|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C000258200 on July 20, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 45, 35170-35175, November 10, 2000
Regulation of Lef-mediated Transcription and
p53-dependent Pathway by Associating -Catenin with
CBP/p300*
Makoto
Miyagishi §,
Ryouji
Fujii §,
Mitsutoki
Hatta §,
Eisaku
Yoshida§,
Natsumi
Araya §,
Akira
Nagafuchi¶,
Satoru
Ishihara¶,
Toshihiro
Nakajima §, and
Akiyoshi
Fukamizu §
From the Center for Tsukuba Advanced Research
Alliance, § Institute of Applied Biochemistry, University of
Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, and the ¶ Department of Cell
Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto
606-8501, Japan
Received for publication, April 17, 2000, and in revised form, July 7, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
CBP and its homologue p300 play significant roles
in cell differentiation, cell cycle, and anti-oncogenesis. We
demonstrated that -catenin, recently known as a potent oncogene, and
CBP/p300 are associated through its CH3 region, which is a primary
target of adenoviral oncoprotein E1A and various nuclear proteins, such as p53, cyclin E, and AP-1, and both are colocalized in the nuclear bodies. CBP/p300 potentiated Lef-mediated transactivation of
-catenin, and E1A, a potent inhibitor of CBP/p300, repressed its
transactivation. Furthermore, overexpression of stable -catenin
mutant competitively suppressed the p53-dependent
pathway. These may be a key mechanism of -catenin involved in
oncogenic events underlying disruption of tumor suppressor function
through CBP/p300.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The coactivator CBP/p300 family is a central regulator of gene
expression (1-5) and important in cell differentiation, cell cycle,
and anti-oncogenesis (6-9). The importance of CBP/p300 in such
cellular functions is supported by their ability to potentiate the
activity of a large number of nuclear factors such as adenoviral oncoprotein E1A, p53, cyclin E, and AP-1 (10-14). In addition, CBP/p300 has been proposed as a bridging protein, bringing together proteins of the RNA polymerase II-dependent basal
transcription complex with either specific transcription factors or
other cofactors.
Drosophila Armadillo and its vertebrate homologue
-catenin are scaffold proteins in cadherin-mediated cell-cell
adhesion, and they function as signal transducers to the nucleus in
Wnt/Wingless pathway (15-17). -Catenin translocated to the nucleus
regulates expression of various downstream genes by acting as a
coactivator of Lef/TCF family. Furthermore, recent studies suggested
that stable mutants of -catenin leading to accumulation in the
nucleus are implicated in the initiation of some forms of colon cancers and melanomas (18-21).
The involvement of -catenin in its nuclear functions, including
transcriptional activation and oncogenic events, addresses the
existence of bridging nuclear factors for recruitment of RNA polymerase
II. To test this hypothesis, in the present study, we explored the
possible association of -catenin with CBP/p300 and attempted to
define the biological function of CBP/p300 and -catenin interaction.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Transfections and Reporter Gene
Assays--
HeLa cells, L cells, and HEK293T cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum. HCT116 cells were maintained in McCoy 5A
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Transfections were performed
by the calcium phosphate method. Thirty ng of a RSV-Renilla
luciferase control plasmid were included in each transfection
experiment to control for the efficiency of transfection. To ensure
equal DNA amounts, empty plasmids were added in each transfection. The
luciferase activity was measured with AutoLumat (Berthold). The values
were normalized to Renilla luciferase activity as an
internal control.
Antibodies--
Anti- -catenin (8A5) and anti-CBP (5614)
antibodies were obtained according to the procedures described
previously (22, 23).
Plasmids--
pTOPFlash and pFOPFlash were provided by H. Clevers (19). A series of CBP deletion mutants, pRc/RSV-mCBP-HA and
pG5b-Luc, have been described previously (24). p53 expression
plasmid (pCIcchp53) was obtained from RIKEN Gene Bank (25). pGAL4
control vector was generated by inserting the GAL4 DNA binding domain (aa 1-147) of pGBT9 (CLONTECH) into pcDNA3
(Invitrogen). pGAL4-p53(1-83) was generated by
PCR1-based subcloning into pGAL4.
pcEF9-mCBP was generated by inserting full-length mouse CBP into pcEF9.
-Catenin deletion mutants were made by digesting a full-length
-catenin with appropriate enzymes or PCR-based subcloning into
pcDNA3-HA. GST-CBP-(1679-1891) and biotinylated tag fused
CBP-(1679-1891) were generated by inserting
EcoRI-SmaI fragment (aa 1679-1891) into pGEX5X-1
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and PinPoint Xa1 (Promega),
respectively. GST- -catenin or GST- -catenin-(550-781) was made by
inserting a full-length -catenin or a fragment (aa 550-781)
generated by PCR into pGEX5X-1. HA-PML expression and Lef-1 expression
plasmids were made by reverse transcription-PCR-based cloning
into pcDNA3-HA. HA-tagged stable -catenin mutant (pEFBCHA) was
generated by inserting C-terminal HA-tagged full-length -catenin mutant (S33A, S37A, T41A, S45A) downstream of EF-1 promoter. HdNB
was made by inserting N-terminal truncated -catenin ( N89) in
frame to N-terminal HA-tag. FLAG-tagged stable -catenin
mutant (pEFFlagMMB) was generated by inserting N-terminal FLAG-tagged full-length -catenin mutant (S33A, S37A, T41A, S45A) downstream of
EF-1 promoter. p300 and p300 CH3 expression plasmids and
wild type and mutants E1A were described previously (23).
Immunofluorescence and TUNEL Assay--
HeLa cells were plated
onto glass coverslips and transfected using Fugene-6 reagents (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) at 60% confluence. Thirty-six h after
transfection, cells were treated with 200 ng/ml doxorubicin
(Sigma) and incubated additional 12-16 h. Cells were then fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min and permeabilized by treatment
with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 30 min. After blocking with 1%
bovine serum albumin, 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS for 30 min, cells were
incubated with rat anti-HA monoclonal antibody (1:200 dilution; 3F10,
Roche Molecular Biochemicals), anti-p53 mouse monoclonal antibody
(1:500 dilution; pAb421 oncogene science), followed by staining with
Cy5-conjugated anti-rat and Cy3-conjugated anti-mouse secondary
antibodies (1:1000 dilution each; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
TUNEL staining was performed by an in situ apoptosis
detection kit (Takara). Immunofluorescence was analyzed under a
confocal microscopy.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
HEK293T cells
were transfected using lipofectAMINE reagents (Life Technologies,
Inc.), and nuclear extracts were prepared as described previously (24).
Approximately 200 µg of nuclear extracts were incubated with anti-HA
antibody (12CA5) coupled with protein A/G-agarose in buffer A (20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol,
1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.05%
Tween 20, 0.1 mM Na3VO4, 20 mM NaF, and protease inhibitors) at 4 °C overnight, and
washed five times with the same buffer. For coimmunoprecipitation of
endogenous -catenin with CBP, cells were lysed in Co-IP buffer (10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM KCl, 0.1% Nonidet
P-40, and protease inhibitors) and subjected to immunoprecipitation
with anti-CBP antibody (5614). Western blot analysis of the
immunoprecipitates was done as described previously (24).
In Vitro Binding Assay and in Vitro Competitive Binding
Assay--
In vitro binding assay was performed as
described previously (24). For in vitro competitive
binding assay, in vitro translated 35S-labeled
p53 was incubated with 2 µg of biotinylated tag-fused CBP
(1679-1860) or control biotinylated tag bound to streptavidin beads in
buffer A containing 250 µg/ml of GST, GST- -catenin-(550-781), or
GST- -catenin-(661-781) for 3 h. After washing five times with buffer A, the pull-down complexes were fractionated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and were analyzed by an image
analyzer (BAS2000; Fujix).
 |
RESULTS |
Interaction of -Catenin with Coactivator CBP/p300--
We first
performed coimmunoprecipitation experiments using an HA-tagged stable
-catenin mutant. HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with the
HA-tagged -catenin expression plasmid or a mock plasmid. Western
blotting of HA- -catenin complexes immunoprecipitated with anti-HA
antibody revealed that endogenous CBP/p300 was coimmunoprecipitated with HA- -catenin (Fig. 1A).
Bacterially expressed GST- -catenin also captured in vitro
translated CBP and p300 with comparable binding to in vitro
translated Lef-1 (Fig. 1B). To evaluate the interaction
between -catenin and CBP/p300 under more physiological conditions,
we analyzed endogenous -catenin and CBP/p300 in colon carcinoma cell
line, HCT116 cells, in which -catenin is mutated and thereby
stabilized. As shown in Fig. 1D, endogenous -catenin could be efficiently coimmunoprecipitated with endogenous CBP/p300. Further analysis using in vitro translated CBP fragments
(Fig. 1A) revealed that -catenin specifically interacted
with the CH3 region of CBP (Fig. 1E), which is known as a
binding site of various nuclear proteins concerning cell cycle
regulation and apoptosis, such as E1A, cyclin E/CDK2, p53, and AP-1. To
define the CBP interaction domain for -catenin binding, we
constructed a series of -catenin deletion mutants (Fig.
1A). GST-pull-down assay using GST-fused CBP CH3 fragment
(aa 1679-1891) indicated that CBP interacted with both of the N- and
C-terminal armadillo (Arm) repeat domains, but not with the N- and
C-terminal hydrophilic activation domains (20, 26) (Fig.
1F). These results indicated that the CH3 region of CBP/p300
interacts with the -catenin Arm repeat domain in vitro.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
In vivo and in vitro
binding of -catenin with CBP.
A, coimmunoprecipitation of CBP using HA-tagged stable
-catenin mutant. Nuclear extracts from HEK293T cells transfected
with 1 µg of HA-tagged stable -catenin mutant expression plasmids
or an empty control plasmid were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA
antibody (12CA10, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and were then subjected
to immunoblotting with anti-CBP (5614), which is cross-reactive with
p300 (top) or anti-HA (12CA10) antibody (center).
Immunoblotting of nuclear extracts with anti-CBP antibody shows a
quantitation of the experiment (bottom). B,
in vitro binding assay using in vitro translated
35S-labeled CBP, p300, or Lef-1, with GST or
GST- -catenin. C, schematic representations of
CBP, -catenin, and their deletion mutants used in this study.
CH, cysteine/histidine-rich region; KIX,
KIX domain; BR, bromodomain; HAT, histone
acetyltransferase domain; p/CIP,
p300/CBP-interacting protein. D,
coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous -catenin using anti-CBP
antibody. Cell extracts from HCT116 cells were immunoprecipitated with
anti-CBP antibody (5614) or normal mouse IgG as a control.
E, in vitro binding assay using in
vitro translated 35S-labeled CBP deletion mutants and
GST or GST- -catenin. The minimal binding domain of CBP is aa
1805-1891. F, in vitro binding assay using
in vitro translated 35S-labeled -catenin
deletion mutants and GST or GST-CBP-(1679-1891).
|
|
Colocalization of -Catenin and CBP/p300--
To further confirm
the interaction between CBP/p300 and -catenin, we examined its
cellular localization using mouse fibroblast L cells. Since this cell
line does not express E-cadherin (27), we predicted that -catenin is
translocated to the nucleus. Overexpression of -catenin in L cells
results in nuclear translocation and formation of speckle-like
aggregates (Fig. 2A,
panel a), in which endogenous CBP was also
translocated to the same speckles (Fig. 2A, panels b and c). A similar speckled pattern was observed in
HeLa cells, when both CBP and -catenin were transfected together
(Fig. 2B, panels d-f). In contrast, transfection
of either CBP or -catenin alone showed uniform distribution in the
nucleus (Fig. 2B, panels g and h).
These results suggested physical association of CBP/p300 with
-catenin in the nucleus. Recently, a similar speckled-like structure
called PML nuclear bodies (NBs) or PODs (PML oncogenic domains) has
been found in the nucleus (18). Its function is not yet fully
understood, but it has been shown that a variety of nuclear proteins
(PML, Sp100, SUMO-1, etc.) are present. Therefore, we examined whether
nuclear aggregates formed by CBP and -catenin are identical to this
nuclear structure. As shown in Fig. 2C (panels i-k), HA-PML was colocalized in the CBP- -catenin aggregates, indicating the nuclear aggregates formed by CBP and -catenin are
NBs.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Colocalization of CBP and
-catenin in the nuclear structure.
A, a stable -catenin mutant is colocalized with
endogenous CBP in L cells. L cells were transfected with stable
-catenin mutant expression vector (HdNB) (panels a and
b) or an empty vector (panel c), and were stained
with anti-CBP (panels b and c) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology; sc-583) or anti- -catenin (8A5) (panel a)
antibodies. The anti- -catenin (8A5) antibody is able to
preferentially detect -catenin expressed in L cells. B,
coexpression of CBP and stable -catenin mutant causes the formation
of nuclear aggregates in HeLa cells. HeLa cells were transfected with
CBP expression plasmid (panels d, e,
f, and g) and/or HA-tagged stable -catenin
mutant expression plasmid (pEFMMBCHA) (panels d,
e, f, and h) and stained with anti-CBP
(5614) (panels d and g) and anti-HA (3F10)
(panels e and h) antibodies. C, HA-PML
coexists in the nuclear aggregates. HeLa cells were transfected
together with FLAG-tagged stable -catenin mutant (pEFFlagMMB), CBP
and HA-PML-expression plasmids (panels i, j, and
k) and incubated with anti-FLAG (M2, Eastman Kodak Co.)
(panel i), anti-CBP (5614) (panel j), and anti-HA
(3F10, Roche Molecular Biochemicals) (panel k) antibodies,
followed by staining with Cy2-conjugated goat anti-mouse,
Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, and Cy5-conjugated goat anti-rat
secondary antibodies, respectively.
|
|
Function of CBP/p300 as a Coactivator for Lef/TCF-mediated
Transcription--
To investigate the functional significance of the
interaction between CBP/p300 and -catenin, we examined the effect of
p300 on -catenin-mediated transcription using a luciferase reporter plasmid containing Lef binding sites (pTOPflash) or mutant Lef binding
sites (pFOPflash) (19). Cotransfection of stable -catenin mutant and
Lef-1 in L cells results in significant enhancement of luciferase
activity (Fig. 3A). p300
enhanced this -catenin-Lef-mediated transactivation in a
dose-dependent manner, while a p300 CH3, which has the
33-amino acid deletion in the CH3 region, had no effect (Fig.
3B). CBP also had the same synergistic effect as p300 (data
not shown). In HCT116 cells, the transcription activity of pTOPFlash
reporter was two to three times higher than that of pFOPFlash as a
result of stabilization of -catenin mutant (Fig. 3C).
p300, but not p300 CH3, could enhance this -catenin-mediated transactivation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
3C). Furthermore, E1A, which binds to CBP/p300 and inhibits
CBP/p300-dependent transactivation, repressed the
-catenin-dependent transactivation in HCT116 (Fig. 3D). E1AmCR2 mutant that lacks the ability to interact with
retinoblastoma protein but does bind to CBP also inhibited the
-catenin-dependent transactivation. In contrast,
E1A N, which is defective for CBP/p300 binding, and E1A CR1, which
is defective for both CBP/p300 and retinoblastoma binding, were
impaired in repression (Fig. 3D). To further verify the
CBP/p300 dependence on the -catenin-mediated transactivation, we
utilized GAL4 fusion system using -catenin-GAL4 DNA binding domain
fusion (GAL4- -catenin) expression plasmid and G5b-Luc reporter
containing five GAL4 binding sites and E1b promoter. p300 potentiated
GAL4- -catenin transactivation, whereas p300 CH3 had no effect
(Fig. 3E). These results indicated that Lef-directed
transactivation by -catenin is mediated by CBP/p300.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Involvement of CBP/p300 in
-catenin-mediated Lef transactivation.
A, -catenin potentiates Lef-mediated transactivation in L
cells. L cells were transiently transfected with 100 ng of pTOPflash
and 10 ng of stable -catenin mutant expression plasmid (pEFMMBCHA)
and/or 10 ng of Lef-1 expression plasmid or empty control plasmid.
B, p300 potentiates Lef-mediated transactivation by
-catenin in L cells. L cells were transfected with 100 ng of
pTOPflash, 10 ng of stable -catenin mutant expression plasmid or
empty control plasmid, and the indicated amount of p300 or p300 CH3
expression plasmid. C, p300 enhances
-catenin-Lef-mediated transactivation in HCT116 cells. HCT116 cells
were transfected with 100 ng of pTOPFlash or pFOPFlash and the
indicated amounts of p300 or p300 CH3 expression plasmid.
D, E1A suppresses Lef-mediated transactivation by
-catenin. HCT116 cells were transfected with 100 ng of pTOPFlash or
pFOPFlash, and 1 ng of wild-type E1A, E1A N, E1A CR1, or E1AmCR2
mutants. E, p300, but not p300 CH3, enhances
transactivation activity of GAL4- -catenin. L cells were transfected
with 100 ng of G5b-Luc reporter plasmid, 1 ng of GAL4 or
GAL4- -catenin, and 500 ng of p300 or p300 CH3 expression
plasmid.
|
|
Inhibition of CBP/p300-mediated p53-dependent Pathway
by -Catenin--
The accumulation of stable -catenin mutant in
the nucleus is known to provide the possibility leading to oncogenesis
(18). We next considered that the interaction between -catenin and CBP might contribute to a certain oncogenic event, such as suppression of apoptosis. In p53-dependent apoptosis, p53 needs for
interaction with CBP/p300 through the CH3 region (11), which is the
same binding region as -catenin. Furthermore, different
transcription factors that associate with CBP/p300 as a cofactor were
known to antagonize one another by competing limiting amounts of
CBP/p300, as reported for AP-1 and nuclear receptor (14), Stat2 and
NF- B (29), and p53 and NF- B (30). These data prompted us to
examine whether -catenin acts to inhibit p53-dependent
pathway by inhibiting the interaction of p53 with CBP.
We first examined the competitive effect of -catenin expression in
p53-dependent transactivation using a Gal4-fused p53
activation domain (aa 1-83) expression plasmid and luciferase reporter
plasmid containing Gal4 binding sites (G5b-Luc), because it has been
reported that CBP/p300 potentiates p53 transactivation through the
N-terminal transactivation domain of p53 (11). As shown in Fig.
4A, stable -catenin mutant
inhibited transactivation of p53 activation domain at comparable levels
of a dominant-negative CBP CH3 fragment (11, 31). We next performed
in vitro competitive binding assay to address the
possibility of direct competition between -catenin and p53 for
association with CBP. As shown in Fig. 4B, GST- -catenin (550-781 aa) competed directly with p53 for association with the CH3
fragment of CBP in a dose-dependent manner, whereas a
control GST protein and -catenin mutant, both of which defect the
binding of CBP/p300, did not.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Suppression of p53-dependent
pathway by stable -catenin mutant.
A, stable -catenin mutant suppresses transactivation
activity of GAL4-p53-(1-83). HeLa cells were transfected with 0.01 ng
of pGAL-p53-(1-83) and stable -catenin mutant expression plasmid
or pEF-HA-CBP-(1679-1891) or an empty control plasmid.
B, in vitro competitive binding assay using
in vitro translated 35S-labeled p53,
biotinylated tag-fused CBP-(1679-1860) and GST,
GST- -catenin-(550-781), and GST- -catenin-(661-781).
GST- -catenin-(550-781) inhibits the binding p53 with the CBP
CH3 region in a dose-dependent manner, whereas GST and
GST- -catenin-(661-781) have no effect. C, HeLa cells
were transfected with 0.5 µg of p53 expression plasmid and 0.5 µg
of HA-tagged stable -catenin expression plasmid or an empty control
plasmid. TUNEL assay and immunostaining were performed as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Arrowheads indicate the
cells expressing p53 but not -catenin.
|
|
Finally, we tested whether -catenin is able to suppress p53-dependnt
apoptosis. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with a p53
expression plasmid and were subjected to following treatment with 200 ng/ml doxorubicin, which is a DNA damage-inducing agent and
known to enhance p53-dependent apoptosis (11).
Approximately 90% of p53-transfected cells were positive for TUNEL
(terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP end labeling)
staining, and microscopic analysis revealed several particular
apoptotic features, such as cell shrinkage and highly nuclear
condensation (Fig. 4C, panels c-e). Coexpression of stable
HA- -catenin mutant significantly suppressed
p53-dependent apoptosis (Fig. 4C, panels f-h, Table I), and
immunocytochemical staining with anti-HA antibody revealed that a few
cells, which undergo apoptosis, express low or undetectable levels of
-catenin. In contrast, almost all cells expressing high
levels of -catenin appeared to escape apoptosis (Fig. 4C,
panels f-i). Collectively, these results suggested that stable -catenin mutant suppresses p53-dependent pathway
by competitively binding to CBP/p300.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Effect of -catenin on p53-dependent apoptosis in HeLa
cells
Apoptotic index represents the percentage of TUNEL positive cells in
p53-transfected HeLa cells. Values were determined by counting more
than 200 cells from randomly chosen fields.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A recent study has described that Drosophila CBP
represses an inappropriate activation of Lef-mediated signal at the low
levels of -catenin (32). Our data from the reporter gene assay
revealed that CBP enhanced Lef-mediated transactivation, suggesting the differential modes of action of -catenin expression between the normal and transformed cells. In the normal cells, as the nuclear levels of wild-type -catenin are thought to be maintained at a low
level by GSK-3 -dependent ubiquitination pathway,
CBP/p300 would be preferentially recruited to Lef/TCF, acting to
repress the Wingless pathway. On the other hand, in the transformed
cells, when -catenin is mutated, stabilized, and present at high
levels in the nucleus, CBP/p300 might be dominantly recruited to
-catenin by the following two mechanisms. (i) Most population of CBP
is occupied by -catenin because of a much higher levels of
-catenin than those of Lef/TCF. (ii) High levels of -catenin
inhibit the binding between Lef and CBP by the association of
-catenin with Lef and/or CBP and cause the conversion from a
Lef-CBP suppression complex to a Lef- -catenin-CBP activation complex.
Although the function of PML bodies is not fully understood, several
recent studies provide clues to understand PML bodies. For instance,
Doucas et al. (33) have shown that the overexpression of PML
results in the recruitment of CBP to PML bodies, accompanied by a
synergistic enhancement of retinoic acid receptor
transactivation. Torii et al. (34) demonstrated that the
recruitment of Daxx to PML bodies affects Fas-induced apoptosis.
Furthermore, PML has been reported to be essential for
irradiation-induced apoptosis (35, 36). Thus, it is possible that the
recruitment of -catenin and CBP/p300 to PML bodies plays a
significant role in the regulation of transcription and apoptosis.
A p53-dependent pathway was recently shown to involve
apoptosis through CBP/p300, considering the dominant-negative effect of
the CH3 fragment (11). Since the cellular level of CBP/p300 is
limiting, different transcription factors associated with CBP/p300 as a
cofactor are reported to antagonize one another. For example, the
repression of AP-1 activity by nuclear receptors was reported in the
earlier study (14), and competitive inhibition between Stat2 and
NF- (29) and p53 and NF- (30) has been described more recently. In
view of these results, it is possible that molecules that tightly bind
to the CH3 region of CBP/p300 prevent the p53-dependent pathway. However, suppression of the p53-dependent pathway
by the CH3-binding molecules would not always occur, because in
many cases cells appear to be transformed by a combination of various oncogenic events. In the case of -catenin, in addition to its ability to inhibit tumor suppresser functions of p53, a certain combinatorial action of other effectors, such as the transcriptional activation of downstream oncogenes (c-Myc or cyclin D), might be
required for subsequent oncogenic transformation (28, 37). Therefore, the up-regulation of downstream oncogenes by CBP,
-catenin, and Lef and the concomitant suppression of
p53-dependent pathway by the competitive mechanism may be
key events for oncogenesis by -catenin.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. H. Clevers (pTOPFlash and
pFOPFlash), Drs. Y. Katsura and S. Fujimoto (LEF-1 expression plasmid),
and Dr. H. Hamada (pCIcchp53) for their kind gift of plasmids. We
acknowledge the Fukamizu laboratory members for their helpful
discussion and encouragement.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the "Research for
the Future" Program (The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science: JSPS-RFTF 97L00804); the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and
Culture of Japan; The Asahi Glass Foundation; and The Nissan Science
Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for Tsukuba
Advanced Research Alliance, Institute of Applied Biochemistry, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan. Tel.:/Fax: 81-298-53-6070; E-mail: akif@tara.tsukuba.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 20, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000258200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
HA, hemagglutinin;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
aa, amino acid(s);
NBs, nuclear bodies.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Chrivia, J. C.,
Kwok, R. P.,
Lamb, N.,
Hagiwara, M.,
Montminy, M. R.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1993)
Nature
265,
855-859
|
| 2.
|
Eckner, R.,
Ewen, M. E.,
Newsome, D.,
Gerdes, M.,
DeCaprio, J. A.,
Lawrence, J. B.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
869-884
|
| 3.
|
Lundblad, J. R.,
Kwok, R. P.,
Laurance, M. E.,
Harter, M. L.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1995)
Nature
374,
85-88
|
| 4.
|
Kwok, R. P.,
Lundblad, J. R.,
Chrivia, J. C.,
Richards, J. P.,
Bachinger, H. P.,
Brennan, R. G.,
Roberts, S. G.,
Green, M. R.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1994)
Nature
370,
223-226
|
| 5.
|
Arany, Z.,
Newsome, D.,
Oldread, E.,
Livingston, D. M.,
and Eckner, R.
(1995)
Nature
374,
81-84
|
| 6.
|
Ait-Si-Ali, S.,
Ramirez, S.,
Barre, F. X.,
Dkhissi, F.,
Magnaghi-Jaulin, L.,
Girault, J. A.,
Robin, P.,
Knibiehler, M.,
Pritchard, L. L.,
Ducommun, B.,
Trouche, D.,
and Harel-Bellan, A.
(1998)
Nature
396,
184-186
|
| 7.
|
Eckner, R.,
Yao, T. P.,
Oldread, E.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2478-2490
|
| 8.
|
Puri, P. L.,
Avantaggiati, M. L.,
Balsano, C.,
Sang, N.,
Graessmann, A.,
Giordano, A.,
and Levrero, M.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
369-383
|
| 9.
|
Muraoka, M.,
Konishi, M.,
Kikuchi-Yanoshita, R.,
Tanaka, K.,
Shitara, N.,
Chong, J. M.,
Iwama, T.,
and Miyaki, M.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
1565-1569
|
| 10.
|
Gu, W.,
Shi, X. L.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1997)
Nature
387,
819-823
|
| 11.
|
Avantaggiati, M. L.,
Ogryzko, V.,
Gardner, K.,
Giordano, A.,
Levine, A. S.,
and Kelly, K.
(1997)
Cell
89,
1175-1184
|
| 12.
|
Lill, N. L.,
Grossman, S. R.,
Ginsberg, D.,
DeCaprio, J. A.,
and Livingston, D. M.
(1997)
Nature
387,
823-827
|
| 13.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
Felzien, L. K.,
Betts, J. C.,
Leung, K.,
Beach, D. H.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1997)
Science
275,
523-527
|
| 14.
|
Kamei, Y.,
Xu, L.,
Heinzel, T.,
Torchia, J.,
Kurokawa, R.,
Gloss, B.,
Lin, S. C.,
Heyman, R. A.,
Rose, D. W.,
Glass, C. K.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1996)
Cell
85,
403-414
|
| 15.
|
Nusse, R.
(1997)
Cell
89,
321-323
|
| 16.
|
Molenaar, M.,
van de Wetering, M.,
Oosterwegel, M.,
Peterson-Maduro, J.,
Godsave, S.,
Korinek, V.,
Roose, J.,
Destree, O.,
and Clevers, H.
(1996)
Cell
86,
391-399
|
| 17.
|
van de Wetering, M.,
Cavallo, R.,
Dooijes, D.,
van Beest, M.,
van Es, J.,
Loureiro, J.,
Ypma, A.,
Hursh, D.,
Jones, T.,
Bejsovec, A.,
Peifer, M.,
Mortin, M.,
and Clevers, H.
(1997)
Cell
88,
789-799
|
| 18.
|
Peifer, M.
(1997)
Science
275,
1752-1753
|
| 19.
|
Korinek, V.,
Barker, N.,
Morin, P. J.,
van Wichen, D.,
de Weger, R.,
Kinzler, K. W.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Clevers, H.
(1997)
Science
275,
1784-1787
|
| 20.
|
Morin, P. J.,
Sparks, A. B.,
Korinek, V.,
Barker, N.,
Clevers, H.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1997)
Science
275,
1787-1790
|
| 21.
|
Rubinfeld, B.,
Robbins, P.,
El-Gamil, M.,
Albert, I.,
Porfiri, E.,
and Polakis, P.
(1997)
Science
275,
1790-1792
|
| 22.
|
Nagafuchi, A.,
Ishihara, S.,
and Tsukita, S.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
235-425
|
| 23.
|
Nakajima, T.,
Uchida, C.,
Anderson, S. F.,
Lee, C. G.,
Hurwitz, J.,
Parvin, J. D.,
and Montminy, M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
1107-1112
|
| 24.
|
Yoshida, E.,
Aratani, S.,
Itou, H.,
Miyagishi, M.,
Takiguchi, M.,
Osumu, T.,
Murakami, K.,
and Fukamizu, A.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
241,
664-669
|
| 25.
|
Yoshida, Y.,
Sadata, A.,
Zhang, W.,
Saito, K.,
Shinoura, N.,
and Hamada, H.
(1998)
Hum. Gene Ther.
9,
2503-2515
|
| 26.
|
Hsu, S. C.,
Galceran, J.,
and Grosschedl, R.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
4807-4818
|
| 27.
|
Nagafuchi, A.,
Shirayoshi, Y.,
Okazaki, K.,
Yasuda, K.,
and Takeichi, M.
(1987)
Nature
329,
341-343
|
| 28.
|
Tetsu, O.,
and McCormick, F.
(1999)
Nature
398,
422-426
|
| 29.
|
Hottiger, M. O.,
Felzien, L. K.,
and Nabel, G. J.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3124-3134
|
| 30.
|
Webster, G. A.,
and Perkins, N. D.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3485-3495 (1999)
|
| 31.
|
Scolnick, D. M.,
Chehab, N. H.,
Stavridi, E. S.,
Lien, M. C.,
Caruso, L.,
Moran, E.,
Berger, S. L.,
and Halazonetis, T. D.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
3693-3696
|
| 32.
|
Waltzer, L.,
and Bienz, M.
(1998)
Nature
395,
521-525
|
| 33.
|
Doucas, V.,
Tini, M.,
Egan, D. A.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
2627-2632
|
| 34.
|
Torii, S.,
Egan, D. A.,
Evans, R. A.,
and Reed, J. C.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6037-6049
|
| 35.
|
Wang, Z. G.,
Ruggero, D.,
Ronchetti, S.,
Zhong, S.,
Gaboli, M.,
Rivi, R.,
and Pandolfi, P. P.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
20,
266-272
|
| 36.
|
Quignon, F.,
De Bels, F.,
Koken, M.,
Feunteun, J.,
Ameisen, J. C.,
and de The, H.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
20,
259-265
|
| 37.
|
He, T. C.,
Sparks, A. B.,
Rago, C.,
Hermeking, H.,
Zawel, L.,
da Costa, L. T.,
Morin, P. J.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1998)
Science
281,
1509-1512
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. A. Thompson, V. Tremblay, G. Lin, and D. A. Bochar
CHD8 Is an ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factor That Regulates {beta}-Catenin Target Genes
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 15, 2008;
28(12):
3894 - 3904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Parker, Y. Y. Ni, J. L. Chang, J. Li, and K. M. Cadigan
Wingless Signaling Induces Widespread Chromatin Remodeling of Target Loci
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 1, 2008;
28(5):
1815 - 1828.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Xu and D. Kimelman
Mechanistic insights from structural studies of beta-catenin and its binding partners
J. Cell Sci.,
October 1, 2007;
120(19):
3337 - 3344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Chen, C. K. Yang, M. Xia, C.-Y. Ou, and M. R. Stallcup
Role of GAC63 in transcriptional activation mediated by {beta}-catenin
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 19, 2007;
35(6):
2084 - 2092.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Rossi, R. Mukerjee, P. Ferrante, K. Khalili, S. Amini, and B. E. Sawaya
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat prevents dephosphorylation of Sp1 by TCF-4 in astrocytes
J. Gen. Virol.,
June 1, 2006;
87(6):
1613 - 1623.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Sierra, T. Yoshida, C. A. Joazeiro, and K. A. Jones
The APC tumor suppressor counteracts beta-catenin activation and H3K4 methylation at Wnt target genes.
Genes & Dev.,
March 1, 2006;
20(5):
586 - 600.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Osafune, M. Takasato, A. Kispert, M. Asashima, and R. Nishinakamura
Identification of multipotent progenitors in the embryonic mouse kidney by a novel colony-forming assay
Development,
January 1, 2006;
133(1):
151 - 161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Lassot, E. Estrabaud, S. Emiliani, M. Benkirane, R. Benarous, and F. Margottin-Goguet
p300 Modulates ATF4 Stability and Transcriptional Activity Independently of Its Acetyltransferase Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 16, 2005;
280(50):
41537 - 41545.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Vietor, R. Kurzbauer, G. Brosch, and L. A. Huber
TIS7 Regulation of the {beta}-Catenin/Tcf-4 Target Gene Osteopontin (OPN) Is Histone Deacetylase-dependent
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 2, 2005;
280(48):
39795 - 39801.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Watanabe-Fukunaga, S. Iida, Y. Shimizu, S. Nagata, and R. Fukunaga
SEI family of nuclear factors regulates p53-dependent transcriptional activation
Genes Cells,
August 1, 2005;
10(8):
851 - 860.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Plisov, M. Tsang, G. Shi, S. Boyle, K. Yoshino, S. L. Dunwoodie, I. B. Dawid, T. Shioda, A. O. Perantoni, and M. P. de Caestecker
Cited1 Is a Bifunctional Transcriptional Cofactor That Regulates Early Nephronic Patterning
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
June 1, 2005;
16(6):
1632 - 1644.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Smith and B. Frenkel
Glucocorticoids Inhibit the Transcriptional Activity of LEF/TCF in Differentiating Osteoblasts in a Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3{beta}-dependent and -independent Manner
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 21, 2005;
280(3):
2388 - 2394.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Labalette, C.-A. Renard, C. Neuveut, M.-A. Buendia, and Y. Wei
Interaction and Functional Cooperation between the LIM Protein FHL2, CBP/p300, and {beta}-Catenin
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
December 15, 2004;
24(24):
10689 - 10702.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. N. de Vries, A. V. Evsikov, B. E. Haac, K. S. Fancher, A. E. Holbrook, R. Kemler, D. Solter, and B. B. Knowles
Maternal {beta}-catenin and E-cadherin in mouse development
Development,
September 15, 2004;
131(18):
4435 - 4445.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|