![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 46, 36164-36171, November 17, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, March 15, 2000, and in revised form, July 11, 2000
UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) convert
dietary constituents, drugs, and environmental mutagens to inactive
hydrophilic glucuronides. Recent studies have shown that the expression
of the UGT1 and UGT2 gene families is regulated
in a tissue-specific fashion. Human small intestine represents a major
site of resorption of dietary constituents and orally administered
drugs and plays an important role in extrahepatic UGT directed
metabolism. Expression of 13 UGT1A and UGT2B
genes coupled with functional and catalytic analyses were studied using
18 small intestinal and 16 hepatic human tissue samples. Hepatic
expression of UGT gene transcripts was without
interindividual variation. In contrast, a polymorphic expression
pattern of all the UGT genes was demonstrated in duodenal, jejunal, and ileal mucosa, with the exception of UGT1A10.
To complement these studies, interindividual expression of UGT proteins
and catalytic activities were also demonstrated. Hyodeoxycholic acid glucuronidation, catalyzed primarily by UGT2B4 and UGT2B7, showed a
7-fold interindividual variation in small intestinal duodenal samples,
in contrast to limited variation in the presence of
4-methylumbelliferone, a substrate glucuronidated by most
UGT1A and UGT2B gene products. Linkage of RNA
expression patterns to protein abundance were also made with several
mono-specific antibodies to the UGTs. These results are in contrast to
a total absence of polymorphic variation in gene expression, protein
abundance, and catalytic activity in liver. In addition, the small
intestine exhibits considerable catalytic activity toward most of the
different classes of substrates accepted for glucuronidation by the
UGTs, which is supported by immunofluorescence analysis of UGT1A
protein in the mucosal cell layer of the small intestine. Thus,
tissue-specific and interindividual polymorphic regulation of
UGT1A and UGT2B genes in small intestine is
identified and implicated as molecular biological determinant contributing to interindividual prehepatic drug and xenobiotic metabolism in humans.
Glucuronidation is an important process of metabolism and
detoxification performed by the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase
(UGT)1 Supergene family (1).
UGTs are resident in the endoplasmic reticulum and catalyze the
conversion of hydrophobic substrates to usually inactive hydrophilic
glucuronides, which subsequently undergo renal and biliary elimination.
Compounds targeted for glucuronidation include dietary constituents,
therapeutic drugs, endogenous metabolites, hormones, and environmental
carcinogens. The human UGT genes are differentially
regulated in a tissue-specific fashion in hepatic and extrahepatic
tissues of the gastrointestinal tract (2-4).
Human UGTs have been divided into the UGT1 and
UGT2 multigene families (5). The human UGT1A gene
locus is located on chromosome 2, which encodes at least nine
functional UGT1A proteins and three pseudogenes (6). Four exons are
located at the 3' end of the UGT1A locus, which are combined
with one of a consecutively numbered array of first exon cassettes
toward the 5' end of the gene locus to form individual UGT gene
products. Therefore, the amino-terminal 280 amino acids of UGT1A
proteins consist of unique exon 1 encoded sequences and the
carboxyl-terminal 245 amino acids encoded by exons 2-5 are identical.
The tissue-specific expression of the UGT1A gene locus has
been well characterized and has been suggested to define
tissue-specific glucuronidation activity in the human digestive system
(2). An analysis of liver tissue led to the characterization of UGT1A1
(7), UGT1A3 (8), UGT1A4 (7), UGT1A6 (9), and UGT1A9 (10) cDNAs.
Studies examining the human extrahepatic gastrointestinal tract have
led to the identification of three extrahepatic UGT1A transcripts:
UGT1A7, which is expressed in stomach and esophagus (3, 4); UGT1A8,
which is expressed in colon and esophagus (2, 11, 12); and UGT1A10,
which is expressed in gastric, esophageal, biliary, and colonic tissue (2, 4, 13, 14).
In contrast to the UGT1A gene locus, the UGT2B
and UGT2A genes have been mapped to chromosome 4 are
individually encoded and comprise six exons (15-17). Transcripts have
been identified for UGT2B4 (18), UGT2B7 (19), UGT2B10 (20), UGT2B11
(21), UGT2B15 (22), UGT2B17 (23, 24), and UGT2A1 (17). Except for
UGT2B17 and UGT2A1, hepatic expression was detected for all UGT2B
transcripts. Extrahepatic UGT2B expression has been shown for UGT2B7 in
intestine, kidney, and brain (25, 26), UGT2B10 and UGT2B15 expression
has been shown for esophagus (3), and UGT2B10, UGT2B11, UGT2B15, and
UGT2B17 expression has been shown in steroid sensitive tissues such as
the mammary gland and the prostate (20-24). One report indicates that
UGT2B4 is not expressed in the gastrointestinal tract (26).
The genetic multiplicity of the UGTs and their wide range of substrate
specificities suggests that UGTs play an important role in human
homeostasis and metabolism. Although hepatic glucuronidation is
considered to play a central role in drug metabolism, direct contact
with xenobiotic compounds is first established in the gastrointestinal
tract prior to resorption (27). The small intestine, which extends to a
length of 300-400 cm in adults, forms the largest metabolically active
external surface of the human digestive system and represents a
significant localization for extrahepatic metabolism. The considerable
degree of immediate xenobiotic contact in the small intestine including
dietary components, drugs, and environmental mutagens would indicate
that enzymes located in the mucosal layer are capable of influencing
first pass metabolism and may function as a metabolic intestinal
barrier. The presented study was undertaken to analyze the regulatory
patterns of UGT1A and UGT2B genes in small
intestine as a biochemical basis for defining human extrahepatic xenobiotic glucuronidation.
Tissue Samples
Tissue samples were obtained from the Department of Abdominal
and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Informed written consent was obtained, and the project was approved by
the ethics committee of Hannover Medical School. Macroscopically and
histologically normal intestinal tissue was obtained from 18 German
patients undergoing surgery for diagnoses summarized in Table
I. None of the patients received
chemotherapy, steroids, diuretics, or antibiotic therapy prior to
sample collection. The records indicated the absence of smoking during
6 months prior to surgery. A high degree of sample normalization
results from the additional fact that all patients were fasting at
least 12 h prior to the surgical procedures and tissue collection.
The collected tissues showed no macroscopic signs of deterioration such
as necrosis and were microscopically examined to document normal
histology. One patient with ulcerative colitis received a colectomy and
had no histological signs of ileal disease. Hepatic tissue RNA and
microsomes used for comparisons have been described previously
(27).
Intestinal mucosa was dissected immediately on ice after surgical
removal, and specimens free of muscularis and most of the submucosa
were used in all subsequent experiments except for indirect immunofluorescence. All tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen within 10 min of surgical removal and stored at Isolation of RNA and Synthesis of Complementary DNA
Tissue--
Approximately 200 mg of tissue was pulverized under
liquid nitrogen and immediately lysed in acidic
phenol/guanidinium-isothiocyanate solution (Tripure; Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) as described previously (4). RNA concentrations were
determined by spectrophotometry at 260 nm, and the purity was verified
by 260/280-nm ratios. Intact RNA was isolated from hepatic, duodenal,
jejunal, and ileal tissue samples and stored in water at cDNA Synthesis--
Three µg of total RNA were denatured
for 10 min at 70 °C in the presence of 0.5 µg of oligo(dT) primer
and quick chilled on ice. The volume of RNA was adjusted to 19 µl
containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mM KCl,
2.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 mM of each dNTP incubated at 42 °C for 5 min
prior to the addition of 1 µl (200 U) of reverse transcriptase
(SuperscriptII; Life Technologies, Inc.). The final volume (20 µl)
was incubated at 42 °C for 50 min and then 70 °C for 15 min and
chilled on ice. Contamination of total RNA with genomic DNA was
excluded by RT-PCR using primers for human Isolation of Microsomal Protein from Intestinal Tissue
Approximately 300 mg of intestinal tissue was pulverized under
liquid nitrogen, resuspended in 1 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 10 mM MgCl2, and homogenized with a
Potter-Elvehjam tissue grinder. The tissue homogenate was centrifuged
at 10,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C in an Eppendorf
(Hamburg, Germany) microcentrifuge, and the supernatant was collected.
The pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.4) and 10 mM MgCl2 and centrifuged, and the
supernatant collected. The combined supernatants were centrifuged at
150,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C in a Beckman (Palo Alto, CA) TL100 ultracentrifuge, and the pellet was resuspended in 0.2 ml of Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 10 mM MgCl2.
Protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford.
Microsomal protein was stored at Catalytic Activity Assay of Human Intestinal and Liver
Microsomes
Glucuronidation substrates (all 18 tested substrates are listed
in the legend to Fig. 3) were solubilized in methanol with the
exception of 7-hydroxy-benzo( Duplex Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for UGT1A
and UGT2B Transcripts
The presence of UGT1A and UGT2B transcripts in total tissue RNA
was analyzed by PCR amplification performed as a duplex RT-PCR coamplification with UGT1A DRT-PCR--
The UGT1A locus predicts the
existence of nine proteins termed UGT1A1 and UGT1A3-1A10. UGT1A2,
UGT1A11 and UGT1A12 lack an uninterrupted open reading frame and have
therefore been identified to be pseudogenes. DRT-PCR detection of all
nine UGT1A transcripts predicted by the human UGT1A locus
was performed using nine exon 1-specific sense primers and two
antisense primers located within exons 2-5 or within a common portion
of the 3' end of the first exons (4). As already reported elsewhere
(4), exon-specific primers were generated that lead to RT-PCR products
of distinct molecular sizes: UGT1A1, 644 bp; UGT1A3, 483 bp; UGT1A4,
572 bp; UGT1A5, 659 bp; UGT1A6, 562 bp; UGT1A7, 754 bp; UGT1A8, 514 bp; UGT1A9, 392 bp; and UGT1A10, 478 bp. Coamplification of UGT1A first
exon and UGT2B DRT-PCR--
Specific primer pairs were generated for the
amplification of UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, and UGT2B15 sequences,
respectively, as recently reported elsewhere (3). Cross-reactivity was
excluded using sequence alignments and PCGene (Oxford Molecular,
Campbell, CA) software, as well as a computerized data bank search
using the blastn software (GenBankTM). UGT2B cDNA was
coamplified with Western Blot Analysis
Twenty µg of microsomal protein from five human duodenal and
five human hepatic tissues samples was boiled for 90 s in loading buffer (2% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 62.5 mmol/liter Tris-HCl (pH 6.8),
10% glycerol, and 0.001% bromphenol blue) with Indirect Immunofluorescence Analysis
Fresh intestinal resection specimens were subjected to cryostat
sectioning following previously published methods (29). Tissue sections
were used for indirect immunofluorescence using a previously described
rabbit anti-peptide (SSLHKDRPVEPLDLA) anti-human UGT1A antibody, which
was generated using branched lysine multiple antigen peptide technology
(2). Antibody was diluted 1:20, 1:40, 1:80, and 1:160 in phosphate
buffered saline without magnesium or calcium (PBS), and immobilized
tissue slices were incubated at room temperature in a humidified
chamber for 60 min. Incubation with a normal rabbit serum was included
as a control. Following two wash steps with PBS, the slides were
incubated at room temperature in a humidified, dark chamber for 60 min
with fluorescein (dichlorotriazinyl-aminofluoresceine)-conjugated affinity purified goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany) diluted 1:100 in PBS. Following two wash steps with PBS, tissue slices were covered with glycerol containing 10% PBS and were
immediately analyzed using an Olympus IMT 2 immunofluorescence microscope (Tokyo, Japan).
Polymorphic Regulation of UGT1A and UGT2B Gene Transcripts in Human
Duodenum, Jejunum, and Ileum--
UGT mRNA expression was analyzed
by isoform-specific DRT-PCR (Fig. 1 and
Table II, right column). The liver was
characterized by the expression of UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6,
UGT1A9, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, and UGT2B15 mRNA, as previously
demonstrated (3, 26). In the 16 different liver samples, there was
little variation in abundance of the RNA transcripts when each was
compared with the levels of expression of actin (not shown but
previously demonstrated in Ref. 14). This is in sharp contrast to
intestinal tissue, which exhibited dramatic differences in
UGT gene transcript expression. Intestinal expression was
characterized by the presence or absence of UGT1A and UGT2B transcripts
in the different samples of intestinal tissue.
Analyses of 13 different UGT transcripts demonstrated that UGT1A10
mRNA was expressed in each sample of duodenal, jejunal, and ileal
mucosa, whereas UGT2B15 was absent in only two of the duodenal samples.
UGT1A3 and UGT1A4 were found to be expressed in the majority of
duodenal, jejunal and ileal mucosa samples. In contrast, UGT1A5,
UGT1A7, UGT1A8, and UGT1A9 transcripts were not detected, and UGT2B10
was found in only one of the ileum preparations. It is interesting to
note that in the ileum sample in which UGT2B10 RNA was expressed, all
of the other UGT2B gene products were also detected (Fig. 1,
bottom panel).
The appearance of UGT1A1, UGT1A6, UGT2B4, and UGT2B7 mRNA showed
the most dramatic variability between the different intestinal samples.
In the duodenum, UGT1A1 was detected in three of the five samples
examined, UGT1A6 was in four of the five samples, UGT2B4 was in one of
the five samples, and UGT2B7 was in two of the five samples. The ratios
of these gene products were found to be similar in the jejunum,
although UGT1A6 mRNA was only detected in one sample. In the ileum,
UGT2B4 was detected in a greater number of samples than found in the
duodenum and jejunum, demonstrating that UGT2B4 is not liver-specific
as previously indicated (26). Combined, analysis of UGT gene
expression as presented by sensitive RT-PCR analysis clearly
demonstrate that the expression of RNAs encoding UGT1A1, UGT1A3,
UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, and UGT2B15 is not
coordinately regulated in the different tissues of the small intestine.
The only exception appears to be UGT1A10, which is expressed in all
portions of the small intestine, as well as all other tissues of the
gastrointestinal tract including the colon, the esophagus, the stomach,
and the biliary tract (2-4, 26, 27).
Interindividual Differences in UGT Activities in Small
Intestine--
Most of the UGTs possess the ability to glucuronidate
many of the same substrates, making it a challenge to use functional studies to follow the expression patterns of any single UGT (5). However, several substrates can be employed to monitor the catalytic activities of a limited number of the UGTs. For example, HDCA has been
identified to be glucuronidated primarily by UGT2B7 (30), with
detectable activity observed with expressed UGT2B4 (31) and UGT1A3 (5,
32). Because the gene expression pattern demonstrated considerable
interindividual differences in UGT2B4 and UGT2B7 expression,
experiments were undertaken to examine the functional properties of
these proteins in microsomal preparations from small intestinal tissue
samples using HDCA as a substrate. In contrast, 4-methylumbelliferone
(4-MU) was chosen as a more general substrate because it is
glucuronidated by most of the UGT1A as well as some of the UGT2
proteins (34). Using five duodenal, jejunal, and hepatic microsomal
preparations, UGT activities confirmed that there existed considerable
interindividual variation of HDCA glucuronidation in the small
intestinal samples when compared with liver microsomal preparations. In
jejunum tissues, this variation was seen to be 7-fold. It is therefore
likely that the differences in HDCA UGT activity reflect the variation
observed in UGT2B4 and UGT2B7 RNA transcript expression in these
samples. In addition, up to a 2.3-fold variation of 4-MU
glucuronidation (Fig. 2A,
top panel) was observed with both intestinal tissues, which
might be reflected in the differences seen with UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4,
and UGT1A6 RNA expression (Table II). As predicted from the mRNA
expression data, there was very little variation of HDCA and 4-MU
glucuronidation activity in the different liver samples. Although the
duodenum, jejunum, and liver tissue samples were taken during surgery
from different individuals, the differences observed in catalytic
activity in the intestinal tissue strongly implicates that the
polymorphic regulation of UGT mRNA leads to interindividual
variation in UGT expression and activity.
Additional support for the findings observed with RNA as well as
functional analysis that the UGTs are differentially expressed in
intestinal tissue could be verified by Western blot analysis. In Fig.
2B the analysis of UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 protein expression in
five samples of human duodenum and liver are shown and correlated with
the detection of transcripts of these genes. The expression of UGT1A1
mRNA in three of the five samples and UGT2B7 mRNA in two of the
five samples (Table II) is confirmed at the protein level by Western
blot analysis, which detected UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 in the same samples.
Duodenal sample 5 in Fig. 2B was used in the RT-PCR analysis
and is shown in Fig. 1, demonstrating the expression of UGT1A1 RNA but
not of UGT2B7 RNA. This finding convincingly links the expression of
RNA to protein. Interestingly, this same sample does not express UGT2B4
RNA, whereas UGT1A3 RNA is barely detectable. UGT2B4, UGT2B7, and
UGT1A3 are capable of catalyzing the glucuronidation of HDCA, and this
sample of duodenum elicited the lowest HDCA UGT glucuronidation
activity of the small intestinal samples that were collected. Combined,
these findings demonstrate that the polymorphic interindividual
regulation of UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 gene expression results in the
detectable presence or absence of these specific UGT proteins. Thus,
polymorphic regulation of UGT genes in small intestine leads to
variations of catalytically active UGT, which determine microsomal
glucuronidation activity between individuals.
Differences of Hepatic and Small Intestinal Glucuronidation--
A
panel of 18 substrates was used to characterize the UGT activity
profile of the small intestine and liver. The consistent expression of
UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A10, and different UGT2B forms would suggest
activities toward steroid hormone and tertiary amine substrates in
addition to phenolics. The putative tobacco carcinogens PhIP,
N-hydroxy-PhIP, and 7-hydroxy benzo(
This experiment also demonstrates that the catalytic activities were
found to be greater in the jejunum than in the proximally located
duodenum or the distally located ileum. In addition, the finding that
the catalytic activities in the jejunum are universally greater than
those found in liver would suggest that this tissue plays an important
role in the metabolism of dietary and xenobiotic material.
Detection and Localization of UGT Protein in Human
Intestine--
To confirm the mucosal distribution of UGT protein, an
indirect immunofluorescence analysis was performed using a rabbit
anti-human UGT1A antibody directed against all UGT1A protein species
(Fig. 4). Staining was exclusively
localized to the epithelial cell layer of the intestinal mucosa (Fig.
4, A and B). No staining was observed in the
submucosa or muscularis as well as with a normal rabbit serum (not
shown). UGT1A protein expression was found only in the epithelilar cell
layer of the crypt (Fig. 4 C) as well as the vili (Fig.
4B).
Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases are expressed in a
tissue-specific fashion that defines tissue-specific glucuronidation activities in metabolically active organs including the liver and the
extrahepatic gastrointestinal tract (2-4, 11, 27). Microsomal
glucuronidation and UGT mRNA expression have been analyzed in human
esophagus, stomach, and colon, establishing the role of these external
surface tissues in extrahepatic glucuronidation. Although intestinal
glucuronidation has been documented (26, 33-35), UGT1A and UGT2B gene
regulation and biological function have not been correlated.
Using DRT-PCR, the regulation of the UGT1A locus as well as
the UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, and
UGT2B15 genes was analyzed in 18 tissue samples from
duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. A pattern of tissue-specific gene
expression was observed in small intestine, which exhibited
considerable differences from that found in liver and colon (Table II
and Fig. 1). Liver (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, and UGT1A9) and
colon (UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, and UGT1A10)
tissue have been characterized to express specific UGT1A transcript
patterns without variation (4, 27, 36). In intestine, gene expression
included UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A10, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, and
UGT2B15 transcripts, and the absence of UGT1A5, UGT1A7, UGT1A8, and
UGT1A9, and most UGT2B10 transcripts. However, the regulation of all
UGT1A and UGT2B transcripts with the exception of UGT1A10 was
polymorphic with variations between individuals and between the
proximal and distal sections of the small intestine. As an example, the
UGT1A6 gene was expressed in fewer jejunum samples, UGT2B4
mRNA was expressed more often in the ileum, and UGT2B7 transcripts
were expressed more often in the jejunum.
To confirm the data observed at the gene transcript level,
immunodetection of the polymorphically regulated UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 gene
products was analyzed with monospecific antisera. This analysis confirmed the presence of UGT1A1 protein in three of the five samples
and of UGT2B7 protein in two of the five samples (Fig. 2B)
as detected by DRT-PCR at the mRNA level (Table II). To assess the
biological effect of the identified polymorphic regulation in small
intestine catalytic UGT activity assays using HDCA and 4-MU and
endoplasmic reticulum protein prepared from the mucosa of small
intestine and from liver tissue were performed. HDCA glucuronidation
has been identified for UGT2B4, UGT2B7 (30, 31), and UGT1A3 (32),
whereas 4-MU glucuronidation can be catalyzed by most UGT1A proteins
(5). As predicted from the polymorphic expression of UGT2B4 and UGT2B7
transcripts in the duodenum and the jejunum, HDCA glucuronidation
varied 7-fold between individuals, whereas 4-MU glucuronidation in the
same samples varied little but clearly more than the absence of
interindividual variation seen in liver tissue. This finding is
explained by a greater redundancy of UGT proteins active with the
substrate 4-MU than with the substrate HDCA. Importantly, both 4-MU and
HDCA glucuronidation showed no significant variation between individual hepatic samples, a finding that reflects the absence of polymorphic UGT
transcript regulation in human liver. The biological effect is best
demonstrated by the analysis of the sample shown in Fig. 2A
(Duodenum, lane 4). In this individual, neither
UGT2B7 nor UGT2B4 are expressed, whereas UGT1A3 transcripts are merely
present at low levels (Fig. 1, top panel). As a result of
the absence or reduced levels of the UGTs with specificity for HDCA,
this duodenum sample was found to have dramatically reduced HDCA
glucuronidation activity. In combination, the mRNA, Western blot
and catalytic activity data provide evidence for the finding that the
polymorphic regulation of UGT genes in the small intestine
represents a molecular biological basis of interinidividual variations
of mucosal glucuronidation activity.
Although UGT activity located in the mucosa of the small intestine is
characterized by interinidividual variation caused by polymorphic gene
regulation, control of hepatic glucuronidation remains constant. The
biological significance of this finding may be reflected in the rate of
metabolism in these tissues. As a consequence the therapeutic efficacy
or toxicity of pharmaceutical compounds could be influenced directly by
extrahepatic glucuronidation during or prior to resorption from the
substantial surface of the small intestine in humans. Analysis of gene
expression provides evidence for the strictly individual regulation of
UGT1A genes, which share common exons 2-5 in the
UGT1A gene complex, and of the UGT2B genes in
humans. Polymorphic regulation of human UGT2B transcripts represents
the second example of polymorphic expression of the human
UGTs identified to date. In human gastric epithelium, the
polymorphic regulation of UGT1A3, UGT1A4, and UGT1A6 transcripts in
contrast to a constitutive expression of UGT1A7 and UGT1A10 mRNA
was recently reported (14). The polymorphic expression of
UGT genes in the gastrointestinal tract indicates that these enzymes may be regulated by a general biochemical mechanism
contributing to interindividual differences in drug and xenobiotic
metabolism (14). Importantly, this finding differs from the principle
of bimodally distributed genetic polymorphisms reported for other drug
metabolizing enzymes (37, 38).
In a recent study, the expression of UGT2B7 but not of UGT1A6 and
UGT2B4 were reported in intestinal tissue by RT-PCR (26). In our
analysis, UGT2B4 transcripts were detectable in 8 out of the 18 small
intestinal tissue samples. When the analysis is subdivided into the
different segments of the small intestine, the UGT2B4 gene was
expressed in one out of the five duodenal samples. Similarly UGT1A6
transcripts were identified in 11 out of the 18 tissue samples, but in
jejunum UGT1A6 mRNA was only present in one out of the five
samples. Both genes were expressed more frequently at other levels of
the small intestine. The data presented in this manuscript provide
evidence for the expression of the UGT1A6 and
UGT2B4 genes in human small intestine. In light of the
identified polymorphic regulation of both genes, sample number as well
as the biopsy position in the small intestine are likely to influence the detection of individual UGT transcripts and represent a likely explanation for the contrasting findings.
The detection of UGT1A8 mRNA in jejunum, ileum, and colon was
recently reported (11). In experiments presented here, UGT1A8 transcripts were not detectable in any of the 17 intestinal specimens. In samples removed near the ileo-cecal valve, we were able to detect
UGT1A8 transcripts in the cecal portions of the mucosa but not in the
terminal ileum (data not shown). Our data suggest that the UGT1A8
transcripts are expressed in esophagus (3) and colon (2) but are not
expressed in small intestine. However, genetic or evolutionary
differences of patient cohorts of different geographic origin may
account for differences in UGT1A8 gene expression. Specimen sampling in
the area of the ileocecal valve may additionally influence the
detection of UGT1A8 mRNA.
Although the human UGT proteins exhibit a considerable overlap of
substrate specificity, the regulation of individual UGT genes in a
tissue allows for a prediction of overall catalytic UGT activity toward
different substrates. In additional experiments, 18 specific UGT
activities in small intestine were determined to demonstrate that
extrahepatic glucuronidation in small intestine can function to
complement hepatic glucuronidation, which would represent an important
consequence in light of the discovered polymorphic regulation of
UGT genes. Specific activities were predicted based on the
gene expression, because UGT1A3 and UGT1A10 display catalytic activity
toward steroid hormones (2, 8); UGT1A4 catalyzes the glucuronidation of
tertiary amine substrates such as antidepressants (39), and UGT1A10
exhibits UGT activity with putative tobacco carcinogens (3). The
hepatic UGT activity profile favored steroids such as 4-hydroxy-estrone
and phenolics such as 1-naphthol, 4-methylumbelliferone, and
4-nitrophenol. Interestingly, specific activities in the small
intestine toward commonly used drugs such as imipramine and
amitriptyline, as well as steroids such as estrone and putative tobacco
carcinogen metabolites such as 7-hydroxybenz( The excellent technical assistance with the
immunofluorescence analyses by Stephanie Loges and Eleonore Schmidt is
gratefully acknowledged. Help in tissue sample procurement by Prof. J. Klempnauer (Director Department of Abdominal and Transplant Surgery,
Hannover Medical School) is gratefully acknowledged.
*
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Grant STR493/3-1 (to C. P. S.) and United States Public
Health Service Grant GM49135 (to R. H. T).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hannover Medical School,
Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany. Tel.: 49-511-532-2853;
Fax: 49-511-532-2093; E-mail:
strassburg.christian@mh-hannover.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002180200
The abbreviations used are:
UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase;
RT, reverse transcription;
DRT, duplex RT;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
HDCA, hyodeoxycholic acid;
4-MU, 4-methylumbelliferone;
PhIP, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo-(4,
5-
Polymorphic Gene Regulation and Interindividual Variation of
UDP-glucuronosyltransferase Activity in Human Small Intestine*
§,
,
,
,
,
Department of Gastroenterology and
Hepatology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany and the
¶ Departments of Chemistry & Biochemistry and Pharmacology,
University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Patient and tissue samples analyzed
80 °C until use.
80 °C
until further analysis.
-actin. The sense primer
5'-ggcggcaccaccatgtaccct-3' and the antisense primer
5'-aggggccggactcgtcatact-3' span the exon 4/intron 5/exon 5 junction of
the
-actin gene. PCR with cDNA leads to a 202-bp product, but
contamination with genomic DNA template would lead to a 312-bp PCR
product, which can be clearly distinguished from the 202-bp cDNA
amplification product.
80 °C.
)pyrene, which was resuspended in
acetone. 7-Hydroxy-benzo(
)pyrene, 3-hydroxy-acetylaminofluorene, and
2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo-(4,5-
)-pyridine (PhIP) were obtained from the National Cancer Institute Chemical Carcinogen Repository (Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, MO);
2-hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo-(4,5-
)-pyridine (N-hydroxy-PhIP) was purchased from Toronto Research
Chemicals Inc. (Toronto, Canada); and all other substrates were from
Sigma-Aldrich. Catalytic activities of 25 µg of microsomal protein
isolated from intestinal or hepatic tissue were assayed in duplicate as
described previously in detail (3). Protein was precipitated, and
supernatants were lyophilized and resuspended in methanol prior to
separation by thin layer liquid chromatography in
n-butanol/acetone/acidic acid/water (35:35:10:20%). The
production of 14C-labeled glucuronides was detected by
autoradiography. To determine specific catalytic activities, the
14C-labeled glucuronides were quantitated using a Fujifilm
BAS-1000 phosphoimager (Raytest GmbH, Straubenhardt, Germany) and TINA 2.0 software (Raytest GmbH) and expressed as pmol glucuronide formed/min/mg of microsomal or recombinant protein. As a control, autoradiography hard copies were additionally analyzed with a GS-710
calibrated imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad) using the Quantity One
software package.
-actin cDNA as a control, as outlined below.
-actin sequences was performed using three cycling protocols: for UGT1A1 and UGT1A6, 94 °C for 1 min, 59 °C for1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min; for UGT1A3, UGT1A4, and UGT1A5, 94 °C for 1 min, 56 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min; and for UGT1A7, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, and UGT1A10, 94 °C for 1 min, 64 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. Each protocol was preceded by a 3-min
incubation of the reaction mixture at 94 °C and followed by a 7-min
elongation at 72 °C. The specificity and kinetics of this assay have
previously been documented in detail (4). Experiments were performed in duplicate, and controls without cDNA, primers, or thermophilic polymerase were included.
-actin cDNA in a starting volume of 92 µl
containing 10 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 10 mM ammonium sulfate, 2 mM magnesium sulfate,
1% Triton X-100, 0.2 mM each dNTP, and 2 µM
of UGT2B primers and VENT (exo-) DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA). After a hot start at 94 °C for 3 min, six
cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C
for 30 s were run on a Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp PCR 2400 system. The
same
-actin primers used for UGT1A DRT-PCR were added to 0.4 µM each, and cycling was resumed for a total of 32 cycles. Specificity of this assay was determined by PCR using all four primer pairs on each cloned UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B10, and UGT2B15 template cDNA to exclude cross-reactivities. PCR products of the expected sizes were generated: UGT2B4, 281 bp; UGT2B7, 407 bp; UGT2B10,
388 bp; and UGT2B15, 330 bp. To confirm the detection of specific UGT1A
and UGT2B cDNAs using this assay, the PCR products were partially
sequenced to document the identity of the specific gene product.
-mercaptoethanol and resolved by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis prior to electrotransfer onto nitrocellulose membrane. As controls, a 5-µg sample of total Sf9 cell lysate expressing recombinant UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 protein as well as Sf9 cells
expressiong no recombinant UGT protein were included (3).
Immunodetection was performed following published protocols (28).
UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 protein was detected using a monospecific rabbit
anti-human UGT1A1 and rabbit anti-human UGT2B7 antibody purchased from
NatuTec/Gentest (Frankfurt, Germany) at a dilution of 1:1500.
Visualization was achieved with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma) diluted 1:4000.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (107K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Polymorphic regulation of the
UGT1A gene locus and UGT2B genes in
human duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and liver. UGT gene expression in
duodenal, jejunal, ileal, and hepatic epithelium was detected by UGT
isoform-specific DRT-PCR. The ethidium bromide stained gels show
isoform-specific DRT-PCR products coamplified in the presence of
-actin primers as a control. Examples of a single patient are given
for each tissue source. In the duodenal example UGT1A3 mRNA is low,
and none of the UGT2B transcripts are detectable. The jejunal sample
shows a typical intestinal pattern with the absence of UGT1A5, UGT1A7,
UGT1A8, UGT1A9, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, and UGT2B10. The bottom
panel shows the previously reported hepatic UGT expression profile
found in all liver samples examined (4).
Expression of UGT1A and UGT2B mRNA in human small intestine and
liver

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Interindividual variation of specific UGT
activity in small intestine but not in liver. A, five
preparations of endoplasmic reticulum protein from duodenum, jejunum,
and liver were analyzed for catalytic activity toward HDCA and 4-MU
(top panel). Duodenal sample 4 is the same as
that shown in the top panel of Fig. 1. In the duodenal
sample 4, HDCA glucuronidation was found to be lowest. This
tissue sample lacks both UGT2B4 and UGT2B7 expression and has low
levels of UGT1A3 expression (compare Fig. 1, top panel). In
the other duodenal samples there is either expression of UGT2B4
(sample 3), UGT2B7 (samples 1 and 5),
or UGT1A3 (samples 2, 4, and 5), which
would lead to the observed HDCA glucuronide formation (compare Table
II). The bottom panel demonstrates a graphic representation
of interindividual variations of the measured UGT activities.
B, Western blot analysis using 20 µg of microsomal protein
from five duodenal and five liver tissue samples. The detection of
UGT1A1 (top panels) and UGT2B7 (bottom panels)
protein was performed using monospecific rabbit anti-human UGT1A1 and
rabbit anti-human UGT2B7 antisera as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The duodenal sample shown in lane 5 (expression of UGT1A1 but not of UGT2B7) is demonstrated in the
top panel of Fig. 1, confirming the expression pattern found
at the transcript level. The
denotes a negative control using
Sf9 cell extracts not expressing UGT protein; + represents
Sf9 cells expressing UGT1A1 or UGT2B7, respectively. The + and
marks below the Western analysis indicate the presence or
absence of UGT1A1 or UGT2B7 mRNA detectable by DRT-PCR.
)pyrene, as well as 3-hydroxy-acetylaminofluorene were also included. Microsomal
protein from two samples each of duodenal, jejunal, and ileal mucosa, were analyzed in the presence of the substrates, and their activities are shown in Fig. 3. The specific
activity toward 1-naphthol, 4-MU, 4-nitrophenol, and HDCA was greater
in liver than in the individual intestinal samples. Yet there were a
greater number of compounds glucuronidated at higher rates in small
intestine. This is best demonstrated by examining the glucuronidation
of steroids such as 2-hydroxy estrone,
-estradiol, estrone, and also
of the carcinogens PhIP, 7-hydroxy benzo(
)pyrene, and
2-hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo-(4,5-
)-pyridine, in addition
to the tertiary amine antidepressant drugs imipramine and
amitriptyline.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Catalytic UGT activities in small intestine
and liver. Graphic representation of the average
(n = 2) specific UGT activities in duodenum, jejunum,
ileum, and liver using 18 substrates as described under
"Experimental Procedures." 1-naphth, 1-naphthol;
4-OH biphen, 4-hydroxybiphenyl; 2-OH-estriol,
2-hydroxyestriol; 4-OH-estrone, 4-hydroxy estrone;
p-nitrophenol, 4-nitrophenol; 7-OH-BAP,
7-hydroxy benzo(
)pyrene; 3-OH-AAF, 3-hydroxy
acetylaminofluorene; 4-tert-butylph,
4-tert-butylphenol; Nitro-PhIP,
2-hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo-(4,5-
)-pyridine.

View larger version (117K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Immunofluorescence detection of UGT1A protein
in the intestinal mucosa. Indirect immunofluorescence using a
rabbit anti-human UGT1A antibody is shown with cryostat sections of
ileum tissue. A, UGT1A protein is localized to the
epithelila cell layer and the crypts (magnification, 40×). UGT
staining of the vili is homogeneous, and the crypts exhibit a ring-like
pattern. B, high power magnification of a vilus section
confirming staining of the epithelial cells but not of the submucosa
(magnification, 400×). C, high power magnification of the
cross-section of a mucosal crypt. UGT1A protein is concentrated in the
apical portions of the crypt enterocytes toward the luminal surface
(magnification, 400×). UGT protein is detected at the surfaces of
direct contact between intestine and xenobiotic matter.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
)pyrene and
N-hydroxy-PhIP exceeded the UGT activities measured in
liver. Specific UGT activities followed a gradient which peaked in the
jejunum (Fig. 3) and demonstrate that the specific activity of steroid
hormone and putative tobacco carcinogen metabolite glucuronidation is
highest in the jejunum, where it exceeds the specific UGT activities of
the liver. In comparison with other extrahepatic tissues such as the
esophagus, the stomach, and the colon, jejunal UGT activity is
identified to represent some of the highest specific glucuronidation
activities in the gastrointestinal tract (3, 14, 27). Polymorphic gene
regulation in this tissue may therefore, more than in other epithelia,
have a significant impact on human xenobiotic metabolism. Intestinal
glucuronidation is capable of determining the extrahepatic metabolism
of pharmacologically active drugs and may also serve as metabolic
barrier for mutagen-associated genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, which is
implicated by the presented characterization of specific UGT activites
toward tobacco carcinogen metabolites in small intestine. The cellular
and subcellular localization of UGT protein exclusively in intestinal
villi and crypts forming this putative barrier was demonstrated by
indirect immunofluorescence analysis and is in aggrement with the data
obtained at the transcript and functional levels (Fig. 4).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
)-pyridine;
bp, base pair(s);
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Dutton, G. J.
(1980)
Glucuronidation of Drugs and Other Compounds
, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
2.
Strassburg, C. P.,
Manns, M. P.,
and Tukey, R. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8719-8726
3.
Strassburg, C. P.,
Strassburg, A.,
Nguyen, N.,
Li, Q.,
Manns, M. P.,
and Tukey, R. H.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
338,
489-498
4.
Strassburg, C. P.,
Oldhafer, K.,
Manns, M. P.,
and Tukey, R. H.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
52,
212-220
5.
Tukey, R. H.,
and Strassburg, C. P.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
40,
581-616
6.
Burchell, B.,
Brierley, C. H.,
Monaghan, G.,
and Clarke, D. J.
(1998)
Adv. Pharmacol.
42,
335-338
7.
Ritter, J. K.,
Crawford, J. M.,
and Owens, I. S.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
1043-1047
8.
Mojarrabi, B.,
Butler, R.,
and Mackenzie, P. I.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
225,
785-790
9.
Harding, D.,
Fournel-Gigleux, S.,
Jackson, M. R.,
and Burchell, B.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
8381-8385
10.
Wooster, R.,
Sutherland, L.,
Ebner, T.,
Clarke, D.,
Da Cruz e Silva, O.,
and Burchell, B.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
278,
465-469
11.
Cheng, Z.,
Radominska-Pandya, A.,
and Tephly, T. R.
(1998)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
356,
301-305
12.
Mojarrabi, B.,
and Mackenzie, P. I.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
247,
704-709
13.
Mojarrabi, B.,
and Mackenzie, P. I.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
238,
775-778
14.
Strassburg, C. P.,
Nguyen, N.,
Manns, M. P.,
and Tukey, R. H.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
54,
647-654
15.
Monaghan, G.,
Clarke, D. J.,
Povey, S.,
See, C. G.,
Boxer, M.,
and Burchell, B.
(1994)
Genomics
23,
496-499
16.
Beaulieu, M.,
Levesque, E.,
Tchernof, A.,
Beatty, B. G.,
Belanger, A.,
and Hum, D. W.
(1997)
DNA Cell Biol.
16,
1143-1154
17.
Jedlitschky, G.,
Cassidy, A. J.,
Sales, M.,
Pratt, N.,
and Burchell, B.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
340,
837-843
18.
Jackson, M. R.,
McCarthy, L. R.,
Harding, D.,
Wilson, S.,
Coughtrie, M. W.,
and Burchell, B.
(1987)
Biochem. J.
242,
581-588
19.
Ritter, J. K.,
Sheen, Y. Y.,
and Owens, I. S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
7900-7906
20.
Jin, C. J.,
Miners, J. O.,
Lillywhite, K. J.,
and Mackenzie, P. I.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
194,
496-503
21.
Beaulieu, M.,
Levesque, E.,
Hum, D. W.,
and Belanger, A.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
248,
44-50
22.
Chen, F.,
Ritter, J. K.,
Wang, M. G.,
McBride, O. W.,
Lubet, R. A.,
and Owens, I. S.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
10648-10657
23.
Beaulieu, M.,
Levesque, E.,
Hum, D. W.,
and Belanger, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22855-22862
24.
Belanger, A.,
Hum, D. W.,
Beaulieu, M.,
Levesque, E.,
Guillemette, C.,
Tchernof, A.,
Belanger, G.,
Turgeon, D.,
and Dubois, S.
(1998)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
65,
301-310
25.
King, C. D.,
Rios, G. R.,
Assouline, J. A.,
and Tephly, T. R.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
365,
156-162
26.
Radominska-Pandya, A.,
Little, J. M.,
Pandya, J. T.,
Tephly, T. R.,
King, C. D.,
Barone, G. W.,
and Raufman, J. P.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1394,
199-208
27.
Strassburg, C. P.,
Nguyen, N.,
Manns, M. P.,
and Tukey, R. H.
(1999)
Gastroenterology
116,
149-160
28.
Strassburg, C. P.,
Kasai, Y.,
Seng, B. A.,
Miniou, P.,
Zaloudik, J.,
Herlyn, D.,
Koprowski, H.,
and Linnenbach, A. J.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
815-821
29.
Strassburg, C. P.,
Alex, B.,
Zindy, F.,
Gerken, G.,
Luttig, B.,
Meyer zum Buschenfelde, K. H.,
Brechot, C.,
and Manns, M. P.
(1996)
J. Hepatol.
25,
859-866
30.
Ritter, J. K.,
Chen, F.,
Sheen, Y. Y.,
Lubet, R. A.,
and Owens, I. S.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
3409-3414
31.
Fournel-Gigleux, S.,
Jackson, M. R.,
Wooster, R.,
and Burchell, B.
(1989)
FEBS Lett.
243,
119-122
32.
Gall, W. E.,
Zawada, G.,
Mojarrabi, B.,
Tephly, T. R.,
Green, M. D.,
Coffman, B. L.,
Mackenzie, P. I.,
and Radominska-Pandya, A.
(1999)
J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.
70,
101-108
33.
Hartmann, F.,
and Bissell, D. M.
(1982)
J. Clin. Invest.
70,
23-29
34.
Matern, S.,
Matern, H.,
Farthmann, E. H.,
and Gerok, W.
(1984)
J. Clin. Invest.
74,
402-410
35.
Parquet, M.,
Pessah, M.,
Sacquet, E.,
Salvat, C.,
Raizman, A.,
and Infante, R.
(1985)
FEBS Lett.
189,
183-187
36.
Strassburg, C. P.,
Manns, M. P.,
and Tukey, R. H.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
2979-2985
37.
Lampe, J. W.,
Bigler, J.,
Horner, N. K.,
and Potter, J. D.
(1999)
Pharmacogenetics
9,
341-349
38.
Meyer, U. A.,
and Zanger, U. M.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
37,
269-296
39.
Green, M. D.,
and Tephly, T. R.
(1998)
Drug Metab. Dispos.
26,
860-867
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Shiratani, M. Katoh, M. Nakajima, and T. Yokoi Species Differences in UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Activities in Mice and Rats Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1745 - 1752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-X. Liu, Y. Liu, J.-W. Zhang, W. Li, H.-T. Liu, and L. Yang UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase 1A6 Is the Major Isozyme Responsible for Protocatechuic Aldehyde Glucuronidation in Human Liver Microsomes Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1562 - 1569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nakamura, M. Nakajima, H. Yamanaka, R. Fujiwara, and T. Yokoi Expression of UGT1A and UGT2B mRNA in Human Normal Tissues and Various Cell Lines Drug Metab. Dispos., August 1, 2008; 36(8): 1461 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fujiwara, M. Nakajima, H. Yamanaka, M. Katoh, and T. Yokoi Product Inhibition of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) Enzymes by UDP Obfuscates the Inhibitory Effects of UGT Substrates Drug Metab. Dispos., February 1, 2008; 36(2): 361 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yamanaka, M. Nakajima, M. Katoh, and T. Yokoi Glucuronidation of Thyroxine in Human Liver, Jejunum, and Kidney Microsomes Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1642 - 1648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kaivosaari, P. Toivonen, L. M. Hesse, M. Koskinen, M. H. Court, and M. Finel Nicotine Glucuronidation and the Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase UGT2B10 Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2007; 72(3): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sakamoto, H. Kusuhara, K. Miyata, H. Shimaoka, T. Kanazu, Y. Matsuo, K. Nomura, N. Okamura, S. Hara, K. Horie, et al. Glucuronidation Converting Methyl 1-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-3-(3-ethylvaleryl)-4-hydroxy-6,7,8-trimethoxy-2-naphthoate (S-8921) to a Potent Apical Sodium-Dependent Bile Acid Transporter Inhibitor, Resulting in a Hypocholesterolemic Action J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2007; 322(2): 610 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Urquhart, R. G. Tirona, and R. B. Kim Nuclear Receptors and the Regulation of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Transporters: Implications for Interindividual Variability in Response to Drugs J. Clin. Pharmacol., May 1, 2007; 47(5): 566 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Katoh, T. Matsui, and T. Yokoi Glucuronidation of Antiallergic Drug, Tranilast: Identification of Human UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Isoforms and Effect of Its Phase I Metabolite Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 583 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. B. Buckley and C. D. Klaassen Tissue- and Gender-Specific mRNA Expression of UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) in Mice Drug Metab. Dispos., January 1, 2007; 35(1): 121 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Tallman, K. K. Miles, F. K. Kessler, J. N. Nielsen, X. Tian, J. K. Ritter, and P. C. Smith The Contribution of Intestinal UDP-Glucuronosyltransferases in Modulating 7-Ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN-38)-Induced Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 29 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||