![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 43, 33314-33320, October 27, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Defensin Expressed in Tongue, Esophagus,
and Trachea*
,
¶,
,
,
¶**
From the Departments of
Pediatrics, ¶ Genetics
Ph.D. Program, and
Microbiology,
University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
52242 and the § Department of Immunology, Lerner Research
Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation,
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Received for publication, July 24, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Defensins are broad spectrum, cationic antimicrobial peptides
expressed in phagocytic leukocytes and epithelial cells at mucosal surfaces (1). Their antibiotic activity and widespread expression suggest that they participate in innate immune responses in a variety
of tissues. In addition, recent studies suggest that defensins may also
signal to the adaptive immune system by acting as chemokines for
T-cells and dendritic cells (2, 3). Defensins have been classified into
two families designated Through their presence as constitutive or inducible components of
mucosal secretions, the many defensins are thought to contribute to the
antimicrobial activity present at surfaces that frequently encounter
bacteria (14). One example is the lung, where a very large surface area
frequently comes in contact with microbes, yet the intrapulmonary
airways and alveoli normally remain sterile. In the disease cystic
fibrosis, chronic bacterial infection develops in the airways
and is the chief cause of morbidity and mortality (15). One hypothesis
for the origin of this persistent infection is that mutations in cystic
fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator cause alterations in
normal ion transport across epithelia, which in turn elevates the NaCl
concentration of the surface lining liquid and impairs the function of
innate host defense factors, including To understand better the role General Methodology
Oligonucleotide probes were end labeled to a specific activity
of about 107 disintegrations/min/pmol using
[ Animals
All tissue samples were obtained from either adult FvB or
C57BL/6 mice. For bacterial exposure experiments, animals were
inoculated with 106 colony-forming units of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 intratracheally. All animal
procedures were approved by the Animal Care Use and Review Committee of
the University of Iowa or the Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
Southern Blot
A genomic Southern blot containing 8 µg of genomic DNA from
mouse, rat, cow, and human origin was digested to completion with EcoRI restriction enzymes (Bios Evo Blot). The blot
was incubated with an oligonucleotide probe, RBD-2-6a
(GGCGACAGCAGCACCAGGAGAAATGAGAAGAGAAGGTAATGGATCCTCAT) based on
sequence from the RBD-2 cDNA (22). The hybridization conditions
were 35% (v/v) formamide, 5 × SSC, 5 × Denhardt's, 1%
(w/v) SDS at 42 °C overnight, and the high stringency wash conditions were 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 55 °C for 30 min (25). The filter was then subjected to autoradiography at Cloning of the MBD-4 cDNA
RT-PCR was conducted using mouse lung cDNA as a template and
various oligonucleotide primer sets that were selected based on
conserved regions of the HBD-2 and RBD-2 sequences (9, 22). One
set of primers (forward: ATGAGGATCCATTACCTTCTCTTCTCATTTCTC; reverse:
GGTTAGTGTACGGACTGGTTTCCTCCGCATACG) generated a PCR product consistent with a partial Cloning of MBD-4 Genomic Sequences
A mouse genomic library (m129/SvJ) in Lambda Fix II (Stratagene,
La Jolla, CA) was plated at a density of 5 × 105
clones/150-mm plate (four genome equivalents). Plaque lifts were performed in duplicate using nylon membranes (Colony/Plaque Screen, PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The oligonucleotide RBD-2-6a was used as a
hybridization probe under the same hybridization and wash conditions as
used for the Southern blot analysis. Positives on duplicate filters
were plaque purified, and then phage DNA was isolated using a
polyethylene glycol precipitation/DNA adsorption protocol (Qiagen
lambda midi kit, Valencia, CA). Isolated phage DNA was digested with
restriction endonucleases and analyzed by Southern blot with
MBD-4-specific oligonucleotide probes. Fragments of interest were
subcloned into pBluescript II s/k (Stratagene).
Additional genomic sequences related to MBD-4 were identified via a
sequential nested anchored PCR strategy using two antisense oligonucleotides from exon 1 of MBD-4 (ACAGCAGCACCAGGAGAAATGTG and
CCAGGAGAAATGTGAAGAGAAGG) and two oligonucleotides
(GTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGC and ACTATAGGGCACGCGTGGT) corresponding to the
sequence of an anchored primer. The PCR template was mouse genomic DNA
that had been first digested to completion with either DraI
or SspI restriction enzyme and then modified by ligation to
an adaptor oligonucleotide
(GTAATACGACTCACTATAGGGCACGCGTGGTCGACGGCCCGGGCTGGT) containing a
sequence complementary to the aforementioned anchor sequence
(GenomewalkerTM, CLONTECH Laboratories). The PCR
was carried out using conditions recommended by the reagent supplier.
The PCR products of interest were identified by Southern blot
hybridization analysis, subcloned into a pBluescript II s/k plasmid
vector, and sequenced in their entirety. The sequence of several
independent clones was nearly identical to the 5'-flanking region
observed in the phage clone isolated as described above, but each
contained several nucleotide differences from the phage sequence. To
understand if these sequences represented alternative alleles or
additional genes highly similar to MBD-4, an oligonucleotide
(CGGTTTGTTGAAGTTCTGTGATT) from the 5'-flanking region 1.5 kb upstream
of the transcription start site together with another partially
degenerate oligonucleotide (TTGTSMATCTTCATGGAGGAGCAAATT) common
to exon 2 of both MBD-3 and MBD-4 were used in a PCR with m129/FvB
mouse genomic DNA as a template. A single product of expected size (4.1 kb) was identified and then subcloned into pBluescript II s/k for
sequence analysis.
Chromosomal Mapping of Mouse Defensins Using Radiation
Hybrids
A sequence tagged site (STS) specific for each of five mouse
defensin genes, MBD-1 (Defb1), MBD-2 (Defb2),
MBD-3 (Defb3), cryptdin-3 (Defcr3), and
cryptdin-17 (Defcr17), was designed from their respective
cDNA sequences found in GenBank (Table
I). The STS specific for
MBD-4(Defb4) was designed from cDNA sequence obtained in
this study (GenBank AF155882). The STSs were mapped with the T31 mouse
radiation hybrid panel (27). The panel was obtained from Research
Genetics (Huntsville, AL) and contains 102 DNA samples along with mouse
and hamster genomic DNA controls. Standard PCR conditions were used as
described above. Each PCR experiment was performed in duplicate, and
the amplification results for each STS were submitted to the Radiation
Hybrid Mapper server at MIT and at the Jackson Laboratory. A
strong signal in both trials was submitted as a "1," no signal in
both trials was submitted as a "0," and weak or conflicting signals
were submitted as a "2." The servers returned the MIT framework
marker that was most tightly linked to the subject STS when the
Logarithm of the ODds score exceeded 3 for the MIT server and 6 for the Jackson Lab server (Table I).
-Defensins are broad spectrum antimicrobial
peptides expressed at epithelial surfaces. Two human
-defensins,
HBD-1 and HBD-2, have been identified. In the lung, HBD-2 is an
inducible product of airway epithelia and may play a role in innate
mucosal defenses. We recently characterized rat homologs (RBD-1, RBD-2)
of the human genes and used these sequences to identify novel mouse
genes. Mouse
-defensin-4 (MBD-4) was amplified from lung cDNA
using polymerase chain reaction primers designed from conserved
sequences of RBD-2 and HBD-2. A full-length cDNA was cloned which
encodes a putative peptide with the sequence
MRIHYLLFTFLLVLLSPLAAFTQIINNPITCMTNGAICWGPCPTAFRQIGNCGHFKVRCCKIR. The peptide shares ~40% identity with HBD-2. MBD-4 mRNA was
expressed in the esophagus, tongue, and trachea but not in any of 20 other tissues surveyed. Cloning of the genomic sequence of MBD-4
revealed two nearly (>99%) identical sequences encoding MBD-4 and the
presence of numerous additional highly similar genomic sequences.
Radiation hybrid mapping localized this gene to a region of chromosome
8 near several other defensins, MBD-2, MBD-3, and
-defensins
(cryptdins)-3 and -17, consistent with a gene cluster. Our genomic
cloning and mapping data suggest that there is a large
-defensin
gene family in mice. Identification of murine
-defensins provides an
opportunity to understand further the role of these peptides in host
defense through animal model studies and the generation of
-defensin-deficient animals by gene targeting.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and
, based on distinctive, although
similar, tri-disulfide linkages in the
processed peptides. In humans, six
-defensins,
HD1-1 through HD-6, and two
-defensins, HBD-1 and
HBD-2, have been identified to date. HD-1 through HD-4 are expressed in
neutrophils, whereas HD-5 and HD-6 are expressed in epithelial cells of
the intestinal and reproductive tract (1). HBD-1 is constitutively expressed in the kidney, urogenital tract, and several other epithelia (4-8). In contrast, HBD-2 is present in skin, oral mucosa, lung, and
other sites, and its expression is remarkably inducible in response to
bacteria or proinflammatory cytokines (9-12). The genes encoding HDs
and HBDs are clustered in a contiguous segment of chromosome 8p23, and
a current hypothesis holds that
-defensins may predate the
-defensins (13).
-defensins, expressed at this
site (8, 16-18).
-defensins play in host defense it
would be advantageous to find homologous genes in species of small
laboratory animals. To date three
-defensin genes have been
described in mice (19-21) and two in rats (22). We hypothesized that a
larger
-defensin gene family exists in mice and proceeded with gene
discovery experiments. Here, we report the identification of a novel
mouse
-defensin, MBD-4, encoding a peptide homologous to known
-defensins. MBD-4 is expressed in the esophagus, tongue, and
trachea. Our data support the notion that there is a large family of
-defensin genes in mice encoding peptides involved in mucosal
defenses. Identification of murine
-defensin homologs of human genes
may further our understanding of their function through in
vivo studies and the generation of
-defensin-deficient animals
by gene targeting.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP as described (23). Purified plasmid DNA was
sequenced from both strands using the dideoxy termination method
(24).
70 °C in the
presence of a Cronex Lightning Plus intensifying screen (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) for 3 weeks.
-defensin sequence. This was confirmed by
DNA sequencing. The 5'-RACE and 3'-RACE techniques (26) were then used
to isolate the full-length cDNA for a novel mouse
-defensin (Marathon cDNA template, CLONTECH).
Radiation hybrid mapping of mouse defensin genes
RNA Analysis
Northern Blot--
Total RNA was extracted from tissues and
subjected to Northern blot analysis as described (22). The
-defensin probes were MBD-1 (CGCTCGTCCTTTATGTCCATTCTTCAAACTACTGTCAGC
(19)), MBD-2 (GCAGAAGGAGGACAAATGGCTCTGACACAGTACCCTC (20)), MBD-3
(TTGAGGAAAGGAACTCCACAACTGCCAATCTGACGAG (21)), and MBD-4
(TTGCTGGTTCTTCATCTTTTTATCTATCTTATCTTAC). Labeled probes were hybridized
overnight to immobilized RNA in 35% (v/v) formamide, 5 × SSC,
5 × Denhardt's, 1% (w/v) SDS at 42 °C and then washed at
high stringency in 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 55 °C for 30 min
(25). A glyeraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase probe (AGCCCCRGCCTTCTCCATGGTRGTGAAGACVCCR) was used as a control for RNA integrity. The filter was stripped of oligonucleotide label by
incubation in 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 70 °C for 30 min. The filter was exposed to film to assure removal of probe prior to hybridization with another probe.
RT-PCR-- RT-PCR was used to screen tissues for expression of MBD-4 and MBD-3. 1 µg of total RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed by random hexamer primers using SuperScript (Life Technologies, Inc.). First strand cDNA was amplified by PCR. As a control for amplification, a pair of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase primers (forward: AGACAGCCGCATCTTCTTGT; reverse: CTTGCCGTGGGTAGAGTCAT) was used in each PCR. The primer set used to amplify MBD-4 consisted of AACATGCATGACCAATGGAG (forward) and TCATCTTGCTGGTTCTTCATCT (reverse) and amplified a 134-bp product. The primer set for MBD-3 consisted of GCTAGGGAGCACTTGTTTGC (forward) and TTGTTTGAGGAAAGGAGGCA (reverse) and amplified a product of 220 bp. Each MBD-4 and MBD-3 reaction contained approximately 1.25 pM primers, 3 mM Mg2+, and 5 µl of the RT reaction product for a total volume of 20 µl. After an initial denaturing step (95 °C for 3 min), 30 cycles of denaturing (94 °C for 30 s), annealing (60 °C for 30 s), and extending (72 °C for 30 s), followed by 5 min at 72 °C for elongation were conducted. Aliquots of the MBD-4 and MBD-3 PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide.
RNase Protection Assay--
Total RNA was isolated from trachea,
lung, and tongue using the acid guanidinium
thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (28).
Ribonuclease protection assays were used to quantitate the mRNA
expression of MBD-4 in tissues (5). [
-32P]dUTP
antisense riboprobes for MBD-4 were prepared using the MAXIscript
in vitro transcription kit following the manufacturer's instructions (Ambion, Austin, TX). 1 ng of each probe was used to
generate protected fragments of 148 and 80 bp for MBD-4 and 18 S,
respectively. Unprotected riboprobe sizes were 327 bp and 128 bp for
MBD-4 and 18 S, respectively. Hybridization was performed using 20 µg
of total RNA following the manufacturer's instructions in the Hybspeed
RPA kit (Ambion). RNA-RNA hybrids were digested with RNase and
protected fragments visualized by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
and autoradiography (5).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Southern Blot--
Using an oligonucleotide probe (RBD-2-6a) from
the 5'-portion of the recently characterized RBD-2 cDNA (22) in
Southern blot analysis, seven discrete bands in mouse genomic DNA were identified (Fig. 1). Using probes from
bovine and human
-defensins in similar Southern blot analysis failed
to detect any discrete bands in either rat or mouse genomic
DNA.2 This observation
suggests that rodent
-defensin genes have diverged significantly
from those in these two other mammalian species.
|
Cloning and Sequencing of the MBD-4 cDNA--
A PCR strategy
was used to clone a novel murine
-defensin sequence with homology to
RBD-2 and HBD-2. Several PCR primer pairs were designed from the RBD-2
cDNA sequence based on highly conserved portions of the HBD-2 (9)
and RBD-2 (22) amino acid sequences. One such primer pair amplified a
product of the predicted size from mouse lung cDNA (see
"Experimental Procedures"). The complete 327-bp cDNA sequence
was obtained by RACE (Fig. 2). The
predicted 192-bp open reading frame codes for a 63-amino acid peptide.
The putative peptide sequence shares approximately 40, 62, and 75% identity with HBD-2, MBD-3, and RBD-2, respectively. Blast search of
the EST data base confirmed that this was a unique sequence with
similarity to three other mouse
-defensins (MBD-1, MBD-2 (Defb-2), and MBD-3). In addition, the presumed translation
product contains the conserved 6-cysteine motif characteristic of a
-defensin. We conclude that we cloned a new mouse
-defensin gene,
MBD-4. This sequence was entered into the GenBank data base under the accession number AF155882.
|
Genomic Organization of MBD-4--
To initiate characterization of
the mouse sequences identified in Fig. 2, RBD-2-6a was used as a probe
to screen a mouse genomic library under the same experimental
conditions. Cloning at the genomic level offers potential advantage of
identifying genes that might be inducible or present in unexpected
tissues or stages of development. This strategy has provided a useful
approach to identify several defensins (29-32). From approximately
four mouse genome equivalents of recombinant lambda phage clones, we
detected 69 corresponding signals on duplicate filters. 28 clones were purified and then categorized by a combination of restriction enzyme,
hybridization and partial sequence analysis. All genomic clones had
inserts in the range of ~10-15 kb, and some appeared to contain more
than one restriction fragment that contained a
-defensin-related
sequence (data not shown). Hybridization properties to a panel of
oligonucleotides were used to segregate these clones into several
groups. One clone, SW30-52, from a group that appeared to contain the
MBD-4 sequence, was selected for in-depth characterization. XbaI and SacI restriction fragments that
contained the MBD-4-like sequence within this clone were isolated, and
the nucleotide sequence was determined (Fig.
3). Sequence analysis revealed two exons that corresponded exactly to the MBD-4 cDNA sequence, separated by
an intron of 2.4 kb. The sequence was submitted to GenBank with the
accession number AF287475. A second MBD-4 genomic sequence was also
cloned using a combination of PCR strategies as described under
"Experimental Procedures." This sequence contained 29 nucleotide
differences in the intron and 5'-flanking regions and 2 nucleotide
differences in the coding region (Fig. 3). This sequence was submitted
to GenBank with the accession number AF288371. It is likely that this
sequence represents a second highly similar gene, as opposed to a
second allele, given that both were identified in genomic DNA from
inbred 129 mouse strains and that multiple bands of similar intensity
were observed by Southern blot analysis (Fig. 1).
|
The MBD-4 5'-flanking sequence exhibited no consensus sequences for
NF
B binding. A comparison of the proximal 5'-flanking region of the
MBD-3 and MBD-4 genes shows remarkable similarity except for the
omission of 26 bp of sequence in the MBD-4 gene which encompasses the
NF
B consensus binding site. However, similar to MBD-3, several NF
interleukin-6 and interferon-
consensus sequences were present.
MBD-4 Localizes to the Defensin Locus on Chromosome
8--
Previously, individual defensin and cryptdin genes were
localized to mouse chromosome 8 (19, 21, 33-36), but comprehensive mapping of this gene family has not been performed. We used the T31
mouse radiation hybrid panel (27) to map MBD-4 (Defb4) along with the previously identified MBD-1, -2, and -3 (Defb1-3)
and two representatives of the cryptdin family, cryptdins -3 and
-17(Defcr3 and Defcr17). The overall retention
pattern for these six STSs was very similar, and all but
Defb1 (see below) map in a narrow interval between markers
D8Mit159 and D8Mit257. This interval is near the
centromere of chromosome 8 and is consistent with previous studies that
localized individual defensin genes by fluorescent in situ
hybridization or by genetic linkage. Based on the radiation hybrid data, the order of the defensin genes on mouse chromosome 8 is
CEN-D8Mit159/Defb3-Defb4-D8Mit170-Defcr3-Defb2-Defcr17-D8Mit257-TEL (Fig. 4). The defensin gene
Defb1 could not be localized anywhere in the mouse genome
with a Logarithm of the ODds >3. Although all of the cell lines
that amplified with the Defb1 STS also amplified with other
defensin STSs, the retention frequency was decreased 3-fold (data not
shown). Similarly, the retention frequency was reduced when the human
homolog of the Defb1 gene (HBD-1) was mapped by radiation
hybrid mapping (37), suggesting that a conserved DNA sequence(s) may
colocalize with the Defb1/HBD1 locus in both genomes, which
causes this region to be genetically unstable. These results are
consistent with the mouse
- and
-defensin genes existing as a
cluster on chromosome 8.
|
MBD-4 Expression Is Restricted to Specific Tissues--
Northern
analysis was used to screen for the tissue expression pattern of MBD-4.
These results are shown in Fig.
5A. For comparison, the same
Northern blot filter was screened for MBD-1, MBD-2, MBD-3, and cryptdin
expression. MBD-4 mRNA expression was restricted to a limited
number of tissues. Positive signals were readily detected in tongue,
esophagus, and trachea. In contrast, the signals for MBD-1, MBD-2, and
MBD-3 were overall much less intense in the same tissues. MBD-1 was
detectable in kidney, consistent with previous studies (19-21). For
MBD-2, no hybridization signals were detected by Northern analysis. The
MBD-3 mRNA was weakly detectable in the tongue. The cryptdin signal
was strong in the small intestine samples, consistent with published
data (38). We also used a sensitive RT-PCR method to confirm the
tissues expressing MBD-3 and MBD-4. As shown in Fig. 5B,
although a wide array of tissues was analyzed, MBD-4 mRNA
expression was again detected only in tongue, esophagus, and trachea.
MBD-3 expression was also detected in the tongue, esophagus, and
trachea.
|
Regulation of MBD-4 Expression--
An important feature of the
innate immune system is that it is either ever ready or rapidly able to
respond to microbial challenges from the environment. In this regard,
epithelial
-defensins described to date have been characterized as
constitutively expressed or inducible. For example, the expression of
bovine TAP, a prototypical epithelial
-defensin, is markedly induced
by proinflammatory stimuli such as bacterial lipopolysaccharide, tumor
necrosis factor-
, or interleukin-1 (39, 40). In contrast, HBD-1 is
constitutively expressed at several epithelial sites, and expression
does not change in response to proinflammatory stimuli (4, 6, 10, 12).
To test whether MBD-4 expression in the trachea is inducible, mice were
challenged intratracheally with P. aeruginosa PAO1
(106 colony-forming units in 100 µl). Control
animals received phosphate-buffered saline in a similar volume. In
previous studies we have shown that such a challenge with PAO1
stimulates a robust pulmonary inflammatory response (18). Animals were
sacrificed 24 h after the bacterial challenge, and tissues were
evaluated for MBD-4 expression by a sensitive ribonuclease protection
assay. As shown in Fig. 6, intratracheal
bacterial challenge had no effect on the abundance of MBD-4 mRNA in
the trachea, suggesting that its expression at this site is
constitutive.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this work we report the discovery of a novel mouse
-defensin
with an interesting pattern of tissue expression. MBD-4 mRNA expression was observed in tongue, esophagus, and trachea but not in
several other mucosal tissues where defensins have been identified in
other species. The genomic organization of the MBD-4 gene is similar to
other
-defensins reported, and evidence for two nearly identical
versions of this gene was obtained. Radiation hybrid mapping confirmed
that MBD-4 is part of the mouse defensin locus, and for the first time,
we colocalized the
-defensin and
-defensin (cryptdin) gene
families to a narrow region of mouse chromosome 8. This information,
coupled with our Southern blot and genomic cloning data, supports the
notion that the mouse defensin family exists as a gene cluster and
suggests that there are likely to be several other related family members.
We found that the MBD-4 genomic sequence contains two exons and a
single intron, similar to other mammalian
-defensins (14). The
putative MBD-4 peptide sequence contains the conserved 6-cysteine motif
characteristic of the
-defensins and is homologous with other
epithelial defensins. In contrast to the inducible
-defensins TAP,
HBD-2, and MBD-3 (9, 21, 40), the MBD-4 5'-flanking sequence exhibited
no consensus sequences for NF
B binding. A comparison of the proximal
5'-flanking region of the MBD-3 and MBD-4 genes shows remarkable
similarity except for the omission of 26 bp of sequence in the MBD-4
gene which encompasses the NF
B consensus binding site. However,
similar to MBD-3, several NF interleukin-6 and interferon-
consensus
sequences are present in the MBD-4 promoter region, suggesting the
possibility for regulation at the transcriptional level resulting in
inducible expression. Following intratracheal challenge with bacteria,
we found no evidence that MBD-4 expression increased. Perhaps MBD-4
expression is constitutive as reported for HBD-1 and the recently
described porcine
-defensin-1 (41). However, this experiment does
not rule out the possibility that there may be other stimuli that
influence MBD-4 expression. Similarly, it is possible that mouse strain
or housing conditions could influence the response to an inflammatory
challenge. Further studies are needed to address these possibilities.
We used radiation hybrid mapping to localize MBD-2, MBD-3, MBD-4, and
the
-defensins (cryptdins)-3 and -17 to a contiguous region on mouse
chromosome 8. The data for MBD-1 were noninformative by this technique,
but others have mapped the MBD-1 gene to chromosome 8 near the
-defensin locus (19, 35). These data confirm and extend previous
reports linking the mouse defensin locus to chromosome 8p (19, 20, 35),
the region syntenic to the human locus on 8p23 (13, 37, 42, 44).
Importantly, we were able to demonstrate simultaneously, using a single
technique, that the mouse
- and
-defensins exist as a gene
cluster, similar to that described in humans (13). These data from the
mouse add further support to the speculation that these genes arose
from the duplication of an ancestral gene (13, 42, 45, 46).
The tissue distribution of MBD-4 mRNA expression is uniquely
restricted. Although clearly species to species variations exist, these
data support the speculation that most mucosal surfaces express a
specific repertoire of
-defensins. The abundant expression of MBD-4
in the tongue is reminiscent of related gene products identified in
cows (47), pigs (48), and humans (12). Similarly, the bovine
-defensins TAP and LAP (47, 49), pig
-defensin-1 (48), sheep
-defensin-1 (43), and HBD-1 and HBD-2 (4, 5, 8, 10, 11) are
expressed in tracheal epithelia. Few studies have documented the
presence of
-defensins in the esophagus, but there is evidence of
such expression in cows (47), pigs (48), and sheep (43). The restricted
pattern of expression exhibited by MBD-4 suggests that the peptide
product may have effects that are best suited for function at these
mucosal surfaces. Further studies of the peptide product are needed to
address this possibility.
Our Northern blot data show a more limited distribution of MBD-3
expression than that reported by Bals et al. (21). The high
similarity of nucleotide sequence for MBD-3 and MBD-4 suggests that
cross-hybridization is very likely when full-length cDNA probes are
used. Highly similar cDNA sequences for various
-defensin cDNA were also detected in cattle and prompted the development of a
strategy of using oligonucleotide probes to assess effectively tissue-specific expression of related
-defensins (23). Although other explanations are possible for the discrepant findings regarding MBD-3 expression, our identification of at least one, and possibly other,
-defensin(s) with similar nucleotide sequence suggests that
tissue expression of related
-defensins should be assessed using
highly discriminating methodology.
Our Southern blot analysis suggests that the mouse defensin locus
encodes several
-defensin genes. All known mouse
-defensin genes
map to chromosome 8, but some are quite divergent at the nucleotide and
amino acid level. This diversity makes hybridization and antibody based
approaches to gene discovery more difficult. A genomic sequencing
approach is an alternative approach to identify other members of the
gene family in mice. Further studies are needed to identify the
additional
-defensins and determine the structure of the mouse
defensin gene cluster. Such information will allow a better
understanding of their role in host defense through focused animal
model studies and the generation of
-defensin deficient animals by
gene targeting.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Patrick Sinn for technical assistance with the ribonuclease protection assays and Dr. Fariba Barahmand-pour for help with initial genomic cloning experiments.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants HL-61234-01 (to B. C. S., B. F. T., and P. B. M.) and AI-32234 and AI-32738 (to C. L. B.) and by the Children's Miracle Network Telethon.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF15882, AF287475, and AF288371.
** Recipient of a career investigator award from the American Lung Association. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Dr., Iowa City, IA 52242. Tel.: 319-356-4866; Fax: 319-356-7171; E-mail: paul-mccray@uiowa.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 1, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006603200
2 F. Barahmand-pour and C. L. Bevins, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
HD, human
-defensin;
HBD, human
-defensin;
MBD, mouse
-defensin;
RBD, rat
-defensin;
RT, reverse transcription;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends;
kb, kilobase(s);
STS, sequence tagged site;
bp, base pair(s);
NF, nuclear factor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Lehrer, R. I., Bevins, C. L., and Ganz, T. (1998) in Mucosal Immunology (Ogra, P. L. , Mestecky, J. , Lamm, M. E. , Strober, W. M. , and Bienstock, J., eds) , pp. 89-99, Academic Press, New York |
| 2. | Chertov, O., Michiel, D. F., Xu, L., Wang, J. M., Tani, K., Murphy, W. J., Longo, D. L., Taub, D. D., and Oppenheim, J. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2935-2940 |
| 3. | Yang, D., Chertov, O., Bykovskaia, S. N., Chen, Q., Buffo, M. J., Shogan, J., Anderson, M., Schroder, J. M., Wang, J. M., Howard, O. M., and Oppenheim, J. J. (1999) Science 286, 525-528 |
| 4. | Zhao, C., Wang, I., and Lehrer, R. I. (1996) FEBS Lett. 396, 319-322 |
| 5. | McCray, P. B., Jr., and Bentley, L. (1997) Am. J. Respir. Cell. Mol. Biol. 16, 343-349 |
| 6. | Valore, E. V., Park, C. H., Quayle, A. J., Wiles, K. R., McCray, P. B., Jr., and Ganz, T. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1633-1642 |
| 7. | Bensch, K. W., Raida, M., Magert, H. J., Schulz-Knappe, P., and Forssmann, W. G. (1995) FEBS Lett. 368, 331-335 |
| 8. | Goldman, M. J., Anderson, M. G., Stolzenberg, E. D., Kari, P. U., Zasloff, M., and Wilson, J. M. (1997) Cell 88, 1-9 |
| 9. | Harder, J., Bartels, J., Christophers, E., and Schroder, J.-M. (1997) Nature 387, 861-862 |
| 10. | Singh, P. K., Jia, H. P., Wiles, K., Hesselberth, J., Liu, L., Conway, B. D., Greenberg, E. P., Valore, E. V., Welsh, M. J., Ganz, T., Tack, B. F., and McCray, P. B., Jr. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14961-14966 |
| 11. | Bals, R., Wang, X., Wu, Z., Freeman, T., Bafna, V., Zasloff, M., and Wilson, J. M. (1998) J. Clin. Invest. 102, 874-880 |
| 12. | Mathews, M. S., Jia, H. P., Guthmiller, J. M., Losh, G., Graham, S., Johnson, G. K., Tack, B. F., and McCray, P. B., Jr. (1999) Infect. Immun. 67, 2740-2745 |
| 13. | Linzmeier, R., Ho, C. H., Hoang, B. V., and Ganz, T. (1999) Gene (Amst.) 233, 205-211 |
| 14. | Huttner, K. M., and Bevins, C. L. (1999) Pediatr. Res. 45, 785-794 |
| 15. | Welsh, M. J., Boat, T. F., Tsui, L.-C., and Beaudet, A. L. (1995) in The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease (Scriver, C. R. , Beaudet, A. L. , Sly, W. S. , and Valle, D., eds), 16th Ed. , pp. 3799-3876, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York |
| 16. | Smith, J. J., Travis, S. M., Greenberg, E. P., and Welsh, M. J. (1996) Cell 85, 229-236 |
| 17. | Zabner, J., Smith, J. J., Karp, P. H., Widdicombe, J. H., and Welsh, M. J. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 397-403 |
| 18. | McCray, P. B., Jr., Zabner, J., Jia, H. P., Welsh, M. J., and Thorne, P. S. (1999) Am. J. Physiol. 277, L183-L190 |
| 19. | Huttner, K. M., Kozak, C. A., and Bevins, C. L. (1997) FEBS Lett. 413, 45-49 |
| 20. | Morrison, G. M., Davidson, D. J., and Dorin, J. R. (1999) FEBS Lett. 442, 112-116 |
| 21. | Bals, R., Wang, X., Meegalla, R. L., Wattler, S., Weiner, D., Nehls, M. C., and Wilson, J. M. (1999) Infect. Immun. 67, 3542-3547 |
| 22. | Jia, H. P., Mills, J. N., Barahmand-Pour, F., Nishimura, D., Mallampali, R. K., Wang, G., Wiles, K., Tack, B. F., Bevins, C. L., and McCray, P. B., Jr. (1999) Infect. Immun. 67, 4827-4833 |
| 23. | Bevins, C. L., and Diamond, G. (1997) Methods Mol. Biol. 78, 151-166 |
| 24. | Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467 |
| 25. | Sambrook, J., Fritch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 26. | Frohman, M. A., Dush, M. K., and Martin, G. R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8998-9002 |
| 27. | McCarthy, L. C., Terrett, J., Davis, M. E., Knights, C. J., Smith, A. L., Critcher, R., Schmitt, K., Hudson, J., Spurr, N. K., and Goodfellow, P. N. (1997) Genome Res. 7, 1153-1161 |
| 28. | Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 |
| 29. | Jones, D. E., and Bevins, C. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23216-23225 |
| 30. | Diamond, G., Jones, D. E., and Bevins, C. L. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4596-4600 |
| 31. | Tarver, A. P., Clark, D. P., Diamond, G., Russell, J. P., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Tempst, P., Cohen, K. S., Jones, D. E., Sweeney, R. W., Wines, M., Hwang, S., and Bevins, C. L. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 1045-1056 |
| 32. | Yount, N. Y., Yuan, J., Tarver, A., Castro, T., Diamond, G., Tran, P. A., Levy, J. N., McCullough, C., Cullor, J. S., Bevins, C. L., and Selsted, M. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26249-26258 |
| 33. | Bals, R., Goldman, M. J., and Wilson, J. M. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 1225-1232 |
| 34. | Lin, M. Y., Munshi, I. A., and Ouellette, A. J. (1992) Genomics 14, 363-368 |
| 35. | Morrison, G. M., Davidson, D. J., Kilanowski, F. M., Borthwick, D. W., Crook, K., Maxwell, A. I., Govan, J. R. W., and Dorin, J. R. (1998) Mamm. Genome 9, 453-457 |
| 36. | Ouellette, A. J., Pravtcheva, D., Ruddle, F. H., and James, M. (1989) Genomics 5, 233-239 |
| 37. | Liu, L., Wang, L., Jia, H. P., Zhao, C., Heng, H. H. Q., Schutte, B. C., McCray, P. B., Jr., and Ganz, T. (1998) Gene (Amst.) 222, 237-244 |
| 38. | Ouellette, A. J., Greco, R. M., James, M., Frederick, D., Naftilan, J., and Fallon, J. T. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 1687-1695 |
| 39. | Russell, J. P., Diamond, G., Tarver, A. P., Scanlin, T. F., and Bevins, C. L. (1996) Infect. Immun. 64, 1565-1568 |
| 40. | Diamond, G., Russell, J. P., and Bevins, C. L. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 5156-5160 |
| 41. | Zhang, G., Hiraiwa, H., Yasue, H., Wu, H., Ross, C. R., Troyer, D., and Blecha, F. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24031-24037 |
| 42. | Liu, L., Zhao, C., Heng, H. H. Q., and Ganz, T. (1997) Genomics 43, 316-320 |
| 43. | Huttner, K. M., Brezinski-Caligari, D. J., Mahoney, M. M., and Diamond, G. (1998) J. Nutr. 128, 297S-299S |
| 44. | Harder, J., Siebert, R., Zhang, Y., Matthiesen, P., Christophers, E., Schlegelberger, B., and Schroder, J.-M. (1997) Genomics 46, 472-475 |
| 45. | Bevins, C. L., Jones, D. E., Dutra, A., Schaffzin, J., and Muenke, M. (1996) Genomics 31, 95-106 |
| 46. | Hughes, A. L., and Yeager, M. (1997) J. Mol. Evol. 44, 675-682 |
| 47. | Schonwetter, B. S., Stolzenberg, E. D., and Zasloff, M. A. (1995) Science 267, 1645-1648 |
| 48. | Shi, J., Zhang, G., Wu, H., Ross, C., Blecha, F., and Ganz, T. (1999) Infect. Immun. 67, 3121-3127 |
| 49. | Diamond, G., Zasloff, M., Eck, H., Brasseur, M., Maloy, W. L., and Bevins, C. L. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 3952-3956 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Radhakrishnan, M. A. Fares, F. S. French, and S. H. Hall Comparative genomic analysis of a mammalian {beta}-defensin gene cluster Physiol Genomics, August 20, 2007; 30(3): 213 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. McMichael, A. I. Maxwell, K. Hayashi, K. Taylor, W. A. Wallace, J. R. Govan, J. R. Dorin, and J.-M. Sallenave Antimicrobial Activity of Murine Lung Cells against Staphylococcus aureus Is Increased In Vitro and In Vivo after Elafin Gene Transfer Infect. Immun., June 1, 2005; 73(6): 3609 - 3617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. Kao, Y. Chen, P. Thai, S. Wachi, F. Huang, C. Kim, R. W. Harper, and R. Wu IL-17 Markedly Up-Regulates {beta}-Defensin-2 Expression in Human Airway Epithelium via JAK and NF-{kappa}B Signaling Pathways J. Immunol., September 1, 2004; 173(5): 3482 - 3491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Harris, D. Wilk, C. L. Bevins, R. S. Munson Jr., and L. O. Bakaletz Identification and Characterization of a Mucosal Antimicrobial Peptide Expressed by the Chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera) Airway J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 20250 - 20256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Cunliffe and Y. R. Mahida Expression and regulation of antimicrobial peptides in the gastrointestinal tract J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2004; 75(1): 49 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Morrison, C. A. M. Semple, F. M. Kilanowski, R. E. Hill, and J. R. Dorin Signal Sequence Conservation and Mature Peptide Divergence Within Subgroups of the Murine {beta}-Defensin Gene Family Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2003; 20(3): 460 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Com, F. Bourgeon, B. Evrard, T. Ganz, D. Colleu, B. Jegou, and C. Pineau Expression of Antimicrobial Defensins in the Male Reproductive Tract of Rats, Mice, and Humans Biol Reprod, January 1, 2003; 68(1): 95 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamaguchi, T. Nagase, R. Makita, S. Fukuhara, T. Tomita, T. Tominaga, H. Kurihara, and Y. Ouchi Identification of Multiple Novel Epididymis-Specific {beta}-Defensin Isoforms in Humans and Mice J. Immunol., September 1, 2002; 169(5): 2516 - 2523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Morrison, F. Kilanowski, D. Davidson, and J. Dorin Characterization of the Mouse Beta Defensin 1, Defb1, Mutant Mouse Model Infect. Immun., June 1, 2002; 70(6): 3053 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Moser, D. J. Weiner, E. Lysenko, R. Bals, J. N. Weiser, and J. M. Wilson {beta}-Defensin 1 Contributes to Pulmonary Innate Immunity in Mice Infect. Immun., June 1, 2002; 70(6): 3068 - 3072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Schutte, J. P. Mitros, J. A. Bartlett, J. D. Walters, H. P. Jia, M. J. Welsh, T. L. Casavant, and P. B. McCray Jr. Discovery of five conserved beta -defensin gene clusters using a computational search strategy PNAS, February 19, 2002; 99(4): 2129 - 2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamaguchi, S. Fukuhara, T. Nagase, T. Tomita, S. Hitomi, S. Kimura, H. Kurihara, and Y. Ouchi A Novel Mouse beta -Defensin, mBD-6, Predominantly Expressed in Skeletal Muscle J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2001; 276(34): 31510 - 31514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||