
should correlate with increased signals from TdT incorporation. We
incubated HeLa cells with mitomycin C, an inter-/intrastrand
cross-linking agent known to cause DNA breaks (20). Compared with
mock-treated cells (Fig. 4A),
treatment with 0.1 µM mitomycin C for 24 h led to a
10-20-fold increase in TdT-mediated signals (Fig. 4B),
providing a correlation between expected increase in strand breakages
with heightened DIG-dUTP incorporation.

View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
DIG-dUTP incorporation is increased after
treatment of cells with DNA-damaging agent mitomycin C
(MMC). A, ambient ( MMC)
DIG-dUTP incorporation in HeLa cells. B, DIG-dUTP
incorporation after treatment with 0.1 µM mitomycin C
(+MMC) for 24 h. Arrowheads point to
examples of incorporated DIG-dUTP.
|
|
Characterization of DNA Damage in Tax-expressing Epithelial and
Lymphoid Cells--
The above conditions established for FISH and
FISHI afforded us techniques to analyze better Tax-induced DNA damage.
Previously, we had used transiently transfected cells to study DNA
damage (5, 6). However, in such approach, efficiency of transfection could not be higher than 10-20% of all cells (5, 6). To more
reproducibly assess effects, we created a HeLa-Tax cell line, using neomycin resistance co-selection, which constitutively expresses an integrated cytomegalovirus-Tax gene (data not shown).
Consistent with our previous findings (5), the selected HeLa-Tax cells had a 6-10% increased prevalence of MN over parental HeLa cells (data
not shown).
MN from HeLa-Tax and ambient MN from HeLa cells were assessed for the
nature of their DNA content. By definition MN contain damaged DNA. We
surveyed MN for the presence of centromeric (Cen), telomeric (Te), and
TdT-accessible incorporation (TI) of DIG-dUTP. Fig.
5A shows that approximately
25% of Tax-induced MN contained centromeric and telomeric signals
(Cen(+)Te(+)), indicating with high probability the presence in MN of
an intact whole chromosome (group 1). This fraction was not
significantly different from that observed for control cells
(C, Fig. 5A). Additionally, in Tax-expressing
cells, the fraction of MN without centromeric and telomeric
(Cen( )Te( ); Fig. 5A, group 4) signals, which
likely represents acentric interstitial fragments, was also
insignificantly different from that for control cells. Based on these
results, we concluded that neither MN containing complete chromosomes
(e.g. Cen(+)Te(+)) nor MN with acentric interstitial
fragments (Cen( )Te( )) are Tax-specific consequences in HeLa cells.
On the other hand, Tax-expressing cells, compared with controls, had
significantly higher frequency of Cen(+)Te( ) MN (Fig. 5A, group
2). Hence, under these experimental conditions, the
aneuploidogenic effects of Tax (9) are largely restricted to centric
fragments of chromosomes and not to intact chromosomes, since the
fraction of Cen(+)Te(+) MN was not substantially different in
Tax-expressing versus control cells (Fig. 5A,
group 1). Last, the type of DNA damage described by
telomere-only MN (Cen( )Te(+); Fig. 5A, group 3)
was significantly less frequent in Tax-expressing cells. These MN can
contain either the natural end(s) of a chromosome or an interstitial
fragment which has been "repaired" by telomeric capping. The latter
would be consistent with the model that eukaryotic chromosomal breaks are "healed" by the addition of telomeric repeats (11, 12, 16-19)
with "telomerized" ends being more stable than counterpart unprotected ends. This reduced frequency of telomere-alone signals suggests a Tax oncoprotein-mediated repression of the telomeric capping
function.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Quantitation of Tax-induced DNA damage in
micronuclei from epithelial and lymphoid cells. A,
characterization of micronuclei in HeLa control (C) or
HeLa-Tax-expressing (Tax) cells for the presence (+) or
absence ( ) of centromeres (Cen) and/or telomeres
(Te). Centromere-specific and telomere-specific oligomeric
probes were used by FISH to assess simultaneously the presence of
centromeres and telomeres. Statistical significance (G test, Ref.
15): **, p < 0.001. B, frequency of
micronuclei in HeLa and HeLa-Tax-expressing cells that incorporate
DIG-dUTP in situ (TI). Statistical significance
(G test, Ref. 15): **, p < 0.01. C,
characterization of DNA by FISHI in Jurkat T-cell line and
HTLV-I-transformed Tax-expressing T-cell, C8166-45, for the presence
(+) or absence ( ) of centromeres (Cen) and/or in
situ incorporation of DIG-dUTP (TI). Statistical
significance (G test, Ref. 15): **, p < 0.01.
|
|
The reduced frequency of MN with telomere-alone signal and the
increased frequency of MN with centromere-alone signal (Fig. 5A) could potentially be explained mechanistically through
the de novo generation of interstitial fragments that are
not repaired by telomeric capping. To address this possibility in
greater detail, we next queried for the status of TdT incorporation
(TI) in Tax and control MN (Fig. 5B). Because TI
of DIG-dUTP requires accessible 3'-OH DNA ends, MN negative for TI have
chromosomal DNA with inaccessible 3'-OH ends. One cause of
inaccessibility would be if the ends were capped by telomeric repeats
with associated proteins (11, 12, 16-19). We, thus, interrogated
Tax-expressing cells for frequency of MN, which were either positive
(TI+; Fig. 5B, groups 1 and 3) or negative (TI ; Fig. 5B,
groups 2 and 4) for incorporation of DIG-dUTP.
The frequency of TI( ) MN in HeLa-Tax cells was indeed found to be
significantly lower than that observed for control cells. Hence, one
interpretation is that DNA breaks in control, but not Tax, cells are
stabilized by telomeric capping. Consistent with this interpretation, a
significant difference between control and Tax cells for Cen(+)TI( )
MN (Fig. 5B, group 2) was also observed.
To check that findings in epithelial cells also generally hold for
T-lymphocytes (the relevant cell types for HTLV-I), we compared DNA
damage (Fig. 5C) in Jurkat (a transformed T-cell line
unrelated to HTLV-I) and HTLV-I-transformed C8166-45 cells, which
express abundant amounts of Tax protein (21). In TI readouts, Tax-expressing T-cells (C8166-45) compared with Jurkat cells showed statistically significant increased frequency of TI(+) MN (Fig. 5C, group 3) and decreased frequency of
Cen( )TI( ) MN (Fig. 5C, group 4). Thus, as in
HeLa cells (Fig. 5, A and B), Tax expression in
T-cells increases substantially TdT-mediated DIG-dUTP
incorporation, supporting a general property of this oncoprotein in
abrogating intracellular telomeric capping at DNA breaks.
Here, we describe a FISHI technique to study the nature of DNA damage
induced by a retroviral oncoprotein, Tax. In cells, based on the
presence/absence of in situ incorporation at the 3'-ends of
DNA fragments and on the simultaneous hybridization of
centromeric/telomeric probe, we could define several classes of DNA
damage, including whole chromosomes (Cen(+)Te(+)TI( )), centric
fragment (Cen(+)TI(+)), and acentric fragment (Cen( )). A salient
observation from our work is that in situ incorporation of
DIG-dUTP correlated negatively with in situ hybridization by telomere-specific probe. Thus, relative ability to generate a TI signal
is indicative of a telomere-free DNA break, while telomeric capping (as
indicated by positive hybridization to telomere-specific probe), which
is thought to stabilize breaks, adversely affects TI.
Relevant to cancer biology, our findings here help to extend generally
the idea that retroviral oncogenes, like mutagens, may work commonly
through heightened genomic mutability to effect transformation.
Specifically, regarding HTLV-I and Tax, the current results help to
explain the clastogenic changes in ATL cells not resolved by a previous
study (9). Thus, FISH and FISHI findings mutually confirm and reveal
that in Tax-expressing cells there is a significant decrease in the
frequency of centric fragments with accessible 3'-OH DNA ends (FISHI;
Fig. 5B, group 2) and a significant increase in
centric fragments without telomeric signals (FISH; Fig. 5A,
group 2). There was also a significant decrease in frequency
of acentric fragments with telomeres (FISH; Fig. 5A,
group 3) and acentric DNA without DIG-dUTP incorporation
(FISHI; Fig. 5B, group 4). Collectively, these
findings indicate that the increased prevalence of DNA strand breaks
seen in ATL and in Tax-expressing cells is less likely explained by
oncogene-induced increased incidence in strand breakages as by
oncogene-mediated suppression of a DNA end-stabilizing mechanism
(i.e. telomeric capping). This study provides the first
detailed characterization of DNA breaks induced by a viral oncoportein.
Our conclusions add to the growing body of evidence of an operationally
defined mutator phenotype for Tax-expressing cells (22-25).
Future investigations will help to shed further light on the ensemble
of cellular factors impinged upon by Tax in generating this phenotype.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank H. Iha, T. Kasai, K. Kibler, Y. Iwanaga, Y. Wu, and V. Yedavalli for critical readings of manuscript
and L. Lin for preparation of manuscript and figures.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biology, Viale
G. Colombo 3, 35131 Padova, Italy. Tel.: 39-49-827-6290; Fax:
39-49-827-6280; E-mail: majone@civ.bio.unipd.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 31, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000538200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HTLV-I, human T-cell
leukemia virus type I;
ATL, adult T-cell leukemia;
MN, micronuclei;
FISH, fluorescent in situ
hybridization;
FISHI, fluorescent
in situ hybridization and
incorporation;
DIG, digoxigenin;
FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate;
TRITC, tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate;
DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole;
Tdt, terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase
enzyme;
Cen, centromeric);
Te, telomeric;
TI, TdT-accessible
incorporation.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Li, R.,
Sonik, A.,
Stindl, R.,
Rasnick, D.,
and Duesberg, P.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
3236-3241
|
| 2.
|
Perucho, M.
(1996)
Biol. Chem.
377,
675-684
|
| 3.
|
Loeb, K. R.,
and Loeb, L. A.
(2000)
Carcinogenesis
21,
379-385
|
| 4.
|
Kibler, K. V.,
and Jeang, K. T.
(1999)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
91,
903-904
|
| 5.
|
Majone, F.,
Semmes, O. J.,
and Jeang, K. T.
(1993)
Virology
193,
456-459
|
| 6.
|
Semmes, O. J.,
Majone, F.,
Cantemir, C.,
Turchetto, L.,
Hjelle, B.,
and Jeang, K. T.
(1996)
Virology
217,
373-379
|
| 7.
|
Majone, F.,
Brunetti, R.,
Fumagalli, O.,
Gabriele, M.,
and Levis, A. G.
(1990)
Mutat. Res.
224,
147-151
|
| 8.
|
Majone, F.,
Tonetto, S.,
Soligo, C.,
and Panozzo, M.
(1992)
Teratog. Carcinog. Mutage.
12,
155-166
|
| 9.
|
Jin, D. Y.,
Spencer, F.,
and Jeang, K. T.
(1998)
Cell
93,
1-20
|
| 10.
|
Driller, L.,
Wellinger, R. J.,
Larrivee, M.,
Kremmer, E.,
Jaklin, S.,
and Feldmann, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
24921-24927
|
| 11.
|
Martin, S. G.,
Laroche, T.,
Suka, N.,
Grunstein, M.,
and Gasser, S. M.
(1999)
Cell
97,
621-633
|
| 12.
|
Matsumoto, T.,
Fukui, K.,
Niwa, O.,
Sugawara, N.,
Szostak, J. W.,
and Yanagida, M.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
4424-4430
|
| 13.
|
Matera, A. G.,
and Ward, D. C.
(1993)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
1,
535-539
|
| 14.
|
Miller, M.,
and Nusse, M.
(1993)
Mutagenesis
8,
35-41
|
| 15.
|
Sokal, P.,
and Rohlf, F. J.
(1991)
Biometry
, Freeman, San Francisco, CA
|
| 16.
|
Pologe, L. G.,
and Ravrech, J. W.
(1988)
Cell
55,
869-874
|
| 17.
|
Gilley, D.,
Preer, J. R., Jr.,
Aufderheide, K. J.,
and Polisky, B.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
4765-4772
|
| 18.
|
Kamper, J.,
Meinhardt, F.,
Gunge, N.,
and Esser, K.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
3931-3937
|
| 19.
|
Yu, G. L.,
and Blackburn, E. H.
(1991)
Cell
67,
823-832
|
| 20.
|
Fiumicino, S.,
Martinelli, S.,
Colussi, C.,
Aquilina, G.,
Leonetti, C.,
Crescenzi, M.,
and Bignami, M.
(2000)
Int. J. Cancer
85,
590-596
|
| 21.
|
Jeang, K. T.,
Derse, D.,
Matocha, M.,
and Sharma, O.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
6277-6278
|
| 22.
|
Jeang, K. T.,
Widen, S. G.,
Semmes, O. J.,
and Wilson, S. H.
(1990)
Science
247,
1082-1084
|
| 23.
|
Kao, S. Y.,
and Marriott, S. J.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
4299-4304
|
| 24.
|
Miyake, H.,
Suzuki, T.,
Hirai, H.,
and Yoshida, M.
(1999)
Virology
253,
155-161
|
| 25.
|
Philpott, S. M.,
and Buehring, G. C.
(1999)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
91,
933-942
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Durkin, X. Guo, K. A. Fryrear, V. T. Mihaylova, S. K. Gupta, S. M. Belgnaoui, A. Haoudi, G. M. Kupfer, and O. J. Semmes
HTLV-1 Tax Oncoprotein Subverts the Cellular DNA Damage Response via Binding to DNA-dependent Protein Kinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 26, 2008;
283(52):
36311 - 36320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Liu, L. Yang, L. Zhang, B. Liu, R. Merling, Z. Xia, and C.-Z. Giam
Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Infection Leads to Arrest in the G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle
J. Virol.,
September 1, 2008;
82(17):
8442 - 8455.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. K. Lindberg, G. C.-M. Falck, H. Jarventaus, and H. Norppa
Characterization of chromosomes and chromosomal fragments in human lymphocyte micronuclei by telomeric and centromeric FISH
Mutagenesis,
September 1, 2008;
23(5):
371 - 376.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. T. Mihaylova, A. M. Green, M. Khurgel, O. J. Semmes, and G. M. Kupfer
Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus I Tax Protein Sensitizes p53-Mutant Cells to DNA Damage
Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2008;
68(12):
4843 - 4852.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Gupta, X. Guo, S. S. Durkin, K. F. Fryrear, M. D. Ward, and O. J. Semmes
Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Oncoprotein Prevents DNA Damage-induced Chromatin Egress of Hyperphosphorylated Chk2
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 5, 2007;
282(40):
29431 - 29440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Durkin, M. D. Ward, K. A. Fryrear, and O. J. Semmes
Site-specific Phosphorylation Differentiates Active from Inactive Forms of the Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Oncoprotein
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 20, 2006;
281(42):
31705 - 31712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Gatza and S. J. Marriott
Genotoxic Stress and Cellular Stress Alter the Subcellular Distribution of Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax through a CRM1-Dependent Mechanism.
J. Virol.,
July 1, 2006;
80(13):
6657 - 6668.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-M. Peloponese Jr. and K.-T. Jeang
Role for Akt/Protein Kinase B and Activator Protein-1 in Cellular Proliferation Induced by the Human T-cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Oncoprotein
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 31, 2006;
281(13):
8927 - 8938.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bolognesi, F. Martini, M. Tognon, R. Filiberti, M. Neri, E. Perrone, E. Landini, P. A. Canessa, G. P. Ivaldi, P. Betta, et al.
A Molecular Epidemiology Case Control Study on Pleural Malignant Mesothelioma
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
July 1, 2005;
14(7):
1741 - 1746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-M. Peloponese Jr., H. Iha, V. R. K. Yedavalli, A. Miyazato, Y. Li, K. Haller, M. Benkirane, and K.-T. Jeang
Ubiquitination of Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus Type 1 Tax Modulates Its Activity
J. Virol.,
November 1, 2004;
78(21):
11686 - 11695.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Yoshizuka, R. Moriuchi, T. Mori, K. Yamada, S. Hasegawa, T. Maeda, T. Shimada, Y. Yamada, S. Kamihira, M. Tomonaga, et al.
An Alternative Transcript Derived from the Trio Locus Encodes a Guanosine Nucleotide Exchange Factor with Mouse Cell-transforming Potential
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 15, 2004;
279(42):
43998 - 44004.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-T. Jeang, C.-z. Giam, F. Majone, and M. Aboud
Life, Death, and Tax: Role of HTLV-I Oncoprotein in Genetic Instability and Cellular Transformation
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 30, 2004;
279(31):
31991 - 31994.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Jiang, Y. Zhao, W.-Y. Chan, S. Vercauteren, E. Pang, S. Kennedy, F. Nicolini, A. Eaves, and C. Eaves
Deregulated expression in Ph+ human leukemias of AHI-1, a gene activated by insertional mutagenesis in mouse models of leukemia
Blood,
May 15, 2004;
103(10):
3897 - 3904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-C. Twizere, V. Kruys, L. Lefebvre, A. Vanderplasschen, D. Collete, C. Debacq, W. S. Lai, J.-C. Jauniaux, L. R. Bernstein, O. J. Semmes, et al.
Interaction of Retroviral Tax Oncoproteins With Tristetraprolin and Regulation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Expression
J Natl Cancer Inst,
December 17, 2003;
95(24):
1846 - 1859.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Norppa and G. C.-M. Falck
What do human micronuclei contain?
Mutagenesis,
May 1, 2003;
18(3):
221 - 233.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. K. Lee, B.-C. Kim, J. N. Brady, K.-T. Jeang, and S.-J. Kim
Human T-cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Tax Inhibits Transforming Growth Factor-beta Signaling by Blocking the Association of Smad Proteins with Smad-binding Element
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 6, 2002;
277(37):
33766 - 33775.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-H. Liang, T. Geisbert, Y. Yao, S. H. Hinrichs, and C.-Z. Giam
Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Oncoprotein Tax Promotes S-Phase Entry but Blocks Mitosis
J. Virol.,
March 19, 2002;
76(8):
4022 - 4033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|