|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002519200 on July 21, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 43, 33669-33678, October 27, 2000
The LIM-only Protein DRAL/FHL2 Binds to the Cytoplasmic
Domain of Several and Integrin Chains and Is Recruited to
Adhesion Complexes*
Viktor
Wixler ,
Dirk
Geerts§,
Emmanuel
Laplantine,
Daniel
Westhoff,
Neil
Smyth,
Monique
Aumailley¶,
Arnoud
Sonnenberg§, and
Mats
Paulsson
From the Institute for Biochemistry II, Medical Faculty, University
of Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany
and § The Netherlands Cancer Institute,
Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Received for publication, March 24, 2000, and in revised form, June 29, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
LIM proteins contain one or more double zinc
finger structures (LIM domains) mediating specific contacts between
proteins that participate in the formation of multiprotein complexes.
We report that the LIM-only protein DRAL/FHL2, with four and a half LIM
domains, can associate with 3A, 3B,
7A, and several integrin subunits as shown in yeast
two-hybrid assays as well as after overexpression in human cells. The
amino acid sequence immediately following the conserved
membrane-proximal region in the integrin subunits or the C-terminal
region with the conserved NXXY motif of the integrin subunits are critical for binding DRAL/FHL2. Furthermore, the DRAL/FHL2
associates with itself and with other molecules that bind to the
cytoplasmic domain of integrin subunits. Deletion analysis of
DRAL/FHL2 revealed that particular LIM domains or LIM domain
combinations bind the different proteins. These results, together with
the fact that full-length DRAL/FHL2 is found in cell adhesion
complexes, suggest that it is an adaptor/docking protein involved in
integrin signaling pathways.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Integrins are key regulators of cell adhesion and migration,
processes that play a crucial role in cell survival and differentiation (1-4). Upon ligand binding, integrins cluster and many intracellular components, including adaptors, structural proteins, and kinases, are
recruited into large multimolecular complexes where actin microfilaments anchor. As integrins do not possess intrinsic enzymatic activity, proteins associated with the complexes activate signaling pathways (1, 4-6). However, the precise molecular mechanisms of signal
transmission still remain elusive. The cytoplasmic domain of integrin
subunits is assumed to play an active role in transducing the
signals, whereas those of the integrin subunits are thought to be
modulators. These different functions are probably mediated by diverse
proteins that have been shown to interact, for most of them in
vitro, with the cytoplasmic domains of the or integrin subunits. Talin, -actinin, paxillin, focal adhesion kinase (for review see Ref. 7), filamin (8), 3-endonexin (9),
integrin-linked kinase (10), cytohesin-1 (11), integrin cytoplasmic
domain-associated protein 1 (ICAP-1; see Refs. 12 and 13), receptor for
activated protein kinase C (Rack-1; see Ref. 14), and WD protein
interacting with integrin tails (WAIT-1; see Ref. 15) were shown to
interact with the cytoplasmic tail of either specific or various integrin subunits. Similarly, several proteins have been shown to bind the cytoplasmic domain of integrin subunits. Five of them,
calreticulin (16), mammalian suppressor of secretion (Mss4), Bridging
Integrator protein-1 (also called box-dependent Myc
interaction protein-1 or BIN1), and integrin-binding proteins 63 (AIBP63) and 80 (AIBP80) (17) interact with several integrin subunits and bind to the conserved sequence proximal to the
transmembrane domain. Another, the calcium- and integrin-binding
protein, has a more restricted binding pattern (18). With the exception
of calreticulin, which has been shown to modulate cell adhesion, the
biological significance of these interactions is still unknown.
Such proteins are likely involved in the control of multiprotein
complex remodeling. The 3 1 integrin
transdominantly regulates the clustering of other integrins, including
6 1 (19-21),
5 1, and 2 1
(22) and of intracellular proteins associated with adhesion complexes.
To identify proteins involved in the transdominant control exerted by
the 3 1 integrin, a yeast two-hybrid
screen was performed using the cytoplasmic domain of the
3A integrin subunit. Of five proteins identified in the
screen, four bind the cytoplasmic domain conserved from several
integrin subunits, whereas the fifth protein interacted with the
unique, more distal sequence of the integrin 3A
cytoplasmic domain (17). This fifth protein is the four and a half LIM
protein 2 (FHL2) of the LIM-only family, which was originally
identified as DRAL (for down-regulated in rhabdomyosarcoma LIM protein)
by subtractive cloning (23). To follow the recommended nomenclature
(HUGO/GDB Nomenclature Committee) and to acknowledge the original
discovery, we will refer to the protein as DRAL/FHL2.
LIM domains are double zinc finger motifs, defining the expanding
family of LIM proteins involved in protein-protein interactions and
transcriptional regulation (24-26). They are composed of either exclusively of LIM domains, the LIM-only proteins, or of LIM domains associated with homeodomains, kinase domains, or other functionally active sites, the LIM-plus proteins. Of the latter several proteins such as paxillin, zyxin, CRP1, abLIM, and the paxillin analog in
platelets (Hic-5) are associated with the cytoskeleton (25, 27-31) and
could function as nuclear-cytoplasmic shutters (32). DRAL/FHL2 is one
of five known LIM-only proteins with four and a half LIM domains
(33-35). We report here that DRAL/FHL2 and specific subdomains thereof
have the capacity to interact with several integrin subunits, a
restricted number of integrin subunits, and with integrin-binding
proteins. Further DRAL/FHL2 can localize to cell adhesion complexes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
DNA Constructs--
cDNA fragments encoding the complete
cytoplasmic domain of integrin 2, 3A,
5, 6A, and 1A subunits
were amplified by reverse transcriptase-PCR1 using as
template total RNA from the human mammary epithelial cell line HBL100.
They were inserted into EcoRI/BamHI sites of the
pAS2-1 vector (CLONTECH. Heidelberg, Germany) as
fusion proteins with the GAL4 DNA binding domain as described
previously (17). cDNA fragments containing the partial or complete
cytoplasmic domains of the integrin 3B,
6B, 7A, 7B,
1D, 2, and 3A subunits were amplified by PCR using the full-length cDNA as a template and
appropriate specific sense and antisense primers containing restriction
site tags. The constructs for the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin
1 and 6 subunits were provided by Drs. B. Eckes and D. Petersohn (Department of Dermatology, University of
Cologne, Germany) and Dr. S. Spong (Lung Biology Center, University
of California, San Francisco), respectively. All integrin
3A and 1A deletion mutants were derived
by PCR amplification using the appropriate cDNA constructs and
inserted into the pAS2-1 vector as above. DRAL/FHL2, AIBP63, AIBP80,
Mss4, and BIN1 were available from our previous study (17) as clones in
the pACT2 vector (CLONTECH). Deletion mutants of
DRAL/FHL2 generated by PCR were cloned into BamHI/XhoI sites of the pACT2 vector. AIBP80 and
DRAL/FHL2 were subcloned and inserted into
EcoRI/BamHI sites of the pAS2-1 vector.
For expression in mammalian cells, the cytoplasmic domains of integrin
2 (aa 1126-1152), 3A (aa 1015-1051),
7A (aa 1060-1115), and 1A (aa 752-798)
subunits were cut from the pAS2-1 construct using NdeI and
SpeI and, after fill-in of the NdeI overhang, the inserts were cloned in-frame into the GST-vector pEBG (a gift of Dr. A. Kalmes, University of Würzburg, Germany), which had been cut and
filled in at the BamHI site and then digested with SpeI. The full-length human DRAL/FHL2 was cut from pACT2
construct by NheI/AvrII and inserted into the
SpeI site of the pEBG vector. For the generation of
Myc-tagged full-length or truncated DRAL/FHL2 and AIBP80, the cDNAs
encoding these proteins were cut from pACT2 constructs (17) by
SalI/XhoI and XbaI/XhoI,
respectively, and cloned in-frame into the pCS2+MT vector (a gift of
Dr. A. Kalmes). Full-length or truncated DRAL/FHL2 was inserted into
the XhoI site, and AIBP80 was inserted after filling in of
the existing overhangs into the StuI site. Full-length
cDNA coding for the entire integrin 3A subunit in
the Bluescript vector (a generous gift of Dr. M. E. Hemler,
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston) was cut by XbaI and
subcloned into the XbaI site of the pcDNA3 vector
(Invitrogen, Groningen, The Netherlands).
Yeast Two-hybrid Library Screening, Mating, and Transformation
Assays--
Yeast cultures were grown under standard conditions in
liquid or on solid media using YPD or minimal SD media. The yeast
strain Y190 (CLONTECH) was transformed sequentially
with the pAS2-1 plasmid coding for the cytoplasmic domain of the
integrin 3A subunit as bait and then with a pACT2
plasmid containing the placenta cDNA library
(CLONTECH). Transformants were grown on SD medium lacking the amino acids leucine, tryptophan, and histidine in the
presence of 25 mM 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. On day 5 the
colonies were tested for the activity of the lacZ reporter
gene in a -galactosidase filter assay. To remove the bait
cDNA, positive clones were recultured on SD medium without
tryptophan in the presence of 10 µg/ml cycloheximide. The
cycloheximide-resistant Y190 yeast clones were verified in a mating
assay with yeast strain Y187 expressing the pAS2-1 plasmid with either
the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin 3A subunit, the
unrelated protein lamin C (CLONTECH), or the
nonfused GAL4 DNA binding domain as baits. Clones were scored as
positive when the His+ and LacZ+ phenotype of
yeast cells was dependent on the co-expression of only the cytoplasmic
domain of the integrin 3A subunit as bait. Such clones
were retested in a co-transformation assay with purified plasmid
cDNA using the same controls as in mating assays.
For direct two-hybrid binding assays, yeast Y190 cells were
co-transfected with DRAL/FHL2 or its deletion mutants fused to the GAL4
transactivation domain in the pACT2 vector and with one of the cDNA
constructs coding for either integrin cytoplasmic domains, mutants
thereof, or DRAL/FHL2 itself, fused to the GAL4-DNA binding domain in
the pAS2-1 vector. In other experiments, yeast cells were
co-transfected with DRAL/FHL2 in pAS2-1 and with AIBP63, AIBP80, Mss4,
BIN1, or DRAL/FHL2 itself in pACT2. In all cases, positive clones were
scored as described above.
Expression of Proteins in Mammalian Cells--
For transient
expression, human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells (American Type
Culture Collection) or mouse 3T3 fibroblasts (kindly provided by Dr. U. Rapp, University of Wurzburg) were grown for 24 h in 6-well plates
(2.5 × 105 cells/35 mm-diameter well) prior to
transfection with plasmid DNA (2 µg/well) using Superfect
Transfection mixture (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. When cells were co-transfected with
different DNAs, the DNA content was equalized with appropriate amounts
of empty expression vectors. For stable expression, HEK293 cells were
transfected with the pTracer-CMV vector (Invitrogen) containing the
full-length DRAL/FHL2 cDNA with an N-terminal insertion of the nine
amino acid hemagglutinin tag (HA tag). The cells were trypsinized
48 h after transfection and selected further in medium containing
25 µg/ml zeocin. After 2 weeks, single colonies were picked, cells
were cultured, and the expression of HA-tagged DRAL/FHL2 was analyzed
by immunoblotting using HA tag-specific monoclonal antibody 12CA5 (a
generous gift from Dr. U. Rapp, University of Würzburg, Germany).
Cell Cultures and Subcellular Fractionation--
Normal human
skin fibroblasts and the epithelial cell line HaCat were provided by
Dr. H. Smola (Department of Dermatology, University of Cologne,
Germany). Established lines of human lung fibroblasts (Wi26), embryonic
kidney (293), fibrosarcoma (HT1080), mammary epithelia (HBL100),
mammary epithelial carcinoma (MCF-7), epidermoid carcinoma (A431), and
ductal mammary carcinoma (T47D) have been previously described
(36-38). CaCo2 cells were newly purchased from the ATCC. Rat PC12 and
mouse NIH 3T3 cells were provided by Dr. U. Rapp (University of
Wurzburg) and human RD-9 cells by Dr. A. Hoffmann (Department of
Biochemistry, University of Cologne). All cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, a mixture of antibiotics, and 10%
heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Seromed/Biochrom, Berlin, Germany).
Cells were fractionated as described previously (39). Cell monolayers
were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, and scraped
in 1 ml of hypotonic lysis buffer (1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM -glycerophosphate, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM
pepstatin, pH 7.2). After incubation on ice for 30 min, the cells were
homogenized with a tight-fitting pestle and loaded onto 1 ml of 1 M sucrose in lysis buffer. The nuclear fraction was
collected by centrifugation (1,600 × g, 10 min). The
pellet was washed once with 1 M sucrose in lysis buffer. The supernatant was further centrifuged (150,000 × g,
30 min), and the resulting pellet and supernatant was taken as membrane and cytosolic fraction, respectively. Cytosolic proteins were precipitated by the methanol/chloroform method (40). Pellets of all
three fractions were dissolved in 100 µl of electrophoresis sample
buffer, and 30 µl were used for SDS-PAGE analysis.
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting--
Transiently
transfected cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and
lysed in 25 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 137 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 1% Brij 98, or 1% Triton X-100, 2%
glycerol, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml
aprotinin, 2 mM pepstatin at room temperature for 20 min. The lysates were cleared by centrifugation (10,000 × g, 10 min) at 4 °C, and the supernatants were incubated
for 3 h at 4 °C with antibodies against the Myc tag (clone
9E10, Oncogene distributed by Calbiochem, Schwalbach, Germany) and
protein G-conjugated agarose (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) or with
glutathione-conjugated Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
when precipitating GST-tagged proteins. The complexes were washed three
time with lysis buffer, suspended in electrophoresis sample buffer, and heated at 95 °C for 3 min. The samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE on
10% acrylamide gels and electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. Proteins were detected with goat polyclonal antibodies against a synthetic peptide corresponding to the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin 3A subunit (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) or against GST (Life Technologies, Inc.), mouse
monoclonal antibodies against Myc (clone 9E10), or rabbit polyclonal
antibodies against recombinant GST-DRAL/FHL2 fusion protein and
partially purified by affinity chromatography on a GST column (a
generous gift of Dr. B. Schäfer, University of Zurich,
Switzerland), followed by appropriate horseradish peroxidase-coupled
secondary antibodies (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and the ECL detection
system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Immunofluorescence Staining of Cell Adhesion
Complexes--
Cells were cultured either overnight on uncoated or for
60 min on fibronectin-coated (10 µg/ml) glass coverslips in DMEM
containing 10% fetal calf serum. The cells were fixed with 2%
paraformaldehyde for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for
2 min, and blocked with 1% BSA (fraction V, Sigma). The cells were
processed for immunofluorescence staining with mouse monoclonal
antibody F-VII against human vinculin (a gift from Dr. M. Glukhova,
Institut Curie, Paris, France), K20 (Immunotech, Marseille, France), or TS2/16 (41) against the human 1 integrin subunit, 9E10
against the Myc tag, or rabbit polyclonal antiserum against recombinant GST-DRAL/FHL2, followed by Cy3-conjugated second antibodies against mouse or rabbit immunoglobulins (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories distributed by Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) together with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin (Sigma). For analysis of cell
footprints the cells were lysed by osmotic shock with or without
cross-linking with 1 mM dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate) (DSP) (Pierce) as described previously (38) and were then processed for
immunofluorescence labeling as detailed above. After mounting, the
samples were observed with an Axiophot microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen,
Germany) equipped with epifluorescence optics.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of DRAL/FHL2 as a Protein Binding the Cytoplasmic
Domain of the Integrin 3A Subunit--
To identify
proteins that bind to the cytoplasmic domain of the 3A
integrin subunit, a human placenta library (>5 × 106
independent clones) was used in a yeast two-hybrid screen with the
C-terminal cytoplasmic part of the 3A integrin subunit
(aa 1015-1051) as bait (17). Out of 84 His+- and
LacZ+-positive clones (17), 28 contained cDNAs with an
identical open reading frame coding for the 279 amino acid residues of
DRAL/FHL2. The specificity of this interaction was confirmed in a
direct two-hybrid binding assay (Table
I). Transformation of yeast cells with
DRAL/FHL2 in pACT2 vector alone or together with the GAL4-DNA binding
domain in pAS2-1 vector or together with an unrelated protein, lamin C,
fused to the GAL4-DNA binding domain instead of 3A, did
not activate the His and lacZ reporter genes (Table I). The
predicted amino acid sequence contains four double zinc finger LIM
domains at the C-terminal end and a half-LIM domain at the N terminus.
It corresponds to FHL2 (23, 42, 43).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Specific interaction of the cytoplasmic domain of integrin
3A subunit with DRAL/FHL2 in a yeast two-hybrid binding
assay
Yeast Y190 cells were co-transformed with the indicated combinations of
bait and prey. The activation of the first reporter gene was determined
by growth on His medium and expression of the second reporter
gene, lacZ, evaluated in a -galactosidase filter assay.
The interaction was scored as negative ( ) when no blue colonies were
visible after 8 h; the interaction was scored as weak (+),
intermediate (++), or strong (+++) when blue colonies became visible
after 8, 4, or 1 h, respectively. The ubiquitously expressed lamin
C was used as a negative control.
|
|
DRAL/FHL2 Interacts with the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Integrin
3A Subunit when Co-transfected into Human Cells--
To
test if DRAL/FHL2 binds the integrin 3A subunit also in
mammalian cells, HEK293 cells were co-transfected with the GST-tagged 3A cytoplasmic domain (aa 1015-1051) and with
Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2. These were tested for complex formation in
co-precipitation experiments. The GST-tagged integrin 3A
cytoplasmic domain precipitated in immune complexes formed in the
presence of antibodies against the Myc tag as shown by immunoblotting
with specific antibodies (Fig.
1A). Reciprocally, the
presence of Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 in complexes specifically precipitated
with antibodies against the cytoplasmic domain of the 3A
integrin subunit was dependent on the expression of GST-tagged
3A cytoplasmic domain but not on the expression of GST
alone (Fig. 1A). Thus, consistent with the two-hybrid data,
the LIM-only protein DRAL/FHL2 specifically interacts with the
cytoplasmic domain of integrin 3A subunit in mammalian
cells.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with the
integrin 3A subunit in human
cells. A, association of DRAL/FHL2 with the cytoplasmic
domain of the integrin 3A subunit. HEK293 cells were
transiently transfected with different GST- and Myc-tagged constructs
as indicated. After 48 h, cell lysates were divided into two
parts. From 1 aliquot, proteins were precipitated with the antibody
9E10 against the Myc tag followed by protein G-conjugated agarose for
precipitation of Myc-tagged proteins. With the other aliquot, proteins
were precipitated with glutathione-conjugated Sepharose beads for
GST-tagged proteins. After SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting, the cytoplasmic
domain of the integrin 3A subunit was only detected in
precipitates from cells where the integrin peptide had been
co-expressed with Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 (left blot, lane 4).
In the reverse experiment (glutathione-precipitated complexes),
Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 was detected only when co-expressed with
GST-tagged 3A peptide (right blot, lane 4)
but not with GST alone. After the first immunodetection, the blots were
stripped and redeveloped with polyclonal antibody against recombinant
DRAL/FHL2 (bottom, left blot) or against GST (bottom,
right blot) to ascertain that Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 and GST-tagged
3A peptide were equivalently precipitated. B,
association of DRAL/FHL2 with the full-length integrin
3A subunit. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected
with different cDNA constructs as indicated. After cell lysis,
Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 was immunoprecipitated (IP) with
antibody against Myc and the precipitated proteins were visualized by
immunoblotting (IB) with antibodies against the cytoplasmic
tail of the integrin 3A subunit (upper blot),
or against Myc (lower blot).
|
|
To analyze whether DRAL/FHL2 also binds the full-length recombinant
3A subunit, the Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 and the full-length integrin 3A subunit were transfected in HEK293 cells
that normally express only small amounts of these polypeptides (data
not shown, but see Fig. 7). Only upon co-expression with Myc-tagged
DRAL/FHL2, was the integrin 3 chain detected in
Myc-containing immunocomplexes (Fig. 1B).
Mapping of the DRAL/FHL2 Binding Site in the Cytoplasmic Domain of
the Integrin 3A Subunit by Yeast Direct Two-hybrid
Assays--
The binding of DRAL/FHL2 was tested with four overlapping
deletion mutants of the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin
3A subunit. We have previously shown (17) that DRAL/FHL2
does not bind to the stretch of highly conserved amino acids
KXGFFKR proximal to the transmembrane domain and common to
all integrin subunits. Here we show also no interaction with a
similar construct containing three additional residues at the C
terminus, which are crucial for integrin function (44, 45).
Furthermore, no binding occurred to a construct containing the last 18 C-terminal residues. However, there was a positive reaction with all
constructs that contain a stretch of 12 amino acid residues beyond the
conserved KCGFFKR motif irrespective of other deletions (Fig.
2).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of a DRAL/FHL2-binding site in
the unique amino acid sequence of the integrin
3A subunit cytoplasmic domain.
Yeast Y190 cells were transformed with pAS2-1 plasmid expressing the
indicated deletion mutants of the integrin 3A subunit
and with DRAL/FHL2 in the pACT2 vector. The interaction was determined
and scored as described in the legend to Table I. Numbers in
parentheses refer to amino acid positions. The conserved
membrane-proximal region is marked.
|
|
Binding Specificity of DRAL/FHL2 for or Integrin Subunits
and Mapping of Its Binding Site within the Integrin 3A
Chain--
To investigate the specificity of DRAL/FHL2 binding, direct
two-hybrid interaction tests were performed between DRAL/FHL2 and the
cytoplasmic domain of nine different integrin subunits: the
1 and 2 integrin chains of collagen
receptors, the 5 chain of the fibronectin receptor, and
the A and B variants of the 3, 6, and
7 chains of laminin receptors (Table
II). In addition to the integrin
3A subunit cytoplasmic domain, 3B
and 7A subunits interacted with DRAL/FHL2 (Table II).
Similar experiments with the cytoplasmic domains of different integrin
subunits indicated that DRAL/FHL2 interacted with all integrin
chains, including 1A, 1D,
2, 3A, and 6 (Table
II).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with cytoplasmic domains of different integrin
and subunits in a yeast two-hybrid assay
Interactions between the cytoplasmic domain of integrin subunits in
pAS2-1 vector and DRAL/FHL2 in pACT2 vector were determined as
described in the legend to Table I. The deletion mutants of
2 cyto-1 and 3A cyto-1 regions are based on the
corresponding integrin subunit cytoplasmic domains and contain,
respectively, the last 23 and 24 C-terminal amino acid residues,
including the cyto-2 and cyto-3 regions, but lacking cyto-1. In the
6-11 construct, the last 11 C-terminal amino acid residues
of the integrin 6 subunit cytoplasmic domain were deleted,
but the cyto-3 region is preserved. All other constructs represent the
full-length cytoplasmic domains. Scoring was as described in the legend
to Table I.
|
|
The cytoplasmic domains of integrin subunits have a stretch of
conserved amino acid residues proximal to the transmembrane domain and
additionally share the conserved cyto-1, cyto-2, and cyto-3 regions,
which are important for integrin function (46-48). Cyto-2 and cyto-3
contain typical protein-binding sequences, NPXY and
NXXY, respectively. Six different deletion mutants
containing one or more of the characteristic motifs of the integrin
1A cytoplasmic domain were constructed and tested for
DRAL/FHL2 binding in the yeast two-hybrid assay. The results showed
that the last nine C-terminal amino acids, including the
NXXY (NPKY) sequence of the cyto-3 region, are necessary for
interaction between DRAL/FHL2 and the cytoplasmic domain of integrin
1A subunit (Fig. 3). The importance of this C-terminal sequence was supported by data obtained with deletion mutants of the integrin 2,
3A, and 6 chains in which the cyto-3
region was preserved (Table II).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Identification of the major DRAL/FHL2-binding
site in the C-terminal cyto-3 region of integrin
1A subunit. Yeast Y190 cells were
transformed with pAS2-1 plasmid expressing the indicated deletion
mutants of the integrin 1A subunit and with DRAL/FHL2 in
the pACT2 vector. The interaction was determined and scored as
described in the legend to Table I. Numbers in
parentheses refer to amino acid positions. The conserved
cyto-1, -2, and -3 regions are highlighted.
|
|
DRAL/FHL2 Interacts with the Cytoplasmic Domain of the
7A or 1A Integrin Subunits in
Co-transfected Human Cells--
To analyze whether the interactions
reported above occur also in mammalian cells, HEK293 cells were
transiently co-transfected with the GST-tagged cytoplasmic domain of
three additional integrin subunits, 2,
7A, or 1A, and with Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2.
As with the integrin 3A subunit, the Myc-tagged
DRAL/FHL2 was precipitated together with GST-tagged 7A
or 1A integrin cytoplasmic domains when using
glutathione-conjugated Sepharose beads (Fig.
4). As expected from the two-hybrid data,
upon co-expression of the integrin 2 cytoplasmic domain
and DRAL/FHL2, the GST-tagged 2 integrin subunit was not
associated with DRAL/FHL2 in the complexes (Fig. 4). The reciprocal
immunoprecipitation test with antibodies against Myc confirmed these
results (not shown).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with the
integrin 7A and
1A subunits in human cells. HEK293
cells were transiently transfected with cDNA constructs as
indicated and lysed 48 h later. GST-tagged proteins were
precipitated (P) as described in the legend to Fig. 2. After
SDS-PAGE and electrophoretic transfer, the blots were incubated with
antibodies against Myc (upper blot) and, after stripping,
with antibodies against GST (lower blot). IB,
immunoblot.
|
|
DRAL/FHL2 Interacts with Itself and with Other Integrin-binding
Proteins--
Several LIM domain-containing proteins have been
suggested to dimerize, thus enhancing their capacity for complex
formation (49). DRAL/FHL2, which contains four and a half LIM domains, could therefore represent an adaptor protein that could interact in
multimolecular complexes with other integrin-binding proteins such as
those that we have recently identified (17). This possibility was
tested in direct two-hybrid interaction experiments. The results showed
that DRAL/FHL2 is able to interact with itself and with two additional
integrin-binding proteins, AIBP80 and BIN1 (Table III). To test the interactions in
vivo, we constructed expression vectors for GST-tagged DRAL/FHL2
and for Myc-tagged AIBP80. HEK293 cells co-expressing GST-DRAL/FHL2 and
Myc-DRAL/FHL2 or Myc-AIBP80 were lysed, and proteins were precipitated
with either anti-Myc antibodies or with glutathione-coupled Sepharose
beads. Immunoblot analysis of the precipitates showed that also in
human cells DRAL/FHL2 self-interacts and that AIBP80 associates with
DRAL/FHL2 (Fig. 5).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with itself and with other integrin subunit-binding proteins
The DRAL/FHL2 in pAS2-1 vector was tested in direct two-hybrid binding
assays with the different integrin-binding proteins, including
DRAL/FHL2 itself, in pACT2 vector. Positive clones were scored as
described in the legend to Table I.
|
|

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Association of DRAL/FHL2 with itself and with
AIBP80 in human cells. After transient transfection with the
indicated cDNA constructs, lysates of HEK293 cells were
precipitated (P) as described in Fig. 2. Co-precipitating
proteins were identified by immunoblotting (IB) with the
indicated antibodies. Myc-tagged DRAL/FHL2 co-migrates with the IgG
heavy chain and could therefore not be visualized with the antibodies
against Myc.
|
|
Molecular Dissection of Binding Sites in DRAL/FHL2--
To
identify the LIM domains of DRAL/FHL2 responsible for the diverse
interactions described in this study, cDNA sequences for single LIM
modules were cloned in the pACT2 vector and were tested in direct
two-hybrid binding assays with the other proteins, including DRAL/FHL2,
cloned in pAS-2 vector. Surprisingly, only two out of six proteins
analyzed interacted with particular single LIM domains; the cytoplasmic
domain of the integrin 7A subunit had affinity for the
LIM 2 domain, whereas DRAL/FHL2 itself bound the C-terminal LIM 3 and
LIM 4 domains (Fig. 6A). Tests
with additional DRAL/FHL2 mutants, in which one, two, or three LIM
domains were deleted from either the C or N terminus confirmed that the
LIM 2 domain is responsible for binding to the integrin
7A subunit and that LIM 3 and LIM 4 modules are involved
in DRAL/FHL2 self-association (Fig. 6A). Additionally, they
revealed that both LIM 1 and LIM 2 N-terminal domains are required for
interaction with AIBP80, whereas binding of the cytoplasmic domains of
the integrin 3A or 3B subunits needs the
last 2, 3, and 4 LIM domains (Fig. 6A). Furthermore,
deletion of any LIM domain prevented the binding of DRAL/FHL2 to the
cytoplasmic domain of the integrin 1A subunit (Fig.
6A), suggesting that the three-dimensional structure of DRAL/FHL2 is important for this interaction. The major binding sites of
the analyzed proteins are summarized in Fig. 6B.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Identification of sites on DRAL/FHL2 that
bind to integrin subunits and to AIBP80 or are required for DRAL/FHL2
self-interaction. A, yeast Y190 cells were co-transformed
with one of the cDNA fragments encoding DRAL/FHL2 deletion mutants
inserted into the pACT2 vector and with the cDNA fragments encoding
one of the ligand proteins inserted into the pAS2-1 vector. The
numbers in parentheses indicate DRAL/FHL2 amino
acids encoded by the corresponding constructs. The interactions were
detected by growth on His medium and in a
-galactosidase filter assay. Scoring was as described in the
legend to Table I. B, schematic representation of principal
binding sites on DRAL/FHL2 identified in A.
|
|
DRAL/FHL2 Is Expressed by Normal Human Skin Fibroblasts and Is
Mainly Localized in the Cell Nucleus and Cytosol--
DRAL/FHL2 was
initially described as a protein preferentially localized in nuclei
after overexpression in NIH 3T3 cells, whereas it was distributed
uniformly over the nucleus and cytoplasm in Rh30 cells (23). To analyze
the subcellular localization of DRAL/FHL2 more precisely, we screened
several human and rodent cells or cell lines for the presence of
endogenous DRAL/FHL2. Immunoblotting with an antiserum raised against
the recombinant GST fusion protein (23) showed the presence of
DRAL/FHL2 in the cell lysates of normal human fibroblasts, Wi26 human
fibroblasts, mouse NIH 3T3, and DRAL/FHL2-transfected HEK293 cells as a
prominent band migrating under reducing (Fig.
7A) or non-reducing (not
shown) conditions at the position expected for an ~31-kDa
polypeptide, in agreement with previous data (23). In cell lysates from
a panel of transformed or tumor cell lines of epithelial or neuronal origin, the DRAL/FHL2 band was fainter or barely seen and had a
slightly different mobility (Fig. 7A), which could indicate different post-translational modifications. Human skin fibroblasts expressed most DRAL/FHL2 and were chosen to study the subcellular localization of naturally occurring protein. After fractionation by
differential centrifugation, DRAL/FHL2 was mainly found in the nuclear
and cytosolic fractions with only small amounts in the cell membrane
fraction (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Expression of DRAL/FHL2 in human skin
fibroblasts and established cell lines (A) and
subcellular distribution of DRAL/FHL2 in human skin fibroblasts
(B). A, total lysates (20 µg of proteins
per lane) of the indicated cells. B, equal samples of
nuclear (N), cytosolic (C), and membrane
(M) fractions from human skin fibroblasts were separated by
SDS-PAGE and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose, and the
blots were developed with a polyclonal antiserum against DRAL/FHL2
fusion protein.
|
|
Endogenous DRAL/FHL2 Can Be Recruited to Cell Adhesion
Complexes--
As integrins function at the cell surface in adhesion
complexes, we used immunofluorescence microscopy to establish whether DRAL/FHL2 is localized at the periphery of spread cells, where it would
be expected to interact with the cytoplasmic tail of integrin subunits.
Normal human skin fibroblasts were the most appropriate for the study
since they express more DRAL/FHL2 than most of the established cell
lines (Fig. 7). Moreover, the polyclonal antibody raised against
GST-DRAL/FHL2 recognized a single major band in immunoblots of normal
human skin fibroblast lysates (Fig. 7). Immunofluorescence staining
with the polyclonal antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 showed that naturally
expressed DRAL/FHL2 was associated with fibril-like structures within
the cell body and with clusters at the cell periphery (Fig.
8, A, D, and G).
Double labeling with antibodies against DRAL/FHL2 (Fig. 8, A,
D, and G) and with monoclonal antibodies against the
integrin 1 subunit (Fig. 8B) or vinculin
(Fig. 8H) showed overlap for many but not all of the
clusters (Fig. 8, superimposed photographs C and
I). Furthermore, visualization of fibrillar actin by
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated phalloidin in cells stained with
the antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 revealed that DRAL/FHL2 is clustered at
the ends of actin bundles (superimposed photograph F).
Again, not all DRAL/FHL2-positive clusters were located at the ends of
the actin fibers and, vice versa, DRAL/FHL2-positive clusters were not
always present at the termini of actin fibers. In contrast, the
antiserum against DRAL/FHL2 did not stain any of the vinculin-positive
peripheral clusters in RD-9 cells (not shown), which agrees with
previous results showing that DRAL/FHL2 is down-regulated in
rhabdomyosarcoma cells (23).

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Localization of DRAL/FHL2 to adhesion
complexes in normal human skin fibroblasts. The cells were
cultured overnight in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum, fixed and
double-stained with rabbit polyclonal antiserum against DRAL/FHL2
together with the mouse monoclonal antibody TS2/16 (A)
against the integrin 1 subunit or F-VII (C)
against vinculin, followed by the appropriate fluorescence-labeled
second antibodies or by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated
phalloidin (E). Specimens were examined and photographed
under epifluorescence microscopy using separate detection channels
(A, B, D, E, G, and H). Superimposed photographs
show that the integrin 1 subunits (C) and
vinculin (I) are, but not always, co-localized with
DRAL/FHL2. Superimposition of actin and DRAL/FHL2 images (F)
reveals that DRAL/FHL2 is localized at the far ends of actin stress
fibers that usually terminate in cell adhesion complexes.
|
|
Cell adhesion complexes are dynamic multimolecular assemblies of
kinases and adaptor proteins that are structurally or transiently associated to integrin clusters (4, 5). To confirm the association of
DRAL/FHL2 with cell adhesion complexes, footprints were prepared by
submitting normal human fibroblasts to osmotic shock in the absence or
in the presence of DSP, a membrane-permeable cross-linker. Immunofluorescence labeling showed that both integrin 1
subunit and vinculin, but not DRAL/FHL2, were present in
non-cross-linked cell remnants (Fig. 9).
However, after cross-linking, DRAL/FHL2 was detected in the footprints
of normal human fibroblasts (Fig. 9).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Immunofluorescence staining of human skin
fibroblast footprints. Fibroblasts were subjected to osmotic shock
either without (a, c, and e) or with (b,
d, and f) previous cross-linking of proteins with DSP
and further processed for immunofluorescence staining with the mouse
monoclonal antibody K20 (a and b) against
integrin 1 subunit or F-VII (c and
d) against vinculin, or the rabbit polyclonal antiserum
against DRAL/FHL2 (e and f).
|
|
Finally, mouse 3T3 fibroblasts were transiently transfected with
Myc-tagged full-length or truncated DRAL/FHL2 representing the N- and
C-terminal part of the molecule. Immunofluorescence detection of the
tagged protein with an antibody against Myc showed that full-length
DRAL/FHL2 localized to focal adhesion clusters (Fig.
10A). In contrast, the
immunofluorescence staining of mouse 3T3 fibroblasts transfected with
constructs representing the N- or C-terminal half of DRAL/FHL2 was only
nuclear (Fig. 10, B and C), indicating that only
full-length DRAL/FHL2 can be targeted to focal adhesion
clusters.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Only full-length DRAL/FHL2 is targeted to
cell adhesion complexes. Mouse 3T3 fibroblasts were transiently
transfected with constructs representing Myc-tagged full-length
(A), N-terminal (B), or C-terminal (C)
half of DRAL/FHL2. The truncated versions of the protein corresponded
to LIM1/2-2 (amino acids 1-157) or LIM 2-4 (amino acids 97-279) as
represented in Fig. 6A. The cells were cultured on
fibronectin-coated coverslips in DMEM containing 10% fetal calf serum
for 60 min. After fixation, they were stained with mouse monoclonal
antibody 9E10 against the Myc tag followed by Cy3-conjugated second
antibodies.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this report we show that the LIM-only protein DRAL/FHL2 is a
novel integrin-binding protein. After the identification in a yeast
two-hybrid screen as interacting with the cytoplasmic domain of the
integrin 3A subunit, we provide evidence that DRAL/FHL2 has the capacity to interact, both in yeast and in mammalian cells, with itself, with the cytoplasmic domain of integrin 3A,
3B, 7A, and several subunits, and
with integrin-binding proteins. Furthermore, studies with mutant forms
of DRAL/FHL2 demonstrate that different LIM domains are responsible for
those interactions. Finally, we show that DRAL/FHL2, previously
described as a nuclear protein, is targeted to cell adhesion complexes.
Together, these results suggest that DRAL/FHL2 may act as an adaptor
protein, regulating integrin trafficking, function, or signaling.
A molecular dissection of the DRAL/FHL2 integrin subunit-binding
sites showed the importance of 12 amino acid residues immediately following the conserved membrane-proximal region of the integrin 3A subunit. Several cytoplasmic proteins, including
calreticulin, calcium-, and integrin-binding protein, BIN1, Mss4,
AIBP63, and AIBP80 interact with the cytoplasmic tail of integrin subunits and require the highly conserved KXGFFKR sequence
for optimal binding (16, 17, 50). DRAL/FHL2, therefore, is the first protein shown to bind the non-conserved region of integrin subunit cytoplasmic domains. Furthermore, DRAL/FHL2 has a specificity restricted to the integrin 3A, 3B, and
7A chains. These subunits have divergent sequences after
the conserved KXGFFKR motif, and it was unexpected that
DRAL/FHL2 interacts with all three. A deletion mutation analysis of
DRAL/FHL2 itself solved the apparent contradiction, as it was revealed
that different LIM domains interact with the 7A peptide
and the 3 variants.
In integrin subunits the C-terminal part of the cytoplasmic domain,
which includes the cyto-3 NXXY motif, is needed for binding
to DRAL/FHL2. Except for the integrin 4 and
8 subunits, the cytoplasmic domains of the chains
share the functionally important cyto-1, cyto-2, and cyto-3 regions
(46-48). Cyto-2 and -3 contain the NPXY and NXXY
motif, respectively. NPXY motifs are recognition sites for
phosphotyrosine-binding proteins such as those containing SH2 domains
(51). It is believed that the integrin cyto-2 region folds in a
-turn so that the C-terminal part of the chain, containing the
NXXY motif of cyto-3, can be brought in the vicinity of the
membrane proximal conserved region (52). Mutations in the
NPXY sequence, truncation or deletion of cyto-2, or peptides
representing this region impair talin, filamin, and -actinin binding
to the 1 cytoplasmic tail as well as cell adhesion,
spreading, and formation of focal adhesions (47, 53-57). The
NXXY motif of cyto-3 is required for ICAP-1 or
3-endonexin binding to the cytoplasmic domain of
integrin 1 or 3 subunit, respectively
(12, 13, 58). Our data show that DRAL/FHL2 binds all tested integrin
subunits. Results obtained with sequential deletion mutants of the
1A subunit and further deletion mutants of several other
subunits indicated that the NXXY cyto-3 motif is within
the critical binding site. Thus, in contrast to ICAP-1 and
3-endonexin, DRAL/FHL2 is a binding partner common to
all integrin subunits that possess the NXXY motif. One
hypothesis is that the function of subunits in integrin activation
is regulated through a conformational change involving folding of
the C-terminal region containing cyto-3 over the N-terminal region
(52). Such a change could be under the control of cytoplasmic factors.
Binding of DRAL/FHL2 to the cyto-3 region may regulate the
conformational changes of the integrin 1 cytoplasmic
domain by either inducing or inhibiting the folding or, alternatively, by transiently competing with other proteins for binding to this domain.
Our observation that DRAL/FHL2 binds numerous proteins is not
surprising because it contains several LIM domains and those are
thought to function as protein interaction modules. In addition, DRAL/FHL2 has the property to bind both and integrin subunits through different LIM domains. Single LIM domains are involved in
binding to the integrin 7A subunit or in DRAL/FHL2
homodimerization, while for binding to other proteins the coordinated
action of several LIM domains was needed. The most striking result was
that deletion of any LIM domain prevented the interaction with the integrin 1A subunit, suggesting that the
three-dimensional structure of DRAL/FHL2 is required for binding. At
this point we do not know if the different interactions described here
for DRAL/FHL2 can take place simultaneously or whether homodimerization
of DRAL/FHL2 influences the interactions. LIM domains fold
independently and are held together by a linker region (26, 59).
Furthermore, a single LIM domain, or even a single zinc finger module
of a LIM domain, can function as protein-binding interface so that single LIM domain could be functionally bipartite (27). For example,
although the LIM-only protein PINCH consists of five LIM domains, it
binds integrin-linked kinase by only the most N-terminal one (60).
Similarly, zyxin, a LIM-plus protein with a tandem of three LIM
domains, binds to another LIM-containing protein, CRP1, also by a
single LIM domain (27). These data, together with the fact that
DRAL/FHL2 forms dimers, suggest that this novel integrin-binding
protein has great potential for forming multimeric protein complexes.
Moreover, sequence comparison of DRAL/FHL2-interacting proteins did not
reveal any homology, except for the integrin subunits that share
the cyto-1, -2, and -3 motifs, so that due to its modular structure
DRAL/FHL2 can potentially be involved in many different interactions.
Interestingly, further interactions of DRAL/FHL2 with the the androgen
receptor (61) or with hCDC47 (62) were recently described. The
interaction with the androgen receptor requires both the N- and
C-terminal domains of DRAL/FHL2, and the interaction with hCDC47
involves the LIM 2 and 3 domains together with the first half LIM motif of FHL2/DRAL, respectively. Taken together, this suggests that by using
different sets or combinations of its LIM domains this adaptor protein
could be involved in the organization or the regulation of very diverse
multimolecular complexes including transcriptional complexes.
Although DRAL/FHL2 is mainly localized in the cell nucleus and cytosol
(23; this report), it was recruited to cell adhesion complexes in
several cell types, including normal skin fibroblasts. There, it was
clustered together with integrins and vinculin at the ends of actin
stress fibers. Only full-length DRAL/FHL2 was targeted to cell adhesion
complexes in transfected mouse 3T3 fibroblasts while truncated versions
of the protein were not. This agrees well with the results observed in
yeast interaction assays showing that binding to the integrin
1A subunit requires full-length DRAL/FHL2. In this
aspect, the requirement for binding is similar to that reported for the
androgen receptor (61). Several proteins from the LIM-plus family, like
paxillin, zyxin, and abLIM, are adaptors involved in scaffolding of
focal adhesion complexes or of the cytoskeleton (25, 27-29). The
Caenorhabditis elegans LIM-only protein UNC-97, that also
has both nuclear and extranuclear distribution, co-localizes in muscle
with integrin in focal adhesion-like structures (63). The other
LIM-only proteins PINCH and CRP1 can also be recruited to integrin
signaling complexes through interactions with integrin-linked kinase
(60) or via zyxin and -actinin (25), respectively.
Our cell fractionation experiments showed that only a small proportion
of DRAL/FHL2 is present in the membrane fraction of human fibroblasts
and that DRAL/FHL2 is more abundant in the cell nucleus and the
cytoplasm. This suggests that DRAL/FHL2 may also have other functions
within the cell such as that recently described in the formation of
transcriptional complexes (61). That only a small amount of DRAL/FHL2
was found to be membrane-associated can explain why we could not
precipitate the endogenous protein with antibodies against integrin
chains. Only when recombinantly overexpressed in mammalian cells, an
interaction of DRAL/FHL2 and integrin cytoplasmic domains or
full-length integrin 3A (this report) or
7A2 could be observed.
Alternatively, in mammalian cells interaction of DRAL/FHL2 with
integrins may be favored by a certain conformation or activation states
of the integrins such as those induced by extracellular ligand binding
and which are lost under the experimental conditions required for
immunoprecipitation. Remarkably, binding of DRAL/FHL2 to the androgen
receptor is strictly agonist-dependent in mammalian cells
(61). Moreover, in fibroblasts co-localization of DRAL/FHL2 and
vinculin, a marker of focal adhesion complexes, or integrin
1 subunit was not always seen. Furthermore, association of naturally expressed DRAL/FHL2 within adhesion complexes of fibroblasts is weak, at least weaker than that of vinculin, since it
was retained in cell footprints only after cross-linking. This finding
argues for a transient or regulatory role of DRAL/FHL2, a hallmark
expected of proteins involved in the signal transduction cascade
initiated in adhesion complexes. The migration velocity in in
vitro wound closure assays as well as the adhesion to several extracellular matrix proteins, including collagens, fibronectin, and
laminins, were not changed after overexpression of DRAL/FHL2. Moreover,
in the RD-9 rhabdomyosarcoma cells vinculin-positive adhesion complexes
were present despite the absence of DRAL/FHL2. Thus, while DRAL/FHL2
obviously participates in protein clusters formed by integrins in
fibroblasts, its presence does not appear to be essential for adhesion
complexes. In this regard it is similar to LIM proteins like PINCH (60)
or Hic-5 (31).
A function as a nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling protein has been proposed
for zyxin, a member of the LIM-plus family (32). The LIM domain
structure has been resolved for a number of proteins, and they all show
a striking similarity to the DNA-interacting CCCC module of the
transcription factor GATA-1 (64-66), suggesting that they can bind DNA
(33, 42). Indeed, two recent reports describe interactions of FHL2/DRAL
with the androgen receptor (61) or with hCDC47 (62) and its involvement
in transcriptional complexes. Finally, one of the other four and a half
LIM domain containing proteins, ACT (activator of CREM in testis),
stimulates the transcriptional activity of CREM and CREB (35). In
conclusion, DRAL/FHL2 appears as an excellent candidate to facilitate
the processing of integrin signals at the cell membrane into the cell program since such proteins are likely to be required for the transfer
of information from cell adhesion complexes into the nucleus.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Monika Pesch for expert technical
assistance; Drs. Beate Eckes and Dirk Petersohn for the integrin
1/pAS2-1 construct; Dr. Marina Glukhova for the
monoclonal antibody against vinculin; Dr. Martin E. Hemler for the
integrin 3 chain cDNA; Dr. Andreas Kalmes for GST-
and Myc-tagged vectors; Drs. Roswitha Nischt and Hans Smola for the
normal human skin fibroblasts, Wi26, and HaCat cells; Dr. Beat W. Schäfer for the antiserum against GST-DRAL; and Dr. Suzanne Spong
for the pAS2-1/ 6 constructs. We are very grateful to Drs. Markus
Plomann and Patrik Maurer for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the University of Cologne, the
Center National de la Recherche Scientifique (to M. A.), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grants Kr 558/10-1, FOR265/2-1, SFB263, and AU
86/5-1, the Köln Fortune Program Numbers 160/1998 and 30/1999,
and the Dutch Cancer Society Grant NKI 95-979.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Institute for Experimental Medicine,
Friedrich-Alexander University, Glückstrasse 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed:
Institute for Biochemistry II, Joseph-Stelzmann-Strasse 52, 50931 Cologne, Germany. Tel.: 49 221 478 6991; Fax: 49 221 478 3109; Email:
aumailley@uni-koeln.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002519200
2
V. Wixler and K. von der Mark, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
aa, amino
acid;
HA, hemagglutinin;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
DSP, dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate);
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Clark, E. A.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1995)
Science
268,
233-238
|
| 2.
|
Schwartz, M. A.,
Schaller, M. D.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
11,
549-599
|
| 3.
|
Dedhar, S.,
and Hannigan, G. E.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
8,
657-669
|
| 4.
|
Yamada, K. M.,
and Geiger, B.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
76-85
|
| 5.
|
Burridge, K.,
and Charzanowska-Wodnicka, M.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
342-347
|
| 6.
|
Howe, A.,
Aplin, A. E.,
Alahari, S. K.,
and Juliano, R. L.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
220-231
|
| 7.
|
LaFlamme, S. E.,
Homan, S. M.,
Bodeau, A. L.,
and Mastrangelo, A. M.
(1997)
Matrix Biol.
16,
153-163
|
| 8.
|
Sharma, C. P.,
Ezzell, R. M.,
and Arnaout, M. A.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
154,
3461-3470
|
| 9.
|
Shattil, S. J.,
O'Toole, T.,
Eigenthaler, M.,
Thon, V.,
Williams, M.,
Babior, B. M.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
807-816
|
| 10.
|
Hannigan, G. E.,
Leung-Hagersteijn, C.,
Fitz-Gibbon, L.,
Copolino, M. G.,
Radeva, G.,
Filmus, J.,
Bell, J. C.,
and Dedhar, S.
(1996)
Nature
79,
91-96
|
| 11.
|
Kolanus, W.,
Nagel, W.,
Schiller, B.,
Zeitlmann, L.,
Godar, S.,
Stockinger, H.,
and Seed, B.
(1996)
Cell
86,
233-242
|
| 12.
|
Chang, D. D.,
Wong, C.,
Smith, H.,
and Liu, J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
1149-1157
|
| 13.
|
Zhang, X. A.,
and Hemler, M. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11-19
|
| 14.
|
Liliental, J.,
and Chang, D. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2379-2383
|
| 15.
|
Rietzler, M.,
Bittner, M.,
Kolanus, W.,
Schuster, A.,
and Holzmann, B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27459-27466
|
| 16.
|
Rojiani, M. V.,
Finlay, B. B.,
Gray, V.,
and Dedhar, S.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
9859-9866
|
| 17.
|
Wixler, V.,
Laplantine, E.,
Geerts, D.,
Sonnenberg, A.,
Petersohn, D.,
Eckes, B.,
Paulsson, M.,
and Aumailley, M.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
445,
351-355
|
| 18.
|
Naik, U. P.,
Patel, P. M.,
and Parise, L. V.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4651-4654
|
| 19.
|
Dogic, D.,
Rousselle, P.,
and Aumailley, M.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
793-802
|
| 20.
|
Dogic, D.,
Hülsmann, H.,
Sherman, N.,
Fox, J. W.,
Broermann, R.,
Paulsson, M.,
and Aumailley, M.
(1999)
Matrix Biol.
18,
433-444
|
| 21.
|
Hodivala-Dilke, K. M.,
DiPersio, C. M.,
Kreidberg, J. A.,
and Hynes, R. O.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
1357-1369
|
| 22.
|
Laplantine, E.,
Vallar, L.,
Mann, K.,
Kieffer, N.,
and Aumailley, M.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
1167-1176
|
| 23.
|
Genini, M.,
Schwalbe, P.,
Scholl, F. A.,
Remppis, A.,
Mattei, M. G.,
and Schäfer, B. M.
(1997)
DNA Cell Biol.
16,
433-442
|
| 24.
|
Sanchez-Garcia, I.,
and Rabbitts, T. H.
(1994)
Trends Genet.
10,
315-320
|
| 25.
|
Beckerle, M.
(1997)
BioEssays
19,
949-957
|
| 26.
|
Dawid, I. B.,
Breen, J. J.,
and Toyama, R.
(1998)
Trends Genet.
14,
156-162
|
| 27.
|
Schmeichel, K. L.,
and Beckerle, M. C.
(1994)
Cell
79,
211-219
|
| 28.
|
Pomies, P.,
Louis, H. A.,
and Beckerle, M. C.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
157-168
|
| 29.
|
Roof, D. J.,
Hayes, A.,
Adamian, M.,
Chishti, A. H.,
and Li, T.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
575-588
|
| 30.
|
Hagmann, J.,
Grob, M.,
Welman, A.,
van Willigen, G.,
and Burger, M. M.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
2181-2188
|
| 31.
|
Thomas, S. M.,
Hagel, M.,
and Turner, C. E.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
181-190
|
| 32.
|
Nix, D. A.,
and Beckerle, M. C.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
1139-1147
|
| 33.
|
Morgan, M. J.,
and Madgwick, A. J.
(1999a)
Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun.
255,
251-255
|
| 34.
|
Morgan, M. J.,
and Madgwick, A. J.
(1999b)
Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun.
255,
245-250
|
| 35.
|
Fimia, G. M.,
De Cesare, D.,
and Sassone-Corsi, P.
(1999)
Nature
398,
165-169
|
| 36.
|
Sonnenberg, A.,
Linders, C. J. T.,
Modderman, P. W.,
Damsky, C. H.,
Aumailley, M.,
and Timpl, R.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
2145-2155
|
| 37.
|
Rousselle, P.,
and Aumailley, M.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
205-214
|
| 38.
|
Sondermann, H.,
Dogic, D.,
Pesch, M.,
and Aumailley, M.
(1999)
Cell Adh. Commun.
7,
43-57
|
| 39.
|
Chen, R. H.,
Sarnecki, C.,
and Blenis, J.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
915-927
|
| 40.
|
Wessel, D.,
and Flügge, U.
(1984)
Anal. Biochem.
138,
141-143
|
| 41.
|
Hemler, M. E.,
Sanchez-Madrid, F.,
Flotte, T. J.,
Krensky, A. M.,
Burakoff, S. J.,
Bhan, A. K.,
Springer, T. A.,
and Strominger, J. L.
(1984)
J. Immunol.
132,
3011-3018
|
| 42.
|
Morgan, M. J.,
and Madgwick, A. J.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
225,
632-638
|
| 43.
|
Chan, K. K.,
Tsui, S. K.,
Lee, S. M.,
Luk, S. C.,
Liew, C. C.,
Fung, K. P.,
Waye, M. M.,
and Lee, C. Y.
(1998)
Gene (Amst.)
210,
345-350
|
| 44.
|
Kassner, P. D.,
Kawaguchi, S.,
and Hemler, M. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19859-19867
|
| 45.
|
Kawaguchi, S.,
Bergelson, J. M.,
Finberg, R. W.,
and Hemler, M. E.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. Cell
5,
977-988
|
| 46.
|
Marcantonio, E. E.,
Guan, J.-L.,
Trevithick, J. E.,
and Hynes, R. O.
(1990)
Cell Regul.
1,
597-604
|
| 47.
|
Reszka, A. A.,
Hayashi, Y.,
and Horwitz, A. F.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
1321-1330
|
| 48.
|
Mastrangelo, A. M.,
Homan, S. M.,
Humphries, M. J.,
and LaFlamme, S. E.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
217-229
|
| 49.
|
Feuerstein, R.,
Wang, X.,
Song, D.,
Cooke, N. E.,
and Liebhaber, S. A.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10655-10659
|
| 50.
|
Vallar, L.,
Melchior, C.,
Plançon, S.,
Drobecq, H.,
Lippens, G.,
Regnault, V.,
and Kieffer, N.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17257-17266
|
| 51.
|
Sudol, M.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
1469-1474
|
| 52.
|
Haas, T. A.,
and Plow, E. F.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
1395-1405
|
| 53.
|
Otey, C. A.,
Vasquez, G. B.,
Burridge, K.,
and Erickson, B. W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21193-21197
|
| 54.
|
Pfaff, M.,
Liu, S.,
Erle, D. J.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6104-6109
|
| 55.
|
Retta, S. F.,
Balzac, F.,
Ferraris, P.,
Belkin, A. M.,
Fässler, R.,
Humphries, M. J.,
De Leo, G.,
Silengo, L.,
and Tarone, G.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
715-731
|
| 56.
|
Sampath, R.,
Gallagher, P. J.,
and Pavalko, F. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33588-33594
|
| 57.
|
Kaapa, A.,
Peter, K.,
and Ylanne, J.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
250,
524-534
|
| 58.
|
Eigenthaler, M.,
Hofferer, L.,
Shattil, S. J.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7693-7698
|
| 59.
|
Konrat, R.,
Krautler, B.,
Weiskirchen, R.,
and Bister, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23233-23240
|
| 60.
|
Tu, Y.,
Li, F.,
Goicoechea, S.,
and Wu, C.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
2425-2434
|
| 61.
|
Müller, J. M.,
Isle, U.,
Metzger, E.,
Rempel, A.,
Moser, M.,
Pscherer, A.,
Breyer, T.,
Holubarsch, C.,
Buetttner, R.,
and Schüle, R.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
359-369
|
| 62.
|
Chan, K. K.,
Tsui, S. K. W.,
Ngai, S.-M.,
Lee, S. M. Y.,
Kotaka, M.,
Waye, M. M. Y.,
Lee, C.-Y.,
and Fung, K.-P.
(2000)
J. Cell. Biochem.
76,
499-508
|
| 63.
|
Hobert, O.,
Moerman, D. G.,
Clark, K. A.,
Beckerle, M. C.,
and Ruvkun, G.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
45-57
|
| 64.
|
Perez-Alvarado, G. C.,
Miles, C.,
Michelsen, J. W.,
Louis, H. A.,
Winge, D. R.,
Beckerle, M. C.,
and Summers, M. F.
(1994)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
1,
388-398
|
| 65.
|
Perez-Alvarado, G. C.,
Kosa, J. L.,
Louis, H. A.,
Beckerle, M. C.,
Winge, D. R.,
and Summers, M. F.
(1996)
Mol. Biol.
257,
153-174
|
| 66.
|
Kowalski, K.,
Czolij, R.,
King, G. F.,
Crossley, M.,
and Mackay, J. P.
(1999)
J. Biomol. NMR
13,
249-262
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Bovill, S. Westaby, A. Crisp, S. Jacobs, and T. Shaw
Reduction of four-and-a-half LIM-protein 2 expression occurs in human left ventricular failure and leads to altered localization and reduced activity of metabolic enzymes
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.,
April 1, 2009;
137(4):
853 - 861.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. R. Legate and R. Fassler
Mechanisms that regulate adaptor binding to {beta}-integrin cytoplasmic tails
J. Cell Sci.,
January 15, 2009;
122(2):
187 - 198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Park, C. Will, B. Martin, L. Gullotti, N. Friedrichs, R. Buettner, H. Schneider, S. Ludwig, and V. Wixler
Deficiency in the LIM-only protein FHL2 impairs assembly of extracellular matrix proteins
FASEB J,
July 1, 2008;
22(7):
2508 - 2520.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Labalette, Y. Nouet, J. Sobczak-Thepot, C. Armengol, F. Levillayer, M.-C. Gendron, C.-A. Renard, B. Regnault, J. Chen, M.-A. Buendia, et al.
The LIM-only Protein FHL2 Regulates Cyclin D1 Expression and Cell Proliferation
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 30, 2008;
283(22):
15201 - 15208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Liu, D. J. Burkin, and S. J. Kaufman
Increasing {alpha}7{beta}1-integrin promotes muscle cell proliferation, adhesion, and resistance to apoptosis without changing gene expression
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
February 1, 2008;
294(2):
C627 - C640.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Samson, C. Will, A. Knoblauch, L. Sharek, K. von der Mark, K. Burridge, and V. Wixler
Def-6, a Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor for Rac1, Interacts with the Skeletal Muscle Integrin Chain {alpha}7A and Influences Myoblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 25, 2007;
282(21):
15730 - 15742.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Wixler, S. Hirner, J. M. Muller, L. Gullotti, C. Will, J. Kirfel, T. Gunther, H. Schneider, A. Bosserhoff, H. Schorle, et al.
Deficiency in the LIM-only protein Fhl2 impairs skin wound healing
J. Cell Biol.,
April 9, 2007;
177(1):
163 - 172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Y. Boateng, R. J. Belin, D. L. Geenen, K. B. Margulies, J. L. Martin, M. Hoshijima, P. P. de Tombe, and B. Russell
Cardiac dysfunction and heart failure are associated with abnormalities in the subcellular distribution and amounts of oligomeric muscle LIM protein
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
January 1, 2007;
292(1):
H259 - H269.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Kahl, L. Gullotti, L. C. Heukamp, S. Wolf, N. Friedrichs, R. Vorreuther, G. Solleder, P. J. Bastian, J. Ellinger, E. Metzger, et al.
Androgen Receptor Coactivators Lysine-Specific Histone Demethylase 1 and Four and a Half LIM Domain Protein 2 Predict Risk of Prostate Cancer Recurrence
Cancer Res.,
December 1, 2006;
66(23):
11341 - 11347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. McGrath, D. L. Cottle, M.-A. Nguyen, J. M. Dyson, I. D. Coghill, P. A. Robinson, M. Holdsworth, B. S. Cowling, E. C. Hardeman, C. A. Mitchell, et al.
Four and a Half LIM Protein 1 Binds Myosin-binding Protein C and Regulates Myosin Filament Formation and Sarcomere Assembly
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 17, 2006;
281(11):
7666 - 7683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Gabriel, D.-C Fischer, M. Orlowska-Volk, A. zur Hausen, R. Schule, J. M. Muller, and A. Hasenburg
Expression of the Transcriptional Coregulator FHL2 in Human Breast Cancer: A Clinicopathologic Study
Reproductive Sciences,
January 1, 2006;
13(1):
69 - 75.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Samarel
Costameres, focal adhesions, and cardiomyocyte mechanotransduction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
December 1, 2005;
289(6):
H2291 - H2301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Mistry, A. Kato, Y. H. Tran, S. Honda, T. Tsukada, Y. Takei, and S. Hirose
FHL5, a novel actin-binding protein, is highly expressed in eel gill pillar cells and responds to wall tension
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
November 1, 2004;
287(5):
R1141 - R1154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Samson, N. Smyth, S. Janetzky, O. Wendler, J. M. Muller, R. Schule, H. von der Mark, K. von der Mark, and V. Wixler
The LIM-only Proteins FHL2 and FHL3 Interact with {alpha}- and {beta}-Subunits of the Muscle {alpha}7{beta}1 Integrin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 2, 2004;
279(27):
28641 - 28652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. McGrath, C. A. Mitchell, I. D. Coghill, P. A. Robinson, and S. Brown
Skeletal muscle LIM protein 1 (SLIM1/FHL1) induces {alpha}5{beta}1-integrin-dependent myocyte elongation
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
December 1, 2003;
285(6):
C1513 - C1526.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Chen, W. Xu, E. Bales, C. Colmenares, M. Conacci-Sorrell, S. Ishii, E. Stavnezer, J. Campisi, D. E. Fisher, A. Ben-Ze'ev, et al.
SKI Activates Wnt/{beta}-Catenin Signaling in Human Melanoma
Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2003;
63(20):
6626 - 6634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-L. Hsu, Y.-L. Chen, S. Yeh, H.-J. Ting, Y.-C. Hu, H. Lin, X. Wang, and C. Chang
The Use of Phage Display Technique for the Isolation of Androgen Receptor Interacting Peptides with (F/W)XXL(F/W) and FXXLY New Signature Motifs
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 20, 2003;
278(26):
23691 - 23698.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. D. Coghill, S. Brown, D. L. Cottle, M. J. McGrath, P. A. Robinson, H. H. Nandurkar, J. M. Dyson, and C. A. Mitchell
FHL3 Is an Actin-binding Protein That Regulates {alpha}-Actinin-mediated Actin Bundling: FHL3 LOCALIZES TO ACTIN STRESS FIBERS AND ENHANCES CELL SPREADING AND STRESS FIBER DISASSEMBLY
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 20, 2003;
278(26):
24139 - 24152.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Turner, H. Nicholas, D. Bishop, J. M. Matthews, and M. Crossley
The LIM Protein FHL3 Binds Basic Kruppel-like Factor/Kruppel-like Factor 3 and Its Co-repressor C-terminal-binding Protein 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 4, 2003;
278(15):
12786 - 12795.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Morlon and P. Sassone-Corsi
The LIM-only protein FHL2 is a serum-inducible transcriptional coactivator of AP-1
PNAS,
April 1, 2003;
100(7):
3977 - 3982.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Lange, D. Auerbach, P. McLoughlin, E. Perriard, B. W. Schafer, J.-C. Perriard, and E. Ehler
Subcellular targeting of metabolic enzymes to titin in heart muscle may be mediated by DRAL/FHL-2
J. Cell Sci.,
March 14, 2003;
115(24):
4925 - 4936.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Nawrotzki, M. Willem, N. Miosge, H. Brinkmeier, and U. Mayer
Defective integrin switch and matrix composition at alpha 7-deficient myotendinous junctions precede the onset of muscular dystrophy in mice
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
March 1, 2003;
12(5):
483 - 495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Robinson, S. Brown, M. J. McGrath, I. D. Coghill, R. Gurung, and C. A. Mitchell
Skeletal muscle LIM protein 1 regulates integrin-mediated myoblast adhesion, spreading, and migration
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
March 1, 2003;
284(3):
C681 - C695.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Wei, C.-A. Renard, C. Labalette, Y. Wu, L. Levy, C. Neuveut, X. Prieur, M. Flajolet, S. Prigent, and M.-A. Buendia
Identification of the LIM Protein FHL2 as a Coactivator of beta -Catenin
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 7, 2003;
278(7):
5188 - 5194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Martin, R. Schneider, S. Janetzky, Z. Waibler, P. Pandur, M. Kuhl, J. Behrens, K. von der Mark, A. Starzinski-Powitz, and V. Wixler
The LIM-only protein FHL2 interacts with {beta}-catenin and promotes differentiation of mouse myoblasts
J. Cell Biol.,
October 14, 2002;
159(1):
113 - 122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. McLoughlin, E. Ehler, G. Carlile, J. D. Licht, and B. W. Schafer
The LIM-only Protein DRAL/FHL2 Interacts with and Is a Corepressor for the Promyelocytic Leukemia Zinc Finger Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 27, 2002;
277(40):
37045 - 37053.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. G. Amaar, G. R. Thompson, T. A. Linkhart, S.-T. Chen, D. J. Baylink, and S. Mohan
Insulin-like Growth Factor-binding Protein 5 (IGFBP-5) Interacts with a Four and a Half LIM Protein 2 (FHL2)
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 29, 2002;
277(14):
12053 - 12060.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Vossmeyer, W. Hofmann, K. Loster, W. Reutter, and K. Danker
Phospholipase Cgamma Binds alpha 1beta 1 Integrin and Modulates alpha 1beta 1 Integrin-specific Adhesion
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 8, 2002;
277(7):
4636 - 4643.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. van der Flier, I. Kuikman, D. Kramer, D. Geerts, M. Kreft, T. Takafuta, S. S. Shapiro, and A. Sonnenberg
Different splice variants of filamin-B affect myogenesis, subcellular distribution, and determine binding to integrin {beta} subunits
J. Cell Biol.,
January 21, 2002;
156(2):
361 - 376.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. van der Flier, I. Kuikman, D. Kramer, D. Geerts, M. Kreft, T. Takafuta, S. S. Shapiro, and A. Sonnenberg
Different splice variants of filamin-B affect myogenesis, subcellular distribution, and determine binding to integrin {beta} subunits
J. Cell Biol.,
January 21, 2002;
156(2):
361 - 376.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|