JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006278200 on September 11, 2000

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 48, 37462-37468, December 1, 2000
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/48/37462    most recent
M006278200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cuthbert, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, W.
Right arrow Articles by Cuthbert, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Post-translational Disruption of the Delta F508 Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR)-Molecular Chaperone Complex with Geldanamycin Stabilizes Delta F508 CFTR in the Rabbit Reticulocyte Lysate*

William FullerDagger and Alan W. Cuthbert§

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QJ, United Kingdom

Received for publication, July 14, 2000, and in revised form, August 17, 2000

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Delta F508 mutation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) is a trafficking mutant, which is retained and degraded in the endoplasmic reticulum by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. The mutant protein fails to reach a completely folded conformation that is no longer a substrate for ubiquitination ("stable B"). Wild type protein reaches this state with 25% efficiency. In this study the rabbit reticulocyte lysate with added microsomal membranes has been used to reproduce the post-translational events in the folding of wild type and Delta F508 CFTR. In this system wild type CFTR does not reach the stable B form if the post-translational temperature is 37 °C, whereas at 30 °C the behavior of both wild type and mutant proteins mimics that observed in the cell. Geldanamycin stabilizes Delta F508 CFTR with respect to ubiquitination only when added post-translationally. The interaction of wild type and mutant CFTR with the molecular chaperones heat shock cognate 70 (hsc70) and heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) has been assessed. Release of wild type protein from hsc70 coincides with the cessation of ubiquitination and formation of stable B. Geldanamycin immediately prevents the binding of hsp90 to Delta F508 CFTR, and after a delay releases it from hsc70. Release of mutant protein from hsc70 also coincides with the formation of stable B Delta F508 CFTR.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mutations in the CFTR1 gene cause cystic fibrosis. The CFTR protein consists of two hydrophobic domains, with ATP binding folds at the carboxyl-terminal end of each (1). These are approximately 150 residues in length, and the first is the site of the most common mutation: Delta F508, the loss of a single phenylalanine residue from position 508 in the polypeptide chain (2).

Like most cystic fibrosis-causing mutations, expression of Delta F508 CFTR in mammalian cell culture systems does not result in the formation of a cAMP activated chloride channel at the cell surface (3, 4). However, the primary defect has been identified as intracellular processing of the mutant rather than a lack of chloride channel activity (5, 6). Wild type CFTR reaches the Golgi apparatus from the ER with approximately 25% efficiency by reaching a degradation-resistant form referred to as "stable B" (5, 7, 8). Delta F508 CFTR is functional if it reaches the cell surface, but it fails to do so in cellular systems, because it cannot reach stable B and is therefore not processed from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. The molecular chaperone hsc70 has been implicated in retaining misfolded Delta F508 CFTR in the ER (9). In addition, a role has been proposed for hsp90 in the biogenesis of the wild type protein (10). Wild type and mutant CFTR failing to leave the ER are degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (11, 12).

The stress-90 molecular chaperones constitute a ubiquitous, major family of stress proteins. Mammalian cytosolic hsp90 is probably the most abundant molecular chaperone, being present at 1-2% of total extractable cellular protein (13). Although the roles of hsp90 in controlling the cell cycle and various DNA-binding proteins are well defined (for review see Ref. 13), the involvement of hsp90 in the folding of newly synthesized polypeptides has not been investigated extensively. At least two proteins are identified complexed with hsp90 when newly synthesized: p56lck (14) and the reovirus cell attachment protein, sigma 1 (15). In the case of the latter protein, hsc70 and hsp90 binding sites on the protein overlap, and because both are involved in the same maturation stages of the protein, it has been suggested that they act cooperatively. This hypothesis is supported by the evidence that these two proteins are found in physical association in the cytosol (the so-called "foldosome" complex (16)).

Like its 70-kDa counterpart, hsp90 is implicated in mediating the degradation as well as folding of proteins in the cytoplasm (17-20). Indeed hsp90 appears to have strong links to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway that mediates the degradation of, among others, wild type and Delta F508 CFTR (11, 12).

The antibiotic geldanamycin is a specific hsp90 binding agent that has been used to elucidate the role of hsp90 in various cellular processes. A benzoquinone ansamycin, it shows a wide range of biological activities as a result of inhibition of hsp90 function (21, 22). These include inhibition of steroid hormone receptor function and destabilization of Raf-1 and other components of the mitogenic pathway; hence, the drug is profoundly cytostatic. Although originally thought to occupy an amino-terminal substrate binding site (23), geldanamycin appears to occupy the ATP binding site on the chaperone (24). Hence it stops ATP binding and prevents the normal function of the amino-terminal substrate binding site of hsp90.

Here evidence is presented that interference with the normal function of hsp90 in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL) with geldanamycin reduces degradation of Delta F508 CFTR and disrupts a chaperone complex such that the protein is no longer presented for ubiquitination. A model for the role of hsp90 and hsc70 in mediating ubiquitination of CFTR is proposed.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- The TNT T7 coupled transcription/translation RRL and canine pancreatic microsomal membranes were obtained from Promega (Madison, WI) and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. Antibodies against hsc70 (clone IB5), hsp90 (clone 16F1), and ubiquitin were supplied by StressGen Biotechnologies and a carboxyl-terminal-specific antibody to CFTR was supplied by Genzyme (Cambridge, MA). Protein G-Sepharose was obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. [35S]Methionine was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Geldanamycin was a generous gift from Dr. David Newman at the United States National Cancer Institute. Wild type and Delta F508 CFTR cDNAs were supplied by Dr. Deborah Gill at the University of Oxford. The cDNA fragment from the NheI site at the 5' end of the CFTR cDNA to the SpeI site at the 3' end after the translation stop codon was cloned into the pSI vector from Promega. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma.

Expression of CFTR in the RRL-- At the chosen translation temperature of 24 °C, optimal expression was achieved using 0.5 µg of DNA, 3 units of canine pancreatic microsomal membranes, and 1 µl of [35S]methionine in a 25-µl reaction. Transcription and translation occurred in the same reaction over 120 min. Post-translational ubiquitination of CFTR and Delta F508 CFTR were measured following the addition of cycloheximide at a final concentration of 100 µg/ml.

Immunoprecipitation of Proteins from the RRL-- For the immunoprecipitation of hsc70, aliquots of lysate were adjusted to 0.1% Triton X-100, 5 mM MgCl2, and 10 units/ml apyrase and agitated for 15 min at 4 °C. Sample composition was adjusted to 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS; samples were pre-cleared, and then 1 µg of anti-hsc70 antibody was added. Following exposure for 2 h at 4 °C, immune complexes were harvested with protein G-Sepharose for 2 h at 4 °C, after which the beads were washed twice for 5 min each with radioimmune precipitation buffer (50 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) and once for 20 min in 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.5, 0.1% Nonidet P-40. Proteins were eluted from the Sepharose beads using SDS sample buffer, and the CFTR content of the bead fraction and immuno-depleted supernatant was assessed by SDS-PAGE. Hence the proportions of wild type and Delta F508 CFTR bound to and free from molecular chaperones were assessed.

CFTR was immunoprecipitated with a carboxyl-terminal-specific antibody under identical conditions but without the preliminary depletion of ATP from the reaction. hsp90 was immunoprecipitated in a buffer consisting of 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.5, 10 mM sodium molybdate, 0.25% Tween 20. Immune complexes on protein G-Sepharose beads were washed three times with 10 mM Tris·Cl, pH 7.5, 10 mM sodium molybdate, 0.1% Nonidet P-40. Ubiquitin was immunoprecipitated under the same conditions as hsp90, with the exclusion of sodium molybdate from the reaction.

SDS-PAGE-- Electrophoresis was performed according to the method of Laemli (25) using the Bio-Rad mini protean II system. 8% polyacrylamide minigels were fixed in 25% isopropyl alcohol, 10% acetic acid and dried under vacuum.

Quantification of CFTR Expression-- Dried gels were exposed to Molecular Dynamics phosphoscreens. Images were obtained using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager, and densitometric analysis was undertaken using the ImageQuant software.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Translation of CFTR in the RRL at 24 °C Produces a Full-length Protein that Is Core-glycosylated in the Presence of Microsomal Membranes-- Panel B of Fig. 1 indicates that the CFTR produced in the RRL is a full-length protein, because it is immunoprecipitated by a carboxyl-terminal-specific antibody. Panel A shows the effect of the addition of microsomes to the translation mix. The molecular mass increase observed (5-6 kDa) is consistent with two N-linked glycosylation events occurring. There are two adjacent N-linked glycosylation sites in the fourth extracellular loop of CFTR (26).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Characterization of wild type and Delta F508 CFTR handling by the RRL. A, unglycosylated CFTR (U) is core-glycosylated in the presence of 3 units of microsomal membranes (CG). B, CFTR produced by the RRL is a full-length protein. Immunoprecipitation with a carboxyl terminus-specific antibody yields an immunodepleted supernatant (fraction S) and immunoprecipitated protein (fraction B). Most of the expressed protein has a complete carboxyl terminus because it is precipitated by this antibody.

Increasing the Post-translational Temperature to 37 °C Causes Rapid Ubiquitination of Wild Type and Delta F508 CFTR-- Following translation at 24 °C and addition of 100 µg/ml cycloheximide, the incubation temperature was increased to 37 °C (time zero). Samples were taken and analyzed by SDS-PAGE as shown in Fig. 2, panel A. Both wild type and Delta F508 CFTRs are ubiquitinated with indistinguishable kinetics. The observed half-lives of the core glycosylated bands (28.7 min for the wild type protein and 29.0 min for the mutant protein) are similar to those reported in cellular systems (7, 8).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Ubiquitination of wild type and Delta F508 CFTR in the RRL at 37 °C. A, core-glycosylated CFTR (CG) is rapidly ubiquitinated at 37 °C following inhibition of translation. Samples were removed from the reaction and analyzed by SDS-PAGE at the times indicated (minutes after inhibition of translation) above each lane. Ubiquitination occurs with first order kinetics and identical half-lives for the wild type and mutant proteins (the graphs on the right side of panel A show the mean ± standard error from five experiments). B, polyubiquitinated CFTR (PU) is immunoprecipitated by an anti-ubiquitin antibody. The immunoprecipitation reaction yields an immunodepleted supernatant (S) free of ubiquitin and beads bearing the immune complex (B). C, polyubiquitinated CFTR is not degraded further on prolonged incubation in the RRL. Samples were removed from the reaction and analyzed by SDS-PAGE at the times indicated (minutes after translation) above each lane. The presence of hemin prevents the breakdown of polyubiquitinated CFTR by the RRL.

Panel B of Fig. 2 indicates that the high molecular mass material observed following incubation of CFTR is immunoprecipitated by an anti-ubiquitin antibody. The addition of multiple ubiquitin chains retards the progress of the CFTR in the gel such that it accumulates at the top. This does not necessarily reflect the true molecular mass of the polyubiquitinated protein; its mobility through the gel suggests a molecular mass of several hundred if not thousands of kilodaltons, which would be caused by the addition of many more ubiquitin chains than has previously been reported (27, 28). The high molecular mass could be due to the polyubiquitination at a single lysine residue or multiple lysine residues on the CFTR protein. The data cannot discount the possibility that ubiquitination caused aggregation of the CFTR protein. Other investigators examining the ubiquitination of CFTR in the cell and the RRL report an identical effect of ubiquitination on its electrophoretic mobility (11, 12, 29).

On continued incubation of core glycosylated wild type CFTR at 37 °C for several hours after synthesis is halted, there is no apparent diminution in the intensity of the polyubiquitinated CFTR band (panel C of Fig. 2). In the cell, this polyubiquitinated CFTR would be degraded by the proteasome (11, 12). However, the RRL contains hemin (20 µM), which is required for optimal translation (30). Hemin is also a potent inhibitor of proteasomal activity (31); hence proteins expressed in the RRL can be ubiquitinated but not degraded by the proteasome. Introduction of core-glycosylated CFTR into hemin-free lysate restores proteasomal degradation of this high molecular mass polyubiquitinated form of the CFTR protein (32).

Wild Type CFTR Is Stabilized Compared with Delta F508 CFTR at 30 °C-- Following translation at 24 °C approximately 20% of wild type protein is stable with respect to ubiquitination when incubated at 30 °C, whereas all Delta F508 CFTR is ubiquitinated at this temperature (Fig. 3). This stable wild type protein may be analogous to the stable B form observed in cells (5, 7, 8). It is not a result of the ability of the RRL to ubiquitinate substrates being compromised; when presented with a similar amount of mutant protein it is all ubiquitinated over the same time.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Wild type but not Delta F508 CFTR forms stable B in the RRL at 30 °C. A, core-glycosylated Delta F508 CFTR (CG) is completely ubiquitinated over 18 h at 30 °C in the RRL. Samples were removed from the reaction and analyzed by SDS-PAGE at the times indicated (hours after inhibition of translation) above each lane. Graph shows mean ± S.E.; n = 5. B, core-glycosylated wild type CFTR (CG) forms stable B under the same conditions. Approximately 20% of wild type protein is not ubiquitinated by the RRL over an identical time period. Graph shows mean ± S.E.; n = 5.

Geldanamycin Restores the Ubiquitination of Delta F508 CFTR to Wild Type Kinetics Only When Added Post-translationally-- The effect of 11 µg/ml geldanamycin on the stability of Delta F508 CFTR in the RRL at 30 °C is shown in Fig. 4. This concentration reliably gives full inhibition of hsp90 function in the RRL (17). Co-translational addition of the drug (panel A) is without effect; however, when the drug is added post-translationally (panel B), approximately 25% of the mutant protein is stabilized with respect to ubiquitination. On treatment with geldanamycin there is no change in the rate of ubiquitination of the mutant protein; there is no significant difference between the amounts of protein remaining in the presence or absence of geldanamycin after up to 6 h of incubation. However, in the presence of geldanamycin little or no further ubiquitination occurs after 4 h of incubation at 30 °C, such that approximately 25% of the mutant protein persists on overnight incubation. Hence, 11 µg/ml geldanamycin has a stabilizing effect on Delta F508 CFTR, restoring its profile of degradation to a wild type-like appearance.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Geldanamycin stabilizes Delta F508 CFTR in the RRL at 30 °C only when added post-translationally. A, addition of 11 µg/ml geldanamycin prior to translation is without effect on the ubiquitination of core-glycosylated Delta F508 CFTR (CG) in the RRL at 30 °C (graph shows mean ± S.E.; n = 5). No differences are observed when the ubiquitination of Delta F508 CFTR with geldanamycin present co-translationally is compared with that in the absence of the drug. B, post-translational addition of 11 µg/ml geldanamycin stabilizes approximately 25% of core-glycosylated Delta F508 CFTR such that it is no longer a substrate for ubiquitination in the RRL at 30 °C (graph shows mean ± S.E.; n = 5). The stable protein may be analogous to stable B wild type CFTR, which forms with similar kinetics in the RRL at this temperature.

Geldanamycin Prevents the Interaction of hsp90 and hsc70 with Delta F508 CFTR-- The interaction of wild type and Delta F508 CFTR with the molecular chaperones hsp90 and hsc70 was assessed over the first 6 h of incubation at 30 °C. This was achieved through immunoprecipitation of the chaperone under conditions favoring substrate association (depletion of ATP in the case of hsc70; 10 mM sodium molybdate for hsp90). Hence the relative proportion of wild type and mutant protein bound to the chaperones was assessed. Geldanamycin treatment was without effect on the efficiency of immunoprecipitation of either hsc70 or hsp90 (data not shown).

Panel A of Fig. 5 shows the interaction of hsp90 with wild type CFTR, Delta F508 CFTR alone, and Delta F508 CFTR in the presence of 11 µg/ml geldanamycin. Panel B shows the interactions of the same three groups with hsc70. Note that whereas association of wild type protein with these chaperones is transient, Delta F508 CFTR forms a long lasting complex with hsc70 (as previously reported (9)) and hsp90. Geldanamycin rapidly prevents the association of hsp90 with Delta F508 CFTR and gradually reduces binding of hsc70 over a 4-h period. It is noteworthy that the loss of binding of hsc70 to both wild type and Delta F508 CFTR coincides with the cessation of ubiquitination of these proteins.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Association of Delta F508 CFTR with hsp90 and hsc70 is abolished by geldanamycin. Wild type CFTR associates with both chaperones transiently. A, immunoprecipitation of Delta F508 CFTR with an hsp90 antibody indicates that the amount of mutant protein in association with the chaperone is relatively high throughout the 6-h period studied. Wild type CFTR is associated with hsp90 at a low level throughout. Addition of 11 µg/ml geldanamycin immediately abolishes the association of hsp90 with Delta F508 CFTR (graphs show mean ± S.E.; n = 6). B, association of hsc70 with Delta F508 CFTR is also high throughout its lifetime. Wild type CFTR is also highly associated with the chaperone initially but dissociates over the 6-h period examined. 11 µg/ml geldanamycin is at first without effect on the binding of hsc70; however, after 4 h of incubation the chaperone is dissociated from Delta F508 CFTR (graphs show mean ± S.E.; n = 6). In the case of the latter two groups, dissociation from hsc70 coincides with the cessation of ubiquitination observed in Fig. 3.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this study, a cell-free system has been described that reproduces the differences between wild type and Delta F508 CFTR observed in the cell. Following translation, 20% of wild type protein is stable with respect to ubiquitination at 30 °C, but all Delta F508 CFTR is ubiquitinated. The stable wild type protein observed may be analogous to the stable B form described in cells (5, 7, 8). This is addressed below. Whatever the nature of this stable form of the wild type protein, a clear difference is observed between the handling of this and the mutant protein, and pharmacological correction of this difference in the RRL such that mutant protein is stable over an overnight incubation at 30 °C may be sufficient to correct the Delta F508 trafficking defect in the intact cell.

The RRL with microsomal membranes added has been presumed to essentially provide cytosolic and ER compartments in which folding and degradation events are unaltered from the way in which they proceed in the intact cell. However, the failure of the lysate to support formation of stable B CFTR at 37 °C casts doubt on such an assumption and calls into question the validity of using the RRL as a model for the cell at this temperature (29). The fact that stable B CFTR may be achieved at 30 °C goes some way to reaffirming that the lysate is indeed a relevant cellular model. Little is known about the properties of the stable B form of the protein. Its well identified characteristics are its lack of susceptibility to ubiquitination in the cell and its ability to traffic from the ER to the Golgi apparatus. Whereas the former property has been established in the RRL, the latter cannot be tested here because trafficking out of the ER is not possible in this system. The failure of Delta F508 CFTR to achieve this state is further evidence that the observed cellular difference between wild type and Delta F508 CFTR is reproduced here; the specific lesion of Delta F508 CFTR is the conversion from unstable to stable band B. It is extremely unlikely that the RRL may be unable to ubiquitinate wild type but not Delta F508 CFTR as a result of being compromised metabolically. Both proteins are synthesized from identical plasmids, save for the presence of the mutation, and similar (very small) quantities of protein are presented to the lysate for ubiquitination. It is therefore unlikely that the lysate could be competent to fully ubiquitinate one but not the other unless the wild type protein is no longer a substrate for ubiquitination. The replication of the cellular behavior of nascent wild type and Delta F508 CFTR in the RRL at 30 °C validates the use of this system to study events leading to the formation of stable B protein.

Given that the RRL supports formation of stable B CFTR at 30 °C, an important question must be why it does so at this temperature but not at higher ones. The recommended (and most commonly used) temperature at which the RRL is operated is 30 °C. It is our experience that translation of other proteins in the RRL at higher temperatures produces little full-length protein; the RRL does not operate efficiently at 37 °C. The differences between the lysate at 37 °C and 30 °C cannot be readily identified. It may be that the lower temperature allows some protein complex such as the foldosome (16) to assemble and operate efficiently where it cannot at 37 °C. It is also possible that at 30 °C some amount of ordering may be possible in the lysate, the added microsomal membranes, the molecular chaperone system, or the polypeptide chain of CFTR that leads to stable B being favored. In the cell, such order may be imposed by the cytoskeleton. An important prediction from the observation that stable B CFTR can be formed in the RRL is that neither an intact cytoskeleton nor membrane traffic from the ER is required to support formation of stable B in the cell.

The fact that the RRL supports formation of stable B wild type CFTR means the effects of drugs on formation of stable B Delta F508 CFTR may be assessed. Any drug showing positive effects may facilitate the release of the mutant protein from its ER processing block in vivo. The effect of geldanamycin on Delta F508 CFTR is described in Fig. 4. This drug supports production of stable B Delta F508 CFTR in the RRL. Stabilization is only observed on post-translational addition of the drug. If binding of hsp90 to the mutant protein were simply post-translational, then geldanamycin would have an identical effect on Delta F508 CFTR whether it was present throughout translation or after it was complete. That geldanamycin is without effect on Delta F508 CFTR stability if present co-translationally implies that co-translational binding of the chaperone is required if stable B is to be achieved. Hence, the following model is put forward. Co-translational binding of Delta F508 CFTR by hsp90 mediates the formation of stable B protein; post-translational binding is involved with ubiquitination of the protein. In the cell, this model predicts that only protein already translated upon addition of geldanamycin will be stabilized with respect to ubiquitination.

However, the role of hsp90 cannot be considered alone. Blockage of hsc70 binding by treatment with an hsp90 binding agent indicates that the functions of these two proteins are linked. The effect of geldanamycin on hsc70 binding is delayed, but its effect on hsp90 binding is immediate. This delay perhaps implies that whereas the effect of this hsp90 binding agent in preventing the association of the chaperone with its substrate is mediated directly, its effect on hsc70 interactions with proteins is indirect. It also suggests that the effect of geldanamycin on hsc70 binding to Delta F508 CFTR is not a result of an interaction between geldanamycin and hsc70; such an effect would be immediate. Association of hsc70 with substrate may rely on an interaction with hsp90 and other members of the foldosome complex. Dissociation of this complex following inhibition of hsp90 function may take time, such that hsc70 interactions with Delta F508 CFTR are still observed after some hours of exposure to the drug. Whatever the mechanism by which these events occur, important conclusions to be drawn are that hsp90 and hsc70 operate together in the RRL (in agreement with other results (33)) and that hsp90 and hsc70 operate cooperatively in the RRL (as suggested in Ref. 34).

The findings of Loo et al. (10) must be considered in respect of the discussion above. These authors describe a destabilization of wild type CFTR in a cellular system as a result of geldanamycin treatment blocking hsp90 function. Geldanamycin prevents the formation of stable B CFTR and targets the protein for ubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Blocking hsp90 interactions with wild type CFTR increases its association with hsc70 in this system. This apparently contradicts the results obtained in this study and the model described above. However, the post-translational effect of geldanamycin on Delta F508 CFTR in the RRL is unlikely to be observed in a cellular system because almost all protein examined in such a system will be translated in the presence of the drug. This may explain many of the differences observed between this study and previous work, in which authors usually observe a destabilization of an hsp90 substrate by treatment with geldanamycin (for example, Refs. 18, 22, 35-38). It is perhaps an unsurprising result that blocking molecular chaperone interactions with proteins emerging from the ribosome prevents them from following the correct folding pathway. Using the methods of Loo et al. (10), it would be impossible to detect the small amount of CFTR present in the ER when the drug is applied to the cells that would escape ubiquitination, because geldanamycin is added before the [35S]methionine pulse. As a result, all labeled protein is translated in the presence of the drug, and all observations regarding the effect of geldanamycin on CFTR are made on a protein that has been translated in the presence of geldanamycin. The advantage of the RRL as the model system is that the separation of co- and post-translational events is made easy. According to our model, translation of wild type or Delta F508 CFTR in the absence of hsp90 will indeed prevent the formation of stable B protein (Fig. 4, panel A). It is only post-translational disruption of the Delta F508 CFTR·hsp90 complex that rescues the protein from ubiquitination (Fig. 4, panel B). Therefore, the results in Ref. 10 do not contradict our model and indeed in some respects confirm the observations made in this study. Specifically, the authors also observe that hsp90 is involved in the biogenesis of CFTR in another in vitro system.

According to Figs. 2-4, ubiquitination of wild type and Delta F508 CFTR in the RRL only occurs when they are interacting with hsc70. Although no causal link has been established between hsc70 and ubiquitination of CFTR by this work, others have found that hsc70 is required for ubiquitination of certain protein substrates (38-40); so our results do suggest a role for hsc70 in mediating the ubiquitination of CFTR in vitro. Release of wild type CFTR from hsc70 coincides with its stabilization in the RRL, and the same result is seen for Delta F508 CFTR when interactions with hsc70 are prevented with geldanamycin. Hence, although the link between hsc70 binding and ubiquitination has not been definitively established, it is clear that this chaperone cannot simply be regarded as a protein folder. Nor indeed can hsp90, because it is this protein whose targeting has affected the ubiquitination of Delta F508 CFTR in this system. hsc70 should be regarded as an agent that promotes protein folding and degradation equally. This is entirely in line with its function in protein quality control. The dual functions of determining the progress toward the folded state of a protein and presenting misfolded proteins to the degradation apparatus of the cell must co-exist for any protein to effectively carry out quality control in the cell. hsc70 appears to fulfil both these functions in the case of controlling the folding of wild type and Delta F508 CFTR.

It is important to appreciate that our model cannot be applied in all situations. When geldanamycin is present co-translationally, Delta F508 CFTR is not stabilized with respect to ubiquitination. According to the model, preventing hsp90 interactions with the protein should prevent ubiquitination of the protein in the RRL. This does not occur probably because the perturbations to the folding pathway are so great when co-translational chaperone binding is prevented that ubiquitination will occur regardless. Whether this effect is mediated by enhanced hsc70 binding to the misfolded protein in some hsp90-independent function (as observed in Ref. 10) will not be speculated upon. However it is achieved, ubiquitination of all Delta F508 CFTR synthesized in the presence of geldanamycin does occur.

The results presented must be considered alongside the observed correction of Delta F508 CFTR trafficking on treatment of cells with the hsc70 binding agent deoxyspergualin (41). Given the data presented here, such a result is perhaps unsurprising. Blockage of binding of the major agent involved in mediating the ubiquitination of Delta F508 CFTR restores its traffic to the plasma membrane.

The identification of the ATP binding site on hsp90 as the site of interaction of geldanamycin (24) raises the possibility that geldanamycin might also bind directly to CFTR at the first or second ATP binding fold. The first ATP binding fold is the site of Delta F508, and it could be argued that geldanamycin is able to stabilize Delta F508 CFTR through binding at the site of the mutation. We do not favor such an explanation, because there is no evidence that geldanamycin is specific for any ATP binding sites other than that on hsp90. Moreover, this cannot explain the requirement that geldanamycin be added post-translationally for its stabilizing effect to be observed in the RRL.

In summary, the molecular chaperones hsc70 and hsp90 have a role in both the folding and ubiquitination of wild type and Delta F508 CFTR. During translation, these chaperones assist the formation of correctly folded protein. Following cessation of translation, hsc70 and hsp90 appear to move into "ubiquitination mode"; blocking the binding of hsp90 and hsc70 to Delta F508 CFTR rescues the protein from ubiquitination. However, the use of chaperone binding drugs in the treatment of cystic fibrosis is unfeasible. Disruption of chaperone function by systemic administration of a drug such as geldanamycin has profound effects throughout an organism (42, 43). Any cystic fibrosis treatment must carry relatively few side effects, because a patient must use such a therapy throughout life. Therefore, disruption of chaperone interactions with nascent Delta F508 CFTR in vivo must be achieved through means other than targeting the molecular chaperones themselves, unless drugs can be targeted directly to epithelia.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Luke Whitesell for preliminary discussions and Dr. David Newman for providing geldanamycin.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant 044441/Z/95/Z from the Wellcome Trust (to W. F.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: Dept. of Cardiovascular Research, The Rayne Inst., St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Rd., London SE1 7EH, UK. Tel.: 44 20 7928 9292 (ext. 2749); Fax: 44 20 7928 0658; E-mail: will.fuller@kcl.ac.uk.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine, Level 5 (Box 157), Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Rd., Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. Tel.: 44 1223 336853; Fax: 44 1223 336846; E-mail: awc1000@cam.ac.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 11, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006278200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; hsc70, heat shock cognate 70; hsp90, heat shock protein 90; RRL, rabbit reticulocyte lysate; SDS-PAGE, SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis..

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Riordan, J. R., Rommens, J. M., Kerem, B., Alon, N., Rozmahel, R., Grzelczak, Z., Zielenski, J., Lok, S., Plavsic, N., Chou, J. L., Drumm, M. L., Iannuzzi, M. C., Collins, F. C., and Tsui, L. C. (1989) Science 245, 1066-1073
2. Kerem, B., Rommens, J. M., Buchanan, J. A., Markiewicz, D., Cox, T. K., Chakravarti, A., Buchwald, M., and Tsui, L. C. (1989) Science 245, 1073-1080
3. Rich, D. P., Anderson, M. P., Gregory, R. J., Cheng, S. H., Paul, S., Jefferson, D. M., McCann, J. D., Klinger, K. W., Smith, A. E., and Welsh, M. J. (1990) Nature 347, 358-363
4. Anderson, M. P., Rich, D. P., Gregory, R. J., Smith, A. E., and Welsh, M. J. (1991) Science 251, 679-682
5. Cheng, S. H., Gregory, R. J., Marshall, J., Paul, S., Souza, D. W., White, G. A., O'Riordan, C. R., and Smith, A. E. (1990) Cell 63, 827-834
6. Denning, G. M., Anderson, M. P., Amara, J. F., Marshall, J., Smith, A. E., and Welsh, M. J. (1992) Nature 358, 761-764
7. Ward, C. L., and Kopito, R. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25710-25718
8. Lukacs, G. L., Mohamed, A., Kartner, N., Chang, X. B., Riordan, J. R., and Grinstein, S. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 6076-6086
9. Yang, Y., Janich, S., Cohn, J. A., and Wilson, J. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 9480-9484
10. Loo, M. A., Jensen, T. J., Cui, L., Hou, Y., Chang, X. B., and Riordan, J. R. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 6879-6887
11. Ward, C. L., Omura, S., and Kopito, R. R. (1995) Cell 83, 121-127
12. Jensen, T. J., Loo, M. A., Pind, S., Williams, D. B., Goldberg, A. L., and Riordan, J. R. (1995) Cell 83, 129-135
13. Scheibel, T., and Buchner, J. (1998) Biochem. Pharmacol. 56, 675-682
14. Hartson, S. D., Barrett, D. J., Burn, P., and Matts, R. L. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 13451-13459
15. Gilmore, R., Coffey, M. C., and Lee, P. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15227-15233
16. Hutchison, K. A., Dittmar, K. D., and Pratt, W. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27894-27899
17. Schneider, C., Sepp-Lorenzino, L., Nimmesgern, E., Ouerfelli, O., Danishefsky, S., Rosen, N., and Hartl, F. U. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 14536-14541
18. Whitesell, L., Sutphin, P., An, W. G., Sculte, T., Blagosklonny, M. V., and Neckers, L. (1997) Oncogene 14, 2809-2816
19. Imamura, T., Haruta, T., Takata, Y., Usui, I., Iwata, M., Ishihara, H., Ishiki, M., Ishibashi, O., Ueno, E., Sasaoka, T., and Kobayashi, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11183-11188
20. Scheibel, T., Weikl, T., and Buchner, J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 95, 1495-1499
21. Whitesell, L., Shifrin, S. D., Schwab, G., and Neckers, L. M. (1992) Cancer Res. 52, 1721-1728
22. Whitesell, L., Mimnaugh, E. G., De Costa, B., Myers, C. E., and Neckers, L. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 91, 8324-8328
23. Stebbins, C. E., Russo, A. A., Schneider, C., Rosen, N., Hartl, F. U., and Pavletich, N. P. (1997) Cell 89, 239-250
24. Prodromou, C., Roe, S. M., O'Brien, R., Ladbury, J. E., Piper, P. W., and Pearl, L. H. (1997) Cell 90, 65-75
25. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
26. Pind, S., Riordan, J. R., and Williams, D. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12784-12788
27. Chau, V., Tobias, J. W., Bachmair, A., Marriott, D., Ecker, D. J., Gonda, D. K., and Varshavsky, A. (1989) Science 243, 1576-1583
28. Deveraux, Q., Ustrell, V., Pickart, C., and Rechsteiner, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7059-7061
29. Sato, S., Ward, C. L., and Kopito, R. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7189-7192
30. Gross, M. (1980) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 31, 25-36
31. Haas, A. L., and Rose, I. A (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 78, 6845-6848
32. Lu, Y., Xiong, X., Helm, A., Kimani, K., Bragin, A., and Skach, W. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 568-576
33. Schumacher, R. J., Hansen, W. J., Freeman, B. C., Alnemri, E., Litwack, G., and Toft, D. O. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 14889-14898
34. Schumacher, R. J., Hurst, R., Sullivan, W. P., McMahon, N. J., Toft, D. O., and Matts, R. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9493-9499
35. June, C. H., Fletcher, M. C., Ledbetter, J. A., Schieven, G. L., Siegel, J. N., Phillips, A. F., and Samelson, L. E. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 87, 7722-7726
36. Uehara, Y., Murakami, Y., Sugimoto, Y., and Mizuno, S. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, 780-785
37. Murakami, Y., Fukazawa, H., Mizuno, S., and Uehara, Y. (1994) Biochem. J. 301, 57-62
38. Sawa, T., Imamura, T., Haruta, T., Sasaoka, T., Ishiki, M., Takata, Y., Takada, Y., Morioka, H., Ishihara, H., Usui, I., and Kobayashi, M. (1996) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 218, 449-453
39. Bercovich, B., Stancovski, I., Mayer, A., Blumenfeld, N., Laszlo, A., Schwartz, A. L., and Ciechanover, A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9002-9010
40. Fisher, E. A., Zhou, M., Mitchell, D. M., Wu, X., Omura, S., Wang, H., Goldberg, L., and Ginsberg, H. N. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20427-20434
41. Jiang, C., Fang, S. L., Xiao, Y. F., O'Connor, S. P., Nadler, S. G., Lee, D. W., Jefferson, D. M., Kaplan, J. M., Smith, A. E., and Cheng, S. H. (1998) Am. J. Physiol. (Cell Physiol.) 275, C171-C178
42. Supko, J. G., Hickman, R. L., Grever, M. R., and Malspeis, L. (1995) Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 36, 305-315
43. Schulte, T. W., and Neckers, L. M. (1998) Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 42, 273-279


Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. Norez, F. Bilan, A. Kitzis, Y. Mettey, and F. Becq
Proteasome-Dependent Pharmacological Rescue of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Revealed by Mutation of Glycine 622
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2008; 325(1): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. R. Ramos, A. J. Swanson, and J. Bass
Calreticulin and Hsp90 stabilize the human insulin receptor and promote its mobility in the endoplasmic reticulum
PNAS, June 19, 2007; 104(25): 10470 - 10475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Xu, C. Liu, J. C. Clark, and J. A. Whitsett
Functional Genomic Responses to Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) and CFTR{Delta}508 in the Lung
J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 11279 - 11291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. B. Goldfarb, O. B. Kashlan, J. N. Watkins, L. Suaud, W. Yan, T. R. Kleyman, and R. C. Rubenstein
Differential effects of Hsc70 and Hsp70 on the intracellular trafficking and functional expression of epithelial sodium channels
PNAS, April 11, 2006; 103(15): 5817 - 5822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. H. Robben, M. Sze, N.V.A.M. Knoers, and P.M.T. Deen
Rescue of Vasopressin V2 Receptor Mutants by Chemical Chaperones: Specificity and Mechanism
Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 379 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Oberdorf, D. Pitonzo, and W. R. Skach
An Energy-dependent Maturation Step Is Required for Release of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator from Early Endoplasmic Reticulum Biosynthetic Machinery
J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38193 - 38202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. F. Simard, N. D. Daigle, M. J. Bergeron, G. M. Brunet, L. Caron, M. Noel, V. Montminy, and P. Isenring
Characterization of a Novel Interaction between the Secretory Na+-K+-Cl- Cotransporter and the Chaperone hsp90
J. Biol. Chem., November 12, 2004; 279(46): 48449 - 48456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
R. T. Youker, P. Walsh, T. Beilharz, T. Lithgow, and J. L. Brodsky
Distinct Roles for the Hsp40 and Hsp90 Molecular Chaperones during Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Degradation in Yeast
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2004; 15(11): 4787 - 4797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
T. Okiyoneda, K. Harada, M. Takeya, K. Yamahira, I. Wada, T. Shuto, M. A. Suico, Y. Hashimoto, and H. Kai
{Delta}F508 CFTR Pool in the Endoplasmic Reticulum Is Increased by Calnexin Overexpression
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2004; 15(2): 563 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Santana, E. Salido, A. Torres, and L. J. Shapiro
Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 in the Canary Islands: A conformational disease due to I244T mutation in the P11L-containing alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase
PNAS, June 10, 2003; 100(12): 7277 - 7282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
L. R. Choo-Kang and P. L. Zeitlin
Induction of HSP70 promotes {Delta}F508 CFTR trafficking
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): L58 - L68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Gusarova, A. J. Caplan, J. L. Brodsky, and E. A. Fisher
Apoprotein B Degradation Is Promoted by the Molecular Chaperones hsp90 and hsp70
J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2001; 276(27): 24891 - 24900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
275/48/37462    most recent
M006278200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend