![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 44, 34224-34230, November 3, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
-Cell
Differentiation Factor Nkx6.1*
§,
¶
,
, and
¶**
From the
Hormone Research Institute and
¶ Department of Medicine, University of California,
San Francisco, California 94143-0534
Received for publication, June 8, 2000, and in revised form, August 3, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the mature pancreas, the homeodomain
transcription factor Nkx6.1 is uniquely restricted to The development and differentiation of organs like the pancreas
require the coordinate activation of unique sets of transcription factors (1, 2). Genetic studies in mice have recently revealed the
critical role of several pancreatic transcription factors in the
differentiation of the insulin-producing Among the known pancreatic transcription factors, the homeodomain
factor Nkx6.1 is unique in its absolute restriction in the mature
pancreas to the Control of cell type-specific gene expression frequently operates at
the level of gene transcription, but post-transcriptional mechanisms
including controls at the level of translation initiation may play
essential roles as well. Generally, cap-dependent ribosomal scanning identifies translation start sites and initiates translation on the majority of cellular mRNAs. This process is severely
hampered on long 5'-untranslated regions
(5'-UTR)2 containing multiple
upstream reading frames and secondary structure (16). Translation of
such mRNAs may initiate through a cap-independent mechanism
utilizing an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) in the 5'-UTR.
Cellular mRNAs containing IRESs can be very specifically regulated,
providing a post-transcriptional mechanism to control their expression
(17, 18). By using this mechanism, the translation of a number of
mammalian growth factor RNAs is specifically regulated during
differentiation or cell growth (19-22). Furthermore, during Drosophila embryonic development, the 5'-UTRs of mRNAs
encoding homeodomain transcription factors Antp and Ubx are known to
regulate protein expression in a spatio-temporal manner, although there are no reports of the existence of IRESs in any mammalian homeodomain transcription factor genes (23, 24).
To understand the mechanisms that regulate Cell Culture and Transient Transfections--
For transient mammalian cell transfections, RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analyses--
Total RNA from
cell lines was isolated using TRIzol® (Life Technologies, Inc.) per
the manufacturer's protocol. Northern blots were performed by standard
procedures using 10 µg of total RNA (25). A fragment of hamster
nkx6.1 cDNA was used as a probe for Northern analysis
and was prepared by digesting pBAT12-Nkx6.1 (26) with KpnI
and NotI and labeling the liberated fragment with
[32P]dCTP.
5'-Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (RACE)--
The 5' end
of mouse nkx6.1 cDNA was identified by 5'-RACE, using a
modification of the protocol from the 5'-RACE system, version 2.0 (Life
Technologies, Inc.). For mouse cDNA, 2.5 pmol of specific primer
HW8 (5'-GCG TTC GCT TTG ATG TAG GA-3') was annealed to 1 µg of total
RNA from RNase Protection Assay--
The fragment from nucleotide Cloning of the Mouse nkx6.1 Gene Promoter--
A Reporter Gene Constructs and Assay--
To generate reporter
plasmids, fragments of the 5' region of the nkx6.1 gene
(obtained either by restriction digestion or PCR) were ligated upstream
of the luciferase gene in the plasmid pFOXLuc1 (14). Mutagenesis of the
reporter gene constructs was performed using the Quick Change®
mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). All constructs were confirmed by sequencing.
In Vitro Transcription and Translation and Electrophoretic
Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)--
Nkx2.2 and PDX-1 proteins were
produced in vitro using T7TNT Quick Coupled Lysate System®
(Promega). Single-stranded wild-type oligonucleotides
(5'-GATCTAGCCCCTCATAAGTGATAATGATCTAGGGG-3'), corresponding to the
sequence between nucleotides Western Blotting Analyses--
Expression of Nkx6.1 in nuclear
extracts was measured by performing Western blot analysis using
polyclonal anti-Nkx6.1 antibody (14). Western blots were visualized by
using the ECL Plus® system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Dicistronic Plasmids and Dicistronic Assay--
For generating
the basic dicistronic construct, the RSV promoter region driving the
CAT gene was inserted upstream of the luciferase gene in pFOXLuc1 to
obtain pFoxRSV-CAT-Luc. The 5'-UTR of nkx6.1 was inserted
bi-directionally into the region between the CAT and luciferase genes
to obtain pFoxRSV-CAT-5'-UTR-Luc and pFoxRSV-CAT-5'-UTR-R-Luc. Next, by
using PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis, the cloning sites and 5'-UTR
of the luciferase gene were removed. The constructs were confirmed by
sequencing. These dicistronic reporter genes were co-transfected with
pBluescript KS(+) into mammalian cells, and 48 h after the
transfection cells were harvested and assayed for luciferase and CAT
activities, as described previously (28). Luciferase enzyme activity
from each transfection was normalized to the activity of CAT and was used as an index of IRES activity.
Expression of Nkx6.1 in Cell Lines--
To identify cell lines
that express Nkx6.1, we performed Northern blot analysis with a hamster
nkx6.1 cDNA probe and Western blot analysis with
antiserum directed against the carboxyl-terminal end of the hamster
Nkx6.1 protein. Total RNA and nuclear extracts for these assays were
prepared from Structure of the Mouse nkx6.1 Gene--
As an initial step toward
characterizing the 5' end of the nkx6.1 gene, we cloned and
sequenced exon 1 and the 5'-flanking region of the mouse
nkx6.1 gene. 5'-RACE performed on RNA from
The strongest band by RNase protection was defined as +1 bp, and other
nucleotides are numbered accordingly. The mouse genomic sequence lacked
a TATAA box upstream of the transcription start sites, but consensus
CCAAT box sequences are located at Deletion Analysis of the Mouse nkx6.1 Promoter--
When ligated
upstream of the luciferase reporter gene and transfected into mammalian
cell lines, a large fragment of the mouse nkx6.1 gene
including 5.6 kb of 5'-flanking sequence and 973 bp of the 5'-UTR was
sufficient to direct the expression of luciferase in the
Further deletion of the region between
To map more precisely the PDX-1 and Nkx2-2 Bind to the nkx6.1 Promoter--
To address
whether PDX-1 and Nkx2-2 bind to these sites, we performed an EMSA
using a double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide corresponding to
nucleotide
When co-transfected into NIH3T3 cells, PDX-1 can activate the
There are additional PDX-1 and Nkx2-2-binding sites in the
nkx6.1 promoter outside of the
It should be noted as well that there are other potential binding sites
for Complex Function of the nkx6.1 Gene 5'-UTR--
Whereas its
promoter plays a critical role in expression of the nkx6.1
gene, Fig. 3 demonstrates that sequences within the 5'-UTR are at least
as important. In
When moved from its normal position downstream of the transcription
start site, the function of the 5'-UTR changes. As shown in Fig.
6, when positioned downstream of the
nkx6.1 or herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (TK) minimal
promoter, the 5'-UTR enhances the expression of luciferase in
These results demonstrate that the 5'-UTR can function as a
position-independent repressor in non-islet cells, and as an activator in islet cells when located in its normal position downstream of the
promoter. Cell type-specific function appears to be dependent on an
intact 5'-UTR, since the 5'-UTR loses all specificity when cut in half
(Fig. 6).
Identification of an IRES in the 5'-UTR--
Several features of
the 5'-UTR suggest that it may provide a poor template for protein
synthesis after cap-dependent scanning: it is long (973 bp), G/C-rich (67.3%), and contains out of frame ATG codons with
reasonable Kozac consensus sequences: These limitations could be
overcome by an IRES. In addition, the presence of an IRES that
functions in a cell type-specific manner could explain the functional
characteristics of the 5'-UTR.
To test for this possibility, a dicistronic gene (pFoxRSV-CAT-Luc) was
constructed placing the CAT gene and the luciferase gene in series
under the control of RSV promoter. The 5'-UTR of the nkx6.1
was inserted between the two cistrons of this plasmid (pFOX-CAT-5'-UTR-Luc). In addition, the 5'-UTR was inserted in an
inverted orientation (pFOX-CAT-5'-UTR-R-Luc) as a nonspecific control.
These plasmids were transfected into two In the present study, we have characterized the nkx6.1
promoter and mapped a region involved in its cell type-specific
expression. In addition, we found that the expression of Nkx6.1 also is
controlled at the post-transcriptional level, and an IRES in the 5'-UTR
plays an important role in directing its expression to islet cells.
Like many transcription factor genes, the 5'-flanking region of the
mouse nkx6.1 gene lacks a classic TATA box. The TATA box is
typically located 30 bp upstream of the transcription initiation site
and helps specify the transcription initiation site by directing the
binding of TFIID. Characteristic of genes that lack TATA boxes, the
nkx6.1 gene has multiple transcription initiation sites as mapped by 5'-RACE and RNase protection assay. Also characteristic of
TATA-less genes, the transcription initiation sites lie just downstream
of two CCAAT boxes, at least one of which is functional in both islet
and non-islet cells.
Complex interactions among a number of transcription factors control
the temporal expression of genes during the development of the
pancreas. Tight control over the temporal and spatial expression of
these factors is essential for proper development of the endocrine cells. Nkx6.1 is expressed in at least three different cell types during mouse pancreatic development as follows: initial broad expression in the epithelial cells that compose the dorsal and ventral
buds, restricted expression after embryonic day 13 in islet cell
precursors, and finally in mature Although there are several binding sites for Nkx2.2 and PDX-1 in the
proximal Nkx6.1 promoter, only the sites located at We recently found that Nkx2.2 by itself cannot activate transcription
even from a construct with 7 tandem repeats of an ideal Nkx2.2-binding
site. The NK2 domain just downstream of the homeodomain in Nkx2.2
inhibits the activation domain, and some modification of the
NK2-specific domain may be required to allow Nkx2.2 to activate
transcription (30). When Nkx2.2 is overexpressed as in the
co-transfection experiments reported here, the non-islet cells may lack
specific modifiers of the NK2 domain, or the capacity of the cells to
modify the NK2 domain may be exceeded. Hence, we cannot rule out the
possibility that Nkx2.2 cooperates with PDX1 in regulating the Nkx6.1
promoter in the normal cellular context.
In addition, a different array of factors may control Nkx6.1 expression
at different points in development. The cells used for these
experiments are probably more representative of mature In addition to controls at the level of the promoter, expression from
the nkx6.1 gene is regulated by its long, complex 5'-UTR, which has similarities to the 5'-UTRs found in some
Drosophila homeobox genes. For example, ubx
contains a 968-bp 5'-UTR and 2 upstream ATGs, and antp
contains a 1735-bp 5'-UTR and 15 upstream ATGs. Both of these 5'-UTRs
contain IRESs that promote developmentally regulated translation.
Similarly, the nkx6.1 5'-UTR functions as an IRES; while it
can function in all the cells types tested, its activity is
significantly higher in islet cell lines. These results demonstrate
that the IRES activity of the nkx6.1 5'-UTR shows cell type
specificity. In addition, the 5'-UTR also inhibits transcription in the
NIH3T3 cells, but not in islet cells, in a position-independent
fashion. Taken together, the 5'-UTR contributes significantly to the
cell type-specific expression of Nkx6.1.
The identified functions of the 5'-UTR, however, cannot completely
explain the differences in expression of Nkx6.1 between It should be noted that further controls provide additional limits on
the function of Nkx6.1 once the protein is expressed. When it binds to
target genes, Nkx6.1 is a potent transcriptional repressor; but a
sequence in the carboxyl-terminal end of the molecule prevents DNA
binding by the homeodomain (14). Presumably only when this binding
inhibition is relieved by interactions provided in the appropriate
cellular environment can Nkx6.1 then turn off target genes. Together,
several layers of regulation ensure that gene targeting by
nkx6.1 is tightly restricted temporally and spatially.
-cells. Nkx6.1
also is expressed in developing
-cells and plays an essential role
in their differentiation. Among cell lines, both
- and
-cell
lines express nkx6.1 mRNA; but no protein can be
detected in the
-cell lines, suggesting that post-transcriptional
regulation contributes to the restriction of Nkx6.1 to
-cells. To
investigate the regulator of Nkx6.1 expression, we outlined the
structure of the mouse nkx6.1 gene, and we identified regions that direct cell type-specific expression. The
nkx6.1 gene has a long 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR)
downstream of a cluster of transcription start sites.
nkx6.1 gene sequences from
5.6 to +1.0 kilobase pairs
have specific promoter activity in
-cell lines but not in NIH3T3
cells. This activity is dependent on sequences located at about
800
base pairs and on the 5'-UTR. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays
demonstrate that homeodomain transcription factors PDX1 and Nkx2.2 can
bind to the sequence element located at
800 base pairs. In addition,
dicistronic assays establish that the 5'-UTR region functions as a
potent internal ribosomal entry site, providing cell type-specific
regulation of translation. These data demonstrate that complex
regulation of both Nkx6.1 transcription and translation provides the
specificity of expression required during pancreas development.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-cells during pancreatic
development (3-12).
-cells. In the developing fetus, however, Nkx6.1 is
initially expressed in almost all the epithelial cells of the
pancreatic buds. Starting around embryonic day 13 (E13), Nkx6.1
expression becomes restricted to
-cells and
-cell precursors (13). Targeted disruption of the nkx6.1 gene causes a severe defect in
-cell differentiation in mice. The nkx6.1 null
mutants have normal numbers of insulin-expressing cells through E12.5, but new
-cell formation is blocked after E12.5. Hence, Nkx6.1 is a
necessary component of the signals triggering the major wave of
-cell differentiation and proliferation after
E12.5.1 Nkx6.1 functions at
one step in the hierarchy of transcription factors controlling
pancreatic development and differentiation. Although Nkx6.1 represses
the transcription of target genes (14), its downstream genetic targets
have not been identified. Upstream of Nkx6.1, two homeodomain
transcription factors are known to control its pancreatic expression,
Nkx2.2 in the fetal pancreas after E12.5 and PDX1 in adult
-cells
(9, 15). However, the mechanisms by which these factors control Nkx6.1
expression and the potential roles of other factors are unknown.
-cell-specific expression
of Nkx6.1, we outlined the structure of the mouse nkx6.1 gene and identified a promoter that directs cell type-specific expression in
-cells. A promoter element found approximately 800 bp
upstream of the transcription initiation sites contains binding sites
for Nkx2.2 and PDX1 and functions as an important transcriptional
enhancer. In addition, a potent IRES in the 5'-UTR further restricts
Nkx6.1 expression to
-cells. These findings establish that gene
regulation through an IRES plays a similar role in development of the
mammalian pancreatic islet as in Drosophila development.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
TC3 cells and
TC1.6 cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
(DMEM) supplemented with 2.5% fetal bovine serum and 15% horse serum.
HIT-T15 M2.22 cells and INR1 cells were grown in DMEM/H16 supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum. NIH3T3 cells were grown in DMEM
supplemented with 10% calf serum. COS7 cells were grown in DMEM with
10% fetal bovine serum with 4 mM glutamine, and INS-1
cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum with 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM pyruvic acid, 10 mM HEPES.
TC3 cells,
TC1.6
cells, and NIH3T3 cells were plated in 6-well tissue culture plates
24 h before transfection. For the standard reporter gene analysis,
1.8 µg of each luciferase reporter plasmid and 0.2 µg of the
CMV
-Gal plasmid were co-transfected into the cells using Superfect®
(Qiagen) under conditions recommended by the manufacturer. Forty eight
hours after transfection, cells were harvested, and luciferase and
-galactosidase assays were performed as described previously (14).
Luciferase activity was corrected for transfection efficiency by use of
the co-transfected CMV
-Gal plasmid. For evaluation of PDX1 and
Nkx2.2 effects on the reporter gene constructs, 50 ng of expression
vector (pBAT12-IPF1, pBAT12hNkx2.2, or expression vector without
insert, pBAT12(14)) were co-transfected into NIH3T3 cells with 2.0 µg
of each luciferase reporter plasmid. Cells were harvested 48 h
later and assayed for luciferase activity. All reporter gene analyses
were performed on at least three occasions, and data are expressed as
mean ± S.E.
TC3 cells. Reverse transcription was carried out using
SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). After
first strand cDNA synthesis, the original mRNA template was
removed by treatment with RNase, and homopolymeric dCTP tails were then
added to the 3' end of the cDNA using terminal
deoxynucleotidyltransferase. By using these products as a template, we
carried out 35 cycles of PCR using the 5'-RACE Abridged Anchor Primer
(Life Technologies, Inc.) and HW9 (5'-CGC CTG GGG TAG CTT CAA AG-3') as
primers. For the nested PCR, we used Abridged Universal Amplification
Primer (Life Technologies, Inc.) and HW11 (5'-GCG GAT CCG CCT CTG ATC TCG CTC GGA -3') as primers, and we performed 35 cycles of PCR. The PCR
products were subcloned into pBluescript KS(+) and sequenced.
159
to nucleotide +100 of the nkx6.1 gene was amplified by PCR
and subcloned into pBluescript. Labeled antisense RNA probe was
generated using this fragment as a template. RNase protection assays
were carried out using HybSpeed RPA® kit (Ambion) per
manufacturer's protocol. Hybridization of the riboprobe to RNA was
performed in a 10-µl reaction containing 8 × 104
cpm of probe and 10 µg of total RNA from
TC3 cells and 40 µg of
yeast tRNA. The control sample contained 50 µg of yeast tRNA alone.
DASH mouse
genomic library was screened for the nkx6.1 gene using a
mouse nkx6.1 partial cDNA probe corresponding to the coding region of exon1. The
DASH clone encoding the longest 5' region of the nkx6.1 gene was subcloned into the
EcoRI site of pBluescript KS(+). This plasmid contains an
approximately 10-kb fragment of nkx6.1 gene (pBSNkx6.1-10
kb). This clone was characterized by restriction enzyme analysis and sequencing.
817 and
788 (B1) and
(5'-CGGAAGAGACGCACTTAAACTGCTTTTC-3') corresponding to the sequence
between
478 and
441 nucleotides, were 5'-end-labeled with
[
-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase. The labeled
oligonucleotide was column-purified and annealed to an excess of
complementary strand. EMSA buffers and electrophoresis conditions were
as described previously (27). One µl of the in vitro
reaction mixture was used for the EMSAs. The following oligonucleotides
were used as competitors in EMSA reactions (top strands shown):
M1, GATCTAGCCCCTCATAAGTGATGGTGATCTAGGGG, and M2, GATCTAGCCCCTCATGGGTGATAATGATCTAGGGG.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-cell lines
TC3 and HIT-T15, from
-cell lines
INR-1 and
TC1.6, and from non-pancreatic cell lines NIH3T3 and COS7.
As shown in Fig. 1, nkx6.1
mRNA is expressed in all four pancreatic islet cell lines but not
in NIH3T3 cells. However, the Nkx6.1 protein can be detected only in
TC3 cells. Although the expression level of nkx6.1
mRNA is higher in
TC3 cells than the other cell line, this
difference alone cannot explain the greater difference in the
expression of Nkx6.1 protein. These results suggest that the
expression of Nkx6.1 is regulated both transcriptionally and
post-transcriptionally.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The expression of Nkx6.1 in cell lines.
A, the Northern blot shown is probed with
32P-labeled hamster nkx6.1 cDNA. Ten
micrograms of total RNA were used from NIH3T3 cells (lane
1),
TC1.6 cells (lane 2),
TC3 cells (lane
3), HIT T15 M2.2.2 cells (lane 4), and INR-1 cells
(lane 5). B, the Western blot shown is probed
with antiserum raised in rabbit against hamster Nkx6.1. Five micrograms
of nuclear extract were used from COS7 cells (lane 1),
NIH3T3 cells (lane 2),
TC1.6 cells (lane 3),
TC3 cells (lane 4), HIT T15 M2.2.2 cells (lane
5), and INR-1 cells (lane 6).
TC3 cells
identified a cluster of seven transcription start sites clustered at
~1 kb upstream from the translation start site with no additional
intervening introns (Fig. 2B).
RNase protection analysis with
TC3 RNA confirmed the position of
four of these start sites.

View larger version (78K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The mouse nkx6.1 gene
promoter. A, the results of an RNase protection assay
are shown. Total RNA from
TC3 cells (10 µg) was hybridized with a
mouse genomic nkx6.1 antisense probe. The protected bands
were indicated by arrows. B, 2.4 kb of genomic
DNA sequence upstream of the mouse Nkx6.1 coding region is shown. Seven
transcription start sites identified by 5'-RACE is shown in
boldface, and four transcription sites identified by RNase
protection are labeled with asterisks. The translation start
site is indicated by italics. Two potential CCAAT boxes and
other promoter elements are indicated in underlined and
boldface. Several proximal TAAT sequences are shown in
boldface. The sequence of the mouse nkx6.1
promoter region and Exon1 are available in the GenBankTM
data base under accession number AF291666.
220 bp and at
150 bp (29).
-cell line
TC3 but not in the fibroblast cell line NIH3T3 (Fig.
3), demonstrating that this fragment of
the gene contains sequences that are important for
-cell-specific
expression. Deletion of the sequence between
5600 and
2570 bp
increases luciferase activity modestly in both cell lines. This
increase is lost, however, when equal molar quantities of the plasmid
are used for the transfections (data not shown).

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Transcriptional activity of the
nkx6.1 promoter. Reporter plasmids were
constructed with the nkx6.1 gene fragments indicated
inserted upstream of the luciferase gene and then were co-transfected
with a CMV promoter-driven
-galactosidase expression plasmid into
NIH3T3 cells (filled bars) of
TC3 cells (hatched
bars). Relative luciferase activities are calculated with the
activity of cells transfected with the pFOXLuc1 plasmid alone set at 1. All data are shown as mean ± S.E.
893 and
645 bp causes a
significant decrease in promoter activity in
TC3 cells but not in
NIH3T3 cells, implicating this region in
-cell-specific expression.
Deletion of sequences within the proximal 334 bp of the promoter causes
the progressive diminution of promoter activity in both cell types
showing that this region is important for basal promoter activity,
although the greater decrease in activity in
-cells suggests some
degree of
-cell-specific function for these sequences.
-cell-specific enhancer sequences within
the region between
893 and
645 bp, we generated a series of small
deletions within this region. As shown in Fig.
4A, the sequences between
840 and
771 bp are necessary for this
-cell specific activity.
This sequence also can function weakly as a
-cell-specific enhancer
when linked to a heterologous promoter (Fig. 4B). This
sequence contains two potentially important binding sites for
-cell
transcription factors, the Nkx2-2-binding site core sequence TAAGTG
(30) and the PDX-1-binding site core sequence TAAT (31). Mutation of
the potential PDX-1-binding site causes a significant fall in promoter
activity, although mutation of the Nkx2-2-binding site causes a more
modest decrease in promoter activity (Fig. 4C).

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Identification of a
-cell-specific enhancer element. A,
reporter plasmids were constructed with the truncated nkx6.1
promoters indicated inserted upstream of the luciferase gene and then
were co-transfected with a CMV promoter-driven
-galactosidase
expression plasmid into NIH3T3 cells (filled bars) or
TC3
cells (hatched bars). Relative luciferase activities are
calculated with the activity of cells transfected with the pFOXLuc1
plasmid alone set at 1. The asterisks indicate a
p value <0.01 for the comparison of the activities
of the
771 promoter with the
840 promoter and <0.05 for the
comparison of the activities of the
771 promoter with the
893
promoter in
TC3 cells as calculated by the paired Student's
t test. B, a reporter plasmids was constructed
with the
840 to
6450bp fragment of the nkx6.1 promoter
inserted upstream of the minimal rat prolactin promoter and the
luciferase gene and then was co-transfected with a CMV promoter-driven
-galactosidase expression plasmid into NIH3T3 cells (filled
bars) or
TC3 cells (hatched bars). Relative
luciferase activities are calculated with the activity of cells
transfected with the pFOXLuc1 plasmid containing only the prolactin
promoter set at 1. The asterisk indicates a p
value <0.05 for the comparison of the activities of the
pFOXluc.prl.Nkx6.1(
840/
645) plasmid with the pFOXluc.prl plasmid in
TC3 cells as calculated by the paired Student's t test.
C, reporter plasmids containing the
893-bp promoter
fragment and complete 5'-UTR with or without the mutations shown
upstream of the luciferase gene were co-transfected with a CMV
promoter-driven
-galactosidase expression plasmid into
TC3 cells.
Relative luciferase activities are calculated with the activity of
cells transfected with the pFOXLuc1 plasmid alone set at 1. The
asterisk indicates a p value <0.05 for the
comparison of the activities of the M1 mutant promoter with the
wild-type promoter as calculated by the paired Student's t
test. All data are shown as mean ± S.E.
817 to
788 (B1) as a probe. In vitro translated Nkx2-2 and PDX-1 can bind to this site (Fig.
5A), and they are competed by
the unlabeled oligonucleotide. An unlabeled oligonucleotide containing
a mutation in the Nkx2-2-binding core (mutant M2) can still compete for
PDX-1 binding but not for Nkx2-2 binding. Interestingly, an unlabeled
oligonucleotide containing a mutation in the PDX-1-binding core (mutant
M1) cannot compete for either PDX-1 or Nkx2-2 binding.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
PDX-1 and Nkx2.2 binding to the
nkx6.1 promoter. A, EMSA using
in vitro translated Nkx2.2 and PDX-1 is shown.
32P-Labeled oligonucleotides encoding the B1 enhancer
element (sequences are shown in (Fig. 4B)) were incubated
with 1 µl of each in vitro translated protein for 15 min
at room temperature and then subjected to electrophoresis on a 5%
polyacrylamide gel. Unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides (sequences
are shown in (Fig. 4B)) were added at 20- and 200-fold molar excess. B, a reporter plasmid
containing five tandem copies of the B1 enhancer element upstream of
the prolactin minimal promoter driving luciferase and pBAT12 expression
plasmids expressing the Nkx2.2 and PDX-1 cDNAs under the control of
the CMV promoter were co-transfected into NIH3T3 cells. Relative
luciferase activities are calculated with the activity of cells
transfected with the pBAT12 expression vector without cDNA insert
set at 1. All data are shown as mean ± S.E. C, an EMSA
using in vitro translated Nkx2.2 is shown.
32P-Labeled oligonucleotides encoding the B1 enhancer
element (lanes 1-3) or the related sequence at
460
(lanes 4 and 5) in the nkx6.1 promoter
(see "Experimental Procedures" for sequence) were incubated with 1 µl of the in vitro translated protein for 15 min at room
temperature and then subjected to electrophoresis on a 5%
polyacrylamide gel. The control lanes (2 and 4)
contain in vitro translated luciferase protein.
N.S. indicates a nonspecific protein-DNA complex produced by
proteins present in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate mix.
-cell-specific enhancer linked to the rat prolactin promoter (Fig.
5B). Nkx2-2, however, cannot activate the mini-enhancer by
itself or in combination with PDX-1 (Fig. 5B), although it can activate the intact nkx6.1 promoter (data not shown).
Neither factor affects the expression of luciferase from the parent
vector containing the prolactin promoter alone. Recently Sepulveda
et al. (32) demonstrated that the closely related cardiac
homeodomain factor Nkx2.5 cooperates with GATA-4, a zinc finger
transcription factor, to activate the
-actin promoter.
Interestingly, for this interaction, a GATA4-binding site is not
necessary. To test the possibility that Nkx2.2 also cooperates with
GATA factors in pancreatic
-cells to activate the nkx6.1
promoter, we co-transfected vectors expressing either GATA4 or GATA6
along with the Nkx2.2 expression vector and a reporter plasmid
containing either the
-cell-specific mini-enhancer linked to the rat
prolactin promoter or the intact nkx6.1 promoter driving
luciferase. However, neither GATA4 nor GATA6 produced any additional
activation of the nkx6.1 promoter or mini-enhancer (data not shown).
-cell-specific enhancer
region. There are multiple TAAT sequences that fit the PDX-1 binding
consensus within the proximal 900 bp of the promoter (see
boldface sequences in Fig. 2B) as well as several
copies of the (C/T)AAG sequence that forms the core of the
Nkx2-2-binding sequence. One of these sites, located at
460 bp, can
function as a high affinity Nkx2-2-binding site (Fig.
5C).
-cell transcription factors in the nkx6.1 promoter, including two copies of the HNF6-binding site consensus sequence (33)
(see Fig. 2B). The functional importance of these sites is
difficult to ascertain since they fall within a region of the proximal
promoter that is also important for expression in NIH3T3 cells.
TC3 cells, the deletion of the 5'-UTR causes a
nearly complete loss of luciferase expression from the
nkx6.1 promoter constructs. In NIH3T3 cells, however, removal of the 5'-UTR increases luciferase activity.
- and
-cell lines but not in the NIH3T3 cell line. In contrast, the 5'-UTR
produces no activity in
- and
-cells and significant repression
in NIH3T3 cells when placed upstream of the nkx6.1 or TK
promoters.

View larger version (31K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Characterization of the 5'-UTR region.
A, reporter plasmids containing nkx6.1 5'-UTR
upstream or downstream of the nkx6.1
344 minimal promoter
region or the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (TK)
promoter driving the luciferase gene were co-transfected with a CMV
promoter-driven
-galactosidase expression plasmid into NIH3T3 cells
(filled bar),
TC3 cells (hatched bar), and
TC1.6 cells (open bar). Relative luciferase activities
are calculated with the activity of cells transfected with the plasmid
containing the promoter alone without 5'-UTR alone set at 1.
-cell lines,
TC3 and
INS1, the
-cell line
TC1.6, and two non-islet cell lines NIH3T3
and COS7. CAT and luciferase activity were assayed 48 h after
transfection. The ratio of luciferase activity to CAT activity provides
a gauge of IRES function. As shown in Fig.
7, the 5'-UTR can function as an IRES
when placed in its native orientation, and this activity is
consistently greater in islet cell lines. Furthermore,
-cell lines
showed modestly higher activity than
-cell lines. These data
demonstrate that the IRES function of the 5'-UTR contributes to the
tissue-specific expression of nkx6.1.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The 5'-UTR of nkx6.1 gene
works as an IRES. Dicistronic reporter plasmid containing the
5'-UTR of nkx6.1 bidirectionally inserted between the CAT
and luciferase genes were transfected into the cell lines shown. CAT
activity and luciferase activity were measured, and the luciferase
activity divided by CAT activity was used as an index of IRES activity.
All data are shown as mean ± S.E. The ratio of CAT/luciferase
activity for the control dicistronic constructs without the 5'-UTR is
set at 1.0.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-cells. Studies of mice that lack
an intact nkx2.2 gene demonstrate that Nkx2.2 is required
for Nkx6.1 expression in the pancreas after E13; specific inactivation
of the pdx-1 gene in insulin-expressing cells demonstrates that PDX-1 is required for maintaining Nkx6.1 expression in
differentiated
-cells (9, 15). It can be concluded from these prior
studies that Nkx6.1 expression is regulated directly or indirectly by these two factors. The promoter studies reported here support the
conclusion that both factors drive Nkx6.1 expression directly, by
binding to the nkx6.1 gene promoter.
800 are required
for expression specifically in the
-cell line. The more proximal
sites may also contribute, but removal of more proximal sequences
affects expression in NIH3T3 cells as well. The presence of binding
sites for both factors in the
-cell-specific enhancer located at
800 bp is intriguing given the essential role of both factors in
Nkx6.1 expression. Despite the juxtaposed binding sites, however,
Nkx2.2 does not activate the
-cell-specific enhancer even in the
presence of co-expressed PDX-1.
-cells than
undifferentiated pancreatic epithelial cells or islet cell progenitors.
During the differentiation of islet cells in the fetal mouse pancreas,
the islet cell progenitors transiently express the basic
helix-loop-helix transcription factor neurogenin3 prior to further
maturation and expression of PDX-1 (34). Some of these early
neurogenin3-expressing cells co-express Nkx6.1, but not PDX-1,
demonstrating that cells at this stage in differentiation do not
require PDX-1 for Nkx6.1 expression (34). Other homeodomain proteins
capable of binding to the TAAT sites or other factors such as HNF6 (35)
may fill the PDX-1 role at this stage.
- and
-cell lines. No Nkx6.1 protein can be detected in
-cell lines,
despite the presence of nkx6.1 mRNA, suggesting that
post-transcriptional regulation of Nkx6.1 expression contributes to its
restriction from
-cells. Although the IRES in the 5'-UTR provides a
mechanism for cell type-specific translation of nkx6.1
mRNA, the activity of the IRES is similar in
TC1 cells and
-TC3 cells. It is possible that in the context of the intact gene,
the IRES may function in a more tightly restricted fashion, or other
posttranscriptional mechanisms must play additional roles in the cell
type-specific expression of Nkx6.1.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank members of German laboratory for helpful comments and criticisms and M. Sander for the mouse nkx6.1 genomic clone.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants DK31371 and DK30255.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF291666.
§ Recipient of a Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International Postdoctoral fellowship.
Recipient of Research Career Award K08 from the National
Institutes of Health.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Hormone Research Institute, University of California, 513 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA 94143-0534. Tel.: 415-476-9262; Fax: 415-731-3612; E-mail: mgerman@biochem.ucsf.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 9, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M004981200
1 M. Sander, L. Sussel, J. Conners, J. Kalamaras, F. DelaCruz, V. Schwitzgebel, A. Hays-Jordan, and M. S. German, submitted for publication.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: 5'-UTR, 5'-untranslated region; IRES, internal ribosomal entry site; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; TK, herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase; CMV, cytomegalovirus; kb, kilobase pairs; bp, base pairs; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; RSV, Rous sarcoma virus.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Sander, M., and German, M. S. (1997) J. Mol. Med. 75, 327-340 |
| 2. | Edlund, H. (1998) Diabetes 47, 1817-1823 |
| 3. | Jonsson, J., Carlsson, L., Edlund, T., and Edlund, H. (1994) Nature 371, 606-609 |
| 4. | Ahlgren, U., Pfaff, S. L., Jessell, T. M., Edlund, T., and Edlund, H. (1997) Nature 385, 257-260 |
| 5. | St-Onge, L., Sosa-Pineda, B., Chowdhury, K., Mansouri, A., and Gruss, P. (1997) Nature 387, 406-409 |
| 6. | Sosa-Pineda, B., Chowdhury, K., Torres, M., Oliver, G., and Gruss, P. (1997) Nature 386, 399-402 |
| 7. | Sander, M., Neubuser, A., Kalamaras, J., Ee, H. C., Martin, G. R., and German, M. S. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 1662-1673 |
| 8. | Naya, F. J., Huang, H. P., Qiu, Y., Mutoh, H., DeMayo, F. J., Leiter, A. B., and Tsai, M. J. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2323-2334 |
| 9. | Sussel, L., Kalamaras, J., Hartigan-O'Connor, D. J., Meneses, J. J., Pedersen, R. A., Rubenstein, J. L., and German, M. S. (1998) Development 125, 2213-2221 |
| 10. | Gradwohl, G., Dierich, A., LeMeur, M., and Guillemot, F. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 1607-1611 |
| 11. | Li, H., Arber, S., Jessell, T. M., and Edlund, H. (1999) Nat. Genet. 23, 67-70 |
| 12. | Harrison, K. A., Thaler, J., Pfaff, S. L., Gu, H., and Kehrl, J. H. (1999) Nat. Genet. 23, 71-75 |
| 13. | Oster, A., Jensen, J., Serup, P., Galante, P., Madsen, O. D., and Larsson, L. I. (1998) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 46, 707-715 |
| 14. | Mirmira, R. G., Watada, H., and German, M. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 14743-14751 |
| 15. | Ahlgren, U., Jonsson, J., Jonsson, L., Simu, K., and Edlund, H. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 1763-1768 |
| 16. | Kozak, M. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 229-241 |
| 17. | Pelletier, J., and Sonenberg, N. (1988) Nature 334, 320-325 |
| 18. | van der Velden, A. W., and Thomas, A. A. (1999) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31, 87-106 |
| 19. | Vagner, S., Gensac, M. C., Maret, A., Bayard, F., Amalric, F., Prats, H., and Prats, A. C. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 35-44 |
| 20. | Teerink, H., Voorma, H. O., and Thomas, A. A. (1995) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1264, 403-408 |
| 21. | Bernstein, J., Sella, O., Le, S. Y., and Elroy-Stein, O. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9356-9362 |
| 22. | Stein, I., Itin, A., Einat, P., Skaliter, R., Grossman, Z., and Keshet, E. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3112-3119 |
| 23. | Oh, S. K., Scott, M. P., and Sarnow, P. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 1643-1653 |
| 24. | Ye, X., Fong, P., Iizuka, N., Choate, D., and Cavener, D. R. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1714-1721 |
| 25. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , pp. 7.2-7.8, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 26. | Rudnick, A., Ling, T. Y., Odagiri, H., Rutter, W. J., and German, M. S. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12203-12207 |
| 27. | German, M. S., Moss, L. G., Wang, J., and Rutter, W. J. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1777-1788 |
| 28. | German, M. S., Wang, J., Chadwick, R. B., and Rutter, W. J. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 2165-2176 |
| 29. | Mantovani, R. (1998) Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 1135-1143 |
| 30. | Watada, H., Mirmira, G. H., Kalamaras, J., and German, M. S. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 9443-9448 |
| 31. | Ohlsson, H., Karlsson, K., and Edlund, T. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4251-4259 |
| 32. | Sepulveda, J. L., Belaguli, N., Nigam, V., Chen, C. Y., Nemer, M., and Schwartz, R. J. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 3405-3415 |
| 33. | Lannoy, V. J., Burglin, T. R., Rousseau, G. G., and Lemaigre, F. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 13552-13562 |
| 34. | Schwitzgebel, V. M., Scheel, D. W., Conners, J. R., Kalamaras, J., Lee, J. E., Anderson, D. J., Sussel, L., Johnson, J. D., and German, M. S. (2000) Development 127, 3533-3542 |
| 35. | Jacquemin, P., Durviaux, S. M., Jensen, J., Godfraind, C., Gradwohl, G., Guillemot, F., Madsen, O. D., Carmeliet, P., Dewerchin, M., Collen, D., Rousseau, G. G., and Lemaigre, F. P. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 4445-4454 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Diraison, M. A. Ravier, S. K. Richards, R. M. Smith, H. Shimano, and G. A. Rutter SREBP1 is required for the induction by glucose of pancreatic {beta}-cell genes involved in glucose sensing J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2008; 49(4): 814 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Artner, B. Blanchi, J. C. Raum, M. Guo, T. Kaneko, S. Cordes, M. Sieweke, and R. Stein MafB is required for islet beta cell maturation PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 3853 - 3858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Baird, M. Turcotte, R. G. Korneluk, and M. Holcik Searching for IRES RNA, October 1, 2006; 12(10): 1755 - 1785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wei, W. K. Miskimins, and R. Miskimins Stage-specific Expression of Myelin Basic Protein in Oligodendrocytes Involves Nkx2.2-mediated Repression That Is Relieved by the Sp1 Transcription Factor J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 16284 - 16294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Testa, G. Donati, P. Yan, F. Romani, T. H.-M. Huang, M. A. Vigano, and R. Mantovani Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) on Chip Experiments Uncover a Widespread Distribution of NF-Y Binding CCAAT Sites Outside of Core Promoters J. Biol. Chem., April 8, 2005; 280(14): 13606 - 13615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Moriscot, F. de Fraipont, M.-J. Richard, M. Marchand, P. Savatier, D. Bosco, M. Favrot, and P.-Y. Benhamou Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Can Express Insulin and Key Transcription Factors of the Endocrine Pancreas Developmental Pathway upon Genetic and/or Microenvironmental Manipulation In Vitro Stem Cells, April 1, 2005; 23(4): 594 - 603. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gasa, C. Mrejen, N. Leachman, M. Otten, M. Barnes, J. Wang, S. Chakrabarti, R. Mirmira, and M. German Proendocrine genes coordinate the pancreatic islet differentiation program in vitro PNAS, September 7, 2004; 101(36): 13245 - 13250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Iype, D. G. Taylor, S. M. Ziesmann, J. C. Garmey, H. Watada, and R. G. Mirmira The Transcriptional Repressor Nkx6.1 Also Functions as a Deoxyribonucleic Acid Context-Dependent Transcriptional Activator during Pancreatic {beta}-Cell Differentiation: Evidence for Feedback Activation of the nkx6.1 Gene by Nkx6.1 Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2004; 18(6): 1363 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Suzuki, K. Tobe, Y. Terauchi, K. Komeda, N. Kubota, K. Eto, T. Yamauchi, K. Azuma, H. Kaneto, T. Taguchi, et al. Pdx1 Expression in Irs2-deficient Mouse {beta}-Cells Is Regulated in a Strain-dependent Manner J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43691 - 43698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Schwitzgebel, A. Mamin, T. Brun, B. Ritz-Laser, M. Zaiko, A. Maret, F. R. Jornayvaz, G. E. Theintz, O. Michielin, D. Melloul, et al. Agenesis of Human Pancreas due to Decreased Half-Life of Insulin Promoter Factor 1 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 4398 - 4406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ogihara, H. Watada, R. Kanno, F. Ikeda, T. Nomiyama, Y. Tanaka, A. Nakao, M. S. German, I. Kojima, and R. Kawamori p38 MAPK Is Involved in Activin A- and Hepatocyte Growth Factor-mediated Expression of Pro-endocrine Gene Neurogenin 3 in AR42J-B13 Cells J. Biol. Chem., June 6, 2003; 278(24): 21693 - 21700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Watada, D. W. Scheel, J. Leung, and M. S. German Distinct Gene Expression Programs Function in Progenitor and Mature Islet Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2003; 278(19): 17130 - 17140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||