|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005115200 on August 10, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 43, 33929-33936, October 27, 2000
Retinoic Acid-dependent Transforming Growth
Factor- 2-mediated Induction of MUC4 Mucin Expression in
Human Pancreatic Tumor Cells Follows Retinoic Acid Receptor-
Signaling Pathway*
Amit
Choudhury ,
Rakesh K.
Singh§,
Nicolas
Moniaux ,
Tarek H.
El-Metwally ,
Jean-Pierre
Aubert¶, and
Surinder K.
Batra
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology and Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases
and § Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University
of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198 and ¶ Unite 377 INSERM, Place de Verdun, 59045 Lille Cedex, France
Received for publication, June 13, 2000, and in revised form, August 9, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The MUC4 mucin is considered as the
homologue of rat sialomucin complex (SMC, rat Muc4) due to its similar
structural organization. Like SMC, MUC4 may also exist as two subunits:
a mucin type unit known as MUC4 and a growth factor-like
transmembrane subunit, MUC4 . The expression of MUC4 in
normal human pancreas is not detectable, but it is highly expressed in
pancreatic tumor cells. In the present study, we investigated the
regulation of MUC4 expression in human pancreatic tumor cells
CD18/HPAF, exhibiting a high level of MUC4 transcripts and
protein. When these cells were adapted to grow in the serum-free medium
(CD18/HPAF-SF), the MUC4 expression was undetectable. Among several
serum constituents, all-trans-retinoic acid (RA) induced
the expression of MUC4 transcripts in a concentration- and
time-dependent manner. The RA-mediated increase in the
level of the MUC4 transcript coincided with an increased
expression of transforming growth factor- 2
(TGF- 2) transcript. The antagonist of the
retinoic acid receptor (RAR)- (Ro41-5253) abrogated the expression
of MUC4 and TGF- 2 induced by RA.
The exogenous addition of TGF- 2 also increased the MUC4
expression. The TGF- -neutralizing antibody blocked the
RA-induced as well as TGF- 2-mediated MUC4 expression. In
conclusion, induction of MUC4 expression in pancreatic carcinoma by RA is mediated through the RAR- signaling pathway, and
TGF- 2 may serve as an interim mediator of this regulated expression.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Mucins are high molecular weight glycoproteins produced by the
majority of secretory epithelial cells for the lubrication and
protection of ducts and lumina within the human body (1). Twelve human
mucin (MUC)1 genes have been
identified and designated as MUC1-4, MUC5AC, MUC5B, MUC6-9, and
MUC11-12 (2-12). The normal distribution and pathological alterations of the apomucins are being investigated in
several organs (13-19) including the pancreas (20). However, the
molecular basis of the alterations that occur in mucins during the
pathogenesis of different diseases is poorly understood (21).
MUC4 is a member of the membrane-bound mucin family and has been cloned
from a human tracheobronchial cDNA library and from the human
pancreatic tumor cell line (22-24). The NH2 terminus of
MUC4 is composed of a 27-residue signal peptide and a large domain,
varying in length from 3285 to 7285 amino acid residues due to variable
number of tandem repeats. The COOH terminus of MUC4 encodes
1156-residue peptide and includes two cysteine-rich domains, three
epidermal growth factor-like domains, a hydrophobic transmembrane
region, and two regions rich in potential N-glycosylation sites. The MUC4 mucin is considered the homologue of rat sialomucin complex (SMC, rat Muc4) due to its structural organization; however, rat Muc4 lacks the tandem repeat domain containing 16-residue repetitive units, the identifying feature of MUC4 (25). Rat Muc4 is
well characterized and is composed of a highly glycosylated mucin
subunit (ascites sialoglycoprotein-1) and a 120-kDa transmembrane N-glycosylated component (ascites sialoglycoprotein-2) (25). The rat Muc4 has been shown to act as a ligand for the receptor tyrosine kinase ErbB2/HER2/neu, which has been strongly implicated in
breast cancer prognosis (26). Like rat Muc4, the human MUC4 can also
exist as two subunits: a mucin type known as MUC4 and a growth
factor like-transmembrane subunit, MUC4 (22-24). Moreover, alternate splicing generates three distinct putative types of MUC4: a
family of secreted MUC4, a membrane-associated variant form, and
a membrane-bound form lacking the tandem repeat domain (24, 27,
28).
MUC4 is expressed at high levels in pancreatic tumors,
whereas its level in a normal pancreas is undetectable (20, 24, 29).
Furthermore, high levels of MUC4 expression have been detected in
differentiated pancreatic tumor cell lines (24, 29). Among the various
pancreatic tumor cell lines, the deduced size of the unglycosylated
protein will range from 550 to 930 kDa because of the variable number
of tandem repeats polymorphism (24). Other tissues reported as having
undetectable levels of MUC4 expression are gall bladder
biliary epithelial cells, intrahepatic bile ducts, and the liver (30).
In contrast, MUC4 apomucin is expressed in numerous normal
tissues such as the stomach, ovary, salivary gland, colon, lung,
trachea, uterus, and prostate (31-35). MUC4 is not restricted to the
specialized epithelial cells but is also expressed in ciliary cells of
the respiratory tract and in intestinal absorptive cells (36). In
bronchial epithelial cells, its expression is regulated at the
mRNA level by the retinoic acid (37). So far, no data on MUC4
protein expression are available because of the unavailability of
MUC4-specific monoclonal antibodies. Furthermore, the MUC
RNA transcripts on Northern blots show a polydisperse message, with the
polydispersity due to the degradation of RNA during preparation (38).
The expression of MUC4 in pancreatic tumors compared with
the normal pancreas suggests a link between regulation of its
expression and one of the immediate cellular alterations involved in
the pathogenic process.
Expression of the human mucin gene like MUC2 in airway
epithelial cells has been regulated by various factors in culture, the
extracellular matrix, and in certain disease states (39, 40). In human
lung carcinoma, MUC5AC and MUC5B transcripts were up-regulated by exposure to irritants like acrolein and an inflammatory mediator (41). Studies in cultured human bronchial epithelial cells
have demonstrated that retinoic acid was necessary for mucociliary differentiation and for the expression of mucin genes including MUC2, MUC4, MUC5AC, and
MUC5B (37, 42-45).
In the present study, we investigated RA-mediated increase of MUC4
expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line CD18/HPAF. We
demonstrated that the RA not only increases the MUC4
transcript and protein levels, but also the
TGF- 2 transcript. These events were inhibited
by a retinoid that functions as RAR- antagonist. Treatment with
TGF- 2 increased MUC4 expression, demonstrating a linkage
of MUC4 with the TGF- 2-signaling pathway. Moreover, the addition of
an antibody against the TGF- , which immunoneutralized the secreted
TGF- 2, completely abrogated the effect of RA and TGF- 2 on
MUC4 expression. These findings provide evidence that RA
induces MUC4 through an RAR- -dependent pathway, and the
increase in MUC4 expression by RA requires activation of the TGF- 2
pathway by autocrine or paracrine mechanisms.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
The following materials were purchased: fetal
bovine serum, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, Ham's F-12
nutrient mixture, Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline, trypsin
solution, and penicillin/streptomycin solution (Life Technologies,
Inc.); Genescreen nylon membranes (PerkinElmer Life Sciences);
restriction enzymes and TGF- 2 EmaxTM
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system (Promega, Madison, WI); random
primed labeling kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech); TGF- 2 and TGF- 1
(R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN); Vectastain universal ABC kit (Vector
Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA); RA, mouse IgG1, (MOPC 21)
(Sigma); mouse hybridoma (1D11.16.8) producing TGF- antibodies
(ATCC, Manassas, VA).
Cell Culture--
The CD18/HPAF pancreatic tumor cells used in
the study were derived from the parental heterogenous HPAF pancreatic
adenocarcinoma cell line (46). CD18/HPAF cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus 10% fetal bovine serum.
These tumor cells were slowly selected for growth in a serum-free
medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus F-12 nutrient
mixture; 1:1 ratio) by gradually decreasing the serum content in the
medium at each passage. The tumor cells that are adapted to grow in a
serum free medium were named CD18/HPAF-SF. These selected cells were
frozen until needed. Once the cell line was thawed, the cells were
grown in a Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus F-12 nutrient
mixture containing penicillin and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) for 15 days. CD18/HPAF-SF cells were incubated in a serum-free medium alone or
with RA (1 nM to 20 µM), Ro41-5253,
TGF- 2, anti-TGF- antibody (IgG1), MOPC 21 antibody (IgG1) alone
or in combination. The working dilution of RA was made from 100 mM stock in Me2SO, TGF- 1, and TGF- 2;
stocks were reconstituted according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Isolation of RNA--
Total cellular RNA from the tumor cells
was isolated by guanidine isothiocyanate cesium chloride cushion
ultracentrifugation. Cells were washed twice with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) and lysed with a solution containing
4 M guanidine isothiocyanate, 0.05 M sodium
acetate, and 250 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. Total RNA was
recovered via sedimentation through a 5.7 M CsCl in 0.025 M sodium acetate cushion in a Beckman SW40Ti rotor
centrifuged at 32,000 rpm for 18 h. RNA pellets were resuspended
in 0.3 M sodium acetate and precipitated with ethanol.
Northern Blotting--
Total RNA (20 µg) was fractionated by
electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose gels containing 0.66 M
formaldehyde and transferred to nitrocellulose via capillary blotting.
The cDNA probes were labeled with [32P]dCTP using a
random primed labeling kit and were separated from the free label by
sephadex G-50 column chromatography. Prehybridization and hybridization
of blots were carried out in a solution of 5× SSPE, 50% formamide,
5× Denhardt's reagent, 200 µg/ml sheared salmon sperm DNA, and a
minimum of 106 cpm/ml of probe at 42 °C for 18 h.
Blots were washed twice with 2× SSC containing 0.1% SDS at room
temperature for 15 min, followed by four washes with 0.2× SSC, 0.1%
SDS at 60 °C.
The cDNA probes used in this analysis were a 500-bp human
MUC4 and 780-bp human glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The MUC4 cDNA clone
was isolated from the HPAF cDNA library that contains 10 complete
tandem repeat units (AF177925). It shares a 98% similarity with the
published MUC4 tandem repeat sequence (5). The
GAPDH probe has 31 bp of 5'-untranslated region and the
region coding the first 250 amino acid residues of the protein.
Expression of the MUC4 mRNA was quantified by
densitometry of autoradiograms using the ImageQuant software program
(Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). The MUC4 signal
on the Northern blot appears as a smear. Each sample measurement was
calculated as the ratio of the average areas between
MUC4-specific smear and 1.3 kilobase pairs
GAPDH band in the linear range of the autoradiogram as reported earlier (29).
Immunohistochemical Analysis--
The subconfluent monolayer of
cells cultured in eight-chambered slides (Nunc, Inc., Naperville, IL)
was used for the immunohistochemical analysis. After the monolayer was
washed, cells were fixed with ice-cold acetone and methanol mixture
(1:1) for 10 min. Immunostaining was performed on the fixed cells with
the Vectastain universal ABC kit. The cell monolayer was blocked with
normal blocking serum for 1 h. Following blocking, the samples
were incubated at 4 °C overnight with either anti-MUC4 rabbit
antiserum raised against 16-amino acid tandem repeat
(Ser-Thr-Gly-Asp-Thr-Thr-Pro-Leu-Pro-Val-Thr-Asp-Thr-Ser-Ser-Val) peptide or preimmune rabbit serum serving as a negative control. To
block the positive staining, the primary test antisera (1:100 dilution)
were incubated with different concentrations of tandem repeat peptide
ranging from 100 through 0.001 mg/ml and were incubated for 30 min at
room temperature. Samples were incubated with the secondary antibody
for 1 h at room temperature and washed with Dulbecco's
phosphate-buffered saline (Life Technologies). The cells were incubated
with ABC reagent for 30 min followed by treatment with peroxidase
substrate solution until the desired stain intensity was developed.
Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR)--
Total RNA (0.5 µg)
from the CD18/HPAF cells and the control normal tissues was reverse
transcribed using the first strand cDNA synthesis kit (PerkinElmer
Life Sciences) and oligo(dT) primers according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Each target gene was co-amplified with the same
GAPDH primers. Amplifications were performed in a
programmable thermal controller (PTC-100, MJ Research, Inc., Watertown,
MA). PCR amplification reactions were conducted in 50-µl reaction
volumes containing 5 µl of 10× PerkinElmer buffer, 5 µl of 10 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 2 µl of first strand pancreatic cell line cDNA, 5 µl of 25 mM
MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, and 2 units of
Taq DNA polymerase (Ampli Taq Gold; PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The mixture was denatured at 96 °C for 10 min, followed by 30 cycles at 96 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for
30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. The final elongation step was
extended for an additional 15 min. The sequence of the PCR product was
confirmed by the dideoxy-mediated chain termination method. The
positive controls for the various mucin genes were as follows: for
MUC1 and MUC4, HPAF/CD18; for MUC6,
the normal pancreas; for MUC2 and MUC3, the small
intestine; for MUC5AC and -B, the trachea; and
for MUC7, salivary gland (3, 9, 29, 47-49). The sequence of
the PCR product was confirmed by the dideoxy-mediated chain termination method.
Oligonucleotide primers for MUC1, -2,
-3, -4, -5AC, -5B,
-6, and -7, RAR- ,
RAR- , RAR- , TGF- 1,
and TGF- 2 are designed from the published
sequences in GenBankTM as shown in Table
I. PCR products were run on 1%
agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and scanned on a Nucleo
VisionTM 760 Imaging Workstation. Amplified products were
quantified for each sample using the gel expertTM 3.5 software suite (Nucleotech Corporation, San Mateo, CA). The densitometric values were calculated for gene-specific product and
GAPDH for each reaction. The value for the mucin gene-specific product
is expressed per unit of GAPDH to account for any differences in
starting amounts of RNA. The lowest densitometric value (weakest band)
for GAPDH is taken as a unit. For convenience, the
corrected densitometric scores for different products were categorized
in three different ranges: high (+++), moderate (++), and weak (+). Each value was determined as the mean of four densitometry
readings.
 |
RESULTS |
Serum-dependent Regulation of MUC4 Expression in
CD18/HPAF-SF Tumor Cells--
The CD18/HPAF cells showed a high
level of MUC4 expression (wild type level) by
Northern blotting, where the MUC4 tandem repeat cDNA
probe hybridized to a >10-kilobase transcript (Fig.
1A). When the cells were
adapted to grow over a period of time in the serum-free medium, no
MUC4 mRNA expression was detected (these tumor cells are
named as CD18/HPAF-SF). The MUC4 expression in CD18/HPAF-SF
cells was resumed within 24 h of culture with fetal bovine serum.
Furthermore, a similar effect on MUC4 expression was
observed with blood plasma. The level of GAPDH transcript was measured for an internal control and was comparable in test and
controls (Fig. 1).

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Northern and immunohistochemical analysis of
serum-dependent regulation of MUC4 expression.
A, Northern blot analysis of 20 µg of total RNA from the
CD18/HPAF cells and CD18/HPAF-SF cells alone or treated for 24 h
with either serum or plasma. Blots were probed with human
MUC4 tandem repeat (a) and GAPDH
(b) (used as a loading control) cDNA probes.
Densitometric values ± S.E. for the MUC4, normalized
to GAPDH band intensity in three different experiments, were
determined by using the Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant software program.
B, immunohistochemical analysis of MUC4 using an anti-MUC4
polyclonal antiserum. Cells showed immunoreactivity to anti-MUC4
antiserum (1:100 dilution) (a and d), whereas
CD18/HPAF-SF cells remained unstained (c). Specific staining
was blocked in CD18/HPAF cells by preincubation of the MUC4-antiserum
with the tandem repeat peptide (b). Original magnification, × 200 (a-d). FBS, fetal bovine serum.
|
|
Due to the large size of the MUC4 protein (1680-2800 kDa,
unglycosylated), and difficulty in resolving the protein by SDS-PAGE, its expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry under similar experimental conditions using anti-MUC4 pAb, raised against MUC4 tandem
repeat peptide. The expression of MUC4 protein correlated with the
transcripts. The positive staining in the cells grown in
serum-containing medium was specifically blocked by preincubation of
the MUC4 antiserum with the tandem repeat peptide (Fig.
1B).
RA-induced MUC4 Expression in CD18/HPAF-SF
Cells--
MUC4 mRNA expression was evaluated after
treatment of CD18/HPAF-SF cells with estradiol-17 , progesterone,
dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, insulin, epidermal growth factor, tumor
necrosis factor- , TGF- , and retinoids. We observed that retinoic
acid (RA, 9-cis-retinoic acid, and
13-cis-retinoic acid) up-regulated the expression of
MUC4 in CD18/HPAF-SF tumor cells. Treatment with RA resulted
in a time-dependent increase in the level of MUC4 mRNA from day 1 to day 4 (Fig.
2A). The RA-induced increase of MUC4 expression was dose-dependent (from 1 nM to 20 µM concentration); however, the
concentration of 10 µM and above was found toxic for the
cells (Fig. 2B). We have therefore used RA at 1 µM or lower concentrations in our subsequent
experiments.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Northern analysis of the MUC4
gene on total cellular RNA prepared from CD18/HPAF-SF cells.
A, expression was examined in cells treated with RA for
different time periods or with medium alone (0 h). B,
expression was examined in cells treated for 48 h with
medium alone (0) or with the indicated
concentration of RA. Blots were probed with human MUC4
tandem repeat (a) and GAPDH (b) (used
as a loading control) cDNA probes. Densitometric values ± S.E. for the MUC4, normalized to GAPDH band
intensity in three different experiments, were determined by using the
Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant software program.
|
|
It is known that the action of RA is mediated through the nuclear
retinoic acid receptors (RARs). We investigated the level of retinoic
acid receptor (RAR- , - , - ) mRNA in CD18/HPAF-SF cells treated with RA (1 µM) and untreated (medium alone)
by RT-PCR. Appropriate amplification products were obtained: 372, 383, and 266 bp, for RAR- , - , and - , respectively (Fig.
3). The results indicate that the levels
of all the RAR isoforms were similar in RA-treated and
untreated cultures.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
RT-PCR analysis of RAR- ,
- , and - mRNA expression in
RA-treated CD18/HPAF-SF cells. Subconfluent CD18/HPAF-SF cultures
were exposed for 48 h to 1 µM concentration of RA,
the total RNA was isolated, and levels of RAR- , - , and - were
analyzed by RT-PCR. Amplified products were quantified for each sample
using the gel expertTM 3.5 software suite. The
densitometric values were calculated for gene specific product and
GAPDH for each reaction. The value for RAR isoform-specific product is
expressed per unit of GAPDH to account for any differences in starting
amounts of RNA. kb, kilobase pair.
|
|
RA-induced MUC4 Expression Mediated through RAR- --
The
contribution of RAR- -dependent signaling pathway to the
increased MUC4 mRNA levels induced by RA was analyzed.
The CD18/HPAF-SF cells were treated for 48 h with 50 nM RA and different doses of Ro41-5253 (a synthetic
retinoid) that functions as an RAR- antagonist (50). When the
Ro41-5253 (1 µM) was used in molar excess to RA (50 nM), it abrogated the RA-induced MUC4 expression (Fig. 4). However, the Ro41-5253
(in molar excess) in combination with 1 µM RA was found
toxic to the cells. Consistent with our mRNA data, similar results
were obtained at protein level, evaluated by immunohistochemistry using
the anti-MUC4 pAb. An intense MUC4 protein staining was observed
after treatment with 50 nM RA (data not shown). The
intensity of staining was similar to that found with the CD18/HPAF
cells (Fig. 1B, a). However, no MUC4 staining was
observed in the cells co-cultured with 50 nM RA and 1 µM Ro41-5253 (data not shown).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Northern analysis of the MUC4
expression in CD18/HPAF-SF cells. A, total
cellular RNA prepared from the tumor cells treated for 48 h with
50 nM RA alone or in the presence of different doses of the
RAR- antagonist Ro41-5253. B, densitometric values ± S.E. for the MUC4, normalized to GAPDH band
intensity in three different experiments, was determined by using the
Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant software program.
|
|
Regulation of Expression of MUC Genes in RA-treated CD18/HPAF-SF
Cells--
Expression of eight mucin genes was investigated by RT-PCR
using total RNA isolated from the RA-treated (48 h) cultures. The level
of MUC4 in RA-treated (1 µM) cultures was
comparable with the wild type levels (Table
II). MUC2 showed an expression
pattern similar to MUC4 but at lower level. MUC7
was not expressed in CD18/HPAF cells but was induced by RA in
CD18/HPAF-SF cells. RA had no influence on the expression of
MUC1 and MUC5B, since their expression remained
unchanged in treated and untreated cells. No detectable expression of
MUC3, MUC5AC, and MUC6 was observed in
RA-treated and untreated cultures, but the positive controls (described
under "Experimental Procedures") showed appropriate amplification.
RA-induced Increase Of TGF- 2 in CD18/HPAF-SF Cells--
The
expression of TGF 2 and
TGF 1 mRNA was measured by RT-PCR using
total RNA. The amplified products for TGF 2 and
TGF 1 were appropriately visualized at 600 and
186 bp, respectively. A high level of
TGF 2 expression was observed in RA-treated
cells, but no detectable expression was found in untreated cells (Fig. 5A). No
TGF 2 expression was seen in the cells cultured
in the presence of RA plus Ro41-5253 (in molar excess); however, there was no effect on the TGF 1 expression.
TGF 1 was expressed in both RA (50 nM)-treated and untreated (medium alone) samples. Furthermore, treatment with TGF 2 (20 pg/ml) up-regulated the expression of TGF 2 transcripts, whereas under
similar conditions TGF 1 levels remained
unaltered.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Analysis of TGF- 2
expression in RA-treated CD18/HPAF-SF cells. The CD18/HPAF culture
(50% confluent) was exposed for 48 h to the indicated culture
conditions. Total RNA was isolated, and TGF- 2
or TGF- 1 was co-amplified with
GAPDH mRNA in each reaction by RT-PCR.
|
|
TGF- 2 Increases the MUC4 Expression in CD18/HPAF-SF
Cells--
The effect of the exogenous addition of TGF- 2 on
MUC4 mRNA and protein levels was examined. A
dose-dependent study was carried out using 10-100 pg/ml
concentrations of TGF- 2. The MUC4 expression increased
from 0 to 20 pg/ml concentration (Fig.
6). TGF- 2 not only increased
MUC4 mRNA but also increased the MUC4 protein
expression at a concentration of 20 pg/ml after treatment for 48 h
as analyzed by immunohistochemistry using anti-MUC4 pAb (data not
shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Northern analysis of MUC4 expression in
TGF- 2-treated CD18/HPAF-SF cells.
A, total cellular RNA was prepared from the cells treated
for 48 h with medium alone or with the indicated
concentration of TGF- 2. B, densitometric values ± S.E. for the MUC4, normalized to GAPDH band
intensity in three different experiments, was determined by using the
Molecular Dynamics ImageQuant software program.
|
|
TGF- -neutralizing Antibody Abrogates RA- and TGF- 2-induced
MUC4 Expression in CD18/HPAF-SF Cells--
The specificity of the
TGF- 2-mediated increase in MUC4 expression in these tumors and the
role of TGF- 2 in a retinoid-mediated increase of MUC4 expression
were assessed by use of a TGF- -neutralizing antibody. The
tumor cell culture (80% confluent) was treated with RA (50 nM), TGF 2 (20 pg/ml) alone or in the presence of 100 µg/ml anti-TGF- monoclonal antibody (IgG1 isotype, binds to
TGF- 1 and TGF- 2). Controls were mouse IgG1 isotype antibody
(mouse MOPC 21, CMAb). The addition of anti-TGF- monoclonal antibody along with the RA treatment completely abrogated the RA (50 nM)-induced MUC4 expression in the CD18/HPAF-SF
cells, but controls with CMAb showed a high level of MUC4
expression (Fig. 7). Furthermore, the
incubation of the antibody with the TGF- 2 (20 pg/ml)-treated culture
also resulted in loss of TGF- 2-induced MUC4
expression.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
RT-PCR analysis to study the effect of
TGF- -neutralizing antibody (100 µg/ml) on the RA (50 nM)- and
TGF- 2 (20 pg/ml)-induced MUC4
mRNA expression in CD18/HPAF-SF cells. A,
50% confluent cultures were exposed for 48 h to the indicated
culture conditions. Total RNA was isolated, and MUC4 and
GAPDH mRNA are co-amplified in each reaction by RT-PCR.
B, amplified products were quantified for each sample using
the gel expertTM 3.5 software suite. The densitometric
values were calculated for gene-specific product and GAPDH
for each reaction. The value for MUC4 gene-specific product
is expressed per unit of GAPDH to account for any
differences in starting amounts of RNA. kb, kilobase
pair.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We report, for the first time, the regulation of MUC4 expression
in human pancreatic tumor cells. The MUC4 gene is highly expressed in pancreatic tumors and cell lines but has no detectable expression in a normal pancreas (20, 29). A clonal pancreatic tumor
cell line (CD18/HPAF) that produces high amounts of MUC4 mRNA (29, 46) was used. The expression of MUC4 was
serum-dependent, and the blood plasma mimics the serum
effect, ruling out the involvement of clotting factors in its
regulation. The SMC (rat Muc4) transcripts have similarly been shown
up-regulated in primary rat mammary epithelial cells (MECs) by serum
(51).
Several serum factors were analyzed for their ability to increase the
MUC4 expression in CD18/HPAF-SF tumor cells, including steroids, growth
factors, cytokines, and retinoic acid. We observed that the naturally
occurring retinoid RA increases the expression of MUC4
mRNA and protein in a concentration- and time-dependent fashion. In airway epithelial cells, it has been demonstrated that the
components of culture medium, like hormones, and growth factors
regulate mucin production (44, 52). In bronchial epithelial cells, a
serum component, the RA, has been reported essential for the
mucociliary differentiation, maintenance of mucociliary phenotype, and
the expression of a variety of mucin (37). The ultrastructural analysis
of the RA-treated CD18/HPAF-SF cells exhibited differentiated
morphology with large luminal
spaces,2 similar to CD18/HPAF
tumor cells that showed high levels of MUC4 expression (24,
46). In cultured bronchial epithelial cells, an
RA-dependent increase of MUC2,
MUC4, MUC5AC, and MUC5B transcript has
been reported (37, 45). In pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells (CD18/HPAF-SF), the RA also increased the expression of MUC2
and MUC7, but at low levels.
Retinoic acids are ligands for the nuclear retinoic acid
receptors (RAR- , - , - ) and retinoid X receptors (RXR- ,
- , - ). Both RAR and RXR act as ligand-activated transcription
factors, controlling gene transcription initiated from promoters of
retinoid-regulated genes by interacting with cis-acting DNA elements,
also called retinoic acid-responsive elements. The RA is a naturally
acting ligand for the RAR in vivo (53). In CD18/HPAF-SF
cells, the expression of RAR- , - , and
- mRNA in RA-treated as well as in untreated cells
was found similar. An antagonist to RAR- isotype (Ro41-5253,
10 6 M) blocked the RA (50 nM)-induced expression of MUC4 mRNA and protein. The Ro41-5253 at a lower concentration
(10 8 and 10 9
M) was not effective in abrogating the RA (50 nM)-induced MUC4 expression, suggesting that a
molar excess of the antagonist was required to efficiently compete and
block the action of RA on RAR- . The RAR- is also
reported to be the main RAR form involved in the
RA-dependent regulation of MUC2 and
MUC5AC transcripts in human tracheobronchial epithelial
cells (54).
We also observed an RA-induced expression of
TGF- 2 transcripts and activated
TGF- 22 in these tumor cells, but no effect was found on
the TGF- 1 transcripts. Co-incubating the tumor
cells with RA and Ro41-5253 (in molar excess) abrogated the RA-induced
expression of not only MUC4 but also
TGF- 2 transcripts. TGF- 2 appeared to act as
a mediator of RA action and was confirmed by the abrogation of
RA-induced MUC4 expression by TGF- -neutralizing antibody.
Similarly, in epidermal cells, one of the major effects of RA was the
specific induction of TGF- 2 that was further supported by the
evidence that TGF- 2 can act as local mediator of RA action (55).
However, these effects of RA on the induction of TGF- 2 expression
are not believed to be direct effects on the TGF- 2
promoter (56). A positive correlation between the MUC4 and
TGF- 2 transcript level was observed; treatments
that resulted in an increased MUC4 expression were also found to
up-regulate the TGF- 2 transcript levels.
In pancreatic tumor cell lines, expression of MUC4 has been reported
undetectable in poorly differentiated cell lines and with an elevated
level of expression in moderately to well differentiated cell lines
(24, 29). A differentiation-dependent induction of TGF- 2
was detected in F9 and PC-13 MECs (57). The TGF- can exert either
positive or negative effects on neoplastic cells. The in
vitro growth of many tumor cells was inhibited by picomolar concentrations of exogenous TGF- (58-62). Furthermore, in MECs the
SMC expression is inhibited by TGF- by a posttranslational mechanism; however, these regulatory processes are altered in the
ascites tumor cells (51, 63). In contrast to its inhibitory effects,
TGF- can also promote the growth and/or invasiveness of several
different tumors (64, 65). In pancreatic cancer, enhanced expression of
TGF- isoforms, especially TGF- 2, was found associated with
disease progression (65). However, the mechanisms regulating the levels
of TGF- are poorly understood. We found that, exogenously supplied,
the TGF- 2 can by itself up-regulate the MUC4 expression
in the tumor cells. However, its other isoform, the TGF- 1, showed no
effect on MUC4 expression in these tumor cells (data not
shown). Similarly, TGF- 1 had no effect on the expression of rat SMC
(rat Muc4) transcript and protein levels in mammary adenocarcinoma
cells (51). In contrast, in normal mammary gland cells, TGF- 1 showed
no effect on SMC transcript, but the protein expression was
down-regulated.
In most if not all cases, TGF- is secreted as an inactive (latent)
high molecular weight complex, composed of TGF- , the amino-terminal
part of the TGF- precursor, and the latent TGF- -binding proteins
(66). In the absence of latent TGF- -binding proteins, TGF- is
secreted very slowly, and considerable amounts of TGF- remain inside
the cell (67). We observed that the treatment of CD18/HPAF-SF cells
with RA increased not only the MUC4 mRNA levels but also
TGF- 2 transcripts in the cells and the
activated TGF- 2 in the culture supernatant.2 The
expression of TGF- 1 mRNA was found similar
in RA-treated and -untreated cells. Furthermore, the RA-induced
expression of TGF- 2 transcripts in CD18/HPAF
cell was abrogated in the presence of a molar excess of the RAR-
antagonist (Ro41-5253); however, there was no effect on the
TGF- 1 expression. Hence, the results suggest
that the TGF- 2 is a local mediator of the RA action on MUC4 expression.
In summary, we report that expression of the MUC4 mucin in
the CD18/HPAF cell is regulated by RA and TGF- 2, which acts as a
local mediator of RA action. This action of RA is mediated through the
RAR- -dependent signaling pathway. Additional
investigations on the promoter of this gene and the analysis of
different regulatory elements will provide better understanding of the
regulation of this gene under normal and pathological conditions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Erik Moore (University of
Nebraska Medical Center) and Evelyne Destailleur (INSERM) for technical
support. The generous gift of anti-MUC4 rabbit polyclonal antiserum
form Dr. Sandra J Gendler (Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, Scottsdale, AZ)
is acknowledged. We also thank the Molecular Biology Core Facility,
UNMC, for oligonucleotide synthesis and DNA sequencing and Kristi
L. W. Berger (Eppley Institute) for editorial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants CA 78590 (to S. K. B) and CA72781 (to R. K. S).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 984525 Nebraska Medical Center,
Omaha, NE 68198-4525. Tel.: 402-559-5455; Fax: 402-559-6650; E-mail: sbatra@unmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 10, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005115200
2
A. Choudhury, and S. K. Batra, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MUC, mucin;
RA, all-trans-retinoic acid;
SMC, sialomucin complex;
TGF, transforming growth factor;
SF, serum free;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR;
RAR, retinoic acid
receptor;
bp, base pair(s);
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase;
MEC, mammary epithelial cell.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kim, Y. S.,
Gum, J. R., Jr.,
Crawley, S. C.,
Deng, G.,
and Ho, J. J.
(1999)
Ann. Oncol.
10 Suppl. 4,
51-55
|
| 2.
|
Lan, M. S.,
Batra, S. K.,
Qi, W. N.,
Metzgar, R. S.,
and Hollingsworth, M. A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
15294-15299
|
| 3.
|
Gum, J. R., Jr.,
Hicks, J. W.,
Toribara, N. W.,
Siddiki, B.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
2440-2446
|
| 4.
|
Gum, J. R.,
Hicks, J. W.,
Swallow, D. M.,
Lagace, R. L.,
Byrd, J. C.,
Lamport, D. T.,
Siddiki, B.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
171,
407-415
|
| 5.
|
Porchet, N.,
Nguyen, V. C.,
Dufosse, J.,
Audie, J. P.,
Guyonnet-Duperat, V.,
Gross, M. S.,
Denis, C.,
Degand, P.,
Bernheim, A.,
and Aubert, J. P.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
175,
414-422
|
| 6.
|
Dufosse, J.,
Porchet, N.,
Audie, J. P.,
Guyonnet Duperat, V.,
Laine, A.,
Van-Seuningen, I.,
Marrakchi, S.,
Degand, P.,
and Aubert, J. P.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
293,
329-337
|
| 7.
|
Aubert, J. P.,
Porchet, N.,
Crepin, M.,
Duterque-Coquillaud, M.,
Vergnes, G.,
Mazzuca, M.,
Debuire, B.,
Petitprez, D.,
and Degand, P.
(1991)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
5,
178-185
|
| 8.
|
Toribara, N. W.,
Roberton, A. M.,
Ho, S. B.,
Kuo, W. L.,
Gum, E.,
Hicks, J. W.,
Gum, J. R., Jr.,
Byrd, J. C.,
Siddiki, B.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5879-5885
|
| 9.
|
Bobek, L. A.,
Liu, J.,
Sait, S. N.,
Shows, T. B.,
Bobek, Y. A.,
and Levine, M. J.
(1996)
Genomics
31,
277-282
|
| 10.
|
Shankar, V.,
Pichan, P.,
Eddy, R. L., Jr.,
Tonk, V.,
Nowak, N.,
Sait, S. N.,
Shows, T. B.,
Schultz, R. E.,
Gotway, G.,
Elkins, R. C.,
Gilmore, M. S.,
and Sachdev, G. P.
(1997)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
16,
232-241
|
| 11.
|
Lapensee, L.,
Paquette, Y.,
and Bleau, G.
(1997)
Fertil. Steril.
68,
702-708
|
| 12.
|
Williams, S. J.,
McGuckin, M. A.,
Gotley, D. C.,
Eyre, H. J.,
Sutherland, G. R.,
and Antalis, T. M.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
4083-4089
|
| 13.
|
Siddiki, J.,
Abe, M.,
Haynes, D.,
Shani, E.,
Yunis, E.,
and Kufe, D.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
6060-6064
|
| 14.
|
Tashiro, Y.,
Yonezawa, S.,
Kim, Y. S.,
and Sato, E.
(1994)
Hum. Pathol.
25,
364-372
|
| 15.
|
Yonezawa, S.,
Byrd, J. C.,
Dahiya, R.,
Ho, J. J.,
Gum, J. R.,
Griffiths, B.,
Swallow, D. M.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
276,
599-605
|
| 16.
|
Dahiya, R.,
Kwak, K. S.,
Byrd, J. C.,
Ho, S.,
Yoon, W. H.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
1437-1443
|
| 17.
|
Ho, S. B.,
Niehans, G. A.,
Lyftogt, C.,
Yan, P. S.,
Cherwitz, D. L.,
Gum, E. T.,
Dahiya, R.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
641-651
|
| 18.
|
Chang, S. K.,
Dohrman, A. F.,
Basbaum, C. B.,
Ho, S. B.,
Tsuda, T.,
Toribara, N. W.,
Gum, J. R.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1994)
Gastroenterology
107,
28-36
|
| 19.
|
Carrato, C.,
Balague, C.,
de Bolos, C.,
Gonzalez, E.,
Gambus, G.,
Planas, J.,
Perini, J. M.,
Andreu, D.,
and Real, F. X.
(1994)
Gastroenterology
107,
160-172
|
| 20.
|
Balague, C.,
Gambus, G.,
Carrato, C.,
Porchet, N.,
Aubert, J. P.,
Kim, Y. S.,
and Real, F. X.
(1994)
Gastroenterology
106,
1054-1061
|
| 21.
|
Gendler, S. J.,
and Spicer, A. P.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
57,
607-634
|
| 22.
|
Nollet, S.,
Moniaux, N.,
Maury, J.,
Petitprez, D.,
Degand, P.,
Laine, A.,
Porchet, N.,
and Aubert, J. P.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
332,
739-748
|
| 23.
|
Moniaux, N.,
Nollet, S.,
Porchet, N.,
Degand, P.,
Laine, A.,
and Aubert, J. P.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
338,
325-333
|
| 24.
|
Choudhury, A.,
Moniaux, N.,
Winpenny, J. P.,
Hollingsworth, M. A.,
Aubert, J.-P.,
and Batra, S. K.
(2000)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
128,
233-243
|
| 25.
|
Rossi, E. A.,
McNeer, R. R.,
Price-Schiavi, S. A.,
Van den Brande, J. M.,
Komatsu, M.,
Thompson, J. F.,
Carraway, C. A.,
Fregien, N. L.,
and Carraway, K. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33476-33485
|
| 26.
|
Carraway, K. L., III,
Rossi, E. A.,
Komatsu, M.,
Price-Schiavi, S. A.,
Huang, D.,
Guy, P. M.,
Carvajal, M. E.,
Fregien, N.,
Carraway, C. A.,
and Carraway, K. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
5263-5266
|
| 27.
| Choudhury, A., Moniaux, N., Ringel, J., King, J., Moore, E., Aubert,
J.-P., and Batra, S. K. (2001) Teratogenesis,
Carcinogenesis, and Mutagenesis, 21, in
press
|
| 28.
|
Moniaux, N.,
Escande, F.,
Batra, S. K.,
Porchet, N.,
Laine, A.,
and Aubert, J.-P.
(2000)
Eur. J. Biochem.
267,
4536-4544
|
| 29.
|
Hollingsworth, M. A.,
Strawhecker, J. M.,
Caffrey, T. C.,
and Mack, D. R.
(1994)
Int. J. Cancer
57,
198-203
|
| 30.
|
Vandenhaute, B.,
Buisine, M. P.,
Debailleul, V.,
Clement, B.,
Moniaux, N.,
Dieu, M. C.,
Degand, P.,
Porchet, N.,
and Aubert, J. P.
(1997)
J. Hepatol.
27,
1057-1066
|
| 31.
|
Audie, J. P.,
Janin, A.,
Porchet, N.,
Copin, M. C.,
Gosselin, B.,
and Aubert, J. P.
(1993)
J. Histochem. Cytochem.
41,
1479-1485
|
| 32.
|
Audie, J. P.,
Tetaert, D.,
Pigny, P.,
Buisine, M. P.,
Janin, A.,
Aubert, J. P.,
Porchet, N.,
and Boersma, A.
(1995)
Hum. Reprod.
10,
98-102
|
| 33.
|
Gipson, I. K.,
Spurr-Michaud, S.,
Moccia, R.,
Zhan, Q.,
Toribara, N.,
Ho, S. B.,
Gargiulo, A. R.,
and Hill, J. A., III
(1999)
Biol. Reprod.
60,
58-64
|
| 34.
|
Buisine, M. P.,
Devisme, L.,
Copin, M. C.,
Durand-Reville, M.,
Gosselin, B.,
Aubert, J. P.,
and Porchet, N.
(1999)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
20,
209-218
|
| 35.
|
Reid, C. J.,
and Harris, A.
(1998)
Gut
42,
220-226
|
| 36.
|
Copin, M. C.,
Devisme, L.,
Buisine, M. P.,
Marquette, C. H.,
Wurtz, A.,
Aubert, J. P.,
Gosselin, B.,
and Porchet, N.
(2000)
Int. J. Cancer
86,
162-168
|
| 37.
|
Bernacki, S. H.,
Nelson, A. L.,
Abdullah, L.,
Sheehan, J. K.,
Harris, A.,
William Davis, C.,
and Randell, S. H.
(1999)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
20,
595-604
|
| 38.
|
Debailleul, V.,
Laine, A.,
Huet, G.,
Mathon, P.,
d'Hooghe, M. C.,
Aubert, J. P.,
and Porchet, N.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
881-890
|
| 39.
|
Li, J. D.,
Dohrman, A. F.,
Gallup, M.,
Miyata, S.,
Gum, J. R.,
Kim, Y. S.,
Nadel, J. A.,
Prince, A.,
and Basbaum, C. B.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
967-972
|
| 40.
|
Li, D.,
Wang, D.,
Majumdar, S.,
Jany, B.,
Durham, S. R.,
Cottrell, J.,
Caplen, N.,
Geddes, D. M.,
Alton, E. W.,
and Jeffery, P. K.
(1997)
J. Pathol.
181,
305-310
|
| 41.
|
Borchers, M. T.,
Carty, M. P.,
and Leikauf, G. D.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
276,
L549-L555
|
| 42.
|
Finkbeiner, W. E.,
Carrier, S. D.,
and Teresi, C. E.
(1993)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
9,
547-556
|
| 43.
|
Gray, T. E.,
Guzman, K.,
Davis, C. W.,
Abdullah, L. H.,
and Nettesheim, P.
(1996)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
14,
104-112
|
| 44.
|
Guzman, K.,
Bader, T.,
and Nettesheim, P.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
L846-L853
|
| 45.
|
Yoon, J. H.,
Gray, T.,
Guzman, K.,
Koo, J. S.,
and Nettesheim, P.
(1997)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
16,
724-731
|
| 46.
|
Kim, Y. W.,
Kern, H. F.,
Mullins, T. D.,
Koriwchak, M. J.,
and Metzgar, R. S.
(1989)
Pancreas
4,
353-362
|
| 47.
|
Reid, C. J.,
Hyde, K.,
Ho, S. B.,
and Harris, A.
(1997)
Mol. Med.
3,
403-411
|
| 48.
|
Buisine, M. P.,
Desseyn, J. L.,
Porchet, N.,
Degand, P.,
Laine, A.,
and Aubert, J. P.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
332,
729-738
|
| 49.
|
Desseyn, J. L.,
Aubert, J. P.,
Van Seuningen, I.,
Porchet, N.,
and Laine, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
16873-16883
|
| 50.
|
Apfel, C.,
Bauer, F.,
Crettaz, M.,
Forni, L.,
Kamber, M.,
Kaufmann, F.,
LeMotte, P.,
Pirson, W.,
and Klaus, M.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
7129-7133
|
| 51.
|
Price-Schiavi, S. A.,
Carraway, C. A.,
Fregien, N.,
and Carraway, K. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
35228-35237
|
| 52.
|
Guzman, K.,
Randell, S. H.,
and Nettesheim, P.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
217,
412-418
|
| 53.
|
Leid, M.,
Kastner, P.,
and Chambon, P.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
17,
427-433
|
| 54.
|
Koo, J. S.,
Jetten, A. M.,
Belloni, P.,
Yoon, J. H.,
Kim, Y. D.,
and Nettesheim, P.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
338,
351-357
|
| 55.
|
Glick, A. B.,
Flanders, K. C.,
Danielpour, D.,
Yuspa, S. H.,
and Sporn, M. B.
(1989)
Cell Regul.
1,
87-97
|
| 56.
|
Kelly, D.,
O'Reilly, M. A.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1992)
Dev. Biol.
153,
172-175
|
| 57.
|
Kelly, D.,
Campbell, W. J.,
Tiesman, J.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1990)
Cytotechnology
4,
227-242
|
| 58.
|
Knabbe, C.,
Lippman, M. E.,
Wakefield, L. M.,
Flanders, K. C.,
Kasid, A.,
Derynck, R.,
and Dickson, R. B.
(1987)
Cell
48,
417-428
|
| 59.
|
Ranchalis, J. E.,
Gentry, L.,
Ogawa, Y.,
Seyedin, S. M.,
McPherson, J.,
Purchio, A.,
and Twardzik, D. R.
(1987)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
148,
783-789
|
| 60.
|
Arteaga, C. L.,
Coffey, R. J., Jr.,
Dugger, T. C.,
McCutchen, C. M.,
Moses, H. L.,
and Lyons, R. M.
(1990)
Cell Growth Differ.
1,
367-374
|
| 61.
|
Arteaga, C. L.,
Tandon, A. K.,
Von Hoff, D. D.,
and Osborne, C. K.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
3898-3904
|
| 62.
|
Ashley, D. M.,
Kong, F. M.,
Bigner, D. D.,
and Hale, L. P.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
302-309
|
| 63.
|
Price-Schiavi, S. A.,
Zhu, X.,
Aquinin, R.,
and Carraway, K. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
17800-17807
|
| 64.
|
Steiner, M. S.,
and Barrack, E. R.
(1992)
Mol. Endocrinol.
6,
15-25
|
| 65.
|
Friess, H.,
Yamanaka, Y.,
Buchler, M.,
Berger, H. G.,
Kobrin, M. S.,
Baldwin, R. L.,
and Korc, M.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
2704-2707
|
| 66.
|
Kelly, D. L.,
and Rizzino, A.
(1999)
Anticancer Res.
19,
4791-4807
|
| 67.
|
Bascom, C. C.,
Wolfshohl, J. R.,
Coffey, R. J., Jr.,
Madisen, L.,
Webb, N. R.,
Purchio, A. R.,
Derynck, R.,
and Moses, H. L.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
5508-5515
|
| 68.
|
Ho, J. J.,
and Kim, Y. S.
(1994)
Pancreas
9,
674-691
|
| 69.
|
Brand, N. J.,
Petkovich, M.,
and Chambon, P.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
6799-6806
|
| 70.
|
Issing, W. J.,
and Wustrow, T. P.
(1996)
Anticancer Res.
16,
2373-2377
|
| 71.
|
Benbrook, D.,
Lernhardt, E.,
and Pfahl, M.
(1988)
Nature
333,
669-672
|
| 72.
|
Krust, A.,
Kastner, P.,
Petkovich, M.,
Zelent, A.,
and Chambon, P.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
5310-5314
|
| 73.
|
Derynck, R.,
Jarrett, J. A.,
Chen, E. Y.,
Eaton, D. H.,
Bell, J. R.,
Assoian, R. K.,
Roberts, A. B.,
Sporn, M. B.,
and Goeddel, D. V.
(1985)
Nature
316,
701-705
|
| 74.
|
de Martin, R.,
Haendler, B.,
Hofer-Warbinek, R.,
Gaugitsch, H.,
Wrann, M.,
Schlusener, H.,
Seifert, J. M.,
Bodmer, S.,
Fontana, A.,
and Hofer, E.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
3673-3677
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C Alliende, Y-J Kwon, M Brito, C Molina, S Aguilera, P Perez, L Leyton, A F G Quest, U Mandel, E Veerman, et al.
Reduced sulfation of muc5b is linked to xerostomia in patients with Sjogren syndrome
Ann Rheum Dis,
October 1, 2008;
67(10):
1480 - 1487.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Chaturvedi, A. P. Singh, and S. K. Batra
Structure, evolution, and biology of the MUC4 mucin
FASEB J,
April 1, 2008;
22(4):
966 - 981.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C Fleisch, C. A Maxwell, and M.-H. Barcellos-Hoff
The pleiotropic roles of transforming growth factor beta in homeostasis and carcinogenesis of endocrine organs.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
June 1, 2006;
13(2):
379 - 400.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T H El-Metwally, M R Hussein, S K. Abd-El-Ghaffar, M M Abo-El-Naga, A B Ulrich, and P M Pour
Retinoic acid can induce markers of endocrine transdifferentiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: preliminary observations from an in vitro cell line model
J. Clin. Pathol.,
June 1, 2006;
59(6):
603 - 610.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Keino, S. Masli, S. Sasaki, J. W. Streilein, and J. Stein-Streilein
CD8+ T Regulatory Cells Use a Novel Genetic Program that Includes CD103 to Suppress Th1 Immunity in Eye-Derived Tolerance.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
April 1, 2006;
47(4):
1533 - 1542.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Segara, A. V. Biankin, J. G. Kench, C. C. Langusch, A. C. Dawson, D. A. Skalicky, D. C. Gotley, M. J. Coleman, R. L. Sutherland, and S. M. Henshall
Expression of HOXB2, a Retinoic Acid Signaling Target in Pancreatic Cancer and Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2005;
11(9):
3587 - 3596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. W. Chu, S. Balzar, G. J. Seedorf, J. Y. Westcott, J. B. Trudeau, P. Silkoff, and S. E. Wenzel
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}2 Induces Bronchial Epithelial Mucin Expression in Asthma
Am. J. Pathol.,
October 1, 2004;
165(4):
1097 - 1106.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Moniaux, G. C. Varshney, S. C. Chauhan, M. C. Copin, M. Jain, U. A. Wittel, M. Andrianifahanana, J.-P. Aubert, and S. K. Batra
Generation and Characterization of Anti-MUC4 Monoclonal Antibodies Reactive with Normal and Cancer Cells in Humans
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
February 1, 2004;
52(2):
253 - 261.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Singh, N. Moniaux, S. C. Chauhan, J. L. Meza, and S. K. Batra
Inhibition of MUC4 Expression Suppresses Pancreatic Tumor Cell Growth and Metastasis
Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2004;
64(2):
622 - 630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Hori, S. Spurr-Michaud, C. L. Russo, P. Argueso, and I. K. Gipson
Differential Regulation of Membrane-Associated Mucins in the Human Ocular Surface Epithelium
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
January 1, 2004;
45(1):
114 - 122.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Li and K. H. Kim
Effects of Ethanol on Embryonic and Neonatal Rat Testes in Organ Cultures
J Androl,
September 1, 2003;
24(5):
653 - 660.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Fischer, J. G. Cuellar, M. L. Diehl, A. M. deFreytas, J. Zhang, K. L. Carraway, and J. A. Voynow
Neutrophil elastase increases MUC4 expression in normal human bronchial epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
April 1, 2003;
284(4):
L671 - L679.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Liu, J. R. Lague, D. P. Nunes, P. Toselli, F. G. Oppenheim, R. V. Soares, R. F. Troxler, and G. D. Offner
Expression of Membrane-associated Mucins MUC1 and MUC4 in Major Human Salivary Glands
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
June 1, 2002;
50(6):
811 - 820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Samuel, C. N. Nagineni, R. K. Kutty, W. T. Parks, J. S. Gordon, S. M. Prouty, J. J. Hooks, and B. Wiggert
Transforming Growth Factor-beta Regulates Stearoyl Coenzyme A Desaturase Expression through a Smad Signaling Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 4, 2002;
277(1):
59 - 66.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Andrianifahanana, N. Moniaux, B. M. Schmied, J. Ringel, H. Friess, M. A. Hollingsworth, M. W. Buchler, J.-P. Aubert, and S. K. Batra
Mucin (MUC) Gene Expression in Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Chronic Pancreatitis: A Potential Role of MUC4 as a Tumor Marker of Diagnostic Significance
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 1, 2001;
7(12):
4033 - 4040.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Perrais, P. Pigny, M.-P. Buisine, N. Porchet, J.-P. Aubert, and I. Van Seuningen-Lempire
Aberrant Expression of Human Mucin Gene MUC5B in Gastric Carcinoma and Cancer Cells. IDENTIFICATION AND REGULATION OF A DISTAL PROMOTER
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 27, 2001;
276(18):
15386 - 15396.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Perrais, P. Pigny, M.-P. Ducourouble, D. Petitprez, N. Porchet, J.-P. Aubert, and I. Van Seuningen
Characterization of Human Mucin Gene MUC4 Promoter. IMPORTANCE OF GROWTH FACTORS AND PROINFLAMMATORY CYTOKINES FOR ITS REGULATION IN PANCREATIC CANCER CELLS
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 10, 2001;
276(33):
30923 - 30933.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|