Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005824200 on August 10, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 43, 33487-33496, October 27, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/43/33487    most recent
M005824200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thangaraju, M.
Right arrow Articles by Couch, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thangaraju, M.
Right arrow Articles by Couch, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

BRCA1 Facilitates Stress-induced Apoptosis in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines*

Muthusamy ThangarajuDagger , Scott H. Kaufmann§, and Fergus J. CouchDagger ||**

From the Departments of Dagger  Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, § Oncology,  Molecular Pharmacology, and || Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota 55905

Received for publication, July 3, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene has previously been implicated in induction of high levels of apoptosis in osteocarcinoma cell lines. Overexpression of BRCA1 was shown to induce an apoptotic signaling pathway involving the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), but the signaling steps upstream and downstream of JNK were not delineated. To better understand the role of BRCA1 in apoptosis, we examined the effect of wild-type and C-terminal-truncated dominant negative BRCA1 on breast and ovarian cancer cell lines subjected to a number of different pro-apoptotic stimuli, including growth factor withdrawal, substratum detachment, ionizing radiation, and treatment with anticancer agents. All of these treatments were found to induce substantial levels of apoptosis in the presence of wild-type BRCA1, whereas dominant negative BRCA1 truncation mutants diminished the apoptotic response. Subsequent mapping of the apoptotic pathway induced by growth factor withdrawal demonstrated that BRCA1 enhanced signaling through a pathway that sequentially involved H-Ras, MEKK4, JNK, Fas ligand/Fas interactions, and caspase-9 activation. In addition, the pathway functioned independently of the p53 tumor suppressor. These data suggest that BRCA1 is an important modulator of the response to cellular stress and that loss of this apoptotic potential due to BRCA1 mutations may contribute to tumor development.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mutations in the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene are found in many families with inherited breast and ovarian cancers and about half of families with a history of breast cancer only (1-3). BRCA1 encodes an 1863-amino acid protein (1) that is located predominantly in the nucleus (4-6). This polypeptide has been implicated in the regulation of a wide variety of biological functions, including growth suppression, induction of apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, response to DNA damage, and maintenance of genome stability (7-11).

BRCA1 contains several well-defined functional domains. An N-terminal RING finger domain interacts with BARD1 (12), E2F transcription factor family members, cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (13). A domain in the middle of BRCA1 associates with the DNA repair protein RAD51 (10). The C-terminal BRCT domains are involved in transcription activation, growth inhibition and tumor suppression through interactions with RNA helicases, RNA polymerase II, TFIIH, TFIIE, BRCA2, and RAD51 (7, 14-18).

Several observations also support a role for BRCA1 in regulation of transcription. BRCA1 activates the p21WAF1/Cip1 promoter in cells that contain wild-type or mutant p53 (19), suggesting that one of the mechanisms by which BRCA1 regulates cell cycle and suppresses growth is through the induction of p21. Additionally, BRCA1 binds the CtIP transcriptional repressor that inhibits BRCA1-mediated activation of the p21WAF1/Cip1 promoter (20), interacts with CBP/p300 (21), and interacts with STAT11 to induce expression of the gamma -interferon gene (IFNgamma ) (22). These data imply that BRCA1 might be directly involved in transcriptional activation of specific genes.

A growing body of evidence has also implicated BRCA1 in the preservation of genome integrity. Initial studies demonstrated that BRCA1 binds to the RAD50 and RAD51 DNA repair proteins (10, 23). More recent studies have implicated BRCA1 in transcription-coupled repair (24) and double strand DNA break repair (25). In accord with a possible role for BRCA1 in repair (or the control of repair), breast tumors from patients with BRCA1 germ-line mutations contain 2- to 3-fold more chromosomal rearrangements than sporadic cancers.

Consistent with the proposed role of BRCA1 as a tumor suppressor, it has been observed that BRCA1 inhibits breast and ovarian cancer cell proliferation in vitro and in an experimental tumor model (7, 26). Conversely, selective reduction of BRCA1 mRNA levels using antisense RNA also induces more rapid cell growth and promotes cell transformation in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (7). Whether the effects of BRCA1 on transcription and genome maintenance are sufficient to explain these results have been unclear. However, several recent reports have suggested that BRCA1 might also play a role in induction of apoptosis. Shao and colleagues (8) reported that expression of BRCA1 in mouse fibroblast and human breast cancer cell lines resulted in apoptosis in response to serum deprivation or calcium ionophore treatment. BRCA1-expressing prostate cancer DU-145 cells were subsequently shown to be susceptible to drug-induced apoptosis (27). More recently, Harkin and colleagues (28) demonstrated that BRCA1 expression can induce apoptosis through activation of a c-Jun N-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK/SAPK). In the present study, we have further delineated the relationship between BRCA1 and JNK-dependent apoptotic signaling in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. We provide evidence that BRCA1 modulates stress-induced apoptotic signaling through a pathway that sequentially involves the H-Ras proto-oncogene, MEKK4, JNK, Fas (CD95)/FasL interactions, and activation of procaspase-8. In addition, we present evidence for dominant negative activity of BRCA1 mutants in the context of this apoptotic response.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Immunological reagents were purchased from the following suppliers: BRCA1 rabbit polyclonal antibodies directed to the C and N termini of BRCA1 (66056E and 66036E) from PharMingen; antibodies against caspase-8, caspase-9, Fas, Fas-L, phospho-JNK, and phospho-MEKK 1-4 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; inhibitory anti-Fas antibodies ZB4 and Nok2 from Kamiya and PharMingen, respectively; p53 antibody from Oncogene Research Products; and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody from the Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories; z-VAD(OMe)-fmk was obtained from Enzyme Systems Products (Dublin, CA). An Annexin V apoptosis detection kit was purchased from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Propidium iodide (PI) and paclitaxel were procured from Sigma. An enhanced chemiluminescence kit was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.

Plasmids-- The full-length BRCA1 coding sequence was subcloned into the pCR3.1 (Invitrogen) mammalian expression vector. Two truncation mutants of BRCA1 (BRCA1Delta 5382-insC and BRCA1Delta 5677-insA) were generated by polymerase chain reaction as described previously (19, 26). The GFP-encoding plasmid pEGFP-N-1 was from CLONTECH. MC159 and CrmA expression constructs were kindly provided by J. Bertin (National Institutes of Health) and C. Young (Mayo Clinic), respectively. Dominant negative expression plasmids dnMEKK1-HA-pCEPT4, dnMKK4-pRSET(Delta 55-72), and dnMKK7-FLAG-pcDNA3 were provided by David McKean (Mayo Clinic). The dnJNK(APF)-pcDNA3 was kindly provided by Roger Davis. The Ras-N17 mutant construct was provided by Larry Karnitz (Mayo Clinic).

Cell Culture and Transfection-- The human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines MCF7 and T47D were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). The ovarian cancer cell line OV177 developed at the Mayo Clinic (29) was obtained from Cheryl Conover. The MCF7, T47D, and OV177 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified essential medium, RPMI 1640, and alpha -minimal essential medium, respectively. Each of these was supplemented with 10% bovine calf serum, 100 units/ml penicillin G, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine. Mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) p53-/- and MCF7 HPV16 cells were grown in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and the additives listed above. Cells were plated (1 × 106 cells) into 100-mm dishes, allowed to adhere overnight, and then transiently transfected with 10 µg of either the full-length BRCA1 or mutant BRCA1 expression constructs along with 2.5 µg of the GFP expression plasmid, pEGFP-N1 using the Fugene 6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) transfection system. After 24 h, GFP-expressing cells were isolated by FACS and replated.

Induction of Apoptosis-- Cells sorted for GFP expression were replated in 6-well plates and incubated in the presence or absence of serum for 24 h. Alternatively, the transfected cells were grown in 100-mm plates and subjected to 10 or 20 grays of gamma -irradiation using a 137Cs source (J. L. Shepard) delivering 103 centigrays/min. Cells were harvested after 8, 16, or 24 h. In some experiments, transfected cells were treated for 24 h with 100 nM paclitaxel, a concentration previously demonstrated to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells (30).

Detection of Apoptosis-- Cell death was determined by two-color flow cytometry after staining of cells with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Annexin V and PI using a Becton Dickinson FacsCaliber. Cells that were Annexin V-positive and PI-negative were considered apoptotic. Apoptosis was also measured by quantitation of nuclei containing subdiploid amounts of DNA. In this latter method, cells were lysed in HFS (0.1% sodium citrate, 0.1% Triton X-100, 50 µg/ml PI); subdiploid nuclei were counted by flow cytometry. For both of these flow cytometry methods, at least 10,000 gated events were recorded for each sample. Data were analyzed by Winlist and WinMDI software (Variety Software House, Topsham, ME).

Analysis of BRCA1 Expression-- After transfection with empty vector, full-length BRCA1, or mutant BRCA1, cells were collected and lysed using EBC buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate with protease inhibitors phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (100 µg/ml), aprotinin (20 µg/ml), and leupeptin (10 µg/ml)). For immunoblotting, equal concentrations (100 µg) of whole cell extract were loaded per lane, resolved in a 6% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking with 5% BSA in TBS-T (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.9% NaCl, and 0.05% Tween 20), membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (66046E BRCA1 C-terminal and 66036E BRCA1 N-terminal) at a concentration of 2 µg/ml in TBS-T containing 1% BSA and 0.1% azide. After several washes with TBS-T, the membrane was incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG at 1:2000 dilution in 1% BSA/TBS-T. Signals were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence.

Cell Fractionation and Western Blotting-- To assess the effect of BRCA1 overexpression on Fas, FasL, and caspases, aliquots containing 1 × 106 cells transfected with vector, full-length BRCA1, or BRCA1Delta 5382-insC mutant, were incubated for 24 h in the presence and absence of serum. Cells were collected, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and resuspended in cell lysis buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% Nonidet P-40, and the protease inhibitors aprotinin (80 ng/ml), leupeptin (40 ng/ml), pepstatin (40 ng/ml), chymostatin (40 ng/ml), and antipain (40 ng/ml). After incubation for 30 min on ice, the cells were homogenized and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The cell supernatants were resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ectopic Expression of BRCA1 Facilitates Apoptosis in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines-- To study the functional properties of BRCA1, we transiently overexpressed full-length BRCA1 cDNA or pCR3.1 empty vector in two breast (MCF7 and T47D) and one ovarian (OV177) cancer cell line. Western blot analysis using the C-terminal anti-BRCA1 (66046E) antibody showed a 7- to 8-fold increase in BRCA1 protein on BRCA1 transfection when compared with the endogenous BRCA1 level in all three cell lines used in this study (Fig. 1A). To evaluate the effect of BRCA1 overexpression on cellular apoptosis, we cotransfected cells with BRCA1 or pCR3.1 and GFP, enriched for transfected cells by sorting for GFP-positive cells, incubated the transfected cells under various conditions for an additional 24 h, and then measured apoptosis using Annexin V and PI. Cells exposed to normal growth conditions (Fig. 1B, +Serum) demonstrated a 6- to 7-fold increase in Annexin V positivity when transfected with BRCA1 as compared with empty vector. For example, 17 ± 2% of BRCA1-transfected MCF7 cells were apoptotic, whereas only 2.5 ± 1% of vector-transfected MCF7 cells were apoptotic under the same conditions. These results suggest that increased levels of wild-type BRCA1 increase the rate of spontaneous apoptosis in the three cell lines.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Transient expression of BRCA1 facilitates apoptosis in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. A, immunoblot analysis. Full-length BRCA1 cDNA expression construct or the pCR3.1 vector were transiently expressed in MCF7, T47D, and OV177 cells. After 24 h cell lysates were prepared. Aliquots containing 100 µg of protein were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted with the C-terminal anti-BRCA1 (66046E) antibody. The -fold increase in BRCA1 expression in each cell line is shown above the blot. B-D, BRCA1 facilitates apoptosis in MCF7, T47D, and OV177 cell lines. Cells were transiently transfected with a BRCA1 expression construct or the pCR3.1 vector along with a GFP expression plasmid, incubated for 24 h, sorted by FACS for GFP expression, exposed to normal or serum-free medium for 24 h (B), ionizing radiation (IR) followed by incubation for 24 h (C), or paclitaxel for 24 h followed by incubation in drug-free medium for 24 h (D). At the conclusion of the incubation, cells were stained with Annexin V and PI. The proportion of Annexin V-positive/PI-negative cells was quantified by flow cytometry. E, BRCA1 facilitates apoptosis in BRCA1 null cell lines. HCC1937 BRCA1 null cells were transiently transfected with the BRCA1 or the pCR3.1 vector along with a GFP expression plasmid. The GFP-expressing cells were collected and subjected to immunoblotting (inset). Lane 1, represents untransfected cells; lane 2, pCR3.1-transfected cells; and lane 3, BRCA1wt-transfected cells. Sorted cells were also incubated for 24 h in the absence or presence of serum. After incubation, cells were fixed and labeled with PI. Quantitative analysis of subdiploid cells was performed by flow cytometry.

To further examine the effect of BRCA1 expression on cellular apoptosis, cells were exposed to various apoptotic stimuli, including serum withdrawal, gamma -irradiation, and treatment with paclitaxel. Staining with Annexin V and PI revealed that 13 ± 1%, 17 ± 2%, and 11 ± 1% of the vector-transfected MCF7, T47D, and OV177 cells, respectively, were apoptotic 24 h after removal of serum. In contrast, 42 ± 4%, 53 ± 4%, and 39 ± 3% of the BRCA1-transfected MCF7, T47D, and OV177 cells were apoptotic after serum withdrawal (Fig. 1B). Similarly, forced overexpression of BRCA1 enhanced the amount of apoptosis observed after treatment with gamma -irradiation (Fig. 1C) and paclitaxel (Fig. 1D). These results suggest that expression of BRCA1 facilitates the response of breast and ovarian cancer cells to a variety of apoptotic stimuli.

Wild-type BRCA1 Is Required for Apoptosis-- To further evaluate the role of BRCA1 in apoptosis, we transiently transfected the wild-type BRCA1 and the pCR3.1 vector into HCC1937 cells, which express only the 5382insC-truncated form of BRCA1. When these cells were incubated in the presence and absence of serum for 24 h, the pCR3.1-transfected cells displayed only minor levels of apoptosis (<3%) (Fig. 1E). In contrast, ectopic expression of BRCA1 at levels that exceeded the expression level of the endogenous BRCA1Delta 5382-insC-truncated protein (inset, Fig. 1E) increased the rate of apoptosis in the presence of serum to 10%, and to 38% upon serum withdrawal (Fig. 1E). The low levels of spontaneous and serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis in the absence of full-length BRCA1 suggest that BRCA1 plays an important role in this apoptotic process.

BRCA1 Mutants Abolish BRCA1-dependent Apoptosis-- To further explore the role of BRCA1 in cellular apoptosis, we transiently transfected the BRCA1Delta 5382-insC mutant construct, containing a common BRCA1 mutation found in BRCA1-associated breast and ovarian cancer families, into both breast and ovarian cancer cells. Immunoblotting with anti-BRCA1 66036E antibody, directed to the N-terminal portion of BRCA1, revealed that the truncated BRCA1Delta 5382-insC protein was expressed at levels that equaled or exceeded the levels of ectopically expressed or endogenous wild-type BRCA1 protein (Fig. 2A). Under these conditions, the BRCA1Delta 5382-insC protein diminished serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis associated with endogenous levels of BRCA1 (Fig. 2B). In addition, when expressed in stoichiometric amounts, the BRCA1Delta 5382-insC mutant blocked spontaneous and growth factor withdrawal-induced apoptosis associated with ectopic expression of wild-type BRCA1 (Fig. 2B). Similar results were also observed in T47D and OV177 cells (data not shown). Furthermore, overexpression of another BRCA1 mutant (BRCA1Delta 5677-insA) also abolished BRCA1-induced apoptosis in both breast and ovarian cancer cells (data not shown). These results clearly demonstrate that BRCA1 expression induces apoptosis in breast and ovarian cancer cells and that mutations in BRCA1 that commonly remove the C terminus, block this induction.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Truncated BRCA1 exerts an anti-apoptotic effect. A, expression of the BRCA1Delta 5382-insC construct results in formation of a stable truncated BRCA1 protein. BRCA1 wild-type (wt) and the BRCA1Delta 5382insC mutant were transiently expressed in MCF7, T47D, and OV177 cells. Lysates were harvested 24 h after transfection. Aliquots containing 100 µg of protein from each cell line were probed using N-terminal BRCA1 (66036E) antibody. The wild-type BRCA1 protein is approximately 220 kDa and the C-terminal-truncated mutant BRCA1Delta 5382-insC is 180 kDa in size. B, the BRCA1Delta 5382-insC mutant inhibits BRCA1-dependent apoptosis. After transient co-transfection of full-length BRCA1 or the C-terminal-truncated BRCA1Delta 5382-insC with a GFP plasmid, GFP-expressing MCF7 cells were incubated for 24 h in the presence and absence of serum, fixed, stained with PI and Annexin V and analyzed by flow cytometry.

BRCA1 Facilitates Serum Withdrawal-induced Apoptosis by Enhancing Signaling through a Ras, MEKK4, and JNK Pathway-- Harkin et al. (28) recently demonstrated that BRCA1-induced apoptosis is associated with activation of JNK/SAPK. However, signaling pathways upstream of JNK/SAPK, or the downstream targets of JNK/SAPK, were not identified. To assess the role of JNK signaling in BRCA1-dependent serum starvation-induced apoptosis, we investigated the involvement of other components of MAPK signaling pathways. MCF7 and OV177 cells were transfected with pCR3.1 vector, full-length BRCA1 or BRCA1Delta 5382-insC, sorted, and cultured in the presence and absence of serum for 24 h. Cell lysates prepared from these cells were subjected to immunoblotting with antisera that recognize phosphorylated species of MEKK1, MEKK4, and JNK. BRCA1 overexpression did not alter MEKK1 phosphorylation (data not shown) but did result in increased levels of phospho-MEKK4 and phospho-JNK, which were increased even further after growth factor withdrawal (Fig. 3, A and B). Conversely, the BRCA1Delta 5382-insC mutant, which failed to induce apoptosis (Fig. 2B), failed to induce phosphorylation of these proteins (Fig. 3, A and B). Further evidence that activation of these kinases plays a critical role in BRCA1-dependent serum withdrawal-triggered apoptosis came from the observation that expression of dn-MKK4 or dn-JNK completely blocked BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in both MCF7 and OV177 cells in the presence and absence of serum (Figs. 3, C-E). In contrast, dominant negative forms of MEKK1 and MKK7 did not affect BRCA1-dependent apoptosis either in the presence or absence of serum (Fig. 3, C and D). These results suggest that JNK and its upstream activators MKK4 and MEKK4 are required for BRCA1-dependent apoptosis after serum withdrawal.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in response to serum withdrawal is mediated by a MEKK4, MKK4, and JNK signaling pathway. A and B, phosphorylation of MEKK4 (A) and JNK (B) in MCF7 and OV177 cells transfected with pCR3.1 vector, full-length BRCA1, or BRCA1Delta 5382-insC. Immunoblotting of 30 µg of protein from each transfection was performed with anti-phospho-MEKK4 or anti-phospho-JNK antiserum (top panels). To confirm equal loading, the membranes were reprobed with anti-MEKK4 or anti-JNK antibody (bottom panels). C and D, overexpression of dn-MKK4 but not dn-MEKK1 or dn-MKK7 inhibits BRCA1-dependent apoptosis. MCF7 cells (C) or OV177 cells (D) were co-transfected with dn-MEKK1, dn-MKK4, or dn-MKK7 and pCR3.1 or wild-type BRCA1 along with GFP. GFP-positive cells were purified by FACS and incubated in the presence or absence of serum for 24 h. At the end of the incubation, cells were labeled with annexin V and PI. E, overexpression of dn-JNK abolishes BRCA1-dependent apoptosis. MCF7 and OV177 cells were co-transfected with dn-JNK, GFP, and pCR3.1 or wild-type BRCA1. GFP-positive cells were purified and treated as in panels C and D.

A number of activators of MEKK proteins have been identified previously, including Ha-Ras (31). Although Ras appears to play a major role in cell survival and proliferation, a role in induction of apoptosis has also been reported (32, 33). To investigate the role of Ras in BRCA1-dependent growth factor withdrawal-induced apoptosis, MCF7 and OV177 cells were transiently co-transfected with BRCA1 and a dominant negative form of H-Ras (Ras N17). Expression of Ras N17 resulted in complete abrogation of BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in the presence and absence of serum starvation (data not shown). Collectively, these observations suggest that BRCA1 facilitates apoptotic signaling through a Ras/MEKK4/MKK4/JNK pathway.

Fas (CD95/APO-1) Mediates BRCA1-dependent Serum Withdrawal-induced Apoptosis-- Recent reports have suggested a role for Fas and FasL in neuronal apoptosis following nerve growth factor withdrawal (34). In addition, JNK has been shown to up-regulate the FasL promoter by activation of the c-Jun and ATF2 transcription factors (35). When combined with the results from the experiments described above, these observations suggest that Fas and FasL play a role in BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in response to growth factor withdrawal. To evaluate this hypothesis, MCF7 and OV177 cells were transiently transfected with pCR3.1, full-length BRCA1, or BRCA1Delta 5382-insC, sorted, incubated in the presence and absence of serum for 24 h, and immunoblotted for Fas and FasL. BRCA1 expression up-regulated both Fas and FasL in MCF7 and OV177 cells (Fig. 4, A and B), and the levels of these proteins were further enhanced by serum withdrawal (Fig. 4, A and B). Conversely, BRCA1Delta 5382-insC completely blocked induction of Fas and FasL by endogenous and ectopically expressed BRCA1 in both cell lines (Fig. 4, A and B).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Fas and FasL mediate BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in breast and ovarian cancer cells after serum withdrawal. A and B, analysis of Fas (A) and FasL (B) protein levels in MCF7 and OV177 cells transfected with GFP and pCR3.1 vector, wild-type BRCA1, or BRCA1Delta 5382-insC. After GFP-expressing cells were incubated in the presence and absence of serum for 24 h, 30 µg of cell lysate was immunoblotted with anti-Fas antibody (A) or anti-FasL antibody (B). To confirm equivalent loading, blots were probed with anti-Histone H2B. C and D, inhibition of Fas signaling abolishes BRCA1-dependent serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis. MCF7 cells (C) or OV177 cells (D) were transiently transfected with GFP and BRCA1 or pCR3.1 in the absence or presence of plasmid encoding dnFADD or MC159. GFP-expressing cells were incubated for 24 h with Nok2 and ZB4 in the absence or presence of serum. Annexin V-positive/PI-negative cells were quantitated by flow cytometry.

To further evaluate the role of Fas, Fas-L, and the adaptor protein FADD in this apoptotic signaling pathway, MCF7 and OV177 cells transfected with BRCA1 and the vector control were incubated with ZB4 or Nok2 in the presence and absence of serum. The Nok2 and ZB4 monoclonal antibodies bind to the Fas receptor and prevent cross-linking by Fas-L. Both of these antibodies abolished BRCA1-induced apoptosis in the presence and absence of serum (Fig. 4C). Likewise, co-expression of a dominant negative version of the adaptor protein FADD, or MC159, a Molluscum contagiosum viral inhibitor of FADD signaling (36), with BRCA1 abolished BRCA1-induced apoptosis (Fig. 4C). These results suggest that the BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in response to serum deprivation is Fas-dependent and that mutant BRCA1 blocks this apoptotic signaling pathway in both breast and ovarian cancer cells.

BRCA1-induced Apoptosis Is Caspase-dependent-- Two pathways of Fas-dependent caspase activation have been described (37, 38). One involves recruitment of caspase-8 followed by direct activation of effector caspases, whereas the second involves activation of caspase-8 and cleavage of the Bcl-2 family member Bid to yield a fragment that induces release of cytochrome c from mitochondria and subsequent activation of effector caspases through the Apaf-1/caspase-9 pathway (39). To assess the activation of caspase-8 and caspase-9 in response to BRCA1 overexpression, lysates from MCF7 and OV177 cells transfected with pCR3.1, wild-type BRCA1, or BRCA1Delta 5382-insC were immunoblotted with antisera directed to the cleaved, active forms of caspase-8 and caspase-9. BRCA1 overexpression resulted in cleavage of both caspase-8 and caspase-9 (Fig. 5, A and B). Serum starvation for 24 h resulted in further activation of both caspase-8 and caspase-9 (Fig. 5, A and B). As expected, the activation of caspase-8 and caspase-9 was completely blocked by co-expression of BRCA1Delta 5382-insC (Fig. 5, A and B). In addition, the z-VAD.fmk general caspase inhibitor inhibited all BRCA1-dependent apoptosis. These results suggest that caspase-8 and caspase-9 are both activated during BRCA1-dependent apoptosis.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in serum-deprived breast and ovarian cancer cells is mediated by caspase-8 and caspase-9. A and B, activation of caspase-8 (A) and caspase-9 (B) during BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in response to serum withdrawal in MCF7 and OV177 cells. Lysates from GFP-expressing cells transfected with GFP and pCR3.1, wild-type BRCA1, or BRCA1Delta 5382-insC were probed with antiserum against active caspase-8 (A) or active caspase-9 (B). Blots were reprobed with anti-Histone 2B as a loading control. C and D, inhibition of caspase-8 or caspase-9 activity blocks BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in serum-deprived breast and ovarian cancer cells. MCF7 cells (C) or OV177 cells (D) were co-transfected with plasmids encoding GFP and dn-caspase-9 or CrmA along with pCR3.1 vector or full-length BRCA1. After GFP-expressing cells were isolated and incubated in the presence and absence of serum for 24 h, apoptosis was assessed by staining with Annexin V and PI. Alternatively, transfected cells were treated with z-VAD.fmk during the course of serum deprivation.

To further assess the role of these initiator caspases, we co-expressed CrmA, which selectively inhibits caspase-1 and caspase-8 (40), and a dominant negative caspase-9 construct, which inhibits caspase-9 activation (41) with BRCA1 and pCR3.1 vector in MCF7 and OV177 cells. Both CrmA and dn-caspase-9 abrogated BRCA1-induced apoptosis (Fig. 5, C and D), suggesting that the BRCA1-dependent signal is transduced through a caspase-9/Bid/Apaf-1/cytochrome c/caspase-9 (type II) pathway in both cell lines.

The MAPK Pathway Is Upstream of Fas Activation in the Serum Starvation-dependent Apoptotic Pathway-- To determine whether JNK activation is upstream or downstream of Fas and caspase activation, we assessed the activation of pathway components after inhibition of other components. Co-expression of dn-MKK4 or dn-JNK with wild-type BRCA1 in MCF7 and OV177 cells inhibited induction of Fas and Fas-L as well as activation of caspases-8 and -9, suggesting that the JNK signaling cascade is upstream of death receptor activation and caspase processing (Fig. 6A). In contrast, dn-caspase-9 and dn-FADD had no effect on JNK activation (Fig. 6B). Thus, the BRCA1-dependent apoptotic pathway that is induced by serum withdrawal appears to signal sequentially from Ras/JNK/Fas/caspase-9.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   The MAPK signaling pathway is upstream of the death receptor and caspase signaling pathway in BRCA1-dependent, serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis. A, inhibition of MKK4 and JNK signaling abrogates Fas and FasL induction and caspase-8 and caspase-9 activation. MCF7 cells were cotransfected with GFP and dnMKK4 or dnJNK along with wild-type BRCA1 or pCR3.1 vector. Cells were sorted for GFP and incubated in the presence and absence of serum for 24 h. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies against Fas and FasL and caspase-8 and active caspase-9. B, inhibition of Fas signaling and caspase-8 function does not affect JNK activation. MCF7 cells co-transfected with GFP and dn-FADD or CrmA, along with BRCA1 wild-type or pCR3.1 vector, were sorted for GFP, and incubated in the presence or absence of serum for 24 h. Immunoblots of lysates with anti-phospho-JNK antibody were used to assess the level of JNK activation.

BRCA1-dependent Apoptosis Is p53-independent-- The tumor suppressor protein p53 has been reported to play a critical role in regulating the Fas apoptotic signaling pathway after DNA damage (42-44). To determine whether p53 is involved in the BRCA1-dependent pathway outlined above, we assessed the apoptotic response of cells that lack p53 to serum starvation following transfection with BRCA1. Full-length BRCA1, BRCA1Delta 5382-insC, and pCR3.1 were transfected into p53-/- MEF cells or MCF7 cells stably expressing the human papilloma virus (HPV) E6 gene (MCF7- E6) (45). Immunoblots using the N-terminal BRCA1 antibody showed that both wild-type BRCA1 and the 180-kDa BRCA1Delta 5382-insC mutant were expressed in these cells (Fig. 7A). Overexpression of full-length BRCA1 in both MEF p53-/- and MCF7 E6 cells induced apoptosis (Fig. 7B). Further increases in the levels of apoptosis were observed following serum withdrawal (Fig. 7B). As seen in MCF7 and OV177 cells, expression of stoichiometric amounts of BRCA1Delta 5382-insC (Fig. 7A) abolished all apoptosis associated with endogenous and ectopically expressed BRCA1 in MCF7 E6 and MEF p53-/- cells (Fig. 7B). These studies suggest that loss of p53 function has no effect on the BRCA1-dependent response to serum withdrawal.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in serum-deprived breast and ovarian cancer cells is p53 independent. A, immunoblot analysis of BRCA1 expression in MCF7 cells stably expressing human papilloma virus 16 E6 gene (HPV16 E6) following transient transfection with pCR3.1 vector, wild-type BRCA1, and BRCA1Delta 5382-insC. Aliquots containing 100 µg of protein were probed with the N-terminal BRCA1 (66036E) antibody. BRCA1 migrated as a 220-kDa band. The BRCA1Delta 5382-insC mutant encodes a 180-kDa polypeptide. B, BRCA1 enhances apoptosis after serum deprivation in the absence of functional p53. p53 null mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) and MCF7 cells expressing HPV16 E6, or vector control, were transiently transfected with pCR3.1 vector, wild-type BRCA1, or BRCA1Delta 5382-insC mutant, along with GFP. The GFP-positive cells were isolated by FACS, incubated in the presence and absence of serum for 24 h, fixed, and stained with PI. The percentage of subdiploid cells is shown. C, inhibition of Fas signaling or caspase function ablates BRCA1-dependent apoptosis in MCF7- HPV16 E6 cells. MCF7-HPV16 E6 cells were transiently transfected with pCR3.1 vector or wild-type BRCA1 along with dn-FADD, CrmA, or dn-caspase-9. Cells were also treated with Nok2 and ZB4 and incubated in the presence and absence of serum for 24 h. Apoptosis was assessed after labeling with Annexin V and PI.

To determine whether BRCA1-mediated apoptosis occurs through the same pathway as defined above in the absence of functional p53, we examined the effect of Nok2 antibody and expression of dn-FADD on serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis in MCF7 E6 cells (Fig. 7C). Both Nok2 and dn-FADD abolished BRCA1-induced apoptosis (Fig. 7C). Similar results were observed when these cells were transfected with CrmA and dn-caspase-9 (Fig. 7C), suggesting that the entire signal transduction pathway appears to function independently of p53.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The results of the present study demonstrate that BRCA1 enhances apoptosis induced by other stimuli in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines; that a truncation mutant lacking the C terminus of BRCA1 suppresses apoptosis, including spontaneous apoptosis, in these cell lines; that BRCA1-dependent apoptosis occurring after serum withdrawal proceeds through a H-Ras/MEKK4/JNK signaling pathway followed by increased expression of Fas and FasL and by activation of caspase-8; and that this Fas-dependent signaling pathway is independent of p53 function. Each of these observations has potentially important implications for current understanding of the role of BRCA1 as a tumor suppressor protein.

A previous study indicated that BRCA1 overexpression can result in induction of high levels of spontaneous apoptosis in U2OS osteosarcoma cells (28). In the present study, overexpression of BRCA1 in breast and ovarian cancer cells was associated with much more modest levels of apoptosis, with 10-12% of the cells undergoing apoptosis in the absence of apoptotic stimuli. The difference between our results and those obtained previously might reflect differences in cell type or in the degree of BRCA1 overexpression. However, the lower levels of apoptosis observed after BRCA1 transfection allowed us to examine the effect of BRCA1 on sensitivity of cells to other apoptotic stimuli. Results of these studies demonstrated that BRCA1 overexpression enhanced the apoptotic response to a variety of stimuli, including withdrawal of serum-derived survival factors, exposure to ionizing radiation, or treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel. These observations suggest that BRCA1 is capable of modulating the apoptotic response to a variety of stimuli.

To further evaluate the effects of BRCA1 on apoptosis, we examined BRCA1 null HCC1937 cells (46). Levels of apoptosis remained low in these cells even after serum starvation, but increased substantially upon ectopic expression of wild-type BRCA1. Conversely, expression of stoichiometric levels of certain BRCA1 truncation mutants was shown to decrease spontaneous and serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis in cells expressing wild-type BRCA1. These observations not only help establish a role for endogenous BRCA1 in the apoptotic response, but also suggest that certain BRCA1 truncation mutants can dampen this response in a dominant negative fashion. The BRCA1 mutants used in these studies were truncated before the C-terminal BRCT domains. This deleted region of the BRCA1 protein has been shown to contain two transactivation domains (14, 15, 47) and an RNA helicase binding domain that facilitates interaction with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme (48). In addition, this region of BRCA1 is known to interact with histone deacetylase (49), the CtIP transcriptional repressor (20, 50), and with p53 (51, 52). Moreover, Abbott and colleagues (53) have shown that the C terminus of BRCA1 is required for transcription-coupled repair and improved cell viability in response to DNA damage. Thus, the mutants that were used in this study were expected to have lost the ability to regulate many BRCA1-associated pathways within the cell. In this study the BRCA1 truncation mutants blocked all apoptosis associated with endogenous or ectopically expressed BRCA1, suggesting that the C terminus of BRCA1 also plays an important role in regulation of apoptosis. Because the C terminus of BRCA1 contains transactivation domains that are involved in transcriptional activation of a number of genes, including p21waf1/cip1, Bax, GADD45, GADD143, and IFN-gamma , as well as repression of several genes, including cyclin B1 (19, 22, 26, 28, 51, 54), it is possible that these or other transcriptional targets of BRCA1 might regulate the apoptotic process described in this study.

Harkin and colleagues (28) reported that BRCA1-induced apoptosis in U2OS osteosarcoma cells is associated with JNK activation. However, the apoptotic signaling pathways upstream of JNK in this model system were not reported. Likewise, the signaling pathways upstream of JNK in nerve growth factor withdrawal-induced apoptosis in neuronal PC12 (34) and in detachment-associated apoptosis (anoikis) in various cell types (55, 56) have not been well defined. In the present study, we investigated the signal transduction pathway that was activated in a BRCA1-dependent manner by serum withdrawal. Results of this analysis identified a pathway involving activation of MEKK4 and JNK by phosphorylation. This pathway was inhibited by Ras N17, dn-MKK4, dn-MEKK4, and dn-JNK, pointing to a pathway that involves sequential signaling from H-Ras to MEKK4, MKK4, and JNK. Although the apparent involvement of H-Ras in this pathway was somewhat unexpected, a number of studies have recently shown that Ras proteins can regulate apoptotic responses in a cell type- and stimulus-dependent fashion (33). In particular, it has been shown that Ras can induce apoptosis by binding and activating MEKK1 (31). Other studies have refined this model by demonstrating that Ras induces apoptosis through a Rac1- and p21-activated kinase-dependent pathway (57), and through a Ras/Rac1/CDC42/MLK3 (mixed lineage kinase 3)/MEKK pathway (58). Most recently, the Ras-associated apoptotic pathway has been shown to signal through JNK in a p53-independent manner (59) similar to the pathway identified above. In the present study we did not attempt to define the specific signaling pathway upstream of H-Ras, nor did we determine how BRCA1 is modulating signaling through this pathway. These are areas for future investigation.

Although BRCA1 was shown to activate JNK in U2OS cells (28), the pathways downstream of JNK in BRCA1-dependent apoptosis were not reported. Previous studies have raised the possibility that JNK can function as a downstream potentiator of Fas-induced apoptosis through caspase and DAXX activation (60, 61), or as an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor-induced apoptosis as seen in lymphocytes from JNKK1 and traf2 null animals (62, 63). Our results indicated a different role for JNK. After serum withdrawal, we observed BRCA1-dependent up-regulation of both FasL and Fas. The ability of dn-JNK to abrogate FasL and Fas induction placed JNK upstream of FasL and Fas in the apoptotic signaling pathway. These results are consistent with recent reports implicating JNK-dependent activation of the Fas/FasL pathway in nerve growth factor withdrawal-induced apoptosis in neuronal PC12 cells (34), stress-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells (35), and cell detachment-associated apoptosis (anoikis) in various cell types (55, 56). These results also extend these previous studies by demonstrating a role for BRCA1 in modulating signaling through the JNK/FasL/Fas pathway.

The ability of the blocking antibodies ZB4 and Nok2 to abrogate BRCA1-dependent serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis provided strong evidence that the up-regulation of FasL and its interaction with Fas are critical to this death process. Consistent with these results, abrogation of FADD signaling and inhibition of caspase-8 (through expression of CrmA) also inhibited the apoptotic response to serum withdrawal. In addition, expression of dn-caspase-9 inhibited this apoptotic pathway, suggesting that activation of caspase-8 results in activation of caspase-9 through a mitochondrial pathway, as has been suggested for "type II" cells (37, 39, 64). Furthermore, because this apoptotic pathway appears to retain activity in the absence of caspase-3, which is known to be down-regulated in MCF7 cells (37), the suggestion is that the caspase-3 effector is not required for this effect. Thus, it is likely that other effector caspases, such as caspase-7, may also mediate processing of multiple cellular targets as part of the BRCA1-dependent apoptotic pathway.

A number of studies have reported that FasL/Fas signaling after DNA damage requires the action of the tumor suppressor protein p53 (42-44). In the present study, we determined whether loss of p53 affected the BRCA1-dependent serum withdrawal-induced Fas/FasL pathway. The signal transduction pathway defined above was activated in a BRCA1-dependent manner in two cell models lacking p53 function. These results suggest that activation of the Fas/FasL after growth factor withdrawal proceeds by a pathway that is distinct from DNA damage-induced Fas/FasL activation.

In summary, we have established that the BRCA1 tumor suppressor functions as a regulator of apoptosis in response to serum deprivation and a number of other apoptotic stimuli. We have delineated a BRCA1-dependent, serum withdrawal-induced apoptotic pathway that sequentially involves H-Ras, MEKK4, and JNK followed by induction of FasL and activation of FADD- and caspase-9-dependent signaling. In addition, we have demonstrated that activation of this pathway is p53-independent and we have identified novel dominant negative activity of BRCA1 truncation mutants. These results provide an improved understanding of the tumor suppressor function of BRCA1 and suggest that the multifunctional BRCA1 protein coordinately regulates apoptotic events in addition to its effects on the DNA damage response, cell cycle progression, and transcription.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Jan van Deursen, Larry Karnitz, and Junjie Chen for insightful discussions; Tyler Jacks and Al Fornace for cell lines; Greg Gores, Larry Karnitz, Dave McKean, Charles Young, and Barbara Weber for plasmids; and Chris Hettinga for assistance in preparation of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Grants CA78878 (to F. J. C.) and CA69008 (to S. H. K.) from the National Institutes of Health, the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (to F. J. C.), and the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Cancer Genetics Program (to F. J. C.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, 1001 Guggenheim Bldg., Mayo Clinic and Foundation, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905. Tel.: 507-284-3623; Fax: 507-266-0824; E-mail: couch.fergus@mayo.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005824200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: STAT1, signal transducers and activators of transcription 1; BSA, bovine serum albumin; dn, dominant negative; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; Fas, the cell surface receptor that is also designated Apo-1 or CD95; FasL, Fas ligand; GFP, green fluorescence protein; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, also known as stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK); MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI, propidium iodide; z-VAD(OMe)-fmk, the methyl ester of N-(Nalpha -benzyloxycarbonylvalinylalanyl)aspartate fluoromethylketone; MEK (MKK), mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase; MEKK4, MEK kinase 4; MEF, mouse embryo fibroblast.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Miki, Y., Swensen, J., Shattuck-Eidens, D., Futreal, P. A., Harshman, K., Tavtigian, S., Liu, Q., Cochran, C., Bennett, L. M., Ding, W., Bell, R., Rosenthal, J., Hussey, C., Tran, T., McClure, M., Frye, C., Hattier, T., Phelps, R., Haugen-Strano, A., Katcher, H., Yakumo, K., Gholami, Z., Shaffer, D., Stone, S., Bayer, S., Wray, C., Bogden, R., Dayannath, P., Ward, J., Tonin, P., Narod, S., Bristow, P. K., Norris, F. H., Helvering, L., Morrison, P., Rosteck, P., Lai, M., Barrett, J. C., Lewis, C., Neuhausen, S., Cannon-Albright, L., Goldgar, D., Wiseman, R., Kamb, A., and Skolnick, M. H. (1994) Science 266, 66-71
2. Easton, D. F., Bishop, D. T., Ford, D., and Crockford, G. P. (1993) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 52, 678-701
3. Feunteun, J., and Lenoir, G. M. (1996) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1242, 177-180
4. Chen, Y., Farmer, A. A., Chen, C. F., Jones, D. C., Chen, P. L., and Lee, W. H. (1996) Cancer Res. 56, 3168-3172
5. Thomas, J. E., Smith, M., Rubinfeld, B., Gutowski, M., Beckmann, R. P., and Polakis, P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28630-28635
6. Scully, R., Ganesan, S., Brown, M., De Caprio, J. A., Cannistra, S. A., Feunteun, J., Schnitt, S., and Livingston, D. M. (1996) Science 272, 123-126
7. Holt, J. T., Thompson, M. E., Szabo, C., Robinson-Benion, C., Arteaga, C. L., King, M. C., and Jensen, R. A. (1996) Nat. Genet. 12, 298-302
8. Shao, N., Chai, Y. L., Shyam, E., Reddy, P., and Rao, V. N. (1996) Oncogene 13, 1-7
9. Lane, T. F., Deng, C., Elson, A., Lyu, M. S., Kozak, C. A., and Leder, P. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 2712-2722
10. Scully, R., Chen, J., Ochs, R. L., Keegan, K., Hoekstra, M., Feunteun, J., and Livingston, D. M. (1997) Cell 90, 425-435
11. Brugarolas, J., and Jacks, T. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 721-722
12. Wu, L. C., Wang, Z. W., Tsan, J. T., Spillman, M. A., Phung, A., Xu, X. L., Yang, M. C., Hwang, L. Y., Bowcock, A. M., and Baer, R. (1996) Nat. Genet. 14, 430-440
13. Wang, H., Shao, N., Ding, Q., Cui, J., Reddy, E. S. P., and Rao, V. N. (1997) Oncogene 15, 143-157
14. Chapman, M. S., and Verma, I. M. (1996) Nature 382, 678-679
15. Monteiro, A. N., August, A., and Hanafusa, H. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13595-13599
16. Thompson, M. E., Jensen, R. A., Obermiller, P. S., Page, D. L., and Holt, J. T. (1995) Nat. Genet. 9, 444-450
17. Rao, V. N., Shao, N., Ahmad, M., and Reddy, E. S. (1996) Oncogene 12, 523-528
18. Humphrey, J. S., Salim, A., Erdos, M. R., Collins, F. S., Brody, L. C., and Klausner, R. D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5820-5825
19. Somasundaram, K., Zhang, H., Zeng, Y. X., Houvras, H., Peng, Y., Zhang, H., Wu, G. S., Licht, J. D., Weber, B. L., and El-Deiry, W. S. (1997) Nature 389, 187-190
20. Li, S., Chen, P. L., Subramanian, T., Chinnadurai, G., Tomlinson, G., Osborne, C. K., Sharp, Z. D., and Lee, W. H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11334-11338
21. Pao, G. M., Janknecht, R., Ruffner, H., Hunter, T., and Verma, I. M. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 1020-1025
22. Ouchi, T., Lee, S. W., Ouchi, M., Aaronson, S. A., and Horvath, C. M. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 97, 5208-5213
23. Zhong, Q., Chen, C. F., Li, S., Chen, Y., Wang, C. C., Xiao, J., Chen, P. L., Sharp, Z. D., and Lee, W. H. (1999) Science 285, 747-750
24. Gowen, L. C., Avrutskaya, A. V., Latour, A. M., Koller, B. H., and Leadon, S. A. (1998) Science 281, 1009-1012
25. Scully, R., Ganesan, S., Vlasakova, K., Chen, J., Socolovsky, M., and Livingston, D. M. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 1093-1099
26. Zhang, H., Somasundaram, K., Peng, Y., Tian, H., Bi, D., Weber, B. L., and El-Deiry, W. S. (1998) Oncogene 16, 1713-1721
27. Fan, S., Wang, J. A., Yuan, R., Ma, Y. X., Meng, Q., Erdos, M. R., Brody, L. C., Goldberg, I. D., and Rosen, E. M. (1998) Oncogene 16, 3069-3082
28. Harkin, D. P., Bean, J. M., Miklos, D., Song, Y. H., Truong, V. B., Englert, C., Christians, F. C., Ellisen, L. W., Maheswaran, S., Oliner, J. D., and Haber, D. A. (1999) Cell 97, 575-586
29. Conover, C. A., Hartmann, S. B., Stalboerger, P., Klee, G. G., Kalli, K. R., and Jenkins, R. B. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 238, 439-449
30. Kottke, T. J., Blajeski, A. L., Martins, L. M., Mesner, P. W., Jr., Davidson, N. E., Earnshaw, W. C., Armstrong, D. K., and Kaufmann, S. H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 15927-15936
31. Russell, M., Lange-Carter, C. A., and Johnson, G. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11757-11760
32. Kauffmann-Zeh, A., Rodriguez-Viciana, P., Ulrich, E., Gilbert, C., Coffer, P., Downward, J., and Evan, G. (1997) Nature 385, 544-548
33. Downward, J. (1998) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 49-54
34. Le-Niculescu, H., Bonfoco, E., Kasuya, Y., Claret, F. X., Green, D. R., and Karin, M. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 751-763
35. Faris, M., Latinis, K. M., Kempiak, S. J., Koretzky, G. A., and Nel, A. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5414-5424
36. Bertin, J., Armstrong, R. C., Ottilie, S., Martin, D. A., Wang, Y., Banks, S., Wang, G. H., Senkevich, T. G., Alnemri, E. S., Moss, B., Lenardo, M. J., Tomaselli, K. J., and Cohen, J. I. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 1172-1176
37. Scaffidi, C., Fulda, S., Srinivasan, A., Friesen, C., Li, F., Tomaselli, K. J., Debatin, K. M., Krammer, P. H., and Peter, M. E. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1675-1687
38. Scaffidi, C., Schmitz, I., Zha, J., Korsmeyer, S. J., Krammer, P. H., and Peter, M. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22532-22538
39. Budihardjo, I., Oliver, H., Lutter, M., Luo, X., and Wang, X. (1999) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 269-290
40. Zhou, Q., Snipas, S., Orth, K., Muzio, M., Dixit, V. M., and Salvesen, G. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7797-7800
41. Srinivasula, S. M., Ahmad, M., Fernandes-Alnemri, T., and Alnemri, E. S. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 949-957
42. Muller, M., Strand, S., Hug, H., Heinemann, E. M., Walczak, H., Hofmann, W. J., Stremmel, W., Krammer, P. H., and Galle, P. R. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 99, 403-413
43. Bennett, M., Macdonald, K., Chan, S. W., Luzio, J. P., Simari, R., and Weissberg, P. (1998) Science 282, 290-293
44. Muller, M., Wilder, S., Bannasch, D., Israeli, D., Lehlbach, K., Li-Weber, M., Friedman, S. L., Galle, P. R., Stremmel, W., Oren, M., and Krammer, P. H. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 188, 2033-2045
45. Fan, S., Smith, M. L., Rivet, D. J., 2nd, Duba, D., Zhan, Q., Kohn, K. W., Fornace, A. J., Jr., and O'Connor, P. M. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 1649-1654
46. Tomlinson, G. E., Chen, T. T., Stastny, V. A., Virmani, A. K., Spillman, M. A., Tonk, V., Blum, J. L., Schneider, N. R., Wistuba, II, Shay, J. W., Minna, J. D., and Gazdar, A. F. (1998) Cancer Res. 58, 3237-3242
47. Haile, D. T., and Parvin, J. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 2113-2117
48. Anderson, S. F., Schlegel, B. P., Nakajima, T., Wolpin, E. S., and Parvin, J. D. (1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 254-256
49. Yarden, R. I., and Brody, L. C. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 4983-4988
50. Yu, X., Wu, L. C., Bowcock, A. M., Aronheim, A., and Baer, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25388-25392
51. Ouchi, T., Monteiro, A. N., August, A., Aaronson, S. A., and Hanafusa, H. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 2302-2306
52. Chai, Y. L., Cui, J. Q., Shao, N., Reddy, E. S. P., and Rao, V. N. (1999) Oncogene 18, 263-268
53. Abbott, D. W., Freeman, M. L., and Holt, J. T. (1998) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 90, 978-985
54. MacLachlan, T. K., Somasundaram, K., Sgagias, M., Shifman, Y., Muschel, R. J., Cowan, K. H., and El-Deiry, W. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2777-2785
55. Frisch, S. M., Vuori, K., Kelaita, D., and Sicks, S. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 1377-1382
56. Cardone, M. H., Salvesen, G. S., Widmann, C., Johnson, G., and Frisch, S. M. (1997) Cell 90, 315-323
57. Lim, L., Manser, E., Leung, T., and Hall, C. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 242, 171-185
58. Clarke, N., Arenzana, N., Hai, T., Minden, A., and Prywes, R. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 1065-1073
59. Joneson, T., and Bar-Sagi, D. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 5892-5901
60. Lenczowski, J. M., Dominguez, L., Eder, A. M., King, L. B., Zacharchuk, C. M., and Ashwell, J. D. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 170-181
61. Yang, X., Khosrovi-Far, R., Chang, H. Y., and Baltimore, D. (1997) Cell 89, 1067-1076
62. Nishina, H., Bachmann, M., Oliveira-dos-Santos, A. J., Kozieradzki, I., Fischer, K. D., Odermatt, B., Wakeham, A., Shahinian, A., Takimoto, H., Bernstein, A., Mak, T. W., Woodgett, J. R., Ohashi, P. S., and Penninger, J. M. (1997) J. Exp. Med. 186, 941-953
63. Yeh, W. C., Shahinian, A., Speiser, D., Kraunus, J., Billia, F., Wakeham, A., de la Pompa, J. L., Ferrick, D., Hum, B., Iscove, N., Ohashi, P., Rothe, M., Goeddel, D. V., and Mak, T. W. (1997) Immunity 7, 715-725
64. Srinivasan, A., Li, F., Wong, A., Kodandapani, L., Smidt, R., Jr., Krebs, J. F., Fritz, L. C., Wu, J. C., and Tomaselli, K. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4523-4529


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles: