|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006170200 on September 5, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 47, 36621-36625, November 24, 2000
Degradation of Amylin by Insulin-degrading Enzyme*
Robert G.
Bennett §,
William C.
Duckworth¶ , and
Frederick G.
Hamel**
From the Medical Research Service, Omaha Veterans
Affairs Medical Center and Department of Internal Medicine, University
of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68105, the ¶ Section
of Endocrinology, Carl T. Hayden Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
Phoenix, Arizona 85012, the Department of Molecular and Cellular
Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287, and the
** Medical Research Service, Omaha Veterans Affairs Medical Center and
Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, University of
Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68105
Received for publication, July 12, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A pathological feature of Type 2 diabetes is
deposits in the pancreatic islets primarily composed of amylin (islet
amyloid polypeptide). Although much attention has been paid to the
expression and secretion of amylin, little is known about the enzymes
involved in amylin turnover. Recent reports suggest that
insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) may have specificity for amyloidogenic
proteins, and therefore we sought to determine whether amylin is an IDE substrate. Amylin-degrading activity co-purified with IDE from rat
muscle through several chromatographic steps. Metalloproteinase inhibitors inactivated amylin-degrading activity with a pattern consistent with the enzymatic properties of IDE, whereas
inhibitors of acid and serine proteases, calpains, and the proteasome
were ineffective. Amylin degradation was inhibited by insulin in a dose-dependent manner, whereas insulin degradation was
inhibited by amylin. Other substrates of IDE such as atrial natriuretic peptide and glucagon also competitively inhibited amylin degradation. Radiolabeled amylin and insulin were both covalently cross-linked to a
protein of 110 kDa, and the binding was competitively inhibited by
either unlabeled insulin or amylin. Finally, a monoclonal anti-IDE antibody immunoprecipitated both insulin- and amylin-degrading activities. The data strongly suggest that IDE is an amylin-degrading enzyme and plays an important role in the clearance of amylin and the
prevention of islet amyloid formation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A pathologic feature of as many as 90% of persons with Type 2 diabetes is the presence of islet amyloid deposits comprised predominantly of the peptide amylin, also known as islet amyloid polypeptide (reviewed in Ref. 1). These deposits are thought to
contribute to pancreatic beta cell dysfunction, either by direct cytotoxicity or by reducing beta cell mass (2). Understanding the
mechanisms of amyloid formation, and how fibril formation is prevented
under normal conditions, is therefore of particular interest in the
study of Type 2 diabetes. Because amylin is continually produced in
non-diabetic humans with no amyloid formation, the mere presence of
amylin is not sufficient to cause fibril formation, a concept that has
been supported in studies using transgenic mice expressing human amylin
(3). Further studies have suggested that amyloid formation is
associated with metabolic perturbations, such as hyperglycemia or high
fat intake (4). Therefore, a shift in the amylin balance either by
altering synthesis, secretion, or degradation could contribute to
amyloid formation. Although there have been numerous studies regarding
amylin synthesis and secretion, at present there have been few studies
exploring the degradation of amylin.
The levels of proteins are regulated by both synthesis and degradation.
The enzyme responsible for the intracellular degradation of insulin is
insulin-degrading enzyme
(IDE),1 also known as
insulysin (E.C. 3.4.24.56). A metallothiolproteinase found
primarily in the cytosol, IDE has been detected in lesser amounts in
endosomes, peroxisomes, on the plasma membrane, and in an extracellular
form (reviewed in Ref. 5). In addition to insulin, a number of other
proteins have been identified as IDE substrates, including proteins
structurally related to insulin such as proinsulin, insulin-like growth
factor II, and relaxin (6), and seemingly unrelated peptides, such as
atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and glucagon (7, 8). However, insulin,
ANP, and glucagon all contain regions that can form beta-pleated
sheets, and thus are amyloid-forming peptides (9). Thus, it has been proposed that, rather than displaying specificity for a primary sequence motif, IDE is specific for amyloidogenic peptides (8, 10).
Indeed, recently the Alzheimer's -amyloid peptide was shown to be
degraded by IDE, and IDE was implicated in regulating extracellular
levels of -amyloid peptide (11-13). Therefore, because amylin is an
amyloid-forming peptide, it may also be a substrate for IDE. The
studies presented here characterize an amylin-degrading activity
purified from rat muscle and identify the degrading enzyme as IDE.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Human and rat amylin were from Bachem. 125I-Human
amylin was from Peninsula Laboratories. In all cases, human amylin was
diluted with deionized water from stock solutions immediately before
use to minimize the spontaneous formation of amyloid fibrils. Because of variable amounts of contaminating 125I-labeled bovine
serum albumin, in some cases 125I-amylin was purified by
reverse-phase HPLC as described below. Biosynthetic human insulin and
125I-insulin (labeled on the A14 position) were generously
provided by Ronald Chance and Bruce Frank, respectively, of Lilly
Research Laboratories. The covalent cross-linking reagent NHS-ASA was
from Pierce. All chemicals were reagent grade or better.
Rat Skeletal Muscle IDE Purification--
Homogenates of hind
leg muscle from 100- to 120-g male Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were
prepared and purified by 30-60% ammonium sulfate precipitation and
batchwise DEAE-Sephacel purification as described previously (14). The
preparation was further purified by chromatography on DEAE-Sephacel,
pentyl agarose, and chromatofocusing columns as described (15), except
that dithiothreitol was omitted from the buffers and a Mono-P
fast-protein liquid chromatography column was used as the
chromatofocusing matrix. After concentration of the chromatofocusing
peak using a microconcentrator with a 10-kDa cutoff
(Centriprep-10, Amicon), the sample was applied to a Bio-Gel
A-0.5m (Bio-Rad) gel filtration column (1.5 × 84 cm) equilibrated
with 50 mM HEPES, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4. The peak of insulin-degrading activity was pooled and stored in aliquots at
70 °C until used. Protein was determined by the bicinchoninic acid
assay (Pierce).
Measurement of Amylin- and Insulin-degrading Activities--
The
degradation of insulin and amylin were measured by the trichloroacetic
acid solubility assay. All studies were performed in test tubes coated
with bovine serum albumin to prevent adsorption of the substrates. An
appropriate amount of enzyme was incubated with tracer
125I-insulin or 125I-amylin in 100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, for 15 min at 37 °C (reaction volume
0.5 ml). The reaction was terminated by adding 25 µl of 10% bovine
serum albumin and 125 µl of 50% trichloroacetic acid. After chilling
in an ice bath for 15 min, the tubes were centrifuged at 3000 × g for 15 min, and the radioactivity in the supernatants and
pellets was counted. The degree of degradation is expressed as the
percentage of trichloroacetic acid-soluble counts.
Reverse-phase HPLC Analysis--
Samples of intact and degraded
125I-amylin were applied to a Supelcosil ODS column
(Supelco) equilibrated in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in water (Buffer
A). The samples were eluted using a linear gradient of 0-60% 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid in acetonitrile (Buffer B) over 45 min, followed
by 60-100% B over 15 min. Fractions of 1 ml were collected, and the
radioactivity was measured.
Covalent Cross-linking--
Partially purified IDE was
covalently cross-linked to either 125I-amylin or
125I-insulin using the heterobifunctional amine/photoactive
cross-linker N-hydroxysuccinimidyl-4-azidosalicylic acid
(NHS-ASA). In a total volume of 50 µl, IDE, purified through the
ammonium sulfate precipitation step as above (0.3 mg of protein), was
incubated with approximately 50,000 cpm of either
125I-insulin or HPLC-purified 125I-amylin. To
determine the specificity of cross-linking, excess (0.1 mg/ml)
unlabeled amylin or insulin was included in some samples. After 30 min
on ice, the samples received NHS-ASA to 1 mM (or Me2SO vehicle alone) under darkroom conditions, and the
samples were incubated on ice for 20 min in the dark, then 20 min under UV light. The samples were diluted in 50 µl of 2× SDS-PAGE sample buffer, resolved on 7.5% SDS-PAGE, dried, and visualized by
Phosphor-Imager (Molecular Dynamics) analysis.
Immunodepletion Studies--
Purified IDE was incubated with the
monoclonal anti-IDE antibody 9B12 (kindly provided by Richard A. Roth,
Stanford University) at various concentrations overnight at 4 °C.
For control experiments, IDE was incubated with mouse anti-tubulin
antibody (Sigma). The antibodies were precipitated with Protein
A-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) coated with goat anti-mouse
IgG (Jackson Immunochemicals) for 2 h at 4 °C, then the samples
were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 15 min. The
supernatants were removed and assayed for residual amylin- and
insulin-degrading activities as above.
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of IDE was carried out by sequential purification
from rat skeletal muscle by a modification of chromatographic methods
described previously (14, 15). Amylin-degrading activity purified
through all steps with IDE, and the specific activity increased
throughout the procedure (Table I),
resulting in a 180-fold enrichment of amylin degradation. For
comparison, insulin-degrading activity was purified 140-fold in the
same series (not shown). To further characterize this activity,
125I-amylin degradation was measured in the presence of
increasing doses of unlabeled amylin or insulin (Fig.
1). Both amylin and insulin reduced
125I-amylin degradation in a dose-dependent
manner (IC50 290 and 80 nM, respectively).
Similarly, when 125I-insulin degradation was measured (Fig.
2), both competitor amylin and insulin
decreased 125I-insulin degradation (IC50 160 and 27 nM, respectively) with a similar profile to that in
Fig. 1, strongly suggesting that the same enzyme is responsible for
degrading both amylin and insulin. To verify that the acid-soluble
radioactivity was due to amylin degradation, 125I-amylin
was incubated with purified IDE for 0 or 30 min, then analyzed by
reverse-phase C18 chromatography (Fig.
3). Intact amylin eluted at ~41 min.
After degradation by IDE, the disappearance of the amylin peak at 41 min was accompanied by the accumulation of three degradation products
eluting at approximately 26, 31, and 35 min. When the peak areas were
quantified, the degree of degradation measured by HPLC was similar to
that estimated by trichloroacetic acid in the same sample (~30%
degraded). In general, there was linear agreement between the two
methods within the range of degradation tested (0-40%).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Amylin degradation is inhibited by excess
insulin or amylin. The effect of increasing doses of unlabeled
human insulin (closed symbols) or amylin (open
symbols) on the degradation of 125I-amylin was
determined. The data are expressed as the percentage of degradation in
the absence of unlabeled hormone (mean ± S.E., for three
independent experiments).
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Insulin degradation is inhibited by excess
insulin or amylin. The effect of increasing doses of unlabeled
human insulin (closed symbols) or amylin (open
symbols) on the degradation of 125I-insulin was
determined. The data are expressed as the percentage of degradation in
the absence of unlabeled hormone (mean ± S.E., for three
independent experiments).
|
|

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
HPLC analysis of amylin degradation
products. Degradation products of amylin were generated by
incubation of 125I-amylin without (top) and with
(bottom) purified IDE and then analyzed by reverse-phase
HPLC as described under "Experimental Procedures." The data are
expressed as the percentage of the total recovered radioactivity for
each experiment.
|
|
To determine whether the amylin-degrading activity is due to IDE, a
panel of inhibitors was used to characterize the enzymatic properties
of the amylin-degrading activity (Table
II). The activity was greatly inhibited
by N-ethylmaleimide, 1,10-phenanthroline, and bacitracin and
inhibited to a lesser degree by EDTA and EGTA, consistent with the
metallothiolproteinase characteristics of IDE. Conversely, other
cysteine proteinase inhibitors (E-64, leupeptin), inhibitors of acid
proteases (pepstatin), serine proteases (aprotinin, leupeptin, PMSF)
and calpains (ALLN), were ineffective at inhibiting amylin degradation.
In addition, because ALLN at 1 mM is a potent proteasome
inhibitor, degradation of amylin by the proteasome in this preparation
can be ruled out. Taken together, the amylin-degrading enzyme has the
properties of a neutral metallothiolproteinase, and the inhibition
profile is consistent with the enzymatic properties of IDE.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Inhibitors of IDE inhibit amylin-degrading activity
The degradation of 125I-amylin by purified IDE was measured in
the absence and presence of protease inhibitors at the indicated
concentrations. The data are expressed as percentage of inhibition of
amylin-degrading activity in the absence of inhibitor.
|
|
Because IDE degrades other proteins in addition to insulin, the ability
of these substrates to competitively inhibit amylin degradation was
examined (Table III). The IDE substrates
insulin, glucagon, ANP, and ACTH all effectively inhibited the
amylin-degrading activity. In addition to human amylin, rat amylin also
inhibited human amylin degradation. In contrast, EGF, which binds IDE
but with low affinity, had little effect, and insulin C-peptide, which is not a IDE substrate, had no effect. Taken together, these data demonstrate that the amylin-degrading activity is consistent with the
enzymatic characteristics of IDE.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Amylin degradation is competitively inhibited by IDE substrates
The degradation of 125I-amylin by purified IDE was measured in
the absence and presence of the indicated peptides (all at 100 nM). The data are expressed as percentage of inhibition of
amylin-degrading activity in the absence of additional peptide.
|
|
To examine amylin-binding proteins in the IDE preparation, covalent
cross-linking experiments were performed. Early experiments using
traditional cross-linking reagents such as the homobifunctional amine-reactive disuccinimidyl suberate were unsuccessful when using
amylin as the substrate. This may have been due to the lack of reactive
groups on the amylin molecule, which contains a single amino acid with
primary amines (the N-terminal lysine). Therefore, a heterobifunctional
amine/photoreactive reagent (NHS-ASA) was used. Partially purified IDE
(through the ammonium sulfate precipitation step) was incubated with
either 125I-amylin or 125I-insulin, and
associated proteins were cross-linked with NHS-ASA (Fig.
4). In the absence of NHS-ASA
(Me2SO only), no cross-linking of labeled amylin or insulin
was detected. In the presence of NHS-ASA, a radiolabeled band at
approximately 110 kDa was readily detected using either
125I-amylin or 125I-insulin. This is consistent
with amylin binding by IDE, which migrates on SDS-PAGE at 110 kDa. In
the presence of either excess insulin or amylin, the cross-linking to
the 110-kDa protein was abolished, indicating the specificity of the
binding. No other specifically cross-linked proteins were detected.
These data show that a protein at 110 kDa on SDS-PAGE binds both
insulin and amylin and is consistent with amylin degradation by
IDE.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Covalent cross-linking of
125I-amylin. Partially purified IDE was incubated with
125I-amylin for 30 min, then the covalent cross-linking
reagent NHS-ASA was used to analyze amylin binding proteins. The
samples were resolved on 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and radioactivity was detected
by phosphorimaging analysis.
|
|
To definitively establish IDE as the protease responsible for
amylin degradation in this preparation, immunodepletion studies were performed. Purified IDE was incubated with the monoclonal IDE-specific antibody 9B12 at various concentrations, then the antibody
was precipitated with anti-mouse IgG-coated Protein A-Sepharose. The
precipitates were removed, and the supernatants were measured for
residual amylin- and insulin-degrading activities (Fig.
5). The removal of IDE with increasing
antibody concentration correlated with a loss of both amylin- and
insulin-degrading activity. In contrast, an isotype-matched control
antibody (anti-tubulin), even at concentrations as high as 25 µg/ml,
did not affect either degrading activity.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
An anti-IDE antibody immunodepletes both
insulin- and amylin-degrading activities. Purified IDE was
incubated with the indicated concentration of either the monoclonal
IDE-specific antibody 9B12 (closed symbols) or a control
isotype-matched antibody specific for -tubulin (open
symbols). The antibodies were precipitated with anti-mouse
IgG-coated Protein A-Sepharose, and the residual
125I-amylin (squares) or
125I-insulin (circles) degrading activities were
determined. The data are expressed as the percentage of degradation in
the absence of antibody (mean ± S.E., for three independent
experiments).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The formation of amyloid deposits is a critical event in the
pathogenesis of many diseases, including Alzheimer's disease and Type
2 diabetes. Much of the research performed to date has focused on the
expression of the amyloid-forming proteins. Little is known about the
processes responsible for the turnover and clearance of amyloid-forming
proteins. Recently, IDE was implicated in the degradation of the
Alzheimer's disease beta-amyloid peptide (11, 12). Further studies
have suggested that IDE plays a role in the control of extracellular
levels of Alzheimer's beta-amyloid peptide (13, 16). Therefore, there
is emerging evidence that a major role of IDE may be in the clearance
of amyloid-forming peptides.
Amylin is co-produced and co-packaged with insulin by pancreatic beta
cells. In as many as 90% of persons with Type 2 diabetes, amyloid
plaques are found in the area of the beta cells, and contribute to beta
cell dysfunction and death. The studies presented here identify IDE as
an amylin-degrading enzyme. In a typical series of purification steps
used to isolate IDE, amylin-degrading activity co-purified with
insulin-degrading activity through all steps. The insulin-degrading
activity was inhibited by amylin in a dose-dependent manner, whereas amylin-degrading activity was similarly inhibited by
excess insulin, suggesting that both insulin and amylin are degraded by
the same protease in the preparation. The inhibitor profile identifies
the enzyme as a metallothiolproteinase with properties consistent with
those reported previously for IDE. On the other hand, the
amylin-degrading activity was not inhibited by serine or acid protease
inhibitors nor by an inhibitor of calpains and proteasomes. The
amylin-degrading proteinase had affinity for insulin, glucagon, ACTH,
and ANP, but not for EGF or insulin C-peptide, all consistent with the
specificity of IDE. Using a cross-linking reagent, the association of a
110-kDa protein with radiolabeled amylin was detected. This
cross-linking was abolished in the presence of either excess insulin or
amylin, indicating that the same protein binds both amylin and insulin.
This finding was supported by the observation that radiolabeled insulin
cross-linked to the 110-kDa protein was also eliminated with excess
insulin or amylin, strongly suggesting that the 110-kDa insulin and
amylin binding protein is IDE. Finally, a well-characterized monoclonal antibody directed against IDE co-immunodepleted both insulin- and
amylin-degrading activity, providing definitive evidence that IDE is
the amylin-degrading proteinase.
Because IDE is an amylin-degrading enzyme, it may play an important
role in amylin homeostasis. It is important to remember that in species
expressing amyloidogenic amylin (including humans), amylin is
continually present, yet does not normally aggregate into amyloid
deposits. Therefore, the mere presence of amylin does not predicate
islet amyloid formation. This has been explored further in studies
using transgenic animals. Although some lines of transgenic mice
overexpressing human amylin displayed amyloid deposits (17, 18), others
did not (3, 19-21), suggesting that elevated amylin alone may not be
sufficient for amyloid formation. Therefore, a perturbation of some
other element of amylin processing, such as amylin degradation, may be involved.
Amylin from a number of species, including human, spontaneously
aggregates into amyloid fibrils as a result of -pleated sheet formation around residues 20-29 of the primary sequence. Rodent amylin, on the other hand, does not form amyloid, presumably because proline residues in this area of the molecule alter secondary structure
(22). In the studies presented here, IDE degraded both human and rat
amylin. It would follow that the recognition motif for IDE is not the
-pleated sheet region itself, but the structure of the peptides in
the non-amyloid-forming state. Indeed, most if not all studies of IDE
and insulin have been performed under conditions in which insulin does
not spontaneously form amyloid fibrils. The role of IDE may, therefore,
be in the cleavage of peptides with the potential to form
amyloid aggregates. In this case, IDE can be thought of as a scavenger
of amyloidogenic peptides. Normally, a balance exists between
deposition and degradation of the amyloidogenic peptide. When the
levels of the peptide exceed the capacity of IDE to degrade them,
either by increased expression of the peptide, or decreased expression
or enzymatic activity of IDE, the balance is shifted from degradation
to deposition. In the case of Type 2 diabetes, both insulin and amylin
secretion are increased due to peripheral insulin resistance. Because
IDE has approximately 4-fold greater affinity for insulin than for amylin, amylin degradation will be proportionately impaired. The increased production and relative decrease in degradation may allow
sufficient accumulation of amylin to cause islet amyloid formation.
The site of both synthesis of amylin and deposition of islet amyloid,
the pancreatic beta cells, is a logical site of amylin degradation. An
insulin-degrading enzyme consistent with the properties of IDE has been
reported in islets and in a beta cell line (23). Furthermore, recent
studies in our laboratory have suggested that IDE is responsible for
amylin degradation in a beta cell line and that inhibition of IDE
increases the formation of amyloid by exogenous human amylin (24). If
this proves to be the case, then IDE would be a critical player in the
prevention of amyloid formation by amylin and perhaps other
amyloidogenic peptides. A new area of study focusing on turnover of
amyloidogenic peptides could lead to novel therapeutic approaches in
the treatment of amyloid diseases.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was funded in part by the Department of Veterans
Affairs Research Service and in part by the Bly Memorial Research Fund,
University of Nebraska Medical Center.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Medical Research
Service (151), Veterans Affairs Medical Ctr., 4101 Woolworth Ave.,
Omaha, NE 68105. Tel.: 402-346-8800 ext. 3105; Fax: 402-449-0604; E-mail: rgbennet@unmc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 5, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006170200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IDE, insulin-degrading enzyme;
ANP, atrial natriuretic peptide;
NHS-ASA, N-hydroxysuccinimidyl-4-azidosalicylic acid;
E-64, trans-epoxysucciny-L-leucylamido-(4-guanidino)butane;
PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride;
ALLN, N-acetyl-Leu-Leu-norleucinal;
ACTH, adrenocorticotropic
hormone;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kahn, S. E.,
Andrikopoulos, S.,
and Verchere, C. B.
(1999)
Diabetes
48,
241-253
|
| 2.
|
Johnson, K. H.,
O'Brien, T. D.,
Betsholtz, C.,
and Westermark, P.
(1989)
N. Engl. J. Med.
321,
513-518
|
| 3.
|
Verchere, C. B.,
D'Alessio, D. A.,
Wang, S.,
Andrikopoulos, S.,
and Kahn, S. E.
(1997)
Horm. Metab. Res.
29,
311-316
|
| 4.
|
Verchere, C. B.,
D'Alessio, D. A.,
Palmiter, R. D.,
Weir, G. C.,
Bonner-Weir, S.,
Baskin, D. G.,
and Kahn, S. E.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3492-3496
|
| 5.
|
Duckworth, W. C.,
Bennett, R. G.,
and Hamel, F. G.
(1998)
Endocr. Rev.
19,
608-624
|
| 6.
|
Roth, R. A.,
Mesirow, M. L.,
Yokono, K.,
and Baba, S.
(1984)
Endocr. Res.
10,
101
|
| 7.
|
Duckworth, W. C.,
and Kitabchi, A. E.
(1974)
Diabetes
23,
536-543
|
| 8.
|
Muller, D.,
Baumeister, H.,
Buck, F.,
and Richter, D.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
202,
285-292
|
| 9.
|
Sipe, J. D.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
61,
947-975
|
| 10.
|
Kurochkin, I. V.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
427,
153-156
|
| 11.
|
Goto, S.,
and Kurochkin, I. V.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
345,
33-37
|
| 12.
|
McDermott, J. R.,
and Gibson, A. M.
(1997)
Neurochem. Res.
22,
49-56
|
| 13.
|
Qiu, W. Q.,
Walsh, D. M.,
Ye, Z.,
Vekrellis, K.,
Zhang, J.,
Podlisny, M. B.,
Rosner, M. R.,
Safavi, A.,
Hersh, L. B.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32730-32738
|
| 14.
|
Duckworth, W. C.,
Heinemann, M.,
and Kitabchi, A. E.
(1972)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
69,
3698-3702
|
| 15.
|
Shii, K.,
Yokono, K.,
Baba, S.,
and Roth, R. A.
(1986)
Diabetes
35,
675-683
|
| 16.
|
Vekrellis, K.,
Ye, Z.,
Qiu, W. Q.,
Walsh, D.,
Hartley, D.,
Chesneau, V.,
Rosner, M. R.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
1657-1665
|
| 17.
|
Yagui, K.,
Yamaguchi, T.,
Kanatsuka, A.,
Shimada, F.,
Huang, C. I.,
Tokuyama, Y.,
Ohsawa, H.,
Yamamura, K.,
Miyazaki, J.,
Mikata, A.,
Yoshida, S.,
and Makino, H.
(1995)
Eur. J. Endocrinol.
132,
487-496
|
| 18.
|
Janson, J.,
Soeller, W. C.,
Roche, P. C.,
Nelson, R. T.,
Torchia, A. J.,
Kreutter, D. K.,
and Butler, P. C.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
7283-7288
|
| 19.
|
Hoppener, J. W.,
Verbeek, J. S.,
de Koning, E. J.,
Oosterwijk, C.,
van Hulst, K. L.,
Visser-Vernooy, H. J.,
Hofhuis, F. M.,
van Gaalen, S.,
Berends, M. J.,
Hackeng, W. H.,
Jansz, H. S.,
Morris, J. F.,
Clark, A.,
Capel, P. J.,
and Lips, C. J.
(1993)
Diabetologia
36,
1258-1265
|
| 20.
|
Fox, N.,
Schrementi, J.,
Nishi, M.,
Ohagi, S.,
Chan, S. J.,
Heisserman, J. A.,
Westermark, G. T.,
Leckstrom, A.,
Westermark, P.,
and Steiner, D. F.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
323,
40-44
|
| 21.
|
D'Alessio, D. A.,
Verchere, C. B.,
Kahn, S. E.,
Hoagland, V.,
Baskin, D. G.,
Palmiter, R. D.,
and Ensinck, J. W.
(1994)
Diabetes
43,
1457-1461
|
| 22.
|
Westermark, P.,
Engstrom, U.,
Johnson, K. H.,
Westermark, G. T.,
and Betsholtz, C.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5036-5040
|
| 23.
|
Bhathena, S. J.,
Timmers, K. I.,
Oie, H. K.,
Voyles, N. R.,
and Recant, L.
(1985)
Diabetes
34,
121-128
|
| 24.
|
Bennett, R. G.,
Hamel, F. G.,
and Duckworth, W. C.
(2000)
The Endocrine Society's 82nd Annual Meeting
, p. 89, The Endocrine Society, Toronto, Canada
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Sabayan, F. Foroughinia, A. Mowla, and A. Borhanihaghighi
Role of Insulin Metabolism Disturbances in the Development of Alzheimer Disease: Mini Review
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias,
May 1, 2008;
23(2):
192 - 199.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kim, L. B. Hersh, M. A. Leissring, M. Ingelsson, T. Matsui, W. Farris, A. Lu, B. T. Hyman, D. J. Selkoe, L. Bertram, et al.
Decreased Catalytic Activity of the Insulin-degrading Enzyme in Chromosome 10-Linked Alzheimer Disease Families
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 16, 2007;
282(11):
7825 - 7832.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zraika, R. L. Hull, J. Udayasankar, A. Clark, K. M. Utzschneider, J. Tong, F. Gerchman, and S. E. Kahn
Identification of the Amyloid-Degrading Enzyme Neprilysin in Mouse Islets and Potential Role in Islet Amyloidogenesis
Diabetes,
February 1, 2007;
56(2):
304 - 310.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-J. Yin, J. R. Cirrito, P. Yan, X. Hu, Q. Xiao, X. Pan, R. Bateman, H. Song, F.-F. Hsu, J. Turk, et al.
Matrix Metalloproteinases Expressed by Astrocytes Mediate Extracellular Amyloid-beta Peptide Catabolism
J. Neurosci.,
October 25, 2006;
26(43):
10939 - 10948.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. L. Hull, G. T. Westermark, P. Westermark, and S. E. Kahn
Islet Amyloid: A Critical Entity in the Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
August 1, 2004;
89(8):
3629 - 3643.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Farris, S. Mansourian, M. A. Leissring, E. A. Eckman, L. Bertram, C. B. Eckman, R. E. Tanzi, and D. J. Selkoe
Partial Loss-of-Function Mutations in Insulin-Degrading Enzyme that Induce Diabetes also Impair Degradation of Amyloid {beta}-Protein
Am. J. Pathol.,
April 1, 2004;
164(4):
1425 - 1434.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.-S. Song, M. A. Juliano, L. Juliano, and L. B. Hersh
Substrate Activation of Insulin-degrading Enzyme (Insulysin): A POTENTIAL TARGET FOR DRUG DEVELOPMENT
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 12, 2003;
278(50):
49789 - 49794.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. G. Bennett, F. G. Hamel, and W. C. Duckworth
An Insulin-Degrading Enzyme Inhibitor Decreases Amylin Degradation, Increases Amylin-Induced Cytotoxicity, and Increases Amyloid Formation in Insulinoma Cell Cultures
Diabetes,
September 1, 2003;
52(9):
2315 - 2320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Morelli, R. Llovera, S. A. Gonzalez, J. L. Affranchino, F. Prelli, B. Frangione, J. Ghiso, and E. M. Castano
Differential Degradation of Amyloid {beta} Genetic Variants Associated with Hereditary Dementia or Stroke by Insulin-degrading Enzyme
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 20, 2003;
278(26):
23221 - 23226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. G. Hamel, J. L. Upward, and R. G. Bennett
In Vitro Inhibition of Insulin-Degrading Enzyme by Long-Chain Fatty Acids and Their Coenzyme A Thioesters
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2003;
144(6):
2404 - 2408.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Farris, S. Mansourian, Y. Chang, L. Lindsley, E. A. Eckman, M. P. Frosch, C. B. Eckman, R. E. Tanzi, D. J. Selkoe, and S. Guenette
Insulin-degrading enzyme regulates the levels of insulin, amyloid beta -protein, and the beta -amyloid precursor protein intracellular domain in vivo
PNAS,
April 1, 2003;
100(7):
4162 - 4167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Suh and F. Checler
Amyloid Precursor Protein, Presenilins, and alpha -Synuclein: Molecular Pathogenesis and Pharmacological Applications in Alzheimer's Disease
Pharmacol. Rev.,
September 1, 2002;
54(3):
469 - 525.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|