![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 48, 37692-37701, December 1, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, May 30, 2000, and in revised form, August 22, 2000
Membrane cofactor protein (MCP; CD46), a widely
distributed regulator of complement activation, is a cofactor for the
factor I-mediated degradation of C3b and C4b deposited on host cells. MCP possesses four extracellular, contiguous complement control protein
modules (CCPs) important for this inhibitory activity. The goal of the
present study was to delineate functional sites within these modules.
We employed multiple approaches including mutagenesis, epitope mapping,
and comparisons to primate MCP to make the following observations.
First, functional sites were located to each of the four CCPs. Second,
some residues were important for both C3b and C4b interactions while
others were specific for one or the other. Third, while a reduction in
ligand binding was invariably accompanied by a parallel reduction in
cofactor activity (CA), other mutants lost or had reduced CA but
retained ligand binding. Fourth, two C4b-regulatory domains overlapped
measles virus interactive regions, indicating that the hemagglutinin
docks to a site important for complement inhibition. Fifth, several MCP
regulatory areas corresponded to functionally critical, homologous positions in other CCP-bearing C3b/C4b-binding proteins. Based on these
data and the recently derived crystal structure of repeats one and two,
computer modeling was employed to predict MCP structure and examine
active sites.
Membrane cofactor protein
(MCP1; CD46) is a widely
expressed type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein that regulates complement
activation (reviewed in Ref. 1). It serves as a cofactor for the plasma serine protease factor I to cleave C3b and C4b that deposit on host
tissue. MCP belongs to a family of structurally, functionally, and
genetically related receptor and inhibitory proteins called the
regulators of complement activation (RCA) (reviewed in Ref. 1). Other
members are complement receptors one (CR1; CD35) and two (CR2; CD21),
decay accelerating factor (DAF; CD55), and two plasma proteins, factor
H and C4b-binding protein (C4BP). The amino-terminal regions of these
proteins consist of variable numbers (from 4 to 30) of tandemly-linked,
independently folding, cysteine-rich modules of approximately 60 amino
acids termed complement control protein (CCP) repeats. The elliptical
CCP modules possess hydrophobic cores with characteristic
Perhaps owing to both its abundant expression and regulatory role, MCP
is the target of several pathogens. It is a receptor for measles virus
(MV) (2-4), group A Streptococcus pyogenes (5), pathogenic
Neisseria species (6), and human herpesvirus 6 (7).
Additionally, other pathogens (e.g. pox viruses) synthesize complement inhibitory proteins (virulence factors) that functionally and, in some cases, structurally resemble MCP or other complement inhibitors (8). Additional roles for MCP include its association with
Most cells express MCP as a family of four alternatively spliced
isoforms that share an identical amino-terminal portion consisting of
four CCP modules (19, 20). Next is the variably spliced region for
O-glycosylation called the STP domain, which is enriched in
serines, threonines, and prolines. This is followed by a 12-amino acid
segment of undefined function, a transmembrane domain, cytoplasmic anchor, and one of two alternatively spliced cytoplasmic tails.
Sites for C3b and C4b interactions have been mapped by CCP deletions
primarily to modules 2, 3, and 4 (21, 22). Additionally, the MV binding
site has been localized to CCPs 1 and 2 (22-26). The aim of the
present study was to identify areas in the CCP domains that are
important for C3b and C4b binding and cofactor activity (CA). We report
on functional insights provided by (a) an analysis of 55 mutants, (b) the binding of ligands to MCP peptides, (c) comparisons to the functional profile of primate MCPs,
and (d) mapping the epitope of a function-blocking mAb.
Based on these results and a recently determined crystal structure of
CCPs 1 and 2 (27), we developed a structural model and localized
putative active sites on the CCPs of MCP.
Mutagenesis and Expression--
Substitutions were produced
utilizing the QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene
Cloning Systems, La Jolla, CA) per the manufacturer's directions. The
template was MCP isoform BC1 (GenBankTM accession no. X59405) cloned
into the EcoRI site of plasmid pSG5 (Stratagene). All
cDNA clones were sequenced in their entirety. Transient
transfections were either performed with Lipofectin (Life Technologies,
Inc.) or Fugene-6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) into Chinese hamster
ovary K1 (CHO) cells per manufacturer's directions. CHO cells were
maintained in Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum and penicillin/streptomycin.
Quantification of MCP--
MCP-expressing cells were
characterized by Western blotting and ELISA as described previously
(28). Nucleated cells were lysed in 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.05% SDS, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride in TBS (10 mM
Tris, pH 7.2, 150 mM sodium chloride) and supernatants
collected following centrifugation at 12,000 × g. Erythrocytes were isolated from primate blood (obtained from Yerkes Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA) and lysed as described previously (29). MCP was quantified by ELISA (28). Briefly, an MCP mAb (TRA-2-10)
was coated on microtiter wells (5 µg/ml) in TBS overnight at 4 °C
followed by blocking with 1% BSA and 0.1% Tween 20. Cell lysates were
prepared in 10 mM Tris, 150 mM sodium chloride,
0.05% Tween 20, 4% BSA, and 0.25% Nonidet P-40. These samples and
standards were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and then washed with
TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. Next, rabbit anti-MCP antiserum
(1:7000) (provided by CytoMed, Inc. Cambridge, MA) was applied for
1 h at 37 °C. After washing, horseradish peroxidase-coupled
donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West
Grove, PA) was added and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. After
washing, TMB substrate (Pierce) was added and absorbance (630 nm)
assessed in an ELISA reader. Mutants were also characterized by Western
blotting utilizing rabbit anti-MCP polyclonal antibody (28).
Functional Assessment--
Ligand binding and cofactor assays
have been described (28). An ELISA format was employed for ligand
binding. Briefly, C3b or C4b (Advanced Research Technologies, San
Diego, CA) was coated on wells at 5 µg/ml in TBS overnight at 4 °C
and then blocked for 1 h at 37 °C (1% BSA and 0.1% Tween 20 in TBS). Dilutions of lysates were prepared in low salt ELISA buffer
(10 mM Tris, 25 mM sodium chloride, 0.05%
Tween 20, 4% BSA, and 0.25% Nonidet-P40) and incubated for 2 h
at 37 °C. A rabbit anti-MCP antiserum (1:2500) in low salt buffer
was then added for 1 h at 37 °C. Following washing, a
peroxidase-coupled donkey anti-rabbit IgG was added and optical density
of the TMB substrate determined. Binding assays were performed on
serially diluted samples (in the linear range of 1-10 × 109 MCP/ml) on three separate occasions. The upper value
was utilized to compare results and the standard error of the mean was
<7%.
For the cofactor assays, biotinylated ligands were employed (28) with a
low salt cofactor buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 25 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), factor I (100 ng), and cell lysates
(2.5 × 108 MCP for the C3b cofactor assay and 5 × 108 for the C4b cofactor assay). Cleavage fragments were
analyzed utilizing 10% reducing SDS-PAGE followed by transfer and
Western blotting. Detection was with ExtrAvidin®
peroxidase conjugate (Sigma). A laser densitometer and GELscan software
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were employed to monitor the generation of
the C4d fragment (adjusted relative to the input as measured by the
Peptide ELISA--
The overlapping MCP-derived peptides utilized
in this study have been described (24). For the ELISA, peptides were
coated on microtiter wells (Nunc MaxiSorp modules, Fisher Scientific, St. Louis, MO) at 10 µg/ml in TBS overnight at 4 °C and blocked with 1% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 in TBS. C4b (or buffer alone) was added at
a concentration of 30 ng/ml in low salt buffer (4% BSA, 0.25% Nonidet
P-40 in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.2, and 25 mM sodium
chloride) and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Wells were washed in
low salt buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.2, 25 mM
sodium chloride, 0.05% Tween 20), followed by incubation with 1:7000
dilution of goat anti-human C4b (Advanced Research Technologies) for
1 h at 37 °C. After washing in low salt ELISA buffer,
peroxidase conjugated anti-globulin reagent was added for 1 h at
37 °C, wells were washed and then the TMB substrate (see above) was
added. Absorbance was measured at 630 nm. The peptides were shown to be
coated on wells to a similar extent by incubating rabbit anti-MCP
antiserum (1:7000) on the peptide wells followed by detection with
anti-globulin and substrate as indicated above.
Epitope Mapping--
These experiments were conducted as
described above under "Quantification of MCP" except that TRA-2-10
(non-function blocking mAb that binds an epitope in CCP 1) (23, 30) or
GB24 (function-blocking mAb that binds to an epitope requiring CCPs 3 and 4) (21, 31) were coated on the microtiter wells.
Computer Modeling--
Three dimensional co-ordinates of the
crystal structure of the first two modules of MCP (CCP 1 and 2) were
obtained from the Brookhaven data base (27). Three-dimensional
molecular models of the two C-terminal modules were constructed within
the program MODELLER (32). Five models were generated per module, and
in each case the model with the smallest root mean square deviations from the average was used in the subsequent interpretation of mutagenesis data and modeling exercises.
The relative orientations of CCP 2 to CCP 3 and of CCP 3 to CCP 4 were
modeled using a hybrid Monte Carlo molecular dynamics algorithm
previously shown to predict the relative orientations for a number of
CCP module pairs.2 In brief,
each of the two pairs of modules of MCP were linked using the Builder
module of Insight II (MSI, San Diego, CA). Further manipulations of the
structures of module pairs were performed using XPLOR (33) with the
charmm22 forcefield (34). Only residues within 18 Å of the linker
between modules were used for the prediction algorithm. This involved
the random selection of one of the Table I presents the sequence of
mutants investigated for functional activity.
Carboxyl-terminal Segment of CCP 1 Is Important for C4b
Binding--
In prior studies, deletion of CCP 1 had no effect on C3b
binding or CA (21, 22) but reduced C4b binding (21). CCP 1 is also
required for MV binding (22-26) and, in particular, amino acids 47-61
were involved in recognition by MV hemagglutinin (24). Complement-related functional analysis of this same mutant (residues 47-61) revealed decreased C4b binding and CA (Table
II). C3b binding and CA were not altered.
Thus, these data map a region specific for a C4b interaction to the
carboxyl terminus of CCP 1, a site that overlaps with one required for
binding to MV hemagglutinin.
Overlapping Peptides Disclose Functional Sites--
To further
analyze the carboxyl terminus of CCP 1 as well as all of CCP 2, an
ELISA format was used to assess ligand binding of overlapping MCP
peptides (Fig. 1). In this screening
assay, C4b binding by peptides 14 and 15 in CCP 1 and peptides 23 and 29 in CCP 2 was reproducibly observed at 3-4-fold over background or
relative to peptides 16-21 (Fig. 2).
Peptide 22 and peptides between 23 and 29 demonstrated intermediate
levels of binding reflecting, in part, the overlap with peptides 23 and
29. Peptides 14 and 15 contain the same region of CCP 1 as noted in the
preceding analysis (i.e. mutant 47-61), providing further
evidence that this region is involved in C4b binding.
With these ELISA data as a starting point, mutants were next
constructed substituting alanines for residues within peptides 23 and
29 of CCP 2 (Table II) that possessed high homology to C4BP (residues
94-103) or to CR1 (residues 118-122) (Fig.
3). These two regions were identified by
a BLAST search of peptides 23 and 29 in the National Center for
Biotechnology data base (35). For the first set (94), single
mutants demonstrated variable decreases in C4b CA (Table II). For
several (Y97A, Y98A, L99A, and E103A), there were substantial decreases
in CA but minimal or no change in C4b binding. In contrast, C4b binding
and CA were diminished in mutants N94A, E95A, G96A, and E102A.
Interestingly, the peptide NEGYYLIGEE is contained within one that
almost completely inhibited MV binding and infection in CCP 2 (i.e. FGYQMHFICNEGYYLIGEEI (Ref. 24)). This same region has
been implicated in MV binding by multiple groups (24, 25, 27, 36, 37).
Thus, these results point to a second site in MCP, encompassing amino
acids 94-103, important for both C4b and MV interactions.
The next area explored was based on the increased binding of peptide 29 to C4b. Amino acids 118-122 were each substituted with an alanine.
These five mutants retained C3b and C4b binding similar to wild type,
although the 120-122 mutants were less efficient in C4b CA (Table II).
These data suggest that residues near the fourth Cys of CCP 2 are
involved in C4b CA and are consistent with prior findings in which MCP
with CCP 2 deleted bound C3b and C4b but lacked CA (21).
Indel in CCP 3 Is a Functional Site--
Indels (i.e.
amino acid insertions or deletions producing length polymorphisms among
members of a protein family) are good candidates for protein:protein
interactive sites (38). Following Cys-2 in CCP 3 is a peptide insertion
of eight amino acids (amino acids 158-165; sequence DPAPGPDP). Alanine
substitutions produced three mutants (P161A, G162A/P163A, and
D164A/P165A) with undetectable or diminished C3b and C4b CA but no or
more limited decreases in ligand binding (Table
III). Most striking was mutant P161A that lacked C3b CA and had minimal C4b CA but largely retained ligand binding capability.
Sequence and Functional Comparisons of Primate MCPs--
We next
compared ligand binding of human and nonhuman primate MCP (Fig.
4). Consistent with previous data, human
MCP (from a CHO transfectant) bound C4b more efficiently than C3b (39). Gorilla erythrocytes did not bind C3b or C4b because they do not express MCP on this cell type (29, 40). The orangutan binding pattern
was similar to humans. However, the six Old World monkeys bound C3b
more efficiently than C4b. Of these, the sequence of MCP is available
for baboon and rhesus (Fig. 5). We asked
if these sequence differences enhanced C3b binding and/or diminished
C4b binding to account for this pattern reversal. Constructs were prepared in which selected primate sequences were substituted in human
MCP (Fig. 5). Two of these mutants showed elevated binding selectively
to C3b (i.e. primate A and D) as well as enhanced C3b CA
(Table IV). These gain-of-function
mutants suggest that an increase in the affinity of MCP for C3b
accounted for the binding results presented in Fig. 3 and that these
two regions (A and D) are involved in C3b interactions.
Block Peptide and Individual Amino Acid Substitutions in CCP 3 and
4--
DAF is a closely related, structurally similar RCA protein that
possesses four CCPs as well as an STP region (reviewed in Ref. 41).
Because CCP 1 of DAF does not possess complement regulatory function
(42), segments of DAF CCP 1 were substituted in homologous regions of
MCP CCP 3 or 4. Of 16 such block substitutions, six were expressed
similar to wild type and functionally assessed (Table
V). Mutant 151-158 demonstrated no
alteration in function while two mutants, 183-190 and 243-250, lost
activity. Mutants 193-197 and 205-212 exhibited partial decreases in
ligand binding with corresponding decreases in CA. In contrast, mutant
127-134 demonstrated no change in ligand binding, yet C3b CA was
abrogated and C4b CA reduced by ~50%.
To identify the functionally important amino acids within these block
substitutions, individual residues were substituted with an alanine or
with the corresponding amino acids from DAF (Table V). Within the
series 127-134, T129A/P130A accounted for the decrease in C4b function
and partially for diminished C3b function. In the segment 183-191,
individual mutants S183T and R184K had no effect while mutants A185I,
E188F, and V191D demonstrated partial decreases in function, especially
CA. These results suggest that the region immediately surrounding the
fourth cysteine in CCP 3 is involved in both C3b and C4b binding.
In the case of individual mutations within 193-197 and 205-212, most
had functional alterations of nearly the same magnitude as those of the
parental protein. Additionally, while mutant 243-250 lacked activity,
none of the individual mutants in peptide 243-246 accounted for the
loss of activity, although several (P244A, P245A, and V246A) did show
diminished cofactor function.
Epitope Mapping of a Function Blocking mAb--
The mAb to MCP,
GB24, blocks C3b and C4b binding and interacts with an epitope that
requires the presence of CCP 3 and 4 (21). We compared the binding of
GB24 to selected mutants of CCP 3 and CCP 4 in parallel with a
non-function blocking antibody, TRA-2-10, that binds to CCP 1 (23).
All mutants bound similarly to TRA-2-10 (data not shown). In CCP 3, GB24 did not bind to the double mutant D164A/P165A (Table
VI). This same mutant had significantly
reduced functional activity (Table III) and is part of the indel in CCP 3. For CCP 4, three block substitution mutants also abrogated binding
by GB24. These same mutants were functionally deficient (see Table V).
Within these blocks, alanine substitutions indicated that amino acids
Phe196, Gly207, and Phe208 were
critical for GB24 binding. Although the block substitution mutant
(243) lost reactivity to GB24, individual mutants in peptide 243-246 did not show a loss of binding.
Structural Analysis of MCP--
Electrostatic depiction (Fig.
6) of the modeled structure reveals the
surface to be mainly negatively charged with a single large patch of
positive charges located over the "front" face that spans the
junction between modules 3 and 4. The latter is a site identified by
mutagenesis (Table V) as important for C3b binding. Decreasing the
positive charge in this region (K193A, R195A, K210A, K211A) inhibited
C3b binding. In contrast, substituting a similarly charged residue
(R184K) did not alter function. Additionally, two sites for C4b
interaction that overlap with MV binding regions in CCP 1 and 2 (shown
on Fig. 6) lie within primarily negatively charged areas. In this
region of CCP 2, a reduction in negative charge (E95A, E102A, and
E103A) decreased primarily C4b CA (Table II).
Finally, residues involved in binding of mAb GB24, which also were
important for both C3b and C4b function, map to two areas that lie
close to each other on the same face
(Asp164/Pro165,
Phe196, Gly206, and
Phe208).
Structural Interpretation of Mutational Analyses of MCP--
Fig.
7A reveals the same large
patch of positively charged residues implicated in C3b binding located
on or close to the "front" face of the 3/4 junction in Fig. 6.
Other residues implicated in C3b binding (Glu102,
Glu188, and Val191) are located on the opposite
face of the modeled structure. Of the primate-interchange CCP 4 mutation (T233K, D229N, and F226Y) that increased C3b binding activity,
Thr233 is in close proximity to the positively charged
surface patch.
Residues implicated in C4b binding are located in several regions of
the modeled structure. A patch of residues lies on the front face close
to the 2/3 interface. The positions of other residues appear to be
dispersed over the surface of the structure and are necessary for both
C4b and C3b binding.
Fig. 7B shows the positions of residues implicated in CA.
Multiple residues that affected mainly C4b CA are close to the putative C3b binding positively charged patch at the 3/4 junction. Another site
for C4b CA is located close to the putative C4b binding site at the 2/3
junction. The few amino acids exclusively influencing C3b CA were on
the back side of the C3b binding area in CCP 4.
The purpose of the present study was to delineate complement
regulatory sites within the four CCP modules of MCP. Earlier studies
demonstrated that CCPs 2, 3, and 4 were most important for ligand
binding and CA (21, 22). We have now obtained further data relative to
the structure and regulatory function of MCP. First, regions that
participate in complement inhibitory activity were identified in each
of the four CCPs. Second, although many mutations produced changes in
both C4b and C3b binding, others produced a selective alteration,
suggesting overlapping as well as distinct requirements for these two
ligands. Third, a reduction in ligand binding produced a proportional
decrease in CA; however, the reverse was not true as other mutants
possessed ligand binding activity similar to wild type, while CA was
reduced or abrogated. Fourth, CA for C3b and C4b also was separable as
indicated by mutants that lost CA for one or the other ligand. Fifth,
we have produced a model of four repeats of MCP and analyzed the
mutagenesis results in light of this proposed structure.
Nine regions likely to be involved in complement inhibition are
highlighted in Fig. 8. Eight of these
areas are adjacent to or incorporate a cysteine. Three regions, two in
CCP 3 and one in CCP 4, are proline-rich, each having at least three
prolines in a stretch of
Dissecting Sites Important for Complement Regulatory Activity in
Membrane Cofactor Protein (MCP; CD46)*
,
,
,
,
Division of Rheumatology, Department
of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis,
Missouri 63110, the ¶ Division of Virology, Department of
Neuropharmacology, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California
92037, and the § Edinburgh Centre for Protein Technology,
Joseph Black Chemistry Building, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9
3JJ, Scotland
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-sheet-rich secondary structures and interact with C3b and C4b.
1 integrins and tetraspans (9), putative involvement in
reproduction (10-15), and use as a therapeutic agent both as a
recombinant soluble form (16) and if expressed in transgenic animals
for organ xenotransplantation (reviewed in Refs. 17 and 18).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-chain fragment of C4b). For the C3b cofactor assay, the
1
fragment was evaluated relative to the
-chain. Activity was
designated as follows: ++++, 90-120% of wild type; +++, 70-89%; ++,
40-69%; +, 10-39%;
, <10%. Assays were performed in duplicate
on two to four separate occasions and the means obtained. The standard
error of the mean was <10%.
/
angles of the two amino
acids linking the module pair, and rotating it by a random amount. This
was followed by a brief period of energy minimization (to allow the
structure to resolve any bad contacts that may have arisen during the
previous step). The resulting conformation of the two modules was then
accepted with a probability (P) based on the relative change
in energy with respect to the previously accepted conformation using
the standard Metropolis Monte Carlo equation: P = min
(1, e
E/kT),
where
E = difference in energy between the old and
the new conformation, k = the Boltzman constant, and
T = temperature. The process was repeated for 5000 cycles. In addition to the cycles of attempted torsional rotations and
energy minimizations, the system was periodically subjected to a
simulated annealing protocol in an attempt to avoid the conformation
getting stuck in a local minimum. To simulate the effects of solvation
and to reduce computational overheads, a distance-dependent
dielectric term was used to simulate the electrostatic energy
component. Each pair of modules was found to rapidly converge to a
single energy minimum, representing a stable conformation. These were
then used, in conjunction with the crystal structure of CCP 1 and 2, to
create a model for the structure of the four CCPs of MCP.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Summary of mutants
Functional effects of amino acid substitutions in CCP 1 and 2

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Overlapping peptides from the carboxyl
terminus of CCP 1 to the end of CCP 2 used to assess ligand
binding. Residues are numbered according to Ref. 24.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Binding of MCP peptides to C4b.
Overlapping peptides in CCP 1 and 2 (see Fig. 1) were coated on
microtiter plates and C4b binding monitored in an ELISA in three
separate experiments.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Ligand-interacting peptides of human MCP show
homologies to C4BP (A) and CR1 (B) of
several species. These two peptide homologies were identified by a
BLAST search of the National Center for Biotechnology data base
(35).
Functional consequences of alanine mutations in the indel of CCP 3

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Comparison of human and primate MCP binding
of human C3b and C4b. Solubilized primate erythrocytes and CHO
human MCP transfectant lysate (1 × 109 MCP molecules)
were compared in an ELISA format in which C3b or C4b was coated on
wells. A representative experiment of three is shown. Gorilla
erythrocytes do not express MCP (29, 40) and, therefore, serve as a
negative control for these experiments (using the highest number of
erythrocyte cell equivalents). Gibbons express MCP on erythrocytes in
similar quantities to orangutan, but bind human C3b and C4b
poorly.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Comparison of amino acid sequences of human,
baboon, and rhesus MCP. Identical amino acids are indicated by a
dash. Those that differ from the human sequence are
indicated. Primate residues substituted into the human sequence are
noted as "Primate" mutants A-D (see Table I).
Functional analysis of mutants with primate to human amino acid
interchanges
Functional effects of amino acid substitutions in CCP 3 and 4
Binding of a function-blocking mAb to selected mutants

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Electrostatic model of MCP showing front
(left) and back (right) views.
Yellow (GB24 binding), green (measles virus
binding), and light blue (C4b binding) indicate
putative interactive sites.

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Model of MCP functional sites.
A, front (left) and back (right) views
of CCPs 1-4 indicating binding sites for C3b and C4b. B,
front and back views of CCPs 1-4 indicating CA sites for C3b and C4b.
Colors for ligands: blue, C3b; red, C4b;
green, both C3b and C4b; black, increased C3b
binding and CA.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
5 amino acids. No other such proline-rich
sequences are found in the CCPs of MCP. A comparison of Fig.
8A with Fig. 8B suggests that these prolines are
part of protruding loops and strands. A site at the carboxyl terminus
of each module, encompassing the fourth cysteine, was involved in
functional activity. Substitutions in this region in CCPs 1 and 2 influenced only C4b CA while in CCPs 3 and 4 altered both C4b and C3b
interactions. A mutated site near the first Cys of CCP 3 and 4 reduced
both C3b and C4b interactions. These observations are consistent with
ligand contact points occurring at the junction between modules or with
amino acid changes at this site influencing the spatial relationships between modules. Additionally, residues likely to be important for C4b
and C3b interactions are located after the second Cys in CCPs 2 and 3. The region in CCP 3 possesses four prolines and overlaps with the
indel. Of interest, a similar indel is present in three highly
homologous and functionally important CCPs (3, 10, and 17) of CR1
(43).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
A, proposed complement regulatory sites
of MCP. The sequence of the four CCPs is shown. Areas of
-sheets are presented as arrows above CCP-1.
Dashed lines between 2 and 3 as well as 4 and 5 indicate plasticity in length of these loops. Putative regulatory
regions are noted in brackets above the sequence.
Boxed residues are those, if mutated, led to a loss of
binding by function-blocking mAb, GB24. Proline-rich areas are
double-underlined. CA, cofactor activity;
#, these sites show mixed functions (i.e. binding
and/or CA);
, Leu99, also important for C3b CA;
*glu102, also important for C3b
binding. B, model of CCP 1 of MCP generated by Molscript
(67).
-Sheets are numbered, disulfide bonds at each
terminus (between
-sheets 4 and 8; and 1 and 6) are depicted. The
highly conserved tryptophan (green ring) is shown with its
blue nitrogen group.
We identified two C4b-regulatory sites that had been previously characterized as MV interactive regions (Figs. 6 and 8). CCPs 1 and 2 (including the N-glycosylation site of CCP 2 (see Refs. 24 and 44-46)) are involved in MV binding and infection, especially between residues 37-56 in CCP 1 and 85-106 in CCP 2 (22-26, 36, 37). Recently, Casasnovas et al. (27) ascertained the crystal structure at 3.1-Å resolution of CCPs 1 and 2. They proposed that MCP residues 94-97 in CCP 2 make direct contact with the virus. Thus, MV hemagglutinin appears to dock to a functionally important site for C4b complement regulation in both CCP 1 and CCP 2. A structural relationship between C4b and hemagglutinin is suggested by these results. Interestingly, new world primates delete CCP 1 by alternative splicing, a change preventing MV binding (26). The functional consequence of this charge may be tolerated because C3b regulatory activity is minimally altered and there is retention, albeit less efficient, of C4b regulatory activity.
Since CCPs share a similar overall structure, it is reasonable to
propose common functional sites in such proteins (47, 48). For example,
each CCP has a hydrophobic core interlaced with
-strands accompanied
by protruding loops. The latter, as already pointed out, are strong
candidates for functional sites (49). One such area with a variable
length and sequence has been termed the "hypervariable loop"
(47-50). Block and individual substitutions within this loop
influenced both C3b and C4b interactions. This region also is part of
the epitope for the function-blocking MCP mAb, GB24, and is important
for C3b/C4b interactions in CCPs 8 and 10 of CR1 (43). Another such
comparison among MCP, C4BP, and CR1 centers on the first Cys of a CCP.
In the case of MCP, functional sites were suggested in CCP 3 and 4 near
Cys 1 (i.e. amino acid series 127-134 and 193-197; and
Phe196 for GB24 binding). Likewise, residues near Cys 1 in
CCP 2 of C4BP are critical for C4b binding (51) and in CCP 2 of CR1 for C3b and C4b interactions (43). MCP residues surrounding the fourth Cys
of CCPs 1-4 were found to be important for C4b regulatory activity and
in CCP 3 and 4 for C3b. This area corresponds in CR1 (CCPs 9 and 16) to
a site important for C3b binding and CA (43). Finally, as shown in Fig.
3, there are two highly homologous regions to MCP in C4BP and CR1.
These regions are ones likely to be involved in C4b regulation as they
are in MCP (52).
The structures of four CCP-containing proteins have been determined
(factor H, 15-16 (Ref. 48)); vaccinia virus complement control
protein, 2-4 (Refs. 53 and 54);
-glycoprotein, 1-5 (Refs. 55 and
56); and MCP, 1-2 (Ref. 27)). For each, the modules aligned in an
end-to-end fashion, sharing a relatively small interface. Results from
the simulations performed here suggest that MCP modules are also joined
end-to-end leading to the formation of an extended structure (Figs. 6
and 7). As with the known structures, the intermodular junctions
between MCP 2/3 and MCP 3/4 appear to be limited and dominated by
hydrophobic
interactions.3
RCA proteins interact with components of complement in an ionic
strength dependent manner (57, 58) and the charge characteristics of
the amino terminus of the
-chains of C3b and C4b are predicted to be
conserved (59-63). The functional role of the positively charged
surface patch of residues in modules 3 and 4 (Fig. 6) supports this
hypothesis. Mutations decreasing the magnitude of this charge produced
a decrease in C3b binding. The mutation T233K (located close to this
patch) would increase the magnitude of positive charge and may be in
part responsible for the increase in C3b binding activity associated
with the triple primate mutant F226Y/D229N/T233K. In contrast, the data
suggest a more critical role for negatively charged residues in C4b interactions.
Regarding C4b interactions (Table II and Fig. 7), Gly96 specifically affects C4b binding and is located close to residues thought to be important in forming direct interactions with ligand (i.e. loop with Asn94/Glu95). Substitution of several residues close to the junction of CCP 2/3 (Tyr97, Tyr98, Leu99, Glu103, Ile122) altered C4b CA. The lack of effect of the mutations Y97A and Y98A on other functionalities suggests that they do not lead to a change in junctional contacts. Given that neither of these residues is surface exposed, we postulate that, after binding C4b, the 2/3 junction alters in such a way so as to expose these two residues for interaction with the C4b/factor I complex. The surface exposed residues, Leu99, Glu103, and Ile122, may also be involved in forming direct interactions with the cofactor complex.
In summary, these mutagenesis and modeling data represent the initial
analysis of ligand binding and cofactor sites within the CCPs of MCP.
An issue common to structure-function analyses by mutagenesis is
whether a conformational change is responsible for the altered
activity. Resolving this issue requires a three dimensional structure
of the binding site with its attached ligand. Thus, our future plans
include elucidating intermolecular junctions and determination of the
three-dimensional structure of CCPs 3 and 4 by physicochemical studies
and NMR spectroscopy as we have begun to do for the active sites of CR1
(64-66). Informative comparisons to other C3b/C4b binding proteins
will be possible as will further interpretations of the mutagenesis
results. A structural analysis of the interactions of MCP with its
natural versus pathogenic ligands should have important
implications for understanding complement inhibition and microbial pathogenesis.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dennis Hourcade, Richard Hauhart and Malgorzata Krych-Goldberg for their review of the manuscript, and Madonna Bogacki and Lorraine Whiteley for editorial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 AI37618.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Div. of
Rheumatology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave., Box 8045, St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-8391; Fax: 314-362-1366; E-mail: jatkinso@im.wustl.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 25, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M004650200
2 J. Parkinson, P. N. Barlow, and J. P. Atkinson, unpublished observation.
3 J. Parkinson, M. K. Liszewski, P. N. Barlow, and J. P. Atkinson, unpublished observation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: MCP, membrane cofactor protein; CCP, complement control protein; RCA, regulators of complement activation; CR, complement receptor; C4BP, C4b-binding protein; DAF, decay accelerating factor; MV, measles virus; CA, cofactor activity; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; GB24 and TRA-2-10, anti-MCP monoclonal antibodies; TMB, 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; BSA, bovine serum albumin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Liszewski, M. K., Farries, T. C., Lublin, D. M., Rooney, I. A., and Atkinson, J. P. (1996) Adv. Immunol. 61, 201-283 |
| 2. | Naniche, D., Varior-Krishnan, G., Cervoni, F., Wild, T. F., Rossi, B., Rabourdin-Combe, C., and Gerlier, D. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 6025-6032 |
| 3. | Dorig, R. E., Marcil, A., Chopra, A., and Richardson, C. D. (1993) Cell 75, 295-305 |
| 4. | Manchester, M., Liszewski, M. K., Atkinson, J. P., and Oldstone, M. B. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2161-2165 |
| 5. | Okada, N., Liszewski, M. K., Atkinson, J. P., and Caparon, M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2489-2493 |
| 6. | Kallstrom, H., Liszewski, M. K., Atkinson, J. P., and Jonsson, A.-B. (1997) Mol. Microbiol. 25, 639-647 |
| 7. | Santoro, F., Kennedy, P. E., Locatelli, G., Malnati, M. S., and Berger, E. A. (1999) Cell 99, 817-827 |
| 8. | Howard, J., Justus, D. E., Totmenin, A. V., Shchelkunov, S., and Kotwal, G. J. (1998) J. Leukocyte Biol. 64, 68-71 |
| 9. | Lozahic, S., Christiansen, D., Manie, S., Gerlier, D., Billard, M., Boucheix, C., and Rubinstein, E. (2000) Eur. J. Immunol. 30, 900-907 |
| 10. | Cervoni, F., Oglesby, T. J., Adams, E. M., Milesi-Fluet, C., Nickells, M. W., Fenichel, P., Atkinson, J. P., and Hsi, B. L. (1992) J. Immunol. 148, 1431-1437 |
| 11. | Xu, C., Mao, D., Holers, V. M., Palanca, B., Cheng, A. M., and Molina, H. (2000) Science 287, 498-501 |
| 12. | Seya, T., Hara, T., and Matsumoto, M. (1993) Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 1322-1327 |
| 13. | Anderson, D. J., Michaelson, J. S., and Johnson, P. M. (1989) Biol. Reprod. 41, 285-293 |
| 14. | Anderson, D. J., Abbott, A. F., and Jack, R. M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10051-10055 |
| 15. | Kitamura, M., Matsumiya, K., Yamanaka, M., Takahara, S., Hara, T., Matsumoto, M., Namiki, M., Okuyama, A., and Seya, T. (1997) J. Reprod. Immunol. 33, 83-88 |
| 16. | Higgins, P. J., Ko, J.-L., Lobell, R., Sardonini, C., Alexxi, M. K., and Yeh, C. G. (1997) J. Immunol. 158, 2872-2881 |
| 17. | Rooney, I. A., Liszewski, M. K., and Atkinson, J. P. (1993) Xeno 1, 29-35 |
| 18. | Cozzi, E., and White, D. J. G. (1995) Nat. Med. 1, 964-966 |
| 19. | Post, T. W., Liszewski, M. K., Adams, E. M., Tedja, I., Miller, E. A., and Atkinson, J. P. (1991) J. Exp. Med. 174, 93-102 |
| 20. | Russell, S. M., Sparrow, R. L., McKenzie, I. F. C., and Purcell, D. F. J. (1992) Eur. J. Immunol. 22, 1513-1518 |
| 21. | Adams, E. M., Brown, M. C., Nunge, M., Krych, M., and Atkinson, J. P. (1991) J. Immunol. 147, 3005-3011 |
| 22. | Iwata, K., Seya, T., Yanagi, Y., Pesando, J. M., Johnson, P. M., Okabe, M., Ueda, S., Ariga, H., and Nagasawa, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15148-15152 |
| 23. | Manchester, M., Valsamakis, A., Kaufman, R., Liszewski, M. K., Alvarez, J., Atkinson, J. P., Lublin, D. M., and Oldstone, M. B. A. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2303-2307 |
| 24. | Manchester, M., Gairin, J. E., Alvarez, J., Liszewski, M. K., Atkinson, J. P., and Oldstone, M. B. A. (1997) Virology 233, 174-187 |
| 25. | Buchholz, C. J., Koller, D., Devaux, P., Mumenthaler, C., Schneider-Schaulies, J., Braun, W., Gerlier, D., and Cattaneo, R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 22072-22079 |
| 26. | Hsu, E. C., Dorig, R. E., Sarangi, F., Marcil, A., Iorio, C., and Richardson, C. D. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 6144-6154 |
| 27. | Casasnovas, J. M., Larvie, M., and Stehle, T. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 2911-2922 |
| 28. | Liszewski, M. K., Leung, M. K., and Atkinson, J. P. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 3711-3718 |
| 29. | Nickells, M. W., Subramanian, V. B., Clemenza, L., and Atkinson, J. P. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 2829-2837 |
| 30. | Andrews, P. W., Knowles, B. B., Parkar, M., Pym, B., Stanley, K., and Goodfellow, P. N. (1985) Ann. Hum. Genet. 49, 31-39 |
| 31. | Hsi, B. L., Yeh, C.-J. G., Fenichel, P., Samson, M., and Grivaux, C. (1988) Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. Microbiol. 18, 21-27 |
| 32. | Sali, A., and Blundell, T. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815 |
| 33. | Brunger, A. (1992) X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR , Yale University Press, New Haven |
| 34. | MacKerell, A. D., Bashford, D., Bellott, M., Dunbrack, R. L., Evanseck, J. D., Field, M. J., Fischer, S., Gao, J., Guo, H., Ha, S., McCarthy, D., Kuchnir, L., Kuczera, K., Lau, F. T. K., Mattos, C., Michnick, S., Ngo, T., Nguyen, D. T., Prodhom, B., Reiher, W. E., Roux, B., Schlenkrich, M., Smith, J. C., Stote, R., Straub, J., Watanabe, M., Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J., Yin, D., and Karplus, M. (1998) J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586-3616 |
| 35. | Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 |
| 36. | Mumenthaler, C., Schneider, U., Buchholz, C. J., Koller, D., Braun, W., and Cattaneo, R. (1997) Protein Sci. 6, 588-597 |
| 37. | Hsu, E. C., Sabatinos, S., Hoedemaeker, F. J., Rose, D. R., and Richardson, C. D. (1999) Virology 258, 314-326 |
| 38. | Ogata, R. T., Ai, R., and Low, P. J. (1998) J. Immunol. 161, 4785-4794 |
| 39. | Liszewski, M. K., and Atkinson, J. P. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 4415-4421 |
| 40. | Nickells, M. W., and Atkinson, J. P. (1990) J. Immunol. 144, 4262-4268 |
| 41. | Liszewski, M. K., and Atkinson, J. P. (1998) in The Complement System (Rother, K. , Till, G. O. , and Hansch, G. M., eds) , pp. 146-162, Springer-Verlag, Berlin |
| 42. | Coyne, K. E., Hall, S. E., Thompson, E. S., Arce, M. A., Kinoshita, T., Fujita, T., Anstee, D. J., Rosse, W., and Lublin, D. M. (1992) J. Immunol. 149, 2906-2913 |
| 43. | Krych, M., Hauhart, R., and Atkinson, J. P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8623-8629 |
| 44. | Maisner, A., Schneider-Schaulies, J., Liszewski, M. K., Atkinson, J. P., and Herrler, G. (1994) J. Virol. 68, 6299-6304 |
| 45. | Maisner, A., and Herrler, G. (1995) Virology 210, 479-481 |
| 46. | Maisner, A., Alvarez, J., Liszewski, M. K., Atkinson, J. P., Atkinson, D., and Herrler, G. (1996) J. Virol. 70, 4973-4977 |
| 47. | Barlow, P. N., Norman, D. G., Steinkasserer, A., Horne, T. J., Pearce, J., Driscoll, P., Sim, R. B., and Campbell, I. D. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 3626-3634 |
| 48. | Barlow, P. N., Steinkasserer, A., Norman, D. G., Kieffer, B., Wiles, A. P., Sim, R. B., and Campbell, I. D. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 232, 268-284 |
| 49. | Perkins, S. J., Haris, P. I., Sim, R. B., and Chapman, D. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 4004-4012 |
| 50. | Baron, M., Norman, D. G., and Campbell, I. D. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 13-17 |
| 51. | Accardo, P., Sanchez-Corral, P., Criado, O., Garcia, E., and Rodriguez de Cordoba, S. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 4935-4939 |
| 52. | Krych-Goldberg, M., Hauhart, R. E., Bala Subramanian, V., Yurcisin, B. M., II, Crimmins, D. L., Hourcade, D. E., and Atkinson, J. P. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 31160-31168 |
| 53. | Kirkitadze, M. D., Henderson, C., Price, N. C., Kelly, S. M., Mullin, N. P., Parkinson, J., Dryden, D. T. F., and Barlow, P. N. (1999) Biochem. J. 344, 167-175 |
| 54. | Wiles, A. P., Shaw, G., Bright, J., Perczel, A., Campbell, I. D., and Barlow, P. N. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 272, 253-265 |
| 55. | Schwarzenbacher, R., Zeth, K., Diederichs, K., Gries, A., Kostner, G. M., Laggner, P., and Prassl, R. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 6228-6239 |
| 56. | Bouma, B., de Groot, P. G., van den Elsen, J. M. H., Ravelli, R. B. G., Schouten, A., Simmelink, M. J. A., Derksen, R. H. W. M., Kroon, J., and Gros, P. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 5166-5174 |
| 57. | Cole, J. L., Housley, G. A., Jr., Dykman, T. R., MacDermott, R. P., and Atkinson, J. P. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 859-863 |
| 58. | Dykman, T. R., Cole, J. L., Iida, K., and Atkinson, J. P. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 1698-1702 |
| 59. | Taniguchi-Sidle, A., and Isenman, D. E. (1994) J. Immunol. 153, 5285-5302 |
| 60. | Oran, A. E., and Isenman, D. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 5120-5130 |
| 61. | Lambris, J. D., Loa, Z., Oglesby, T. J., Atkinson, J. P., Hack, C. E., and Becherer, J. D. (1996) J. Immunol. 156, 4821-4832 |
| 62. | Barlow, P. N., Baron, M., Norman, D. G., Day, A. J., Willis, A. C., Sim, R. B., and Campbell, I. D. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 997-1004 |
| 63. | Nagar, B., Jones, R. G., Diefenbach, R. J., Isenman, D. E., and Rini, J. M. (1998) Science 280, 1277-1281 |
| 64. | Kirkitadze, M. D., Jumel, K., Harding, S. E., Dryden, D. T. F., Krych, M., Atkinson, J. P., and Barlow, P. N. (1999) Prog. Colloid Polymer Sci. 113, 164-167 |
| 65. | Kirkitadze, M. D., Krych, M., Uhrin, D., Dryden, D. T. F., Smith, B. O., Cooper, A., Wang, X., Hauhart, R., Atkinson, J. P., and Barlow, P. N. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 7019-7031 |
| 66. | Kirkitadze, M. D., Dryden, D. T. F., Kelly, S. M., Price, N. C., Wang, X., Krych, M., Atkinson, J. P., and Barlow, P. N. (1999) FEBS Lett. 459, 133-138 |
| 67. | Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. G. Hocking, A. P. Herbert, D. Kavanagh, D. C. Soares, V. P. Ferreira, M. K. Pangburn, D. Uhrin, and P. N. Barlow Structure of the N-terminal Region of Complement Factor H and Conformational Implications of Disease-linked Sequence Variations J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2008; 283(14): 9475 - 9487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. N. Yadav, K. Pyaram, J. Mullick, and A. Sahu Identification of Hot Spots in the Variola Virus Complement Inhibitor (SPICE) for Human Complement Regulation J. Virol., April 1, 2008; 82(7): 3283 - 3294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Fang, V. Fremeaux-Bacchi, M. K. Liszewski, G. Pianetti, M. Noris, T. H. J. Goodship, and J. P. Atkinson Membrane cofactor protein mutations in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS), fatal Stx-HUS, C3 glomerulonephritis, and the HELLP syndrome Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 624 - 632. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Fleischli, D. Sirena, G. Lesage, M. J. E. Havenga, R. Cattaneo, U. F. Greber, and S. Hemmi Species B adenovirus serotypes 3, 7, 11 and 35 share similar binding sites on the membrane cofactor protein CD46 receptor J. Gen. Virol., November 1, 2007; 88(11): 2925 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kuttner-Kondo, D. E. Hourcade, V. E. Anderson, N. Muqim, L. Mitchell, D. C. Soares, P. N. Barlow, and M. E. Medof Structure-based Mapping of DAF Active Site Residues That Accelerate the Decay of C3 Convertases J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2007; 282(25): 18552 - 18562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Chung, M. K. Liszewski, G. Nybakken, A. E. Davis, R. R. Townsend, D. H. Fremont, J. P. Atkinson, and M. S. Diamond From the Cover: West N |