Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005430200 on July 27, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 44, 34086-34091, November 3, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/44/34086    most recent
M005430200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seiffert, D.
Right arrow Articles by Zaczek, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seiffert, D.
Right arrow Articles by Zaczek, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Presenilin-1 and -2 Are Molecular Targets for gamma -Secretase Inhibitors*

Dietmar SeiffertDagger §, Jodi D. BradleyDagger , Cynthia M. RomingerDagger , David H. RomingerDagger , Fude YangDagger , Jere E. Meredith Jr.Dagger , Qian WangDagger , Arthur H. RoachDagger , Lorin A. ThompsonDagger , Susan M. SpitzDagger , Jeffrey N. Higaki, Shimoga R. PrakashDagger , Andrew P. CombsDagger , Robert A. CopelandDagger , Stephen P. ArnericDagger , Paul R. HartigDagger , David W. RobertsonDagger , Barbara Cordell, Andrew M. SternDagger , Richard E. OlsonDagger , and Robert ZaczekDagger

From Dagger  DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, Wilmington, Delaware 19880 and  Scios Incorporation, Sunnyvale, California 94086

Received for publication, June 21, 2000


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Presenilins are integral membrane protein involved in the production of amyloid beta -protein. Mutations of the presenilin-1 and -2 gene are associated with familial Alzheimer's disease and are thought to alter gamma -secretase cleavage of the beta -amyloid precursor protein, leading to increased production of longer and more amyloidogenic forms of Abeta , the 4-kDa beta -peptide. Here, we show that radiolabeled gamma -secretase inhibitors bind to mammalian cell membranes, and a benzophenone analog specifically photocross-links three major membrane polypeptides. A positive correlation is observed among these compounds for inhibition of cellular Abeta formation, inhibition of membrane binding and cross-linking. Immunological techniques establish N- and C-terminal fragments of presenilin-1 as specifically cross-linked polypeptides. Furthermore, binding of gamma -secretase inhibitors to embryonic membranes derived from presenilin-1 knockout embryos is reduced in a gene dose-dependent manner. In addition, C-terminal fragments of presenilin-2 are specifically cross-linked. Taken together, these results indicate that potent and selective gamma -secretase inhibitors block Abeta formation by binding to presenilin-1 and -2.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

beta -Amyloid precursor protein (beta APP)1 is a transmembrane protein that undergoes processing to Abeta by proteolytic activities known as beta - and gamma -secretases (for review, see Refs. 1-3). The beta -secretase cleavage occurs in the extracellular domain by a recently identified aspartyl protease variously termed BACE, memapsin, and Asp2 (4-9), whereas the heterogeneous gamma -secretase cleavage occurs in the transmembrane domain (2, 10). Dominant mutations in either of the two human presenilin (PS-1 and PS-2) genes lead to familial Alzheimer's disease (AD). PS-1 and -2 are polytopic membrane proteins (for review, see Refs. 11-13). Presenilins are proteolytic processed. In vivo, only small amounts of the holoprotein can be detected, primarily in the nuclear envelope, whereas 30-kDa N-terminal and 20-kDa C-terminal fragments of presenilin are observed in all mammalian tissues and cell lines analyzed so far. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that presenilin fragments are assembled into a high molecular weight complex together with other proteins (for review see 11-13). The proposed mechanism through which the presenilin mutations cause AD is an alteration in the predominant gamma -secretase cleavage site which increases the amount of the longer, more amyloidogenic Abeta 1-42(43) fragments produced (11-13). A null mutation of the mouse PS-1 selectively reduces gamma -secretase activity (14), and site-directed mutagenesis of PS-1 and PS-2 at two conserved aspartyl residues, which resemble the catalytic center of aspartyl proteases, also reduces gamma -secretase activity (15, 16). These observations indicate that PS-1 and PS-2 either stimulate the activity of gamma -secretase by trafficking to appropriate cellular compartments, serve as cofactors of the gamma -secretase, or are gamma -secretase themselves.

Here, we report that a series of potent and selective gamma -secretase inhibitors bind to mammalian cell membranes and specifically cross-link to three major polypeptides. Immunological techniques identified PS-1 and PS-2 as the major, specifically cross-linked polypeptides. These results indicate that this series of potent and selective gamma -secretase inhibitors blocks Abeta formation by binding to PS-1 and PS-2

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Binding Assays-- Binding assays using [3H]Compound A (see Table I; 87.5 Ci/mmol) were performed using standard methods (17). THP-1 cells were grown in Spinner cultures in RPMI 1640 containing L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Inc.) and 10 µM beta -mercaptoethanol to a density of 5 × 105/ml. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, and cell pellets were quick frozen in dry ice/ethanol and stored at -70 °C prior to use. The pellets of approximately 2 × 108 THP-1 cells were homogenized in 10 ml of either 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, or 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, at 4 °C, using a Brinkmann Polytron at setting 6 for 10 s. The homogenate was centrifuged at 48,000 × g for 12 min, and the resulting pellet was washed by repeating the homogenization and centrifugation steps. The final cell pellet was resuspended in buffer to yield a protein concentration of approximately 0.5 mg/ml. Assays were initiated by the addition of 150 µl of membrane suspension to 150 µl of assay buffer containing 0.064 µCi of radioligand and various concentrations of unlabeled compounds. Binding assays were performed in duplicate in polypropylene 96- well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA) in a final volume of 0.3 ml of 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, or 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, containing 5% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide. Nonspecific binding was defined in the presence of 300 nM Compound E or as indicated in the figure legends. After incubating at 23 °C for 1.3 h (or as indicated in the figure legends), the separation of bound from free radioligand was accomplished by filtration over GFF glass fiber filters (Inotech Biosystems International, Lansing, MI) presoaked in 0.3% ethyleneimine polymer solution using an Inotech cell harvester. Filters were washed three times with 0.3 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.0, containing 0.01% Triton X-100. Filters were assessed for radioactivity by liquid scintillation counting using a Packard 2500 TR (Packard Instrument Co., Downers Grove, IL). Ki values of competing compounds were derived through Cheng-Prussoff correction of IC50 values calculated using the program GraphPad Prism by GraphPad Software (San Diego, CA).

Cross-linking Studies-- THP-1 membranes for cross-linking studies were prepared as outlined for the binding studies. Membranes were preincubated for 30 min at room temperature with labeled Compound C in the presence or absence of unlabeled competitors. Photolysis at 365 nm was performed for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were harvested by centrifugation (40,000 × g for 20 min), resuspended in SDS sample buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (18). The following experiments were performed to optimize the cross-linking conditions. (i) The membrane protein concentration was varied from 1 to 10 mg/ml. (ii) Ligand concentrations were varied from 10 to 120 nM. (iii) Cross-linking temperature was varied between 4 °C and room temperature. Overall, the specifically labeled polypeptides patterns were not altered by any of the above procedures. In addition, the intensity of the labeling increased between 5 and 30 min of UV illumination and plateaued thereafter. The cross-linking experiments presented in this manuscript were all performed with 1 h of illumination. Similar gel patterns were obtained when samples were analyzed under nonreducing and reducing conditions. However, boiling for extended periods of time resulted in multimerization and disappearance of specifically labeled polypeptides.

Immunoprecipitation Studies-- THP-1 membranes (10 mg/ml) were incubated with radiolabeled Compound C (120 nM) for 30 min at room temperature followed by photolysis at room temperature for 1 h. The membranes were harvested by centrifugation (40,000 × g for 20 min) and extracted (10 mg of membrane proteins/ml of extraction buffer) with 2% CHAPS, 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.4, for 1 h at 4 °C in the presence of complete protease inhibitors (one tablet of protease inhibitors/25 ml of extraction buffer; Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The membrane extract was centrifuged at 40,000 × g for 20 min. Similar results were obtained with membrane extracts centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 1 h. Comparison of different extraction procedures revealed that 2% CHAPS quantitatively solubilized the cross-linked polypeptides compared with SDS sample buffer, which was assumed to solubilize the membrane proteins completely. The membrane extract was diluted with an equal volume of distilled water and preabsorbed (1 h; 4 °C) with normal mouse serum (10 µl/ml of extract) and goat anti-mouse IgG-Sepharose (Sigma). The beads were removed by centrifugation followed by the addition of antibodies to PS-1 (10 µg/ml) and goat anti-mouse IgG-Sepharose for 16 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed three times with 1% CHAPS in binding buffer (1 ml each wash) and three times with phosphate-buffered saline (1 ml each wash). Bound proteins were eluted by boiling (approximately 3 min) in SDS sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (18) and fluorography. For immunoprecipitation of PS-2 fragments, the CHAPS extract was preabsorbed with normal rabbit serum, and protein A-Sepharose (Sigma) was used instead of the anti-mouse IgG-Sepharose.

Large Scale Affinity Purification of Cross-linked Polypeptides-- Normal mouse IgG (Sigma) or anti-PS-1 IgG was immobilized to an agarose matrix (AminoLink Plus Immobilization Kit) at 2 mg/ml of beads according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pierce). THP-1 membrane extracts (5 mg/ml membrane proteins) in 1% CHAPS, 25 mM Tris, pH 7.4, were applied by batch absorption (16 h; room temperature) to the normal mouse IgG column. The nonbound fraction was recovered by centrifugation and applied by batch absorption (16 h; room temperature) to the PS-1 column. Both columns were washed extensively in parallel with 1% CHAPS, 25 mM Tris, pH 7.4, followed by 1% CHAPS in distilled water and eluted (15 min; room temperature) with 0.1 M glycine, 0.5% CHAPS, pH 2.3. The elution fractions were neutralized immediately by the addition of 1 M Tris, pH 9.5. For immunoblotting analysis, polypeptides were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and analyzed as described (19). Prestained molecular size markers were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc.

Determination of Abeta Levels by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay-- The ability of compounds to lower Abeta secretion was tested using Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing wild-type beta  APP as described previously (20) and Roach et al.2 Briefly, confluent cells were incubated with a range of concentrations of compounds for 16 h in serum-free medium containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin. Abeta 1-40 in the resultant conditioned media was quantified by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a position 40 neoepitope-specific monoclonal antibody and a biotinylated monoclonal antibody directed to Abeta residues 10-20.

Compound Synthesis and Labeling-- Compounds A-D and F and G were prepared according to the general synthesis strategy shown in Scheme 1 following the methods described in PCT application WO 00/07995. t-Butoxycarbonyl-caprolactam 1 was deprotonated with lithium diisopropylamide and alkylated with a benzylic halide to introduce the diaryl ether or benzophenone substituent. In the case of Compound G, 3-iodobenzyl bromide was employed, which allowed the subsequent construction of the biaryl group using Suzuki coupling. The t-butoxycarbonyl group was removed using trifluoroacetic acid and the resulting amine was coupled to a substituted succinic acid derivative using the coupling agent hexafluorophosphate in the presence of diisopropylethylamine. The succinic acid derivatives were prepared using Evans' oxazolidinone methodology according to published procedures (21 and WO 97/18207). After coupling, the t-butyl ester was removed using trifluoroacetic acid and the primary amide was prepared using hexafluorophosphate and excess gaseous ammonia. Compound D was prepared in an analogous fashion using 3-(S)-amino-1-methyl-5-phenyl-1,3-dihydro-benzo[e](1,4)diazepin-2-one as described in PCT application WO 00/07995. Compound E was prepared according to WO 98/28268.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Scheme 1.   Synthesis of gamma -secretase inhibitors.

[3H]Compound C was labeled at the propyl site chain by reduction in the presence of tritium gas. Briefly, to a reaction vessel containing a stirred solution of (2-allyl-N4-[1-(3-benzoyl-benzyl)-2-oxo-azepan-3-yl]-3-isobutyl-succinamide, 10 mg) in tetrahydrofuran (2 ml) was added 10% palladium on carbon (10 mg). The reaction vessel was evacuated and degassed via a freeze-thaw evacuation cycle and then exposed to tritium gas (50 Ci). After 30 min, unreacted tritium gas was removed, and the catalyst was filtered from the reaction mixture. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the labile tritium was further removed by evaporation with methanol (three times 2 ml). The residue was dissolved in 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid/methanol (50:50; 10 ml) and purified on a reversed-phase HPLC column (Zorbax SB- C18, 25 × 0.92 cm) using 50% acetonitrile in 0.1% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid as the mobile phase (flow rate 2 ml/min). Fractions containing the product were pooled, and the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation. The product was dissolved in ethanol (145 mCi, 15.5 mCi/ml). HPLC analysis (Vydac protein-peptide C18, 0.46 × 25 cm, 30% methanol in 0.05% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid for 5 min, 15-min gradient to 95% methanol in 0.05% aqueous trifluoroacetic acid, 1 ml/min) indicated the radiochemical purity to be greater than 99%. MS (FAB): m/z, 526 (most abundant ion), 3H NMR (proton decoupled, 320 MHz, CDCl3): multiplets at delta  0.83, 1.21.

Miscellaneous-- The N-terminal monoclonal antibody to PS-1 (clone 614) was raised to a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein expressed in bacteria containing the N-terminal 77 residues of PS-1. The C-terminal monoclonal antibody (clone 361) was obtained by immunizing mice with a synthetic peptide to PS-1 residues 309-331. Rat anti-PS-1 N-terminal monoclonal antibody and PS-1 polyclonal antibodies were obtained from Chemicon. Antibodies to PS-2 were kindly provided by Bart De Strooper. Embryonic tissue from PS-1 and PS-2 gene target animals was provided by Bart De Strooper and Paul Saftig.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Correlation between Cellular Potency and Membrane Binding of gamma -Secretase Inhibitors-- We have identified a series of small molecules (Compounds A-D, F, and G) which inhibit the formation of the Abeta 1-40 and 1-42 peptides in beta APP-transfected and nontransfected mammalian cells with nanomolar potencies2 (Table I). For comparison, we have also characterized Compound E, described in the patent literature (PCT application WO 98/28268). Abeta formation was specifically inhibited without any signs of cellular toxicity in in vitro assays.2 These compounds have been classified as inhibitors of gamma -secretase by virtue of their ability to induce the increased accumulation of the C-terminal 99-amino acid fragment of beta APP (CT99),2 the substrate for gamma -secretase action which results from beta -secretase processing (1, 3, 11-13).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Molecules (Compounds A-G) in formation of Abeta -Peptides
Binding assays using [3H]Compound A (87.5 Ci/mmol) were performed using THP-1 membranes (see "Experimental Procedures"). Ki values of competing compounds were derived through Cheng-Prussoff correction of IC50 values calculated using the program GraphPad Prism. The ability of compounds to lower Abeta secretion was tested using Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing wild-type beta APP. Briefly, confluent cells were incubated with a range of concentrations of compounds for 16 h in serum-free medium containing 0.2% bovine serum albumin. Abeta X-40 in the resultant conditioned media was quantified by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using a position 40 neoepitope-specific mAB and a biotinylated mAB directed to Abeta 10-20.

[3H]Compound A bound specifically and reversibly to rat brain membranes (not shown). A survey of established mammalian cell lines was performed to identify a high expressing, easily grown cellular source for membrane binding and molecular target identification. Of the eight lines analyzed, membranes from a human macrophage cell line, THP-1, possessed the highest specific binding capacity (Bmax). The Bmax was 1,057 ± 138 (n = 2) fmol/mg THP-1 membrane protein. Association kinetics using THP-1 membranes revealed a Kd of 2.4 nM and a t1/2 of association of 0.75 +/= 0.49 min (n = 2). In addition, Compound A blocked Abeta formation in THP-1 cells (data not shown). These results suggest that THP-1 cells contain the pharmacological site for Abeta lowering and membrane binding.

The correlation between cellular potency (IC50 for inhibition of Abeta formation in Chinese hamster ovary cells overexpressing beta APP) and Ki for membrane binding is indicated in Table I for seven compounds ranging over 4 log units in affinity; we observed a significant correlation (r2 = 0.96; p < 0.0001 (two-tailed t test)) for displacement of a radiolabeled gamma -secretase inhibitor and cellular potency for Abeta lowering. A similar correlation was observed using Compound C (a photochemical cross-linker) or D as ligand. Moreover, a positive correlation between cellular potency and membrane binding was also observed in human cell lines expressing endogenous beta APP, IMR32 neuroblastoma cells, and in human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cells overexpressing beta APP (data not shown). These results strongly suggest that the membrane preparations contain the intact molecular target of gamma -secretase inhibitors.

Correlation between Membrane Binding and Photoaffinity Cross-linking-- Photocross-linking experiments were performed to identify the target of these gamma -secretase inhibitors. THP-1 membranes were preincubated with radiolabeled Compound C in the absence or presence of the indicated unlabeled competitors. Membranes were analyzed by binding (Fig. 1A) or by cross-linking after exposure to UV light (Fig. 1B). After cross-linking, membranes were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in SDS sample buffer, fractionated by SDS-PAGE, and analyzed by fluorography (Fig. 2B). Several major polypeptides of 43, 30, 25, 20, and 14 kDa (as well as several minor species) were identified by the cross-linking approach. The reduction in specific binding in the binding assay by competing with unlabeled inhibitors (panel A) correlated with the reduction in cross-linking intensity of the 30-, 25-, 20-, and 14-kDa polypeptides (panel B). No additional specifically labeled polypeptides were observed when cross-linked polypeptides were analyzed by 15% polyacrylamide gels (not shown). Importantly, a chemically similar, yet much less potent compound (Compound B) failed to compete for cross-linking of specifically labeled bands of 30, 25, 20, and 14 kDa (Fig. 1B, lane 5). Also, Compound B did compete for major cross-linking band at 43 kDa, whereas the active Compounds A and E did not compete for the 43-kDa band. Taken together, these observations allow us to classify the 43-kDa band as nonspecifically labeled. Moreover, the specific cross-linking to the 30-, 25-, and 20-kDa bands was also observed in HEK 293 cells (data not shown). Additional experiments established a dose-dependent reduction in specific binding and cross-linking intensity. For example, for each of the seven compounds analyzed, the corresponding pair of dose-response curves for inhibition of binding and reduction in photocross-linking was indistinguishable for compounds ranging over 4 log potency (0.3-7,900 nM). For example, the parallel reduction of binding and cross-linking intensity of the 30-, 25-, and 20-kDa bands is indicated for Compound D in Fig. 2.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Correlation between binding and photoaffinity cross-linking in THP-1 membranes. THP-1 membranes were incubated with 10 nM [3H]Compound C (83.4 Ci/mmol) and analyzed by filtration binding assay (panel A) or, after cross-linking, by SDS-PAGE and fluorography (panel B). Competition experiments with unlabeled compounds (1 µM) established that only four of the polypeptides, indicated by the arrowheads (30, 25, 20, and 14 kDa) were specifically labeled. Note that reduction in cross-linking (panel B) correlates positively with reduction in binding (panel A). Lane 1, dimethyl sulfoxide control; lane 2, Compound A; lane 3, Compound C; lane 4, racemic mixture of Compound E; lane 5, Compound B.


View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Correlation between binding and photaffinity cross-linking in THP-1 membranes for Compound D. THP-1 membranes were incubated with 10 nM [3H]Compound C (83.4 Ci/mmol) in the presence of the indicated concentrations of Compound D and analyzed by filtration binding assay (panel A) or, after cross-linking, by SDS-PAGE and fluorography (panel B) (see Fig. 1). Note that the reduction in cross-linking (panel B) to bands of 30, 25, and 20 kDa (arrowheads) correlates positively with reduction in binding (panel A). Lane 1, dimethyl sulfoxide control; lane 2, 0.3 nM Compound D; lane 3, 1 nM Compound D; lane 4, 3 nM Compound D; lane 5, 10 nM Compound D; lane 6, 30 nM Compound D. The mobility of molecular weight markers is indicated.

Identification of the Molecular Target of gamma -Secretase Inhibitors-- The molecular sizes of the cross-linked polypeptides (11-13) are, in part, consistent with the hypothesis that presenilins are the molecular target. To determine whether Compound C cross-linked to presenilins, membranes were incubated with tritiated Compound C, cross-linked, extracted with 2% CHAPS, and analyzed by immunoprecipitation using antibodies to PS-1. Extraction of membranes with 2% CHAPS quantitatively solubilized the specifically cross-linked polypeptides. Regardless of subunit specificity, antibodies to PS-1 are expected to immunoprecipitate both N- and C-terminal PS-1 fragments because CHAPS extraction does not dissociate the PS-1 complex (22, 23). The major labeled polypeptides of 30 and 20 kDa coimmunoprecipitated with antibodies to PS-1 (Fig. 3). Similar immunoprecipitation patterns were observed with three commercially available antibodies to PS-1 (data not shown; see antibody listing under "Experimental Procedures"). The immunoprecipitation was specific, as shown by the disappearance of radiolabeled bands when cross-linking was performed in the presence of excess Compound E or when the PS-1 antibody was replaced by normal mouse IgG. In addition, the PS-1 antibodies immunoprecipitated only the specifically cross-linked polypeptides, whereas nonspecifically labeled bands were not recovered in the immunoprecipitate. The latter finding rules out precipitation of incompletely solubilized membrane fragments. It should be noted that the antibody to the C-terminal loop region of PS-1 also immunoprecipitated the 14-kDa polypeptide (Fig. 3A, lane 3). Similar immunoprecipitation patterns were observed using HEK 293 cell membranes (data not shown). When membranes were extracted under conditions known to disrupt the PS-1 complex (in the presence of 1% SDS), the N-terminal PS-1 antibody immunoprecipitated only the 30-kDa band; likewise, the C-terminal antibody precipitated only the 20-kDa band (not shown). Large scale affinity purification was performed using the C-terminal PS-1 antibody or IgG derived from normal mouse serum bound to Sepharose (Fig. 3B). The specifically cross-linked bands of 30, 25, and 20 kDa bound to and eluted from the anti PS-1 IgG column, but not normal mouse IgG column. The elution fractions of both columns were analyzed by fluorography (Fig. 3, B1), and by silver staining (Fig. 3, B2) followed by fluorography of the dried silver-stained gel (Fig. 3, B3). The 30- and 20-kDa silver-stained polypeptides were also positive in the fluorography. Moreover, immunoblotting analysis established that the 30-kDa band reacted with antibodies to the N terminus of PS-1 (Fig. 3, B4), whereas the 20-kDa band reacted with antibodies to the C terminus of PS-1 (Fig. 3, B5). It should be noted that traces of the 25-kDa polypeptide copurified with the PS-1 C-terminal antibody (Fig. 3, B1); however, this band was not detected by immunoblotting using N- or C-terminal PS-1 antibodies. These observations suggest that the 25-kDa band copurified with the PS-1 complex. The involvement of PS-1 in compound binding was confirmed in binding studies using membranes from PS-1 knock-out embryos (14). A gene dose-dependent reduction in binding was observed (Fig. 4). It should be noted that even in the absence of PS-1 expression, residual specific binding of approximately 25% of the wild-type animals was observed. These results suggest that PS-1 is not the only binding site for the compounds under study. Incorporation of radioactivity into the 14-kDa band varied among several THP-1 and HEK 293 cell preparations. Based on the observed variability, this band was not a focus of this study.


View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Immunopurification identifies PS-1 as the molecular target for gamma -secretase inhibitors. Panel A, immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled polypeptides with PS-1 antibodies. THP-1 membranes were incubated with 120 nM [3H]Compound C in the absence or presence of Compound E. After cross-linking, membranes were extracted with CHAPS and analyzed by immunoprecipitation using anti-human PS-1 IgG (to either the N terminus or C-terminal loop). Bound proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (11%) and fluorography. The band below 14 kDa in lanes 1 and 5 represents free cross-linker comigrating with the dye front. Lane 1, CHAPS extract, no competition; lane 2, immunoprecipitation with PS-1 N-terminal monoclonal antibody; lane 3, immunoprecipitation with PS-1 C-terminal loop antibody; lane 4, immunoprecipitation with normal mouse IgG control; lane 5, CHAPS extract, specific cross-linking competed by unlabeled Compound E (racemic mixture); lane 6, immunoprecipitation PS-1 N-terminal monoclonal antibody using CHAPS extract from cross-linking competed by unlabeled Compound E (racemic mixture). Panel B, affinity purification of photoaffinity cross-linked PS-1. THP-1 membranes were photoaffinity cross-linked as in panel A. The resulting CHAPS extracts were applied to a normal mouse IgG column followed by a PS-1 (C-terminal loop) antibody column. The columns were washed extensively and eluted with 0.5% CHAPS, 0.1 M glycine, pH 2.3. The elution fractions were analyzed by fluorography (B1) and silver staining (B2). Note the presence of the 30- and 20-kDa band in the elution of the PS-1 (lane 1) but not the mouse IgG column (lane 2). Fluorography of the silver-stained gel revealed that the 30- and 20-kDa bands contain the majority of radioactivity (B3). The 30-kDa band was detected by immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies to the N terminus of PS-1 (B4), whereas the 200-kDa band was detected by monoclonal antibodies to the C-terminal loop of PS-1 (B5). In panels B1-B5, lane 1 is the elution from anti-PS-1-Sepharose, and lane 2 is the elution from normal mouse IgG-Sepharose.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Binding of labeled gamma -secretase inhibitors to PS-1 knockout embryonic membranes. Embryos from PS-1 knockout mice were tested at E17-18. Whole embryos were homogenized in buffer (10% w/v), and membranes were prepared. The final pellet was resuspended in buffer at a protein concentration of approximately 8-10 mg/ml original wet weight. Radioligand binding assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures," the ligand used was [3H]Compound D (86 Ci/mmol). Specific binding was determined using 0.064 µCi of [3H]Compound D and 300 nM Compound E to define nonspecific binding. Data are mean values of four animals for each group and are expressed as a percentage of specific binding observed in wild type embryos; ** indicates p < 0.01 as determined by one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's tests.

The involvement of PS-2 in binding and cross-linking was further analyzed (Fig. 5). Membranes from THP-1 cells were cross-linked and extracted as for the PS-1 experiments and analyzed by immunoprecipitation using antibodies to PS-2. The extract contained the major specifically labeled polypeptides of 30, 25, and 20 kDa (Fig. 5, lane 1). Immunoprecipitation with both N- and C-terminal specific polyclonal antibodies to PS-2 identified the 25-kDa fragment as PS-2 related (Fig. 5, lanes 2 and 3). Control immunoprecipitation experiments using normal rabbit IgG established that the immunoprecipitation was specific (Fig. 5, lane 4). The 25-kDa fragment was the only band specifically stained in THP-1 membrane extracts by immunoblotting using the PS-2 C-terminal antibody (not shown). Moreover, the 25-kDa band comigrated with the PS-2 C-terminal fragment derived by in vitro transcription and translation of a 5'-truncated PS-2 cDNA (not shown). Taken together, these results indicate that potent and selective gamma -secretase inhibitors block Abeta formation by binding to PS-1 and -2. 


View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Immunoprecipitation identifies PS-2 as the molecular target for gamma -secretase inhibitors. THP-1 membranes were incubated with 120 nM [3H]Compound C. After cross-linking, membranes were extracted with CHAPS and analyzed by immunoprecipitation using anti-human PS-2 IgG (to either the N terminus or C-terminal loop). Bound proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (11%) and fluorography. Lane 1, CHAPS extract; lane 2, immunoprecipitation with PS-2 N-terminal antibody; lane 3, immunoprecipitation with PS-2 C-terminal loop antibody; lane 4, immunoprecipitation with normal rabbit IgG control.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The studies presented here provide evidence that the described small molecule gamma -secretase inhibitors bind to PS-1 and PS-2. This conclusion is based on the molecular size of specifically labeled polypeptides, cross-linking to PS-1 and PS-2 as shown by immunoprecipitation with PS-1 and PS-2 specific antibodies, and reduced binding to membranes derived from PS-1 gene-targeted embryos.

Compound C labels both N- and C-terminal PS-1 fragments with similar intensity. The photoaffinity ligand employed is monovalent, and the binding isotherms for THP-1 membranes are consistent with a single high affinity binding site. These results suggest that the compound is labeling an area of the PS-1 complex of close proximity of N- and C-terminal fragments. Interestingly, modeling studies suggest that two highly conserved Asp residues (Asp-257, Asp-385; PS-1 numbering) necessary for PS-1 and PS-2 function are in close proximity in adjacent transmembrane loops comprised of N- and C-terminal PS fragments (15, 16). The positive correlation between cellular potency and membrane binding suggests that the compounds can easily penetrate and possibly insert into the transmembrane domains of PS-1. If PS-1 itself is an aspartyl protease required for gamma -secretase cleavage, it is tempting to speculate that these inhibitors bind in the transmembrane region near the putative catalytic site.

It should be noted that Wolfe et al. (15) suggested that the PS-1 holoprotein is a zymogen and requires proteolytic activation for biological activity. In this respect, we currently aim to address the question of whether cleavage of PS-1 and incorporation into the high molecular weight PS-1 complex are prerequisites for binding and cross-linking. In addition, the binding and cross-linking to PS-1 familial AD mutants are currently being analyzed. It should be noted that Compound A inhibits Abeta production in human fibroblasts derived from the familial AD A246E mutation followed transient transfection with beta APP.

PS-1 and PS-2 are the major molecular target for this series of gamma -secretase inhibitors. The 30- and 20-kDa specifically labeled polypeptides are, based on immunological characterization, N- and C-terminal PS-1 fragments. Moreover, the 25-kDa specifically cross-linked polypeptide was identified as the C-terminal fragment of PS-2. Interestingly, little if any labeling of the N-terminal fragment of PS-2 was observed. This result suggests that the compound binding pockets in PS-1 and PS-2 are distinct. The involvement of PS-2 in binding and cross-linking is consistent with the observation of residual specific binding to membranes derived from PS-1-/- animals. The compounds employed in this study completely blocked Abeta formation in mammalian cells,2 whereas Abeta production in cells derived from PS-1 gene-targeted mice is reduced only by 50-70% (14), and no inhibition is observed in cells derived from single PS-2 knockout animals (24). Furthermore, Abeta was reported as undetectable in cells derived from both PS-1 and PS-2 double knockout animals.3 These results are consistent with binding of gamma -secretase inhibitors to PS-1 and PS-2.

In summary, the results of the present study further link the involvement of PS-1 and PS-2 to gamma -secretase action since small molecule gamma -secretase inhibitors bind to PS-1 and PS-2. These studies define PS-1 and PS-2 as the molecular target for gamma -secretase inhibitors developed for the pharmacological treatment of AD.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: E400/3253, Experimental Station, DuPont Pharmaceuticals Company, P.O. Box 80400, Wilmington, DE 19880. Tel.: 302-695-7069; Fax: 302-695-8313; E-mail: Dietmar.A.Seiffert@DuPontpharma.com.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005430200

2 A. H. Roach, D. Seiffert, L. A. Thompson, B. Cordell, J. N. Higaki, R. E. Olson, and R. Zaczek, unpublished observations.

3 Herreman, A., Serneels, L., Annaert, W., Collen, D., Schoonjans, L., and De Strooper, B. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 461-462.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: beta APP, beta -amyloid precursor protein; Abeta , 4-kDa amyloid beta -peptide; PS, presenilin; AD, Alzheimer's disease; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid; HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Selkoe, D. J. (1994) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10, 373-403
2. Selkoe, D. J. (1999) Nature 399, A23-A31
3. Hooper, N. M., Karran, E. H., and Turner, A. J. (1997) Biochem. J. 321, 265-279
4. De Strooper, B., and Koenig, G. (1999) Nature 402, 471-472
5. Hussain, I., Howlett, D. R., Powell, D. J., Tew, D., Meek, T., Simmons, D. L., Walsh, F. S., Dingwall, C., and Christie, G. (1999) Mol. Cell. Neurosci. www.academicpress.com/www/journal/cn/mence. 1999.0811/
6. Lin, X., Koelsch, G., Wu, S., Downs, D., Dashiti, A., and Tang, J. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 1456-1460
7. Sinha, S., Anderson, J. P., Barbour, R., Basi, G. S., Caccavello, R., Davis, D., Doan, M., Dovey, H. F., Frigon, N., Hong, J., Jacobson-Croak, K., Jewett, N., Kelm, P., Knops, J., Liebergurg, I., Power, M., Tan, H., Tasuno, G., Tung, J., Schenk, D., Seubert, P., Suomensaarf, S. M., Wang, S., Walker, D., Zhao, J., McConlogue, L., and Varghese, J. (1999) Nature 402, 537-540
8. Vassar, R., Bennett, B. D., Babu-Khan, S., Kahn, S., Mendiaz, E. A., Denis, P., Teplow, D. B., Ross, S., Amarante, P., Loeloff, R., Luo, Y., Fisher, S., Fuller, J., Edenson, S., Lile, J., Jaronski, M. A., Biere, A. L., Curran, E., Burgess, T., Louis, J. C., Collins, F., Treanor, J., Rogers, G., and Citron, M. (1999) Science 286, 735-741
9. Yan, R., Bienkowski, M. J., Shuck, M. E., Miao, H., Tory, M. C., Pauley, A. M., Brashler, J. R., Stratman, N. C., Rodney Matthews, W., Buhl, A. E., Carter, D. B., Tomasselli, A. G., Parodi, L. A., Heirikson, R. L., and Gurney, M. E. (1999) Nature 402, 533-537
10. Moore, C. L., and Wolfe, M. S. (1999) Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents 9, 135-146
11. Czech, C., Tremp, G., and Pradier, L. (2000) Prog. Neurobiol. 60, 363-384
12. Haass, C. (1997) Neuron 18, 687-690
13. Haass, C., and De Strooper, B. (1999) Science 286, 916-919
14. De Strooper, B., Saftig, P., Craessaerts, K., Vanderstichele, H., Guhde, G., Annaert, W., von Figura, K., and van Leuven, F. (1998) Nature 391, 387-390
15. Wolfe, M. S., Zia, W., Ostaszewski, B. L., Diehl, T. S., Kimberly, W. T., and Selkoe, D. J. (1999) Nature 398, 513-517
16. Steiner, H., Duff, K., Capell, A., Romig, H., Grim, M. G., Lincoln, S., Hardy, J., Yu, X., Picciano, M., Fechteler, K., Citron, M., Kopan, R., Pesold, B., Keck, S., Baader, M., Tomita, T., Iwatsubo, T., Baumeister, R., and Haass, C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28669-28673
17. Keen, M. (1999) in Receptor Binding Techniques (Walker, J. M., ed) , p. 106, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
18. Laemmli, U. (1970) Nature 227, 680-68
19. Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1999) Using Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
20. Higaki, J., Chakravarty, S., Bryant, C., Cowart, L., Harden, P., Scandina, J., Mavunkel, B., Luedtke, G., and Cordell, B. (1999) J.Med.Chem. 42, 3889-3898
21. Beckett, R. P., Crimmin, M. J., Davis, M. H., and Spavold, Z. (1993) Synlett 2, 137-138
22. Capell, A., Grunberg, J., Pesold, B., Diehlmann, A., Citron, M., Nixon, R., Beyreuther, K., Selkoe, D. J., and Haass, C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3205-3211
23. Yu, G., Chen, F., Levesque, G., Nishimura, M., Zhang, D.-M., Levesque, L., Rogaeva, E., Xu, D., Liang, Y., Duthie, M., St. George-Hyslop, H. P., and Fraser, P. E. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16470-16475
24. Herreman, A., Hartman, D., Annaert, W., Saftig, P., Craessaerts, K., Serneels, L., Umans, L., Huylebroeck, D., Zwijsen, A., van Leuven, F., and De Strooper, B. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 11872-11877


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
V. B. Kumar, M. Franko, W. A. Banks, P. Kasinadhuni, S. A. Farr, K. Vyas, V. Choudhuri, and J. E. Morley
Increase in Presenilin 1 (PS1) levels in senescence-accelerated mice (SAMP8) may indirectly impair memory by affecting amyloid precursor protein (APP) processing
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2009; 212(4): 494 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Placanica, L. Tarassishin, G. Yang, E. Peethumnongsin, S.-H. Kim, H. Zheng, S. S. Sisodia, and Y.-M. Li
Pen2 and Presenilin-1 Modulate the Dynamic Equilibrium of Presenilin-1 and Presenilin-2 {gamma}-Secretase Complexes
J. Biol. Chem., January 30, 2009; 284(5): 2967 - 2977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. M. Elzinga, C. Twomey, J. C. Powell, F. Harte, and J. V. McCarthy
Interleukin-1 Receptor Type 1 Is a Substrate for {gamma}-Secretase-dependent Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis
J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2009; 284(3): 1394 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Sato, K. Ananda, C. I. Cheng, E. J. Suh, S. Narayanan, and M. S. Wolfe
Distinct Pharmacological Effects of Inhibitors of Signal Peptide Peptidase and {gamma}-Secretase
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 2008; 283(48): 33287 - 33295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. R. Burton, J. E. Meredith, D. M. Barten, M. E. Goldstein, C. M. Krause, C. J. Kieras, L. Sisk, L. G. Iben, C. Polson, M. W. Thompson, et al.
The Amyloid-{beta} Rise and {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitor Potency Depend on the Level of Substrate Expression
J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2008; 283(34): 22992 - 23003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Zhang, Y. Yang, P. A. Zweidler-McKay, and D. P.M. Hughes
Critical Role of Notch Signaling in Osteosarcoma Invasion and Metastasis
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 14(10): 2962 - 2969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
W. S. Liang, T. Dunckley, T. G. Beach, A. Grover, D. Mastroeni, K. Ramsey, R. J. Caselli, W. A. Kukull, D. McKeel, J. C. Morris, et al.
Altered neuronal gene expression in brain regions differentially affected by Alzheimer's disease: a reference data set
Physiol Genomics, April 1, 2008; 33(2): 240 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. G. Iben, R. E. Olson, L. A. Balanda, S. Jayachandra, B. J. Robertson, V. Hay, J. Corradi, C. V. C. Prasad, R. Zaczek, C. F. Albright, et al.
Signal Peptide Peptidase and {gamma}-Secretase Share Equivalent Inhibitor Binding Pharmacology
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2007; 282(51): 36829 - 36836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. L. Cummings, R. Doody, and C. Clark
Disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease: Challenges to early intervention
Neurology, October 16, 2007; 69(16): 1622 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. E. Goldstein, Y. Cao, T. Fiedler, J. Toyn, L. Iben, D. M. Barten, M. Pierdomenico, J. Corsa, C. V. C. Prasad, R. E. Olson, et al.
Ex Vivo Occupancy of {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors Correlates with Brain beta-Amyloid Peptide Reduction in Tg2576 Mice
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Urra, C. A. Escudero, P. Ramos, F. Lisbona, E. Allende, P. Covarrubias, J. I. Parraguez, N. Zampieri, M. V. Chao, W. Annaert, et al.
TrkA Receptor Activation by Nerve Growth Factor Induces Shedding of the p75 Neurotrophin Receptor Followed by Endosomal {gamma}-Secretase-mediated Release of the p75 Intracellular Domain
J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2007; 282(10): 7606 - 7615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
Y.-F. Liao, B.-J. Wang, W.-M. Hsu, H. Lee, C.-Y. Liao, S.-Y. Wu, H.-T. Cheng, and M.-K. Hu
Unnatural Amino Acid-Substituted (Hydroxyethyl)urea Peptidomimetics Inhibit {gamma}-Secretase and Promote the Neuronal Differentiation of Neuroblastoma Cells
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2007; 71(2): 588 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Landman, S. Y. Jeong, S. Y. Shin, S. V. Voronov, G. Serban, M. S. Kang, M. K. Park, G. Di Paolo, S. Chung, and T.-W. Kim
Presenilin mutations linked to familial Alzheimer's disease cause an imbalance in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate metabolism
PNAS, December 19, 2006; 103(51): 19524 - 19529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Palomero, W. K. Lim, D. T. Odom, M. L. Sulis, P. J. Real, A. Margolin, K. C. Barnes, J. O'Neil, D. Neuberg, A. P. Weng, et al.
NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth
PNAS, November 28, 2006; 103(48): 18261 - 18266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. E. Clarke, I. Churcher, S. Ellis, J. D. J. Wrigley, H. D. Lewis, T. Harrison, M. S. Shearman, and D. Beher
Intra- or Intercomplex Binding to the {gamma}-Secretase Enzyme: A MODEL TO DIFFERENTIATE INHIBITOR CLASSES
J. Biol. Chem., October 20, 2006; 281(42): 31279 - 31289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. Chen, B. Zhao, E. Kieff, J. C. Aster, and F. Wang
EBNA-3B- and EBNA-3C-Regulated Cellular Genes in Epstein-Barr Virus-Immortalized Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines.
J. Virol., October 1, 2006; 80(20): 10139 - 10150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
Y. S. Oh and R. J. Turner
Effect of {gamma}-secretase inhibitors on muscarinic receptor-mediated calcium signaling in human salivary epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): C76 - C82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Morohashi, T. Kan, Y. Tominari, H. Fuwa, Y. Okamura, N. Watanabe, C. Sato, H. Natsugari, T. Fukuyama, T. Iwatsubo, et al.
C-terminal Fragment of Presenilin Is the Molecular Target of a Dipeptidic {gamma}-Secretase-specific Inhibitor DAPT (N-[N-(3,5-Difluorophenacetyl)-L-alanyl]-S-phenylglycine t-Butyl Ester)
J. Biol. Chem., May 26, 2006; 281(21): 14670 - 14676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. Cui, J. Z. Ke, Q. Zhang, H.-Z. Ke, C. Chalouni, and A. Vignery
The intracellular domain of CD44 promotes the fusion of macrophages
Blood, January 15, 2006; 107(2): 796 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Zhao, M.-Z. Cui, G. Mao, Y. Dong, J. Tan, L. Sun, and X. Xu
{gamma}-Cleavage Is Dependent on {zeta}-Cleavage during the Proteolytic Processing of Amyloid Precursor Protein within Its Transmembrane Domain
J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37689 - 37697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. S. Vetrivel, H. Cheng, S.-H. Kim, Y. Chen, N. Y. Barnes, A. T. Parent, S. S. Sisodia, and G. Thinakaran
Spatial Segregation of {gamma}-Secretase and Substrates in Distinct Membrane Domains
J. Biol. Chem., July 8, 2005; 280(27): 25892 - 25900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. W. Cowan, X. Wang, R. Guan, K. He, J. Jiang, G. Baumann, R. A. Black, M. S. Wolfe, and S. J. Frank
Growth Hormone Receptor Is a Target for Presenilin-dependent {gamma}-Secretase Cleavage
J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 19331 - 19342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Zampieri, C.-F. Xu, T. A. Neubert, and M. V. Chao
Cleavage of p75 Neurotrophin Receptor by {alpha}-Secretase and {gamma}-Secretase Requires Specific Receptor Domains
J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14563 - 14571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. D. J. Wrigley, I. Schurov, E. J. Nunn, A. C. L. Martin, E. E. Clarke, S. Ellis, T. P. Bonnert, M. S. Shearman, and D. Beher
Functional Overexpression of {gamma}-Secretase Reveals Protease-independent Trafficking Functions and a Critical Role of Lipids for Protease Activity
J. Biol. Chem., April 1, 2005; 280(13): 12523 - 12535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. T. Parent, N. Y. Barnes, Y. Taniguchi, G. Thinakaran, and S. S. Sisodia
Presenilin Attenuates Receptor-Mediated Signaling and Synaptic Function
J. Neurosci., February 9, 2005; 25(6): 1540 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
P. Bakshi, Y.-F. Liao, J. Gao, J. Ni, R. Stein, L.-A. Yeh, and M. S. Wolfe
A High-Throughput Screen to Identify Inhibitors of Amyloid {beta}-Protein Precursor Processing
J Biomol Screen, February 1, 2005; 10(1): 1 - 12.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Qi-Takahara, M. Morishima-Kawashima, Y. Tanimura, G. Dolios, N. Hirotani, Y. Horikoshi, F. Kametani, M. Maeda, T. C. Saido, R. Wang, et al.
Longer Forms of Amyloid {beta} Protein: Implications for the Mechanism of Intramembrane Cleavage by {gamma}-Secretase
J. Neurosci., January 12, 2005; 25(2): 436 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Ghersi, C. Noviello, and L. D'Adamio
Amyloid-{beta} Protein Precursor (A{beta}PP) Intracellular Domain-associated Protein-1 Proteins Bind to A{beta}PP and Modulate Its Processing in an Isoform-specific Manner
J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 49105 - 49112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-F. Liao, B.-J. Wang, H.-T. Cheng, L.-H. Kuo, and M. S. Wolfe
Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}, Interleukin-1{beta}, and Interferon-{gamma} Stimulate {gamma}-Secretase-mediated Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Protein through a JNK-dependent MAPK Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 49523 - 49532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Noseda, L. Chang, G. McLean, J. E. Grim, B. E. Clurman, L. L. Smith, and A. Karsan
Notch Activation Induces Endothelial Cell Cycle Arrest and Participates in Contact Inhibition: Role of p21Cip1 Repression
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2004; 24(20): 8813 - 8822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Beher, E. E. Clarke, J. D. J. Wrigley, A. C. L. Martin, A. Nadin, I. Churcher, and M. S. Shearman
Selected Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Their Derivatives Target {gamma}-Secretase at a Novel Site: EVIDENCE FOR AN ALLOSTERIC MECHANISM
J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 43419 - 43426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Wang, W.-j. Luo, Y.-w. Zhang, Y.-M. Li, G. Thinakaran, P. Greengard, and H. Xu
Presenilins and {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors Affect Intracellular Trafficking and Cell Surface Localization of the {gamma}-Secretase Complex Components
J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 2004; 279(39): 40560 - 40566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Das, C. Craig, Y. Funahashi, K.-M. Jung, T.-W. Kim, R. Byers, A. P. Weng, J. L. Kutok, J. C. Aster, and J. Kitajewski
Notch Oncoproteins Depend on {gamma}-Secretase/Presenilin Activity for Processing and Function
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30771 - 30780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Araki, N. Miyagi, N. Kato, T. Yoshida, S. Wada, M. Nishimura, H. Komano, T. Yamamoto, B. De Strooper, K. Yamamoto, et al.
Coordinated Metabolism of Alcadein and Amyloid {beta}-Protein Precursor Regulates FE65-dependent Gene Transactivation
J. Biol. Chem., June 4, 2004; 279(23): 24343 - 24354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. C. Nyborg, A. Y. Kornilova, K. Jansen, T. B. Ladd, M. S. Wolfe, and T. E. Golde
Signal Peptide Peptidase Forms a Homodimer That Is Labeled by an Active Site-directed {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 2004; 279(15): 15153 - 15160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
X.-X. Yan, T. Li, C. M. Rominger, S. R. Prakash, P. C. Wong, R. E. Olson, R. Zaczek, and Y.-W. Li
Binding Sites of {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitors in Rodent Brain: Distribution, Postnatal Development, and Effect of Deafferentation
J. Neurosci., March 24, 2004; 24(12): 2942 - 2952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
J. L. Jankowsky, D. J. Fadale, J. Anderson, G. M. Xu, V. Gonzales, N. A. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, M. K. Lee, L. H. Younkin, S. L. Wagner, et al.
Mutant presenilins specifically elevate the levels of the 42 residue {beta}-amyloid peptide in vivo: evidence for augmentation of a 42-specific {gamma} secretase
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 15, 2004; 13(2): 159 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. H. Searfoss, W. H. Jordan, D. O. Calligaro, E. J. Galbreath, L. M. Schirtzinger, B. R. Berridge, H. Gao, M. A. Higgins, P. C. May, and T. P. Ryan
Adipsin, a Biomarker of Gastrointestinal Toxicity Mediated by a Functional {gamma}-Secretase Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 46107 - 46116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Nyabi, M. Bentahir, K. Horre, A. Herreman, N. Gottardi-Littell, C. Van Broeckhoven, P. Merchiers, K. Spittaels, W. Annaert, and B. De Strooper
Presenilins Mutated at Asp-257 or Asp-385 Restore Pen-2 Expression and Nicastrin Glycosylation but Remain Catalytically Inactive in the Absence of Wild Type Presenilin
J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43430 - 43436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K.-M. Jung, S. Tan, N. Landman, K. Petrova, S. Murray, R. Lewis, P. K. Kim, D. S. Kim, S. H. Ryu, M. V. Chao, et al.
Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis of the p75 Neurotrophin Receptor Modulates Its Association with the TrkA Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 42161 - 42169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
B. Martoglio and T. E. Golde
Intramembrane-cleaving aspartic proteases and disease: presenilins, signal peptide peptidase and their homologs
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 15, 2003; 12(90002): R201 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. H. Adler, E. Chiffoleau, L. Xu, N. M. Dalton, J. M. Burg, A. D. Wells, M. S. Wolfe, L. A. Turka, and W. S. Pear
Notch Signaling Augments T Cell Responsiveness by Enhancing CD25 Expression
J. Immunol., September 15, 2003; 171(6): 2896 - 2903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Weggen, J. L. Eriksen, S. A. Sagi, C. U. Pietrzik, V. Ozols, A. Fauq, Todd. E. Golde, and E. H. Koo
Evidence That Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Decrease Amyloid {beta}42 Production by Direct Modulation of {gamma}-Secretase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2003; 278(34): 31831 - 31837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Taniguchi, S.-H. Kim, and S. S. Sisodia
Presenilin-dependent "{gamma}-Secretase" Processing of Deleted in Colorectal Cancer (DCC)
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 30425 - 30428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
W. Xia and M. S. Wolfe
Intramembrane proteolysis by presenilin and presenilin-like proteases
J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2003; 116(14): 2839 - 2844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. H. Pasternak, R. D. Bagshaw, M. Guiral, S. Zhang, C. A. Ackerley, B. J. Pak, J. W. Callahan, and D. J. Mahuran
Presenilin-1, Nicastrin, Amyloid Precursor Protein, and {gamma}-Secretase Activity Are Co-localized in the Lysosomal Membrane
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 26687 - 26694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
O. Berezovska, P. Ramdya, J. Skoch, M. S. Wolfe, B. J. Bacskai, and B. T. Hyman
Amyloid Precursor Protein Associates with a Nicastrin-Dependent Docking Site on the Presenilin 1-{gamma}-Secretase Complex in Cells Demonstrated by Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging
J. Neurosci., June 1, 2003; 23(11): 4560 - 4566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X.-P. Shi, K. Tugusheva, J. E. Bruce, A. Lucka, G.-X. Wu, E. Chen-Dodson, E. Price, Y. Li, M. Xu, Q. Huang, et al.
{beta}-Secretase Cleavage at Amino Acid Residue 34 in the Amyloid {beta} Peptide Is Dependent upon {gamma}-Secretase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 21286 - 21294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Takahashi, I. Hayashi, Y. Tominari, K. Rikimaru, Y. Morohashi, T. Kan, H. Natsugari, T. Fukuyama, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
Sulindac Sulfide Is a Noncompetitive gamma -Secretase Inhibitor That Preferentially Reduces Abeta 42 Generation
J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 18664 - 18670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Y. Kornilova, C. Das, and M. S. Wolfe
Differential Effects of Inhibitors on the gamma -Secretase Complex. MECHANISTIC IMPLICATIONS
J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2003; 278(19): 16470 - 16473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. Herreman, G. Van Gassen, M. Bentahir, O. Nyabi, K. Craessaerts, U. Mueller, W. Annaert, and B. De Strooper
{gamma}-Secretase activity requires the presenilin-dependent trafficking of nicastrin through the Golgi apparatus but not its complex glycosylation
J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2003; 116(6): 1127 - 1136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sci SignalHome page
T. E. Golde and C. B. Eckman
Physiologic and Pathologic Events Mediated by Intramembranous and Juxtamembranous Proteolysis
Sci. Signal., March 4, 2003; 2003(172): re4 - re4.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. H. Scheinfeld, S. Matsuda, and L. D'Adamio
JNK-interacting protein-1 promotes transcription of Abeta protein precursor but not Abeta precursor-like proteins, mechanistically different than Fe65
PNAS, February 18, 2003; 100(4): 1729 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C.-Y. Ni, H. Yuan, and G. Carpenter
Role of the ErbB-4 Carboxyl Terminus in gamma -Secretase Cleavage
J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 4561 - 4565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. P. Weng, Y. Nam, M. S. Wolfe, W. S. Pear, J. D. Griffin, S. C. Blacklow, and J. C. Aster
Growth Suppression of Pre-T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cells by Inhibition of Notch Signaling
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2003; 23(2): 655 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Takasugi, Y. Takahashi, Y. Morohashi, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
The Mechanism of gamma -Secretase Activities through High Molecular Weight Complex Formation of Presenilins Is Conserved in Drosophila melanogaster and Mammals
J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 50198 - 50205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. H. Scheinfeld, E. Ghersi, K. Laky, B. J. Fowlkes, and L. D'Adamio
Processing of beta -Amyloid Precursor-like Protein-1 and -2 by gamma -Secretase Regulates Transcription
J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 44195 - 44201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Chen, Y. Gu, H. Hasegawa, X. Ruan, S. Arawaka, P. Fraser, D. Westaway, H. Mount, and P. St George-Hyslop
Presenilin 1 Mutations Activate gamma 42-Secretase but Reciprocally Inhibit epsilon -Secretase Cleavage of Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP) and S3-Cleavage of Notch
J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36521 - 36526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
Y.-H. Suh and F. Checler
Amyloid Precursor Protein, Presenilins, and alpha -Synuclein: Molecular Pathogenesis and Pharmacological Applications in Alzheimer's Disease
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2002; 54(3): 469 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D.-S. Yang, A. Tandon, F. Chen, G. Yu, H. Yu, S. Arawaka, H. Hasegawa, M. Duthie, S. D. Schmidt, T. V. Ramabhadran, et al.
Mature Glycosylation and Trafficking of Nicastrin Modulate Its Binding to Presenilins
J. Biol. Chem., July 26, 2002; 277(31): 28135 - 28142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C. P. Ponting, M. Hutton, A. Nyborg, M. Baker, K. Jansen, and T. E. Golde
Identification of a novel family of presenilin homologues
Hum. Mol. Genet., May 1, 2002; 11(9): 1037 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Morohashi, N. Hatano, S. Ohya, R. Takikawa, T. Watabiki, N. Takasugi, Y. Imaizumi, T. Tomita, and T. Iwatsubo
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of CALP/KChIP4, a Novel EF-hand Protein Interacting with Presenilin 2 and Voltage-gated Potassium Channel Subunit Kv4
J. Biol. Chem., April 19, 2002; 277(17): 14965 - 14975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Taniguchi, H. Karlstrom, J. Lundkvist, T. Mizutani, A. Otaka, M. Vestling, A. Bernstein, D. Donoviel, U. Lendahl, and T. Honjo
Notch receptor cleavage depends on but is not directly executed by presenilins
PNAS, March 19, 2002; 99(6): 4014 - 4019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. E. Berechid, M. Kitzmann, D. R. Foltz, A. H. Roach, D. Seiffert, L. A. Thompson, R. E. Olson, A. Bernstein, D. B. Donoviel, and J. S. Nye
Identification and Characterization of Presenilin-independent Notch Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8154 - 8165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-H. Kim, J. Y. Leem, J. J. Lah, H. H. Slunt, A. I. Levey, G. Thinakaran, and S. S. Sisodia
Multiple Effects of Aspartate Mutant Presenilin 1 on the Processing and Trafficking of Amyloid Precursor Protein
J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2001; 276(46): 43343 - 43350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
Y.-M. Li
{gamma}-Secretase: A Catalyst of Alzheimer Disease and Signal Transduction
Mol. Interv., October 1, 2001; 1(4): 198 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Levitan, J. Lee, L. Song, R. Manning, G. Wong, E. Parker, and L. Zhang
PS1 N- and C-terminal fragments form a complex that functions in APP processing and Notch signaling
PNAS, September 26, 2001; (2001) 211321898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Doerfler, M. S. Shearman, and R. M. Perlmutter
Presenilin-dependent gamma -secretase activity modulates thymocyte development
PNAS, July 19, 2001; (2001) 161102498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
S. L. Roberds, J. Anderson, G. Basi, M. J. Bienkowski, D. G. Branstetter, K. S. Chen, S. Freedman, N. L. Frigon, D. Games, K. Hu, et al.
BACE knockout mice are healthy despite lacking the primary {beta}-secretase activity in brain: implications for Alzheimer's disease therapeutics
Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2001; 10(12): 1317 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
C.-Y. Ni, M. P. Murphy, T. E. Golde, and G. Carpenter
gamma -Secretase Cleavage and Nuclear Localization of ErbB-4 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase
Science, December 7, 2001; 294(5549): 2179 - 2181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Iwata, T. Tomita, K. Maruyama, and T. Iwatsubo
Subcellular Compartment and Molecular Subdomain of beta -Amyloid Precursor Protein Relevant to the Abeta 42-promoting Effects of Alzheimer Mutant Presenilin 2
J. Biol. Chem., June 8, 2001; 276(24): 21678 - 21685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Tomita, T. Watabiki, R. Takikawa, Y. Morohashi, N. Takasugi, R. Kopan, B. De Strooper, and T. Iwatsubo
The First Proline of PALP Motif at the C Terminus of Presenilins Is Obligatory for Stabilization, Complex Formation, and gamma -Secretase Activities of Presenilins
J. Biol. Chem., August 24, 2001; 276(35): 33273 - 33281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Beher, J. D. J. Wrigley, A. Nadin, G. Evin, C. L. Masters, T. Harrison, J. L. Castro, and M. S. Shearman
Pharmacological Knock-down of the Presenilin 1 Heterodimer by a Novel gamma -Secretase Inhibitor. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRESENILIN BIOLOGY
J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2001; 276(48): 45394 - 45402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H.-J. Lee, K.-M. Jung, Y. Z. Huang, L. B. Bennett, J. S. Lee, L. Mei, and T.-W. Kim
Presenilin-dependent gamma -Secretase-like Intramembrane Cleavage of ErbB4
J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2002; 277(8): 6318 - 6323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. S. Wolfe and C. Haass
The Role of Presenilins in gamma -Secretase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5413 - 5416.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Doerfler, M. S. Shearman, and R. M. Perlmutter
Presenilin-dependent gamma -secretase activity modulates thymocyte development
PNAS, July 31, 2001; 98(16): 9312 - 9317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. Levitan, J. Lee, L. Song, R. Manning, G. Wong, E. Parker, and L. Zhang
PS1 N- and C-terminal fragments form a complex that functions in APP processing and Notch signaling
PNAS, October 9, 2001; 98(21): 12186 - 12190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
P. Cupers, M. Bentahir, K. Craessaerts, I. Orlans, H. Vanderstichele, P. Saftig, B. De Strooper, and W. Annaert
The discrepancy between presenilin subcellular localization and {gamma}-secretase processing of amyloid precursor protein
J. Cell Biol., August 20, 2001; 154(4): 731 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/44/34086    most recent
M005430200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seiffert, D.
Right arrow Articles by Zaczek, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seiffert, D.
Right arrow Articles by Zaczek, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement