|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006287200 on August 30, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 47, 36590-36595, November 24, 2000
Activation of Insulin Signal Transduction Pathway and
Anti-diabetic Activity of Small Molecule Insulin Receptor
Activators*
Sajjad A.
Qureshi §,
Victor
Ding §,
Zhihua
Li ,
Deborah
Szalkowski ,
Dawn E.
Biazzo-Ashnault ,
Dan
Xie ,
Richard
Saperstein¶,
Edward
Brady¶,
Su
Huskey ,
Xiaolan
Shen**,
Kun
Liu ,
Libo
Xu ,
Gino M.
Salituro§§,
James
V.
Heck ,
David E.
Moller ,
A. Brian
Jones , and
Bei B.
Zhang ¶¶
From the Departments of Molecular Endocrinology,
¶ Pharmacology, Drug Metabolism, ** Comparative Medicine,
§§ Natural Product Drug Discovery, and
 Medicinal Chemistry, Merck Research
Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey 07065
Received for publication, July 17, 2000, and in revised form, August 22, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
We recently described the identification of a
non-peptidyl fungal metabolite (L-783,281, compound
1), which induced activation of human insulin receptor (IR) tyrosine
kinase and mediated insulin-like effects in cells, as well as decreased
blood glucose levels in murine models of Type 2 diabetes (Zhang, B.,
Salituro, G., Szalkowski, D., Li, Z., Zhang, Y., Royo, I., Vilella, D.,
Diez, M. T., Pelaez, F., Ruby, C., Kendall, R. L., Mao, X.,
Griffin, P., Calaycay, J., Zierath, J. R., Heck, J. V.,
Smith, R. G. & Moller, D. E. (1999) Science 284, 974-977). Here we report the characterization of an active
analog (compound 2) with enhanced IR kinase activation potency and
selectivity over related receptors (insulin-like growth factor I
receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and platelet-derived growth
factor receptor). The IR activators stimulated tyrosine kinase
activity of partially purified native IR and recombinant IR tyrosine
kinase domain. Administration of the IR activators to mice was
associated with increased IR tyrosine kinase activity in liver.
In vivo oral treatment with compound 2 resulted in
significant glucose lowering in several rodent models of diabetes. In
db/db mice, oral administration of compound 2 elicited significant
correction of hyperglycemia. In a streptozotocin-induced diabetic mouse
model, compound 2 potentiated the glucose-lowering effect of insulin. In normal rats, compound 2 improved oral glucose tolerance with significant reduction in insulin release following glucose challenge. A
structurally related inactive analog (compound 3) was not effective on
insulin receptor activation or glucose lowering in db/db mice. Thus,
small molecule IR activators exert insulin mimetic and sensitizing effects in cells and in animal models of diabetes. These results have
implications for the future development of new therapies for diabetes mellitus.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Insulin elicits a diverse array of biological responses by binding
to its specific receptor (1). The insulin receptor
(IR)1 is a heterotetrameric
protein consisting of two extracellular subunits and two
transmembrane subunits. The binding of the ligand to the subunit of IR not only concentrates insulin at its site of action, but
also induces conformational changes in the receptor, which in turn
stimulates the tyrosine kinase activity intrinsic to the subunit of
the IR. Extensive studies have indicated that the ability of the
receptor to autophosphorylate and phosphorylate intracellular
substrates is essential for its mediation of the complex cellular
responses of insulin (2-5). Insulin receptors trans-phosphorylate
several immediate substrates (on Tyr residues), including insulin
receptor substrate (IRS) proteins 1-4, Shc, and Gab 1, each of which
provide specific docking sites for other signaling proteins containing
Src homology 2 domains (6). These events lead to the activation
of downstream signaling molecules, including phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase (PI 3-kinase). Numerous studies have adduced that PI 3-kinase
is required for the metabolic effects of insulin. Although the discrete
pathways that couple PI 3-kinase to glucose regulation remain poorly
defined, Akt (or PKB), a Ser/Thr kinase known to be PI
3-kinase-dependent, appears to be involved in
insulin-mediated activation of glucose transport (7) and glycogen
synthesis (8).
Insulin is essential for maintaining glucose homeostasis and regulating
carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism (9). The central role of
the insulin receptor in metabolic and growth control has been validated
in insulin receptor null mouse models (10, 11). Decreased cellular
responses to insulin or perturbation of the insulin signaling pathways
are associated with a number of pathological states. Mutations in
insulin receptor gene that lead to alterations of receptor synthesis,
degradation, and function have been described in patients with several
uncommon syndromes associated with severe insulin resistance (12). The
molecular basis for insulin resistance that proceeds, or is associated
with, common forms of Type 2 diabetes remains poorly understood.
However, several studies have shown modest decreases in insulin
receptor number attributed to down-regulation in response to
hyperinsulinemia in tissues or cells from Type 2 diabetic
patients (13, 14). Substantial decreases in insulin-stimulated receptor
tyrosine kinase activity and an even more substantial defect in
receptor-mediated IRS phosphorylation or PI 3-kinase activation have
been described using samples of tissue (e.g. muscle or fat)
from rodents or human subjects with Type 2 diabetes (15-17). Although
controversial, diminished insulin-stimulated Akt activation was
documented in skeletal muscle from Type 2 diabetic patients (18, 19).
Thus, in humans with Type 2 diabetes there are clear defects involving the insulin receptor and proximal steps in insulin signaling. Pharmaceutical intervention aimed at augmenting insulin receptor function may ultimately prove beneficial in patients with diabetes.
We have previously reported the discovery of a small molecule fungal
metabolite (L-783,281) with insulin-like activities in cells and in animal models of diabetes (20). Here we describe a new
active analog of L-783,281 with improved potency for
activation of insulin receptor in cells as well as improved selectivity
toward insulin receptor versus other homologous receptor
tyrosine kinases. Moreover, a structurally related inactive analog was
also synthesized and used, along with the active compound, to establish
the correlation between insulin receptor activation in vitro
and glucose lowering in animals. The results of these studies further
validate approaches designed to identify new small molecule insulin
receptor activators as potential novel anti-diabetic agents.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
All biological reagents used here were obtained
from commercial sources. Radiochemical were purchased from PerkinElmer
Life Sciences. Compound 1 (L-783,281) was
prepared as described previously (20). Compounds 2 and 3 were prepared synthetically as described
previously (21). Compound stock solutions were prepared in 100%
dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) and diluted in appropriate media just prior to use.
Animals--
Male db/db and db/+ mice were from Jackson
Laboratories. Male Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were from Charles River
Breeding Laboratories, Inc. Animals were allowed access to standard
rodent chow and water ad libitum. Animals were treated
orally (by gavage) with vehicle or test compounds. Blood glucose level
was measured using One TouchTM Glucometer (Lifescan) or
Accu-ChekTM blood glucose monitoring system (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals). Plasma glucose concentration was
measured using a glucose oxidase kit (Sigma). Plasma insulin
concentration was measured with a radioimmunoassay kit (Linco). Animal
care was in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Cell Culture and Treatment--
Chinese hamster ovary cells
expressing human insulin receptor (CHO.IR, a gift from Dr. Richard
Roth, Stanford University, Stanford, CA) were maintained as described
previously (20). For experiments, cells were treated in the
appropriate serum-free media containing compounds dissolved in
Me2SO. Control cells received equivalent amounts of
Me2SO, and the final concentration of Me2SO was
always kept below 0.1%.
Tyrosine Kinase Assays--
The IRTK activity in CHO.IR cells
and mouse liver extracts was determined using a previously described
procedure (20). To determine IRTK in a cell-free assay, insulin
receptor was partially purified from CHO.IR cells using WGA-agarose
columns (22). For the in vitro kinase assay, 2 µg of
WGA-purified IR was incubated in a buffer (final volume 50 µl)
containing 5 mM MnCl2, 50 mM HEPES
(pH 7.5), 0.1% Triton X-100, insulin or test compounds at 25 °C for
20 min. ATP (25 µM, 0.25 µCi/µl) was added and
incubation continued for 20 min. The mixture was then incubated for 5 min at 25 °C with 100 µM concentration of a
peptide substrate based on insulin receptor autophosphorylation sites
(TRDIYETDYYRK) (23). The reaction was terminated by addition of 10 µl
of 1% bovine serum albumin followed by 30 µl of 20% trichloroacetic
acid. The mixtures were centrifuged, and 20 µl of the
supernatant was applied to phosphocellulose filter strip. The filters
were washed several times with 20% trichloroacetic acid, and
radioactivity was determined in a scintillation counter. To determine
the activity of recombinant IRTK, a GST fusion protein containing the
48-kDa intracellular domain of IR (5 nM) (24) was incubated
in a buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.1% Triton X-100, test compounds, and ATP (0-200 µM) at 25 °C for 30 min.
Biotinylated IR peptide substrate (above) was added and the reaction
continued for 30 min. The reaction was then terminated, and IRTK
activity was determined by measuring tyrosine phosphorylation of the IR peptide substrate using anti-phosphotyrosine antibody in a coupled fluorescence resonance energy transfer reaction according to standard methodology (25).
SDS-PAGE and Western Blot--
CHO.IR cells were incubated with
serum-free medium for 2 h and then stimulated with insulin or test
compounds. The cells were lysed (20), and clarified cell lysates were
fractionated on 4-12% or 4-20% SDS-PAGE. The proteins were then
transferred to nitrocellulose filters which were subsequently incubated
with antibodies directed against phosphotyrosine or Akt protein. After incubation with secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, the signals were detected with RenaissanceTM
ECL kit (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).
Measurement of Liver Insulin Receptor Kinase Activity--
Male
db/+ mice (7-8 weeks old) were orally treated with vehicle (0.5%
methylcellulose) or with a single dose of test compound. Food was
withdrawn 14 h before and during the experiment. At 2 h
post-dose, the animals received injection (via tail vein) of saline or
insulin. Five minutes later, liver samples were removed and frozen in
liquid N2. Liver lysates were prepared. After incubation for 30 min and centrifugation, supernatant containing 50 µg of soluble protein was incubated overnight at 4 °C in microtiter wells
coated with insulin receptor antibody (AB-3). Tyrosine kinase activity
of bound IR was measured as described above.
Anti-diabetic Effects in db/db and Streptozotocin-induced
Diabetic Mouse Models--
Male db/db mice (7-9 weeks old) were
orally treated (by gavage) with vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose) or
single doses of test compounds followed by immediate removal of food
(with free access to water). Blood glucose concentrations were
monitored prior to dosing and post dosing at indicated intervals. For
chronic studies, mice were treated with a single oral dose of test
compounds per day, and blood glucose was measured at 24 h
post-last dose on the indicated days. For generation of the
streptozotocin-mouse model, male lean (db/+) mice (7 weeks old)
were administered streptozotocin (Sigma) (180 mg/kg intraperitoneal,
0.2 ml/25 g) in distilled water. The efficacy of the streptozotocin on
blood glucose levels was assessed after 5 days. Compound (at 10 mg/kg)
or vehicle was administrated by oral gavage. Insulin (Humulin R, Lilly)
at the appropriate dose was administered intraperitoneal in a volume of
200 µl/animal. Blood glucose level was monitored at indicated time points.
Oral Glucose Tolerance Test--
Male Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats
(350 g) were orally dosed with vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose) or test
compound for 3 days. At days 1 and 2, blood samples were collected
prior to and 6 h post-dosing via exteriorized cannula in femoral
vein. At day 3, food was withdrawn following dosing, and blood samples
were collected at 4 h post-dosing. Oral glucose challenge (1 g/kg)
was then administered, and blood samples were collected at indicated
time point for measurement of plasma glucose and insulin levels.
Other Procedures--
Protein concentrations were determined
using Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad) following the manufacturer's
instruction. Data are expressed as means ± S.E. Statistical
analysis was conducted using Student's t test or analysis
of variance.
 |
RESULTS |
Activation of Insulin Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and Signal
Transduction in CHO.T Cells--
To identify a more potent and
selective analog of L-783,281 (compound 1)
(Table I) derivatives of this compound
were synthesized and tested in a cell based assay that monitors
activation of IR tyrosine kinase activity in CHO cells expressing human
insulin receptor (CHO.IR) (20). One of these derivatives (compound
2) increased the insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity
in these cells with an EC50 of 300 nM,
reflecting a greater than 10-fold improvement in the potency compared
with compound 1 (Table I). In contrast, a closely related
analog, compound 3, was not effective in activating IRTK
in the same assay at concentrations up to 100 µM.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Structure of compounds and activity in cell-based IRTK activation assay
CHO.IR cells were serum starved for 2 h and then treated with
insulin or test compounds for 20 min. The lysates of cells were
prepared and receptors were captured with anti-IR antibody (Ab-3), and
IRTK activity was measured using [ -32P]ATP and polyGlu:Tyr
(4:1) as substrates. EC50 values are shown.
|
|
Activation of insulin receptor by insulin results in increased
phosphorylation of number of proteins, including IR, IRS-1, and Akt. To
determine whether compound 2 also induced these effects,
CHO.IR cells were treated with insulin or compounds, and lysates
prepared from these cells were subjected to Western blot analysis using
phosphoprotein specific antibodies. As shown in Fig.
1, A and B,
compound 2 stimulated tyrosyl phosphorylation of the IR subunit and IRS-1 as well as phosphorylation of Akt in a
dose-dependent manner. Moreover, the effect of insulin and compound 2 on activation of Akt can be blocked by
pretreatment with wortmannin (an inhibitor of PI 3-kinase), suggesting
the activation of a PI 3-kinase-dependent pathway (26, 27).
Compound 3 did not stimulate phosphorylation of IR subunit, IRS-1, or Akt, suggesting that it was not effective in
activating the insulin signal transduction pathway.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Activation of insulin receptor signaling in
CHO.IR cells. A, tyrosine kinase activation and
anti-phosphotyrosine Western blot. CHO.IR cells were treated with
insulin or test compounds (Cpd). The cells were lysed, and
solubilized proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. Immunblot analysis was
performed utilizing monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (PY20).
Molecular masses (in kilodaltons) of marker proteins and the bands
corresponding to the subunit of the insulin receptor
(IR ) and IRS-1 are indicated. B, activation of
Akt. Fractionated proteins from lysates of cells treated with indicated
agents were immunobloted with an antibody specific for
phospho-Ser473 of Akt.
|
|
The insulin receptor belongs to a family of receptor tyrosine kinases
that share high degree of homology in the tyrosine kinase domain.
Activation of receptor tyrosine kinases leads to a wide variety of
biological effects ranging from beneficial metabolic regulation to
deleterious neoplastic transformation. To establish that compound
2 is not a general receptor kinase activator, we tested this
compound in transfected CHO cells overexpressing human insulin-like
growth factor-1, epidermal growth factor, or platelet-derived growth
factor receptors by employing cell-based assays that measure
receptor autophosphorylation and/or tyrosine kinase activity. In all
these cell lines, compound 2 failed to activate insulin-like
growth factor-1, epidermal growth factor, or platelet-derived growth
factor receptors at concentrations up to 30 µM,
representing an ~100-fold selectivity for insulin receptor
versus the other homologous receptors. Taken together, these
data suggest that compound 2 is capable of activating insulin receptor and its downstream signaling molecules in these cells
and is not a general receptor tyrosine kinase activator.
Activation of Partially Purified IR and Recombinant IR Kinase
Domain--
To establish that the effect of the compounds observed in
a cell-based assay is due to direct activation of IR, we tested the
ability of compound 2 to activate IR in cell-free assays. Insulin receptor was partially purified from CHO.IR cells using WGA
affinity chromatography. When the partially purified IR was incubated
in the presence [ -32P]ATP and a 12-mer IR peptide
substrate, insulin stimulated IR kinase activity in a
dose-dependent manner as measured by increased incorporation of radiolabel into the substrate peptide. Under similar
conditions compound 2, but not compound 3, produced a dose-dependent increase in IR tyrosine kinase
activity (Fig. 2A). These
results suggest that the activation of IR by compound 2 is
due to a direct effect of the compound on the insulin receptor. To
further delineate the site of interaction of this compound on the IR,
we examined the effect of compound 2 on a recombinant GST
fusion protein containing the cyptoplasmic domain of the human IR
(Gln983 to the COOH-terminal stop codon) (GST-IRK)
expressed in baculovirus. Compound 2 stimulated tyrosine
kinase activity of this protein as well (Fig. 2B). As
predicted, compound 3 had no measurable effect in this
assay.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
In vitro activation of insulin
receptor kinase. A, IRTK activity of partially purified
IR from CHO.IR cells using WGA affinity chromatography. The receptor
fraction was incubated with test compounds (Cpd) and
tyrosine kinase activity was determined using
[ -32P]ATP and an IR peptide as a substrate.
B, recombinant GST-IRK was incubated with compounds
2 ( ) or 3 ( ) at the indicated
concentrations with or without 10 µM ATP, and tyrosine
kinase activity was determined using a non-radioactive fluorescence
resonance energy transfer readout.
|
|
Correction of Hyperglycemia in db/db Mice--
The results of
in vitro experiments demonstrated that compound 2 is a potent and selective insulin receptor activator, thus it was
initially tested in the db/db mouse model to determine whether an
in vivo glucose lowering effect might occur. Single dose
oral administration of compound 2 (5 mg/kg) resulted in
significant lowering of blood glucose (over 2-4 h; food withheld), achieving ~50% transient correction of hyperglycemia (percent correction of mean db/db glucose levels relative to mean glucose levels
in db/+ mice) (Fig. 3). However,
treatment of db/db mice with compound 3 (at 30 mg/kg) did
not alter the elevated blood glucose levels. This finding is consistent
with the inability of this compound to activate IR in the in
vitro assays.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Glucose lowering in db/db mice.
A, male db/db mice were orally treated (by gavage) with
vehicle or with single dose of compound 2 or compound
3. Food was withheld following dosing. Blood glucose
concentration was monitored before and after dosing at indicated
intervals. Blood glucose levels in lean control mice (not dosed) are
also shown as a reference. *, p < 0.01 comparing
treatment versus vehicle groups (n = 7-8 in
each group). Cpd, compoud.
|
|
Having established that compound 2 can lower glucose upon
acute treatment, we next determined the ability of compound 2 to correct hyperglycemia in db/db mice after long term treatment. Mice were treated with a daily dose of compound 2 or 3 for 8 days. At day 8, the extent to which compound 2 treatment resulted in correction of hyperglycemia was 35%
at 1 mg/kg and 76% at 10 mg/kg, respectively. Under similar conditions
compound 3 (at 10 mg/kg) was not efficacious in lowering
glucose in these animals. Furthermore, similar treatment with compound
2 at 1 or 10 mg/kg had no significant effect on blood
glucose levels in normal lean mice.
Insulin-dependent Effect of Compound 2on
Hyperglycemia in Streptozotocin-induced Diabetic Mouse Model--
The
results of studies using db/db mice described above indicated that
compound 2 was an effective agent for reducing hyperglycemia. However, since db/db mice are obese and have sustained endogenous insulin levels, it was difficult to differentiate the insulin mimetic versus sensitizing effects of the compound
in these animals. To address this issue, we tested compound
2 in a streptozotocin-induced insulin-deficient diabetic
mouse model (28). As expected, 1 week following streptozotocin
treatment, the mice had blood glucose levels that were elevated from
~100 to 300-400 mg/dl and plasma insulin levels reduced by ~70%.
We titrated insulin in streptozotocin-treated mice and estimated that the dose of insulin needed for partial correction of hyperglycemia (~50% reduction in blood glucose at 4 h post-intraperitoneal
injection) was ~2.5 units/kg. Having established the efficacy of
insulin we then used these animals to establish whether compound
2 would have an effect on blood glucose levels in the
absence and presence of exogenous insulin. To do so, these animals were
given two daily oral doses of vehicle or compound 2. Immediately following the second daily dose, mice were injected with
saline or insulin at 2.5 units/kg. Blood glucose levels were measured prior to injection of saline or insulin (zero time) and 4 h later. The results showed that while treatment with either insulin or compound
alone had no significant effect on blood glucose levels in these
animals, a combination of the two agents produced a significant decrease in blood glucose (~34%) (Fig.
4). These results suggest that compound
2 had insulin sensitizing effects in this animal model.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Insulin-dependent glucose
lowering in streptozotocin induced diabetic mouse model.
Insulin-deficient diabetic mouse model was prepared as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Groups of mice were treated with a daily
single oral dose of vehicle or compound 2 at 10 mg/kg for 2 days. On day 2, saline or insulin (at 2 units/kg) was injected
intraperitoneally as indicated. Blood glucose levels were determined at
0 and 4 h after dosing. Results are expressed as the mean percent
change in blood glucose levels from 0 to 4 h ± S.E.
(n = 10 in each group). *, p < 0.05 comparing insulin injected groups with or without compound 2 treatment. Cpd, compoud.
|
|
Improvement of Glucose Tolerance in Rat--
An earlier
manifestation of the onset of diabetes in man is the reduced ability to
dispose of glucose after a meal. To establish if treatment with
compound 2 will result in a more efficient glucose disposal
from plasma, we investigated the effects of the compound on glucose
tolerance in Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were treated with single
daily oral dose of vehicle or compound 2 (at 1 or 10 mg/kg)
for 3 days. This treatment did not significantly change glucose levels
in these animals during the first 2 days. On day 3, an oral glucose
tolerance test was administered at 4 h post-dose. As shown in Fig.
5, treatment of these animals with
compound 2 at 10 mg/kg (but not at 1 mg/kg) resulted in
improved glucose tolerance. Moreover, treatment with the compound 2 was associated with a dose-dependent decrease
in elevation of plasma insulin level following the oral glucose
challenge. Taken together, these data suggest that compound
2 is able to maintain or improve glucose disposal in the
presence of reduced insulin levels in this non-diabetic animal model
without causing hypoglycemia.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Glucose tolerance test in Harlan
Sprague-Dawley rats. Groups of rats were treated with daily single
oral dose of vehicle ( ) or compound 2 at 1 mg/kg ( ) or
10 mg/kg ( ) for 3 days. On day 3, food was removed after dosing.
Four hours later (0 min), oral glucose tolerance test was performed by
administration of a bolus of glucose (1 g/kg). Blood samples were
collected at the times indicated, plasma glucose and insulin levels
were determined. Results shown are means ± S.E.
(n = 8 per group). *, p < 0.01; **,
p < 0.003 comparing compound 2 with vehicle
treated groups. Cpd, compoud.
|
|
Activation of IR Tyrosine Kinase Activity in Mouse Liver--
To
determine whether the compounds are capable of modulating activation of
insulin receptors in vivo, we examined the IRTK activity in
liver extracts prepared from mice. Lean normal mice (db/+) were treated
with compound 1 (at 50 and 150 mg/kg) or vehicle for 2 h and then given an injection of saline or insulin via the tail vein
prior to preparation of liver extracts. In vehicle-treated groups, a
high dose of insulin (2 units/kg) induced an ~6-fold increase in the
hepatic IRTK activity. Treatment with compound 1 resulted in
significant increase in basal IRTK activity (Fig.
6) to a level that was comparable with
~30% of that stimulated by injection of moderate dose of insulin
(0.4 unit/kg). Furthermore, compound 1 potentiated insulin
activation of IRTK in the liver (not shown). Similar insulin
sensitizing effect was also observed in mice treated with compound
2 (at 10 mg/kg). In studies with compound 2, insulin-stimulated IRTK activities in treated groups were 177% and
143% of those in the vehicle groups for db/+ and db/db mice,
respectively (p < 0.05, n = 8-10 in
each group). In contrast, treatment with compound 3 (at 10 mg/kg) had no effect on insulin-stimulated IRTK activity. These data demonstrate the ability of compounds 1 and 2 to activate and enhance insulin activation of IRTK in vivo,
which may account for the anti-diabetic effects of this class of
compounds.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Activation of hepatic insulin receptor.
Lean control (db/+) mice were treated with single oral dose of vehicle
(0.5% methylcellulose) or compound 1 at 50 or 150 mg/kg as
indicated. Two hours later, intravenous injection of saline or insulin
was administered. Liver samples were removed 5 min later, and IRTK
activity in liver lysates was measured as described in the legend to
Fig. 2A. Results shown are means ± S.E.
(n = 8-10 mice in each group). *, p < 0.01 comparing vehicle- or compound 1-treated groups.
Cpd, compoud.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The pathogenesis of Type 2 diabetes is complex, involving the
progressive development of insulin resistance and a relative deficiency
in insulin secretion, leading to overt hyperglycemia. The molecular
basis for insulin resistance in Type II diabetes is not fully
understood. However, abnormalities in insulin receptor expression,
structure (rarely), and function are present in association with
chronic insulin resistance and diabetes. Thus, it has been described
that patients with obesity and diabetes have impaired insulin receptor
binding in liver, muscle, and adipose tissue (13-15, 29). The defect
is exacerbated by additive defect in insulin receptor kinase that is
also present in tissues of patients with overt diabetes (14, 29, 30).
More recently, defects in the insulin receptor-mediated signal
transduction pathway, including IRS-1 phosphorylation and PI 3-kinase
activation, have been found in tissues from Type 2 diabetic patients or
rodent models (16, 31, 32). Thus, augmenting insulin signaling by
targeting insulin receptor activation may represent a potential approach to alleviate insulin resistance and improve glucose
homeostasis in Type 2 diabetes.
We previously reported on the discovery of a small molecule
fungal metabolite (compound 1) that functions as an insulin mimetic in cells and in animal models of diabetes (20). In this study, we have described active and inactive analogs of compound 1. We have shown that compound 2 is a potent and selective activator of insulin receptor. In contrast, a closely related
analog (compound 3) is completely inactive, suggesting that
the effect of the active compound is likely to be specific on the
target receptor. Thus, compound 1 was not simply an isolated
example, but it represents a lead from which the directed synthesis of
new compounds with improved features can be derived.
Insulin receptor belongs to a large family of receptor tyrosine
kinases. Binding of insulin to the extracellular domain of the dimeric
IR leads to autophosphorylation of key tyrosine residues in the
intrinsic tyrosine kinase that resides in the cytoplasmic domain. This
event triggers a cascade of signal transduction steps. The mechanism
for activation of insulin receptor tyrosine kinase has been a subject
of intensive investigation. High resolution structural information has
been obtained through crystallographic studies of IR kinase domain (33,
34). Based on crystal structures of the unphosphorylated low activity
form, as well as the phosphorylated, active form of the IR, a model of
cis-inhibition and trans-activation of the receptor was proposed. The
unliganded receptors exist in the autoinhibitory conformation that
prevents access of ATP and substrate to the active site. Upon
autophosphorylation of Tyr1158, Tyr1162, and
Tyr1163 in the activation loop, the IR kinase undergoes a
major conformational change resulting in unrestricted access of ATP and
substrate to the active site and full activation of the kinase. More
recently, the three-dimensional structure of insulin receptor
bound to insulin was determined by electron cryomicrospcopy
(35). The three-dimensional reconstruction of the quaternary structure
reveals that the both subunits are involved in insulin binding and
that the two subunits are poised for trans-autophosphorylation.
These structural studies have provided molecular basis of activation of
IR.
In the current study, we demonstrated that insulin receptor activator
compound 2 stimulated activation of recombinant insulin
receptor kinase (Fig. 2). It is possible that interaction of the
compound with the inactive receptor kinase domain alters conformation
of the protein, thereby partially relieving the autoinhibition and
increasing accessibility of ATP to the active site. This hypothesis is
being investigated. Further structural studies will be necessary to
further define the mechanism of action of the insulin receptor activators at molecular level.
Compounds 1 and 2 were capable of potentiating
activation of IRTK in liver of normal mice following in vivo treatment at doses that were efficacious for hyperglycemia (in diabetic
mice). Consistent with the lack of activity in cell-based and cell-free
insulin receptor activation assays, compound 3 was without
effect on insulin stimulation of IRTK in liver. When tested in the
db/db mouse model, compound 2 elicited a glucose lowering
effect at 2-4 h following single oral dose (5 mg/kg) (food withdrawn)
or following chronic treatment, whereas compound 3 was not
effective at an equivalent or higher dose. These results demonstrated a
correlation between modulation of insulin receptor activation and
glucose-lowering efficacy in the animal models and further validated
the role of insulin receptor in the regulation of glucose homeostasis.
It is of interest to point out that although compound 2 (10 mg/kg) was able to potentiate activation of hepatic IR by exogenous
insulin in lean euglycemia mice, it did not cause hypoglycemia in this
mouse model at the dose tested. In the murine model with insulinopenic
diabetes induced by streptozotocin, oral administration of compound
2 alone (10 mg/kg) was without effect on blood glucose
levels. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rodent model is characterized
with in vivo insulin resistance (36, 37) and altered
regulation of insulin signal transduction pathway (32, 38-40).
In this study, co-administration of the compound with an otherwise
subefficacious dose of insulin resulted in a significant degree of
glucose lowering (Fig. 4), suggesting that the compound could function
as an insulin sensitizer in this animal model of diabetes. In addition,
we observed that treatment with compound 2 was able to
improve glucose tolerance without causing hypoglycemia in Harlan
Sprague-Dawley rats.
The above results, along with the apparent lack of hypoglycemic effects
of the compounds in lean non-diabetic mice, suggest that compounds
1 and 2 could potentially function as insulin
sensitizers in vivo in the animal models. This notion contrasts with the ability of the compounds to function as full insulin-mimetics in CHO.IR cells. However, relative to the effects of
exogenous insulin, the extent of in vivo IR activation by
compounds administered alone was modest. Thus, we speculate that the
molecular mechanism of IR activation by compounds is sufficient, only
in part, to mimic that of insulin, this effect may be exaggerated in
CHO.IR cells, an artificial system where >500,000 IRs per cell are
expressed. In vivo, it is possible that direct interactions of compound with IRs may allow for further insulin-mediated activation (in all or selected subsets) of cell-surface receptors.
In summary, we have characterized small molecule insulin receptor
activator compounds that are capable of activating the receptor kinase
in a variety of in vitro assays and in tissue following in vivo treatment. The availability of the structurally
related inactive analog provided an invaluable tool to establish the
correlation between insulin receptor activation and glucose lowering in
the animal model of diabetes. Exploratory mechanistic studies indicate that the active compounds interacted with and activated insulin receptor. In rodent models of diabetes, the active compounds had both
insulin-like and insulin-sensitizing effects. These studies further
validated the approach of targeting the insulin receptor for potential
novel anti-diabetic agents.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
These authors contributed equally to this paper.
¶¶
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be
addressed: R80W250, Merck Research Laboratories, P. O. Box 2000, 126 E. Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ 07065. E-mail:
bei_zhang@merck.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 30, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006287200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IR, insulin
receptor;
TK, tyrosine kinase;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
WGA, wheat germ agglutinin, IRS, insulin
receptor substrate;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
PI 3-kinase, phosphatidylinositol
3-kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
White, M. F.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1-4
|
| 2.
|
Kasuga, M.,
Karlsson, F. A.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1982)
Science
215,
185-187
|
| 3.
|
Rosen, O. M.,
Herrera, R.,
Olowe, Y.,
Petruzzelli, M.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
3237-3240
|
| 4.
|
Yu, K. T.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
5277-5286
|
| 5.
|
Ellis, L.,
Morgan, D. O.,
Clauser, E.,
Roth, R. A.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1987)
Mol. Endocrinol.
1,
15-24
|
| 6.
|
White, M. F.,
and Yenush, L.
(1998)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
228,
179-208
|
| 7.
|
Kohn, A. D.,
Summers, S. A.,
Birnbaum, M. J.,
and Roth, R. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31372-31378
|
| 8.
|
Alessi, D. R.,
and Cohen, P.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
8,
55-62
|
| 9.
|
Rosen, O. M.
(1989)
Diabetes
38,
1508-1511
|
| 10.
|
Accili, D.,
Drago, J.,
Lee, E. J.,
Johnson, M. D.,
Cool, M. H.,
Salvatore, P.,
Asico, L. D.,
Jose, P. A.,
Taylor, S. I.,
and Westphal, H.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
12,
106-109
|
| 11.
|
Joshi, R. L.,
Lamothe, B.,
Cordonnier, N.,
Mesbah, K.,
Monthioux, E.,
Jami, J.,
and Bucchini, D.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1542-1547
|
| 12.
|
Taylor, S. I.
(1992)
Diabetes
41,
1473-1490
|
| 13.
|
Olefsky, J. M.
(1976)
J. Clin. Invest.
57,
1165-1172
|
| 14.
|
Caro, J. F.,
Itoop, O.,
Pories, W. J.,
Meelheim, D.,
Flickinger, E. G.,
Thomas, F.,
Jenquin, M.,
Silverman, J. F.,
Khazanie, P. G.,
and Sinha, M. K.
(1986)
J. Clin. Invest.
78,
249-258
|
| 15.
|
Caro, J. F.,
Sinha, M. K.,
Raju, S. M.,
Ittoop, O.,
Pories, W. J.,
Flickinger, E. G.,
Meelheim, D.,
and Dohm, G. L.
(1987)
J. Clin. Invest.
79,
1330-1337
|
| 16.
|
Goodyear, L. J.,
Giorgino, F.,
Sherman, L. A.,
Carey, J.,
Smith, R. J.,
and Dohm, G. L.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
2195-2204
|
| 17.
|
Kerouz, N. J.,
Horsch, D.,
Pons, S.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
100,
3164-3172
|
| 18.
|
Krook, A.,
Roth, R. A.,
Jiang, X. J.,
Zierath, J. R.,
and Wallberg-Henriksson, H.
(1998)
Diabetes
47,
1281-1286
|
| 19.
|
Kim, Y. B.,
Zhu, J. S.,
Zierath, J. R.,
Shen, H. Q.,
Baron, A. D.,
and Kahn, B. B.
(1999)
Diabetes
48,
310-320
|
| 20.
|
Zhang, B.,
Salituro, G.,
Szalkowski, D.,
Li, Z.,
Zhang, Y.,
Royo, I.,
Vilella, D.,
Diez, M. T.,
Pelaez, F.,
Ruby, C.,
Kendall, R. L.,
Mao, X.,
Griffin, P.,
Calaycay, J.,
Zierath, J. R.,
Heck, J. V.,
Smith, R. G.,
and Moller, D. E.
(1999)
Science
284,
974-977
|
| 21.
|
Liu, K.,
Xu, L.,
Szalkowski, D.,
Li, Z.,
Kwei, G.,
Moller, D. E.,
Heck, J. V.,
Zhang, B. B.,
and Jones, A. B.
(2000)
J. Med. Chem.
43,
3487-3494
|
| 22.
|
Zick, Y.,
Kasuga, M.,
Kahn, C. R.,
and Roth, J.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
75-80
|
| 23.
|
White, M. F.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Keutmann, H.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
2969-2980
|
| 24.
|
Kendall, R. L.,
and Thomas, K. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10705-10709
|
| 25.
|
Zhou, G.,
Cummings, R.,
Li, Y.,
Mitra, S.,
Wilkinson, H. A.,
Elbrecht, A.,
Hermes, J. D.,
Schaeffer, J. M.,
Smith, R. G.,
and Moller, D. E.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
1594-1604
|
| 26.
|
Cross, D. A. E.,
Alessi, D. R.,
Vandenheede, J. R.,
McDowell, H. E.,
Hundal, H. S.,
and Cohen, P.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
303,
21-26
|
| 27.
|
Shepherd, P. R.,
Nave, B. T.,
and Siddle, K.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
305,
25-28
|
| 28.
|
Kolb, H.
(1987)
Diabetes Metab. Rev.
3,
751-778
|
| 29.
|
Sinha, M. K.,
Pories, W. J.,
Flickinger, E. G.,
Meelheim, D.,
and Caro, J. F.
(1987)
Diabetes
36,
620-625
|
| 30.
|
Freidenberg, G. R.,
Henry, R. R.,
Klein, H. H.,
Reichart, D. R.,
and Olefsky, J. M.
(1987)
J. Clin. Invest.
79,
240-250
|
| 31.
|
Heydrick, S. J.,
Jullien, D.,
Tanti, J. F.,
Giorgetti, S.,
Van Obberghen, E.,
and Le Marchand-Brustel, Y.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
91,
1358-1366
|
| 32.
|
Saad, M. J. A.,
Araki, E.,
Miralpeix, M.,
Rothenberg, P. L.,
White, M. F.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1992)
J. Clin. Invest.
90,
1839-1849
|
| 33.
|
Hubbard, S. R.,
Wei, L.,
Ellis, L.,
and Hendrickson, W. A.
(1994)
Nature
372,
746-754
|
| 34.
|
Hubbard, S. R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5572-5581
|
| 35.
|
Luo, R. Z.,
Beniac, D. R.,
Fernandes, A.,
Yip, C. C.,
and Ottensmeyer, F. P.
(1999)
Science
285,
1077-1080
|
| 36.
|
Blondel, O.,
and Portha, B.
(1989)
Diabetes Metab. Rev.
15,
382-387
|
| 37.
|
Blondel, O.,
Bailbe, D.,
and Portha, B.
(1989)
Diabetologia
32,
185-190
|
| 38.
|
Blondel, O.,
Simon, J.,
Chevalier, B.,
and Portha, B.
(1990)
Am. J. Physiol.
258,
E459-E467
|
| 39.
|
Bonini, J. A.,
Colca, J.,
and Hofmann, C.
(1995)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
212,
933-938
|
| 40.
|
Kadowaki, T.,
Kasuga, M.,
Akanuma, Y.,
Ezaki, O.,
and Takaku, F.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
14208-14216
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Velliquette, J. E. Friedman, J. Shao, B. B. Zhang, and P. Ernsberger
Therapeutic Actions of an Insulin Receptor Activator and a Novel Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma} Agonist in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Obese Rat Model of Metabolic Syndrome X
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
July 1, 2005;
314(1):
422 - 430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Z. Strowski, Z. Li, D. Szalkowski, X. Shen, X.-M. Guan, S. Juttner, D. E. Moller, and B. B. Zhang
Small-Molecule Insulin Mimetic Reduces Hyperglycemia and Obesity in a Nongenetic Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetes
Endocrinology,
November 1, 2004;
145(11):
5259 - 5268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Li, N. D. Covino, E. G. Stein, J. H. Till, and S. R. Hubbard
Structural and Biochemical Evidence for an Autoinhibitory Role for Tyrosine 984 in the Juxtamembrane Region of the Insulin Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 3, 2003;
278(28):
26007 - 26014.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Li, J. F. Youngren, A. Dunaif, I. D. Goldfine, B. A. Maddux, B. B. Zhang, and J. L. Evans
Decreased Insulin Receptor (IR) Autophosphorylation in Fibroblasts from Patients with PCOS: Effects of Serine Kinase Inhibitors and IR Activators
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
September 1, 2002;
87(9):
4088 - 4093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. T. Lee
Functional Genomics and Cardiovascular Drug Discovery
Circulation,
September 18, 2001;
104(12):
1441 - 1446.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|