|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005542200 on August 2, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 42, 33134-33141, October 20, 2000
Human Ku Antigen Tightly Binds and Stabilizes a Tetrahelical Form
of the Fragile X Syndrome d(CGG)n Expanded Sequence*
Livnat
Uliel ,
Pnina
Weisman-Shomer ,
Hely
Oren-Jazan ,
Terry
Newcomb§,
Lawrence A.
Loeb§, and
Michael
Fry §¶
From the Unit of Biochemistry, The Bruce Rappaport
Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa
31096, Israel, and the § Gottstein Memorial Cancer Research
Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Washington,
Seattle, Washington 98195-7705
Received for publication, June 23, 2000, and in revised form, August 1, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Hairpin and tetrahelical structures of a
d(CGG)n sequence in the FMR1 gene have been
implicated in its expansion in fragile X syndrome. The identification
of tetraplex d(CGG)n destabilizing proteins (Fry, M., and Loeb,
L. A.(1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12797-12803;
Weisman-Shomer, P., Naot, Y., and Fry, M. (2000) J. Biol.
Chem. 275, 2231-2238) suggested that proteins might modulate
d(CGG)n folding and aggregation. We assayed human TK-6
lymphoblastoid cell extracts for d(CGG)8 oligomer binding proteins. The principal binding protein was identified as Ku antigen by
its partial amino acid sequence and antigenicity. The purified 88/75-kDa heterodimeric Ku bound with similar affinities
(Kd ~1.8-10.2 × 10 9
mol/liter) to double-stranded
d(CGG)8·d(CCG)8, hairpin d(CGG)8, single-stranded d(CII)8, or tetraplex structures of
telomeric or IgG switch region sequences. However, Ku associated more
tightly with bimolecular G'2 tetraplex d(CGG)8
(Kd ~0.35 × 10 9 mol/liter).
Binding to Ku protected G'2 d(CGG)8 against nuclease digestion and impeded its unwinding by the tetraplex destabilizing protein qTBP42. Stabilization of d(CGG)n tetraplex domains in
FMR1 by Ku or other proteins might promote d(CGG) expansion and FMR1 silencing.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Fragile X syndrome is the single most common inherited cause of
mental impairment. Recent studies suggest that fragile X affects 1 in
2000 males and 1 in 4000 females regardless of race or ethnicity (1).
The syndrome is associated with a substantial expansion of a d(CGG)
trinucleotide repeat in the 5'-untranslated region of the first exon of
the FMR1 gene (2). This gene is located at a site coincident
with a folate-sensitive Xq27.3 fragile site in cells of affected males
(2, 3). Whereas normal subjects carry 2-50 repeats of the d(CGG)
trinucleotide and phenotypically unaffected carriers have up to 200 repeats, this tract is expanded to >200-2000 d(CGG) copies in
affected individuals (2, 4-8). Subsequent to d(CGG) expansion that
takes place in maternal oocytes or early in development (9) the repeat
sequence itself (10-13) and an adjacent CpG island (12) become
hypermethylated. As a result of d(CGG) expansion and/or the ensuing
hypermethylation, transcription of the FMR1 gene is silenced
(12, 14, 15). In addition, replication of the mutated FMR1
alleles and of a chromosomal region extending hundreds of kilobases 5'
and 3' to the amplified trinucleotide tract becomes delayed (16,
17).
Oligonucleotides having a d(CGG)n sequence readily generate
in vitro under physiological conditions tetrahelical structures (18-20) and hairpin formations (21-24). It was conjectured that tetraplex or hairpin structures of the expanded d(CGG)n tract arrest the progression of DNA polymerase during DNA replication and promote slippage of the enzyme and expansion of the repeated sequence (18, 25-28). Once expanded, stable hairpin or tetraplex structures are likely to block the transcriptional machinery and thus
prevent FMR1 gene expression (21, 23).
It was proposed that the formation and stability of d(CGG)n
tetraplex or hairpin structures may be modulated by proteins (19, 23).
Following this suggestion, we demonstrated that human Werner syndrome
DNA helicase (29) and two hnRNP-related murine telomeric DNA binding
proteins, qTBP42 and uqTBP25 (30), unwind a bimolecular G'2
d(CGG)n tetraplex structure. In this work we searched for a
protein that might act to stabilize secondary structures of
d(CGG)n. We fractionated proteins from cultured human
lymphoblastoid cells based on their binding to d(CGG)8. We
report the purification of a major d(CGG)n binding protein of
88- and 75-kDa subunits. This heterodimeric d(CGG)n binding
protein was identified as Ku antigen by its fully homologous partial
amino acid sequence and recognition by monospecific anti-Ku antigen
antibodies. The purified Ku antigen preferentially and tightly bound
G'2 d(CGG)n bimolecular tetraplexes. Association with Ku
antigen preferentially protected G'2 d(CGG)8 tetraplex
against digestion by micrococcal nuclease and impeded its unwinding by
the tetraplex d(CGG)n destabilizing protein qTBP42. We
speculate that Ku antigen or other proteins that tightly bind secondary
structures of d(CGG)n stretches may play a role in stabilizing
folded structures of this sequence in genomic DNA.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and Enzymes--
Isotopically 5'-labeled
[ -32P]ATP (~3000 Ci/mmol), Bacteriophage T4
polynucleotide kinase, and molecular mass Rainbow® marker proteins
were the products of Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Synthetic DNA
oligomers listed in Table I were supplied
by Operon Technologies. Micrococcal nuclease, nonimmune goat
IgG, bovine serum albumin, soy bean trypsin inhibitor
(STI),1 gel filtration
molecular weight protein markers, proteinase K, dithiothreitol (DTT),
N-ethylmaleimide, leupeptin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
SDS, Nonidet P-40, cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B,
and protein G-agarose were provided by Sigma. DEAE-cellulose (DE-52),
phosphocellulose (P-11), and DE-81 and 3MM filter paper were purchased
from Whatman. Amresco supplied acryl/bisacrylamide (19:1 or 30:1.2).
CalBiochem provided Aprotinin and benzamidine. N,N,N',N'-tetramethylenediamine,
bromphenol blue, and xylene cyanol FF were the products of IBI. Sep-Pak
cartridges were purchased from the Waters Division of Millipore.
Superdex© 200 high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) gel
filtration column was the product of Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Santa
Cruz Biotechnology provided affinity-purified goat polyclonal anti-Ku
70 and anti-Ku 86 antibodies. A nearly homogeneous tetraplex
d(CGG)n destabilizing hnRNP-related protein qTBP42 (30, 33) was
prepared, and its units of activity were defined as in Ref. 33.
Cells--
A human lymphoblastoid TK-6 cell line was the gift of
Dr. R. Monnat, University of Washington. The cells were grown at
37 °C under a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells seeded into
roller bottles at a density of 7.5 × 104 cells/ml
were harvested at a density of 5.0 × 106 cells/ml by
centrifugation at 4 °C at 1000 × g for 5 min. The cell pellet was rinsed twice with 10 volumes of ice-cold phosphate buffered saline and was immediately frozen and stored at 80 °C until used. A human SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cell line was the gift of Dr.
George M. Martin (University of Washington). The cells were grown in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum. Cells seeded in 75-cm2 flasks were grown at 37 °C
under 5% CO2 and were harvested by exposure to 0.25%
trypsin after reaching 85% confluence. The cells were collected,
rinsed, and stored as described above.
Preparation of Single-stranded, Double-stranded, and Tetraplex
DNA Oligomers--
DNA oligomers were purified by electrophoresis
through an 8.0 M urea, 15% polyacrylamide denaturing gel
(acrylamide:bisacrylamide, 19:1) in 0.5× TBE buffer (1.25 mM EDTA in 45 mM Tris borate buffer, pH 8.3).
The DNA was isolated from the gel as described previously (31), except
that salt and acrylamide residues were removed from the isolated DNA
either by precipitation and wash of the DNA by ethanol or by Sep-Pak
column chromatography. Purified DNA oligomers were 5' end labeled with
32P in a T4 polynucleotide kinase catalyzed reaction and
maintained in their single-stranded conformation by being stored as
0.25 µM solution in water and by boiling immediately
prior to use. Double-stranded
hook(CGG)8·hook(CCG)8 DNA (oligomer sequences are listed in Table I) was prepared by heating at 90 °C for 2 min an
equimolar mixture of the complementary 5' end labeled oligomers (36 µM each in TE buffer), followed by slow cooling to room
temperature. Bimolecular quadruplex DNA structures of
32P-5'-labeled d(CGG)8 were formed by
incubating 30-60 µM oligomers at 4 °C for ~20 h in
10 µl of TE buffer containing 300 mM NaCl. Bimolecular
tetraplex DNA structure of 32P-5'-labeled TeR2 were
similarly generated except that the oligomers were incubated at
37 °C for ~20 h in TE buffer containing 1 M KCl.
Tetramolecular quadruplex DNA structure of oligomer Q was prepared by
incubating 32P-5'-labeled oligomer at 50 °C for ~20 h
in TE buffer, 300 mM NaCl. Formed tetraplex DNA structures
and residual single-stranded oligomers were precipitated and washed by
ethanol and resuspended and stored at 4 °C in TE buffer containing
100 mM of the respective salt. For some experiments the
tetraplex DNA structures were enriched by nondenaturing gel
electrophoresis (29, 30). That the formed DNA secondary structures were
Hoogsteen hydrogen-bonded tetrahelices was demonstrated by
dimethylsulfate protection assay of guanine N7 groups as described
previously (19, 32). The stoichiometry of quadruplex DNA forms was
determined as described previously (19, 30, 32).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay, SDS-PAGE, and UV
Cross-linking of Protein-DNA Complexes--
Binding of proteins
isolated from a human TK-6 cell extract to DNA oligomers was monitored
by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (31). Briefly, 1.0-2.0 ng of
32P-5'-labeled d(CGG)8 was incubated at 4 °C
for 20 min with crude or purified protein fractions in 10 µl of final
volume of buffer D (0.5 mM DTT, 1.0 mM EDTA,
20% glycerol in 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5).
Protein-DNA complexes were resolved from unbound DNA by electrophoresis
of the reaction mixture at 4 °C and at a constant current of 15 mA
through a nondenaturing 6% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE running
buffer. Formed protein-DNA complexes were visualized in gels that were
dried on Whatman 3MM filter paper and exposed to x-ray film. To
quantify the electrophoretically resolved free and protein-bound DNA,
the gels were dried on DE-81 filter paper and exposed to a
PhosphorImager plate (Fuji). Amounts of protein-bound and unbound DNA
were calculated by phosphorimaging quantification of their
corresponding radioactive bands and the predetermined specific activity
of the labeled DNA. One unit of DNA binding activity was defined as the
amount of protein that formed a complex with 0.01 ng of
32P-5'-labeled d(CGG)8. SDS-PAGE and silver or
Coomassie Blue staining of resolved proteins were conducted as
described previously (31).
Covalent cross-linking of protein-DNA complexes by UV light was
performed as described (31, 32). Briefly, 10-µl aliquots of DNA
binding reaction mixtures placed in microtiter plate wells at a
distance of 6 cm from a UV light source (UVP, San Gabriel) were
irradiated at 4 °C for 5 min at 254 nm (580 microwatts/cm2 at 6 inches). An equal volume of denaturing
electrophoresis-loading buffer was added to the irradiated samples,
which were than boiled for 5 min and resolved by SDS-PAGE.
Purification of a d(CGG)n Binding Protein from TK-6
Human Cells--
Frozen lymphoblastoid TK-6 cells (packed volume, 20 ml) or neuroblastoma SK-N-MC cells (packed volume, 10 ml) were thawed at 4 °C and suspended in an equal volume of ice-cold buffer S (0.8 M NaCl, 1.0 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml STI, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 0.1 mM benzamidine, 0.5 mM DTT, 1.0 mM
EDTA, 20% glycerol, 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5). All the subsequent steps of protein purification were conducted at 4 °C.
The cells were disrupted in a Dounce homogenizer equipped with a B
pestle, and the cell extract was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 45 min. The supernatant was collected, and the pellet was resuspended in an equal volume of the above buffer containing 0.4 M NaCl (buffer S1), homogenized, and centrifuged as
described above. The combined two supernatant fractions were
chromatographed through a DE-52 column equilibrated in buffer D
containing 0.4 M NaCl to remove residual DNA (31).
Following overnight dialysis against ~200 volumes of buffer D,
proteins were precipitated by addition of ammonium sulfate to a final
concentration of 55%, and the protein precipitate was suspended in and
dialyzed against buffer D. Electrophoretic mobility shift analysis
detected most of the activity of a major d(CGG)8 binding
protein in the 55% (NH4)2SO4
precipitate. This fraction was chromatographed on a DE-52 column as
described (33) except that absorbed proteins were eluted from the
column by a linear gradient of 50-400 mM NaCl in buffer D. To stabilize the eluted d(CGG)8 binding activity and to
prevent its adsorption to glass or plastic, fractions were collected at
each consecutive step of column chromatography into STI and Nonidet
P-40 at final concentrations of 0.2 mg/ml and 0.05%, respectively.
Aliquots of the collected fractions were dialyzed against ~200
volumes of buffer D, and d(CGG)8 binding activity was
detected in fractions that were eluted from the column by 120-250
mM NaCl. Pooled active fractions were dialyzed overnight against ~200 volumes of buffer P (0.5 mM DTT, 1.0 mM EDTA, 20% glycerol, 50 mM KPO4
buffer, pH 7.3) and loaded onto a P-11 column equilibrated with the
same buffer (33). Adsorbed proteins were eluted by a linear gradient of
buffer P containing 50-500 mM KPO4, and
aliquots of each collected fraction were dialyzed against buffer D. The
major portion of the d(CGG)8 binding activity was detected
in fractions that were eluted from P-11 by 130-380 mM KPO4. Pooled active fractions were dialyzed overnight
against ~200 volumes of buffer D and loaded onto an affinity
chromatography column of d(CGG)16 covalently linked to
Sepharose 4B. To prepare the affinity matrix, CNBr-activated Sepharose
4B was suspended in water and washed over a Millipore funnel by 30 volumes each of 1.0 mM HCl and H2O followed by
10 volumes of 10 mM KPO4 buffer, pH 8.0. The
matrix, suspended in the last wash buffer was mixed with a solution
that contained in the same buffer, 250 µg/ml of unlabeled
d(CGG)16 and 0.4 ng/ml of 32P-5'-labeled
d(CGG)16, which served to monitor the efficacy of DNA
binding to the matrix. The mixture was slowly rotated at room temperature overnight, and the matrix was subsequently washed over a
Millipore funnel by 20 volumes of H2O and 10 volumes of 1.0 M ethanolamine-HCl buffer, pH 8.0. After suspending the
matrix in the last wash buffer it was rotated at room temperature for additional 4 h and washed by 10 volumes each of 10 mM
KPO4 buffer, pH 8.0; 1.0 M KPO4
buffer, pH 8.0; 1.0 M KCl; and 300 mM NaCl, 1.0 mM EDTA, 0.02% NaN3 in 10 mM
Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5. The washed matrix was packed into a column and
stored at 4 °C under the final wash buffer until used. About 20% of
the 32P-5'-labeled d(CGG)16 became covalently
bound to the activated Sepharose to 20 µg of d(CGG)16/ml
of packed Sepharose 4B matrix. After slowly loading the protein
solution onto a column pre-equilibrated with buffer D, it was washed
with one column volume of buffer D, and adsorbed proteins were eluted
stepwise with a single column volume each of solutions that contained
0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M NaCl in buffer D. Collected fractions were dialyzed against buffer D, and the
d(CGG)8 binding activity was detected by electrophoretic
mobility shift analysis in fractions eluted by 200-500 mM
NaCl. The active fractions were stored at 80 °C in the presence of
0.2 mg/ml STI and 0.05% Nonidet P-40. Under these conditions the DNA
binding activity remained undiminished for at least 6 months.
Protein Analysis--
Amounts of protein were determined using
the Bio-Rad protein assay kit. Partial amino acid sequence of a
d(CGG)16-Sepharose purified fraction of the d(CGG)n
binding protein was determined following its resolution by SDS-PAGE and
Coomassie Blue staining. Bands of 75 and 88 kDa that corresponded to
the d(CGG)8 binding activity were excised, and protein was
eluted from the gel slices. The isolated proteins were digested by Lys C protease, and resulting peptides were separated by reverse-phase HPLC. Amino acid sequences of selected peptides were determined by
standard automated procedures, utilizing Peptide Sequencer 476A
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Immunochemical Identification of the d(CGG)n Binding
Protein--
Two immunoassays were used to verify the identification
of the d(CGG)n binding protein as Ku antigen: (a)
Gel supershift. P-11 purified fraction of the binding protein was
incubated with 32P-5'-labeled d(CGG)7 under
standard DNA binding conditions followed by incubation at 4 °C for
30 min with 0.2-0.6 µg of nonimmune goat IgG or goat antibodies
directed against a peptide corresponding to amino acids 713-730 of the
86-kDa subunit of human Ku antigen or to amino acids 577-595 of the
70-kDa subunit of this protein. Shifted and supershifted
32P-5'-d(CGG)7-protein complexes were resolved
by electrophoresis at 4 °C through a nondenaturing 6%
polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE buffer. (b) Immune
precipitation. Aliquots of the P-11 fraction of the d(CGG)n
binding protein were incubated at 4 °C for 45 min with 0.6 µg of
either nonimmune goat IgG or goat anti-Ku 86 antibodies. Swollen
protein G-agarose beads were added at 1.5 mg/reaction mixture and
adsorption of immune complexes onto protein G was conducted at 4 °C
by rotation for 4 h. Protein G-adsorbed immune complexes were
removed by centrifugation at 6,000 × g for 5 min, and
aliquots of the supernatant fractions were analyzed by mobility shift
electrophoresis for their capacity to bind 32P-5'-labeled
d(CGG)7.
Assay of Tetraplex d(CGG)n Unwinding by
qTBP42--
G'2 d(CGG)8 destabilizing activity of qTBP42
with or without added Ku antigen or STI was assayed as described
(30).
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of a d(CGG)n Binding Protein--
In a
search for proteins that affect the conformation of the fragile X
expanded sequence (CGG)n, we fractionated proteins from human
TK-6 lymphoblastoid cells based on their binding to oligomeric
(CGG)n. A major TK-6 cell d(CGG)8 binding activity
was precipitated by 55% ammonium sulfate and was further purified by
chromatography on columns of DE-52, P-11, and
d(CGG)16-Sepharose (see "Experimental Procedures").
Fig. 1A shows a typical
elution pattern of 32P-5'-d(CGG)8 binding
proteins from a d(CGG)16-Sepharose column. These results
demonstrated that d(CGG)8 formed a major
electrophoretically retarded complex with a protein that was eluted
from the column by 200-500 mM NaCl, with maximum binding
activity detected in the second 300 mM NaCl fraction. A
lower sized complex was also discerned in fractions eluted by
500 mM NaCl (Fig. 1A). However, this lower
complex was eliminated when an excess of unlabeled ~d(G)17~ competing oligomer was added to the binding
mixture, whereas the intensity of the major complex remained
undiminished (results not shown). SDS-PAGE of the
d(CGG)16-Sepharose resolved proteins revealed in the
200-500 mM NaCl fractions two major subunits of 72 and 87 kDa. The relative amounts of these polypeptides that constituted
more than 50% to the total protein content of the second 300 mM NaCl eluate were in concordance with their binding activity (Fig. 1B). Repeated SDS-PAGE analyses yielded
average sizes of 75 and 88 kDa for these two polypeptide chains,
respectively (see below).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Resolution of d(CGG)8 binding
activities by d(CGG)16-Sepharose affinity chromatography
and SDS-PAGE of protein fractions. Phosphocellulose-purified
fraction of the d(CGG)8 binding protein was loaded onto a
d(CGG)16-Sepharose affinity column, and proteins were
eluted by a stepwise gradient of 0.05-1.0 M NaCl in buffer
D. Each eluting salt solution (a single column volume) was collected in
two fractions that were stabilized by 0.2 mg/ml STI and 0.05% Nonidet
P-40. A, mobility shift electrophoresis of the
affinity-purified protein. Fractions were assayed for binding of
32P-5'-labeled d(CGG)8 as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Concentrations of eluting salt are
indicated for each fraction in the abscissa. B, Coomassie
Blue staining of SDS-PAGE resolved affinity purified protein fractions.
Electrophoresis and protein staining were conducted as described under
"Experimental Procedures." To better separate high molecular mass
proteins, lower mass proteins including the added STI stabilizer were
run out of the gel. Arrows indicate the positions of the 72- and 87-kDa protein bands whose distribution in the eluted fractions was
in concordance to the binding activity (A).
|
|
To further establish the identity of the d(CGG)n binding
protein, the affinity purified protein was cross-linked to
32P-5'-d(CGG)8 by UV light and the covalently
bonded complex was resolved by SDS-PAGE. Fractions collected from the
d(CGG)16-Sepharose affinity matrix were assayed for
32P-5'-d(CGG)8 binding activity, and
protein-DNA complexes were irradiated by UV light. As seen in Fig.
2A, fractions that were eluted
from the affinity matrix by 300 mM NaCl contained
d(CGG)8 binding activity and also displayed a corresponding
covalently linked complex of 83 kDa (Fig. 2B). Notably,
whereas SDS-PAGE revealed two protein bands that conformed with the
d(CGG)8 binding activity (Fig. 1B), only a
single band of UV cross-linked d(CGG)8-protein complex was
discerned (Fig. 2B). The presence of a single complex band
was likely due to the confinement of the DNA binding capacity to the
75-kDa protein subunit of the dimeric protein which together with the
associated d(CGG)8 oligomer, yielded the observed 83-kDa complex (see "Discussion").

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Covalent cross-linking of the binding protein
to d(CGG)8. Resolution of the d(CGG)8
binding activity by d(CGG)16-Sepharose affinity column
chromatography was conducted as described in the legend to Fig. 1.
Aliquots of each of the d(CGG)16-Sepharose resolved
fractions were incubated with 32P-5'-labeled
d(CGG)8 under binding conditions as described under
"Experimental Procedures" except that a 100-fold molar excess of
unlabeled ~d(G)17~ competing oligomer was present in
the reaction mixtures. The protein-d(CGG)8 complexes were
either directly resolved by nondenaturing mobility shift
electrophoresis or were covalently cross-linked by UV light (see
"Experimental Procedures"). Following electrophoresis through an
SDS-12% polyacrylamide gel, the dried gels were exposed to
autoradiographic film. Molecular mass of the cross-linked complex was
estimated from its migration relative to that of molecular size marker
proteins. A, nondenaturing mobility shift electrophoresis.
B, SDS-PAGE of a UV-cross-linked complex.
|
|
By eliminating the d(CGG)16-Sepharose chromatography step,
a major d(CGG)n binding protein was purified to a lower degree
from cultured SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cells. Properties of the binding
activities isolated from TK-6 or SK-N-MC cells were indistinguishable,
and results shown hereto forth were obtained with the TK-6 cell protein.
Properties of the d(CGG)n Binding
Activity--
Initial characterization of the
d(CGG)16-Sepharose affinity purified d(CGG)n
binding activity from TK-6 cells indicated that it is a protein.
Digestion of the binding activity with 133 µg/ml proteinase K as
described (32) or its incubation at 4 °C for 5 min with 0.13% SDS
reduced by 80% or 100%, respectively, the formation of an
electrophoretically retarded complex with 32P-5'-labeled
d(CGG)8. Similarly, incubation of the affinity purified activity at 50 or 54 °C for 10 min resulted in loss of 91 or 97%, respectively, of the d(CGG)8 binding activity. By contrast,
digestion of the protein with 4 units/µl micrococcal nuclease (33),
stimulated binding of 32P-5'-labeled d(CGG)8,
probably as a result of hydrolysis of residual protein-bound cellular
DNA. Incubation of the protein at 4 °C for 15 min with 8.5 mM N-ethylmaleimide and termination of the reaction by the addition of 22 mM DTT, resulted in a
80-100% reduction in the binding 32P-5'-labeled
d(CGG)8. Hence, reduced sulfydryl groups thus appeared to
be essential for the DNA binding activity.
Two independent determinations of the native molecular mass of the
protein by Superdex© 200 gel filtration yielded values of 170 and 162 kDa. SDS-PAGE resolution of the affinity-purified protein and its
staining with silver or Coomassie Blue indicated molecular sizes of
75 ± 3.0 and 88 ± 2.0 kDa for the two prominent protein
bands seen in Fig. 1B (average of three independent
determinations). The measured native mass of the binding protein and
the denatured sizes of its two related polypeptides suggested that it
is a heterodimer of ~75- and ~88-kDa subunits.
The d(CGG)n Binding Protein Is Ku Autoantigen--
To
identify the d(CGG)n binding protein, we determined partial
amino acid sequences of three Lys C peptides derived from each of its
two isolated subunits. A search through GenBankTM revealed
that the two subunits of human Ku autoantigen were the only proteins to
contain sequences homologous to the similarly sized subunits of the
d(CGG)n binding protein. Ku autoantigen, as well as closely
homologous or identical nuclear DNA binding proteins (35, 38-43), are
heterodimers of a 68-75-kDa polypeptide and a larger subunit of 83-87 kDa (Refs. 36-38, 41, and 43; for a recent review see Ref. 44). As shown in Table II, sequences of
peptides derived from the 75- and 88-kDa subunits of the
d(CGG)n binding protein with cumulative lengths of 47 and 35 amino acid residues, respectively, were 100% homologous to sequences
of the two corresponding Ku autoantigen subunits.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Amino acid sequences of peptides derived from the 75- and 88-kDa
subunits of the d(CGG)n binding protein and sequences of the
70- and 85-kDa subunits of human Ku autoantigen
The 75- and 88-kDa subunits of the d(CGG)n binding protein,
designated p75 and p88, respectively, were resolved by SDS-PAGE,
stained with Coomassie Blue, and isolated as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Amino acid sequences of HPLC-resolved
Lys C peptides were determined and a search through GenBankTM
identified the 70-kDa (48) and 85-kDa (36) subunits of Ku autoantigen
as the only homologs of the corresponding d(CGG)n binding
protein subunits. Positions of the identified amino acid residues
within each Ku autoantigen subunit are indicated.
|
|
The designation of the d(CGG)n binding protein as a Ku antigen
was further verified by demonstrating its specific interaction with
goat antibodies directed against the subunits of human Ku antigen.
Aliquots of the P-11 purified fraction of the d(CGG)n binding
protein were preincubated with 32P-5'-d(CGG)7
under standard DNA binding conditions and then incubated at 4 °C for
30 min with no added protein or with either nonimmune goat IgG or a
goat antibody directed against the 86-kDa subunit of Ku antigen. Formed
protein-DNA complexes or complexes of antibody-protein-DNA were
resolved by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis. As seen in Fig.
3A, neither nonimmune IgG nor
anti-Ku 86 antibodies by themselves formed a detectable complex with
32P-5'-d(CGG)7. Additionally, nonimmune IgG did
not affect the formation or electrophoretic migration of the complex of
the binding protein with 32P-5'-d(CGG)7.
However, anti-Ku 86 antibody retarded the electrophoretic mobility of
the DNA-binding protein complex (Fig. 3A). A similar supershifting of the protein-d(CGG)7 complex was induced by
an antibody directed against the 70-kDa subunit of human Ku antigen (result not shown). To test whether anti-Ku antibodies
immunoprecipitated the d(CGG)n binding protein, it was
incubated with either nonimmune IgG or with anti-Ku 86 antibody. Immune
complexes were adsorbed onto protein G-agarose beads, and
nonprecipitated DNA binding activity was measured by electrophoretic
mobility shift assay. As seen in Fig. 3B, whereas binding
activity was detected in samples that were not exposed to
immunoglobulin or were incubated with nonimmune IgG, it was eliminated
following incubation with anti-Ku 86 antibody. A more rapidly migrating
faint band that was detected after immune precipitation (Fig.
3B) represented either a complex of the DNA with
unprecipitated 75-kDa Ku subunit or with a weaker DNA binding activity
that was ordinarily competed out by the more strongly binding Ku
antigen. By virtue of their similar native and subunit molecular
masses, fully homologous partial amino acid sequences and specific
interaction with anti-Ku antigen antibodies, the d(CGG)n
binding protein was identified as Ku antigen (see
"Discussion").

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
The d(CGG)n binding protein is
recognized by anti-Ku antigen antibodies. A,
electrophoretic mobility supershift by anti-Ku 86 antibody. P-11
purified d(CGG)n binding protein was incubated with
32P-5'-labeled d(CGG)7 under standard DNA
binding conditions, 0.2 µg of nonimmune goat IgG or goat antibodies
directed against the 86-kDa subunit of human Ku antigen were added, and
the mixtures were further incubated at 4 °C for 30 min. Control
mixtures contained the respective immunoglobulins without
d(CGG)n binding protein. Protein-DNA complexes were resolved by
electrophoresis at 4 °C through a nondenaturing gel of 6%
polyacrylamide in 0.5× TBE buffer. Arrows indicate the
positions of free 32P-5'-d(CGG)7, a complex of
the binding protein with 32P-5'-d(CGG)7 and of
a complex supershifted by anti-Ku 86 antibody. B,
immunoprecipitation of the binding protein by anti-Ku 86 antibody.
Aliquots of P-11 purified d(CGG)n binding protein were
incubated at 4 °C for 45 min with 0.6 µg of either nonimmune goat
IgG or goat anti-Ku 86 antibodies. Protein G-agarose beads were added
at 1.5 mg/reaction mixture, and the mixtures were rotated at 4 °C
for 4 h. Protein-G adsorbed immune complexes were removed by 5 min
of centrifugation in the cold at 6,000 × g, and
aliquots of the supernatant fractions were assayed for
32P-5'-d(CGG)n binding by mobility shift gel
electrophoresis. Arrows mark positions of unbound
32P-5'-d(CGG)n and of a
32P-5'-d(CGG)7-protein complex.
|
|
DNA Sequence and Structure Binding Preferences of Ku
Antigen--
Mammalian Ku antigen binds in vitro ends of
double-stranded or hairpin DNA in a largely DNA structure- and
sequence-independent fashion (reviewed in Ref. 44). To quantitatively
assess the nucleotide sequence and DNA structure binding preferences of
the d(CGG)n binding Ku, we determined dissociation constants (Kd) of its complexes with selected DNA structures
and sequences.
A typical Scatchard plot of the binding of increasing amounts of
5'-32P-labeled G'2 d(CGG)8 to affinity purified
TK-6 cell Ku and the deduced Kd value are shown in
Fig. 4. Average Kd values were similarly determined for complexes of Ku with various single-stranded, double-stranded, and tetraplex DNA sequences and are
listed in Table III. Whereas
d(CGG)n exists in solution in a hairpin form (21-24), its
analog (CII)8 maintained a single-stranded conformation
under a variety of conditions as a result of its inability to form a
hydrogen bond at the inosine C2
group.2 As seen in
Table III, Ku formed a complex with (CII)8 that had a
similar Kd value to dissociation constants of
complexes with other guanine or cytosine-rich single strands. However,
the complex of Ku with hairpin d(CGG)8 had a 2-3-fold
higher Kd value. In line with its reported
preferential binding to ends of double-stranded DNA (44), Ku bound
d(CGG)8·d(CCG)8 at a Kd that was 1.8-2.9-fold lower than the Kd value of Ku
complexes with single-stranded oligomers (Table III). Tetramolecular
tetraplex structure of the IgG switch region sequence
d(TACAG4AGCTG4TAGA) and bimolecular and
unimolecular tetraplex structures of the vertebrate telomeric sequence
d(TTAGGG)n were bound at affinities that ranged between those
of single-stranded and hairpin DNA.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Determination of the dissociation constant of
Ku antigen-G'2 d(CGG)8 complex. Affinity purified Ku
antigen (32 activity units) was incubated at 4 °C for 20 min with
increasing amounts of 5'-32P-labeled G'2
d(CGG)8 under standard DNA binding conditions. Ku-G'2
d(CGG)8 complexes were resolved from unbound G'2
d(CGG)8 by mobility shift electrophoresis through a
nondenaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel in 0.5× TBE buffer (see
"Experimental Procedures"). A, mobility shift
electrophoresis pattern of mixtures of Ku antigen with increasing
amounts of G'2 d(CGG)8. B, Scatchard plot of
results shown in A and quantified by phosphorimaging. The
Kd value was calculated as the negative reciprocal
of the slope of the Scatchard plot.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Dissociation constants of complexes of Ku antigen with preferred DNA
sequences and structures
Dissociation constants (Kd) for the listed
protein-DNA complexes were inferred from Scatchard plots of the binding
of increasing amounts of DNA by affinity-purified Ku antigen as shown
in Fig. 4.
|
|
Most notable was the significantly higher affinity of the Ku protein
for a G'2 bimolecular tetraplex structure of d(CGG)8. The
measured average Kd value of 0.35 × 10 9 mol/l for the Ku-G'2 d(CGG)8 complex was
27.4-fold lower than the Kd of a complex with
hairpin d(CGG)8 (Table III). Further, Ku-G'2
d(CGG)8 complexes had a Kd that was 29- and 8.6-fold lower than the Kd values of complexes
with G'2 d(TTAGGG)2 and G4
d(TACAG4AGCTG4TAGA). Also, the dissociation constant of the Ku-G'2 d(CGG)8 complex was 9.1-15.1 lower
than the Kd values of complexes with the four
examined single-stranded sequences and >5-fold lower than the
Kd of the complex with double-stranded
d(CGG)8·d(CCG)8 (Table III). Thus, the TK-6 cell Ku displayed preferentially tight binding to tetraplex G'2 d(CGG)8.
Ku Antigen Protects G'2 d(CGG)8 Tetraplex against
Nuclease Digestion--
We next examined whether the preferential
tight binding of tetraplex G'2 d(CGG)8 by TK-6 cell Ku
affected the resistance of this tetrahelix to nuclease digestion.
End-labeled G'2 d(CGG)8 was incubated under binding
condition with either affinity purified Ku antigen containing 200 µg/ml STI stabilizing protein or with a similar amount of STI alone.
A set of control DNA samples was similarly incubated with no protein
added. The mixtures were than digested by micrococcal nuclease for
different periods of time. Fig. 5 shows
results of electrophoretic separation of intact G'2 d(CGG)8
from its degradation products. The presented data indicated that 1 min
of digestion with micrococcal nuclease with or without added STI led to
degradation of about 35% of the tetraplex DNA structure. By contrast,
only 15% of this DNA was digested in mixtures that contained Ku
antigen. Likewise, throughout the time course of the experiment,
Ku-bound G'2 d(CGG)8 remained more resistant to degradation
relative to DNA incubated without or with STI (Fig. 5). Hence, Ku
specifically increased the nuclease resistance of the tightly bound G'2
d(CGG)8.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Ku antigen protects G'2 d(CGG)8
against nuclease digestion. DNA binding mixtures at a volume of 9 µl each, contained 2.0 ng of G'2 32P-5'
d(CGG)8 and affinity purified Ku antigen (300 activity
units containing 0.6 µg of STI) or 0.6 µg of STI alone in buffer D. A third set of control mixtures contained each 2.0 ng of
32P-5' G'2 d(CGG)8 in buffer D with no protein
added. Following incubation at 4 °C for 20 min, 1 µl of a solution
containing micrococcal nuclease and CaCl2 at final
concentrations of 0.2 µg/µl and 1 mM, respectively, was
added, and the mixtures were transferred to 20 °C. Digestion by the
nuclease was terminated at the indicated time points by adding to each
mixture 3 µl of a solution of 40% glycerol, 50 mM EDTA,
2 mM SDS, 3% bromphenol blue, and 3% xylene cyanol.
Intact G'2 d(CGG)8 was resolved from its degradation
products by electrophoresis through a nondenaturing 6% polyacrylamide
gel in 0.5× TBE buffer. Upper panels, autoradiograms of the
progressive nucleolytic digestion of 32P-5' G'2
d(CGG)8 without added protein or in the presence of STI
containing Ku antigen or STI alone. Lower panel, kinetics of
32P-5' G'2 d(CGG)8 digestion inferred from
phosphorimaging quantification of results shown in the upper
panels.
|
|
Ku Antigen Impedes Unwinding of G'2 d(CGG)8 Tetraplex
by the Destabilizing Protein qTBP42--
Bimolecular tetraplex
structures of d(CGG)n oligomers were shown to be unwound by
human Werner syndrome DNA helicase (29) and by the murine hnRNP-related
proteins qTBP42 and uqTBP25 (30). We inquired whether formation of a
complex with Ku affected the destabilization of G'2 d(CGG)8
by qTBP42. Following incubation of G'2
32P-5-d(CGG)8 under binding conditions with either
STI-containing Ku or with a similar amount of STI alone, the binding
reaction mixtures were incubated with qTBP42 under tetraplex unwinding conditions. Results presented in Fig. 6
indicated that up to ~20% of the G'2 d(CGG)8 was
destabilized in the presence of STI under the tested conditions.
However, no significant unwinding was detected in mixtures that
contained Ku. Thus, in line with its preferential tight binding to G'2
d(CGG)8 (Table III) and protection against nuclease attack
(Fig. 5), Ku also hindered qTBP42-mediated destabilization of this
tetraplex DNA.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Ku antigen impedes destabilization of G'2
d(CGG)8 by qTBP24. DNA binding mixtures at a volume of
6 µl each, contained 2.0 ng of G'2
32P-5'-d(CGG)8 and affinity purified Ku antigen
(300 activity units containing 0.6 µg ofSTI) or 0.6 µg of STI alone
in buffer D. Following incubation at 4 °C for 20 min, 0.3-1.3 units
of qTBP42 in buffer D were added to the reaction mixtures to a final
volume of 10 µl, and incubation continued at 37 °C for 30 min.
Destabilization of the G'2 32P-5' d(CGG)8
tetraplex by qTBP42 was terminated by the addition to each mixture of 3 µl of 40% glycerol, 50 mM EDTA, 2 mM SDS,
3% bromphenol blue, and 3% xylene cyanol and displacement of single
strands from the G'2 d(CGG)8 tetraplex was monitored by
electrophoresis through a nondenaturing 12% polyacrylamide gel in
0.5× TBE buffer. A, autoradiograms of the destabilization
of G'2 d(CGG)8 by increasing amounts of qTBP42 in the
presence of STI-containing Ku antigen or STI alone. B,
phosphorimaging quantification of the extent of G'2 d(CGG)8
destabilization by increasing amounts of qTBP42 in the presence of
STI-containing Ku antigen or STI alone.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Ku protein, originally identified as a nuclear autoantigen (35),
is mainly recognized for its essential roles in the repair of DNA
double-stranded breaks and in site-specific recombination of the V(D)J
gene segments (45). Identical or very closely related proteins were
characterized as sequence-independent or sequence-selective DNA binding
proteins (35, 38, 40, 43, 46, 47). Additionally, human DNA helicase II
was also equated with Ku antigen (37, 41). Evidence suggested that the
~70-kDa DNA binding subunit of Ku antigen is encoded by multiple,
closely homologous but not identical genes and that minimal variations
in the amino acid sequence of this subunit in members of the Ku
autoantigen family, dictate different DNA binding specificity of the
proteins (48). The classification of the TK-6 cell d(CGG)n
binding protein as Ku antigen was indicated most strongly by the
synonymous amino acid sequences of Lys C peptides from each of the two
subunits of the d(CGG)n binding protein and sequences of
corresponding Ku autoantigen subunits (Table II). The identity of the
d(CGG)n binding protein was confirmed by its specific binding
and immunoprecipitation by antibodies directed against the 70- and
86-kDa subunits of human Ku antigen (see Fig. 3 and "Results").
Three additional lines of evidence supported the classification of the
d(CGG)n binding protein as Ku antigen: (a) Similarly
to the heterodimeric Ku antigen that constitutes of 68-75- and
83-87-kDa subunits (37, 38, 41, 43) the native ~170-kDa
d(CGG)n binding protein displayed subunits of 75 and 88 kDa
(Fig. 1 and "Results"). (b) UV cross-linking analysis
attributed the DNA binding activity of Ku antigen-related proteins to
their 70-75-kDa subunit (38, 44). The 83-kDa molecular mass of the
single band of UV cross-linked d(CGG)8-protein complex
(Fig. 2B) suggested that it was composed of the 75-kDa
polypeptide of the binding protein and the ~ 7.5-kDa d(CGG)8. (c) N-ethylmaleimide, which
obliterated the d(CGG)n binding activity of the TK-6 cell
protein (see "Results"), was also reported to abolish DNA binding
by of Ku autoantigen (49). These cumulative data warranted the
identification of the TK-6 d(CGG)n binding protein as Ku antigen.
Preferentially Tight Binding of G'2 d(CGG)n by Ku
Antigen--
The TK-6 cell Ku protein was purified based on its
binding to d(CGG)n. However, results summarized in Table III
indicated that it bound DNA in a largely sequence- and
structure-independent fashion. The dissociation constants of complexes
of Ku with inosine-, guanine-, or cytosine-rich single-stranded
oligomers were very similar, ranging between 3.2 ± 1.8 and
5.3 ± 2.3 × 10 9 mol/liter (Table III). These
values were in good accord with a dissociation constant of 3.5 ± 1.3 nM that was determined for a complex of Ku with
single-stranded fragment of the long terminal repeat of mouse mammary
tumor virus (50). Double-stranded hook d(CGG)8·hook
d(CCG)8 was bound to the TK-6 cell Ku protein more tightly,
as reflected by a measured Kd of 1.8 ± 0.7 × 10 9 mol/liter. This dissociation constant was
in the same range as Kd values of 0.84 ± 0.24 (55) or 2.4 × 10 9 mol/liter (51) that were reported
for complexes of Ku with other short DNA double strands. Dissociation
constants of Ku complexes with tetrahelical structures of vertebrate
and Tetrahymena telomeric DNA and of an IgG switch region
sequence ranged between 3.0 ± 1.8 and 10.2 ± 3.5 × 10 9 mol/liter (Table III). These values are in some
conflict with recently documented results, obtained by binding
competition assay, of tighter association of Ku with tetraplex and
single-stranded forms of the Oxytricha telomeric repeat than
with double strands of this sequence (52). This discrepancy might be
due to the different modes of measurement employed or to the specific
sequence or structure of the Oxytricha telomeric tetraplex structure.
Most notable was the preferentially tight binding of Ku to a
bimolecular tetraplex structure of d(CGG)8. The measured
Kd of 0.35 ± 0.15 × 10 9
mol/liter for a Ku-G'2 d(CGG)8 complex was 27- and 9.7-fold
lower than dissociation constants for complexes with hairpin
d(CGG)8 and single-stranded d(CII)8,
respectively (Table III). Similarly, Ku bound G'2 d(CGG)8
significantly more tightly than any of the DNA sequences or structures
that were tested, suggesting a preferred affinity of this protein for
bimolecular tetraplex d(CGG)n. That this selectively tight
binding reflected preferred recognition by Ku of both the sequence and
structure of G'2 d(CGG)8 was demonstrated by the tighter
binding of G'2 d(CGG)8 than hairpin d(CGG)8 or tetraplex structures of other guanine-rich sequences.
Protection of G'2 d(CGG)n by Ku Antigen--
A number
of proteins have been shown to associate in
vitro with different structures of d(CGG) repeats. These include
HMG box proteins that bind branched structures of
(GCC)15·d(CGG)10 (54) and a 20-kDa human
nuclear protein that associates with double-stranded but not
single-stranded d(CGG)n oligomers (55, 56) and affects the
activity of the FMR1 gene promoter (57). An additional
protein from mouse brain binds several single-stranded trinucleotide
repeats including d(CGG)n (58). Although these proteins were
not studied for their potential effect on the structure of the bound
DNA, human Werner syndrome DNA helicase (29) and the murine
hnRNP-related proteins qTBP42 and uqTBP25 (30) were found to
efficiently unwind bimolecular tetraplex forms of d(CGG)n.
Results presented in this work indicated that by tightly associating
with bimolecular tetraplex d(CGG)n, human Ku antigen was
capable of stabilizing this tetrahelical structure of the fragile X
expanded repeat sequence.
As our results indicated, the preferential tight binding by Ku of G'2
d(CGG)n affected the stability of the protein-associated bimolecular tetraplex. Data shown in Fig. 5 showed that binding to Ku
increased the relative resistance of G'2 d(CGG)8 to
digestion by micrococcal nuclease. Further, association with Ku
rendered G'2 3'-tail d(CGG)8 resistant to unwinding by
qTBP42 (Fig. 6). Qualitatively similar results were obtained when Ku
protected G'2 3'-tail d(CGG)8 against unwinding by human
Werner syndrome helicase (results not shown). However, in line with a
recent report (53) we found that Ku stimulated the helicase-associated
3' 5' exonuclease, leading to degradation of part of the tetraplex 3'-tail d(CGG)8 substrate in the course of the unwinding
reaction (data not presented).
Significance of d(CGG)n Binding and Protection by
Proteins--
Expansion of the d(CGG) trinucleotide repeat in the
FMR1 gene (2, 4-8) and ensuing hypermethylation of the
amplified sequence and an adjacent CpG island (10-13) silence
FMR1 transcription (12, 14, 15) and delay its replication
(16, 17) in fragile X cells. The formation of hairpin (21-24, 34) and
tetrahelical structures (18-20) of d(CGG)n results in blocking
of DNA polymerases in vitro at d(CGG)n template
tracts (26, 27) and in the obstruction of replication in
vivo (59). Evidence suggested that hairpin or tetraplex structures
of d(CGG)n may cause polymerase slippage and expansion of the
d(CGG) trinucleotide repeat (46).
Previously we showed that proteins, Werner syndrome helicase (29) and
qTBP42 and uqTBP25 (30), mediated unwinding of bimolecular tetraplex
forms of d(CGG)n into their single-stranded constituents. The
demonstrated capability of the TK-6 cell Ku protein to impede
nucleolytic digestion of G'2 d(CGG)n and to block its
destabilization by qTBP42 raises the possibility that proteins might
also prevent the removal or melting of d(CGG)n secondary
structures. In vivo stabilization of secondary structures of
the FMR1 gene d(CGG)n stretch by Ku or similar DNA binding proteins, might thus contribute to polymerase slippage and to
trinucleotide repeat expansion. Further, proteins that protect and
stabilize hairpin or tetraplex formations of d(CGG)n might also
exacerbate the blocking of FMR1 transcription in fragile X
cells. Hence, in assessing the formation and stability of secondary structures of d(CGG)n, the potential contribution of both
hairpin and tetraplex d(CGG)n stabilizing and destabilizing nuclear proteins should be taken into account.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Prof. Arie Admon and the Technion
Protein Research Center for peptide sequencing.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants from the Conquer
Fragile X Foundation Inc. (to M. F.), from the United
States-Israel Binational Science Fund, and from the Fund for Promotion
of Research in the Technion and by NCI, National Institutes of Health
Grant P01-CA-47852 (to L. A. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Unit of
Biochemistry, The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 9649, Haifa 31096, Israel. Tel.: 972-4-829-5328; Fax: 972-4-851-0735; E-mail:
mickey@tx.technion.ac.il.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 2, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005542200
2
M. Fry, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
STI, soy bean
trypsin inhibitor;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bailey, D. B.,
and Nelson, D.
(1995)
Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev.
1,
238-244
|
| 2.
|
Verkerk, A. J. M. H.,
Pieretti, M.,
Sutcliffe, J. S.,
Fu, Y.-H.,
Kuhl, D. P. A.,
Pizzuti, A.,
Reiner, O.,
Richards, S.,
Victoria, M. F.,
Zhang, F.,
Eussen, B. E.,
van Ommen, G.-J. B.,
Blonden, L. A. J.,
Riggins, G. J.,
Chastain, J. L.,
Kunst, C. B.,
Galjaard, H.,
Caskey, C. T.,
Nelson, D. L.,
Oostra, B. A.,
and Warren, S. T.
(1991)
Cell
65,
905-914
|
| 3.
|
Sutherland, G. R.
(1977)
Science
197,
265-266
|
| 4.
|
Fu, Y.-H.,
Kuhl, D. P. A.,
Pizzuti, A.,
Pierreti, M.,
Sutcliffe, J. S.,
Richards, S.,
Verkerk, A. J. M. H.,
Holden, J. J. A.,
Fenwick, R. G., Jr.,
Warren, S. T.,
Oostra, B. A.,
Nelson, D. L.,
and Caskey, C. T.
(1991)
Cell
67,
1047-1058
|
| 5.
|
Kremer, E. J.,
Pritchard, M.,
Lynch, M., Yu, S.,
Holman, K.,
Baker, E.,
Warren, S. T.,
Schlessinger, D,
Sutherland, G. R.,
and Richards, R. I.
(1991)
Science
252,
1711-1714
|
| 6.
|
Nakahori, Y.,
Knight, S. J. L.,
Holland, J.,
Schwartz, C.,
Roche, A.,
Tarleton, J.,
Wong, S.,
Flint, T. J.,
Froster-Iskenius, U.,
Bentley, D.,
Davies, K. E.,
and Hirst, M. C.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
4355-4359
|
| 7.
|
Oberlé, I.,
Rousseau, F.,
Heitz, D.,
Kretz, C.,
Devys, D.,
Hanauer, A.,
Blue, J.,
Bertha, M. F.,
and Mandel, J. L.
(1991)
Science
252,
1097-1102
|
| 8.
|
Yu, S.,
Pritchard, M.,
Kremer, E.,
Lynch, M.,
Nancarrow, J.,
Baker, E.,
Holman, K.,
Mulley, J. C.,
Warren, S. T.,
Schlessinger, D.,
Sutherland, G. R.,
and Richards, R. I.
(1991)
Science
252,
1179-1181
|
| 9.
|
Malter, H. E.,
Iber, J. C.,
de Graff, E.,
Tabletop, J. C.,
Leisti, J.,
Warren, S. T.,
and Oostra, B. A.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
15,
165-169
|
| 10.
|
Bell, M. V.,
Hirst, M. C.,
Nakahori, Y.,
MacKinnon, R. N.,
Roche, A.,
Flint, T. J.,
Jacobs, P. A.,
Tommerup, N.,
Tranebjaerg, L.,
Froster-Iskenius, U.,
Kerr, B.,
Turner, G.,
Lindenbaum, R. H.,
Winter, R.,
Pembrey, M.,
Thibodeau, S.,
and Davies, K. E.
(1991)
Cell
64,
861-866
|
| 11.
|
Dietrich, A.,
Kioschis, P.,
Monaco, A. P.,
Gross, B.,
Korn, B.,
Williams, S. V.,
Sheer, D.,
Heitz, D.,
Oberlé, I.,
Toniolo, D.,
Warren, S.,
Lehrach, H.,
and Poustka, A.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
2567-2572
|
| 12.
|
Hansen, R. S.,
Gartler, S. M.,
Scott, C. R.,
Chen, S.-H.,
and Laird, C. D.
(1992)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
1,
571-578
|
| 13.
|
Heitz, D.,
Rousseau, R.,
Devys, D.,
Saccone, S.,
Abderrahim, H.,
LePaslier, D.,
Cohen, D.,
Vincent, A.,
Toniolo, D.,
Della, V. G.,
Johnson, S.,
Schlessinger, D.,
Oberlé, I.,
and Mandel, J. L.
(1991)
Science
251,
1236-1239
|
| 14.
|
Pieretti, M.,
Zhang, F.,
Fu, Y.-H.,
Warren, S. T.,
Oostra, B. A.,
Caskey, C. T.,
and Nelson, D. L.
(1991)
Cell
66,
817-822
|
| 15.
|
Sutcliffe, J. S.,
Nelson, D. L.,
Zhang, F.,
Pieretti, M.,
Caskey, C. T.,
Saxe, D.,
and Warren, S. T.
(1992)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
1,
397-400
|
| 16.
|
Hansen, R. S.,
Canfield, T. K.,
Lamb, M. M.,
Gartler, S. M.,
and Laird, C. D.
(1993)
Cell
73,
1403-1409
|
| 17.
|
Hansen, R. S.,
Canfield, T. K.,
Fjeld, A. D.,
Mumm, S.,
Laird, C. D.,
and Gartler, S. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4587-4592
|
| 18.
|
Chen, F.-M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23090-23096
|
| 19.
|
Fry, M.,
and Loeb, L. A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4950-4954
|
| 20.
|
Kettani, A.,
Kumar, R. A.,
and Patel, D. J.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
254,
638-656
|
| 21.
|
Gacy, A. M.,
Goellner, G.,
JuraniÉ, N.,
Macura, S.,
and McMurray, C. T.
(1995)
Cell
81,
533-540
|
| 22.
|
Mitas, M., Yu, A.,
Dill, J.,
and Haworth, I. S.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
12803-12811
|
| 23.
|
Nadel, Y.,
Weisman-Shomer, P.,
and Fry, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28970-28978
|
| 24.
|
Santhana Mariappan, S. V.,
Catasti, P.,
Chen, X.,
Ratliff, R.,
Moyzis, R. K.,
Bradbury, E. M.,
and Gupta, G.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
784-792
|
| 25.
|
Ji, J.,
Clegg, N. J.,
Peterson, K. R.,
Jackson, A. L.,
Laird, C. D.,
and Loeb, L. A.
(1996)
Nucleic Acids Res.
24,
2835-2840
|
| 26.
|
Kang, S.,
Ohshima, K.,
Shimizu, M.,
Amirhaeri, S.,
and Wells, R. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27014-27021
|
| 27.
|
Usdin, K.,
and Woodford, K. J.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
4202-4209
|
| 28.
|
Wells, R. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2875-2878
|
| 29.
|
Fry, M.,
and Loeb, L. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
12797-12803
|
| 30.
|
Weisman-Shomer, P.,
Naot, Y.,
and Fry, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2231-2238
|
| 31.
|
Weisman-Shomer, P.,
and Fry, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
3306-3312
|
| 32.
|
Erlitzki, R.,
and Fry, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15881-15890
|
| 33.
|
Sarig, G.,
Weisman-Shomer, P.,
Erlitzki, R.,
and Fry, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4474-4482
|
| 34.
|
Chen, X.,
Santhana Mariappan, S. V.,
Catasti, P.,
Ratliff, R.,
Moyzis, R. K.,
Laayoun, A.,
Smith, S.,
Bradbury, E. M.,
and Gupta, G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5199-5203
|
| 35.
|
Mimori, T.,
Hardin, J. A.,
and Steitz, J. A.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
2274-2278
|
| 36.
|
Mimori, T.,
Ohosone, Y.,
Hama, N.,
Suwa, A.,
Akizuki, M.,
Homma, M.,
Griffith, A J.,
and Hardin, J. A.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
1777-1781
|
| 37.
|
Vishwanatha, J. K.,
and Baril, E. F.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
8753-8759
|
| 38.
|
May, G.,
Sutton, C.,
and Gould, H.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3052-3059
|
| 39.
|
Zhang, W.-W.,
and Yaneva, M.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
186,
574-579
|
| 40.
|
Tóth, C. É.,
Marusic, L.,
Ochem, A.,
Patthy, A.,
Pongor, S.,
Giacca, M.,
and Falaschi, A.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3257-3263
|
| 41.
|
Tuteja, N.,
Tuteja, R.,
Ochem, A.,
Taneja, P.,
Huang, N. W.,
Simoncsits, A.,
Susic, S.,
Rahman, K.,
Marusic, L.,
Chen, J.,
Zhang, J.,
Wang, S.,
Pongor, S.,
and Falaschi, A.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4991-5001
|
| 42.
|
Cao, Q. P.,
Pitt, S.,
Leszyk, J.,
and Baril, E. F.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
8548-8557
|
| 43.
|
Genersch, E.,
Eckerskorn, C.,
Lottspeich, F. | |