![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 45, 35176-35184, November 10, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
¶
From the
Department of Structural Biology, Stanford
University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 and the
§ Glycobiology Institute, Department of Biochemistry,
University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
Received for publication, June 25, 2000, and in revised form, August 4, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Efficient release of ligands from the
Ca2+-dependent carbohydrate-recognition
domain (CRD) of the hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor at endosomal pH
requires a small set of conserved amino acids that includes a critical
histidine residue. When these residues are incorporated at
corresponding positions in an homologous galactose-binding derivative
of serum mannose-binding protein, the pH dependence of ligand binding
becomes more like that of the receptor. The modified CRD displays
40-fold preferential binding to N-acetylgalactosamine compared with galactose, making it a good functional mimic of the
asialoglycoprotein receptor. In the crystal structure of the modified
CRD bound to N-acetylgalactosamine, the histidine
(His202) contacts the 2-acetamido methyl group and
also participates in a network of interactions involving
Asp212, Arg216, and Tyr218 that
positions a water molecule in a hydrogen bond with the sugar amide
group. These interactions appear to produce the preference for
N-acetylgalactosamine over galactose and are also likely to influence the pKa of His202.
Protonation of His202 would disrupt its interaction with an
asparagine that serves as a ligand for Ca2+ and sugar. The
structure of the modified CRD without sugar displays several different
conformations that may represent structures of intermediates in the
release of Ca2+ and sugar ligands caused by protonation of
His202.
The hepatocyte asialoglycoprotein receptor mediates uptake of
glycoproteins bearing oligosaccharides terminating in galactose or
N-acetylgalactosamine
(GalNAc)1 residues (1). The
receptor contains two homologous polypeptide chains: the major form is
designated rat hepatic lectin 1 (RHL-1), and the minor form is
designated RHL-2/3 (2). Each of these component polypeptides consists
of a short N-terminal cytoplasmic domain, a single transmembrane
Structure-based sequence alignments between RHL-1 and MBP-A and
site-directed mutagenesis have led to the identification of several
residues that provide selective affinity for galactose in C-type
lectins (8, 9). Substitution of Glu and Asn with Gln and Asp at
positions 185 and 187 of MBP-A and also the presence of a tryptophan
residue at position 189 confer upon MBP-A galactose affinity that is
comparable with that of RHL-1 (9). Discrimination against mannose is
provided by a glycine-rich sequence immediately following
Trp189, which forms a compact, well ordered loop that holds
Trp189 in position for interaction with the B face of
galactose while sterically excluding mannose (10). This
galactose-binding mutant of MBP-A is designated QPDWG. RHL-1 displays a
60-fold preference for GalNAc over Gal, whereas QPDWG does not
discriminate between these two sugars. Introduction of a histidine
residue found in RHL-1 into the equivalent position, 202, of QPDWG
confers approximately 9-fold selectivity for GalNAc over Gal, thereby
providing a partial mimic of RHL-1. The crystal structure of this
mutant complexed with GalNAc (11) revealed that the distal edge of the
His202 imidazole ring directly contacts the methyl group of
the acetamido moiety.
RHL-1 and many other C-type lectins exploit the Ca2+
dependence of sugar binding to release their endocytosed ligands in
endosomes. Acidification of endosomes reduces the affinity for
Ca2+ and hence sugar. The ligand and receptor are sorted
from one another, with the receptor returning to the cell surface for
another round of ligand binding, whereas the ligand is usually
delivered to lysosomes for degradation. For different C-type lectins,
the pH at which Ca2+ affinity is sufficiently weakened to
result in loss of sugar ligands is tuned so that separation of ligand
and receptor occurs in an appropriate endosome. For RHL-1 in isolation,
the pH at which half-maximal sugar binding occurs (pHB) at
1 mM Ca2+ is 7.1 (at 5 mM
Ca2+ pHB is 6.3) (12), which corresponds to the
separation of this receptor from its sugar ligands in mildly acidic
early endosomes. In contrast, MBP-A, which is not an endocytic
receptor, shifts to a state with weaker Ca2+ affinity only
when the pH is reduced to below 5.0. These results indicate that
different pH sensitivity for Ca2+ binding can be encoded in
the common C-type CRD structural framework.
Mutagenesis of the RHL-1 CRD has led to the identification of several
residues that are necessary for release of ligands at endosomal pH. Key
residues include His256, Asp266, and
Arg270. Introduction of these RHL-1 residues at
corresponding positions in MBP-A results in shifts in the pH dependence
of ligand binding. Introduction of His202 to generate the
GalNAc-selective mutant of QPDWG, QPDWG-H, changes pHB from 5.0 to 5.7 at 1 mM Ca2+
and from 3.5 to 5.3 at 4 mM Ca2+ (12).
Inspection of the structure of QPDWG-H (11) reveals that
His202 acts as a hydrogen bond acceptor from the amide
group of Asn210, which is a Ca2+ and sugar
ligand (see Fig. 1a). Introduction of aspartic acid at
position 212 of QPDWG-H to generate the mutant QPDWG-HD, results in an
8-fold reduction in the effective Ca2+ affinity and an
increase in pHB (6.1 at 1 mM Ca2+,
and 5.7 at 4 mM Ca2+), although in the absence
of His202 this substitution has no effect (12). These
results suggest that Asp212 alters the
pKa of His202. Replacement of a loop at
positions 216-218 in QPDWG-HD with the corresponding RHL-1 sequence
Arg-Pro-Tyr produces the mutant QPDWG-HDRPY, which shows a further
5-fold reduction Ca2+ affinity and a raised pHB
(6.4 at 4 mM Ca2+) (12). Although this mutant
binds Ca2+ approximately 15 times more weakly than RHL-1 at
pH 7.8, its properties make it the best available mimic of RHL-1.
Biochemical and structural data on QPDWG-HDRPY presented here provide a
structural basis for the strong GalNAc selectivity of RHL-1. A high
resolution crystal structure of native QPDWG-HDRPY reveals
conformational differences that likely represent intermediates leading
to the loss of Ca2+ at endosomal pH. An intricate network
of interactions appears to be responsible for adjusting the pH at which
Ca2+ is released from the structure.
Protein Expression and Purification--
Following expression in
the previously described bacterial system (12), the arginine residue
that was introduced into QPDWG-HDRPY proved to be accessible to
clostripain digestion. Thus, it was not possible to use clostripain to
remove the N-terminal extension sequence following the approach used in
previous crystallization studies (13). To obviate this problem, the
expression vector was modified by replacing appropriate restriction
fragments with synthetic oligonucleotides to encode a cleavage site for
factor Xa. In the final vector, the sequence encoding the bacterial
ompA signal sequence (14) is followed by the sequence
GCTGAATTAATTCCAAGCTTGGATAAAATCGAGGGTAGA, which is fused to codon 73 of
the MBP-A cDNA (15). The N-terminal sequence of the secreted
protein, which was confirmed by automated Edman degradation, is
Ala-Glu-Leu-Ile-Pro-Ser-Leu-Asp-Lys-Ile-Glu-Gly-Arg-Ala-Ile-Glu-Val-Lys-Leu-Ala. Following cleavage with Factor Xa (New England Biolabs), the new N-terminal sequence Ala-Ile-Glu-Val-Lys-Leu-Ala was again confirmed by
Edman degradation. The resulting protein thus has exactly the same N
terminus as the trimeric fragments of wild type MBP-A and other mutants
previously studied by crystallography (10, 11, 13, 16).
Cultures (6 l) of Escherichia coli strain JA221 containing
the expression plasmid were grown in Luria-Bertani broth containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin at 25 °C to an A550
of 0.8. Following induction with 40 µM
isopropyl- Binding Assays--
Solid phase binding competition assays were
performed using 125I-Gal34-serum albumin as
reporter ligand (9). The results reported are the ratios of
concentrations required for half-maximal competition of binding
(KI values) for Gal and GalNAc, determined using a
nonlinear least-squares fitting program (SigmaPlot, SPSS, Inc.).
Crystallization and Structure Determination--
Lyophilized
protein was dissolved in 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM
CaCl2 and neutralized with 50 mM NaOH to give a
final pH of ~7.5. The protein was diluted to a final concentration of
15-22.5 mg/ml with 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM
CaCl2. Crystals of QPDWG-HDRPY were grown at 20 °C by
hanging drop vapor diffusion, by mixing 1-2 µl of protein solution
with 1-2 µl of reservoir solution containing 13.5% polyethylene
glycol 8,000, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM NaCl, and 20 mM CaCl2 (solution A). Crystals
appeared within 3-4 days and grew to full size in 7-14 days. Prior to
data collection, the crystals were adapted in a stepwise fashion to
solution A plus 0, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20% 2-methyl-2,4-pentanediol
and flash cooled by plunging into liquid nitrogen. The complex with
GalNAc was prepared by including 200 mM GalNAc (Sigma) in
the soaking solutions.
Diffraction data from native and GalNAc-soaked crystals were measured
to maximum Bragg spacings of 1.9 Å on a MAR345 Image plate detector at
the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory beam line 9-1. A total of
166 images were measured from a single native crystal (size 200 × 50 × 50 µm3), with oscillation ranges of 1.2, 1.0, or 0.6° depending on the portion of reciprocal space being measured.
Exposure times were 10 s for the 1.2 and 1.0° sweeps and 5 s for the 0.6° sweep. For the GalNAc-soaked crystal (size 250 × 250 × 60 µm3), 96 1.2° oscillation sweeps were
measured at 60 s/image. The same images were then remeasured with a 10 s/image exposure time to measure reflections that were saturated
in the high dose pass. Intensities were integrated, scaled and merged
with DENZO and SCALEPACK (18) (Table
I).
Crystals of QPDWG-HDRPY are nearly isomorphous with those of the
QPDWG-H mutant and permitted structure solution by rigid body
refinement of the QPDWG-H model (11) against the QPDWG-HDRPY data set.
The temperature factors from the QPDWG-H model were retained, and all
water molecules were omitted from the model. All refinement procedures
employed the maximum likelihood amplitude target in CNS (19). An
overall anisotropic temperature factor and a bulk solvent correction
were applied throughout. The trimer was refined as a single rigid body
against data from 30-2.5 Å (R = 0.398, Rfree = 0.408), and then the protomers were
refined as individual rigid bodies extending the resolution range to
30-2.2 Å (R = 0.363, Rfree = 0.366). After several rounds of positional and isotropic temperature
factor refinement, the side chains of the mutated residues at positions
212 and 216-218 could be seen clearly in the maps and were added to
the model using the program O (20). The electron density maps clearly
indicated that the glycine-rich loop comprising residues 188-197 in
protomer B has a different conformation from that of the search model.
These residues were removed from the model, and after several rounds of
positional and isotropic temperature factor refinement alternating with
manual model adjustment (initially using data from 30-2.2 Å and then
extending the range to 30-1.95 Å), this loop region could be built
unambiguously. Water molecules were assigned to peaks in
Fo GalNAc Selectivity of MBP-A/RHL-1 Chimeras--
Previous studies
have revealed that the imidazole ring of His202 plays a
critical role in preferential binding of GalNAc compared with Gal, as
well as serving as part of the pH-sensing mechanism in the
asialoglycoprotein receptor (11, 12). For this reason, it was of
interest to examine the sugar binding properties of other
asialoglycoprotein receptor mimics created in the context of the CRD
from MBP to assess the possible influence of other residues in this
region (Table II). Addition of
Asp212 (QPDWG-HD) increases selectivity for GalNAc
over Gal from 9- to 14-fold. Remarkably, addition of the Arg-Pro-Tyr
(RPY) sequence to QPDWG-HD generates further selectivity for GalNAc,
with the resulting QPDWG-HDRPY mutant showing a 40-fold preference for GalNAc over Gal. Therefore, introduction of just four residues beyond
the QPDWG-H mutant generates a chimeric protein that displays nearly
the full GalNAc selectivity of RHL-1, as well as having a pH dependence
of sugar binding close to that of the hepatic asialoglycoprotein
receptor (12).
Structural Correlates of GalNAc Selectivity--
To examine the
structural basis for preferential binding of GalNAc, the structure of
QPDWG-HDRPY complexed with GalNAc was determined at 1.95 Å resolution (Tables I and III). The
crystal form used in these studies contains a trimer in the asymmetric unit, providing three independent views of the molecule for each structure. As found in other studies of this crystal form (10, 11),
differences in overall temperature factors lead to copy A of the trimer
being best defined, copy C being slightly less well ordered, and copy B
being the least well defined. Nonetheless, in all three copies the mode
of binding appears to be identical.
The complex with GalNAc can be best understood with reference to the
structures of the QPDWG-H mutant studied previously. The principal
Ca2+ and sugar binding site is
identical to that observed in QPDWG-H, and GalNAc is bound in this site as before (Figs. 1, a and
b, and 2a). The
network of Ca2+ coordination and hydrogen bonds that forms
the ternary protein/Ca2+/sugar complex is retained.
Trp189 and the glycine-rich loop adopt identical positions
in the complex as those in QPDWG-H, with the 5 and 6 positions of
GalNAc stacking over the Trp ring. Thus, the interactions that have
previously been observed to define galactose binding in C-type lectins
(10, 11) are observed in this complex.
There are several novel features of the interaction of GalNAc with
QPDWG-HDRPY arising from additional contacts between the acetamido
moiety and the residues that have been introduced into the MBP
framework. First, there is a water-mediated hydrogen bond between the
NH group of the sugar and Asp212 (Fig. 1, a and
b). Asp212 and the water molecule are positioned
by an elaborate network of hydrogen bonds involving the newly
introduced Arg216 and Tyr218, the
Ca2+ and sugar ligand Glu198, and another water
molecule (Fig. 1, a and b). The geometry of these
interactions appears to be specifically optimized for interaction with
the acetamido moiety. Second, the methyl group of GalNAc forms van der
Waals' contacts with the distal edge of the His202 ring as
described previously (11). However, the imidazole ring is rotated
(
The crystal structure of the major subunit of the human hepatocyte
asialoglycoprotein receptor (human hepatic lectin-1 (HHL-1)) in its
uncomplexed form was recently solved (22). The structures of HHL-1 and
QPDWG-HDRPY are virtually identical in the principal Ca2+-binding site and the glycine-rich loop (Fig.
1d). Of the residues that provide GalNAc specificity,
His202, Asp212, and Arg216, as well
as the water molecules positioned by these residues, are also identical
to their HHL-1 counterparts. There are, however, two significant
differences between HHL-1 and QPDWG-HDRPY; the ring of
Tyr218 is rotated approximately 20° with respect to
Tyr272 of HHL-1, and Ser154, although in the
same general vicinity as Asn208 of HHL-1, is positioned
differently (Fig. 1d). The latter difference can be
attributed to an insertion of one residue in this loop of HHL-1
relative to MBP-A, which moves the backbone slightly. The difference in
the tyrosine ring position appears to be due to several effects. In
HHL-1, Asn208 C
A modest enhancement of GalNAc selectivity is achieved by addition of
Asp212 to QPDWG-H, whereas further addition of the RPY loop
greatly enhances selective GalNAc binding. These data suggest that the precise positioning of Asp212 through its interactions with
Arg216 and Tyr218 is important in creating an
energetically significant water-mediated hydrogen bond with the
N-acetyl amide group. The structure of the QPDWG-HD
mutant3 shows that
Asp212 interacts with His218 found in the
parent MBP-A sequence, changing its position relative to that described
here, so this mutant does not allow dissection of the structural role
of Asp212 from the positioning effect of the RPY loop. The
positioning of Tyr218 by the network of interactions shown
in Fig. 1b appears to orient His202 optimally in
the binding site. The strong preference of the mutant studied here for
GalNAc suggests that the complete network of interactions is essential
in creating a subsite for the N-acetyl group.
Structural Transitions in Ca2+ Binding--
The
structure of QPDWG-HDRPY was determined in its sugar-free form in the
presence of Ca2+. Unlike the case of the GalNAc complex,
the three independent copies of the molecule in the asymmetric unit
show significant differences in structure, with each copy in the native
structure displaying a different conformation in the principal
Ca2+- and sugar-binding site. In copy A, the conformation
of the protein is the same as that in the GalNAc complex (Fig. 2,
a and b). Two water molecules form the same
Ca2+ coordination and hydrogen bonds as the 3- and 4-OH
groups of GalNAc. The replacement of vicinal sugar hydroxyl groups by
waters has been observed previously in wild type and mutant
MBPs4 (7, 10, 16). Thus, copy
A represents a conformation fully competent to bind to sugar ligands.
In copy C, the conformation is similar to copy A, except that in 50%
of the molecules Asn210 adopts a different
Copy B shows the most dramatic conformational differences with respect
to the GalNAc-bound structure. Ca2+ prefers a pentagonal
bipyramidal coordination state, with five oxygen atoms arranged in a
pentagonal plane and two or three ligands at apices 90° away from the
plane. In wild type and mutant MBP sugar complexes studied to
date4 (5-7, 10, 11, 16), side chain oxygen atoms of
Gln185, Asp187, Glu198, and
Asn210, as well as the main chain carbonyl oxygen of
Asp211, form the pentagonal equatorial plane; a side chain
oxygen atom of Asp211 forms one apex, and the 3- and 4-OH
groups of the sugar bisect the other apex to form an eight-coordinated
Ca2+ (QPDWG-HDRPY numbering) (Fig. 2a). This
eight-coordinate arrangement is found in copy A of the native
QPDWG-HDRPY (Fig. 2b). In copy B, however,
Asn210 is rotated out of the site as observed in copy C,
and a water molecule occupies a nearby coordination position (Fig.
2d). The position formerly occupied by the amide group of
Asn210 is replaced by a water molecule, which forms
hydrogen bonds with His202, Asp212, and another
Ca2+-coordinating water molecule. The
In addition to the local changes in the principal Ca2+
site, the glycine-rich loop is dramatically rearrranged in copy B. The loop still adopts a well structured conformation, but it is displaced away from the protein (Fig. 4,
a and b). As part of this change, Trp189 changes position and is considerably more solvent
exposed than when it is packed against the loop in the sugar-binding
conformation. The loop rearrangement cannot be ascribed to a simple
hinge motion, because many of the backbone Ramachandran angles differ
between the two structures. The distal end of the loop forms contacts with neighboring molecules in the lattice, which may explain its order,
but in any case the structure indicates that the loop is dynamic.
The rearrangement of the structure in copy B is reminiscent of changes
in the equivalent region of mannose-binding protein C (MBP-C) upon loss
of Ca2+ (23). In the crystal structure of apo-MBP-C, a
conserved cis-proline in the Ca2+ site (position
194; equivalent to 186 in MBP-A) is observed to isomerize to the
trans-form in some copies of the molecule. The equivalent
Pro186 of QPDWG-HDRPY retains the
cis-configuration, and in this sense is most similar to copy
B of the apo-MBP-C structure (Fig. 4c). Comparison of these
structures (Fig. 4d) shows that the region equivalent to the
glycine-rich loop moves in a similar direction. Thus, copy B may
represent a structural rearrangement related to loss of
Ca2+ from the CRD.
GalNAc Selectivity--
The 40-fold preference of QPDWG-HDRPY for
GalNAc over Gal is nearly as great as the 60-fold preference shown by
RHL-1. The QPDWG-HDRPY structure presented here reveals a specific
subsite for the 2-acetamido group that is formed by an intricate
network of interactions among His202, Asp212,
Arg216, and Tyr218, which are highly conserved
in C-type lectins that display preferential binding to GalNAc.
Comparison with the unliganded structure of the major subunit of the
human hepatocyte asialoglycoprotein receptor (22) reveals that the
present structure is virtually identical in the sugar-binding site.
These observations indicate that the structure of QPDWG-HDRPY in
complex with GalNAc is likely to represent faithfully the mode of
interaction in these proteins.
Unlike the hepatocyte asialoglycoprotein receptor, the macrophage
galactose receptor (MGR) shows no preference for GalNAc over Gal. All
of the RHL-1 residues introduced into QPDWG to give RHL-1-like GalNAc
selectivity, i.e. His202, Asp212,
Arg216, Pro217, and Tyr218 (QPDWG
numbering), are found in the MGR. However, it has been shown that
position 208 of RHL-1 (230 in the MGR) influences the GalNAc
selectivity of this receptor. In RHL-1, this position is asparagine.
Replacement of this asparagine with the valine residue present in MGR
or isoleucine almost abrogates GalNAc selectivity (24). The equivalent
residue in MBP-A is Ser154. Replacement of
Ser154 of QPDWG-H with Val reduces GalNAc selectivity from
9- to 3-fold (11). The structure of QPDWG-H containing
Ser154
In QPDWG-HDRPY, rotation of the His202 imidazole ring is
restricted because of its interaction with Tyr218. The
presence of Val230 in the MGR may therefore be more
disruptive to the GalNAc binding site than observed in the
Ser154 Structural Basis of Altered pH and Ca2+
Affinity--
The three conformations of the uncomplexed QPDWG-HDRPY
observed in the present crystals may represent discrete structural states associated with Ca2+ binding and release by this
protein. The crystals were grown at pH 8.0 at a nominal
Ca2+ concentration of 15 mM. The effective
Ca2+ affinity, KCa, obtained by
assaying sugar ligand binding at pH 7.8 as a function of
Ca2+ is 7.2 mM (12). Thus, the Ca2+
concentration is not much over the KCa, and it
is plausible that three conformations represent intermediates between
Ca2+-bound and -free forms found in solution. The fact that
the three independent copies in the GalNAc-soaked crystals are
identical reflects the fact that sugar and Ca2+ binding are
linked equilibria, so that the effective Ca2+ affinity is
higher in the presence of GalNAc. The change in Ca2+
coordination geometry and the fact that the movement of the
glycine-rich loop in copy B is similar to changes in this region in
Ca2+-free MBP-C (23) suggests that this conformation
represents a structural state on the pathway to Ca2+ release.
Based on the available structural data, the following pathway of
transitions from Ca2+ bound to Ca2+ free forms
of C-type CRDs can be proposed. Copy A of the uncomplexed QPDWG-HDRPY
is identical to the GalNAc bound structure, with the exception of the
two water molecules that substitute for the 3- and 4-OH groups of the
sugar. This structure therefore represents the fully bound
Ca2+ site structure in a conformation competent to bind to
sugar ligands. Copy C is identical to A, except that Asn210
is rotated out of the site. The amide group of the Asn210
side chain serves as a hydrogen bond donor to His202. At
acid pH, His202 will be protonated, making it unable to
accept the Asn210 hydrogen bond. This electrostatic clash
can be relieved by the Asn210 side chain rotation observed
in copy C, and this conformation would represent the first step in
Ca2+ release. This would be followed by the side chain
rotations of Gln185 and Glu193, the resultant
change in coordination geometry and coordination number from 8 to 7 (Fig. 2, f and g), and the movement of the glycine-rich loop observed in copy B (Fig. 4). These changes may be
sufficient to release sugar ligands from the protein. It is not known
whether the Ca2+ is actually released, but if it is this
pathway would ultimately produce a state like that observed in
apo-MBP-C. The changes may be accompanied by loss of the auxiliary
Ca2+. Previous work on the MBPs has shown that the
Ca2+-free state corresponds to an ensemble of
conformations. These include states in which Pro186 of
MBP-A (194 in MBP-C) has isomerized to the
trans-configuration. Kinetic measurements of this transition
have shown that 80% of the Ca2+-free molecules are in the
trans-form (25), and the slow halftime (several minutes) of
cis-trans-proline isomerization slows attainment of the cis-conformation required to bind Ca2+.
It was proposed that this may serve as a kinetic trap to ensure that
receptor and ligand can be sorted from one another (25).
In a recent structure of the fourth CRD from the macrophage mannose
receptor, another C-type lectin, the principal Ca2+ site is
occupied, but the auxiliary site is vacant (26). In this structure, the
principal site is rearranged in a manner inconsistent with the geometry
of mannose binding in the MBPs. Based on these observations, it was
proposed that this CRD may use a different mechanism to release sugar
ligands, in which loss of the auxiliary Ca2+ leads to
changes in the principal site, rendering the latter unable to bind
sugar. Although the macrophage mannose receptor and RHL-1 may differ in
how they sense acid pH, these two distinct kinds of C-type CRDs may
have in common the use of pH-dependent changes outside of
the immediate coordination shell of the principal Ca2+ site
to alter their ability to interact with sugar ligands.
pH Dependence of Ca2+ Binding--
Carbohydrate
binding in the C-type lectins is strictly dependent on the precise
8-fold coordination found in the principal Ca2+ site (4)
(Fig. 2, a, b, and f). This dependence
couples sugar binding with pH. As the pH drops, a higher fraction of
molecules become protonated, resulting in a reduced effective
Ca2+ affinity. MBPs, which are not endocytic receptors,
show a sharp pH dependence of ligand binding, in which binding to
multivalent glycoprotein ligands is lost as the pH is lowered between
5.4 and 4.8. The pHB, defined as the pH at which
half-maximal sugar binding occurs at a given Ca2+
concentration, is 5.0 for the QPDWG mutant of MBP-A at 1 mM
Ca2+ (12). This effect is likely due to direct protonation
of one or more Ca2+ ligands. In contrast, endocytic
receptors such as RHL-1 must release their ligands in more mildly
acidic conditions and show a more gentle dependence of ligand binding
on pH. Mutagenesis of RHL-1 (12) has implicated His256 as
an important determinant of pHB. Introduction of
His202, the equivalent of RHL-1 His256, into
QPDWG raises pHB. Introduction of Asp212
further raises pHB, but Asp212 has no effect
unless His202 is present (12). These data imply that
His202 is largely responsible for the pH sensitivity of
ligand binding.
Although pHB is dependent on the Ca2+
concentration and is therefore not an intrinsic property of the
protein, it is likely to be correlated with the pKa
of His202. At 1 mM Ca2+,
pHB of QPDWG-H is 5.7. The solution pKa
of free histidine is approximately 6.5. The structures of GalNAc-bound
and copy A of native QPDWG-HDRPY show that His202 accepts a
hydrogen bond from Asn210. Protonation of
His202 will disrupt this interaction, so this arrangement
would be expected to lower the effective pKa of
His202. The addition of Asp212 to QPDWG-H
further raises the pHB to 6.1. The present structures show
that Asp212 is approximately 3.9 Å from the N
Addition of the RPY loop to QPDWG-HD further raises the
pHB. Changes in pH dependence produced by introduction of
these residues are likely due to a combination of effects.
Arg216 interacts directly with Asp212, which
would be predicted to lessen the effect of the latter on the
pKa of His202 by neutralizing the
negative charge. It would be expected that the presence of
Arg216 in the vicinity of His202 would lower
the pKa of the histidine. This notion is supported
by the observation that mutation of Arg270 to leucine in
RHL-1 raises the pHB (12). On the other hand, there are two
well ordered water molecules held in position by this arginine and two
acidic residues (Fig. 1, a and b). The network of
interactions (Fig. 1, a and b) serves to position
Tyr218, so that its delocalized
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helix, an
-helical stalk, and a C-terminal
carbohydrate-recognition domain (CRD). The stalk mediates trimerization
of the receptor, probably by formation of a parallel coiled-coil of
-helices (3).2 The CRD is
a member of the C-type (Ca2+-dependent) lectin
superfamily (4). Structural analysis of the homologous C-type CRDs of
rat mannose-binding proteins (MBP-A and MBP-C) (5-7) has shown that
two Ca2+ stabilize an extensive series of loops at one end
of the domain. Sugar ligands interact directly with Ca2+ at
site 2, which is designated the principal Ca2+ site.
Vicinal hydroxyl groups on the pyranose ring of the sugar form both
direct coordination bonds with this Ca2+ and hydrogen bonds
with amino acid side chains that also serve as Ca2+
coordination ligands.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-thiogalactoside and addition of
CaCl2 to a final concentration of 100 mM,
incubation was continued for a further 18 h at 25 °C. Cells
were harvested by centrifugation for 15 min at 4000 × g, suspended in 500 ml of loading buffer (1.25 M
NaCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, and 25 mM
CaCl2) and sonicated with the 4-mm probe of a Branson model
250 sonifier for a total of 10 min in 2-min bursts interspersed with
cooling on ice. Debris was removed by centrifugation for 15 min at
27,000 × g and by further centrifugation for 60 min at
100,000 × g. The supernatant was applied to a column
(5 ml) of galactose-Sepharose, which was washed, eluted, and analyzed
as described previously (17). Eluted protein (approximately 25 mg in 40 ml) was adjusted to 25 mM CaCl2, and
preparative digestion was performed with 200 µg of factor Xa for
16 h at 37 °C. Digested protein was isolated on
galactose-Sepharose and repurified by reverse phase chromatography as
described previously (13, 17).
Data collection statistics for QPDWG-HDRPY
Fc electron density
maps at a contour greater than 3.5
that were within hydrogen
bonding distance from a potential partner. The sugar complex was
refined by similar strategy, starting from the refined model for the
QPDWG-HDRPY data set. As found in other studies of this crystal form
(10, 11), the positioning of GalNAc was unambiguous for protomer A and
C and less well defined for protomer B. Only the
anomer of GalNAc
was modeled. In addition to the three GalNAc residues found in the
principal Ca2+ binding site (one for each protomer),
another GalNAc molecule was found between two protomers, near the end
of the neck and the first
-strand (residues 100-107) of protomer C
and the first
-helix of protomer A. This binding site probably has
no biological relevance and is observed because of the high
concentrations of sugar used in the soaking experiment. The final
native model contains residues 73-226 of each protomer, 412 water
molecules, 9 Ca2+, and 2 Cl
. The GalNAc
complex consists of residues 73-226 of each protomer, 171 water
molecules, 9 Ca2+, 3 Cl
, and 4 molecules of
GalNAc.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
GalNAc selectivity of QPDWG mutants
Refinement statistics for QPDWG-HDRPY

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
GalNAc binding to QPDWG-HDRPY.
a, stereo diagram of the complex. The upper portion of the
CRD backbone is shown in a blue ribbon representation,
except that the glycine-rich loop is shown in red. The
principal Ca2+ is shown as a green sphere.
Selected side chains are shown in ball-and-stick
representation. GalNAc is shown with yellow bonds. Hydrogen
bonds are shown as dashed lines. b, schematic
diagram of the interactions in the GalNAc binding site.
Ca2+ coordination bonds are shown as thin black
lines, hydrogen bonds are red lines, van der Waals'
contacts with the methyl group of GalNAc are blue lines, and
the His202-Tyr218 interaction is a green
arrow. c, closeup of the
His202-Tyr218 interaction, showing the
interaction geometry. Views parallel and perpendicular to the
Tyr218 ring are shown in the left and
right panels, respectively. d,
superposition of the GalNAc subsite of QPDWG-HDRPY and HHL-1 (22),
showing the similarities in structure. HHL-1 is shown with a
green backbone and green bonds, QPDWG-HDRPY is
shown with a blue backbone and side chains in
gray bonds, and the GalNAc bound to QPDWG-HDRPY is shown
with yellow bonds. Oxygen and nitrogen atoms are shown as
red and blue spheres, respectively.
Ca2+ is shown as a large blue-green
sphere.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Coordination in the principal
Ca2+ site of QPDWG-HDRPY. Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen,
and calcium are represented as white, blue,
red, and green spheres, respectively. Hydrogen
bonds are shown as dashed black lines, and Ca2+
coordination bonds are solid green lines. a,
GalNAc complex, copy A. b, native, copy A. c,
native, copy C. The two alternate conformations of Asn210
are shown. d, native, copy B. e, stereo view of
superimposed copy A of the GalNAc complex (white bonds) and
native copy B (yellow bonds). f, schematic
drawing of the 8-coordinate Ca2+ site in native copy A. g, schematic drawing of the rearranged, 7-coordinate
Ca2+ site in native copy B. The diagrams in f
and g are in approximately the same orientation shown in
b and d, respectively, and emphasize the rotation
of the pentagonal equatorial coordination plane.
2) by approximately 60° with respect to its position in the
QPDWG-H structure (Fig. 3). The
repositioning of the His202 ring appears to be due to its
interaction with the aromatic ring of Tyr218. The two rings
are roughly parallel, but are laterally displaced with respect to one
another, and are also slightly canted with their distal portions closer
to one another (Fig. 1c). This arrangement places the
partial positive charge of the His202 side chain near the
-electron system of the Tyr218 ring (Fig.
1b), an electrostatically favorable interaction commonly found in proteins (21).

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Comparison of His202
conformations. The positions of His202 and neighboring
residues in QPDWG-HDRPY (gray bonds), QPDWG-H
(cyan bonds) (11), and QPDWG-H with
Ser154
Val (yellow bonds) (11)
are shown after superposition of the three structures. Residues of
QPDWG-HDRPY are labeled. Tyr218 of QPDWG-HDRPY is a
histidine in QPDWG-H.
is in van der Waals' contact with
Tyr272. Also, in QPDWG-HDRPY, the side chain of
Arg118 would clash with the tyrosine if it were in the
conformation seen in HHL-1. This region is more open in HHL-1 because
of the presence of glycine at the position equivalent to
Arg118 of QPDWG-HDRPY. These differences result in a
relative shift in the tyrosine ring, so that Tyr272 of
HHL-1 does not make a direct cation-
interaction with
His256, unlike the Tyr218-His202
interaction in QPDWG-HDRPY. Despite these differences, Fig.
1d demonstrates that the mode of GalNAc binding observed in
QPDWG-HDRPY provides a good structural mimic of the binding site in the
hepatocyte asialoglycoprotein receptors.
1 rotamer and
is swung out of the Ca2+ site (Fig. 2c). A water
molecule replaces the amide group of Asn210 and forms
hydrogen bonds with His202. In this conformation, the Asn
side chain would have to rotate back to bind Ca2+ and
sugar. Moreover, in this conformation the Asn210 side chain
amide cannot form a hydrogen bond with His202 (Fig. 1,
a and b). In addition to the alternate
conformation of Asn210, Ser154, which forms a
hydrogen bond with the other side of the His202 imidazole
ring, adopts two conformations. In the ligand-bound conformation, the
singly protonated His202 gives an unambiguous arrangement
of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors (Fig. 1b);
His202 is a hydrogen bond acceptor from Asn210
and is a donor to the OH group of Ser154. In the alternate
Asn210 conformation, however, the location of the proton on
His202 is not defined uniquely.
3 angle of
Glu198 changes by approximately 75° (Fig. 2e).
The
3 angle of Gln185 also shows small differences
relative to the sugar-bound structure (Fig. 2e). These
changes produce an altered Ca2+ coordination geometry, such
that the pentagonal equatorial plane of the eight-coordinated, ligand
bound state (Fig. 2f) is rotated approximately 90° with
respect to the sugar-binding conformation. Side chain oxygen atoms of
Gln185, Glu198, and Asp211, along
with two water molecules, form the equatorial pentagonal plane (Fig.
2g). The main chain carbonyl oxygen of Asp211
and a side chain oxygen of Asp187 form the two apices,
giving a seven-coordinate state. Thus, the coordination number and
geometry is altered in copy B, with oxygen atoms from
Asp187 and Asp211 now, respectively, apical and
equatorial, reversing their roles in the sugar-bound structure (Fig. 2,
f and g).

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Conformational differences around the
principal Ca2+ site. The color scheme is the same as
in Fig. 1a. Ca2+ 1 and 2 are the auxiliary and
principal sites, respectively. a, native QPDWG-HDRPY, copy
A. b, native QPDWG-HDRPY, copy B. c, copy B of
apo-MBP-C (23). d, superposition of QPDWG-HDRPY copy A
(blue), QPDWG-HDRPY copy B (red), and apo-MBP-C
copy B (green).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Val showed that the
-branched methyl group
sterically forces the imidazole ring of His202 to rotate
25°, but the van der Waals' contacts with the acetamido methyl group
are retained (Fig. 3) (11). The relationship of the altered
His202 position to the reduced GalNAc affinity is unclear
from this structure. It should be noted that the rotation of the
His202 ring in the presence of Val154 relative
to its position in QPDWG-H is opposite to the direction that would be
needed to superimpose it on that in QPDWG-HDPRY (Fig. 3).
Val mutant of QPDWG-H (11). In particular, the
steric clash between valine and the imidazole ring cannot be relieved
without forcing the ring of Tyr218 to move. This in turn
would disrupt the intricate network of hydrogen bonds in the acetamido
subsite. It must be noted that the natural galactose receptors contain
an extra residue in the loop that contains Ser154 in
QPDWG-HDRPY, and the position of these residues is not strictly equivalent (Fig. 1d). Ultimately, structural analysis will
be required to determine the effects of
-branched amino acids at this position.
2
imidazole nitrogen of His202. This distance is too long for
a hydrogen bond interaction but would be expected to provide a
significant perturbation of the electrostatic environment of
His202. In particular, the presence of negative charge
would be predicted to favor protonation of His202 and raise
the pKa.
-electron system forms
an electrostatically favorable interaction with His202.
Formation of a hydrogen bond by the phenolic hydroxyl proton with
Asp212 will enhance the partial negative charge of the
aromatic system. Protonation of His202 would be expected to
enhance this interaction, as has been observed in other systems (27).
As noted above, however, the position of Tyr270 in HHL-1
differs slightly from that of Tyr218 in QPDWG-HDRPY (Fig.
1d), so that a direct cation-
interaction with
His256 does not exist in HHL-1. Nonetheless, the proximity
of the delocalized
system of the tyrosine may provide a small
electrostatic contribution that would tend to raise the
pKa of His202. Finally, as discussed
above, Val230 of the MGR, equivalent to Ser154
of QPDWG-HDRPY, would be expected to disrupt this network, which may
account for the fact that the pHB of 6.3 (1 mM
Ca2+) found for the
MGR5 is lower than the
pHB of RHL-1. Collectively, these observations indicate
that the interactions of the Asp212, Arg216,
Tyr218, and water must influence the electrostatic
environment of His202 to alter its pKa.
A more detailed dissection of the contributions of these residues
awaits direct measurement of the His202
pKa and detailed electrostatic calculations.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Markus Meier and Peter Burkhard for providing the HHL-1 coordinates prior to general release. We thank Andy May and Katy Spink for data collection at Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory and for comments on the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Grants 041845 and 054508 from the Wellcome Trust (to K. D.) and Grant GM50565 from the National Institutes of Health (to W. I. W.). This work is based upon research conducted at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, which is funded by the Department of Energy and the National Institutes of Health (NCRR and NIGMS).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1FIF and 1FIH) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Structural Biology, Fairchild Bldg., Stanford University School of Medicine, 299 Campus Dr. West, Stanford, CA 94305-5126. E-mail: bill.weis@stanford.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 7, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005557200
2 A. K. Powell and K. Drickamer, unpublished observations.
3 B. Zagrovic, H. Feinberg, A. Kolatkar, K. Drickamer, W. Weis, unpublished data.
4 A Kolatkar, K. Ng, S. Park-Snyder, K. Drickamer, W. Weis, manuscript in preparation.
5 H. Dobbyn and S. Wragg, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: GalNAc, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine; CRD, carbohydrate recognition domain; HHL, human hepatic lectin; MBP, mannose-binding protein; RHL, rat hepatic lectin; MGR, macrophage galactose receptor.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Spiess, M. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 10009-10018 |
| 2. | Halberg, D. F., Wager, R. E., Farrell, D. C., Hildreth, J., IV, Quesenberry, M. S., Loeb, J. A., Holland, E. C., and Drickamer, K. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 9828-9838 |
| 3. | Beavil, A. J., Edmeades, R. L., Gould, H. J., and Sutton, B. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 753-757 |
| 4. | Weis, W. I., Taylor, M. E., and Drickamer, K. (1998) Immunol. Rev. 163, 19-34 |
| 5. | Weis, W. I., Kahn, R., Fourme, R., Drickamer, K., and Hendrickson, W. A. (1991) Science 254, 1608-1615 |
| 6. | Weis, W. I., Drickamer, K., and Hendrickson, W. A. (1992) Nature 360, 127-134 |
| 7. | Ng, K. K.-S., Drickamer, K., and Weis, W. I. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 663-674 |
| 8. | Drickamer, K. (1992) Nature 360, 183-186 |
| 9. | Iobst, S. T., and Drickamer, K. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 15512-15519 |
| 10. | Kolatkar, A. R., and Weis, W. I. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6679-6685 |
| 11. | Kolatkar, A. R., Leung, A. K., Isecke, R., Brossmer, R., Drickamer, K., and Weis, W. I. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19502-19508 |
| 12. | Wragg, S., and Drickamer, K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 35400-35406 |
| 13. | Weis, W. I., and Drickamer, K. (1994) Structure 2, 1227-1240 |
| 14. | Ghrayeb, J., Kimura, H., Takhara, M., Hsiung, H., Masui, Y., and Inouye, M. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 2437-2442 |
| 15. | Drickamer, K., Dordal, M. S., and Reynolds, L. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 6878-6886 |
| 16. | Ng, K. K.-S., and Weis, W. I. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 979-988 |
| 17. | Weis, W. I., Crichlow, G. V., Murthy, H. M. K., Hendrickson, W. A., and Drickamer, K. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 20678-20686 |
| 18. | Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326 |
| 19. | Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921 |
| 20. | Jones, T. A., Zou, J.-Y., Cowan, S. W., and Kjeldgaard, M. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 47, 110-119 |
| 21. | Gallivan, J. P., and Dougherty, D. A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 9459-9464 |
| 22. | Meier, M., Bider, M. D., Malashkevich, V. N., Spiess, M., and Burkhard, P. (2000) J. Mol. Biol. 300, 857-865 |
| 23. | Ng, K. K.-S., Park-Snyder, S., and Weis, W. I. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17965-17976 |
| 24. | Iobst, S. T., and Drickamer, K. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6686-6693 |
| 25. | Ng, K. K.-S., and Weis, W. I. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17977-17989 |
| 26. | Feinberg, H., Park-Snyder, S., Kolatkar, A. R., Heise, C. T., Taylor, M. E., and Weis, W. I. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 21539-21548 |
| 27. | Loewenthal, R., Sancho, J., and Fersht, A. R. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 224, 759-770 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Powlesland, T. Fisch, M. E. Taylor, D. F. Smith, B. Tissot, A. Dell, S. Pohlmann, and K. Drickamer A Novel Mechanism for LSECtin Binding to Ebola Virus Surface Glycoprotein through Truncated Glycans J. Biol. Chem., January 4, 2008; 283(1): 593 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Feinberg, M. E. Taylor, and W. I. Weis Scavenger Receptor C-type Lectin Binds to the Leukocyte Cell Surface Glycan Lewisx by a Novel Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., June 8, 2007; 282(23): 17250 - 17258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yura, M. Ishihara, Y. Kanatani, B. Takase, H. Hattori, S. Suzuki, M. Kawakami, and T. Matsui Interaction Study between Synthetic Glycoconjugate Ligands and Endocytic Receptors Using Flow Cytometry. J. Biochem., April 1, 2006; 139(4): 637 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Appenzeller-Herzog, A.-C. Roche, O. Nufer, and H.-P. Hauri pH-induced Conversion of the Transport Lectin ERGIC-53 Triggers Glycoprotein Release J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12943 - 12950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hatakeyama, K. Shiba, N. Matsuo, T. Fujimoto, T. Oda, H. Sugawara, and H. Aoyagi Characterization of Recombinant CEL-I, a GalNAc-Specific C-Type Lectin, Expressed in Escherichia coli Using an Artificial Synthetic Gene J. Biochem., January 1, 2004; 135(1): 101 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Fadden, O. J. Holt, and K. Drickamer Molecular characterization of the rat Kupffer cell glycoprotein receptor Glycobiology, July 1, 2003; 13(7): 529 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||