JBC PeproTech; Our Business is Cytokines!

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M005991200 on August 16, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 45, 35491-35498, November 10, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/45/35491    most recent
M005991200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kronfeld, I.
Right arrow Articles by Brodie, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kronfeld, I.
Right arrow Articles by Brodie, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Phosphorylation of Protein Kinase Cdelta on Distinct Tyrosine Residues Regulates Specific Cellular Functions*

Ilana KronfeldDagger , Gila KazimirskyDagger , Patricia S. Lorenzo§, Susan H. Garfield, Peter M. Blumberg§, and Chaya BrodieDagger ||

From the Dagger  Gonda (Goldschmied) Medical Diagnosis Research Center, Faculty of Life-Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel and the § Laboratory of Cellular Carcinogenesis and Tumor Promotion and the  Laboratory of Experimental Carcinogenesis, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

Received for publication, July 7, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein kinase Cdelta (PKCdelta ) inhibits proliferation and decreases expression of the differentiation marker glutamine synthetase (GS) in C6 glioma cells. Here, we report that distinct, specific tyrosine residues on PKCdelta are involved in these two responses. Transfection of cells with PKCdelta mutated at tyrosine 155 to phenylalanine caused enhanced proliferation in response to 12-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, whereas GS expression resembled that for the PKCdelta wild-type transfectant. Conversely, transfection with PKCdelta mutated at tyrosine 187 to phenylalanine resulted in increased expression of GS, whereas the rate of proliferation resembled that of the PKCdelta wild-type transfectant. The tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta and the decrease in GS expression induced by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) were abolished by the Src kinase inhibitors PP1 and PP2. In response to PDGF, Fyn associated with PKCdelta via tyrosine 187. Finally, overexpression of dominant negative Fyn abrogated the decrease in GS expression and reduced the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta induced by PDGF. We conclude that the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta and its association with tyrosine kinases may be an important point of divergence in PKC signaling.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein kinase C (PKC)1 comprises a family of phospholipid-dependent serine-threonine kinases that play important roles in signal transduction of various physiological stimuli, including growth factors, hormones, and neurotransmitters (1-3). Activation of PKC leads to the phosphorylation of proteins that are involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis (4-7). PKC consists of at least 11 isoforms showing diversity in their structures, cellular distributions, and biological functions (8). The members of the classical PKCs alpha , beta 1, beta 2, and gamma  bind phorbol esters and are Ca2+-dependent. The novel PKCs delta , epsilon , eta , and theta  do not depend on Ca2+ but bind phorbol esters. The third subfamily includes the atypical PKCs (PKCzeta and PKCiota /lambda ), which do not bind either Ca2+ or phorbol esters, and PKCµ, which exhibits unique characteristics (9). All PKC isoforms can be divided into an N-terminal regulatory domain and a C-terminal catalytic domain with serine-threonine kinase activity (10, 11). Both domains contain conserved (C) regions of extended sequence homology and variable (V) regions. In the classical PKC isoforms the regulatory domain contains a Ca2+-binding domain, and in both the classical and novel PKC isoforms it contains a pair of highly conserved zinc fingers (C1 domains) that bind phorbol esters and a pseudosubstrate region (12-14). PKC chimeras have been used to study the role of the regulatory and catalytic domains of different PKC isoforms.

PKCdelta is a widely expressed member of the novel PKCs (15). This isoform has been associated with the proliferation of various cells in a cell type-specific manner. For example, PKCdelta inhibited the proliferation of smooth muscle cells (16) and glial cells (17) and caused cell arrest at the G2/M phase of the cell cycle in Chinese hamster ovary cells (18). In contrast, in breast cancer cells PKCdelta has been shown to increase tumorigenicity (19). PKCdelta has also been reported to play a role in cell differentiation. Thus, PKCdelta has been shown to undergo translocation and activation during differentiation of keratinocytes (20) and overexpression of this isoform induced squamous (21) and myeloid cell differentiation (22).

Recent studies suggest that PKCdelta associates with different tyrosine kinases and that this association can induce the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta itself and can affect the activity of both the tyrosine kinases and PKC (15). PKCdelta has been shown to be tyrosine phosphorylated in response to various stimuli such as PMA, EGF, PDGF (23-25), ligands for the IgE receptor (26, 27), ATP, and H2O2 (28). The phosphorylation site(s) and the role of tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta in its activity and in its function are just beginning to be understood. Two specific sites in the regulatory domain, tyrosines 187 and 52, have been reported so far to be phosphorylated in response to PDGF and Fcepsilon RI, respectively (29), and tyrosine 311 has been shown to be phosphorylated by Src (30). In contrast, tyrosine residues in the catalytic domain of PKCdelta have been reported to be phosphorylated in response to H2O2 (28).

In a recent study (23), we found that in C6 glioma cells tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta in the regulatory domain mediated the inhibitory effect of this isoform on the expression of the astrocytic marker, glutamine synthetase (GS). In the present study, we found that tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta also plays a role in the inhibitory effect of PKCdelta on cell proliferation and have identified different tyrosine residues that are involved in the selective effects of PKCdelta on cell proliferation and GS expression.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- PDGF and an affinity-purified polyclonal anti-PKCepsilon antibody against a polypeptide corresponding to amino acids 726-737 of PKCepsilon were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Monoclonal anti-PKC and anti-GS antibodies were obtained from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Polyclonal anti-PKC antibodies and anti-Src, -Fyn, and -Lyn antibodies were from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA). PMA was from Alexis Co. (San Diego, CA). Leupeptin, aprotinin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and sodium vanadate were obtained from Sigma.

Generation of PKC Chimeras-- The PKC chimeras were generated by exchanging the regulatory and catalytic domains of PKCalpha , -delta , and -epsilon as described by Acs et al. (31). PKCalpha /delta refers to the chimera with the PKCalpha regulatory domain and the PKCdelta catalytic domain, and PKCdelta /alpha refers to the reciprocal chimera. The PKC cDNAs were subcloned into the metallothionein promoter-driven eukaryotic expression vector (MTH). The vector sequence encodes a C-terminal PKCepsilon -derived 12-amino acid tag (epsilon MTH) that is added to the expressed proteins (44). The expression of these chimeras and their activities in C6 cells were described recently (23).

Site-directed Mutagenesis of PKCdelta -- Mouse PKCdelta was cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega, Madison, WI) as described previously (23). This plasmid served as our "master" vector for the site-directed mutagenesis, using the Transformer Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). Conversion of tyrosine residues at sites 52, 64, 155, 187, and 565 into phenylalanine was performed as described previously (23). PKCdelta and the PKCdelta mutants were subcloned into the metallothionein promoter-driven eukaryotic expression vector (epsilon MTH).

Construction of PKCdelta -GFP Fusion Protein-- cDNAs encoding the murine PKCdelta and the various PKCdelta mutants were fused into the N-terminal-enhanced GFP vector pEGFP-N1 (CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). The original pEGFP-N1 vector was modified by the insertion of an MluI site in the plasmid polylinker. The restriction site was created by ligating a phosphorylated linker containing the MluI site into pEGFP-N1 digested with SmaI. The construct was verified by sequencing. The clones containing the GFP-PKCdelta - or GFP-fused to the different PKCdelta mutants were constructed by the excision of PKCdelta or the specific mutants from MTH-PKC plasmids by digestion with XhoI and MluI. The inserts were then ligated into the modified GFP vector using the same restriction sites. DNA sequencing of the GFP-PKC constructs confirmed the intended reading frame.

C6 Glial Cultures and Cell Transfection-- C6 cells of late passages (50), that exhibit an astrocytic phenotype, were used in this study. Cells of these passages showed somewhat smaller response to overexpression of PKCdelta as compared with the C6 cells of passage 30, which exhibit progenitor properties (17, 23). For the current studies we chose cells of late passages, because we wanted to focus on the effects of PKCdelta on the expression of GS and not on general aspects of cell differentiation. Cells (1 × 105 cells/ml) were seeded on tissue culture dishes (10 cm) and were grown in medium consisting of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, penicillin (50 units/ml), and streptomycin (0.05 mg/ml). The cells were transfected either with the empty vectors, the different PKCdelta expression vectors, or a Fyn dominant negative mutant in pSG5 (kindly provided by Alan P. Saltiel) using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.) as described previously (17). Experiments were routinely carried out on a clone of the transfected cells, but all the results were confirmed on one pool and two additional individual clones.

For overexpression of the GFP-PKCdelta fusion proteins, C6 cells were seeded onto 40-mm round glass coverslips at a density of 5 × 104 cells/coverslip. Twenty-four hours later, cells were transfected with the different GFP-PKCdelta constructs using LipofectAMINE Plus reagent according to the manufacturer's instructions. All experiments were performed 48 h post-transfection.

Preparation of Cell Homogenates-- Cells were washed and resuspended in serum-free medium. The plates were placed on ice, scraped with a rubber policeman, and centrifuged at 1,400 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were aspirated, and the cell pellets were resuspended in 100 µl of lysis buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 2% Nonidet P-40, 0.2% SDS, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 µg/ml aprotinin, 50 µM leupeptin, 0.5 mM Na3VO4) on ice for 15 min. The cell lysates were centrifuged for 15 min at 14,000 rpm in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge, supernatants were removed, and 2× sample buffer was added.

Immunoblot Analysis-- Lysates (20 µg of protein) were resolved by SDS-PAGE (10%) and were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% dry milk in phosphate-buffered saline and subsequently stained with the primary antibody. Specific reactive bands were detected using a goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Bio-Rad), and the immunoreactive bands were visualized by the ECL Western blotting detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Immunoprecipitation-- Immunoprecipitation was performed as described previously (23). Briefly, C6 cells overexpressing PKCdelta or the PKCdelta mutants were serum-starved overnight and treated for different periods of time with PMA (10 nM) or PDGF (100 ng/ml). The samples were preabsorbed with 25 µl of protein A/G-Sepharose (50%) for 10 min, and immunoprecipitation was performed using 4 µg/ml antibody for 1 h at 4 °C and then incubated with 30 µl of A/G-Sepharose for an additional hour. Following washes, the pellets were resuspended in 25 µl of SDS sample buffer and boiled for 5 min. The entire supernatants were subjected to Western blotting. Membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed and visualized by the ECL system.

PKC Kinase Assay-- PKC activity was assayed by measuring the incorporation of 32P from [gamma -32P]ATP into substrate in the presence of 100 µg/ml phosphatidylserine and 1 µM PMA as described previously (23).

Cell Proliferation Assay-- Cells overexpressing the wild-type PKCdelta or the PKCdelta mutants were seeded in triplicate and incubated in the absence or presence of ZnCl2 (20 µM) for 24 h followed by treatment with PMA (30 nM) for an additional 48 h. Cells were pulsed with 0.5 µCi of [3H]thymidine for the last 6 h and then harvested. The incorporation of [3H]thymidine was determined in a Beckman Scintillation counter.

Confocal Microscopy-- Confocal fluorescent images were collected with a Bio-Rad MRC 1024 confocal scan head (Bio-Rad) mounted on a Nikon microscope with a 60× planapochromat lens. Excitation at 488 nm was generated by a krypton-argon gas laser with a 522/32 emission filter for green fluorescence. For kinetics of GFP-PKCdelta translocation in living cells, cells plated on a 40-mm-round coverslip were enclosed in a Bioptechs Focht Chamber System (Bioptechs, Butler, PA). The chamber was inverted and attached to the microscope stage with a custom stage adapter; a temperature controller set at 37 °C was connected, and medium was perfused through the chamber with a Lambda microperfusion pump. Sequential images of the same cell were collected at various time points using LaserSharp Software.

Statistical Analysis-- The results are presented as the mean values ± S.E. All data were analyzed using a paired Student's t test to determine the level of difference between the treatments.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Regulatory Domain of PKCdelta and Its Tyrosine Phosphorylation Mediate the Decrease in Cell Proliferation Induced by PMA-- In a recent study we demonstrated that the regulatory domain of PKCdelta mediated its inhibitory effect on the expression of the astrocytic marker GS (23). To characterize the effect of PKCdelta on C6 cell proliferation we first examined the relative contributions of the regulatory and catalytic domains of this isoform. For these studies, we used chimeras between the regulatory and catalytic domains of PKCalpha , -delta , and -epsilon , combined at the highly conserved hinge region. The expression and activity of C6 cells overexpressing the different chimeras were already described previously (23).

Cells were pretreated for 24 h with ZnCl2, followed by PMA treatment (20 nM) for an additional 48 h. This concentration of PMA induced prolonged activation of PKCdelta without marked down-regulation. Cells overexpressing PKCdelta /delta exhibited a lower rate of cell proliferation than control cells. In contrast, cells overexpressing PKCalpha /alpha and epsilon /epsilon exhibited a higher rate of cell proliferation than controls both in the presence and absence of PMA. Similar to cells expressing PKCdelta /delta , cells overexpressing the chimeras containing the regulatory domain of PKCdelta , namely delta /alpha and delta /epsilon , also showed a reduced level of cell proliferation, whereas cells expressing chimeras containing the catalytic domain of PKCdelta together with the regulatory domain of PKCalpha or -epsilon exhibited an increased level of proliferation similar to that observed with cells expressing PKCalpha /alpha or PKCepsilon /epsilon (Fig. 1A). Untreated cells overexpressing PKCdelta /delta or chimeras containing the regulatory domain of PKCdelta also showed decreased cell proliferation as compared with control vector cells, but the magnitude of this decrease was much lower than that observed in PMA-treated cells (Fig. 1A).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Proliferation of C6 cells overexpressing different PKC chimeras and the PKCdelta 5 mutant. C6 cells overexpressing different PKC chimeras (A) or the PKCdelta 5 mutant (B) were plated in 24-well plates in the absence and presence of PMA (20 nM) for 48 h. [3H]Thymidine was added to the cells for the last 6 h, and the assay was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." The results are expressed as the percent of the control untreated cells and represent the mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.002, as compared with control untreated cells.

We reported that the expression of the PKCdelta 5 mutant (in which tyrosines 52, 64, 155, 187, and 565 were mutated to phenylalanine) in C6 cells abolished the decrease in the expression of the astrocytic marker GS induced by PMA or PDGF. Expression of the PKCdelta 5 mutant also resulted in a lower tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta in response to these treatments (23). Using cells expressing PKCdelta 5 we found that in response to PMA (20 nM) these cells displayed enhanced proliferation as compared with vector control cells, contrasting with cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT which exhibited a significantly lower proliferative response (Fig. 1B). Similar results were obtained when the proliferation of C6 cells expressing PKCdelta and PKCdelta 5 was followed over the course of 5 days (data not shown).

Overexpression of PKCdelta Mutants-- To identify the specific tyrosines that are involved in the inhibitory effect of PKCdelta on cell proliferation and GS expression, we examined the role of tyrosines 52, 155,and 187, which were already reported to be phosphorylated in other systems (25, 29). C6 cells were stably transfected with PKCdelta mutants in which one of these three tyrosines was mutated to phenylalanine. Fig. 2A illustrates a representative Western blot of C6 cells overexpressing PKCdelta , PKCdelta 5, PKCdelta Y155F, PKCdelta Y187F, and PKCdelta Y52F mutants, and the vector control. Using the previously described tagging system (44), we were able to detect specifically the transfected PKC isoforms using an antibody against the PKCepsilon epitope tag on the constructs. The levels of the overexpressed PKCdelta WT and the PKCdelta mutants in the transfected cells we used were 8-10-fold higher than the endogenous PKCdelta as determined using an anti-PKCdelta specific antibody (data not shown). Cells overexpressing PKCdelta or the PKCdelta mutants expressed similar levels of PKCalpha , -beta , -gamma , -epsilon , -eta , -theta , -zeta , and -µ (data not shown), thus excluding the possibility that the different effects of PKCdelta , and the PKCdelta mutants were indirectly mediated by changes in the expression of the other PKC isoforms. To establish that the overexpressed PKCdelta mutants were functionally active, we measured kinase activity on cell lysates. All PKCdelta mutants expressed higher kinase activity as compared with the control vector cells (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Expression of the PKCdelta mutants. Stable transfectants of C6 cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT, the various PKCdelta mutants, or the empty vector (M) were harvested and subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. The membranes were probed with anti-epsilon antibody, which recognized the epsilon -tag (A). Cell lysates of C6 clones overexpressing PKCdelta WT or the different PKC mutants were analyzed for kinase activity by measuring 32P incorporation into substrate in the presence of 1 µM PMA and 100 µg/ml phosphatidylserine. The values for the PKCdelta and the PKCdelta mutants are expressed as percent of control (empty vector cells) (B). The results represent one of three separate experiments which gave similar results.

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the PKCdelta Mutants by PMA and PDGF-- The degree of tyrosine phosphorylation of the various PKCdelta mutants was examined in response to PMA and PDGF. As illustrated in Fig. 3, a small basal level of tyrosine phosphorylation was observed in untreated cells. PMA and PDGF induced marked tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta WT but, as already described, no significant degree of enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta 5 (p > 0.07, n = 5). The degree of tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta Y155F and PKCdelta Y187F in response to PMA was intermediate between that of PKCdelta WT and that of the PKCdelta 5 mutant, suggesting that both tyrosines 155 and 187 are being phosphorylated in response to PMA. In contrast, cells overexpressing PKCdelta Y52F exhibited a level of tyrosine phosphorylation similar to that of PKCdelta WT, suggesting that this tyrosine may not be phosphorylated in response to PMA. As already described, PDGF also induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta and this effect was abolished in the PKCdelta 5 cells. We found that treatment of cells overexpressing PKCdelta Y187F with PDGF resulted in a very low tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta . In contrast, PDGF-stimulated cells overexpressing PKCdelta Y155F or PKCdelta Y52F exhibited similar levels of tyrosine phosphorylation to those observed in cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta mutants in response to PMA and PDGF. C6 cells transfected with PKCdelta WT or the PKCdelta mutants were treated with either PMA (20 nM) or PDGF (100 ng/ml) for 20 min. Cells were then harvested, and immunoprecipitation of PKCdelta was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Following SDS-PAGE, membranes were stained with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (anti-Tyr(P)) or with anti-PKCdelta antibody. The results represent one of three separate experiments which gave similar results.

Tyrosine 155 Mediates the Inhibitory Effect of PKCdelta on Cell Proliferation, whereas Tyrosine 187 Mediates the Inhibitory Effect of PKCdelta on GS Expression-- We then examined the degree of cell proliferation and GS expression in cells overexpressing the different PKC mutants. We found that, in response to PMA, cells overexpressing PKCdelta Y155F displayed an increased cell proliferation over control vector expressing cells and significantly increased proliferation compared with cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, the degree of cell proliferation in the PKCdelta Y155F cells was similar to that obtained with the PKCdelta 5 overexpressing cells. In contrast, cells overexpressing the PKCdelta Y187F or PKCdelta Y52F mutant exhibited a reduced degree of cell proliferation as compared with vector control cells and were similar to cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Proliferation and GS expression of C6 cells overexpressing the PKCdelta mutants. C6 cells overexpressing PKCdelta or the PKCdelta mutants were plated in 24-well plates in the absence and presence of PMA (20 nM) for 48 h. [3H]Thymidine was added to the cells for the last 6 h, and the assay was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures" (A). The results are expressed as the percent of the control untreated cells and represent the mean ± S.E. of five separate experiments. For GS expression, stable transfectants of PKCdelta WT or the PKCdelta mutants were treated with PDGF (100 ng/ml) for 48 h. Cells were harvested, and the level of GS was determined using Western blot analysis (B). The results are from one representative experiment out of four separate experiments. *, p < 0.02; **, p < 0.001, as compared with control untreated cells.

The effects of the PKCdelta mutants were also examined on the expression of GS in response to PDGF. Cells were pretreated for 24 h with ZnCl2 and then with PDGF (100 ng/ml) for an additional 48 h. As described previously, cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT exhibited lower levels of GS expression upon PDGF treatments, whereas cells overexpressing PKCdelta 5 exhibited increased levels of GS compared with vector control cells. Cells overexpressing PKCdelta Y155F or PKCdelta Y52F exhibited lower GS expression in PDGF-treated cells similar to the level obtained in cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT. Opposite results were obtained in cells overexpressing PKCdelta Y187F. These cells exhibited an increased expression of GS in response to stimulation with PDGF, similar to the results obtained in cells overexpressing PKCdelta 5 (Fig. 4B). Similar results with the mutants were obtained in cells treated with 20 nM PMA (data not shown).

Translocation and Degradation of PKCdelta and the PKCdelta Mutants-- One possible explanation for the differential effect of the mutants on cell proliferation and GS expression is translocation to different cellular compartments following stimulation. We therefore examined the translocation of the different PKCdelta mutants in response to PMA and PDGF. For these experiments we used GFP-tagged PKCdelta WT or the different PKCdelta mutants. Cells were transiently transfected with the specific GFP-PKCdelta mutants, and the response of the cells to PMA or PDGF was monitored over a period of 30 min. Stimulation of the cells with 100 nM PMA induced initial translocation of PKCdelta to the plasma membrane followed by some translocation of PKCdelta to the perinuclear membrane (Fig. 5). PDGF also induced translocation of PKCdelta , but the magnitude of this translocation was much lower than that induced by PMA. PDGF induced some membranal translocation of PKCdelta and distribution of PKCdelta around the perinuclear membrane (Fig. 5). A similar pattern of translocation was observed for PKCdelta and the PKCdelta mutants in response to PMA (Fig. 6) and PDGF (data not shown). Thus, PMA induced translocation of the PKCdelta mutants to both the plasma membrane and the perinuclear membrane (Fig. 6). The kinetics of the translocation as well as the response to lower concentrations of PMA were likewise similar in all of the mutants (data not shown). PMA or PDGF did not induce any changes in cells overexpressing GFP protein alone (data not shown).


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Kinetics of PKCdelta translocation in response to PMA and PDGF. Cells were transiently transfected with GFP-PKCdelta . Following 48 h, cells were treated with either PMA (100 nM) (A) or PDGF (100 ng/ml) (B), and sequential confocal images were taken every 30 s for a period of 30 min. The figures present images taken at time 0, 10, and 30 min after treatment. Cells shown are representative of four independent experiments.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Cellular localization of PKCdelta and the PKCdelta mutants in PMA-treated C6 cells. Cells were transiently transfected with GFP-PKCdelta or the different GFP-PKCdelta mutants. Following 48 h, cells were treated with PMA (100 nM), and sequential confocal images were taken every 30 s for a period of 30 min. The figures present images taken at time 0 (-PMA) and 30 min (+PMA) after treatment. Cells shown are representative of four independent experiments.

Recent studies suggested that tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta may play a role in its degradation (30). Since the inhibitory effects of PMA on GS expression and cell proliferation require a prolonged exposure of the cells to PMA, we examined whether the various PKCdelta mutants exhibit different degrees of degradation as compared with PKCdelta WT. For these experiments, cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT or the PKCdelta mutants were treated for 24 h with a range of concentrations of PMA, and the expression was examined by Western blot analysis using the anti-epsilon tag antibody. PMA induced a dose-dependent decrease in the expression of the exogenous PKCdelta WT. Similar results were obtained for PKCdelta 5 or the different PKCdelta mutants (data not shown).

Phosphorylation of PKCdelta by PDGF Is Inhibited by PP1 and PP2-- To examine the role of Src-related kinases in the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta , we employed the Src kinase inhibitors PP1 and PP2. Pretreatment of the cells with either PP1 or PP2 abolished the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta in response to PDGF (Fig. 7A). PP1 and PP2 also abrogated the inhibitory effect of PKCdelta on GS expression (Fig. 7B), providing further support that the tyrosine-phosphorylated form of PKCdelta is involved in the inhibition of GS expression. Since PP1 has also been reported to inhibit the kinase activity of the PDGFRbeta at a similar concentration range (30), our results suggest that either Src-related kinases or the PDGFRbeta are involved in the phosphorylation of PKCdelta in response to PDGF.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   PP1 and PP2 inhibit the PDGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta and the decrease in GS expression. C6 cells were treated with PP1 or PP2 for 1 h following by stimulation with PDGF for an additional 15 min (A). Cells were then harvested and immunoprecipitation of PKCdelta was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Following SDS-PAGE, membranes were stained with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (anti-Tyr(P)) or with anti-PKCdelta antibody. C6 cells were pretreated with PP1 or PP2 for 1 h and then with PDGF for 48 h (B). GS expression was determined using Western blot analysis. The results represent one of three separate experiments that gave similar results.

Association of PKCdelta with Src-related Kinases-- To examine the association of PKCdelta with Src-related kinases we performed co-immunoprecipitation of PKCdelta with Src, Fyn, and Lyn. We found that in unstimulated C6 cells PKCdelta was constitutively associated with p60Src (Fig. 8A). Stimulation of the cells with either PMA or PDGF for 1-60 min did not induce further association of PKCdelta with Src (data not shown). In contrast, PDGF induced association of Fyn with PKCdelta and, to a lesser extent, association of Lyn (Fig. 8A). To further characterize the association of Fyn with PKCdelta , we performed a kinetic study and found that PDGF induced association of Fyn following 1 min of treatment and that this association was decreased after 30 min (Fig. 8B).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Association of Src-related kinases with PKCdelta . C6 cells were treated with PDGF for 15 min, immunoprecipitation of PKCdelta was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures," and the membranes were stained with anti-Src, anti-Fyn, or anti-Lyn (A). Cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT or PKCdelta Y187F were treated with PDGF for different periods of time. PKCdelta or PKCdelta Y187F was immunoprecipitated using anti-PKCepsilon antibody, and the association of Fyn with PKCdelta was measured (B). The results represent one of three separate experiments that gave similar results.

Since the decrease in GS expression by PDGF appeared to involve phosphorylation of tyrosine 187 in PKCdelta , we examined the role of this tyrosine residue in the association of Fyn and PKCdelta . Stimulation of cells overexpressing PKCdelta Y187F with PDGF (Fig. 8B) or PMA (data not shown) did not lead to association of the mutated PKCdelta with Fyn as determined by co-immunoprecipitation, indicating the tyrosine 187 is essential for the association. In contrast, the mutant PKCdelta Y155F associated with Fyn similarly to PKCdelta WT (data not shown), suggesting the tyrosine 155 does not play a role in the association of PKCdelta and Fyn.

Fyn Is Involved in the Inhibitory Effect of PKCdelta on GS Expression-- Since Fyn associates via tyrosine 187 with PKCdelta in response to PDGF treatment, we wanted to examine the role of Fyn in the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta and in the inhibitory effect of PKCdelta on GS expression. We stably transfected a Fyn dominant negative mutant in C6 cells and examined their response to PDGF. Cells overexpressing empty vector exhibited an increase in the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta following 10 min of PDGF treatment. In contrast, a decrease in the degree of the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta was observed in cells overexpressing the Fyn dominant negative mutant (Fig. 9A). We also examined the expression of GS in the different cells. PDGF decreased the expression of GS in cells overexpressing control vector. In contrast, there was no significant decrease in the expression of GS in response to PDGF in cells overexpressing the Fyn dominant negative mutant (Fig. 9B). Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of the Fyn dominant negative on the decrease in GS expression induced by PDGF was more marked than the decrease in tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta , suggesting that Fyn is not the only tyrosine kinase phosphorylating PKCdelta in response to PDGF. Similar results with the Fyn dominant negative mutant were obtained in cells treated with 20 nM PMA (data not shown). In contrast, Fyn dominant negative did not abolish the decrease in cell proliferation induced by PMA, suggesting that the effect of Fyn dominant negative was specific to GS expression (data not shown).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Effects of the Fyn dominant negative mutant on tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta and GS expression by PDGF. For tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta , cells overexpressing Fyn dominant negative mutant or the control vector (Control) were treated with PDGF (100 ng/ml) for 10 min, immunoprecipitation of PKCdelta was performed as described under "Experimental Procedures," and the membranes were stained with anti-phosphotyrosine (A). C6 cells expressing a Fyn dominant negative mutant or the control vector (Control) were treated with PDGF for 24 h, and the expression of GS was determined using Western blot analysis (B). The results represent one of five separate experiments, which gave similar results.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study we explored the mechanisms involved in the inhibitory effects of PKCdelta on C6 cell proliferation and GS expression. We found that the regulatory domain of PKCdelta is responsible for the effects of this isoform on C6 cell proliferation. These results are similar to those we recently described regarding the regulation of GS expression by PKCdelta (23). Chimeras have been used to delineate the contributions of individual PKC domains to the specific functions of different PKC isoforms in a number of systems. Both the catalytic and the regulatory domains of PKC may determine isoform-specific functions depending on the specific system. For example, the catalytic domain of PKCbeta was found to confer isoform-specific function in the differentiation of erythroleukemia cells (14), and the catalytic domain of PKCdelta in reciprocal delta - and epsilon -chimeras mediated PMA-induced macrophage differentiation of mouse promyelocytes (32). In contrast, the regulatory domain of PKCepsilon enhanced cell growth and induced colonies in soft agar in NIH 3T3 cells (33). Recently, it has been reported that the regulatory domain of PKCdelta overexpressed by itself inhibited mammary tumor cell metastases (34).

PKCdelta has been shown to become tyrosine-phosphorylated in the regulatory domain in response to PMA and PDGF in C6 cells (23). Tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta has been reported in response to EGF stimulation in keratinocytes (24), in response to carbachol, substance P and PMA stimulation in parotid acinar cells (35), in response to H2O2 in CHO-K1 cells (28), and in response to activation of the IgE receptor in RBL-2H3 cells (26, 27). Constitutive tyrosine phosphorylation was reported in Ras-transformed mouse keratinocytes (36). Our results suggest that Src-related kinases are involved in the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta in response to PDGF, since the Src kinase inhibitors PP1 and PP2 reduced significantly the phosphorylation induced by PDGF. Our results using cells overexpressing a Fyn dominant negative mutant further suggest that Fyn contributes to PKCdelta tyrosine phosphorylation in response to PDGF. Since PP1 has also been reported to inhibit the kinase activity of PDGFRbeta (3), we cannot exclude at this point that this receptor directly phosphorylates PKCdelta upon PDGF binding. Indeed, Li et al. (22) reported that the PDGF receptor phosphorylated PKCdelta in vitro.

The effect of tyrosine phosphorylation on the activity of PKCdelta or on its function differs, depending on the specific system. Thus, tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta has been reported to reduce its activity in Ras-transformed cells and in response to activation of the EGF receptor (24, 36). In contrast, tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta by Fyn increased the kinase activity (37). Recently it was suggested that the tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta in response to engagement of the IgE receptor leads to altered substrate specificity (26). A previous report has shown that mutation of PKCdelta at tyrosine 187 did not change kinase activity (25). In this study we did not further explore the kinase activity of the different PKC mutants using different substrates, since the nature of the endogenous substrates involved in the effects of PKCdelta on cell proliferation and GS expression have not yet been identified.

Our results using the PKCdelta 5 mutant suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta plays a role in the inhibitory effect exerted by this isoform on cell proliferation. These results are similar to our recent findings, which showed a role for tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta in the inhibitory effect of this isoform on the expression of the astrocytic marker GS (23). Thus, the PKCdelta 5 mutant appears to act in an opposite way to PKCdelta in the effect of this isoform on both GS expression and cell proliferation. Since tyrosine phosphorylation of PKCdelta in response to PMA occurs only in the regulatory domain of this isoform in the C6 cells (23), our results are consistent with the importance of the regulatory domain of PKCdelta in the inhibitory effect of this isoform on different cellular functions.

Although tyrosine phosphorylation in the regulatory domain of PKCdelta mediates the inhibitory effects of this isoform on both GS expression and cell proliferation, it appears that different tyrosine residues are involved in the different effects. Thus, tyrosine 155 is implicated as a phosphorylation site that is involved in the inhibitory effect of PKCdelta on cell proliferation but not on GS expression, whereas tyrosine 187 appears to be involved in the inhibitory effect of PKCdelta on GS expression. There have been a number of reports regarding the phosphorylation of specific tyrosines on PKCdelta . For example, tyrosine phosphorylation in the catalytic domain of PKCdelta was described in response to treatment with H2O2 (28). Tyrosine 311 was reported to be phosphorylated in response to Src (30), and engagement of the Fcepsilon R1 resulted in tyrosine phosphorylation of tyrosine 52 in the regulatory domain (27, 29). Interestingly, tyrosine 52 did not appear to be phosphorylated in response to either PMA or PDGF in the C6 cells. Our results of PDGF-induced phosphorylation of tyrosine 187 in PKCdelta are consistent with the results of Li et al. (25), who reported that PMA and PDGF induced phosphorylation of PKCdelta on tyrosine 187 in NIH 3T3 cells. The authors concluded that this phosphorylation site was not important for the monocytic differentiation of 32D cells by PMA. Thus, the monocytic differentiation of 32D cells resembles C6 cell proliferation and contrasts with GS expression in its control by tyrosine 187 phosphorylation of PKCdelta .

One of the factors that could explain the different effects of the PKCdelta mutants is a distinct pattern of translocation. Translocation of PKC to specific cellular compartments could lead to different effects due to the phosphorylation of different substrates and to the association of PKCdelta with specific proteins present in these locations. One of the important factors that can determine the localization of PKC following its activation is association with RACKs (receptors for activated protein kinase Cs) (38). It is currently not clear to what extent tyrosine kinases can act as RACKs and affect the translocation of PKC isoforms. In a recent study, Ron et al. (39) suggested that Fyn, which is associated with PKCtheta , might act as a RACK of this PKC isoform. We found that PMA induced initial translocation of PKCdelta to the plasma membrane followed by translocation to the perinuclear membrane. This pattern of translocation is similar to the translocation of PKCdelta reported in CHO-K1 cells (40). PDGF also induced membranal translocation of PKCdelta , although to a lesser extent, with some accumulation around the perinuclear membrane. Stimulation of cells overexpressing PKCdelta WT or the different PKCdelta mutants with PMA or PDGF resulted in a similar pattern of translocation. Thus, the differential effects of the different PKCdelta mutants on cell proliferation and GS expression are probably not due to their different translocation following activation. At this point, however, we cannot exclude the possibility that the PKCdelta mutants undergo translocation to different membranal subdomains, causing their association with distinct signaling molecules.

PKCdelta has been reported to associate with different tyrosine kinases such as Src (27, 30, 41, 42), Lyn (27), and c-Abl (43) in either a phosphorylation-dependent or -independent manner. The ability of PKCdelta to be tyrosine phosphorylated on more than one tyrosine suggests that PKCdelta can associate with different tyrosine kinases. We found that PKCdelta associated with Src in a phosphorylation-independent manner and with Fyn following stimulation of PDGF via tyrosine 187. Specifically, the effect of PKCdelta on cell proliferation and GS expression in C6 cells may be mediated by either different downstream PKC substrates or different tyrosine kinases that are associated with PKCdelta . Indeed, our results suggest that Fyn is involved in the inhibitory effect of PDGF on GS expression, since overexpression of the Fyn dominant negative mutant abrogated the inhibitory effect of PDGF. It has been reported that the differential interaction of PKCdelta with tyrosine kinases may lead to changes in the activity and substrate recognition of PKCdelta and to changes in the activity of the associated tyrosine kinases (26, 27). Thus, the differential phosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues may generate diversity in the effects of PKCdelta and positions this isoform as an important component in a complex bi-directional interaction between serine-threonine and tyrosine kinase signaling. The identities of the tyrosine kinases that are associated with PKCdelta via tyrosine 155 and are involved in the inhibitory effect of PKCdelta on cell proliferation are currently under investigation.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Alan Saltiel (Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research) for providing us with the Fyn dominant negative mutant. We also thank Avrille Goldreich for the skillful preparation of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by the Nicol and Andre Bollag Stiftung.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel. Tel.: 972-3-531-8266; Fax: 972-3-736-9929; E-mail: chaya@mail.biu.ac.il.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 16, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005991200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PKC, protein kinase C; GS, glutamine synthetase; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; GFP, green fluorescent protein; PMA, 12-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Nishizuka, Y. (1984) Nature 308, 693-698
2. Nishizuka, Y. (1988) Nature 334, 661-665
3. Toker, A. (1998) Front. Biosci. 3, D1134-D1147
4. Ghayur, T., Hugunin, M., Talanian, R. V., Ratnofsky, S., Quinlan, C., Emoto, Y., Pandey, P., Datta, R., Huang, Y., Kharbanda, S., Allen, H., Kamen, R., Wong, W., and Kufe, D. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184, 2399-2404
5. Newton, A. C. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 28495-28498
6. Nishizuka, Y. (1995) FASEB J. 9, 484-496
7. Stabel, S., and Parker, P. J. (1991) Pharmacol. Ther. 51, 71-95
8. Jaken, S. (1996) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 168-173
9. Johannes, F. J., Prestle, J., Eis, S., Oberhagemann, P., and Pfizenmaier, K. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6140-6148
10. Hug, H., and Sarre, T. F. (1993) Biochem. J. 291, 329-343
11. Newton, A. C. (1995) Curr. Biol. 5, 973-976
12. Burns, D. J., and Bell, R. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18330-18338
13. Hurley, J. H., Newton, A. C., Parker, P. J., Blumberg, P. M., and Nishizuka, Y. (1997) Protein Sci. 6, 477-480
14. Walker, S. D., Murray, N. R., Burns, D. J., and Fields, A. P. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9156-9160
15. Gschwendt, M. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 259, 555-564
16. Fukumoto, S., Nishizawa, Y., Hosoi, M., Koyama, H., Yamakawa, K., Ohno, S., and Morii, H. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13816-13822
17. Brodie, C., Kuperstein, I., Acs, P., and Blumberg, P. M. (1998) Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 56, 108-117
18. Watanabe, T., Ono, Y., Taniyama, Y., Hazama, K., Igarashi, K., Ogita, K., Kikkawa, U., and Nishizuka, Y. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10159-10163
19. Li, W., Jiang, Y. X., Zhang, J., Soon, L., Flechner, L., Kapoor, V., Pierce, J. H., and Wang, L. H. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5888-5898
20. Denning, M. F., Dlugosz, A. A., Williams, E. K., Szallasi, Z., Blumberg, P. M., and Yuspa, S. H. (1995) Cell Growth Differ. 6, 149-157
21. Ohba, M., Ishino, K., Kashiwagi, M., Kawabe, S., Chida, K., Huh, N. H., and Kuroki, T. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 5199-5207
22. Mischak, H., Pierce, J. H., Goodnight, J., Kazanietz, M. G., Blumberg, P. M., and Mushinski, J. F. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20110-20115
23. Brodie, C., Bogi, K., Acs, P., Lorenzo, P. S., Baskin, L., and Blumberg, P. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30713-30718
24. Denning, M. F., Dlugosz, A. A., Threadgill, D. W., Magnuson, T., and Yuspa, S. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5325-5331
25. Li, W., Li, W., Chen, X.-H., Kelley, C. A., Alimandi, M., Zhang, J., Chen, Q., Bottaro, D. P., and Pierce, J. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26404-26409
26. Haleem-Smith, H., Chang, E. Y., Szallasi, Z., Blumberg, P. M., and Rivera, J. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9112-9116
27. Song, J. S., Swann, P. G., Szallasi, Z., Blank, U., Blumberg, P. M., and Rivera, J. (1998) Oncogene 16, 3357-3368
28. Konishi, H., Tanaka, M., Takemura, Y., Matsuzaki, H., Ono, Y., Kikkawa, U., and Nishizuka, Y. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 11233-11237
29. Szallasi, Z., Denning, M. F., Chang, E. Y., Rivera, J., Yuspa, S. H., Lehel, C., Olah, Z., Anderson, W. B., and Blumberg, P. M. (1995) Biochem. Cell Biol. 214, 888-894
30. Blake, R. A., Garcia-Paramio, P., Parker, P. J., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1999) Cell Growth Differ. 10, 231-241
31. Acs, P., Bogi, K., Lorenzo, P. S., Marquez, A. M., Biro, T., Szallasi, Z., and Blumberg, P. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22148-22153
32. Wang, Q. J., Acs, P., Goodnight, J., Giese, T., Blumberg, P. M., Mischak, H., and Mushinski, J. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 76-82
33. Acs, P., Wang, Q. J., Bogi, K., Marquez, A. M., Lorenzo, P. S., Biro, T., Szallasi, Z., Mushinski, J. F., and Blumberg, P. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28793-28799
34. Kiley, S. C., Clark, K. J., Goodnough, M., Welch, D. R., and Jaken, S. (1999) Cancer Res. 59, 3230-3238
35. Soltoff, S. P., and Toker, A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13490-13495
36. Denning, M. F., Dlugosz, A. A., Howett, M. K., and Yuspa, S. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 26079-26081
37. Li, W., Mischak, H., Yu, J. C., Wang, L. M., Mushinski, J. F., Heidaran, M. A., and Pierce, J. H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2349-2352
38. Mochly-Rosen, D., and Gordon, A. S. (1998) FASEB J. 12, 35-42
39. Ron, D., Napolitano, E. W., Voronova, A., Vasquez, N. J., Roberts, D. N., Calio, B. L., Caothien, R. H., Pettiford, S. M., Wellik, S., Mandac, J. B., and Kauvar, L. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 19003-19010
40. Wang, Q. M., Bhattacharyya, D., Garfield, S., Nacro, K., Marquez, V. E., and Blumberg, P. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37233-37239
41. Shanmugam, M., Krett, N. L., Peters, C. A., Maizels, E. T., Murad, F. M., Kawakatsu, H., Rosen, S. T., and Hunzicker-Dunn, M. (1998) Oncogene 16, 1649-1654
42. Zang, Q., Lu, Z., Curto, M., Barile, N., Shalloway, D., and Foster, D. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13275-13280
43. Yuan, Z. M., Utsugisawa, T., Ishiko, T., Nakada, S., Huang, Y., Kharbanda, S., Weichselbaum, R., and Kufe, D. (1998) Oncogene 16, 1643-1648
44. Olah, Z., Lehel, C., Jakab, G., and Anderson, W. B. (1994) Anal. Biochem. 221, 94-102


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.