|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M003566200 on August 21, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 49, 38467-38473, December 8, 2000
An Early Ethylene Up-regulated Gene Encoding a Calmodulin-binding
Protein Involved in Plant Senescence and Death*
Tianbao
Yang and
B. W.
Poovaiah
From the Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology and Physiology,
Department of Horticulture, Washington State University,
Pullman, Washington 99164-6414
Received for publication, April 26, 2000, and in revised form, July 27, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
35S-Labeled calmodulin (CaM)
was used to screen a tobacco anther cDNA library. A positive clone
(NtER1) with high homology to an early
ethylene-up-regulated gene (ER66) in tomato, and an
Arabidopsis homolog was isolated and characterized. Based
on the helical wheel projection, a 25-mer peptide corresponding to the
predicted CaM-binding region of NtER1 (amino acids 796-820) was
synthesized. The gel-mobility shift assay showed that the peptide
formed a stable complex with CaM only in the presence of
Ca2+. CaM binds to NtER1 with high affinity
(Kd ~ 12 nM) in a
calcium-dependent manner. Tobacco flowers at different
stages of development were treated with ethylene or with
1-methylcyclopropene for 2 h before treating with ethylene.
Northern analysis showed that the NtER1 was rapidly induced
after 15 min of exposure to ethylene. However, the 2-h
1-methylcyclopropene treatment totally blocked NtER1
expression in flowers at all stages of development, suggesting that
NtER1 is an early ethylene-up-regulated gene. The senescing
leaves and petals had significantly increased NtER1
induction as compared with young leaves and petals, implying that
NtER1 is developmentally regulated and acts as a trigger
for senescence and death. This is the first documented evidence for the
involvement of Ca2+/CaM-mediated signaling in ethylene action.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In plants, like in animals, Ca2+ is known to act as a
mediator of stimulus-response coupling in the regulation of diverse
cellular functions which are triggered by a variety of hormonal and
environmental stimuli (1-4). Calmodulin
(CaM),1 a ubiquitous
Ca2+-binding protein in eukaryotes is the primary
intracellular Ca2+ receptor, which transduces the second
messenger Ca2+ signal by binding to and altering the
activity of the CaM-binding proteins, thereby generating the
physiological responses to stimuli (3-7). In recent years, an
increasing number of CaM-binding proteins in plants have been reported
(6, 7). There has been considerable interest in identifying and
characterizing these proteins in order to understand the role of
Ca2+/CaM-mediated signal transduction in response to
various environmental and hormonal stimuli.
The gaseous hormone ethylene has profound effects on plant growth and
development. There are numerous responses to ethylene throughout plant
development, including induction of ripening in climacteric fruits,
senescence, programmed cell death, abscission of various organs,
promotion of seed germination, promotion, or inhibition of flowering
(8). The ethylene biosynthetic pathway and aspects of its regulation
have been determined (9, 10). Environmental stresses such as wounding,
pathogen attack, and flooding can induce ethylene production; the
stress-induced ethylene in turn can lead to certain defense responses
such as accelerated senescence, abscission of infected organs, or
induction of specific defense proteins (8). The physiological responses
to ethylene are complex, and not much is known about the mechanism of
ethylene action (10). However, progress is being made in the
understanding of the ethylene signal perception and transduction mainly
on the basis of the isolation of ethylene-responsive mutants (11-14). The identification of early ethylene-regulated genes is another strategy in gaining further understanding of the molecular mechanisms of ethylene action (15, 16).
There is a close relationship between cell calcium status and ethylene.
For example, calcium can influence ethylene biosynthesis by affecting
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase transcription (17) and
activity (18). Raz and Fluhr (19) reported that calcium is essential
for the ethylene-dependent pathway of pathogenesis-related protein induction, and direct elevation of cytosolic calcium induced chitinase accumulation. Calcium is also required for ethylene-promoted morphogenic responses in seedlings (19). However, the molecular mechanism of Ca2+ and Ca2+/CaM in ethylene
action is not clear. Using the 35S-labeled CaM-binding
approach, we isolated and characterized a tobacco gene,
NtER1, which has high homology with tomato
ethylene-up-regulated gene ER66 (16). Results described here
demonstrate that NtER1 is an early ethylene-responsive gene,
and CaM binds to NtER1 protein only in the presence of calcium.
Furthermore, our results also indicate that Ca2+/CaM is
involved in the mechanism of ethylene action.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Preparation of 35S-Labeled
CaM--
35S-Labeled recombinant CaM was prepared by using
a potato CaM (PCM6) cloned into the pET-3b expression vector (20, 21). The specificity of 35S-labeled CaM was about 0.5 × 106 cpm/µg.
Screening the cDNA Library and DNA Sequence Analysis--
A
tobacco anther cDNA expression library ( ZAP II) prepared in our
laboratory was screened using 35S-labeled PCM6 as described
(21). The positive cDNA clones were sequenced on both strands. DNA
sequences were analyzed using GCG versions 8.0 and 9.0 software
(22).
Plant Materials and Treatments--
Nicotiana tabacum
cv. Xanthi plants grown under standard greenhouse conditions were used
in this investigation. For ethylene treatment, flowers at various
stages of development were excised and treated in 250-ml sealed jars
with 100 µl liter 1 of ethylene for
15 min to 24 h at room temperature. The control flowers were
exposed to air alone. For the 1-methylcyclopropene (MCP) treatment,
tobacco flowers were treated for 2 h with 100 µl
liter 1 MCP prior to the ethylene treatment.
After treatments, the flowers were immediately frozen in liquid
nitrogen and stored at 80 °C until RNA extraction.
RNA Isolation and Northern Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated
from frozen tissue essentially as described (23). RNA samples (50 µg)
were denatured and separated on 1.5% formaldehyde/agarose gels.
Following transfer to Hybond N+ filters, the blots were
hybridized using the 32P-labeled NtER1 cDNA
fragment and washed as described earlier (24). Blots were stripped and
reprobed with a fragment of Arabidopsis 18 S rDNA (accession
no. X16077, nucleotides 158-1669). The blots were exposed on the Kodak
x-ray films from 1 to 4 days depending on the intensity of the signals.
Construction of DNA Templates Coding NtER1 Proteins--
The
template coding for C-terminal 643 amino acids of NtER1 was produced by
polymerase chain reaction amplification from the original cDNA with
NtER1 specific oligonucleotides containing appropriate
restriction sites (NdeI at the 5' end, and BamHI
at the 3' end) for cloning into the downstream of His6 tag
into the pET-14b expression vector (Novagen, Inc.). The NtER1 was
expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) pLysS
according to the method of Studier et al. (25). The
nucleotide sequence of the cloned fragment derived by polymerase chain
reaction amplification was determined after cloning into the pET-14b
vector, using oligonucleotides designed for sequencing from both sides
of the pET-14b cloning sites as primers.
35S-Recombinant CaM Binding Assay--
The NtER1
protein was extracted, and purified essentially as described (21). The
amount of protein was estimated by the Bradford's method (26) using a
protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). Proteins were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electophoresis (SDS-PAGE), electrotransferred
onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore), and incubated with
35S-labeled recombinant CaM with 1 mM
CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA as described (21). The
membrane was washed with 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 1 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA and exposed
to the x-ray film overnight.
Peptide Binding to CaM--
The synthetic peptides were prepared
using Applied Biosystems peptide synthesizer 431A in the Laboratory of
Bioanalysis and Biotechnology, Washington State University. Samples
containing 240 pmol (4 µg) of bovine CaM (Sigma) and different
amounts of purified synthetic peptides in 100 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.2, and either 1 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA in a total volume of 30 µl were incubated for
1 h at room temperature. The samples were analyzed by
nondenaturing PAGE as described (27).
CaM Binding Affinity Assay--
The purified recombinant NtER1
(4 pmol) was spotted on an Immobilion membrane (Millipore) and
incubated with 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, 100, and 500 nM
35S-labeled CaM with 1 mM CaCl2
overnight. After washing in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM CaCl2,
radioactivities of bound CaM on each filter and free CaM in the
incubation buffer collected before washing were measured using a liquid
scintillation counter. In order to eliminate the nonspecific CaM
binding, the BSA was used as a negative control. The average background
count was subtracted from the counts of NtER1 protein samples when
calculating the specific binding. The dissociation constant
Kd was calculated based on Scatchard plot.
Southern Blot Analysis--
Tobacco genomic DNA was extracted as
described (28). Ten µg of DNA was digested with BamHI,
BglII, and SacI; separated by electrophoresis on
0.8% agarose Tris acetate gel; and transferred to Hybond
N+ nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with 0.4 M NaOH. Southern blot analysis was carried out as described
earlier (28) using an NtER1 cDNA as a probe.
 |
RESULTS |
Cloning of NtER1 cDNA--
The CaM-binding screening approach
was used to isolate the CaM-binding proteins from a tobacco anther
cDNA expression library. Eight positive clones were obtained from
2 × 105 recombinant phages. One of these clones had
high affinity to CaM. The nucleotide sequence of the 2135-bp cDNA
clone contained a partial coding region (672 amino acids) and 116 bp of
3'-untranslated region. The clone was named as NtER1 because
the deduced polypeptide of this partial cDNA had high homology with
tomato ER66, an ethylene-up-regulated gene (16). In order to
get the full clone, the same cDNA library was screened with the
partial NtER1 cDNA as a probe. The nucleotide sequence
and the deduced amino acid sequence of NtER1 are shown in
Fig. 1. The cDNA codes for a
polypeptide of 926 amino acids flanked by a 17-bp untranslated region
at the 5' end and 153-bp untranslated region with poly(A)+
tail at the 3' end. The calculated molecular mass and the isoelectric point of the NtER1 polypeptide were 104 kDa and 8.69, respectively. The
polypeptide was a serine-rich protein with 101 Ser in 926 amino acid
residues.
Comparisons to known sequences in GenBankTM showed that NtER1 had high
homology with tomato ER66, LeER66, and an Arabidopsis homolog, AtER-like (accession number AC007168), particularly at
the C-terminal portions. The C-terminal 643 amino acids of NtER1 are
aligned in Fig. 2 with LeER66 and
AtER-like. In this portion, the NtER1 protein is 91.5% similar and
89.2% identical with tomato ER66, 69.2% similar and 62% identical
with an Arabidopsis homolog. NtER1 also displays some
homology with the FIN21.9 clone (accession number AC002130; 47.1%
similarity and 37.9% identity) and a transcription factor-like protein
(accession number Z97340; 40.5% similarity and 31.9% identity) of
Arabidopsis (data not shown).

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence
of NtER1 to tomato ER66 (LeER66) and an Arabidopsis
homolog (AtER-like). The CaM-binding region is
underlined. The accession numbers of LeER66 and AtER-like
are AF096260 and AC007168.
|
|
Binding of CaM to NtER1--
The partial NtER1 (C-terminal 643 amino acid) was expressed in E. coli, using the pET-14b
expression vector. The recombinant protein was present mainly in the
soluble fraction. The 73.7-kDa fusion protein (71.5-kDa NtER1 plus
2.2-kDa N-terminal His6 tag) was purified by CaM affinity
chromatography to near homogeneity as judged by SDS-PAGE (data not
shown). Using CaM-binding assay, it was shown that
35S-labeled CaM binds to NtER1 protein only in the
presence of Ca2+ (Fig.
3A). After adding 2 mM EGTA, no CaM binding was observed, suggesting that CaM
binding to NtER1 is calcium-dependent. In the control
experiment, the proteins from E. coli transformed with only
the pET-14b vector did not show any CaM binding (data not
shown).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
CaM binding to NtER1 recombinant
protein. A, the NtER1 protein was expressed in E. coli, and the cell extract was subjected to SDS-PAGE. The proteins
were transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and
incubated with 35S-labeled CaM (50 nM) in the
buffer containing either 2 mM EGTA or 1 mM
CaCl2. The protein size markers are shown on the
left. B, gel mobility shift assay showing CaM
binding to the synthetic peptide, corresponding to the amino acids
796-820 in NtER1 (listed on the top). Increasing amounts of
the peptide (peptide/CaM molar ratios indicated) were incubated with
240 pmol of bovine CaM with 1 mM CaCl2; samples
were separated by nondenaturing PAGE. Arrows indicate the
position of the free CaM and the CaM/peptide complex.
|
|
Most characterized CaM-binding proteins have a secondary structural
feature, basic amphiphilic -helix, even though the amino acid
residues in the CaM-binding region of these proteins are not conserved
(27, 29-31). A helical wheel projection of the peptide sequences
predicted that the amino acids 796-820 in the C-terminal domain of
NtER1 have a CaM-binding domain feature. The amino acid residues
805-818 formed an -helix with a hydrophobic face (including two
leucines, one isoleucine, and one valine) and a basic hydrophilic face
(including four arginines and one lysine). Particularly, a hydrophobic
residue, often Trp (here amino acid 809), embedded in a context of
basic residues Lys or Arg (here amino acids 810 and 811), is a common
feature in known CaM targets (27, 30, 31). A peptide with 25 residues
corresponding to the putative CaM-binding region (amino acids 796-820)
was incubated with bovine CaM, and the complex formation was assessed
by nondenaturing PAGE in the presence or absence of Ca2+.
The 25-mer peptide is capable of forming a stable complex with CaM in
the presence of Ca2+ (Fig. 3B), but not in the
absence of Ca2+ (data not shown). Without adding the
peptide, a single CaM band was observed. As the peptide was added,
another band of low mobility appeared, representing the peptide-CaM
complex. When the ratio of peptide to CaM was equal, the CaM band
disappeared, and the intensity of the peptide-CaM complex increased. At
a peptide to CaM molar ratio of 1.5, no free CaM was detected. These
observations indicate that the peptide binds to Ca2+/CaM
with a 1:1 stoichiometry.
Interestingly, the amino acids at CaM-binding region (amino acids
796-820) of NtER1 has a very high homology with the counterparts of
ER66 and AtER-like (Fig. 2). The amino acids 431-455 of LeER66 are
exactly the same as NtER1 amino acids 796-820. The AtER-like amino
acids 909-933 have just two conservative amino acid substitutions. Both putative CaM-binding regions in LeER66 and AtER-like can form a
basic amphiphilic -helix, and contain the Trp-Arg-Arg motif,
suggesting that this type of proteins in general are CaM-binding proteins.
To determine the binding affinity of CaM to NtER1, the 4-pmol
recombinant NtER1 was blotted on a filter and incubated with the
different concentrations of 35S-labeled CaM in the presence
of 1 mM CaCl2. The labeled CaM binds to NtER1
with a saturation at ~100 nM (Fig.
4), indicating the presence of a
saturable high affinity binding site in NtER1. From the Scatchard plot
analysis of the saturation curve, the dissociation constant
(Kd) of CaM for NtER1 was estimated to be about 12 nM. The binding of CaM to NtER1 was completely blocked in
the presence of 2 mM EGTA. The Scatchard analysis also
indicated that the C-terminal portion of NtER1 has a single CaM-binding
site.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Saturation curve of 35S-CaM
binding to purified NtER1. E. coli-expressed NtER1
protein (4 pmol) was spotted on an membrane (Millipore) and incubated
with different amounts of 35S-labeled CaM. Radioactivity of
35S-CaM bound in the filter and free CaM in the solution
was measured using a liquid scintillation counter. Each measurement was
the average of three repeats. The amount of bound CaM at each point was
represented as a percentage of the maximal binding. The
inset shows a Scatchard plot of data indicating that binding
ratio of CaM to NtER1 is 1:1. Bound/free and bound CaM are expressed as
B/F and B, respectively.
|
|
Expression of NtER1 in Response to Ethylene and during
Senescence--
Tomato ER66 is an early
ethylene-up-regulated gene (16). In order to confirm that
NtER1 is regulated by ethylene, tobacco buds and fully
opened flowers were treated with 100 µl
liter 1 ethylene for 15 min to 24 h. The
total RNA was isolated from plant tissues, and the expression of
NtER1 mRNA was analyzed using Northern hybridization. A
size of ~3.2-kilobase band was detected on the blot. Without ethylene
application, NtER1 expression was detected in the fully
opened flowers (Fig. 5A,
lane 2). However, very low expression of
NtER1 in the buds was detected after a longer exposure of
the blot to x-ray film (data not shown). By treating with 100 µl
liter 1 ethylene, the expression of
NtER1 was quickly induced. The induction began within 15 min
(Fig. 5A, lanes 3 and 4).
Increased induction of NtER1 was observed after 5 and
24 h of ethylene treatment (Fig. 5A, lanes
5-8). Both buds and fully opened flowers showed
increased expression following ethylene treatment, but the expression
was higher in fully opened flowers in comparison to the buds. It is known that MCP is a potent inhibitor of ethylene action by blocking the
ethylene receptor (32). Treatment with MCP prior to ethylene treatment
blocked the induction of NtER1 (Fig. 5B). These
results suggest that NtER1 is an early
ethylene-up-regulated gene.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of ethylene on expression of
NtER1. A, the excised buds (B)
and fully opened flowers (O) were treated with 100 ml
liter 1 ethylene with the time periods
indicated on the top. B, prior to the ethylene
treatment, tobacco flowers were treated with for 2 h with 100 µl
liter 1 MCP. The total RNAs were subjected to
Northern analysis. Autoradiograms of Hybond N+ filter
hybridized successively with 32P-labeled NtER1
cDNA and 18 S rDNA fragment 158-1669 (accession number X16077).
Exposure time on x-ray film for the blot was 24 h.
|
|
The differential expression of NtER1 in the buds and fully
opened flowers suggests that the NtER1 is associated with
senescence, a form of programmed cell death. To investigate the
possible role of NtER1 in senescence and aging, the levels of
NtER1 mRNA were studied at different stages of
development in tobacco petals and leaves. These organs are commonly
used for studying plant senescence and programmed cell death. Fig. 6
shows that the NtER1 expression increases during senescence
in both leaves and petals. In the immature and fully mature leaves,
NtER1 expression was low (Fig. 6, lanes 1 and
2), while NtER1 was highly induced when the
leaves started to turn yellow (Fig. 6, lane 3).
In petals, NtER1 was detected at low levels in buds (Fig. 6,
lane 4). There was a significant increase in the
expression of NtER1 in petals of fully opened flowers
coinciding with pollination and fertilization (Fig. 6, lane
5). As the flowers became senescent, NtER1
expression was further increased (Fig. 6, lane
6). Results shown in Fig. 6 also indicated that NtER1
expression was higher in petals as compared with leaves.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Expression of NtER1 in
tobacco leaves and flower petals. The total RNAs from the
immature, fully mature and senescing leaves and petals from bud, fully
opened flowers, and senescing flowers were subjected to Northern
analysis. Autoradiograms of Hybond N+ filter hybridized
successively with 32P-labeled NtER1 cDNA and
18 S rDNA fragment 158-1669 (accession number X16077). Exposure time
on x-ray film for the blot was 60 h.
|
|
Genomic Southern Blot Analysis--
Southern analysis was carried
out using a genomic DNA extracted from tobacco leaves. DNA was digested
with BamHI, BglII, and SacI, for which
there was no restriction site in the NtER1 cDNA. The
hybridization was performed with the NtER1 cDNA as
a probe. Under high stringency conditions, one or two strong bands were observed after restriction with all three enzymes (Fig.
7). These results suggest that
NtER1 belongs to a small gene family.

View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Southern blot analysis. The blot of
tobacco genomic DNA digested with the restriction enzymes as indicated
was hybridized with 32P-labeled NtER1 cDNA
fragment. The sizes of DNA markers (kilobase pairs) are shown on the
left, and the restriction enzymes on the top of
the blot. Ba, BamHI; Bg,
BglII; S, SacI.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Calmodulin is known to regulate a large number of enzymes in
animals. In recent years, plant scientists have begun to isolate and
characterize CaM-binding proteins to understand
Ca2+/CaM-mediated signaling in plants (3-7). This
information has increased the understanding of how calcium and CaM
regulate the various biochemical and molecular processes that
eventually lead to a physiological response.
In this study, we identified a novel CaM-binding protein encoded by
NtER1, which has high homology to the tomato early
ethylene-up-regulated gene ER66 (Fig. 2). Further
investigations confirmed that NtER1 is up-regulated by
ethylene (Fig. 5A) and MCP, which blocks ethylene action,
also blocked the expression of NtER1. The expression of NtER1 is developmentally regulated, especially during
senescence and aging. In the aging tissues, such as the yellow leaves
and senescing petals, NtER1 expression is highly induced
(Fig. 6). In other report, the expression of tomato ER66 is
higher in the fruits at red stage and less at the mature green stage
(16). The plant growth hormone ethylene, known as "death hormone,"
promotes aging, senescence, ripening, and wilting. A close relationship exists between plant senescence and ethylene biosynthesis (33, 34). In
senescing tissues, ethylene biosynthesis increases (33). In bean
explants, the senescence was deferred when ethylene synthesis was
inhibited (35). Results from this investigation revealed that
NtER1 expression greatly increased as the leaf and petal started to senesce (Fig. 6). This suggests that NtER1 is
regulated by ethylene and it plays an important role in the progression of senescence and death. However, it is not known whether
NtER1 is involved in other ethylene-regulated physiological
processes, such as retardation of cell elongation, response to
various stresses and defense responses.
A large number of studies have shown that plant senescence is
associated with an elevated level of intracellular Ca2+
(36-39). Elevation of cytosolic Ca2+ in plants has been
linked to cell death, including hypersensitive response cell death,
tracheary cell death, aleorone cell death, leaf senescence, and petal
senescence (40-46). The application of Ca2+ increases both
DNase activity and DNA laddering in both animal cells and plant cells
(47, 48). Results from this study show that the ethylene-up-regulated
and senescence-associated gene, NtER1, encodes a
Ca2+/CaM-binding protein (Fig. 3), and these results will
increase the understanding of the role for calcium in plant senescence and cell death.
The response of NtER1 expression to ethylene is very rapid,
within 15 min (Fig. 5A). The isolation and characterization
of early ethylene-regulated genes are important in gaining an
understanding of the molecular mechanisms of ethylene action and in
defining the role of this hormone in various physiological processes in plants. Screening ethylene-treated mature green tomato fruit has led to
the isolation of a set of ethylene regulated genes including the
genes' homology to transcriptional co-activator MBF-1, elongation factor EF-Ts, stress-related protein catalase, and a protease inhibitor
(16, 49). Others include a chitinase, which is ethylene-regulated in
bean leaves (50, 51); a glutathione S-transferase, which responds to ethylene in senescing carnation petals (52); ER43, a
putative GTP-binding protein; and ER50, a CTR-like clone (16). At
present it is not known whether any of these proteins is regulated by
Ca2+/CaM.
Identification of NtER1 and other related proteins such as tomato ER66
as CaM-binding proteins are significant in our understanding of the
cross-talk between Ca2+/CaM-mediated signaling and ethylene
action, as well as the molecular mechanisms of these signal
transduction processes during senescence. It is known that ethylene and
other plant hormones such as auxin, cytokinin, gibberellic acid, and
abscisic acid can induce changes in free calcium levels in plant cells
and calcium can act as a messenger in triggering various physiological
processes. It is also known that calcium can affect ethylene
biosynthesis by affecting the transcription and activity of
1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase, a key enzyme in ethylene
biosynthetic pathway (17, 18). Calcium also regulates the
ethylene-dependent pathway of pathogenesis-related protein
induction, and is required for ethylene-promoted morphogenic responses
in seedlings (19). The results described here indicate that
Ca2+/CaM interacts with NtER1 protein, which is involved in
ethylene action leading to senescence and death. It is possible to
control the onset of senescence by manipulating the expression of
NtER1 gene. Delay of senescence could have major
implications in prolonging the storage life of various agricultural
products, especially fruits, vegetables, and flowers.
In summary, the sequence of events that leads to programmed senescence
and death involves two crucial steps. The first step involves the
biosynthesis of ethylene, and the second step involves the increase of
cytosolic calcium and the induction of NtER1. This study
suggests that Ca2+/CaM binds to NtER1 protein, and the
complex then triggers a cascade of events that ultimately lead to
senescence and death. Our earlier study indicated that
Ca2+/CaM is involved in auxin action by binding to SAUR
(small auxin up RNA) proteins (31). Identifying the early
ethylene-regulated NtER1 as a CaM-binding protein further strengthens
the importance of Ca2+/CaM messenger system in plant
hormone action. It is quite clear that Ca2+/CaM affect
gibberellic acid- and abscisic acid-regulated seed germination (53).
Further isolation and characterization of the
Ca2+/CaM-regulated, hormone-responsive proteins should help
in the understanding of hormonal control of plant growth and development.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to Dr. John Fellman, David R. Rudell, and Scott Mattinson for help in ethylene and MCP treatments of
tobacco flowers.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Science
Foundation Grant MCB-0082256 and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Grant NAG-10-0061.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF253511.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 509-335-2487;
Fax: 509-335-8690; E-mail: poovaiah@wsu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 21, /2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M003566200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CaM, calmodulin;
MCP, 1-methylcyclopropene;
bp, base pair(s);
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Trewavas, A. J.,
and Malho, R.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
1181-1195
|
| 2.
|
Trewavas, A.
(1999)
Plant Physiol.
120,
428-433
|
| 3.
|
Poovaiah, B. W.,
and Reddy, A. S. N.
(1987)
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
6,
47-103
|
| 4.
|
Poovaiah, B. W.,
and Reddy, A. S. N.
(1993)
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
12,
185-211
|
| 5.
|
Roberts, D. M.,
and Harmon, A. C.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
43,
375-414
|
| 6.
|
Snedden, W. A.,
and Fromm, H.
(1998)
Trends Plant Sci.
3,
299-304
|
| 7.
|
Zielinski, R.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
49,
697-725
|
| 8.
|
Abeles, F. B.,
Morgan, P. W.,
and Salveit, M. E.
(1992)
Ethylene in Plant Biology
, 2nd Ed.
, Academic Press, San Diego
|
| 9.
|
Yang, S. F.,
and Hoffman, N. E.
(1984)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.
35,
155-189
|
| 10.
|
Kende, H.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
44,
283-307
|
| 11.
|
Chang, C.,
and Shockey, J. A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
2,
352-358
|
| 12.
|
Ecker, J. R.
(1995)
Science
268,
667-675
|
| 13.
|
Bleecker, A. B.,
and Schaller, G. E.
(1996)
Plant Physiol.
111,
653-660
|
| 14.
|
Kieber, J. J.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
48,
277-296
|
| 15.
|
Deikman, J.
(1997)
Physiol. Plant
100,
561-566
|
| 16.
|
Zegzouti, H.,
Jones, B.,
Frasse, P.,
Marty, C.,
Maitre, B.,
Latche, A.,
Pech, J.,
and Bouzyen, M.
(1999)
Plant J.
18,
589-600
|
| 17.
|
Kwak, S. H.,
and Lee, S. H.
(1997)
Plant Cell Physiol.
38,
1142-1149
|
| 18.
|
Gallardo, M.,
Gomez-Jimenez, M. C.,
and Matilla, A.
(1999)
Phytochemistry
50,
373-376
|
| 19.
|
Raz, V.,
and Fluhr, R.
(1992)
Plant Cell
4,
1123-1130
|
| 20.
|
Fromm, H.,
and Chua, N. H.
(1992)
Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.
10,
199-206
|
| 21.
|
Takezawa, D.,
Ramachandiran, S.,
Paranjape, V.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8126-8132
|
| 22.
|
Devereaux, J.,
Haeberli, P.,
and Smithies, O.
(1984)
Nucleic Acids Res.
12,
387-395
|
| 23.
|
Longemann, J.,
Shell, J.,
and Willmitzer, L.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
163,
16-20
|
| 24.
|
Yang, T.,
Lev-Yadun, S.,
Feldman, M.,
and Fromm, H.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
37,
109-120
|
| 25.
|
Studier, F. W.,
Rosenberg, A. H.,
Dunn, J. J.,
and Dubendorf, J. W.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
185,
60-89
|
| 26.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254
|
| 27.
|
Arazi, T.,
Baum, G.,
Snedden, W. A.,
Shelp, B.,
and Fromm, H.
(1995)
Plant Physiol.
108,
551-561
|
| 28.
|
Yang, T.,
Segal, G.,
Abbo, S.,
Feldman, M.,
and Fromm, H.
(1996)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
252,
684-694
|
| 29.
|
O'Neil, K. T.,
and DeGrado, W. E.
(1990)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
15,
59-64
|
| 30.
|
Clore, G. M.,
Bax, A.,
Ikura, M.,
and Gronenborn, A. M.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
3,
838-845
|
| 31.
|
Yang, T.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
3137-3143
|
| 32.
|
Sisler, E. C.,
Serek, M.,
and Dupille, E.
(1995)
Plant Growth Regul.
17,
1-6
|
| 33.
|
Matto, A. K.,
and Aharoni, N.
(1988)
in
Senescence and Aging in Plants
(Nooden, L. D.
, and Leopold, A. C., eds)
, pp. 242-280, Academic Press, San Diego
|
| 34.
|
Nooden, L. D.
(1988)
in
Senescence and Aging in Plants
(Nooden, L. D.
, and Leopold, A. C., eds)
, pp. 2-50, Academic Press, San Diego
|
| 35.
|
Kushad, M.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1984)
Plant Physiol.
76,
293-296
|
| 36.
|
Poovaiah, B. W.
(1988)
in
Senescence and Aging in Plants
(Nooden, L. D.
, and Leopold, A. C., eds)
, pp. 369-389, Academic Press, San Diego
|
| 37.
|
Xu, Y.,
and Hanson, M. R.
(2000)
Plant Physiol.
122,
1323-1333
|
| 38.
|
Nicotera, P.,
and Rossi, A. D.
(1994)
Mol. Cell Biochem.
135,
89-98
|
| 39.
|
McConkey, D. J.,
and Orrenius, S.
(1997)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
239,
357-366
|
| 40.
|
Leshem, Y. Y.
(1987)
Plant Physiol.
69,
551-560
|
| 41.
|
Porat, R.,
Halevy, A. H.,
Serek, M.,
and Borochov, A.
(1995)
Physiol. Plant
93,
778-784
|
| 42.
|
Levine, A.,
Pennell, R. I.,
Alvarez, M. E.,
Palmer, R.,
and Lamb, C.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
427-437
|
| 43.
|
Poovaiah, B. W.,
and Leopold, A. C.
(1973)
Plant Physiol.
52,
236-239
|
| 44.
|
Kuo, A.,
Cappelluti, S.,
Cervantes, C. M.,
Rodriguez, M.,
and Bush, D. S.
(1996)
Plant Cell
8,
259-269
|
| 45.
|
Xu, H.,
and Heath, M. C.
(1998)
Plant Cell
10,
587-597
|
| 46.
|
Groover, A.,
and Jones, A. M.
(1999)
Plant Physiol.
119,
375-384
|
| 47.
|
Bortner, C. D.,
Oldenberg-Nicklas, B. E.,
and Cidlowski, J. A.
(1995)
Trends Cell Biol.
5,
21-26
|
| 48.
|
Wang, H.,
Li, J.,
Bostock, R. M.,
and Gilchrist, D. G.
(1996)
Plant Cell
8,
375-391
|
| 49.
|
Licoln, J. E.,
Cordes, S.,
Read, E.,
and Fischer, R. L.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
2793-2797
|
| 50.
|
Boller, T.,
Gehri, A.,
Mauch, F.,
and Vogeli, U.
(1993)
Planta
157,
22-31
|
| 51.
|
Broglie, K. E.,
Gaynor, J. J.,
and Broglie, R. M.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
6820-6824
|
| 52.
|
Meyer, R. C.,
Goldsbrough, P. B.,
and Woodson, W. R.
(1991)
Plant Mol. Biol.
17,
277-281
|
| 53.
|
Gilroy, S.,
and Jones, R. L.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3591-3595
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Kim, W. S. Chung, D.-J. Yun, and M. J. Cho
Calcium and Calmodulin-Mediated Regulation of Gene Expression in Plants
Mol Plant,
January 6, 2009;
(2009)
ssn091v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Gong, J. Han, K. Reddig, and H.-S. Li
A Potential Dimerization Region of dCAMTA Is Critical for Termination of Fly Visual Response
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 20, 2007;
282(29):
21253 - 21258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Choi, M. C. Kim, J. H. Yoo, B. C. Moon, S. C. Koo, B. O. Park, J. H. Lee, Y. D. Koo, H. J. Han, S. Y. Lee, et al.
Isolation of a Calmodulin-binding Transcription Factor from Rice (Oryza sativa L.)
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 9, 2005;
280(49):
40820 - 40831.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Fujiki, Y. Nakagawa, T. Furumoto, S. Yoshida, B. Biswal, M. Ito, A. Watanabe, and I. Nishida
Response to Darkness of Late-Responsive Dark-Inducible Genes is Positively Regulated by Leaf Age and Negatively Regulated by Calmodulin-Antagonist-Sensitive Signalling in Arabidopsis thaliana
Plant Cell Physiol.,
October 1, 2005;
46(10):
1741 - 1746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Leclercq, B. Ranty, M.-T. Sanchez-Ballesta, Z. Li, B. Jones, A. Jauneau, J.-C. Pech, A. Latche, R. Ranjeva, and M. Bouzayen
Molecular and biochemical characterization of LeCRK1, a ripening-associated tomato CDPK-related kinase
J. Exp. Bot.,
January 1, 2005;
56(409):
25 - 35.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yang, S. Chaudhuri, L. Yang, Y. Chen, and B. W. Poovaiah
Calcium/Calmodulin Up-regulates a Cytoplasmic Receptor-like Kinase in Plants
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 8, 2004;
279(41):
42552 - 42559.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yang and B. W. Poovaiah
A Calmodulin-binding/CGCG Box DNA-binding Protein Family Involved in Multiple Signaling Pathways in Plants
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 15, 2002;
277(47):
45049 - 45058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Bouche, A. Scharlat, W. Snedden, D. Bouchez, and H. Fromm
A Novel Family of Calmodulin-binding Transcription Activators in Multicellular Organisms
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 7, 2002;
277(24):
21851 - 21861.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-F. Chen, M. D. Randlett, J. L. Findell, and G. E. Schaller
Localization of the Ethylene Receptor ETR1 to the Endoplasmic Reticulum of Arabidopsis
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 24, 2002;
277(22):
19861 - 19866.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|