![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 46, 35978-35985, November 17, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología
Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto Universitario de
Oncología, Universidad de Oviedo, 33006-Oviedo, Spain and the
Received for publication, July 10, 2000, and in revised form, August 15, 2000
We have cloned and characterized a cDNA
encoding Dm1-MMP, the first matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)
identified in Drosophila melanogaster. The isolated
cDNA encodes a protein of 541 residues that has a domain
organization identical to that of most vertebrate MMPs including a
signal sequence, a prodomain with the activation locus, a catalytic
domain with a zinc-binding site, and a COOH-terminal hemopexin domain.
Northern blot analysis of Dm1-MMP expression in embryonic
and larval adult tissues revealed a strong expression level in the
developing embryo at 10-22 h, declining thereafter and being
undetectable in adults. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of
pro- and active forms of Dm1-MMP in vivo during larval development. In situ hybridization experiments
demonstrated that Dm1-MMP is expressed in a segmented
pattern in cell clusters at the midline during embryonic stage 12-13,
when neurons of the central nervous system start to arise. Recombinant
Dm1-MMP produced in Escherichia coli exhibits a
potent proteolytic activity against synthetic peptides used for
analysis of vertebrate MMPs. This activity is inhibited by tissue
inhibitors of metalloproteinases and by synthetic MMP inhibitors such
as BB-94. Furthermore, Dm1-MMP is able to degrade the
extracellular matrix and basement membrane proteins fibronectin and
type IV collagen. On the basis of these data, together with the
predominant expression of Dm1-MMP in embryonic neural
cells, we propose that this enzyme may be involved in the extracellular matrix remodeling taking place during the development of
the central nervous system in Drosophila.
In 1962, Gross and Lapière (1) reported the discovery of a
collagenolytic enzyme involved in resorbing amphibian tadpole tails
during metamorphosis. This report initiated the field of matrix
metalloproteinases (MMPs),1 a
family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases. These proteinases play an essential role in the connective tissue remodeling occurring in
normal processes in vertebrates, such as embryonic development, bone
growth, angiogenesis, wound healing, and limb regeneration (2, 3). In
addition, abnormal expression of these enzymes may contribute to a
variety of pathological processes including atherosclerosis (4),
rheumatoid arthritis (5), neurological diseases (6), and tumor invasion
and metastasis (7). To date, the human MMP family consists of 20 distinct proteinases that can be classified into five major subfamilies
according to their primary structures, substrate specificity, and
cellular localization. These are collagenases, stromelysins,
gelatinases, membrane-type MMPs, and other MMPs (1, 8, 9). Structural analysis of MMPs reveals that most are organized into three distinctive and well defined domains as follows: a propeptide with a conserved Cys
residue involved in maintaining the enzyme latency, a catalytic domain
with a zinc-binding site, and a hemopexin-like domain that plays
a role in substrate binding as well as in mediating interactions with
the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs), a family of
endogenous inhibitors of MMPs (10). Additional domains such as
fibronectin-like repeats or COOH-terminal hydrophobic extensions are
present in other family members like gelatinases or membrane type (MT)-MMPs, thus contributing to an increase in their structural complexity. Interestingly, recent biochemical characterization of
diverse mammalian MMPs has shown that these enzymes are not exclusively
involved in the degradation of extracellular matrix or basement
membrane protein components. These MMPs play direct roles in essential
cellular processes such as proliferation, differentiation, angiogenesis, or apoptosis through their ability to catalyze the hydrolysis of a variety of substrates including membrane-bound precursors of cytokines, growth factors, or hormone receptors (11-15).
The finding that MMPs may be involved in a wide variety of biological
processes has prompted the search for members of this family in model
organisms, in which the functional roles of these enzymes could be
recognized and extensively analyzed by using additional experimental
approaches. Thus, in addition to the diverse MMPs identified in
mammalian tissues, MMPs have also been cloned from Xenopus
laevis (16, 17), embryonic sea urchin (18), green alga (19),
Caenorhabditis elegans (20), Hydra vulgaris (21),
and Arabidopsis thaliana (22). However, no member of the MMP
family has been cloned in Drosophila melanogaster. This is
particularly intriguing if we consider that MMPs are assumed to play a
decisive role in tissue remodeling during embryogenesis, a process that
has been extensively studied in Drosophila and that has many
other features that are conserved. Furthermore, a number of recent
reports provide evidence that Drosophila metalloproteases belonging to other families, including those encoded by the
kuzbanian, tolloid, and tolkin genes,
are key components in many signaling pathways in Drosophila
and mediate essential processes such as neurogenesis or embryonic
patterning (23-27).
Because of the potential importance of MMPs in developmental processes,
identification and characterization of members of this family in
Drosophila are likely to help resolve the functions of these
enzymes. In this study, we report the identification and
characterization of Dm1-MMP, the first MMP family member
identified in D. melanogaster. We show that it is expressed
in larval tissues, with a distinct, reiterated expression pattern in
the midline, coinciding with the beginning of neural and glial
differentiation during embryogenesis. Furthermore, recombinant
Dm1-MMP produced in Escherichia coli has
proteolytic activity against extracellular matrix and basement membrane
proteins. On the basis of these data, we propose that
Dm1-MMP may play a role during the development of the
central nervous system in Drosophila.
Materials--
Fly cosmid genomic clones in Lorist 6 vector
(28) were obtained from the Human Genome Mapping Resource Center
(Cambridgeshire, UK). cDNA libraries constructed in Probe Preparation and Screening of a Drosophila cDNA
Library--
A computer search of the GenBankTM data base
STSs for entries with similarity to MMPs previously described
identified a sequence (Z31945) contributed by the D. melanogaster STS European Mapping Project. This 309-bp sequence
revealed significant similarity with the catalytic domain of MMPs.
Cosmid clones containing this STS (18a7, 23 g10, 57 g3, 162d9) were
used to verify this sequence and to extend it by direct sequencing. To
obtain the corresponding cDNA sequence, two specific primers,
5'-CGGCTATCTACCCGCCTCTG (primer 1) and 5'-AGATCTTGTAGGTGAGGTT (primer
2), were used for PCR amplification to prepare a probe to screen a
panel of cDNAs from different developmental stages. The PCR was
carried out in a GeneAmp 2400 PCR system from PerkinElmer Life Sciences
for 30 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 15 s), annealing
(57 °C, 15 s), and extension (72 °C, 20 s). A 271-bp
PCR product amplified from larva cDNA was radiolabeled and used to
screen a larva cDNA library according to standard procedures (29).
Cloned DNA fragments were sequenced with an ABI 337 automatic sequencer
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences). Computer analysis of DNA and protein
sequences was performed with the GCG software package of the University
of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group.
Chromosomal Mapping--
Hybridization to polytene chromosomes
squashes using the alkaline phosphatase-based DNA detection system was
performed as described (30). cDNA was biotin-labeled by nick
translation (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and used as probe.
RNA Analysis--
Total RNA (30 µg) from diverse developmental
stages of Drosophila was electrophoresed and blotted to
Hybdond N+ (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The blot was hybridized with a
radiolabeled Dm1-MMP cDNA and washed according to
standard procedures (21). Blots were subsequently hybridized with a
ribosomal DNA probe to control for RNA loading. In situ
hybridization to whole mount embryos was performed using sense and
antisense RNA probes synthesized by using the DIG-RNA labeling kit
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Detection was with anti-DIG-alkaline
phosphatase reaction (31).
Expression, Refolding, and Purification of Dm1-MMP--
A 735-bp
fragment of the Dm1-MMP cDNA containing the pro- and
catalytic domains was generated by PCR amplification with primers 5'-CGGGATCCGCAATCGGCACCCGTTTCCACC (BamHI-proDm1) and
5'-CGGAATTCATACAGTGACTGGATGGCCGC (EcoRI-proDm1) using the
full-length Dm1-MMP cDNA as template. PCR amplification
was performed for 30 cycles using the ExpandTM High
Fidelity PCR system. Due to the design of the oligonucleotides, the
amplified fragment could be cleaved at both ends with EcoRI and BamHI and ligated in frame into the pRSETB E. coli expression vector (Invitrogen) thereby adding an
NH2-terminal His6 tag to the protein. The
resulting pRSET-proDm1 vector was transformed into BL21(DE3)pLysS
E. coli cells, and expression was induced by addition of
isopropyl-1-thio- Enzymatic Assays--
Enzymatic activity of purified recombinant
Dm1-MMP was detected using the synthetic fluorescent
substrates Mca-Pro-Leu-Gly-Leu-Dpa-Ala-Arg-NH2 (QF-24), Mca-Pro-Leu-Ala-Nva-Dpa-Ala-Arg-NH2 (QF-35), and
Mca-Pro-Cha-Gly-Nva-His-Ala-Dpa-NH2 (QF-41) (provided by
C. G. Knight, University of Cambridge, UK). Routine assays were
performed at 37 °C at substrate concentrations of 1 µM
in an assay buffer of 50 mM Tris/HCl, 5 mM
CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% (v/v) Brij 35, pH
7.6, with a final concentration of Me2SO of 1%
(32). The fluorometric measurements were made in an MPF-44A PerkinElmer
Life Sciences spectrofluorometer ( Substrate Gel Zymography--
Casein zymography was done using a
13% SDS-polyacrylamide gel containing 1 mg/ml casein. Electrophoresis
was performed at room temperature, under nonreducing conditions.
Following electrophoresis, the gel was washed twice for 1 h each
in 100 ml of 2.5% Triton X-100 (v/v) to remove SDS and incubated for
24 h at 37 °C in 50 mM Tris/HCl, 5 mM
CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% (v/v) Brij 35, pH 7.6, to allow proteolysis. After that, the gel was stained with Coomassie Blue to visualize the lytic bands.
Antibody Production and Western Blot Analysis--
Purified
Dm1-MMP was injected into rabbits using the multiple
injection method developed by Vaitukaitis (33). The rabbits were bled 6 weeks after the injection, and the serum was dialyzed for 24 h at
4 °C against 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.2. The
material was then chromatographed in a column of DEAE-cellulose
equilibrated and eluted in the same buffer. IgG-containing fractions
were collected and stored at Identification and Characterization of a Drosophila Larva
cDNA-encoding a Member of the Matrix Metalloproteinase
Family--
By analyzing the GenBankTM data base of
Drosophila expressed sequence tags and STSs, we identified a
sequence with similarity to vertebrate MMPs. We used this sequence to
isolate a short genomic fragment (Z31945) with significant sequence
similarity to a region of the catalytic domain found in the different
vertebrate MMPs, and then we isolated a full-length cDNA clone from
a a fly larva
Comparison of the predicted Dm1-MMP sequence with those of
the vertebrate MMPs demonstrated that the Drosophila MMP has
all the structural features typical of members of this family. The stretch of hydrophobic residues close to the proposed initiator methionine strongly suggests the presence of the signal peptide, which
is characteristic of most MMPs. Dm1-MMP also has a sequence PRCGVXD (at positions 91-97), which is a conserved motif in
the prodomain of MMPs that is involved in maintaining latency. Seven residues COOH-terminal to this motif, the deduced amino acid sequence contains a furin consensus sequence (RXKR) that mediates the
intracellular activation of several family members including
MT-MMPs and stromelysin-3 (35, 36). In addition,
Dm1-MMP also contains a putative catalytic domain of about
160 residues, including the consensus motif
HEXGHXXGXXHS (at positions 224-234)
containing the three His residues involved in the coordination of the
zinc atom at the active site and the Ser residue that distinguishes
MMPs from other metalloproteinases. This catalytic domain also has a
Met residue seven residues COOH-terminal to the zinc-binding site,
conserved in all MMPs and proposed to play an essential role in the
structure of the active sites of these enzymes (37). Finally, the
deduced sequence contains a COOH-terminal fragment of about 200 residues with sequence similarity to hemopexin and found in most family
members. On the basis of these structural features, we propose that
this nucleotide sequence codes for a new member of the MMP family that
we suggest to call Dm1-MMP, because it is the first MMP
cloned and characterized in D. melanogaster.
Sequence analysis has subdivided the collagenases, stromelysins,
membrane-type MMPs, and gelatinases to distinct MMP subgroups. However,
detailed analysis of the deduced amino acid sequence of
Dm1-MMP did not allow us to assign it to any of the main
subfamilies (Fig. 2). Dm1-MMP
lacks the three residues (Tyr, Asp, and Gly) that are conserved in all
collagenases and that have been proposed as essential determinants of
collagenase specificity (38, 39). The equivalent residues in
Dm1-MMP are Thr-216, Gln-237, and Ser-239. Stromelysins are
characterized by the presence of an insertion of 9 mostly hydrophobic
residues in the COOH terminus of their catalytic domain. The sequence
of Dm1-MMP shows a longer insertion (15 residues) in the
homologous region that has marked differences in amino acid sequence
when compared with stromelysins. Furthermore, Dm1-MMP lacks
the fibronectin-like domain present in gelatinases and the hydrophobic
transmembrane domain in the COOH terminus characteristic of the
MT-MMPs, although it possesses a COOH-terminal extension rich in
acidic residues whose functional significance is presently unclear
(Fig. 2). There is a growing category of "other MMPs," and we
suggest that Dm1-MMP should be included with them. Finally,
it should be mentioned that during preparation of this manuscript, the
genomic sequence of Drosophila was reported (40). One of the
annotated genes in this sequence (AAF47255) appears to correspond to
Dm1-MMP although there are some differences in the predicted
exons. The first exon of Dm1-MMP, which encodes the
initiator Met and signal sequence, is not identified in AAF47255, whereas an additional exon is predicted at the 3'-end of AAF47255 which
is missing in the corresponding cDNA. The finding of an expressed
sequence tag covering the region present in clone AAF47255 together
with data derived from sequencing several other cDNA clones are
fully compatible with the sequence of Dm1-MMP reported in
Fig. 2.
Enzymatic Activity of Dm1-MMP Produced in Bacterial Cells--
To
investigate the enzymatic properties of Dm1-MMP, a cDNA
construct coding for its pro- and catalytic domains was expressed in
E. coli as a His fusion protein (Fig.
3). After purification and refolding, a
fraction of the proenzyme was autoactivated, resulting in the
generation of a protein with a molecular mass of about 19 kDa (Fig. 3).
This behavior has been observed previously with some vertebrate
pro-MMPs (41). In order to assess the substrate specificity of the
recombinant protease, a series of synthetic quenched fluorescent
peptides commonly used for assaying vertebrate MMPs were employed. As
shown in Fig. 4, the general MMP
substrate QF-24, the collagenase/gelatinase substrate QF-41, and the
stromelysin substrate QF-35 were hydrolyzed by Dm1-MMP.
Next, we examined the potential inhibition of active Dm1-MMP
by different available TIMPs and the hydroxamic acid-based inhibitor
BB-94 (Fig. 4). For this purpose, we used a constant enzyme
concentration of 20 nM in the quenched fluorescent assay,
employing QF-41 as substrate. As shown in Fig. 4, TIMP-4 completely
abolished the hydrolyzing activity of Dm1-MMP, whereas
TIMP-2 and BB-94 extensively blocked this activity. By contrast, the
inhibitory effect of TIMP-1 was significantly lower.
We next tested whether Dm1-MMP could hydrolyze a series of
basement membrane and extracellular matrix components. For this purpose, a variety of proteins including type IV collagen, laminin, fibronectin, fibrinogen, gelatin, and fibrillar collagens were incubated with purified Dm1-MMP and the reactions followed
by SDS-PAGE. As shown in Fig.
5A, the active
Dm1-MMP was able to degrade mammalian fibronectin and type
IV collagen. In both cases, the degrading activity was completely
blocked by MMP inhibitors including EDTA, synthetic hydroxamic
acid-based compounds like BB-94, and TIMP-4 (data not shown). Fig.
5A also shows that no proteolysis was obtained with laminin,
fibrinogen, and gelatin. Similarly, type I and type II fibrillar
collagens were resistant to hydrolysis, which is consistent with the
fact that Dm1-MMP lacks the structural determinants to act
as a triple helical fibrillar collagenase. Zymogram analysis using
casein provided additional evidence on the enzymatic activity of
Dm1-MMP (Fig. 5B). Lytic bands co-migrating with
the proform and active Dm1-MMP recombinant proteins (35 and
19 kDa, respectively) were observed. An additional band of 21 kDa was
also detected in the zymogram. This band is absent in the control
extracts and likely corresponds to an intermediate form generated
during the activation process (Fig. 5B). Taken together,
these results provide evidence that Dm1-MMP is an active enzyme on extracellular matrix and basement membrane substrates and
with the inhibitory profile characteristic of members of the MMP family
of endopeptidases.
Spatio-temporal Expression Pattern of Dm1-MMP--
To determine
the temporal expression pattern of Dm1-MMP during
Drosophila development, a Northern blot containing total RNA prepared from different developmental stages was hybridized with the
Dm1-MMP cDNA. As can be seen in Fig.
6A, the Dm1-MMP
mRNA migrated as a major band of 3.5 kb, although a second
transcript of 7 kb was also detected. These Dm1-MMP
transcripts were first observed in the embryo at 10-22 h.
Dm1-MMP expression declined to much lower levels throughout
all larval stages and was virtually undetectable in adults (Fig.
6A). To characterize the abundance of Dm1-MMP
protein, we performed Western blot analysis of protein extracts from
larva, using polyclonal antibodies against the purified recombinant
protein. As can be seen in Fig. 6B, a major band of about 49 kDa and a minor one of 60 kDa were observed in larva. These bands
likely correspond to the active and latent forms of the enzyme,
respectively. By contrast, no signal was obtained with the preimmune
antiserum (Fig. 6B). Finally, the spatial expression pattern
of Dm1-MMP in Drosophila embryos was analyzed by
whole mount in situ hybridization. In agreement with the
results obtained by Northern blot analysis, Dm1-MMP mRNA
was only detected in stage 12-13 embryos (Fig.
7). At this point, Dm1-MMP RNA
was mainly in a single cluster of cells present in each segment along
the ventral midline. At this developmental stage such pattern resembles the distribution of midline glial cells associated with the developing commissures of the ventral nerve cord (42).
This work provides the first characterization of a
Drosophila MMP. The approach to identify Dm1-MMP
involved the search of Drosophila genomic STSs for sequences
conserved in vertebrate MMPs, followed by screening of a
Drosophila larva cDNA library using the identified STSs
as hybridization probes. The isolated full-length cDNA codes for a
protein that contains all protein domains characteristic of vertebrate
MMPs, including a signal sequence, a propeptide with a conserved Cys
residue involved in maintaining enzyme latency, a catalytic domain with
the corresponding zinc-binding site, a hinge region, and a
COOH-terminal hemopexin domain organized in four recognizable repeats.
Dm1-MMP also contains a furin-like cleavage site at the end
of the propeptide domain that could be involved in the activation of
this enzyme by some of the furin-like proteases described in
Drosophila (43, 44). On the basis of these data, we conclude
that the identified protein is a member of the MMP family that has
conserved all structural features defined in its vertebrate
counterparts as essential determinants for secretion, latency,
activation, and catalytic activity of these enzymes.
In addition to all these structural properties, we have also provided
evidence that Dm1-MMP is a functionally active member of
this family of proteolytic enzymes as assessed by its ability to
degrade several peptides and proteins widely used as substrates for
vertebrate MMPs. Recombinant Dm1-MMP exhibited a broad
specificity against synthetic substrates, efficiently degrading a
general MMP peptide substrate as well as collagenase-gelatinase, and
stromelysin-specific substrates. The recombinant Dm1-MMP was
also able to cleave proteins such as fibronectin and type IV collagen,
which are present in extracellular matrix and basement membranes and
have been previously documented in Drosophila (45-47).
Interestingly, all these proteolytic activities mediated by
Dm1-MMP are inhibited by specific MMP inhibitors including
TIMPs, providing additional support for the idea that Dm1-MMP behaves as its vertebrate counterparts in terms of
enzymatic properties, substrate specificity, and sensitivity to inhibitors.
The finding of a Drosophila MMP exhibiting striking
structural and functional similarities with MMPs described in other
organisms, together with the observation that at least a member of the
TIMP gene family is also present in flies (48), strongly suggests that
a conserved proteolytic system of tissue remodeling can be fully
reconstituted in invertebrates. However, compared with other organisms,
the Drosophila MMP system is significantly simpler. In fact,
20 different MMPs and 4 TIMPs have been described in human tissues to
date, whereas only two MMPs and a single TIMP have been identified in
the Drosophila genome (40, 48). These results suggest that
this protease family has undergone extensive gene duplication events
following divergence of invertebrates and vertebrates, perhaps as a
consequence of the increasing complexity of substrates that must be
hydrolyzed by mammalian MMPs. However, the possibility that
Drosophila MMPs may have a broader substrate specificity
cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, the apparently simplified MMP-TIMP
system in Drosophila may represent a very useful and
interesting model for studying the functional role of protease-mediated
events during development processes. This aspect is of special interest
considering that over many years Drosophila has proven to be
ideally suited for the analysis of this type of biological questions.
In addition, it is remarkable that other experimental systems including
C. elegans or A. thaliana are somewhat incomplete
as compared with Drosophila if we consider that to date no
evidence of presence of TIMPs in these organisms has been reported (20,
22).
As a prelude to analyzing the functional importance of
Dm1-MMP in development processes, we have examined the
spatio-temporal pattern of expression of this enzyme in the
Drosophila embryo. Interestingly, in the course of
embryogenesis, Dm1-MMP was detected predominantly in what
appear to be midline glial cells, suggesting that this enzyme may have
a role in the development of the Drosophila neural system.
The observed pattern of expression has interesting parallels to the
expression of previously described genes such as buttonless
(49), and this similarity may provide clues to the putative function of
Dm1-MMP in development of Drosophila neural
system. The midline glia are specialized non-neuronal cells that play a
major role in growth cone guidance (50-52). Thus, during neural
development, these cells are thought to provide guidance cues for
extending axons and at the same time to migrate and contribute to
separate the two axon commissures. Dm1-MMP synthesized by
these glial cells could be directly involved in these processes. In this way, its proteolytic activity on extracellular matrix proteins may
facilitate growth cone penetration through the complex cellular environment of the nervous system. Consistent with this possibility, previous work has demonstrated that MMPs are associated with extending neurites in mammals (53, 54). Likewise, the ADAM metalloprotease encoded by kuzbanian is required for axonal extension in the
embryonic central nervous system of Drosophila (23-27, 55).
Alternatively, Dm1-MMP might play more specific and subtle
roles than providing space for axonal growth by degrading extracellular
matrix proteins. Instead, this protease could help regulate the
availability of proteins sequestered as inactive molecules in the
extracellular matrix or help produce guidance signals encrypted in cell
surface molecules located in the environment of midline glial cells. In this regard, it is of interest that a number of midline glia or growth
cone guidance proteins such as Fasciclin II, Neuroglian, Wrapper,
Frazzled, and Klingon, contain several fibronectin-like domains in
their extracellular region (56-60). Our finding that Dm1-MMP can degrade fibronectin suggests that these proteins
could be potential targets of a regulated action of this protease. The advantages of D. melanogaster as an experimental model will
make it possible to combine genetic and biochemical approaches to
understand the biological meaning of the presence of Dm1-MMP
during neural development and to identify functionally relevant targets
of this protease.
In conclusion, we have cloned Dm1-MMP the first member of
the MMP family identified and characterized in Drosophila.
This enzyme exhibits extensive structural similarities with its
vertebrate counterparts in terms of similar domain organization and the
presence of critical residues for enzymatic activity. Likewise,
functional analysis has confirmed that Dm1-MMP is able to
degrade synthetic substrates and extracellular matrix remodeling and
basement membrane protein components that are targets of the
proteolytic action of vertebrate MMPs. Expression analysis has revealed
an unexpected specificity to its synthesis and suggests interesting
roles of this protease in development of the neural system. Further
studies, including analysis with mutant Drosophila deficient
in Dm1-MMP, will be required to elucidate the precise role
of this protease in any of the extensive extracellular matrix
remodeling processes taking place during Drosophila development.
We thank all members from our group for
support and helpful comments and S. Alvarez, F. Rodríguez, C. Garabaya, and M. Fernández for excellent technical assistance. We
are also grateful to Drs. V. Knäuper and Jan O. Stracke (School
of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, UK) for reagents and
technical discussions. The Instituto Universitario de Oncologia is
supported by Obra Social Cajastur-Asturias.
*
This work was supported by Comisión Interministerial
de Ciencia y Tecnología Spain Grant SAF97-0258, and Plan Fondos
Europeos para el Desarrollo Regional 1FD97-0214.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF271666.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. de
Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Medicina,
Universidad de Oviedo, 33006 Oviedo, Spain. Tel.: 34985104201; Fax:
34985103564; E-mail: CLO@correo.uniovi.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 29, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006045200
The abbreviations used are:
MMP, matrix
metalloproteinase;
bp, base pair(s);
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
SDS, sodium dodecyl
sulfate;
STS, sequence tagged site;
TIMP, tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinases;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
kb, kilobase pair;
Mca, (7-methoxycoumarin-4-yl)-acetyl;
Dpa, N-3-(2,4-dinitrophenyl)-L-2,3-diaminopropionyl;
Nva, norvalyl.
Dm1-MMP, a Matrix Metalloproteinase from
Drosophila with a Potential Role in Extracellular Matrix
Remodeling during Neural Development*
,
, and
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of
California, San Francisco, California 94143
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
gt11 were
from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). Restriction
endonucleases and other reagents used for molecular cloning were from
Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Synthetic oligonucleotides were prepared
with an Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) model 392A DNA
synthesizer. Double-stranded DNA probes were radiolabeled with
[32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol) purchased from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech using a commercial random-priming kit from the same company.
-D-galactopyranoside (0.5 mM final concentration) followed by further incubation for
3-20 h at 30 °C. Recombinant protein obtained in inclusion bodies
was solubilized using 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.6, containing
6 M GdnHCl, and 5 mM DTT, and purified in a
Superdex-75 column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.6, containing 3 M GdnHCl,
and 5 mM DTT. After SDS-PAGE analysis, peak fractions with
the recombinant protein were pooled, and the GdnHCl concentration was
adjusted to 6 M. Refolding was achieved by dialysis, first against a 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.6, containing 5 mM CaCl2, 200 mM NaCl, 50 µM ZnSO4, 0.05% Brij 35, 20% glycerol, and
2 M GdnHCl, and then against the same buffer with 2 mM DTT, without GdnHCl.
ex = 328 nm,
em = 393 nm). For inhibition assays, Dm1-MMP
(20 nM) and inhibitors were preincubated for 30 min at
20 °C, with BB-94 (British Biotech Pharmaceuticals, Oxford, UK) at
concentrations ranging from 0 to 100 nM. Inhibition assays
with TIMPs (kindly provided by Drs. V. Knäuper and G. Murphy)
were performed at the same conditions with 20 nM
concentration of the different inhibitors. Cleavage of type I, type II,
and type IV collagens, type I gelatin, type I laminin, fibronectin, and
fibrinogen (purchased from Sigma) by recombinant Dm1-MMP was
followed by SDS-PAGE. All assays were performed in the above described
assay buffer for 16 h at 37 °C. The enzyme/substrate ratio
(w/w) used in these experiments was 1/10.
20 °C until used. Western blots were
blocked in 5% milk in PBT (PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20) and then
incubated for 1 h with rabbit antiserum diluted 1:5000 in PBT.
After three washes in PBT, blots were incubated for 1 h with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG at 1:20,000 and
developed with the Renaissance chemiluminescence kit
(PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
gt-11 library. The corresponding 2.2-kb mRNA has
an open reading frame with two potential translation start sites. The most likely start site is the second methionine residue since the
sequence immediately upstream of the AUG codon corresponding to this
residue (CAAA AUG) perfectly matches the
Drosophila translation start site consensus sequence
((C/A)AA(A/C) AUG) (34). Furthermore, this methionine residue immediately precedes a hydrophobic sequence that could direct the protein to the secretory pathway. Assuming that
translation starts at this residue, the identified open reading frame
encodes a protein of 541 residues with a calculated molecular mass of
60.3 kDa (Fig. 1). Localization of the
Dm1-MMP gene to polytene chromosomes revealed that it was
located to region 60D13 (data not shown).

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid
sequence of Dm1-MMP. The amino acid sequence is
shown in single-letter code below the nucleotide
sequence. The methionine residue predicted as translation start site is
underlined. The cysteine-switch residues and those
corresponding to the zinc-binding site are shaded.

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Amino acid sequence alignment of
Dm1-MMP with different human MMPs. The amino acid
sequences of human MMPs showing the highest degree of sequence
similarity with Dm1-MMP were extracted from the SwissProt
data base, and the multiple alignment was performed with the PILEUP
program of the GCG package. Common residues to all sequences are
shaded. Gaps are indicated by hyphens. Numbering
corresponds to the sequence of Dm1-MMP.

View larger version (73K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Production of recombinant
Dm1-MMP in E. coli
BL21(DE3)pLysS. SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant
Dm1-MMP, 5 µl of bacterial extracts transformed with
pRSETB (lane 1), pRSETB-Dm1-MMP (lane 2), and
purified Dm1-MMP (lane 3). The processed form of
the enzyme generated after dialysis of the purified
proDm1-MMP (lane 4) indicated as active
Dm1-MMP. The sizes of the molecular weight markers
(MWM) are shown to the left.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Analysis of enzymatic activity of
Dm1-MMP. Synthetic fluorescent peptides QF-24,
QF-35, and QF-41 (1 µM) were incubated with active
Dm1-MMP (20 nM) at 50 mM Tris/HCl, 5 mM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.05%
(v/v) Brij 35, pH 7.6, with a final concentration of Me2SO
of 1%, for 12 h at 37 °C. The fluorometric measurements were
made at
ex = 328 nm and
em = 393 nm.
Synthetic peptide QF-41 was incubated with active Dm1-MMP in
the presence or absence of 20 nM of the indicated TIMPs and
of the MMP inhibitor BB-94 (100 nM), and fluorescence was
monitored as above.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Degradation of extracellular matrix compounds
by recombinant Dm1-MMP. A, type I, II,
and IV collagens, laminin, fibronectin, fibrinogen, and gelatin were
incubated with buffer alone (
lanes) or with 1 µg of
Dm1-MMP (+ lanes). The digestion products were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE (8% acrylamide) under reducing conditions and
stained with Coomassie Blue after electrophoresis. The sizes of the
molecular weight markers (MWM) are shown to the
left. B, zymogram analysis of Dm1-MMP.
Dm1-MMP was analyzed by casein zymography under nonreducing
conditions. The sizes of the molecular weight markers (MWM)
are shown to the left.

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Expression analysis of
Dm1-MMP in diverse Drosophila
development stages. A, developmental pattern of
the Dm1-MMP transcripts determined by Northern blot
analysis. The filter was hybridized to a Dm1-MMP cDNA
probe and then to a ribosomal DNA probe to control for RNA loading.
B, Western blot analysis of larval extracts incubated with
polyclonal antibody against Dm1-MMP diluted 1/5000 in
PBT.

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Embryonic pattern of Dm1-MMP
gene expression. In situ hybridization to stage 12-13
embryos using a Dm1-MMP antisense RNA probe. A,
ventral view; B, lateral view. Hybridization signal is
detected in midline glial cells. Signal at the salivary glands was
detected with the sense and antisense probe.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Gross, J.,
and Lapière, C. M.
(1962)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
54,
1197-1204
2.
Nagase, H.,
and Woessner, F., Jr.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
21491-21494
3.
Lund, R. L.,
Romer, J.,
Bugge, T. H.,
Nielsen, B. S.,
Frandsen, T. L.,
Degen, J. L.,
Stephens, R. W.,
and Dano, K.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
4645-4656
4.
Halpert, I.,
Sires, U. I.,
Roby, J. D.,
Potter-Perigo, S.,
Wight, T.,
Shapiro, S. D.,
Welgus, H. G.,
Wickline, S. A.,
and Parks, W. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
9748-9753
5.
Konttinen, Y.,
Ainola, M.,
Valleala, H.,
Ma, J.,
Ida, H.,
Mandelin, J.,
Kinne, R. W.,
Santavirta, S.,
Sorsa, T.,
López-Otín, C.,
and Takagi, M.
(1999)
Ann. Rheum. Dis.
58,
691-697
6.
Yong, V. W.,
Krekoski, C. A.,
Forsyth, P. A.,
Bell, R.,
and Edwards, D. R.
(1998)
Trends Neurosci.
21,
75-80
7.
MacDougall, J. R.,
and Matrisian, L. M.
(1995)
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
14,
351-362
8.
Park, H. I.,
Ni, J.,
Gerkema, F. E.,
Liu, D.,
Belozerov, V. E.,
and Sang, Q.-X. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
20540-20544
9.
Uría, J. A.,
and López-Otín, C.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
4745-4751
10.
Brew, K.,
Dinakarpandian, D.,
and Nagase, H.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1477,
267-283
11.
Werb, Z.
(1997)
Cell
91,
439-442
12.
Murphy, G.,
and Gavrilovic, J.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
614-621
13.
Yu, Q.,
and Stamenkovic, I.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
163-176
14.
Couet, J.,
Sar, S.,
Jolivet, A.,
Hai, M. T. V.,
Milgrom, E.,
and Misrahi, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4545-4552
15.
Koshikawa, N.,
Giannelli, G.,
Cirulli, V.,
Miyazaki, K.,
and Quaranta, V.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
615-624
16.
Stolow, M. A.,
Bauzon, D. D.,
Li, J.,
Sedgwick, T.,
Liang, V. C. T.,
Sang, Q. A.,
and Shi, Y. B.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
1471-1483
17.
Yang, M.,
Murray, M. T.,
and Kurkinen, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13527-13533
18.
Lepage, T.,
and Gache, C.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
3003-3012
19.
Kinoshita, T.,
Fuzukawa, H.,
Shimada, T.,
Saito, T.,
and Matsuda, Y.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
4693-4697
20.
Wada, K.,
Sato, H.,
Kinoh, H.,
Kajita, M.,
Yamamoto, H.,
and Seiki, M.
(1998)
Gene (Amst.)
21,
57-62
21.
Leontovich, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Shimokawa, K.,
Nagase, H.,
and Sarras, M. P., Jr.
(2000)
Development
127,
907-922
22.
Maidment, J. M.,
Moore, D.,
Murphy, G. P.,
Murphy, G.,
and Clark, I. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34706-34710
23.
Rooke, J.,
Pan, D.,
Xu, T.,
and Rubin, G. M.
(1996)
Nature
273,
1227-1231
24.
Pan, D.,
and Rubin, G. M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
271-280
25.
Qi, H.,
Rand, M. D.,
Wu, X.,
Sestan, N.,
Wang, W.,
Rakic, P.,
Xu, T.,
and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.
(1999)
Science
283,
91-94
26.
Marqués, G.,
Musacchio, M.,
Shimell, M. J.,
Wunnenberg-Stapleton, K.,
Cho, K. W.,
and O'Connor, M. B.
(1997)
Cell
91,
417-426
27.
Sotillos, S.,
Roch, F.,
and Campuzano, S.
(1997)
Development
124,
4769-4779
28.
Siden-Kiamos, I.,
Saunders, R. D.,
Spanos, L.,
Majerus, T.,
Treanear, J.,
Savakis, C.,
Louis, C.,
Glover, D. M.,
Ashburner, M.,
and Kafatos, F. C.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
6261-6270
29.
Maniatis, T.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1982)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
30.
Langer-Safer, P. R.,
Levine, M.,
and Ward, D. C.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
4381-4385
31.
Tautz, D.,
and Pfeifle, C.
(1989)
Chromosoma
89,
81-85
32.
Willembrock, F.,
Crabbe, T.,
Slocombe, P. M.,
Sutton, C. W.,
Docherty, A. J. P.,
Cockett, M. I.,
O'Shea, M. I.,
Brocklehurst, K.,
Phillips, I. R.,
and Murphy, G.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
4330-4337
33.
Vaitukaitis, J. L.
(1981)
Methods Enzymol.
73,
46-52
34.
Cavener, D. R.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
1353-1361
35.
Pei, D.,
and Weiss, S. J.
(1995)
Nature
375,
244-247
36.
Sato, H.,
Kinoshita, T.,
Takino, T.,
Nakayama, K.,
and Seiki, M.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
393,
101-104
37.
Bode, W.,
Gomis-Rüth, F. X.,
and Stöcker, W.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
331,
134-140
38.
Sánchez-López, R.,
Alexander, C. M.,
Behrendtsen, O.,
Breathnach, R.,
and Werb, Z.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7238-7247
39.
Freije, J. P.,
Díez-Itza, I.,
Balbín, M.,
Sánchez, L. M.,
Blasco, R.,
Tolivia, J.,
and López-Otín, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
16766-16773
40.
Adams, M. D.,
Celniker, S. E.,
Holt, R. A.,
Evans, C. A.,
Gocayne, J. D.,
Amanatides, P. G.,
et al..
(2000)
Science
287,
2185-2195
41.
Stracke, J. O.,
Hutton, M.,
Stewart, M.,
Pendás, A. M.,
Smith, B.,
López-Otín, C.,
Murphy, G.,
and Knäuper, V.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14809-14816
42.
Spana, E. P.,
Kopczynski, C.,
Goodman, C. S.,
and Doe, C. Q.
(1995)
Development
121,
3489-3494
43.
Roebroek, A. J.,
Creemers, J. W.,
Pauli, I. G.,
Kurzik-Dumke, U.,
Rentrop, M.,
Gateff, E. A.,
Leunissen, J. A.,
and Van de Ven, W. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17208-17215
44.
Roebroek, A. J.,
Creemers, J. W.,
Pauli, I. G.,
Bogaert, T.,
and Van de Ven, W. J.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
1853-1870
45.
Fessler, J. H.,
and Fessler, L. I.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
5,
309-339
46.
Cecchini, J. P.,
Knibiehler, B.,
Mirre, C.,
and Le Parco, Y.
(1987)
Eur. J. Biochem.
165,
587-593
47.
Gratecos, D.,
Naidet, C.,
Astier, M.,
Thiery, J. P.,
and Semeriva, M.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
215-223
48.
Pohar, N.,
Godenschwege, T. A.,
and Buchner, E.
(1999)
Genomics
57,
293-296
49.
Chiang, C.,
Patel, N. H.,
Young, K. E.,
and Beachy, P. A.
(1994)
Development
120,
3581-3593
50.
Klambt, C.,
Jacobs, J. R.,
and Goodman, C. S.
(1991)
Cell
64,
801-815
51.
Goodman, C. S.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
19,
341-377
52.
Menne, T. V.,
Luer, K.,
Technau, G. M.,
and Klambt, C.
(1997)
Development
124,
4949-4958
53.
Nordstrom, L. A.,
Lochner, J.,
Yeung, W.,
and Ciment, G.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
6,
56-68
54.
Muir, D.
(1994)
Exp. Cell Res.
210,
243-252
55.
Fambrough, D.,
Pan, D.,
Rubin, G. M.,
and Goodman, C. S.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13233-13238
56.
Grenningloh, G.,
Rehm, E. J.,
and Goodman, C. S.
(1991)
Cell
67,
45-57
57.
Bieber, A. J.,
Snow, P. M.,
Hortsch, M.,
Patel, N. H.,
Jacobs, J. R.,
Traquina, Z. R.,
Schilling, J.,
and Goodman, C. S.
(1989)
Cell
59,
447-460
58.
Noordermeer, J. N.,
Kopczynski, C. C.,
Fetter, R. D.,
Bland, K. S.,
Chen, W. Y.,
and Goodman, C. S.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
991-1001
59.
Kolodziej, P. A.,
Timpe, L. C.,
Mitchell, K. J.,
Fried, S. R.,
Goodman, C. S.,
Jan, L. Y.,
and Jan, Y. N.
(1996)
Cell
87,
197-204
60.
Butler, S. J.,
Ray, S.,
and Hiromi, Y.
(1997)
Development
124,
781-792
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Miller, A. Page-McCaw, and H. T. Broihier Matrix metalloproteinases promote motor axon fasciculation in the Drosophila embryo Development, January 1, 2008; 135(1): 95 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Greenlee, Z. Werb, and F. Kheradmand Matrix Metalloproteinases in Lung: Multiple, Multifarious, and Multifaceted Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 69 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Meyer and H. Aberle At the next stop sign turn right: the metalloprotease Tolloid-related 1 controls defasciculation of motor axons in Drosophila Development, October 15, 2006; 133(20): 4035 - 4044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhang, G. M. Dailey, E. Kwan, B. M. Glasheen, G. E. Sroga, and A. Page-McCaw An MMP liberates the Ninjurin A ectodomain to signal a lossof cell adhesion Genes & Dev., July 15, 2006; 20(14): 1899 - 1910. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lomniczi, A. Cornea, M. E. Costa, and S. R. Ojeda Hypothalamic Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Converting Enzyme Mediates Excitatory Amino Acid-Dependent Neuron-to-Glia Signaling in the Neuroendocrine Brain J. Neurosci., January 4, 2006; 26(1): 51 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Medioni and S. Noselli Dynamics of the basement membrane in invasive epithelial clusters in Drosophila Development, July 1, 2005; 132(13): 3069 - 3077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Curtin, I. A. Meinertzhagen, and R. J. Wyman Basigin (EMMPRIN/CD147) interacts with integrin to affect cellular architecture J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2005; 118(12): 2649 - 2660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. McHugh, S. A. Krause, B. Yu, A.-M. Deans, S. Heasman, P. McLaughlin, and M. M.S. Heck Invadolysin: a novel, conserved metalloprotease links mitotic structural rearrangements with cell migration J. Cell Biol., November 22, 2004; 167(4): 673 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Llano, G. Adam, A. M. Pendas, V. Quesada, L. M. Sanchez, I. Santamaria, S. Noselli, and C. Lopez-Otin Structural and Enzymatic Characterization of Drosophila Dm2-MMP, a Membrane-bound Matrix Metalloproteinase with Tissue-specific Expression J. Biol. Chem., June 21, 2002; 277(26): 23321 - 23329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||