|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003492200 on August 22, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 44, 34521-34527, November 3, 2000
Identification of Mrj, a DnaJ/Hsp40 Family Protein, as a
Keratin 8/18 Filament Regulatory Protein*
Ichiro
Izawa ,
Miwako
Nishizawa ,
Kazuhiro
Ohtakara §,
Kenzo
Ohtsuka¶,
Hiroyasu
Inada , and
Masaki
Inagaki
From the Division of Biochemistry and the ¶ Cell
Stress Biology Research Group, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute,
Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan and the
§ Department of Neurosurgery, Mie University School of
Medicine, Edobashi, Tsu, Mie 514-8507, Japan
Received for publication, April 24, 2000, and in revised form, July 19, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
To elucidate the function of keratins 8 and 18 (K8/18), major components of the intermediate filaments of simple
epithelia, we searched for K8/18-binding proteins by screening a yeast
two-hybrid library. We report here that human Mrj, a DnaJ/Hsp40 family
protein, directly binds to K18. Among the interactions between
DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins and various intermediate filament proteins
that we tested using two-hybrid methods, Mrj specifically interacted with K18. Immunostaining with anti-Mrj antibody showed that Mrj colocalized with K8/18 filaments in HeLa cells. Mrj was
immunoprecipitated not only with K18, but also with the stress-induced
and constitutively expressed heat shock protein Hsp/c70. Mrj bound to
K18 through its C terminus and interacted with Hsp/c70 via its N
terminus, which contains the J domain. Microinjection of anti-Mrj
antibody resulted in the disorganization of K8/18 filaments, without
effects on the organization of actin filaments and microtubules. Taken together, these results suggest that Mrj may play an important role in
the regulation of K8/18 filament organization as a K18-specific co-chaperone working together with Hsp/c70.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Intermediate filaments
(IFs)1 are major components
of the cytoskeleton and nuclear envelope in most types of eukaryotic
cells (1-6). Although structural components of other major
cytoskeletal proteins (actin and tubulin) are highly conserved in
different cell types, the constituent proteins of IFs show intriguing
molecular diversities and are expressed in tissue-specific programs,
which makes them ideal molecular markers for the differentiation state in developmental biology and pathology (7). Cytoplasmic IFs are usually
organized into 10-nm diameter fibers that are prevalent in the
perinuclear region, where they appear to be attached to the outer
nuclear envelope membrane or to nuclear pore complexes (4). Continuous
with this perinuclear array, IFs extend radially through the cytoplasm,
eventually forming a close association with the plasma membrane. The
intracellular IF networks were thought to be relatively stable in
comparison with other cytoskeletal components such as actin filaments
and microtubules; however, IFs have dynamic properties (8, 9).
Accumulating data strongly suggest that assembly and disassembly of IF
organization are regulated by the site-specific phosphorylation state
of IFs (9-11), which is determined by kinase/phosphatase equilibria
(11-14).
The keratin subfamily, which is preferentially expressed in epithelial
cells, has over 20 members (keratins 1-20) that form obligate
noncovalent heteropolymers of at least one type I keratin (keratins
9-20) and one type II keratin (keratins 1-8) (15). In epithelial
cells, keratin filaments are typically organized in a cytoplasmic
reticular network of anastomosing filament bundles involving their
noncovalent linkage at the surface of the nucleus and at cell adhesion
complexes. This adhesion machinery consists of desmosomes, which
mediate adhesion between cells, and hemidesmosomes, which mediate the
adhesion of epithelial cells to the underlying basal lamina. One role
that has been ascribed to various keratin filament networks of
stratified squamous epithelia is to impart mechanical integrity to
cells, without which the cells become fragile and prone to rupture
(16). Disruption of the keratin IF network in epidermal keratinocytes
via the targeted expression of dominant-negative keratin mutants
(17-19) or the introduction of null mutations (20) results in lysis of
the targeted cell population whenever the skin of such mice is
subjected to trivial mechanical trauma. Mutations in keratin genes,
weakening the structural framework of cells, increase the risk of cell
rupture and cause a variety of human skin disorders (6, 21).
Keratins 8 and 18 (K8/18) are the major components of the IFs of simple
or single-layered epithelia, as found in the gastrointestinal tract,
liver, and exocrine pancreas, from which many carcinomas arise. Gene
targeting techniques have been used to elucidate the function of K8/18.
K8 knockout mice in one strain died around day 12 from undetermined
tissue damage (22), whereas in a different strain, they survived to
adulthood, but colorectal hyperplasia and inflammation were present
(23). K18 null mice were fertile and had a normal life span, whereas
old K18 null mice developed a distinct liver pathology with abnormal
hepatocytes containing K8-positive aggregates that resembled the
Mallory bodies seen in human livers with alcoholic hepatitis (24).
Together with the report describing a mutation in the K18 gene in a
patient with cryptogenic cirrhosis (25), additional work has indicated that K18 mutations may possibly cause or result in a predisposition to
liver disease (26).
Although the molecular basis for functions of K8/18 are unknown,
dissection of interactions of K8/18 with associated proteins has
provided clues to the physiological roles of K8/18. Several K8/18-associated proteins have been reported, including a protein kinase C -related kinase (27), an 85-kDa membrane-associated protein
(28), the stress-induced and constitutively expressed heat shock
protein Hsp/c70 (29, 30), the glucose-regulated protein Grp78
(31), and members of the 14-3-3 protein family (32, 33). In the present
work, we screened a yeast two-hybrid library using K18 as a bait to
search for new K18-associated proteins. Among the positive clones, we
identified two identical ones encoding the C-terminal portion of human
Mrj, a DnaJ/Hsp40 family protein. We report evidence for the in
vivo association of Mrj with K18 and suggest a possible role of
the Mrj-Hsp/c70 chaperone in the regulation of K8/18 filament organization.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Yeast Two-hybrid Screening--
The pGEX-2TH-K18 and -K8
plasmids were kindly provided by Dr. H. Eto (Massachusetts General
Hospital, Boston, MA). The pET8c-K5 and -K14 plasmids were kindly
provided by Dr. E. Fuchs (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL). DNA
encoding full-length K18 was cloned into the yeast Gal4
DNA-binding domain vector pYTH9 . The resulting plasmid,
pYTH9 -K18, was used in the two-hybrid screen of the human liver
cDNA library fused to the pACT2 vector
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA) following the Matchmaker
Two-hybrid System protocol (CLONTECH). Positive
clones were screened for their potential to grow on selective medium
containing 25 mM 3-aminotriazole and for the expression of
-galactosidase. Yeast DNA was recovered and transformed into
Escherichia coli. Plasmids containing cDNA clones were
identified by restriction mapping and further characterized by DNA
sequencing. Subsequent two-hybrid interaction analyses were carried out
by cotransformation of plasmids containing the Gal4 DNA-binding (pGBT9)
and activation (pACT2) domains into Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strain Y190.
Cloning of Full-length Mrj and DNA Constructs--
Standard DNA
protocols were used (34). Full-length human Mrj cDNA was amplified
using human brain Marathon-Ready cDNA
(CLONTECH) and PyroBest polymerase (Takara, Tokyo,
Japan) with a set of primers designed according to the human Mrj
cDNA sequence deposited in the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank
(accession number AB014888). Various Mrj deletion mutants, including
Mrj-N1(aa 1-100), Mrj-N2 (aa 1-146), and Mrj-C (aa 99-242), were
also amplified with appropriate sets of primers and then cloned into
vectors. A series of truncations of K18 were constructed in the
pYTH9 plasmid by enzyme digestion and using polymerase chain
reaction techniques. Yeast two-hybrid vectors encoding human cytosolic
Hsc70 was constructed, using polymerase chain reaction techniques, from
the pHSC7 plasmid, which was kindly provided by Dr. N. Imamoto (Osaka
University, Osaka, Japan). Mouse DnaJ/Hsp40 family cDNAs, encoding
Hsp40, mDj6, mDj7, mDj8, and mDj11 (35), were also subcloned into yeast
two-hybrid vectors. Sequences of these constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
Purification of Recombinant Proteins--
Recombinant
full-length Mrj protein (aa 1-242) was expressed as a
His6-tagged protein using pQE30 vectors (QIAGEN K. K., Tokyo). Expression and purification of the His-tagged Mrj protein were done
according to the manufacturer's protocol (QIAGEN). Full-length Mrj was
also expressed as a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein in E. coli and purified on glutathione-agarose beads
essentially as described (36). Recombinant human K8 and K18 expressed
in E. coli using pET3a vectors were prepared as described
(12). Recombinant mouse vimentin and human desmin were purified as
described (37, 38).
Filament Assembly and Co-sedimentation Assay--
IF assembly
in vitro was done as described (10, 12). Briefly, purified
K8 and K18 were dissolved at a 1:1 (mol/mol) ratio in 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.8) containing 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
and 7 M urea. The mixture in 7 M urea solution
was dialyzed against 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8) containing 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM EGTA, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for 24 h at 4 °C.
These heterotypic complexes of K8 and K18 (0.5 mg/ml) were incubated,
with or without GST or GST-Mrj, in 20 mM imidazole (pH 7.0)
containing 1 mM MgCl2 at 25 °C for 1 h.
Purified vimentin or desmin was assembled in the presence or absence of
GST-Mrj in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 50 mM NaCl at 25 °C for 1 h. The reassembled complexes were subjected to centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 30 min. The supernatants and precipitates were then analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Cell Culture--
HeLa cells and human bladder carcinoma T24
cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin in an air and 5%
CO2 atmosphere with constant humidity.
Generation of Anti-Mrj Antibody and
Immunoblotting--
Anti-Mrj antibody was produced in rabbits injected
with recombinant His6-tagged Mrj protein and affinity-purified
with recombinant GST-Mrj fusion protein. HeLa and T24 cells were lysed
with SDS sample buffer, sonicated, and boiled. Whole lysates of
~2 × 104 cells were then loaded onto the lanes,
resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred
onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Atto, Tokyo). The blots were
incubated with anti-Mrj antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
second antibody, and immunoreactive bands were visualized using
chemiluminescence detection reagents (Renaissance, PerkinElmer
Life Sciences). To confirm specificity of the anti-Mrj antibody, it was
pre-absorbed by recombinant His-tagged Mrj protein as a control.
Anti-K18 (CY-90, Sigma), anti-Hsp/c70 (BRM-22, Sigma), and anti-GST
(B-14, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa, Cruz, CA) monoclonal antibodies
were also used as primary antibodies for immunoblotting.
Immunoprecipitation--
Cells were lysed on ice for 20 min in
lysis buffer consisting of 1% Triton X-100, 20 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 10 mM
NaF. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 30 min.
Endogenous Mrj was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with anti-Mrj
antibody or control rabbit IgG and protein A-agarose beads and washed
four times with lysis buffer. Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by
immunoblotting with primary antibodies and horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies or protein A.
Immunofluorescence--
Cells grown on 13-mm coverslips were
fixed by incubation for 10 min in 50% methanol and 50% acetone (v/v)
at 20 °C. Methanol/acetone-fixed cells were washed three times
with phosphate-buffered saline prior to blocking with 10% (v/v) goat
serum in phosphate-buffered saline. For double immunostaining with
anti-Mrj and anti-K18 (CY-90) monoclonal antibodies, cells were
incubated with anti-Mrj antibody diluted 1:20, followed by Alexa
488-labeled anti-rabbit antibody (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR).
Next, the cells were incubated with anti-K18 antibody (1:200), followed
by FluoroLink Cy3-linked anti-mouse antibody (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). To visualize a Myc tag,
actin, or tubulin, cells were reacted with anti-Myc (9E10), anti-actin
(C4, Chemicon International, Inc., Temecula, CA), or anti-tubulin
(Sigma) monoclonal antibody, respectively, followed by Alexa
488-labeled anti-mouse antibody (Molecular Probes, Inc.) or FluoroLink
Cy3-linked anti-mouse antibody. The coverslips were examined on an
Olympus LSM-GB200 microscope.
Mammalian Expression Vectors and Transfection--
cDNAs
encoding full-length Mrj (Mrj-F) and deletion mutants, including Mrj-N2
(aa 1-146) and Mrj-C (aa 99-242), were cloned into the mammalian
expression vector pRK5-Myc for expression of Myc epitope-tagged
proteins. HeLa cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 104 cells/ml onto 13-mm glass coverslips in 6-well dishes
the day before lipofection with 1 µg of each plasmid using
LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the
manufacturer's protocols. Sixteen hours after lipofection, the cells
were fixed for immunofluorescence studies.
Microinjection--
The affinity-purified rabbit anti-Mrj
polyclonal antibody and chromatographically purified normal rabbit IgG
(Sigma) were dialyzed against a buffer containing 5 mM
sodium phosphate (pH 7.4) and 100 mM KCl and then
concentrated to ~5 mg/ml by ultrafiltration (Centricon, Millipore
Corp., Bedford, MA). Either anti-Mrj antibody or normal rabbit IgG was
injected into HeLa cells using an Eppendorf microinjection system.
Approximately 1 h after the injection, the cells were fixed and
subjected to immunofluorescence study. The cells were stained with
Alexa 488-labeled anti-rabbit antibody to detect the injected anti-Mrj
antibody and cells, followed by staining for K18, actin, or tubulin.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of Mrj as a K18-interacting Protein--
To
investigate the function of K8/18, we screened a human liver cDNA
library using the yeast two-hybrid technique and full-length K18. We
obtained 73 positive clones and classified the clones by restriction
analysis and nucleotide sequencing. They contained 25 independent
clones of fibrinogen- , one clone of K8, and one clone of 14-3-3 protein tau. A BLAST search suggested that two independent clones
encoded the C-terminal region (aa 99-242) of the human Mrj protein, a
recently cloned DnaJ/Hsp40 family protein (39, 40). As DnaJ/Hsp40
family proteins interact with the Hsp70 class of chaperones, and
Hsp/c70 was reported to associate with K8/18 filaments (29, 30), we
further analyzed the Mrj clones. The full-length Mrj cDNA was
amplified by polymerase chain reaction using a set of primers designed
according to the human Mrj sequence deposited in the
GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank (accession number AB014888). The
human Mrj cDNA encodes a 242-amino acid protein, and the N-terminal
half of the Mrj protein contains the J domain (aa 1-74) and a
glycine/phenylalanine-rich domain (aa 75-119), which are present in
E. coli DnaJ (Fig.
1A). To confirm that
full-length Mrj interacts with K18 and to determine if Mrj can bind to
K8, epidermal K5 and K14, or type III IF proteins, we examined the
interaction of full-length Mrj or the C-terminal region of Mrj with K5,
K8, K14, K18, and type III IF proteins, including vimentin, glial
fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and desmin, in the two-hybrid system
(Fig. 1B). The C-terminal region of Mrj (Mrj-C, original
two-hybrid fragment) strongly interacted with K18, but did not interact
with K5, K8, K14, vimentin, GFAP, or desmin. In the same fashion,
full-length Mrj (Mrj-F) specifically interacted with K18, but did not
bind to K5, K8, K14, vimentin, GFAP, or desmin. We next asked whether
other DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins could bind to K8, K18, or other IF
proteins using two-hybrid methods. Expression vectors harboring various
mouse DnaJ/Hsp40 family cDNAs, including Hsp40, mDj6, mDj7, mDj8,
and mDj11 (35), fused to the Gal4 activation domain were cotransformed
into yeast Y190 cells with expression vectors encoding various IF
cDNAs fused to the Gal4 DNA-binding domain. Among the interactions
between DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins and K8 or K18 that we tested in this study, only the Mrj-K18 interaction was strongly positive (Fig. 1C). In addition, none of these DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins
interacted with other IF proteins, including K5, K14, vimentin, GFAP,
and desmin (data not shown). These results suggest that the interaction of Mrj with K18 is highly specific, although it is still possible that
other untested DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins can specifically bind to some
IF proteins. We then analyzed the region of K18 containing the Mrj
interaction site. For this, the binding between a series of truncations
of K18 and Mrj-F or Mrj-C was determined using the two-hybrid system
(Fig. 1D). The coil II region of K18 specifically interacted
with both Mrj-F and Mrj-C.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Identification of Mrj as a K18-interacting
protein. A, domain organization of the human Mrj
protein. The J domain (aa 1-74) and the glycine/phenylalanine-rich
domain (G/F; aa 75-119) are indicated. The position of the
original clone encoding the C-terminal region of Mrj (Mrj-C) is also
indicated. Numbers refer to amino acid positions.
B, interactions of Mrj-C or Mrj-F with K18 or other IFs.
Y190 cells cotransformed with various pYTH9 -IFs and pACT2-Mrj-F or
pACT2-Mrj-C were selected in Trp/Leu-free medium and subjected
to -galactosidase filter assay. The plus signs represent
the relative rates at which the transformed yeast colonies turned blue
after incubation at 30 °C on filters: +++, <3 h; ++, 3-8 h;
+, >8 h. The minus signs represent colonies
remaining white at 24 h. Yeast cells cotransformed with
pYTH9 -K18 and pACT2-K8, which started to turn blue in <3 h
(designated +++) during the filter assay, served as a positive control.
Vim., vimentin; Des., desmin. C,
interactions of various DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins with K8 or K18.
Expression vectors harboring various mouse DnaJ/Hsp40 family cDNAs,
including Hsp40, mDj6, mDj7, mDj8, and mDj11, fused to the Gal4
activation domain were cotransformed into yeast Y190 cells with
expression vectors encoding K8 and K18 cDNAs fused to the Gal4
DNA-binding domain. The interactions were determined as described for
B. D, identification of the coil II region of K18
that is sufficient for binding to Mrj. Y190 cells cotransformed with
various pYTH9 -K18 deletion mutants and pACT2-Mrj-F or pACT2-Mrj-C
were selected in Trp/Leu-free medium and subjected to -galactosidase
filter assay. Plus and minus signs are as
described for B. Numbers refer to amino acid
positions.
|
|
Direct Association of Mrj with K8/18 Filaments in Vitro--
Next
we analyzed the in vitro direct association of Mrj with
K8/18 filaments using a co-sedimentation assay (Fig.
2). As the separation of K18 and
recombinant Mrj protein produced as a GST fusion protein (GST-Mrj) on
Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained gel after SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis was not clear (Fig. 2A), the samples were
also detected with anti-GST antibody by immunoblotting to more clearly
show the proportions of supernatant and precipitated GST-Mrj (Fig.
2B). Incubation in filament assembly buffer induced a rapid
polymerization of K8 and K18 (Fig. 2A, lanes 1).
Recombinant GST (which served as a control) did not sediment in the
presence of K8/K18 (Fig. 2, A and B, lanes
3). In the absence of K8/18, GST-Mrj did not sediment (Fig. 2,
A and B, lanes 4); but in the presence
of K8/18, a substantial portion of GST-Mrj was precipitated with K8/18
(lanes 5). Because Mrj interacted with K18, but not with K8,
in the two-hybrid analysis, the Mrj sedimenting with K8/18 was thought
to be associated with the K8/18 polymer via direct binding to K18. In
addition, Mrj did not sediment with vimentin (Fig. 2, A and
B, lanes 6) or desmin (lanes 7),
consistent with the results using the two-hybrid method.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Co-sedimentation of Mrj with K8/18.
K8/18 filaments were assembled in the absence (lanes 1) or
presence of GST (lanes 3) or GST-Mrj (lanes 5).
As a control, only GST (lanes 2) or GST-Mrj protein
(lanes 4) was incubated in the assembly buffer. Vimentin
(lanes 6) or desmin (lanes 7) filaments were
assembled in the presence of GST-Mrj. Samples of supernatant
(S) and pellet (P) fractions were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then stained with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue (A) or detected with anti-GST antibody by
immunoblotting (B). Substantial portions of GST-Mrj
sedimented with K8/18. GST-Mrj did not sediment with either vimentin or
desmin under these conditions. The arrowheads and
arrows indicate the positions of GST and GST-Mrj,
respectively. Molecular size markers (in kilodaltons) are shown on the
left.
|
|
Interaction of Mrj with K18 and Hsp/c70 in Vivo--
To further
explore the interaction between Mrj and K18, polyclonal antibodies
raised against Mrj were generated using the purified
His6-tagged Mrj protein as the immunogen. Affinity-purified rabbit anti-Mrj antibody specifically recognized a polypeptide with a
relative molecular mass of 27 kDa in HeLa and T24 lysates (Fig.
3A). Preincubation of the
antibody with recombinant His6-tagged Mrj selectively inhibited
the immunoreactivity (Fig. 3A). Using this antibody, we
precipitated complexes containing Mrj proteins from 1% Triton
X-100-soluble fractions of HeLa cell lysates (Fig. 3B). Mrj
was immunoprecipitated with anti-Mrj antibody, but not by control
rabbit IgG. K18 was co-immunoprecipitated with Mrj using anti-Mrj
antibody. Because DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins are known to interact with
Hsp/c70, we examined whether Mrj was associated with Hsp/c70. Hsp/c70
was indeed detected in the Mrj immune complex. These results indicate
that Mrj is associated with K18 and Hsp/c70 in vivo.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
In vivo association of Mrj with
K18 and Hsp/c70. A, detection of Mrj in HeLa and T24
cells. Lysates from HeLa cells (lanes 1, 3, and
5) and T24 cells (lanes 2, 4, and
6) were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue
(CBB) (lanes 1 and 2), detected with
anti-Mrj antibody by immunoblotting (lanes 3 and
4), or immunostained with anti-Mrj antibody pre-absorbed by
His-Mrj protein (lanes 5 and 6). Anti-Mrj
antibody specifically recognized bands of ~27 kDa in samples obtained
from HeLa and T24 cells. Molecular size markers (in kilodaltons) are
shown on the left. B, interactions of Mrj with K18 and
Hsp/c70 in vivo. Immunoprecipitates were prepared from
lysates of HeLa cells using control rabbit IgG (lane 1) and
anti-Mrj antibody (lane 2) as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Each precipitate, separated into three
parts, was subjected to immunoblot analysis with anti-Mrj, anti-K18, or
anti-Hsp/c70 antibody.
|
|
Mrj Colocalizes with K8/18 Filaments in HeLa Cells--
To
determine the intracellular distribution of Mrj and to determine if Mrj
colocalizes with K8/18 filament networks, HeLa cells were fixed with
50% methanol and 50% acetone and double-stained with anti-Mrj
polyclonal antibody and anti-K18 monoclonal antibody. Mrj was present
in both the cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig.
4a). In the cytoplasm, Mrj was
dispersed mainly in the perinuclear area and showed some filamentous
patterns. There was a significant overlap between filamentous Mrj and
K18 (Fig. 4, a-d), where Mrj was more remarkably associated
with K8/18 filament bundles around perinuclear areas than with finer
filament structures in the cell periphery. In addition, colocalization
of Mrj with K8/18 filament networks appeared to be heterogeneous, and
the extent of the overlap differed from cell to cell, suggesting the
dynamic feature of the interaction between Mrj and K8/18 filaments.
These associations of Mrj with K8/18 were also observed in other
epithelial cell lines such as T24, Madin-Darby canine kidney, and COS-7
cells (data not shown). When we investigated whether Mrj colocalized with other major cytoskeletons, such as actin filaments and
microtubules, double staining showed no apparent co-distribution of Mrj
with actin filaments (Fig. 4, e-h) or with microtubules
(i-l). In addition, Mrj did not colocalize with vimentin
filaments in HeLa cells (data not shown).

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Colocalization of Mrj and K8/18 filaments in
HeLa cells. HeLa cells were double-stained with anti-Mrj
antibody (a) and anti-K18 antibody (b). A merged
image of a and b (c) and an
enlargement of the area indicated by the arrow in
c (d) are shown. The double immunofluorescence
analysis of Mrj immunoreactivity (e) and actin
immunoreactivity (f), an overlaid image of e and
f (g), and magnification of the area indicated by
the arrow in g (h) are shown. HeLa
cells were also co-stained with anti-Mrj antibody (i) and
anti-tubulin antibody (j). The superimposed image of
i and j (k) and an enlargement of the
area indicated by the arrow in k (l)
are shown. Bars = 20 µm.
|
|
Effects of the Overexpression of Deletion Mutants of Mrj on K8/18
Filaments--
To further examine the function of Mrj, we determined
which region of Mrj interacts with Hsp/c70 and K18 using the two-hybrid system. As shown in Fig. 5 (A
and B), Mrj-F interacted with both K18 and Hsc70, but not
with K8. Mrj-C (aa 99-242) strongly interacted with K18, but Mrj-N1
(aa 1-100) and Mrj-N2 (aa 1-146) did not bind to K18. In contrast,
Mrj-N1 and Mrj-N2 bound to Hsc70, but Mrj-C did not interact with
Hsc70. The interaction of Mrj-N2 with Hsc70 was stronger than that of
Mrj-N1 with Hsc70, suggesting that in addition to the J domain, the
glycine/phenylalanine-rich domain may be important for the tight
association of Mrj with Hsp/c70. These results are consistent with a
recent report of the characterization of the interaction between
E. coli DnaJ and DnaK demonstrating, using surface plasmon
resonance detection (BIAcore), that aa 1-76 of DnaJ bound to DnaK with
somewhat lower affinity than did aa 1-108 of DnaJ (41). Taken
together, the two-hybrid assay for the interaction between Mrj and K18
or Hsc70 shows that Mrj interacts with K18 through its C terminus and
binds to Hsp/c70 via its N terminus-containing J domain. Based on these characterizations of the domains of Mrj, we speculated that the overexpression of Mrj-N2 might dominant-negatively inhibit the interactions between endogenous Mrj and Hsp/c70 and that the
overexpression of Mrj-C might dominant-negatively inhibit the
interaction between endogenous Mrj and K18. To check this idea, we
transiently expressed Myc-tagged full-length Mrj (Myc-Mrj-F),
Myc-Mrj-N2, and Myc-Mrj-C in HeLa cells and observed the effects of the
expressed Mrj proteins on K8/18 filaments as well as actin filaments
and microtubules. The expressed Myc-Mrj-F protein showed almost the
same distribution as did the native Mrj protein (Fig. 5,
C-E). The expressed Myc-Mrj-N2 protein was present
predominantly in the nucleus as well as diffusely in the cytoplasm
(Fig. 5, C-E). The expression of Myc-Mrj-N2 resulted in a
pronounced disruption in the K8/18 filament network, although the
expressed Myc-Mrj-N2 protein did not apparently colocalize with the
collapsed K8/18 filaments around the nucleus (Fig. 5C, panels d-f). The expressed Myc-Mrj-C protein was present
only in the cytoplasm and aggregated with K18, which resulted in the disruption of K8/18 filaments (Fig. 5C, panels
g-i). The expression of Myc-Mrj-F or Myc-Mrj-C had no apparent
effects on actin filaments (Fig. 5D), microtubules (Fig.
5E), and vimentin filaments (data not shown). In contrast,
the expression of Myc-Mrj-N2 resulted in the disruption not only of
K8/18 filaments (Fig. 5C, panels d-f), but also
of actin filaments (Fig. 5D, panels d-f),
microtubules (Fig. 5E, panels d-f), and vimentin
filaments (data not shown). Almost the same phenotype was observed with
other cell lines, including T24 and COS-7 cells (data not shown).
Although the overexpression of Mrj-N2 would be initially expected to
specifically inhibit the Mrj-Hsp/c70 interaction and to have effects on
only K8/18 filaments, these results suggest that the overexpression of
Myc-Mrj-N2 may inhibit other functions of Hsp/c70 chaperones.
Consistent with this observation, Michels et al. (42)
recently reported that coexpression of a truncated protein restricted
to the J domain of Hsp40 had a dominant-negative effect on
Hsp70-facilitated luciferase reactivation, suggesting that the
overexpression of the J domain of Hsp40 might be used as an excellent
tool to knock out Hsp70 function and might result in serious
pathophysiological situations. Therefore, the phenotype induced by the
overexpression of Myc-Mrj-N2 may be due to the inhibition of some or
overall functions of Hsp/c70. In addition, as for the results of the
overexpression of Myc-Mrj-C, we should note a possibility that the
disruption of K8/18 filaments by the overexpression of Myc-Mrj-C is an
artifact of peptide binding to the assembly domain of K18 rather than
of the inhibition of the function of endogenous Mrj.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Analysis of Mrj deletion mutants.
A, schematic representation of full-length Mrj and its
deletion mutants. Numbers refer to amino acid positions.
B, mapping of Mrj-K18 and Mrj-Hsc70 interaction domains
using the yeast two-hybrid system. Expression vector pGBT9-Mrj-F,
-Mrj-N1, -Mrj-N2, or -Mrj-C was cotransformed into yeast Y190 cells
with pACT2-K8, -K18, or -Hsc70. The interactions were determined by
-galactosidase assay as described in the legend to Fig.
1B. C-E, effects of expression of Myc-Mrj-F,
Myc-Mrj-N2, or Myc-Mrj-C on K8/18 filaments (C), actin
filaments (D), and microtubules (E) in HeLa
cells. pRK5-Myc-Mrj-F (C-E, panels a-c),
pRK5-Myc-Mrj-N2 (C-E, panels d-f), and
pRK5-Myc-Mrj-C (C-E, panels g-i) vectors were
transfected into HeLa cells. The transfected cells were fixed 16 h
later and double-stained with anti-Myc antibody (C-E,
panels a, d, and g) and anti-K18
antibody (C, panels b, e, and
h), anti-actin antibody (D, panels b,
e, and h), or anti-tubulin antibody
(E, panels b, e, and h).
The merged images of panels a and b (panels
c), panels d and e (panels f),
and panels g and h (panels i) are
shown. Bars = 20 µm. G/F,
glycine/phenylalanine-rich domain.
|
|
K8/18 Filament Organization Is Affected by Microinjection of
Anti-Mrj Antibody--
The overexpression of Mrj deletion mutants
indeed resulted in the disorganization of K8/18 filaments, but these
results may not provide us with a conclusive answer for a role of Mrj
as described above. To overcome this problem and to address an actual
role of Mrj in K8/18 filament organization, microinjection of anti-Mrj antibody was carried out. Either anti-Mrj antibody or normal rabbit IgG
was injected into HeLa cells; and 1 h later, cells were fixed and
stained for K18, actin, or tubulin. Microinjection of normal rabbit IgG
had no apparent effects on K8/18 filaments, actin filaments, and
microtubules (data not shown). Microinjection of anti-Mrj antibody
resulted in the disruption of K8/18 filaments (Fig.
6, a-c). In contrast,
microinjection of anti-Mrj antibody did not have any effects on actin
filaments (Fig. 6, d-f) or microtubules (g-i).
These results clearly demonstrate that Mrj is involved in the
organization of K8/18 filaments in vivo.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Microinjection of anti-Mrj antibody. One
hour after microinjection of anti-Mrj antibody into HeLa cells, cells
were fixed and then subjected to immunofluorescence study. The fixed
cells were first incubated with Alexa 488-labeled anti-rabbit antibody
to detect the injected anti-Mrj antibody and cells (a,
d, and g). Next, the cells were double-stained
for K18 (b), actin (e), or tubulin
(h). Merged images of a and b
(c), d and e (f), and
g and h (i) are shown.
Bars = 20 µm.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we identified Mrj, a recently cloned
DnaJ/Hsp40 family protein, as a K18-binding protein using the yeast
two-hybrid system, biochemical analysis, and cell biological
techniques. The human Mrj gene has been mapped to the
chromosome 11q25 region, and the open reading frame of the gene encodes
a protein of 242 amino acid residues containing a canonical J domain, a
highly conserved 70-amino acid region at the N-terminal end of
DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins, and a glycine/phenylalanine-rich domain,
which is also present in DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins (Fig.
1A) (40). Mouse homozygous Mrj mutants died at mid-gestation
due to a failure of chorioallantoic fusion at embryonic day 8.5, of
which the molecular mechanism is unknown (39). We addressed that one of
the specific functions of Mrj may be to regulate K8/18 filament organization.
The DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins work together with the DnaK/Hsp70 class
of chaperones, which comprise a set of abundant cellular machines that
assist a large variety of protein folding processes in almost all
cellular compartments (43, 44). The J domain of DnaJ/Hsp40 family
proteins is essential to stimulate the weak intrinsic ATPase activity
of Hsp70 proteins (43, 44). Since Hsp70 proteins have a very broad
substrate specificity (45-47), it has been proposed that some of the
DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins act as specialized co-chaperones that
recruit an Hsp70 protein to a specific set of substrates (48-50).
Cytosolic Hsp/c70 has been reported to be associated with K8/18 via
direct binding to K8, although the nature of the relationship between
Hsp/c70 and K8/18 remains uncertain (30). We showed here that Mrj was
associated in vitro with K8/18 filaments via direct binding
to K18 using a co-sedimentation assay. In a two-hybrid assay, Mrj
interacted strongly with K18, but not with other IF proteins, including
K5, K8, K14, vimentin, GFAP, and desmin. Among the interactions between DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins and various IF proteins that we have thus
far tested using the two-hybrid method, only the Mrj-K18 interaction
was apparently positive. Mrj was associated in vivo with K18
and Hsp/c70 and colocalized with K8/18 filaments. Mrj interacted with
Hsc70 via its N terminus-containing J domain and bound to K18 through
its C terminus. These results suggest that Mrj may act as a K18
(K8/18)-specific adaptor protein to link K18 (K8/18) to the Hsp/c70
chaperone. Furthermore, microinjection of anti-Mrj antibody resulted in
the disorganization of K8/18 filaments, indicating that Mrj plays an
indispensable role in the organization of K8/18 filaments in
vivo.
In HeLa cells, the overexpression of the N-terminal region of Mrj
(Myc-Mrj-N2) resulted in the disruption not only of K8/18 filaments,
but also of actin filaments, microtubules, and vimentin filaments.
Because Mrj-N2 can interact with Hsc70, but not with K18, the
overexpressed Myc-Mrj-N2 protein would be initially expected to
dominant-negatively inhibit the specific interaction between endogenous
Mrj and Hsp/c70. As described above, Michels et al. (42)
recently reported that the overexpression of a truncated protein
restricted to the J domain of Hsp40 showed dominant-negative effects on
the chaperone activity of Hsp70 in a living cell. Therefore, the
effects of the overexpression of Myc-Mrj-N2 on major cytoskeletal systems observed in this study might be caused by the disturbance of
some or overall functions of the Hsp/c70 chaperone system rather than
by the specific inhibition of the Mrj-Hsp/c70 interaction. If this is
the case, these results indicate a possibility that Hsp/c70 chaperones
may play an important role in the regulation of the organization of
actin filaments, microtubules, and vimentin filaments as well as K8/18
filaments. In addition, it is tempting to speculate that there may
exist some specific DnaJ/Hsp40 family proteins that link actin,
tubulin, or various IF proteins to Hsp/c70 (Fig.
7). In support of this idea, there is a
growing body of evidence suggesting an intimate relationship between
the cytoskeleton and molecular chaperones, including the Hsp/c70 family
(51). In S. cerevisiae, it was genetically demonstrated that
Ssa1p (yeast cytosolic Hsp70) and Ydj1p (yeast cytosolic DnaJ
homologue) play a role in the regulation of microtubule formation (52).
It was also reported that in human gastric cancer cells, overexpressed BAG-1, a negative regulator of Hsp/c70 chaperone activity, colocalizes with keratin filaments as well as actin filaments and promoted cell
migration (53). Taken together, these observations will shed new light
on a possible role of the Hsp/c70 chaperone in the regulation of
cytoskeletons.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Working hypothesis of the regulation of major
cytoskeletons by the Hsp/c70 chaperone and DnaJ/Hsp40 family
co-chaperones.
|
|
B-crystallin and Hsp27, members of the small Hsp family, were
reported to be associated with both soluble and filamentous IF
proteins, including GFAP, vimentin, and keratin (54, 55). The in
vitro polymerization of GFAP and vimentin is repressed by
B-crystallin (54) as well as by Hsp27 (55). A physiological role for
B-crystallin with IFs was further demonstrated by a recent report
describing that a mutation in the B-crystallin gene causes desmin
aggregation in certain myopathies called desmin-related myopathies
(56). As for the pathological aggregation of K8/18, it is well known
that Mallory bodies in the livers of human patients with alcoholic
hepatitis and of griseofulvin-treated mice are the cytoplasmic
accumulation of K8/18-containing aggregates (57-60). As described
earlier, old K18 null mice developed a distinctive liver pathology with
abnormal hepatocytes containing K8-positive aggregates that resembled
Mallory bodies (24). The finding that K8/18 filament organization may
be regulated by the Mrj-Hsp/c70 chaperone will provide a new clue to
dissect the mechanism of the formation of Mallory bodies.
Assembly and disassembly of IF organization are regulated by the
site-specific phosphorylation state of IFs, and these
phosphorylations are spatially and temporally regulated during
cellular events, including mitosis (9, 10, 11, 61). When phosphorylated by purified protein kinase C, calmodulin-dependent protein
kinase, or cAMP-dependent kinase, K8/18 filaments
reconstituted in vitro undergo complete disassembly, and
there is a significant release of soluble K8 and K18 proteins from the
keratin filaments (12). It has been reported that the increase in K8/18
phosphorylation is associated with the binding of the soluble fraction
of K8/18 to 14-3-3 proteins (33). Because Mrj is associated with both soluble and filamentous K8/18, it is likely that the phosphorylation state of K8/18 may not directly affect the association of Mrj with
K8/18. The relationship between the
phosphorylation-dependent and Mrj-dependent
regulation of K8/18 filaments needs to be investigated in the future.
In conclusion, we are the first to report that human Mrj
proteins directly interact with K18 and might regulate K8/18 filament organization as K18-specific co-chaperones working together with Hsp/c70. These observations will pave the way toward further research on K8/18 filament organization as well as understanding the
pathological mechanisms of Mallory body formation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank H. Eto for kindly providing the
pGEX-2TH-K8 and -K18 plasmids, E. Fuchs for kindly providing the
pET8c-K5 and -K14 plasmids, N. Imamoto for providing a plasmid
harboring human Hsc70 cDNA, T. Saito and A. Hattori (National
Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan) for helpful
suggestions regarding Mrj, S. Ando and R. Gohara (Saga Medical School,
Saga, Japan) for helpful discussions, Toshimichi Yoshida (Mie
University School of Medicine) for suggestions, and K. Nagata (our
laboratory) for technical advice and helpful discussions. We are
grateful to M. Ohara for a critique of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid for
scientific research and cancer research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan; by the Japan Society for Promotion of Science Research for the Future; by a grant-in-aid for the
Second Term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control from the
Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan; by a grant from
Bristol-Myers-Squibb; and by the Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research
Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of
Biochemistry, Aichi Cancer Center Research Inst., 1-1 Kanokoden,
Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 464-8681, Japan. Tel.: 81-52-762-6111 (ext.
7020); Fax: 81-52-763-5233; E-mail:
minagaki@aichi-cc.pref.aichi.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003492200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IFs, intermediate
filaments;
K, keratin;
aa, amino acids;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lazarides, E.
(1980)
Nature
283,
249-256
|
| 2.
|
Franke, W. W.
(1987)
Cell
48,
3-4
|
| 3.
|
Steinert, P. M.,
and Liem, R. K.
(1990)
Cell
60,
521-523
|
| 4.
|
Skalli, O.,
and Goldman, R. D.
(1991)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
19,
67-79
|
| 5.
|
Fuchs, E.,
and Weber, K.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
345-382
|
| 6.
|
Fuchs, E.,
and Cleveland, D. W.
(1998)
Science
279,
514-519
|
| 7.
|
Steinert, P. M.,
and Roop, D. R.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
57,
593-625
|
| 8.
|
Inagaki, M.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Takeda, M.,
Nishimura, T.,
and Inagaki, N.
(1994)
Brain Pathol.
4,
239-243
|
| 9.
|
Inagaki, M.,
Matsuoka, Y.,
Tsujimura, K.,
Ando, S.,
Tokui, T.,
Takahashi, T.,
and Inagaki, N.
(1996)
Bioessays
18,
481-487
|
| 10.
|
Inagaki, M.,
Nishi, Y.,
Nishizawa, K.,
Matsuyama, M.,
and Sato, C.
(1987)
Nature
328,
649-652
|
| 11.
|
Eriksson, J. E.,
Opal, P.,
and Goldman, R. D.
(1992)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
4,
99-104
|
| 12.
|
Yano, T.,
Tokui, T.,
Nishi, Y.,
Nishizawa, K.,
Shibata, M.,
Kikuchi, K.,
Tsuiki, S.,
Yamauchi, T.,
and Inagaki, M.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
197,
281-290
|
| 13.
|
Toivola, D. M.,
Goldman, R. D.,
Garrod, D. R.,
and Eriksson, J. E.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
23-33
|
| 14.
|
Inada, H.,
Togashi, H.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
Nagata, K.,
and Inagaki, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34932-34939
|
| 15.
|
Moll, R.,
Franke, W. W.,
Schiller, D. L.,
Geiger, B.,
and Krepler, R.
(1982)
Cell
31,
11-24
|
| 16.
|
Hutton, E.,
Paladini, R. D., Yu, Q. C.,
Yen, M.,
Coulombe, P. A.,
and Fuchs, E.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
487-499
|
| 17.
|
Vassar, R.,
Coulombe, P. A.,
Degenstein, L.,
Albers, K.,
and Fuchs, E.
(1991)
Cell
64,
365-380
|
| 18.
|
Coulombe, P. A.,
Hutton, M. E.,
Vassar, R.,
and Fuchs, E.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1661-1674
|
| 19.
|
Takahashi, K.,
and Coulombe, P. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14776-14781
|
| 20.
|
Lloyd, C., Yu, Q. C.,
Cheng, J.,
Turksen, K.,
Degenstein, L.,
Hutton, E.,
and Fuchs, E.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1329-1344
|
| 21.
|
Coulombe, P. A.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5,
17-29
|
| 22.
|
Baribault, H.,
Price, J.,
Miyai, K.,
and Oshima, R. G.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1191-1202
|
| 23.
|
Baribault, H.,
Penner, J.,
Iozzo, R. V.,
and Wilson-Heiner, M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2964-2973
|
| 24.
|
Magin, T. M.,
Schroder, R.,
Leitgeb, S.,
Wanninger, F.,
Zatloukal, K.,
Grund, C.,
and Melton, D. W.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
1441-1451
|
| 25.
|
Ku, N. O.,
Wright, T. L.,
Terrault, N. A.,
Gish, R.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
19-23
|
| 26.
|
Omary, M. B.,
and Ku, N. O.
(1997)
Hepatology
25,
1043-1048
|
| 27.
|
Omary, M. B.,
Baxter, G. T.,
Chou, C. F.,
Riopel, C. L.,
Lin, W. Y.,
and Strulovici, B.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
583-593
|
| 28.
|
Chou, C. F.,
Riopel, C. L.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
298,
457-463
|
| 29.
|
Napolitano, E. W.,
Pachter, J. S.,
Chin, S. S.,
and Liem, R. K.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
1323-1331
|
| 30.
|
Liao, J.,
Lowthert, L. A.,
Ghori, N.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
915-922
|
| 31.
|
Liao, J.,
Price, D.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
417,
316-320
|
| 32.
|
Liao, J.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
345-357
|
| 33.
|
Ku, N. O.,
Liao, J.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1892-1906
|
| 34.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 35.
|
Ohtsuka, K.,
and Hata, M.
(2000)
Cell Stress Chap.
5,
98-112
|
| 36.
|
Smith, D. B.,
and Johnson, K. S.
(1988)
Gene (Amst.)
67,
31-40
|
| 37.
|
Ogawara, M.,
Inagaki, N.,
Tsujimura, K.,
Takai, Y.,
Sekimata, M.,
Ha, M. H.,
Imajoh-Ohmi, S.,
Hirai, S.,
Ohno, S.,
Sugiura, H.,
Yamauchi, T.,
and Inagaki, M.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1055-1066
|
| 38.
|
Inada, H.,
Goto, H.,
Tanabe, K.,
Nishi, Y.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
and Inagaki, M.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
253,
21-25
|
| 39.
|
Hunter, P. J.,
Swanson, B. J.,
Haendel, M. A.,
Lyons, G. E.,
and Cross, J. C.
(1999)
Development
126,
1247-1258
|
| 40.
|
Seki, N.,
Hattori, A.,
Hayashi, A.,
Kozuma, S.,
Miyajima, N.,
and Saito, T.
(1999)
J. Hum. Genet.
44,
185-189
|
| 41.
|
Suh, W.-C.,
Lu, C. Z.,
and Gross, C. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30534-30539
|
| 42.
|
Michels, A. A.,
Kanon, B.,
Bensaude, O.,
and Kampinga, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36757-36763
|
| 43.
|
Hartl, F. U.
(1996)
Nature
381,
571-579
|
| 44.
|
Bukau, B.,
and Horwich, A. L.
(1998)
Cell
92,
351-366
|
| 45.
|
Flynn, G. C.,
Chappell, T. G.,
and Rothman, J. E.
(1989)
Science
245,
385-390
|
| 46.
|
Beckmann, R. P.,
Mizzen, L. E.,
and Welch, W. J.
(1990)
Science
248,
850-854
|
| 47.
|
James, P.,
Pfund, C.,
and Craig, E. A.
(1997)
Science
275,
387-389
|
| 48.
|
Cyr, D. M.,
Langer, T.,
and Douglas, M. G.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
176-181
|
| 49.
|
Kelley, W. L.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
222-227
|
| 50.
|
Lu, Z.,
and Cyr, D. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27824-27830
|
| 51.
|
Liang, P.,
and MacRae, T. H.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
1431-1440
|
| 52.
|
Oka, M.,
Nakai, M.,
Endo, T.,
Lim, C. R.,
Kimata, Y.,
and Kohno, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
29727-29737
|
| 53.
|
Naishiro, Y.,
Adachi, M.,
Okuda, H.,
Yawata, A.,
Mitaka, T.,
Takayama, S.,
Reed, J. C.,
Hinoda, Y.,
and Imai, K.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
3244-3251
|
| 54.
|
Nicholl, I. D.,
and Quinlan, R. A.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
945-953
|
| 55.
|
Perng, M. D.,
Cairns, L.,
van den IJssel, P.,
Prescott, A.,
Hutcheson, A. M.,
and Quinlan, R. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
2099-2112
|
| 56.
|
Vicart, P.,
Caron, A.,
Guicheney, P.,
Li, Z.,
Prevost, M. C.,
Faure, A.,
Chateau, D.,
Chapon, F.,
Tome, F.,
Dupret, J. M.,
Paulin, D.,
and Fardeau, M.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
20,
92-95
|
| 57.
|
Denk, H.,
Gschnait, F.,
and Wolff, K.
(1975)
Lab. Invest.
32,
773-776
|
| 58.
|
Franke, W. W.,
Denk, H.,
Schmid, E.,
Osborn, M.,
and Weber, K.
(1979)
Lab. Invest.
40,
207-220
|
| 59.
|
Jensen, K.,
and Gluud, C.
(1994)
Hepatology
20,
1330-1342
|
| 60.
|
Jensen, K.,
and Gluud, C.
(1994)
Hepatology
20,
1061-1077
|
| 61.
|
Yasui, Y.,
Amano, M.,
Nagata, K.,
Inagaki, N.,
Nakamura, H.,
Saya, H.,
Kaibuchi, K.,
and Inagaki, M.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1249-1258
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Meimaridou, S. B Gooljar, and J P. Chapple
From hatching to dispatching: the multiple cellular roles of the Hsp70 molecular chaperone machinery
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2009;
42(1):
1 - 9.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sugimoto, A. Inoko, T. Shiromizu, M. Nakayama, P. Zou, S. Yonemura, Y. Hayashi, I. Izawa, M. Sasoh, Y. Uji, et al.
The keratin-binding protein Albatross regulates polarization of epithelial cells
J. Cell Biol.,
October 6, 2008;
183(1):
19 - 28.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-W. Chen, J.-Y. Lee, J.-Y. Huang, C.-C. Wang, W.-J. Chen, S.-F. Su, C.-W. Huang, C.-C. Ho, J. J.W. Chen, M.-F. Tsai, et al.
Curcumin Inhibits Lung Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis through the Tumor Suppressor HLJ1
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2008;
68(18):
7428 - 7438.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-C. Lai, K.-W. Chang, C.-J. Liu, S.-Y. Kao, and T.-C. Lee
IFN-Induced Protein with Tetratricopeptide Repeats 2 Inhibits Migration Activity and Increases Survival of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Mol. Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2008;
6(9):
1431 - 1439.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Cheng, M. Belshan, and L. Ratner
Hsp40 Facilitates Nuclear Import of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Vpx-Mediated Preintegration Complex
J. Virol.,
February 1, 2008;
82(3):
1229 - 1237.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kim and P. A. Coulombe
Intermediate filament scaffolds fulfill mechanical, organizational, and signaling functions in the cytoplasm
Genes & Dev.,
July 1, 2007;
21(13):
1581 - 1597.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. D. Watson, C. Geary-Joo, M. Hughes, and J. C. Cross
The Mrj co-chaperone mediates keratin turnover and prevents the formation of toxic inclusion bodies in trophoblast cells of the placenta
Development,
May 1, 2007;
134(9):
1809 - 1817.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Hatle, W. Neveu, O. Dienz, S. Rymarchyk, R. Barrantes, S. Hale, N. Farley, K. M. Lounsbury, J. P. Bond, D. Taatjes, et al.
Methylation-Controlled J Protein Promotes c-Jun Degradation To Prevent ABCB1 Transporter Expression
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 15, 2007;
27(8):
2952 - 2966.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-S. Dai, J. Xu, and J. D. Molkentin
The DnaJ-Related Factor Mrj Interacts with Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells c3 and Mediates Transcriptional Repression through Class II Histone Deacetylase Recruitment
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
November 15, 2005;
25(22):
9936 - 9948.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nishizawa, I. Izawa, A. Inoko, Y. Hayashi, K.-i. Nagata, T. Yokoyama, J. Usukura, and M. Inagaki
Identification of trichoplein, a novel keratin filament-binding protein
J. Cell Sci.,
March 1, 2005;
118(5):
1081 - 1090.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Z. Chuang, H. Zhou, M. Zhu, S.-H. Li, X.-J. Li, and C.-H. Sung
Characterization of a Brain-enriched Chaperone, MRJ, That Inhibits Huntingtin Aggregation and Toxicity Independently
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 24, 2002;
277(22):
19831 - 19838.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Izawa, M. Nishizawa, K. Ohtakara, and M. Inagaki
Densin-180 Interacts with delta -Catenin/Neural Plakophilin-related Armadillo Repeat Protein at Synapses
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 8, 2002;
277(7):
5345 - 5350.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.L. Stanton and D.P.L. Green
A set of 1542 mouse blastocyst and pre-blastocyst genes with well-matched human homologues
Mol. Hum. Reprod.,
February 1, 2002;
8(2):
149 - 166.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Inada, I. Izawa, M. Nishizawa, E. Fujita, T. Kiyono, T. Takahashi, T. Momoi, and M. Inagaki
Keratin attenuates tumor necrosis factor-induced cytotoxicity through association with TRADD
J. Cell Biol.,
October 29, 2001;
155(3):
415 - 426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|