Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002519200 on July 21, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 43, 33669-33678, October 27, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/43/33669    most recent
M002519200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wixler, V.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wixler, V.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsson, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The LIM-only Protein DRAL/FHL2 Binds to the Cytoplasmic Domain of Several alpha  and beta  Integrin Chains and Is Recruited to Adhesion Complexes*

Viktor WixlerDagger, Dirk Geerts§, Emmanuel Laplantine, Daniel Westhoff, Neil Smyth, Monique Aumailley, Arnoud Sonnenberg§, and Mats Paulsson

From the Institute for Biochemistry II, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany and § The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received for publication, March 24, 2000, and in revised form, June 29, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

LIM proteins contain one or more double zinc finger structures (LIM domains) mediating specific contacts between proteins that participate in the formation of multiprotein complexes. We report that the LIM-only protein DRAL/FHL2, with four and a half LIM domains, can associate with alpha 3A, alpha 3B, alpha 7A, and several beta  integrin subunits as shown in yeast two-hybrid assays as well as after overexpression in human cells. The amino acid sequence immediately following the conserved membrane-proximal region in the integrin alpha  subunits or the C-terminal region with the conserved NXXY motif of the integrin beta  subunits are critical for binding DRAL/FHL2. Furthermore, the DRAL/FHL2 associates with itself and with other molecules that bind to the cytoplasmic domain of integrin alpha  subunits. Deletion analysis of DRAL/FHL2 revealed that particular LIM domains or LIM domain combinations bind the different proteins. These results, together with the fact that full-length DRAL/FHL2 is found in cell adhesion complexes, suggest that it is an adaptor/docking protein involved in integrin signaling pathways.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Integrins are key regulators of cell adhesion and migration, processes that play a crucial role in cell survival and differentiation (1-4). Upon ligand binding, integrins cluster and many intracellular components, including adaptors, structural proteins, and kinases, are recruited into large multimolecular complexes where actin microfilaments anchor. As integrins do not possess intrinsic enzymatic activity, proteins associated with the complexes activate signaling pathways (1, 4-6). However, the precise molecular mechanisms of signal transmission still remain elusive. The cytoplasmic domain of integrin beta  subunits is assumed to play an active role in transducing the signals, whereas those of the integrin alpha  subunits are thought to be modulators. These different functions are probably mediated by diverse proteins that have been shown to interact, for most of them in vitro, with the cytoplasmic domains of the alpha  or beta  integrin subunits. Talin, alpha -actinin, paxillin, focal adhesion kinase (for review see Ref. 7), filamin (8), beta 3-endonexin (9), integrin-linked kinase (10), cytohesin-1 (11), integrin cytoplasmic domain-associated protein 1 (ICAP-1; see Refs. 12 and 13), receptor for activated protein kinase C (Rack-1; see Ref. 14), and WD protein interacting with integrin tails (WAIT-1; see Ref. 15) were shown to interact with the cytoplasmic tail of either specific or various beta  integrin subunits. Similarly, several proteins have been shown to bind the cytoplasmic domain of integrin alpha  subunits. Five of them, calreticulin (16), mammalian suppressor of secretion (Mss4), Bridging Integrator protein-1 (also called box-dependent Myc interaction protein-1 or BIN1), and alpha  integrin-binding proteins 63 (AIBP63) and 80 (AIBP80) (17) interact with several integrin alpha  subunits and bind to the conserved sequence proximal to the transmembrane domain. Another, the calcium- and integrin-binding protein, has a more restricted binding pattern (18). With the exception of calreticulin, which has been shown to modulate cell adhesion, the biological significance of these interactions is still unknown.

Such proteins are likely involved in the control of multiprotein complex remodeling. The alpha 3beta 1 integrin transdominantly regulates the clustering of other integrins, including alpha 6beta 1 (19-21), alpha 5beta 1, and alpha 2beta 1 (22) and of intracellular proteins associated with adhesion complexes. To identify proteins involved in the transdominant control exerted by the alpha 3beta 1 integrin, a yeast two-hybrid screen was performed using the cytoplasmic domain of the alpha 3A integrin subunit. Of five proteins identified in the screen, four bind the cytoplasmic domain conserved from several integrin alpha  subunits, whereas the fifth protein interacted with the unique, more distal sequence of the integrin alpha 3A cytoplasmic domain (17). This fifth protein is the four and a half LIM protein 2 (FHL2) of the LIM-only family, which was originally identified as DRAL (for down-regulated in rhabdomyosarcoma LIM protein) by subtractive cloning (23). To follow the recommended nomenclature (HUGO/GDB Nomenclature Committee) and to acknowledge the original discovery, we will refer to the protein as DRAL/FHL2.

LIM domains are double zinc finger motifs, defining the expanding family of LIM proteins involved in protein-protein interactions and transcriptional regulation (24-26). They are composed of either exclusively of LIM domains, the LIM-only proteins, or of LIM domains associated with homeodomains, kinase domains, or other functionally active sites, the LIM-plus proteins. Of the latter several proteins such as paxillin, zyxin, CRP1, abLIM, and the paxillin analog in platelets (Hic-5) are associated with the cytoskeleton (25, 27-31) and could function as nuclear-cytoplasmic shutters (32). DRAL/FHL2 is one of five known LIM-only proteins with four and a half LIM domains (33-35). We report here that DRAL/FHL2 and specific subdomains thereof have the capacity to interact with several beta  integrin subunits, a restricted number of integrin alpha  subunits, and with integrin-binding proteins. Further DRAL/FHL2 can localize to cell adhesion complexes.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA Constructs-- cDNA fragments encoding the complete cytoplasmic domain of integrin alpha 2, alpha 3A, alpha 5, alpha 6A, and beta 1A subunits were amplified by reverse transcriptase-PCR1 using as template total RNA from the human mammary epithelial cell line HBL100. They were inserted into EcoRI/BamHI sites of the pAS2-1 vector (CLONTECH. Heidelberg, Germany) as fusion proteins with the GAL4 DNA binding domain as described previously (17). cDNA fragments containing the partial or complete cytoplasmic domains of the integrin alpha 3B, alpha 6B, alpha 7A, alpha 7B, beta 1D, beta 2, and beta 3A subunits were amplified by PCR using the full-length cDNA as a template and appropriate specific sense and antisense primers containing restriction site tags. The constructs for the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 1 and beta 6 subunits were provided by Drs. B. Eckes and D. Petersohn (Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne, Germany) and Dr. S. Spong (Lung Biology Center, University of California, San Francisco), respectively. All integrin alpha 3A and beta 1A deletion mutants were derived by PCR amplification using the appropriate cDNA constructs and inserted into the pAS2-1 vector as above. DRAL/FHL2, AIBP63, AIBP80, Mss4, and BIN1 were available from our previous study (17) as clones in the pACT2 vector (CLONTECH). Deletion mutants of DRAL/FHL2 generated by PCR were cloned into BamHI/XhoI sites of the pACT2 vector. AIBP80 and DRAL/FHL2 were subcloned and inserted into EcoRI/BamHI sites of the pAS2-1 vector.

For expression in mammalian cells, the cytoplasmic domains of integrin alpha 2 (aa 1126-1152), alpha 3A (aa 1015-1051), alpha 7A (aa 1060-1115), and beta 1A (aa 752-798) subunits were cut from the pAS2-1 construct using NdeI and SpeI and, after fill-in of the NdeI overhang, the inserts were cloned in-frame into the GST-vector pEBG (a gift of Dr. A. Kalmes, University of Würzburg, Germany), which had been cut and filled in at the BamHI site and then digested with SpeI. The full-length human DRAL/FHL2 was cut from pACT2 construct by NheI/AvrII and inserted into the SpeI site of the pEBG vector. For the generation of Myc-tagged full-length or truncated DRAL/FHL2 and AIBP80, the cDNAs encoding these proteins were cut from pACT2 constructs (17) by SalI/XhoI and XbaI/XhoI, respectively, and cloned in-frame into the pCS2+MT vector (a gift of Dr. A. Kalmes). Full-length or truncated DRAL/FHL2 was inserted into the XhoI site, and AIBP80 was inserted after filling in of the existing overhangs into the StuI site. Full-length cDNA coding for the entire integrin alpha 3A subunit in the Bluescript vector (a generous gift of Dr. M. E. Hemler, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston) was cut by XbaI and subcloned into the XbaI site of the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands).

Yeast Two-hybrid Library Screening, Mating, and Transformation Assays-- Yeast cultures were grown under standard conditions in liquid or on solid media using YPD or minimal SD media. The yeast strain Y190 (CLONTECH) was transformed sequentially with the pAS2-1 plasmid coding for the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 3A subunit as bait and then with a pACT2 plasmid containing the placenta cDNA library (CLONTECH). Transformants were grown on SD medium lacking the amino acids leucine, tryptophan, and histidine in the presence of 25 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. On day 5 the colonies were tested for the activity of the lacZ reporter gene in a beta -galactosidase filter assay. To remove the bait cDNA, positive clones were recultured on SD medium without tryptophan in the presence of 10 µg/ml cycloheximide. The cycloheximide-resistant Y190 yeast clones were verified in a mating assay with yeast strain Y187 expressing the pAS2-1 plasmid with either the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 3A subunit, the unrelated protein lamin C (CLONTECH), or the nonfused GAL4 DNA binding domain as baits. Clones were scored as positive when the His+ and LacZ+ phenotype of yeast cells was dependent on the co-expression of only the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 3A subunit as bait. Such clones were retested in a co-transformation assay with purified plasmid cDNA using the same controls as in mating assays.

For direct two-hybrid binding assays, yeast Y190 cells were co-transfected with DRAL/FHL2 or its deletion mutants fused to the GAL4 transactivation domain in the pACT2 vector and with one of the cDNA constructs coding for either integrin cytoplasmic domains, mutants thereof, or DRAL/FHL2 itself, fused to the GAL4-DNA binding domain in the pAS2-1 vector. In other experiments, yeast cells were co-transfected with DRAL/FHL2 in pAS2-1 and with AIBP63, AIBP80, Mss4, BIN1, or DRAL/FHL2 itself in pACT2. In all cases, positive clones were scored as described above.

Expression of Proteins in Mammalian Cells-- For transient expression, human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells (American Type Culture Collection) or mouse 3T3 fibroblasts (kindly provided by Dr. U. Rapp, University of Wurzburg) were grown for 24 h in 6-well plates (2.5 × 105 cells/35 mm-diameter well) prior to transfection with plasmid DNA (2 µg/well) using Superfect Transfection mixture (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. When cells were co-transfected with different DNAs, the DNA content was equalized with appropriate amounts of empty expression vectors. For stable expression, HEK293 cells were transfected with the pTracer-CMV vector (Invitrogen) containing the full-length DRAL/FHL2 cDNA with an N-terminal insertion of the nine amino acid hemagglutinin tag (HA tag). The cells were trypsinized 48 h after transfection and selected further in medium containing 25 µg/ml zeocin. After 2 weeks, single colonies were picked, cells were cultured, and the expression of HA-tagged DRAL/FHL2 was analyzed by immunoblotting using HA tag-specific monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (a generous gift from Dr. U. Rapp, University of Würzburg, Germany).

Cell Cultures and Subcellular Fractionation-- Normal human skin fibroblasts and the epithelial cell line HaCat were provided by Dr. H. Smola (Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne, Germany). Established lines of human lung fibroblasts (Wi26), embryonic kidney (293), fibrosarcoma (HT1080), mammary epithelia (HBL100), mammary epithelial carcinoma (MCF-7), epidermoid carcinoma (A431), and ductal mammary carcinoma (T47D) have been previously described (36-38). CaCo2 cells were newly purchased from the ATCC. Rat PC12 and mouse NIH 3T3 cells were provided by Dr. U. Rapp (University of Wurzburg) and human RD-9 cells by Dr. A. Hoffmann (Department of Biochemistry, University of Cologne). All cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, a mixture of antibiotics, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Seromed/Biochrom, Berlin, Germany).

Cells were fractionated as described previously (39). Cell monolayers were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and scraped in 1 ml of hypotonic lysis buffer (1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM pepstatin, pH 7.2). After incubation on ice for 30 min, the cells were homogenized with a tight-fitting pestle and loaded onto 1 ml of 1 M sucrose in lysis buffer. The nuclear fraction was collected by centrifugation (1,600 × g, 10 min). The pellet was washed once with 1 M sucrose in lysis buffer. The supernatant was further centrifuged (150,000 × g, 30 min), and the resulting pellet and supernatant was taken as membrane and cytosolic fraction, respectively. Cytosolic proteins were precipitated by the methanol/chloroform method (40). Pellets of all three fractions were dissolved in 100 µl of electrophoresis sample buffer, and 30 µl were used for SDS-PAGE analysis.

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting-- Transiently transfected cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and lysed in 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 137 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1% Brij 98, or 1% Triton X-100, 2% glycerol, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM pepstatin at room temperature for 20 min. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 10 min) at 4 °C, and the supernatants were incubated for 3 h at 4 °C with antibodies against the Myc tag (clone 9E10, Oncogene distributed by Calbiochem, Schwalbach, Germany) and protein G-conjugated agarose (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) or with glutathione-conjugated Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) when precipitating GST-tagged proteins. The complexes were washed three time with lysis buffer, suspended in electrophoresis sample buffer, and heated at 95 °C for 3 min. The samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE on 10% acrylamide gels and electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. Proteins were detected with goat polyclonal antibodies against a synthetic peptide corresponding to the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 3A subunit (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or against GST (Life Technologies, Inc.), mouse monoclonal antibodies against Myc (clone 9E10), or rabbit polyclonal antibodies against recombinant GST-DRAL/FHL2 fusion protein and partially purified by affinity chromatography on a GST column (a generous gift of Dr. B. Schäfer, University of Zurich, Switzerland), followed by appropriate horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and the ECL detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Immunofluorescence Staining of Cell Adhesion Complexes-- Cells were cultured either overnight on uncoated or for 60 min on fibronectin-coated (10 µg/ml) glass coverslips in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum. The cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 2 min, and blocked with 1% BSA (fraction V, Sigma). The cells were processed for immunofluorescence staining with mouse monoclonal antibody F-VII against human vinculin (a gift from Dr. M. Glukhova, Institut Curie, Paris, France), K20 (Immunotech, Marseille, France), or TS2/16 (41) against the human beta 1 integrin subunit, 9E10 against the Myc tag, or rabbit polyclonal antiserum against recombinant GST-DRAL/FHL2, followed by Cy3-conjugated second antibodies against mouse or rabbit immunoglobulins (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories distributed by Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) together with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin (Sigma). For analysis of cell footprints the cells were lysed by osmotic shock with or without cross-linking with 1 mM dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) (DSP) (Pierce) as described previously (38) and were then processed for immunofluorescence labeling as detailed above. After mounting, the samples were observed with an Axiophot microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with epifluorescence optics.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of DRAL/FHL2 as a Protein Binding the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Integrin alpha 3A Subunit-- To identify proteins that bind to the cytoplasmic domain of the alpha 3A integrin subunit, a human placenta library (>5 × 106 independent clones) was used in a yeast two-hybrid screen with the C-terminal cytoplasmic part of the alpha 3A integrin subunit (aa 1015-1051) as bait (17). Out of 84 His+- and LacZ+-positive clones (17), 28 contained cDNAs with an identical open reading frame coding for the 279 amino acid residues of DRAL/FHL2. The specificity of this interaction was confirmed in a direct two-hybrid binding assay (Table I). Transformation of yeast cells with DRAL/FHL2 in pACT2 vector alone or together with the GAL4-DNA binding domain in pAS2-1 vector or together with an unrelated protein, lamin C, fused to the GAL4-DNA binding domain instead of alpha 3A, did not activate the His and lacZ reporter genes (Table I). The predicted amino acid sequence contains four double zinc finger LIM domains at the C-terminal end and a half-LIM domain at the N terminus. It corresponds to FHL2 (23, 42, 43).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Specific interaction of the cytoplasmic domain of integrin alpha 3A subunit with DRAL/FHL2 in a yeast two-hybrid binding assay
Yeast Y190 cells were co-transformed with the indicated combinations of bait and prey. The activation of the first reporter gene was determined by growth on His- medium and expression of the second reporter gene, lacZ, evaluated in a beta -galactosidase filter assay. The interaction was scored as negative (-) when no blue colonies were visible after 8 h; the interaction was scored as weak (+), intermediate (++), or strong (+++) when blue colonies became visible after 8, 4, or 1 h, respectively. The ubiquitously expressed lamin C was used as a negative control.

DRAL/FHL2 Interacts with the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Integrin alpha 3A Subunit when Co-transfected into Human Cells-- To test if DRAL/FHL2 binds the integrin alpha 3A subunit also in mammalian cells, HEK293 cells were co-transfected with the GST-tagged alpha 3A cytoplasmic domain (aa 1015-1051) and with Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2. These were tested for complex formation in co-precipitation experiments. The GST-tagged integrin alpha 3A cytoplasmic domain precipitated in immune complexes formed in the presence of antibodies against the Myc tag as shown by immunoblotting with specific antibodies (Fig. 1A). Reciprocally, the presence of Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 in complexes specifically precipitated with antibodies against the cytoplasmic domain of the alpha 3A integrin subunit was dependent on the expression of GST-tagged alpha 3A cytoplasmic domain but not on the expression of GST alone (Fig. 1A). Thus, consistent with the two-hybrid data, the LIM-only protein DRAL/FHL2 specifically interacts with the cytoplasmic domain of integrin alpha 3A subunit in mammalian cells.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with the integrin alpha 3A subunit in human cells. A, association of DRAL/FHL2 with the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 3A subunit. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with different GST- and Myc-tagged constructs as indicated. After 48 h, cell lysates were divided into two parts. From 1 aliquot, proteins were precipitated with the antibody 9E10 against the Myc tag followed by protein G-conjugated agarose for precipitation of Myc-tagged proteins. With the other aliquot, proteins were precipitated with glutathione-conjugated Sepharose beads for GST-tagged proteins. After SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 3A subunit was only detected in precipitates from cells where the integrin peptide had been co-expressed with Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 (left blot, lane 4). In the reverse experiment (glutathione-precipitated complexes), Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 was detected only when co-expressed with GST-tagged alpha 3A peptide (right blot, lane 4) but not with GST alone. After the first immunodetection, the blots were stripped and redeveloped with polyclonal antibody against recombinant DRAL/FHL2 (bottom, left blot) or against GST (bottom, right blot) to ascertain that Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 and GST-tagged alpha 3A peptide were equivalently precipitated. B, association of DRAL/FHL2 with the full-length integrin alpha 3A subunit. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with different cDNA constructs as indicated. After cell lysis, Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 was immunoprecipitated (IP) with antibody against Myc and the precipitated proteins were visualized by immunoblotting (IB) with antibodies against the cytoplasmic tail of the integrin alpha 3A subunit (upper blot), or against Myc (lower blot).

To analyze whether DRAL/FHL2 also binds the full-length recombinant alpha 3A subunit, the Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 and the full-length integrin alpha 3A subunit were transfected in HEK293 cells that normally express only small amounts of these polypeptides (data not shown, but see Fig. 7). Only upon co-expression with Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2, was the integrin alpha 3 chain detected in Myc-containing immunocomplexes (Fig. 1B).

Mapping of the DRAL/FHL2 Binding Site in the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Integrin alpha 3A Subunit by Yeast Direct Two-hybrid Assays-- The binding of DRAL/FHL2 was tested with four overlapping deletion mutants of the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 3A subunit. We have previously shown (17) that DRAL/FHL2 does not bind to the stretch of highly conserved amino acids KXGFFKR proximal to the transmembrane domain and common to all integrin alpha  subunits. Here we show also no interaction with a similar construct containing three additional residues at the C terminus, which are crucial for integrin function (44, 45). Furthermore, no binding occurred to a construct containing the last 18 C-terminal residues. However, there was a positive reaction with all constructs that contain a stretch of 12 amino acid residues beyond the conserved KCGFFKR motif irrespective of other deletions (Fig. 2).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Identification of a DRAL/FHL2-binding site in the unique amino acid sequence of the integrin alpha 3A subunit cytoplasmic domain. Yeast Y190 cells were transformed with pAS2-1 plasmid expressing the indicated deletion mutants of the integrin alpha 3A subunit and with DRAL/FHL2 in the pACT2 vector. The interaction was determined and scored as described in the legend to Table I. Numbers in parentheses refer to amino acid positions. The conserved membrane-proximal region is marked.

Binding Specificity of DRAL/FHL2 for alpha  or beta  Integrin Subunits and Mapping of Its Binding Site within the Integrin beta 3A Chain-- To investigate the specificity of DRAL/FHL2 binding, direct two-hybrid interaction tests were performed between DRAL/FHL2 and the cytoplasmic domain of nine different alpha  integrin subunits: the alpha 1 and alpha 2 integrin chains of collagen receptors, the alpha 5 chain of the fibronectin receptor, and the A and B variants of the alpha 3, alpha 6, and alpha 7 chains of laminin receptors (Table II). In addition to the integrin alpha 3A subunit cytoplasmic domain, alpha 3B and alpha 7A subunits interacted with DRAL/FHL2 (Table II). Similar experiments with the cytoplasmic domains of different integrin beta  subunits indicated that DRAL/FHL2 interacted with all beta  integrin chains, including beta 1A, beta 1D, beta 2, beta 3A, and beta 6 (Table II).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with cytoplasmic domains of different integrin alpha  and beta  subunits in a yeast two-hybrid assay
Interactions between the cytoplasmic domain of integrin subunits in pAS2-1 vector and DRAL/FHL2 in pACT2 vector were determined as described in the legend to Table I. The deletion mutants of beta 2 cyto-1 and beta 3A cyto-1 regions are based on the corresponding integrin subunit cytoplasmic domains and contain, respectively, the last 23 and 24 C-terminal amino acid residues, including the cyto-2 and cyto-3 regions, but lacking cyto-1. In the beta 6-11 construct, the last 11 C-terminal amino acid residues of the integrin beta 6 subunit cytoplasmic domain were deleted, but the cyto-3 region is preserved. All other constructs represent the full-length cytoplasmic domains. Scoring was as described in the legend to Table I.

The cytoplasmic domains of integrin beta  subunits have a stretch of conserved amino acid residues proximal to the transmembrane domain and additionally share the conserved cyto-1, cyto-2, and cyto-3 regions, which are important for integrin function (46-48). Cyto-2 and cyto-3 contain typical protein-binding sequences, NPXY and NXXY, respectively. Six different deletion mutants containing one or more of the characteristic motifs of the integrin beta 1A cytoplasmic domain were constructed and tested for DRAL/FHL2 binding in the yeast two-hybrid assay. The results showed that the last nine C-terminal amino acids, including the NXXY (NPKY) sequence of the cyto-3 region, are necessary for interaction between DRAL/FHL2 and the cytoplasmic domain of integrin beta 1A subunit (Fig. 3). The importance of this C-terminal sequence was supported by data obtained with deletion mutants of the integrin beta 2, beta 3A, and beta 6 chains in which the cyto-3 region was preserved (Table II).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Identification of the major DRAL/FHL2-binding site in the C-terminal cyto-3 region of integrin beta 1A subunit. Yeast Y190 cells were transformed with pAS2-1 plasmid expressing the indicated deletion mutants of the integrin beta 1A subunit and with DRAL/FHL2 in the pACT2 vector. The interaction was determined and scored as described in the legend to Table I. Numbers in parentheses refer to amino acid positions. The conserved cyto-1, -2, and -3 regions are highlighted.

DRAL/FHL2 Interacts with the Cytoplasmic Domain of the alpha 7A or beta 1A Integrin Subunits in Co-transfected Human Cells-- To analyze whether the interactions reported above occur also in mammalian cells, HEK293 cells were transiently co-transfected with the GST-tagged cytoplasmic domain of three additional integrin subunits, alpha 2, alpha 7A, or beta 1A, and with Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2. As with the integrin alpha 3A subunit, the Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 was precipitated together with GST-tagged alpha 7A or beta 1A integrin cytoplasmic domains when using glutathione-conjugated Sepharose beads (Fig. 4). As expected from the two-hybrid data, upon co-expression of the integrin alpha 2 cytoplasmic domain and DRAL/FHL2, the GST-tagged alpha 2 integrin subunit was not associated with DRAL/FHL2 in the complexes (Fig. 4). The reciprocal immunoprecipitation test with antibodies against Myc confirmed these results (not shown).


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with the integrin alpha 7A and beta 1A subunits in human cells. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with cDNA constructs as indicated and lysed 48 h later. GST-tagged proteins were precipitated (P) as described in the legend to Fig. 2. After SDS-PAGE and electrophoretic transfer, the blots were incubated with antibodies against Myc (upper blot) and, after stripping, with antibodies against GST (lower blot). IB, immunoblot.

DRAL/FHL2 Interacts with Itself and with Other Integrin-binding Proteins-- Several LIM domain-containing proteins have been suggested to dimerize, thus enhancing their capacity for complex formation (49). DRAL/FHL2, which contains four and a half LIM domains, could therefore represent an adaptor protein that could interact in multimolecular complexes with other integrin-binding proteins such as those that we have recently identified (17). This possibility was tested in direct two-hybrid interaction experiments. The results showed that DRAL/FHL2 is able to interact with itself and with two additional integrin-binding proteins, AIBP80 and BIN1 (Table III). To test the interactions in vivo, we constructed expression vectors for GST-tagged DRAL/FHL2 and for Myc-tagged AIBP80. HEK293 cells co-expressing GST-DRAL/FHL2 and Myc-DRAL/FHL2 or Myc-AIBP80 were lysed, and proteins were precipitated with either anti-Myc antibodies or with glutathione-coupled Sepharose beads. Immunoblot analysis of the precipitates showed that also in human cells DRAL/FHL2 self-interacts and that AIBP80 associates with DRAL/FHL2 (Fig. 5).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with itself and with other integrin alpha  subunit-binding proteins
The DRAL/FHL2 in pAS2-1 vector was tested in direct two-hybrid binding assays with the different integrin-binding proteins, including DRAL/FHL2 itself, in pACT2 vector. Positive clones were scored as described in the legend to Table I.


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Association of DRAL/FHL2 with itself and with AIBP80 in human cells. After transient transfection with the indicated cDNA constructs, lysates of HEK293 cells were precipitated (P) as described in Fig. 2. Co-precipitating proteins were identified by immunoblotting (IB) with the indicated antibodies. Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 co-migrates with the IgG heavy chain and could therefore not be visualized with the antibodies against Myc.

Molecular Dissection of Binding Sites in DRAL/FHL2-- To identify the LIM domains of DRAL/FHL2 responsible for the diverse interactions described in this study, cDNA sequences for single LIM modules were cloned in the pACT2 vector and were tested in direct two-hybrid binding assays with the other proteins, including DRAL/FHL2, cloned in pAS-2 vector. Surprisingly, only two out of six proteins analyzed interacted with particular single LIM domains; the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 7A subunit had affinity for the LIM 2 domain, whereas DRAL/FHL2 itself bound the C-terminal LIM 3 and LIM 4 domains (Fig. 6A). Tests with additional DRAL/FHL2 mutants, in which one, two, or three LIM domains were deleted from either the C or N terminus confirmed that the LIM 2 domain is responsible for binding to the integrin alpha 7A subunit and that LIM 3 and LIM 4 modules are involved in DRAL/FHL2 self-association (Fig. 6A). Additionally, they revealed that both LIM 1 and LIM 2 N-terminal domains are required for interaction with AIBP80, whereas binding of the cytoplasmic domains of the integrin alpha 3A or alpha 3B subunits needs the last 2, 3, and 4 LIM domains (Fig. 6A). Furthermore, deletion of any LIM domain prevented the binding of DRAL/FHL2 to the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin beta 1A subunit (Fig. 6A), suggesting that the three-dimensional structure of DRAL/FHL2 is important for this interaction. The major binding sites of the analyzed proteins are summarized in Fig. 6B.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Identification of sites on DRAL/FHL2 that bind to integrin subunits and to AIBP80 or are required for DRAL/FHL2 self-interaction. A, yeast Y190 cells were co-transformed with one of the cDNA fragments encoding DRAL/FHL2 deletion mutants inserted into the pACT2 vector and with the cDNA fragments encoding one of the ligand proteins inserted into the pAS2-1 vector. The numbers in parentheses indicate DRAL/FHL2 amino acids encoded by the corresponding constructs. The interactions were detected by growth on His- medium and in a beta -galactosidase filter assay. Scoring was as described in the legend to Table I. B, schematic representation of principal binding sites on DRAL/FHL2 identified in A.

DRAL/FHL2 Is Expressed by Normal Human Skin Fibroblasts and Is Mainly Localized in the Cell Nucleus and Cytosol-- DRAL/FHL2 was initially described as a protein preferentially localized in nuclei after overexpression in NIH 3T3 cells, whereas it was distributed uniformly over the nucleus and cytoplasm in Rh30 cells (23). To analyze the subcellular localization of DRAL/FHL2 more precisely, we screened several human and rodent cells or cell lines for the presence of endogenous DRAL/FHL2. Immunoblotting with an antiserum raised against the recombinant GST fusion protein (23) showed the presence of DRAL/FHL2 in the cell lysates of normal human fibroblasts, Wi26 human fibroblasts, mouse NIH 3T3, and DRAL/FHL2-transfected HEK293 cells as a prominent band migrating under reducing (Fig. 7A) or non-reducing (not shown) conditions at the position expected for an ~31-kDa polypeptide, in agreement with previous data (23). In cell lysates from a panel of transformed or tumor cell lines of epithelial or neuronal origin, the DRAL/FHL2 band was fainter or barely seen and had a slightly different mobility (Fig. 7A), which could indicate different post-translational modifications. Human skin fibroblasts expressed most DRAL/FHL2 and were chosen to study the subcellular localization of naturally occurring protein. After fractionation by differential centrifugation, DRAL/FHL2 was mainly found in the nuclear and cytosolic fractions with only small amounts in the cell membrane fraction (Fig. 7B).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Expression of DRAL/FHL2 in human skin fibroblasts and established cell lines (A) and subcellular distribution of DRAL/FHL2 in human skin fibroblasts (B). A, total lysates (20 µg of proteins per lane) of the indicated cells. B, equal samples of nuclear (N), cytosolic (C), and membrane (M) fractions from human skin fibroblasts were separated by SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose, and the blots were developed with a polyclonal antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 fusion protein.

Endogenous DRAL/FHL2 Can Be Recruited to Cell Adhesion Complexes-- As integrins function at the cell surface in adhesion complexes, we used immunofluorescence microscopy to establish whether DRAL/FHL2 is localized at the periphery of spread cells, where it would be expected to interact with the cytoplasmic tail of integrin subunits. Normal human skin fibroblasts were the most appropriate for the study since they express more DRAL/FHL2 than most of the established cell lines (Fig. 7). Moreover, the polyclonal antibody raised against GST-DRAL/FHL2 recognized a single major band in immunoblots of normal human skin fibroblast lysates (Fig. 7). Immunofluorescence staining with the polyclonal antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 showed that naturally expressed DRAL/FHL2 was associated with fibril-like structures within the cell body and with clusters at the cell periphery (Fig. 8, A, D, and G). Double labeling with antibodies against DRAL/FHL2 (Fig. 8, A, D, and G) and with monoclonal antibodies against the integrin beta 1 subunit (Fig. 8B) or vinculin (Fig. 8H) showed overlap for many but not all of the clusters (Fig. 8, superimposed photographs C and I). Furthermore, visualization of fibrillar actin by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin in cells stained with the antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 revealed that DRAL/FHL2 is clustered at the ends of actin bundles (superimposed photograph F). Again, not all DRAL/FHL2-positive clusters were located at the ends of the actin fibers and, vice versa, DRAL/FHL2-positive clusters were not always present at the termini of actin fibers. In contrast, the antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 did not stain any of the vinculin-positive peripheral clusters in RD-9 cells (not shown), which agrees with previous results showing that DRAL/FHL2 is down-regulated in rhabdomyosarcoma cells (23).


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Localization of DRAL/FHL2 to adhesion complexes in normal human skin fibroblasts. The cells were cultured overnight in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum, fixed and double-stained with rabbit polyclonal antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 together with the mouse monoclonal antibody TS2/16 (A) against the integrin beta 1 subunit or F-VII (C) against vinculin, followed by the appropriate fluorescence-labeled second antibodies or by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin (E). Specimens were examined and photographed under epifluorescence microscopy using separate detection channels (A, B, D, E, G, and H). Superimposed photographs show that the integrin beta 1 subunits (C) and vinculin (I) are, but not always, co-localized with DRAL/FHL2. Superimposition of actin and DRAL/FHL2 images (F) reveals that DRAL/FHL2 is localized at the far ends of actin stress fibers that usually terminate in cell adhesion complexes.

Cell adhesion complexes are dynamic multimolecular assemblies of kinases and adaptor proteins that are structurally or transiently associated to integrin clusters (4, 5). To confirm the association of DRAL/FHL2 with cell adhesion complexes, footprints were prepared by submitting normal human fibroblasts to osmotic shock in the absence or in the presence of DSP, a membrane-permeable cross-linker. Immunofluorescence labeling showed that both integrin beta 1 subunit and vinculin, but not DRAL/FHL2, were present in non-cross-linked cell remnants (Fig. 9). However, after cross-linking, DRAL/FHL2 was detected in the footprints of normal human fibroblasts (Fig. 9).


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Immunofluorescence staining of human skin fibroblast footprints. Fibroblasts were subjected to osmotic shock either without (a, c, and e) or with (b, d, and f) previous cross-linking of proteins with DSP and further processed for immunofluorescence staining with the mouse monoclonal antibody K20 (a and b) against integrin beta 1 subunit or F-VII (c and d) against vinculin, or the rabbit polyclonal antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 (e and f).

Finally, mouse 3T3 fibroblasts were transiently transfected with Myc-tagged full-length or truncated DRAL/FHL2 representing the N- and C-terminal part of the molecule. Immunofluorescence detection of the tagged protein with an antibody against Myc showed that full-length DRAL/FHL2 localized to focal adhesion clusters (Fig. 10A). In contrast, the immunofluorescence staining of mouse 3T3 fibroblasts transfected with constructs representing the N- or C-terminal half of DRAL/FHL2 was only nuclear (Fig. 10, B and C), indicating that only full-length DRAL/FHL2 can be targeted to focal adhesion clusters.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Only full-length DRAL/FHL2 is targeted to cell adhesion complexes. Mouse 3T3 fibroblasts were transiently transfected with constructs representing Myc-tagged full-length (A), N-terminal (B), or C-terminal (C) half of DRAL/FHL2. The truncated versions of the protein corresponded to LIM1/2-2 (amino acids 1-157) or LIM 2-4 (amino acids 97-279) as represented in Fig. 6A. The cells were cultured on fibronectin-coated coverslips in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum for 60 min. After fixation, they were stained with mouse monoclonal antibody 9E10 against the Myc tag followed by Cy3-conjugated second antibodies.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this report we show that the LIM-only protein DRAL/FHL2 is a novel integrin-binding protein. After the identification in a yeast two-hybrid screen as interacting with the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 3A subunit, we provide evidence that DRAL/FHL2 has the capacity to interact, both in yeast and in mammalian cells, with itself, with the cytoplasmic domain of integrin alpha 3A, alpha 3B, alpha 7A, and several beta  subunits, and with integrin-binding proteins. Furthermore, studies with mutant forms of DRAL/FHL2 demonstrate that different LIM domains are responsible for those interactions. Finally, we show that DRAL/FHL2, previously described as a nuclear protein, is targeted to cell adhesion complexes. Together, these results suggest that DRAL/FHL2 may act as an adaptor protein, regulating integrin trafficking, function, or signaling.

A molecular dissection of the DRAL/FHL2 integrin alpha  subunit-binding sites showed the importance of 12 amino acid residues immediately following the conserved membrane-proximal region of the integrin alpha 3A subunit. Several cytoplasmic proteins, including calreticulin, calcium-, and integrin-binding protein, BIN1, Mss4, AIBP63, and AIBP80 interact with the cytoplasmic tail of integrin alpha  subunits and require the highly conserved KXGFFKR sequence for optimal binding (16, 17, 50). DRAL/FHL2, therefore, is the first protein shown to bind the non-conserved region of integrin alpha  subunit cytoplasmic domains. Furthermore, DRAL/FHL2 has a specificity restricted to the integrin alpha 3A, alpha 3B, and alpha 7A chains. These subunits have divergent sequences after the conserved KXGFFKR motif, and it was unexpected that DRAL/FHL2 interacts with all three. A deletion mutation analysis of DRAL/FHL2 itself solved the apparent contradiction, as it was revealed that different LIM domains interact with the alpha 7A peptide and the alpha 3 variants.

In integrin beta  subunits the C-terminal part of the cytoplasmic domain, which includes the cyto-3 NXXY motif, is needed for binding to DRAL/FHL2. Except for the integrin beta 4 and beta 8 subunits, the cytoplasmic domains of the beta  chains share the functionally important cyto-1, cyto-2, and cyto-3 regions (46-48). Cyto-2 and -3 contain the NPXY and NXXY motif, respectively. NPXY motifs are recognition sites for phosphotyrosine-binding proteins such as those containing SH2 domains (51). It is believed that the integrin cyto-2 region folds in a beta -turn so that the C-terminal part of the chain, containing the NXXY motif of cyto-3, can be brought in the vicinity of the membrane proximal conserved region (52). Mutations in the NPXY sequence, truncation or deletion of cyto-2, or peptides representing this region impair talin, filamin, and alpha -actinin binding to the beta 1 cytoplasmic tail as well as cell adhesion, spreading, and formation of focal adhesions (47, 53-57). The NXXY motif of cyto-3 is required for ICAP-1 or beta 3-endonexin binding to the cytoplasmic domain of integrin beta 1 or beta 3 subunit, respectively (12, 13, 58). Our data show that DRAL/FHL2 binds all tested integrin beta  subunits. Results obtained with sequential deletion mutants of the beta 1A subunit and further deletion mutants of several other beta  subunits indicated that the NXXY cyto-3 motif is within the critical binding site. Thus, in contrast to ICAP-1 and beta 3-endonexin, DRAL/FHL2 is a binding partner common to all integrin beta  subunits that possess the NXXY motif. One hypothesis is that the function of beta  subunits in integrin activation is regulated through a conformational change involving folding of the C-terminal region containing cyto-3 over the N-terminal region (52). Such a change could be under the control of cytoplasmic factors. Binding of DRAL/FHL2 to the cyto-3 region may regulate the conformational changes of the integrin beta 1 cytoplasmic domain by either inducing or inhibiting the folding or, alternatively, by transiently competing with other proteins for binding to this domain.

Our observation that DRAL/FHL2 binds numerous proteins is not surprising because it contains several LIM domains and those are thought to function as protein interaction modules. In addition, DRAL/FHL2 has the property to bind both alpha  and beta  integrin subunits through different LIM domains. Single LIM domains are involved in binding to the integrin alpha 7A subunit or in DRAL/FHL2 homodimerization, while for binding to other proteins the coordinated action of several LIM domains was needed. The most striking result was that deletion of any LIM domain prevented the interaction with the integrin beta 1A subunit, suggesting that the three-dimensional structure of DRAL/FHL2 is required for binding. At this point we do not know if the different interactions described here for DRAL/FHL2 can take place simultaneously or whether homodimerization of DRAL/FHL2 influences the interactions. LIM domains fold independently and are held together by a linker region (26, 59). Furthermore, a single LIM domain, or even a single zinc finger module of a LIM domain, can function as protein-binding interface so that single LIM domain could be functionally bipartite (27). For example, although the LIM-only protein PINCH consists of five LIM domains, it binds integrin-linked kinase by only the most N-terminal one (60). Similarly, zyxin, a LIM-plus protein with a tandem of three LIM domains, binds to another LIM-containing protein, CRP1, also by a single LIM domain (27). These data, together with the fact that DRAL/FHL2 forms dimers, suggest that this novel integrin-binding protein has great potential for forming multimeric protein complexes. Moreover, sequence comparison of DRAL/FHL2-interacting proteins did not reveal any homology, except for the integrin beta  subunits that share the cyto-1, -2, and -3 motifs, so that due to its modular structure DRAL/FHL2 can potentially be involved in many different interactions. Interestingly, further interactions of DRAL/FHL2 with the the androgen receptor (61) or with hCDC47 (62) were recently described. The interaction with the androgen receptor requires both the N- and C-terminal domains of DRAL/FHL2, and the interaction with hCDC47 involves the LIM 2 and 3 domains together with the first half LIM motif of FHL2/DRAL, respectively. Taken together, this suggests that by using different sets or combinations of its LIM domains this adaptor protein could be involved in the organization or the regulation of very diverse multimolecular complexes including transcriptional complexes.

Although DRAL/FHL2 is mainly localized in the cell nucleus and cytosol (23; this report), it was recruited to cell adhesion complexes in several cell types, including normal skin fibroblasts. There, it was clustered together with integrins and vinculin at the ends of actin stress fibers. Only full-length DRAL/FHL2 was targeted to cell adhesion complexes in transfected mouse 3T3 fibroblasts while truncated versions of the protein were not. This agrees well with the results observed in yeast interaction assays showing that binding to the integrin beta 1A subunit requires full-length DRAL/FHL2. In this aspect, the requirement for binding is similar to that reported for the androgen receptor (61). Several proteins from the LIM-plus family, like paxillin, zyxin, and abLIM, are adaptors involved in scaffolding of focal adhesion complexes or of the cytoskeleton (25, 27-29). The Caenorhabditis elegans LIM-only protein UNC-97, that also has both nuclear and extranuclear distribution, co-localizes in muscle with beta  integrin in focal adhesion-like structures (63). The other LIM-only proteins PINCH and CRP1 can also be recruited to integrin signaling complexes through interactions with integrin-linked kinase (60) or via zyxin and alpha -actinin (25), respectively.

Our cell fractionation experiments showed that only a small proportion of DRAL/FHL2 is present in the membrane fraction of human fibroblasts and that DRAL/FHL2 is more abundant in the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. This suggests that DRAL/FHL2 may also have other functions within the cell such as that recently described in the formation of transcriptional complexes (61). That only a small amount of DRAL/FHL2 was found to be membrane-associated can explain why we could not precipitate the endogenous protein with antibodies against integrin chains. Only when recombinantly overexpressed in mammalian cells, an interaction of DRAL/FHL2 and integrin cytoplasmic domains or full-length integrin alpha 3A (this report) or alpha 7A2 could be observed. Alternatively, in mammalian cells interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with integrins may be favored by a certain conformation or activation states of the integrins such as those induced by extracellular ligand binding and which are lost under the experimental conditions required for immunoprecipitation. Remarkably, binding of DRAL/FHL2 to the androgen receptor is strictly agonist-dependent in mammalian cells (61). Moreover, in fibroblasts co-localization of DRAL/FHL2 and vinculin, a marker of focal adhesion complexes, or integrin beta 1 subunit was not always seen. Furthermore, association of naturally expressed DRAL/FHL2 within adhesion complexes of fibroblasts is weak, at least weaker than that of vinculin, since it was retained in cell footprints only after cross-linking. This finding argues for a transient or regulatory role of DRAL/FHL2, a hallmark expected of proteins involved in the signal transduction cascade initiated in adhesion complexes. The migration velocity in in vitro wound closure assays as well as the adhesion to several extracellular matrix proteins, including collagens, fibronectin, and laminins, were not changed after overexpression of DRAL/FHL2. Moreover, in the RD-9 rhabdomyosarcoma cells vinculin-positive adhesion complexes were present despite the absence of DRAL/FHL2. Thus, while DRAL/FHL2 obviously participates in protein clusters formed by integrins in fibroblasts, its presence does not appear to be essential for adhesion complexes. In this regard it is similar to LIM proteins like PINCH (60) or Hic-5 (31).

A function as a nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling protein has been proposed for zyxin, a member of the LIM-plus family (32). The LIM domain structure has been resolved for a number of proteins, and they all show a striking similarity to the DNA-interacting CCCC module of the transcription factor GATA-1 (64-66), suggesting that they can bind DNA (33, 42). Indeed, two recent reports describe interactions of FHL2/DRAL with the androgen receptor (61) or with hCDC47 (62) and its involvement in transcriptional complexes. Finally, one of the other four and a half LIM domain containing proteins, ACT (activator of CREM in testis), stimulates the transcriptional activity of CREM and CREB (35). In conclusion, DRAL/FHL2 appears as an excellent candidate to facilitate the processing of integrin signals at the cell membrane into the cell program since such proteins are likely to be required for the transfer of information from cell adhesion complexes into the nucleus.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Monika Pesch for expert technical assistance; Drs. Beate Eckes and Dirk Petersohn for the integrin alpha 1/pAS2-1 construct; Dr. Marina Glukhova for the monoclonal antibody against vinculin; Dr. Martin E. Hemler for the integrin alpha 3 chain cDNA; Dr. Andreas Kalmes for GST- and Myc-tagged vectors; Drs. Roswitha Nischt and Hans Smola for the normal human skin fibroblasts, Wi26, and HaCat cells; Dr. Beat W. Schäfer for the antiserum against GST-DRAL; and Dr. Suzanne Spong for the pAS2-1/beta 6 constructs. We are very grateful to Drs. Markus Plomann and Patrik Maurer for helpful discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the University of Cologne, the Center National de la Recherche Scientifique (to M. A.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants Kr 558/10-1, FOR265/2-1, SFB263, and AU 86/5-1, the Köln Fortune Program Numbers 160/1998 and 30/1999, and the Dutch Cancer Society Grant NKI 95-979.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: Institute for Experimental Medicine, Friedrich-Alexander University, Glückstrasse 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute for Biochemistry II, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany. Tel.: 49 221 478 6991; Fax: 49 221 478 3109; Email: aumailley@uni-koeln.de.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002519200

2 V. Wixler and K. von der Mark, unpublished observations.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; GST, glutathione S-transferase; aa, amino acid; HA, hemagglutinin; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; DSP, dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Clark, E. A., and Brugge, J. S. (1995) Science 268, 233-238
2. Schwartz, M. A., Schaller, M. D., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 549-599
3. Dedhar, S., and Hannigan, G. E. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 657-669
4. Yamada, K. M., and Geiger, B. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 76-85
5. Burridge, K., and Charzanowska-Wodnicka, M. (1997) Trends Cell Biol. 7, 342-347
6. Howe, A., Aplin, A. E., Alahari, S. K., and Juliano, R. L. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 220-231
7. LaFlamme, S. E., Homan, S. M., Bodeau, A. L., and Mastrangelo, A. M. (1997) Matrix Biol. 16, 153-163
8. Sharma, C. P., Ezzell, R. M., and Arnaout, M. A. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 3461-3470
9. Shattil, S. J., O'Toole, T., Eigenthaler, M., Thon, V., Williams, M., Babior, B. M., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1995) J. Cell Biol. 131, 807-816
10. Hannigan, G. E., Leung-Hagersteijn, C., Fitz-Gibbon, L., Copolino, M. G., Radeva, G., Filmus, J., Bell, J. C., and Dedhar, S. (1996) Nature 79, 91-96
11. Kolanus, W., Nagel, W., Schiller, B., Zeitlmann, L., Godar, S., Stockinger, H., and Seed, B. (1996) Cell 86, 233-242
12. Chang, D. D., Wong, C., Smith, H., and Liu, J. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 1149-1157
13. Zhang, X. A., and Hemler, M. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11-19
14. Liliental, J., and Chang, D. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2379-2383
15. Rietzler, M., Bittner, M., Kolanus, W., Schuster, A., and Holzmann, B. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 27459-27466
16. Rojiani, M. V., Finlay, B. B., Gray, V., and Dedhar, S. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 9859-9866
17. Wixler, V., Laplantine, E., Geerts, D., Sonnenberg, A., Petersohn, D., Eckes, B., Paulsson, M., and Aumailley, M. (1999) FEBS Lett. 445, 351-355
18. Naik, U. P., Patel, P. M., and Parise, L. V. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4651-4654
19. Dogic, D., Rousselle, P., and Aumailley, M. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 793-802
20. Dogic, D., Hülsmann, H., Sherman, N., Fox, J. W., Broermann, R., Paulsson, M., and Aumailley, M. (1999) Matrix Biol. 18, 433-444
21. Hodivala-Dilke, K. M., DiPersio, C. M., Kreidberg, J. A., and Hynes, R. O. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 1357-1369
22. Laplantine, E., Vallar, L., Mann, K., Kieffer, N., and Aumailley, M. (2000) J. Cell Sci. 113, 1167-1176
23. Genini, M., Schwalbe, P., Scholl, F. A., Remppis, A., Mattei, M. G., and Schäfer, B. M. (1997) DNA Cell Biol. 16, 433-442
24. Sanchez-Garcia, I., and Rabbitts, T. H. (1994) Trends Genet. 10, 315-320
25. Beckerle, M. (1997) BioEssays 19, 949-957
26. Dawid, I. B., Breen, J. J., and Toyama, R. (1998) Trends Genet. 14, 156-162
27. Schmeichel, K. L., and Beckerle, M. C. (1994) Cell 79, 211-219
28. Pomies, P., Louis, H. A., and Beckerle, M. C. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 157-168
29. Roof, D. J., Hayes, A., Adamian, M., Chishti, A. H., and Li, T. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 575-588
30. Hagmann, J., Grob, M., Welman, A., van Willigen, G., and Burger, M. M. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 2181-2188
31. Thomas, S. M., Hagel, M., and Turner, C. E. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 181-190
32. Nix, D. A., and Beckerle, M. C. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 1139-1147
33. Morgan, M. J., and Madgwick, A. J. (1999a) Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun. 255, 251-255
34. Morgan, M. J., and Madgwick, A. J. (1999b) Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun. 255, 245-250
35. Fimia, G. M., De Cesare, D., and Sassone-Corsi, P. (1999) Nature 398, 165-169
36. Sonnenberg, A., Linders, C. J. T., Modderman, P. W., Damsky, C. H., Aumailley, M., and Timpl, R. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 2145-2155
37. Rousselle, P., and Aumailley, M. (1994) J. Cell Biol. 125, 205-214
38. Sondermann, H., Dogic, D., Pesch, M., and Aumailley, M. (1999) Cell Adh. Commun. 7, 43-57
39. Chen, R. H., Sarnecki, C., and Blenis, J. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 915-927
40. Wessel, D., and Flügge, U. (1984) Anal. Biochem. 138, 141-143
41. Hemler, M. E., Sanchez-Madrid, F., Flotte, T. J., Krensky, A. M., Burakoff, S. J., Bhan, A. K., Springer, T. A., and Strominger, J. L. (1984) J. Immunol. 132, 3011-3018
42. Morgan, M. J., and Madgwick, A. J. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 225, 632-638
43. Chan, K. K., Tsui, S. K., Lee, S. M., Luk, S. C., Liew, C. C., Fung, K. P., Waye, M. M., and Lee, C. Y. (1998) Gene (Amst.) 210, 345-350
44. Kassner, P. D., Kawaguchi, S., and Hemler, M. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19859-19867
45. Kawaguchi, S., Bergelson, J. M., Finberg, R. W., and Hemler, M. E. (1994) Mol. Biol. Cell 5, 977-988
46. Marcantonio, E. E., Guan, J.-L., Trevithick, J. E., and Hynes, R. O. (1990) Cell Regul. 1, 597-604
47. Reszka, A. A., Hayashi, Y., and Horwitz, A. F. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 117, 1321-1330
48. Mastrangelo, A. M., Homan, S. M., Humphries, M. J., and LaFlamme, S. E. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 217-229
49. Feuerstein, R., Wang, X., Song, D., Cooke, N. E., and Liebhaber, S. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10655-10659
50. Vallar, L., Melchior, C., Plançon, S., Drobecq, H., Lippens, G., Regnault, V., and Kieffer, N. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17257-17266
51. Sudol, M. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1469-1474
52. Haas, T. A., and Plow, E. F. (1997) Protein Eng. 10, 1395-1405
53. Otey, C. A., Vasquez, G. B., Burridge, K., and Erickson, B. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21193-21197
54. Pfaff, M., Liu, S., Erle, D. J., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6104-6109
55. Retta, S. F., Balzac, F., Ferraris, P., Belkin, A. M., Fässler, R., Humphries, M. J., De Leo, G., Silengo, L., and Tarone, G. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 715-731
56. Sampath, R., Gallagher, P. J., and Pavalko, F. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33588-33594
57. Kaapa, A., Peter, K., and Ylanne, J. (1999) Exp. Cell Res. 250, 524-534
58. Eigenthaler, M., Hofferer, L., Shattil, S. J., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7693-7698
59. Konrat, R., Krautler, B., Weiskirchen, R., and Bister, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23233-23240
60. Tu, Y., Li, F., Goicoechea, S., and Wu, C. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2425-2434
61. Müller, J. M., Isle, U., Metzger, E., Rempel, A., Moser, M., Pscherer, A., Breyer, T., Holubarsch, C., Buetttner, R., and Schüle, R. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 359-369
62. Chan, K. K., Tsui, S. K. W., Ngai, S.-M., Lee, S. M. Y., Kotaka, M., Waye, M. M. Y., Lee, C.-Y., and Fung, K.-P. (2000) J. Cell. Biochem. 76, 499-508
63. Hobert, O., Moerman, D. G., Clark, K. A., Beckerle, M. C., and Ruvkun, G. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 144, 45-57
64. Perez-Alvarado, G. C., Miles, C., Michelsen, J. W., Louis, H. A., Winge, D. R., Beckerle, M. C., and Summers, M. F. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 388-398
65. Perez-Alvarado, G. C., Kosa, J. L., Louis, H. A., Beckerle, M. C., Winge, D. R., and Summers, M. F. (1996) Mol. Biol. 257, 153-174
66. Kowalski, K., Czolij, R., King, G. F., Crossley, M., and Mackay, J. P. (1999) J. Biomol. NMR 13, 249-262


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. Bovill, S. Westaby, A. Crisp, S. Jacobs, and T. Shaw
Reduction of four-and-a-half LIM-protein 2 expression occurs in human left ventricular failure and leads to altered localization and reduced activity of metabolic enzymes
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2009; 137(4): 853 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K. R. Legate and R. Fassler
Mechanisms that regulate adaptor binding to {beta}-integrin cytoplasmic tails
J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2009; 122(2): 187 - 198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
J. Park, C. Will, B. Martin, L. Gullotti, N. Friedrichs, R. Buettner, H. Schneider, S. Ludwig, and V. Wixler
Deficiency in the LIM-only protein FHL2 impairs assembly of extracellular matrix proteins
FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2508 - 2520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Labalette, Y. Nouet, J. Sobczak-Thepot, C. Armengol, F. Levillayer, M.-C. Gendron, C.-A. Renard, B. Regnault, J. Chen, M.-A. Buendia, et al.
The LIM-only Protein FHL2 Regulates Cyclin D1 Expression and Cell Proliferation
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15201 - 15208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. Liu, D. J. Burkin, and S. J. Kaufman
Increasing {alpha}7{beta}1-integrin promotes muscle cell proliferation, adhesion, and resistance to apoptosis without changing gene expression
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): C627 - C640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Samson, C. Will, A. Knoblauch, L. Sharek, K. von der Mark, K. Burridge, and V. Wixler
Def-6, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for Rac1, Interacts with the Skeletal Muscle Integrin Chain {alpha}7A and Influences Myoblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15730 - 15742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
V. Wixler, S. Hirner, J. M. Muller, L. Gullotti, C. Will, J. Kirfel, T. Gunther, H. Schneider, A. Bosserhoff, H. Schorle, et al.
Deficiency in the LIM-only protein Fhl2 impairs skin wound healing
J. Cell Biol., April 9, 2007; 177(1): 163 - 172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. Y. Boateng, R. J. Belin, D. L. Geenen, K. B. Margulies, J. L. Martin, M. Hoshijima, P. P. de Tombe, and B. Russell
Cardiac dysfunction and heart failure are associated with abnormalities in the subcellular distribution and amounts of oligomeric muscle LIM protein
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): H259 - H269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Kahl, L. Gullotti, L. C. Heukamp, S. Wolf, N. Friedrichs, R. Vorreuther, G. Solleder, P. J. Bastian, J. Ellinger, E. Metzger, et al.
Androgen Receptor Coactivators Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1 and Four and a Half LIM Domain Protein 2 Predict Risk of Prostate Cancer Recurrence
Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 66(23): 11341 - 11347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. J. McGrath, D. L. Cottle, M.-A. Nguyen, J. M. Dyson, I. D. Coghill, P. A. Robinson, M. Holdsworth, B. S. Cowling, E. C. Hardeman, C. A. Mitchell, et al.
Four and a Half LIM Protein 1 Binds Myosin-binding Protein C and Regulates Myosin Filament Formation and Sarcomere Assembly
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7666 - 7683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
B. Gabriel, D.-C Fischer, M. Orlowska-Volk, A. zur Hausen, R. Schule, J. M. Muller, and A. Hasenburg
Expression of the Transcriptional Coregulator FHL2 in Human Breast Cancer: A Clinicopathologic Study
Reproductive Sciences, January 1, 2006; 13(1): 69 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Samarel
Costameres, focal adhesions, and cardiomyocyte mechanotransduction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): H2291 - H2301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. C. Mistry, A. Kato, Y. H. Tran, S. Honda, T. Tsukada, Y. Takei, and S. Hirose
FHL5, a novel actin-binding protein, is highly expressed in eel gill pillar cells and responds to wall tension
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): R1141 - R1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Samson, N. Smyth, S. Janetzky, O. Wendler, J. M. Muller, R. Schule, H. von der Mark, K. von der Mark, and V. Wixler
The LIM-only Proteins FHL2 and FHL3 Interact with {alpha}- and {beta}-Subunits of the Muscle {alpha}7{beta}1 Integrin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28641 - 28652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
M. J. McGrath, C. A. Mitchell, I. D. Coghill, P. A. Robinson, and S. Brown
Skeletal muscle LIM protein 1 (SLIM1/FHL1) induces {alpha}5{beta}1-integrin-dependent myocyte elongation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): C1513 - C1526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Chen, W. Xu, E. Bales, C. Colmenares, M. Conacci-Sorrell, S. Ishii, E. Stavnezer, J. Campisi, D. E. Fisher, A. Ben-Ze'ev, et al.
SKI Activates Wnt/{beta}-Catenin Signaling in Human Melanoma
Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 63(20): 6626 - 6634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C.-L. Hsu, Y.-L. Chen, S. Yeh, H.-J. Ting, Y.-C. Hu, H. Lin, X. Wang, and C. Chang
The Use of Phage Display Technique for the Isolation of Androgen Receptor Interacting Peptides with (F/W)XXL(F/W) and FXXLY New Signature Motifs
J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23691 - 23698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. D. Coghill, S. Brown, D. L. Cottle, M. J. McGrath, P. A. Robinson, H. H. Nandurkar, J. M. Dyson, and C. A. Mitchell
FHL3 Is an Actin-binding Protein That Regulates {alpha}-Actinin-mediated Actin Bundling: FHL3 LOCALIZES TO ACTIN STRESS FIBERS AND ENHANCES CELL SPREADING AND STRESS FIBER DISASSEMBLY
J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 24139 - 24152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Turner, H. Nicholas, D. Bishop, J. M. Matthews, and M. Crossley
The LIM Protein FHL3 Binds Basic Kruppel-like Factor/Kruppel-like Factor 3 and Its Co-repressor C-terminal-binding Protein 2
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 12786 - 12795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Morlon and P. Sassone-Corsi
The LIM-only protein FHL2 is a serum-inducible transcriptional coactivator of AP-1
PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 3977 - 3982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
S. Lange, D. Auerbach, P. McLoughlin, E. Perriard, B. W. Schafer, J.-C. Perriard, and E. Ehler
Subcellular targeting of metabolic enzymes to titin in heart muscle may be mediated by DRAL/FHL-2
J. Cell Sci., March 14, 2003; 115(24): 4925 - 4936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
R. Nawrotzki, M. Willem, N. Miosge, H. Brinkmeier, and U. Mayer
Defective integrin switch and matrix composition at alpha 7-deficient myotendinous junctions precede the onset of muscular dystrophy in mice
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2003; 12(5): 483 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. A. Robinson, S. Brown, M. J. McGrath, I. D. Coghill, R. Gurung, and C. A. Mitchell
Skeletal muscle LIM protein 1 regulates integrin-mediated myoblast adhesion, spreading, and migration
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): C681 - C695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Wei, C.-A. Renard, C. Labalette, Y. Wu, L. Levy, C. Neuveut, X. Prieur, M. Flajolet, S. Prigent, and M.-A. Buendia
Identification of the LIM Protein FHL2 as a Coactivator of beta -Catenin
J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 5188 - 5194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
B. Martin, R. Schneider, S. Janetzky, Z. Waibler, P. Pandur, M. Kuhl, J. Behrens, K. von der Mark, A. Starzinski-Powitz, and V. Wixler
The LIM-only protein FHL2 interacts with {beta}-catenin and promotes differentiation of mouse myoblasts
J. Cell Biol., October 14, 2002; 159(1): 113 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. McLoughlin, E. Ehler, G. Carlile, J. D. Licht, and B. W. Schafer
The LIM-only Protein DRAL/FHL2 Interacts with and Is a Corepressor for the Promyelocytic Leukemia Zinc Finger Protein
J. Biol. Chem., September 27, 2002; 277(40): 37045 - 37053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. G. Amaar, G. R. Thompson, T. A. Linkhart, S.-T. Chen, D. J. Baylink, and S. Mohan
Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein 5 (IGFBP-5) Interacts with a Four and a Half LIM Protein 2 (FHL2)
J. Biol. Chem., March 29, 2002; 277(14): 12053 - 12060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Vossmeyer, W. Hofmann, K. Loster, W. Reutter, and K. Danker
Phospholipase Cgamma Binds alpha 1beta 1 Integrin and Modulates alpha 1beta 1 Integrin-specific Adhesion
J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2002; 277(7): 4636 - 4643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. van der Flier, I. Kuikman, D. Kramer, D. Geerts, M. Kreft, T. Takafuta, S. S. Shapiro, and A. Sonnenberg
Different splice variants of filamin-B affect myogenesis, subcellular distribution, and determine binding to integrin {beta} subunits
J. Cell Biol., January 21, 2002; 156(2): 361 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. van der Flier, I. Kuikman, D. Kramer, D. Geerts, M. Kreft, T. Takafuta, S. S. Shapiro, and A. Sonnenberg
Different splice variants of filamin-B affect myogenesis, subcellular distribution, and determine binding to integrin {beta} subunits
J. Cell Biol., January 21, 2002; 156(2): 361 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/43/33669    most recent
M002519200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wixler, V.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsson, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wixler, V.
Right arrow Articles by Paulsson, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement