![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 47, 36487-36490, November 24, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS, Sophia Antipolis, 06560 Valbonne, France
Received for publication, August 25, 2000, and in revised form, September 14, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies are
fatal neurological diseases characterized by astroglyosis, neuronal
loss, and by the accumulation of the abnormal isoform of the prion
protein. The amyloid prion protein fragment 106-126 (P106-126) has
been shown to be toxic in cultured hippocampal neurons (1). Here, we
show that P106-126 is also cytotoxic in vivo. Taking
advantage of the fact that retina is an integral part of the central
nervous system, the toxic effect of the peptide was investigated by
direct intravitreous injection. Aged solutions of P106-126 induced
apoptotic-mediated retinal cell death and irreversibly altered the
electrical activity of the retina. Neither apoptosis nor
electroretinogram damages were observed with freshly diluted P106-126,
suggesting that the toxicity is linked to the aggregation state of the
peptide. The retina provides a convenient in vivo system
to look for potential inhibitors of cytotoxicity associated with
spongiform encephalopathies.
Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies
(TSE)1 are neurological
disorders having common pathological signs like vacuolization of the
neurophils, astrocytosis, and loss of neurons (2). TSE are
characterized by the accumulation of large aggregates of the prion
protein, PrP-res, in both human and animal brains. The abnormal PrP-res
isoform has a high content of The in vivo mechanisms leading to the synaptic loss and
neuronal death are not elucidated, but the possible involvement of apoptotic processes has been postulated and is consistent with the lack
of inflammation stigmata in TSE-affected brains. The neural tissue
damages could be due exclusively to PrP-res deposits, and/or to
disruption of PrP-sen physiological functions, and/or to cytotoxic
effects induced by PrP fragments or PrP-res aggregates. PrP-res and a
synthetic peptide fragment (P106-126) have been shown to be cytotoxic
in vitro likely via the programmed cell death pathway (1,
13). Like PrP-res, the P106-126 peptide is partially resistant to
proteinase K, presents a high Whether the apoptotic process could account for in vivo
neurodegeneration taking place during the development of TSE remains unclear. The induction of apoptosis has been suggested in
scrapie-infected mouse brain (16), as well as in Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease (17) and bovine spongiform encephalopathy (18).
In the present report, we examined whether the PrP fragment P106-126
can induce apoptotic-mediated cell death in vivo. To address
this question, we directly administrated P106-126 into rat eyes taking
advantage of the fact that the retina is an integral part of the
central nervous system. Apoptotic process induced by P106-126 was
demonstrated by means of the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase
dUTP-end labeling (TUNEL) staining and of the DNA fragmentation
technique. Neuronal death was confirmed by measurement of the
electrical activity of the retina.
Peptides--
The human sequence of the prion protein fragment
(P106-126; KTNMKHMAGAAAAGAVVGGLG) was purchased from Bachem. The prion
fragment used as a control peptide (P89-103; GQGGGTHNQWNKPSK) was
synthesized by Eurogentec. Lyophilized peptides were dissolved
in deionized water at a concentration of 5 mM, distributed
into 20-µl aliquots, and stored at Intravitreal Injection--
Adult male albino Wistar rats
(35-55 days old) were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection
of 60 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital followed by a topical application of
0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride. The injections of 2 µl of peptides
or vehicle (phosphate-buffered solution) were done unilaterally with a
30-gauge needle introduced into the posterior chamber on the upper pole
of the eye directed toward the center of the vitreous. The injections
were performed slowly to allow a better diffusion of the peptide and
avoid any ocular hypertension. For negative controls, we both
considered the uninjected contralateral eyes and eyes injected in the
same conditions with 2 µl of vehicle (PBS). At least four animals
were used in each group of experimental conditions.
In Situ Labeling by the TUNEL Method--
Rats were euthanatized
with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital 3 days post-intravitreal
injections. The eyes were enucleated, and a puncture was made at the
limbus to permit the infusion of the fixative solution. The eyes were
immediately fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 4 h
then cryoprotected overnight in PBS containing 20% sucrose and
embedded in Tissue-Tek® (Sakura). Frozen sections
(10 µm) were cut on a cryostat (Leica), and slides were heated
at 50 °C for 60 min then stored at Dose-Response of the Effect of PrP P106-126--
2 µl of PBS
alone or of 3-day-aged peptide P106-126 diluted extemporarily in PBS
(corresponding to 0.05, 0.5, and 5 nmol) were injected as described
above. For each condition, four rats were treated, and retina sections
were processed simultaneously for the TUNEL-labeling assay. To
evaluate the number of TUNEL-positive cells, photographs of retinal
sections were collected at an original magnification of × 10. The
intensity of gray of each layer (ganglion cell, G; inner nuclear, INL;
outer nuclear, ONL) was quantified using the NIH image software system.
The gray intensity was expressed per surface unit in arbitrary units.
DNA Fragmentation Analysis--
After enucleation, the retinas
were dissected from the retinal epithelium and choroid. Proteins were
then digested with 200 µg/ml of proteinase K in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 1% SDS) for 2 h at 55 °C. Retinal DNA was extracted by phenol-chloroform solutions, and the aqueous phase was incubated with Dnase-free RNase A
(100 µg/ml) and then precipitated in a solution of 0.3 M
sodium acetate in ethanol overnight at Electroretinograms (ERGs)--
Dark-adapted ERGs were performed
as described previously (19). Full-field ERG responses were obtained
overnight with dark-adapted rats prepared under dim red light before
recording. The pupils of anesthetized rats were dilated with a drop of
0.5% tropicamide. A silver chloride ring-recording electrode was
placed on the cornea, and the reference electrode, with a silver-silver
chloride tip, was connected to the ear. Light stimulus (10 µs) was
provided by a stroboscopic flash (Grass Instruments Inc.) placed
0.25 m in front of the rat. The ERGs were recorded using the
visual electroretinogram test system (LKC Technologies, Inc.)
and then stored and analyzed. Amplitude of the a-wave was measured from
the base line to the trough of the a-wave; b-wave amplitude was
measured from the trough of the a-wave to the peak of the b-wave. The
averaged responses represent the mean of five white flashes delivered
four min apart. Electroretinograms were recorded before treatment and
then at different times of recovery (1, 2, 3, and 7 days).
Statistical Analysis--
The amplitude values of a- and b-waves
obtained with each animal were normalized to base-line amplitudes at
each time point of the study and expressed as percentage of base-line
value. Data were expressed as mean ± S.E. of values obtained with
4 rats per group. Results from the ERG recordings were not distributed
normally and had unequal variance. Therefore, the Mann Witney
U test was used to compare the peptide and the
vehicle-treated group of rats. Differences were considered
statistically significant when P values were less than 0.02.
In Vivo Induction of Retina Cells Apoptosis by Peptides--
The
effect of freshly prepared or 3-day-aged P106-126 and soluble P89-103
PrP peptides on the retina cell death was examined after intravitreal
injection. Fig. 1 shows representative
photomicrographs of treated retina sections processed through the TUNEL
labeling assay (Fig. 1, B-E) and the histology of
PBS-treated retina stained with cresyl violet (Fig. 1A).
After intravitreal injections of aged P106-126 (5 nmol),
TUNEL-positive cells were observed in the inner and outer nuclear
layers, as well as in the ganglion cells layer (Fig. 1D).
When freshly prepared P106-126 was intravitreally injected, only
occasional TUNEL-positive cells were observed (Fig. 1C)
suggesting that the cytotoxic effect of the peptide was linked to its
physicochemical state. Intact retinas (data not shown) and retinas
treated with PBS alone (Fig. 1B) or soluble PrP peptide P89-103 (Fig. 1E) showed only few TUNEL-positive cells. No
differences in labeling patterns were observed between the lower and
the upper poles of the retina where injections were done.
Dose-Response Effect of PrP Peptide P106-126 on TUNEL
Labeling--
To assess whether the cytotoxic effect was
dose-dependent, rat eyes were treated for 72 h with
PBS alone or containing 0.05, 0.5, or 5 nmol of aged P106-126.
Corresponding retina sections were processed through the TUNEL-labeling
assay and revealed with the DAB substrate. We previously checked that
the intensity of gray coloration developed by the DAB substrate was
directly proportional to the number of TUNEL-positive cells. This
estimation method allowed us to screen a large surface layer and an
important number of retinal sections. Fig.
2 is a histogram representation of the relative gray intensity obtained for the inner and outer nuclear layers
and the ganglion cells layer. The gray intensity of the three layers
increases with the quantity of injected P106-126. Although 0.05 nmol
of injected P106-126 was not significantly toxic for the retina cells,
higher quantities induced TUNEL-labeled positive cells in ganglion
cells and in inner and outer nuclear layers. When 5 nmol of P106-126
were injected, the TUNEL-labeling method showed that almost all the
nuclei from the three layers were positive.
DNA Fragmentation Kinetics--
To better discriminate between
necrosis and apoptotic cell death, the fragmentation of the retinal DNA
was studied. Four eyes were injected with vehicle alone or with 5 nmol
of aged peptide P106-126 and analyzed at different times after
inoculation. The peptide-treated retinas showed a ladder pattern of DNA
degradation with bands corresponding to multiples of 180 to 200 base
pairs (Fig. 3). The DNA laddering was
clearly but slightly observable 24 h after injection and was more
intense after 48 and 72 h. No DNA degradation was observed either
in the PBS-treated retinas (Fig. 3, control lane) or in
retinas treated with freshly prepared peptide P106-126 (data not
shown).
Electroretinographic Studies--
The electrical activity of
peptide-treated or untreated retinas was monitored by recording the
ERGs. Fig. 4 shows the effect of
intravitreal injections on the electroretinograms and describes the
variation of the a- and b-wave amplitudes several days after inoculation. When compared with vehicle-treated group, the aged P106-126-treated group exhibited significant deficits in both a- and
b-wave amplitudes, direct evidence of persistent and long-term damages
to retinal function. In the peptide-injected group, the a-wave
amplitude decreased significantly at day 1 (71 ± 8%,
p < 0.02) and continued to decline slowly from day 2 to day 7. Unlike the a-wave, the b-wave amplitude markedly decreased at
day 1 (57 ± 8%) and then partly recovered at day 2 (78 ± 9%) and further decreased from day 3 (63 ± 6%) to day 7 (56 ± 7%). When electroretinogram recordings were done after
injection of control peptide P89-103 or freshly prepared P106-126, no
significant decrease on the a- and b-wave amplitudes could be
observed (data not shown).
For the last decade, many reports have shown that PrP peptide
P106-126 could provide insights into the understanding of some aspects
of TSE pathology (1, 15, 20, 21). Although P106-126 does not cause
infection or induce in vitro conversion of PrP-sen to
PrP-res isoform, it shares a number of physicochemical properties with
the PrP-res molecule. For instance, P106-126 is partially proteinase
K-resistant and displays high In contrast with in vitro observations, neurotoxicity of
P106-126 has never been reported after direct administration into the
brain. Several explanations can be proposed for this discrepancy, including the rapid clearance of the peptide by the brain. Supporting this idea, PrP-res is detectable in the brain of intracerebrally infected mice a few days after infection, then it decreases to undetectable levels, and last the accumulation of the endogenous PrP-res starts (25). For several reasons, the retina seems to be an
interesting in vivo model. First, retina is an integral part
of the central nervous system; second, it is a closed system with a low
content of proteolytic enzymes. Furthermore, the PrP-sen isoform is
expressed in photoreceptor cells of adult retina (26). Finally,
widespread retinopathy has been observed in scrapie-affected hamsters
(27-29). Therefore, the retina is a well suited model to study the
molecular events leading to neuronal death in the course of the
disease. For the first time, we show that aged P106-126 induces the
death of retinal cells according to an apoptotic process and provides a
significant reduction of the electrical activity of the retina. The
observed effects of the peptide are monitored by DNA fragmentation and
electroretinogram recording analysis and can be evidenced as soon as
24 h after intravitreal injection. Moreover, P106-126 causes
long-term damages on the physiological activity of retina, because no
recovery of the deleterious effects can be observed 7 days after
peptide inoculation.
The molecular mechanisms involved in the P106-126 toxicity are not
completely understood. The relationship between toxicity and
physicochemical properties of amyloid peptides has been extensively studied in vitro (30, 31). The Apart from programmed-cell death, other molecular mechanisms of
P106-126 toxicity have been proposed but are still controversial (33).
The possible insertion of the peptide into the cell membrane could lead
to channel formation, the subsequent disruption of ion homeostasis
being responsible for the cell death (34, 35).
Our results strongly suggest that at least part of the neuronal loss
observed in TSE diseases is because of the toxic effects of PrP-res
and/or its degradation products. In contrast with Alzheimer's disease
in which the overproduction of the amyloid peptides A In conclusion, our study provides the first in vivo evidence
of the involvement of an apoptotic process in the cytotoxic mechanisms of the prion protein fragment P106-126 suggesting that similar mechanisms also occur in TSE. The retina model used in the present work
is a powerful tool to further identify the molecular mechanisms leading
to the neuronal loss that could be a general characteristic of several
neurodegenerative diseases. Finally, the retina model should serve for
screening drugs able to limit cell damage and prevent neuronal loss.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-sheet secondary structure, forms
amyloid fibrils, and is partially resistant to proteolysis (3-5). The
precursor of the pathological isoform PrP-res is a normal host
glycoprotein (termed PrP-sen) widely expressed in the central nervous
system and in peripheral tissues. Unlike PrP-res, PrP-sen is a
protease-sensitive protein, soluble in mild detergents, and has mainly
-helix structures (6-8). Interestingly, the development of
spongiform pathologies requires the presence of both isoforms PrP-res
and PrP-sen (9), the level of PrP-sen expression being an essential
factor in the pathology (10). In experimental transmissions with
transgenic mice, it was found that increasing the number of
PrP gene copies led to a decreased incubation time of
the disease (11, 12).
-sheet enriched structure, and forms
amyloid fibrils in vitro (14). Hope et al. (15)
have shown that the expression of PrP-sen is necessary for P106-126 to
exert its cytotoxic effects.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
20 °C. Peptides were diluted
twice with 2× PBS minus Ca2+ and immediately used or aged
by incubation at room temperature for 3 days.
20 °C until use. The
in situ cell death detection was performed following the
manufacturer's recommendations (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) then
revealed using a 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate kit (Vector
Laboratories) and processed for detailed examination by light
microscopy. Morphological and histological observations of retinas were
done by staining the sections with 1% cresyl violet.
20 °C. Precipitated DNA
samples were resuspended in distilled water, and the DNA concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm. Samples of 10 µg of DNA were electrophoresed through 1.2% agarose gel containing 1 µg/ml of ethidium bromide. DNA bands were visualized by a UV light
transilluminator and photographed.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effect of PrP peptides P106-126 and P89-103
on retina cell death. Representative microphotographs
showing an uninjected rat retina stained by 1% cresyl violet
(A) and peptide-treated retina sections revealed by the
TUNEL-labeling method (B-E) are shown. Rats were
intravitreally injected with 2 µl of PBS alone (B) or
containing 5 nmol of freshly prepared (C) and 3-day-aged PrP
peptides P106-126 (D) and P89-103 (E),
respectively. Rat eyes were enucleated 72 h after injection,
fixed, and cut on a cryostat. Retinal sections (10 µm) were processed
through the TUNEL-labeling protocol and revealed with the DAB substrate
kit. The nuclei of TUNEL-positive cells are black.
Magnification, × 10. Bar, 50 µm. The cell layer
abbreviations are as follows: G, ganglion cell;
IP, internal plexiform; INL, inner nuclear;
EP, external plexiform; ONL, outer nuclear;
IS, inner segments of rods; OS, outer segments of
rods and cones.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Dose-response histograms of the cytotoxic
effect induced by the PrP peptide P106-126 on retina cells. Rat
eyes were intravitreally injected with 2 µl of PBS alone or
containing 0.05, 0.5, and 5 nmol of 3-day-aged peptide P106-126.
72 h after injection, rats were sacrificed, and the retinas were
fixed and processed by the TUNEL-labeling method as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Each group represents four animals
injected unilaterally; ten sections were cut per eye. The relative
intensity of gray per surface unit was determined in a
10-fold magnification photograph of retina sections and quantified with
the NIH image software. The data represent the means ± S.E. of
two independent experiments expressed in arbitrary units. G,
ganglion cell layer; INL, inner nuclear layer;
ONL, outer nuclear layer.

View larger version (89K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of PrP peptide P106-126 on the
retinal DNA laddering pattern. The retinal DNA was extracted and
electrophoresed on a 1.2% agarose gel as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Each lane was loaded with 10 µg of retinal DNA extracted from four retinas treated with PBS
(control) or aged peptide P106-126 for 24, 48, and 72 h. DNA standard ladders are indicated on the left side of
the gel. bp, base pair.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Electroretinogram profiles
(A) and a- and b-wave amplitudes (B)
in PrP peptide P106-126 and PBS-injected groups. ERGs were
recorded before (0) and after 1, 2, 3, and 7 days of recovery. The
black and gray marks correspond to the
intravitreal injections of vehicle alone and of aged P106-126 (5 nmol), respectively. The a- and b-wave amplitudes were normalized and
expressed as the percentage of the control value. Each bar
and error represents the mean ± S.E.
(n = 6). *, statistically significant differences
between control and peptide-treated groups (p < 0.02 versus control).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-sheet structure (14). Amyloid fibrils
formed in vitro by P106-126 are birefringent under polymerized light when stained by Congo red (22). Like PrP-res, which
causes cell death in vitro (13), P106-126 can induce
apoptotic cell death (1, 23). In addition, P106-126 exerts its toxic effects through direct and specific interactions with
PrP-sen-expressing cells (20, 24).
-sheet structure adopted
by P106-126 and its aggregation state are crucial (1, 15). Our results
are consistent with these previous reports, because intravitreous injections of freshly diluted P106-126 failed to cause cell death and
modification of electrical activity of the retina. Moreover, Jen
et al. (32) have shown recently that the amyloid peptides A
1-40 and A
1-42 involved in Alzheimer's disease also induced photoreceptor cells apoptosis after intravitreous injections. Here
again, cell death was observed only with aged (aggregated) peptides,
whereas freshly prepared solutions were devoid of cytotoxicity. As a
positive control to our own experiments, the apoptotic response induced
by aged solutions of A
1-40 have been reproduced in the present work
(data not shown). There exists no sequence homology between A
1-40
and P106-126 peptides. However, both peptides share the same propency
to form
-sheet structures and sedimentable aggregates. Taken
together these data strongly suggest that the specific mode of the
aggregation of P106-126, rather than its amino acid sequence, is
responsible for the observed in vivo cell death.
1-40 and
A
1-42 is well documented, the catabolism of the PrP molecules remains unclear. An amino-terminally truncated fragment of PrP insoluble in detergents and resistant to protease has been purified from brains of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease affected patients (36). Caughey et al. (37) have also shown that a PrP-res isoform
truncated at residue 90 is formed in scrapie-infected mouse
neuroblastoma cells. Furthermore, fragments of PrP-sen have been
identified in extracts of normal brain, and the precise cleavage site
has been mapped to His-111 or Met-112 (36). Interestingly, the cleavage occurring in physiological conditions disrupts the neurotoxic region of
PrP-sen comprising amino acid residues 106-126. Thus, pathological
conditions could promote the appearance of PrP toxic fragments that are
never formed in physiological situation.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Nicole Zsürger for help with the preparation of the figures and Jean-Daniel Barde for animal care. We thank Dr. Frédéric Checler for critical reading of this manuscript. A very special thank you goes to Dr. Bruce Chesebro for advice and comments on the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and the Actions concertées coordonnées-Prions (number 4; 1998).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: IPMC, CNRS, 660 route
des lucioles, 06560 Valbonne, France. Tel.: 334 93 95 77 67; Fax: 334 93 95 77 08; E-mail: chabry@ipmc.cnrs.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 27, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000579200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: TSE, transmissible spongiform encephalopathies; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP-end labeling; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DAB, 3,3'-diaminobenzidine; ERG(s), electroretinograms.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Forloni, G., Angeretti, N., Chiesa, R., Monzani, E., Salmona, M., Bugiani, O., and Tagliavini, F. (1993) Nature 362, 543-546 |
| 2. | Fraser, H. (1993) Br. Med. Bull. 49, 792-809 |
| 3. | Caughey, B. W., Dong, A., Bhat, K. S., Ernst, D., Hayes, S. F., and Caughey, W. S. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 7672-7680 |
| 4. | Pan, K.-M., Baldwin, M., Nguyen, J., Gasset, M., Serban, A., Groth, D., Mehlhorn, I., Huang, Z., Fletterick, R. J., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10962-10966 |
| 5. | Safar, J., Roller, P. P., Gajdusek, D. C., and Gibbs, C. J., Jr. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20276-20284 |
| 6. | Meyer, R. K., McKinley, M. P., Bowman, K. A., Braunfeld, M. B., Barry, R. A., and Prusiner, S. B. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 2310-2314 |
| 7. | Riek, R., Hornemann, S., Wider, G., Glockshuber, R., and Wuthrich, K. (1997) FEBS Lett. 413, 282-288 |
| 8. | Riek, R., Hornemann, S., Wider, G., Billeter, M., Glockshuber, R., and Wuthrich, K. (1996) Nature 382, 180-182 |
| 9. | Brandner, S., Isenmann, S., Raeber, A. J., Fischer, M., Sailer, A., Kobayashi, Y., Marino, S., Weissmann, C., and Aguzzi, A. (1996) Nature 379, 339-343 |
| 10. | Büeler, H., Aguzzi, A., Sailer, A., Greiner, R. A., Autenried, P., Aguet, M., and Weissmann, C. (1993) Cell 73, 1339-1347 |
| 11. | Carlson, G. A., Ebeling, C., Yang, S. L., Telling, G., Torchia, M., Groth, D., Westaway, D., DeArmond, S. J., and Prusiner, S. B. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 5690-5694 |
| 12. | Tremblay, P., Meiner, Z., Galou, M., Heinrich, C., Petromilli, C., Lisse, T., Cayetano, J., Torchia, M., Mobley, W., Bujard, H., DeArmond, S. J., and Prusiner, S. B. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 12580-12585 |
| 13. | Müller, W. E. G., Ushijima, H., Schröder, H. C., Forrest, J. M. S., Schatton, W. F. H., Rytik, P. G., and Heffner-Lauc, M. (1993) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 246, 261-267 |
| 14. | Selvaginni, C., De Gioia, L., Cantù, L., Ghibaudi, E., Diomede, L., Passerini, F., Forloni, G., Bugiani, O., Tagliavini, F., and Salmona, M. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 194, 1380-1386 |
| 15. | Hope, J., Shearman, M. S., Baxter, H. C., Chong, A., Kelly, S. M., and Price, N. C. (1996) Neurodegeneration 5, 1-11 |
| 16. | Giese, A., Groschup, M. H., Hess, B., and Kretzschmar, H. A. (1995) Brain Pathol. 5, 213-221 |
| 17. | Gray, F., Chretien, F., Adle-Biassette, H., Dorandeu, A., Ereau, T., Delisle, M. B., Kopp, N., Ironside, J. W., and Vital, C. (1999) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 58, 321-328 |
| 18. | Theil, D., Fatzer, R., Meyer, R., Schobesberger, M., Zurbriggen, A., and Vandevelde, M. (1999) J. Comp. Pathol. 121, 357-367 |
| 19. | Ettaiche, M., Fillacier, K., Widmann, C., Heurteaux, C., and Lazdunski, M. (1999) Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 40, 729-736 |
| 20. | Brown, D. R., Herms, J., and Kretzschmar, H. A. (1994) Neuroreport 5, 2057-2060 |
| 21. | Brown, D. R., Schmidt, B., and Kretzschmar, H. A. (1996) Nature 380, 345-347 |
| 22. | Tagliavini, F., Prelli, F., Verga, L., Giaccone, G., Sarma, R., Gorevic, P., Ghetti, B., Passerini, F., Ghibaudi, E., and Forloni, G. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 9678-9682 |
| 23. | Florio, T., Thellung, S., Amico, C., Robello, M., Salmona, M., Bugiani, O., Tagliavini, F., Forloni, G., and Schettini, G. (1998) J. Neurosci. Res. 54, 341-352 |
| 24. | Brown, D. R., Schmidt, B., Groschup, M. H., and Kretzschmar, H. A. (1998) Eur. J. Cell Biol. 75, 29-37 |
| 25. | Lasmezas, C. I., Deslys, J.-P., Demaimay, R., Adjou, K. T., Hauw, J.-J., and Dormont, D. (1996) J. Gen. Virol. 77, 1601-1609 |
| 26. | Chishti, M. A., Strome, R., Carlson, G. A., and Westaway, D. (1997) Neurosci. Lett. 234, 11-14 |
| 27. | Buyukmihci, N., Rorvik, M., and Marsh, R. F. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 1169-1171 |
| 28. | Hogan, R. N., Baringer, J. R., and Prusiner, S. B. (1981) Lab. Invest. 44, 34-42 |
| 29. | Buyukmihci, N. C., Goehring-Harmon, F., and Marsh, R. F. (1987) Exp. Neurol. 97, 201-206 |
| 30. | Salmona, M., Malesani, P., De Gioia, L., Gorla, S., Bruschi, M., Molinari, A., Della Vedova, F., Pedrotti, B., Marrari, M. A., Awan, T., Bugiani, O., Forloni, G., and Tagliavini, F. (1999) Biochem. J. 342, 207-214 |
| 31. | Jobling, M. F., Stewart, L. R., White, A. R., McLean, C., Friedhuber, A., Maher, F., Beyreuther, K., Masters, C. L., Barrow, C. J., Collins, S. J., and Cappai, R. (1999) J. Neurochem. 73, 1557-1565 |
| 32. | Jen, L. S., Hart, A. J., Jen, A., Relvas, J. B., Gentleman, S. M., Garey, L. J., and Patel, A. J. (1998) Nature 372, 140-141 |
| 33. | Manunta, M., Kunz, B., Sandmeier, E., Christen, P., and Schindler, H. (2000) FEBS Lett. 474, 255-256 |
| 34. | Lin, M.-C., Mirzabekov, T., and Kagan, B. L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 44-47 |
| 35. | Kawahara, M., Kuroda, Y., Arispe, N., and Rojas, E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 14077-14083 |
| 36. | Chen, S. G., Teplow, D. B., Parchi, P., Teller, J. K., Gambetti, P., and Autilio-Gambetti, L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19173-19180 |
| 37. | Caughey, B., Raymond, G. J., Ernst, D., and Race, R. E. (1991) J. Virol. 65, 6597-6603 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Linden, V. R. Martins, M. A. M. Prado, M. Cammarota, I. Izquierdo, and R. R. Brentani Physiology of the Prion Protein Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 673 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. N. M. Hajj, M. H. Lopes, A. F. Mercadante, S. S. Veiga, R. B. da Silveira, T. G. Santos, K. C. B. Ribeiro, M. A. Juliano, S. G. Jacchieri, S. M. Zanata, et al. Cellular prion protein interaction with vitronectin supports axonal growth and is compensated by integrins J. Cell Sci., June 1, 2007; 120(11): 1915 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Alfa Cisse, C. Sunyach, B. E. Slack, A. Fisher, B. Vincent, and F. Checler M1 and M3 Muscarinic Receptors Control Physiological Processing of Cellular Prion by Modulating ADAM17 Phosphorylation and Activity J. Neurosci., April 11, 2007; 27(15): 4083 - 4092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gong, A. Jellali, V. Forster, J. Mutterer, E. Dubus, W. D. Altrock, J. A. Sahel, A. Rendon, and S. Picaud The Toxicity of the PrP106-126 Prion Peptide on Cultured Photoreceptors Correlates with the Prion Protein Distribution in the Mammalian and Human Retina Am. J. Pathol., April 1, 2007; 170(4): 1314 - 1324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pietri, A. Caprini, S. Mouillet-Richard, E. Pradines, M. Ermonval, J. Grassi, O. Kellermann, and B. Schneider Overstimulation of PrPC Signaling Pathways by Prion Peptide 106-126 Causes Oxidative Injury of Bioaminergic Neuronal Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2006; 281(38): 28470 - 28479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Novitskaya, O. V. Bocharova, I. Bronstein, and I. V. Baskakov Amyloid Fibrils of Mammalian Prion Protein Are Highly Toxic to Cultured Cells and Primary Neurons J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2006; 281(19): 13828 - 13836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Murali and R. Jayakumar Lymphocyte toxicity of prion fragments. J. Biochem., March 1, 2006; 139(3): 329 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-L. Bergstrom, H. Cordes, N. Zsurger, P. M. H. Heegaard, H. Laursen, and J. Chabry Amidation and Structure Relaxation Abolish the Neurotoxicity of the Prion Peptide PrP106-126 in Vivo and in Vitro J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 23114 - 23121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Marella and J. Chabry Neurons and Astrocytes Respond to Prion Infection by Inducing Microglia Recruitment J. Neurosci., January 21, 2004; 24(3): 620 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rhie, L. Kirby, N. Sayer, R. Wellesley, P. Disterer, I. Sylvester, A. Gill, J. Hope, W. James, and A. Tahiri-Alaoui Characterization of 2'-Fluoro-RNA Aptamers That Bind Preferentially to Disease-associated Conformations of Prion Protein and Inhibit Conversion J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2003; 278(41): 39697 - 39705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chabry, C. Ratsimanohatra, I. Sponne, P.-P. Elena, J.-P. Vincent, and T. Pillot In Vivo and In Vitro Neurotoxicity of the Human Prion Protein (PrP) Fragment P118-135 Independently of PrP Expression J. Neurosci., January 15, 2003; 23(2): 462 - 469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. O'Donovan, D. Tobin, and T. G. Cotter Prion Protein Fragment PrP-(106-126) Induces Apoptosis via Mitochondrial Disruption in Human Neuronal SH-SY5Y Cells J. Biol. Chem., November 16, 2001; 276(47): 43516 - 43523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Della-Bianca, F. Rossi, U. Armato, I. Dal-Pra, C. Costantini, G. Perini, V. Politi, and G. Della Valle Neurotrophin p75 Receptor Is Involved in Neuronal Damage by Prion Peptide-(106-126) J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2001; 276(42): 38929 - 38933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Gu, H. Fujioka, R. S. Mishra, R. Li, and N. Singh Prion Peptide 106-126 Modulates the Aggregation of Cellular Prion Protein and Induces the Synthesis of Potentially Neurotoxic Transmembrane PrP J. Biol. Chem., January 11, 2002; 277(3): 2275 - 2286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |