|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M006162200 on August 30, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 49, 38371-38377, December 8, 2000
Cell Adhesion and Focal Adhesion Kinase Regulate Insulin Receptor
Substrate-1 Expression*
Patricia
Lebrun §,
Véronique
Baron ¶,
Christof R.
Hauck **,
David D.
Schlaepfer  , and
Emmanuel
Van
Obberghen
From INSERM U145, Institut
F d ratif de Recherche 50, Avenue de Valombrose,
06107 Nice Cédex 2, France and the Department of
Immunology, Scripps Research Institute,
La Jolla, California 92037
Received for publication, July 12, 2000, and in revised form, August 21, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Integrins are transmembrane receptors involved in
interactions between cells and extracellular matrix proteins. Here we
show that cell adhesion regulates insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1) mRNA synthesis. When fibroblasts are held in suspension, lower levels of IRS-1 mRNA, but not of IRS-2 mRNA, are detected, and this effect is due to the negative regulation of IRS-1 transcription rather than to decreased mRNA stability. Upon fibronectin- or vitronectin-mediated integrin stimulation, the level of IRS-1 mRNA
was restored within 4 h. The focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is known
to be activated upon integrin stimulation, and we found that IRS-1 was
not expressed in FAK / cells. Stable
re-expression of epitope-tagged FAK in FAK /
fibroblasts (DA2 cells) restored normal levels of IRS-1 expression, confirming that IRS-1 mRNA expression is regulated by FAK. It is
known that integrins activate the JNK pathway. However, in adherent
FAK / cells, we failed to detect activation
of JNK, whereas JNK was stimulated in DA2 cells. This confirms the role
of FAK in integrin-induced JNK stimulation. FAK-independent stimulation
of JNK with anisomycin treatment both in
FAK / cells and in suspended
FAK+/+ cells confirmed that IRS-1 mRNA transcription
can be partially regulated by JNK. We suggest that integrins can
modulate insulin and insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling pathways by
regulating the levels of IRS-1 in cells and that FAK-mediated signaling
to JNK is one pathway involved in this process.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Integrins are involved in several biological functions such as
angiogenesis, wound repair, prevention of apoptosis, and cell migration
and adhesion (1-6). Various intracellular events are induced by
adhesion. For example, integrins regulate the intracellular concentrations of ions such as Ca2+, H+, and
K+; activate several kinases like lipid kinases
(phosphatidylinositol (PI)1
3-kinase and PI 5-kinase) and protein kinases; control the activity of
phospholipases; and induce cytoskeleton rearrangements (7-9). It has
been demonstrated that integrins can also influence the expression of
several proteins. For instance, IIb 3
integrins have a positive effect on Bcl3 protein translation in
platelets (10). Moreover, integrins activate the synthesis of
platelet-derived growth factor B subunit mRNA in human monocytes
(11). This correlates with high levels of c-Jun,
c-Fos, and EGR2 mRNAs. In addition, adhesion of porcine
vascular smooth muscle cells to fibronectin leads to the synthesis of
insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-5 (12). This effect is
inhibited by Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide and echistatin, which antagonize
integrins. Recently, it has been shown that integrins regulate the
interleukin-8 mRNA level in polymorphonuclear neutrophils (13).
2 integrin aggregation was found to induce de
novo synthesis and secretion of biologically active
interleukin-8.
There are also several examples showing that integrins modulate the
activity of transcription factors. In primary mouse mammary epithelial
cells, the extracellular matrix is required for the prolactin-induced
activation of STAT5 (signal transducer
and activator of transcription 5) (14). In
endothelial cells, the engagement of v 3
integrins by the extracellular matrix protein osteopontin rapidly
increases nuclear factor- B activity and induces the translocation of
the nuclear factor- B p65 form to the nucleus (15). In osteoclasts, activation of 2 integrins is involved in the
transcription of the gene encoding osteocalcin in response to ascorbic
acid (16). Several studies have demonstrated that integrins activate
JNK (17-20). Moreover, it has been shown recently that adhesion of NIH3T3 cells to fibronectin induces activation not only of Jun kinase,
but also of the transcription factor AP-1 (21). Using a
dominant-negative form of FAK, the study demonstrated that the effect
depends on the activation of FAK and of the proto-oncogene c-src (21). In addition, FAK signaling is critical in the
shear stress-induced stimulation of JNK and ERK in bovine aortic
endothelial cells (22). FAK is one of the proteins implicated in the
integrin signaling pathway. Following integrin engagement, FAK is
activated and phosphorylated on tyrosine 397, which serves as a docking site for c-src (23). This association leads to further
phosphorylation of FAK and allows its interaction with several
signaling molecules such as the p85 subunit of PI 3-kinase, Grb2
(growth factor receptor-bound protein-2), and p130CAS
(Crk-associated substrate)
(24-26). p130CAS and Crk could also be involved in
activation of the JNK pathway induced by several stimuli (21, 27,
28).
Since it has been demonstrated that integrins potentiate the insulin
and IGF-1 signaling pathways, we studied the role of adhesion in the
expression of IRS-1, a protein implicated in the intracellular cascade
induced by insulin and IGF-1. We show here that in mouse fibroblasts,
integrins regulate the expression of IRS-1, a major substrate of
insulin/IGF-1 receptors and a central element of their signaling
pathway. Furthermore, we provide evidence that FAK and JNK are key
transducers of this effect of integrins.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Culture media were from Life Technologies, Inc.
[ -32P]dCTP and [ -32P]dATP were from
ICN Pharmaceuticals (Costa Mesa, CA). Triton X-100, Nonidet P-40,
leupeptin, benzamidine, pepstatin, and anisomycin were from Sigma.
Aprotinin was from Bayer Pharma (Puteaux, France), and
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany).
Protein A was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Uppsala, Sweden).
Antiserum to IRS-1 was prepared in our laboratory and was raised
against a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C-terminal sequence
comprising amino acids 1223-1235 of rat IRS-1. Antibody to IRS-2 was
kindly provided by M. F. White (Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston,
MA). Antibody to FAK was prepared in our laboratory by immunizing
rabbits with a synthetic peptide comprising amino acids 392-406.
Antibody to IR (C19) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz,
CA), and antibody to phosphorylated JNK/SAPK was from New England
Biolabs Inc. (Beverly, MA). Oligonucleotides were from Life
Technologies, Inc. (Paisley, Scotland).
Cell Culture--
Wild-type (FAK+/+) and knockout
(FAK / ) fibroblasts were isolated from
wild-type and knockout embryos generated by Ilic et al. (29). The stably transfected cells (DA2) have been described elsewhere
(30, 31). Cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum at 37 °C and 5%
CO2.
Cell Adhesion Assay--
Cell culture dishes were coated with
fibronectin (10 µg/ml) or vitronectin (2 µg/ml) in
phosphate-buffered saline at 4 °C overnight. Dishes were rinsed
twice with phosphate-buffered saline and warmed for 1 h at
37 °C before use.
Fibroblasts were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum. Confluent cells were detached
with trypsin, which was eliminated by centrifugation. Cells were
resuspended in 10% fetal calf serum medium and kept in suspension for
the indicated times. They were plated on coated dishes for increasing
periods. Non-adherent cells were removed, and total RNA was extracted.
Northern Blotting--
Total RNA was extracted from cells using
Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). 15 µg of total RNA were
denatured with formaldehyde/formamide and resolved by electrophoresis
on 1.2% agarose gel containing formaldehyde. RNA was then transferred onto a Hybond membrane (ICN Pharmaceuticals), which was hybridized at
42 °C for 18 h. The probes used were cDNA fragments of
IRS-1 (1-2.8 kb), IRS-2 (2.9-3.9 kb), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; 0.6 kb). They were labeled with
[ -32P]dCTP using a random primer labeling kit
(Rediprime kit) and purified with a ProbeQuant kit (both from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Hybridization of 18 S RNA was performed
using the oligonucleotide 5'-ACG GTA TCT GAT CGT CTT CGA ACC-3' labeled
with [ -32P]dATP using T4 kinase (Life Technologies,
Inc.)
Reverse Transcription-PCR Analysis--
Cells were incubated
with actinomycin D (5 µg/ml) for 1-6 h and then lysed, and total RNA
was extracted. Reverse transcription was performed on 5 µg of total
RNA using the mouse mammary leukemia virus enzyme and oligo(dT)
primers. The reverse transcription products were then used as templates
for PCR amplification using gene-specific primers: for IRS-1,
5'-ACCATGGGGACAAGCCCGGCG-3' and 5'-GGGGCTGCTGGTGTTGGAATC-3'; and for
-actin, 5'-GTGGGGGCGCCCCAGGCACCA-3' and 5'-TCCTTAATGTCACGCACGATTTC.
The linear range of the PCR was determined by checking the amount of
PCR products after various cycles of amplification to allow comparison
between different samples. PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose
gel and analyzed by ethidium bromide incorporation.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blotting--
Cells were washed
with buffer A (50 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 150 mM
NaCl, 100 mM NaF, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM
Na4P2O7, and 2 mM
NaVO4) and then lysed for 15 min on ice with buffer A
supplemented with 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 20 mM leupeptin,
4 mM benzamidine, 2 mM pepstatin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 100 units/ml aprotinin. After centrifugation at 4 °C for 15 min, cell
lysates (800 µg of proteins) were added to antibodies (anti-IRS-1,
serum dilution of 1:50; anti-IRS-2, serum dilution of 1:200; and
anti-IR, 1 µg of purified Ig) preadsorbed on protein A-Sepharose.
Immunoprecipitation was performed at 4 °C for 3 h. Pellets were
then washed three times with buffer A containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40 and
resuspended in Laemmli buffer (32). Immunoprecipitated proteins or
whole lysates were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under reducing conditions, and proteins were transferred to an Immobilon membrane (polyvinylidene difluoride; Millipore Corp.) in 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 20% methanol (pH
8.3). The membrane was blocked with TBS (10 mM Tris (pH
7.4) and 140 mM NaCl) containing 5% (w/v) bovine serum
albumin for 1 h and incubated with antibodies to IRS-1 (1:1000),
IRS-2 (1:1000), IR (0.7 µg/ml), FAK (1:200), HA tag (1:4000), or
phosphotyrosine (1:2000) for 60 min at room temperature and with
antibodies to phospho-JNK/phospho-SAPK (1:1000) or JNK/SAPK for 1 night
at 4 °C. The membrane was washed four times with TBS containing 1%
(v/v) Nonidet P-40 and then twice with TBS. Finally, the membrane was
incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (Dako AS,
Glostrap, Denmark) for 1 h at room temperature, washed four
times with TBS containing 1% (v/v) Nonidet P-40 and twice with TBS,
revealed with chemiluminescent substrate (ECL, Pierce), and exposed to
sensitive films.
 |
RESULTS |
IRS-1 mRNA Is Decreased in Suspended Fibroblasts--
In this
study, we investigated the role of cellular adhesion in the regulation
of IRS-1 expression. To this end, FAK+/+ fibroblasts either
were kept attached or were detached from plates and kept in suspension.
The two series of cells were then compared. Total RNA was extracted
after different times of suspension, and IRS-1 mRNA was analyzed by
Northern blotting. The results are presented in Fig.
1. After 2 h of suspension, the
level of IRS-1 mRNA (normalized to amounts of 18 S rRNA) decreased
(~20% left) and remained very low at 4 h (~12% left). IRS-2
mRNA, which was studied in parallel, was not down-regulated in
suspended fibroblasts, but on the contrary, seemed to be up-regulated.
The 18 S rRNA quantification was used as a loading control. Amounts of
GAPDH mRNA (normalized to amounts of 18 S rRNA) were similar in
suspended and adherent fibroblasts. Thus, disruption of cellular
adhesion results in a marked loss of IRS-1 mRNA in fibroblasts.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
IRS-1 mRNA expression in adherent and
suspended fibroblasts. FAK+/+ fibroblasts were left
adherent or were detached from plates and kept in suspension for 2 or
4 h. Total RNA was extracted, resolved on a formaldehyde gel, and
subjected to Northern blotting. IRS-1, IRS-2, and GAPDH mRNAs were
revealed using IRS-1 (1-2.8 kb), IRS-2 (2.9-3.9 kb), and GAPDH (0.6 kb) cDNAs, respectively. The 18 S rRNA was revealed with an
oligonucleotide. Upper panel, autoradiogram of the Northern
blot; lower panel, autoradiogram of three experiments
scanned and quantified using NIH Imager. The amounts of IRS-1 were
normalized to amounts of 18 S rRNA and are expressed as a percentage of
the adherent conditions.
|
|
Stability of IRS-1 mRNA Is Similar in Suspended and Adherent
Fibroblasts--
Since the level of IRS-1 mRNA was decreased in
suspended fibroblasts, we next examined if this was due to decreased
mRNA stability. To do this, suspended and adherent
FAK+/+ fibroblasts were treated with actinomycin D (5 µg/ml) for 45 min, 1.5 h, and 3 h to block transcription.
Total RNA was extracted and analyzed by Northern blotting. As shown in
Fig. 2, the levels of IRS-1 and IRS-2
mRNAs were already decreased after 45 min of actinomycin D
treatment. After 3 h, both were undetectable. We calculated that
the half-life of IRS-1 mRNA was 1 and 1.5 h in adherent and
suspended fibroblasts, respectively. A similar degradation rate was
observed for IRS-2 mRNA. The GAPDH and 18 S RNA amounts remained
unchanged even after 3 h of actinomycin D treatment in suspended
and adherent fibroblasts. We conclude that the decreased level
of IRS-1 mRNA observed in suspended cells is not due to decreased
mRNA stability.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Stability of IRS-1 mRNA in suspended and
adherent fibroblasts. FAK+/+ fibroblasts detached from
plates or left adherent were incubated with actinomycin D (5 µg/ml)
for 45 min to 3 h. Total RNA was extracted and analyzed by
Northern blotting. IRS-1, IRS-2, and GAPDH mRNAs were revealed
using IRS-1 (1-2.8 kb), IRS-2 (2.9-3.9 kb), and GAPDH (0.6 kb)
[ -32P]dCTP-labeled cDNAs, respectively. The 18 S
rRNA was revealed with a [ -32P]dATP-labeled
oligonucleotide. An autoradiogram of a representative experiment is
shown.
|
|
Cell Adhesion to Fibronectin and Vitronectin Induces Synthesis of
IRS-1 mRNA--
To further investigate the role of integrins in
the regulation of IRS-1 expression, we measured the synthesis of IRS-1
mRNA upon activation of integrins. To this end, FAK+/+
fibroblasts were detached from plates and kept in suspension for 2 h. They were then replated on fibronectin or vitronectin, both of which
engage the 5 1 or
v 3 integrins, respectively. Total RNA was
extracted after 1, 2, or 4 h of adhesion, and IRS-1 mRNA was
revealed by Northern blotting (Fig. 3).
Again, IRS-1 mRNA was decreased after 2 h of suspension.
Importantly, the level of IRS-1 mRNA was restored after 4 h of
adhesion to fibronectin as well as to vitronectin. The GAPDH and 18 S
RNA amounts were unchanged. These experiments show that activation of
integrins by fibronectin or vitronectin induces the synthesis of IRS-1
mRNA. Since the tyrosine kinase FAK is one of the major proteins
activated in adherent cells, but inactivated in suspended cells, we
next studied the potential role of FAK in the regulation of IRS-1
expression.

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Expression of IRS-1 mRNA in fibroblasts
replated on fibronectin and vitronectin. FAK+/+
fibroblasts were left attached or were detached and kept in suspension
for 2 h. Cells were replated for 1, 2, or 4 h on fibronectin
(10 µg/ml) or vitronectin (2 µg/ml). Total RNA was extracted and
subjected to Northern blotting. The mRNAs of interest were revealed
as described in the legend to Fig. 1. A representative
autoradiogram is shown.
|
|
Expression of IRS-1 mRNA Is Abolished in FAK /
Fibroblasts--
To investigate the role of FAK in the control of
IRS-1 mRNA levels, we used FAK knockout cells
(FAK / ) (29). Total RNA was extracted from
FAK / , FAK+/+, and NIH3T3
fibroblasts. mRNAs were analyzed by Northern blotting. As expected,
the Northern blot revealed IRS-1 mRNA in NIH3T3 fibroblasts and
FAK+/+ cells (Fig. 4,
upper panel). However, no IRS-1 mRNA was detected in
FAK / cells. On the contrary, the levels of
IRS-2 mRNA were the same in FAK / and
FAK+/+ cells. Note that GAPDH mRNA levels were also the
same in both cell lines and that IRS-2 mRNA was also expressed in
NIH3T3 fibroblasts. In summary, knockout of the gene encoding FAK leads
to reduced synthesis of IRS-1 mRNA, but has no effect on IRS-2
mRNA.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
IRS-1 mRNA expression in
FAK /
fibroblasts. Upper panel, total RNA was extracted from
confluent knockout fibroblasts (FAK / ) and
from wild-type fibroblasts (FAK+/+ and NIH3T3). IRS-1,
IRS-2, and GAPDH mRNAs were revealed by Northern blotting using
specific cDNAs corresponding to IRS-1, IRS-2, and GAPDH. A
representative autoradiogram out of two experiments is shown.
Lower panel, knockout and wild-type fibroblasts were treated
with actinomycin D (5 µg/ml) for 1, 2, 4, or 6 h. After
extraction of total RNA, reverse transcription was performed on 5 µg.
cDNAs obtained were used to perform a co-amplification of IRS-1 and
-actin with specific oligonucleotides. PCR products were resolved on
a 1% agarose gel and analyzed for ethidium bromide
incorporation.
|
|
We next determined if there was a decreased stability of the IRS-1
mRNA in FAK / cells. As there were very
low amounts of IRS-1 mRNA in these cells, a method more sensitive
than Northern blotting was used, i.e. reverse
transcription-PCR. Cells were treated with actinomycin D (5 µg/ml)
for the indicated periods of time to block transcription. Total RNA was
extracted and subjected to reverse transcription-PCR as described under
"Experimental Procedures." As shown in Fig. 4 (lower
panel), the level of IRS-1 mRNA rapidly decreased in FAK+/+ cells, consistent with the half-life calculated from
results shown in Fig. 2. The amount of IRS-1 mRNA was strongly
reduced in FAK / cells compared with
FAK+/+ cells. Due to the very low level of IRS-1 mRNA
in FAK / cells, it was not possible to
calculate its half-life. -Actin mRNA was stable even after
6 h of actinomycin D treatment and was the same in both cell
lines. As a whole, our results indicate that FAK may be required for
synthesis of IRS-1 mRNA.
Expression Level of the IRS-1 Protein in FAK /
Cells--
Protein expression of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IR was determined
in FAK / and FAK+/+ fibroblasts.
To do this, FAK / or FAK+/+
cells were lysed, and immunoprecipitation of IRS-1, IRS-2, and IR was
performed. Immunopurified proteins were analyzed by Western blotting
using antibodies to IRS-1, IRS-2, and IR (Fig.
5). As expected, the IRS-1 protein was
undetectable in FAK / cells, whereas no
difference in the expression of IRS-2 and IR was observed between the
two cell lines. In this experiment, FAK was correctly expressed in the
wild-type cells, whereas no FAK was present in the mutant cells (data
not shown).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Expression of IRS-1 protein in
FAK /
fibroblasts. Immunoprecipitation (IP) of IRS-1, IRS-2,
and IR was carried out on lysates from
FAK / and FAK+/+ cells.
Immunoprecipitates were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies
to IRS-1, IRS-2, and IR. Results were revealed with a
chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce). The autoradiogram shown is
representative of three comparable experiments.
|
|
To further establish the role of FAK in IRS-1 gene expression, we
investigated whether the expression of FAK in
FAK / cells would restore IRS-1 protein
expression. To do this, we used DA2 cells, which are
FAK / cells stably transfected with an empty
vector or a vector containing the cDNA encoding HA-tagged FAK (30).
These cells were lysed, and immunoprecipitation of IRS-1 was performed
using a specific antibody to IRS-1. Immunopurified proteins and total
lysates were analyzed by Western blotting using antibodies to IRS-1 or
FAK. FAK expression was checked in all cell lines using an antibody to
FAK (Fig. 6B, middle
panel). Due to the HA tag, FAK had an increased molecular mass in
DA2 cells. An antibody to HA revealed that the protein observed in DA2
cells using the antibody to FAK corresponds to HA-tagged FAK (Fig.
6B, lower panel). We found that IRS-1 expression
was restored in the stably transfected DA2 cell line that expresses FAK
(Fig. 6, A and B, upper panel). So far, we cannot explain why IRS-1 in DA2 cells seems to have an increased electrophoretic mobility compared with IRS-1 in
FAK+/+ cells. Taking the results of Figs. 5 and 6 together,
we suggest that FAK plays a positive role in the regulation of IRS-1
protein expression, but does not appear to be involved in IRS-2 or IR expression.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Restored expression of IRS-1 protein in
FAK / cells
stably transfected with FAK. Two representative experiments are
presented. A, total lysates were extracted from knockout
fibroblasts (FAK / ), knockout fibroblasts
stably transfected with an empty vector
(FAK / ;vect),
knockout fibroblasts stably transfected with FAK (DA2), and wild-type
fibroblasts (FAK+/+). Immunoprecipitation (IP)
of IRS-1 was performed on lysates, and immunocomplexes were separated
on a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by Western blotting.
B, immunoprecipitation of IRS-1 was performed on one part of
the lysates. Immunoprecipitates and a fraction of whole lysates were
separated on a minigel and analyzed by Western blotting using
antibodies to IRS-1 and to FAK and the HA tag, respectively.
|
|
Integrins Do Not Activate JNK in FAK /
Cells--
It has previously been demonstrated in several cell types
that integrins can activate JNK and that FAK is implicated in this process (20, 21). Therefore, we examined whether this occurred also in
FAK / cells. To this end,
FAK / cells were serum-starved and kept in
suspension for 1 h. Cells were then replated on fibronectin for 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, and 4 h. Cells were lysed, and proteins
were separated on a large-size polyacrylamide gel. Western blotting was
performed using antibodies to activated JNK. As shown in Fig.
7 (upper panels), JNK was not activated in FAK / cells in response to
integrin engagement. Note that suspension of cells led to a weak
stimulation of JNK. This effect could be caused by the
engagement of stress signaling pathways due to serum depletion and
suspension and is likely to be unrelated to the integrin signaling
pathway. To document the role of FAK in integrin-induced JNK
activation, we performed the same experiment in DA2 cells. The results
presented in Fig. 7 (lower panels) demonstrate that the
re-expression of FAK in FAK / cells is
sufficient to restore the activation of JNK by integrins, which reaches
a peak within 10 min and then fades out. Western blotting carried out
with antibodies to JNK revealed similar levels of proteins under all
conditions.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
FAK contributes to fibronectin-stimulated JNK
activation. FAK / or FAK-re-expressing
DA2 cells were either serum-starved (0.5% serum for 24 h),
detached by limited trypsin/EDTA treatment, and suspended for 1 h
or replated on fibronectin-coated (10 µg/ml) dishes for the times
indicated in the absence of serum. Equal amounts (100 µg) of whole
cell lysates were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
and analyzed by anti-phospho-activated JNK blotting (Promega). Blots
were reprobed with polyclonal antibodies to JNK-1 (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) to verify equal amounts of JNK-1 protein.
|
|
Activation of the JNK Pathway Is Implicated in IRS-1 mRNA
Expression--
To study the involvement of JNK in the synthesis of
IRS-1 mRNA, FAK / cells were treated
with anisomycin (50 ng/ml) for the indicated times to stimulate JNK.
Total RNA was extracted, and IRS-1 mRNA was revealed by Northern
blotting. Activation of JNK by anisomycin was tested after 30 and 60 min of stimulation. Proteins were analyzed by Western blotting, and
activated JNK and SAPK were revealed using a specific antibody. As
illustrated in Fig. 8 (lower
panels), JNK and SAPK were fully activated by anisomycin in
FAK / cells after 30 min of treatment, and
the stimulation started to decrease after 60 min. Fig. 8 (upper
panel) shows that IRS-1 mRNA levels increased in a
time-dependent manner in FAK /
cells. However, the amount of IRS-1 mRNA in
FAK / cells after 5 h of stimulation
with anisomycin was still 2-fold smaller than that in
FAK+/+ cells. Therefore, it appears that activated JNK only
partially induces IRS-1 mRNA synthesis in the absence of FAK. Taken
together, these results demonstrate that JNK is one of the pathways
implicated in IRS-1 mRNA synthesis.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Involvement of the JNK pathway in IRS-1
mRNA expression in adherent
FAK /
cells. Adherent FAK / cells were
incubated with anisomycin (50 ng/ml) for 2 or 5 h. Upper
panel, total RNA was extracted, and IRS-1, GAPDH, and 18 S RNAs
were analyzed by Northern blotting. Lower panels, cells were
lysed after 30 and 60 min of treatment with anisomycin. Proteins were
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and activated
JNK/SAPK was revealed using specific antibodies. Blots were reprobed
with monoclonal antibodies to JNK/SAPK. Representative autoradiograms
are shown.
|
|
To further establish the role of JNK in integrin-induced IRS-1 mRNA
synthesis, we determined if JNK activation could restore the IRS-1
mRNA level in suspended cells. To this end, FAK+/+
cells were treated with anisomycin at the indicated concentrations for
30 min. Cells were then kept in suspension for 2 h in the presence
of anisomycin, and total RNA was extracted. IRS-1 mRNA expression
was revealed by Northern blotting. The results are presented in Fig.
9 (upper panel). As previously
demonstrated, the IRS-1 mRNA level decreased after 2 h of
suspension. However, a dose-dependent increase in IRS-1
mRNA was observed in suspended cells treated with anisomycin. At 50 ng/ml anisomycin, the increase in IRS-1 mRNA was maximal, and the
level of IRS-1 mRNA was very similar to the one detected in
adherent cells. Activation of JNK by anisomycin was tested on whole
cell lysates after 2 h of suspension under all conditions.
Proteins were revealed by Western blotting using antibodies to
phospho-JNK/phospho-SAPK and JNK/SAPK. As shown in Fig. 9 (lower
panels), treatment with anisomycin induced a
dose-dependent activation of JNK and SAPK. Interestingly,
it seems that in suspended cells, anisomycin treatment slightly induced the expression of JNK. Therefore, it is possible that this effect contributes to the positive regulation of IRS-1 mRNA synthesis observed upon anisomycin treatment.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Involvement of the JNK pathway in IRS-1
mRNA expression in suspended FAK+/+ cells.
FAK+/+ cells were pretreated with increased concentrations
of anisomycin for 30 min and then put in suspension in the presence of
the indicated amounts of anisomycin for 2 h. Upper
panel, total RNA was extracted, and IRS-1, GAPDH, and 18 S RNAs
were analyzed by Northern blotting. Lower panels, cells were
lysed after 2 h of suspension and anisomycin treatment. Proteins
were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and activated
JNK/SAPK was revealed using specific antibodies. Blots were reprobed
with monoclonal antibodies to JNK/SAPK. Representative autoradiograms
are shown.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Previous studies have demonstrated the existence of a cross-talk
between signaling pathways used by integrins and those used by growth
factors (8). It is generally believed that adhesion is required for
growth factors to induce the full array of their intracellular effects.
More specifically, there have been examples for integrin regulation of
insulin and IGF-1 signaling pathways (33-35). Insulin and IGF-1
receptors are tyrosine kinase receptors, which are activated and
autophosphorylated upon ligand binding. This leads to the tyrosine
phosphorylation of the docking proteins IRS-1 and IRS-2 and to their
subsequent interaction with several SH2 domain-containing proteins such
as the regulatory subunit of PI 3-kinase, Grb2, SHP-2 (SH2
domain-containing phosphotyrosine phosphatase-2), and Nck (36, 37). Insulin and
IGF-1 affect several cellular events, including metabolism, cell growth
and differentiation, and apoptosis (38, 39).
The cellular effects of IGF-1 such as DNA and protein synthesis are
potentiated by engagement of v 3 integrins
in smooth muscle cells (40), whereas in Chinese hamster ovary cells,
5 1 integrins synergize with the insulin
signal (33, 34). These effects may be mediated by increased tyrosine
phosphorylation of the receptors and their substrates. In addition,
human pancreatic carcinoma cells overexpressing
v 3 integrins show a 2.5-fold increased
DNA synthesis in response to insulin when cells are plated on
vitronectin (41). It has been demonstrated in Rat1 cells and in human
pancreatic carcinoma cells that, upon insulin stimulation, both IRS-1
and IR interact with v 3 integrins
(42).
In the context of cross-talk between signaling pathways used by
integrins and those used by insulin and IGF-1, our work provides evidence for the requirement of integrins for IRS-1 expression. Indeed,
disruption of adhesion induces a fast down-regulation of IRS-1
mRNA, which drops to very low levels within 2 h. Conversely, integrin engagement on fibronectin or vitronectin restores the level of
IRS-1 mRNA within 4 h. The molecular mechanisms implicated in
this regulation remain to be defined. It has been demonstrated that
engagement of integrins induces the recruitment and activation of
tyrosine kinases such as FAK and Src (43). The tyrosine kinase FAK,
which is a key player in integrin signaling, is inactivated in
suspended fibroblasts, but becomes activated upon cell adhesion. Therefore, this protein is a likely candidate for a regulator of IRS-1
gene expression. We used FAK / cells to
investigate FAK putative involvement in the control of IRS-1
mRNA levels. Interestingly, IRS-1 mRNA and protein were not
expressed in FAK knockout cells, suggesting a role for FAK. Complete
FAK deficiency in FAK / animals is lethal at
an early stage of development due to a pronounced defect of mesoderm
maturation (29). No profound protein down-regulation has been observed
in these cells so far. In fact, protein expression of the FAK-related
tyrosine kinase PYK2 is increased in FAK /
cells and compensates for FAK absence regarding the activation of ERK2,
but not cell migration (44). However, PYK2 does not appear to be able
to maintain IRS-1 expression in FAK / cells.
Moreover, ectopic expression of FAK in FAK /
cells is sufficient to restore the synthesis of IRS-1 to a normal level. Since FAK knockout cells show a certain degree of
disorganization of the cortical cytoskeleton, we cannot exclude that
this could participate in the pathways leading to regulation of IRS-1
expression in FAK / cells.
Previous studies have demonstrated that integrin engagement activates
JNK and that FAK can be implicated in this process (20, 21).
Accordingly, our adhesion experiments showed that in FAK re-expressing
DA2 cells, integrins strongly and transiently activated JNK, whereas
JNK stimulation was not seen in FAK / cells
replated on fibronectin (Fig. 7). However, a weak amount of
phosphorylated JNK was detected in suspended
FAK / and FAK+/+ cells. This
activation could be due to stress induced by suspension and serum
depletion and is unrelated to integrin-mediated effects (21). Treatment
of adherent FAK / cells and suspended
FAK+/+ cells with the activator of the JNK pathway,
anisomycin, partially restores IRS-1 mRNA expression. In fact, it
seems that anisomycin not only activates JNK, but induces JNK
expression in suspended fibroblasts. Taken all together, our results
show that IRS-1 mRNA expression strongly correlates with increased
JNK signaling. Since anisomycin treatment only partially restores the
IRS-1 mRNA level, additional pathways are likely to be implicated
in the regulation of IRS-1 expression. It is well known that integrins
activate the MAPK pathway and that FAK is involved in this process. To investigate the potential role of MAPK in IRS-1 mRNA synthesis, we
overexpressed a constitutively active form of MEK (the upstream activator of MAPK) in FAK / and
FAK+/+ cells. In these cells, no synthesis of IRS-1
mRNA was detected (data not shown). This suggests that the MAPK
pathway is not implicated in the regulation of IRS-1 expression.
Moreover, it has been demonstrated that PI 3-kinase is activated in
response to integrins and that the interaction between FAK and p85 is
involved in this process. However, our preliminary experiments using
the specific PI 3-kinase inhibitor wortmannin suggest that the PI
3-kinase pathway is not implicated in the regulation of IRS-1 synthesis
by integrins (data not shown).
Very few things are known about transcriptional regulation of the IRS-1
gene. Its promoter lacks typical CAAT and TATA boxes, but contains nine
potential Sp1-binding sites, consistent with the structure of a
housekeeping gene (45). It also contains AP-1-, AP-2-, and
CAAT/enhancer-binding protein-binding sites; an E-box; and several
hormone response elements such as the glucocorticoid response element
and the progesterone response element (46). It has been reported that
integrins regulate the activities of JNK and of the AP-1 transcription
factor and that FAK is implicated in this control (21). Together with
our findings presented here, these data suggest that integrins regulate
the transcription of the IRS-1 gene via FAK-mediated JNK activation.
A remarkable finding of our work is that integrins quite differently
affect the expression level of IRS-1 mRNA versus IRS-2 mRNA. Indeed, in adherent fibroblasts, integrins positively
regulate IRS-1 gene expression, but seem to lead to a decrease in IRS-2 mRNA expression. Moreover, IRS-1 expression is abolished in FAK knockout cells, whereas the level of IRS-2 is unchanged. IRS-1 and
IRS-2 are thought to play distinct roles in the biological effects
mediated by insulin and IGF-1. Indeed, several studies suggest that
IRS-1 preferentially mediates the mitogenic effects of insulin and
IGF-1, whereas IRS-2 appears to be more involved in generating the
metabolic responses of insulin (47-50). Considering this, we suggest
that the positive control of IRS-1 expression (but not IRS-2
expression) by integrins could alter specific responses. However, a
very recent report provides evidence that IRS-1 and IRS-2 can share
biological effects, but that they exert tissue-specific roles (51).
IRS-1 would play a prominent role in skeletal muscle, whereas IRS-2
would be the dominant player in liver. In such a model, integrins would
have a prominent role in the regulation of the insulin response in
skeletal muscle and would have a less pronounced impact in insulin
signaling in the liver.
Another interesting possibility to consider is that IRS-1 participates
in signaling mediated by FAK in response to integrin engagement
independently of the insulin or IGF-1 circuitry. Indeed, we have
demonstrated that FAK interacts directly with IRS-1 (35). This
association leads to tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and its
interaction with SH2 domain-containing proteins such as p85, Grb2, and
SHP-2. Finally, FAK activates IRS-1-associated PI 3-kinase. In this
context, down-regulation of IRS-1 expression in suspended cells may act
as a negative feedback loop in the integrin signaling pathway.
To conclude, a picture is emerging that shows that cell adhesion is
required to allow optimal functioning of integrated cell systems. Our
present study and previous reports (34, 40, 41) suggest that cell
adhesion is required for the full use of IRS-1 signaling machinery by
insulin and IGF-1.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank D. Ilic for the generous gift of
FAK / and FAK+/+ cells.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by INSERM, Université
de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, and by the Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer (Axe Oncogenèse).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by a student fellowship from the Ligue Nationale contre
le Cancer.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
33-4-93-37-77-96; Fax: 33-4-93-81-54-32; E-mail: vbaron@skcc.org.
**
Supported by Postdoctoral Fellowship HA 2856/1-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Supported by United States Public Health Service Grant R29
CA75240 from NCI, National Institutes of Health.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 30, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M006162200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PI, phosphatidylinositol;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase;
FAK, focal adhesion kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase;
IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1;
IR, insulin receptor;
IRS, insulin
receptor substrate;
SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase;
kb, kilobase pair(s);
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
TBS, Tris-buffered
saline;
HA, hemagglutinin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Brooks, P. C.,
Clark, R. A.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1994)
Science
264,
569-571
|
| 2.
|
Echtermeyer, F.,
Schober, S.,
Poschl, E.,
von der Mark, H.,
and von der Mark, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2071-2075
|
| 3.
|
Frisch, S. M.,
and Francis, H.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
619-626
|
| 4.
|
Meng, F.,
and Lowell, C. A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4391-4403
|
| 5.
|
Palecek, S. P.,
Loftus, J. C.,
Ginsberg, M. H.,
Lauffenburger, D. A.,
and Horwitz, A. F.
(1997)
Nature
385,
537-540
|
| 6.
|
Xu, J.,
and Clark, R. A.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
239-249
|
| 7.
|
Boudreau, N. J.,
and Jones, P. L.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
339,
481-488
|
| 8.
|
Howe, A.,
Aplin, A. E.,
Alahari, S. K.,
and Juliano, R. L.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
220-231
|
| 9.
|
Juliano, R. L.,
and Haskill, S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
577-585
|
| 10.
|
Pabla, R.,
Weyrich, A. S.,
Dixon, D. A.,
Bray, P. F.,
McIntyre, T. M.,
Prescott, S. M.,
and Zimmerman, G. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
175-184
|
| 11.
|
Shaw, R. J.,
Doherty, D. E.,
Ritter, A. G.,
Benedict, S. H.,
and Clark, R. A.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
2139-2148
|
| 12.
|
Zheng, B.,
Duan, C.,
and Clemmons, D. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8994-9000
|
| 13.
|
Walzog, B.,
Weinmann, P.,
Jeblonski, F.,
Scharffetter-Kochanek, K.,
Bommert, K.,
and Gaehtgens, P.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
1855-1865
|
| 14.
|
Edwards, G. M.,
Wilford, F. H.,
Liu, X.,
Hennighausen, L.,
Djiane, J.,
and Streuli, C. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
9495-9500
|
| 15.
|
Scatena, M.,
Almeida, M.,
Chaisson, M. L.,
Fausto, N.,
Nicosia, R. F.,
and Giachelli, C. M.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
141,
1083-1093
|
| 16.
|
Xiao, G.,
Wang, D.,
Benson, M. D.,
Karsenty, G.,
and Franceschi, R. T.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32988-32994
|
| 17.
|
Miyamoto, S.,
Teramoto, H.,
Coso, O. A.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
Burbelo, P. D.,
Akiyama, S. K.,
and Yamada, K. M.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
791-805
|
| 18.
|
Mainiero, F.,
Murgia, C.,
Wary, K. K.,
Curatola, A. M.,
Pepe, A.,
Blumemberg, M.,
Westwick, J. K.,
Der, C. J.,
and Giancotti, F. G.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
2365-2375
|
| 19.
|
Miranti, C. K.,
Leng, L.,
Maschberger, P.,
Brugge, J. S.,
and Shattil, S. J.
(1998)
Curr. Biol.
8,
1289-1299
|
| 20.
|
Almeida, E. A.,
Ilic, D.,
Han, Q.,
Hauck, C. R.,
Jin, F.,
Kawakatsu, H.,
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
and Damsky, C. H.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
741-754
|
| 21.
|
Oktay, M.,
Wary, K. K.,
Dans, M.,
Birge, R. B.,
and Giancotti, F. G.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
1461-1469
|
| 22.
|
Li, S.,
Kim, M.,
Hu, Y. L.,
Jalali, S.,
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
Hunter, T.,
Chien, S.,
and Shyy, J. Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30455-30462
|
| 23.
|
Schaller, M. D.,
Hildebrand, J. D.,
Shannon, J. D.,
Fox, J. W.,
Vines, R. R.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1680-1688
|
| 24.
|
Chen, H. C.,
and Guan, J. L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10148-10152
|
| 25.
|
Polte, T. R.,
and Hanks, S. K.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10678-10682
|
| 26.
|
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
Hanks, S. K.,
Hunter, T.,
and van der Geer, P.
(1994)
Nature
372,
786-791
|
| 27.
|
Dolfi, F.,
Garcia-Guzman, M.,
Ojaniemi, M.,
Nakamura, H.,
Matsuda, M.,
and Vuori, K.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
15394-15399
|
| 28.
|
Zhu, T.,
Goh, E. L.,
LeRoith, D.,
and Lobie, P. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33864-33875
|
| 29.
|
Ilic, D.,
Furuta, Y.,
Kanazawa, S.,
Takeda, N.,
Sobue, K.,
Nakatsuji, N.,
Nomura, S.,
Fujimoto, J.,
Okada, M.,
and Yamamoto, T.
(1995)
Nature
377,
539-544
|
| 30.
|
Sieg, D. J.,
Hauck, C. R.,
and Schlaepfer, D. D.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
2677-2691
|
| 31.
|
Sieg, D. J.,
Hauck, C. R.,
Ilic, D.,
Klingbeil, C. K.,
Schaefer, E.,
Damsky, C. H.,
and Schlaepfer, D. D.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
249-256
|
| 32.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
|
| 33.
|
Guilherme, A.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
33119-33122
|
| 34.
|
Guilherme, A.,
Torres, K.,
and Czech, M. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22899-22903
|
| 35.
|
Lebrun, P.,
Mothe-Satney, I.,
Delahaye, L.,
Van Obberghen, E.,
and Baron, V.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32244-32253
|
| 36.
|
Cheatham, B.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1995)
Endocr. Rev.
16,
117-142
|
| 37.
|
Waters, S. B.,
and Pessin, J. E.
(1996)
Trends Cell Biol.
6,
1-4
|
| 38.
|
Baserga, R.,
Hongo, A.,
Rubini, M.,
Prisco, M.,
and Valentinis, B.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1332,
F105-F126
|
| 39.
|
Kahn, R.
(1997)
in
International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus
(Alberti, K. G. M. M.
, Zimmet, P.
, DeFronzo, R. A.
, and Keen, H., eds), 2nd Ed.
, pp. 437-467, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, United Kingdom
|
| 40.
|
Zheng, B.,
and Clemmons, D. R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
11217-11222
|
| 41.
|
Vuori, K.,
and Ruoslahti, E.
(1994)
Science
266,
1576-1578
|
| 42.
|
Schneller, M.,
Vuori, K.,
and Ruoslahti, E.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5600-5607
|
| 43.
|
Keely, P.,
Parise, L.,
and Juliano, R.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
101-106
|
| 44.
|
Sieg, D. J.,
Ilic, D.,
Jones, K. C.,
Damsky, C. H.,
Hunter, T.,
and Schlaepfer, D. D.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5933-5947
|
| 45.
|
Araki, E.,
Haag, B. L., III,
Matsuda, K.,
Shichiri, M.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
1367-1379
|
| 46.
|
Matsuda, K.,
Araki, E.,
Yoshimura, R.,
Tsuruzoe, K.,
Furukawa, N.,
Kaneko, K.,
Motoshima, H.,
Yoshizato, K.,
Kishikawa, H.,
and Shichiri, M.
(1997)
Diabetes
46,
354-362
|
| 47.
|
Bruning, J. C.,
Winnay, J.,
Cheatham, B.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1513-1521
|
| 48.
|
Miele, C.,
Caruso, M.,
Calleja, V.,
Auricchio, R.,
Oriente, F.,
Formisano, P.,
Condorelli, G.,
Cafieri, A.,
Sawka-Verhelle, D.,
Van Obberghen, E.,
and Beguinot, F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3094-3102
|
| 49.
|
Myers, M. G., Jr.,
Wang, L. M.,
Sun, X. J.,
Zhang, Y.,
Yenush, L.,
Schlessinger, J.,
Pierce, J. H.,
and White, M. F.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
3577-3587
|
| 50.
|
Rose, D. W.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
Majumdar, M.,
Decker, S. J.,
and Olefsky, J. M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
797-801
|
| 51.
|
Kido, Y.,
Burks, D. J.,
Withers, D.,
Bruning, J. C.,
Kahn, C. R.,
White, M. F.,
and Accili, D.
(2000)
J. Clin. Invest.
105,
199-205
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Behmoaram, K. Bijian, S. Jie, Y. Xu, A. Darnel, T. A. Bismar, and M. A. Alaoui-Jamali
Focal Adhesion Kinase-Related Proline-Rich Tyrosine Kinase 2 and Focal Adhesion Kinase Are Co-Overexpressed in Early-Stage and Invasive ErbB-2-Positive Breast Cancer and Cooperate for Breast Cancer Cell Tumorigenesis and Invasiveness
Am. J. Pathol.,
November 1, 2008;
173(5):
1540 - 1550.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Bisht, K. Srinivasan, and C. S. Dey
In vivo inhibition of focal adhesion kinase causes insulin resistance
J. Physiol.,
August 15, 2008;
586(16):
3825 - 3837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Spentzos, S. A Cannistra, F. Grall, D. A Levine, K. Pillay, T. A Libermann, and C. S Mantzoros
IGF axis gene expression patterns are prognostic of survival in epithelial ovarian cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2007;
14(3):
781 - 790.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Huang, M. Khoe, M. Befekadu, S. Chung, Y. Takata, D. Ilic, and M. Bryer-Ash
Focal adhesion kinase mediates cell survival via NF-{kappa}B and ERK signaling pathways
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
April 1, 2007;
292(4):
C1339 - C1352.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-C. Alessi and I. Juhan-Vague
PAI-1 and the Metabolic Syndrome: Links, Causes, and Consequences
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
October 1, 2006;
26(10):
2200 - 2207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Huang, M. Khoe, D. Ilic, and M. Bryer-Ash
Reduced Expression of Focal Adhesion Kinase Disrupts Insulin Action in Skeletal Muscle Cells
Endocrinology,
July 1, 2006;
147(7):
3333 - 3343.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Cui, H.-J. Kim, I. Kuiatse, H. Kim, P. H. Brown, and A. V. Lee
Epidermal Growth Factor Induces Insulin Receptor Substrate-2 in Breast Cancer Cells via c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase/Activator Protein-1 Signaling to Regulate Cell Migration.
Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2006;
66(10):
5304 - 5313.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. I. Vulin, K. K. Jacob, and F. M. Stanley
Integrin Activates Receptor-Like Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase {alpha}, Src, and Rho to Increase Prolactin Gene Expression through a Final Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Cytoskeletal Pathway that Is Additive with Insulin
Endocrinology,
August 1, 2005;
146(8):
3535 - 3546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Clemmons and L. A. Maile
Interaction between Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Receptor and {alpha}V{beta}3 Integrin Linked Signaling Pathways: Cellular Responses to Changes in Multiple Signaling Inputs
Mol. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2005;
19(1):
1 - 11.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Pereira, T. Meyer, S. E. Docherty, H. H. Reid, J. Marshall, E. W. Thompson, J. Rossjohn, and J. T. Price
Bimolecular Interaction of Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein-2 with {alpha}v{beta}3 Negatively Modulates IGF-I-Mediated Migration and Tumor Growth1
Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2004;
64(3):
977 - 984.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Cui and A. V. Lee
Regulatory Nodes That Integrate and Coordinate Signaling as Potential Targets for Breast Cancer Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 1, 2004;
10(1):
396S - 401S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Clemmons and L. A. Maile
Minireview: Integral Membrane Proteins that Function Coordinately with the Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Receptor to Regulate Intracellular Signaling
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2003;
144(5):
1664 - 1670.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yujiri, R. Nawata, T. Takahashi, Y. Sato, Y. Tanizawa, T. Kitamura, and Y. Oka
MEK Kinase 1 Interacts with Focal Adhesion Kinase and Regulates Insulin Receptor Substrate-1 Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 31, 2003;
278(6):
3846 - 3851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Chattopadhyay and G. Carpenter
PLC-{gamma}1 is required for IGF-I protection from cell death induced by loss of extracellular matrix adhesion
J. Cell Sci.,
May 15, 2002;
115(10):
2233 - 2239.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Huang, A. T. Cheung, J. T. Parsons, and M. Bryer-Ash
Focal Adhesion Kinase (FAK) Regulates Insulin-stimulated Glycogen Synthesis in Hepatocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 10, 2002;
277(20):
18151 - 18160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Schwartz and R. K. Assoian
Integrins and cell proliferation: regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases via cytoplasmic signaling pathways
J. Cell Sci.,
March 9, 2002;
114(14):
2553 - 2560.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Hauck, D. J. Sieg, D. A. Hsia, J. C. Loftus, W. A. Gaarde, B. P. Monia, and D. D. Schlaepfer
Inhibition of Focal Adhesion Kinase Expression or Activity Disrupts Epidermal Growth Factor-stimulated Signaling Promoting the Migration of Invasive Human Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2001;
61(19):
7079 - 7090.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|