|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005669200 on August 22, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 45, 35040-35050, November 10, 2000
Equilibrium and Kinetic Binding Interactions between DNA and a
Group of Novel, Nonspecific DNA-binding Proteins from Spores of
Bacillus and Clostridium Species*
Christopher S.
Hayes,
Zheng-Yu
Peng , and
Peter
Setlow§
From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Connecticut
Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030
Received for publication, June 28, 2000, and in revised form, August 10, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Binding of / -type small acid-soluble spore
proteins (SASP) is the major determinant of DNA resistance to damage
caused by UV radiation, heat, and oxidizing agents in spores of
Bacillus and Clostridium species. Analysis of
several / -type SASP showed that these proteins have essentially
no secondary structure in the absence of DNA, but become significantly
-helical upon binding to double-stranded DNAs or oligonucleotides.
Folding of / -type SASP induced by a variety of DNAs and
oligonucleotides was measured by CD spectroscopy, and this allowed
determination of a DNA binding site size of 4 base pairs as well as
equilibrium binding parameters of the / -type SASP-DNA
interaction. Analysis of the equilibrium binding data further allowed
determination of both intrinsic binding constants (K) and
cooperativity factors ( ), as the / -type SASP-DNA interaction
was significantly cooperative, with the degree of cooperativity
depending on both the bound DNA and the salt concentration. Kinetic
analysis of the interaction of one / -type SASP,
SspCTyr, with DNA indicated that each binding event
involves the dimerization of SspCTyr monomers at a DNA
binding site. The implications of these findings for the structure of
the / -type SASP·DNA complex and the physiology of / -type
SASP degradation during spore germination are discussed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Dormant spores of Bacillus and Clostridium
species are extremely resistant to a number of environmental insults
compared with the corresponding vegetatively growing cells (1-3). A
family of abundant spore proteins termed the / -type small
acid-soluble spore proteins
(SASP)1 that saturates the
dormant spore chromosome is primarily responsible for the resistance of
spore DNA to lethal damage caused by heat, oxidizing agents, and UV
radiation (4-8). Indeed, spores of Bacillus subtilis that
lack the majority of their / -type SASP are much more sensitive to
these treatments than are wild-type spores (4, 5, 8). The / -type
SASP are small (6.2-7.6 kDa) nonspecific DNA-binding proteins that are
synthesized only within the developing forespore compartment during
sporulation (7). The amino acid sequences of / -type SASP are
highly conserved both within and between species (~70% identity and
~80% similarity, without gaps for Bacillus species);
however, these proteins show no sequence similarity to any other
protein family and do not contain any motifs characteristic of other
DNA-binding proteins (7). In all Bacillus species studied
thus far, two major / -type SASP accumulate to high levels,
whereas other minor / -type SASP are present at lower levels (7).
During spore germination and outgrowth, / -type SASP are rapidly
cleaved into two peptides by a sequence-specific endoprotease, the
germination protease; and these oligopeptides are then degraded to
amino acids by other spore peptidases (7).
Previous studies suggest that / -type SASP undergo a significant
change in structure upon binding to DNA. First, / -type SASP are
extremely sensitive to proteases, but become much more resistant to
proteases such as trypsin, chymotrypsin, and germination protease when
bound to DNA (9). Second, / -type SASP are very susceptible to two
forms of spontaneous covalent protein damage, asparagine residue
deamidation and methionine residue oxidation (10, 11), indicating that
the / -type SASP peptide backbone is flexible and accessible to
solvent (12, 13). However, the rates of asparagine residue deamidation
and methionine residue oxidation in / -type SASP are substantially
reduced when these proteins are bound to DNA (10, 11). Increased
resistance to proteolysis, asparagine residue deamidation, and
methionine residue oxidation is consistent with / -type SASP
becoming structurally more compact upon binding to DNA.
One established aspect of the structural change in / -type SASP is
the oligomerization of these proteins upon binding to DNA. Equilibrium
ultracentrifugation studies have demonstrated that / -type SASP
are monomeric in solution (14). However, electron micrographs of
/ -type SASP·plasmid DNA complexes show clearly that these
proteins bind in long clusters along the DNA backbone, indicating that
DNA binding may be cooperative and that the cooperativity could be due
to protein-protein interactions between adjacently bound / -type
SASP (15). DNase I protection studies also indicate that / -type
SASP-DNA binding is cooperative (16). DNA-dependent
protein-protein contacts between / -type SASP have been confirmed
in other studies, and the interacting amino acid residues have been
identified (17).
Clearly, there is considerable evidence that substantial conformational
changes occur in / -type SASP upon binding to DNA. In this study,
we report the use of CD spectroscopy to more directly detect and
quantify these structural changes. Spectroscopic signals arising from
these structural changes were used to obtain thermodynamic and kinetic
parameters for the / -type SASP-DNA interaction. The significance
of these findings is discussed with respect to the role of / -type
SASP in the mature spore and their degradation during spore germination
and outgrowth.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Expression and Purification of / -Type
SASP--
SspCTyr (L28Y variant of SspC from B. subtilis) (18) was overexpressed in Escherichia coli
strain BL21(DE3) (T7 RNA polymerase under the control of the
lac promoter) (19) from the pET3d-derived plasmid pPS2896.
The / -type SASP BceI from Bacillus cereus T (17, 20)
and CbiC from Clostridium bifermentans (21) were overexpressed in E. coli strain BL21(DE3) from pET3-derived
plasmids pPS2734 and pPS2315, respectively. SASP-A was purified from
dormant spores of Bacillus megaterium strain QMB1551.
SASP- and SASP- (22) were purified from dormant spores of
C. bifermentans (a gift of W. M. Waites).
E. coli strains were routinely grown in Terrific broth (24 g
of yeast extract, 12 g of Tryptone, and 4 ml of glycerol per 900 ml plus 100 ml of 170 mM KH2PO4 and
720 mM K2HPO4) supplemented with
200 µg/ml ampicillin and 0.5% glucose at 37 °C with shaking. E. coli strains containing plasmids pPS2734, pPS2315, and
pPS2896 were grown to an absorbance at 600 nm of 2.5, and / -type
SASP synthesis was induced by adding
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside to 0.5 mM. Cells were harvested by centrifugation after 2 h
of further incubation, washed once with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.4) and 150 mM NaCl, frozen, and lyophilized. B. megaterium was sporulated at 30 °C in supplemented nutrient
broth, and spores were harvested, purified, and lyophilized as
described previously (14, 23).
Lyophilized E. coli cells (100 mg at a time) were broken by
dry rupture for 2 min in a dental amalgamator (Wig-L-Bug) with glass
beads (150 mg) as the abrasive. Lyophilized B. megaterium spores (100 mg) were broken similarly, but by 8 min of dry rupture. All
/ -type SASP except SASP-A, SASP- , and SASP- were extracted twice with cold 3% acetic acid and 30 mM HCl from dry
ruptured E. coli cells (10). SASP-A, SASP- , and SASP-
were extracted twice with 3% acetic acid from dry ruptured spores (14,
22). After centrifugation (20 min, 8000 × g), acid extracts
(40-80 ml) were dialyzed in Spectrapor 3 tubing (molecular mass cutoff of 3500 Da) at 4 °C against 1% acetic acid (three changes of 4 liters), and the dialyzed extracts were passed over a DEAE-cellulose column equilibrated in 1% acetic acid. The flow-through was frozen and
lyophilized, and the dry residue was dissolved in 8 M urea and 10 mM Tris maleate (pH 5.5). Dissolved protein was
adsorbed to a CM-cellulose column pre-equilibrated in 10 mM
Tris maleate (pH 5.5) and eluted with a linear salt gradient of 0-400
mM NaCl in 10 mM Tris maleate (pH 5.5).
Fractions containing pure / -type SASP were pooled, lyophilized,
redissolved in distilled water, and dialyzed against 10 mM
sodium phosphate (pH 7.5). All proteins were >95% pure by
Tris/Tricine/SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Polynucleotides and Oligonucleotides--
All synthetic
polynucleotides (poly(dG)·poly(dC), poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC),
poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC), poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT), and
poly(dA)·poly(dT)) were obtained from Sigma. Plasmid DNA (pUC19) was
purified by two rounds of CsCl equilibrium density centrifugation and
linearized by digestion with EcoRI. All polynucleotides were dialyzed in Spectrapor 3 tubing at 4 °C against 10 mM
sodium phosphate (pH 7.5). Polynucleotides were quantitated (in base
pairs) using the following molar extinction coefficients:
poly(dG)·poly(dC) and poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC), 254 = 16.8 mM 1
cm 1; poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) and pUC19,
260 = 13.0 mM 1
cm 1; and poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) and
poly(dA)·poly(dT), 262 = 13.2 mM 1 cm 1
(24).
All oligonucleotides were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. and
were dissolved at ~1 mg/ml in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and
annealed on ice for 30 min. Annealed oligonucleotides were purified by
electrophoresis on 20% polyacrylamide gels in 90 mM Tris borate and 2 mM EDTA. Oligonucleotide positions were
identified by UV shadowing against an intensifying screen, and gel
slices containing duplex oligonucleotides were removed with a clean
razor blade. Oligonucleotides were eluted from gel slices into 50 mM ammonium acetate and 5 mM EDTA by gentle
shaking at 4 °C for 15 h; eluted oligonucleotides were
lyophilized; and the dry residue was dissolved in 50-100 µl of
Milli-Q water and dialyzed against 10 mM sodium phosphate
(pH 7.5) at 4 °C in a 1-kDa cutoff DispoBiodialyzer (Spectrapor).
All purified oligonucleotides were >99% pure as judged by ethidium
bromide staining of 20% polyacrylamide gels. Molar extinction
coefficients for oligonucleotides of n base pairs were
calculated as follows: for blunt end oligonucleotides,
254 = n(16.8
mM 1
cm 1), and for 3'-dA overhang-containing
oligonucleotides of n base pairs, 254 = n(16.8 mM 1
cm 1) + 30.8 mM 1 cm 1
(24, 25).
CD Spectroscopy--
All CD experiments were conducted with a
Jasco J-715 spectropolarimeter equipped with a thermoelectric
temperature controller. Far-UV spectra of / -type SASP, DNA, and
/ -type SASP/DNA mixtures were averages of three scans acquired at
a rate of 20 nm/min, a bandwidth of 1 nm, and a response time of 8 s, using a 1-mm path length cuvette. All equilibrium, kinetic, and
thermal dissociation data were obtained with a 1.0-cm path length
cuvette. Stoichiometric reverse titrations of SspCTyr and
CbiC with poly(dG)·poly(dC) were conducted in 1.2 ml of 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) at 21 °C with stirring.
Poly(dG)·poly(dC) was added sequentially, and the CD signals
at 222 nm were measured for 3 min at 5-s intervals. The CD values at
222 nm for each titration point were averaged, and corrections were
made for dilution and the contribution of DNA to the CD signals at 222 nm. Corrected CD values are expressed as mean residue ellipticity,
[ ]222. Secondary structure deconvolution was
carried out using a web-based neural network algorithm, K2D (26).
Equilibrium binding forward titrations to determine binding constants
were carried out with 15-17 µM (in base pairs) DNA at 21 °C in 5 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) with 20, 40, or
80 mM NaCl or in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH
7.5) without added NaCl. Each forward titration consisted of 15-20
separate solutions with increasing amounts of added / -type SASP,
which were allowed to equilibrate for 15 h prior to CD
measurements. The concentrations of all protein stock solutions were
determined by quantitative amino acid analysis. The CD signal of each
forward titration solution was measured at 222 nm for 3 min at 5-s
intervals, and a spectrum from 300 to 250 nm was also obtained. The
relative concentrations of DNA-bound and unbound SspCTyr
were calculated based on a two-state model of SspCTyr-DNA
binding according to the following equation:
[ obs]222 = b[ b]222 + (1 b)[ u]222, where
[ obs]222 is the observed mean residue
ellipticity corrected for DNA and buffer contributions, b is the fraction of DNA-bound protein,
[ b]222 is the mean residue ellipticity of
DNA-bound SspCTyr ( 18,400 degrees cm2
dmol 1), and
[ u]222 is the mean residue ellipticity of
unbound SspCTyr ( 4000 degrees cm2
dmol 1). Calculated proportions of DNA-bound
and unbound SspCTyr were consistent with changes in the
near-UV CD spectrum (300 to 250 nm) of the titrated polynucleotide.
Therefore, fractional saturation of the titrated polynucleotide
was determined from calculations of bound / -type SASP. McGhee-von
Hippel binding densities ( ) were expressed as fractional DNA
saturation divided by the site size of 4 bp as described (27), and
intrinsic binding constants (K) and cooperativity factors
( ) were determined by iterative nonlinear least-squares fitting of
the McGhee-von Hippel model to experimental data. Forward titrations of
poly(dG)·poly(dC), poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT), and pUC19 with
SspCTyr in 5 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5)
and 40 mM NaCl were performed twice each, from which an
experimental error of approximately ±15% for K was estimated.
CD-monitored thermal unfolding/dissociation experiments were performed
on pre-equilibrated complexes of / -type SASP (5 µM) and DNA (25 µM in base pairs) in 10 mM sodium
phosphate (pH 7.5) in a sealed cuvette with stirring. The heating rates
were 25 and 50 °C/h, and the CD signal at 222 nm was measured at
every 0.5 or 1 °C interval. The midpoint of each transition (defined
as Tm) was determined by taking the first derivative
of ellipticity with respect to the inverse of the absolute temperature as described (28).
Kinetic experiments were performed by adding DNA to a stirring
solution of / -type SASP and monitoring the CD signals at 222 nm
as a function of time. This procedure entailed a dead time of ~5 s,
although no change in the CD signals at 222 nm (aside from the
contribution from added DNA) was seen during the dead time. Initial
rates of SspCTyr binding were determined by performing
least-squares linear regression analysis on the linear portion of the
curves. Rates were calculated using the same formula outlined above for
equilibrium measurements. Binding rate constants
(kb) were calculated according to the following
binding reaction:
[SspCTyrb]/ t = kb[SspCTyru]02[DNAu]0,
where [SspCTyrb]/ t is the
calculated initial SspCTyr-DNA binding rate in nanomolar
bound SspCTyr per s,
[SspCTyru]0 is the initial
concentration of unbound SspCTyr, and
[DNAu]0 is the initial concentration of
unbound polynucleotide expressed as 8-bp binding sites (4 bp for each
SspCTyr monomer). This model is useful for describing the
initial binding reaction at low binding densities, but does not account
for overlapping binding sites or potential anti-cooperativity at high
/ -type SASP binding densities (29, 30).
CD spectra of SspCTyr·oligonucleotide complexes were
obtained from solutions containing 25 µM protein and 145 µM (in base pairs) oligonucleotide in 1.3 mM
sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) at 4 °C in a 1-mm path length cuvette.
Each solution was allowed to equilibrate at 4 °C for at least
15 h prior to spectrum acquisition, and all spectra were the
average of three scans.
 |
RESULTS |
/ -Type SASP Become -Helical upon Binding to
DNA--
Several studies suggest that / -type SASP lack higher
order structure in the absence of DNA, but become more compact upon binding to DNA (9-11). However, these studies employed indirect methods and were therefore not able to determine which type or degree
of structural changes occur in / -type SASP upon binding to DNA.
To explore these issues more definitively, we have used CD spectroscopy
to study the changes in / -type SASP secondary structure upon the
binding of these proteins to DNA. As expected, the far-UV CD spectra of
a number of / -type SASP from a variety of bacterial species
(SspCTyr from B. subtilis, SASP-A from B. megaterium, BceI from B. cereus, and CbiC from C. bifermentans) were indicative of a largely random coil
conformation in the absence of DNA (Fig.
1 and data not shown) (31). The CD
spectra of / -type SASP are characterized by a large lobe of
negative ellipticity at 200 nm and a less intense lobe of negative
ellipticity at ~225 nm (Fig. 1 and data not shown). The smaller lobe
of negative ellipticity at ~225 nm probably does not indicate nascent
secondary structure, as the intensity of this band remained virtually
unchanged at 90 °C (data not shown). The mean residue ellipticities
([ ]) of SspC as a function of wavelength were identical at protein
concentrations of 1-60 µM (data not shown), indicating
that oligomerization does not occur over this concentration range.
Based upon these data and preliminary NMR
studies,2 it appears that
/ -type SASP lack any significant amount of regular secondary or
tertiary structure in the absence of DNA. However, in the presence of
poly(dG)·poly(dC), a DNA that binds very tightly to / -type SASP
(16), the / -type SASP listed above acquired a significant amount
of -helical secondary structure (Fig. 1A and data not
shown). Difference spectra in which the CD spectrum of free DNA is
subtracted from the spectrum of the / -type SASP·DNA complex
(32, 33) are characteristic of -helical proteins, showing nearly
equal lobes of negative ellipticity at 208 and 222 nm and a large lobe
of positive ellipticity at 190 nm (Fig. 1A and data not
shown). Ellipticity values (200-240 nm) from difference spectra were
used to estimate the amount of secondary structure in DNA-bound
/ -type SASP; these values ranged from 56 to 69% -helix, 4 to
8% -sheet, and 27 to 35% random structure for the four
/ -type SASP studied. These calculations assume that only minor
changes occur in the DNA component of the CD spectra compared with the
changes that occur in the protein component (32, 34).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Circular dichroism spectra of
SspCTyr with and without polynucleotides.
SspCTyr undergoes a transition from random coil to a
largely -helical conformation upon binding to DNA (A).
The CD spectrum labeled SspCTyr was acquired from a
solution containing 25 µM SspCTyr from
B. subtilis in the absence of added DNA. The spectrum
labeled poly(dG)-poly(dC) was acquired from a solution
containing poly(dG)·poly(dC) at 145 µM (in base pairs)
in the absence of added / -type SASP. The spectrum labeled
SspCTyr/poly(dG)-poly(dC) is a difference
spectrum in which the spectrum of free poly(dG)·poly(C) described
above was subtracted from the spectrum of an SspCTyr (25 µM)/poly(dG)·poly(dC) (145 µM) mixture.
The SspCTyr/poly(dG)-poly(dC) spectrum
should represent mostly protein-derived CD signals provided that only
minor changes occur in the CD spectrum of poly(dG)·poly(dC) upon
/ -type SASP binding. Virtually identical CD spectral changes were
observed with all / -type SASP tested (see "Results").
However, only very minor changes in the CD spectrum of
SspCTyr were seen with poly(dA)·poly(dT) (B).
The spectrum labeled poly(dA)-poly(dT) was acquired from a
solution containing poly(dA)·poly(dT) at 145 µM (in
base pairs). The spectrum labeled
SspCTyr/poly(dA)-poly(dT) is a difference
spectrum in which the spectrum of free poly(dA)·poly(dT) was
subtracted from the spectrum of an SspCTyr (25 µM)/poly(dA)·poly(dT) (145 µM) mixture.
mdeg, millidegrees.
|
|
These studies suggest that the large changes in the CD spectra of
/ -type SASP upon addition of poly(dG)·poly(dC) are due to
/ -type SASP binding to DNA. To confirm this, the interactions between several / -type SASP and poly(dA)·poly(dT) were
examined by CD spectroscopy. DNase I protection studies have shown that / -type SASP do not bind or bind extremely weakly to
poly(dA)·poly(dT) (16). Consistent with these previous findings, the
difference spectra of / -type SASP/poly(dA)·poly(dT) mixtures
showed only minor differences when compared with the spectra of
/ -type SASP in the absence of DNA (Fig. 1B and data
not shown). These data support the conclusion that the changes in
ellipticity upon mixing / -type SASP and poly(dG)·poly(dC) are
due to / -type SASP-DNA binding, and not some other effect arising
from the polyelectrolyte nature of nucleic acids. In addition, no CD
spectral changes were seen in SspCTyr (25 µM)
mixed with 145 µM (in base pairs or bases)
single-stranded DNA, single-stranded RNA, or double-stranded RNA (data
not shown), consistent with previous results showing no interaction
between / -type SASP and these nucleic acids (16).
Determination of Thermodynamic Parameters for the
SspCTyr-DNA Interaction--
Although the interaction
between / -type SASP and DNA has been studied previously (16, 35),
little quantitative data relating to the binding constants of these
proteins for DNA have been obtained. Thermodynamic parameters for
nonspecific protein-nucleic acid interactions are commonly determined
by fluorescence quenching in which intrinsic tryptophan residue
fluorescence is quenched as the protein binds to a nucleic acid (24,
27). However, / -type SASP lack tryptophan residues (7, 21), and
attempts to introduce tryptophan residues into / -type SASP have
resulted in proteins that either have significantly reduced affinity
for DNA (36) or exhibit no change in fluorescence upon binding to DNA.3 Therefore, we sought to
exploit the large change in mean residue ellipticity at 222 nm
([ ]222) as / -type SASP bind to DNA to extract
thermodynamic parameters for the binding interaction between these two molecules.
SspCTyr was used for most of the following experiments
because it is the / -type SASP that has been characterized
in vitro and in vivo most extensively (16, 18,
35). Initial equilibrium titrations were performed as reverse
titrations in which progressively more DNA was added to a constant
amount of SspCTyr. Reverse titrations of
SspCTyr with all polynucleotides displayed isodichroic
points at ~204.5 nm (Fig. 2 and data
not shown), suggesting (although not proving) that
SspCTyr-DNA binding can be described by a simple two-state
model (31). An isodichroic point at this wavelength is also
characteristic of random coil to -helix peptide transitions (31).
Reverse titrations of SspCTyr with poly(dG)·poly(dC)
under tight-binding (stoichiometric) conditions were undertaken to
determine the SspCTyr-binding site size in base pairs and
the [ ]222 value for SspCTyr bound to DNA
(Fig. 3). Knowledge of the site size and
the [ ]222 values for SspCTyr bound
([ b]222) and not bound
([ u]222) to DNA allows calculation of the
concentrations of bound and unbound protein in forward titrations under
non-stoichiometric conditions. Reverse titrations of
SspCTyr (at 5 and 10 µM) with
poly(dG)·poly(dC) displayed sharp break points at DNA concentrations
corresponding to a site size of ~4 bp (Fig. 3). The same 4-bp site
size was determined by a forward titration of poly(dG)·poly(dC) with
SspCTyr in which CD signals from both SspCTyr
and poly(dG)·poly(dC) were monitored (data not shown). Forward and
reverse titrations also gave the same corrected [ ]222
value of approximately 18,400 degrees cm2
dmol 1 for SspCTyr bound to
poly(dG)·poly(dC) (Fig. 3 and data not shown). Similar analysis also
determined a 4-bp DNA binding site size for CbiC from C. bifermentans with poly(dG)·poly(dC) (data not shown). We were
unable to directly determine the site sizes for other polynucleotides
by CD because stoichiometric binding conditions could not be obtained.
However, scanning transmission electron microscopic studies show that
each SspCTyr monomer covers 13.9 Å of random sequence
linear pUC19 DNA,4
corresponding to ~4.1 bp of B-form DNA covered per
SspCTyr monomer. In addition, electron micrographs of
negatively stained, unfixed complexes of SspC and a 392-bp fragment of
random sequence DNA show a 28-Å repeating substructure consistent with
the 4-bp site size (15). The 4-bp site size is also in good agreement with the range of 4-5 bp determined for the site size of
SspCTyr on poly(dG)·poly(dC), poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC),
poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT), and pUC19 by DNase I protection assays
(16). Based upon all of these data, the binding site sizes of
SspCTyr and CbiC under these conditions were assumed to be
4 bp for all polynucleotides.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Reverse titration of SspCTyr with
poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC). CD spectra of solutions containing
SspCTyr with increasing amounts of added
poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) were acquired as described under
"Experimental Procedures." All spectra are difference spectra
in which the spectrum of free poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) was subtracted
from the spectrum of the corresponding
SspCTyr/poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) mixture. The
concentrations of poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) used were 0 (curve
a), 6.1 (curve b), 11 (curve c), and 15 (curve d) µM in base pairs. deg,
degrees.
|
|

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Stoichiometric reverse titrations of
SspCTyr with poly(dG)·poly(dC).
Poly(dG)·poly(dC) was added sequentially to stirring solutions of
SspCTyr at 5 µM ( ) or 10 µM
( ) as described under "Experimental Procedures." The CD signal
at 222 nm was corrected for dilution and buffer and polynucleotide
contributions and then used to calculate mean residue ellipticity
([ ]222) values as described under "Experimental
Procedures." deg, degrees.
|
|
Quantitative analysis of reverse titrations to extract thermodynamic
parameters involves the graphical binding density function analysis of
Bujalowski and Lohman (24, 37). Unfortunately, we were unable to
perform such an analysis for two reasons: 1) at protein concentrations
above 10 µM, there is precipitation at the high
protein/DNA ratios employed during reverse titrations; and 2) each
titration point had to be obtained from separate solutions due to the
slow kinetics of / -type SASP-DNA binding (see below), making the
binding density function analysis very time-consuming and prohibitive
in terms of polynucleotide usage. Therefore, we used data from forward
titrations (in which increasing amounts of SspCTyr were
added to a constant amount of DNA) under non-stoichiometric conditions
to determine binding parameters for the interaction between
SspCTyr and various polynucleotides as described by
Kowalczykowski et al. (27). With the exception of
poly(dG)·poly(dC), SspCTyr·DNA complexes required
several minutes to several hours to reach equilibrium. Therefore, each
titration point had to be determined from separate solutions that had
been allowed to equilibrate for at least 15 h at 21 °C. The
concentrations of unbound and DNA-bound SspCTyr for each
titration solution were calculated as described under "Experimental
Procedures," and the amount of DNA-bound SspCTyr was
used to calculate the fractional saturation of the DNA lattice based on
the determined site size of 4 bp. The calculated values of fractional
saturation were confirmed by proportional changes in the near-UV CD
spectra (250-300 nm) of the titrated DNA lattice (Fig.
4 and data not shown). The maximum change
in near-UV ellipticity between free DNA and / -type SASP-bound DNA
at a given wavelength was typically only 5-6 millidegrees at the
polynucleotide concentrations used (Fig. 4 and data not shown).
Therefore, we chose to calculate fractional saturation from
[ ]222 instead of the near-UV ellipticities because the
protein-derived signals had a larger signal to noise ratio (Fig. 4 and
data not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Induced changes in the near-UV CD spectra of
polynucleotides correspond with the fractional DNA saturation
calculated from [ ]222.
A, near-UV CD spectra (250-300 nm) of
poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) with increasing amounts of
SspCTyr in 5 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) and
40 mM NaCl at 21 °C were acquired as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The concentrations of added
SspCTyr were 0 (curve a), 3 (curve
b), 6 (curve c), 9 (curve d), 12 (curve e), 15 (curve f), and 18 (curve
g) µM. B, the percent change in the
ellipticity of poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) at 271 nm ( ) and the
fractional saturation of poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) calculated from
[ ]222 ( ) were plotted as a function of total
SspCTyr concentration from a forward titration of
poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) in 5 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5)
and 40 mM NaCl at 21 °C. The concentrations of added
SspCTyr were the same as for A. mdeg,
millidegrees.
|
|
The McGhee-von Hippel equation for nonspecific protein-nucleic acid
binding (38) was fitted to SspCTyr-polynucleotide forward
titration data, and the thermodynamic parameters K and were determined from the fits (Table I),
where K is the intrinsic binding constant of a monomer for
an isolated DNA binding site, and is a dimensionless cooperativity
factor describing the relative affinity of a ligand for a contiguous versus isolated binding site (27, 38, 39). K and
were not reported for / -type SASP-pUC19 interactions (Table
I) because McGhee-von Hippel isotherms did not fit the data well (data
not shown), presumably due to the heterogeneous nucleotide sequence of
plasmid DNA. In addition, accurate determination of K and
for SspCTyr-poly(dG)·poly(dC) binding was not
possible due to the high affinity of this interaction (Table I). Under
identical buffer and salt conditions, SspCTyr bound all
polynucleotides with similar affinities, with the exception of
poly(dG)·poly(dC), which was bound much more tightly (Table I). The
order of binding affinity was as follows: poly(dG)·poly(dC)
pUC19 > poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) > poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC), with
binding constants (K ) ranging from 1.3 × 105 M 1 for
poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) to >107
M 1 for poly(dG)·poly(dC) (Table
I). These data disagree somewhat with previous results obtained by
DNase I protection assays (16). In that study, the order of binding
affinity was determined to be as follows: poly(dG)·poly(dC) > poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) > pUC19 > poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) (16). The differences in observed relative
binding affinities are probably due to the higher temperature (37 °C; see "Thermal Stability of / -Type
SASP·Polynucleotide Complexes" below) used in the previous study
(16). Forward titrations of linear pUC19 plasmid DNA and
poly(dG)·poly(dC) with CbiC from C. bifermentans were also
performed to examine the differences in binding affinity compared with
SspCTyr (Table I). CbiC bound to both polynucleotides with
lower affinity than SspCTyr (Table I), which agrees well
with data from DNase I protection and gel shift assays using pUC19
plasmid DNA (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Equilibrium binding constants (K ) for the / -type SASP
interaction with polynucleotides
Apparent binding constants (K ) were determined by fitting
McGhee-von Hippel isotherms to data from forward titrations (5 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) with 20, 40, or 80 mM NaCl at 21 °C). Errors were determined by the fitting
program. Experimental error of K determination was
approximately ±15% as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Although the apparent binding constants (K ) for
SspCTyr interactions with poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) and
poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) are similar, there is a significant
difference in the binding cooperativities for each polynucleotide. It
has been reported previously that the
SspCTyr-poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) interaction is more
cooperative than the interaction of SspCTyr with
poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) (16). The current analysis confirms and
quantifies this finding, with values for
SspCTyr-poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) binding determined to be
~1.8- and 7.5-fold greater than values for
SspCTyr-poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) binding (Table I).
The binding of nonspecific DNA-binding proteins to DNA is typically
very sensitive to salt concentration due to the polyelectrolyte effect;
this is the entropically favorable release of ordered cations from
nucleic acids that drives many nonspecific protein-DNA interactions. To
examine the importance of this effect on the / -type SASP-DNA
interactions, the effect of salt concentration upon
SspCTyr-poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) binding was examined at
20, 40, and 80 mM NaCl (Table I). In contrast to many
nonspecific protein-nucleic acid binding interactions in which is
insensitive to salt (39-42), the cooperativity factor decreased as the
salt concentration was increased (Table I). Interestingly, no
significant decrease in was seen in the binding of
SspCTyr to poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) when the salt
concentration was increased from 0 to 40 mM (Table I). The
number of ionic interactions involved in nonspecific protein-DNA
interactions can be obtained from the slope of a log(K)
versus log[NaCl] plot (43, 44). The
log(K)/log[NaCl] plot for the
SspCTyr-poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) interaction is linear
within this salt concentration range, with a slope equal to 0.85
(data not shown), suggesting the formation of approximately one ionic
interaction between each SspCTyr monomer and
poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) upon binding (43, 44).
Thermal Stability of / -Type SASP·Polynucleotide
Complexes--
Thirty-four / -type SASP have been identified at
the gene or protein level from 13 different Gram-positive
endospore-forming species (7, 22). The DNA-binding properties of 11 of
these proteins have been examined in some detail (9,
16).5 It is becoming clear
that despite the high degree of sequence conservation between these
proteins, significant differences in DNA-binding affinities exist
(16).5 Because forward titrations are time-consuming and
expensive in terms of protein and DNA, we sought to develop a rapid
alternative method of determining relative / -type SASP-DNA
binding affinities. Therefore, the thermal stability of the
/ -type SASP-DNA interaction was determined by monitoring the CD
signals at 222 nm of pre-equilibrated / -type SASP·DNA complexes
as a function of temperature. Each / -type SASP·polynucleotide
complex dissociated sharply over a characteristic temperature range,
and the hierarchy of thermal stabilities for
SspCTyr·polynucleotide complexes was as follows:
poly(dG)·poly(dC) > pUC19 poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) > poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) > poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) (Table II).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Thermal stabilities of / -type SASP · polynucleotide
complexes
Pre-equilibrated / -type SASP (5 µM) · polynucleotide (25 µM in base pairs) complexes in 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) were heated, and CD signals at
222 nm were measured as described under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Quantitative analysis of thermal unfolding/dissociation requires that
the process be reversible. Typically, >80% of the original [ ]222 value was recovered within 1 h after
cooling to 20 °C, provided that the solutions were not heated beyond
the temperature of complete dissociation (data not shown). In addition,
thermal dissociation curves for
SspCTyr·poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) and
SspCTyr·poly(dG)·poly(dC) complexes obtained at heating
rates of 25 and 50 °C/h were superimposable (data not shown),
suggesting that the dissociation reaction is at equilibrium at each
point along these thermal dissociation curves. However, dissociation
curves for SspCTyr·pUC19 complexes at the two heating
rates used were not exactly superimposable, with a
Tm value 1 °C lower for the dissociation conducted at 25 °C/h compared with 50 °C/h (data not shown). This minor difference in the Tm value is probably due to
increased protein damage to unbound / -type SASP that occurs at
higher temperatures. All / -type SASP from Bacillus
species contain a conserved Asn residue within an Asn-Gly sequence,
which deamidates rapidly in vitro, and deamidation of this
specific Asn residue abolishes the DNA-binding activity of / -type
SASP (10). Because deamidation of unbound / -type SASP occurs so
rapidly at high temperatures (10), it is difficult to confirm that each
point on the thermal dissociation curves for pUC19 and
poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) represents an equilibrium condition.
The hierarchy of thermal stability varied somewhat from that of the
equilibrium binding constants determined in 5 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5) and 40 mM NaCl at 21 °C. In general,
the thermal stabilities were a reflection of both the intrinsic binding
affinity between / -type SASP and DNA and the melting temperatures
of the polynucleotides used. Each / -type SASP·polynucleotide
complex underwent dissociation at temperatures lower than or coincident with the DNA melting transition (Table II), indicating that
/ -type SASP do not increase the melting point of DNA. This
property of the / -type SASP-DNA interaction may account for the
unexpectedly low thermal stability of / -type
SASP·poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) complexes (Table II) and explains the
previously observed low affinity seen in DNase I protection assays that
were conducted at 37 °C (16).
Although the Tm values obtained with polynucleotides
do not exactly correspond to the equilibrium binding constants determined at 21 °C, thermal dissociations are still useful to quickly determine relative differences in / -type SASP binding affinity for a given polynucleotide. For instance, there is a substantial difference in the Tm values for
SspCTyr complexes with poly(dG)·poly(dC)
versus poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) (Table II), consistent with
the differences in their respective equilibrium binding constants.
Therefore, Tm values do reflect the intrinsic
binding affinity when comparing DNAs that have similar melting
temperatures (Tables I and II). The Tm values
determined for SspCTyr and CbiC complexes with
poly(dG)·poly(dC) or pUC19 DNA indicate that CbiC·DNA complexes are
less stable than the corresponding SspCTyr·DNA complexes
(Table II). The difference in thermal stability is consistent with the
equilibrium binding constants for poly(dG)·poly(dC) and pUC19
determined for CbiC and SspCTyr (Table I). Similar
Tm values for the SspCTyr- and
CbiC-poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) interactions (Table II) probably indicate that the thermal stability of these complexes is primarily a
function of this polynucleotide's low melting point. Thus, the relative thermal stabilities of / -type SASP·polynucleotide
complexes can serve as a rapid quantitative alternative to detailed
equilibrium binding studies. Indeed, this relationship has been
confirmed using several different mutant forms of SspC that have both
lower and higher affinities for DNA than the wild-type
protein.5
/ -Type SASP-Polynucleotide Binding Kinetics--
As
previously mentioned, the interaction of SspCTyr with most
polynucleotides required several minutes to several hours to reach equilibrium. Slow kinetics of / -type SASP·DNA complex formation have been reported in previous studies of / -type SASP-DNA binding (16) and are not particularly surprising given that substantial changes
in both protein and DNA conformation occur upon complex formation. The
kinetics of / -type SASP-DNA binding were studied by monitoring CD
signals at 222 nm as a function of time after the addition of DNA.
Polynucleotides (15 µM in base pairs) were added to a
stirring solution of SspCTyr (5 µM), and the
ellipticity at 222 nm was monitored for 15 min (Fig.
5). The measured ellipticities were
corrected for the addition of DNA and used to calculate DNA-bound
protein based upon the same equation used in the equilibrium studies.
The initial rates of SspCTyr-DNA binding were calculated
from least-squares linear regression analysis of the linear portion of
the curves. The relative rates of SspCTyr binding to
polynucleotides were as follows: poly(dG)·poly(dC) > pUC19 > poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) > poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) (Fig. 5 and
Table III). The binding rates of
SspCTyr for poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) and
poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) were particularly slow (Fig. 5 and Table
III), which necessitated the long incubation times used in the
equilibrium binding studies outlined above. However, there was a wide
range of initial binding rates for pUC19 plasmid DNA and different
/ -type SASP (5 µM), with SASP- from C. bifermentans reaching equilibrium within 1 min, whereas SASP-A and
SASP-C from B. megaterium failed to show any detectable
binding within the first 10 min of mixing (data not shown). Based on
studies with pUC19 and poly(dG)·poly(dC), the relative rates of
/ -type SASP binding were as follows: SASP- (C. bifermentans) > SspCTyr BceI > SASP- (C. bifermentans) > CbiC > SASP-C > SASP-A (data not shown). This hierarchy of / -type SASP-DNA
binding rates corresponds to the relative affinities of these proteins
for DNA as determined by DNase I protection (9, 16).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Kinetics of SspCTyr-DNA
binding. Polynucleotides (15 µM in base pairs) were
added to a stirring solution of SspCTyr (5 µM), and CD signals at 222 nm were recorded every 5 s (every 4 s for poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The trace labeled
SspCTyr is a control experiment in which no DNA was
added. Measured ellipticities were corrected for contributions from
buffer and DNA and used to calculate [ ]222 as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Initial rates of
SspCTyr-DNA binding were determined by converting the
change in [ ]222 per unit time into the change in
DNA-bound SspCTyr per unit time (as described under
"Experimental Procedures"), and these values were tabulated in
Table III. deg, degrees.
|
|
Binding rate constants were also determined to compare the binding of
SspCTyr to several different polynucleotides. Because
accurate CD measurements require micromolar concentrations of
macromolecules, we were unable to conduct kinetic experiments under
pseudo first-order conditions in which the DNA is in vast excess, as
the DNA concentrations required would be prohibitively high. Instead,
kinetic binding experiments were conducted using SspCTyr
and linear pUC19 plasmid DNA over a range of concentrations, and
initial rates of binding were calculated (Table III). For each given
concentration of SspCTyr, a 2-fold increase in plasmid DNA
concentration resulted in a corresponding 2-fold increase in the
initial rate of binding (Table III). However, for each given
concentration of plasmid DNA, a 2-fold increase in SspCTyr
concentration resulted in a 4-fold increase in the initial rate of
binding (Table III). These data indicate that the binding interaction between SspCTyr and pUC19 is second-order with respect to
SspCTyr concentration and therefore is not a simple
bimolecular reaction. Instead, the rate-limiting step of binding
involves the dimerization of SspCTyr monomers at the DNA
binding site. Based upon these results, the binding rate constants were
calculated using the initial binding rates according to the following
rate equation: [SspCb]/ t = kb[SspCu]02[pUC19]0,
where [SspCb] is the concentration of DNA-bound
SspCTyr, [SspCu]0 is the initial
concentration of unbound SspCTyr, [pUC19]0 is
the initial concentration of free 8-bp protein-binding sites, and
kb is the binding rate constant. DNA concentration was expressed in terms of 8-bp binding sites (4 bp for each
SspCTyr monomer) to reflect the dimerization of
SspCTyr during the binding interaction. The same
second-order dependence on SspCTyr concentration was
observed with poly(dG-dT)·poly(dA-dC) (Table III) and
poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) (data not shown) and therefore appears to be
a general property of the SspCTyr-DNA interaction. This
model was supported by other kinetic studies that showed that the
initial rate of change in pUC19 conformation as measured by CD at 263 nm increased 4-fold when the added SspCTyr concentration
was doubled (data not shown). Additional kinetic studies using SASP-
from C. bifermentans and pUC19 DNA gave similar results
(data not shown).
Interaction of SspCTyr with
Oligonucleotides--
Although / -type SASP and their DNA-binding
properties have been studied for several years, there are no high
resolution structural data for this novel class of nonspecific
DNA-binding proteins. Because all / -type SASP are essentially
without structure in the absence of DNA, high resolution structural
information will be obtained only with a defined, non-degenerate
complex of an / -type SASP with a double-stranded oligonucleotide.
It has been shown previously that SspCTyr can protect a
GC-rich oligonucleotide as small as 12 bp from digestion with DNase I
(16). More recently, it has been shown by polyacrylamide gel shift
analysis that SspCTyr can bind to 10-bp GC-rich
oligonucleotides.5 The current study has demonstrated that
CD spectroscopy is a very sensitive tool capable of detecting
/ -type SASP-DNA interactions. Therefore, we used CD spectroscopy
to examine the binding of SspCTyr to a variety of
oligonucleotides to identify small DNA fragments that still support
SspCTyr binding and that may be useful in biophysical
characterization of the complex by multidimensional NMR or x-ray crystallography.
Because / -type SASP tend to form more stable complexes with
GC-rich polynucleotides, we focused on making oligonucleotides that
were very GC-rich. Two classes of oligonucleotides were studied. The
first class contained self-annealing oligonucleotides of 6, 8, 10, and
12 bp with or without single 3'-dA overhangs. The second class of
oligonucleotides was composed of 5-8-bp homo-oligomers of dG and dC,
which were annealed to one another. The homo-oligomers also contained
single 3'-dA overhangs to prevent strand slippage. SspCTyr
bound to oligonucleotides larger than 7 bp, as determined by a
significant change in [ ]222 as measured from
difference spectra (Fig. 6). The change
in [ ]222 was greater for homo-oligomers than for
self-annealing oligomers of the same length (Fig. 6), consistent with
the difference in SspCTyr affinity for poly(dG)·poly(dC)
and poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC). In addition, the degree of CD spectral
changes tended to decrease as the size of the oligonucleotide was
decreased (Fig. 6). The shortest oligonucleotide that still supported
SspCTyr binding was a 6-bp homo-oligonucleotide,
5'-d(G6A)·5'-d(C6A) (Fig. 6). No interaction
was detected between SspCTyr and a 5-bp
homo-oligonucleotide, 5'-d(G5A)·5'-d(C5A), or
a 6-bp self-annealing oligonucleotide, 5'-d(GCCGGCA)2,
indicating binding constants of <102
M 1 (Fig. 6). Each of the two
oligonucleotides that failed to bind to SspCTyr were
double-stranded, as determined by near-UV CD spectroscopy and 20%
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not shown). Therefore, SspCTyr appears to require a minimum of 6 bp of duplex DNA
with single 3'-overhangs to bind productively.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Far-UV CD spectra of
SspCTyr·oligonucleotide complexes. CD spectra were
acquired from solutions of SspCTyr (25 µM)
containing various oligonucleotides (145 µM in base
pairs) and used to generate difference CD spectra from which the free
oligonucleotide contributions have been subtracted as described
under "Experimental Procedures." A,
[ ]222 values were calculated from
SspCTyr·oligonucleotide difference spectra.
Oligonucleotides are as follows: 12A, 5'-d(GGCCGGCCGGCCA)2;
10A, 5'-d(GCGGGCCCGCA)2; h8A,
5'-d(G8A)·5'-d(C8A); 8A,
5'-d(GCCCGGGCA)2; 8, 5'-d(GCCCGGGC)2; h7A,
5'-d(G7A)·5'-d(C7A); h6A,
5'-d(G6A)·5'-d(C6A); 6A,
5'-d(GCCGGCA)2; and h5A,
5'-d(G5A)·5'-d(C5A). B, the
labeled difference spectra were obtained from the following
mixtures: SspCTyr with no added oligonucleotide
(curve a), SspCTyr plus 6A (curve b),
SspCTyr plus h6A (curve c), SspCTyr
plus h7A (curve d), and SspCTyr plus h8A
(curve e). The difference spectrum from a solution
containing SspCTyr and
5'-d(G5A)·5'-d(C5A) was superimposable with
the spectrum of free SspCTyr (data not shown).
deg, degrees.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The data presented in this study clearly demonstrate that the
/ -type SASP lack significant secondary structure when not bound
to double-stranded DNA. However, in the DNA-bound state, / -type
SASP acquire a significant amount of -helical secondary structure
and therefore appear to fold upon the DNA scaffold. To our knowledge,
the general phenomenon of nucleic acid binding coupled to folding of a
completely disordered protein has at least three precedents
in the literature: 1) the N protein from bacteriophage is
completely disordered, but becomes partially -helical upon binding
to its specific boxB RNA sequence (45); 2) a fragment of the
high mobility group chromosomal protein HMG-I is a random coil in the
absence of DNA, but adopts a defined conformation within the minor
groove of bound DNA (46); and 3) the Phd protein of phage P1 is largely
unfolded at 37 °C, but becomes -helical upon binding to its
specific operator sequence (34). In addition, several other
site-specific DNA-binding proteins undergo transitions in which
disordered domains become ordered and form binding interfaces with
specific DNA sites (47). The possible advantages of having an unfolded
protein recognize nucleic acids have been outlined recently by Frankel
and Smith (48). These include the ability to add other macromolecules
to the complex in an ordered fashion and a mechanism by which the cell
can monitor the functional (folded versus unfolded) state of
the protein ligand (48). These two properties could be important to
/ -type SASP·DNA complex formation and / -type SASP
degradation after spore germination, respectively. First,
protein-protein contacts are formed between / -type SASP only
while bound to DNA (17). The formation of potential protein-protein binding surfaces induced by DNA could direct the further addition of
/ -type SASP molecules to the ends of DNA-bound protein clusters and therefore regulate protein binding. Second, the / -type SASP are toxic when overexpressed in E. coli (49) and can also
inhibit transcription during spore germination and outgrowth (50).
Consequently, these proteins must be degraded early in spore
germination such that vegetative growth may resume. The unfolded nature
of unbound / -type SASP ensures that these proteins are very
susceptible to germination protease and possibly other proteases.
The binding constants determined for the / -type SASP-DNA
interaction are similar to those determined for other nonspecific DNA-binding proteins involved in maintaining general chromatin structure (24, 51). However, during sporulation, the / -type SASP
accumulate to millimolar concentrations within the spore core, and the
total amount of / -type SASP within the spore appears to be
sufficient to saturate the spore chromosome (4). The SspCTyr binding constants were all determined under
relatively low salt conditions (<80 mM) so that the
concentrations of DNA-bound and unbound / -type SASP could be
measured most accurately by CD spectroscopy. However, it is difficult
to relate the conditions used in vitro to determine binding
constants to the environment within the dormant spore core. It is not
clear whether there are free monovalent ions or free water within the
dormant spore, and all divalent cations probably exist as chelates with
pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylic acid (dipicolinic acid) (3), so the actual
binding constant for the interaction in vivo could be
substantially higher. However, during spore germination and outgrowth,
several changes occur within the spore core, including rehydration,
volume expansion, release and re-accumulation of potassium ions, and
release of dipicolinic acid plus its chelated divalent cations (52,
53). These changes decrease the concentration of / -type SASP and increase the effective ionic strength of the spore core and therefore favor the dissociation of / -type SASP from the chromosome. A rough estimate for the / -type SASP-DNA binding constant during spore outgrowth can be obtained by extrapolation of the data for the
SspCTyr-poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) interaction to
physiological salt concentrations (~200 mM) assuming that
the log(K )/log[NaCl] relationship is linear. The
binding constant determined in this manner is 7.0 × 103 M 1, although this
value would most certainly be significantly lower in the presence of
free Mg2+ ions. Furthermore, the two major / -type
SASP in B. subtilis ( and ) have a lower affinity for
DNA in vitro compared with SspCTyr (16, 54).
Therefore, a substantial fraction of DNA-bound / -type SASP would
dissociate under germination conditions and be quickly cleaved by
germination protease. Rapid degradation of unbound / -type SASP
leads to further dissociation by mass action until the chromosome is
free of / -type SASP, as suggested previously (50).
The moderate degree of binding cooperativity seen in the / -type
SASP-DNA binding interaction has been described previously, but never
quantitated (15, 16). A previous study also reported that / -type
SASP binding to poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) was very cooperative, but
that binding to poly(dG-dC)·poly(dG-dC) was not (16). This difference
in cooperativity has been confirmed and quantitated here; and in
addition, / -type SASP-DNA binding cooperativity has been shown to
be dependent upon salt concentration. The polynucleotide-specific differences in binding cooperativity are thought to be related to the
ability of the DNA to adopt an A-like conformation, as the / -type
SASP change DNA structure to an A-like conformation in which the pitch
of the double helix is not changed significantly (15, 54). GC-rich
polynucleotides adopt the A-conformation in solution more readily than
do AT-rich polynucleotides. Accordingly, binding cooperativity is
thought to be largely due to local changes in DNA structure near the
ends of / -type SASP clusters that favor binding of additional
/ -type SASP contiguously at that site rather than at other
non-contiguous binding sites. However, protein-protein interactions
probably also contribute to the binding cooperativity, and the
dependence of upon salt concentration may reflect the importance of
ionic protein-protein interactions. Chemical cross-linking studies have
shown that the positively charged amino terminus of one DNA-bound
/ -type SASP interacts with an acidic region on another adjacent
DNA-bound / -type SASP (17). Other studies have demonstrated that
positively charged residues near the amino terminus of SspC increase
DNA-binding affinity, although these residues do not appear to directly
interact with DNA.5 The
decrease in binding cooperativity with increased ionic strength is
consistent with the disruption of an ionic protein-protein interaction
and, in combination with the aforementioned data,5 suggests
that this protein-protein interaction makes a significant contribution
to DNA-binding affinity.
Perhaps the most unexpected finding in the current study is that the
initial rate of SspCTyr (and SASP- from C. bifermentans)-polynucleotide binding is second-order with respect
to initial unbound protein concentration. The simplest interpretation
of these data is that two SspCTyr monomers are required for
each productive binding event to occur. A trimolecular binding reaction
coupled with the extensive macromolecular rearrangements that occur
during / -type SASP-DNA binding could account for the very slow
binding kinetics. However, the second-order dependence upon protein
concentration was not observed in kinetic studies with SASP- from
C. bifermentans or SASP-C from B. megaterium (data not shown). This is particularly surprising given the high degree
of amino acid sequence conservation between SspCTyr and
SASP-C and between SASP- and SASP- from C. bifermentans (21). These findings suggest that there may be two
different mechanisms of / -type SASP-DNA binding. Alternatively,
it is possible that the binding mechanism involves multiple kinetic intermediates, and the binding of individual / -type SASP may be
rate-limited at different intermediate steps. It is clear that more
detailed kinetic and structural studies are warranted to more clearly
define the mechanism of / -type SASP-DNA binding.
The ultimate goal of these studies on / -type SASP is to obtain a
high resolution structure of an / -type SASP·oligonucleotide complex, and the current study has been very important in
facilitating further biophysical studies aimed at determining such a
structure. It has become clear from the polynucleotide studies that the
DNA binding site size for SspCTyr (and probably all
/ -type SASP) is 4 bp and that productive DNA binding probably
requires at least two SspCTyr monomers. This
information is important for designing oligonucleotides for high
resolution structural studies, particularly for NMR, where only
relatively small complexes are tractable. Based on a DNA binding site
size of 4 bp and a requirement for at least two bound / -type
SASP, the smallest double-stranded oligonucleotide predicted to still
support / -type SASP binding would be 8 bp in length. However, the
smallest oligonucleotide that interacted with SspCTyr was a
6-bp molecule with single 3'-nucleotide overhangs. This is still
consistent with the determined site size and postulated requirement for
two bound SspCTyr monomers, as the two 3'-overhangs
increase the overall dimensions of the oligonucleotide to approximately
those of a blunt-ended 8-bp duplex. The observation that binding is
abruptly lost between the 6- and 5-bp homo-oligonucleotides with single
3'-nucleotide overhangs is also consistent with the binding model, in
that the 5-bp oligonucleotide would be predicted to support binding of only one SspCTyr molecule. It should be pointed out that a
site size of 4 bp does not necessarily indicate that the protein ligand
directly interacts with all 4 bp of the binding site; instead, it is a
measure of how many base pairs are occluded by the ligand. The exact
nature of the / -type SASP-DNA binding interaction will only be
known when a high resolution structure is obtained. This should yield important data in general terms, as / -type SASP are a unique class of DNA-binding proteins that have no amino acid sequence similarity to any other DNA-binding proteins (7, 21). Also of interest
is the exact molecular nature of the change in DNA conformation induced
by / -type SASP binding, as this conformational change is the
biochemical basis for spore resistance to UV radiation (3, 4). Based
upon the results of this study, high resolution NMR studies of an
SspCTyr·oligonucleotide complex are currently being pursued.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Richard A. Ando and Kendall L. Knight for helpful suggestions on determining equilibrium binding
constants and Margery A. Ross for providing additional pUC19 plasmid
DNA. Jane Setlow, Beth Yu Lin, Martha Simon, and Joseph Wall determined
the SspCTyr-binding site by scanning transmission electron microscopy.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant GM19698 (to P. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM54533.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
MC-3305, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Ave.,
Farmington, CT 06030. Tel.: 860-679-2607; Fax: 860-679-3408; E-mail:
setlow@sun.uchc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005669200
2
C. S. Hayes, M. Maciejewski, G. P. Mullen, and P. Setlow, unpublished results.
3
C. S. Hayes, M. A. Ross, and P. Setlow, unpublished results.
4
J. Setlow, B. Setlow, and P. Setlow, unpublished results.
5
C. S. Hayes and P. Setlow, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SASP, small
acid-soluble spore protein(s);
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine;
bp, base
pair(s) of DNA.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Marquis, R. E.,
Sim, J.,
and Shin, S. Y.
(1994)
Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Sym. Ser.
76 (suppl.),
40S-48S
|
| 2.
|
Gerhardt, P.,
and Marquis, R. E.
(1989)
in
Regulation of Prokaryotic Development
(Smith, I.
, Slepecky, R. A.
, and Setlow, P., eds)
, pp. 43-63, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 3.
|
Setlow, P.
(1994)
Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Sym. Ser.
(suppl.) 76,
49S-60S
|
| 4.
|
Setlow, P.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
49,
29-54
|
| 5.
|
Setlow, B.,
and Setlow, P.
(1993)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
59,
3418-3423
|
| 6.
|
Setlow, B.,
and Setlow, P.
(1995)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
61,
2787-2790
|
| 7.
|
Setlow, P.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
42,
319-338
|
| 8.
|
Mason, J. M.,
and Setlow, P.
(1986)
J. Bacteriol.
167,
174-178
|
| 9.
|
Setlow, B.,
and Setlow, P.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
4149-4151
|
| 10.
|
Hayes, C. S.,
and Setlow, P.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
6020-6027
|
| 11.
|
Hayes, C. S.,
Illades-Aguiar, B.,
Casillas-Martinez, L.,
and Setlow, P.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
2694-2700
|
| 12.
|
Wright, H. T.
(1991)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
26,
1-52
|
| 13.
|
Stadtman, E. R.
(1992)
Science
257,
1220-1224
|
| 14.
|
Setlow, P.
(1975)
J. Biol. Chem.
250,
8168-8173
|
| 15.
|
Griffith, J.,
Makhov, A.,
Santiago-Lara, L.,
and Setlow, P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8224-8228
|
| 16.
|
Setlow, B.,
Sun, D.,
and Setlow, P.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
2312-2322
|
| 17.
|
Hayes, C. S.,
and Setlow, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17326-17332
|
| 18.
|
Tovar-Rojo, F.,
and Setlow, P.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
4827-4835
|
| 19.
|
Studier, F. W.,
and Moffatt, B. A.
(1986)
J. Mol. Biol.
189,
113-130
|
| 20.
|
Loshon, C. A.,
Fliss, E. R.,
Setlow, B.,
Foerster, H. F.,
and Setlow, P.
(1986)
J. Bacteriol.
167,
168-173
|
| 21.
|
Driks, A.,
and Setlow, P.
(1999)
in
Prokaryotic Development
(Brun, Y. V.
, and Shimkets, L. J., eds)
, pp. 191-218, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 22.
|
Cabrera-Martinez, R. M.,
Mason, J. M.,
Setlow, B.,
Waites, W. M.,
and Setlow, P.
(1989)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
52,
139-143
|
| 23.
|
Setlow, P.
(1975)
J. Biol. Chem.
250,
8159-8167
|
| 24.
|
McAfee, J. G.,
Edmondson, S. P.,
Zegar, I.,
and Shriver, J. W.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
4034-4045
|
| 25.
|
Sober, H. A.
(ed)
(1970)
Handbook of Biochemistry: Selected Data for Molecular Biology
, CRC Press, Inc., Cleveland, OH
|
| 26.
|
Andrade, M. A.,
Chacon, P.,
Merelo, J. J.,
and Moran, F.
(1993)
Protein Eng.
6,
383-390
|
| 27.
|
Kowalczykowski, S. C.,
Paul, L. S.,
Lonberg, N.,
Newport, J. W.,
McSwiggen, J. A.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1986)
Biochemistry
25,
1226-1240
|
| 28.
|
Cantor, C. R.,
and Schimmel, P. R.
(1980)
Biophysical Chemistry: The Behavior of Biological Macromolecules, Part III
, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York
|
| 29.
|
Lohman, T.
(1986)
CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem.
19,
191-245
|
| 30.
|
Urbanke, C.,
and Schaper, A.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
1744-1749
|
| 31.
|
Woody, R. W.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
246,
34-71
|
| 32.
|
Weiss, M. A.,
Ellenberger, T.,
Wobbe, C. R.,
Lee, J. P.,
Harrison, S. C.,
and Struhl, K.
(1990)
Nature
347,
575-578
|
| 33.
|
Patel, L.,
Abate, C.,
and Curran, T.
(1990)
Nature
347,
572-575
|
| 34.
|
Gazit, E.,
and Sauer, R. T.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2652-2657
|
| 35.
|
Nicholson, W. L.,
Setlow, B.,
and Setlow, P.
(1990)
J. Bacteriol.
172,
6900-6906
|
| 36.
|
Sanchez-Salas, J. L.,
Sharon, M.,
and Setlow, P.
(1992)
Biochimie (Paris)
74,
651-660
|
| 37.
|
Bujalowski, W.,
and Lohman, T. M.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
3099-3106
|
| 38.
|
McGhee, J. D.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1974)
J. Mol. Biol.
86,
469-489
|
| 39.
|
Ando, R. A.,
and Morrical, S. W.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
283,
785-796
|
| 40.
|
de Jong, E. A. M.,
Harmsen, B. J. M.,
Konings, R. N. H.,
and Hilbers, C. W.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
2039-2046
|
| 41.
|
Kuil, M. E.,
van Amerongen, H.,
van der Vliet, P. C.,
and van Grondelle, R.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
9795-9800
|
| 42.
|
Menetski, J. P.,
and Kowalczykowski, S. C.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
181,
281-295
|
| 43.
|
Record, M. T., Jr.,
Lohman, T. M.,
and deHaseth, P.
(1976)
J. Mol. Biol.
107,
145-158
|
| 44.
|
Record, M. T., Jr.,
deHaseth, P.,
and Lohman, T. M.
(1977)
Biochemistry
16,
1791-1796
|
| 45.
|
Van Gilst, M. R.,
Rees, W. A.,
Das, A.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
1514-1524
|
| 46.
|
Huth, J. R.,
Bewley, C. A.,
Nissen, M. S.,
Evans, J. N. S.,
Reeves, R.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Clore, G. M.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
657-665
|
| 47.
|
Spolar, R. S.,
and Record, M. T., Jr.
(1994)
Science
263,
777-784
|
| 48.
|
Frankel, A. D.,
and Smith, C. A.
(1998)
Cell
92,
149-151
|
| 49.
|
Setlow, B.,
Hand, A. R.,
and Setlow, P.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
1642-1653
|
| 50.
|
Sanchez-Salas, J.-L.,
Santiago-Lara, M. L.,
Setlow, B.,
Sussman, M. D.,
and Setlow, P.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
807-814
|
| 51.
|
Groch, N.,
Schindelin, H.,
Scholtz, A. S.,
Hahn, U.,
and Heinemann, U.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
207,
677-685
|
| 52.
|
Setlow, P.
(1981)
in
Sporulation and Germination
(Levinson, H. S.
, Tipper, D. J.
, and Sonenshein, A. L., eds)
, pp. 13-28, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
|
| 53.
|
Swerdlow, B. M.,
Setlow, B.,
and Setlow, P.
(1981)
J. Bacteriol.
148,
20-29
|
| 54.
|
Mohr, S. C.,
Sokolov, N. V. H. A.,
He, C.,
and Setlow, P.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
77-81
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Frenkiel-Krispin, R. Sack, J. Englander, E. Shimoni, M. Eisenstein, E. Bullitt, R. Horowitz-Scherer, C. S. Hayes, P. Setlow, A. Minsky, et al.
Structure of the DNA-SspC Complex: Implications for DNA Packaging, Protection, and Repair in Bacterial Spores
J. Bacteriol.,
June 1, 2004;
186(11):
3525 - 3530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kosman and P. Setlow
Effects of Carboxy-Terminal Modifications and pH on Binding of a Bacillus subtilis Small, Acid-Soluble Spore Protein to DNA
J. Bacteriol.,
October 15, 2003;
185(20):
6095 - 6103.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Hayes and P. Setlow
An {alpha}/{beta}-Type, Small, Acid-Soluble Spore Protein Which Has Very High Affinity for DNA Prevents Outgrowth of Bacillus subtilis Spores
J. Bacteriol.,
April 15, 2001;
183(8):
2662 - 2666.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Hayes, E. Alarcon-Hernandez, and P. Setlow
N-terminal Amino Acid Residues Mediate Protein-Protein Interactions between DNA-bound alpha /beta -Type Small, Acid-soluble Spore Proteins from Bacillus Species
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 12, 2001;
276(3):
2267 - 2275.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|