JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003163200 on August 15, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 44, 34701-34709, November 3, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/44/34701    most recent
M003163200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kasahara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sanai, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kasahara, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sanai, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Involvement of Gangliosides in Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Neuronal Cell Adhesion Molecule TAG-1 Signaling in Lipid Rafts*

Kohji KasaharaDagger §, Kazutada Watanabe, Kosei Takeuchi||, Harumi Kaneko, Atsuhiko Oohira**, Tadashi YamamotoDagger Dagger , and Yutaka SanaiDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biochemical Cell Research, The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo Metropolitan Organization for Medical Research, Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8613, the  Department of Cell Recognition, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-0015, the ** Department of Perinatology and Neuroglycoscience, Institute for Developmental Research, Kasugai, Aichi 480-0392, and the Dagger Dagger  Department of Oncology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-0071, Japan

Received for publication, April 13, 2000, and in revised form, August 1, 2000


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The association of ganglioside GD3 with TAG-1, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored neuronal cell adhesion molecule, was examined by coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Previously, we have shown that the anti-ganglioside GD3 antibody (R24) immunoprecipitated the Src family kinase Lyn from the rat cerebellum, and R24 treatment of primary cerebellar cultures induced Lyn activation and rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of an 80-kDa protein (p80). We now report that R24 coimmunoprecipitates a 135-kDa protein (p135) from primary cerebellar cultures. Treatment with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C revealed that p135 was glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored to the membrane. It was identified as TAG-1 by sequential immunoprecipitation with an anti-TAG-1 antibody. Antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 induced Lyn activation and rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of p80. Selective inhibitor for Src family kinases reduced the tyrosine phosphorylation of p80. Sucrose density gradient analysis revealed that the TAG-1 and tyrosine-phosphorylated p80 in cerebellar cultures were present in the lipid raft fraction. These data show that TAG-1 transduces signals via Lyn to p80 in the lipid rafts of the cerebellum. Furthermore, degradation of cell-surface glycosphingolipids by endoglycoceramidase induced an alteration of TAG-1 distribution on an OptiPrep gradient and reduced the TAG-1-mediated Lyn activation and tyrosine phosphorylation of p80. These observations suggest that glycosphingolipids are involved in TAG-1-mediated signaling in lipid rafts.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Gangliosides, sialic acid-containing glycosphingolipids (GSLs),1 are found in the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane of all vertebrate cells and are thought to play functional roles in cellular interactions and the control of cell proliferation (1-4). In the nervous system, where gangliosides are particularly abundant, the species and amounts of gangliosides undergo profound changes during development, suggesting that they may play fundamental roles in this process (5). The accumulation of gangliosides within the neurons in ganglioside storage diseases results in extensive neurite outgrowth (6). Exogenously administered gangliosides accelerate the regeneration of neurons in the central nervous system in vivo after lesioning (7). The addition of exogenous gangliosides to primary cultures of neurons and neuroblastoma cells in vitro stimulates cellular differentiation with concomitant neurite sprouting and extension (8-10). Glucosylceramide synthesis, the first glycosylation step of GSL synthesis, is required for axonal growth in hippocampal neurons (11) and for embryonic development (12). Transfection of the ganglioside GD32 synthase cDNA into neuroblastoma cells induces their cholinergic differentiation and neurite sprouting (13). Finally, mice lacking complex gangliosides exhibit axonal degeneration (14). These data show that gangliosides are involved in neural cell differentiation and brain development. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the ganglioside-dependent neural functions remain obscure.

GSLs are known to exist in clusters and form microdomains containing cholesterol at the surface of the plasma membrane. These microdomains are variously referred to as lipid rafts, detergent-resistant membranes, detergent-insoluble glycosphingolipid-enriched domains, or caveolae membranes (15-20). The GSL microdomains have been implicated in signal transduction because a variety of signaling molecules, such as the Src family kinases, are associated with them. However, the precise functions of GSLs in the microdomains remain to be explored.

We investigated the association of gangliosides with specific proteins in the central nervous system by coimmunoprecipitation experiments using an anti-ganglioside antibody. We previously demonstrated that anti-ganglioside GD3 antibody (R24) coimmunoprecipitates the Src family kinase Lyn from the rat cerebellum (21). R24 treatment of primary cerebellar cultures induced Lyn activation and rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of an 80-kDa protein (p80). Furthermore, sucrose density gradient analysis showed that Lyn, in both cerebella and CHO cells transfected with Lyn cDNA, was detected in the lipid raft fraction. R24 immunoprecipitated caveolin, a caveolae marker protein, from CHO cells transfected with GD3 synthase cDNA (22). These observations suggest that GSL may regulate the functions of Lyn in lipid rafts.

In the present study, we attempted to identify the cell-surface molecules involved in Lyn signaling because Lyn is a nonreceptor-type kinase, and we found that R24 coimmunoprecipitates TAG-1, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored neuronal cell adhesion molecule and that the antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 induced Lyn activation and rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of p80. Furthermore, we investigated the roles of GSLs in TAG-1 signaling.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Endoglycoceramidase II and activator II (EGCase II ACT) and phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) were purchased from Takara Biomedicals (Osaka, Japan) and Funakoshi (Tokyo, Japan), respectively. OptiPrep was purchased from Nycomed Pharma (Oslo, Norway). Triton X-100 and EGTA were purchased from Sigma. PP1, PP2, and PP3 were purchased from Alexis Biochemicals (San Diego, CA) and Calbiochem, respectively. The 3.1C12 mouse monoclonal IgG for rat TAG-1 was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD, National Institutes of Health, and maintained by the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa. The mouse IgG3 anti-ganglioside GD3 monoclonal antibody, R24, anti-Lyn (Lyn8) monoclonal antibody, and anti-NCAM polyclonal antibody were obtained from Signet Laboratories (Dedham, MA), Wako Chemicals (Osaka, Japan), and Affinity Research Products (Mamhead, UK), respectively. The anti-caveolin polyclonal antibody, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY20), and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG antibody were purchased from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY) and Zymed Laboratories Inc. (San Francisco, CA), respectively. Anti-rat N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, subunit 2C (amino acids 25-130, extracellular domain), polyclonal rabbit IgG, and anti-integrin beta 5 (cytoplasmic domain) polyclonal rabbit IgG were obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR) and Chemicon International (Temecula, CA), respectively. The anti-T-cadherin polyclonal antibody (amino acids 1-20) was a gift from Dr. Eichmann (University of California, San Diego). Phosphacan was purified as described by Maeda et al. (23).

Primary Culture-- Cerebellar granule cell cultures, 98% pure, were prepared from the cerebella of 6-day-old rats according to the method of Levi et al. (24) with some modifications. Briefly, the cerebella were incubated in 1% trypsin or 0.4 mg/ml dispase for 30 min at room temperature and triturated with a Pasteur pipette in 0.05% DNase until no tissue aggregates remained. Then 2.5 × 106 cells were suspended in basal Eagle's medium containing 25 mM KCl and 5% fetal bovine serum and plated onto 35-mm poly-D-lysine-coated plastic dishes. To avoid the proliferation of glial cells, 100 µM cytosine arabinoside was added 18 h after the seeding.

Antibodies-- Anti-TAG-1 serum was generated against recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli using the pET vector system from the rat TAG-1 encoding immunoglobulin domains I-II (amino acids 31-143). Based on the sequence information of the rat TAG-1 cDNA, two degenerate oligonucleotides were synthesized. The sequences of the 5' and 3' primers were 5'-TCATATGCAGGGAACCCCAGCTACCTTTGG-3' and 5'-TGAGGAGCCAGCGGTAGGACAAACC-3'. For PCR amplification, first strand cDNA was synthesized from the total RNA of rat brain. Thirty cycles (94 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s) were run. The PCR product, around 400 base pairs in length, was subcloned into the pCR II vector, and the NdeI-BamHI fragment was inserted into the pET-3b vector (Novagen). The protein was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS after induction with isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside and then partially purified as inclusion bodies. After SDS-PAGE, the recombinant protein was eluted electrophoretically from the gel. Aliquots containing about 1 mg of the protein were emulsified with complete or incomplete Freund's adjuvant and used to immunize rabbits.

Anti-contactin/F3 serum was generated against recombinant proteins expressed in E. coli using the pET vector system from rat contactin/F3 encoding immunoglobulin domains I-II (amino acids 22-255). Based on the sequence information of rat contactin/F3 cDNA, two degenerate oligonucleotides were synthesized. The sequences of the 5' and 3' primers were 5'-ATACATATGTTTACATGGCACAGAAGATAT-3' and 5'-AGATCTGAATTCATGGTGTATATGTCCTTG-3'. For PCR amplification, first strand cDNA was synthesized from the total RNA of rat brain. Thirty cycles (94 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s) were run. The PCR product, around 680 base pairs in length, was subcloned into the pCRII vector, and the NdeI-BamHI fragment was inserted into the pET-3b vector. Aliquots containing about 1 mg of the protein were emulsified with complete or incomplete Freund's adjuvant and used to immunize rabbits.

Metabolic Labeling and Immunoprecipitation-- Primary cerebellar cultures were labeled with the EXPRE35S35S Protein Labeling Mix (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) for 3 h in a methionine-/cysteine-depleted medium, at a final concentration of 0.1 mCi/ml. The cells were solubilized in lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) at 4 °C for 20 min. The postnuclear supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 3 min. Aliquots (0.5 ml, 750 µg of protein) of the supernatants were precleared with protein G-Sepharose (7.5 µl) and then incubated with the anti-GD3 antibody, R24 (2.5 µg), for 1 h and precipitated with protein G-Sepharose (7.5 µl). Following immunoprecipitation, the beads were washed three times with lysis buffer, and after the addition of the Laemmli sample buffer, the samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide) followed by autoradiography. In the sequential immunoprecipitation experiment, the immunoprecipitates were boiled for 5 min in lysis buffer with 1% SDS, diluted 10-fold with lysis buffer, and then reimmunoprecipitated with anti-GPI-anchored protein antibodies.

Cell-surface Labeling and PI-PLC Treatment-- Primary cerebellar cells, 5 × 106, were washed with PBS. To the cells in 0.5 ml of PBS were added 100 µl of lactoperoxidase (1 units/ml in PBS) and 500 µCi of Na125I at room temperature. The reaction was started by the addition of 1 µl of freshly prepared 0.0015% H2O2. The diluted H2O2 was added at 1-min intervals over 4 min. To terminate the reaction, an equal volume of 1 mg/ml tyrosine in PBS was added.

For PI-PLC treatment, the surface-labeled cells were washed with PBS and incubated in a medium containing 2.5 units/ml PI-PLC from Bacillus thuringiensis for 1 h at 37 °C.

Antibody-mediated Cross-linking of TAG-1 and Measurement of Lyn Activity in Primary Cerebellar Cultures-- Cerebellar cultures of 3 days in vitro in a 35-mm dish were incubated with 20 µg/ml anti-TAG-1 monoclonal antibody (3.1C12) on ice for 30 min in BSA medium (culture medium without fetal bovine serum containing 1% BSA and 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4)). After washing with cold BSA medium, the cells were incubated with 50 µg/ml anti-mouse IgG affinity-purified polyclonal antibody (secondary antibody) in BSA medium at 37 °C for the indicated times on the dish. After washing with ice-cold PBS, lysates were prepared in 1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at 4 °C. After centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 3 min, the supernatants were incubated with the anti-Lyn antibody and precipitated with protein G-Sepharose. The immunoprecipitates were incubated with kinase buffer containing 10 µM ATP and 5 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol). Kinase activity was measured by in vitro autophosphorylation.

For cross-linking of ganglioside GD3, cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml R24 on ice for 30 min in BSA medium. After washing with cold BSA medium, the cells were incubated with 50 µg/ml anti-mouse IgG affinity-purified polyclonal antibody in BSA medium at 37 °C for 3 min.

For cross-linking of NMDA receptors, cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml anti-NMDA receptor antibody on ice for 30 min in BSA medium. After washing with cold BSA medium, the cells were incubated with 50 µg/ml anti-rabbit IgG affinity-purified polyclonal antibody (secondary antibody) in BSA medium at 37 °C for 3 min. Alternatively, cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml anti-NMDA receptor antibody in BSA medium at 37 °C for 3 min.

For mock cross-linking of TAG-1 or ganglioside GD3, cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml normal mouse IgG on ice for 30 min in BSA medium. After washing with cold BSA medium, the cells were incubated with 50 µg/ml anti-mouse IgG affinity-purified polyclonal antibody in BSA medium at 37 °C for 3 min. For mock cross-linking of NMDA receptors, cells were incubated with 20 µg/ml normal rabbit IgG on ice for 30 min in BSA medium. After washing with cold BSA medium, the cells were incubated with 50 µg/ml anti-rabbit IgG affinity-purified polyclonal antibody (secondary antibody) in BSA medium at 37 °C for 3 min.

Phosphacan-mediated Stimulation and Detection of Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Proteins in Primary Cerebellar Cultures-- Two methods were used for the phosphacan-mediated stimulation. For method 1, the cerebellar cultures were incubated with 10 µg/ml phosphacan in BSA medium at 37 °C for 3 min. For method 2, the cerebellar cultures were incubated with 10 µg/ml phosphacan in BSA medium on ice for 30 min. After washing with cold BSA medium, the cells were incubated with a 10-fold concentrated culture supernatant of hybridoma 6B4 (anti-phosphacan) (25) at 37 °C for 3 min. As a negative control experiment, the cells were incubated with the concentrated 6B4 supernatant at 37 °C for 3 min without phosphacan pretreatment.

For the detection of tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins, cells were lysed with lysis buffer and subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 was quantified by densitometry.

Protein Kinase Activity Coprecipitated with Anti-TAG-1 Antibody or R24-- Membrane fractions were prepared from newborn rat cerebella. The cerebella were homogenized in ice-cold buffer A (0.32 M sucrose, 1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 0.1 mM EDTA) using a Teflon motor-driven glass homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 900 × g for 1 min. The supernatant was centrifuged at 11,500 × g for 3 min. The resulting pellet of the rat brain or the centrifuged cultured cells was solubilized in lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin and 5 µg/ml pepstatin A) at 4 °C for 20 min. The supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 3 min. Aliquots (0.5 ml, 750 µg of protein) of the supernatants were precleared with protein G-Sepharose (7.5 µl), then incubated with anti-TAG-1 antibody or R24 (2.5 µg) for 1 h, and precipitated with protein G-Sepharose (7.5 µl). Following immunoprecipitation, the beads were washed three times with lysis buffer, once with kinase buffer (30 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM MnCl2), and then resuspended in 20 µl of kinase buffer. The reaction was started by the addition of 5 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol, PerkinElmer Life Sciences), and the samples were incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Phosphorylation was stopped by the addition of the Laemmli sample buffer, and the samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. We used normal mouse IgG, anti-NMDA receptor antibody, and anti-integrin beta 5 antibody as negative controls.

Density Gradient Analysis-- TAG-1 distribution on a density gradient was investigated by three different methods. Sucrose gradient analysis with sodium carbonate was performed according to a method described previously (26). Rat primary cerebellar cultures in a 35-mm dish were homogenized using a Teflon glass homogenizer and sonicated in 2 ml of 500 mM sodium carbonate at pH 11.0. The sucrose content in the homogenate was then adjusted to 45% by the addition of 90% sucrose in MBS (25 mM MES (pH 6.5), 0.15 M NaCl). A linear sucrose gradient (5-35%) in 6 ml of MBS containing 250 mM sodium carbonate was layered over the lysate. The gradients were centrifuged for 16-20 h at 39,000 rpm at 4 °C in a Hitachi RPS40T rotor. 10 × 1-ml fractions were collected from the top of the gradient.

Sucrose gradient analysis with Triton X-100 was performed according to a method described previously (27). The cells were homogenized using a Teflon glass homogenizer in 2 ml of TNE/Triton X-100 buffer (1% Triton X-100, 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EGTA). The sucrose content in the homogenate was then adjusted to 40% by the addition of 80% sucrose. A linear sucrose gradient (5-30%) in 6 ml of TNE without Triton X-100 was layered over the lysate. The gradients were centrifuged for 16-20 h at 39,000 rpm at 4 °C in a Hitachi RPS40T rotor. 10 × 1 ml fractions were collected from the top of the gradient.

OptiPrep gradient analysis was performed according to a previously described method with some modifications (28). The cells were homogenized using a Teflon glass homogenizer and a sonicator in 2 ml of buffer A (0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, and 20 mM Tricine (pH 7.8)). The OptiPrep content in the homogenate was then adjusted to 25% by the addition of 50% OptiPrep in buffer A. A linear OptiPrep gradient (10-20%) in 6 ml of buffer A was layered over the lysate. The gradients were centrifuged for 16-20 h at 39,000 rpm at 4 °C in a Hitachi RPS40T rotor. 10 × 1 ml fractions were collected from the top of the gradient.

After trichloroacetic acid precipitation of each fraction, TAG-1 was detected by immunoblotting using the anti-TAG-1 polyclonal antibody.

Caveolin in CHO cells was used as a marker protein of the lipid raft fraction, because caveolin was not detected in rat cerebellar cultures. After CHO cells in a 35-mm dish were subjected to density gradient analysis, caveolin in each fraction was detected by immunoblotting using an anti-caveolin polyclonal antibody.

Distribution of tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 was investigated by sucrose density gradient with Triton X-100. After antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 or GD3 in cerebellar cultures in five 35-mm dishes, the Triton X-100 extracts were subjected to density gradient analysis. For the detection of the tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins, each fraction was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.

EGCase Treatment-- EGCase II ACT (1 units/ml EGCase II, 0.5 mM activator II) was diluted with the culture medium and applied to the culture at 2-3 days in vitro at a final concentration of 2 to 60 milliunits/ml (EGCase) and 1-30 µM (activator). To investigate the reversibility of the EGCase effect, the cells were washed and cultured with the conditioned medium after the EGCase treatment. Heat-inactivated EGCase was prepared by boiling for 5 min. The colorimetric assay of cell viability was performed using MTT according to the manufacturer's instructions (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA).

We investigated the EGCase effect on the following: 1) cell-surface ganglioside GD3 expression; 2) Lyn activation by TAG-1 cross-linking; 3) tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 by TAG-1 or GD3 cross-linking; 4) cell morphology; 5) cell viability; and 6) TAG-1 distribution on density gradient.

Flow Cytometry-- After treatment with EGCase, the rat primary cerebellar cultures were harvested. The cells were first treated with R24, then with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody, and analyzed on a FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Anti-ganglioside GD3 Antibody Coprecipitates p135-- The immunoprecipitate obtained with the anti-GD3 antibody (R24) from the Triton X-100 extract of rat primary cerebellar cultures metabolically labeled with [35S] methionine was analyzed by autoradiography. R24 coimmunoprecipitated two proteins of 135 and 16 kDa, as revealed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1). This observation suggests that ganglioside GD3 associates with these two proteins.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Anti-ganglioside GD3 antibody (R24)-precipitated protein from primary cerebellar cultures labeled with 35S. Primary cerebellar cultures metabolically labeled with 35S were solubilized in lysis buffer. The supernatants were immunoprecipitated with R24, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Lane 1, precipitate with control mouse IgG3; lane 2, precipitate with R24. Arrow indicates p135.

Identification of p135 as the GPI-anchored Neuronal Cell Adhesion Molecule, TAG-1-- 125I surface labeling and immunoprecipitation with R24 were performed to investigate whether or not the 135-kDa protein (p135) was a surface protein. p135, but not the 16-kDa protein, was also coprecipitated with R24 from the surface-labeled cells (Fig. 2A). The appearance of another smaller band was possibly due to the degradation of p135 by trypsin during cell culture, since the cell surface was labeled 12 h after trypsinization.


View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   p135 is surface-labeled and released by PI-PLC treatment of primary cerebellar cultures. A, primary cerebellar cultures whose p135 was surface-labeled with 125I were solubilized in lysis buffer. The supernatants were immunoprecipitated with R24, and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Lane 1 is same as lane 2 of Fig. 1. Lane 2, precipitate with control mouse IgG3; lane 3, precipitate with R24. B, the cultures with surface-labeled p135 were treated with PI-PLC. Lane 1, immunoprecipitates with R24; lane 2, cell lysate; lane 3, culture supernatant. Right lane, PI-PLC-treated cells, left lane, untreated cells. Proteins were visualized by autoradiography. Arrow indicates p135.

p135 was not coprecipitated with R24 after treatment of the surface-labeled cells with PI-PLC (Fig. 2B, lane 1). PI-PLC treatment released p135 from the cell surface (Fig. 2B, lane 2) into the culture medium (Fig. 2B, lane 3), indicating that p135 is a GPI-anchored protein.

p135 was identified as the GPI-anchored neuronal cell adhesion molecule, TAG-1, by sequential immunoprecipitation with R24 and the anti-TAG-1 antibody. Immunoprecipitation with R24 was performed using cerebellar cultures metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine, after which the immune complexes were disrupted by boiling in SDS-containing buffer (Fig. 3, lane 5) and subjected to second immunoprecipitation with antibodies specific for GPI-anchored neuronal cell adhesion molecules, i.e. TAG-1, contactin/F3, NCAM, and T-cadherin. The anti-TAG-1 polyclonal antibody, but not anti-contactin/F3, anti-NCAM, anti-T-cadherin antibodies, specifically precipitated p135 in the re-immunoprecipitation experiment (Fig. 3, lane 1).


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Identification of p135 as the neuronal cell adhesion molecule, TAG-1. The R24 precipitates from the cerebellar cultures labeled with 35S (lane 5) were eluted by boiling in 1% SDS. After 10-fold dilution with lysis buffer, re-immunoprecipitation was performed with anti-TAG-1 (lane 1), anti-contactin/F3 (lane 2), anti-NCAM (lane 3), and anti-T-cadherin (lane 4) polyclonal antibody, respectively. The immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Arrow indicates p135.

Antibody-mediated Cross-linking of TAG-1 Activates Lyn Signaling in Lipid Rafts-- To examine the possibility of TAG-1-mediated signal transduction via Lyn, we measured the Lyn activity in cerebellar cultures after antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1. Triton X-100 extracts were prepared from cerebellar cultures, which were sequentially treated with the anti-TAG-1 monoclonal antibody for 30 min on ice and secondary antibody for the indicated time at 37 °C. Immunoprecipitation was carried out with the anti-Lyn antibody. Kinase activity was measured by in vitro autophosphorylation. Treatment with the secondary antibody resulted in a rapid (within 1 min) and significant (3.5-fold) increase in Lyn activity (Fig. 4, lanes 1-5).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Lyn activation induced by antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 in rat primary cerebellar cultures. After antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 or NMDA receptors for the indicated times, lysates were prepared and immunoprecipitated with anti-Lyn monoclonal antibody. Kinase activity was measured by in vitro auto-phosphorylation. Cross-linking of TAG-1 was allowed to proceed for 1 (lane 2), 3 (lane 3), 7 (lane 4), and 15 min (lane 5). Mock cross-linking using normal mouse IgG was allowed for 1 min (lane 1). Cross-linking of NMDA receptors was allowed to proceed for 3 min (lane 7). Mock cross-linking using normal rabbit IgG was allowed for 3 min (lane 6). Arrows indicate p53Lyn and p56Lyn.

The possible increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins as a result of antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 was investigated. After SDS-PAGE, phosphotyrosines were detected by anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblotting. Treatment with the secondary antibody induced tyrosine phosphorylation of several proteins, including the prominent phosphorylation of p80 (Fig. 5A). The phosphorylation peaked at 2 min and returned to the control level at 20 min. Treatment with the anti-TAG-1 monoclonal antibody only at 37 °C, even at 100 µg/ml, resulted in no change in tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 (data not shown). p80 was also phosphorylated by antibody-mediated cross-linking of ganglioside GD3 (Fig. 5B). Mock cross-linking with normal mouse IgG and antibody-mediated cross-linking of NMDA receptor did not induce increase in Lyn activity (Fig. 4, lanes 6 and 7) and protein tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 5D). Phosphacan, a neural tissue-specific chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, is known to be one of the high affinity ligands of TAG-1 (29). Sequential treatment of cerebellar cultures with phosphacan and anti-phosphacan antibody also induced tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 (Fig. 5C). Furthermore, PP1 and PP2, selective inhibitor for Src family kinases, significantly reduced tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 by antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 (Fig. 6, lanes 3-6). However, the inactive compound PP3 did not reduce (Fig. 6, lanes 7 and 8). These observations suggest that TAG-1 transduces signals via Lyn to p80 in the rat cerebellum.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 induced by antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 or by phosphacan-mediated stimulation. A, time-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of the protein. After antibody mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 for the indicated times, the lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. Lane 1, 0 min; lane 2, 1 min; lane 3, 2 min; lane 4, 4 min; lane 5, 6 min; lane 6, 8 min; lane 7, 10 min; lane 8, 12 min; lane 9, 14 min; lane 10, 16 min. B, tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 induced by antibody-mediated cross-linking of ganglioside GD3. Mock cross-linking was allowed for 3 min (lane 1), TAG-1 cross-linking for 3 min (lane 2), and GD3 cross-linking for 3 min (lane 3). C, tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 by phosphacan-mediated stimulation. Untreated cells (lane 1), phosphacan-treated cells (lane 2), cells sequentially treated with phosphacan and anti-phosphacan antibody (lane 3), and cells treated with anti-phosphacan antibody alone (lane 4) are shown. D, tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins induced by antibody-mediated cross-linking of NMDA receptors. Untreated cells (lane 1), cells treated with anti-NMDA receptor antibody for 3 min (lane 2), cells sequentially treated with anti-NMDA receptor, and anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody for 3 min (lane 3) are shown. Arrow indicates p80.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of selective inhibitors for Src family kinases on tyrosine phosphorylation of p80. Tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 induced by antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 for 3 min after 10 min pretreatment with inhibitors (lane 3-8). Mock cross-linking was allowed for 3 min (lane 1) and TAG-1 cross-linking for 3 min (lane 2) without the pretreatment. Pretreatment with 1 µM PP1 (lane 3), 10 µM PP1 (lane 4), 1 µM PP2 (lane 5), 10 µM PP2 (lane 6), 1 µM PP3 (lane 7), 10 µM PP3 (lane 8) is shown. Tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 was visualized by anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblotting.

Previously, we found that R24 treatment of primary cerebellar cultures induced Lyn activation and tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 and that Lyn was present in the lipid raft fraction of sucrose density gradient analysis (21). Therefore, we investigated whether tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 was detected in the lipid raft fraction. Antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 or GD3 induced tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 in low density lipid raft fractions 3-5 on sucrose density gradient (Fig. 7, B and C). TAG-1 was also detected in the lipid raft fraction by immunoblotting (Fig. 7D). In contrast, tyrosine phosphorylation of about 110-kDa protein, but not p80, and most cellular proteins were detected in high density sample fractions 7-10 (Fig. 7, A-C and E). These observations suggest that TAG-1 transduces signal via Lyn in lipid rafts of rat cerebellum and that antibody-mediated cross-linking of ganglioside GD3 can mimic the TAG-1 signaling.


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 in lipid rafts. After antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 or GD3 in cerebellar cultures, the Triton X-100 extracts were subjected to sucrose density gradient analysis. For the detection of tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins, each fraction was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. A, mock cross-linking; B, TAG-1 cross-linking; C, ganglioside GD3 cross-linking. TAG-1 was detected by immunoblotting (D). The cellular proteins of D were stained with Ponceau S (E). Arrow indicates p80.

Association of Protein Kinase Activity with TAG-1 and Ganglioside GD3-- Previously we found that R24 coprecipitated protein kinase activity from the rat cerebellum (21). Therefore, we investigated whether the protein kinase activity was precipitated or not by the anti-TAG-1 monoclonal antibody (Fig. 8A). Proteins of 80, 56, 53, and 40 kDa were phosphorylated as revealed by an immune complex kinase assay using R24 from postnatal days 5-21. In addition, a 46-kDa protein was phosphorylated as revealed by an immune complex kinase assay using R24 from postnatal days 5-14. Proteins of 56 and 53 kDa were identified as two isoforms of the Src family kinase Lyn by reimmunoprecipitation with the anti-Lyn antibody (Fig. 8B, lane 3). The 46-kDa protein was also detected by the immune complex kinase assay using the anti-TAG-1 antibody from postnatal days 5-14 at the same level as that of R24. However, the phosphorylation of Lyn and the 80- and 40-kDa proteins was weak in contrast with that by R24. This indicates that association with TAG-1 of Lyn and the 40-kDa and 80-kDa proteins is weak or unstable in comparison to their association with ganglioside GD3. The anti-NMDA receptor antibody and anti-integrin beta 5 antibody also precipitated protein kinase activity. However, Lyn and the 80- and 40-kDa proteins were not detected by the immune complex kinase assay (Fig. 8C, lanes 3 and 4). Furthermore, normal mouse IgG precipitated no protein kinase activity (Fig. 8C, lane 1). Therefore, the association of Lyn and the 80- and 40-kDa proteins with GD3 and TAG-1 is specific. Furthermore, the level of phosphorylation of Lyn and the 40- and 80-kDa proteins coprecipitated with anti-TAG-1 antibody gradually decreased from postnatal days 5-21 in contrast with the constant level of phosphorylation of proteins coprecipitated with R24. TAG-1 and Lyn are expressed in cerebellum from newborn to adult rats (30, 31). Consistent with this, the protein levels of TAG-1 and Lyn were not changed from postnatal days 5-21 (data not shown). These observations suggest a possibility that the association of TAG-1 with Lyn may be transient during the early stage of cerebellar development.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Protein kinase activity coprecipitated with anti-TAG-1 antibody or R24 from cerebellum. A, the membrane fractions of newborn rat cerebella (P5-P21) were solubilized in 1% Triton X-100 lysis buffer. The supernatants were immunoprecipitated with anti-TAG-1 monoclonal antibody (lane T) or R24 (lane G), and the immunoprecipitates were subjected to an in vitro kinase assay and SDS-PAGE. Phosphorylation was visualized by autoradiography. P5 (lane 1), P10 (lane 2), P14 (lane 3), P17 (lane 4), and P21 (lane 5). B, identification of the 56- and 53-kDa proteins as the Src family kinase Lyn. R24 precipitates from the rat cerebella (P7) were subjected to an in vitro kinase reaction (lane 1) and eluted by boiling in 1% SDS. After 10-fold dilution with lysis buffer, reimmunoprecipitation was allowed to proceed with normal mouse IgG (lane 2) and anti-Lyn antibody (lane 3). C, protein kinase activity from the rat cerebella (P5) coprecipitated with normal rabbit IgG (lane 1), anti-Lyn (lane 2), anti-NMDA receptor (lane 3), and anti-integrin beta 5 antibody (lane 4).

Density Gradient Analysis of TAG-1-- Although GPI-anchored proteins associate with lipid rafts during signal transduction, there is some debate as to whether GPI-anchored proteins associate with lipid rafts under the steady state (32, 33). Therefore, three different methods of density gradient analysis were performed to investigate whether TAG-1 associates with lipid rafts in cerebellar cultures. Distribution of caveolin in lipid raft fractions for each method is shown in Fig. 9 (upper panels). Most of the TAG-1 was present in the lipid raft fractions 3-5 in sucrose gradients with sodium carbonate (pH 11) and sucrose gradient with Triton X-100 (Fig. 9, A and B, lower panesl). However, most of the TAG-1 was absent in lipid raft fractions 1-6 in OptiPrep gradients (without detergent, neutral pH) (Fig. 9C). The discrepancy may be explained by a previous finding that the GPI-anchored protein was concentrated in lipid rafts after detergent treatment (34). Therefore, results of Fig. 8 and Fig. 9 suggest that TAG-1 is associated with lipid rafts, but the association may be unstable. However, two membrane subdomains, ganglioside-microdomains and caveolin-enriched microdomains, seem to exist among lipid rafts (35). Therefore, we cannot deny the possibility that discrepancy of distribution between TAG-1 and caveolin on OptiPrep gradient may be due to separation of the subdomains.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Density gradient analysis of TAG-1 in primary cerebellar cultures. The cultures in a 35-mm dish were homogenized in each buffer, and linear density gradients were formed over them. Ten fractions were collected from top to bottom after centrifugation. TAG-1 of the cerebellar cultures was visualized in each fraction by immunoblotting (lower panel). A, sodium carbonate (pH 11) and sucrose gradient 5-35%; B, 1% Triton X-100 and sucrose gradient 5-30%; C, Tricine (pH 7.8) and OptiPrep gradient 10-20%. Caveolin of CHO cells was visualized by immunoblotting (upper panel).

Effect of GSL Hydrolysis by EGCase on TAG-1 Signaling-- In the present study, anti-GSL antibody coimmunoprecipitated TAG-1, and antibody-mediated cross-linking of GSL mimicked TAG-1 signaling in lipid rafts. What is the role of GSL in TAG-1 signaling? EGCase is an enzyme that specifically hydrolyzes the linkage between carbohydrates and ceramides in GSLs (36). With the aid of an activator protein, it is capable of releasing the carbohydrate moiety of GSLs on the cell surface without affecting other lipids and glycoproteins (37, 38).

Treatment of cerebellar cultures with EGCase and an activator protein greatly reduced the cell-surface ganglioside GD3 content (Fig. 10A) and R24-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 (Fig. 10C, lane 4). Interestingly, EGCase treatment reduced TAG-1-mediated Lyn activation (Fig. 10B, lanes 3 and 4) and tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 (Fig. 10C, lane 5) with a concomitant neurite retraction (Fig. 11D, panel b). The EGCase effect on TAG-1-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 was dose- and time-dependent (Fig. 11, A and B) and reversible (Fig. 11C). Hydrolysis of cell-surface GSL by EGCase induces an increase in GSL synthesis de novo for maintaining the cell-surface GSL contents (36). Consistent with this, GD3 expression was restored by removal of EGCase (Fig. 11E, panel c). TAG-1-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 and neurites are also restored following the removal of EGCase (Fig. 11C, panel c, and D, panel c). EGCase treatment did not decrease cell viability as determined by the MTT method under this condition. No change in TAG-1-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 was observed following treatment with heat-inactivated EGCase (data not shown). Therefore, the inhibition of TAG-1-mediated signaling is probably due to the degradation of cell-surface GSLs. Furthermore, EGCase treatment altered TAG-1 distribution on the OptiPrep gradient to a low density fraction (Fig. 12C). Similarly, although slightly, the alteration was also observed in sucrose density gradients. TAG-1 was additionally detected in fraction 2 with sodium carbonate (Fig. 12A) and in fraction 4 with Triton X-100 (Fig. 12B) after EGCase treatment. This suggests that degradation of cell-surface GSLs may affect the properties of lipid rafts. Taken together, these results indicate that GSLs are involved in TAG-1 signaling in lipid rafts.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Effect of EGCase treatment on TAG-1 signaling. A, flow cytometric analysis of GD3 expression. After treatment with 50 milliunits/ml of EGCase at 37 °C for 6 h, the cells were stained with R24, followed by that with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody. Untreated cells (thick line) and EGCase-treated cells (thin line). Cells stained with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody alone (dot line) are indicated as the control. B, effect of EGCase on Lyn activation induced by TAG-1 cross-linking. Lyn activity was measured by in vitro autophosphorylation after mock cross-linking (lane 1) and TAG-1 cross-linking (lane 2) for 1 min of untreated cells, or after mock cross-linking (lane 3) and TAG-1 cross-linking (lane 4) for 1 min of EGCase-treated cells. C, effect of EGCase on tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 induced by the antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 or the ganglioside GD3. Mock cross-linking (lane 1), GD3 cross-linking (lanes 2 and 4), TAG-1 cross-linking (lanes 3 and 5); untreated cells (lanes 1-3), EGCase-treated cells (lanes 4 and 5). Arrow indicates tyrosine phosphorylation of p80.


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Dose- and time-dependent and reversible effect of EGCase on TAG-1 signaling and cell morphology. A-C, measurement of tyrosine phosphorylation of p80. D, cell morphology; E, cell-surface GD3 expression. A, dose-dependent effect of EGCase treatment for 6 h on TAG-1-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p80. The concentrations of EGCase and the activator are 2 milliunits/ml and 1 µM (lane 2), 5 milliunits/ml and 2.5 µM (lane 3), 10 milliunits/ml and 5 µM (lane 4), and 60 milliunits/ml and 30 µM (lane 5), respectively; untreated cells (lane 1). Relative percentage of tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 by TAG-1 cross-linking in untreated cells is indicated. B, time-dependent effect of EGCase treatment on TAG-1-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p80. The concentrations of EGCase and the activator are 50 milliunits/ml and 25 µM, respectively. Untreated cells (lane 1), and cells treated for 2 (lane 2), 4 (lane 3), and 6 h (lane 4). C-E, reversible effect of treatment with 50 milliunits/ml EGCase. C, TAG-1-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p80, D, time course of changes of cell morphology; E, flow cytometric analysis of GD3 expression; the dotted lines are indicated as the control. Untreated cells (a), EGCase-treated cells for 5 h (b), and cells 12 h after the removal of EGCase (c).


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 12.   Effect of EGCase treatment on TAG-1 distribution in a density gradient. Sodium carbonate (pH 11) and sucrose gradient 5-35% (A), 1% Triton X-100 and sucrose gradient 5-30% (B), Tricine (pH 7.8) and OptiPrep gradient 10-20% (C). Untreated cells (upper panel) and EGCase-treated cells (lower panel) were subjected to density gradient analysis. TAG-1 in each fraction was visualized by immunoblotting.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

TAG-1 Signaling via Src Family Kinase Lyn in Rat Cerebellum-- In our study, we have shown the association of ganglioside GD3 with GPI-anchored neuronal cell adhesion molecule, TAG-1, and the Src family kinase Lyn by a coimmunoprecipitation technique.

Several GPI-anchored proteins have been implicated in transmembrane signaling via Src family tyrosine kinases (39, 40). In leukocytes, antibodies against a variety of GPI-anchored proteins coimmunoprecipitate Src family kinases. Antibody-mediated cross-linking of GPI-anchored proteins induces transient tyrosine phosphorylation of several substrates and, concomitantly, cell activation (40). Some groups have reported coprecipitation of Src family kinases with GPI-anchored proteins in the nervous system. Src family kinase Fyn is coprecipitated with Thy-1 in the chick brain (41), with contactin/F3 in the mouse cerebellum (42) and with NCAM120 in oligodendrocytes (43). Antibody-mediated cross-linking of F11(chicken contactin/F3) on embryonic chick neuronal cells induces Fyn activation (44). Antibody-mediated cross-linking of contactin/F3 on oligodendrocytes induces Fyn activation (43). In the present study, we found that Lyn can interact with TAG-1 in the rat cerebellum and that antibody-mediated cross-linking of TAG-1 induced Lyn activation in rat primary cerebellar cultures. These observations show that TAG-1 transduces signals via Lyn in the rat cerebellum.

The main site of TAG-1 signaling via Lyn in the cerebellum is probably the granule cells. Indeed, both TAG-1 and Lyn are predominantly expressed in the cerebellar granule cells, as has been shown by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical studies (30, 31, 45-47). During development, cerebellar granule cells in the external granular layer undergo proliferation, axon outgrowth, migration to the internal granular layer, and formation of synaptic connections (48). Regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation through Src family kinases is critical in the control of neural development (49). For example, Fyn-deficient mice exhibit impaired myelination (50). It has been shown that Src family kinases are involved in the intracellular signaling pathway for responses by the neural cell adhesion molecules of the immunoglobulin superfamily (51). TAG-1, a GPI-anchored neuronal cell adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily, is involved in neurite outgrowth, pathfinding, and fasciculation (52). Therefore, TAG-1 signaling via Lyn might play a role in the development of cerebellar granule cells.

Isolation of Lipid Rafts by Anti-GSL Antibody-- GPI-anchored proteins are restricted to the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer and are integrated into the membrane by GPI anchors. These lipid anchors have no direct contact with the cytoplasm. Src family kinases anchor onto the inner leaflet via N-terminal lipid modification, palmitoylation, and myristoylation. How do GPI-anchored proteins transduce signals via Src family kinases? This is probably possible via the lipid rafts that are rich in GSLs, cholesterol, GPI-anchored proteins, and signaling molecules such as Src family kinases (53, 54). The basic forces driving lipid raft formation are considered to be lipid interactions, which are weak and transient (16, 55). The saturated acyl chains and high acyl chain-melting temperature of GSLs mediate GSL clustering in combination with cholesterol, which has the properties of a "liquid-ordered phase" with restricted fluidity (16). In contrast, most phospholipids have unsaturated acyl chains, low melting temperature, and the properties of a "liquid phase" with high fluidity. Lipid rafts may exist as phase-separated domains in the membrane. Interactions between the carbohydrates of GSLs by hydrogen bonds is also assumed to contribute to raft formation (19). The linkage of GPI-anchored proteins and Src family kinases to saturated acyl chains is considered to facilitate targeting to lipid rafts. The lipid composition renders lipid rafts and their constituent proteins resistant to solubilization with non-ionic detergents. Thus, lipid rafts can be isolated as low density membrane fractions in sucrose density gradients with detergents. Lipid rafts can be also isolated in OptiPrep gradients without detergents or by immunoprecipitation with the anti-caveolin antibody (17). We found that the anti-GSL antibody coprecipitates TAG-1, Lyn, and caveolin, suggesting that immunoprecipitation with this antibody is an immunoabsorption method for isolating lipid rafts. Consistent with this idea, other anti-GSL antibodies such as anti-ganglioside GM3, anti-ganglioside alpha GalGD1b, and anti-globotriaosylceramide Gb3 can immunoprecipitate Src family kinases and GPI-anchored proteins (56-59).

Role of GSL in GPI-anchored Protein Signaling in Lipid Rafts-- A number of studies have examined the influence of cholesterol on the physical properties and signaling of lipid rafts by (i) cholesterol depletion using cyclodextrin or by oxidation to cholestenone, (ii) inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis by compactin or lovastatin, and (iii) using cholesterol-binding agents, such as filipin or nystatin. Cholesterol depletion results in an increase in solubility of GPI-anchored proteins in non-ionic detergents and perturbation of raft-mediated signaling (16, 17, 60-64).

In contrast to cholesterol, only a few studies have examined the influence of GSL, another core lipid of lipid rafts, on the physical properties and signaling in lipid rafts (65, 66). Inhibition of sphingolipid biosynthesis results in an increase in solubility of GPI-anchored proteins in non-ionic detergents (62). Single particle tracking of GPI-anchored proteins and GSL in native membranes showed their transient confinement in patches, which is assumed to represent lipid rafts in vivo (67). The size of the confining domain for the GPI-anchored protein is reduced by treatment with inhibitors of GSL biosynthesis (68). These observations suggest that GSLs can regulate the physical properties of lipid rafts.

What is the role of GSL in raft-mediated signaling? In the present study, we showed that GSL signaling and GPI-anchored protein signaling have many properties in common. (i) Both the anti-ganglioside GD3 antibody (R24) and anti-TAG-1 antibody (3.1C12) coprecipitate protein kinase activity. Proteins of 80 and 40 kDa, and 56/53 kDa:Lyn are phosphorylated as revealed by immune complex kinase assays. (ii) Cross-linking mediated by both R24 and 3.1C12 induces Lyn activation. (iii) Cross-linking mediated by both R24 and 3.1C12 induces rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 in lipid rafts. It was reported that both the anti-ganglioside alpha GalGD1b antibody and anti-Thy-1 antibody coprecipitate Lyn, as well as phosphoproteins of 80 and 40 kDa. Cross-linking mediated by these antibodies also induces Lyn activation in lipid rafts, rapid tyrosine phosphorylation of proteins including an 80-kDa protein, and calcium flux in rat basophilic leukemia RBL-2H3 cells (58, 69-72). The 80-kDa phosphoprotein as revealed by the immune complex kinase assays is identical to the 80-kDa protein phosphorylated in RBL-2H3 cells by antibody cross-linking (58). Treatment with the anti-GSL antibody can mimic GPI-anchored protein signaling, suggesting that GPI-anchored proteins and GSLs transduce signals into the cell using the same signaling pathway. Several groups also reported that antibodies against various GPI-anchored proteins and GSLs coprecipitate protein kinase activity. Proteins of 80 and 40 kDa and 60-53-kDa:Src family kinases are phosphorylated at the tyrosine residue as indicated by the immune complex kinase assays (40, 41, 58, 73-75). GPI-anchored ephrin-A5 also induces tyrosine phosphorylation of an 80-kDa protein in the lipid raft fraction by binding its receptor, and the phosphorylation was abrogated in the presence of a selective inhibitor against Src family kinases and in Src family kinase-deficient mice (76). These observations suggest that p80 may be a membrane protein in lipid rafts and a putative substrate for Src family kinases. Thus, Src family kinases, p80 and 40-kDa protein are sets of signaling components in lipid rafts for both GPI-anchored proteins and GSLs.

We used the GSL-degrading enzyme, EGCase, to investigate the function of GSLs in lipid rafts. EGCase specifically hydrolyzes cell-surface GSLs of intact cells with the assistance of its activator protein (36-38). The application of EGCase to living cells provides a novel approach to determining the physiological roles of endogenous GSLs. In the present study, we showed that EGCase treatment reduced cell-surface GSL and impairs TAG-1-dependent signaling via Lyn. GD3 expression and TAG-1-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of p80 was restored by removal of EGCase. The inhibition of TAG-1-mediated signaling by EGCase is not due to degradation of TAG-1 by protease contaminants in EGCase, because TAG-1 protein levels were not changed following EGCase treatment (Fig. 12). This is also not due to its cytotoxic effects, because EGCase treatment did not decrease cell viability and the EGCase effect was reversible. Therefore, the inhibition of TAG-1-mediated signaling is probably due to the degradation of GSLs and that cell-surface GSLs are probably necessary for TAG-1 signaling in lipid rafts. We also found that EGCase treatment induces neurite retraction. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this remains unknown.

What is the mechanism underlying inhibition of TAG-1-mediated signaling by EGCase? We found that enzymatic removal of the carbohydrate moiety from GSLs by EGCase alters the TAG-1 distribution on an OptiPrep gradient. This suggests that carbohydrate moiety of GSLs can affect the interaction of TAG-1 with lipid rafts or the physical properties of lipid rafts. A recent report showed that exogenously administered ganglioside, which was incorporated in lipid raft fraction, displaced GPI-anchored proteins from lipid rafts and increased their detergent solubility (77, 78). This finding suggests that GSL can affect distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in lipid rafts. Taken together, our results suggest that GSLs are involved in GPI-anchored protein signaling in lipid rafts. Further experiments are required to clarify the role of GSLs in signal transduction by GPI-anchored proteins.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to Dr. Makoto Ito (Kyushu University) for technical assistance with EGCase treatment. We thank Dr. Vance Lemmon (Case Western Reserve University) and Dr. Hiroaki Aso (Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology) for the helpful discussion. We also thank Dr. Youichi Tajima and Dr. Yumiko Watanabe (Department of Biochemical Cell Research) for the technical assistance with flow cytometry. We are grateful to Dr. Yoshitaka Nagai (Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences, Tokyo) for encouraging this work.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants-in-aid 11121237 (to K. K.) and 10178102 (to Y. S.) for Scientific Research on Priority Areas, by Grant-in-aid 10780376 (to K. K.) for Encouragement of Young Scientists, by Grant-in-aid 10480173 (to Y. S.) for Scientific Research (B) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, and by the Yamada Science Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemical Cell Research, The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo Metropolitan Organization for Medical Research, 3-18-22, Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8613, Japan. Tel.: 81-3-3823-2101, ext. 5235; Fax: 81-3-3828-6663; E-mail: kasahara@rinshoken.or.jp.

|| Present address: Dept. of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003163200

2 The nomenclature for gangliosides follows the system of Svennerholm (79).

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GSL, glycosphingolipid; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; PI-PLC, phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; EGCase, endoglycoceramidase; MTT, [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide]; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Yamakawa, T., and Nagai, Y. (1978) Trends Biochem. Sci. 3, 128-131
2. Hakomori, S. (1981) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 733-764
3. Hakomori, S. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 18713-18716
4. Tettamanti, G., and Riboni, L. (1994) Prog. Brain Res. 101, 77-100
5. Rösner, H., Al-Aqtum, M., and Rahmann, H. (1992) Neurochem. Int. 20, 339-351
6. Purpura, D. P. (1978) Nature 276, 520-521
7. Toffano, G., Savoini, G., Moroni, F., Lombardi, G., Calza, L., and Agnati, L. F. (1983) Brain Res. 261, 163-166
8. Roisen, F. J., Bartfeld, H., Nagele, R., and Yorke, G. (1981) Science 214, 577-578
9. Ledeen, R. W. (1984) J. Neurosci. Res. 12, 147-159
10. Skaper, S. D., Katoh-Semba, R., and Varon, S. (1985) Brain Res. 355, 19-26
11. Schwarz, A., Rapaport, E., Hirschberg, K., and Futerman, A. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10990-10998
12. Yamashita, T., Wada, R., Sasaki, T., Deng, C., Bierfreund, U., Sandhoff, K., and Proia, R. L. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 9142-9147
13. Kojima, N., Kurosawa, N., Nishi, T., Hanai, N., and Tsuji, S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30451-30456
14. Sheikh, K. A., Sun, J., Liu, Y., Kawai, H., Crawford, T. O., Proia, R. L., Griffin, J. W., and Schnaar, R. L. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 7532-7537
15. Simons, K., and Ikonen, E. (1997) Nature 387, 569-572
16. Brown, D. A., and London, E. (1998) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 14, 111-136
17. Anderson, R. G. W. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 199-225
18. Okamoto, T., Schlegel, A., Scherer, P. E., and Lisanti, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 5419-5422
19. Masserini, M., Palestini, P., and Pitto, M. (1999) J. Neurochem. 73, 1-11
20. Kurzchalia, T. V., and Parton, R. G. (1999) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 424-431
21. Kasahara, K., Watanabe, Y., Yamamoto, T., and Sanai, Y. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 29947-29953
22. Nara, K., Watanabe, Y., Maruyama, K., Kasahara, K., Nagai, Y., and Sanai, Y. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 7952-7956
23. Maeda, N., Hamanaka, H., Oohira, A., and Noda, M. (1995) Neuroscience 67, 23-35
24. Levi, G., Aloisi, F., Ciotti, M. T., Thangnipon, W., Kingsbury, A., and Balazs, R. (1989) in A Dissection and Tissue Culture Manual of Nervous System (Shahar, A. , de Vellis, J. , Vernadakis, A. , and Haber, B., eds) , pp. 211-214, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York
25. Maeda, N., Matsui, F., and Oohira, A. (1992) Dev. Biol. 151, 564-574
26. Song, K. S., Li, S., Okamoto, T., Quilliam, L. A., Sargiacomo, M., and Lisanti, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9690-9697
27. Brown, D. A., and Rose, J. K. (1992) Cell 68, 533-544
28. Smart, E., Ying, Y. S., Mineo, C., and Anderson, R. G. W. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10104-10108
29. Milev, P., Maurel, P., Häring, M., Margolis, R. K., and Margolis, R. U. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15716-15723
30. Yoshihara, Y., Kawasaki, M., Tamada, A., Nagata, S., Kagamiyama, H., and Mori, K. (1995) J. Neurobiol. 28, 51-69
31. Chen, S., Ren, Y. Q., and Hillman, D. E. (1996) Dev. Brain Res. 92, 140-146
32. Kenworthy, A. K., and Edidin, M. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 142, 69-84
33. Friedrichson, T., and Kurzchalia, T. V. (1998) Nature 394, 802-805
34. Mayor, S., and Maxfield, F. R. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 929-944
35. Iwabuchi, K., Handa, K., and Hakomori, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33766-33773
36. Izu, H., Izumi, Y., Kurome, Y., Sano, M., Kondo, A., Kato, I., and Ito, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 19846-19850
37. Ito, M., Ikegami, Y., and Yamagata, T. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7919-7926
38. Ito, M., and Komori, H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12655-12660
39. Robinson, P. J. (1991) Immunol. Today 12, 35-41
40. Stefanová, I., Horejsí-V, Ansotegui, I., Knapp, W., and Stockinger, H. (1991) Science 254, 1016-1019
41. Henke, R. C., Seeto, G. S., and Jeffrey, P. L. (1997) J. Neurosci. Res. 49, 655-670
42. Olive, S., Dubois, C., Schachner, M., and Rougon, G. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 2307-2317
43. Krämer, E., Klein, C., Koch, T., Boytinck, M., and Trotter, J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29042-29049
44. Zisch, A. H., D'Alessandri, L., Amrein, K., Ranscht, B., Winterhalter, K. H., and Vaughan, L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 6, 263-279
45. Kuhar, S. G., Feng, L., Vidan, S., Ross, M. E., Hatten, M. E., and Heintz, N. (1993) Development 117, 97-104
46. Buttiglione, M., Revest, J.-M., Pavlou, O., Karagogeos, D., Furley, A., Rougon, G., and Faivre-Sarrailh, C. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 6853-6870
47. Umemori, H., Wanaka, A., Kato, H., Takeuchi, M., Tohyama, M., and Yamamoto, T. (1992) Mol. Brain Res. 16, 303-310
48. Hatten, M. E., and Heintz, N. (1995) Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 385-408
49. Maness, P. F. (1992) Dev. Neurosci. 14, 257-270
50. Umemori, H., Sato, S., Yagi, T., Aizawa, S., and Yamamoto, T. (1994) Nature 367, 572-576
51. Walsh, F. S., and Doherty, P. (1997) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 13, 425-456
52. Furley, A. J., Morton, S. B., Manalo, D., Karagogeos, D., Dodd, J., and Jessell, T. M. (1990) Cell 61, 157-170
53. Horejsí, V., Drbal, K., Cebecauer, M., Cer