|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005430200 on July 27, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 44, 34086-34091, November 3, 2000
Presenilin-1 and -2 Are Molecular Targets for -Secretase
Inhibitors*
Dietmar
Seiffert §,
Jodi D.
Bradley ,
Cynthia M.
Rominger ,
David H.
Rominger ,
Fude
Yang ,
Jere E.
Meredith Jr. ,
Qian
Wang ,
Arthur H.
Roach ,
Lorin A.
Thompson ,
Susan M.
Spitz ,
Jeffrey N.
Higaki¶,
Shimoga R.
Prakash ,
Andrew P.
Combs ,
Robert A.
Copeland ,
Stephen P.
Arneric ,
Paul R.
Hartig ,
David W.
Robertson ,
Barbara
Cordell¶,
Andrew M.
Stern ,
Richard E.
Olson , and
Robert
Zaczek
From DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19880 and ¶ Scios Incorporation, Sunnyvale, California 94086
Received for publication, June 21, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Presenilins are integral membrane protein
involved in the production of amyloid -protein. Mutations of
the presenilin-1 and -2 gene are associated with familial Alzheimer's
disease and are thought to alter -secretase cleavage of the
-amyloid precursor protein, leading to increased production of
longer and more amyloidogenic forms of A , the 4-kDa -peptide.
Here, we show that radiolabeled -secretase inhibitors bind to
mammalian cell membranes, and a benzophenone analog specifically
photocross-links three major membrane polypeptides. A positive
correlation is observed among these compounds for inhibition of
cellular A formation, inhibition of membrane binding and
cross-linking. Immunological techniques establish N- and C-terminal
fragments of presenilin-1 as specifically cross-linked polypeptides.
Furthermore, binding of -secretase inhibitors to embryonic membranes
derived from presenilin-1 knockout embryos is reduced in a gene
dose-dependent manner. In addition, C-terminal fragments of
presenilin-2 are specifically cross-linked. Taken together, these
results indicate that potent and selective -secretase inhibitors
block A formation by binding to presenilin-1 and -2.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
-Amyloid precursor protein
( APP)1 is a transmembrane
protein that undergoes processing to A by proteolytic activities
known as - and -secretases (for review, see Refs. 1-3). The
-secretase cleavage occurs in the extracellular domain by a recently
identified aspartyl protease variously termed BACE, memapsin, and
Asp2 (4-9), whereas the heterogeneous -secretase cleavage
occurs in the transmembrane domain (2, 10). Dominant mutations in
either of the two human presenilin (PS-1 and PS-2) genes lead to
familial Alzheimer's disease (AD). PS-1 and -2 are polytopic membrane
proteins (for review, see Refs. 11-13). Presenilins are proteolytic
processed. In vivo, only small amounts of the holoprotein
can be detected, primarily in the nuclear envelope, whereas 30-kDa
N-terminal and 20-kDa C-terminal fragments of presenilin are observed
in all mammalian tissues and cell lines analyzed so far.
Coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that presenilin fragments
are assembled into a high molecular weight complex together with other
proteins (for review see 11-13). The proposed mechanism through which
the presenilin mutations cause AD is an alteration in the predominant
-secretase cleavage site which increases the amount of the longer,
more amyloidogenic A 1-42(43) fragments produced (11-13). A null
mutation of the mouse PS-1 selectively reduces -secretase activity
(14), and site-directed mutagenesis of PS-1 and PS-2 at two conserved
aspartyl residues, which resemble the catalytic center of aspartyl
proteases, also reduces -secretase activity (15, 16). These
observations indicate that PS-1 and PS-2 either stimulate the activity
of -secretase by trafficking to appropriate cellular compartments,
serve as cofactors of the -secretase, or are -secretase themselves.
Here, we report that a series of potent and selective -secretase
inhibitors bind to mammalian cell membranes and specifically cross-link
to three major polypeptides. Immunological techniques identified PS-1
and PS-2 as the major, specifically cross-linked polypeptides. These
results indicate that this series of potent and selective -secretase
inhibitors blocks A formation by binding to PS-1 and PS-2
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Binding Assays--
Binding assays using
[3H]Compound A (see Table I; 87.5 Ci/mmol) were performed
using standard methods (17). THP-1 cells were grown in Spinner cultures
in RPMI 1640 containing L-glutamine (Life Technologies,
Inc.) and 10 µM -mercaptoethanol to a density of
5 × 105/ml. Cells were harvested by centrifugation,
and cell pellets were quick frozen in dry ice/ethanol and stored at
70 °C prior to use. The pellets of approximately 2 × 108 THP-1 cells were homogenized in 10 ml of either 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, or 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, at
4 °C, using a Brinkmann Polytron at setting 6 for 10 s. The
homogenate was centrifuged at 48,000 × g for 12 min,
and the resulting pellet was washed by repeating the homogenization and
centrifugation steps. The final cell pellet was resuspended in buffer
to yield a protein concentration of approximately 0.5 mg/ml. Assays
were initiated by the addition of 150 µl of membrane suspension to
150 µl of assay buffer containing 0.064 µCi of radioligand and
various concentrations of unlabeled compounds. Binding assays were
performed in duplicate in polypropylene 96- well plates (Costar,
Cambridge, MA) in a final volume of 0.3 ml of 50 mM Hepes,
pH 7.0, or 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 5% (v/v)
dimethyl sulfoxide. Nonspecific binding was defined in the presence of 300 nM Compound E or as indicated in the figure
legends. After incubating at 23 °C for 1.3 h (or as indicated
in the figure legends), the separation of bound from free radioligand
was accomplished by filtration over GFF glass fiber filters (Inotech
Biosystems International, Lansing, MI) presoaked in 0.3% ethyleneimine
polymer solution using an Inotech cell harvester. Filters were washed three times with 0.3 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.0, containing 0.01% Triton X-100. Filters were assessed for radioactivity
by liquid scintillation counting using a Packard 2500 TR (Packard
Instrument Co., Downers Grove, IL). Ki values of
competing compounds were derived through Cheng-Prussoff correction of
IC50 values calculated using the program GraphPad Prism by
GraphPad Software (San Diego, CA).
Cross-linking Studies--
THP-1 membranes for cross-linking
studies were prepared as outlined for the binding studies. Membranes
were preincubated for 30 min at room temperature with labeled Compound
C in the presence or absence of unlabeled competitors. Photolysis at
365 nm was performed for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes
were harvested by centrifugation (40,000 × g for 20 min), resuspended in SDS sample buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (18).
The following experiments were performed to optimize the cross-linking
conditions. (i) The membrane protein concentration was varied from 1 to
10 mg/ml. (ii) Ligand concentrations were varied from 10 to 120 nM. (iii) Cross-linking temperature was varied between
4 °C and room temperature. Overall, the specifically labeled
polypeptides patterns were not altered by any of the above procedures.
In addition, the intensity of the labeling increased between 5 and 30 min of UV illumination and plateaued thereafter. The cross-linking
experiments presented in this manuscript were all performed with 1 h of illumination. Similar gel patterns were obtained when samples were
analyzed under nonreducing and reducing conditions. However, boiling
for extended periods of time resulted in multimerization and
disappearance of specifically labeled polypeptides.
Immunoprecipitation Studies--
THP-1 membranes (10 mg/ml) were
incubated with radiolabeled Compound C (120 nM) for 30 min
at room temperature followed by photolysis at room temperature for
1 h. The membranes were harvested by centrifugation (40,000 × g for 20 min) and extracted (10 mg of membrane
proteins/ml of extraction buffer) with 2% CHAPS, 50 mM
Tris buffer, pH 7.4, for 1 h at 4 °C in the presence of
complete protease inhibitors (one tablet of protease inhibitors/25 ml
of extraction buffer; Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The membrane extract was centrifuged at 40,000 × g for 20 min.
Similar results were obtained with membrane extracts centrifuged at
100,000 × g for 1 h. Comparison of different
extraction procedures revealed that 2% CHAPS quantitatively
solubilized the cross-linked polypeptides compared with SDS sample
buffer, which was assumed to solubilize the membrane proteins
completely. The membrane extract was diluted with an equal volume of
distilled water and preabsorbed (1 h; 4 °C) with normal mouse serum
(10 µl/ml of extract) and goat anti-mouse IgG-Sepharose (Sigma). The
beads were removed by centrifugation followed by the addition of
antibodies to PS-1 (10 µg/ml) and goat anti-mouse IgG-Sepharose for
16 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times with 1% CHAPS
in binding buffer (1 ml each wash) and three times with
phosphate-buffered saline (1 ml each wash). Bound proteins were eluted
by boiling (approximately 3 min) in SDS sample buffer and analyzed by
SDS-PAGE (18) and fluorography. For immunoprecipitation of PS-2
fragments, the CHAPS extract was preabsorbed with normal rabbit serum,
and protein A-Sepharose (Sigma) was used instead of the anti-mouse
IgG-Sepharose.
Large Scale Affinity Purification of Cross-linked
Polypeptides--
Normal mouse IgG (Sigma) or anti-PS-1 IgG was
immobilized to an agarose matrix (AminoLink Plus Immobilization Kit) at
2 mg/ml of beads according to the manufacturer's instructions
(Pierce). THP-1 membrane extracts (5 mg/ml membrane proteins) in 1%
CHAPS, 25 mM Tris, pH 7.4, were applied by batch absorption
(16 h; room temperature) to the normal mouse IgG column. The nonbound
fraction was recovered by centrifugation and applied by batch
absorption (16 h; room temperature) to the PS-1 column. Both columns
were washed extensively in parallel with 1% CHAPS, 25 mM
Tris, pH 7.4, followed by 1% CHAPS in distilled water and eluted (15 min; room temperature) with 0.1 M glycine, 0.5% CHAPS, pH
2.3. The elution fractions were neutralized immediately by the addition
of 1 M Tris, pH 9.5. For immunoblotting analysis,
polypeptides were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and analyzed
as described (19). Prestained molecular size markers were obtained from
Life Technologies, Inc.
Determination of A Levels by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent
Assay--
The ability of compounds to lower A secretion was tested
using Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing wild-type APP as
described previously (20) and Roach et
al.2 Briefly, confluent
cells were incubated with a range of concentrations of compounds for
16 h in serum-free medium containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin.
A 1-40 in the resultant conditioned media was quantified by
sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a position 40 neoepitope-specific monoclonal antibody and a biotinylated monoclonal
antibody directed to A residues 10-20.
Compound Synthesis and Labeling--
Compounds A-D and F and G
were prepared according to the general synthesis strategy shown in
Scheme 1 following the methods described
in PCT application WO 00/07995.
t-Butoxycarbonyl-caprolactam 1 was
deprotonated with lithium diisopropylamide and alkylated with a
benzylic halide to introduce the diaryl ether or benzophenone substituent. In the case of Compound G, 3-iodobenzyl bromide was employed, which allowed the subsequent construction of the biaryl group
using Suzuki coupling. The t-butoxycarbonyl group was
removed using trifluoroacetic acid and the resulting amine was coupled to a substituted succinic acid derivative using the coupling agent hexafluorophosphate in the presence of diisopropylethylamine. The
succinic acid derivatives were prepared using Evans' oxazolidinone methodology according to published procedures (21 and WO 97/18207). After coupling, the t-butyl ester was removed using
trifluoroacetic acid and the primary amide was prepared using
hexafluorophosphate and excess gaseous ammonia. Compound D was prepared
in an analogous fashion using
3-(S)-amino-1-methyl-5-phenyl-1,3-dihydro-benzo[e](1,4)diazepin-2-one as described in PCT application WO 00/07995. Compound E was prepared according to WO 98/28268.
[3H]Compound C was labeled at the propyl site chain by
reduction in the presence of tritium gas. Briefly, to a reaction vessel containing a stirred solution of
(2-allyl-N4-[1-(3-benzoyl-benzyl)-2-oxo-azepan-3-yl]-3-isobutyl-succinamide, 10 mg) in tetrahydrofuran (2 ml) was added 10% palladium on carbon (10 mg). The reaction vessel was evacuated and degassed via a freeze-thaw
evacuation cycle and then exposed to tritium gas (50 Ci). After 30 min,
unreacted tritium gas was removed, and the catalyst was filtered from
the reaction mixture. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and
the labile tritium was further removed by evaporation with methanol
(three times 2 ml). The residue was dissolved in 0.1% aqueous
trifluoroacetic acid/methanol (50:50; 10 ml) and purified on a
reversed-phase HPLC column (Zorbax SB- C18, 25 × 0.92 cm) using
50% acetonitrile in 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid as the mobile
phase (flow rate 2 ml/min). Fractions containing the product were
pooled, and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The product
was dissolved in ethanol (145 mCi, 15.5 mCi/ml). HPLC analysis (Vydac
protein-peptide C18, 0.46 × 25 cm, 30% methanol in 0.05%
aqueous trifluoroacetic acid for 5 min, 15-min gradient to 95%
methanol in 0.05% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid, 1 ml/min) indicated
the radiochemical purity to be greater than 99%. MS (FAB):
m/z, 526 (most abundant ion), 3H NMR
(proton decoupled, 320 MHz, CDCl3): multiplets at 0.83, 1.21.
Miscellaneous--
The N-terminal monoclonal antibody to PS-1
(clone 614) was raised to a glutathione S-transferase fusion
protein expressed in bacteria containing the N-terminal 77 residues of
PS-1. The C-terminal monoclonal antibody (clone 361) was obtained by
immunizing mice with a synthetic peptide to PS-1 residues 309-331. Rat
anti-PS-1 N-terminal monoclonal antibody and PS-1 polyclonal antibodies were obtained from Chemicon. Antibodies to PS-2 were kindly provided by
Bart De Strooper. Embryonic tissue from PS-1 and PS-2 gene target
animals was provided by Bart De Strooper and Paul Saftig.
 |
RESULTS |
Correlation between Cellular Potency and Membrane Binding of
-Secretase Inhibitors--
We have identified a series of small
molecules (Compounds A-D, F, and G) which inhibit the formation of the
A 1-40 and 1-42 peptides in APP-transfected and nontransfected
mammalian cells with nanomolar potencies2 (Table
I). For comparison, we have also
characterized Compound E, described in the patent literature
(PCT application WO 98/28268). A formation was specifically
inhibited without any signs of cellular toxicity in in vitro
assays.2 These compounds have been classified as inhibitors
of -secretase by virtue of their ability to induce the increased
accumulation of the C-terminal 99-amino acid fragment of APP
(CT99),2 the substrate for -secretase action which
results from -secretase processing (1, 3, 11-13).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Molecules (Compounds A-G) in formation of A -Peptides
Binding assays using [3H]Compound A (87.5 Ci/mmol) were
performed using THP-1 membranes (see "Experimental Procedures").
Ki values of competing compounds were derived
through Cheng-Prussoff correction of IC50 values calculated
using the program GraphPad Prism. The ability of compounds to lower
A secretion was tested using Chinese hamster ovary cells
overexpressing wild-type APP. Briefly, confluent cells were
incubated with a range of concentrations of compounds for 16 h in
serum-free medium containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin. A X-40 in
the resultant conditioned media was quantified by sandwich
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using a position 40 neoepitope-specific mAB and a biotinylated mAB directed to A
10-20.
|
|
[3H]Compound A bound specifically and reversibly to rat
brain membranes (not shown). A survey of established mammalian cell lines was performed to identify a high expressing, easily grown cellular source for membrane binding and molecular target
identification. Of the eight lines analyzed, membranes from a human
macrophage cell line, THP-1, possessed the highest specific binding
capacity (Bmax). The Bmax
was 1,057 ± 138 (n = 2) fmol/mg THP-1 membrane protein. Association kinetics using THP-1 membranes revealed a Kd of 2.4 nM and a
t1/2 of association of 0.75 +/= 0.49 min
(n = 2). In addition, Compound A blocked A formation
in THP-1 cells (data not shown). These results suggest that THP-1 cells
contain the pharmacological site for A lowering and membrane binding.
The correlation between cellular potency (IC50 for
inhibition of A formation in Chinese hamster ovary cells
overexpressing APP) and Ki for membrane binding
is indicated in Table I for seven compounds ranging over 4 log units in
affinity; we observed a significant correlation
(r2 = 0.96; p < 0.0001 (two-tailed t test)) for displacement of a radiolabeled
-secretase inhibitor and cellular potency for A lowering. A
similar correlation was observed using Compound C (a photochemical
cross-linker) or D as ligand. Moreover, a positive correlation between
cellular potency and membrane binding was also observed in human cell
lines expressing endogenous APP, IMR32 neuroblastoma cells, and in
human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells overexpressing APP (data not
shown). These results strongly suggest that the membrane preparations
contain the intact molecular target of -secretase inhibitors.
Correlation between Membrane Binding and Photoaffinity
Cross-linking--
Photocross-linking experiments were performed to
identify the target of these -secretase inhibitors. THP-1 membranes
were preincubated with radiolabeled Compound C in the absence or
presence of the indicated unlabeled competitors. Membranes were
analyzed by binding (Fig. 1A)
or by cross-linking after exposure to UV light (Fig. 1B).
After cross-linking, membranes were harvested by centrifugation,
resuspended in SDS sample buffer, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and
analyzed by fluorography (Fig.
2B). Several major polypeptides of 43, 30, 25, 20, and 14 kDa (as well as several minor
species) were identified by the cross-linking approach. The reduction
in specific binding in the binding assay by competing with unlabeled
inhibitors (panel A) correlated with the reduction in
cross-linking intensity of the 30-, 25-, 20-, and 14-kDa polypeptides (panel B). No additional specifically labeled polypeptides
were observed when cross-linked polypeptides were analyzed by 15%
polyacrylamide gels (not shown). Importantly, a chemically similar, yet
much less potent compound (Compound B) failed to compete for
cross-linking of specifically labeled bands of 30, 25, 20, and 14 kDa
(Fig. 1B, lane 5). Also, Compound B did compete
for major cross-linking band at 43 kDa, whereas the active Compounds A
and E did not compete for the 43-kDa band. Taken together, these
observations allow us to classify the 43-kDa band as nonspecifically
labeled. Moreover, the specific cross-linking to the 30-, 25-, and
20-kDa bands was also observed in HEK 293 cells (data not shown).
Additional experiments established a dose-dependent
reduction in specific binding and cross-linking intensity. For example,
for each of the seven compounds analyzed, the corresponding pair of
dose-response curves for inhibition of binding and reduction in
photocross-linking was indistinguishable for compounds ranging over 4 log potency (0.3-7,900 nM). For example, the parallel
reduction of binding and cross-linking intensity of the 30-, 25-, and
20-kDa bands is indicated for Compound D in Fig. 2.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Correlation between binding and photoaffinity
cross-linking in THP-1 membranes. THP-1 membranes were incubated
with 10 nM [3H]Compound C (83.4 Ci/mmol) and
analyzed by filtration binding assay (panel A) or, after
cross-linking, by SDS-PAGE and fluorography (panel B).
Competition experiments with unlabeled compounds (1 µM)
established that only four of the polypeptides, indicated by the
arrowheads (30, 25, 20, and 14 kDa) were specifically
labeled. Note that reduction in cross-linking (panel B)
correlates positively with reduction in binding (panel A).
Lane 1, dimethyl sulfoxide control; lane 2,
Compound A; lane 3, Compound C; lane 4, racemic
mixture of Compound E; lane 5, Compound B.
|
|

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Correlation between binding and photaffinity
cross-linking in THP-1 membranes for Compound D. THP-1 membranes
were incubated with 10 nM [3H]Compound C
(83.4 Ci/mmol) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of
Compound D and analyzed by filtration binding assay (panel
A) or, after cross-linking, by SDS-PAGE and fluorography
(panel B) (see Fig. 1). Note that the reduction in
cross-linking (panel B) to bands of 30, 25, and 20 kDa
(arrowheads) correlates positively with reduction in binding
(panel A). Lane 1, dimethyl sulfoxide control;
lane 2, 0.3 nM Compound D; lane 3, 1 nM Compound D; lane 4, 3 nM Compound
D; lane 5, 10 nM Compound D; lane 6,
30 nM Compound D. The mobility of molecular weight markers
is indicated.
|
|
Identification of the Molecular Target of -Secretase
Inhibitors--
The molecular sizes of the cross-linked polypeptides
(11-13) are, in part, consistent with the hypothesis that presenilins are the molecular target. To determine whether Compound C cross-linked to presenilins, membranes were incubated with tritiated Compound C,
cross-linked, extracted with 2% CHAPS, and analyzed by
immunoprecipitation using antibodies to PS-1. Extraction of membranes
with 2% CHAPS quantitatively solubilized the specifically cross-linked
polypeptides. Regardless of subunit specificity, antibodies to PS-1 are
expected to immunoprecipitate both N- and C-terminal PS-1 fragments
because CHAPS extraction does not dissociate the PS-1 complex (22, 23). The major labeled polypeptides of 30 and 20 kDa coimmunoprecipitated with antibodies to PS-1 (Fig. 3). Similar
immunoprecipitation patterns were observed with three commercially
available antibodies to PS-1 (data not shown; see antibody listing
under "Experimental Procedures"). The immunoprecipitation was
specific, as shown by the disappearance of radiolabeled bands when
cross-linking was performed in the presence of excess Compound E or
when the PS-1 antibody was replaced by normal mouse IgG. In addition,
the PS-1 antibodies immunoprecipitated only the specifically
cross-linked polypeptides, whereas nonspecifically labeled bands were
not recovered in the immunoprecipitate. The latter finding rules out
precipitation of incompletely solubilized membrane fragments. It should
be noted that the antibody to the C-terminal loop region of PS-1 also
immunoprecipitated the 14-kDa polypeptide (Fig. 3A,
lane 3). Similar immunoprecipitation patterns were observed
using HEK 293 cell membranes (data not shown). When membranes were
extracted under conditions known to disrupt the PS-1 complex (in the
presence of 1% SDS), the N-terminal PS-1 antibody immunoprecipitated
only the 30-kDa band; likewise, the C-terminal antibody precipitated
only the 20-kDa band (not shown). Large scale affinity purification was
performed using the C-terminal PS-1 antibody or IgG derived from normal
mouse serum bound to Sepharose (Fig. 3B). The specifically
cross-linked bands of 30, 25, and 20 kDa bound to and eluted from the
anti PS-1 IgG column, but not normal mouse IgG column. The elution fractions of both columns were analyzed by fluorography (Fig. 3,
B1), and by silver staining (Fig. 3, B2) followed
by fluorography of the dried silver-stained gel (Fig. 3,
B3). The 30- and 20-kDa silver-stained polypeptides were
also positive in the fluorography. Moreover, immunoblotting analysis
established that the 30-kDa band reacted with antibodies to the N
terminus of PS-1 (Fig. 3, B4), whereas the 20-kDa band
reacted with antibodies to the C terminus of PS-1 (Fig. 3,
B5). It should be noted that traces of the 25-kDa
polypeptide copurified with the PS-1 C-terminal antibody (Fig. 3,
B1); however, this band was not detected by immunoblotting
using N- or C-terminal PS-1 antibodies. These observations suggest that
the 25-kDa band copurified with the PS-1 complex. The involvement of
PS-1 in compound binding was confirmed in binding studies using
membranes from PS-1 knock-out embryos (14). A gene
dose-dependent reduction in binding was observed (Fig.
4). It should be noted that even in the
absence of PS-1 expression, residual specific binding of approximately
25% of the wild-type animals was observed. These results suggest that
PS-1 is not the only binding site for the compounds under study.
Incorporation of radioactivity into the 14-kDa band varied among
several THP-1 and HEK 293 cell preparations. Based on the observed
variability, this band was not a focus of this study.

View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Immunopurification identifies PS-1 as the
molecular target for -secretase
inhibitors. Panel A, immunoprecipitation of
radiolabeled polypeptides with PS-1 antibodies. THP-1 membranes were
incubated with 120 nM [3H]Compound C in the
absence or presence of Compound E. After cross-linking, membranes were
extracted with CHAPS and analyzed by immunoprecipitation using
anti-human PS-1 IgG (to either the N terminus or C-terminal loop).
Bound proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by
SDS-PAGE (11%) and fluorography. The band below 14 kDa in lanes
1 and 5 represents free cross-linker comigrating with
the dye front. Lane 1, CHAPS extract, no competition;
lane 2, immunoprecipitation with PS-1 N-terminal monoclonal
antibody; lane 3, immunoprecipitation with PS-1 C-terminal
loop antibody; lane 4, immunoprecipitation with normal mouse
IgG control; lane 5, CHAPS extract, specific cross-linking
competed by unlabeled Compound E (racemic mixture); lane 6,
immunoprecipitation PS-1 N-terminal monoclonal antibody using CHAPS
extract from cross-linking competed by unlabeled Compound E (racemic
mixture). Panel B, affinity purification of photoaffinity
cross-linked PS-1. THP-1 membranes were photoaffinity cross-linked as
in panel A. The resulting CHAPS extracts were applied to a
normal mouse IgG column followed by a PS-1 (C-terminal loop) antibody
column. The columns were washed extensively and eluted with 0.5%
CHAPS, 0.1 M glycine, pH 2.3. The elution fractions were
analyzed by fluorography (B1) and silver staining
(B2). Note the presence of the 30- and 20-kDa band in the
elution of the PS-1 (lane 1) but not the mouse IgG column
(lane 2). Fluorography of the silver-stained gel revealed
that the 30- and 20-kDa bands contain the majority of radioactivity
(B3). The 30-kDa band was detected by immunoblotting with
monoclonal antibodies to the N terminus of PS-1 (B4),
whereas the 200-kDa band was detected by monoclonal antibodies to the
C-terminal loop of PS-1 (B5). In panels B1-B5,
lane 1 is the elution from anti-PS-1-Sepharose, and
lane 2 is the elution from normal mouse IgG-Sepharose.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Binding of labeled
-secretase inhibitors to PS-1 knockout embryonic
membranes. Embryos from PS-1 knockout mice were tested at E17-18.
Whole embryos were homogenized in buffer (10% w/v), and membranes were
prepared. The final pellet was resuspended in buffer at a protein
concentration of approximately 8-10 mg/ml original wet weight.
Radioligand binding assays were performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures," the ligand used was
[3H]Compound D (86 Ci/mmol). Specific binding was
determined using 0.064 µCi of [3H]Compound D and 300 nM Compound E to define nonspecific binding. Data are mean
values of four animals for each group and are expressed as a percentage
of specific binding observed in wild type embryos; ** indicates
p < 0.01 as determined by one-way analysis of variance
and Dunnett's tests.
|
|
The involvement of PS-2 in binding and cross-linking was further
analyzed (Fig. 5). Membranes from THP-1
cells were cross-linked and extracted as for the PS-1 experiments and
analyzed by immunoprecipitation using antibodies to PS-2. The extract
contained the major specifically labeled polypeptides of 30, 25, and 20 kDa (Fig. 5, lane 1). Immunoprecipitation with both N- and
C-terminal specific polyclonal antibodies to PS-2 identified the 25-kDa
fragment as PS-2 related (Fig. 5, lanes 2 and 3).
Control immunoprecipitation experiments using normal rabbit IgG
established that the immunoprecipitation was specific (Fig. 5,
lane 4). The 25-kDa fragment was the only band specifically stained in THP-1 membrane extracts by immunoblotting using the PS-2
C-terminal antibody (not shown). Moreover, the 25-kDa band comigrated
with the PS-2 C-terminal fragment derived by in vitro transcription and translation of a 5'-truncated PS-2 cDNA (not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that potent and selective -secretase inhibitors block A formation by binding to
PS-1 and -2.

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Immunoprecipitation identifies PS-2 as the
molecular target for -secretase
inhibitors. THP-1 membranes were incubated with 120 nM
[3H]Compound C. After cross-linking, membranes were
extracted with CHAPS and analyzed by immunoprecipitation using
anti-human PS-2 IgG (to either the N terminus or C-terminal loop).
Bound proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by
SDS-PAGE (11%) and fluorography. Lane 1, CHAPS extract;
lane 2, immunoprecipitation with PS-2 N-terminal antibody;
lane 3, immunoprecipitation with PS-2 C-terminal loop
antibody; lane 4, immunoprecipitation with normal rabbit IgG
control.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The studies presented here provide evidence that the described
small molecule -secretase inhibitors bind to PS-1 and PS-2. This
conclusion is based on the molecular size of specifically labeled
polypeptides, cross-linking to PS-1 and PS-2 as shown by
immunoprecipitation with PS-1 and PS-2 specific antibodies, and reduced
binding to membranes derived from PS-1 gene-targeted embryos.
Compound C labels both N- and C-terminal PS-1 fragments with similar
intensity. The photoaffinity ligand employed is monovalent, and the
binding isotherms for THP-1 membranes are consistent with a single high
affinity binding site. These results suggest that the compound is
labeling an area of the PS-1 complex of close proximity of N- and
C-terminal fragments. Interestingly, modeling studies suggest that two
highly conserved Asp residues (Asp-257, Asp-385; PS-1 numbering)
necessary for PS-1 and PS-2 function are in close proximity in adjacent
transmembrane loops comprised of N- and C-terminal PS fragments (15,
16). The positive correlation between cellular potency and membrane
binding suggests that the compounds can easily penetrate and possibly
insert into the transmembrane domains of PS-1. If PS-1 itself is an
aspartyl protease required for -secretase cleavage, it is tempting
to speculate that these inhibitors bind in the transmembrane region
near the putative catalytic site.
It should be noted that Wolfe et al. (15) suggested that the
PS-1 holoprotein is a zymogen and requires proteolytic activation for
biological activity. In this respect, we currently aim to address the
question of whether cleavage of PS-1 and incorporation into the high
molecular weight PS-1 complex are prerequisites for binding and
cross-linking. In addition, the binding and cross-linking to PS-1
familial AD mutants are currently being analyzed. It should be noted
that Compound A inhibits A production in human fibroblasts derived
from the familial AD A246E mutation followed transient transfection
with APP.
PS-1 and PS-2 are the major molecular target for this series of
-secretase inhibitors. The 30- and 20-kDa specifically labeled polypeptides are, based on immunological characterization, N- and
C-terminal PS-1 fragments. Moreover, the 25-kDa specifically cross-linked polypeptide was identified as the C-terminal fragment of
PS-2. Interestingly, little if any labeling of the N-terminal fragment
of PS-2 was observed. This result suggests that the compound binding
pockets in PS-1 and PS-2 are distinct. The involvement of PS-2 in
binding and cross-linking is consistent with the observation of
residual specific binding to membranes derived from
PS-1 / animals. The compounds employed in this study
completely blocked A formation in mammalian cells,2
whereas A production in cells derived from PS-1 gene-targeted mice
is reduced only by 50-70% (14), and no inhibition is observed in
cells derived from single PS-2 knockout animals (24). Furthermore, A
was reported as undetectable in cells derived from both PS-1 and PS-2
double knockout animals.3 These
results are consistent with binding of -secretase inhibitors to PS-1
and PS-2.
In summary, the results of the present study further link the
involvement of PS-1 and PS-2 to -secretase action since small molecule -secretase inhibitors bind to PS-1 and PS-2. These studies define PS-1 and PS-2 as the molecular target for -secretase
inhibitors developed for the pharmacological treatment of AD.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: E400/3253, Experimental
Station, DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, P.O. Box 80400, Wilmington, DE
19880. Tel.: 302-695-7069; Fax: 302-695-8313; E-mail: Dietmar.A.Seiffert@DuPontpharma.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005430200
2
A. H. Roach, D. Seiffert, L. A. Thompson,
B. Cordell, J. N. Higaki, R. E. Olson, and R. Zaczek, unpublished observations.
3
Herreman, A., Serneels, L., Annaert, W., Collen,
D., Schoonjans, L., and De Strooper, B. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol.
2, 461-462.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
APP, -amyloid
precursor protein;
A , 4-kDa amyloid -peptide;
PS, presenilin;
AD, Alzheimer's disease;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Selkoe, D. J.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
10,
373-403
|
| 2.
|
Selkoe, D. J.
(1999)
Nature
399,
A23-A31
|
| 3.
|
Hooper, N. M.,
Karran, E. H.,
and Turner, A. J.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
321,
265-279
|
| 4.
|
De Strooper, B.,
and Koenig, G.
(1999)
Nature
402,
471-472
|
| 5.
| Hussain, I., Howlett, D. R., Powell, D. J., Tew, D., Meek,
T., Simmons, D. L., Walsh, F. S., Dingwall, C., and Christie,
G. (1999) Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
www.academicpress.com/www/journal/cn/mence. 1999.0811/
|
| 6.
|
Lin, X.,
Koelsch, G.,
Wu, S.,
Downs, D.,
Dashiti, A.,
and Tang, J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
1456-1460
|
| 7.
|
Sinha, S.,
Anderson, J. P.,
Barbour, R.,
Basi, G. S.,
Caccavello, R.,
Davis, D.,
Doan, M.,
Dovey, H. F.,
Frigon, N.,
Hong, J.,
Jacobson-Croak, K.,
Jewett, N.,
Kelm, P.,
Knops, J.,
Liebergurg, I.,
Power, M.,
Tan, H.,
Tasuno, G.,
Tung, J.,
Schenk, D.,
Seubert, P.,
Suomensaarf, S. M.,
Wang, S.,
Walker, D.,
Zhao, J.,
McConlogue, L.,
and Varghese, J.
(1999)
Nature
402,
537-540
|
| 8.
|
Vassar, R.,
Bennett, B. D.,
Babu-Khan, S.,
Kahn, S.,
Mendiaz, E. A.,
Denis, P.,
Teplow, D. B.,
Ross, S.,
Amarante, P.,
Loeloff, R.,
Luo, Y.,
Fisher, S.,
Fuller, J.,
Edenson, S.,
Lile, J.,
Jaronski, M. A.,
Biere, A. L.,
Curran, E.,
Burgess, T.,
Louis, J. C.,
Collins, F.,
Treanor, J.,
Rogers, G.,
and Citron, M.
(1999)
Science
286,
735-741
|
| 9.
|
Yan, R.,
Bienkowski, M. J.,
Shuck, M. E.,
Miao, H.,
Tory, M. C.,
Pauley, A. M.,
Brashler, J. R.,
Stratman, N. C.,
Rodney Matthews, W.,
Buhl, A. E.,
Carter, D. B.,
Tomasselli, A. G.,
Parodi, L. A.,
Heirikson, R. L.,
and Gurney, M. E.
(1999)
Nature
402,
533-537
|
| 10.
|
Moore, C. L.,
and Wolfe, M. S.
(1999)
Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents
9,
135-146
|
| 11.
|
Czech, C.,
Tremp, G.,
and Pradier, L.
(2000)
Prog. Neurobiol.
60,
363-384
|
| 12.
|
Haass, C.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
687-690
|
| 13.
|
Haass, C.,
and De Strooper, B.
(1999)
Science
286,
916-919
|
| 14.
|
De Strooper, B.,
Saftig, P.,
Craessaerts, K.,
Vanderstichele, H.,
Guhde, G.,
Annaert, W.,
von Figura, K.,
and van Leuven, F.
(1998)
Nature
391,
387-390
|
| 15.
|
Wolfe, M. S.,
Zia, W.,
Ostaszewski, B. L.,
Diehl, T. S.,
Kimberly, W. T.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(1999)
Nature
398,
513-517
|
| 16.
|
Steiner, H.,
Duff, K.,
Capell, A.,
Romig, H.,
Grim, M. G.,
Lincoln, S.,
Hardy, J., Yu, X.,
Picciano, M.,
Fechteler, K.,
Citron, M.,
Kopan, R.,
Pesold, B.,
Keck, S.,
Baader, M.,
Tomita, T.,
Iwatsubo, T.,
Baumeister, R.,
and Haass, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28669-28673
|
| 17.
|
Keen, M.
(1999)
in
Receptor Binding Techniques
(Walker, J. M., ed)
, p. 106, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
|
| 18.
|
Laemmli, U.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-68
|
| 19.
|
Harlow, E.,
and Lane, D.
(1999)
Using Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 20.
|
Higaki, J.,
Chakravarty, S.,
Bryant, C.,
Cowart, L.,
Harden, P.,
Scandina, J.,
Mavunkel, B.,
Luedtke, G.,
and Cordell, B.
(1999)
J.Med.Chem.
42,
3889-3898
|
| 21.
|
Beckett, R. P.,
Crimmin, M. J.,
Davis, M. H.,
and Spavold, Z.
(1993)
Synlett
2,
137-138
|
| 22.
|
Capell, A.,
Grunberg, J.,
Pesold, B.,
Diehlmann, A.,
Citron, M.,
Nixon, R.,
Beyreuther, K.,
Selkoe, D. J.,
and Haass, C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
3205-3211
|
| 23.
|
Yu, G.,
Chen, F.,
Levesque, G.,
Nishimura, M.,
Zhang, D.-M.,
Levesque, L.,
Rogaeva, E.,
Xu, D.,
Liang, Y.,
Duthie, M.,
St. George-Hyslop, H. P.,
and Fraser, P. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16470-16475
|
| 24.
|
Herreman, A.,
Hartman, D.,
Annaert, W.,
Saftig, P.,
Craessaerts, K.,
Serneels, L.,
Umans, L.,
Huylebroeck, D.,
Zwijsen, A.,
van Leuven, F.,
and De Strooper, B.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
11872-11877
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. B. Kumar, M. Franko, W. A. Banks, P. Kasinadhuni, S. A. Farr, K. Vyas, V. Choudhuri, and J. E. Morley
Increase in Presenilin 1 (PS1) levels in senescence-accelerated mice (SAMP8) may indirectly impair memory by affecting amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing
J. Exp. Biol.,
February 15, 2009;
212(4):
494 - 498.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Placanica, L. Tarassishin, G. Yang, E. Peethumnongsin, S.-H. Kim, H. Zheng, S. S. Sisodia, and Y.-M. Li
Pen2 and Presenilin-1 Modulate the Dynamic Equilibrium of Presenilin-1 and Presenilin-2 {gamma}-Secretase Complexes
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 30, 2009;
284(5):
2967 - 2977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Elzinga, C. Twomey, J. C. Powell, F. Harte, and J. V. McCarthy
Interleukin-1 Receptor Type 1 Is a Substrate for {gamma}-Secretase-dependent Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 16, 2009;
284(3):
1394 - 1409.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sato, K. Ananda, C. I. Cheng, E. J. Suh, S. Narayanan, and M. S. Wolfe
Distinct Pharmacological Effects of Inhibitors of Signal Peptide Peptidase and {gamma}-Secretase
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 28, 2008;
283(48):
33287 - 33295.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Burton, J. E. Meredith, D. M. Barten, M. E. Goldstein, C. M. Krause, C. J. Kieras, L. Sisk, L. G. Iben, C. Polson, M. W. Thompson, et al.
The Amyloid-{beta} Rise and {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitor Potency Depend on the Level of Substrate Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 22, 2008;
283(34):
22992 - 23003.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Zhang, Y. Yang, P. A. Zweidler-McKay, and D. P.M. Hughes
Critical Role of Notch Signaling in Osteosarcoma Invasion and Metastasis
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2008;
14(10):
2962 - 2969.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. S. Liang, T. Dunckley, T. G. Beach, A. Grover, D. Mastroeni, K. Ramsey, R. J. Caselli, W. A. Kukull, D. McKeel, J. C. Morris, et al.
Altered neuronal gene expression in brain regions differentially affected by Alzheimer's disease: a reference data set
Physiol Genomics,
April 1, 2008;
33(2):
240 - 256.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. G. Iben, R. E. Olson, L. A. Balanda, S. Jayachandra, B. J. Robertson, V. Hay, J. Corradi, C. V. C. Prasad, R. Zaczek, C. F. Albright, et al.
Signal Peptide Peptidase and {gamma}-Secretase Share Equivalent Inhibitor Binding Pharmacology
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 21, 2007;
282(51):
36829 - 36836.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Cummings, R. Doody, and C. Clark
Disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease: Challenges to early intervention
Neurology,
October 16, 2007;
69(16):
1622 - 1634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Goldstein, Y. Cao, T. Fiedler, J. Toyn, L. Iben, D. M. Barten, M. Pierdomenico, J. Corsa, C. V. C. Prasad, R. E. Olson, et al.
Ex Vivo Occupancy of {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors Correlates with Brain beta-Amyloid Peptide Reduction in Tg2576 Mice
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
October 1, 2007;
323(1):
102 - 108.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Urra, C. A. Escudero, P. Ramos, F. Lisbona, E. Allende, P. Covarrubias, J. I. Parraguez, N. Zampieri, M. V. Chao, W. Annaert, et al.
TrkA Receptor Activation by Nerve Growth Factor Induces Shedding of the p75 Neurotrophin Receptor Followed by Endosomal {gamma}-Secretase-mediated Release of the p75 Intracellular Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 9, 2007;
282(10):
7606 - 7615.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-F. Liao, B.-J. Wang, W.-M. Hsu, H. Lee, C.-Y. Liao, S.-Y. Wu, H.-T. Cheng, and M.-K. Hu
Unnatural Amino Acid-Substituted (Hydroxyethyl)urea Peptidomimetics Inhibit {gamma}-Secretase and Promote the Neuronal Differentiation of Neuroblastoma Cells
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 2007;
71(2):
588 - 601.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Landman, S. Y. Jeong, S. Y. Shin, S. V. Voronov, G. Serban, M. S. Kang, M. K. Park, G. Di Paolo, S. Chung, and T.-W. Kim
Presenilin mutations linked to familial Alzheimer's disease cause an imbalance in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate metabolism
PNAS,
December 19, 2006;
103(51):
19524 - 19529.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Palomero, W. K. Lim, D. T. Odom, M. L. Sulis, P. J. Real, A. Margolin, K. C. Barnes, J. O'Neil, D. Neuberg, A. P. Weng, et al.
NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth
PNAS,
November 28, 2006;
103(48):
18261 - 18266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. E. Clarke, I. Churcher, S. Ellis, J. D. J. Wrigley, H. D. Lewis, T. Harrison, M. S. Shearman, and D. Beher
Intra- or Intercomplex Binding to the {gamma}-Secretase Enzyme: A MODEL TO DIFFERENTIATE INHIBITOR CLASSES
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 20, 2006;
281(42):
31279 - 31289.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chen, B. Zhao, E. Kieff, J. C. Aster, and F. Wang
EBNA-3B- and EBNA-3C-Regulated Cellular Genes in Epstein-Barr Virus-Immortalized Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines.
J. Virol.,
October 1, 2006;
80(20):
10139 - 10150.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. S. Oh and R. J. Turner
Effect of {gamma}-secretase inhibitors on muscarinic receptor-mediated calcium signaling in human salivary epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
July 1, 2006;
291(1):
C76 - C82.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Morohashi, T. Kan, Y. Tominari, H. Fuwa, Y. Okamura, N. Watanabe, C. Sato, H. Natsugari, T. Fukuyama, T. Iwatsubo, et al.
C-terminal Fragment of Presenilin Is the Molecular Target of a Dipeptidic {gamma}-Secretase-specific Inhibitor DAPT (N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-Butyl Ester)
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 26, 2006;
281(21):
14670 - 14676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Cui, J. Z. Ke, Q. Zhang, H.-Z. Ke, C. Chalouni, and A. Vignery
The intracellular domain of CD44 promotes the fusion of macrophages
Blood,
January 15, 2006;
107(2):
796 - 805.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Zhao, M.-Z. Cui, G. Mao, Y. Dong, J. Tan, L. Sun, and X. Xu
{gamma}-Cleavage Is Dependent on {zeta}-Cleavage during the Proteolytic Processing of Amyloid Precursor Protein within Its Transmembrane Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 11, 2005;
280(45):
37689 - 37697.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Vetrivel, H. Cheng, S.-H. Kim, Y. Chen, N. Y. Barnes, A. T. Parent, S. S. Sisodia, and G. Thinakaran
Spatial Segregation of {gamma}-Secretase and Substrates in Distinct Membrane Domains
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 8, 2005;
280(27):
25892 - 25900.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. W. Cowan, X. Wang, R. Guan, K. He, J. Jiang, G. Baumann, R. A. Black, M. S. Wolfe, and S. J. Frank
Growth Hormone Receptor Is a Target for Presenilin-dependent {gamma}-Secretase Cleavage
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 13, 2005;
280(19):
19331 - 19342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Zampieri, C.-F. Xu, T. A. Neubert, and M. V. Chao
Cleavage of p75 Neurotrophin Receptor by {alpha}-Secretase and {gamma}-Secretase Requires Specific Receptor Domains
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 15, 2005;
280(15):
14563 - 14571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. J. Wrigley, I. Schurov, E. J. Nunn, A. C. L. Martin, E. E. Clarke, S. Ellis, T. P. Bonnert, M. S. Shearman, and D. Beher
Functional Overexpression of {gamma}-Secretase Reveals Protease-independent Trafficking Functions and a Critical Role of Lipids for Protease Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 1, 2005;
280(13):
12523 - 12535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Parent, N. Y. Barnes, Y. Taniguchi, G. Thinakaran, and S. S. Sisodia
Presenilin Attenuates Receptor-Mediated Signaling and Synaptic Function
J. Neurosci.,
February 9, 2005;
25(6):
1540 - 1549.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Bakshi, Y.-F. Liao, J. Gao, J. Ni, R. Stein, L.-A. Yeh, and M. S. Wolfe
A High-Throughput Screen to Identify Inhibitors of Amyloid {beta}-Protein Precursor Processing
J Biomol Screen,
February 1, 2005;
10(1):
1 - 12.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Qi-Takahara, M. Morishima-Kawashima, Y. Tanimura, G. Dolios, N. Hirotani, Y. Horikoshi, F. Kametani, M. Maeda, T. C. Saido, R. Wang, et al.
Longer Forms of Amyloid {beta} Protein: Implications for the Mechanism of Intramembrane Cleavage by {gamma}-Secretase
J. Neurosci.,
January 12, 2005;
25(2):
436 - 445.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ghersi, C. Noviello, and L. D'Adamio
Amyloid-{beta} Protein Precursor (A{beta}PP) Intracellular Domain-associated Protein-1 Proteins Bind to A{beta}PP and Modulate Its Processing in an Isoform-specific Manner
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 19, 2004;
279(47):
49105 - 49112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-F. Liao, B.-J. Wang, H.-T. Cheng, L.-H. Kuo, and M. S. Wolfe
Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}, Interleukin-1{beta}, and Interferon-{gamma} Stimulate {gamma}-Secretase-mediated Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Protein through a JNK-dependent MAPK Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 19, 2004;
279(47):
49523 - 49532.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Noseda, L. Chang, G. McLean, J. E. Grim, B. E. Clurman, L. L. Smith, and A. Karsan
Notch Activation Induces Endothelial Cell Cycle Arrest and Participates in Contact Inhibition: Role of p21Cip1 Repression
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 15, 2004;
24(20):
8813 - 8822.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Beher, E. E. Clarke, J. D. J. Wrigley, A. C. L. Martin, A. Nadin, I. Churcher, and M. S. Shearman
Selected Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Their Derivatives Target {gamma}-Secretase at a Novel Site: EVIDENCE FOR AN ALLOSTERIC MECHANISM
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 15, 2004;
279(42):
43419 - 43426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Wang, W.-j. Luo, Y.-w. Zhang, Y.-M. Li, G. Thinakaran, P. Greengard, and H. Xu
Presenilins and {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors Affect Intracellular Trafficking and Cell Surface Localization of the {gamma}-Secretase Complex Components
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 24, 2004;
279(39):
40560 - 40566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Das, C. Craig, Y. Funahashi, K.-M. Jung, T.-W. Kim, R. Byers, A. P. Weng, J. L. Kutok, J. C. Aster, and J. Kitajewski
Notch Oncoproteins Depend on {gamma}-Secretase/Presenilin Activity for Processing and Function
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 16, 2004;
279(29):
30771 - 30780.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Araki, N. Miyagi, N. Kato, T. Yoshida, S. Wada, M. Nishimura, H. Komano, T. Yamamoto, B. De Strooper, K. Yamamoto, et al.
Coordinated Metabolism of Alcadein and Amyloid {beta}-Protein Precursor Regulates FE65-dependent Gene Transactivation
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 4, 2004;
279(23):
24343 - 24354.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Nyborg, A. Y. Kornilova, K. Jansen, T. B. Ladd, M. S. Wolfe, and T. E. Golde
Signal Peptide Peptidase Forms a Homodimer That Is Labeled by an Active Site-directed {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 9, 2004;
279(15):
15153 - 15160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-X. Yan, T. Li, C. M. Rominger, S. R. Prakash, P. C. Wong, R. E. Olson, R. Zaczek, and Y.-W. Li
Binding Sites of {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors in Rodent Brain: Distribution, Postnatal Development, and Effect of Deafferentation
J. Neurosci.,
March 24, 2004;
24(12):
2942 - 2952.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Jankowsky, D. J. Fadale, J. Anderson, G. M. Xu, V. Gonzales, N. A. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, M. K. Lee, L. H. Younkin, S. L. Wagner, et al.
Mutant presenilins specifically elevate the levels of the 42 residue {beta}-amyloid peptide in vivo: evidence for augmentation of a 42-specific {gamma} secretase
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
January 15, 2004;
13(2):
159 - 170.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. Searfoss, W. H. Jordan, D. O. Calligaro, E. J. Galbreath, L. M. Schirtzinger, B. R. Berridge, H. Gao, M. A. Higgins, P. C. May, and T. P. Ryan
Adipsin, a Biomarker of Gastrointestinal Toxicity Mediated by a Functional {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 14, 2003;
278(46):
46107 - 46116.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Nyabi, M. Bentahir, K. Horre, A. Herreman, N. Gottardi-Littell, C. Van Broeckhoven, P. Merchiers, K. Spittaels, W. Annaert, and B. De Strooper
Presenilins Mutated at Asp-257 or Asp-385 Restore Pen-2 Expression and Nicastrin Glycosylation but Remain Catalytically Inactive in the Absence of Wild Type Presenilin
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 31, 2003;
278(44):
43430 - 43436.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-M. Jung, S. Tan, N. Landman, K. Petrova, S. Murray, R. Lewis, P. K. Kim, D. S. Kim, S. H. Ryu, M. V. Chao, et al.
Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis of the p75 Neurotrophin Receptor Modulates Its Association with the TrkA Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 24, 2003;
278(43):
42161 - 42169.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Martoglio and T. E. Golde
Intramembrane-cleaving aspartic proteases and disease: presenilins, signal peptide peptidase and their homologs
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
October 15, 2003;
12(90002):
R201 - 206.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H. Adler, E. Chiffoleau, L. Xu, N. M. Dalton, J. M. Burg, A. D. Wells, M. S. Wolfe, L. A. Turka, and W. S. Pear
Notch Signaling Augments T Cell Responsiveness by Enhancing CD25 Expression
J. Immunol.,
September 15, 2003;
171(6):
2896 - 2903.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Weggen, J. L. Eriksen, S. A. Sagi, C. U. Pietrzik, V. Ozols, A. Fauq, Todd. E. Golde, and E. H. Koo
Evidence That Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Decrease Amyloid {beta}42 Production by Direct Modulation of {gamma}-Secretase Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 22, 2003;
278(34):
31831 - 31837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Taniguchi, S.-H. Kim, and S. S. Sisodia
Presenilin-dependent "{gamma}-Secretase" Processing of Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC)
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 15, 2003;
278(33):
30425 - 30428.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Xia and M. S. Wolfe
Intramembrane proteolysis by presenilin and presenilin-like proteases
J. Cell Sci.,
July 15, 2003;
116(14):
2839 - 2844.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. H. Pasternak, R. D. Bagshaw, M. Guiral, S. Zhang, C. A. Ackerley, B. J. Pak, J. W. Callahan, and D. J. Mahuran
Presenilin-1, Nicastrin, Amyloid Precursor Protein, and {gamma}-Secretase Activity Are Co-localized in the Lysosomal Membrane
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 11, 2003;
278(29):
26687 - 26694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Berezovska, P. Ramdya, J. Skoch, M. S. Wolfe, B. J. Bacskai, and B. T. Hyman
Amyloid Precursor Protein Associates with a Nicastrin-Dependent Docking Site on the Presenilin 1-{gamma}-Secretase Complex in Cells Demonstrated by Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging
J. Neurosci.,
June 1, 2003;
23(11):
4560 - 4566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X.-P. Shi, K. Tugusheva, J. E. Bruce, A. Lucka, G.-X. Wu, E. Chen-Dodson, E. Price, Y. Li, M. Xu, Q. Huang, et al.
{beta}-Secretase Cleavage at Amino Acid Residue 34 in the Amyloid {beta} Peptide Is Dependent upon {gamma}-Secretase Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 30, 2003;
278(23):
21286 - 21294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Takahashi, I. Hayashi, Y. Tominari, K. Rikimaru, Y. Morohashi, T. Kan, H. Natsugari, T. Fukuyama, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
Sulindac Sulfide Is a Noncompetitive gamma -Secretase Inhibitor That Preferentially Reduces Abeta 42 Generation
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 9, 2003;
278(20):
18664 - 18670.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Y. Kornilova, C. Das, and M. S. Wolfe
Differential Effects of Inhibitors on the gamma -Secretase Complex. MECHANISTIC IMPLICATIONS
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 2003;
278(19):
16470 - 16473.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Herreman, G. Van Gassen, M. Bentahir, O. Nyabi, K. Craessaerts, U. Mueller, W. Annaert, and B. De Strooper
{gamma}-Secretase activity requires the presenilin-dependent trafficking of nicastrin through the Golgi apparatus but not its complex glycosylation
J. Cell Sci.,
March 15, 2003;
116(6):
1127 - 1136.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. E. Golde and C. B. Eckman
Physiologic and Pathologic Events Mediated by Intramembranous and Juxtamembranous Proteolysis
Sci. Signal.,
March 4, 2003;
2003(172):
re4 - re4.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Scheinfeld, S. Matsuda, and L. D'Adamio
JNK-interacting protein-1 promotes transcription of Abeta protein precursor but not Abeta precursor-like proteins, mechanistically different than Fe65
PNAS,
February 18, 2003;
100(4):
1729 - 1734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-Y. Ni, H. Yuan, and G. Carpenter
Role of the ErbB-4 Carboxyl Terminus in gamma -Secretase Cleavage
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 7, 2003;
278(7):
4561 - 4565.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Weng, Y. Nam, M. S. Wolfe, W. S. Pear, J. D. Griffin, S. C. Blacklow, and J. C. Aster
Growth Suppression of Pre-T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells by Inhibition of Notch Signaling
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
January 15, 2003;
23(2):
655 - 664.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Takasugi, Y. Takahashi, Y. Morohashi, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
The Mechanism of gamma -Secretase Activities through High Molecular Weight Complex Formation of Presenilins Is Conserved in Drosophila melanogaster and Mammals
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 13, 2002;
277(51):
50198 - 50205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Scheinfeld, E. Ghersi, K. Laky, B. J. Fowlkes, and L. D'Adamio
Processing of beta -Amyloid Precursor-like Protein-1 and -2 by gamma -Secretase Regulates Transcription
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 8, 2002;
277(46):
44195 - 44201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Chen, Y. Gu, H. Hasegawa, X. Ruan, S. Arawaka, P. Fraser, D. Westaway, H. Mount, and P. St George-Hyslop
Presenilin 1 Mutations Activate gamma 42-Secretase but Reciprocally Inhibit epsilon -Secretase Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) and S3-Cleavage of Notch
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 20, 2002;
277(39):
36521 - 36526.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Suh and F. Checler
Amyloid Precursor Protein, Presenilins, and alpha -Synuclein: Molecular Pathogenesis and Pharmacological Applications in Alzheimer's Disease
Pharmacol. Rev.,
September 1, 2002;
54(3):
469 - 525.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-S. Yang, A. Tandon, F. Chen, G. Yu, H. Yu, S. Arawaka, H. Hasegawa, M. Duthie, S. D. Schmidt, T. V. Ramabhadran, et al.
Mature Glycosylation and Trafficking of Nicastrin Modulate Its Binding to Presenilins
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 26, 2002;
277(31):
28135 - 28142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. P. Ponting, M. Hutton, A. Nyborg, M. Baker, K. Jansen, and T. E. Golde
Identification of a novel family of presenilin homologues
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
May 1, 2002;
11(9):
1037 - 1044.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Morohashi, N. Hatano, S. Ohya, R. Takikawa, T. Watabiki, N. Takasugi, Y. Imaizumi, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of CALP/KChIP4, a Novel EF-hand Protein Interacting with Presenilin 2 and Voltage-gated Potassium Channel Subunit Kv4
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 19, 2002;
277(17):
14965 - 14975.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Taniguchi, H. Karlstrom, J. Lundkvist, T. Mizutani, A. Otaka, M. Vestling, A. Bernstein, D. Donoviel, U. Lendahl, and T. Honjo
Notch receptor cleavage depends on but is not directly executed by presenilins
PNAS,
March 19, 2002;
99(6):
4014 - 4019.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. E. Berechid, M. Kitzmann, D. R. Foltz, A. H. Roach, D. Seiffert, L. A. Thompson, R. E. Olson, A. Bernstein, D. B. Donoviel, and J. S. Nye
Identification and Characterization of Presenilin-independent Notch Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 1, 2002;
277(10):
8154 - 8165.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-H. Kim, J. Y. Leem, J. J. Lah, H. H. Slunt, A. I. Levey, G. Thinakaran, and S. S. Sisodia
Multiple Effects of Aspartate Mutant Presenilin 1 on the Processing and Trafficking of Amyloid Precursor Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 9, 2001;
276(46):
43343 - 43350.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-M. Li
{gamma}-Secretase: A Catalyst of Alzheimer Disease and Signal Transduction
Mol. Interv.,
October 1, 2001;
1(4):
198 - 207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Levitan, J. Lee, L. Song, R. Manning, G. Wong, E. Parker, and L. Zhang
PS1 N- and C-terminal fragments form a complex that functions in APP processing and Notch signaling
PNAS,
September 26, 2001;
(2001)
211321898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Doerfler, M. S. Shearman, and R. M. Perlmutter
Presenilin-dependent gamma -secretase activity modulates thymocyte development
PNAS,
July 19, 2001;
(2001)
161102498.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Roberds, J. Anderson, G. Basi, M. J. Bienkowski, D. G. Branstetter, K. S. Chen, S. Freedman, N. L. Frigon, D. Games, K. Hu, et al.
BACE knockout mice are healthy despite lacking the primary {beta}-secretase activity in brain: implications for Alzheimer's disease therapeutics
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
June 1, 2001;
10(12):
1317 - 1324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-Y. Ni, M. P. Murphy, T. E. Golde, and G. Carpenter
gamma -Secretase Cleavage and Nuclear Localization of ErbB-4 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase
Science,
December 7, 2001;
294(5549):
2179 - 2181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Iwata, T. Tomita, K. Maruyama, and T. Iwatsubo
Subcellular Compartment and Molecular Subdomain of beta -Amyloid Precursor Protein Relevant to the Abeta 42-promoting Effects of Alzheimer Mutant Presenilin 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 8, 2001;
276(24):
21678 - 21685.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Tomita, T. Watabiki, R. Takikawa, Y. Morohashi, N. Takasugi, R. Kopan, B. De Strooper, and T. Iwatsubo
The First Proline of PALP Motif at the C Terminus of Presenilins Is Obligatory for Stabilization, Complex Formation, and gamma -Secretase Activities of Presenilins
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 24, 2001;
276(35):
33273 - 33281.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Beher, J. D. J. Wrigley, A. Nadin, G. Evin, C. L. Masters, T. Harrison, J. L. Castro, and M. S. Shearman
Pharmacological Knock-down of the Presenilin 1 Heterodimer by a Novel gamma -Secretase Inhibitor. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRESENILIN BIOLOGY
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 21, 2001;
276(48):
45394 - 45402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-J. Lee, K.-M. Jung, Y. Z. Huang, L. B. Bennett, J. S. Lee, L. Mei, and T.-W. Kim
Presenilin-dependent gamma -Secretase-like Intramembrane Cleavage of ErbB4
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 15, 2002;
277(8):
6318 - 6323.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Wolfe and C. Haass
The Role of Presenilins in gamma -Secretase Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 16, 2001;
276(8):
5413 - 5416.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Doerfler, M. S. Shearman, and R. M. Perlmutter
Presenilin-dependent gamma -secretase activity modulates thymocyte development
PNAS,
July 31, 2001;
98(16):
9312 - 9317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Levitan, J. Lee, L. Song, R. Manning, G. Wong, E. Parker, and L. Zhang
PS1 N- and C-terminal fragments form a complex that functions in APP processing and Notch signaling
PNAS,
October 9, 2001;
98(21):
12186 - 12190.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Cupers, M. Bentahir, K. Craessaerts, I. Orlans, H. Vanderstichele, P. Saftig, B. De Strooper, and W. Annaert
The discrepancy between presenilin subcellular localization and {gamma}-secretase processing of amyloid precursor protein
J. Cell Biol.,
August 20, 2001;
154(4):
731 - 740.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|