|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M002673200 on August 21, 2000
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 49, 38831-38841, December 8, 2000
Eicosanoid Activation of Extracellular Signal-regulated
Kinase1/2 in Human Epidermoid Carcinoma Cells*
Charles K.
Szekeres §,
Keqin
Tang §,
Mohit
Trikha §, and
Kenneth V.
Honn §¶
From the Department of Radiation Oncology and the
¶ Departments of Pathology and Chemistry, Wayne State University,
Detroit and the § Karmanos Cancer Institute,
Detroit, Michigan 48202
Received for publication, March 29, 2000, and in revised form, August 17, 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
12(S)-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid
(12(S)-HETE), a 12-lipoxygenase metabolite of arachidonic
acid, has multiple effects on tumor and endothelial cells, including
stimulation of invasion and angiogenesis. However, the signaling
mechanisms controlling these physiological processes are poorly
understood. In a human epidermoid carcinoma cell line (i.e.
A431), 12(S)-HETE activates extracellular signal-regulated
kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2), which is mediated by upstream kinases MEK and
Raf. 12(S)-HETE stimulates phosphorylation of phospholipase
C 1 and activity of protein kinase C (PKC ). In addition,
independent of PKC 12(S)-HETE increases tyrosine
phosphorylation of Shc, and Grb2, stimulates association between Shc
and Src, and increases the activity of Ras, via Src family kinases.
Furthermore, at low (10-100 nM) concentrations 12(S)-HETE counteracts epidermal growth factor-stimulated
activation of ERK1/2 via stimulating protein tyrosine phosphatases. We
also present evidence that 12(S)-HETE stimulates ERK1/2 via
G proteins and that A431 cells have multiple binding sites for
12(S)-HETE. Finally, inhibition of 12-lipoxygenase induced
apoptosis of A431 cells, which was reversed by addition of exogenous
12(S)-HETE. Collectively we demonstrate that the activation
of ERK1/2 by 12(S)-HETE may be regulated by multiple
receptors triggering PKC-dependent and PKC-independent
pathways in A431 cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Tumor cell-host interactions are fundamentally influenced by
bioactive lipids produced by the tumor cells themselves, as well as by
the infiltrating leukocytes, monocytes, and by aggregation with
platelets (1). Previous studies have demonstrated that one of the most
important lipid metabolites to influence tumor progression is the
lipoxygenase metabolite 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid
(12(S)-HETE).1
This eicosanoid stimulates several steps of tumor invasion and motility
(2-4), protects tumor cells from apoptosis (5), and promotes
angiogenesis (6). Initial studies suggest that the pleiotropic effects
of 12(S)-HETE on tumor cells are mediated by an eicosanoid
receptor which activates protein kinase C (PKC) (7).
The extracellular signal-regulated kinases, ERK1 and -2, also known as
p44 and p42 mitogen-activated protein kinases (p42/44 MAPK),
respectively, are well characterized as convergence points of numerous
signal transduction pathways. Through their diverse substrates, ERKs
modulate nuclear, as well as cytoplasmic events in cells resulting in
increased proliferation (8), differentiation (9), changes in cell
morphology (9), and motility (10). It is well established that
receptor-tyrosine kinases activate ERK via the consecutive stimulation
of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Sos, monomeric G protein Ras,
and the Raf-MEK-MAPK cascade of protein kinases. In addition to growth
factor receptors with tyrosine kinase activity, G protein-coupled
receptors also are stimulators of ERK. G proteins can influence ERK
activity via multiple mechanisms (11), which include activation of
tyrosine kinases such as the EGF receptor (12) or Src (13), stimulating the early stages of the conventional cascade. Alternatively, G proteins
may activate ERK by promoting the production of lipid second messengers
via phospholipase C (PLC) or phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase resulting
in the activation of PKC. Protein kinase C in turn can stimulate the
ERK cascade through Raf and MEK.
An earlier study, reported that 12(S)-HETE increased the
tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular proteins migrating in the
40-50-kDa range (14), which led us to hypothesize that ERK1/2 may be
mediators of 12(S)-HETE-induced cellular responses.
In this study we identify ERK1/2 as signaling targets of exogenous
12(S)-HETE in A431 epidermoid carcinoma cells, and we
describe the signaling mechanisms leading to this stimulation through
the following: (a) the Src family-mediated activation of
PLC 1 and PKC , (b) Src family-mediated tyrosine
phosphorylation of Shc and subsequent stimulation of the Raf/MEK/ERK
cascade via Ras. Furthermore, we provide evidence for the involvement
of G proteins in 12(S)-HETE signaling.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Antibodies and Reagents--
Anti-phospho-specific ERK,
anti-phospho-specific MEK, anti-phospho-specific Elk, and
phospho-specific epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor antibodies were
purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA). Anti-phospho-specific
PKC was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid,
NY). Anti-pan-ERK, Ras, MEK, PY20, Shc, Grb2, anti-PKC , and PKC
sampler kit antibodies to screen PKC isotype expression were from
Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). Anti-actin was from ICN
(Costa Mesa, CA), and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibodies were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Anti-Raf-1,
PLC 2, PLC 1, and Src (SRC 2, which recognizes Src, Yes, and Fyn)
were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). 5-, 11-, 12-, and
15(S)-HETE were purchased from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor,
MI). Protein G-Sepharose 4B was from Zymed Laboratories
Inc. (South San Francisco, CA). The inhibitors Go6976 (inhibitor
of conventional PKC isozymes, IC50 2.3 nM (15),
solvent: ethanol), PP2 (inhibitor of Src family kinases (16), solvent:
ethanol), PD98059 (inhibitor of MEK, IC50 2 µM (17) solvent: ethanol), Tyrphostin51 (inhibitor of EGF
receptor tyrosine kinase, IC50 800 nM (18),
solvent: Me2SO), FTase inhibitor II (inhibitor of
farnesyltransferase, IC50 50 nM (19) solvent:
H2O), and suramin (inhibitor of G protein-receptor coupling
(20) solvent: H2O) were from Calbiochem. The specific peptide substrate for Src kinase assay, KVEKIGEGTYGVVYK, was purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. The 12-lipoxygenase-selective inhibitor N-benzyl-N-hydroxy-5-phenylpentanamide,
BHPP (21), was a generous gift from Biomide Corp (Grosse Pointe Farms,
MI). All other chemicals were obtained from Sigma.
Cell Culture--
The human epidermoid carcinoma cell line A431
(American Tissue Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) was cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) and 25 mg/liter gentamicin
(Life Technologies, Inc.). Cells were passaged with 0.05%
trypsin-EDTA.
Platelet type 12 lipoxygenase-transfected A431 cells were described
earlier (22).
For drug treatments, A431 cells (1.5 × 106) were
plated in 6-well plates, cultured for 1 day in DMEM supplemented with
10% fetal bovine serum, and then serum-starved overnight (20 h). Fresh serum-free DMEM was added 1 h prior to treatments. Inhibitors (at
the concentrations indicated in the figure legends) or vehicle (0.1%)
treatment was 15 min before stimulation with 12(S)-HETE or
other chemicals, with the exception of farnesyltransferase inhibitor
(FTase inhibitor II, 1 h) and Src family kinase inhibitor (PP2, 30 min).
Immunoblotting--
Cells were rinsed twice with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed with 200 µl of boiling gel
loading buffer (20% glycerol; 2% SDS; 2.5 × 10 2mg/ml bromphenol blue; 125 mM Tris base,
pH 6.8; 5% 2-mercaptoethanol). Cell lysates were sonicated briefly and
boiled for 5 min. Aliquots (20 µl) were resolved on 10 or 4-20%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels (the latter from Fisher) and electrotransferred
onto nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). In gels used to detect the
mobility shift of phosphorylated proteins, the acrylamide:bisacrylamide
ratio was 118:1. Membranes were probed with the antibodies indicated in
the text, and bands were visualized with the Supersignal system (Pierce). Blots were routinely stripped at 50 °C for 30 min in stripping buffer (0.7% 2-mercaptoethanol; 2% SDS; 62.5 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.7) and reprobed with other antibodies. Densitometric
analysis of the Western blots was performed with an LKB 2222-010
UltroScan XL laser densitometer (Bromma, Sweden).
Immunoprecipitation--
Cells were serum-starved overnight,
pretreated with drugs, followed by washing with ice-cold PBS. For
immunoprecipitation under denaturing conditions, cells were lysed (200 µl boiling 1% SDS; 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4), boiled for 5 min, and briefly sonicated. Cell lysates were centrifuged (13,000 × g, 5 min), and equal amounts of debris-free supernatant
was mixed with 1 ml of IP buffer (1% Triton X-100; 150 mM
NaCl; 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4; 1 mM EDTA; 1 mM EGTA; 0.2 mM Na3VO4;
0.2 mM PMSF; 0.5% Nonidet P-40) and anti-phosphotyrosine (3 µg) or other antibodies (1 µg). In the case of non-denaturing immunoprecipitation, cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS and scraped off into 1 ml of ice-cold IP buffer, sonicated, incubated with agitation for 30 min at 4 °C, and centrifuged (13,000 × g, 10 min) to remove insoluble material. Equal amounts of
protein were mixed with 2 µg of antibody for 3 h and then with
50 µl of protein G-Sepharose. After overnight incubation (4 °C),
beads were washed twice with dilution buffer (10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 140 mM NaCl; 0.1% Triton X-100; 0.1%
BSA; 0.025% NaN3) and once with TSA solution (10 mM Tris-HCl; 140 mM NaCl; 0.025%
NaN3). For PLC 2 coprecipitation with G antibody
anti-G (2 µg) was mixed with protein G-Sepharose (50 µl) for
3 h and then washed (2 times) with IP buffer before mixing with
cell lysates. Immunocomplexes were denatured by boiling in gel loading buffer.
ERK Kinase Assay--
Kinase assays were performed using an MAPK
assay kit from New England Biolabs according to the manufacturer's
recommendations. Briefly, activated ERK was precipitated from cell
lysates using anti-phospho-ERK antibody, and precipitates were
incubated with a specific substrate, Elk-1, and ATP. The reaction was
terminated by adding boiling gel loading buffer. ERK activity was
detected by immunoblotting the products of the kinase reaction with
anti-phospho-Elk antibody.
Raf Kinase Assay--
Raf kinase assay was performed using the
c-Raf1 immunoprecipitation kinase cascade assay kit from Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc., according to the protocol provided by the
manufacturer. Briefly, Raf was precipitated and incubated with GST-MEK
and GST-ERK1 in [32P]ATP (PerkinElmer Life Sciences)
containing buffer. ERK1 was recovered on phosphocellulose paper, and
the incorporated radioactivity was measured with a 1900TR Liquid
Scintillation Analyzer (Packard Instrument Co.).
Src Kinase Assay--
After various treatments, A431 cells were
lysed, and Src was precipitated under non-denaturing conditions with
anti-Src polyclonal antibody (SRC2; 3 µg/sample). Precipitates were
washed (1 time) with lysis buffer and then (3 times) with 0.5 M LiCl, Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and 1 time in 25 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, then resuspended and incubated at room temperature
for 30 min in 15 µl of kinase buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5; 5 mM MgCl2; 25 µM ATP; 1 µg/sample Src substrate; 5 µCi of [32P]ATP). The
reaction was terminated by adding 20 µl of 2× gel loading buffer and
boiling for 5 min. Samples were run on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide, and
incorporated radioactivity was quantitated with a Storm 940 PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Ras Assay--
Ras activity was assessed using Raf-1 RBD
(Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's
protocol. Briefly, beads conjugated to the Ras binding domain (RBD) of
Raf were used to precipitate GTP-bound Ras. The amount of precipitated
Ras was determined by Western blotting, with a pan antibody that
recognizes all human isoforms of Ras.
PKC Translocation--
Translocation of PKC was determined as
described previously (7, 23). Following 12(S)-HETE
treatment, cells were rinsed (twice) with cold PBS, scraped off, and
homogenized with 26-gauge needle in 2 ml of buffer A (25 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.6; 1 mM EGTA; aprotinin (5 µg/ml);
leupeptin (10 µg/ml) and 1 mM PMSF). Membrane and
cytosolic fractions were separated by centrifugation (100,000 × g; 1 h, 4 °C). The membrane fraction was rinsed
(twice) with buffer A and resuspended in buffer A containing 1%
Nonidet P-40. Samples were applied to a 1-ml DEAE-Sepharose column
(Sigma) equilibrated with buffer B (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5;
2 mM EDTA; 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol; 0.2 mM PMSF; 0.15 mM pepstatin A). PKC was eluted
with 2 ml of buffer B containing 120 mM NaCl. Samples were
concentrated using a Centricon (Amicon, Beverly, MA), and the protein
concentration was determined with the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce).
Inhibition of PKC Activity--
PKC activity was inhibited using
two approaches. First, cells were treated with PKC inhibitor as
described above. Second, PKC protein level in A431 cells was
down-regulated with chronic PMA treatment (22 h, 100 nM) in
serum-free media (24). Phorbol ester-containing media were removed
1 h prior to initiating treatment with various drugs, and cells
were washed (twice) with serum-free DMEM.
Binding Assay--
2 × 105 cells were plated
per well of 24-well plates (Corning Glass), cultured for 1 day under
regular growth conditions, and then serum-starved overnight. Prior to
performing the binding assay, cell count/well was determined, and media
were changed to 12.5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, containing 4 °C
cold DMEM, and plates were placed at 4 °C for 30 min. Binding assay
was initiated by adding [3H]12(S)-HETE with or
without 1000× concentration of cold 12(S)-HETE or other
eicosanoids in DMEM/HEPES at final volume of 400 µl. The plates were
kept under constant and gentle swirling at 4 °C for the times
indicated in the text. Following the incubation period 50% of the
binding media was set aside and the rest decanted, and plates were
washed 4 times with PBS, and cells were solubilized with 300 µl of
0.1 M NaOH for 10 min at room temperature. Cell lysates or
200 µl of the binding media were mixed with Ultima Gold scintillation
liquid (Packard Instrument Co.), and radioactivity was measured with a
Packard 1900TR scintillation counter. Each sample was counted for 20 min to accumulate at least 500 counts. Data points under 3 nM [3H]12(S)-HETE concentration
represent the mean of triplicate determinations, and at higher
concentrations duplicates were used.
Analysis of [3H]12(S)-HETE Incorporation into
Membrane Fraction--
3 × 106 cells were incubated
similar to binding assay with 3 nM
[3H]12(S)-HETE in the presence or absence of
300 nM (100 times) cold 12(S)-HETE for 30 min
and rinsed 4 times with PBS; cells were scraped off and homogenized
with brief sonication in 2 ml of buffer A (25 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.6; 1 mM EGTA; aprotinin (5 µg/ml); leupeptin (10 µg/ml) and 1 mM PMSF). Membrane and cytosolic fractions were separated by centrifugation (100,000 × g; 1 h, 4 °C). The membrane fraction was rinsed (4 times) with buffer A
and solubilized with sonication in 1% SDS, 10 mM Tris, pH
7.4. Lipids were extracted with 1 ml of chloroform:methanol (1:1).
Lipids dissolved in the chloroform layer were loaded on Whatman silica
gel 60A thin layer chromatography plates and developed with ethyl
acetate:methyl chloride:glacial acetic acid (5:5:1). Plates were dried,
and position of lipids was determined following treatment with iodine
vapor. Ten identical areas of each lane were scraped into scintillation vials, and Ultima Gold scintillation fluid added and radioactivity measured with a Packard 1900TR scintillation counter.
DNA Fragmentation Assay--
Cells (2.5 × 106)
were grown in 10-cm tissue culture dishes in DMEM until 90% confluent
and serum-starved (18 h) prior to experimental use. Cells were washed
with PBS (3 times) and then either treated with BHPP at different
concentrations (25, 50, 100 µM) for 24 h or
pretreated with 12(S)-HETE at 1 µM for 5 h. Equal amounts of ethanol were used as a vehicle control.
Subsequently, cells were harvested with a rubber policeman, and
fragmented DNA was extracted with 200 µl of the lysis buffer (50 nM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 20 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet
P-40) for 5 min. Samples were then centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min. The resultant supernatants were transferred to
a clean set of Eppendorf tubes, and pellets were dissolved in 200 µl
of lysis buffer and extracted for 2 min. Samples were centrifuged
again, and the resultant supernatants were combined with previous
supernatants. Subsequently, SDS and DNase-free RNase (Ambion, Austin,
TX) were added to the pooled supernatants to the final concentration of
0.1% and 5 mg/ml, respectively, and samples were incubated at 56 °C
for 2 h. At the end of RNase treatment, proteinase K (2.5 ml/ml)
was added, and samples were further incubated for 2 h at 37 °C.
Samples were extracted once with alkaline phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) and DNA precipitated with 0.3 M NaAc, pH
5.2. DNA from equal number of cells or equal amounts of DNA (20 µg) were run on a 1.2% agarose gel, and the DNA ladder formation was visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
 |
RESULTS |
12(S)-HETE Activates ERK1/2--
Following 12(S)-HETE
treatment both ERK1 and -2 were transiently activated, as determined by
Western blot analyses with an antibody to the activated forms of
ERK1/2. A single peak of activation (10-fold) was observed 10 min after
stimulation with 12(S)-HETE (300 nM) (Fig.
1A). The increase in ERK1/2
phosphorylation was detected as early as 2 min, returned to basal level
30 min after stimulation, and was concentration-dependent
in the 0-500 nM 12(S)-HETE range (Fig.
1B). These results were confirmed with an in
vitro kinase assay where an increase in phosphorylation of a
MAPK-specific substrate, i.e. Elk, paralleled the increase
in ERK1/2 activity (Fig. 1, A and B).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
12(S)-HETE activates ERK1
and ERK2. A, 12(S)-HETE activates ERK1/2 in
a time-dependent manner. ERKs were precipitated at the
indicated time points from 12(S)-HETE (300 nM)-treated A431 cells. Elk was used as a specific
substrate for in vitro kinase assay (inset, upper
panel). ERK activity was monitored by probing blots for
phosphorylated Elk. 12(S)-HETE also increased the
phosphorylated (activated) state of ERK1/2 as revealed by Western blots
of whole cell lysates with phospho-specific ERK1/2 antibody
(inset, middle panel). The blot was reprobed with
non-phospho-specific ERK antibody to demonstrate equal loading
(inset, lower panel). Western blots of three independent
experiments probed for phospho-ERK1/2 were analyzed by densitometric
scanning, and the results are represented in the graph as a percent of
maximal activation. B, 12(S)-HETE activates MAPK
in a dose-dependent manner. A431 cells were treated for 10 min with increasing concentration of 12(S)-HETE, and ERK1/2
activity was determined either by its ability to phosphorylate Elk in
an in vitro kinase assay (upper panel) or by
probing Western blots of whole cell lysates for activated ERK1/2
(middle panel). The blot was stripped and reprobed with
non-phospho-specific ERK antibody for loading control (lower
panel). The bar graph represents densitometric analysis
of three independent anti-phospho-ERK Western blots. Results are
expressed in arbitrary units. C, HETEs affect on ERK1/2
activity. A431 cells were treated for 10 min with 300 nM
vehicle, 5(S)-HETE, 11(S)-HETE,
12(S)-HETE, or 15(S)-HETE, and ERK1/2
phosphorylation was evaluated by Western blotting (upper
panel). Blot was stripped and reprobed with non-phospho-specific
ERK antibody for loading control (lower panel). The
bar graph represents densitometric analysis of the
anti-phospho-ERK Western blot.
|
|
To test whether 12(S)-HETE is unique or whether other
eicosanoids also activate ERK1/2 in A431 cells in similar dose and time ranges, cells were treated with 5(S)-HETE,
11(S)-HETE, 12(S)-HETE, and 15(S)-HETE
(300 nM, 10 min). Anti-phospho-ERK probed Western blots
revealed (Fig. 1C) that under these conditions
12(S)-HETE is the most potent activator of ERK1/2, whereas
11(S)-HETE was 50% less potent. 5- and
15(S)-HETE stimulated ERK1/2 only to the extent of 5-15%
of 12(S)-HETE, respectively. These results indicate that
multiple HETEs may activate ERK1/2 in A431 cells, but
12(S)-HETE is the most potent, suggesting that this function
is mediated by a specific response.
To investigate whether activation of ERK kinase by
12(S)-HETE was restricted to the A431 cell line, we tested
human melanoma (WM983B and HT168), human prostate carcinoma (DU145),
mouse melanoma (B16a), mouse lung carcinoma (3LL), endothelial (RVECT
and HUVEC) as well as Chinese hamster ovary and African green monkey
kidney (COS-1) cell lines. In these cell lines, with the exception of HT168, Chinese hamster ovary, and COS-1 cells, 12(S)-HETE
also increased ERK1/2 activity within 10 min of treatment (data not shown). These findings indicate that 12(S)-HETE activation
of ERK1/2 is not unique to A431 cells, but neither is it a ubiquitous phenomenon.
Other investigators (25) have reported that 12(S)-HETE
increases the activity of another MAPK, i.e. c-Jun
N-terminal kinase. In contrast, by using A431 cells, we found no
evidence that either p38 or JNK mitogen-activated protein kinases were
stimulated by this lipid mediator in a similar time and dose range as
observed for ERK (data not shown).
The activity of ERK can be modulated at several levels in the
evolutionarily conserved ERK cassette, i.e. either by
enhancing GTP loading of Ras, by phosphorylation of Raf and MEK (26), or by binding non-enzymatic scaffold proteins (27). Some studies also
suggest MEK-independent mechanisms for ERK activation, such as
phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase-dependent or conventional
PKC-dependent pathways (28). Therefore, we tested whether
MEK, the immediate upstream dual specificity kinase to ERK, was
involved in 12(S)-HETE-stimulated ERK1/2 activity.
12(S)-HETE Activates MEK--
12(S)-HETE increased
(8-fold) the activity of MEK in a dose-dependent manner in
the 0-600 nM range (Fig.
2A). Furthermore, PD98059, a
specific inhibitor of MEK1/2 dose dependently abolished MAPK activation
by 12(S)-HETE (Fig. 2B), thus ruling out the
possibility that 12(S)-HETE modulates ERK activity by a
MEK-independent mechanism.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
12(S)-HETE activates ERK1/2
through MEK. A, MEK is activated following 10 min of
12(S)-HETE treatment (0-600 nM), as determined
by probing Western blots of whole cell lysates for activated MEK
(upper panel). The blot was reprobed for actin as loading
control (lower panel). The bar graph represents
densitometric analysis of the Western blot. Results are expressed as
arbitrary units. 12(S)-HETE dose-dependently
increases phosphorylation of MEK (lower blot).
Phosphorylated MEK runs slower than the non-phosphorylated form in low
bisacrylamide SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In Western blots
probed for MEK after 12(S)-HETE treatment, the upper
band represents the phosphorylated form of MEK and the lower
band represents the non-phosphorylated form of MEK. B,
a MEK inhibitor blocks 12(S)-HETE stimulated activation of
MAPK. MEK inhibitor PD98059 (15 min, at the indicated doses)-pretreated
cells were exposed to 12(S)-HETE for 10 min. Whole cell
lysates were probed for activated ERK1/2 on a Western blot (upper
panel), stripped, and reprobed for ERK1/2 as a loading control
(lower panel). The bar graph represents
densitometric analysis of the Western blot with the results expressed
as arbitrary units.
|
|
12(S)-HETE Activates Raf--
Since MEK is a convergence point for
several signaling pathways, we next tested for the involvement of Raf1
in 12(S)-HETE signaling. By utilizing an in vitro
kinase assay, we observed that Raf kinase activity was increased
(3-fold) 5 min after cells were treated with 300 nM
12(S)-HETE (Fig. 3) and that
this activation was decreased (75%) in cells pretreated with the PKC
inhibitor, Go6976 (at 10× IC50 dose (15)). These data
suggest that PKC participates in 12(S)-HETE activation of
Raf1.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Raf is stimulated by
12(S)-HETE in a conventional PKC-dependent
manner. A431 cells were pretreated with the conventional PKC
inhibitor Go6976 (at 1 and 10× IC50, 2.3 and 23 nM, respectively) for 15 min and then with
12(S)-HETE (300 nM, 5 min). Raf was
immunoprecipitated and used for an in vitro kinase assay
where it activated GST-MEK which in turn phosphorylated
([32P]ATP) GST-ERK2. Proteins were bound on
phosphocellulose paper, and after extensive washing incorporated
radioactivity was determined. Pretreatment of cells with a PKC
inhibitor reduced activation of ERK2. Error bars represent
S.D. of triplicate determinations, and the graph is a representative of
three independent experiments.
|
|
12(S)-HETE Activates PKC --
The inhibition of
12(S)-HETE-stimulated Raf activity by Go6976 led us to
examine the extent to which conventional PKCs were involved in the
observed ERK1/2 stimulation. Treatment with 12(S)-HETE induced a dose-dependent translocation (5-fold at 600 nM) of PKC from the cytosol to the membrane fraction
accompanied by increased phosphorylation (5-fold at 300 nM)
(Fig. 4, A and B).
Enzyme activity in the subcellular fractions was confirmed with a
kinase assay using myelin basic protein as a substrate for
immunoprecipitated PKC (data not shown). Phosphorylation of PKC
reached a maximum at approximately 2.5 min (Fig. 4C).
Therefore, the time course of PKC activation by 12(S)-HETE,
in A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells, is similar to that observed
in B16a murine melanoma cells (7).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
12(S)-HETE activates
PKC in a time- and
concentration-dependent manner. A,
12(S)-HETE dose dependently activates PKC . After 3 min
12(S)-HETE treatment, cytosolic and particulate fractions
were isolated from A431 cells. Proteins from the particulate fractions
were analyzed by Western blotting with an antibody directed to PKC .
12(S)-HETE dose dependently increased translocation of
PKC to the particulate fraction. The bar graph represents
densitometric analysis of 3 Western blots, with the results expressed
as arbitrary units. B, 12(S)-HETE dose
dependently induces phosphorylation of PKC . A431 cells were treated
with the indicated doses of 12(S)-HETE for 3 min. Western
blots of whole cell lysates were probed for the phosphorylated form of
PKC (upper panel). As a loading control the blot was
reprobed with a non-phospho-specific PKC antibody (lower
panel). The bar graph represents densitometric analysis
of the Western blot, with the results expressed as arbitrary units.
C, PKC is transiently activated by 12(S)-HETE. Probing blots
from 12(S)-HETE (300 nM)-stimulated whole cell
lysates with anti-phospho-PKC antibody revealed that PKC is
maximally activated at 2.5 min after stimulation (upper
panel). As a loading control the blot was stripped and reprobed
with a non-phospho-specific PKC antibody (lower panel).
The graph represents densitometric analysis of the Western blot, with
the results expressed as arbitrary units.
|
|
12(S)-HETE-stimulated ERK1/2 Activity Is Mediated in Part by
PKC --
Western blotting of A431 cells revealed that they express
seven isoforms of PKC, i.e. , , , , , µ,
and (Fig. 5A). Chronic exposure to phorbol esters leads to degradation of the activated PKC
species. In A431 cells PKC , , and but not PKC , µ, , and were eliminated by chronic phorbol ester exposure. To determine whether 12(S)-HETE activation of ERK1/2 was mediated by PKC,
we tested whether PKC depletion could block ERK1/2 activation.
Depletion of PKC resulted in a partial (40%) inhibition of
12(S)-HETE activation of ERK1/2 (Fig. 5B). In
contrast, this treatment completely abolished ERK1/2 activation by PMA,
a direct and potent activator of PKC (Fig. 5B). Chronic
exposure to another, non-related PKC activator, bryostatin, also
resulted in a partial inhibition of 12(S)-HETE activation of
ERK1/2 (data not shown). Chemical inhibition of conventional PKC
isoforms by Go6976 partially (60%) reduced 12(S)-HETE activation of ERK in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
5C). Even at 50 times the IC50 concentration,
Go6976 failed to completely block the 12(S)-HETE activation
of ERK1/2. Together, these results suggest that the conventional PKC
pathways are important but are not the exclusive mechanism for
12(S)-HETE activation of ERK.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
ERK1/2 activation by
12(S)-HETE is dependent, in part, on conventional PKC
activity. A, PKC , , , , , , and µ are expressed in A431 cells at a detectable level, as determined by
Western blotting. Chronic PMA exposure depletes PKC , , and .
c, positive control, mouse brain lysate ( , , , ,
, , , ) or Jurkat cell lysate ( and µ); + and represent PMA-depleted and non-depleted A431 cell lysates,
respectively. B, conventional PKCs are partially responsible
for 12(S)-HETE induced ERK1/2 activation. Chronic exposure
to phorbol ester (100 nM PMA, 20 h) eliminated PKC
from A431 cells (lower panel). In PKC -depleted cells,
ERK1/2 activation was not induced by PMA treatment (10 min, 100 nM). 12(S)-HETE (10 min, 300 nM)-stimulated ERK1/2 activation is decreased when compared
with that of cells in which PKC was not depleted; however, it was not
eliminated completely (upper panel). Blot was stripped and
reprobed with an antibody to ERK that recognizes these enzymes
independent of their phosphorylation state (middle panel).
The bar graph represents densitometric analysis of the
Western blot, with the results expressed as arbitrary units.
C, pretreatment of cells with a specific chemical inhibitor
Go6976 (23 nM (+) and 115 nM (++)) for
conventional PKCs dose dependently inhibited
12(S)-HETE-mediated activation of ERK1/2. Western blots of
whole cell lysates were probed for activated ERK1/2 (upper
panel), stripped, and reprobed with non-phospho-specific ERK
antibody as a loading control (lower panel). The bar
graph represents densitometric analysis of the Western blot, with
the results expressed as arbitrary units.
|
|
12(S)-HETE Activates PLC 1--
Activation of PKC by
12(S)-HETE in B16a murine melanoma cells can be blocked by
either PLC inhibitors or by an inhibitor of Gi proteins,
i.e. pertussis toxin (7). The PLC family of isoforms are
activated by G proteins (29), and stimulation of PLC 2 is sensitive
to pertussis toxin treatment (30). Therefore, we tested for a role for
this PLC isoform in 12(S)-HETE signaling. PLC 2
co-immunoprecipitated with the G subunit after a stimulus with
exogenous ATP, but not after 12(S)-HETE, or in
non-stimulated cell lysates (Fig.
6B), suggesting that this PLC
isoform is not involved in 12(S)-HETE signaling events.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Involvement of phospholipases in
12(S)-HETE signaling. A, PLC 1 is
rapidly phosphorylated on tyrosine residues after exposure to
12(S)-HETE (300 nM). Tyrosine-phosphorylated
proteins were immunoprecipitated and probed for PLC 1 by Western blot
(upper panel). Maximal phosphorylation was observed between
0.5 and 2 min. Pretreatment with an inhibitor of Src family kinases
(PP2, 5 µM, 30 min) abolished the 12(S)-HETE
effect on tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC 1 (lower panel).
B, PLC 2 is not involved in 12(S)-HETE signal
transduction. PLC 2 coprecipitated with G subunits in ATP (1 µM, 30 s) but not in 12(S)-HETE (300 nM, 30 s)-treated cells.
|
|
Members of the PLC family were thought to be activated by receptors
with inherent tyrosine kinase activity (29). However, recent
publications demonstrate that angiotensin II (31) and leukotriene B4
(32), both of which exert their effects through G protein-coupled
receptors, stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation and activity of PLC 1
as rapidly as 15 s after exposure. Therefore, we examined if
PLC 1 is involved in mediating the 12(S)-HETE effect (Fig.
6A). Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were
immunoprecipitated, and Western blots were probed for PLC 1. In
12(S)-HETE-challenged cells PLC 1 is
tyrosine-phosphorylated within 30 s and remains phosphorylated for
4 min. The time course for this phosphorylation precedes that of
PKC , thereby supporting a role for PLC 1 in the activation of
PKC during 12(S)-HETE signaling.
Growth Factor Receptors Are Not Activated by 12(S)-HETE--
The
finding that activation of PLC 1 is an early event after
12(S)-HETE exposure suggests that the putative
12(S)-HETE receptor may be coupled to tyrosine kinases. A
number of publications illustrate that G protein-coupled receptors can
trans-activate receptor-tyrosine kinases, such as the EGF-,
insulin-like growth factor-, and PDGF receptors (33-35). The EGF
receptor is expressed at high level in A431 cells; therefore, we tested
whether this receptor was responsible for the early tyrosine
phosphorylation events induced by 12(S)-HETE. Tyrphostin 51, a specific inhibitor of the EGF receptor kinase, did not affect
12(S)-HETE signaling (Fig.
7A). In contrast, under
similar experimental conditions it blocked the EGF-induced activation
of ERK1/2 (Fig. 7A). In addition, Western blots using an
anti-active EGFR antibody could not detect EGF receptor activation by
12(S)-HETE (Fig. 7B). No increase in tyrosine phosphorylation was apparent in precipitates of the PDGF receptor or
the FGF receptor substrate FRS2 following 12(S)-HETE
treatment (data not shown). We conclude that the trans-activation of
EGF, PDGF, or FGF receptors does not appear to play a role in
12(S)-HETE signaling.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Interaction between EGF and
12(S)-HETE signaling. A, EGF receptor
(EGFR) is not involved in 12(S)-HETE signaling in
A431 cells. Tyrphostin 51, a specific inhibitor of EGF receptor kinase,
inhibits ERK1/2 activation by EGF but does not effect
12(S)-HETE activation. Cells were treated with the inhibitor
(at IC50, 800 nM, 20 min) and then with either
EGF (1 ng/ml, 10 min) or 12(S)-HETE (300 nM, 10 min). Western blots of whole cell lysates were probed for active ERK1/2
(upper panel), stripped, and reprobed for ERK as a loading
control (lower panel). B, EGF receptor is not
activated by 12(S)-HETE. A431 cells were treated with the
indicated concentrations of 12(S)-HETE or EGF (0.5 ng/ml for
1 min). Western blots were probed with a phospho-EGF receptor antibody
to assess the receptor activation (upper panel) and with an
actin antibody as a loading control. No activation of the EGF receptor
is apparent after eicosanoid treatment. C, influence of
12(S)-HETE on EGF signaling. Cells pretreated with
12(S)-HETE (1 min, 0-600 nM) were challenged
with EGF (50 ng/ml, 5 min). ERK1/2 activation in response to EGF was
attenuated by 12(S)-HETE exposure in the 10-100
nM range and enhanced by 600 nM
12(S)-HETE (upper panel). Blots were stripped and
reprobed with anti-ERK antibody to demonstrate even loading
(lower panel). Results from the densitometric analysis of
the middle panel is shown in the bar chart
(arbitrary units). D, 12(S)-HETE affect on EGF
signaling is mediated by protein tyrosine phosphatases. Cells were
pretreated with protein tyrosine phosphatases inhibitor
Na3VO4 (2 mM, 30 min), then exposed
to 100 nM 12(S)-HETE or vehicle (1 min), and
treated with EGF (50 ng/ml, 5 min). ERK1/2 activation identified with
Western blotting (upper panel), stripping, and reprobing the
membrane for ERK served as demonstration of even loading (lower
panel). Results from the densitometric analysis are shown in the
bar chart (arbitrary units).
|
|
12(S)-HETE Affects EGF Signaling--
Since G protein-coupled
receptors may activate protein tyrosine phosphatases (36), next we
tested whether 12(S)-HETE may have an opposing rather than
synergistic effect on EGF signaling. Serum-starved cells were
challenged with 0-600 nM 12(S)-HETE for 1 min
and then with 50 ng/ml EGF for 5 min, and cell lysates were tested for
ERK1/2 activity. We found a biphasic response. Lower concentrations of
12(S)-HETE (10-100 nM) reduced EGF-stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and higher (600 nM) concentrations
of 12(S)-HETE further increased EGF-stimulated ERK1/2
activity (Fig. 7C).
One possibility is that at the 10-100 nM concentration
12(S)-HETE stimulates a phosphatase. To evaluate this, cells
were pretreated with or without sodium orthovanadate (2 mM,
30 min); similar to the above described experiments, cells were treated
with EGF in the presence or absence of 100 nM
12(S)-HETE. ERK1/2 activation was tested by Western blotting
(Fig. 7D). In the absence of the protein tyrosine
phosphatase inhibitor sodium orthovanadate, as earlier, 100 nM 12(S)-HETE interfered with EGF-stimulated
ERK1/2 activation (35% reduction). In contrast, in the presence of the protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, pretreatment with 100 nM 12(S)-HETE resulted in a slight (15%)
increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Taken together these results
suggest that at lower doses 12(S)-HETE stimulates ERK1/2
activity, as well as stimulates a protein tyrosine phosphatase that
antagonizes EGF signaling. However, at higher concentrations,
12(S)-HETE does not activate the protein tyrosine phosphatase, only ERK1/2, hence its effect is additive to that of EGF
on ERK1/2.
Src Family Kinases Are Involved in Early 12(S)-HETE
Signaling--
The Src family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases are
implicated in signaling events downstream of G proteins (13).
Pretreatment of A431 cells with PP2, a specific inhibitor of Src
kinases, abolished tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC 1 stimulated by
12(S)-HETE (Fig. 6A). Therefore, we questioned
whether Src family kinases are activated by 12(S)-HETE.
Western blot analysis of proteins precipitated from
12(S)-HETE treated A431 cells revealed a
time-dependent increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of Src
family kinases (Fig. 8A) as rapidly as 10 s following exposure to 12(S)-HETE.
However, tyrosine phosphorylation of these enzymes can either stimulate
or inhibit their activity, depending on the site of phosphorylation
(37). Therefore, we assayed for Src kinase activity in SRC2
antibody-generated precipitates and found that 12(S)-HETE
stimulated Src activity. Pretreatment with PP2 (5 µM) was
sufficient to reduce kinase activity below basal levels (Fig.
8B). As revealed with immunoprecipitation and Western
blotting, 12(S)-HETE increased association of Src with Shc
(Src homology and collagen) adapter proteins, which was abolished by
pretreating the cells with PP2 (Fig. 8C). Furthermore, PP2
(5 µM) significantly inhibited, but did not entirely
abolish, ERK1/2 activation by 12(S)-HETE (Fig.
10B).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Src family kinases are involved in
12(S)-HETE signaling. A, Src family
kinases are phosphorylated in response to 12(S)-HETE.
Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins were precipitated 10 and 30 s or
1, 2, or 5 min after 12(S)-HETE treatment. Western blot
(IB) was probed with an antibody that recognizes multiple
members of Src family. B, Src family kinases are
activated by 12(S)-HETE. A431 cells were pretreated with Src
inhibitor PP2 (5 µM, 30 min) and with
12(S)-HETE (100 nM, 1 min). Immunoprecipitated
(IP) Src family kinases were used in an in vitro
kinase assay. Radioactivity incorporated into a specific substrate was
determined by PhosphorImager analysis. C, Src family
kinases associate with Shc adapter proteins in response of
12(S)-HETE treatment in an Src kinase activity dependent
manner. A431 cells were pretreated with Src inhibitor PP2 (5 µM, 30 min) and then with 12(S)-HETE (100 nM, 1 min). Shc proteins were immunoprecipitated under
non-denaturing conditions, and the associated proteins were analyzed by
Western blotting.
|
|
12(S)-HETE Stimulates Phosphorylation of Shc--
The potential
involvement of Src family kinases in 12(S)-HETE signaling
suggested an alternative pathway to the previously established PLC-PKC
route of ERK1/2 activation. Adapter proteins, such as Grb2 (growth
factor receptor-bound protein 2; pp24) and Shc (pp66, pp52, and pp46),
are tyrosine-phosphorylated by activated growth factor receptor and
oncogene-tyrosine kinases and link these kinases to the ERK cascade.
Therefore, we tested whether adapter proteins are phosphorylated in
response to 12(S)-HETE treatment. Tyrosine phosphorylation
of Shc adapter proteins was detectable as early as 15 s after
12(S)-HETE stimulation (Fig. 9A) and peaks at 30-60 s. The
tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc is maximal in the 100-300
nM range of 12(S)-HETE (3.5-fold over basal
level). Another adapter protein, Grb2 (growth factor receptor-bound), also was tyrosine-phosphorylated, and it associated with Shc in response to 12(S)-HETE treatment (Fig. 9B).
Pretreatment with the Src family kinase inhibitor, PP2, completely
abolished activation of these adapter proteins. Shc and Grb2 are well
characterized as activators of Ras through the guanine nucleotide
exchange factor, Sos. Pretreatment with a PKC inhibitor (Go6976) did
not affect the increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc (Fig.
9C). Therefore, Shc may represent an alternative pathway to
PKC activation of ERK following 12(S)-HETE stimulation.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Adapter proteins are involved in
12(S)-HETE signaling. A, Shc is
tyrosine-phosphorylated after 12(S)-HETE exposure in a time-
(upper panel) and dose (lower
panel)-dependent manner. Tyrosine-phosphorylated
proteins were immunoprecipitated (IP) under denaturing
conditions, and Western blots (IB) were analyzed with
anti-Shc antibody. Maximal phosphorylation was observed at
approximately 1 min (upper panel) and at 300 nM
concentration (lower panel). B, Shc
phosphorylation is dependent on Src family kinase activity but not on
Gi proteins. A431 cells were pretreated with an inhibitor
of Src family kinases (PP2, 5 µM, 30 min) and then with
12(S)-HETE (300 nM, 1 min) or EGF (0.5 ng/ml, 2 min). Shc was immunoprecipitated under non-denaturing conditions, and
Western blots of the precipitated proteins were probed for
phosphotyrosine (left, upper panel), stripped, and reprobed
for Grb2 (left, middle panel), stripped again and probed for
Shc as loading control (left, lower panel). Inhibition of
Src family kinases completely blocked Shc tyrosine phosphorylation and
its association with Grb2. Inhibition of Gi proteins with
pertussis toxin pretreatment (PTX, 100 ng/ml, overnight) did
not effect Shc phosphorylation (right panel) after
12(S)-HETE exposure (300 nm, 1 min) as determined by
analyzing Western blots of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins that were
precipitated under denaturing conditions. C,
12(S)-HETE-stimulated phosphorylation of Shc is independent
of conventional PKC activity. Pretreatment with PKC inhibitor Go6976
(115 nM, 15 min) did not influence the
12(S)-HETE (300 nM, 1 min)-induced
phosphorylation of Shc. Treatment with EGF (0.5 ng/ml, 2 min) served as
a positive control.
|
|
12(S)-HETE Activates Ras--
To test whether Ras was stimulated
in our system, we took advantage of the fact that only GTP-Ras (the
activated form) binds its effector, Raf. We found that 300 nM 12(S)-HETE stimulated Ras binding 3 min after
12(S)-HETE exposure (Fig.
10A), which was blocked by
pretreatment with Src inhibitor, PP2 (5 µM, 30 min), but
not by an inhibitor of conventional PKCs, Go6976 (115 nM, 30 min). Next we questioned the contribution of Ras to
12(S)-HETE-induced ERK activation. Inhibitors of
farnesyltransferase (FTase inhibitor II, 5 µM, 1 h)
interfere with Ras function. Farnesyltransferase inhibitor pretreatment
partially blocked ERK activation by 12(S)-HETE (Fig.
10B).

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Ras is involved in
12(S)-HETE signaling. A, Ras is
activated by 12(S)-HETE in an Src-dependent but
cPKC-independent manner. Cells were treated with PP2 (5 µM) or Go6976 (115 nM) for 30 min and then
with 12(S)-HETE (300 nM) for 3 min. Cells were
lysed, and activated Ras was precipitated (IP) with Raf-Ras
binding domain (Raf-RBD)-conjugated beads. Western blots were probed
for Ras. B, inhibitors of both Ras (FTase inhibitor I, 5 µM, 1 h) and Src family kinase (PP2, 5 µM, 30 min) reduced, but did not completely block,
12(S)-HETE (600 nM, 10 min)-stimulated ERK1/2
activation as revealed by probing Western blot (IB) for
activated ERK1/2 (upper panel). Blot was stripped and
reprobed for ERK as loading control (lower panel).
|
|
G Proteins Are Involved in 12(S)-HETE Signaling--
Since
previous reports suggested involvement of G proteins in
12(S)-HETE signaling (7, 38), we tested whether they were involved in activation of ERK using two inhibitors of serpentine receptor/G protein signaling. Uncoupling seven transmembrane receptors from G proteins with suramin (5 min, 150 µM) (20)
abolished the 12(S)-HETE effect on ERK phosphorylation (Fig.
11B). At higher concentrations suramin may block the interaction of growth factors with
their receptor, such as EGF with EGFR. However, the suramin dose
applied in our experiments did not affect the ERK response to EGF (Fig.
11B). Previous studies suggested the involvement of Gi in 12(S)-HETE signaling (7); therefore, we
exposed A431 cells (18 h) to various doses of pertussis toxin (a
specific inhibitor of Gi ). The results demonstrated that
12(S)-HETE stimulates ERK1/2 in both a
Gi -dependent and -independent manner (Fig.
11A). Pertussis toxin inhibition of ERK1/2 reached its
maximum at 100 ng/ml and reduced 12(S)-HETE (300 nM) activation of ERK1/2 to 60% of the maximum at 10 min.
Collectively, these results suggest that ERK1/2 activation by
12(S)-HETE is mediated by more than one heterotrimeric G
protein.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
The putative 12(S)-HETE
receptor is G protein-coupled. A, Gi
proteins are involved in 12(S)-HETE signaling. A431 cells
were incubated with the indicated concentrations of pertussis toxin
(PTX) overnight and then challenged with 300 nM
12(S)-HETE for 10 min. Western blotting with anti-active
ERK1/2 reveals that ADP-ribosylation of Gi only
partially block ERK1/2 activation (upper panel). Blot was
stripped and reprobed for ERK as loading control (lower
control). The bar graph represents densitometric
analysis of the Western blot, with the results expressed as arbitrary
units. B, suramin (5 min, 150 µM), which
uncouples G proteins from receptors, reduced ERK1/2 activity to basal
level after 12(S)-HETE stimulus (300 nM, 10 min), whereas it did not inhibit EGF (5 ng/ml) signaling (upper
panel). Blot was stripped and reprobed for ERK as loading control
(lower panel).
|
|
A431 Cells Have Multiple Binding Sites for 12(S)-HETE--
The
inconsistency between the concentration of 12(S)-HETE
necessary to saturate Shc phosphorylation (~100 nM, Fig.
9A) and ERK1/2 activation (>500 nm, Fig. 1) suggested that
more than one receptor might be involved in mediating the
12(S)-HETE response in A431 cells. To substantiate this
hypothesis A431 cell monolayers were incubated with
[3H]12(S)-HETE in the presence or absence of
competing 1000× non-labeled 12(S)-HETE. As shown in Fig.
12A, specific association
between 12(S)-HETE and A431 cells was maximal at 100 min.
Binding was further characterized by incubating cells with 0.4-10
nM [3H]12(S)-HETE with or without
competing 1000× non-labeled 12(S)-HETE for 120 min. These
studies reproducibly showed (Fig. 12B) a binding site that
was saturated at approximately 0.8 nM concentration and
another, which was not completely saturated by 10 nM
12(S)-HETE. Scatchard transformation of the binding data
resulted in a curve plot rather than a linear plot (Fig.
12C) suggesting that 12(S)-HETE binds to A431
cells through multiple binding sites, with different binding
affinities.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 12.
There are multiple
12(S)-HETE-binding sites on A431 cells.
A, time-dependent binding. Cell monolayer
was incubated at 4 °C with 2 nM
3[H]12(S)-HETE with (lower line) or
without (upper line) competing 2 µM cold
12(S)-HETE for the indicated periods. Cell-bound
radioactivity is expressed as disintegrations per min. Specific binding
site is saturated at 100 min at 4 °C. The figure is representative
of 3 independent experiments, and points are triplicate determinations.
B, concentration-dependent binding. Cells were
incubated for 120 min at 4 °C with 0.4-10 nM
[3H]12(S)-HETE with or without competing
1000× cold 12(S)-HETE. The difference between specific and
nonspecific binding was charted. Inset, plot of the specific
binding at the high affinity binding region. The figure is
representative of 4 independent experiments, and points are triplicate
determinations. C, Scatchard plot representation of data
generated from the concentration-dependent binding assays.
Specific binding is plotted against specific binding/concentration of
free 12(S)-HETE. The non-linear data suggests multiple
binding sites. D, competition for the specific binding site
with eicosanoids. Cells were incubated for 120 min at 4 °C with 2 nM 3[H]12(S)-HETE with or without
competing 1000× cold eicosanoids. Results are expressed as percent of
the radioactivity without competing eicosanoid (0). U46619,
thromboxane A2-mimetic. E, radioactivity (3 nM [3H]12(S)-HETE) incorporated
into plasma membrane with (right column) or without
(left column) competing 100× cold 2(S)-HETE.
F, thin layer chromatography analysis of membrane
incorporated [3H]12(S)-HETE. Cells were
incubated with 3 nM
[3H]12(S)-HETE, and the membrane fraction was
isolated. Lipids extracted from this fraction (lower line)
or [3H]12(S)-HETE standard (upper
line) were separated on a TLC plate, and radioactivity in even
size rectangles from top (left side) to bottom (right
size) of the plate was determined. Exposure to iodine vapor
revealed that the majority of membrane lipids remained in the 2nd to
4th rectangles from the bottom, whereas the majority of the
radioactivity corresponded to the position of free
3[H]12(S)-HETE.
|
|
Competition between Binding of 12(S)-HETE and Other
Eicosanoids--
In order to evaluate the specificity of
12(S)-HETE binding, A431 cells were incubated with 3 nM [3H]12(S)-HETE in the presence
of various eicosanoids (Fig. 12D). One thousand-fold
non-labeled 12(S)-HETE was the best competitor, decreasing
incorporated radioactivity by 70% and 11(S)-HETE by 55%.
Of the HETEs tested 5(S)-HETE and 15(S)-HETE were
the least potent, reducing binding by 30%. Other eicosanoids,
prostaglandin E2 and prostaglandin F2 , or
thromboxane A2 analog U46619 did not affect
[3H]12(S)-HETE binding to A431 cells.
12(S)-HETE Binds to Cell Membrane--
Previous experiments
suggested involvement of trimeric G proteins in 12(S)-HETE
signaling. Since G protein-coupled receptors reside in the plasma
membrane, we next questioned whether there is specific
12(S)-HETE binding to this cell compartment. Cells were
exposed to 3 nM [3H]12(S)-HETE
with or without competing 100-fold non-labeled 12(S)-HETE and then the membrane fraction was isolated. Radioactivity was recovered from the membrane fractions, which was displaced by excess
non-labeled 12(S)-HETE (Fig. 12E). It is
conceivable that the recovered 12(S)-HETE is in an
esterified form. Therefore, following
[3H]12(S)-HETE incubation, lipids were
extracted from the membrane fraction and analyzed by thin layer
chromatography. The majority of the radioactivity showed an identical
migration pattern on TLC as authentic standard
[3H]12(S)-HETE (Fig. 12F),
suggesting that the 12(S)-HETE recovered from the membrane
is non-esterified under these experimental conditions.
12(S)HETE Rescues A431 Cells from Apoptosis Induced by a 12-LOX
Inhibitor--
Previous studies showed that 12-LOX functions as a
survival factor in several tumor cell lines and that exogenous
12(S)-HETE blocks apoptosis induced by 12-LOX inhibitors
(5). First, we showed by DNA laddering assay that the 12-LOX-specific
inhibitor, BHPP, induced apoptosis in A431 cells in
dose-dependent manner (Fig.
13A), similar to the effects
found in an earlier study with W256 cells (5). When A431 cells,
12-LOX-transfected A431 cells, or vector control cells were treated
(37 °C; 24 h) with BHPP at 25, 50, or 100 µM, the
cells transfected with platelet-type 12-LOX were more resistant to
apoptosis induced by BHPP than 3.1+ vector control cells as shown by
the density of the DNA ladder (Fig. 13A). Prior to the
treatment with BHPP, A431 cells were incubated with
12(S)-HETE for 2 h. As shown in Fig. 13B,
12(S)-HETE pretreatment completely prevented A431 cells from
undergoing apoptosis triggered by BHPP at low dose and significantly
reduced the response to high dose BHPP (Fig. 13B). The
results suggest that the 12-LOX product, 12(S)-HETE,
provides cells with resistance to apoptosis and also that
12(S)-HETE may play a role in an anti-apoptotic signaling
pathway.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 13.
12(S)-HETE effect on
BHPP-induced apoptosis in A431 cells by DNA laddering assay.
A, comparison of A431 12-LOX transfectants with vector
control 3.1+. Cells were treated with BHPP at the concentrations
indicated for 24 h and were low molecular weight DNA-extracted,
run on a 1.2% agarose gel, and visualized with ethidium bromide.
B, A431 cells were pretreated with 12(S)-HETE (1 µM) before incubation in DMEM in the presence of BHPP,
see details under "Experimental Procedures." Aliquots of DNA
extracts were subjected to 1.2% agarose gel and visualized with
ethidium bromide. M, DNA marker; C, ethanol as
vehicle control; 3.1+, empty vector control;
12-LOX, A431 cells transfected with human full-length
platelet-type 12-LOX; Control, without 12(S)-HETE
treatment.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The platelet-type 12-lipoxygenase is ectopically expressed in a
variety of human and rodent cancer cells, and 12-lipoxygenase expression has been correlated positively with metastatic potential in
a rodent tumor model (39). More importantly, in a clinical study of 132 tumors from prostate cancer patients, the expression of 12-lipoxygenase
message correlated with tumor stage, grade, and the presence of cancer
cells in the surgical margins (40). The sole product of the metabolism
of arachidonic acid by platelet type 12-lipoxygenase is
12(S)-HETE. This bioactive lipid is reported to induce a
plethora of cellular responses when added exogenously to tumor cells or
endothelial cells and to alter tumor growth when overexpressed
endogenously. The latter effect may be due to the suppression of
apoptosis and stimulation of angiogenesis (5, 6). For example,
exogenously added 12(S)-HETE alters the metastatic phenotype
by inducing alterations in the cancer cell cytoskeleton (41), thereby
enhancing tumor cell motility (4), secretion of proteinases (42, 43),
expression of integrins (2, 44), and increased invasion (46). In
endothelial cells, 12(S)-HETE induces the non-destructive
retraction of monolayers (47) and promotes tumor cell adhesion (46).
The motility of isolated endothelial cells and tube formation is also
enhanced by 12(S)-HETE (6). Given the numerous and varied
cellular responses to 12(S)-HETE, we delineated in this
study the signaling pathways utilized by this bioactive lipid in A431
human epidermoid carcinoma cells. Data presented in this study
demonstrate that exogenous 12(S)-HETE induces a transient
activation of ERK1/2. We report for the first time that
12(S)-HETE stimulates phosphorylation of PLC 1, which in
turn is responsible for activation of a conventional PKC isoform
(i.e. PKC ). We show that PKC plays a significant but
not exclusive role in ERK1/2 activation. Furthermore, we
demonstrate that the 12(S)-HETE-induced activation of Src
family kinases and the subsequent phosphorylation of adapter proteins
(i.e. Shc and Grb2) lead to activation of ERK1/2 via Ras.
Furthermore, the data presented suggest that protein tyrosine
phosphatases are involved in eicosanoid signaling and that multiple
receptors might be involved in the A431 response to
12(S)-HETE. Finally, we show that inactivation of endogenous
12(S)-HETE production with 12-lipoxygenase inhibitors leads
to apoptosis of A431 cells, which is counteracted by overexpression of
12-lipoxygenase or by exogenously added 12(S)-HETE.
Many of the above-mentioned signaling molecules are implicated in
cellular functions known to be affected by 12(S)-HETE. For example, 12(S)-HETE-stimulated PKC activity may be
responsible for altered cellular morphology, since
12(S)-HETE induces phosphorylation of cytoskeletal proteins
including actin, vimentin, and myosin light chain (48) and stimulates
cellular spreading (4). 12(S)-HETE-stimulated PKC may
promote the cellular migratory phenotype (46). All of the
aforementioned 12(S)-HETE stimulated responses can be
inhibited or significantly reduced with select PKC inhibitors (42,
46).
The above results demonstrate that 12(S)-HETE also protects
tumor cells from the induction of apoptosis, but the exact mechanism of
this effect needs further investigation. However, one may speculate that since ERK can activate p90rsk, which in turn can
phosphorylate BAD and CREB (49), two proteins demonstrated to have an
anti-apoptotic effect, this may be a plausible mechanism to explain the
anti-apoptotic effect of 12(S)-HETE. Alternatively, PKC
may prevent apoptosis independent of ERK. Ruvolo et al. (50)
suggested that mitochondrial protein kinase C may inhibit apoptosis
through phosphorylation of Bcl2.
The findings that 12(S)-HETE signaling can be inhibited by
suramin or pertussis toxin suggests the existence of G protein-coupled receptor(s). However, no HETE receptors have yet been cloned. Receptors
for arachidonate-lipoxygenase products that have been identified to
date are the lipoxin A4 (51) and leukotriene B4 (52) and cysteinyl leukotriene receptors (53, 54). These receptors,
similar to the receptors for prostaglandins, are members of the family
of G protein-coupled seven transmembrane receptors. Several attempts to
identify a 12(S)-HETE receptor have resulted only in the
identification of a cytoplasmic binding complex, which is not well
characterized (55, 56). Several lines of evidence suggests that
12(S)-HETE might have multiple receptors on A431 cells. 1)
Binding studies revealed at least two binding sites on intact cells. 2)
Shc tyrosine phosphorylation is maximal around 100 nM
12(S)-HETE concentration, but ERK activation is not
saturated even at 500 nM. 3) 12(S)-HETE effect
on EGF-stimulated activation of ERK is bi-phasic; at 100 nM
it is negative, but at 600 nM, ERK phosphorylation is
augmented. Considering these data we speculate that
12(S)-HETE may have a high and a low affinity receptor. The high affinity receptor stimulates a protein tyrosine phosphatase as
well as a protein tyrosine kinase, i.e. Src. This is not
necessarily conflicting, since Src family kinases are inhibited by
phosphorylation of a C-terminal residue. The proposed phosphatase may
remove phosphate from this residue, lifting the inhibition, which then
leads to activation of Src. The observed increase in the overall
tyrosine phosphorylation of Src following 12(S)-HETE
exposure might reflect autophosphorylation of the activated Src on the
two positive regulatory tyrosine residues. In this pathway Src is
positioned upstream of Shc, Grb2, Ras, and ultimately of the ERK
cascade. The low affinity receptor does not appear to stimulate either
the protein tyrosine phosphatase, Src, or Shc. Possibly the low
affinity receptor activates ERK1/2 via stimulation of PKC (hence
increased translocation of PKC at 600 nM
12(S)-HETE concentration). However, that does not exclude
the possibility that low dose 12(S)-HETE activates PKC
via the high affinity receptor coupled to phospholipases.
The notion of multiple 12(S)-HETE receptors is supported by
the fact that high affinity (Kd 1 nM
(7)) as well as low affinity (Kd 658 nM (38)) binding sites were found on different cell lines,
and by our observation that human prostate carcinoma cell lines express
both high and low affinity binding sites
simultaneously.2 Furthermore,
the Shc phosphorylation response curve is shaped like the curve of
functional responses to 12(S)-HETE by melanoma cells that
express the high affinity binding site (7).
It is not surprising that the utilization of labeled
12(S)-HETE for isolation of its receptor has been
unsuccessful, considering that the serpentine receptors are sensitive
to solubilization and may lose binding of their ligands once extracted
from the plasma membrane or dissociated from G proteins (57).
Therefore, functional cloning is a method that may lead to the
isolation of the 12(S)-HETE receptor(s). The present report
identifies downstream effector molecules of 12(S)-HETE
signaling which can be monitored and hence provide useful tools for
future cloning of the 12(S)-HETE receptor(s).
Following activation of the putative, G protein-coupled
12(S)-HETE receptor, we observed activation of Src kinases
and a bifurcation of the signaling pathway. The concept of a G
protein-coupled signaling system utilizing parallel pathways to
activate ERK is not unique to 12(S)-HETE. For example,
angiotensin II can stimulate ERK through activation of PKC or,
alternatively, by trans-activating the EGF receptor (12).
Although this study describes two novel pathways for
12(S)-HETE-induced activation of ERK, it raises some
interesting questions. The two pathways identified in the present study
emanate from the activation of Src kinases. However, inactivation of
Src family kinases with PP2 completely inhibited tyrosine
phosphorylation of both PLC 1 and Shc, following
12(S)-HETE treatment, yet this was insufficient to suppress
completely ERK1/2 stimulation, suggesting the possibility of a
Src-independent pathway in 12(S)-HETE signaling.
Both mitogenic and motogenic cellular responses are elicited by
12(S)-HETE (46). The different responses to the same
signaling molecule may be due to the duration of the signal stimulated
by 12(S)-HETE and whether or not 12(S)-HETE
stimulation results from exogenously or endogenously generated
eicosanoid. The duration of ERK activation has a profound effect on the
cellular response. Depending on the cell type, the short time period
activation of ERK might lead to differentiation, and long term activity
of ERK may result in proliferation or vice versa (58). In this study, the addition of exogenous 12(S)-HETE to A431 cells
stimulated ERK activity for approximately 30 min. However, phorbol
ester or EGF can stimulate ERK activity for a period of hours. The
short duration of the ERK response observed in the present study may result from esterification of exogenously added 12(S)-HETE
into membrane lipids (59), limiting the availability of free
eicosanoid, and hence, dampening the duration of the ERK response. It
is possible that continuous, endogenous production of
12(S)-HETE could result in a constitutively elevated level
of ERK activity. The addition of a single bolus of exogenous
12(S)-HETE to tumor cells, as utilized in this study, may
mimic a situation that occurs during metastasis when tumor cells are
exposed to exogenously produced 12-HETE during their aggregation with
platelets, a rich source of 12(S)-HETE (1). However, the
biological response may be different in the case of continuous,
endogenous production of 12(S)-HETE, such as in epidermal
growth factor (60) or autocrine motility factor (61)-stimulated cells.
Downstream signaling pathways activated by other lipoxygenase products
are not well characterized. Nevertheless, there are similarities among
the findings described in the literature and those in the present
study. For example, neutrophil 5(S)-HETE, a
positional isomer of 12(S)-HETE, also stimulates ERK via RAF and MEK (62). In eosinophils, leukotriene B4 activates
ERK1/2 but not JNK or p38 MAPK (63) and promotes hydrogen peroxide production in a PKC-dependent manner (64). Lipoxin
A4 increases intracellular calcium concentration in a
manner inhibited by pertussis toxin (65). Leukotriene D4
also increases calcium concentration in cells but by two pathways as
follows: 1) by a pertussis toxin-sensitive pathway that results in the
stimulation of extracellular calcium influx, and 2) by a pertussis
toxin-insensitive pathway resulting in the mobilization of the
intracellular calcium pool (45). Therefore, both leukotriene
D4 and 12(S)-HETE promote a simultaneous effect
(i.e. an increase in intracellular calcium concentration or
ERK activity, respectively), in a pertussis toxin-dependent and -independent manner. These examples suggest that lipoxygenase generated eicosanoids signal via pathways that are in common with other
paracrine effectors.
Fig. 14 depicts a model of
12(S)-HETE-mediated signaling consistent with the data
presented in this report. Stimulation of a putative high affinity G
protein-coupled receptor leads to the activation of Src family kinases
and a protein tyrosine phosphatase. The pathway bifurcates with
tyrosine phosphorylation of two Src family substrates, Shc and PLC 1.
In one arm of the pathway Shc recruits Grb2 and activates Sos and Ras
which in turn activates MEK and ERK. In the parallel pathway, PLC 1
activates PKC , leading to activation of Raf, which stimulates the
downstream kinases MEK and ERK. A low affinity receptor may also
stimulate PKC and ultimately ERK1/2.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 14.
Schematic representation of the proposed
12(S)-HETE signal transduction pathways.
12(S)-HETE binds to a putative high affinity, trimeric G
protein-coupled receptor that results in activation of a protein
tyrosine phosphatase and Src family kinases. These kinases
phosphorylate PLC 1 and the adapter protein Shc. PLC activation
results in stimulation of PKC , whereas Shc phosphorylation leads to
recruitment of Grb2, Sos, and ultimately to increased GTP loading of
Ras. Ultimately both of these pathways converge on Raf. A putative low
affinity receptor also activates PKC via PLC. DAG,
diacylglycerol; IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate;
PTP, protein tyrosine phosphatase.
|
|
The goal of this study was to identify signaling molecules that may be
responsible for the pleiotropic effects of 12(S)-HETE on
tumor cells. We identified PKC, Ras, and ERK1/2 as targets of
12(S)-HETE stimulation. These molecules are at the
intersections of multiple signaling pathways, activation of which can
lead to diverse changes in cellular behavior. Stimulation of these
signaling molecules may help to explain the many and varied effects of
12(S)-HETE on tumor metastasis, i.e. adhesion,
spreading, migration, and invasion (2-4), stimulation of angiogenesis
(6), and protection against the induction of apoptosis (5). Since the
presence of 12-lipoxygenase has been correlated with prostate cancer
progression in a clinical setting (40), it is important to identify the signaling pathways utilized by its principal arachidonate metabolite (i.e. 12(S)-HETE). Future studies are directed
toward the identification of the 12(S)-HETE receptor(s).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Yinlong Cai for excellent help with
the apoptosis studies; Dr. Debra Skafar for most helpful suggestions on
the binding studies; and Drs. Jozsef Timar, Daotai Nie, Clem Stanyon,
and Avraham Raz for helpful discussion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant CA 29997 (to K. V. H.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: 431 Chemistry
Bldg., Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202. Tel.: 313-577-1018; Fax: 313-577-0798; E-mail: k.v.honn@wayne.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, August 21, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M002673200
2
K. V. Honn, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
12(S)-HETE, 12(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
MAPK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase;
PLC, phospholipase C;
PKC, protein kinase C;
Shc, Src
homology collagen;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
EGFR, epidermal growth
factor receptor;
Grb2, growth factor-bound protein 2;
Me2SO, dimethyl sulfoxide;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
RBD, Ras binding
domain;
PMA, phorbol myristate acetate;
PDGF, platelet-derived growth
factor;
FGF, fibroblast growth factor;
FTase, farnesyltransferase;
MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase;
12-LOX, 12-lipoxygenase;
BHPP, N-benzyl-N-hydroxy-5-phenylpentanamide.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Honn, K. V.,
Tang, D. G.,
and Crissman, J. D.
(1992)
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
11,
325-351
|
| 2.
|
Chopra, H.,
Timar, J.,
Chen, Y. Q.,
Rong, X. H.,
Grossi, I. M.,
Fitzgerald, L. A.,
Taylor, J. D.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1991)
Int. J. Cancer
49,
774-786
|
| 3.
|
Timar, J.,
Chen, Y. Q.,
Liu, B.,
Bazaz, R.,
Taylor, J. D.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1992)
Int. J. Cancer
52,
594-603
|
| 4.
|
Timar, J.,
Silletti, S.,
Bazaz, R.,
Raz, A.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1993)
Int. J. Cancer
55,
1-8
|
| 5.
|
Tang, D. G.,
Chen, Y. Q.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5241-5246
|
| 6.
|
Nie, D.,
Hillman, G. G.,
Geddes, T.,
Tang, K.,
Pierson, C.,
Grignon, D.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
4047-4051
|
| 7.
|
Liu, B.,
Khan, W. A.,
Hannun, Y. A.,
Timar, J.,
Taylor, D. J.,
Lundy, S. K.,
Butovich, I.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
9323-9327
|
| 8.
|
Landgren, E.,
Schiller, P.,
Cao, Y.,
and Claesson-Welsh, L.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
359-367
|
| 9.
|
Whalen, A. M.,
Galasinski, S. C.,
Shapiro, P. S.,
Nahreini, T. S.,
and Ahn, N. G.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1947-1958
|
| 10.
|
Klemke, R. L.,
Cai, S.,
Giannini, A. L.,
Gallagher, P. J.,
de Lanerolle, P.,
and Cheresh, D. A.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
481-492
|
| 11.
|
Sugden, P. H.,
and Clerk, A.
(1999)
Cell. Signal.
5,
337-351
|
| 12.
|
Li, X.,
Lee, J. W.,
Graves, L. M.,
and Earp, H. S.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
2574-2583
|
| 13.
|
Luttrell, L. M.,
Hawes, B. E.,
van Biesen, T.,
Luttrell, D. K.,
Lansing, T. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19443-19450
|
| 14.
|
Tang, D. G.,
Tarrien, M.,
Dobzynski, P.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1995)
J. Cell. Physiol.
165,
291-306
|
| 15.
|
Gschwendt, M.,
Dieterich, S.,
Rennecke, J.,
Kittstein, W.,
Mueller, H. J.,
and Johannes, F. J.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
392,
77-80
|
| 16.
|
Hanke, J. H.,
Gardner, J. P.,
Dow, R. L.,
Changelian, P. S.,
Brissette, W. H.,
Weringer, E. J.,
Pollok, B. A.,
and Connelly, P. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
695-701
|
| 17.
|
Kultz, D.,
Madhany, S.,
and Burg, M. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
13645-13651
|
| 18.
|
Levitzki, A.
(1990)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
40,
913-918
|
| 19.
|
Vogt, A.,
Qian, Y.,
Blaskovich, M. A.,
Fossum, R. D.,
Hamilton, A. D.,
and Sebti, S. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
660-664
|
| 20.
|
Beindl, W.,
Mitterauer, T.,
Hohenegger, M.,
Ijzerman, A. P.,
Nanoff, C.,
and Freissmuth, M.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
50,
415-423
|
| 21.
|
Chen, Y. Q.,
Duniec, Z. M.,
Liu, B.,
Hagmann, W.,
Gao, X.,
Shimoji, K.,
Johnson, C. R.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
1574-1579
|
| 22.
|
Tang, K.,
Finley, R. L.,
Nie, D.,
and Honn, K. V.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
3185-3191
|
| 23.
|
Gopalakrishina, R.,
and Barsky, S. H.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
612-616
|
| 24.
|
Liu, B.,
Timar, J.,
Howlett, J.,
Diglio, C. A.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1991)
Cell Regul.
2,
1045-1055
|
| 25.
|
Bleich, D.,
Chen, S.,
Wen, Y.,
and Nadler, J. L.
(1997)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
230,
448-3451
|
| 26.
|
Standaert, M. L.,
Galloway, L.,
Karnam, P.,
Bandyopadhyay, G.,
Moscat, J.,
and Farese, R. V.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30075-300082
|
| 27.
|
Schaeffer, H. J.,
Catling, A. D.,
Ebling, S. T.,
Collier, L. S.,
Krauss, A.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1998)
Science
281,
1668-1671
|
| 28.
|
Grammer, T. C.,
and Blenis, J.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
1635-1642
|
| 29.
|
Katan, M.
(1996)
Cancer Surv.
27,
199-121
|
| 30.
|
Sankaran, B.,
Osterhout, J.,
Wu, D.,
and Smrcka, A. V.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7148-7154
|
| 31.
|
Venema, R. C.,
Ju, H.,
Venema, V. J.,
Schieffer, B.,
Harp, J. B.,
Ling, B. N.,
Eaton, D. C.,
and Marrero, M. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7703-7708
|
| 32.
|
Gronroos, E.,
Andersson, T.,
Schippert, A.,
Zheng, L.,
and Sjolander, A.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
316,
239-245
|
| 33.
|
Rao, G. N.,
Delafontaine, P.,
and Runge, M. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27871-27875
|
| 34.
|
Linseman, D. A.,
Benjamin, C. W.,
and Jones, D. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12563-12568
|
| 35.
|
Daub, H.,
Weiss, F. U.,
Wallasch, C.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1996)
Nature
379,
557-560
|
| 36.
|
Graness, A.,
Hanke, S.,
Boehmer, F. D.,
Presek, P.,
and Liebmann, C.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
347,
441-447
|
| 37.
|
Thomas, A. M.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
13,
513-609
|
| 38.
|
Zakaroff-Girard, A.,
Gilbert, M.,
Meskini, N.,
Nemoz, G.,
Lagarde, M.,
and Prigent, A.-F.
(1999)
Life Sci.
64,
2135-2148
|
| 39.
|
Liu, B.,
Marnett, L. J.,
Chaundhary, A.,
Ji, C.,
Blair, I. A.,
Johnson, C. R.,
Diglio, C. A.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1994)
Lab. Invest.
70,
314-323
|
| 40.
|
Gao, X.,
Grignon, D. J.,
Chbihi, T.,
Zacharek, A. R.,
Chen, Y. Q.,
Sakr, W.,
Porter, A. T.,
Crissman, J. D.,
Pontes, J. D.,
Powell, I. J.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1995)
Urology
46,
227-237
|
| 41.
|
Tang, D. G.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1997)
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
400,
349-361
|
| 42.
|
Honn, K. V.,
Timar, J.,
Rozhin, J.,
Bazaz, R.,
Sameni, M.,
Ziegler, G.,
and Sloane, B. F.
(1994)
Exp. Cell Res.
214,
120-130
|
| 43.
|
Liu, X. H.,
Connolly, J. M.,
and Rose, D. P.
(1996)
Clin. Exp. Metastasis
14,
145-152
|
| 44.
|
Tang, D. G.,
Diglio, C. A.,
Bazaz, R.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
2629-2644
|
| 45.
|
Sjolander, A.,
and Gronroos, E.
(1994)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
744,
155-160
|
| 46.
|
Honn, K. V.,
Tang, D. G.,
Gao, X.,
Butovich, I. A.,
Liu, B.,
Timar, J.,
and Hagmann, W.
(1994)
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
13,
365-396
|
| 47.
|
Honn, K. V.,
Tang, D. G.,
Grossi, I.,
Duniec, Z. M.,
Timar, J.,
Renaud, C.,
Leithauser, M.,
Blair, I.,
Johnson, C. R.,
Diglio, C. A.,
Kimler, V. A.,
Taylor, J. D.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
565-574
|
| 48.
|
Rice, R. L.,
Tang, D. G.,
Haddad, M.,
Honn, K. V.,
and Taylor, J. D.
(1998)
Int. J. Cancer
77,
271-278
|
| 49.
|
Bonni, A.,
Brunet, A.,
West, A. E.,
Datta, S. R.,
Takasu, M. A.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1999)
Science
286,
1358-1362
|
| 50.
|
Ruvolo, P. P.,
Deng, X.,
Carr, B. K.,
and May, W. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
25436-25442
|
| 51.
|
Fiore, S.,
Maddox, J. F.,
Perez, H. D.,
and Serhan, C. N.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
253-260
|
| 52.
|
Yokomizo, T.,
Izumi, T.,
Chang, K.,
Takuwa, Y.,
and Shimizu, T.
(1997)
Nature
387,
620-624
|
| 53.
|
Sarau, H. M.,
Ames, R. S.,
Chambers, J.,
Ellis, C.,
Elshourbagy, N.,
Foley, J. J.,
Schmidt, D. B.,
Muccitelli, R. M.,
Jenkins, O.,
Murdock, P. R.,
Herrity, N. C.,
Halsey, W.,
Sathe, G.,
Muir, A. I.,
Nuthulaganti, P.,
Dytko, G. M.,
Buckley, P. T.,
Wilson, S.,
Bergsma, D. J.,
and Hay, D. W.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
56,
657-663
|
| 54.
|
Kevin, R.,
Lynch, K. R.,
Oneill, G. P.,
Liu, Q.,
Im, D. S.,
Sawyer, N.,
Metters, K. M.,
Coulombe, N.,
Abramovitz, M.,
Figueroa, D. J.,
Zeng, Z.,
Connolly, G. M.,
Bai, C.,
Austin, C. P.,
Chateauneuf, A.,
Stocco, R.,
Greig, G. M.,
Kargman, S.,
Hooks, S. B.,
Hosfield, E.,
Williams, D. L.,
Ford-Hutchinson, A. W.,
Caskey, C. T.,
and Evans, J. F.
(1999)
Nature
399,
789-793
|
| 55.
|
Herbertsson, H.,
Kuhme, T.,
Evertsson, U.,
Wigren, J.,
and Hammarstrom, S.
(1998)
J. Lipid Res.
39,
237-244
|
| 56.
|
Kurahashi, Y.,
Herbertsson, H.,
Soderstrom, M.,
Rosenfeld, M. G.,
and Hammarstrom, S.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
5779-5783
|
| 57.
|
Mong, S.,
and Sarau, H. M.
(1990)
Mol. Pharmacol.
37,
60-64
|
| 58.
|
Marshall, C. J.
(1995)
Cell
80,
179-185
|
| 59.
|
Costello, P. B.,
Baer, A. N.,
and Green, F. A.
(1991)
Inflammation
15,
269-279
|
| 60.
|
Hagmann, W.,
Gao, X.,
Timar, J.,
Chen, Y. Q.,
Strohmaier, A. R.,
Fahrenkopf, C.,
Kagawa, D.,
Lee, M.,
Zacharek, A.,
and Honn, K. V.
(1996)
Exp. Cell Res.
228,
197-205
|
| 61.
|
Silletti, S.,
Timar, J.,
Honn, K. V.,
and Raz, A.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
5752-5756
|
| 62.
|
Capodici, C.,
Pillinger, M. H.,
Han, G.,
Philips, M. R.,
and Weissmann, G.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
102,
165-175
|
| 63.
|
Lindsay, M. A.,
Haddad, E. B.,
Rousell, J.,
Teixeira, M. M.,
Hellewell, P. G.,
Barnes, P. J.,
and Giembycz, M. A.
(1998)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
64,
555-562
|
| 64.
|
Perkins, R. S.,
Lindsay, M. A.,
Barnes, P. J.,
and Giembycz, M. A.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
310,
795-806
|
| 65.
|
Maddox, J. F.,
Hachicha, M.,
Takano, T.,
Fokin, V. V.,
and Serhan, C. N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
6972-6978
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Zhao, D. Wang, S. Y. Cheranov, M. Karpurapu, K. R. Chava, V. Kundumani-Sridharan, D. A. Johnson, J. S. Penn, and G. N. Rao
A novel role for activating transcription factor-2 in 15(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid-induced angiogenesis
J. Lipid Res.,
March 1, 2009;
50(3):
521 - 533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Tommasini, A. Guidarelli, L. Palomba, L. Cerioni, and O. Cantoni
5-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid is a key intermediate of the arachidonate-dependent protective signaling in monocytes/macrophages exposed to peroxynitrite
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
October 1, 2006;
80(4):
929 - 938.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. T. Bolick, S. Srinivasan, A. Whetzel, L. C. Fuller, and C. C. Hedrick
12/15 Lipoxygenase Mediates Monocyte Adhesion to Aortic Endothelium in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Through Activation of RhoA and NF-{kappa}B
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
June 1, 2006;
26(6):
1260 - 1266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Zhang, H. Wang, J. Li, L. Dong, P. Xu, W. Chen, R. L. Neve, J. J. Volpe, and P. A. Rosenberg
Intracellular Zinc Release and ERK Phosphorylation Are Required Upstream of 12-Lipoxygenase Activation in Peroxynitrite Toxicity to Mature Rat Oligodendrocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 7, 2006;
281(14):
9460 - 9470.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. R. Preston, N. S. Hill, R. R. Warburton, and B. L. Fanburg
Role of 12-lipoxygenase in hypoxia-induced rat pulmonary artery smooth muscle cell proliferation
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
February 1, 2006;
290(2):
L367 - L374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. T. Bolick, A. W. Orr, A. Whetzel, S. Srinivasan, M. E. Hatley, M. A. Schwartz, and C. C. Hedrick
12/15-Lipoxygenase Regulates Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression and Monocyte Adhesion to Endothelium Through Activation of RhoA and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.,
November 1, 2005;
25(11):
2301 - 2307.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shigeta, N. Sanzen, M. Ozawa, J. Gu, H. Hasegawa, and K. Sekiguchi
CD151 regulates epithelial cell-cell adhesion through PKC- and Cdc42-dependent actin cytoskeletal reorganization
J. Cell Biol.,
October 13, 2003;
163(1):
165 - 176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Mikule, S. Sunpaweravong, J. C. Gatlin, and K. H. Pfenninger
Eicosanoid Activation of Protein Kinase C {epsilon}: INVOLVEMENT IN GROWTH CONE REPELLENT SIGNALING
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 30, 2003;
278(23):
21168 - 21177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zhou, R. N. Fariss, and P. S. Zelenka
Synergy of Epidermal Growth Factor and 12(S)-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoate on Protein Kinase C Activation in Lens Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 7, 2003;
278(7):
5388 - 5398.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Slevin, S. Kumar, and J. Gaffney
Angiogenic Oligosaccharides of Hyaluronan Induce Multiple Signaling Pathways Affecting Vascular Endothelial Cell Mitogenic and Wound Healing Responses
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 18, 2002;
277(43):
41046 - 41059.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E. Lovat, S. Oliverio, M. Ranalli, M. Corazzari, C. Rodolfo, F. Bernassola, K. Aughton, M. Maccarrone, Q. D. C. Hewson, A. D. J. Pearson, et al.
GADD153 and 12-Lipoxygenase Mediate Fenretinide-induced Apoptosis of Neuroblastoma
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2002;
62(18):
5158 - 5167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Muller, M. Siebert, M. Heidt, F. Marks, P. Krieg, and G. Furstenberger
Modulation of Epidermal Tumor Development Caused by Targeted Overexpression of Epidermis-type 12S-Lipoxygenase
Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2002;
62(16):
4610 - 4616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. K. Tithof, M. Elgayyar, H. M. Schuller, M. Barnhill, and R. Andrews
4-(Methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, a nicotine derivative, induces apoptosis of endothelial cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
November 1, 2001;
281(5):
H1946 - H1954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|