![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 46, 36238-36244, November 17, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center,
Houston, Texas 77030 and
Received for publication, March 14, 2000, and in revised form, July 26, 2000
Stimulation of growth factor signaling has been
implicated in the development of invasive phenotypes and the activation
of p21-activated kinase (Pak1) in human breast cancer cells (Adam, L.,
Vadlamudi, R., Kondapaka, S. B., Chernoff, J., Mendelsohn, J., and
Kumar, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28238-28246;
Adam, L., Vadlamudi, R., Mandal, M., Chernoff, J., and Kumar, R. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 12041-12050). To study the role
of Pak1 in the regulation of motility and growth of breast epithelial
cells, we developed human epithelial MCF-7 clones that overexpressed the kinase-active T423E Pak1 mutant under an inducible tetracycline promoter or that stably expressed the kinase-active H83L,H86L Pak1 mutant, which is deficient in small GTPase binding sites. The expression of both T423E and H83L,H86L Pak1 mutants in breast epithelial cells was accompanied by increased cell motility without any
apparent effect on the growth rate of cells. The T423E Pak1 mutant was
primarily localized to filopodia, and the H83L,H86L Pak1 mutant was
primarily localized to ruffles. Cells expressing T423E Pak1 exhibited a
regulatable stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and Jun
N-terminal kinase activities. The expression of kinase-active Pak1
mutants significantly stimulated anchorage-independent growth of cells
in soft agar in a preferential mitogen-activated protein
kinase-sensitive manner. In addition, regulatable expression of
kinase-active Pak1 resulted in an abnormal organization of mitotic
spindles characterized by appearance of multiple spindle orientations.
We also provide evidence to suggest a close correlation between the
status of Pak1 kinase activity and base-line invasiveness of human
breast cancer cells and breast tumor grades. This study is the first
demonstration of Pak1 regulation of anchorage-independent growth,
potential Pak1 regulation of invasiveness, and abnormal organization of
mitotic spindles of human epithelial breast cancer cells.
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the United
States, affecting one in nine women. Overexpression of the human
epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER
2,1 also known as
c-ErbB2) is associated with increased progression and
metastasis, an aggressive clinical course, and decreased disease-free survival in human breast cancer patients (1). Accumulating evidence
suggests that in addition to HER 2 overexpression, the heregulin (HRG;
a combinatorial ligand for HER 3, HER 4) pathway is involved in the
progression of breast cancer cells to a more invasive phenotype (2-5).
Exposure of cells to growth factors induces cytoskeleton
reorganization, lamellipodia formation, and membrane ruffling; such
changes contribute to increased cell migration and invasion (3, 6).
Members of Rho family of the small GTPases Rac1, Cdc42, and RhoA have
been implicated in the regulation of cytoskeletal rearrangements; RhoA
is involved in the maintenance of actin stress-fibers and focal
adhesion points; Rac1 in the formation of lamellipodia and membrane
ruffles (7); and Cdc42 in the formation of peripheral actin microspikes
and filopodia (8). The small GTPases also regulate gene expression:
Cdc42 and Rac1 activate Jun N-terminal kinase and p38
mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) pathways (9). Thus GTPases
Rac1, Cdc42, and Rho are implicated in cellular transformation (10, 11). Cdc42 and Rac1 family members also activate extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases and ternary-complex factor (12). The
signaling pathway by which the small GTPases regulate their diverse
cellular functions is an evolving area of investigation.
In mammalian cells, p21-activated kinases (Paks) are identified as one
target of the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac1, and binding of GTP-bound
GTPases to Pak1 stimulates its kinase activity via autophosphorylation
(13). Expression of the activated T423E Pak1 mutant triggers the
formation of lamellipodia, dissolution of stress fibers, and
dissolution of focal adhesion complexes in fibroblast cells (14, 15).
Expression of another kinase-active Pak1 mutant with a mutation in
GTPase binding sites, H83L,H86L, supports the formation of actin
ruffles (16).
The Pak1 contains five potential SH3 domains (16, 17). In addition to
kinase activity, SH3 domains of Pak1 have been implicated in
cytoskeletal changes and Pak1 localization, probably via their interaction with adapter molecules such as Nck, guanine nucleotide factor PIX, and paxillin (18-20). Pak1 kinase activity is essential for the formation of polarized lamellipodia at the leading edge (21)
and for actin-myosin-mediated cytoskeletal changes involving myosin
light chain phosphorylation (22). Pak1 also activates a number
of signaling pathways, including p38 MAPK, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase, Jun N-terminal kinase, and
NF- Treatment of noninvasive human breast epithelial MCF-7 cells with HRG
induces Pak1 kinase activity and motility (4). To further understand
the role of Pak1 in the regulation of motility and growth of breast
epithelial cells, we established stable breast cancer cell lines
expressing T423E and H83L,H86L Pak1 mutants. The expression of
kinase-active Pak1 mutants was accompanied by a significant stimulation
of motility, invasiveness, and anchorage-independent growth of
epithelial cells. The Pak1-linked enhanced ability of cells to grow in
soft agar was preferentially sensitive to a specific MAPK inhibitor
compared with p38 MAPK inhibitor, implying that Pak1 regulates
anchorage-independent growth of epithelial cells via a MAPK kinase pathway.
Cell Cultures and Reagents--
MCF-7 human breast cancer cells
(4) were maintained in DMEM/F-12 (1:1) supplemented with 10% fetal
calf serum. Antibodies were purchased from the following companies:
Pak1 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA); Vinculin
from Sigma; anti-HA from Roche Molecular Biochemicals;
phospho-MEK1, phospho-p42/44 MAPK, and phospho-p38 MAPK
from New England Biolabs. Inhibitors SB203580 and PD980599 were
purchased from Calbiochem.
Constructs and Production of Stable Cell Lines--
MCF-7 cells
were sequentially transfected with pTak (Teton vector,
CLONTECH) plus pNeomycin plasmid (pNeo) and
pTet-Splice-HA-Pak1 (T423E) (21) and hygromycin plasmid (pHyg,
CLONTECH) using the calcium phosphate method.
Forty-eight hours post transfection, cells were selected in
medium containing 1000 µg/ml G418 (to retain the
tetracycline-VP16 transactivator) and 200 µg/ml hygromycin (to
select for the T423E Pak1-regulated expression vector). Stable cells
expressing H83L,H86L Pak1 were transfected and selected with
hygromycin. Expression of Pak1 mutants was verified by immunoblotting using anti-HA mAb.
Cell Migration and Immunofluorescence Assays--
The cell
migration assays were performed using the Boyden chambers using a
confocal microscope (4). T423E cells were induced for 24 h with
doxycycline (1 µg/ml) in DMEM containing 10% serum. Cells grown in
the absence of doxycycline were used as control. After a short
treatment with trypsin, the cells were washed, resuspended in DMEM/F-12
plus 0.1% bovine serum albumin in the presence or absence of
doxycycline, and loaded on the upper well of a Boyden chamber at a
concentration of 20,000 cells/well. The lower side of the separating
filter was coated with chemoattractant (a thick layer of 1:2 diluted
Matrigel (Life Technologies, Inc.) in serum-free DMEM/F-12. The number
of cells that successfully migrated through the filter and invaded the
2-mm Matrigel layer in order to spread as well as those that remained
on the upper side of the filter were counted by confocal microscopy
after staining with propidium iodide (Sigma). The percentage of
migrating cells compared with the total number of cells was recorded
and represents the mean ± S.E. of triplicate wells from three
separate experiments. For co-staining of filamentous actin and
HA-tagged Pak1, 0.1 µM Alexa 546-conjugated phalloidin
was included during incubation with the fluorescein isothiocyanate-goat
anti-mouse secondary antibody. Slides were mounted and analyzed by a
Zeiss-LSM inverted microscope or by confocal microscopy.
Cell Proliferation and Soft Agar Assays--
Cell proliferation
assays were performed using the
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
(MTT) dye method as described (4). Colony growth assays were performed as described previously (26). Briefly 1 ml of solution of 0.6% Difco
agar in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS with insulin was layered onto
60 × 15-mm tissue culture plates. MCF-7 cell (10,000 cells) were
mixed with 1 ml of 0.36% Bactoagar solution in DMEM prepared in a
similar manner and layered on top of the 0.6% Bactoagar layer. Plates
were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 21 days. For cells expressing T423 Pak1, doxycycline (1 µg/ml) was added where indicated. As a positive control, HRG 10 ng/ml was also included in the
medium. When indicated, some cultures were treated with MEK1/2
inhibitor PD980599 (10 µM) and p38 MAPK inhibitor
SB203580 (10 µM).
Biochemical Assays--
We have prepared the cell extracts and
performed immunoprecipitation, immunoblotting, kinase reactions, and
DNA-binding gel shift assays following the methods described by us
earlier (3-6).
Immunohistochemistry--
Nine cases of 10% formalin-fixed,
paraffin-embedded human breast carcinoma samples was processed for
peroxidase anti-peroxidase immunohistochemical staining to
reveal the Pak-1 expression. Briefly, the sections were deparaffinized
with xylene and rehydrated through graded ethanol. The sections were
then incubated with rabbit-anti-Pak-1 (1:50 dilution; Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) for 2 h, goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100 dilution,
Sigma) for 1 h, and rabbit peroxidase anti-peroxidase (1:200 dilution, Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature. The sections were washed three times with PBS after each incubation. Finally, the
staining was visualized with
diaminobenzidine-H2O2 and counterstained with hematoxylin. For specificity control, the sections were stained with the same concentration of normal rabbit IgG in place of the primary antibody.
Characterization of Inducible Expression of Kinase-active T423E
Pak1 in Epithelial Cancer Cells--
To study the influence of Pak1
kinase on the biology of epithelial breast cancer cells, we established
stable cell lines with inducible expression of the activated form of
Pak1 under the control of the tetracycline-regulated promoter. We used
the T423E Pak1 mutant, which behaves as activated Pak1 kinase but
retains its ability to bind Cdc42 and Rac1 (16, 21). We also used
another stable clone expressing the H83L,H86L Pak1 mutant, which lacks the ability to bind Cdc42/Rac1 but behaves as an activated Pak1 kinase
(16, 21). These Pak1 mutants allowed us to differentiate the effects
that were caused by sequestering of Cdc42/Rac1, Pak1 kinase activity,
or both.
To induce the expression of T423E Pak1, MCF-7 cells stable transfected
with Tet-T423E plasmid were treated with doxycycline for various time
intervals or with different doses of doxycycline (Dox), and T423E Pak1
expression was analyzed by Western blotting analysis using an anti-HA
tag monoclonal antibody. Doxycycline induced expression of T423E Pak1
protein in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Figs.
1, B and C). The
identity of the induced band as T423E Pak1 was also confirmed by
immunoblotting with an anti-Pak1 antibody. The levels of induced
expression of T423E Pak1 were 3-5 times those of endogenous Pak1. To
determine if the expressed protein was functional and retained its
kinase activity, HA-tagged T423E Pak1 was immunoprecipitated from cells
grown in serum-free conditions with an anti-HA mAb, and exogenously
expressed Pak1 kinase activity was measured by in vitro
kinase assay. Myelin basic protein was used as a substrate, and signal
was quantitated by a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.,
Sunnyvale, CA). As shown in Fig. 1D, Pak1 kinase activity
was also induced by doxycycline in a dose-dependent manner.
For subsequent studies, we used a 1 µg/ml dose of doxycycline, which
could effectively induce about 3-fold induction of T423E Pak1 protein
and its kinase activity as compared with endogenous Pak1 levels. The
level of expression of H83L,H86L Pak1 in stable clones was 5-6-fold
that of vector-transfected control cells. The kinase activity of
H83L,H86L Pak1, however, was lower than that of T423E Pak1 cells,
taking into account the 3-fold lower expression of T423E Pak1 (Fig.
1D, compare lanes 4 and
6).
We next analyzed the influence of Pak1 expression on the migration of
MCF-7 cells using Boyden chamber assay. Vector-transfected cells showed
low motility (Fig. 1E). In contrast, induction of T423E Pak1
with doxycycline resulted in a significant increase in cell motility.
HRG treatment was used as a positive control. H83L,H86L Pak1 mutant
also induced motility of epithelial cells to a level similar to that
induced with HRG treatment. Recently, it was shown that kinase activity
affects directional cell movement (21). Although both active mutants
(T423E Pak1 and H83L,H86L Pak1) stimulated cell migration, the higher
activity of T423E suggests that kinase activity and its localization
and interaction with other proteins also play a role in increasing the
migratory potential of MCF-7 cells.
Localization of T423E Pak1 and H83L,H86L Pak1--
The subcellular
localization of active Pak1 mutants was visualized by
immunofluorescence staining for tagged HA and actin. MCF-7 cells
expressing T423E and H83L,H86L Pak1 exhibited distinct actin
localization. Cells expressing T423E Pak1 showed the presence of
filopodia, and HA-Pak1 was predominantly localized at the cell periphery that corresponds to the filopodia structures (Fig.
2A). Cells expressing T423E
Pak1 showed very few stress fiber compared with
vector-transfected cells (Fig. 2A) and exhibited scattered phenotype. Thirty to forty percent of cells expressing T423E Pak1 generated a leading edge reminiscent of motile phenotype. In contrast, cells expressing H83L,H86L Pak1 showed lower levels of filopodia or
stress fibers but exhibited extensive membrane ruffling to which
HA-Pak1 staining was localized. Formation and induction of
actin-containing structures, including filopodia, ruffles, and leading
edge, and dissolution of stress fibers by active kinase mutants, which
in turn loosen their contacts with the substratum, may provide an
advantage for the cells and may have contributed to the increased
migration observed in Boyden chamber assays (Fig. 2A).
Increased Anchorage-independent Growth of MCF-7 Cells Expressing
Kinase-active Pak1 Mutants--
Kinase-deficient Pak1 can suppress
transformation that is mediated by Ras, Rho, and Rac1 (24, 25) in Rat1
cells but not in NIH3T3 cells, suggesting that the
transformation-blocking function of Pak1 depends on the cellular
context. To examine the potential influence of regulatable expression
of kinase-active Pak1 on the growth characteristics of breast
epithelial cancer cells, we measured the growth rate and ability of
cells to grow in an anchorage-independent manner. Expression of
kinase-active Pak1 mutants had very little or no significant effect on
the growth rate of MCF-7 cells on plastic (data not shown).
Kinase-active Pak1 mutants did, however, significantly enhance the
ability of MCF-7 cells to form colonies on soft agar (Fig.
2B). There was no difference in the number or size of
colonies between vector-transfected control cells and uninduced
T423E-expressing cells. Doxycycline-mediated increase in the level of
expression of T423E Pak1 was accompanied by a significant reproducible
enhancement of the ability of cells to form colonies in soft agar
comparable with that of the cells treated with HRG as a positive
control. Cells expressing H83L,H86L Pak1 also exhibited a profound
increase in ability to grow in an anchorage-independent manner (Fig.
2B). This finding contradicts an earlier observation (24)
showing the inability of H83L,H86L Pak1 in Rat1 cells to form colonies
in soft agar. It is possible that these different results reflect the
use of fibroblast versus epithelial cells in these two studies.
Regulation of MAPK Signaling Pathways by T423E Pak1--
To study
the biochemical basis of the increased ability of MCF-7 cells to form
colonies in soft agar, we analyzed the signaling pathways activated in
cells expressing T423E Pak1. We used doxycycline to induce the
expression of T423E Pak1 and analyzed the activation status of the
signaling components by blotting with phosphospecific antibodies. Both
T423E and H83L,H86L Pak1 mutants demonstrated increased p42/44 MAPK
activity (2-4-fold) over vector-transfected cells. T423E Pak1 mutant
demonstrated a modest increase in the level of p38 MAPK (1.6-2-fold,
Fig. 3A). Both Pak1 mutants
exhibited increased AP-1-DNA binding activity, which was determined by
electrophoretic mobility shift assay (Fig. 3B,
upper panel). Results of supershift experiments
using specific antibodies that recognize specific components of the
AP-1 complex suggested that the increased AP-1 DNA binding activity was
caused primarily by c-Jun and JunD transcription factors (Fig.
3B, lower panel). The exhibition of
similar patterns of super shifts of AP-1 DNA complex by both
Pak1 mutants suggested the possibility of regulation of c-Jun
and JunD transcription factors by the Pak1 pathway. To further
characterize the regulation of the p42/44 MAPK pathway by Pak1, we used
doxycycline to induce T423E Pak1 expression in MCF-7 as a function of
time. Consistent with the earlier results, p42/44 MAPK and its upstream
kinase MEK1/2 were activated in a time-dependent manner by
the induction of Pak1 (Fig. 3C). When vector-transfected
cells were exposed to doxycycline, the p42/44 MAPK pathway was not
induced (data not shown).
To address the possibility that activation of p42/44 MAPK contributed
to the anchorage-independent growth by active Pak1 mutants, the soft
agar experiment was repeated in the presence or absence of PD98059, a
specific MAPK inhibitor, or SB203580, a specific p38 MAPK inhibitor. As
illustrated in Fig. 3D, inclusion of a nontoxic dose of
PD98059 blocked the T423E Pak1-mediated increase in
anchorage-independent growth; inclusion of SB203580 had a small inhibitory effect compared with PD98059. Nonspecific inhibitory effects
of PD98059 did not cause the observed blockade effect of PD98059 on
anchorage-independent growth, because it failed to suppress the
anchorage-independent growth supported by HRG treatment (Fig.
3D). These results suggest that Pak1 plays a role in
activating p42/44 MAPK. Although it is well accepted that Pak1 activates Jun N-terminal kinase and p38 MAPK pathways, there are contradictory reports on whether Pak1 activates p42/44 MAPK (12, 23,
27). The use of different cell systems or the use of transient and
inducible systems could have caused the variation between the earlier
reports and the results presented in this study. These results suggest
that p42/44 MAPK may have a possible preferential role of supporting
the anchorage-independent growth of cells expressing kinase-active
T423E Pak1.
Active Pak1 Expression Leads to an Abnormal Organization of Mitotic
Spindles--
Earlier studies with Pak homologues in
Saccharomyces cervisiae (Ste20) showed that Pak
homologues have a role in cytokinesis and in mitosis (28, 29). To
determine whether extended expression of the mammalian Pak1 homologue
affected cell cycle progression, we induced expression of kinase-active
Pak1 by treating MCF-7 cells expressing T423E for 72 h with
doxycycline. Cell cycle progression was analyzed by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, and there were no
significant differences between the cell cycle progression of these
treated cells and that of the control vector-transfected cells (data
not shown). We next examined whether prolonged activation of Pak1 could
influence the organization of mitotic spindles and thus possibly
contribute to anchorage-independent growth via modifying the status of
DNA ploidy and genomic instability. To explore this possibility, MCF-7
cells expressing Tet vector or T423E Pak1 were treated with doxycycline
for 72 h to induce the expression of active Pak1. Cells were
costained with monoclonal antibody against Pak Expression and Breast Cancer--
Since HRG activates Pak1
activity and breast cancer progression (3-6), we hypothesized that
Pak1 expression and activity may be closely associated with the
invasive phenotypes of breast cancer cells. To explore this
possibility, we analyzed the level of Pak1 expression and activity in
small numbers of grade II and grade III breast tumor biopsies. As shown
in Fig. 5A, there was a
significant increase in the expression and kinase activity of Pak1 in
grade III tumors, as compared with grade II tumors (4). Interestingly,
increased expression of another band at 55 kDa was also observed
in grade III tumors. Since Pak1 antiserum is also known to react with
the Pak2 isoform, we believe that Pak2 may also be elevated in grade
III samples.
We also examined the level of endogenous Pak1 activity in a panel of
invasive and noninvasive breast cancer cell lines grown in complete
medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. Invasive breast cell
lines (MDA-MB435, MDA-MB231) exhibited a significant elevation in the
level of Pak activity as compared with noninvasive breast cancer cell
lines (MDA-453, BT-474, and MCF-7) (Fig. 5B). Although Pak1
expression was observed in MCF-7 cells, the level of Pak1 kinase
activity in MCF-7 cells was significantly lower as compared with its
levels higher in invasive cells, suggesting that Pak activity rather
than the amount Pak1 may be responsible for the phenotype. Similarly,
grade III tumors (four out of five) exhibited an elevation in the level
of Pak kinase activity compared with grade II tumors. There was no
direct correlation between the expression level of Pak1 protein and its
activity. It is possible that the Pak1 kinase activity in tumor cells
may be stimulated by mutation or signaling pathways or
autocrine/paracrine growth factors. Taken together, these observations
support the notion that Pak1 activity rather than the expression of
Pak1 protein may be closely related with the invasiveness of breast cancer.
We next analyzed the expression of Pak1 in a panel of tumor biopsies by
immunohistochemical staining. As shown in Fig. 5
(C-H), there were low levels of Pak1
immunoreactivity in low grade tumors (F, G). In
contrast, poorly differentiated ductal carcinomas of the breast
(documented as grade III) demonstrated a significant intense Pak1
staining (Figs. 5, C-E). Fig. 5F displays grade
2 breast carcinoma showing low level staining for Pak1. A larger study
is needed to further establish the validity of these new results.
In summary, our findings demonstrated the ability of Pak1 activity to
stimulate the growth of breast epithelial cancer cells in an
anchorage-independent manner and to promote an abnormal organization of
mitotic spindles. We also provide new evidence to suggest a close
relationship between the levels of Pak1 expression and activity Pak1
and invasive phenotypes of human breast cancer cell lines and tumor grades.
We thank Subrato Sen for providing the
centromere marker BTAK antibody.
*
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants CA 80066 and CA65746, the Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Programs of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (to R. K.), and Cancer Center Core Grant CA16672.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed:
Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center-108, 1515 Holcomble Blvd., Houston,
TX 77030. E-mail: rkumar@notes.mdacc.tmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 16, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002138200
The abbreviations used are:
HER, human
epidermal growth factor receptor;
HRG, heregulin
Regulatable Expression of p21-activated Kinase-1 Promotes
Anchorage-independent Growth and Abnormal Organization of Mitotic
Spindles in Human Epithelial Breast Cancer Cells*
,
The Fox Chase Cancer Center,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19100
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B (12, 23). Expression of the kinase-dead K299R Pak1 mutant blocks the transformation of Rat1 fibroblast by Ras (24) and cooperative extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase activation by
Ras, Rho, and Rac1 GTPases, suggesting that Pak1 plays a role in the
cell transformation and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase
activation (25).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Characterization of kinase-active
Pak1-expressing cell lines. A, schematic representation
of Pak1 mutants (T423E and H83L,H86L) used in the study.
PBD, p21 GTPase binding domain. B,
T423E-expressing MCF-7 cells were treated with increasing
concentrations of Dox, and induction of T423E Pak1 was analyzed by
immunoblotting with HA mAb. Lysates from stable clones expressing
HA-H83L,H86L Pak1 were loaded in the last lane. A
duplicate set of blots was immunoblotted with a Pak1 antibody.
C, kinetics of HA-Pak1 expression was analyzed by treating
cells at various time points with 1 µg/ml of Dox and analyzed by
Western blot using a mouse anti-HA mAb. The blot was reprobed with an
anti-vinculin antibody as a loading control. D, an equal
amount of protein from serum-starved cells was immunoprecipitated with
an anti-HA antibody, and kinase activity of exogenously expressed Pak1
mutants was analyzed by in vitro kinase assay using myelin
basic protein as a substrate. E, migration of T423E-
and H83L,H86L-expressing clones was analyzed using a modified Boyden
chamber as described under "Materials and Methods." Results shown
are representative of three separate experiments.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
A, Localization of kinase-active
Pak1 mutants. Vector-transfected or active Pak1-expressing cells were
co-stained with Alexa 546-phalloidin to visualize F-actin-containing
structures and with an anti-HA mAb to visualize the localization of
active HA-tagged Pak1 mutants. Yellow indicates
colocalization between the F-actin and Ha-tagged Pak1 protein
(arrows). T423E cells were treated with or without
doxycycline for 24 h to induce the expression of Pak1 mutant.
T423E Pak1 cells exhibited numerous F-actin-containing filopodia
(T423E + Dox), and H83L,H86L Pak1-expressing cells exhibited
extensive membrane ruffling as compared with control Tet
vector-transfected cells. The arrows indicate
co-localization of HA-tagged Pak1 with F-actin. Similar results were
obtained in three separate experiments. B, effect of
kinase-active Pak1 expression on anchorage-independent growth of MCF-7
cells. Anchorage-independent growth potential of the active
Pak1-expressing clones was measured by their ability to form colonies
on soft agar. HRG treatment was used as a positive control. Similar
results were seen on four independent experiments. Error
bars represent S.E. C, representative photographs
of soft agar colonies. Results shown are representative of four
independent experiments.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Signaling pathways activated by T423E
and H83L,H86L Pak1 mutants. MCF-7 cells expressing either vector
or Pak1 mutants were serum-starved for 24 h and induced to express
T423E Pak1 by treating cells with doxycycline (1 µg/ml) for 24 h. A, activation of signaling molecules was measured by
Western blotting using phosphospecific antibodies. B, AP-1
binding activity was measured as a measure of activation of JNK pathway
by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (upper
panel) and Supershift (arrowheads) assays with
various antibodies (bottom panel). C,
kinetics of activation of MEK1 and 42/44 MAPK kinases by induction of
T423E. Results shown are representative of three separate experiments
with similar findings. -Fold induction over control was calculated
using the Sigma Scan program. D, MEK1 inhibitor PD98059
significantly reduced active Pak1-mediated anchorage-independent
growth. Soft agar colony assays were performed in the presence of
p42/44 MAPK pathway inhibitor (PD98059) and p38 MAPK kinase pathway
inhibitor (SB203580). Treatment with HRG was used as a positive
control. Results shown are representative of three independent
experiments.
-tubulin
(green) to mark spindles and polyclonal antibody against the
BTAK protein (red) to localize the centromere. The cells
were analyzed by confocal microscopy. As shown in Fig.
4, cells expressing activated Pak1
exhibited multiple spindles with several orientations and centromere
spots (arrows); vector-transfected cells did not show
multiple spindles. For quantitation, we scored 40 mitotic cells per
field in eight different fields (× 20) and counted cells exhibiting
multiple spindles by analyzing each of them at a higher magnification.
Induction of kinase-active T423E Pak1 for 72 h resulted in the
appearance of multiple spindles in 11 ± 1% of mitotic cells
compared with <2% in vector-transfected cells or T423E cells without
doxycycline. The multiple spindles in T423E Pak1-expressing MCF-7 cells
could have been caused by defects in cytokinesis, but we could not
differentiate this possibility in the present study. Additional studies
are needed to delineate the potential role of Pak1 in mitosis,
including the effect of abnormal Pak activation on cellular events
responsible for segregation of mitotic spindles.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Prolonged expression of Pak1 leads to
appearance of multiple spindles. MCF-7 cells expressing Tet vector
(a and b) or Tet-T423E construct
(c-g) were treated with Dox for 72 h. Cells were
co-stained with anti-
1-tubulin mAb (green) and
anti-BTAK antibody (red) and analyzed by confocal
microscopy. Two vector-transfected cells are shown: one in metaphase
(upper cell) and one in anaphase
(lower cell) sectioned at one 400-nm interval
(a and b). Note the typical localization of BTAK
at the level of each spindle pole and a quasiplanar distribution of the
symmetric spindles. By contrast, cells expressing the active T423E Pak1
showed three (c-e) or multiple (f and
g) spindles that form different angles between them (one
antero-superior, one latero-posterior, and one supero-posterior
(d). Multiple spindles with different orientations are shown
in another example of the effect of T423E Pak-1 induction (f
and g).

View larger version (100K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Levels of Pak1 expression and activity in
human breast cancer cell lines and tumors. A, Pak1
levels and activity in breast tumors. Breast tumor lysates (4) were
analyzed by Western blotting for Pak1 expression (upper
panel) and subsequently reprobed with a vinculin antibody as
a loading control (middle panel). Tumor
lysates were immunoprecipitated with a Pak1 Ab and assayed for
in vitro Pak1 kinase activity (bottom
panel). Quantitation of Pak1 kinase activity is shown as
-fold change. B, status of endogenous Pak1 expression was
analyzed by immunoblotting in a panel of breast cancer cells grown in
complete medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
(upper panel). Pak1 was immunoprecipitated, and
kinase activity was determined by in vitro kinase assay
using myelin basic protein as a substrate (bottom
panel). Quantitation of Pak1 kinase activity is shown as
-fold change. C-H, immunohistochemical demonstration of
Pak1 in breast tissue samples. C-E, are invasive poorly
differentiated ductal carcinomas of the breast (documented as grade
III). All show very strong positively for Pak1. F, grade
2-breast carcinoma showing low level staining for PAK1. E,
ductal epithelial hyperplasia with a low level of Pak1 staining.
H, negative control of section adjacent to stained with
normal rabbit IgG in place of the primary antibody. The sections were
stained with the peroxidase anti-peroxidase method and
counterstained with hematoxylin.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
-1;
Pak, p21-activated kinase;
MAPK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
Dox, doxycycline;
HA, hemagglutinin.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Slamon, D. J.,
and Clark, G. M.
(1988)
Science
240,
1795-1798
2.
Tang, C. K.,
Perez, C.,
Grunt, T.,
Waibel, C.,
Cho, C.,
and Lupu, R.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
3350-3358
3.
Adam, L.,
Vadlamudi, R.,
Kondapaka, S. B.,
Chernoff, J.,
Mendelsohn, J.,
and Kumar, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28238-28246
4.
Vadlamudi, R.,
Adam, L.,
Tseng, B.,
Costa, L.,
and Kumar, R.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
2843-2846
5.
Vadlamudi, R.,
Adam, L.,
Talukder, A.,
Mendelsohn, J.,
and Kumar, R.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
7253-7264
6.
Adam, L.,
Vadlamudi, R.,
Mandal, M.,
Chernoff, J.,
and Kumar, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
12041-12050
7.
Ridley, A. J,
Paterson, H. F.,
Johnston, C. L.,
Diekmann, D.,
and Hall, A.
(1992)
Cell
70,
401-410
8.
Kozma, R.,
Ahmed, S.,
Best, A.,
and Lim, L.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5069-5080
9.
Coso, O.,
Chiariello, M., Yu, J. C.,
Teramoto, H.,
Crespo, P.,
Xu, N.,
Miki, T.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1137-1146
10.
Qiu, A,
Chen, J.,
McCormick, F.,
and Symons, M.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11781-11781
11.
Qiu, A,
Chen, J.,
Kir, D.,
McCormick, F.,
and Symons, M.
(1995)
Nature
374,
457-459
12.
Frost, J. A.,
Steen, H.,
Shapiro, P.,
Lewis, T.,
Ahn, N.,
Shaw, P. E.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
426-6438
13.
Manser, E.,
Leung, T.,
Salhuddin, H.,
Zhao, Z. S.,
and Lim, L.
(1994)
Nature
367,
40-46
14.
Zhao, Z.,
Manser, E.,
Chen, X.,
Chong, C.,
Leung, T.,
and Lim, L
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2153-2163
15.
Manser, E.,
Loo, T. H.,
Koh, C. G.,
Zhao, Z. S.,
Chen, X. Q.,
Tan, L.,
Tan, I.,
Leung, T.,
and Lim, L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
183-192
16.
Sells, M. A.,
Knaus, U. G.,
Bagrodia, S.,
Ambrose, D. M.,
Bakoch, G. M.,
and Chernoff, J.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
202-210
17.
Pawson, T.,
and Scott, J. D.
(1998)
Science
278,
2075-2080
18.
Frost, J. A.,
Khokhlatchev, A.,
Stippec, S.,
White, M. A.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28191-28198
19.
Dharmawardhane, S.,
Sanders, L. C.,
Martin, S. S.,
Daniels, R. H.,
and Bokoch, G. M.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
1265-1278
20.
Turner, C. E.,
Brown, M. C.,
Perrotta, J. A.,
Riedy, M. C.,
Nikolopoulos, S. N.,
McDonald, A. R.,
Bagrodia, S.,
Thomas, S.,
and Leventhal, P. S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
851-863
21.
Sells, M. A.,
Boyd, J. T.,
and Chernoff, J.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
837-849
22.
Sanders, L. C.,
Mastsumura, F.,
Bokoch, G. M.,
and de Lanerolle, P.
(1999)
Science
283,
2083-2085
23.
Bagrodia, S.,
Derijard, B.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27995-27998
24.
Tang, Y.,
Chen, Z.,
Ambrose, D.,
Liu, J.,
Gibbs, J. B.,
Chernoff, J.,
and Field, J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4454-4464
25.
Tang, Y., Yu, J.,
and Field, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1881-1891
26.
Cox, A. D.,
and Der, C. J.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
238,
277-294
27.
Frost, J. A.,
Xu, S.,
Hutchison, M. R.,
Marcus, S.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1996)
Mol. Cell Biol.
16,
3707-3713
28.
Cvrckova, F.,
De Vigilio, C.,
Manser, E.,
Pringle, J. R.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1817-1830
29.
Wu, C.,
Lytvyn, V.,
Thomas, D. V.,
and Leberer, E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30623-30626
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Yi, E. W. Wilker, M. B. Yaffe, A. Stemmer-Rachamimov, and J. L. Kissil Validation of the p21-Activated Kinases as Targets for Inhibition in Neurofibromatosis Type 2 Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 68(19): 7932 - 7937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Coniglio, S. Zavarella, and M. H. Symons Pak1 and Pak2 Mediate Tumor Cell Invasion through Distinct Signaling Mechanisms Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2008; 28(12): 4162 - 4172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Jadeski, J. M. Mataraza, H.-W. Jeong, Z. Li, and D. B. Sacks IQGAP1 Stimulates Proliferation and Enhances Tumorigenesis of Human Breast Epithelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2008; 283(2): 1008 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Lu, R. Yao, D. Jia, W. Wen, M. LaRegina, K. Crist, R. Lubet, and M. You Enhanced Susceptibility to Chemical Induction of Ovarian Tumors in Mice with a Germ Line p53 Mutation Mol. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 6(1): 99 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. W. Mayhew, E. D. Jeffery, N. E. Sherman, K. Nelson, J. M. Polefrone, S. J. Pratt, J. Shabanowitz, J. T. Parsons, J. W. Fox, D. F. Hunt, et al. Identification of phosphorylation sites in betaPIX and PAK1 J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2007; 120(22): 3911 - 3918. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Aoki, T. Yokoyama, K. Fujiwara, A. M. Tari, R. Sawaya, D. Suki, K. R. Hess, K. D. Aldape, S. Kondo, R. Kumar, et al. Phosphorylated Pak1 Level in the Cytoplasm Correlates with Shorter Survival Time in Patients with Glioblastoma Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6603 - 6609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Manavathi, S. K. Rayala, and R. Kumar Phosphorylation-dependent Regulation of Stability and Transforming Potential of ETS Transcriptional Factor ESE-1 by p21-activated Kinase 1 J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2007; 282(27): 19820 - 19830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-P. Ching, V. Y.L. Leong, M.-F. Lee, H.-T. Xu, D.-Y. Jin, and I. O.-L. Ng P21-Activated Protein Kinase Is Overexpressed in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Enhances Cancer Metastasis Involving c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Activation and Paxillin Phosphorylation Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3601 - 3608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Meng, S. K. Rayala, A. E. Gururaj, A. H. Talukder, B. W. O'Malley, and R. Kumar Signaling-dependent and coordinated regulation of transcription, splicing, and translation resides in a single coregulator, PCBP1 PNAS, April 3, 2007; 104(14): 5866 - 5871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Singh, K. Kaluarachchi, M. Chen, S. K. Rayala, S. Balasenthil, J. Ma, and R. Kumar Solution Structure and Antiestrogenic Activity of the Unique C-terminal, NR-box Motif-containing Region of MTA1s J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2006; 281(35): 25612 - 25621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Rayala, P. R. Molli, and R. Kumar Nuclear p21-Activated Kinase 1 in Breast Cancer Packs Off Tamoxifen Sensitivity. Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 5985 - 5988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Holm, S. Rayala, K. Jirstrom, O. Stal, R. Kumar, and G. Landberg Association between Pak1 expression and subcellular localization and tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst, May 17, 2006; 98(10): 671 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Gururaj, R. R. Singh, S. K. Rayala, C. Holm, P. den Hollander, H. Zhang, S. Balasenthil, A. H. Talukder, G. Landberg, and R. Kumar MTA1, a transcriptional activator of breast cancer amplified sequence 3 PNAS, April 25, 2006; 103(17): 6670 - 6675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Rayala, A. H. Talukder, S. Balasenthil, R. Tharakan, C. J. Barnes, R.-A. Wang, M. Aldaz, S. Khan, and R. Kumar P21-Activated Kinase 1 Regulation of Estrogen Receptor-{alpha} Activation Involves Serine 305 Activation Linked with Serine 118 Phosphorylation Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 66(3): 1694 - 1701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Gururaj, S. K. Rayala, R. K. Vadlamudi, and R. Kumar Novel Mechanisms of Resistance to Endocrine Therapy: Genomic and Nongenomic Considerations Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2006; 12(3): 1001s - 1007s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Vadlamudi, B. Manavathi, S. Balasenthil, S. S. Nair, Z. Yang, A. A. Sahin, and R. Kumar Functional Implications of Altered Subcellular Localization of PELP1 in Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 65(17): 7724 - 7732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cau and A. Hall Cdc42 controls the polarity of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons through two distinct signal transduction pathways J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2005; 118(12): 2579 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Vadlamudi, C. J. Barnes, S. Rayala, F. Li, S. Balasenthil, S. Marcus, H. V. Goodson, A. A. Sahin, and R. Kumar p21-Activated Kinase 1 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics by Phosphorylating Tubulin Cofactor B Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2005; 25(9): 3726 - 3736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Callow, S. Zozulya, M. L. Gishizky, B. Jallal, and T. Smeal PAK4 mediates morphological changes through the regulation of GEF-H1 J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2005; 118(9): 1861 - 1872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang, S. Rayala, D. Nguyen, R. K. Vadlamudi, S. Chen, and R. Kumar Pak1 Phosphorylation of Snail, a Master Regulator of Epithelial-to-Mesenchyme Transition, Modulates Snail's Subcellular Localization and Functions Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 65(8): 3179 - 3184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kumar and M.-C. Hung Signaling Intricacies Take Center Stage in Cancer Cells Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 65(7): 2511 - 2515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Parsons, J. Monypenny, S. M. Ameer-Beg, T. H. Millard, L. M. Machesky, M. Peter, M. D. Keppler, G. Schiavo, R. Watson, J. Chernoff, et al. Spatially Distinct Binding of Cdc42 to PAK1 and N-WASP in Breast Carcinoma Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2005; 25(5): 1680 - 1695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||