|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006079200 on September 15, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 49, 38254-38260, December 8, 2000
H2O2-sensitive Fur-like Repressor CatR
Regulating the Major Catalase Gene in Streptomyces
coelicolor*
Ji-Sook
Hahn §¶,
So-Young
Oh ,
Keith F.
Chater§,
You-Hee
Cho , and
Jung-Hye
Roe **
From the Laboratory of Molecular Microbiology, School
of Biological Sciences, and Institute of Microbiology, Seoul National
University, Seoul 151-742, Korea and the § Department of
Genetics, John Innes Centre, Colney,
Norwich NR4 7UH, United Kingdom
Received for publication, July 11, 2000, and in revised form, August 28, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Streptomyces coelicolor produces
three distinct catalases to cope with oxidative and osmotic stresses
and allow proper growth and differentiation. The major vegetative
catalase A (CatA) is induced by H2O2 and is
required for efficient aerobic growth. In order to investigate the
H2O2-dependent regulatory
mechanism, an H2O2-resistant mutant (HR40)
overproducing CatA was isolated from S. coelicolor A3(2).
Based on the genetic map location of the mutated locus in HR40, the
wild type catR gene was isolated from the ordered cosmid
library of S. coelicolor by screening for its ability to
suppress the HR40 phenotype. catR encodes a protein of 138 amino acids (15319 Da), with sequence homology to ferric uptake
regulator (Fur)-like proteins. Disruption of catR caused
CatA overproduction as observed in the HR40 mutant, confirming the role
of CatR as a negative regulator of catA expression. The
levels of catA and catR transcripts were higher
in HR40 than in the wild type, implying that CatR represses
transcription of these genes. Transcripts from the catA and
catR genes were induced within 10 min of
H2O2 treatment, suggesting that the repressor activity of CatR may be directly modulated by
H2O2. A putative CatR-binding site containing
an inverted repeat of 23 base pairs was localized upstream of
the catA and catR gene, on the basis of
sequence comparison and deletion analysis. CatR protein purified in the
presence of dithiothreitol bound to this region, whereas oxidized CatR,
treated with H2O2 or diamide, did not. The
redox shift of CatR involved thiol-disulfide exchange as judged by
modification of free thiols with
4-acetamido-4'-maleimidylstilbene-2,2'-disulfonate. From these results
we propose that CatR regulates its downstream target genes as a
repressor whose DNA binding ability is directly modulated by redox
changes in the cell.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
All aerobically growing organisms come into contact with reactive
oxygen species, generated as a by product of normal respiratory processes or from encounter with exogenous oxidants. To counter the
damaging effect of reactive oxygen species, cells have evolved anti-oxidant defense systems, whose expression is usually induced by
reactive oxygen species and/or oxidants. Cells possess regulators that
sense and transduce the oxidative signals to allow coordinated gene expression.
In Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium,
distinct responses against H2O2 and superoxide
(O 2) are mediated by OxyR and SoxR/SoxS regulators,
respectively (1, 2). OxyR is an H2O2-sensing
transcriptional regulator inducing more than 10 genes in response to
H2O2 (2, 3). It is activated by disulfide bond
formation between two cysteine residues, and induces the expression of
oxyS (a small, non-translated regulatory RNA),
katG (hydroperoxidase I), ahpC (alkyl
hydroperoxide reductase), gorA (glutathione reductase),
dps (DNA-binding protein), and grxA (glutaredoxin 1) (2). Glutaredoxin 1 deactivates OxyR by reducing the disulfide bond,
forming an autoregulatory loop (4). SoxR is activated by O 2 or
NO via oxidation of a [2Fe-2S] center, present as a pair per dimer
(5). Activated SoxR induces soxS expression, generating more
SoxS protein which then activates various target genes such as
sodA (Mn-SOD), nfo (endonuclease IV),
zwf (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase), fumC
(fumarase), acnA (aconitase), fpr
(ferredoxin:NADPH oxidoreductase), and ribA
(GTP-cyclohydrolase II) (2, 6).
In Bacillus subtilis, where an oxyR homologue has
not been identified, PerR has been proposed to mediate the
H2O2- and metal-dependent induction
of such genes as katA (catalase), ahpCF (alkyl
hydroperoxide reductase), mrgA (nonspecific DNA-binding
protein), and hemAXCDBL (heme biosynthesis operon) (7, 8).
It has been speculated that the peroxide sensing by PerR, which is a
homologue of the ferric uptake regulator
(Fur)1 of enteric bacteria,
might be mediated via metal-catalyzed oxidation of the protein or a
change in the oxidation state of the bound metal ion (8).
Streptomyces coelicolor, a Gram-positive aerobic soil
bacterium that undergoes complex cycle of morphological and
physiological differentiation, responds to H2O2
by inducing about 100 proteins as judged by two-dimensional gel
analysis (9). It produces two monofunctional catalases (CatA and CatB)
and a catalase peroxidase (CatC), among which only CatA is induced by
H2O2. CatA is the major catalase required for
efficient growth of mycelium and resistance against
H2O2 (10). CatB is induced by osmotic stress or
at the stationary phase, and is required for proper differentiation and osmoprotection of the cell (11). CatC is expressed transiently at late
exponential to early stationary phase, and its function in
vivo has not been revealed yet (12). In addition to these, it has
been reported that S. coelicolor possesses two kinds of superoxide dismutases (Ni-SOD and FeZn-SOD encoded by sodN
and sodF, respectively), an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase
system (encoded by ahpCD), and a thioredoxin system (encoded
by trxBA) as oxidative defense proteins (13-16). Three
transcriptional regulation systems controlling the expression of a
subset of these oxidative defense proteins have been found: an anti-
factor RsrA which binds a cognate factor, R, in a
redox-dependent manner and thus regulates
R-dependent transcription of the
trxBA and sigR genes (16, 17); OxyR which
activates the ahpCD gene but not the catalase genes (15);
and FurA which regulates catalase peroxidase gene (catC; Ref. 12). A soxR-like gene has been predicted from the
sequence information (S. coelicolor Genome Project, The
Sanger Center).
The redox-dependent activity modulation is best described
for RsrA. It binds and sequesters R from transcribing
trxBA and its own gene under reducing conditions. Upon
oxidation by H2O2 or a thiol-oxidizer diamide,
it loses its R binding activity, releasing
R to transcribe its target genes. The
redox-dependent modulation of RsrA activity is mediated via
thiol-disulfide exchange. The induced thioredoxin, in turn, reduces
RsrA, forming a negative feedback loop. This allows the homeostatic
control of intracellular redox conditions by RsrA. Not much is yet
known about the activity modulation of OxyR in S. coelicolor
nor the mechanism of H2O2-dependent induction of the major catalase. In this study, we report on the isolation and characterization of another novel redox-sensitive regulator CatR, which serves as a transcriptional repressor regulating the catA gene.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions--
S.
coelicolor A3(2) J1501 was mutagenized with UV to isolate
H2O2-resistant mutants (18). J1915, a
glkA derivative of M145 (19), was used to disrupt the
catR gene. Streptomyces cells were grown in YEME
medium for liquid culture, and on R2YE, nutrient agar (NA), or minimal
medium plates for surface culture (20). E. coli ET12567, a
non-methylating strain, was used to prepare DNA to transform S. coelicolor (21).
Cloning catR from the Ordered Cosmid Library--
Based on
genetic mapping of the mutated locus in the
H2O2-resistant mutant HR40, ordered cosmids
from K13 to 2E1 (kindly provided by H. Kieser), encompassing the
mthB2 locus (22), were tested to isolate catR.
Cosmid DNAs were prepared from E. coli ET12567, and
introduced into HR40 protoplasts following denaturation (23). Cosmid-integrated clones were selected on R2YE medium containing 200 µg/ml kanamycin, and tested for their ability to repress CatA overproduction in HR40. The amount of catalase production was initially
assessed by dropping 30% H2O2 on colonies and
observing the intensity of bubbling caused by O2 evolution,
and then confirmed by Coomassie staining of proteins in SDS-PAGE.
Two overlapping cosmids, 6F2 and 7E4, which repressed catalase
overproduction in HR40 were further analyzed. Restriction fragments in
the overlapping region of the two cosmids were cloned into pSET152
(24), a conjugation vector containing the C31 phage attachment site.
Each plasmid was used to transform E. coli ET12567, which
harbors a mobilizing plasmid pUZ8002 (a kind gift from D. H. Figurski), and then transferred into HR40 by conjugation based on the
method of Mazodier et al. (25). Exconjugants were selected with 50 µg/ml apramycin, and tested for catalase production.
S1 Mapping Analysis--
RNA was isolated from S. coelicolor cells grown in YEME as described previously (20). Cells
were resuspended in Kirby mixture and disrupted by sonication with a
micro tip (Sonics and Materials Inc.) at 25% of the maximum amplitude
(600 W, 20 kHz) for 10 s. For mapping 5' ends of catR
transcripts, a 270-base pair HindIII/BglII fragment of the PCR-amplified catR gene uniquely labeled
with [ 32P]ATP at the BglII site (148 nucleotides from the start codon) was prepared. S1 nuclease protection
assay was done as described previously (26). For mapping
catA transcript, a 0.6-kb SalI/BglII fragment of the catA gene uniquely labeled at the
BglII site (244 nucleotides from the start codon) was used
as a probe.
Disruption of catR--
catR was disrupted by
inserting a hygromycin-resistance cassette (hyg, provided by
J. Ainsa) in the middle of the gene. Plasmid pDH5 containing
hyg was digested with SphI, and cloned into the same site of pIJ2925 (provided by M. Bibb). The cassette was excised as
an 1.9-kb BglII fragment, and inserted into the
BglII site of pJH3013 which contains a 1.2-kb
HincII/BamHI fragment of catR (Fig. 2)
in pUC18. The resulting plasmid pJH3013H was digested with
EcoRI and HindIII, and the 3.1-kb insert was
cloned into EcoRI/HindIII-cut pIJ6650 (provided
by M. Paget), a pKC1132 derivative containing the glkA gene
marker, resulting in pJH3083H. The plasmid pJH3083H was introduced into
E. coli ET12567 containing pUZ8002, and then transferred by
conjugation into J1915, a glkA derivative of
M145. The exconjugants were selected on SFM media containing 150 µg/ml hygromycin and 50 µg/ml apramycin. The selected exconjugants
were then grown under hygromycin selection, and the spores were plated
on MM containing 200 mM deoxyglucose plus 150 µg/ml
hygromycin. The surviving colonies, expected to have lost the vector
including the counterselectable glkA by second crossover, were confirmed for apramycin sensitivity by replica plating. The catR disruption was then confirmed by Southern hybridization.
Overproduction and Purification of CatR from E. coli--
The
catR coding region was amplified by PCR with mutagenic
primers CRON (5'-AGGCTGATGCATATGAGTGACC-3'; NdeI
site underlined) and CROB (5'-CAGGATTGGATCCTGCGACCT-3';
BamHI site underlined). The PCR product was cut with
NdeI and BamHI and cloned into pET21c (Novagen)
to generate pJH7. E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS cells transformed with pJH7 were grown in LB medium to A600 of 0.5 and treated with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside for 3 h.
After harvest, cells were resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 0.15 M NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, and 10% glycerol) and disrupted by sonication. The lysate
was centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min, and the
supernatant was precipitated with 60% ammonium sulfate. The pellet was
dissolved in and dialyzed against TGED buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, and
10% glycerol). The dialysate was subjected to chromatography on
heparin-Sepharose CL-6B, Q-Sepharose, Superdex-75, and Mono-Q columns.
The final eluate from Mono-Q, eluted at 0.2-0.3 M NaCl in
TGED buffer, contained CatR protein at more than 90% homogeneity.
Purified CatR was stored at 70 °C in 50% glycerol before use.
Gel Mobility Shift Assay--
The catR promoter
region from 111 to +71 nucleotides from the start codon was generated
by PCR with primers CR1 (5'-CTCTTGGCCAATGCCGCCCCGG-3') and CRS1
(5'-TCGGCCACGACCCGCCGCTGCG-3'). The catA promoter region from 84 to +254 nucleotides from the start codon was generated by PCR
with primers CAD84 (5'-AGCAGGCTTCGGCATCAATT-3') and CAC (5'-TCGGAGAAGATCTTCGCGCTGG-3'). The PCR product was end-labeled with
[ -32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase.
Unincorporated isotopes were removed by centrifugation through a
Sephadex G-50 spun column. The end-labeled probe (about 30,000 cpm for
less than 0.1 pmol per each reaction) was incubated with 200 ng (13 pmol) of purified CatR in 20 µl of binding buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM MgCl2, 40 mM
KCl, 100 µg of poly(dI-dC) per ml, and 5% glycerol) at 30 °C for
10 min. The DNA/protein mixture was electrophoresed on a 5%
native PAGE in 20 mM Tris borate buffer, and analyzed by autoradiography.
Western Blot Analysis--
Polyclonal antibody against purified
CatR was raised in mice. The reacting signal was detected by goat
anti-mouse immunoglobulin G conjugated with horseradish peroxidase
using the Western ECL detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of an H2O2-resistant
Mutant of S. coelicolor--
An H2O2-resistant
mutant HR40 was generated by UV mutagenesis of spores from S. coelicolor A3(2) J1501 as described previously (18). It grows as
rapidly as the wild type and differentiates normally, although it
produces less of the blue antibiotic, actinorhodin, than the wild type.
The protein profile of HR40 was compared with that of its parent
(J1501) on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1A).
A prominent difference in HR40 was the overproduction of catalase A. No
other significant changes in protein profile were observed. HR40
overproduced about 50-fold more CatA than the wild type as judged by
Western blot analysis (Fig. 1B). Measurement of the catalase
activity in cell extracts also produced similar results (data not
shown). Expression of other antioxidant enzymes such as catalase
peroxidase (CatC) and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase system (AhpCD) was
lowered in HR40 (Fig. 1B). The level of catalase B (CatB), a
stationary phase-specific catalase, did not change significantly (Fig.
1B). Although HR40 was more resistant to
H2O2 than the wild type, it was slightly
sensitive to cumene hydroperoxide, consistent with the reduced
expression of AhpCD. Sensitivity of HR40 against superoxide generating agents such as paraquat, plumbagin, and menadione was similar to that of J1501 (data not shown).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Overproduction of catalase A in
H2O2-resistant mutant HR40. A,
the profile of total proteins from HR40 (lanes 4-6) and its
wild type parent J1501 (lanes 1-3). Extracts prepared from
cells grown in YEME medium for 24, 48, and 72 h were subjected to
SDS-PAGE followed by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. The
prominent band of catalase A is denoted (CatA).
B, levels of various antioxidant enzymes. The amount of
catalases (CatA, CatB, and CatC) and alkyl-hydroperoxide reductase
system (AhpC and AhpD) was determined by Western blot analysis of the
same cell extracts used in panel A. For each track, 20 µg
of protein was analyzed except for CatA detection in the HR40 extract,
where 2 µg of protein was analyzed.
|
|
Cloning of catR--
The mutation (catR1) in HR40 had
been previously mapped close to the mthB2 locus by genetic
crosses (18). This locus is near the center of the chromosome, being
separated by more than half a genome distance from catA,
which has been physically mapped to the AseI F fragment near
one end of the linear chromosome
(22).2 Therefore,
catR is likely to encode a regulator for catalase A
production, the catR1 allele giving rise to either a
repressor with lost function or an activator with gained function. It
has been previously suggested that catA expression may be
regulated by a repressor system on the grounds that the presence of
catA promoter fragments on a multicopy plasmid increased the
production of catalase A in Streptomyces lividans.
Therefore, assuming that the catR1 is a recessive
loss-of-function mutation, we attempted to clone the wild type
catR by introducing into HR40 genomic DNAs from ordered
cosmids spanning the mthB2 locus, screening for wild type
levels of catalase production as follows: since HR40 overproduces catalase A, application of 30% H2O2 solution
on top of its colonies generates the explosive evolution of
O2 in contrast to mild bubbling on wild type colonies.
Using this handy screening tool, we were able to select two overlapping
cosmids (6F2 and 7E4) out of 23 cosmids (from K15 to 2E1) tested, as
candidates harboring the catR gene. Cosmids 6F2 and 7E4
overlaps by about 21 kb. To localize catR more precisely,
various restriction fragments of the overlapping region were subcloned
into pSET152, a conjugation vector containing a phage integration site
(att) (24). The recombinant plasmids were introduced into
HR40 and tested for phenotype suppression. We found that a 1.2-kb
HincII-BamHI fragment (in pJH3113) was able to
repress catalase overproduction in HR40, whereas its subfragment (0.8-kb HincII-BglII fragment in pJH 3115) was
not (Fig. 2, A and B,
lanes 3 and 4). This enabled us to narrow down the
position of the catR gene.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of the catR
gene repressing CatA production. A, restriction
map of the 1.2-kb HincII/BamHI fragment
containing catR is presented. The insert DNAs in
pSET152-based recombinant plasmids pJH3113 and pJH3115 are indicated.
Restriction sites marked are: BamHI (BI),
BglII (BII), SmaI (Sm),
HincII (HII). B, repression of CatA
production by the catR gene. Plasmids pJH3113 and pJH3115
were introduced into HR40 by conjugal transfer. The catR
disruptant (JH11) and its wild type parent J1915 were analyzed in
parallel. Extracts from cells grown for 40 h on NA with
appropriate antibiotics were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and staining with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
|
|
Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that the insert DNA in pJH3113
contained two open reading frames, one coding for a homologue of
inosine-phosphate dehydrogenase and the other coding for a Fur
homologue (Fig. 2A). Since plasmid pJH3115 failed to repress mutant phenotype, it appeared that the downstream open reading frame
encoding a Fur homologue is the catR gene regulating
catA expression.
To confirm the role of CatR as a repressor of catA gene
expression, the catR gene in strain J1915 was disrupted as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The
catR mutant (JH11) showed no defect in growth
or differentiation, except that it produced a reduced amount of
actinorhodin on R2YE plates as observed for HR40. As expected, JH11
overproduced CatA to an extent comparable to HR40 (Fig. 2B, lane
6).
The catR Gene Encodes a Fur-like Protein--
The catR
gene encodes a protein of 138 amino acids with a deduced molecular mass
of 15,319 Da and close similarity to Fur-like proteins of other
bacteria (Fig. 3). The closest match was
found with FurV of Streptomyces
venezuelae, whose gene is transcribed divergently from the
bca gene encoding bromoperoxidase catalase (27). CatR also
matched closely with PerR of B. subtilis.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Comparison of the amino acid sequence of CatR
with other Fur homologues. The predicted amino acid sequence of
CatR from S. coelicolor (Sco; AF186372) was
aligned with other bacterial Fur homologues: S. venezuelae
(Sve) FurV (X14792); B. subtilis (Bsu)
PerR (Z99108); S. reticuli (Sre) FurS (Y14317);
S. coelicolor FurA (AF126956); M. tuberculosis
(Mtu) FurA (Z97193). The completely conserved residues are
shaded. The cysteine residues are marked in bold.
The Arg51 (R51) residue of CatR within the
putative helix turn helix motif, which is mutated to glutamine in HR40,
are shaded and marked in bold. Asterisks and
dots indicate identical and similar matches,
respectively.
|
|
To identify the mutated residue in HR40, the catR1 allele
was amplified from HR40 genome by PCR and sequenced. A single
nucleotide change from G to A at nucleotide 152 was detected, causing a
codon change from Arg to Gln at residue 51. Since this residue is
within a putative helix-turn-helix motif of Fur proteins (Fig. 3), we postulate that the mutated CatR protein in HR40 may be deficient in
binding to the catA promoter.
Negative Regulation of catA and catR Transcription by CatR--
We
analyzed the transcripts from the catA and catR
genes in wild type and HR40 mutant by S1 mapping (Fig.
4). HR40 produced catA
transcripts drastically more than the wild type, suggesting that
catA transcription is under the negative control of CatR. HR40 also produced more catR transcripts than the wild type,
especially the longer one (catRp2), whose 5' end lies at
about 70 nucleotides upstream from the translation start site. The 5'
ends of the shorter transcripts (catRp1) were located at
multiple sites immediately downstream of the ATG codon. A putative
promoter (TCGGGA-N18-TAGGCT) resembling the sequences
recognized by the major factor HrdB was identified
upstream of the translation start codon, separated from ATG by 7 residues. Therefore, it is conceivable that the shorter transcripts
were generated from degradation of transcripts initiated at the
translation start site (catRp1). catRp2 start sites were located more precisely by high-resolution S1 mapping at
74 and 66 nucleotides upstream from the ATG codon (data not shown). A putative HrdB-type promoter
(TTGGCC-N17-TACAAT) was found upstream of the 74 site. The observation that catRp2 transcript was highly
expressed in HR40, like the catA transcript, suggests that
transcription from both catRp2 and the catA
promoter is negatively regulated by CatR. The catRp1
promoter may be partially regulated by CatR. The production of CatR
protein was also elevated in HR40 as judged by Western analysis (data
not shown).

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
S1 mapping analysis of catR
and catA transcripts in J1501 and HR40.
RNAs were prepared from J1501 (lanes 1-3) and HR40 cells
(lanes 4-6) grown in YEME for 12, 22, and 40 h. The 5'
ends of catR and catA mRNAs were mapped by S1
nuclease protection assay as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The transcripts from catRp1, catRp2, and
catA promoters produce protected bands as designated.
|
|
H2O2 Induction of the catA and catR
Transcripts--
We then examined whether catR
expression is induced by H2O2 as is the
catA expression. The changes in both catR and
catA transcripts following H2O2
treatment were monitored by S1 mapping (Fig.
5). Within 10 min of
H2O2 treatment, the catR transcripts
increased to a maximum level and decayed to the basal level within 30 min. Both the catRp1 and catRp2 transcripts
exhibited similar behavior even though catRp2 transcripts
were induced more dramatically. The catA transcript
increased sharply within 10 min, reaching a maximal level at around 20 min, and decayed within 60 min to the basal level. The similar kinetics
of rapid induction by H2O2 of both genes
suggests that the transcriptional regulation is mediated by activity
modulation of an already existing regulator, most likely CatR, by
H2O2. The delay observed for catA
transcript in reaching and decaying from the maximum level might
reflect the higher stability of catA transcript than
catR. The changes in the level of CatA and CatR proteins
followed the changes in mRNAs as judged by Western analysis (Fig.
5). The CatA protein began to increase from 20 min, reaching a maximum
value between 40 and 50 min following H2O2
treatment. The CatR protein also began to increase from 20 min reaching
a maximum value at about 40 min.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Induction of the catR and
catA transcription by
H2O2. J1501 cells were grown in YEME to
early exponential phase (12 h) and treated with 200 µM
H2O2. RNA was prepared from cells either
untreated (lanes 1 and 8) or treated with 200 µM H2O2 for 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min (lanes 2-7). S1 mapping analysis was carried out
for catR and catA transcripts as dscribed in the
legend to Fig. 4. The same cell extracts were analyzed for CatA, CatC,
and CatR proteins by Western blot.
|
|
Identification of the Putative Binding Site of CatR--
On the
basis of the assumption that CatR binds directly to the promoter region
of catA and catR genes we examined the nucleotide sequences of these promoter regions. The nucleotide sequences of the
two promoter regions were compared with the similar sequence region of
the furV-bca genes from S. venezuelae (Fig.
6). furV is divergently
transcribed from the neighboring bca gene, whereas the
transcription units of the catR and catA gene in
S. coelicolor are distantly located. We identified an
inverted repeat of 23 base pairs in all these genes; between 32 and
54 nucleotides from the start codon for catR and
furV, between 70 and 92 for catA, and between
73 and 95 for bca genes. Counting from the catA transcription start site (+1), the inverted repeat box
lies between 43 and 65. The bca gene contains putative
promoter elements almost identical with the catA promoter
(catAp). A consensus CatR binding sequence
(TCcNRARYNR-N3-YNRYTYNgGA) was deduced. In order to verify the role of this region in
vivo, we generated recombinant reporter plasmids containing the
catAp region up to 69 or 54 nucleotides from the
transcription start site in front of the reporter gene in pXE4 plasmid
(28). catAp-driven transcripts were determined by S1 mapping
in S. lividans. The strain containing the shorter upstream
sequence produced a greater amount of catAp-driven
transcripts than the longer one, suggesting that the inverted repeat
sequence does indeed function as a negative regulatory site (data not
shown).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Prediction of the CatR-binding site.
Comparison of promoter sequences of catA and catR
from S. coelicolor with those of bca and
furV from S. venezuelae. A schematic presentation
of gene organizations is shown above, with the putative CatR-binding
site is indicated as a box. The start codon of each gene is
shaded and the ribosome-binding sites of catA and
bca are underlined. The putative 35 and 10
promoter elements recognizable by HrdB are marked in
bold and underlined. The transcription start site
for each promoter is marked by bent arrows. The putative
CatR (or FurV)-binding site with an inverted repeat sequence is
indicated by converging arrows with proposed consensus
sequence. Within these sites, nucleotides with dyad symmetry are marked
in bold, whereas the conserved nucleotides are
shaded. The putative consensus CatR binding sequence was
deduced. R and Y denote purine and pyrimidine
nucleotides, respectively.
|
|
Redox-dependent Binding of CatR to the catR and catA
Promoter Fragments--
We then examined the binding of CatR protein
to the catA and catR promoter fragments by gel
mobility shift assay. CatR protein overproduced in E. coli
was purified as described under "Experimental Procedures" in the
presence of 1-2 mM DTT throughout the preparation. Purified CatR protein specifically bound to both catR and
catA promoters in the presence of 1 mM DTT (Fig.
7, lane 2). When the CatR
protein was oxidized by treatment with 10 mM
H2O2 or diamide, it did not bind to the
promoters (Fig. 7, lanes 5 and 6). Addition of
extra metals did not enhance the DNA binding activity. However, addition of 5 mM EDTA inhibited DNA binding of CatR,
implying that metals are required for DNA binding (data not shown).

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Redox-sensitive binding of purified CatR to
the catR and catA promoter
fragments. End-labeled catR (A) or
catA (B) promoter fragments were incubated with
200 ng of CatR protein in the presence of 1 mM DTT
(lanes 2-4), 10 mM H2O2
(lane 5), or 10 mM diamide (lane 6)
in 20 µl of binding buffer as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The binding was detected by electrophoresis on 5% PAGE
and autoradiography. Lane 1 contains labeled probe alone
(P). Lanes 3 and 4 contain 200-fold
molar excess of specific (S; unlabeled probe) and
nonspecific (N; HpaII-degested GEM3Zf (+) DNA)
competitors in the binding reaction, respectively.
|
|
Involvement of Thiol Oxidation in Redox Modulation of
CatR--
Since CatR contains four cysteine residues, which are
conserved in most of the Fur-like proteins, we tried to find out
whether the redox modulation of CatR binding activity is mediated via thiol-disulfide exchange between the cysteine residues. To this end,
purified CatR in the absence or presence of oxidants (10 mM
H2O2 or 10 mM diamide) was treated
with 20 mM
4-acetamido-4'-maleimidylstilbene-2,2'-disulfonate (AMS) to alkylate
sulfhydryl groups of cysteines. As presented in Fig.
8, in the absence of oxidants and AMS,
unmodified monomeric CatR migrated as a 17-kDa band in SDS-PAGE, in
close agreement with its predicted size (lane 1).
AMS-treated CatR in the presence of 1 mM DTT migrated as a
retarded band of 24 kDa (lane 2). Considering the molecular
mass of AMS (500 Da), the extent of mobility retardation far
exceeds that predicted from alkylation of all four available cysteines
in CatR. This could have resulted from the conversion of CatR protein
into a more relaxed conformation by AMS attachment. CatR oxidized by
H2O2 or diamide did not exhibit any retardation upon AMS treatment, implying that all the cysteine residues were oxidized and formed disulfide bonds under the conditions employed (lanes 4 and 6). In the diamide-treated sample, a
small amount of dimer-sized band appeared, as predicted from the
formation of intermolecular disulfide bonds.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Intramolecular disulfide bond formation in
CatR oxidized by H2O2 or diamide. Purified
CatR protein containing 1 mM DTT was either untreated
(lanes 1 and 2) or treated with 10 mM
H2O2 (lanes 3 and 4) or
diamide (lanes 5 and 6). The CatR proteins were
incubated with 20 mM AMS on ice for 90 min (lanes 2, 4, and 6) or not (lanes 1, 3, and
5). The samples were subjected to non-reducing SDS-PAGE.
CatR-D, CatR-AMS, and CatR-M indicate CatR dimer, CatR·AMS complex,
and CatR monomer, respectively.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
A number of bacteria contain multiple Fur homologues, whose role
is specified in metal assimilation or oxidative stress response. Among
three Fur-like proteins found in B. subtilis, Fur and Zur regulate the uptake of iron and zinc, respectively (29, 30), whereas
PerR acts as a repressor for peroxide regulon (8). Campylobacter
jejuni also contains PerR responsible for
iron-dependent repression of catalase and alkyl
hydroperoxide reductase, in addition to Fur which represses iron uptake
genes (31).
S. coelicolor contains at least four Fur homologues; FurA
which controls catalase peroxidase (encoded by catC) in a
metal-dependent manner (12), CatR which controls catalase A
production in response to H2O2, and two
Fur-like proteins of unknown function predicted from the genome
sequencing data base (S. coelicolor Genome Project, The
Sanger Center). Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a close relative of S. coelicolor in being a Gram-positive bacterium of high
G + C content, contains two fur-like genes, furA
and furB. The furA gene is located upstream of
the katG gene encoding catalase peroxidase (32, 33), similar
to the equivalent gene organization in Streptomyces reticuli (furS-cpeB) (34) and S. coelicolor
(furA-catC) (12). This group of Fur homologues seems to
regulate the catalase peroxidase gene in a manner sensitive to metals
but insensitive to H2O2, as observed in the
regulation of mycobacterial katG or S. coelicolor catC (33, 12). On the other hand, CatR seems closely related with
B. subtilis PerR in
H2O2-dependent regulation of
downstream target genes. Closer sequence match among CatR, PerR, and
FurV of S. venezuelae suggests that these regulators may
share similar characteristics of peroxide sensing (Fig. 3).
We postulate a model for the rapid adaptation response against
H2O2 in S. coelicolor as
demonstrated in Fig. 9. Under a normal reducing intracellular environment, CatR is bound to the
catA and catR genes and represses their
transcription. Upon exposure to H2O2, the free
cysteine thiols of CatR are oxidized to form disulfide bonds, causing
loss of DNA binding activity and thus derepression of catA
and catR. The induced catalase A efficiently removes
H2O2, whereas the overproduced CatR represses
both genes as soon as peroxide is removed, thus forming an efficient
negative feedback loop.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
A model for the rapid
H2O2-sensitive regulation by CatR. Reduced
CatR binds to the catA and catR genes and
represses their transcription (path A). Upon exposure to
H2O2, the free cysteine thiols of CatR are
oxidized to form disulfide bonds (B), causing loss of DNA
binding activity and thus derepression of catA and
catR (C). The induced catalase removes
H2O2 (D), whereas the induced CatR
(coupled with an increase in the proportion of the reduced form as
peroxide is removed) represses both genes (E), forming a
negative feedback loop.
|
|
In contrast to B. subtilis PerR which is a global regulator
of peroxide regulon involving several anti-oxidant genes, CatR in
S. coelicolor seems to regulate only CatA production among the known peroxide-degrading enzymes including CatB, CatC, and AhpCD
(15). Therefore, the induction of antioxidant enzymes in S. coelicolor seems to require more specified regulators for individual enzymes. In addition, unlike B. subtilis PerR
regulon, whose induction at post-exponential phase is inhibited by
Mn(II) or Fe(II) (7), catA expression in S. coelicolor is not induced at post-exponential phase and is
relatively insensitive to the amount of metals used in our experiments.
Addition of excess metal salts or the iron chelator dipyridyl to
minimal media elicited little change in CatA levels (data not shown).
Only a high concentration of Ni(II) (1 mM) in Nutrient agar
plate medium repressed CatA expression (data not shown). However, in
DNA binding assays, deprivation of metals by EDTA inhibited CatR
binding, whereas addition of extra metals did not enhance the DNA
binding. This indicates that not only reduced thiols of cysteine
residues but also appropriate metals are required for CatR to bind to
its specific target DNA. Further investigation is needed to reveal the
specific cysteine residues and the type of metals, if any, involved in
the redox modulation of CatR binding activity.
The four cysteines of CatR in
Cys92-X2-Cys95 and
Cys132-X2-Cys135 are conserved in
most Fur-like proteins (Fig. 3). If we assume that Fur homologues share
basically similar tertiary structures, the cysteine pair
Cys92 and Cys95 in CatR may be involved in
structural zinc binding like its equivalent cysteine pairs in
Fur proteins from E. coli and B. subtilis (29, 35, 36). Disulfide bond formation between these two cysteines may cause
release of the coordinating zinc, and loss of DNA binding activity as a
result. A similar mechanism has been postulated in the activation
mechanism of E. coli heat shock protein Hsp33 (37). Hsp33 is
a member of a newly discovered family of heat shock proteins, whose
chaperone activity is induced by disulfide bond formation with
concomitant release of coordinating zinc (37). Zinc transfer from
eukaryotic zinc metallothionein to zinc-depleted protein is also
affected by the oxidation state of the thiolate ligands. Oxidation of
the thiolate ligands to form disulfide bond causes release of
coordinating zinc from the metallothionein (38). We do not rule out the
possibility that the C-terminal
Cys132-X2-Cys135 is also involved
in redox-mediated control of CatR activity. The CX2C motif
is conserved in active sites of disulfide oxidoreductases such as
thioredoxin, disulfide isomerase, and Dsb proteins of E. coli (39-41), participating in reversible disulfide bond
formation. Therefore it is quite possible that the C-terminal cysteine
pair of CatR could form a disulfide bond and affect the conformation of
CatR. Further research is required to address the role of these conserved cysteines and metal binding in regulating the DNA binding activity of CatR.
The location of the CatR-binding site in catR and
catA promoters suggests that CatR repress transcription of
these genes via different modes. The transcription from the
catRp2 promoter is likely to be blocked at the elongation
stage whereas the catA transcription could be blocked at the
initiation stage (see Fig. 6). The transcription from the
catRp1 promoter, which is partially repressed by CatR, may
be blocked at the initiation stage. The binding of CatR near the 35
promoter element may be effective for repression as observed in
catA promoter, whereas binding at closer proximity as
observed in catRp1 may be less effective. The similarity
between CatR and FurV (from S. venezuelae) in the coding
region as well as in the nucleotide sequences of the regulatory region
suggests that FurV may act similarly to CatR in
H2O2-dependent regulation of
downstream target genes.
In addition to the previously described OxyR and R/RsrA
systems, we have here identified another redox-sensitive
transcriptional regulator controlling oxidative defense genes in
S. coelicolor. Although not much is known about the detailed
mechanism of activity modulation, all three regulators seem to involve
thiol-disulfide exchange. The rich reservoir of potential
transcriptional regulators predicted from the sequence data base
(S. coelicolor Genome Project, The Sanger Center) leads us
to expect a multitude of regulators responding to myriads of
environmental cues. Along with detailed specificity, we expect to
discover some unity in regulatory mechanisms in further investigations
of the action mechanism of these regulators.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are thankful to Jae-Bum Bae for advice in
protein purification, and members of the Molecular Microbiology
laboratory in SNU for helpful discussions. We thank H. Kieser, M. Bibb,
J. Ainsa, and M. Paget for providing strains and plasmids.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by International Collaborative
Research Grants from Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Present address: Dept. of Biological Chemistry, The University
of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine Rd., Ann Arbor, MI48109.
Supported by BK21 Research Fellowship from the Korean Ministry
of Education.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 82-2-880-6706;
Fax: 82-2-888-4911; E-mail: jhroe@plaza.snu.ac.kr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006079200
2
E. J. Kim and H. Kieser, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Fur, ferric uptake
regulator;
Ahp, alkyl-hydroperoxide reductase;
AMS, 4-acetamido-4'-maleimidylstilbene-2,2'-disulfonate;
CatA, catalase A;
RsrA, a regulator of SigR;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
kb, kilobase(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Farr, S. B.,
and Kogoma, T.
(1991)
Microbiol. Rev.
55,
561-585
|
| 2.
|
Storz, G.,
and Imlay, J. A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
2,
188-194
|
| 3.
|
Christman, M. F.,
Morgan, R. W.,
Jacobson, F. S.,
and Ames, B. N.
(1985)
Cell
41,
753-762
|
| 4.
|
Zheng, M.,
Aslund, F.,
and Storz, G.
(1998)
Science
279,
1718-1721
|
| 5.
|
Hidalgo, E.,
Ding, H.,
and Demple, B.
(1997)
Cell
88,
121-129
|
| 6.
|
Koh, Y. S.,
Choih, J.,
Lee, J. H.,
and Roe, J. H.
(1996)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
251,
591-598
|
| 7.
|
Chen, L.,
Keramati, L.,
and Helmann, J. D.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8190-8194
|
| 8.
|
Bsat, N.,
Herbig, A.,
Casillas-Martinez, L.,
Setlow, P.,
and Helmann, J. D.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
29,
189-198
|
| 9.
|
Chung, H. J.,
and Roe, J. H.
(1993)
J. Microbiol.
31,
166-174
|
| 10.
|
Cho, Y. H.,
and Roe, J. H.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
4049-4052
|
| 11.
|
Cho, Y. H.,
Lee, E. J.,
and Roe, J. H.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
35,
150-160
|
| 12.
|
Hahn, J. S.,
Oh, S. Y.,
and Roe, J. H.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
3767-3774
|
| 13.
|
Kim, E. J.,
Chung, H. J.,
Suh, B.,
Hah, Y. C.,
and Roe, J. H.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
27,
187-195
|
| 14.
|
Kim, E. J.,
Chung, H. J.,
Suh, B.,
Hah, Y. C.,
and Roe, J. H.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
2014-2020
|
| 15.
|
Hahn, J. S.
(1999)
Regulation of Oxidative Stress Response by FurA, OxyR, and CatR in Streptomyces coelicolor.Ph. D. thesis
, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
|
| 16.
|
Paget, M. S.,
Kang, J.-G.,
Roe, J.-H.,
and Buttner, M. J.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5776-5782
|
| 17.
|
Kang, J.-G.,
Paget, M. S.,
Seok, Y.-J.,
Hahn, M.-Y.,
Bae, J.-B.,
Hahn, J.-S.,
Kleanthous, C.,
Buttner, M. J.,
and Roe, J.-H.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
4292-4298
|
| 18.
|
Hahn, J. S.,
Oh, S. Y.,
Chater, K. F.,
and Roe, J. H.
(2000)
J. Microbiol.
38,
18-23
|
| 19.
|
Kelemen, G. H.,
Plaskitt, K. A.,
Lewis, C. G.,
Findlay, K. C.,
and Buttner, M. J.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
17,
221-230
|
| 20.
|
Hopwood, D. A.,
Bibb, M. J.,
Chater, K. F.,
Kieser, T.,
Bruton, C. J.,
Kieser, H. M.,
Lydiate, D. J.,
Smith, C. P.,
Ward, J. M.,
and Schrempf, H.
(1985)
Genetic Manipulation of Streptomyces: A Laboratory Manual
, John Innes Foundation, Norwich, UK
|
| 21.
|
MacNeil, D. J.,
Gewain, K. M.,
Ruby, C. L.,
Dezeny, G.,
Gibbons, P. H.,
and MacNeil, T.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
111,
61-68
|
| 22.
|
Redenbach, M.,
Kieser, H. M.,
Denapaite, D.,
Eichner, A.,
Cullum, J.,
Kinashi, H.,
and Hopwood, D. A.
(1996)
Mol. Microbiol.
21,
77-96
|
| 23.
|
Oh, S. H.,
and Chater, K. F.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
122-127
|
| 24.
|
Bierman, M.,
Logan, R.,
O'Brien, K.,
Seno, E. T.,
Rao, R. N.,
and Schoner, B. E.
(1992)
Gene (Amst.)
116,
43-49
|
| 25.
|
Mazodier, P.,
Petter, R.,
and Thompson, C.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
3583-3585
|
| 26.
|
Smith, C. P.
(1991)
in
Essential Molecular Biology, a Practical Approach
(Brown, T. A., ed)
, pp. 237-252, Oxford University Press, New York
|
| 27.
|
Facey, S. J.,
Gross, F.,
Vining, L. C.,
Yang, K.,
and van Pee, K. H.
(1996)
Microbiology
142,
657-665
|
| 28.
|
Ingram, C.,
Brawner, M.,
Youngman, P.,
and Westpheling, J.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
6617-6624
|
| 29.
|
Bsat, N.,
and Helmann, J. D.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
4299-4307
|
| 30.
|
Gaballa, A.,
and Helmann, J. D.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5815-5821
|
| 31.
|
van Vliet, A. H.,
Baillon, M. L.,
Penn, C. W.,
and Ketley, J. M.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
6371-6376
|
| 32.
|
Deretic, V.,
Song, J.,
and Pagan-Ramos, E.
(1997)
Trends. Microbiol.
5,
367-372
|
| 33.
|
Pagan-Ramos, E.,
Song, J.,
McFalone, M.,
Mudd, M. H.,
and Deretic, V.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
4856-4864
|
| 34.
|
Zou, P.,
Borovok, I.,
Ortiz de Orue Lucana, D.,
Muller, D.,
and Schrempf, H.
(1999)
Microbiology
145,
549-559
|
| 35.
|
Gonzalez de Peredo, A.,
Saint-Pierre, C.,
Adrait, A.,
Jacquamet, L.,
Latour, J. M.,
Michaud-Soret, I.,
and Forest, E.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
8582-8589
|
| 36.
|
Coy, M.,
Doyle, C.,
Besser, J.,
and Neilands, J. B.
(1994)
Biometals
7,
292-298
|
| 37.
|
Jakob, U.,
Muse, W.,
Eser, M.,
and Bardwell, J. C.
(1999)
Cell
96,
341-352
|
| 38.
|
Maret, W.,
and Vallee, B. L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
3478-3482
|
| 39.
|
Holmgren, A.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
54,
237-271
|
| 40.
|
Missiakas, D.,
and Raina, S.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
2465-2471
|
| 41.
|
Edman, J. C.,
Ellis, L.,
Blacher, R. W.,
Roth, R. A.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1985)
Nature
317,
267-270
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Y. Oh, J.-H. Shin, and J.-H. Roe
Dual Role of OhrR as a Repressor and an Activator in Response to Organic Hydroperoxides in Streptomyces coelicolor
J. Bacteriol.,
September 1, 2007;
189(17):
6284 - 6292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. A. Owen, B. Pascoe, D. Kallifidas, and M. S. B. Paget
Zinc-Responsive Regulation of Alternative Ribosomal Protein Genes in Streptomyces coelicolor Involves Zur and {sigma}R
J. Bacteriol.,
June 1, 2007;
189(11):
4078 - 4086.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Shin, S.-Y. Oh, S.-J. Kim, and J.-H. Roe
The Zinc-Responsive Regulator Zur Controls a Zinc Uptake System and Some Ribosomal Proteins in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)
J. Bacteriol.,
June 1, 2007;
189(11):
4070 - 4077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-W. Lee and J. D. Helmann
Biochemical Characterization of the Structural Zn2+ Site in the Bacillus subtilis Peroxide Sensor PerR
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 18, 2006;
281(33):
23567 - 23578.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Seib, H.-J. Wu, S. P. Kidd, M. A. Apicella, M. P. Jennings, and A. G. McEwan
Defenses against Oxidative Stress in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a System Tailored for a Challenging Environment
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
June 1, 2006;
70(2):
344 - 361.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Jakimowicz, M. R. Cheesman, W. R. Bishai, K. F. Chater, A. J. Thomson, and M. J. Buttner
Evidence That the Streptomyces Developmental Protein WhiD, a Member of the WhiB Family, Binds a [4Fe-4S] Cluster
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 4, 2005;
280(9):
8309 - 8315.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. I. Katona, R. Tokarz, C. J. Kuhlow, J. Benach, and J. L. Benach
The Fur Homologue in Borrelia burgdorferi
J. Bacteriol.,
October 1, 2004;
186(19):
6443 - 6456.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-H. Cho, E.-J. Kim, H.-J. Chung, J.-H. Choi, K. F. Chater, B.-E. Ahn, J.-H. Shin, and J.-H. Roe
The pqrAB Operon Is Responsible for Paraquat Resistance in Streptomyces coelicolor
J. Bacteriol.,
December 1, 2003;
185(23):
6756 - 6763.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Nakano, E. Kuster-Schock, A. D. Grossman, and P. Zuber
Spx-dependent global transcriptional control is induced by thiol-specific oxidative stress in Bacillus subtilis
PNAS,
November 11, 2003;
100(23):
13603 - 13608.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Sala, F. Forti, E. Di Florio, F. Canneva, A. Milano, G. Riccardi, and D. Ghisotti
Mycobacterium tuberculosis FurA Autoregulates Its Own Expression
J. Bacteriol.,
September 15, 2003;
185(18):
5357 - 5362.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-S. Hahn, S.-Y. Oh, and J.-H. Roe
Role of OxyR as a Peroxide-Sensing Positive Regulator in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)
J. Bacteriol.,
October 1, 2002;
184(19):
5214 - 5222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fuangthong, A. F. Herbig, N. Bsat, and J. D. Helmann
Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis fur and perR Genes by PerR: Not All Members of the PerR Regulon Are Peroxide Inducible
J. Bacteriol.,
June 15, 2002;
184(12):
3276 - 3286.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Fuangthong and J. D. Helmann
The OhrR repressor senses organic hydroperoxides by reversible formation of a cysteine-sulfenic acid derivative
PNAS,
May 14, 2002;
99(10):
6690 - 6695.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|