![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 48, 38005-38011, December 1, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Section of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of
California, Davis, California 95616 and the
Received for publication, July 6, 2000, and in revised form, September 20, 2000
To improve our understanding of the roles of
microtubule cross-linking motors in mitosis, we analyzed two sea urchin
embryonic kinesin-related proteins. It is striking to note that both of these proteins behave as homotetramers, but one behaves as a more compact molecule than the other. These observations suggest that these
two presumptive motors could cross-link microtubules into bundles with
different spacing. Both motors localize to mitotic spindles, and
antibody microinjection experiments suggest that they have mitotic
functions. Thus, one of these kinesin-related proteins may cross-link
spindle microtubules into loose bundles that are "tightened" by the other.
Animal cell reproduction involves mitosis and cytokinesis, events
that depend on the action of a bipolar protein machine, the mitotic
spindle, which uses microtubules
(MTs)1 and MT-based motor
proteins. A classic model system for studying mitosis and cytokinesis
is the early echinoderm embryo where MTs and MT-based motor proteins
are thought to position mitotic centrosomes, centrosomes dictate the
positioning of the spindle, and the spindle in turn positions the
cleavage plane (1). Antibody microinjection experiments are useful for
probing the functions of MT-motors in sea urchin embryonic cell
division (2); previously, the microinjection of pan-kinesin antibodies
suggested that some kinesin motors, but apparently not conventional
kinesin or heterotrimeric kinesin II, play important roles in mitosis
and cell division (3-6).
One of these motors is a 110-kDa polypeptide, KRP110, that
reacts with an antibody, CHO1, to the mammalian mitotic motor, MKLP1
(3). MKLP1 is an anti-parallel MT-MT sliding motor that appears to be
required for the organization of midzonal MTs and progression through
mitosis and cytokinesis in several systems (7-12). The mechanism of
how MKLP1 family members might function to cross-link microtubules and
bundle them into the anti-parallel arrays required for cytokinesis is
still unclear, because the size and subunit composition of the native
holoenzyme is unclear.
The microinjection of the CHO1 antibody into sea urchin embryonic cells
caused a prophase or metaphase arrest, suggesting that
KRP110 is a functional homologue of MKLP1 and is required for mitosis and cell division in this system (3). Work done in several
systems suggests that interdigitating MTs in the spindle midzone are
required to signal the proper progression of the contractile ring and
completion of cytokinesis. However, in echinoderm cells, cleavage
furrows can form, and subsequent cytokinesis can occur between two
adjacent MT asters in the absence of such midzonal MTs (1). This raises
the possibility that the MKLP1 homologue in echinoderm embryos,
KRP110, may be localized to the MT asters rather than the
central spindle (13).
Another putative MT cross-linking motor that is also likely to
participate in sea urchin embryonic mitosis is KRP170, a
member of the phylogenetically diverse bipolar bimC
kinesin subfamily. Bipolar bimC kinesins are homotetramers
that move slowly toward the plus-end of MTs (14-17). It has been
proposed that bipolar kinesins serve to push spindle poles apart by
cross-linking and sliding MTs in relation to one another, and thus play
important roles in the maintenance and elongation of bipolar mitotic
spindles (18, 19).
Here, we report the molecular characterization of native
KRP110 and KRP170, which reveals that they are
homotetrameric members of the MKLP1 and bipolar bimC kinesin
families, respectively. Localization and functional studies of
KRP110 and KRP170 suggest that they both play
important roles in mitotic cell division in sea urchin embryos.
Materials--
All chemicals used for studies described below
were obtained from Sigma unless otherwise specified. Sea urchins
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus were collected at Point Arena,
CA. Lytechinus variegatus and Lytechinus pictus
were obtained from Susan Decker and Marinus, Inc., respectively.
Purification of KRP110 and
KRP170--
To monitor the purification of
KRP110 and KRP170, we used immunoblotting with
(a) CHO1 IgM and a peptide antibody to detect KRP110; and (b) a rabbit polyclonal antibody to
KRP170 (15) and a mouse polyclonal antibody to the
KRP170 stalk/tail to detect KRP170. Buffers
used were as follows: (a) protease mixture (1 mM
dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 1 mM NaN3, 20 µg/ml benzamidine, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 µg/ml pepstatin A, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 100 µg/ml soybean trypsin inhibitor, 1 mg/ml p-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester); (b)
PME (85 mM K2PIPES, 15 mM acid PIPES, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 5 mM EGTA), pH 6.9; (c) PE (85 mM
K2PIPES, 15 mM acid PIPES, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 5 mM EGTA), pH 6.9;
(d) PME + high salt (PME, 300 mM KCL), pH 6.9;
(e) low salt PIPES for HiTrap SP (50 mM PIPES,
0.5 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 100 mM KCl), pH 6.9;
(f) high salt PIPES for HiTrap SP (50 mM PIPES,
0.5 mM EDTA, 2.5 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 1.0 M KCl), pH 6.9;
(g) sucrose gradient buffer (5 or 20% sucrose) in gel
filtration buffer PME + high salt; 0.1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM ATP, no other protease inhibitors, pH 6.9;
(h) low salt PIPES for hydrodynamic data (PME, 150 mM KCl), pH 6.9.
Sea urchin (S. purpuratus) unfertilized egg extracts and
high-speed supernatant was prepared as described (20-22). All steps were performed at 4 °C unless otherwise specified. Starting with 200 ml of sea urchin high-speed supernatant, GTP and taxol were added to a
final concentration of 1 mM and 20 µM,
respectively, to promote endogenous microtubule polymerization. 200 µl of 10 mg/ml cytochalasin D in Me2SO was added to
inhibit actin polymerization. Then, AMPPNP was added to 1 mM final concentration, and the solution was stirred for an
additional 20 min. The mixture was layered on top of a 15% sucrose
cushion in PME buffer at a 5:1 ratio and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for
1 h in a JA20 rotor. The MT pellets were washed with 15 ml of PE
buffer and centrifuged at 40,000 rpm for 30 min in a Ti50.2 rotor; the
motors and MAPs were eluted from the MT pellets in 15 ml of PME buffer
with 50 mM KCl and 10 mM MgATP on ice for
2 h, and the MT pellets were collected by centrifuging at 40,000 rpm for 30 min in a Ti50.2 rotor. A second elution using 15 ml of high
salt buffer (PME plus 300 mM KCl and 10 mM
MgATP) was performed on ice for 4 h, and the supernatant (high
salt eluate) was collected after centrifuging at 40,000 rpm for 30 min
in a Ti50.2 rotor. The high salt eluate was concentrated down to 3-5
ml (15-ml spin concentrator, 50-kDa cut off, Millipore) and
loaded onto a Superose 6 FPLC gel filtration column (AK16/70, 100-ml
bed volume, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The peak fractions of
KRP170 and KRP110 were pooled separately and
diluted 1:1:1 (v/v/v) with a low salt PIPES buffer and water and loaded
onto a disposable 1-ml HiTrapSP column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Bound proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of 100-500
mM KCl in PME buffer over 30 min. Fractions containing
either KRP110 or KRP170 were further
concentrated to less than 200 µl using a Nanosep spin concentrator
(0.5-ml, Omega membrane, 10-kDa cut off, Pall Filtron). The
concentrated material was loaded onto 5-ml, 5-20% linear sucrose
density gradients and centrifuged at 55,000 rpm for 9 h in a SW55
rotor. Alternatively, the gel filtration fractions containing
KRP110 or KRP170 were concentrated to less than
2 ml, and exogenously polymerized bovine
phosphocellulose-purified tubulin and 2 mM AMPPNP
were added to promote the binding of KRPs to MTs. The bound material
was pelleted by centrifugation and eluted differentially, first with
100 mM KCl and 10 mM MgATP in PME, then
followed by 300 mM KCl and 10 mM MgATP in PME.
The high salt eluate was loaded directly onto the sucrose density
gradient and centrifuged as described above.
Peptide Sequencing--
To microsequence KRP110 and
KRP170 peptides, samples of the purified proteins were
excised from polyvinylidene membranes and digested with Endo-LysC
followed by high pressure liquid chromatography purification. Digests
were analyzed by MALDI-TOF (matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization/time of flight) mass spectroscopy, and selected peptides
were sequenced using Edman degradation (16).
Hydrodynamic Analysis--
The Stokes radii of
KRP170 and KRP110 were determined by gel
filtration chromatography in the presence of either high salt or low
salt PME buffers using a Superose 6 column calibrated with the
following: ferritin (6.1 nm), thyroglobulin (8.5 nm), catalase (5.2 nm), aldolase (4.8 nm), myosin (19.9 nm), bovine serum albumin (3.5 nm), beta-amylase (5.4 nm), alcohol dehydrogenase (4.6 nm), carbonic
anhydrase (2.0 nm), cytochrome c (1.7 nm), blue dextran (void), and ATP (included volume). The sedimentation coefficients of
KRP170 and KRP110 were determined from 5-20%
sucrose density gradients. Bovine serum albumin (4.3 S), aldolase (7.3 S), and catalase (11.3 S) were used as standards. The "low salt"
data were obtained from cytosol in 150 mM KCl that was
clarified (~100,000 × g) and filtered prior to
loading onto gel filtration columns or sucrose density gradients but
was not further fractionated. The standards were run under both high
and low salt conditions, and no significant difference was observed
(with the exception of myosin that was only run in high salt for gel
filtration to prevent the effects caused by filament formation, which
occurs in low salt). The native molecular weights of KRP170
and KRP110 were calculated (23) using partial specific
volumes of 0.713 for KRP170 and 0.717 for
KRP110 (24).
Cloning KRP110 and KRP170--
A partial
cDNA fragment encoding residues 137-250 of KRP170 was
obtained in a polymerase chain reaction screen (25) and was used to
screen a S. purpuratus cDNA library and thus to obtain two overlapping clones that encoded full-length KRP170. A
polymerase chain reaction screen using degenerate primers based on
conserved MKLP1 family sequences, namely, NHNMYVA and NKMVPY, yielded
products that encoded amino acid residues 272-401 of
KRP110. This region was subsequently used as a probe to
screen out the rest of the 3'-end by conventional library screening.
The 5'-end was identified by 5'-RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends).
Antibody Preparation--
The KRP110 tail peptide
CTRGGGRAVQFTDVEK, obtained from microsequence data of
KRP110 and incorporating an extra Cys for
N-hydroxysuccinimide coupling, was synthesized
(Stanford PAN Facility, Stanford University) and conjugated to keyhole
limpet hemocyanin (26). Half of the material used as antigen was
coupled by N-hydroxysuccinimide coupling and the
other half using glutaraldehyde; then, they were mixed and injected
into rabbits to produce antiserum according to standard protocols.
GST170 stalk/tail recombinant protein was affinity-purified using
glutathione-agarose affinity chromatography, diluted 1:1 with Titermax
(CytRx Corp.), and injected into mice for ascites preparation.
Antibodies against KRP170 stalk/tail region were affinity-purified on GST170 stalk/tail resin.
Immunofluorescence and Microinjection--
Indirect confocal
immunofluorescence of KRP110 and KRP170 was
performed on methanol-fixed embryos stained with primary antibodies (25 µg/ml), followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate- or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200 diluted) (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Inc.) and DAPI (3). Fertilized eggs were injected with ~40 plicoliters of 7 mg/ml mouse polyclonal anti-KRP170
stalk/tail antibodies, control mouse IgG at an identical concentration
(<5% cell volume), affinity-purified dominant-negative fusion protein GST-KRP170 Coil4Tail, or GST at 57 µM in
aspartate injection buffer; those that survived the injection process
were monitored using differential interference contrast (DIC)
microscopy and filmed or photographed as described (5).
Molecular Analysis of sea urchin KRP110 and
KRP170--
The amino acid sequences of the two
presumptive mitotic motors, KRP110 and KRP170,
were deduced from the corresponding cDNA clones
(GenBankTM accession numbers AF292394 and AF292395) and
axnalyzed using standard procedures to generate maps shown in Fig.
1, A and B. The
cloned cDNAs are likely to encode the KRP110 and
KRP170 polypeptides that are recognized by pan-kinesin
antibodies and co-purify with sea urchin egg MTs based on antibody
reactivity (Fig. 1C). This idea was confirmed by a
comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences with partial peptide
sequences obtained from the corresponding MT-affinity-purified
polypeptides (Fig. 1, A and B, and Fig. 2,
D and E).
The deduced sequence of KRP110 predicts a tripartite
99-kDa, 870-amino acid residue polypeptide organized into motor (aa
1-450), stalk (aa 451-700), and tail (aa 701-870) domains. The
249-residue stalk contains a region (aa 550-693) that is predicted to
form a 22-nm coiled-coil rod. There is an unusually high degree of sequence similarity (42-57% identity in the motor domain) to members of the MKLP1 family of kinesins, although KRP110 is unique
in containing a proline-rich segment (aa 178-193) that may be a target for proline-directed protein kinase.
The deduced sequence of KRP170 predicts a tripartite
122-kDa, 1081-amino acid residue polypeptide organized into motor (aa 1-348), stalk (aa 349-800), and tail (aa 801-1081) domains. The 451-residue stalk contains a region (aa 356-772) that is predicted to
contain three coiled-coil segments that form a 62-nm long rod. There is
an unusually high degree of sequence identity (50-72% identity) in
the motor region and bimC box (aa 934-946) with members of
the bipolar bimC family of kinesins.
Biochemical Analysis of Native KRP110 and
KRP170--
Anti-KRP110 and KRP170
antibodies were used to probe for the presence of KRP110
and KRP170 in subcellular fractions prepared from sea
urchin egg cytosolic extract (Fig. 2). We
observed that KRP110 and KRP170 co-sedimented
with MTs in the presence and absence of AMPPNP or ATP (Fig.
1C). Both proteins were eluted from MT pellets by
differential centrifugation in high ionic strength buffers and then
subjected to gel filtration chromatography, ion exchange
chromatography, or MT-affinity binding and sucrose density gradient
centrifugation (Fig. 2, A-E). To investigate whether the
high salt elution conditions might dissociate a loosely bound accessory
protein, we also performed hydrodynamic experiments under low salt
conditions on clarified and filtered cytosol that was not subjected to
prior fractionation steps (Table I).
From the fractionation data, it was clear that KRP110 and
KRP170 behaved as two separate monodisperse peaks under
high salt conditions, indicative of two distinct holoenzymes (Fig.
2A and Table I). Both proteins appeared to lack accessory
subunits (Fig. 2, B and C), as the only other
polypeptides present in the KRP110- and
KRP170-containing fractions were variable and highly
substoichiometric to the major band (<0.1:1.0 mol/mol), with the
exception of tubulin, which contaminated KRP170 following
the MT-affinity purification step (Fig. 2E).
Based on the Stokes radius (RS) of 11 nm and a
sedimentation coefficient of 9.8 S obtained under high salt conditions (Table I), we estimated that the KRP110 holoenzyme is a
compact, asymmetric molecule with an axial ratio of <20 and a native
molecular mass of 464 kDa, consistent with the hypothesis that
KRP110 is a homotetramer of four identical 110-kDa subunits
(Table I). However, under low salt conditions, there was a major peak
of KRP110 for which the predicted molecular mass is
somewhat higher (Table I). It is possible that this small difference in
apparent molecular mass reflects variations due to experimental errors, but it is also consistent with the hypothesis that a 50-kDa polypeptide may associate with the holoenzyme under low salt, but not high salt, conditions.
Based on a RS of 16 nm and sedimentation coefficient
of 9.0 S, we estimated that the KRP170 holoenzyme is a
homotetramer with a native molecular weight of 610 kDa and a high axial
ratio of 60-80, indicative of an elongated asymmetric shape. Under low salt conditions, the estimated molecular mass is elevated somewhat, but
both estimates are consistent with a homotetramer (predicted molecular
mass = 680 kDa). KRP170 is thus likely to be a stable bipolar homotetramer like other members of the bipolar bimC
kinesin family. The purification protocol was useful in providing
enough pure material for protein microsequencing and for measuring the hydrodynamic properties of KRP110 and KRP170.
Unfortunately, however, it has not so far proved feasible to obtain
sufficient amounts of pure protein to examine the structure of either
KRP110 or KRP170 by rotary shadow
electronmicroscopy or to test their predicted ability to
cross-link MTs into bundles.
Localization of KRP110 and KRP170 within
Mitotic Spindles--
Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that
KRP110 and KRP170 are associated with sea
urchin embryonic mitotic spindles. KRP110 displayed a
somewhat punctate staining pattern (Fig.
3, a-d). During prophase,
KRP110 was concentrated in a broad band that circumscribes
the nucleus (Fig. 3a), and subsequently in metaphase it was
concentrated throughout the entire mitotic apparatus (Fig. 3b). In unextracted anaphase cells, the protein was present
in a broad band throughout the spindle interzone, between segregating sister chromatids (Fig. 3c). Following detergent lysis of
anaphase cells, the KRP110 antibody staining of the
interzone region was greatly enhanced,and clear staining of spindle
poles became evident (Fig. 3c, inset). In the pre-extracted
cells, the interzonal staining appeared to peak at the equatorial
plane, which predicts the position of the future cleavage furrow. Faint
but detectable punctate staining in the spindle asters was present in
both extracted and unextracted anaphase spindles. During telophase,
some KRP110 appeared to redistribute to the asters
surrounding the reforming nuclei, but the staining of the spindle
equator persisted as two intensely fluorescent bands located at the
midbody (Fig. 3d, arrow and inset).
The anti-KRP170 antibody produced a fibrous, albeit
punctate, staining pattern. During prophase, staining of the asters
associated with separating centrosomes was observed (Fig.
3e). KRP170 appears to associate with both
spindle fibers and spindle poles during metaphase (Fig. 3f)
and at this stage we observed clear, albeit faint, staining of apparent
interzonal MT bundles that cross the metaphase plate, similar to those
that were stained with anti-KLP61F antibody in Drosophila
embryos (18). The fibrous localization of KRP170 persisted
through anaphase (Fig. 3g), but during early telophase,
anti-KRP170 produced punctate perinuclear staining with no
specific staining of the midzone (Fig. 3h).
Microinjection Studies of KRP110 and KRP170
Function--
Previously, we showed that the microinjection of an
anti-KRP110 antibody into one-cell sea urchin embryos leads
to a prophase or metaphase arrest depending upon the time of injection
(3). The timing of the prophase arrest corresponds to a time when
KRP110 displays a broad perinuclear distribution, whereas
the metaphase arrest occurs just prior to the relocalization of
KRP110 from the metaphase asters and half spindles to the
spindle interzone (Fig. 3). In the present study, we used a similar
approach to investigate the function of KRP170.
When antibodies against the KRP170 stalk/tail region were
injected into L. pictus blastomeres, 86% of the injected
embryos were arrested in prophase at the one-cell or two-cell stage
(n = 35) with swollen
nuclei containing disc-shaped structures (Fig. 4 and Table
II). This prophase arrest occurs at a
time when KRP170 is associated with the prophase asters
(Fig. 3E), and the arrest persists for more than 8 h
before the cell dies. During a time period corresponding to the arrest
of the injected cell, control embryos divided to form normal
multicellular blastulae (Fig. 4, top panels).
Immunofluorescence microscopy of injected embryos revealed that MT
arrays appeared to emanate from two or sometimes four foci, which may
correspond to separated ectopic microtubule-organizing centers
associated with each nucleus (Fig. 4, bottom right; Table III). Curiously, we observed that
approximately 14% of the anti-KRP170-injected blastomeres
arrested in anaphase rather than prophase (Table II). In a
complementary experiment, a dominant-negative fusion protein consisting
of GST fused to the distal stalk/tail domains of KRP170 (GST170Coil4Tail; Fig. 1B) was also microinjected
into sea urchin embryos and produced identical mitotic defects to those
observed using antibody inhibition (Table II). Thus, although the
inhibition of KRP110 activity appears to induce a prophase
or metaphase arrest (3), a loss of function of KRP170
appears to result in a prophase or anaphase arrest.
The data described here are consistent with the hypothesis that
KRP110 and KRP170 are homotetrameric members of
the MKLP1 and bipolar kinesin families, respectively, that are
likely to play important roles in mitotic
cell divisions by cross-linking spindle MTs into bundles (Fig.
5).
Based on hydrodynamic data, KRP110 and KRP170
are thought to be homotetramers, at least when partially purified by MT
affinity binding and elution under high salt conditions. Because
bipolar bimC kinesins from Drosophila and yeast
are bipolar, with motor domains at opposite ends of a central rod (15,
17), it is likely that KRP170 has a similar structure;
hydrodynamic data obtained at both low and high ionic strength are
consistent with this idea. Although our data are consistent with
the notion that KRP110 consists of four 110-kDa
polypeptides in the native protein complex, we cannot formally exclude
the possibility that the native protein is a lower order multimer that
contains undetected accessory polypeptides; but this seems unlikely in
light of the fact that the contaminants detected in the preparations
are variable and substoichiometric, and yet the protein behaves as a
monodisperse peak during fractionation. Also, we cannot exclude the
possibility that the difference in the predicted native molecular mass
of KRP110 obtained under low salt conditions may be due to
the presence of a small (50 kDa) accessory polypeptide that is
dissociated from the complex under high salt conditions. Candidate
associated polypeptides include Caenorhabditis elegans
Cyk-4 (28) and polo kinase (7, 27), which are implicated in
MKLP1 function in other systems, where they also play a role in central
spindle formation and cytokinesis.
We speculate that KRP110 also has a bipolar organization,
although further structural studies are needed to test this idea. A
bipolar homotetrameric structure would allow both KRP110
and KRP170 to bind MTs and cross-link them into bundles,
but regardless of whether KRP110 is in fact bipolar, it is
likely, based on hydrodynamic studies, to be a compact holoenzyme
(axial ratio An alternative hypothesis is that the bipolar structure of
homotetrameric plus end-directed kinesins like KRP110 and
KRP170 allows these motors to transport a cargo and
localize it to the spindle interzone. Thus, rather than cross-linking
and sliding anti-parallel MTs, these bipolar motors would move to the
plus ends of MTs within MT bundles, concentrating in the region of overlap as a consequence of being "trapped" there (28). This would
allow bipolar kinesins to localize regulatory molecules like the polo
kinase and Cyk-4 to the interzone. Further work would be needed
to address this hypothesis.
Our finding that sea urchin embryonic cells contain a member of the
bipolar bimC kinesin subfamily, KRP170, which is
homotetrameric and is required for progression through mitosis, is
consistent with work done in several other systems (29). Our
localization data are consistent with the hypothesis that
KRP170 associates generally with spindle MTs, and
inhibiting the function of KRP170 leads to mitotic arrest.
These results are consistent with the model that KRP170 may
cross-link MTs into relatively loose bundles and slide them apart
during the assembly and elongation of the mitotic spindle, consistent
with data from Drosophila that implicate KLP61F in bipolar
spindle maintenance and elongation (19). In Drosophila,
KLP61F is sequestered in the nucleus during prophase and does not
participate in the initial separation of the spindle poles, but only
following nuclear envelope breakdown can KLP61F interact with MTs and
exert forces that push apart the poles (18, 19). Our data on sea urchin
embryonic cells is consistent with the hypothesis that in this system,
KRP170 associates with cytoplasmic MTs where it interacts
with MTs to help push apart the centrosomes during initial spindle
assembly and anaphase spindle elongation, so that inhibiting its
function leads to prophase or anaphase arrest (6).
Our characterization of KRP110 as a MKLP1 homologue that
localizes to mitotic spindles extends our previous work showing that the microinjection of an antibody to mammalian MKLP1, CHO1, causes a
mitotic arrest in sea urchin blastomeres (3). The injected antibody
arrested mitosis at one of two distinct points, namely prophase and
metaphase, depending upon the time of injection. KRP110
localizes to perinuclear regions during prophase and to spindles during
metaphase, which are both regions of high MT density. In mammalian
cells, Nislow et al. (30) saw a similar metaphase arrest;
but no corresponding prophase arrest was seen, perhaps because MKLP1 is
localized to metaphase spindles but is sequestered in the nucleus at
prophase, where it cannot interact with MTs. Thus, we propose that
KRP110 functions to cross-link MTs into tight bundles and
that inhibiting this process leads to a prophase or a metaphase arrest
by interfering directly with spindle mechanics, by activating spindle
assembly checkpoints, or by interfering with the localization of
regulatory components of the spindle.
As in mammalian cells, the microinjection of the CHO1 antibody did not
reveal any effects on later stages of mitosis or cytokinesis, suggesting that earlier mitotic defects may obscure any subsequent defects. However, the most striking localization pattern of
KRP110 was a faint staining of the asters and an intense
concentration in the spindle interzone and midbody during anaphase and
telophase, respectively. In the interzone and midbody, the
homotetrameric KRP110 motor could bind loosely organized,
anti-parallel, midzonal MTs and cross-link them into the tight bundles
that are thought to localize the components of the cleavage furrow and
facilitate progression through cytokinesis (7-12). A role for
KRP110 in the formation of tight midzonal MT bundles is
consistent with the defects in midzonal MT organization seen in
mammalian, Drosophila, and C. elegans cells when
MKLP1 function is impaired. The low but detectable pool of
KRP110 present in anaphase and telophase asters could be
responsible for cross-linking anti-parallel MTs emanating from two
adjacent asters, thereby signaling the formation of the cleavage furrow
between the two asters in the absence of an associated central spindle
(1).
These data improve our understanding of the roles of MT-based motors in
sea urchin embryonic mitotic cell divisions by suggesting that
KRP110 and KRP170 are homotetramers that play
important roles in mitosis. We hypothesize that the long
KRP170 motors cross-link MTs into relatively loose bundles
and slide them apart during centrosome separation, whereas the compact
KRP110 motors organize MTs into more closely packed bundles
that are required for progression through mitosis and completion of cytokinesis.
In sea urchin embryos, as in other systems (19), multiple mitotic
motors are likely to function in a coordinated fashion. How
KRP110 and KRP170 may work in concert with
other mitotic motors, including kinesin C (25), KRP180 (6),
and cytoplasmic dynein are topics for future work.
We thank the numerous members of the Scholey,
Hawley, McNally, Liu, Rose, Mitchison, and Wilt laboratories for
advice, information, and discussions.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM55507 (to J. M. S.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF292394 and AF292395.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Section of Molecular
and Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, One Shields
Ave., Davis, CA 95616. Tel.: 530-752-2271; Fax: 530-752-7522; E-mail:
jmscholey@ucdavis.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 26, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005948200
The abbreviations used are:
MT, microtubule;
KRP, kinesin-related protein;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
AMPPNP, adenosine
5'-(
Roles of Two Homotetrameric Kinesins in Sea Urchin Embryonic Cell
Division*
, and
Department of
Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Berkeley,
California 94720-3200
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Maps of KRP110 and
KRP170 and antibody characterization.
KRP110 and KRP170 were completely sequenced and
the sequences deposited in GenBankTM (accession numbers
AF292394 and AF292395). A, four sequenced KRP110
peptides displayed 100% identity with the deduced amino acid sequence.
The KRP110 peptide antibody was raised against the
double underlined peptide. B, three sequenced
KRP170 peptides were found to match 100% with the deduced
amino acid sequence. Recombinant GST KRP170
Stalk/Tail fusion protein was used to raise mouse
anti-KRP170 antiserum, and recombinant GST
KRP170 Coil4/Tail protein was used as
a dominant-negative construct for microinjection studies. C,
characterization of antibodies. Coomassie Blue-stained
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and corresponding Western blots probed
with pan-kinesin, anti-KRP170, or anti-KRP110
antibodies. Lanes: 1, MTs prepared in AMPPNP; 2,
MTs prepared in ATP; 3, partially purified
KRP170; 4, partially purified
KRP110. A mouse monoclonal CHO1 antibody (lanes
1, 2, and 4) or a KRP110 peptide
antibody (lane 4') were used. Note that lanes 4 and 4' were from a single blot strip cut in two to show that
the mouse monoclonal antibody, CHO1 (lane 4) and the
anti-KRP110 peptide antibody (lane 4') recognize
the same 110-kDa polypeptide.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Partial purification of KRP110
and KRP170.. A, immunoblots of
gel filtration fractions 15-28 of high salt eluted MT-binding proteins
probed with anti-KRP110 (top) and
anti-KRP170 antibodies (bottom). B,
fractions of KRP110 from a 5-20% sucrose density gradient
on a silver-stained gel (top) and anti-KRP110
immunoblot (bottom). C, fractions of
KRP170 from a 5-20% sucrose density gradient on a
Coomassie Blue-stained gel (top) and an anti-KRP170
immunoblot (below). D and E, Coomassie
Blue-stained gels of partially purified KRP110
(D) and KRP170 (E); identical samples
were immobilized onto polyvinylidene membranes, and the excised bands
(indicated by arrows) were sequenced.
Hydrodynamic properties of native KRP110 and KRP170

View larger version (59K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Localization of KRP110
and KRP170 within sea urchin embryonic mitotic
spindles. a
d, confocal images of
anti-KRP110 (yellow) and DAPI
(blue)-stained sea urchin (L. variegatus) embryos
fixed with cold methanol during the first cell division.
Inset c is pre-extracted embryo spindle
and inset d is a close-up of the stained midbody
(arrow). e
h, confocal images of
anti-KRP170 (yellow)- and DAPI
(blue)-stained sea urchin (L. pictus) embryos
fixed with cold methanol during the 4-8-cell stage. a and
e, prophase; b and f, metaphase;
c and g, anaphase; and d and
h, telophase.

View larger version (104K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of the KRP170
function in sea urchin embryo results in a prophase arrest.
Microinjection of anti-KRP170 antibody. Differential
interference contrast images of an affinity-purified
anti-KRP170 stalk/tail antibody-injected embryo and a
control-injected embryo. Control embryos divided normally, whereas
anti-KRP170 antibody-injected embryos arrested in prophase
with enlarged nuclei. The right-hand column shows tubulin
staining of the same embryos shown in the left-hand and
middle columns, post-injection and post-development, using
indirect immunofluorescence.
Microinjection of anti-KRP170 stalk/tail antibody or
GST-KRP170Coil4Tail resulted in mitotic arrest
Number of ectopic microtubule-organizing centers (MTOCs) associated per
nucleus in blastomeres injected with anti-KRP170 stalk/tail
antibody
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Model for cross-linking of microtubules into
bundles by KRP110 and KRP170.
KRP170 is predicted to have a longer stalk than
KRP110 based on hydrodynamic data and coiled-coil
predictions. We propose that KRP170 may cross-link
microtubules into "loose bundles" that are tightened by
KRP110, allowing normal progression through mitosis and
completion of cytokinesis.
20) with a coiled-coil rod that is only 22 nm
long. KRP170 is predicted to be more elongated (axial ratio
of 60-80) with an
-helical rod ~62 nm in length; this would
predict that KRP110 cross-links MTs into tighter,
more-closely packed bundles than KRP170. Both
KRP110 and KRP170 bind MTs in a
nucleotide-insensitive fashion, but MT-cross-linking remains to be
demonstrated. To test our hypothesis, it would be of interest to
perform immunoelectronmicroscopic studies to visualize KRP110 and KRP170 cross-bridges within
spindles. Such experiments are being initiated using the homologous
proteins, PAV-KLP and KLP61F in Drosophila embryos, where we
have already visualized KLP61F cross-bridges in situ
(18).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
,
-imino)triphosphate;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA
ends;
DAPI, 4-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole;
aa, amino acid;
CHO1, Chinese hamster ovary-1;
MKLP1, mitotic kinesin-like protein 1.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Rappaport, R.
(1996)
Cytokinesis in Animal Cells
, pp. 1-386, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2.
Scholey, J. M.
(1998)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
39,
257-260
3.
Wright, B. D.,
Terasaki, M.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
681-689
4.
Bi, G. Q.,
Morris, R. L.,
Liao, G.,
Alderton, J. M.,
Scholey, J. M.,
and Steinhardt, R. A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
999-1008
5.
Morris, R. L.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
1009-1022
6.
Rogers, G. C.,
Chui, K. K.,
Lee, E. W.,
Wedaman, K. P.,
Sharp, D. J.,
Holland, G.,
Morris, R. L.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
499-512
7.
Adams, R. R.,
Tavares, A. A.,
Salzberg, A.,
Bellen, H. J.,
and Glover, D. M.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1483-1494
8.
Nislow, C.,
Lombillo, V. A.,
Kuriyama, R.,
and McIntosh, J. R.
(1992)
Nature
359,
543-547
9.
Powers, J.,
Bossinger, O.,
Rose, D.,
Strome, S.,
and Saxton, W.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1133-1136
10.
Raich, W. B.,
Moran, A. N.,
Rothman, J. H.,
and Hardin, J.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
2037-2049
11.
Savoian, M. S.,
Earnshaw, W. C.,
Khodjakov, A.,
and Reider, C. L.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
297-311
12.
Sellitto, C.,
and Kuriyama, R.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
106,
431-439
13.
Robinson, D. N.,
and Spudich, J. A.
(2000)
Trends Cell Biol.
10,
228-237
14.
Cole, D. G.,
Saxton, W. M.,
Sheehan, K. B.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22913-22916
15.
Kashina, A. S.,
Baskin, R. J.,
Cole, D. G.,
Wedaman, K. P.,
Saxton, W. M.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1996)
Nature
379,
270-272
16.
Kashina, A. S.,
Scholey, J. M.,
Leszyk, J. D.,
and Saxton, W. M.
(1996)
Nature
384,
225
17.
Gordon, D. M.,
and Roof, D. M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
28779-28786
18.
Sharp, D. J.,
McDonald, K. L.,
Brown, H. M.,
Matthies, H. J.,
Walczak, C.,
Vale, R. D.,
Mitchison, T. J.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
125-138
19.
Sharp, D. J.,
Brown, H. M.,
Kwon, M.,
Rogers, G. C.,
Holland, G.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
241-253
20.
Buster, D.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1991)
J. Cell Sci.
14,
109-115
21.
Scholey, J. M.,
Neighbors, B.,
McIntosh, J. R.,
and Salmon, E. D.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
6516-6525
22.
Scholey, J. M.,
Porter, M. E.,
Grissom, P. M.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1985)
Nature
318,
483-486
23.
Siegel, L.,
and Monty, K.
(1966)
Biochim. Biolphys. Acta
112,
346-362
24.
Zamyatnin, A. A.
(1972)
Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.
24,
107-123
25.
Rogers, G. C.,
Hart, C. L.,
Wedaman, K. P.,
and Scholey, J. M.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
294,
1-8
26.
Field, C. M.,
Oegema, K.,
Zheng, Y.,
Mitchison, T. J.,
and Walczak, C. E.
(1998)
Methods Enzymol.
298,
525-541
27.
Lee, K. S.,
Yuan, Y. L.,
Kuriyama, R.,
and Erikson, R. L.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
7143-7151
28.
Jantsch-Plunger, V.,
Gonczy, P.,
Romano, A.,
Schnabel, H.,
Hamill, D.,
Schnabel, R.,
Hyman, A. A.,
and Glotzer, M.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
1391-1404
29.
Walczak, C. E.,
and Mitchison, T. J.
(1996)
Cell
85,
943-946
30.
Nislow, C.,
Sellitto, C.,
Kuriyama, R.,
and McIntosh, J. R.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
511-522
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Bartolini and G. G. Gundersen Generation of noncentrosomal microtubule arrays J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2006; 119(20): 4155 - 4163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Hildebrandt, L. Gheber, T. Kingsbury, and M. A. Hoyt Homotetrameric Form of Cin8p, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kinesin-5 Motor, Is Essential for Its in Vivo Function J. Biol. Chem., September 8, 2006; 281(36): 26004 - 26013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Minestrini, A. S. Harley, and D. M. Glover Localization of Pavarotti-KLP in Living Drosophila Embryos Suggests Roles in Reorganizing the Cortical Cytoskeleton during the Mitotic Cycle Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2003; 14(10): 4028 - 4038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Matuliene and R. Kuriyama Kinesin-like Protein CHO1 Is Required for the Formation of Midbody Matrix and the Completion of Cytokinesis in Mammalian Cells Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2002; 13(6): 1832 - 1845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kuriyama, C. Gustus, Y. Terada, Y. Uetake, and J. Matuliene CHO1, a mammalian kinesin-like protein, interacts with F-actin and is involved in the terminal phase of cytokinesis J. Cell Biol., March 4, 2002; 156(5): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Minestrini, E. Mathe, and D. M. Glover Domains of the Pavarotti kinesin-like protein that direct its subcellular distribution: effects of mislocalisation on the tubulin and actin cytoskeleton during Drosophila oogenesis J. Cell Sci., February 15, 2002; 115(4): 725 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kuriyama, C. Gustus, Y. Terada, Y. Uetake, and J. Matuliene CHO1, a mammalian kinesin-like protein, interacts with F-actin and is involved in the terminal phase of cytokinesis J. Cell Biol., March 4, 2002; 156(5): 783 - 790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |