![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 48, 37915-37921, December 1, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,From the Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne, Weyertal 121, D-50931 Koeln, Germany
Received for publication, June 5, 2000, and in revised form, August 17, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene under
the control of the late E2A promoter of adenovirus type 2 (Ad2) was
introduced as transgene into the B6D2F1 mouse strain with mixed genetic
background and became extensively de novo methylated. The
methylation of this pAd2E2AL-CAT (7-1A) transgene
was regulated in a strain-specific manner apparently depending on the
site of integration. Transmission of the 7-1A transgene
into an inbred DBA/2, 129/sv, or FVB/N genetic background led to a
significant loss of methylation in the transgene, whereas C57BL/6,
CB20, and Balb/c backgrounds favored the de novo methylation in very specific patterns. The newly established patterns of de novo methylation were transmitted to the offspring
and remained stable for many generations, regardless of the
heterozygosity of strain-specific DNA sequences present in these mouse
strains. Segregation analyses showed a non-mendelian transmission of
methylation phenotypes and suggested the involvement of dominant
modifiers of methylation. The genotype-specific modifications of the
transgene were followed for 11 backcross generations. These
observations reflect an evolutionarily conserved mechanism directed
against foreign, e.g. viral or bacterial, DNA at least in
the chromosomal location of the 7-1A transgene. In seven
additional mouse lines carrying the same transgene in different
chromosomal locations, strain-specific alterations of methylation
patterns were not observed.
Studies on the fate of foreign DNA introduced into an established
mammalian genome are of considerable general interest. Upon integration, foreign (viral) DNA becomes frequently de novo
methylated in very specific patterns (1-3) that are characterized by
the gradual spreading of DNA methylation (4, 5). Following
fertilization, similar epigenetic changes are known to affect a number
of transgenes in mice as well as in transgenic fish and plants (6-12).
The changes take place postzygotically in the early mouse embryo even
before a stable somatic pattern is established (13). Already during early gastrulation, shortly after the genome-wide loss of methylation before the blastocyst stage, many DNA sequences become heavily remethylated (14-17).
In our laboratory, the adenovirus system has been used as a model to
gain insight into consequences of foreign DNA integration. We have
shown that the insertion of foreign DNA can lead to changes in cellular
DNA methylation patterns even remote from the site of transgene
integration (18, 19).
The regulation of de novo methylation of foreign DNA
presumably involves a series of genes, sometimes referred to as
modifier genes. Their putative function has frequently been ascribed to the demethylation of transgenes in DBA/2, FVB/N, and 129/sv
backgrounds, whereas the Balb/c and C57BL/6 genotypes are often
associated with extensive de novo methylation (20-25). Some
transgenes show parent-of-origin effects that affect the genomic
imprint at individual loci (for reviews see Refs. 26-28). The
phenomenon of genomic imprinting at specific loci has first been
demonstrated at randomly integrated transgene loci (8, 9, 29-32).
In this study, changes in the methylation of the transgene
7-1A (pAd2E2AL-CAT) have been investigated. This
transgene has become methylated in a strain-specific manner in mice
(12). We have studied the dynamics of 7-1A methylation for
up to 12 generations in different mouse strains. We have also asked
additional questions. Are the observed changes in transgene methylation
restricted to specific 5'-CG-3' sites? How many factors influence the
observed alterations in methylation? Is there a correlation between
transgene methylation and the copy number of heterologous genome
segments present?
Mouse Strains--
The origins and relationships of the inbred
mouse strains DBA/2, 129, FVB/N, C57BL/6, Balb/c, and CBA are reviewed
in Beck et al. (33). A chart of inbred strain genealogies is
available at the Mouse Genome Database.
Transgenic Mice--
The plasmid pAd2E2AL-CAT, which
was used to generate the transgenic animals, was described previously
(34). A complete map of the construct is shown in Fig. 2b.
The male founder animal 7-1 was obtained after microinjection of
unmethylated DNA. The 7-1 mouse line bearing two transgene arrays was
subsequently separated into two substrains, 7-1A and 7-1B. Embryos used
for microinjection resulted from matings between B6D2F1
mice. 129/sv and CB20 mice were obtained from the mouse facility of the
Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne, and all other strains
(DBA/2, C57BL/6, Balb/c, FVB/N, and B6D2F1) were received
from Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany.
DNA Extraction and Southern Blotting--
Animals were screened
for the presence of the transgene by cutting tail tips of 3-4-week-old
mice. Tail and organ tissues were frozen in liquid N2,
mortar-pulverized, and then incubated at 55 °C for a minimum of
12 h in lysis buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 5 mM EDTA, 200 mM NaCl, 0.2% SDS, and 500 µg
of proteinase K per ml). Proteinase K was then inactivated for 30 min
at 65 °C. Subsequently, RNase A (20 µg/ml) was added, and
incubation was continued for 1 h at 37 °C. The DNA was then
purified by one phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) extraction
followed by one phenol:chloroform (1:1) treatment. The DNA samples were ethanol-precipitated and resuspended in TE (10 mM Tris, pH
7.5, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), and 20 µg of each sample was
used to identify transgenic animals. The methylation levels were
determined by cleaving the DNA with BamHI (10 units/µg
DNA) for 5 h followed by either HpaII or
MspI (10 units/µg DNA) incubation overnight. The fragments
were separated by electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gels in 1× TAE (40 mM Tris acetate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) for about 14 h at 30-40 V. Gels were stained with ethidium bromide (1 µg/ml) for 5-10 min, destained in water, and then prepared for
downward Southern transfer (35) to Nylon plus membranes (Qiagen). The pAd2E2AL-CAT construct with flanking pBR322 vector sequences
was used as 32P-labeled hybridization probe in all
hybridization experiments. The membranes were then exposed to x-ray
films for 1-3 days. Methylation indices were determined by comparing
the intensities of the HpaII (methylated) with the
MspI (unmethylated) bands on the autoradiogram. The
autoradiograms were scanned and analyzed by two different computer
programs, Cybertech CS-1 Image Processing Software and TINA version
2.08. Some of the blots were also evaluated with the help of a
PhosphorImager (Bio-Imaging Analyzer BAS 1000).
Establishing the 7-1A Mouse Line--
In earlier work in our
laboratory, six mouse lines transgenic for the pAd2E2AL-CAT
were established (34). The founder animal of line 7-1 originated from a
microinjection experiment with an unmethylated transgene and had a
mixed C57BL/6 × DBA/2 genetic background. Mouse line 7-1 was
characterized by the stable integration of an estimated number of 10 transgene copies in a de novo methylated state. These
animals had initially been mated to C57BL/6 animals for one generation.
Out of this offspring, a transgenic male was selected to initiate
systematic crossing experiments (Fig. 1, animal F1, number 8).
The methylation patterns of all animals from the ensuing crosses were
routinely screened by BamHI/HpaII restriction and
subsequent Southern blot hybridization. Transgenic male animals were
crossed further with non-transgenic hybrid strain B6D2F1
females (C57BL/6 × DBA/2) for at least 4 generations. Although
these transgenic animals were heterozygous for the
pAd2E2AL-CAT transgene, they transmitted transgenes usually
to about 70% of the offspring. Thus, the transgenes were located on
separate chromosomes. As previously shown, the 7-1 mouse line carried
two short arrays of four (A) and six (B) transgenes, respectively, in
two different chromosomal locations (12). Starting from the
F4 cross, the separate transgene arrays were isolated on
individual loci, resulting in the mouse lines 7-1A and 7-1B. Most of
the six transgenes in the 7-1B animals were completely methylated at
the 5'-CCGG-3' (HpaII) sites, whereas transmission of the
7-1A transgenes in a mixed B6D2F1 background
sometimes led to a significant decrease in transgene methylation. Males
from both 7-1 mouse lines were subsequently mated to non-transgenic
C57BL76, DBA/2, or Balb/c females. These crosses revealed that the
methylation status of the 7-1A locus was influenced by the
genetic background of the mouse strain. The DBA/2 background favored
the loss of methylation from the 7-1A transgenes, whereas
the C57BL/6 and Balb/c backgrounds not only maintained the methylation
pattern but led to an increase in transgene methylation.
Strain-specific effects were, however, not found for the 7-1B line.
This finding indicated position effects on the methylation of the
pAd2E2AL-CAT transgene. Starting with animals F5
number 18 and F5 number 24 (Fig. 1), consecutive
matings with animals from different mouse strains (C57BL/6, Balb/c,
DBA/2, CB20, FVB/N, or 129/sv) were performed to assess the effect of the inbred genetic background on the methylation patterns of the transgene in the 7-1A progeny.
DNA Methylation of the 7-1A Transgenes--
The breeding
experiments generated four main 7-1A lines that were screened for over
11 generations as follows: two C57BL/6 lines with moderate to high
de novo methylation of the transgene, very high methylation
levels in the Balb/c line, and the decrease of methylation in the DBA/2
line. Typical transgene methylation profiles of the 7-1A transgene
in animals from different strains are presented in Fig. 2a.
Among different animals, there is some variability in the extent of
transgene methylation. In the experiment shown here, densitometric
evaluation of transgene methylation revealed 22% for the DBA/2
animals, 55% for C57BL/6, and 62% for Balb/c mice.
The HpaII-MspI cleavage patterns were evaluated
by densitometry. The ratio of HpaII bands representing
methylated transgene segments, most of which were larger than 2.0 kbp,1 to MspI
fragments reflecting unmethylated transgene segments facilitated an
assessment of the levels of 5'-CCGG-3' methylation in the transgenes of
these mice. The cleavage patterns of the seven HpaII sites
(Fig. 2b) revealed that the transgene in the DBA/2 line lost
methylation, as evidenced by the almost complete absence of the 4.8- and 5.3-kbp off-size bands (Fig. 2a). These bands carried
the junctions that linked the transgene to genomic DNA. Cleavage at the
unique BamHI restriction site in the transgene produced a
strong signal for the 3.3-kbp transgene repeat band, which exhibited
about twice the intensity in the DNA from the highly methylating mouse
strains C57BL/6 and Balb/c (Fig. 2a). The transgene copies
with low levels of methylation were approximately 20% methylated,
whereas the hypermethylated copies in the C57BL/6 strain reached levels
of methylation between 40 and 60%. In the Balb/c genetic background,
the methylation of the pAd2E2AL-CAT transgene was in excess
of 80%. The high degree of 5'-CCGG-3' methylation correlated with the
loss of CAT activity in the transgene. These methylation and expression
patterns were identical in all organs, except when the transgenic
construct had become demethylated and regained CAT activity (34). The
increasing loss of methylation from the transgene in the germ line
might signal an epigenetic reprogramming event at early stages of gametogenesis.
Maintenance and Variability of the Strain-specific Methylation in
7-1A Transgenes--
Obviously, in the chromosomal location of the
7-1A transgene, the genetic background of the animals played
a major role in determining the maintenance or alterations of the
methylation status in a foreign DNA transgene that had been introduced
into the founder generation of hybrid C57BL/6-DBA/2 mice. The kind and
number of genetic strain-specific factors affecting de novo methylation and its alterations in transgenes were unknown. Therefore, we performed a large number of crosses to transfer the transgene from
the hybrid strain into a more homogeneous background and to keep it
there for several generations. For example, starting with the
F7 animal 10 (Fig. 1) nine generations of backcrosses to
DBA/2 mice resulted in a 99.8% DBA/2 genetic background. Since a DBA/2
background favored the loss of methylation of the 7-1A transgenes, matings were set up to investigate to what extent, after
the prolonged crossing to DBA/2 animals, methylation in the transgene
was decreased and whether the expression of the CAT gene could be
reactivated. With successive backcrossings in a genetic DBA/2
background, methylation of the 7-1A transgene was reduced to
and maintained at the 10-30% level (Fig.
3a). In these breedings, the
transgene was always transmitted by the males to rule out a putative
cytoplasmic reprogramming mechanism of the transgene during oogenesis.
However, no significant variations in methylation were observed when
transgenic 7-1A females were crossed with males of the same
strain (data not shown). Regression analyses of methylation levels
(Fig. 3a) demonstrated that in the DBA/2 animals transgene
methylation remained stable at a level of 21%. Among siblings of the
same litter, a 10% variation in transgene methylation was found.
However, these differences were not transmitted to the offspring. Even
in a pure genetic background of >99%, the transgene methylation
remained mosaic and was associated with the silencing of the
pAd2E2AL-CAT transgene.
All transgenes in animals resulting from Balb/c × 7-1A-Balb/c or
C57BL/6 × 7-1A-C57BL/6 crosses remained hypermethylated
after the initial de novo methylation in the F1
generation (Fig. 3, b and c). The transgenes in
the C57BL/6 animals showed comparable methylation levels at around
55%; transgenic animals from backcrosses into Balb/c had a
methylation level of 61.5% in the transgenes. In earlier work, we
had shown in crosses with mixed genetic background BDF1 × BDF1 (Fig. 1) that in only 10% of the offspring transgene methylation was lost, and in the following generations the
grandparental methylation patterns were usually reestablished (12). The
ensemble of results (Fig. 3) suggests that both mouse strains, C57BL/6 and Balb/c, supply dominant factors favoring de novo
methylation. The methylation dynamic of the 7-1A transgene
resembles that of the TKZ751 transgene in mice (22, 23) in
which the Balb/c genetic background led to stronger de novo
methylation than the C57BL/6 background.
In addition to these B6 mouse lines, an additional C57BL/6-(b) line was
established. In contrast to C57BL/6-(a), this line originated from
animal number 24F5 which was derived from animals showing
no loss of methylation in their transgenes. After the first backcross,
however, these animals exhibited a methylation pattern similar to that
in the C57BL/6-(a) line. In both lines, the variation of transgene
methylation was somewhat higher than in the other strains analyzed. For
a more detailed analysis of these reproducibly observed strain-specific
modifications, we backcrossed the 7-1A transgene into mouse
strains FVB/N, 129/sv, or CB20 (data not shown). Starting from a DBA/2
animal with a hypomethylated transgene, its transfer into the FVB/N
strain did not further affect the low level of transgene methylation.
This observation paralleled the behavior of the RSVIgmyc
transgenes in the same mouse strain (36). Similar results were obtained with 129/sv mice. Again like for other transgenes (22), the 129/sv
background favored a moderate loss of methylation of the transgene. In
testis, the transgene was fully demethylated, an effect typical for
many strain-specifically methylated transgenes (8, 21, 34). In contrast
to the FVB/N and 129/sv strains, the CB20 background led to de
novo methylation. The CB20 mouse strain originated from Balb/c and
C57BL/6 animals and might also harbor factors promoting methylation.
Stability of the 7-1A Methylation Patterns--
The observed
strain-specific variations of transgene methylation are presumably
subject to the control of modifying genes that are different in
individual mouse strains. To test this hypothesis, a series of crosses
was analyzed. At first, we investigated to what extent the highly
methylated transgene phenotype in Balb/c mice could be reversed. Hence,
we crossed the highly methylated transgene in the Balb/c animals into a
DBA/2 background (Fig. 4). Conversely,
the hypomethylated transgene from DBA/2 animals was backcrossed into a
Balb/c background (Fig. 5a).
In both experiments, the transgenes in the offspring showed the
hypermethylated phenotype of the Balb/c mice. Therefore, the Balb/c
genetic background seemed to play a dominant role in this process. At
least after the first backcross, the methylation phenotypes were not
immediately reversed.
We also tested whether the genetic factors would work in an independent
fashion or, when inherited as heterozygous loci, by complementing each
other. The hypermethylated transgene from Balb/c males was, therefore,
crossed into a C57BL/6 genetic background. Intriguingly, all offspring
showed the typical B6 methylation pattern of the 7-1A
transgene (Fig. 6). These data indicated
that the B6 allele was not only dominant over the DBA/2 allele (Fig. 5a) but also over the Balb/c allele. This result suggests
the existence of a dominant factor affecting levels of DNA methylation in the C57BL/6 genetic background.
Segregation of the High and Low Methylation Phenotypes in the
Progeny of 7-1A males with (B6 × D2)F1
Females--
The initial strategy was to correlate the methylation in
the offspring of crosses between DBA/2 males and (B6 × D2)F1 females with previously characterized polymorphic
loci. But instead of either the B6 or the D2 methylation phenotypes,
additional methylation phenotypes were observed (data not shown). This
result indicated that a multitude of factors could contribute to the
establishment of distinct methylation phenotypes. Similarly complex
patterns of methylation were encountered in segregation analyses with
the transgenes E36 (25, 37, 38) and TKZ751
(22).
Further evidence for the complex role of genetic backgrounds in
transgene methylation was adduced by crossing (C57BL/6 × DBA/2) F1 females with 7-1A males of the DBA/2 background.
Consistent with the notion of multiple methylation modifier loci, a
non-mendelian segregation of methylation levels was apparent in the
progeny (Fig. 5b). One-third of the offspring carried
hypermethylated transgenes, whereas two-thirds of the progeny showed a
de novo methylation that represented the B6 phenotype. These
results indicate that the effect of several factors combine to modulate
the transgene methylation in the 7-1A lines.
Interestingly, the observed de novo methylation might be
directed to specific 5'-CG-3' dinucleotides (Fig.
7). HpaII and HhaI cleavage patterns of transgenic DNA from DBA/2, Balb/c, and C57BL/6 (not shown) were compared among animals of both sexes, which were randomly chosen from the sixth and seventh backcross generations. Although striking differences in HpaII-(CCGG) methylation
were observed, the same animals showed no difference in their
HhaI-(GCGC) cleavage patterns. This HhaI sequence
is the only such site located within the pBR322 sequences of the
construct. We conclude that the process of strain-specific transgene
methylation seems to be a very specific modification that is dependent
on more than one host-specific factor as well as on position
effects.
Factors Affecting Transgene Methylation--
In recent years, a
large number of transgenic mice have been generated to study various
issues in genetics, like gene function or gene therapy. It is of
considerable interest to understand the events accompanying or
following the insertion of foreign DNA into established mammalian
genomes (39). Not only the transgene affects the biology of the host,
the transgene itself is often the target for several modifications. One
of the major changes is the de novo methylation of the
transgene upon insertion into the recipient genome. This heritable
genetic modification modulates the overall genomic patterns of
chromatin organization and gene expression without altering the
nucleotide sequence. The extent of de novo methylation of
the transgene depends on the mouse strain bearing the transgene. The
7-1A transgene used in this report consists of the CAT
reporter gene driven by the adenovirus type E2A late promoter which is
silenced after integration into the mouse genome. In early work from
this laboratory, an inverse correlation between the methylation of the
E2A late promoter and other adenovirus promoters and patterns of gene
expression has been documented (2, 3, 34, 40, 41). The de
novo methylation of transgenes is generally associated with
altered chromatin organization that is inhibitory for transcription (6,
31). Nevertheless, the mechanisms behind this reprogramming remain an
intriguing problem. Various factors are relevant in determining the
extent and pattern of DNA methylation of the pAd2-E2AL-CAT
transgene and of foreign DNA in general as follows: (a)
position effects; (b) the mode of recombination;
(c) specific bacterial or viral motifs in the foreign DNA;
(d) the nucleotide sequence of the inserted construct; (e) the timing of insertion; and (f) the
influence of other genes in the recipient cell or organism.
In this study, we have shown that the Ad2-E2AL-CAT transgene
methylation is influenced in a strain-specific manner by a very coordinated regulation. In the mouse strains Balb/c, CB20, and C57BL/6,
the 7-1A transgenes become highly de novo
methylated, whereas a decrease in methylation is observed when the
transgene is transmitted by DBA/2, 129/sv, or FVB/N animals. Obviously, the genetic background of the mouse strain can be a crucial factor in
determining the expression levels of integrated foreign DNA. The
expression of the transgene loci is inversely correlated with the
extent of their methylation. Strain-specific effects are, of course,
not restricted to our transgene model; other transgenes, regardless of
their nature, can show similar characteristics when introduced into
these mouse strains (Table I). The
TKZ751 transgene (22) becomes repressed and methylated when
TKZ751 males fertilize Balb/c eggs but not DBA/2 eggs. The
brief transient exposure of C57BL/6 male pronuclei to the DBA/2 egg
cytoplasm in the mouse compromises the ability of these nuclei in
preimplantation development even when these nuclei are transplanted
back into C57BL/6 recipient eggs (43). However, some transgenes are
expressed in a strain-specific manner and are not de novo
methylated upon passage into these backgrounds.
The Dynamics of 7-1A Methylation and the Role of Modifying
Genes--
The dynamics of the de novo methylation of the
7-1A transgene might shed light on the amount and nature of
strain-specific factors. Immediately after the first cross of the
7-1A transgene in the Balb/c or C57BL/6 backgrounds,
de novo methylation was initiated. The newly established
methylation pattern was subsequently transmitted to the offspring and
remained stable in the following generations. This dominant methylation
was a unique event with no further modifications, and indicated that
both mouse strains supplied at least one, perhaps several, dominant
allele that affected the stability of the pattern of methylation.
In 1991, Engler and co-workers (24) reported that a modifying locus
regulated the methylation phenotype of a pHRD transgene that
encoded a target sequence for the VDJ recombinase. Another interesting
observation in the 7-1A lines was the decrease in methylation in the
transgenes in the DBA/2, 129/sv, and FVB/N strains. Since these mice
show no maintenance of the transgene methylation as compared with the
methylation status in the founder animals, the loss of methylation
might be an active process or the consequence of a failure in the
maintenance mechanism. Thus, the methylation of the transgene could be
considered the "default" state of the surrounding genomic
sequences. Similar events were proposed for the RSVIgmyc
transgene (36) which became hypomethylated and expressed in an inbred
FVB/N genetic background but hypermethylated and silenced in inbred
C57BL/6 mice. In contrast to the 7-1A construct, the
RSVIgmyc transgene was also regulated by genomic imprinting, with the transgene being undermethylated when transmitted by the father
and hypermethylated and silent when transmitted by the mother.
Furthermore, the imprint was lost in the C57BL/6 genetic background but
was restored by breeding the transgene into the FVB/N strain. Variation
in the imprinting behavior in the C57BL/6 background suggested that
elements in addition to the strain-specific factors had influenced
de novo methylation during embryogenesis.
In mice carrying the 7-1A transgene, no significant
variations in transgene methylation could be observed, when the
transgene was transmitted by females instead of 7-1A males.
Furthermore, the methylation pattern remained stable, when the
transgene was transmitted as homozygous 7-1A locus (data not
shown). These data suggest the following two alternative mechanisms
affecting the methylation of the 7-1A transgene: an active
decrease in methylation or methylation protection and a dominant
mechanism supplied by the C57BL/6, Balb/c, and CB20 backgrounds
resulting in the de novo methylation of the 7-1A
transgene. The observation that the 7-1A transgene became
dominantly de novo methylated in (B6 × D2)F1 and (Balb/c × D2)F1 hybrids was
more compatible with the latter mechanism. However, the protection from
de novo methylation would be incomplete and
dosage-dependent. Successive backcrossings of the transgene
into the DBA/2 background did not lead to the complete loss of
methylation in the 7-1A transgene, although the decrease in
transgene methylation could have been the result of changes in the
proportion of cells carrying differentially methylated transgenes. In
addition, the offspring of the highly inbred DBA/2 animals crossed with
Balb/c animals always showed direct de novo methylation of
the transgene.
The mechanism of de novo methylation might be related to an
ancient defense system targeted against foreign DNA (1, 44-46). The
7-1A transgene consists of viral sequences (Ad2 and SV40) as
well as bacterial DNA (pBR322; Fig. 2b). The
importance of specific DNA sequences for the methylation status of
transgenes has been previously discussed (36, 47). A short repetitive IgA sequence in the RSVIgmyc transgenes conveyed parental
imprinting in a strain-specific manner. In another pHRD
transgene, an E. coli sequence (gpr) might be recognized by
the host and could therefore have served as a focus for the
strain-specific modifier action with spreading of DNA methylation into
the flanking sequences (47). It is unknown whether a specific sequence
or repetitive structure within the 7-1A transgene can help
trigger strain-specific methylation.
We have previously reported that the de novo methylation of
the pAd2E2AL-CAT transgene is influenced by the position of
integration (12). It is important to emphasize that only one of the six transgenic mouse lines then studied (34) showed strain-specific effects. These results are reminiscent of the phenomenon of position effect variegation in Drosophila where proximity to
heterochromatic regions predisposes to variegation. Models have been
proposed to explain the transgene inactivation by factors similar to
the Drosophila Su(Var) genes that function in the
epigenetic control of gene expression, presumably by modifying higher
order chromatin structures (48). Recently, two vertebrate homologues,
the human SUV39H1 and the mouse Suv39hl proteins, were isolated
(49). The mammalian homologues contained highly conserved sequence
motifs, the chromo and SET domains, a combination that was also
preserved in the Schizosaccharomyces pombe silencing factor
clr4 (50). Therefore, based on the notion of chromatin
modeling and the fact that mammalian heterochromatin is often
enriched in 5'-CG-3' methylation, the methylation status
observed in the 7-1A transgene in different mouse
strains might reflect secondary events following the formation of heterochromatin.
Our data also underscore the importance to choose the right mouse
strain for gene targeting or embryogenic stem cell generation. The
inbred genetic background may be decisive in determining the stability
and continued expression of foreign DNA. Since the Balb/c and C57BL/6
backgrounds favor frequent inactivation of transgene constructs, mice
from the DBA/2, FVB/N, or 129 strains would be preferable for targeting experiments.
Much further work will be necessary to understand the role of genetic
background in the maintenance or alteration of the methylation status
that affects the phenotypes associated with mutations in mice and in
human disease. DNA methylation in mammalian genomes has frequently been
interpreted as an epigenetic effect (51). Since patterns of DNA
methylation in specific segments of a mammalian genome with a specific
overall genetic background are stable and inherited, it might be more
realistic to view these patterns as true genetic, rather than
epigenetic, signals.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Pedigree of 7-1 transgenic mice. All
lines originated from a B6D2F1 hybrid genetic background.
Transgenes were transmitted by heterozygous animals. After establishing
a transgenic line, all further crosses were performed with heterozygous
males. Non-transgenic animals were not included in this figure.
BD indicated mating to non-transgenic B6D2F1
animals, B mating to C57BL/6, Ba mating to Balb/c, and D
mating to DBA/2 animals. Open squares designate male and
open circles designate female animals with 7-1A
transgenes; asterisk indicates animals with demethylated
transgenes (<30% methylated); filled squares indicate
male, and filled circles indicate female animals with
7-1B transgenes; half-filled squares indicate
male, and half-filled circles indicate female animals with
7-A/B transgenes. For comparisons of the methylation
dynamics of the 7-1A transgenes, all mouse lines were
derived from the same animal 16F6 with the exception of
mouse line C57BL/6(b) that originated from animal
24F5.

View larger version (66K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Methylation patterns of the 7-1A mouse
lines. a, tail tip DNA (20 µg/lane) was cut with
BamHI and the isoschizomeric endonuclease HpaII
(H) or MspI (M) as indicated in the
figure. Cleavage at the seven HpaII sites (see map in
b) revealed a loss of methylation in the DBA/2 line, as
evidenced by the almost complete absence of the 4.8- and 5.3-kbp
off-size bands (arrows on the left) which
represented the junctions linking the transgene to genomic DNA. The
3.3-kbp transgene repeat fragment in the C57BL/6 and Balb/c lines
exhibited about double intensity when compared with DBA/2 DNA. This
fragment was created by the cleavage at the unique BamHI
restriction site. Densitometric evaluation (see "Experimental
Procedures") of the cleavage patterns revealed that the transgene
copies in DBA/2 mice were approximately 20% methylated, whereas the
C57BL/6 lines (about 55% methylation) and Balb/c (about 62%
methylation) favored de novo methylation of their
transgenes. C, control animal DBA/2. b, the
pAd2E2AL-CAT construct contained seven HpaII
(H) restriction sites, one BamHI and a single
HhaI site. The transgene consisted of two short pBR322
vector sequences at both ends, as well as a simian virus 40 (SV40)
poly(A) sequence with the CAT gene as reporter gene, driven by the
adenoviral E2A late (Ad2-E2AL) promoter. This construct was
used as hybridization probe in all hybridization experiments.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Methylation status of foreign DNA in
different inbred mouse strains. The pAd2E2AL-CAT
transgene was crossed from a B6D2 hybrid strain into homogeneously
inbred strains and was transmitted by heterozygous males. The resulting
mouse lines were screened for up to 11 backcross generations. None of
the analyzed mouse strains exhibited a correlation of transgene
methylation and heterozygous DNA segments or strain-specific DNA
sequences present (dash-double dot line). a,
after crossing the 7-1A transgene into a DBA/2 background,
transgene methylation remained at a low level. Although some
variability in transgene methylation in different mice was found, the
transgene methylation remained stable at a level of 21% (regression
line, solid horizontal line) and was transmitted to the
following generations. Open circles represent the
methylation status of transgenic animals. Filled circle,
founder animal. b, crossing the 7-1A transgene
from a mixed genetic background ([C57BL/6 × DBA/2] × DBA/2)F1 into a Balb/c background led to the de
novo methylation in the transgene. The methylation level then
remained constant at around 61.5%. Each diamond represents
the methylation status of one transgenic animal. Filled
diamond, founder animal. c, each open circle
represents a transgenic animal derived from founder animal
24F5 (mouse line C57BL/6-b, see Fig. 1), whereas a
triangle represents an animal derived from founder animal
16F6 (mouse line C57BL/6-a). Filled triangle,
founder animal. Both transgenic lines harbored hypermethylated
7-1A transgenes (fluctuating around 55%) after initial
de novo methylation. The dashed line
(dashes only) indicates the theoretical values for
percentages of original DBA/2 (a), Balb/c (b),
and C57LB/6 (c) genomes remaining after increasing numbers
of crosses.

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Genetic dominance of the Balb/c
background. Crosses of 7-1A Balb/c animals with non-transgenic
DBA/2 mice always resulted in the maintenance of the hypermethylated
state of the transgene (>50% methylated). Off- size band and 3.3-kbp
transgene repeat bands were not cut. The same results were seen when
transgenic DBA/2 mice were crossed with non-transgenic Balb/c animals
(see Fig. 5a). The Balb/c genetic background seems to play a
dominant role in the generation of the 7-1A methylation pattern. Tail
DNA was cut with BamHI (lane 1) or with
BamHI and HpaII (lanes 3 and
4). Double cleavage with BamHI and
MspI (lane 2) served as reference for
unmethylated fragments. Symbols are as follows: H,
HpaII; M, MspI; B,
BamHI. Open squares, male, non-transgenic
animals; filled squares, male; filled circles,
female mice carrying the 7-1A transgene.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Epigenetic stability of the hypomethylated
transgene copies. a, methylation status of transgenic
progeny from crosses with 7-1A DBA/2 males with hypomethylated
transgene. The following crosses were analyzed: C57BL/6 × 7-1A-DBA/2 (black bars), Balb/c × 7-1A-DBA/2
(white bars), and DBA/2 × 7-1A-DBA/2 (dark gray
bars). All male transgenic animals were randomly chosen for
analyses and stemmed from the 9th DBA/2 backcross generation with an
estimated 99.8% pure genetic background. All transgenes that were
maintained in a DBA/2 background remained hypomethylated, whereas
transmissions into Balb/c or C57BL/6 genetic backgrounds always led to
significant de novo methylation of the transgenes.
Therefore, both genetic backgrounds, Balb/c and C57/BL6, may contribute
at least one dominant factor directing the de novo
methylation of the 7-1A transgene. b,
non-mendelian segregation of methylation phenotypes in progeny of
crosses (C57BL/6 × DBA/2)F1 × 7-1A-DBA/2. One-third
of the F1 animals exhibited the typical DBA/2 pattern
(0-30% methylation), and two-thirds showed the C57BL/6 phenotype in
their 7-1A transgenes (31-60% methylation). Methylation
indices were determined as described under "Experimental
Procedures."

View larger version (70K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Factors affecting de novo
methylation in C57BL/6 and Balb/c genetic backgrounds cannot
complement each other. To test whether factors can work in an
independent fashion or, when transmitted as heterozygous loci, by
complementing each other, the hypermethylated 7-1A transgene
was crossed from the Balb/c genetic background into the C57BL/6
background. Tail DNA (20 µg) of mice derived from the cross
C57BL/6 × 7-1A-Balb/c was cut with BamHI and the
methylation-sensitive endonuclease HpaII. The parent animal
(p.Balb/c) exhibited a typical Balb/c methylation status of 73%. After
the cross, all transgenes underwent a loss of methylation which led to
the typical C57BL/6 methylation pattern (45-58% methylation). No
increase in 5'-CCGG-3' methylation was found. Symbols are as follows:
p, parental animal; H, HpaII;
M, MspI; B, BamHI;
open circles, female, non-transgenic animal; filled
squares, male; filled circles, female mice carrying the
7-1A transgene. The arrows designate the
positions of the 4.8- and 3.4 kbp fragments that decreased in
intensities in the DNA from the offspring of this cross.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The unique HhaI (GCGC) site
escapes strain-specific loss of methylation. After
HpaII treatment, the tail DNA was cleaved differentially,
depending on the genetic background. The 3.3-kbp transgene repeat band
was cut to almost 100% in transgenes in the DBA/2 (D)
background (lane 3), whereas a large portion remained
uncleaved in the Balb/c (Ba) genetic background (lane
4). When the same DNA was treated with HhaI, however,
the cleavage patterns were not influenced by the genetic background
(lanes 5 and 6). Symbols are as follows:
H, HpaII; M, MspI;
Hh, HhaI; D, DBA/2; C,
control animal (DBA/2).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Strain-specific methylation of transgenes
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SFB274-A1, by the Center for Molecular Medicine Koeln, TV13, and EU Contract BMH4-CT96-0050.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Qiagen GmbH, Max-Volmer Strasse 4, D-40724
Hilden, Germany.
§ Present address: 1135 Stanyan St., San Francisco, CA 94117. Supported by a fellowship of the Alexander von Humboldt Stiftung.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne, Weyertal 121, D-50931 Koeln, Germany. Tel: 49-221-470-2386; Fax: 49-221-470-5163; E-mail: doerfler@scan. genetik.uni-koeln.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 22, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M004839200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: kbp, kilobase pairs; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; Ad2, adenovirus type 2.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Sutter, D., Westphal, M., and Doerfler, W. (1978) Cell 14, 569-585 |
| 2. | Sutter, D., and Doerfler, W. (1980) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 44, 565-568 |
| 3. | Sutter, D., and Doerfler, W. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 253-256 |
| 4. | Toth, M., Lichtenberg, U., and Doerfler, W. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 3728-3732 |
| 5. | Toth, M., Müller, U., and Doerfler, W. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 214, 673-683 |
| 6. | McGowan, R., Campbell, R., Peterson, A., and Sapienza, C. (1989) Genes Dev. 3, 1669-1676 |
| 7. | Surani, M. A., Kothary, R., Allen, N. D., Singer, P. B., Fundele, R., Ferguson-Smith, A. C., and Barton, S. C. (1990) Development 3 (suppl.), 89-98 |
| 8. | Chaillet, J. R., Vogt, T. F., Beier, D. R., and Leder, P. (1991) Cell 66, 77-83 |
| 9. | Sasaki, H., Hamada, T., Ueda, T., Seki, R., Higashinakagawa, T., and Sasaki, Y. (1991) Development 111, 573-581 |
| 10. | Kakutani, T., Jeddeloh, J. A., and Richards, E. J. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 130-137 |
| 11. | Martin, C. C., and McGowan, R. (1995) Genet. Res. 65, 21-28 |
| 12. | Koetsier, P. A., Mangel, L., Schmitz, B., and Doerfler, W. (1996) Transgenic Res. 5, 235-244 |
| 13. | Monk, M. (1990) Trends Genet. 6, 110-114 |
| 14. | Monk, M., Boubelik, M., and Lehnert, S. (1987) Development 99, 371-382 |
| 15. | Sanford, J. P., Clark, H. J., Chapman, V. M., and Rossant, J. (1987) Genes Dev. 1, 1039-1046 |
| 16. | Howlett, S. K., and Reik, W. (1991) Development 113, 119-127 |
| 17. | Kafri, T., Ariel, M., Brandeis, M., Shemer, R., Urven, L., McCarrey, J., Cedar, H., and Razin, A. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 705-714 |
| 18. | Heller, H., Kämmer, C., Wilgenbus, P., and Doerfler, W. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 5515-5519 |
| 19. | Remus, R., Kämmer, C., Heller, H., Schmitz, B., Schell, G., and Doerfler, W. (1999) J. Virol. 73, 1010-1022 |
| 20. | Lacy, E., Roberts, S., Evans, E. P., Burtenshaw, M. D., and Constantini, F. D. (1983) Cell 34, 343-358 |
| 21. | Sapienza, C., Paquette, J., Tran, T. H., and Peterson, A. (1989) Development 107, 165-168 |
| 22. | Allen, N. D., Norris, M. L., and Surani, M. A. (1990) Cell 61, 853-861 |
| 23. | Reik, W., Howlett, S. K., and Surani, M. A. (1990) Development 3 (suppl.), 99-106 |
| 24. | Engler, P., Haasch, D., Pinkert, C. A., Doglio, L., Glymour, M., Brinster, R., and Storb, U. (1991) Cell 65, 939-947 |
| 25. | Schweizer, J., Valenza-Schaerly, P., Goret, F., and Pourcel, C. (1998) DNA Cell Biol. 17, 427-435 |
| 26. | Latham, K. E. (1995) Differentiation 59, 269-282 |
| 27. | Reik, W., and Walter, J. (1998) Curr. Opin. Genet. & Dev. 8, 154-164 |
| 28. | Solter, D. (1998) Int. J. Dev. Biol. 42, 951-954 |
| 29. | Reik, W., Collick, A., Norris, M. L., Barton, S. C., and Surani, M. A. (1987) Nature 328, 248-251 |
| 30. | Sapienza, C., Peterson, A. C., Rossant, J., and Balling, R. (1987) Nature 328, 251-254 |
| 31. | Swain, J. L., Stewart, T. A., and Leder, P. (1987) Cell 50, 719-727 |
| 32. | DeLoia, J. A., and Solter, D. (1990) Development 3 (suppl.), 73-79 |
| 33. | Beck, J. A., Lloyd, S., Hafezparast, M., Lennon-Pierce, M., Eppig, J. T., Festing, M. F. W., and Fisher, E. M. C. (2000) Nat. Genet. 24, 23-25 |
| 34. | Lettmann, C., Schmitz, B., and Doerfler, W. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 7131-7137 |
| 35. | Koetsier, P. A., Schorr, J., and Doerfler, W. (1993) BioTechniques 15, 260-262 |
| 36. | Chaillet, J. R., Bader, D. S., and Leder, P. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1177-1187 |
| 37. | Hadchouel, M., Farza, H., Simon, D., Tiollais, P., and Pourcel, C. (1987) Nature 329, 454-456 |
| 38. | Wu, X., Hadchouel, M., Farza, H., Amar, L., and Pourcel, C. (1992) Mechanisms of Eukaryotic DNA Recombination , pp. 69-73, Academic Press, New York |
| 39. | Doerfler, W. (1999) Foreign DNA in Mammalian Systems , Wiley-VCH Publishers, New York |
| 40. | Vardimon, L., Neumann, R., Kuhlmann, I., Sutter, D., and Doerfler, W. (1980) Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 2461-2473 |
| 41. | Müller, U., and Doerfler, W. (1987) J. Virol. 61, 3710-3720 |
| 42. | Weichman, K., and Chaillet, J. R. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 5269-5274 |
| 43. | Latham, K. E., and Solter, D. (1991) Development 113, 561-568 |
| 44. | Jähner, D., Stuhlmann, H., Stewart, C. L., Harbers, K., Lohler, J., Simon, I., and Jaenisch, R. (1982) Nature 298, 623-628 |
| 45. | Doerfler, W. (1991) Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 372, 557-564 |
| 46. | Yoder, J. A., Walsh, C. P., and Bestor, T. H. (1997) Trends Genet. 13, 335-340 |
| 47. | Engler, P., Doglio, L. T., Bozek, G., and Storb, U. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 10763-10768 |
| 48. | Sapienza, C. (1990) Development 3 (suppl.), 107-113 |
| 49. | Aagaard, L., Laible, G., Selenko, P., Schmid, M., Dorn, R., Schotta, G., Kuhfittig, S., Wolf, A., Lebersorger, A., Singh, P. B., Reuter, G., and Jenuwein, T. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1923-1938 |
| 50. | Ivanova, A. V., Bonaduce, M. J., Ivanov, S. V., and Klar, A. J. S. (1998) Nat. Genet. 19, 192-195 |
| 51. | Holliday, R. (1987) Science 238, 163-170 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Delaloy, J. Hadchouel, M. Imbert-Teboul, M. Clemessy, A.-M. Houot, and X. Jeunemaitre Cardiovascular Expression of the Mouse WNK1 Gene during Development and Adulthood Revealed by a BAC Reporter Assay Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2006; 169(1): 105 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Park, B. T. Kren, D. A. Largaespada, and C. J. Steer DNA methylation of Sleeping Beauty with transposition into the mouse genome Genes Cells, August 1, 2005; 10(8): 763 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Suzuki, S. Imagawa, C. T. Noguchi, M. Yamamoto, and U. Klingmuller Do {beta}-globin, GATA-1,or EpoR regulatory domains specifically mark erythroid progenitors in transgenic reporter mice? Blood, November 1, 2004; 104(9): 2988 - 2989. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schumacher and W. Doerfler Influence of in vitro manipulation on the stability of methylation patterns in the Snurf/Snrpn-imprinting region in mouse embryonic stem cells Nucleic Acids Res., March 5, 2004; 32(4): 1566 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, K. Mochida, Y. Yamamoto, K. Takano, T. Kohda, F. Ishino, and A. Ogura Effects of Donor Cell Type and Genotype on the Efficiency of Mouse Somatic Cell Cloning Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1394 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. DOERFLER, U. HOHLWEG, K. MULLER, R. REMUS, H. HELLER, and J. HERTZ Foreign DNA Integration--Perturbations of the Genome--Oncogenesis Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2001; 945(1): 276 - 288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||