Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003035200 on August 9, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 46, 35876-35885, November 17, 2000
Characterization of a
(2R,3R)-2,3-Butanediol Dehydrogenase as the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae YAL060W Gene Product
DISRUPTION AND INDUCTION OF THE GENE*
Eva
González
,
M. Rosario
Fernández
,
Carol
Larroy
,
Lluís
Solà§,
Miquel A.
Pericàs§,
Xavier
Parés
¶, and
Josep A.
Biosca
From the
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,
E-08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona) and the § Unitat de
Recerca en Síntesi Asimètrica, Departament de
Química Orgànica, Universitat de Barcelona,
E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
Received for publication, April 11, 2000, and in revised form, July 28, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The completion of the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome project in 1996 showed that almost 60% of the potential open reading frames of the
genome had no experimentally determined function. Using a
conserved sequence motif present in the zinc-containing medium-chain
alcohol dehydrogenases, we found several potential alcohol
dehydrogenase genes with no defined function. One of these, YAL060W, was overexpressed using a multicopy inducible
vector, and its protein product was purified to homogeneity. The enzyme was found to be a homodimer that, in the presence of NAD+,
but not of NADP, could catalyze the stereospecific oxidation of
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol (Km = 14 mM, kcat = 78,000 min
1) and meso-butanediol
(Km = 65 mM,
kcat = 46,000 min
1)
to (3R)-acetoin and (3S)-acetoin, respectively.
It was unable, however, to further oxidize these acetoins to
diacetyl. In the presence of NADH, it could catalyze the
stereospecific reduction of racemic acetoin
((3R/3S)- acetoin; Km = 4.5 mM, kcat = 98,000 min
1) to
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and
meso-butanediol, respectively. The substrate
stereospecificity was determined by analysis of products by gas-liquid
chromatography. The YAL060W gene product can therefore be
classified as an NAD-dependent
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase (BDH).
S. cerevisiae could grow on 2,3-butanediol as the sole
carbon and energy source. Under these conditions, a 3.5-fold increase
in (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase
activity was observed in the total cell extracts. The isoelectric
focusing pattern of the induced enzyme coincided with that of the pure BDH (pI 6.9). The disruption of the YAL060W gene was not
lethal for the yeast under laboratory conditions. The disrupted strain could also grow on 2,3-butanediol, although attaining a lesser cell
density than the wild-type strain. Taking into consideration the
substrate specificity of the YAL060W gene product, we
propose the name of BDH for this gene. The corresponding
enzyme is the first eukaryotic
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase
characterized of the medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
One of the tasks left after the completion of the various genome
projects is to ascertain the function of the sequenced genes. When the
Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome project was finished, it was
found that ~60% of the potential open reading frames of the genome
had no defined function (1). One way of finding the biological role of
each gene is to study its pattern of expression. A systematic effort
has been performed in S. cerevisiae by means of DNA
microarrays. The study of the temporal program of the gene expression
accompanying the metabolic shift from fermentation to respiration has
yield useful information on virtually every gene of this yeast (2).
Another approach is to use consensus sequences of well characterized
protein families to reveal close relatives, previously uncharacterized,
in the sequenced genomes.
The alcohol dehydrogenase
(ADH)1 superfamily catalyzes
the reversible oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes or ketones and can be
grouped in at least three enzyme families: medium-chain
dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR), short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases
(SDR), and iron-activated alcohol dehydrogenases (3, 4). Since most of
the enzymes belonging to the MDR family contain one or two
Zn2+ ions/subunit, they are also known as
Zn2+-containing medium-chain ADHs.
S. cerevisiae has seven genes coding for MDR enzymes with
known function: ADH1 codes for the fermentative enzyme
responsible for ethanol production from acetaldehyde and NADH, and it
is produced in large amounts in glucose-grown cells (5).
ADH2 encodes the glucose-repressible isozyme (ADHII) that
converts the ethanol accumulated under anaerobic conditions to
acetaldehyde and allows the yeast to grow with ethanol as the carbon
source (6-8). ADH3 codes for ADHIII, the mature form of
which is located in mitochondria (9) and which is also repressed by
glucose. ADH5 codes for an ADH with a 76% sequence identity
to the ADHI isozyme (10). SFA1 encodes the
glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase (class III
alcohol dehydrogenase) (11-13), which is a ubiquitous enzyme expressed
in prokaryotes and eukaryotes with a formaldehyde detoxication role.
SOR1 codes for a sorbitol dehydrogenase, which is induced in
cells grown in the presence of sorbitol (14). Finally,
YLR070C has recently been shown to code for a xylitol dehydrogenase (15). The ADH4 gene (16) codes for ADHIV,
which is considered a member of the "iron-activated" ADH
family (17).
In this work, we have used a conserved sequence motif found in the
Zn2+-containing medium-chain ADH (the zinc-containing ADH
signature) (18-20) to look for possible uncharacterized ADH genes in
the yeast genome. One of the genes found with unknown function,
YAL060W, was overexpressed in a yeast ADH-deficient
strain, and the protein was purified to homogeneity and characterized.
The enzyme was found to be a dimer that oxidized reversibly and
stereospecifically (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and
meso-2,3-butanediol to (3R)-acetoin and
(3S)-acetoin, respectively. Although other
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenases have been
described, this would be, to our knowledge, the first characterized
eukaryotic protein with this specificity and known sequence belonging
to the family of zinc-containing medium-chain ADHs.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials
Restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase were from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany). Vent polymerase was from New England Biolabs Inc. (Beverly, MA). DNA oligomers were synthesized and purified by Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden). Chemicals
were purchased from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland), Aldrich, or Sigma and
were of the highest quality available. Hydroxylapatite Bio-Gel HT was
from Bio-Rad; Cibacron blue 3GA-agarose was from Sigma; and the
Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Search for Zinc-containing Alcohol Dehydrogenases in S. cerevisiae
The consensus pattern
GHEXXGXXXXX(GA)XX(IVAC), found in the
zinc-containing medium-chain ADH family (18-20), was used as the input
sequence in the BLAST program (NCBI, National Institutes of Health) to
search for open reading frames in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome Database. This sequence contains a histidine that is the second ligand of the catalytic zinc and several glycines that are important for structural reasons in the substrate-binding domain of these enzymes (21). Multiple sequence alignments were generated using ClustalW Version 1.7 software (22) in combination with
TreeView Version 1.6.1 (23) to study phylogenies.
Yeast and Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, and Media
Escherichia coli XL1-Blue (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA)
was used for cloning procedures. The yeast ADH-deficient strain
WV36-405 (MATa, ade2,
ura3-52, trp1, adh1
, adh2
, adh3, adh4::TRP1) (24), constructed by Dr. Wolfgang Vogel (Institut fur Strahlenbiologie, Neuherberger, Germany) and generously provided by Dr. Silvia Atrian (Universitat de Barcelona), was used to search for the function of the
YAL060W gene product. Because of its low background in alcohol oxidation reactions, this strain is useful in ascertaining potentially new ADH genes. The yeast strain FY834
(MAT
, his3
200, ura3-52,
leu2
1, lys2
202,
trp1
63) (25), used in the S. cerevisiae genome project, was used here to amplify the
YAL060W gene by PCR. The cell growth in the presence of
2,3-butanediol, and the levels of 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase activity
in the homogenates were studied in both yeast strains (WV36-405 and
FY834
). The protease-deficient yeast strain BJ5459
(MATa, ura3-52,
trp1, lys2-801,
leu2
1, his3
200,
pep4::HIS3,
prb1
1.6R, can1, GAL)
(26), generously provided by Dr. Benjamí Piña (Consejo
Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, Spain), was
used to overexpress and purify the YAL060W gene product.
The inducible E. coli-yeast shuttle vector pYes2 (carrying
the promoter and upstream activating sequences of
GAL1) from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA) was used to clone
and overexpress the YAL060W gene in yeast strains WV36-405
and BJ5459. E. coli cells were grown at 37 °C in LB
medium supplemented with 50 µg/ml ampicillin to select for the
desired plasmid constructs. Yeast strains WV36-405 and BJ5459 were
grown at 30 °C in synthetic complete medium
lactriyourairl supplemented with 2% galactose to allow for the
selection and induction of the yeast transformed with the pYes2
constructs. The medium used to grow the yeast in 2,3-butanediol
contained 1% yeast extract (Difco), 2% peptone, and 0.5 or 3%
2,3-butanediol isomers (mixture of
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol,
(2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol, and
meso-2,3-butanediol).
Subcloning Methods
All DNA manipulations were performed under standard conditions
as described (27).
Amplification of YAL060W--
Yeast genomic DNA was isolated
from yeast strain FY834
by standard methods (28), and the
YAL060W gene was amplified by PCR using the oligonucleotide
5'-GGGGTACCAATTATGAGAGCTTTGGCATATTTC-3', which hybridizes at the 5'-end
of the gene and carries a KpnI restriction site, and the
oligonucleotide 5'-GCGGAATTCTTACTTCATTTCACCGTGATTGTTAG-3', which hybridizes at the 3'-end and carries an EcoRI
restriction site. The amplification initiated with a "hot start,"
which was followed by five cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at
57 °C, and 90 s of extension at 72 °C. This initial phase
was followed by 25 more cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 1 min at 60 °C,
and 90 s of extension at 72 °C at the end. The PCR mixture
contained 1 unit of Vent DNA polymerase, 1 µM
each primer, 200 µM each dNTP, and 2 mM
MgSO4.
Construction of pYes2-YAL060W--
To construct the
YAL060W expression vector under the control of the
GAL1 promoter, the gel-purified PCR product obtained above was digested with KpnI and EcoRI and ligated to
the pYes2 vector digested with the same restriction enzymes. Both
chains of the plasmid construct, pYes2-YAL060W, were
sequenced (Oswel Research Products, Southampton, UK) to verify
that there were no mutations introduced by PCR and that the construct
was correct.
Construction of Yeast Strains WV36-405(pYes2),
WV36-405(pYes2-YAL060W), BJ5459(pYes2), and
BJ5459(pYes2-YAL060W)--
Yeast strains WV36-405 and BJ5459 were
grown in rich medium and transformed with the pYes2 and
pYes2-YAL060W vectors following the method of Ito et
al. (29), and the transformants were selected on SC-Ura plates
(28).
Disruption of the YAL060W Gene--
The disruption of the
YAL060W gene was carried out by one-step gene replacement
(30) with the TRP1 gene. The starting point was plasmid
pYes2-YAL060W, containing the coding region of
YAL060W that was digested with MluNI. This
digestion removed ~360 base pairs of the YAL060W coding
region and was followed by the insertion of the TRP1 gene.
The TRP1 gene, which was obtained by digesting the YDp-W
vector (31) with BamHI, was subcloned into the
MluNI site mentioned above after making blunt ends. This
construct was digested with KpnI and EcoRI,
resulting in a linear fragment containing the TRP1 gene
flanked by homologous regions of the YAL060W gene. This
fragment was introduced into the yeast haploid strain FY834
by the
lithium acetate method (29), and after homologous recombination, the
coding region of YAL060W was disrupted with the
TRP1 gene. The yeast cells that had incorporated the
TRP1 gene were selected by growing in Wikerham's medium
supplemented for all auxotrophs except for tryptophan. The disruption
of the YAL060W gene in several transformants was confirmed
by PCR of the genomic DNA and by enzyme activity in the homogenates of
the resulting yeast strains.
Enzyme Assays
Enzyme activities were determined spectrophotometrically by
measuring the change in absorbance at 340 nm and 25 °C corresponding to the oxidation of NADH (
340 = 6220 M
1 cm
1)
or the reduction of NAD+. The purification of the
YAL060W gene product was followed by measuring the activity
with 120 mM (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol
and 4 mM NAD+ in 33 mM sodium
pyrophosphate (pH 8). To determine the steady-state kinetic constants,
the enzyme assays were carried out with the pH 8 buffer and 5 mM NAD+ for the oxidation reactions, and with 33 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7) 0.2 mM NADH for the
reduction reactions. After adding 20-50 µl of enzyme
solution, the reaction was started by the addition of the substrate.
One unit of activity corresponds to 1 µmol of NAD(H) formed/min. The
initial velocities were measured in duplicate at eight different
substrate concentrations, and the kinetic constants were calculated
using the nonlinear regression program Enzfitter (Elsevier/Biosoft).
All reported values are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of at least
three separate experiments.
Enzyme Purification
(2R,3R)-2,3-Butanediol dehydrogenase (BDH)
was purified from yeast strain BJ5459(pYes2-YAL060W), and
all the purification steps were carried out at 4 °C. The cells (34 g) were suspended in 34 ml of buffer A (20 mM potassium
phosphate (pH 6.8) containing 30% glycerol and 0.5 mM
dithiothreitol) and broken up with glass beads 0.5 mm in diameter. The
lysate was centrifuged at 29,000 × g for 1 h, and
the supernatant was applied to a hydroxylapatite Bio-Gel HT column
(10.5 × 2 cm) equilibrated with buffer A. After washing the
column with 250 ml of the same buffer, the enzyme was eluted with a
linear gradient of 20-600 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.8)
containing 30% glycerol and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol in a
400-ml total volume. The active fractions were pooled; concentrated in
an Amicon concentrator, which also served for changing the buffer to
buffer A; and applied to a Cibacron Blue 3GA-agarose column (11.5 × 2.4 cm) equilibrated with buffer A. After washing the column with
buffer (330 ml), a linear gradient of NADH (0-250 µM in 200 ml) was applied. After washing again with
buffer A (185 ml), the enzyme was eluted with a linear gradient of 0-2
M NaCl in 700 ml of buffer. The active fractions were
pooled and applied to a Superdex 200 HR 10/30 gel filtration column
equilibrated with 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7), 0.15 M NaCl, and 30% glycerol. The column was eluted at
a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min with the equilibration buffer. The purified
enzyme was concentrated and stored at
80 °C.
Molecular Mass Determinations
The relative mass of the native enzyme was determined by size
exclusion chromatography at 22 °C on a Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column.
The column was connected to a high performance liquid chromatography apparatus (Waters) and was equilibrated with 2 volumes
of 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7), 0.15 M NaCl,
and 30% glycerol. The column was run at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The molecular mass was estimated by comparison with the elution of protein
standards. The molecular mass was also determined by native gradient
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, in which proteins were visualized
by silver staining. The submolecular structure of the enzyme was
studied under denaturing conditions by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (32) and silver staining.
Other Electrophoretic Methods
Isoelectric focusing was performed according to a reported
method (33). The pI of the YAL060W gene product was
determined by comparison with known standards (isoelectric focusing
calibration kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The BDH activity
was visualized by incubating the gel at pH 8.6 with 0.5 M
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol, 0.6 mM
NAD+, 5-methylphenazine methosulfate (0.1 mg/ml), and nitro
blue tetrazolium chloride (0.2 mg/ml).
Gas-Liquid Chromatography
GLC analyses were performed in a Shimadzu GC-14B gas
chromatograph equipped with a chiral column (Supelco
-DEXTM 120, 30-m length, 0.25-mm inner diameter),
helium as the carrier gas (2.4 ml/min), and a flame ionization detector
(275 °C). The following temperature program was used: isotherm at
75 °C for 8 min, 2 °C/min ramp to 85 °C, and isotherm at
85 °C. A standard mixture of 40 mM
(3R/3S)-acetoin, 7.5 mM
(2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol, 9.5 mM
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol, and 7 mM
meso-2,3-butanediol was prepared by dissolving the pure
compounds in 30 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7). One
volume of the standard mixture was extracted with 1 volume of ethyl
acetate, and 1 µl of the organic phase was applied to the chiral
column. This extraction protocol was repeated three times, showing that
the recovery of the compounds was >70% after the first extraction and
that the relative percentages of the recovered compounds were similar
for each extraction step. The reagents and products of the enzymatic
reaction mixtures were extracted with ethyl acetate before the analysis
by GLC.
 |
RESULTS |
Search for Zinc-containing Alcohol Dehydrogenases in S. cerevisiae--
The search performed with the BLAST program found the
following genes of unknown function that could be members of the
NAD+-dependent, zinc-containing medium-chain
alcohol dehydrogenases: YDL246C, which codes for a protein
nearly identical (>99% identity) to the product of the
SOR1 gene (sorbitol dehydrogenase), and YAL060W
and YAL061W, two adjacent genes classified as genes coding for proteins with similarity to alcohol/sorbitol dehydrogenases. Two
other genes, YMR318C and YCR105W, also belong to
the yeast MDR family, although they have been found to code for
NADP(H)-dependent enzymes (see below).
A multiple sequence alignment performed with these five gene products,
together with the seven dehydrogenases of known function (mentioned in
the Introduction), was used to generate a phylogenetic tree based on
the neighbor-joining method of Saitou and Nei (34) with 1000 bootstraps. The topology of the tree with the zinc-containing MDR
enzymes from yeast (Fig. 1B)
shows three main groups. Yeast glutathione-dependent formaldehyde
dehydrogenase is in the first group, whereas the second group (formed
by enzymes active with polyol substrates) is composed of two subgroups:
BDH (the product of the YAL060W gene; active with
2,3-butanediol) and Yal061p (with 51% identity to BDH and of unknown
function) are in the first subgroup, whereas xylitol dehydrogenase,
sorbitol dehydrogenase, and Ydl246p (active with sugars) are in the
second. The third group is composed of two subgroups: the first one
clusters the ethanol-active enzymes ADHI, ADHII, ADHIII, and ADHV,
whereas the second is composed of two
NADP(H)-dependent cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenases
(Ycr105p and Ymr318p, showing 64% identity) recently characterized in our
laboratory.2 Among the
several previously uncharacterized MDR enzymes from yeast, we describe
in this work the results found with YAL060W.


View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Yeast BDH, encoded by the gene
YAL060W, is a member of the MDR
family. A, multiple sequence alignment between BDH and
other members of the MDR family. The alignment was obtained using the
program ClustalW, except at position 174 (according to the numbering of
horse liver ADH), which has been introduced manually. Black
and gray boxes indicate residues that are identical in at
least five of the seven sequences aligned or similar, respectively. The
solid arrows mark the residues that bind to the catalytic
zinc, and the open arrows mark the residues involved in the
binding of the structural zinc. ScBDH, S. cerevisiae BDH; PpBDH, P. putida
2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase; EcTDH, E. coli
threonine dehydrogenase; HsSDH, Homo sapiens
sorbitol dehydrogenase; ScADHI, S. cerevisiae
ADHI; ScFALDH, S. cerevisiae
glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase;
HLADH, horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase Class I subunit E. B, unrooted phylogenetic tree relating the zinc-containing
MDR enzymes (discussed under "Results") from the yeast
S. cerevisiae. The tree was generated from a multiple
sequence alignment with the ClustalW Version 1.7 and TreeView Version
1.6.1 programs. Numbers show results from bootstrap analyses
(1000 bootstrap replicates). XDH, xylitol
dehydrogenase.
|
|
Homologous Overexpression and Purification of the YAL060W Gene
Product--
Sequencing demonstrated that the construct for
overexpressing the YAL060W gene was correct. To easily
follow the purification of the corresponding enzyme, we needed to find
a specific substrate. The sequence of the enzyme was similar (>30%
sequence identity) to different alcohol and sorbitol dehydrogenases.
Thus, to avoid interferences with related activities, we used an
alcohol dehydrogenase-deficient strain (WV36-405) to transform with a
multicopy inducible vector carrying the YAL060W gene. The
activity toward several alcohols was measured in the corresponding
homogenate, whereas the same strain transformed with the same plasmid
without insert served as a control. The best substrate for the
overexpressed enzyme was (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol.
The (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase-specific activity of the homogenate of the WV36-405 strain carrying the expression vector pYes2-YAL060W was 130 times higher than
that of the homogenate of the control strain (10.9 versus
0.08 units/mg). The product from the YAL060W gene was
therefore a 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase, which was later confirmed by
kinetic analysis (see below). We designated the enzyme BDH.
When BDH was overexpressed in yeast strain WV36-405, we found that 30%
of the activity of BDH was lost from the lysate fraction after 2 h
at 4 °C (in 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.8) with 5 mM dithiothreitol). The initial activity was retained,
however, in the presence of the same extraction buffer containing 30%
glycerol. We decided therefore to overexpress and purify the enzyme
from a protease-deficient yeast strain (BJ5459) using 30% glycerol in
the buffers of all the purification steps. In addition, we had to
develop a rapid protocol to purify the enzyme. Essentially, the
homogenate was fractionated with a hydroxylapatite column, followed by
dye-ligand chromatography and gel filtration chromatography. Table I shows the results of a typical purification
experiment starting with 34 g of BJ5459(pYes2-YAL060W)
cells. A major step in purification was the dye-ligand chromatography.
The efficiency of this step was due, in part, to the strong binding of
BDH to the column. An NADH gradient did not elute the enzyme, but
eliminated other dehydrogenases. High ionic strength was needed to
elute BDH. After the gel filtration step, the resulting enzyme was
homogeneous, as detected by a single band upon SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig.
2C). This last chromatographic
step was also important to eliminate NADH, which otherwise would
inhibit the oxidative reactions. The increase in specific activity
after the gel filtration chromatography (Table I) is mostly a
consequence of the NADH elimination since the preparation was already
free from extraneous proteins after the dye-ligand chromatography (Fig.
2C). The pure enzyme was stable when kept at
80 °C with
30% glycerol for >1 month.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Purification of yeast (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase
Activity was measured with 120 mM
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and 5 mM NAD
in 33 mM sodium pyrophosphate (pH 8.0)
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Determination of the molecular properties of
yeast (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol
dehydrogenase. A, size exclusion chromatography on a
Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column. a, cytochrome c
(12.4 kDa); b, carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa); c,
bovine serum albumin (66 kDa); d, yeast alcohol
dehydrogenase (150 kDa); e, -amylase (200 kDa);
p, BDH. B, native gradient polyacrylamide gel
(8-25%) stained with silver salts. Lane 1, 0.4 µg of
catalase (220 kDa); lane 2, 0.4 µg of yeast
glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase (80 kDa);
lane 3, 0.4 µg of ovalbumin (43 kDa); lanes 4 and 5, 0.07 µg of BDH. C, SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis of the active fractions obtained after each
purification step of yeast BDH. The proteins were revealed by silver
staining. Lanes 1 and 5, molecular mass
standards; lane 2, crude extract (10 µg of protein);
lane 3, hydroxylapatite chromatography (5 µg); lane
4, Cibacron blue 3GA-agarose chromatography (1 µg).
|
|
Molecular Mass of BDH--
Gel filtration of the pure enzyme on a
Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column showed a molecular mass of
~81,800 Da (Fig. 2A). When a sample of the pure enzyme was
loaded on a native polyacrylamide gel and subjected to electrophoresis,
a mobility pattern very similar to the one shown by pure yeast
glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase was
obtained (Fig. 2B). Given the close isoelectric points of
BDH (pI 6.9) and yeast glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase (pI 6.7) (35) and the known molecular mass (80,000 Da) of
yeast glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase, this technique also supports a molecular mass of ~80,000 Da for the
native BDH. Analysis by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis showed a
protein band of ~41,000 Da (Fig. 2C), consistent with the
predicted molecular mass of the BDH protein sequence (41,530 Da). We
conclude that the native BDH is a homodimer composed of two subunits
with molecular masses of 41,000 Da.
Substrate Specificity and Kinetic Properties--
BDH catalyzed
the oxidation of several 1,2- and 2,3-diols (Table
II), showing a higher activity for
secondary alcohols (such as 2,3-butanediol) than for primary alcohols
(such as 1,2-butanediol), with a maximum of activity toward
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol.
(2S,3S)-2,3-Butanediol was neither a substrate of
the enzyme nor an inhibitor for the oxidation of
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol. (100 mM
(2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol did not inhibit the
oxidation of 15 mM
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol.) BDH could oxidize
meso-2,3-butanediol, although showing less activity than
with the 2R,3R-isomer. The enzyme could not
oxidize (3R/3S)-acetoin (a racemic mixture of
(3R)- and (3S)-3-hydroxy-2-butanone), glycerol, sorbitol, or xylitol.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Substrate specificity of yeast (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase
Enzyme activity in the oxidation reactions was measured with 100 mM substrate and 5 mM NAD in 33 mM
sodium pyrophosphate (pH 8.0). The activity toward
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol (830 units/mg of protein)
was taken as 100%. Reduction activities were measured with 50 mM substrate and 0.2 mM NADH in 33 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0). The activity toward
(3R/3S)-acetoin (1090-units/mg of protein) was
taken as 100%. ND, <0.2% of the activity detected.
|
|
Either
-diketo groups or vicinal hydroxyketo functions were required
as structural elements of the compounds that were substrates for the
reduction reaction. Thus, (3R/3S)-acetoin was the
best substrate in the reduction reaction, followed by diacetyl
(2,3-butanedione). Other substrates were hydroxyacetone, methylglyoxal,
dihydroxyacetone, and 2,3-pentanedione. As in the oxidation reactions,
the four-carbon length substrates were also preferred in the reduction reactions.
The enzyme specifically required NAD(H), which could not be substituted
by NADP(H). Thus, the activity displayed with NADP(H) was <1% of the
activity with NAD(H) (at 5 mM oxidized cofactors and 1 mM reduced cofactors) with
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and
(3R/3S)-acetoin, respectively.
The rate of the enzymatic reactions was affected by the pH of the assay
buffer. The pH optima for the oxidation of 10 mM
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and for the reduction of
10 mM (3R/3S)-acetoin were 8 and 7, respectively. We tried to determine the kinetic parameters for all the
best substrates assayed for BDH (Table II). However, only
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol, meso-2,3-butanediol, and 1,2-butanediol for the oxidation
and (3R/3S)-acetoin for the reduction saturated
the enzyme (Table III). The
catalytic efficiency constant
(kcat/Km) was greater for the
reduction of (3R/3S)-acetoin than for the
oxidation of (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol. Moreover,
the Km for NADH was 10-fold lower than that for NAD.
Therefore, the enzyme would preferentially function as a reductase
rather than as a dehydrogenase.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Kinetic constants of yeast (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase
Alcohol oxidation activities were measured in 33 mM sodium
pyrophosphate (pH 8.0) with 5 mM NAD. Ketone reduction
activities were measured in 33 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0)
with 0.2 mM NADH. NAD and NADH kinetic analyses were
performed with 120 mM
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and 50 mM
(3R/3S)-acetoin, respectively. NS, no saturation
could be reached up to 100 mM diacetyl or up to 20 mM 2,3-pentanedione.
|
|
Stereospecificity of BDH--
Some experiments were carried out to
unambiguously demonstrate the specificity of the enzyme in the
oxidation-reduction processes of the 2,3-butanediol/acetoin
interconversion. In the first place, we developed a GLC analytical
system able to efficiently separate substrates and products of the
reaction. The retention times of the substrates and products were as
follows: (3R)-acetoin, 9.9 min; (3S)-acetoin,
10.6 min; (2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol, 26.6 min; (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol, 27.9 min; and
meso-2,3-butanediol, 31.1 min (Fig.
3A). With respect to the
oxidation reaction, when meso-2,3-butanediol was incubated
in the presence of BDH and NAD+ (Fig. 3C),
(3S)-acetoin was the only product detected. This acetoin resulted from the selective oxidation of the alcohol function at the
R-carbon of the meso-diol. No
(3R)-acetoin was detected, which would arise from the
oxidation of the S-carbon, confirming the extremely high
specificity (>99.9% enantiomeric excess) of the enzyme for carbons
possessing an R-configuration. On the other hand, when
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol was treated under the same
reaction conditions (Fig. 3B), (3R)-acetoin was,
as expected, the only product obtained. Moreover, the absence of
(3S)-acetoin among the products of this reaction provides
additional information: no racemization occurred at all under the
employed experimental conditions. Concerning the reduction process,
when a racemic mixture of (3R/3S)-acetoin was
incubated in the presence of BDH and NADH (Fig. 3D), a
completely enantioselective reduction of the carbonyl groups leading to
an R-alcohol took place. Thus, a product mixture of
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol (arising from
(3R)-acetoin) and meso-2,3-butanediol (arising
from (3S)-acetoin) was obtained. Although both acetoins were
substrates for the enzyme, the R-isomer was considerably more reactive since the final reaction mixture was enriched in the
(3S)-acetoin (Fig. 3D) as compared with the
initially identical concentrations of both isomers. Controls, performed
for all experiments at identical conditions, but without BDH, showed no
significant conversion (<3%) to the corresponding products.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
GLC analyses of the substrates and products
of reactions catalyzed by
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol
dehydrogenase. A, a standard mixture of 40 mM (3R/3S)-acetoin, 7.5 mM (2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol, 9.5 mM (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol, and 7 mM meso-2,3-butanediol in 100 mM
sodium phosphate (pH 7) was extracted with ethyl acetate, and 1 µl of
the organic phase was inoculated in the GLC apparatus. B-D,
shown are the products after the reaction catalyzed by 2 units of BDH
with the following initial mixtures prepared at 40 mM
concentrations: (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and
NAD+ (B), meso-2,3-butanediol and
NAD+ (C), and
(3R/3S)-acetoin and NADH (D). All
starting mixtures, including the standard, were dissolved in 100 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7) and were allowed to
proceed for 24 h at room temperature. The final mixtures
were extracted with ethyl acetate and analyzed by GLC as described
under "Experimental Procedures."
|
|
Growth on 2,3-Butanediol--
The wild-type FY834
yeast strain
could grow on 2,3-butanediol (mixture of 2R,3R-,
2S,3S-, and meso-isomers) as the sole
energy and carbon source, with growth rates of 0.06 and 0.05 h
1 at 3 and 0.5% 2,3-butanediol,
respectively. The extract of FY834
cells harvested at its late
exponential phase had specific activities for the oxidation of
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol of 0.25 units/mg of protein for a culture grown on 2% glucose and of 0.93 units/mg for a
culture grown on 3% 2,3-butanediol. When these extracts were analyzed
on an isoelectric focusing gel and stained by activity with
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and NAD+, a
clear induction of the enzyme was observed (Fig.
4). The maximum cell densities reached
with the FY834
yeast strain were 1.2 × 108
cells/ml when it was grown on 2% glucose and 1.2 × 107 cells/ml when it was grown on 2,3-butanediol.

View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Isoelectric focusing analysis (pH 3-9) of
purified BDH and extracts of yeast strains grown on different carbon
sources. Lane 1, homogenate of FY834 cells (38 µg
of protein) grown on 2% glucose (0.25 units/mg of protein);
lanes 2 and 3, homogenates of FY834 cells (48 µg of protein) grown on 3% 2,3-butanediol (mixture of isomers; 0.93 units/mg of protein); lane 4, 0.02 µg of purified BDH (968 units/mg of protein); lane 5, homogenate of yeast cells
overexpressing BDH (WV36-405(pYes2-YAL060W); 48.3 µg of
protein) grown on 2% galactose (10.9 units/mg of protein). The cells
were harvested in the mid-exponential phase, and the crude
extracts were obtained by agitation with glass beads. Activity staining
was performed with (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol.
|
|
Disruption of the YAL060W Gene--
The disruption of the
YAL060W gene was confirmed by PCR of genomic DNA from the
transformed strains (Fig. 5) and by
isoelectric focusing analysis and measurement of the
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase activity of
the corresponding yeast extracts. Thus, the size of the PCR band
resulting from the selective amplification of the genomic
YAL060W locus with two primers that hybridize in the coding
region of YAL060W was longer in the disrupted strain than in
the wild type. This is due to the fact that the size of the
TRP1 gene introduced is longer than the 360-base pair
fragment eliminated from the coding region of YAL060W (Fig.
5). Moreover, isoelectric focusing analysis showed no
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase activity
band in the disrupted strains as opposed to the one shown by the
wild-type strain (data not shown). The disruption of the gene was not
lethal for S. cerevisiae, although the cell density attained
in the stationary phase by the disrupted strain grown on 2,3-butanediol
(mixture of isomers) was half of the density attained by the wild-type
strain.

View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Analysis of the disruption of the
YAL060W gene from S. cerevisiae.
Shown are the results from the agarose gel electrophoresis (0.7%) of
genomic DNA from the FY834 , EG2, and EG3 yeast strains (isogenic to
FY834 , except with yal060w::TRP1) amplified
with two oligonucleotides that hybridize to YAL060W.
Lane 1, molecular size standards (shown in kilobases
(kb)); lane 2, PCR fragment obtained by the
amplification of the YAL060W gene from FY834 ; lanes
3 and 4, PCR fragments obtained by the amplification of
the yal060w-disrupted gene
(yal060w::TRP1) from EG2 and EG3.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The YAL060W gene product, BDH, exhibits the
characteristic properties of an MDR enzyme (Fig. 1). Thus, as indicated
in the multiple alignment of Fig. 1A, it shows a suitable
chain length and has 13 amino acids highly conserved in the MDR family.
These are distributed in three clusters: one in the substrate-binding domain (Gly66, Gly71, Gly77,
Gly86, and Val80); another in the
coenzyme-binding domain (Gly192, Gly201,
Gly204, and Gly236), with numbering according
to the numbering of horse liver ADH); and a third involved in the
binding of the catalytic zinc (Cys46 and His67,
putative ligands of the catalytic zinc, and Asp49 and
Glu68, which are considered "second sphere ligands,"
interacting with the zinc ligands themselves). We believe that the
third ligand of the catalytic zinc in BDH would be Glu174.
Thus, it can be aligned with Glu174 from mammalian sorbitol
dehydrogenase (which is known to be a ligand of the catalytic zinc)
(36) and also with Glu174 from the Pseudomonas
putida 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase, where it has also been
assigned as the third ligand for the catalytic zinc (37). It is also
aligned with Asp174 in E. coli threonine
dehydrogenase (38) and with Cys174 in S. cerevisiae ADHI, S. cerevisiae FALDH, and horse
liver ADH, which are the known ligands occupying the third position in
the coordination sphere of the catalytic zinc in these enzymes
(20).
There are two more relevant residues conserved in the alignment:
Ser48 and Glu223. Ser48 is aligned
with Ser/Thr48 in the other medium-chain ADHs and could
function in a proton relay system to facilitate removal of the proton
from the alcohol (39). Glu223, like Asp223 of
the other members of the medium-chain ADH family, would interact with
the 2'- and 3'-hydroxyl groups of the adenosine ribose of the coenzyme
and would importantly contribute to the discrimination between NAD(H)
and NADP(H) (40-42). The present BDH and P. putida BDH are the first examples of NAD(H)-dependent medium-chain
ADHs with Glu223 instead of Asp223. The
Glu223 change, a residue bigger than Asp and therefore
imposing additional steric hindrance to an extra phosphate, could
contribute to the stronger NAD+ specificity of BDH
(practically without activity with NADP) as compared with other MDR
enzymes that, in general, have some activity with NADP(H).
Whereas several members of the zinc-containing medium-chain ADH family
have two Zn2+ ions/subunit, others, such as mammalian
sorbitol dehydrogenase, have only one (36). Although the alignment of
BDH with the members of the medium-chain ADH family is reasonably good
for the ligands of the catalytic zinc, it is more speculative in regard
to the ligands for the so-called "structural zinc." The ligands for
the structural zinc in the medium-chain ADHs are four cysteines
located within a short-segment region. In the case of BDH, there are
four cysteines aligned with the cysteines that typically act as the zinc ligands in medium-chain ADHs (Cys97,
Cys100, Cys103, and Cys111). It is
possible, then, that BDH could bind a second zinc, although the long
insertion existing between Cys97 and Cys100 may
interfere with the binding.
The phylogenetic tree generated from a multiple sequence alignment of
12 MDR enzymes from S. cerevisiae containing the "zinc ADH
signature" resulted in five subgroups. Whereas the clustering of the
polyol MDR enzymes (xylitol dehydrogenase, sorbitol dehydrogenase, and
its close homolog Yal246p in one subgroup and BDH and Yal061p in the
other) is well supported (>95% bootstraps), the grouping of the two
other clusters (the one comprising the ethanol-active enzymes (ADHI,
ADHII, ADHIII, and ADHV) and the one with the putative cinnamyl-alcohol
dehydrogenases (Ycr105p and Ymr318p)) is supported by only 63% of the
bootstraps. Ycr105p has already been described as an MDR enzyme in a
recent report (43).
The S. cerevisiae YAL060W gene product, BDH,
catalyzes the NAD+-dependent oxidation of
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol and
meso-2,3-butanediol to (3R)-acetoin and
(3S)-acetoin, respectively, as well as the corresponding
reverse reactions. A chiral column that could resolve the three
2,3-butanediol isomers and the two acetoin isomers was used to
demonstrate the stereospecificity of the enzyme. The GLC profiles
indicated that the oxidation of meso-2,3-butanediol yielded (3S)-acetoin (showing the specificity toward the secondary
alcohol in R-configuration), whereas the reduction of
(3R/3S)-acetoin yielded
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol (from
(3R)-acetoin) and meso-2,3-butanediol (from
(3S)-acetoin). This demonstrated that the reduction of the carbonyl from acetoin yielded also the R-configuration of
the corresponding alcohol. It has also been shown that the rate of the
reduction of the carbonyl depends on the configuration of the vicinal
alcohol, being greater if it is in R-configuration than in
S-configuration. This is also true for the oxidation
reaction since the kcat value for the oxidation
of meso-2,3-butanediol is approximately two-thirds of the
value found for the oxidation of
(2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol. As many other
2,3-butanediol dehydrogenases, BDH can also reduce diacetyl to acetoin.
Other 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenases have been partially characterized
in S. cerevisiae (44), Candida utilis (45, 46), and Candida salmanticensis (45), although their properties
are different from those of the present enzyme. Thus, the molecular mass of the enzyme from S. cerevisiae is 140,000 Da, with a
subunit molecular mass of 35,000 Da (44), whereas the molecular mass of
the enzyme studied here is 81,800 Da, with a subunit molecular mass of
41,000 Da. Also, the specific activity given by the pure (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase previously
isolated from S. cerevisiae was 20.25 units/mg, but was
>900 units/mg in the present work (measured under similar conditions).
Also, the present kinetic constants differ from those in the previous
report. The specific activities and the kinetic constants of the
enzymes with 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase activity from C. utilis (45, 46) were also different from those of our enzyme.
Moreover, the lack of sequence information for those enzymes precludes
a complete comparison with the present BDH.
Most prokaryotic 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenases characterized so far in
terms of their stereospecificity toward the different 2,3-butanediol
isomers and corresponding acetoins (such as the ones from
Brevibacterium saccharolyticum, Klebsiella
terrigena, and Klebsiella pneumoniae (47-49))
have characteristics of the SDR family of enzymes. Only one known
example in prokaryotes, the BDH from P. putida, corresponds
to an MDR enzyme (37). It shows 36.5% identity (and 45.6% similarity)
to BDH (Fig. 1 A), which represents the highest homology
found for BDH to any related enzyme. Little is known of enzymes with
BDH specificity in eukaryotes. The only reported eukaryotic BDH, a
bovine butanediol dehydrogenase similar to that from K. terrigena, also belongs to the SDR family (50). Therefore, the
present enzyme from S. cerevisiae, BDH, would be the first
characterized eukaryotic MDR with demonstrated stereospecificity toward
the 2,3-butanediol isomers (and corresponding acetoins).
During normal alcoholic fermentation from glucose, yeast produces
2,3-butanediol at a concentration of ~1 mM (51). This compound derives from the reduction of the physiological intermediates acetoin (3-hydroxy-2-butanone) and diacetyl (2,3-butanedione) (52) and
constitutes a mixture of ~67%
(2R,3R)-(
)-2,3-butanediol and 33%
meso-2,3-butanediol (51), although a small percentage of
(2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol cannot be excluded. There
is general agreement that acetoin, the precursor of 2,3-butanediol, is
produced by yeast at least by three different mechanisms (53-56) (Fig.
6): 1) by the action of pyruvate
decarboxylase, which catalyzes an aldol-type condensation reaction
between two molecules of acetaldehyde; 2) by the addition of
acetaldehyde to an intermediate formed between pyruvate and thiamin
pyrophosphate in a reaction also catalyzed by pyruvate decarboxylase;
and 3) by the action of
-acetolactate synthase on pyruvate, yielding
-acetolactate, which is decarboxylated to diacetyl and reduced to
acetoin. Although it has been reported that S. cerevisiae
does not have
-acetolactate decarboxylase, it still can produce
diacetyl from
-acetolactate by spontaneous oxidative decarboxylation
(57, 58). Moreover, the yeast has at least two
NADPH-dependent diacetyl reductases, which can reduce diacetyl to (3R)-acetoin and (3S)-acetoin
(59).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Metabolic pathway for the formation of
acetoin and 2,3-butanediol in yeast. Acetoin can be produced from
acetaldehyde and pyruvate by the action of the thiamin
pyrophosphate-dependent enzyme, pyruvate decarboxylase
(PDC), located in the cytosol. It can also be formed
by the reduction of diacetyl, arising from the spontaneous
decarboxylation (broken arrow) of -acetolactate produced
by the mitochondrial enzyme -acetolactate synthase (ALS).
The diacetyl reduction reaction can be catalyzed by the
NAD(H)-dependent enzyme BDH and by two
NADP(H)-dependent diacetyl reductases (not shown in the
pathway). 2,3-Butanediol arises from the reduction of acetoin by
BDH.
|
|
In P. putida, the gene coding for 2,3-butanediol
dehydrogenase is part of the acetoin dehydrogenase operon that allows
this bacterium to grow on 2,3-butanediol (37). S. cerevisiae
can also grow on 2,3-butanediol as the sole carbon and energy source, and the yeast shows a >3-fold increase in BDH content when it grows in
the presence of this compound. These data suggest that the enzyme
reported here is needed in both, the fermentation giving 2,3-butanediol
from acetoin, and under oxidation conditions allowing the yeast to use
2,3-butanediol as a carbon and energy source.
The fact that the strain with the YAL060W gene disrupted
could still grow on 2,3-butanediol (mixture of isomers) indicates that S. cerevisiae has other enzymes that can metabolize
2,3-butanediol. We are currently using the YAL060W-disrupted
yeast strain to study the induction of other genes by
2,3-butanediol.
A potential use of BDH would be in the synthesis of chiral acetoinic
pure compounds (the three 2,3-butanediol and two acetoin isomers)
and other related compounds. An enzyme already reported in this regard
is (2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase from
Bacillus stearothermophilus (60, 61), which has been
used for the interconversion between
(2S,3S)-2,3-butanediol and
(3S)-acetoin and in the preparation of enantiomerically pure
bicyclic octenols/octenones and heptenols/heptenones.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants PB98-0855 and PB96-1167
from the Dirección General de Enseñanza Superior e
Investigación Científica and Grant BIO4-CT97-2123 from
the Commission of the European Union.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
34-93-581-3026; Fax: 34-93-581-1264; E-mail:
xavier.pares@uab.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 9, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003035200
2
C. Larroy, M. R. Fernández, E. González, X. Parés and J. A. Biosca, manuscript
in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ADH, alcohol
dehydrogenase;
MDR, medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase;
SDR, short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
BDH, (2R,3R)-2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase;
GLC, gas-liquid chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Botstein, D.,
Chervitz, S. A.,
and Cherry, J. M.
(1997)
Science
277,
1259-1260
|
| 2.
|
DeRisi, J. L.,
Iyer, V. R.,
and Brown, P. O.
(1997)
Science
278,
680-686
|
| 3.
|
Jörnvall, H.,
Danielsson, O.,
Eklund, H.,
Helmqvist, L.,
Höög, J.-O.,
Parés, X.,
and Shafqat, J.
(1993)
in
Enzymology and Molecular Biology of Carbonyl Metabolism
(Weiner, H.
, Crabb, D. W.
, and Flynn, T. G., eds), Vol. 4
, pp. 533-544, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 4.
|
Persson, B.,
Zigler, J. S., Jr.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
226,
15-22
|
| 5.
|
Bennetzen, J. L.,
and Hall, B. D.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
3018-3025
|
| 6.
|
Ciriacy, M.
(1975)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
135,
157-164
|
| 7.
|
Wills, C.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1979)
Eur. J. Biochem.
99,
323-331
|
| 8.
|
Russell, D. W.,
Smith, M.,
Williamson, V. M.,
and Young, E. T.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
2674-2682
|
| 9.
|
Young, E. T.,
and Pilgrim, D.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
3024-3034
|
| 10.
|
Feldmann, H.,
Aigle, M.,
Aljinovic, G.,
André, B.,
Baclet, M. C.,
Barthe, C.,
Baur, A.,
Becam, A. M.,
Biteau, N.,
Boles, E.,
et al..
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5795-5809
|
| 11.
|
Wehner, E. P.,
Rao, E.,
and Brendel, M.
(1993)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
237,
351-358
|
| 12.
|
Fernández, M. R.,
Biosca, J. A.,
Norin, A.,
Jörnvall, H.,
and Parés, X.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
370,
23-26
|
| 13.
|
Fernández, M. R.,
Biosca, J. A.,
Torres, D.,
Crossas, B.,
and Parés, X.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
37869-37875
|
| 14.
|
Sarthy, A.,
Schopp, C.,
and Idler, K. B.
(1994)
Gene (Amst.)
140,
121-126
|
| 15.
|
Richard, P.,
Toirani, M. H.,
and Penttilä, M.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
457,
135-138
|
| 16.
|
Williamson, V. M.,
and Paquin, C. E.
(1987)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
209,
374-381
|
| 17.
|
Drewke, C.,
and Ciriacy, M.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
950,
54-60
|
| 18.
|
Persson, B.,
Hallborn, J.,
Walfridsson, M.,
Hahn-Hägerdal, B.,
Keränen, S.,
Penttilä, M.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
324,
9-14
|
| 19.
|
Jörnvall, H.
(1994)
in
Toward a Molecular Basis of Alcohol Use and Abuse
(Jansson, B.
, Jörnvall, H.
, Rydberg, U.
, Terenius, L.
, and Vallee, B. L., eds)
, pp. 221-229, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland
|
| 20.
|
Reid, M. F.,
and Fewson, C. A.
(1994)
Crit. Rev. Microbiol.
20,
13-56
|
| 21.
|
Sun, H.,
and Plapp, B. V.
(1992)
J. Mol. Evol.
34,
522-535
|
| 22.
|
Thompson, J. D.,
Higgins, D. G.,
and Gibbson, J. J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
4673-4680
|
| 23.
|
Page, R. D.
(1996)
Comput. Appl. Biosci.
12,
357-358
|
| 24.
|
Atrian, S.,
González-Duarte, R.,
and Fothergill-Gilmore, L. A.
(1990)
Gene (Amst.)
93,
205-212
|
| 25.
|
Winston, F.,
Dollard, C.,
and Ricupero-Hovasse, S. L.
(1995)
Yeast
11,
53-55
|
| 26.
|
Jones, E. W.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
194,
428-453
|
| 27.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 28.
|
Ausubel, F. H.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(1991)
Current Protocols of Molecular Biology
, pp. 133.1-13.7.2, Greene Publishing/Wiley-Interscience, New York
|
| 29.
|
Ito, H.,
Fukuda, Y.,
Murata, K.,
and Kimura, A.
(1983)
J. Bacteriol.
153,
163-168
|
| 30.
|
Rothstein, R. J.
(1983)
Methods Enzymol.
101,
202-211
|
| 31.
|
Berben, G.,
Dumant, J.,
Gilliquet, V.,
Bolle, P. A.,
and Hilger, F.
(1991)
Yeast
7,
475-477
|
| 32.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 33.
|
Robertson, E. F.,
Dannelly, H. K.,
Malloy, P. J.,
and Reeves, H. C.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
167,
290-294
|
| 34.
|
Saitou, N.,
and Nei, M.
(1987)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
4,
406-425
|
| 35.
|
Fernández, M. R.
(1998)
Functional and structural studies of the glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cloning, detection and site-directed mutagenesis. Ph.D. thesis
, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
|
| 36.
|
Höög, J.-O.,
Karlsson, C.,
Eklund, H.,
Shapiro, R.,
and Jörnvall, H.
(1993)
in
Enzymology and Molecular Biology of Carbonyl Metabolism
(Weiner, H.
, Crabbe, D. W.
, and Flynn, T. G., eds), Vol. 4
, pp. 439-450, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 37.
|
Huang, M.,
Oppermann, F. B.,
and Steinbüchel, A.
(1994)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
124,
141-150
|
| 38.
|
Aronson, B.,
Somerville, R. L.,
Epperly, B. R.,
and Dekker, E. E.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
5226-5232
|
| 39.
|
Eklund, H.,
Plapp, B. V.,
Samara, J. P.,
and Bränden, C.-I.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
14349-14358
|
| 40.
|
Jörnvall, H.
(1977)
Eur. J. Biochem.
16,
25-40
|
| 41.
|
Ganzhorn, A. J.,
Green, D. W.,
Hershey, A. D.,
Gould, R. M.,
and Plapp, B. V.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
3754-3761
|
| 42.
|
Plapp, B. V.,
Ganzhorn, A. J.,
Gould, R. M.,
Green, D. W.,
and Hershey, A. D.
(1991)
in
Enzymology and Molecular Biology of Carbonyl Metabolism
(Weiner, H., ed)
, pp. 241-251, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 43.
|
Wilkin, J. M.,
Soetaert, K.,
Stélandre, M.,
Buyssens, P.,
Castillo, G.,
Demoulin, V.,
Bottu, G.,
Laneelle, M. A.,
Daffe, M.,
and De Bruyn, J.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
262,
299-307
|
| 44.
|
Heidlas, J.,
and Tressl, R.
(1990)
Arch. Microbiol.
154,
267-273
|
| 45.
|
Verduyn, C.,
Breeveld, G. J.,
Scheffers, A.,
and van Dijken, J. P.
(1988)
Yeast
4,
135-142
|
| 46.
|
Verduyn, C.,
Breeveld, G. J.,
Scheffers, A.,
and van Dijken, J. P.
(1988)
Yeast
4,
127-133
|
| 47.
|
Ui, S.,
Otagiri, M.,
Mimura, A.,
Dohmae, N.,
Takio, K.,
Ohkuma, M.,
and Kudo, T.
(1998)
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
86,
290-295
|
| 48.
|
Ui, S.,
Okajima, Y.,
Mimura, A.,
Kanai, H.,
Kobayashi, T.,
and Kudo, T.
(1997)
J. Ferment. Bioeng.
84,
185-189
|
| 49.
|
Blomqvist, K.,
Nikkola, M.,
Lehtovaara, P.,
Suihko, M.,
Airaksinen, U.,
Straby, K.,
Knowles, J.,
and Penttila, M.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
1392-1404
|
| 50.
|
Smania, A. M.,
and Argaraña, C. E.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
197,
231-238
|
| 51.
|
Neish, A. C.
(1950)
Can. J. Res.
28B,
660-661
|
| 52.
|
Liebs, P.,
Wolter, H.-C.,
and Krüger, M.
(1969)
Nahrung
13,
455-459
|
| 53.
|
Chao-Chen, G.,
and Jordan, F.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
3576-3582
|
| 54.
|
Stivers, J. T.,
and Washabaugh, M. W.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
13472-13482
|
| 55.
|
Romano, P.,
and Suzzi, G.
(1993)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
108,
23-26
|
| 56.
|
Tittel, D.,
and Radler, F.
(1979)
Monatsschr. Brau.
32,
260-267
|
| 57.
|
Suomalainen, H.,
and Ronkainen, P.
(1968)
Nature
220,
792-793
|
| 58.
|
Blomqvist, K.,
Suihko, M.,
Knowles, J.,
and Pentittla, M.
(1991)
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
57,
2796-2803
|
| 59.
|
Heidlas, J.,
and Tressl, R.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
188,
165-174
|
| 60.
|
Giovannini, P. P.,
Medici, A.,
Bergamini, C. M.,
and Rippa, M.
(1996)
Bioorg. Med. Chem.
4,
1197-1201
|
| 61.
|
Giovannini, P. P.,
Hanau, S.,
Rippa, M.,
Bortolini, O.,
Fogagnolo, M.,
and Medici, A.
(1996)
Tetrahedron
52,
1669-1676
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles: