![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 49, 38131-38134, December 8, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3-Adrenergic Receptor Is Required for MAP Kinase
Activation*
,
§,
§, and
From the Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
¶ Pharmacology, and
Medicine and the
§ Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical
Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
Received for publication, August 30, 2000, and in revised form, September 20, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both During the past several years, transmembrane signaling traffic
through G protein-coupled receptors
(GPCRs)1 has grown from the
classic G protein effectors such as adenylyl cyclase and phospholipases
to include novel mechanisms for activation of mitogen-activated protein
(MAP) kinase cascades. These signaling systems typically involve
receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinases as scaffolds and
intermediaries (1-6). An example of this flexibility in GPCR signaling
includes the In exploring the mechanisms of The Chemicals and Construction of Plasmids--
-The
Cell Culture and Transfections and Signal Transduction
Assays--
C3H10T1/2 (T1/2) preadipocytes and COS-7 cells were grown
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum in
6-well dishes as detailed (13, 24). Cells were transfected with
HA- Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy--
Confocal microscopy was
performed on a Zeiss LSM510 laser scanning microscope using a Zeiss 63X
1.4 numerical aperture water immersion lens, and fluorescent signals
were collected (14). Three independent experiments were performed, and
10 or more fields/sample were analyzed in each experiment.
Protein-Protein Interaction and Co-precipitation Assays--
The
biotinylated fusion proteins for the wild-type or mutated
Xa-2- Activation of the Ras-dependent ERK cascade by many
GPCRs requires Src kinase activity (13, 25). For the
2- and
3-adrenergic receptors (ARs) are able to activate the
extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway. We previously
showed that c-Src is required for ERK activation by
2AR
and that it is recruited to activated
2AR through
binding of the Src homology 3 (SH3) domain to proline-rich regions of the adapter protein
-arrestin1. Despite the absence of sites for
phosphorylation and
-arrestin binding, ERK activation by
3AR still requires c-Src. Agonist activation of
2AR, but not
3AR, led to redistribution
of green fluorescent protein-tagged
-arrestin to the plasma
membrane. In
-arrestin-deficient COS-7 cells,
-agonist-dependent co-precipitation of c-Src with the
2AR required exogenous
-arrestin, but activated
3AR co-precipitated c-Src in the absence or presence of
-arrestin. ERK activation and Src co-precipitation with
3AR also occurred in adipocytes in an
agonist-dependent and pertussis toxin-sensitive manner. Protein interaction studies show that the
3AR interacts
directly with the SH3 domain of Src through proline-rich motifs
(PXXP) in the third intracellular loop and the
carboxyl terminus. ERK activation and Src co-precipitation were
abolished in cells expressing point mutations in these PXXP
motifs. Together, these data describe a novel mechanism of ERK
activation by a G protein-coupled receptor in which the intracellular
domains directly recruit c-Src.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2-adrenergic receptor (
2AR). Although this receptor is classically known to couple to Gs and stimulate adenylyl cyclase, it can also activate the ERK1/2 MAP kinase
pathway (7, 8). In some cell types, the
2AR activates ERK through its coupling to a PTX-sensitive Gi protein and
subsequent Ras-dependent MAP kinase activation (7, 9),
whereas in other systems this occurs in a PTX-independent and a
Gs- and cAMP-dependent process (10, 11) through
the activation of Rap1 (11).
2AR-stimulated MAP kinase
activation, we have found that some of the same signaling molecules required for receptor desensitization can also be intimately involved in the activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Following agonist activation, most GPCRs are phosphorylated by GPCR kinases (GRKs), with
subsequent binding of
-arrestin to the phosphorylated receptor serving to interdict G protein coupling and signal transduction (5, 12,
13). However, in addition to its role in desensitization,
-arrestin
can also participate in the events leading to MAP kinase activation.
Binding of
-arrestin1 to the agonist-activated
2AR rapidly recruits c-Src to the receptor (12, 14). This recruitment appears to be mediated by an interaction between the amino-terminal proline-rich region of
-arrestin1 and the SH3 domain of c-Src (13,
15).
3AR is a member of the
AR subfamily of GPCRs that
is expressed predominantly in adipocytes. Because selective
3AR agonists have been shown to prevent or even reverse
obesity and diabetes in various animal models (16-18), increased
attention has been focused upon the molecular and physiological
regulation of this receptor as a therapeutic target (19). Early studies
of
-adrenergic stimulation of adenylyl cyclase in adipocytes by
Rodbell and colleagues (20) indicated the presence of a PTX-sensitive
component. In examining this issue, we showed that this effect is due
to the presence of the adipocyte-specific
3AR and its
ability to simultaneously couple to both Gs and
Gi, leading to the activation of the
cAMP-dependent protein kinase A and ERK1/2 pathways,
respectively (9). Because GRK-mediated phosphorylation is necessary for
-arrestin binding (reviewed in Ref. 21), but the
3AR
lacks sites for phosphorylation (22), we concluded that the
3AR must employ a novel mechanism of ERK activation.
Here, we demonstrate that conserved proline-rich motifs in the third
intracellular loop and carboxyl terminus of the
3AR
directly recruit c-Src in a
3AR agonist- and
PTX-sensitive manner. This interaction occurs specifically through the
SH3 domain of c-Src. Our findings establish a new mechanism whereby
some GPCRs can acquire ligand-induced tyrosine kinase activity by means of direct recruitment of Src kinases.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
3AR agonist CL316,243 was a gift from American Cyanamid
Co. (Pearl River, NY). L-(
)-Isoproteronol and propranolol
were from Sigma and selective c-Src inhibitor PP2 from
Calbiochem. For plasmids Xa-2-Loop3 (Wt), Xa-2-Tail (Wt),
Xa-2-MutL1 (L1), and Xa-2-MutT1 (T1), the wild-type or mutated third
intracellular domain (amino acids 222-289) or the carboxyl terminus
(amino acids 344-400) of mouse
3AR were cloned into
PinPoint Xa-2 vector at HindIII and BglII sites
under the control of the SV40 promoter. All plasmid constructs were
verified by sequencing. GST fusion proteins of c-Src containing either
the SH3 and SH2 domains (GST-SH3/SH2) or the SH2 domain alone (GST-SH2)
were prepared as described previously (23).
3AR DNA (2 µg for T1/2 cells; 1 µg for COS-7
cells) and 5 µl of LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies, Inc.). For T1/2,
on day 2 cells were induced to differentiate (1 µM
rosiglitazone, 0.1 µM LGD1069, 200 nM
insulin). Prior to each analysis, the density of receptor per cell was
assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting. MAP kinase assays were
performed as previously detailed (9) in cells that were serum-deprived
for 24 h. Where indicated, some cells were treated with PTX (100 ng/ml, 16 h) propranolol (0.1 µM, 5 min), CL316,243
(10 µM), or isoproterenol (10 µM, 5 min).
cAMP levels in whole cells were measured as described previously (9).
3AR Loop3 or Xa-2-
3AR Tail were
expressed and purified (Promega). For in vitro binding, 2 µg of purified biotinylated fusion protein was mixed with 4 µg of
GST-Src-SH3/2 or GST-Src-SH2 fusion proteins and incubated in
phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% bovine serum albumin, 5%
glycerol, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40. After 16 h at 4 °C, the
reactions were terminated by washing the immobilized complexes with 30 volumes of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline containing 5% glycerol
and 0.1% Nonidet P-40. The supernatant was removed, and 50 µl of 2×
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer was added to each
reaction. The biotinylated proteins were resolved by 4-20%
SDS-acrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (Novagen), transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes, and identified by staining with
streptavidin-conjugated alkaline phosphatase. Immunoprecipitations of
HA-tagged
2AR and
3AR from intact cells and immunoblotting for co-precipitated proteins were performed as
described previously (25).
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2AR, ERK activation depends on the delivery of
-arrestin-bound c-Src to the receptor (13). However, it is unclear
whether other GPCRs utilize this same mechanism. As shown in Fig.
1,
3AR-mediated ERK
activation similarly requires Src kinase activity, as demonstrated by
its concentration-dependent sensitivity to the Src-specific
tyrosine kinase inhibitor, PP2. Complete inhibition was achieved within the range of 1 to 5 µM; a concentration previously
established to selectively inhibit Src kinase (8, 26). Inhibition of
3AR-mediated ERK activation was also observed when the
C-terminal Src kinase was co-expressed with
3AR (data
not shown). Because GRK-mediated phosphorylation of receptors is
necessary for
-arrestin binding (21), but the
3AR
is not phosphorylated by GRKs, we hypothesized that agonist stimulation
of
3AR would not lead to
-arrestin binding. This
hypothesis is confirmed as illustrated in Fig.
2, which compares the effects of agonist
stimulation on the cellular distribution of a chimeric
-arrestin
2-GFP in HEK-293 cells expressing either the human
2AR
or the mouse
3AR. Isoprenaline (10 µM)
stimulation of the
2AR promotes the rapid translocation of
-arrestin 2-GFP from a diffuse cytosolic distribution to the plasma membrane where it aggregates with the receptor in
membrane-associated puncta (14). In contrast, stimulation of cells
expressing the mouse
3AR with the selective
3AR agonist CL316,243 (5 µM) fails to
induce
-arrestin 2-GFP translocation. Thus, although
3AR-stimulated ERK activation is
Src-dependent, similar to the
2AR, the
3AR response occurs without the formation of complexes
between
3AR and
-arrestin.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The c-Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor PP2
inhibits the activation of ERK1/2 by
3AR receptors. A, COS-7
cells mock transfected (NT) or expressing
3AR
were pretreated with 0.1 µM propranolol and indicated
concentrations of PP2 for 15 min prior to stimulation with 10 µM CL316,243 for 5 min. Cell lysates were prepared and
analyzed by immunoblotting with antisera for ERK1/2 as described
previously (9). B, Quantification of the results described
in A shows the mean ± S.E. for 3 independent
experiments.

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Stimulation of
2AR, but not
3AR, results in recruitment of
-arrestin 2-GFP to the plasma membrane.
Cells expressing HA epitope-tagged
2AR
(upper panel) or
3AR (lower panel)
and
-arrestin 2-GFP chimera were stimulated for 10 min with 10 µM isoproterenol or 5 µM CL316,243,
respectively. The subcellular distribution of
-arrestin 2-GFP before
(left panels) and after (right panels) agonist
stimulation was determined by laser confocal immunofluorescence
microscopy (13). Frames shown are from 1 of 3 independent
experiments.
We previously showed that c-Src interacts with proline-containing
motifs in the
-arrestin amino terminus and the SH3 domain of c-Src,
although the c-Src catalytic domain also contributes significantly to
this binding (13). Interestingly, although the
3AR does
not recruit
-arrestin, all species homologues of this receptor
contain highly conserved proline residues in both the third
intracellular domain and the carboxyl terminus that are completely
absent from the
2AR. Two of these proline clusters in
each domain contain the sequence PXXP, which represents the minimal consensus motif for SH3 domain binding (27-29). We therefore tested the hypothesis that these proline-rich motifs within the
3AR might directly recruit SH3 domain-containing
proteins to the receptor, obviating the need for
-arrestin to
function as an adapter protein.
First, we determined whether
3AR could directly
recruit Src kinases to activate the ERK pathway in the absence or
presence of over-expressed
-arrestin in COS-7 cells, which express
little endogenous
-arrestin (30). As shown in Fig.
3 (lanes 1-3), agonist
treatment resulted in the detectable co-precipitation of c-Src with the
2AR only in the presence of co-expressed
-arrestin. As expected from earlier studies (13), the provision of
-arrestin dramatically enhanced
2AR-mediated ERK phosphorylation
under these conditions. In contrast, the expression of
-arrestin had no effect on responses mediated by the
3AR. Robust
3AR agonist-dependent co-precipitation of
c-Src and ERK1/2 activation was observed, which did not require the
presence of
-arrestin (lanes 4-6). Src that
co-precipitated with
2AR and
3AR was also
in its activated (dephosphorylated) state.
|
Second, because the physiological site of expression of the
3AR is the adipocyte, a key question is whether the
3AR directly recruits Src kinase in adipocytes as
observed in COS-7 cells. We performed similar co-precipitation
experiments in the mouse white adipocyte cell line, C3H10T1/2 (31). As
shown in Fig. 4A, by day 4 of
differentiation, C3H10T1/2 cells express the adipocyte-specific genes
3AR and the fatty acid-binding protein aP2 (32, 33). Fig. 4B shows that the
3AR-selective agonist
CL316,243 is capable of triggering ERK activation in both
nontransfected (NT) cells (via the endogenous
3AR), and in the HA-m
3AR transfected
cells, but ERK activation was abolished by inactivation of
Gi with PTX. Fig. 4C shows that, as observed in
COS-7 cells, Src kinase co-precipitates with the HA-
3AR
in C3H10T1/2 adipocytes, and this interaction is both agonist- and
Gi-dependent.
|
These results taken together indicate that the
3AR can
mediate the
-arrestin-independent recruitment of c-Src. To address whether binding between proline-rich motifs in the
3AR
and the c-Src SH3 domain might be responsible for this interaction, we first tested whether peptides derived from these regions of the
3AR, as shown in Fig. 5A, would bind to
GST-Src fusion proteins in vitro. As shown in Fig.
5B, biotinylated fusion
proteins derived from both the third intracellular domain (Loop3) and
the carboxyl terminus (Tail) of the wild-type
3AR bound
to the GST-Src SH3/SH2 but not to the GST-Src SH2 fusion protein. There
was no interaction with GST alone. Consistent with an SH3
domain-mediated interaction, mutants of the
3AR Loop3
(L1) and Tail (T1) peptides in which Ser was substituted for Pro in the
PXXP motifs were no longer able to interact with the GST-Src
SH3/SH2 peptide. In addition, we found that the wild-type
3AR Loop3 and Tail peptides could precipitate endogenous
c-Src and Grb2 from whole cell lysates of HEK-293 cells (not shown).
Collectively, these data suggest that proline-rich motifs in both Loop3
and the Tail of the
3AR possess the capacity to bind SH3
domains.
|
To assess the functional role of the
3AR proline-rich
motifs in Src-dependent activation of the ERK cascade,
mutant
3ARs were constructed in which these motifs were
disrupted by site-directed mutagenesis. Mouse
3ARs
containing the L1, L2 (a deletion of Loop3 amino acids Ser-242
to Pro-266), or T1 mutations were expressed in COS-7 cells and assayed
for the ability to co-precipitate endogenous c-Src and to induce ERK1/2
phosphorylation and cAMP production. As shown in Fig.
6, mutation or deletion of the
PXXP motifs in either the third intracellular loop or the
carboxyl terminus resulted in a striking dissociation of
3AR-mediated c-Src binding and ERK activation from
3AR-mediated stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. Fig.
6A shows that endogenous c-Src co-precipitated with
wild-type
3AR in an agonist-dependent
manner, whereas co-precipitation of c-Src with each of the mutant
receptors was markedly impaired. Similar effects were observed for
3AR-mediated ERK1/2 activation, which was abolished by
the L1, L2, and T1 mutations (Fig. 6C). In contrast,
3AR-mediated production of cAMP was completely
unaffected by disruption of the PXXP motifs (Fig.
6E).
|
These data suggest that the ability of the
3AR to
mediate Src-dependent activation of the ERK cascade, but
not its ability to interact with Gs protein and stimulate
the cAMP pathway, is dependent upon the integrity of the
PXXP motifs in the third intracellular domain and the
carboxyl terminus of the receptor. Each of these motifs is sufficient
to bind to Src-GST SH3 domains in vitro, and site-directed
mutagenesis of either motif prevents the agonist-dependent formation of complexes between the
3AR and c-Src when
the mutant receptors are expressed in intact cells. The apparent
necessity for intact PXXP motifs in both the third
intracellular loop and the carboxyl terminus of the
3AR
for agonist-dependent Src co-precipitation and functional
ERK activation is not clear, but it implies that a novel multimeric
complex containing at least activated c-Src and two domains of the
3AR is formed on the receptor itself to trigger this
signaling cascade. However, the exact nature of this complex is
unknown, and the stoichiometry of the receptor-Src interaction will
require further mutagenesis and structural analysis.
The distinct strategies employed by the
2AR and
3AR to recruit Src kinases illustrate the flexibility
that characterizes the mechanisms of G protein coupling,
agonist-induced receptor sequestration, and activation of tyrosine
protein kinases by heptahelical receptors. In the case of the
2AR, G protein coupling and ERK activation occur
sequentially. Src recruitment requires
-arrestin binding, an event
that simultaneously terminates receptor-G protein coupling and triggers
removal of the receptor from the cell surface. In contrast, the
3AR is expressed in adipocytes where it is stimulated by
norepinephrine in response to the requirement for fuel mobilization and
heat generation (34). Given its physiologic role, there is little
apparent need for
3AR desensitization, particularly in
times of chronic stimulation such as exposure to cold. There is
increasing evidence that the coincident activation of the
cAMP-dependent protein kinase A and MAP kinase
pathways could have important consequences for energy balance (35-38),
given the potent and robust effects of
3AR agonists
in vivo (17, 39). Inclusion of SH3 domain binding motifs
within the intracellular domains of the receptor incorporates the
adapter protein role of
-arrestin within the receptor, thus allowing
Src recruitment and ERK activation to proceed independently of receptor sequestration.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Bruce Spiegelman for the
cDNA encoding aP2, Drs. Larry Barak and Marc Caron for the
-arrestin 2-GFP clone, and Dr. William C. Wetsel for reading the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Duke University
Medical Ctr., Box 3557, Durham, NC 27710. Tel.: 919-684-8991; Fax: 919-684-3071; E-mail: colli008@mc.duke.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 29, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C000592200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
GPCR, G
protein-coupled receptor;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
2/
3AR,
2/
3-adrenergic receptor;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
PTX, pertussis toxin;
GRK, GPCR
kinase;
SH3, Src homology 3;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
GFP, green fluorescent protein.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Koch, W., Hawes, B., Allen, L., and Lefkowitz, R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U. S. A. 91, 12706-12710 |
| 2. | van Biesen, T., Hawes, B. E., Luttrell, D. K., Krueger, K. M., Touhara, K., Porfiri, E., Sakaue, M., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) Nature 376, 781-784 |
| 3. | Crespo, P., Xu, N., Simonds, W. F., and Gutkind, J. S. (1994) Nature 369, 418-420 |
| 4. | van Biesen, T., Luttrell, L. M., Hawes, B. E., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1996) Endocr. Rev. 17, 698-714 |
| 5. | Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18677-18680 |
| 6. | Gutkind, J. S. (2000) Science's STKE ww.stke.org/cgi/content/full/OC_sigtrans; 2000/40/rel |
| 7. | Daaka, Y., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1997) Nature 390, 88-91 |
| 8. | Maudsley, S., Pierce, K. L., Zamah, A. M., Miller, W. E., Ahn, S., Daaka, Y., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Luttrell, L. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9572-9580 |
| 9. | Soeder, K. S., Snedden, S. K., Cao, W., Della Rocca, G. J., Daniel, K. W., Luttrell, L. M., and Collins, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12017-12022 |
| 10. | Wan, Y., and Huang, X.-Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 14533-14537 |
| 11. | Schmitt, J. M., and Stork, P. J. S. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 25342-25350 |
| 12. | Lin, F., Krueger, K., Kendall, H., Daaka, Y., Fredericks, Z., Pitcher, J., and Lefkowitz, R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31051-31057 |
| 13. | Luttrell, L. M., Ferguson, S. S. G., Daaka, Y., Miller, W. E., Maudsley, S., Rocca, G. J. D., Lin, F.-T., Kawakatsu, H., Owada, K., Luttrell, D. K., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1999) Science 283, 655-661 |
| 14. | Barak, L. S., Ferguson, S. S., Zhang, J., and Caron, M. G. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27497-27500 |
| 15. | Miller, W. E., Maudsley, S., Ahn, S., Khan, K. D., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11312-11319 |
| 16. | Himms-Hagen, J., Cui, J., Danforth, E., Jr., Taatjes, D. J., Lang, S. S., Waters, B. L., and Claus, T. H. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 266, R1371-R1382 |
| 17. | Collins, S., Daniel, K. W., Petro, A. E., and Surwit, R. S. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 405-413 |
| 18. | Sasaki, N., Uchida, E., Niiyama, M., Yoshida, T., and Saito, M. (1998) J. Vet. Med. Sci. 60, 465-469 |
| 19. | Collins, S., and Surwit, R. S. (2000) Recent Prog. Horm. Res., in press |
| 20. | Cooper, D., Schlegel, W., Lin, M., and Rodbell, M. (1979) J. Biol. Chem. 254, 8927-8931 |
| 21. | Freedman, N., and Lefkowitz, R. (1996) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 51, 319-353 |
| 22. | Liggett, S., Freedman, N. J., Schwinn, D. A., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 3665-3669 |
| 23. | Luttrell, L., Della Rocca, G., van Biesen, T., Luttrell, D., and Lefkowitz, R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 4637-4644 |
| 24. | Kliewer, S. A., Lenhard, J. M., Wilson, T. M., Patel, I., Morris, D. C., and Lehmann, J. M. (1995) Cell 83, 813-819 |
| 25. | Luttrell, L. M., Hawes, B. E., van Biesen, T., Luttrell, D. K., Lansing, T. J., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19443-19450 |
| 26. | Yoshizumi, M., Abe, J.-i., Haendeler, J., Huang, Q., and Berk, B. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 11706-11712 |
| 27. | Yu, H., Chen, J. K., Feng, S., Dalgarno, D. C., Brauer, A. W., and Schreiber, S. L. (1994) Cell 76, 933-945 |
| 28. | Cohen, G. B., Ren, R., and Baltimore, D. (1995) Cell 80, 237-248 |
| 29. | Sparks, A. B., Rider, J. E., Hoffman, N. G., Fowlkes, D. M., Quillam, L. A., and Kay, B. K. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1540-1544 |
| 30. | Menard, L., Ferguson, S. S., Zhang, J., Lin, F. T., Lefkowitz, R. J., Caron, M. G., and Barak, L. S. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 51, 800-808 |
| 31. | Lehmann, J. M., Lenhard, J. M., Oliver, B. B., Ringold, G. M., and Kliewer, S. A. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 3406-3410 |
| 32. | Hunt, C. R., Ro, J. H.-S., Dobson, D. E., Min, H. Y., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 3786-3790 |
| 33. | Strosberg, A. D., and Pietri-Rouxel, F. (1996) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 17, 373-381 |
| 34. | Strosberg, A. (1997) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37, 421-450 |
| 35. | Hu, E., Kim, J. B., Sarraf, P., and Spiegelman, B. M. (1996) Science 274, 2100-2103 |
| 36. | Adams, M., Reginato, M., Shao, D., Lazar, M., and Chatterjee, V. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5128-5132 |
| 37. | Souza, S. C., Yamamoto, M. T., Franciosa, M. D., Lien, P., and Greenberg, A. S. (1998) Diabetes 47, 691-695 |
| 38. | Puigserver, P., Wu, Z., Park, C., Graves, R., Wright, M., and Spiegelman, B. (1998) Cell 92, 829-839 |
| 39. | Arch, J. R. S., Ainsworth, A. T., Cawthorne, M. A., Piercy, V., Sennitt, M. V., Thody, V. E., Wilson, C., and Wilson, S. (1984) Nature 309, 163-165 |
| 40. | Collins, S., and Surwit, R. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9437-9440 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Galandrin, G. Oligny-Longpre, H. Bonin, K. Ogawa, C. Gales, and M. Bouvier Conformational Rearrangements and Signaling Cascades Involved in Ligand-Biased Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling through the {beta}1-Adrenergic Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2008; 74(1): 162 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Liu, Q. F. Collins, F. Moukdar, D. Zhuo, J. Han, T. Hong, S. Collins, and W. Cao Suppression of Hepatic Glucose Production by Human Neutrophil {alpha}-Defensins through a Signaling Pathway Distinct from Insulin J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2008; 283(18): 12056 - 12063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Janes, K. M. E. Chu, A. J. L. Clark, and P. J. King Mechanisms of Adrenocorticotropin-Induced Activation of Extracellularly Regulated Kinase 1/2 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in the Human H295R Adrenal Cell Line Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1898 - 1905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sato, T. Horinouchi, D. S. Hutchinson, B. A. Evans, and R. J. Summers Ligand-Directed Signaling at the beta3-Adrenoceptor Produced by 3-(2-Ethylphenoxy)-1-[(1,S)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapth-1-ylamino]-2S-2-propanol oxalate (SR59230A) Relative to Receptor Agonists Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2007; 72(5): 1359 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. F. Collins, H.-Y. Liu, J. Pi, Z. Liu, M. J. Quon, and W. Cao Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), A Green Tea Polyphenol, Suppresses Hepatic Gluconeogenesis through 5'-AMP-activated Protein Kinase J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2007; 282(41): 30143 - 30149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. McGarrigle and X.-Y. Huang GPCRs Signaling Directly Through Src-Family Kinases Sci. Signal., June 26, 2007; 2007(392): pe35 - pe35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Barthet, B. Framery, F. Gaven, L. Pellissier, E. Reiter, S. Claeysen, J. Bockaert, and A. Dumuis 5-Hydroxytryptamine4 Receptor Activation of the Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Pathway Depends on Src Activation but Not on G Protein or beta-Arrestin Signaling Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1979 - 1991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kumar, J. Robidoux, K. W. Daniel, G. Guzman, L. M. Floering, and S. Collins Requirement of Vimentin Filament Assembly for beta3-Adrenergic Receptor Activation of ERK MAP Kinase and Lipolysis J. Biol. Chem., March 23, 2007; 282(12): 9244 - 9250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tao, H.-y. Wang, and C. C. Malbon Src Docks to A-kinase Anchoring Protein Gravin, Regulating beta2-Adrenergic Receptor Resensitization and Recycling J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2007; 282(9): 6597 - 6608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rey, D. Manen, R. Rizzoli, J. Caverzasio, and S. L. Ferrari Proline-rich Motifs in the Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)/PTH-related Protein Receptor C Terminus Mediate Scaffolding of c-Src with beta-Arrestin2 for ERK1/2 Activation J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38181 - 38188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Robidoux, N. Kumar, K. W. Daniel, F. Moukdar, M. Cyr, A. V. Medvedev, and S. Collins Maximal beta3-Adrenergic Regulation of Lipolysis Involves Src and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-dependent ERK1/2 Activation J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37794 - 37802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Lenard, V. Prpic, A. W. Adamson, R. C. Rogers, and T. W. Gettys Differential coupling of beta3A- and beta3B-adrenergic receptors to endogenous and chimeric G{alpha}s and G{alpha}i Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2006; 291(4): E704 - E715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. F. Collins, Y. Xiong, E. G. Lupo Jr., H.-Y. Liu, and W. Cao p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Mediates Free Fatty Acid-induced Gluconeogenesis in Hepatocytes J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24336 - 24344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Topolnik, M. Azzi, F. Morin, A. Kougioumoutzakis, and J.-C. Lacaille mGluR1/5 subtype-specific calcium signalling and induction of long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal oriens/alveus interneurones J. Physiol., August 15, 2006; 575(1): 115 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cordelier, J.-P. Esteve, S. Najib, L. Moroder, N. Vaysse, L. Pradayrol, C. Susini, and L. Buscail Regulation of Neuronal Nitric-oxide Synthase Activity by Somatostatin Analogs following SST5 Somatostatin Receptor Activation J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19156 - 19171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sato, D. S. Hutchinson, T. Bengtsson, A. Floren, U. Langel, T. Horinouchi, B. A. Evans, and R. J. Summers Functional Domains of the Mouse {beta}3-Adrenoceptor Associated with Differential G Protein Coupling J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2005; 315(3): 1354 - 1361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Girnita, S. K. Shenoy, B. Sehat, R. Vasilcanu, A. Girnita, R. J. Lefkowitz, and O. Larsson {beta}-Arrestin Is Crucial for Ubiquitination and Down-regulation of the Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 Receptor by Acting as Adaptor for the MDM2 E3 Ligase J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24412 - 24419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Camden, A. M. Schrader, R. E. Camden, F. A. Gonzalez, L. Erb, C. I. Seye, and G. A. Weisman P2Y2 Nucleotide Receptors Enhance {alpha}-Secretase-dependent Amyloid Precursor Protein Processing J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 18696 - 18702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Hutchinson, M. Sato, B. A. Evans, A. Christopoulos, and R. J. Summers Evidence for Pleiotropic Signaling at the Mouse {beta}3-Adrenoceptor Revealed by SR59230A [3-(2-Ethylphenoxy)-1-[(1,S)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronapth-1-ylamino]-2S-2-propanol Oxalate] J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2005; 312(3): 1064 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Hupfeld, J. L. Resnik, S. Ugi, and J. M. Olefsky Insulin-induced {beta}-Arrestin1 Ser-412 Phosphorylation Is a Mechanism for Desensitization of ERK Activation by G{alpha}i-coupled Receptors J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1016 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|