![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 48, 37937-37944, December 1, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Protein Section, Division of Basic Sciences, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, February 7, 2000, and in revised form, August 31, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chromosomal proteins high mobility group (HMG)-14
and HMG-17 are nucleosomal-binding proteins that unfold the chromatin
fiber and enhance transcription from chromatin templates. Their
intracellular organization is dynamic and related to both cell cycle
and transcription. Here we examine possible mechanisms for targeting
HMG-14/-17 to specific regions in chromatin. Chromatin
immunoprecipitation assays indicate that HMG-17 protein is not
preferentially associated with chromatin regions containing
transcriptionally active genes, or any type of specific DNA. We used a
modification of the random amplified polymorphic DNA method to analyze
DNA in various HMG-14/-17·nucleosome complexes. We found that
although HMG-14 or HMG-17 proteins preferentially associate with core
particles in which the DNA has a low frequency of CG dinucleotides, the
genome does not contain consensus sequences that serve as specific
targeting sites for the binding of either HMG-14 or HMG-17 proteins to
nucleosomes. We used size exclusion and ion exchange chromatography to
demonstrate that nuclei contain a large portion of HMG-17 associated
with other proteins in a multiprotein complex. We suggest that these
complexes regulate the dynamic organization of HMG-14/-17 in the
nucleus and serve to target the proteins to specific sites in chromatin.
The binding of specific proteins to their appropriate target sites
in chromatin facilitates the orderly progression of various DNA-dependent activities such as transcription and
replication. Many of the proteins regulating these activities recognize
their chromatin-binding targets in a DNA sequence-dependent
manner. In addition, the nucleus contains numerous proteins, such as
HMG1 proteins, that bind to
their chromatin targets without apparent specificity for the underlying
DNA sequence. The high mobility group (HMG) proteins affect the
expression of many genes, most probably by altering the local structure
of DNA or chromatin and by inducing a conformation that facilitates the
binding of specific regulatory factors (1, 2). Each type of HMG
subgroup has a characteristic binding site; however, the main
mechanisms for targeting the proteins to these sites or to specific
regions in chromatin are not fully understood.
The HMG-14/-17 proteins are the only nuclear proteins known to
preferentially bind to the 147-base pair nucleosome core particles, i.e. to the building block of the chromatin fiber (3). These proteins can function as architectural elements that unfold the chromatin fiber (4, 5). All the nucleosomes in the chromatin can bind
these proteins; however, the amount of HMG-14/-17 in the nucleus is
limited (6). Therefore, in vivo, only a small fraction of
the nucleosomes in cellular chromatin contains these HMGs. The HMG-17
nucleosomes are clustered into domains and can serve to decompact the
structure of the 30-nm chromatin fiber, thereby reducing the repressive
activity of chromatin.
The intranuclear distribution of both HMG-14 and HMG-17 is dynamic and
not uniform (7, 8). The proteins are not associated with chromatin
during metaphase and re-enter the nucleus, in a facilitated process,
only after the formation of the nuclear membrane (8). Thus, their
cellular location is cell cycle related. In addition, the intranuclear
organization of the proteins depends on transcriptional activity. At
high levels of transcriptional activity the proteins are dispersed into
small foci, while at low levels of transcriptional activity they are
organized into larger clusters (9).
The molecular mechanisms that regulate the intranuclear distribution
and chromatin organization of these proteins are not known. One
possibility is that certain nucleosomes contain unique sequences with
high affinity for HMG-14/-17 proteins. Alternatively, the HMG-14/-17
proteins are targeted to specific regions with the assistance of other
proteins. It is relevant that activities known to modify the chromatin
structure such as histone acetylases, histone deacetylases, and
chromatin remodeling complexes are present in the nucleus as high
molecular weight multiprotein complexes.
Here we investigate several mechanisms that may determine the
distribution of the HMG-14/-17 proteins in chromatin. First, we use
chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (ChIP) to examine whether any DNA
class, such as transcriptionally active chromatin regions, or
repetitive DNA sequences, are significantly enriched in HMG-17 protein.
We find that the HMG-17 content in chromatin regions containing the
transcribed T-cell receptor Immunoprecipitation of HMG-Nucleosome Complexes and Slot-blot
Hybridization Analysis of DNA Pools from Mouse Thymus Cells (ChIP,
Chromatin ImmunoPrecipitation)
Mouse thymus mononucleosome preparation and immunoprecipitation
with antibodies to HMG-17 was carried out as described before (5).
Three DNA preparations (T-DNA for total mononucleosome preparation,
IP-DNA for immunoprecipitate, and S-DNA for supernatant) were blotted
to nylon membranes and probed with the following probes: 1) mouse high
Cot-1 DNA (Life Technologies); 2) mouse repetitive B1 element-containing plasmid derived from the
Core Particle Preparation, Reconstitution with HMG Proteins
in Vitro, Mobility Shift Assays, Analysis of the Protein Pattern, and
Isolation of DNA
Recombinant human HMG-14 and HMG-17 proteins were expressed
using the T7 expression system and vector pVEX11 and purified as
described before (13). Nucleosome core particles were isolated from
chicken red blood cells (14). The histone content of the nucleosomes
was monitored by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
Triton-acid-urea gel electrophoresis (15). Gel mobility shift assays of
HMG-nucleosome complexes were carried out in 2 × TBE buffer,
(1 × TBE buffer = 90 mM Tris, 90 mM
borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.4). In brief, 50 pmol of core
particles were incubated with 5-150 pmol of HMG protein, in a volume
of 50 µl, at 4 °C for 10 min. 10 µl of 20% Ficoll 400 were
dispensed to each tube and the reaction mixture was loaded on a 5%
native polyacrylamide gel, run, and stained with ethidium bromide. The
core particles that were shifted at a low HMG:core particle ratio
(below 1) were denoted as high affinity (HA) core particles. Typically,
these were less than 15% of the total DNA (as measured by ethidium
bromide staining). Conversely, the nucleosome cores that have not been shifted at HMG:core particles ratio of about 3 (approximately 15% of
total particle population) were denoted as low affinity (LA) cores.
Bands of interest were excised from the gel, and the DNA extracted by
diffusion from crushed gels. The preparations served as DNA templates
for PCR with RAPD primers.
Immunoprecipitation of HMG-17-containing Mononucleosomes from
HeLa Cells
Sucrose density gradient-purified HeLa mononucleosomes were
prepared as described previously (16), except that buffer A contained a
complete mixture of protease inhibitors (Roche Molecular Biochemicals).
Immunoprecipitation was done using affinity pure antibodies and
immobilized Protein A. DNAs were extracted from the immunoprecipitates
and the supernatants, and denoted as IP-DNA and S-DNA, respectively.
RAPD Reaction, Cloning, and Sequencing
Primers--
For each RAPD reaction, a set of three 10-base
oligonucleotide primers was used to amplify various preparations of
nucleosomal DNA. About 100 primers for RAPD reactions were purchased
from Operon Technologies. They were selected with the requirements that
the G+C content should be 60 to 70%, and no self-complementary ends
were allowed. By using three primers per one reaction an average of 60 PCR products were observed. This number of fragments can be reliably
resolved and analyzed using short sequencing gels. The primers were
grouped into 30 sets of 3 primers each, ensuring no internal priming
sites for the two other primers in a set (the complete list is
available upon request).
DNA Amplification and Cloning--
Pre-mixed sets of primers
were end-labeled with [ Hybridization of the Cloned Fragments--
The DNA preparations
(the same as were used for RAPD reaction) were extracted from the
native gel, denatured, and slot blotted onto a nylon membrane (S&S,
Nytran, 0.45 µm) in three dilutions (150, 50, and 15 ng). The DNA
probes were labeled with the T7 QuickPrime Kit (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech). Hybridizations were done in 5 × Denhardt, 6 × SSC, 0.5% SDS, salmon sperm DNA (20 µg/ml) at 65 °C for 4 h.
The blots were washed once with 2 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65 °C
for 30 min and 3 times with 0.1 × SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65 °C for
5 min.
Reconstitution of HMG-Nucleosome Complexes on Cloned
Sequences--
Cloned RAPD fragments were excised from vectors and
then purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The ends of the
DNA fragment were filled-in with Klenow enzyme and
[ DNA Sequence Analysis--
The cloned RAPD bands were sequenced
using USB Sequenase version 2.0 kit and 40-cm long 8%
electrolyte-gradient polyacrylamide gel. GenBank homology searches were
done using the Blast program. Multiple alignments were done using
Clustal W (version 1.74). Di- and trinucleotide frequency analysis was
done as described by others (18). The average roll angle, tilt angle,
and twist angle of each cloned DNA sequence predicted from the di- and
trinucleotide frequency were calculated using available software DNA
tools (19, 20).
Reconstitution of Nucleosomes on Methylated Cloned Sequences
Selected cloned sequences were treated with Sss I
methylase (CpG methylase, New England BioLabs), and an aliquot was
digested by HpaII to verify the effectiveness of methylation
as described previously (21). Then, the DNA was end-labeled,
reconstituted into nucleosomes by the exchange method as described
above, and titrated with increasing amounts of HMG-14 or HMG-17. The
reaction mixture was loaded on native 5% polyacrylamide gel run in
2 × TBE. The gels were dried, autoradiographed, and the resulting bands were quantified with a PhosphorImager.
Isolation of a Multiprotein Complex Containing HMG-17 Protein
The presence of HMG-17 during the various purification steps was
followed by Western analysis. After every round of chromatography, the
HMG-17 containing fractions were dialyzed against the initial buffer of
the next chromatography step and concentrated as required. Nuclear
extracts from exponentially growing HeLa S3 cells were prepared as
described (22). The nuclear extract was applied to a Superose 6 column
eluted with in 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2. The
fraction containing HMG-17 was dialyzed against 100 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 6, loaded onto a Mono S HR 5/5 column and the
proteins were eluted using linear 0 to 1 M NaCl gradient. The HMG-17 containing fraction was concentrated and size fractionated on BioSep SEC S3000 (Phenomenex) in 50 mM sodium phosphate,
pH 7.2. The HMG-17 containing fraction was concentrated, and
fractionated on a Mono Q HR 5/5 column eluted with a sodium chloride
gradient from 0.1 to 0.6 M in 50 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 8.8. The proteins in the various fractions were analyzed by
electrophoresis in SDS-containing 15% polyacrylamide gels and
visualized by silver staining of 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and silver staining.
Hybridization Analysis of the DNA from the Mouse Thymus
HMG-17-containing Mononucleosomes (ChIP)--
Initially, we examined
whether in a differentiated tissue, such as mouse thymus, HMG-17
protein is associated with a specific class of DNA sequence. Chromatin
isolated from mouse thymus nuclei was digested with micrococcal
nuclease, fractionated on sucrose gradients, and the mononucleosomes
containing HMG-17 protein were immunoprecipitated using affinity pure
antibodies. Approximately 1% of the DNA was recovered in the immunoprecipitates.
Membranes with equal amounts of total input DNA (T-DNA),
immunoprecipitated DNA (IP-DNA), and DNA from the mononucleosomes that
remained in the supernatant (S-DNA), were hybridized with the following
32P-labeled probes: T-DNA, IP-DNA, B1-DNA (a highly
Alu-like repetitive element found in >105 copies per
genome), mouse high Cot-1 DNA,
Usually, results obtained by ChIP assays are dependent on the choice of
the probes and do not provide information on potential DNA sequence
elements that may regulate the binding of HMG-14/-17 proteins to
nucleosomes. Therefore we used an alternative approach, a modification
of the RAPD method, to scan all of the possible HMG:core
particles. This approach does not require the use of arbitrarily chosen probes.
The RAPD Technique Differentiates between Nucleosome Cores with Low
Affinity and High Affinity for HMG-14/-17 Proteins--
The
specific binding of HMG-14/-17 to nucleosome core particles (Fig.
2A) can be detected by
mobility shift assays, in which the HMG·CP complex migrates slower
than the free CP. A gradual increase in the HMG:CP molar ratio results
in a concomitant increase in the relative amount of the HMG·CP
complex (Fig. 2B). The nucleosomes with the highest affinity
for HMG-14/-17 will form complexes with the protein first. We
reconstituted the total population of chicken blood CP with various
amounts of HMG-14 or HMG-17 and separated the HMG·CP complexes from
free CP by electrophoresis on native nucleoprotein gels. The CP that
formed complexes with either HMG-14 or HMG-17 at a low protein:CP ratio
(less than 1), when approximately 15% of the total CP were shifted,
were denoted as "high affinity HMG-14/-17 CP" (HA-CP in Fig. 2B),
and the DNA excised from these bands was denoted as "HMG-14/-17 high
affinity DNA" (HA-DNA). The CP that remained uncomplexed at relative
high protein:CP ratios (molar ratio 3:1), when over 80% of the CP were
shifted, were denoted as "low affinity HMG-14/-17 CP" (LA-CP in
Fig. 2B), and the DNA extracted from these bands was denoted as
"HMG-14/-17-low affinity DNA" (LA-DNA). The DNA, extracted from the
total population of CP (CP in lane 1 in Fig. 2B), was
denoted as "total CP DNA" (T-DNA). The average length of the
nucleosomal DNA was the same in all the DNA populations, as assessed by
electrophoresis of 32P-end labeled DNA on sequencing gels
and autoradiography (not shown). Likewise, electrophoresis in
Triton-acid-urea gels did not reveal significant differences in the
acetylation state of the core histones in all the populations of core
particles (not shown).
To examine whether the binding of HMG-14/-17 proteins to CP is affected
by the sequence of the nucleosomal DNA, we used a modification of the
RAPD procedure to search for differences between the HA-(14 or 17)-DNA,
LA-(14 or 17)-DNA, and T-DNA preparations. The DNAs were amplified
using different sets of 32P-labeled RAPD primers. The
radioactive PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on sequencing
gels and then visualized by autoradiography (Fig.
3A). Control reactions, in
which DNA was not added, contained only short 15-25-nucleotide long
PCR bands, which could be the products of primer dimerization at low
annealing temperature. Therefore, in all the lanes, the bands migrating
at these positions were ignored. For analysis, each lane was scanned,
the background subtracted, and the scans superimposed.
The results clearly indicate that most of the bands with identical
mobility have the same intensity in all the tracks (Fig. 3A). There was no marked difference in the RAPD pattern
generated from CP complexed with either HMG-14 or HMG-17 proteins. In
more than 1000 bands generated from 30 RAPD reactions we detected only one specific band generated from the DNA isolated from the CP that
preferentially bound to HMG-17, and one specific band generated by the
CP that preferentially bound HMG-14. However, the autoradiography signals of about 4% of the bands in the HA-DNA tracks, and of 2% of
bands in the LA-DNA tracks, were at least twice more intense than that
of the corresponding bands in the T-DNA tracks. These results suggest
that a small fraction of the total core particles binds HMG-14/-17
protein with either a higher (bands enriched in the HA-DNA tracks) or
lower (bands enriched in the LA-tracks) affinity than the average particle.
To examine the DNA in the nucleosome particles that bind HMG-14/-17
with an affinity that is different from the average, we isolated,
cloned, and sequenced all the PCR fragments that were highly enriched
in either HA-DNA or LA-DNA (HA bands and LA bands). A total of 83 clones were analyzed (Table I). Since
HMG-14 and HMG-17 proteins generated very similar RAPD patterns we did
not distinguish between those originating from the HMG-14·CP
complexes from those originating form HMG-17·CP complexes. As
controls, we cloned and sequenced 41 fragments, that were equally
intense in both HA- and LA- DNAs. These are named AA clones (AA stands for "average affinity").
We performed two kinds of tests to verify that the DNAs identified by
RAPD indeed had some property that was different from the average DNA.
First, we tested whether the DNA rehybridized to the selected bands
with the expected intensity. Slot-blot analysis, in which the cloned
DNAs were used as probes for HA-DNA, LA-DNA, or T-DNA indicated that
the cloned sequences do indeed hybridize with the expected intensity
(Fig. 3B). Thus, HA clone 42.1a.7 that was enriched in an
RAPD reaction with HA-DNA, preferentially hybridized to HA-DNA on a
membrane. As expected, AA clone 48.6b.2 that was cloned as one of the
control sequences, did not show any preference for either LA-DNA or
HA-DNA, while LA clone 40.1c.6 preferentially hybridizes to LA-DNA. The
results corroborate the RAPD data.
Second, we tested whether the cloned DNAs can be complexed with
histones to reconstitute nucleosomes with the expected affinity for
HMG-14/-17 proteins. Clones with inserts longer than 140 bp were
reconstituted into nucleosomes and tested for affinity for HMG-14 or
HMG-17 proteins by gel mobility shift assays (Fig. 3C). The
affinity constant of HMG-14 and HMG-17 for nucleosomes is 1.1 and
0.5 × 107, respectively (15). We found that
nucleosomes reconstituted using the DNA from HA clones (40.1a.5 and
H015-3, lanes 1-6) have higher affinity for HMG proteins
(~2.05 × 107 for HMG-14 and 0.95 × 107 for HMG-17), while the nucleosomes reconstituted using
the DNA from LA clones (40.1c.7 and 48.5c.1, lanes 7-12)
had a lower affinity for HMG-14/-17 (~0.25 × 107
and 0.15 × 107, respectively) (Fig. 3C).
Thus, in lanes 2, 3, 5, and 6 most of the CPs,
reconstituted on HA clone DNAs, were associated with HMG proteins while
in lanes 8, 9, 11, and 12 most of the CPs, reconstituted on LA clone DNAs, were not associated with HMG proteins at similar protein concentrations. Thus, the RAPD reaction is suitable
for isolating the DNA from nucleosomes that vary in their affinity for
HMG-14/-17 proteins
Search for HMG-14/-17 Protein DNA-binding Sites--
To examine
whether the sequences from the various DNA pools contain common
sequence motifs, we performed multiple alignment analysis of all the
sequences in both orientations. The analysis did not detect any common
motifs in any of the DNA pools, even though we limited the number of
aligned sequences to five at a time, checked all the possible
combinations of five sequences, and also calculated the average
pairwise alignment per each nucleotide. A Blast search of the GenBank
data base with each of the sequences detected seven clones having
85-100% identity with known sequences. One of the HA clones was
homologous to a region located 300 bp downstream from the protein
phosphatase inhibitor 2 gene, and another HA clone to a region located
500 bp upstream from the acyl CoA-binding protein/diazepam-binding
inhibitor gene. Three AA clones contained regions homologous to the
transcribed portion of the chicken neuropeptide Y gene, to chicken
endogenous proviral avian retroviral LTR and to Mus musculus
uroplakin II gene. One LA clone was similar to a known sequence of a
CpG island, and the other one contained an Alu-like repeat. We conclude
that in vitro, the binding of HMG-14/-17 to nucleosome cores
is not dependent on a specific DNA sequence element.
We next performed a similar analysis with HMG-17 containing nucleosomes
isolated by immunoprecipitation of HeLa chromatin. These particles
should be representative of the in vivo HMG·CP complexes.
We immunoprecipitated HMG:CP particles as described before (see
previous section) and analyzed the DNA isolated from both the
immunoprecipitated nucleosomes and from the nucleosomes that remained
in the supernatant, by the RAPD procedure using the primer sets that
were used in the in vitro experiments.
Most of the bands generated by the entire sets of primers were common
to two DNA pools; however, several primer sets generated bands that
were specific to either the immunoprecipitated DNA (IP-DNA) or the DNA
that remained in the supernatant (S-DNA, Fig. 4). We reasoned that the RAPD bands
enriched in the IP-DNA lanes were preferentially associated with HMG-17
in vivo. Conversely, the bands were enriched in the S-DNA
lanes, originated from the core particles that in vivo had
low affinity for HMG-17. We isolated and sequenced 6 clones from each
type of DNA (IP clones and S clones, respectively) and analyzed them by
the same parameters as the CP isolated from the in vitro
reactions (Fig. 3A). We did not obtain a consensus sequence
and a Blast search did not yield any significant hits.
We conclude therefore that the genome does not contain unique DNA
sequence motifs that target HMG-14/-17 proteins to specific regions in
chromatin. It is important to note that in these studies we analyzed
individual RAPD fragments with total length of more than
105 base pairs (35 RAPD reactions, 50 bands in each, with
an average length of 80 bp per band). This number of base pairs
includes all possible genomic hexamers 25 times, all possible heptamers 7 times, and all possible octamers 1.5 times. Consensus sequences for
abundant regulatory factors are of limited length. For example, the
consensus sequence for the TATA-binding protein (TBP) is shorter than 7 bp. Therefore, any putative short consensus sequence regulating the
binding of HMG-14/-17 proteins (either positively or negatively) to
core particles would have been present in the samples that we analyzed.
Thus, our studies indicate that the genome does not contain specific
short sequence elements that target HMG-14/-17 proteins to specific
sites. Both in vivo and in vitro HMG-14/-17
proteins bind to nucleosome cores to form complexes containing either
two molecules of HMG-14 or two molecules of HMG-17. Our finding that the RAPD patterns generated by the nucleosome cores interacting with
HMG-14 are indistinguishable from those generated by HMG-17, provides
additional support for the conclusion that the DNA sequence is not a
significant factor in determining the binding of these proteins to core particles.
Characterization of the DNA in the Various Types of Nucleosome Core
Particles--
Nevertheless, the RAPD analysis suggests that the
affinity of about 6% of the core particles is either higher (4%), or
lower (2%) than that of the bulk core particles. To further
characterize the DNA in the various nucleosome core pools, we grouped
all HA, AA, and LA clones into separate pools and calculated the
observed versus expected frequencies for mono-, di-, and
trinucleotides. As indicated in Fig.
5A, the 3 pools had a very
similar content of mononucleotides. However, the 3 DNA pools differed
in the frequency of some of the dinucleotides. Most strikingly, the
frequency of the dinucleotide CG (arrowhead) was 3 times
lower in HA clones (observed versus expected frequency 0.22)
than that in the LA clones. Indeed, a plot of the distribution of CG
occurrences in all the individual clones indicates that the sequences
derived from HA-DNA have a significantly lower content of CG than those derived from LA-DNA (Fig. 5C). In addition, the frequencies
for GG, CC, TA, and AT dimers in HA-DNA were 25-40% higher than in LA-DNA.
The trinucleotide frequency distribution of the clones reflected their
dinucleotide content. Thus, the majority of the triplets were uniformly
dispersed between all DNA pools (not shown). All the trinucleotides
that were strongly under-represented in HA-DNA contained the
dinucleotide CG. The 4 dinucleotides CC, GG, AT, or TA were not present
in these CG-containing trinucleotides, but were over-represented in
other trinucleotides that were prevalent in HA-DNA. We note that all
these differences between the HA-DNA and LA-DNA are internally
consistent, since the frequency distribution of the dinucleotides
within each DNA pool was very close to the inverted complementary
dinucleotide. For example, the dinucleotide frequency of GG is equal to
that of CC. Likewise, the frequency of almost every dinucleotide, if
increased for HA clones, was decreased in LA clones, and vice versa (in
13 out of 16 combinations). We also note that the dinucleotide
frequencies of all the clones, i.e. the overall low content
of CG (and not GC) and TA, and the high frequencies of AG, CT, TG, and
CA, are characteristic of the chicken genome.
We also analyzed certain structural characteristics of the various
sequences. We calculated the local maximum, minimum, and average
bendability for each clone, and averaged the values for the HA-, AA-,
and LA-DNA pools. Although the DNA in the HA clones was relatively
untwisted, none of these calculations showed statistically significant
differences between the various DNA pools.
The distribution frequency of the di- and trinucleotides and the
physical characteristics of the DNA in the clones obtained from the
mononucleosomes isolated from HeLa were the same as in the clones
obtained from the in vitro reactions. Thus, the clones generated by the IP-DNA, i.e. from mononucleosomes that were
associated with HMG-17, had both a lower frequency of CG (observed
versus expected ratio 0.23), and a higher frequency of
CC, GG, AT, and TA than the clones generated from the mononucleosomes
that remained in the supernatant (Fig. 5B).
An obvious explanation of the dinucleotide frequency data would be that
HMG-14/-17 proteins bind weaker to nucleosomes containing methylated
DNA, since CG sequences are known methylation sites in DNA. We
therefore reconstituted nucleosomes on Sss I-methylated cloned
DNAs from either HA-DNA or LA-DNA. Mobility shift assays indicated that
methylation did not affect the binding of HMG-14/-17 proteins to either
DNA or cores particles (not shown). Thus, we conclude that the
under-representation of CG in the HA-DNA does not reflect a lower
affinity of HMG-14/-17 proteins to methylated DNA.
In summary, the characteristics of the nucleosomal DNA in the
HMG-17-containing mononucleosomes isolated from HeLa cells by the ChIP
procedure were similar to those in the chicken CP that associated with
HMG-14/-17 in vitro. HMG-14/-17 proteins preferentially bind
to nucleosomes in which the DNA has a relatively low content of CG
dinucleotides and is somewhat enriched in TA and AT dinucleotides. However, based on the measurements of the affinity constants for the
binding of HMG-14/-17 to sequences with different dinucleotide frequencies, we conclude that the dinucleotide composition is not a
major factor in regulating the interaction of the proteins with
chromatin. Thus, our major conclusion is that the genome does
not contain specific DNA sequence elements that serve to target these
proteins to nucleosomes, i.e. the organization of HMG-14/-17
in chromatin is not dependent on direct, specific interactions between
the nucleosomal DNA and the HMG-14/-17 proteins.
Nuclear HMG-17 Protein Is in a Multiprotein Complex--
The
absence of DNA sequence elements that specifically bind HMG-14/-17
protein raises the possibility that the proteins are actively targeted
to specific regions, perhaps in association with other proteins,
i.e. as multiprotein complexes. Indeed other nuclear
activities known to target and modify chromatin have been isolated as
large complexes containing several proteins. We searched for the
presence of such tentative complexes, by fractionating a nuclear
extract of HeLa S3 cells on size exclusion columns. Western analysis of
fractions obtained from a BioSep SEC S3000 column revealed the presence
of two major HMG-17-containing peaks (Fig.
6B). The first peak eluted
with the void volume, i.e. contained complexes larger than
700 kDa, while the second peak contained free HMG-17 protein. High
molecular weight complex containing HMG-17 protein has been partially
purified by several chromatographic steps (Fig. 6A). We used
Western blotting to confirm the presence of HMG-17 protein and silver
staining of 15% polyacrylamide gels to analyze the protein composition
of the peaks. We observed 8-10 protein bands that consistently
co-purified with HMG-17 protein (Fig. 6C). These finding
strongly suggest that HeLa nuclei contain a large portion of HMG-17
associated with other proteins in a multiprotein complex.
Conclusions--
This article contains two major new findings.
First, we conclusively demonstrate that the genome does not contain DNA
sequences that target the HMG-14/-17 proteins to specific nucleosomes.
Thus, the organization of HMG-14/-17 proteins is not dependent on
direct interactions between the sequence of the nucleosomal DNA and
HMG-14/-17 proteins. We suggest that the association of the proteins
with a specific region in chromatin may be transient, dependent on the
metabolic state of a cell, and independent of the sequence of the
nucleosomal DNA. This observation fully agrees with recent photobleaching experiments indicating that in living cells, both HMG-14
and HMG-17 move rapidly and constantly throughout the entire nucleus in
a diffusion driven, Brownian-type motion. Second, we demonstrate that
in the nucleus HMG-17 is associated with other proteins to form a high
molecular weight, multiprotein complex. Although this complex is not
fully characterized, its occurrence provides a conceptual framework to
explain the dynamics of the intracellular organization of HMG-14/-17
proteins. We suggest that the intracellular trafficking and chromatin
targeting of HMG-14/-17 proteins are regulated by proteins that
interact with these HMGs and form a multiprotein complex.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
REFERENCES
gene from mouse thymus is only 1.5 times higher than in chromatin regions containing a non-transcribed
gene. Similar levels of enrichment were observed previously by other
approaches. In all these studies the choice of gene examined is
arbitrary, and does not exclude the possibility that chromatin regions
containing a particular subset of genes are highly enriched in
HMG-14/-17 proteins. We therefore used a modification of the random
amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) method (10) to screen the nucleosomes
obtained from the entire genome, and search for DNA sequence elements
that would serve to target HMG-14/-17 proteins to particular
nucleosomes. We find that HMG-14/-17 proteins preferentially bind to
DNA regions depleted of CG and enriched in AT and TA; however, this
preference is not sufficient to target the proteins to specific regions
in chromatin. Our results clearly indicate that the genome does not contain sequences that serve as HMG-14/-17-binding sites. By
fractionating a nuclear extract we obtained a high molecular weight
multiprotein complex containing non-nucleosome-bound HMG-17. We
therefore suggest that in the nucleus the proteins are present as
multiprotein complexes, and that components of this complex affect the
intranuclear organization and chromatin binding of HMG-14/-17 proteins.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
REFERENCES
-fetoprotein gene (11); and 3) a sequence specific to the T-cell
receptor
gene (12). DNA was labeled by T7 QuickPrime random-priming kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and hybridized as described below.
-32P]ATP by T4 polynucleotide
kinase and used to amplify 100 ng of DNA. The cycling reactions were
performed at 94 °C for 1 min, 45 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min, 30 cycles. After PCR, gel loading dye was added to the reaction
mixtures and a 3-µl aliquot loaded onto 40-cm sequencing gels and run
for 1.5 h, at constant power (30 W). The gel was transferred onto
Whatman 3MM paper and the PCR products visualized by PhosphorImager
(Storm Instrument, Molecular Dynamics). The rest of the reaction
mixture was loaded on preparative sequencing gels. The bands were
excised from the preparative gels and subjected to a second round of
PCR using the original set of RAPD primers, which were phosphorylated
with cold dATP. The ends of the PCR products were blunted using Klenow
and the reaction mixture loaded on 8% PAGE in 1 × TBE buffer.
The bands were visualized by staining with ethidium bromide, and the
DNAs eluted and ligated into the SmaI site of a pUC18
cloning vector.
-32P]dNTP. Nucleosome reconstitutions were carried
out by the exchange technique (17), using chicken blood core particles
as the histone octamer donors. HMG-14/-17 proteins were added to the
reconstituted nucleosomes and HMG·CP complexes were analyzed as
described above. These reaction mixtures contained 100 M
excess of cold competitor DNA to minimize the effects of the slight
fluctuations in concentration of the purified cloned fragment.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
REFERENCES
-satellite
DNA, and a probe for the T-cell receptor
gene, known to be
expressed in the mouse thymus. All the probes hybridize with equal
efficiency to the T-DNA and S-DNA (Fig.
1). The IP-DNA was depleted of the repetitive B1 sequences and slightly enriched in high
Cot-1 DNA. The IP-DNA, i.e. the
HMG-containing mononucleosomes, was also enriched (1.5 times) in
gene sequences. The differences in the amount of HMG-17 protein
associated with various types of DNA were not significant. Therefore,
we conclude that this protein is not permanently and exclusively
associated with any specific class of DNA, including the DNA in
transcriptionally active chromatin regions. This conclusion is in full
agreement with previous information obtained by various
immunofractionation approaches (23, 24), and also with the more recent
finding that the intranuclear organization of the proteins is dynamic
(7, 8), i.e. their interaction with any particular chromatin
region is temporary rather than permanent.

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Slot blot analysis of HMG-17-associated
mononucleosomes from mouse thymus. DNA isolated from either the
total population of mononucleosomes (T-DNA), from mononucleosomes
specifically immunoprecipitated with anti-HMG-17 (IP-DNA), or from the
non-precipitated mononucleosomes remaining in the supernatant (S-DNA),
were immobilized and probed with the DNA indicated on the
left of the blots. The radioactivity signals were
quantitated with a PhosphorImager (bars on the
right).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Experimental design for using RAPD to examine
the DNA sequence preference for the interaction of HMG-14/-17 proteins
with nucleosome core particles (see "Experimental Procedures" for
details). A, core particles (CP) were
obtained from chicken erythrocytes and reacted with recombinant
HMG-14/-17 proteins. B, mobility shifts of HMG-14/-17 with
CP. In lane 2 approximately 15% of core particles were
shifted. HA-CP denotes the CP with high affinity
for HMG. In lane 4 over 80% of CP were shifted.
LA-CP denotes CP with low affinity for HMG.
C, the DNAs from the various bands were purified and
PCR-amplified with 10-nucleotide long primers (RAPD procedure).
D, PCR products were fractionated on sequencing gels.
E, bands of interest were excised, re-amplified,
re-purified, and cloned as "HA clones," LA clones," or "AA
clones" (high, low, and average affinity, correspondingly). The
cloned DNAs were examined by blot hybridization, gel mobility assays,
and sequence analysis.

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Analysis of RAPD-generated products.
A, various DNA preparations (labels on the left)
have been amplified with more than 30 primer sets and resolved on
sequencing gels. A representative autoradiogram is shown. High affinity
band was 116 nucleotides long. B, slot-blot hybridization.
HA-DNA, LA-DNA, and T-DNA were obtained by preparative mobility shifts
of CP with either HMG-14 or HMG-17 protein, and slot blotted. The
membrane was probed with DNAs cloned from specific RAPD-generated bands
indicated above the blot. C, mobility shift
assays. HMG-14 and HMG-17 bind better to core particles, reconstituted
on HA clone sequences 40.1a.5 and H015-3 (lanes 1-6 in
both panels) than to core particles reconstituted on LA clone sequences
40.1c.7 and 48.5c.1 (lanes 7-12). Each reaction contained 1 ng of reconstituted core particles, 100 ng of cold competitor DNA, and
none (lanes 1, 4, 7, and 10), or 2.5 ng
(lanes 2, 5, 8, and 11), and 5 ng (lanes 3, 6, 9, and 12) of HMG protein.
Statistics of RAPD
![]()
View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Analysis of PCR-generated bands from DNA
pools isolated from HeLa cells by immunoprecipitation. DNAs for
RAPD reaction were isolated either from the immunoprecipitated CP
(IP-DNA) or from the DNA that remained in the supernatants (S-DNA).
Arrowheads point to bands that were unique or enriched in
one of the DNAs.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Frequency distribution of nucleotides in RAPD
clones. A, observed versus expected
frequency distribution of nucleotides in HA clones, LA clones, and AA
clones obtained from in vitro reconstitution experiments.
Mononucleotide (left side) and dinucleotide (right
side) distribution. B, observed versus
expected frequencies for the distribution of dinucleotides in the
pooled clones prepared from IP- and S-DNA obtained by
immunoprecipitation of HeLa chromatin, i.e. from HMG·CP
complexes formed in vivo. C, histogram of the
distribution of CG dinucleotides in individual clones. The
abscissa denotes the ratio of observed frequency to expected
frequency for CG in a sequence. The ordinate represents the
number of sequences with similar CG frequency.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
HMG-17 is a part of multiprotein
complex. A, flow diagram of the fractionation steps.
B, size exclusion chromatography of HeLa nuclear extract
(100 µg of the protein). 1-ml fractions have been collected and
20-µl aliquots were loaded on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Western
blotting shows binary distribution of HMG-17 protein into free and
complexed form. C, SDS-polyacrylamide gel of the partially
purified HMG-17-containing multiprotein complex.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Bldg. 37, Rm. 3D-20,
NCI, National Institutes of Health, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD
20892. Tel.: 301-496-2885; Fax: 301-496-8419; E-mail: yupo@helix.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 5, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M000989200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: HMG, high mobility group; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation assays; RAPD, random amplified polymorphic DNA; HA, high affinity; LA, low affinity; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; T-DNA, total mononucleosome preparation DNA; IP-DNA, immunoprecipitated DNA; S-DNA, supernatant DNA; AA, average affinity; bp, base pair(s); CP(s), nucleosome core particle(s).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bustin, M., and Reeves, R. (1996) Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 54, 35-100 |
| 2. | Bustin, M. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 5237-5246 |
| 3. | Sandeen, G., Wood, W. I., and Felsenfeld, G. (1980) Nucleic Acids Res. 8, 3757-3778 |
| 4. | Postnikov, Y. V., Trieschmann, L., Rickers, A., and Bustin, M. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 252, 423-432 |
| 5. | Postnikov, Y. V., Herrera, J. E., Hock, R., Scheer, U., and Bustin, M. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 274, 454-465 |
| 6. | Jones, E. W. (1982) The HMG Chromosomal Proteins , Academic Press, London |
| 7. | Phair, R. D., and Misteli, T. (2000) Nature 404, 604-609 |
| 8. | Hock, R., Wilde, F., Scheer, U., and Bustin, M. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 143, 1427-1436 |
| 9. | Hock, R., Scheer, U., Bustin, M., and Wilde, F. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 6992-7001 |
| 10. | Williams, J. G., Kubelik, A. R., Livak, K. J., Rafalski, J. A., and Tingey, S. V. (1990) Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 6531-6535 |
| 11. | Young, P. R., Scott, R. W., Hamer, D. H., and Tilghman, S. M. (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 3099-3116 |
| 12. | Weissman, A. M., Baniyash, M., Hou, D., Samelson, L. E., Burgess, W. H., and Klausner, R. D. (1988) Science 239, 1018-1021 |
| 13. | Postnikov, Y. V., Lehn, D. A., Robinson, R. C., Friedman, F. K., Shiloach, J., and Bustin, M. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4520-4526 |
| 14. | Ausio, J., Dong, F., and van Holde, K. E. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 206, 451-463 |
| 15. | Dimitrov, S. I., and Wolffe, A. P. (1997) Methods 12, 57-61 |
| 16. | O'Neill, T. E., Roberge, M., and Bradbury, E. M. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 223, 67-78 |
| 17. | Hayes, J. J., and Lee, K. M. (1997) Methods 12, 2-9 |
| 18. | Karlin, S., and Mrazek, J. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 10227-10232 |
| 19. | Ulyanov, N. B., and James, T. L. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 261, 90-120 |
| 20. | Munteanu, M. G., Vlahovicek, K., Parthasarathy, S., Simon, I., and Sangor, S. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 341-347 |
| 21. | Nightingale, K., and Wolffe, A. P. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4197-4200 |
| 22. | Dignam, J. D. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 182, 194-203 |
| 23. | Postnikov, Y. V., Shick, V. V., Belyavsky, A. V., Khrapko, K. R., Brodolin, K. L., Nikolskaya, T. A., and Mirzabekov, A. D. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 717-725 |
| 24. | Druckmann, S., Mendelson, E., Landsman, D., and Bustin, M. (1986) Exp. Cell Res. 166, 486-96 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Amen, H. M. Espinoza, C. Cox, X. Liang, J. Wang, T. M. E. Link, R. G. Brennan, J. F. Martin, and B. A. Amendt Chromatin-associated HMG-17 is a major regulator of homeodomain transcription factor activity modulated by Wnt/{beta}-catenin signaling Nucleic Acids Res., February 2, 2008; 36(2): 462 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Zhu and U. Hansen HMGN1 Modulates Estrogen-Mediated Transcriptional Activation through Interactions with Specific DNA-Binding Transcription Factors Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2007; 27(24): 8859 - 8873. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Furusawa, J.-H. Lim, F. Catez, Y. Birger, S. Mackem, and M. Bustin Down-Regulation of Nucleosomal Binding Protein HMGN1 Expression during Embryogenesis Modulates Sox9 Expression in Chondrocytes Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2006; 26(2): 592 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Hill, C. L. Peterson, and A. N. Imbalzano Effects of HMGN1 on Chromatin Structure and SWI/SNF-mediated Chromatin Remodeling J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41777 - 41783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. West, M. A. Castellini, M. K. Duncan, and M. Bustin Chromosomal Proteins HMGN3a and HMGN3b Regulate the Expression of Glycine Transporter 1 Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(9): 3747 - 3756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Lim, M. Bustin, V. V. Ogryzko, and Y. V. Postnikov Metastable Macromolecular Complexes Containing High Mobility Group Nucleosome-binding Chromosomal Proteins in HeLa Nuclei J. Biol. Chem., May 31, 2002; 277(23): 20774 - 20782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. West, Y. Ito, Y. Birger, Y. Postnikov, H. Shirakawa, and M. Bustin HMGN3a and HMGN3b, Two Protein Isoforms with a Tissue-specific Expression Pattern, Expand the Cellular Repertoire of Nucleosome-binding Proteins J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2001; 276(28): 25959 - 25969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |