Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006328200 on August 9, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 33059-33067, October 20, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/42/33059    most recent
M006328200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Commins, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gettys, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Commins, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gettys, T. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Central Leptin Regulates the UCP1 and ob Genes in Brown and White Adipose Tissue via Different beta -Adrenoceptor Subtypes*

Scott P. ComminsDagger , Patricia M. Watson§, Nancy Levin, Rudolph J. Beiler§, and Thomas W. GettysDagger §||

From the Departments of § Medicine and Dagger  Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425 and  Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, California 91320

Received for publication, July 17, 2000


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The three known subtypes of beta -adrenoreceptors (beta 1-AR, beta 2-AR, and beta 3-AR) are differentially expressed in brown and white adipose tissue and mediate peripheral responses to central modulation of sympathetic outflow by leptin. To assess the relative roles of the beta -AR subtypes in mediating leptin's effects on adipocyte gene expression, mice with a targeted disruption of the beta 3-adrenoreceptor gene (beta 3-AR KO) were treated with vehicle or the beta 1/beta 2-AR selective antagonist, propranolol (20 µg/g body weight/day) prior to intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of leptin (0.1 µg/g body weight/day). Leptin produced a 3-fold increase in UCP1 mRNA in brown adipose tissue of wild type (FVB/NJ) and beta 3-AR KO mice. The response was unaltered by propranolol in wild type mice, but was completely blocked by this antagonist in beta 3-AR KO mice. In contrast, ICV leptin had no effect on leptin mRNA in either epididymal or retroperitoneal white adipose tissue (WAT) from beta 3-AR KOs. Moreover, propranolol did not block the ability of exogenous leptin to reduce leptin mRNA in either WAT depot site of wild type mice. These results demonstrate that the beta 3-AR is required for leptin-mediated regulation of ob mRNA expression in WAT, but is interchangeable with the beta 1/beta 2-ARs in mediating leptin's effect on UCP1 mRNA expression in brown adipose tissue.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In mice the absence of leptin (ob/ob) or its functional receptor (db/db) produces a complex metabolic syndrome characterized by hyperphagia, endocrine abnormalities, and morbid obesity (1). Deposition of excess body fat occurs even when food intake is controlled, suggesting that an important function of leptin is to regulate energy balance through modulation of metabolic efficiency. This view is supported by studies in ob/ob mice showing that leptin-injected animals lose more weight than pair-fed vehicle-injected littermates (2, 3). Of particular interest is the observation that leptin-induced weight loss occurs specifically in adipose tissue with little effect in other tissues (3, 4). The loss of adipose tissue is associated with an increase in fat oxidation, and the associated shift in fuel selection can be measured as a decrease in the respiratory quotient during leptin repletion (5, 6). Thus, adipose tissue is an important target of leptin action and the primary effect is a shift from fat storage to fat mobilization and oxidation.

This leptin-mediated shift in adipocyte function involves a coordinated change in gene expression. Two mechanisms have been postulated and include both centrally mediated effects and direct effects through functional leptin receptors (Ob-Rb) on the adipocyte (7-9). It should be noted, however, that although supraphysiologic levels of leptin are capable of producing significant direct effects on adipose tissue (10, 11), increments of plasma leptin in the physiological range are thought to act primarily through receptors in the hypothalamus (10). Occupancy of hypothalamic leptin receptors promotes activation of the sympathetic nervous system (12-15), and recent studies using surgical (16), chemical (17), and transgenic approaches (18) have shown that norepinephrine is required for leptin effects on gene expression in both brown and white adipose tissue (19-22). Thus, several lines of evidence support an emerging consensus that norepinephrine represents the peripheral signal linking hypothalamic leptin receptors to leptin-dependent changes in adipocyte gene expression.

Occupancy of each of the three known beta -adrenoreceptor (beta -AR)1 subtypes leads to activation of adenylyl cyclase in adipose tissue (23), but the combination of unequal expression and differing affinities for endogenous agonists has made it challenging to assess the relative contributions of each receptor subtype in various physiological states. Recent studies also demonstrate that beta -adrenoreceptor subtypes may be differentially coupled to various functions within the adipocyte (24-26). Therefore, we have attempted to identify the beta -adrenoreceptor subtype(s) that mediate the effects of leptin on gene expression in various adipose tissue depot sites. Using intracerebroventricular injections of leptin in mice lacking beta 3-adrenoreceptors, we show that different complements of beta -adrenoreceptor subtypes are required to transduce leptin's effects on gene expression in white versus brown adipose tissue.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Experimental Animal Protocol-- Mice in each of the four experiments described below were housed in pairs in solid-bottom cages with continuous access to chow (Purina Mouse Chow, Ralston Purina, St. Louis, MO) and water. Room temperature was maintained at 22-23 °C, and the lights were on a 12-h light/dark cycle. The animals were acclimated for 1-2 weeks prior to each study, and injected thereafter with various agents according to protocols specified under each experiment. All injections were given 2 h following the start of the light cycle, and all mice were sacrificed 2 or 4 h after the last injection in the series. Thereafter, interscapular BAT, as well as epididymal, retroperitoneal, and inguinal WAT depots were carefully removed, weighed, and used for preparation of total RNA or isolation of adipocytes.

Intracerebroventricular Injections-- Mice were anesthetized by inhalation of isoflurane and a guarded, blank 27-gauge 0.5-inch needle was used to create a guide injection site 0.7 mm posterior to bregma and 1.0 mm lateral to midline at a depth of 4.0 mm (27). In the experiments proper, a 10.0-µl Hamilton 1700 series gastight syringe (Hamilton, Reno, NV) was used to inject artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), murine leptin, or rat neuropeptide Y in a volume of 2-5 µl. Correct positioning of the guide injection site was confirmed prior to the start of each experiment by monitoring feeding behavior following injection of neuropeptide Y (0.075 µg/g body weight). Mice failing to respond to neuropeptide Y were removed from the experiment. aCSF, consisting of 70 mM NaCl, 6 mM KCl, 0.7 mM CaCl2, 0.85 mM MgCl2, 0.75 mM Na2HPO4, 0.10 mM NaH2PO4, and 0.1% untreated bovine serum albumin, was injected in a volume of 5 µl. Thereafter, mice were monitored to ensure full recovery.

Experiment 1-- Seven-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME) and acclimated for 2 weeks prior to the study. Thereafter, mice were injected ICV with leptin (0.1 µg/g body weight/day) for 1, 2, or 3 days, and representative mice were sacrificed 2 and 4 h following the respective injections on each day. Separate groups of mice received intraperitoneal injections of CL-316,243 (1 µg/g body weight/day) for 1 or 2 days, and were sacrificed 2 h after injection. Control mice were injected ICV with aCSF. Interscapular BAT, as well as epididymal, retroperitoneal, and inguinal WAT depots were removed, weighed, and used to prepare total RNA as described previously (19).

Experiment 2-- Seven-month-old male FVB/NJ (WT) mice and age-matched FVB/NJ male mice with a targeted disruption of the beta 3-adrenoreceptor (beta 3-AR KO) gene (28) were acclimated as described above and equal numbers of each phenotype were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. The mice in group 1 received ICV injections of aCSF for 3 days, and food was provided ad libitum. Mice in group 2 received ICV injections of mouse leptin (0.1 µg/g body weight/day), while group 3 received ICV leptin (0.1 µg/g body weight/day) in combination with intraperitoneal injections of propranolol (20 µg/g body weight/day). Food was provided ad libitum, and intake was measured. Mice in group 4 received intraperitoneal injections of propranolol (20 µg/g body weight/day) for 3 days and were pair-fed to the mean intake of mice in groups 2 and 3. Two h after the final injection, the mice were sacrificed and tissues processed as described above.

Experiment 3-- Seven-month-old male FVB/NJ mice and age-matched beta 3-AR KO male mice were acclimated as described above. Thereafter, the WT and beta 3-AR KO mice were sacrificed, and the adipose tissue depot sites were carefully removed and used for cell isolation and membrane preparation as described below.

Experiment 4-- Male C57BL/6J (ob/ob) mice and their lean littermates (+/?) were obtained from Jackson Laboratories at 6 weeks of age and randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. The mice were housed individually at 23 °C and equilibrated for 4 days before beginning the experiment. On the morning of the 5th day and for 2 mornings thereafter, half the mice in each phenotype received intraperitoneal injections of recombinant mouse leptin (20 µg/g body weight/day), while the remaining mice in each phenotype received vehicle injections. Within each phenotype, the mice receiving vehicle were pair-fed with the mice receiving leptin. Three h following the final injections on day 7, the mice were weighed, sacrificed, and adipose tissue processed as described previously.

Experiment 5-- Seven-month-old male FVB/NJ mice and age-matched beta 3-AR KO male mice were acclimated as described above. Thereafter, half of the WT and beta 3-AR KO mice were moved to 4 °C environmental chambers while the remaining mice in each group were maintained at 23 °C. After 4 h, all mice were sacrificed, and the adipose tissue depot sites were carefully removed and used for isolation of total RNA.

Ribonuclease Protection Assay-- RNA probes complementary to UCP1 mRNA and leptin mRNA were prepared, labeled, and used as described previously to assay the respective mRNA species (18, 19). Using the same method, a beta 3-AR probe was produced by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (5' to 3'; forward, accccagtgcagccaacacca; reverse, cgcaaccagtttcgcccaagg), purified, and cloned into the pGEM-3Z riboprobe vector (Promega, Madison, WI). The identity of the cloned fragment was confirmed by sequencing, and it corresponded to nucleotides 630-890, producing a protected fragment of 261 base pairs. beta 1- and beta 2-AR probes corresponding to nucleotides 534-971 and 789-971 of the rat beta 1- and beta 2-AR cDNAs, respectively, were obtained from Dr. James Granneman (29). The concentration of UCP1, leptin, and beta 1-, beta 2-, and beta 3-AR mRNA in each sample was determined by comparison to known amounts of sense strand fragments for each gene that were hybridized simultaneously in the ribonuclease protection assay. After autoradiography and densitometry, standard curves were constructed for each gene and used to estimate mRNA concentrations in unknown samples as described previously (18).

Isolation of Adipocytes and Preparation of Plasma Membranes-- White adipocytes were prepared from pooled epididymal, retroperitoneal, and inguinal fat pads of 8-month-old WT FVB/NJ and beta 3-AR KO mice by collagenase treatment according to Rodbell (30) with slight modification (31). The cells were washed and resuspended in Krebs-Henseleit-HEPES buffer (pH 7.4), then broken in a Dounce homogenizer in 10 mM TES (pH 7.0) containing 0.25 M sucrose. Crude membranes were collected following centrifugation at 48,000 × g for 20 min and stored at -80 °C. Interscapular brown adipose tissue was carefully dissected free of surrounding tissue, finely minced with scissors, and washed in Krebs-Henseleit-HEPES buffer (pH 7.4). Following centrifugation at 1000 × g, the infranatant was aspirated and the fat cells resuspended in 10 mM TES (pH 7.0) containing 0.25 M sucrose. The brown fat cells were then broken using an overhead stirrer and filtered through nylon mesh, and crude membranes were collected following an initial low speed spin to remove unbroken cells and nuclei. The crude membranes were resuspended and stored at -80 °C.

Competition Binding Assay for beta 1- and beta 2-AR-- Radioligand binding assays were conducted with adipocyte membranes using our modification (32) of previously described methods (32-34). Briefly, 20 µg of white and 40 µg of brown adipocyte membranes were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h with 30 pM 125I-cyanopindolol (ICYP) in 25 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing 12.5 mM MgCl2, and increasing concentrations of the beta 1-AR-specific antagonist, CGP-20712A (RBI, Natick, MA). Bound ICYP was collected on filters in a Skatron cell harvester (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA), and the components of beta 1-AR and beta 2-AR binding of ICYP were resolved by fitting a two-site competition curve to the data by least squares (Prizm; Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA) and analyzed as described previously (32).

Adenylyl Cyclase Assay-- Adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity was determined in adipocyte membranes using combinations of receptor subtype selective agonists and antagonists to assess the functional activity of each receptor subtype (31, 32, 35). The beta 3-AR antagonist, SR 59230A (36) was obtained from Dr. Luciano Manara (Sanofi Midy, Milan, Italy) and solubilized in ethylene glycol at 200 µg/ml. The antagonist was used at a final concentration of 10 µM as reported previously (36). Other agonists and antagonists were from commercial sources.

Methods of Analysis-- One-way analysis of variance was used to compare group means for UCP1 mRNA, leptin mRNA, beta 1-AR mRNA, beta 2-AR mRNA, beta 3-AR mRNA, adenylyl cyclase activity, and ICYP binding in the respective experiments for each variable. The level of protection against type I errors was set at 5%, and P values for specific treatment comparisons are presented under "Results."

Materials-- All reagents, except where noted, were obtained from Sigma and were of the highest reagent grade. T1-RNase and Trizol LS reagent were from Life Technologies, Inc. Oligonucleotide primers and DNA sequencing were generated at the DNA Core Facility at the Medical University of South Carolina. [alpha -32P]CTP and [125I]iodocyanopindolol were purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. 1-Chloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl difluoromethyl ether (isoflurane) was from Ohmeda PPD (Liberty Corner, NJ). CL-316,243 was a gift from Wyeth Ayerst Research (Princeton, NJ). Recombinant methionyl mouse leptin was kindly provided by Amgen (Thousand Oaks, CA). The beta 3-adrenoreceptor antagonist SR59230A was kindly provided by Dr. Luciana Manara (Sanofi, Italy). Breeding pairs of the beta 3-AR KO mice (28)were kindly provided by Dr. Brad Lowell (Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Time Course of Central Leptin Effects on BAT UCP1 in C57BL/6J Mice-- To determine the time course for leptin's effects on UCP1 expression in BAT and distinguish between central versus peripheral effects of the peptide, mice were given ICV injections of leptin or artificial CSF and sacrificed 2 and 4 h later on successive days. This protocol complemented our normal treatment regimen of 3 days and revealed that leptin increased UCP1 mRNA 2 and 4 h after the initial injection on day 1 (Fig. 1). The ~2-fold increase was maximal 4 h after leptin injection and comparable to the increase produced by the beta 3-adrenoreceptor selective agonist, CL316,243 (data not shown). Similar results were observed on day 2, but, because a somewhat larger increase in UCP1 mRNA was seen on day 3, the 3-day injection protocol was adopted for subsequent studies (see Fig. 2). These results confirm that the effect of leptin was both rapid and centrally mediated, and they are consistent with our previous work showing that leptin regulates gene expression in adipose tissue through a central site of action (18).


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Ribonuclease protection assay of UCP1 mRNA from BAT of C57BL/6J mice. 0.5 µg of total RNA from BAT was hybridized with an antisense probe for UCP1 mRNA (nucleotides 7-300) and 18 S rRNA (nucleotides 715-794). Mice were injected ICV with either aCSF (5 µl) or leptin (Lep, 2 µg) for 1 day and sacrificed either 2 or 4 h following injection as described under "Experimental Procedures." The relative abundance of UCP1 mRNA was quantitated by comparing the densitometric intensities of protected fragments from each treatment group to known amounts of sense strand transcripts that were hybridized simultaneously. Individual RNA samples from each animal were analyzed to calculate group means, and representative samples are presented in the figure (aCSF, 1.71 ± 0.04 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 3; leptin at 2 h, 2.32 ± 0.16 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 6; leptin at 4 h, 2.94 ± 0.29 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 6).


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Ribonuclease protection assay of UCP1 mRNA from BAT of FVB/NJ (A) and beta 3-AR KO mice (B). 0.5 µg of total RNA from BAT was hybridized with an antisense probe for UCP1 mRNA (nucleotides 7-300) and 18 S rRNA (nucleotides 715-794). Mice were injected ICV with either aCSF (5 µl) or leptin (2 µg), in the presence and absence of intraperitoneally injected propranolol (20 µg/g body weight/day) for 3 days and sacrificed 2 h following the final injection as described under "Experimental Procedures." The relative abundance of UCP1 mRNA was quantitated by comparing the densitometric intensities of protected fragments from each treatment group to known amounts of sense strand transcripts that were hybridized simultaneously. Individual RNA samples from each animal were analyzed to calculate group means and representative samples are presented in the figure. A, aCSF, 0.51 ± 0.1 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 3; leptin, 2.26 ± 0.21 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; propranolol, 0.25 ± 0.06 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; propranolol + leptin, 1.1 ± 0.12 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5. B, beta 3-AR KO aCSF, 0.51 ± 0.04 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 3; beta 3-AR KO leptin, 1.76 ± 0.26 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5; beta 3-AR KO propranolol, 0.70 ± 0.10 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; beta 3-AR KO propranolol + leptin, 0.89 ± 0.12 fmol of UCP1 mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5. Veh, vehicle; Lep, leptin; Prop, propranolol; P+L, propranolol + leptin.

Effect of Leptin on BAT UCP1 in beta 3-KO Mice-- The purpose of experiment 2 was to determine whether the absence of the beta 3-AR in both BAT and WAT would compromise the ability of centrally administered leptin to regulate gene expression in each depot site. A secondary objective was to determine whether the beta 1/beta 2-ARs could substitute for the missing beta 3-AR or whether alpha -adrenoreceptors might also be involved in mediating the response. WT age-matched FVB/NJ mice served as positive controls and responded to ICV-injected leptin with a 4-5-fold increase in UCP1 mRNA in BAT (p < 0.01, Fig. 2A). Intraperitoneal injection of propranolol to block beta 1/beta 2-ARs reduced basal expression of UCP1 mRNA in WT mice, but did not block leptin's ability to induce UCP1 mRNA expression by 4-fold (p < 0.01, Fig. 2A). These results suggest that the beta 1/beta 2-ARs and beta 3-ARs are interchangeable with respect to their ability to mediate central effects of leptin on UCP1 expression. This conclusion is supported by results from the beta 3-AR KO mice, which show that central leptin produced a 3-4-fold increase in UCP1 mRNA (p < 0.01, Fig. 2B), and the finding that propranolol completely blocked the ability of leptin to increase UCP1 mRNA in BAT from these animals (p < 0.01, Fig. 2B). These findings also make the case that alpha -adrenoreceptors are not involved in the response and that beta -adrenoreceptors are the primary adrenergic receptors mediating the effects of leptin on UCP1 mRNA.

Effect of ICV Leptin on Leptin mRNA in WAT-- To test the hypothesis that centrally administered leptin regulates its own expression in WAT, we measured leptin mRNA in epididymal and retroperitoneal depot sites from WT and beta 3-AR KO mice treated with leptin. The two sites were chosen as being representative of WAT depots that respond differently to adrenergic stimulation (19). In WT mice, ICV leptin produced a highly significant reduction (p < 0.01) of leptin mRNA in epididymal WAT from 0.021 ± 0.003 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA to 0.005 ± 0.002 fmol/µg of RNA (Fig. 3A). A similar reduction in leptin mRNA (p < 0.001) was noted in the retroperitoneal WAT depot of these mice (Fig. 4A). Figs. 3A and 4A show that propranolol produced a modest increase in basal leptin mRNA in both depot sites of WT mice (p < 0.05), but did not impair leptin's ability to decrease expression of its own message in either site (Figs. 3A and 4A). In contrast, ICV leptin failed to decrease leptin mRNA in epididymal or retroperitoneal WAT from beta 3-KO mice (Figs. 3B and 4B). Propranolol alone produced a slight increase in leptin mRNA in both depot sites of beta 3-AR KO mice (p < 0.05), and treating these mice with propranolol and leptin produced no additional change in leptin mRNA (Figs. 3B and 4B). The failure of ICV leptin to down-regulate leptin mRNA in WAT from beta 3-KO mice coupled with the inability of propranolol to block leptin's ability to down-regulate leptin mRNA in WT mice indicates that the beta 3-adrenoreceptor is both necessary and sufficient for mediation of this response.


View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Ribonuclease protection assay of leptin mRNA from epididymal WAT of FVB/NJ (A) and beta 3-AR KO mice (B). Total RNA from epididymal WAT of wild type (5.0 µg) and beta 3-AR KO (2.0 µg) mice, respectively, was hybridized with an antisense probe for leptin mRNA (nucleotides 1-355) and 18 S rRNA (nucleotides 715-794). Mice were injected ICV with either aCSF (5 µl) or leptin (2 µg), in the presence and absence of intraperitoneally injected propranolol (20 µg/g body weight/day) for 3 days and sacrificed 2 h following the final injection as described under "Experimental Procedures." The relative abundance of leptin mRNA was quantitated by comparing the densitometric intensities of protected fragments from each treatment group to known amounts of sense strand transcripts that were hybridized simultaneously. Individual RNA samples from each animal were analyzed to calculate group means, and representative samples are presented in the figure. A, aCSF, 0.021 ± 0.003 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 3; leptin, 0.005 ± 0.002 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; propranolol, 0.058 ± 0.013 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; propranolol + leptin, 0.008 ± 0.003 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5. B, beta 3-AR KO aCSF, 0.072 ± 0.015 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 3; beta 3-AR KO leptin, 0.082 ± 0.017 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5; beta 3-AR KO propranolol, 0.123 ± 0.016 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; beta 3-AR KO propranolol + leptin, 0.099 ± 0.012 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5. Veh, vehicle; Lep, leptin; Prop, propranolol; P+L, propranolol + leptin.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Ribonuclease protection assay of leptin mRNA from retroperitoneal WAT of FVB/NJ (A) and beta 3-AR KO mice (B). Total RNA from retroperitoneal WAT of wild type (5.0 µg) and beta 3-AR KO (2.0 µg) mice was hybridized with an antisense probe for leptin mRNA (nucleotides 1-355) and 18 S rRNA (nucleotides 715-794). Mice were injected ICV with either aCSF (5 µl) or leptin (2 µg), in the presence and absence of intraperitoneally injected propranolol (20 µg/g body weight/day) for 3 days and sacrificed 2 h following the final injection as described under "Experimental Procedures." The relative abundance of leptin mRNA was quantitated by comparing the densitometric intensities of protected fragments from each treatment group to known amounts of sense strand transcripts that were hybridized simultaneously. Individual RNA samples from each animal were analyzed to calculate group means, and representative samples are presented in the figure. A, aCSF, 0.012 ± 0.004 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 3; leptin, 0.002 ± 0.001 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; propranolol, 0.035 ± 0.008 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; propranolol + leptin, 0.003 ± 0.001 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5. B, beta 3-AR KO aCSF, 0.070 ± 0.009 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 3; beta 3-AR KO leptin, 0.083 ± 0.017 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5; beta 3-AR KO propranolol, 0.103 ± 0.019 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 4; beta 3-AR KO propranolol + leptin, 0.096 ± 0.015 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA, n = 5. Veh, vehicle; Lep, leptin; Prop, propranolol; P+L, propranolol + leptin.

Additional data that support the importance of the beta 3-AR in regulating leptin expression can be found by comparing leptin mRNA and serum leptin in WT and beta 3-AR KO mice. If our hypothesis is correct, the absence of the beta 3-AR should lead to up-regulation of leptin mRNA. The data from epididymal WAT support this conclusion by showing that leptin mRNA is ~3-fold higher (p < 0.01) in the beta 3-AR KOs compared with the WT mice (WT (0.021 ± 0.003 fmol of leptin mRNA/µg of RNA) versus beta 3-AR KO (0.072 ± 0.005 fmol/µg of RNA)). The difference was even more striking in the retroperitoneal depot, where leptin mRNA was 5-fold higher in beta 3-AR KO compared with WT mice (WT (0.012 ± 0.004 fmol/µg of RNA) versus beta 3-AR KO (0.070 ± 0.009 fmol/µg of RNA)). Circulating leptin levels were also higher (p < 0.05) in beta 3-AR KOs (8.7 ± 0.4 ng/ml) compared with WT mice (5.6 ± 0.4 ng/ml), although the magnitude of the difference was less than that noted with leptin mRNA. Taken together, the results support the conclusion that the absence of the beta 3-AR leads to up-regulation of leptin expression.

Existence and Functionality of beta 1- and beta 2-AR in FVB/NJ and beta 3-AR KO Mice-- The results from experiment 2 support the conclusion that there are tissue-specific differences in the requirement for the beta 3-AR in mediating leptin effects on gene expression. This interpretation is based on the assumption of comparable expression patterns and functionality of the beta 1/beta 2-ARs in BAT and WAT between the WT and beta 3-AR KO mice. To address this question, we compared beta 1- and beta 2-AR mRNA levels and ICYP binding to beta 1- and beta 2-ARs in adipose tissue from both phenotypes. Fig. 5 shows that mRNA levels of both beta 1- and beta 2-AR mRNA are reduced ~2-fold (p < 0.01) in BAT of beta 3-AR KO mice compared with WT mice (beta 1-AR WT, 0.021 ± 0.003 fmol/µg of RNA; beta 3-AR KO, 0.009 ± 0.002 fmol/µg of RNA; beta 2-AR WT, 0.036 ± 0.008 fmol/µg of RNA; beta 3-AR KO, 0.013 ± 0.006 fmol/µg of RNA). In epididymal WAT (Fig. 5), a similar 2-fold decrease (p < 0.05) in beta 1-AR mRNA was noted in beta 3-AR KOs (0.019 ± 0.002 fmol/µg of RNA) compared with WT mice (0.041 ± 0.003 fmol/µg of RNA). In contrast, beta 2-AR mRNA was significantly increased (p < 0.05) in beta 3-AR KOs (0.178 ± 0.024 fmol/µg) compared with WT mice (0.009 ± 0.001 fmol/µg).


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Ribonuclease protection assay of beta 1- and beta 2-AR mRNA from BAT and epididymal WAT of FVB/NJ and beta 3-AR KO mice. 15.0 µg of total RNA from BAT and EWAT of wild type and beta 3-AR KO mice was hybridized with antisense probes for beta 1-AR mRNA (nucleotides 534-971) and beta 2-AR mRNA (nucleotides 789-971), and 18 S rRNA (nucleotides 715-794). The relative abundance of beta 1- and beta 2-AR mRNA was quantitated by comparing the densitometric intensities of protected fragments from each treatment group to known amounts of sense strand transcripts that were hybridized simultaneously. Individual RNA samples from each animal were analyzed to calculate group means and representative samples are presented in the figure. BAT, beta 1-AR mRNA WT, 0.021 ± 0.003 fmol/µg of RNA, n = 3; beta 3-AR KO, 0.009 ± 0.002 fmol/µg of RNA, n = 4; beta 2-AR mRNA WT, 0.036 ± 0.008 fmol/µg of RNA, n = 4; beta 3-AR KO, 0.013 ± 0.006 fmol/µg of RNA, n = 3. WAT, beta 1-AR mRNA WT, 0.041 ± 0.003 fmol/µg of RNA, n = 3; beta 3-AR KO, 0.019 ± 0.002 fmol/µg of RNA, n = 4; beta 2-AR mRNA WT, 0.009 ± 0.001 fmol/µg of RNA, n = 4; beta 3-AR KO, 0.178 ± 0.024 fmol/µg of RNA, n = 4).

To evaluate whether the observed changes in mRNA levels are reflected by comparable changes in beta 1-AR and beta 2-AR binding capacity, we used a competition radioligand binding approach with ICYP in the presence of the selective beta 3-AR agonist, CL316,243, to eliminate low affinity binding of ICYP to beta 3-ARs (37). Then, using crude membrane preparations from brown and white adipocytes of each phenotype, the highly selective beta 1-AR antagonist, CGP-20712A, which displays ~1000-fold selectivity for beta 1-AR over beta 2-AR (38), was used to resolve ICYP binding into the components contributed by the beta 1- and beta 2-AR subtypes (Fig. 6, A and B). With ICYP at 30 pM (Fig. 6A), total ICYP bound by both beta 1- and beta 2- ARs in white adipocyte membranes was similar between WT FVB/NJ (21.3 ± 0.5 fmol/mg of protein) and beta 3-AR KO mice (19.7 ± 0.3 fmol/mg of protein). The high affinity binding component of the curves, resolved by curve fitting and defined as the beta 1-AR, accounted for 26% (5.6 ± 0.6 fmol/mg) of the total binding sites in membranes from WT FVB/NJ mice. In beta 3-AR KO mice, the high affinity component accounted for 19% (3.8 ± 0.5 fmol/mg) of total ICYP binding (Fig. 6A). The second component of the curves represents ICYP bound by the beta 2-AR and represents the remaining binding sites (WT FVB/NJ, 74%; beta 3-AR KO, 81%). Although the total ICYP bound to white adipocyte membranes did not differ between the two groups, comparison of the respective binding curves using an F test indicated that the proportion of binding sites contributed by the beta 1- and beta 2-AR subtypes in each group was significantly different (p < 0.01). Thus, the modest decrease in beta 1-AR binding sites and increase in beta 2-AR binding sites noted in the beta 3-AR KOs (Fig. 6A) are consistent with the observed changes in beta 1- and beta 2-AR mRNA levels in this group (Fig. 5) compared with the WT mice.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Competition binding analysis to resolve beta 1- and beta 2-AR binding in adipocyte membranes from FVB/NJ and beta 3-KO mice. Adipocyte membranes (40 µg) were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 30 pM 125I-CYP and increasing concentrations of the beta 1-AR-specific antagonist, CGP-20712A. Bound 125I-CYP was collected on filters in a Skatron cell harvester and counted. The components of 125I-CYP binding were resolved by fitting a two-site competition curve to the data by least squares as described under "Experimental Procedures." Fitted curves are representative of three experiments. A, binding from WAT membranes of WT () and beta 3-AR KO () mice. B, binding from BAT membranes of WT () and beta 3-KO mice ().

In the case of BAT, total ICYP binding did not differ between WT FVB/NJ (18.6 ± 0.3 fmol/mg) and beta 3-AR KO mice (17.5 ± 0.4 fmol/mg, Fig. 6B). The high affinity beta 1-AR component comprised 27% (5.0 ± 0.6 fmol/mg) of total binding sites in WT FVB/NJ membranes and 28% (4.9 ± 0.4 fmol/mg) of total binding sites in the beta 3-AR KO group (Fig. 6B). The remaining beta 2-AR binding sites comprised 73% and 72% of total ICYP binding in BAT membranes from WT and beta 3-AR KO mice, respectively. In contrast to WAT, where subtle alterations were noted, we found no evidence of a change in the proportion of beta 1- or beta 2-AR binding sites in BAT between the groups (Fig. 6B). In contrast to WAT, where binding and mRNA results were consistent, the similarity in binding capacity was not reflective of the observed group differences in BAT beta 1- and beta 2-AR mRNA levels (Fig. 5).

Functionality of beta 1- and beta 2-ARs in Adipocyte Membranes of FVB/NJ and beta 3-KO Mice-- The third component of studies in experiment 3 was to assess the functional coupling of beta 1- and beta 2-ARs to AC in adipocyte membranes from the two groups. The goal of these studies was to complement the binding studies by testing the hypothesis that expressed beta -adrenoreceptor subtypes are equivalently coupled to AC in each group. Clarification of this point would rule out altered expression or effector coupling of beta 1- or beta 2-ARs as the basis for the differential requirements of receptor subtypes in regulating gene expression between BAT and WAT that was shown in experiment 2. To that end, combinations of nonselective and selective receptor agonists and antagonists were used in a systematic attempt to evaluate the relative contributions of the beta 1/beta 2-ARs and beta 3-ARs in activating AC in adipocyte membranes from each group. As shown in Table I, basal AC activity in white and brown adipocyte membranes did not differ between WT and beta 3-AR KO mice. As judged by forskolin stimulation, total AC activity in BAT and WAT was also unaffected by the absence of the beta 3-AR (Table I). The selective beta 3-AR antagonist, SR59230A, and the selective beta 1/beta 2-AR antagonist, propranolol, were used in combination with isoproterenol to show that the beta 1/beta 2-ARs accounted for between 10% and 30% of the total AC activation elicited by isoproterenol in WAT and BAT membranes from WT mice, respectively (Table I). A similar assessment of receptor subtype contribution was reached with epinephrine, which was used at 1 µM to fully activate the beta 1- and beta 2-ARs without significantly activating the beta 3-AR (Table I). Using both strategies, AC activation attributable to the beta 1/beta 2-ARs in membranes from WT mice was similar to the stimulation of AC activity in beta 3-AR KO mice that is solely attributable to the beta 1/beta 2-ARs (Table I). Taken together, these data establish the presence and functionality of beta 1- and beta 2-ARs on brown and white adipocytes in beta 3-AR KO mice at levels that are comparable to those in WT mice.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Relative contributions of beta -adrenoceptor subtypes to activation of adenylyl cyclase in brown and white adipocyte membranes from control and beta 3-adrenoceptor knockout mice
BAT and WAT were isolated from control and beta 3-adrenoceptor knockout mice as described under "Experimental Procedures." Crude adipocyte membranes were obtained from each genotype and tissue type and assayed for adenylyl cyclase activity under conditions designed to assess the relative contribution of each receptor subtype to cyclase activation. The means and their standard errors were from four replicate assays on two separate membrane preparations.

Effect of Leptin on Leptin mRNA in ob/ob Mice-- A practical test of our conclusion that the beta 3-AR is required for leptin-dependent regulation of leptin mRNA in WAT can be made with the ob/ob mouse. This follows from our previous demonstration that expression of the beta 3-AR is severely compromised in both brown and white adipocytes from ob/ob mice (35). Ob/ob mice are also particularly well suited for this purpose because of the absence of functional leptin and the resulting sensitivity to leptin replacement. Results from experiment 4 show that treatment of ob/ob mice for 3 days with leptin failed to reduce leptin mRNA in either retroperitoneal or epididymal WAT (Fig. 7). Similar treatment of lean mice produced a 6-7-fold reduction in leptin mRNA in both sites (Fig. 7 and Table II). The reduction in beta 3-AR mRNA in WAT from the ob/ob mice used here was on the order of 50-100-fold (Table II). These findings are consistent with and support our conclusion that the beta 3-AR is required for leptin-dependent regulation of leptin mRNA in WAT. To test whether the requirement for the beta 3-AR is specific to WAT or specific to the gene being regulated, we examined the effect of leptin in BAT from the same mice. Expression of the beta 3-AR is also compromised in BAT from ob/ob mice (Table II), so if the effect is dependent on the beta 3-AR, regardless of site, we would predict that leptin mRNA would not be reduced by leptin in BAT. Quite the contrary, BAT from the same ob/ob mice showed a significant reduction in leptin mRNA following leptin treatment (vehicle, 0.020 ± 0.001 fmol/µg of RNA; leptin, 0.007 ± 0.001 fmol/µg of RNA). Collectively, these results indicate that regulation of leptin expression requires the beta 3-AR in WAT but is capable of using the beta 1/beta 2-AR in BAT.


View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Ribonuclease protection assay of leptin mRNA from epididymal and retroperitoneal WAT of lean and ob/ob mice. 2.0 µg of total RNA from epididymal WAT (EWAT) and retroperitoneal WAT (RPWAT) of lean and ob/ob mice was hybridized with an antisense probe for leptin mRNA (nucleotides 1-355) and 18 S rRNA (nucleotides 715-794). The relative abundance of leptin mRNA was quantitated by comparing the densitometric intensities of protected fragments from each treatment group to known amounts of sense strand transcripts that were hybridized simultaneously. Individual RNA samples from each animal were analyzed to calculate group means presented in Table II.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
beta 3-Adrenoceptor and leptin mRNA from lean and ob/ob mice treated with leptin
Lean and ob/ob mice received intraperitoneal injections of vehicle or murine leptin (20 µg/g body weight/day) on each of three successive days as described under "Experimental Procedures." 2.0 µg and 10.0 µg of total RNA from WAT and BAT, respectively, was hybridized with an anti-sense probe for leptin mRNA (nucleotides 1-355) or beta 3-AR mRNA (nucleotides 630-890). A probe for 18 S rRNA (nucleotides 715-794) was included to correct for differences in total RNA loaded. The relative abundance of mRNA was quantitated by comparing the densitometric intensities of protected fragments from each treatment group to known amounts of sense strand transcripts that were hybridized simultaneously. Individual RNA samples from each animal were analyzed to calculate group means, which are presented in the table. The data were subjected to analysis of variance. Mean values are expressed as femtomoles of protected mRNA/µg of total RNA ± S.E. EWAT, epididymal WAT; RPAT, retroperitoneal WAT; IBAT, interscapular BAT.

Effect of Cold Exposure on Adipocyte Gene Expression in beta 3-AR KO Mice-- A more general test of our hypothesis that the sympathetic nervous system utilizes different complements of beta -adrenoreceptors to mediate the effects of norepinephrine in white versus brown adipose tissue can be made by exposing beta 3-AR KO mice to cold. In experiment 5, the beta 3-AR KOs adapted to cold exposure readily and increased UCP1 mRNA to the same extent as their WT controls (data not shown). This finding agrees with observations made by the original developers of this transgenic mouse line (28), but of particular interest is our finding that cold exposure does not reduce leptin mRNA in WAT of beta 3-AR KO mice (room temperature, 0.056 ± 0.009 fmol/µg RNA; 4 °C, 0.094 ± 0.015 fmol/µg RNA). In contrast, 4 h of cold exposure in WT mice reduced leptin mRNA to the detection limit of the assay (data not shown). Taken together, these studies show that the beta 3-AR is required to transduce the effects of changes in sympathetic outflow on leptin expression in WAT. As noted with ICV leptin, the beta 1/beta 2-AR is capable of substituting for the beta 3-AR in mediating sympathetic effects of leptin on gene expression in BAT.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In the present study, we have used the ICV route of administration to study centrally-mediated effects of leptin on gene expression in adipose tissue. The technique was used with mice lacking beta 3-adrenoreceptors (beta 3-AR KO) to evaluate the involvement of this and other adrenoreceptor subtypes in mediating peripheral effects of leptin. This experimental approach is based on an emerging consensus that leptin regulates adipocyte function through central modulation of the sympathetic nervous system. The initial evidence came from a study showing that leptin increased norepinephrine turnover in BAT (12), and was followed by studies mapping the neural pathways within the sympathetic nervous system activated by leptin (13-15). Subsequent studies have shown that surgical (16), chemical (17, 39), or genetic (18) sympathectomy blocked leptin's effects on gene expression in both BAT and WAT. The latter studies established a requirement for the long form of the leptin receptor (Ob-Rb), but did not distinguish between central versus peripheral sites of action for leptin. The requirement of norepinephrine (18) suggested that central leptin receptors were activated, but the involvement of peripheral leptin receptors that communicate with the brain by afferent autonomic nerves (40, 41) could not be excluded. Results from the present study argue that peripheral leptin receptors are not required for leptin's effects on adipocyte gene expression, and make the case that central leptin receptors mediate the observed effects on UCP1 mRNA in BAT and leptin mRNA in WAT. Additionally, based on the comparable magnitude of the effects produced by central versus peripheral administration of leptin in our studies, it seems reasonable to assume that peripherally injected leptin is primarily working through central leptin receptors. Taken together, the evidence is compelling that leptin regulates adipocyte gene expression through central modulation of sympathetic nervous system outflow. The premise that norepinephrine is the peripheral mediator of leptin action is the basis for using the present experimental approach to deduce which adrenoreceptor(s) mediate the respective responses in brown and white adipose tissue.

Several recent studies have suggested the existence of a putative beta 4-AR based on interpretation of pharmacological profiles from adipocytes expressing the beta 3-AR at various levels (42-44). The existence of a fourth beta -adrenoreceptor could complicate interpretation of the present experiments, which assume the existence of only three beta -adrenoreceptors. The evidence for a beta 4-AR centers around the observation that CGP12177A, a partial agonist of the beta 3-AR and antagonist of beta 1/beta 2-ARs, activates lipolysis in adipocytes containing little or no beta 3-AR (42, 43). Complementing this result is the observation that beta 1-AR-selective or nonselective beta -AR antagonists block this response while the beta 3-AR-selective antagonist, SR59230, does not (43). It should be noted, however, that the documented heterogeneity in the relationship between binding affinity and coupling efficiency with ligands for beta -adrenoreceptor subtypes complicates interpretation of pharmacological approaches in adipoyctes (45-49). Such seems possible with CGP12177 after the careful studies of Konkar et al. (50) have systematically documented an unexpected activation of the beta 1-AR by this ligand. Thus it is unnecessary to invoke the existence of a beta 4-AR to explain the results obtained with CGP12177 if its binding to the beta 1-AR results in partial activation. In the present study, conclusions regarding requirements for specific beta -receptors in WAT and BAT are not predicated on the existence of the putative beta 4-AR because of the adequacy of a model containing beta 1-, beta 2-, and beta 3-ARs in explaining the observed results.

The most significant finding from the present study is the differential requirement for the beta 3-AR in mediating leptin's effects in brown versus white adipose tissue. The concept of differential coupling of beta -adrenoreceptor subtypes to various responses within the same cell is not new. The subject has received significant attention in BAT, where densely innervated brown adipocytes are stimulated by norepinephrine in response to environmental and physiological stimuli (12, 51). Using isolated brown adipocytes from both Syrian hamsters (52) and rats (24, 53), Zhao et al. addressed the role of beta 3-ARs versus beta 1-ARs in mediating catecholamine-stimulated oxygen consumption. Based on analysis of Schild plots constructed from propranolol-mediated inhibition of norepinephrine dose-response curves, the authors concluded that the thermogenic response was coupled solely to the beta 3-AR (24, 53). This conclusion is at odds with results from experiments with beta 3-AR knockouts where thermogenic responses to norepinephrine, isoproterenol, and cold exposure were normal (28). Thus, the absence of the beta 3-AR did not compromise the ability of BAT to respond to catecholamines. A role for the beta 1-AR is also supported by the work of Atgie et al. (25), who used isolated brown adipocytes to show that a specific beta 1-AR antagonist effectively blocked the effects of low concentrations of norepinephrine (25-100 nM) on respiration. The authors concluded that, within the physiological range of norepinephrine concentrations, the beta 1-AR makes a significant contribution to activating respiration. Chaudhry and Granneman (26) investigated the possibility that beta 1-ARs and beta 3-ARs serve different signaling functions in brown adipocytes. Supported by data showing the predicted compartmentalization of phosphorylated proteins (cAMP-responsive element-binding protein and perilipin), the authors concluded that norepinephrine induced UCP1 expression preferentially through the beta 1-AR and lipolysis primarily through the beta 3-AR (26). Our results extend these findings to the intact animal and show for the first time that centrally mediated effects of leptin on UCP1 expression in brown adipose tissue can be transduced interchangeably by beta 1/beta 2- or beta 3-ARs. Our results demonstrate that this conclusion is not an artifact of altered expression or function of the beta 1/beta 2-ARs in BAT from beta 3-AR KO mice. The present findings are also consistent with the original report with these mice showing comparable cold-induced increases in UCP1 mRNA in BAT from wild type and beta 3-AR KO mice (28). A study by Revelli et al. (54) using C57BL/6J mice with the beta 3-AR gene deleted by homologous recombination found a positive correlation between UCP1 and beta 1-AR mRNA, indicating a role for the beta 1-AR in the absence of the beta 3-AR. It should also be noted that, despite significant reductions in beta 3-AR expression in BAT from ob/ob mice (35), they respond to leptin repletion with robust increases in BAT UCP1 expression (19). Taken together, the evidence is internally consistent and supports our conclusion of interchangeability of receptor subtypes in this tissue.

In contrast to BAT, where the beta 3-AR is sufficient but not necessary to mediate leptin effects on gene expression, the present