![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 49, 38929-38937, December 8, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, August 30, 2000
Ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis of
specific target proteins is required for several important steps during
the cell cycle. Degradation of such proteins is strictly cell
cycle-regulated and triggered by two large ubiquitin ligases, termed
anaphase-promoting complex (APC) and Skp1/Cullin/F-box complex (SCF).
Here we show that yeast Ran-binding protein 1 (Yrb1p), a predominantly
cytoplasmic protein implicated in nucleocytoplasmic transport, is
required for cell cycle regulated protein degradation. Depletion of
Yrb1p results in the accumulation of unbudded G1
cells and of cells arrested in mitosis implying a function of Yrb1p in
the G1/S transition and in the progression through mitosis.
Temperature-sensitive yrb1-51 mutants are defective in
APC-mediated degradation of the anaphase inhibitor protein Pds1p and in
degradation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Sic1p,
a target of SCF. Thus, Yrb1p is crucial for efficient APC- and
SCF-mediated proteolysis of important cell cycle regulatory proteins.
We have identified the UBS1 gene as a multicopy suppressor
of yrb1-51 mutants. Ubs1p is a nuclear protein, and its
deletion is synthetic lethal with a yrb1-51 mutation. Interestingly, UBS1 was previously identified as a
multicopy suppressor of cdc34-2 mutants, which are
defective in SCF activity. We suggest that Ubs1p may represent a link
between nucleocytoplasmic transport and ubiquitin ligase activity.
There are three major transitions in the cell cycle of the budding
yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the G1/S
transition when cells commit to replicate their genome, the metaphase
to anaphase transition, when sister chromatids are separated, and the
exit from mitosis, when the mitotic spindle is depolymerized and
cytokinesis occurs. For efficient proliferation, cells must ensure the
correct order of these events. Therefore, execution of these processes is tightly controlled.
One important cell cycle regulator is the cyclin-dependent
kinase Cdk1p, also called Cdc28p (1). Cdk1p is active only in association with a member of either the B-type cyclins Clb1-6p or the
G1 cyclins Cln1-3p. Another important mechanism of cell cycle control is regulated protein degradation (2, 3). Such proteins
are targeted for proteolytic destruction by the formation of covalently
linked chains of ubiquitin molecules. The final step of this fusion
process, the ligation of activated ubiquitin to the substrate, is
catalyzed by ubiquitin ligases. Two of these ubiquitin-protein
isopeptide ligase enzymes are essential for cell cycle
progression: the anaphase-promoting complex
(APC),1 also called
cyclosome, and the Skp1/Cullin/F-box (SCF) complex.
Components of the SCF complex are Skp1p, the cullin protein Cdc53p, the
ring finger protein Hrt1p, the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34p, and
one of several F-box proteins such as Cdc4p (4, 5). SCF is constantly
active throughout the cell cycle, but ubiquitination of specific SCF
substrates is regulated by substrate phosphorylation. An essential role
of SCF is the destruction of Sic1p, which is an inhibitor specific for
Cdk1p associated with B-type cyclins (6). At the G1/S
transition, G1 cyclins Cln1p and Cln2p accumulate and
activate Cdk1p to phosphorylate Sic1p (6). Phosphorylated Sic1p is then
rapidly degraded by the SCF complex (5, 7). Thereby, Cdk1p associated
with S phase cyclins Clb5p and Clb6p becomes active and triggers DNA replication.
APC is a large protein complex that consists of at least 12 subunits in
S. cerevisiae and is highly conserved in eukaroytes (8, 9).
At the metaphase to anaphase transition, APC triggers sister chromatid
separation by targeting the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p for destruction
(10). APC is also required for the mitotic exit. It triggers
degradation of B-type cyclins leading to the inactivation of
cyclin-dependent kinases (9, 11).
Several yeast strains that are mutated in essential components of the
nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery do not stop cell cycle
progression randomly but show distinct cell cycle arrest phenotypes,
predominantly in the G2/M phase. Such strains are cse1 (12), srp1 (13), yrb1 (14), and
sac3 (15) mutants. These observations indicate an important
role of nucleocytoplasmic transport for cell cycle progression. One of
these mutants, srp1-31, was demonstrated to be defective in
degradation of the mitotic cyclin Clb2p (13).
A crucial component for nuclear transport in all eukaryotes is the
small Ras-like GTPase Ran, which exists in a GTP- and a GDP-bound form
(16-18). Ran is present both in the nucleus and in the cytoplasm, but
the two Ran pools differ with respect to their GTP/GDP binding state;
because of a cytosolic Ran GTPase activating protein (Ran-GAP),
cytosolic Ran is predominantly in its GDP-bound form. In the nucleus,
Ran is kept in its GTP-bound form by the action of a nuclear Ran
guanine-nucleotide exchange factor. Apparently, this asymmetric
distribution of the two forms of Ran is the driving force for
nucleocytoplasmic transport.
Most of the nuclear protein transport is mediated by a large
superfamily of transport receptors, which are classified either as
importins or as exportins, depending on the transport direction (19,
20). Importins and exportins differ with respect to the affinity for
their substrates in the presence of RanGTP. Importins bind their
substrate in the cytoplasm, where Ran-GTP is largely absent, and
facilitate transport through the nuclear pore complex. In the nucleus,
RanGTP binds to importin and thereby triggers the release of the
substrate from the importin (21, 22), which is then transported back
into the cytoplasm.
Exportins bind their substrates cooperatively with RanGTP to form a
trimeric complex (23), which passages through the nuclear pore complex.
Cytoplasmic dissociation of both RanGTP/importin and of
RanGTP/exportin/cargo complexes requires the cytosolic Ran-binding
protein 1 (RanBP1) (24). Binding of RanBP1 to RanGTP appears to trigger
the transient formation of a RanGTP/RanBP1 dimer. In this dimer, RanGTP
is accessible to RanGAP, which mediates GTP hydrolysis and renders
complex disassembly irreversible (25, 26). Thus, RanBP1 appears to be a
crucial factor for the recycling of transport factors and, as a
consequence, for nuclear protein transport mediated by some of these receptors.
The yeast homologue of the RanBP1 is encoded by the essential
YRB1 (yeast RanBP1) gene
(27-29). Temperature-sensitive mutants of YRB1 show
defects in nuclear import and mRNA export
(30).2 Like other mutants
implicated in nucleocytoplasmic transport, temperature-sensitive
yrb1 mutants were shown to be impaired in cell cycle
progression (14).
In this study, we show that cells depleted of Yrb1p arrest either in
G1 or in mitosis. These cell cycle defects prompted us to
analyze whether Yrb1p is required for ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation during the cell cycle. We demonstrate that
yrb1-51 cells are impaired in proteolysis of crucial cell
cycle regulatory proteins. The anaphase inhibitor Pds1p, a target of
the APC and the CDK inhibitor Sic1p, whose degradation is normally
triggered by the SCF, are both stabilized in these mutants. In a screen for high copy suppressors of yrb1-51, we have identified
UBS1, which was previously identified as a putative positive
regulator of Cdc34p, an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme associated with
SCF. Our data imply that Ran-binding protein Yrb1 is important for cell
cycle-regulated proteolysis mediated by both the APC and SCF ubiquitin
ligases and that Ubs1p may influence both the Ran pathway and ubiquitin ligases.
Yeast Strains--
All yeast strains used in this study are
derivatives of the S. cerevisiae W303 strain
(MATa ade2-1 trp1-1 can1-100 leu2-3, 12 his3-11,
15 ura3 GAL psi+). The yrb1-51 mutant was previously
isolated as suppressor of the mating defect of a fus1 Plasmid Construction--
Plasmid pMK114 containing the
YRB1 gene under the control of the GAL1 promoter
(GAL-YRB1) was generated by a fusion of the EcoRI-BamHI GAL1 promoter fragment to
the YRB1 open reading frame (as a
BamHI-XbaI fragment) on plasmid pRS316. The
UBS1 gene was isolated as 1.4-kilobase
HindIII-XbaI- fragment from the complementing plasmid pMK136 and subcloned into the 2µ plasmid YEp352, resulting in
plasmid pMK145. pMK136 contains a genomic
BglII-StuI UBS1 fragment in the
BamHI-EcoRV sites of pBluescriptKS(+). This
fragment contains, in addition to the complete UBS1 open
reading frame (834 base pairs), 387-base pair upstream and 122-base
pair downstream regions. The ubs1::HIS3 disruption
plasmid pMK147i was constructed by inserting a genomic BamHI
HIS3 fragment into a single BamHI site within the
coding region of UBS1 in pBluescriptKS(+)-UBS1
(pMK136) in the opposite transcriptional orientation relative to
UBS1. For construction of
YEplac112-NOP1p-GFP-UBS1 expressing a GFP fusion of
UBS1 under control of the NOP1 promoter, a
polymerase chain reaction-generated (using OUBS1-1
5'-GGGGCCATGGCTTACTCTTTAACAAGGAAATTGC-3' and OUBS1-2
5'-GGGGAGATCTTTAGATTTTTTTCCTCTTTGTGTA-3' as primers and
YEp352-UBS1 (pMK145) as template)
NcoI/BglII fragment comprising the entire ORF of
UBS1 was inserted first into pNOPPATA1L (31) and
subsequently recloned as a PstI fragment into
YEplac112-NOP1p-GFP (32).
Growth Conditions and Cell Cycle Arrests--
Yeast cells were
grown in YEP medium (2% bactopeptone, 1% yeast extract, 0.005%
adeninsulfate) supplemented either with 2% glucose (YEPD) or 2%
raffinose (YEP+Raf) or appropriate minimal mediums (33). Prior to cell
cycle arrests, cultures were pregrown to log phase
(A600 = 0.3-0.6) at 25 °C. When a
gene was expressed from the inducible GAL1 promoter, cells
were pregrown in medium containing raffinose as the sole carbon source.
The GAL1 promoter was induced by the addition of galactose
(final concentration, 2%). To turn off the GAL1 promoter,
cells were filtered and resuspended in medium containing 2% glucose
(final concentration).
To arrest cells with the microtubule depolymerizing drug nocodazole,
cells were incubated for 2.5-3 h in the presence of 15 µg/ml
nocodazole (added from a 1.5 mg/ml stock solution in dimethyl sulfoxide). Cells were arrested in G1 phase with Isolation of High Copy Suppressors of the yrb1-51
Mutation--
To identify high copy suppressors of the
yrb1-51 mutation, yrb1-51 strain
JTY20262 was transformed with a genomic library on the high
copy vector YEp352. This library contained 3-kilobase Sau3AI
fragments of yeast genomic DNA ligated into the BamHI site
of the URA3-based plasmid YEp352 (34). Transformants were
tested for their ability to grow at 32 °C on plates containing
minimal medium without uracil ( Immunoblot Analysis--
Preparation of whole cell extracts and
protein immunoblot analyses were performed as described (35). After
separation on SDS gels, proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose
membranes. The enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (ECL;
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used to detect specific proteins.
Antibodies were used in 1:1000 (Clb2), 1:2000 (Cdc28), 1:1000 (Swi6),
1:5000 (Yrb1), and 1:100 (HA, 12CA5) dilutions, respectively.
Other Methods--
RNA isolation and Northern hybridization was
performed as described (36). Polymerase chain reaction-generated
fragments of the respective genes were radiolabeled by random primer
labeling (Stratagene) and used as hybridization probes. For
immunfluorescence microscopy, cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde,
and spheroplasts were prepared as described by Pringle et
al. (37). 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining and
anti-tubulin antibodies were used for visualization of nuclei and
spindles, respectively. Fluorescence microscopy of living yeast cells
expressing GFP fusion proteins was performed according to Hellmuth
et al. (31).
Depletion of Yrb1p Results in the Accumulation of Unbudded and
Large Budded Yeast Cells--
The Ran-binding protein 1 is a
predominantly cytoplasmic protein encoded by the essential
YRB1 gene in yeast. Earlier studies showed that different
temperature-sensitive yrb1 mutant strains exhibit a cell
cycle arrest phenotype at their restrictive temperature (14, 38). To
further elucidate how Yrb1p might influence cell cycle progression, we
first characterized the phenotype of a strain in which the
YRB1 gene was deleted. Because YRB1 is an
essential gene, yrb1
To find out whether
Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that about 35% of the large
budded cells contained two separated nuclei and a distinctly elongated
spindle, indicating a cell cycle arrest in late anaphase/telophase (Fig. 1C). These spindles had frequently an unusual twisted
appearance. The remaining 65% of large budded cells had a short or
moderately elongated spindle and mostly one nucleus. Thus, cells with
reduced Yrb1p levels arrest either in G1 or during mitosis.
These findings confirm that Yrb1p is essential for cell cycle progression.
yrb1-51 Mutants Are Blocked at the G1/S Transition and
in the Passage through Mitosis--
To further characterize the role
of Yrb1p during the cell cycle, we used a temperature-sensitive
yrb1-51 mutant strain that represents a conditional null
allele defective in nuclear import and mRNA
export.2
To test whether a functional Yrb1p is required for the G1/S
transition, yrb1-51 cells and isogenic wild-type cells were
arrested in G1 phase with
We next analyzed the role of Yrb1p in the progression through mitosis.
For this purpose we used cells that were prearrested in metaphase with
the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole. The temperature was
then shifted to 37 °C, and cells were transferred to medium lacking
nocodazole and released into medium containing
These findings show that yrb1-51 mutants display at least
partial defects in APC-mediated proteolysis. The failure of these cells
to exit mitosis suggests that Yrb1p is needed for the M/G1 transition.
Proteolysis of the Anaphase Inhibitor Pds1p Is Impaired in the
yrb1-51 Mutant Strain--
Because yrb1 mutants were
delayed in Pds1p degradation when released from a metaphase arrest, we
asked whether yrb1-51 mutants are indeed impaired in
degradation of Pds1p. To test this, the stability of Pds1p was
determined in G1 arrested cells. In this period of the cell
cycle APC is normally fully active and, as a consequence, Pds1p is
highly unstable in G1 wild-type cells (10).
Wild-type and yrb1-51 cells containing a
GAL-PDS1-HA gene fusion were arrested in G1 with
A further characteristic of such mutants defective in APC function is
their increased sensitivity toward elevated levels of the mitotic
cyclin Clb2p (39). To test whether yrb1-51 mutants display a
similar phenotype, Clb2p was expressed in these cells to high levels
from the GAL1 promoter. Indeed, yrb1-51 GAL-CLB2 cells were inviable on plates containing galactose at 25 °C, a temperature that is normally permissive for this mutant, similar to
cdc16-123 GAL-CLB2 cells, which were used as a control (Fig. 4B). These findings indicate that Yrb1p is necessary for
proper degradation of targets of the APC.
yrb1-51 Mutants Are Defective in SCF-mediated Proteolysis of the
CDK Inhibitor Sic1p--
The defect of yrb1-51 in
APC-mediated degradation prompted us to test whether the SCF ubiquitin
ligase is also affected. SCF is essential for entry into S phase,
because it needs to trigger proteolysis of the CDK inhibitor Sic1p. To
analyze whether Sic1p proteolysis is defective in yrb1-51
mutants, a promoter shut-off experiment was performed with wild-type
and yrb1-51 cells containing a HA-tagged SIC1
gene expressed from the GAL1 promoter. In an unperturbed
cell cycle, Sic1p is unstable from late G1 to late anaphase
(6, 40). To test Sic1p stability, strains were first arrested in a
metaphase-like state with nocodazole, where Sic1p is normally unstable.
Expression of the SIC1-HA4 gene was transiently induced by
galactose, and then the GAL1 promoter was turned off by
glucose addition. Immunoblot analysis showed that Sic1p is stabilized
in yrb1-51 cells at the restrictive temperature, compared with metaphase arrested wild-type cells (Fig.
5). This experiment shows that Yrb1p is
required for proteolytic degradation of Sic1p.
Yrb1p Protein Levels Remain Constant during the Cell
Cycle--
Because Yrb1p is needed for crucial cell cycle transitions,
the abundance of this protein might itself be regulated during the cell
cycle. Indeed, the level of RanBP1 is cell cycle-regulated in mammalian
cells (41). To test a possible fluctuation of Yrb1p, Yrb1p levels were
analyzed in a culture of synchronized wild-type cells. Cells were
arrested in G1 phase by UBS1 Is a High Copy Suppressor of the yrb1-51 Mutant--
A widely
used approach to find out more about the cellular function of a
specific protein is the screening for genetic suppressors. To identify
genes whose overexpressions suppress the lethality of
yrb1-51 mutants, we performed a screen for high copy
suppressors of a yrb1-51 mutant strain at its restrictive
temperature. Of 100,000 transformants, 38 clones were finally selected
and restriction analysis and sequencing showed that suppressing
plasmids could be grouped into four different complementation groups.
16 of them contained the YRB1 gene. The crucial open reading
frame on four plasmids was incomplete and encoded the N-terminal
GTP-binding domain of Tef2, which is the yeast homologue of
EF1
This interesting connection to the ubiquitination machinery
prompted us to analyze the UBS1 gene in more detail. The
UBS1 open reading frame was subcloned into the multi-copy
vector YEp352 and tested for its suppressing activity of the
cdc34-2 and yrb1-51 mutants. Indeed, this plasmid
restored viability to both cdc34-2 and yrb1-51
mutants at their otherwise restrictive temperatures of 35 or 32 °C,
respectively (Fig. 7, A and
B). In contrast, multiple copies of UBS1 failed
to suppress the lethality of a yrb1 deletion and did not
influence mutants in the APC ubiquitin ligase (data not shown). In
contrast to UBS1, overexpression of YRB1 did not suppress cdc34-2 mutants (Fig. 7A). Taken
together, these results show that high levels of Ubs1p suppress
mutations in both a Ran-binding protein and in the
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme of SCF.
The yrb1-51 allele encodes a protein that is distinctly
destabilized compared with the wild-type protein (Fig. 7C).
To find out whether high amounts of Ubs1p simply rescue the
yrb1-51 mutant by stabilizing the mutant protein,
yrb1-51 cells expressing UBS1 on a high copy
plasmid were shifted to 37 °C, and levels of the mutant protein were
monitored by immunoblotting. The mutant Yrb1p was unstable in the
presence of Ubs1p, similar to mutants containing an empty vector
plasmid (Fig. 7C). Thus, suppression of the
yrb1-51 mutants by high levels of UBS1 is not
caused by stabilization of the Yrb1p mutant protein. Multiple copies of
UBS1 rather restore viability to cells containing abnormally
low levels of unstable Yrb1p.
Disruption of UBS1 Is Lethal for yrb1-51 Mutants--
Because
overexpression of UBS1 suppressed yrb1-51 mutant
cells, we analyzed whether a disruption of UBS1 is
deleterious to this mutant. In a wild-type background, a disruption of
UBS1 displays no effect on cell viability or morphology
(45). To analyze the situation in a yrb1-51 background, the
yrb1-51 mutant strain was crossed with a
ubs1::HIS3 disruption strain, and the
resulting segregants containing both mutations were incubated at
semi-permissive temperatures. Whereas a yrb1-51 single
mutant is viable and forms colonies at 28 °C (Fig. 7D)
and 30 °C (not shown), double mutants are inviable under these
conditions. Therefore, yrb1-51 and the ubs1
disruption display a synthetic lethal phenotype, and we conclude that
Ubs1p is required for viability of cells containing a partially destabilized Yrb1p.
Ubs1p Is a Nuclear Protein--
Because Yrb1p is localized to the
cytoplasm, we asked whether Ubs1p is also localized to a specific
cellular compartment. To determine the localization of Ubs1p, the
UBS1 gene was fused at its N terminus to green fluorescent
protein and expressed under the control of the NOP1 promoter
(31). The wild-type UBS1 gene was replaced by this
NOP1-GFP-UBS1 fusion gene. To confirm that the
GFP-UBS1 gene product is functional, it was placed on a
multi-copy plasmid and transformed in yrb1-51
ubs1::HIS3 double mutants. Indeed, the conditional
synthetic lethal phenotype was complemented by the fusion gene to a
similar degree as by the UBS1 gene, suggesting that the
fusion protein is functional (data not shown). Fluorescence microscopy
showed that GFP-Ubs1p is localized in the nucleus (Fig. 7E).
We conclude that the multi-copy suppressor of yrb1-51
mutants, Ubs1p, is a predominantly nuclear protein.
In this paper, we have analyzed the role of the Ran-binding
protein 1 (Yrb1) in cell cycle progression in budding yeast. Yrb1p is a
predominantly cytoplasmic protein implicated in nuclear import and
export. A crucial role of Yrb1p in nucleocytoplasmic transport is
thought to be the release of nuclear transport receptors from RanGTP in
the cytoplasm. Thereby, Yrb1p is needed for the terminal step of
nuclear export and for the recycling of import receptors (46).
A Role for Yrb1p in Cell Cycle-regulated Proteolysis--
We found
that depletion of Yrb1p results in a cell cycle arrest either in
G1 phase or in mitosis, and temperature-sensitive yrb1-51 mutants fail to release from G1 or M
phase arrests at their restrictive temperature. These data confirm and
extend previous findings showing that mutants in Yrb1p display cell
cycle arrest phenotypes (14). Because ubiquitin-dependent
proteolysis of specific target proteins is essential for cell cycle
progression, we have particularly examined the role of Yrb1p in
degradation of key regulatory proteins. We have shown here that
yrb1-51 mutants fail to degrade the anaphase inhibitor
protein Pds1p, a substrate of the APC. Furthermore, mutant cells are
sensitive against high levels of the mitotic cyclin Clb2p and thereby
resemble mutants in the APC. We found that yrb1-51 mutants
are also impaired in degradation of an inhibitor of
cyclin-dependent kinases, Sic1p, a target of the SCF
complex (Fig. 5), and another substrate of SCF, the transcription
factor Gcn4p, is also stabilized in these mutants.3 We conclude from
these results that Yrb1p plays an important role in cell
cycle-regulated proteolysis mediated by both the APC and SCF ubiquitin ligases.
It was previously demonstrated that mutants in SRP1,
encoding the yeast homologue of importin
What could be the role of cytoplasmic Yrb1p in
ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation? The findings that
srp1 and yrb1 mutants are both impaired in this
process implies that the obvious reason for this phenotype is their
defect in nucleocytoplasmic transport. Impaired nuclear import or
export may cause defects in ubiquitin ligase activity, for example by
mislocalization of crucial components or regulators of the
ubiquitination machinery. Alternatively, target proteins of ubiquitin
ligases may be stabilized because they are not transported to locations
where the ubiquitination machinery is active. At least in the case of
the APC, which triggers the separation of sister chromatids, it is
obvious that the important function of this ubiquitin ligase resides in
the nucleus (9). However, it is yet unknown whether the activity of
ubiquitin ligases is restricted to a specific cellular compartment.
Another reason for the defect in proteolysis may be an impaired
function of the proteasome. Indeed, recent findings showed that
biogenesis of the 20 S proteasome depends on a functional nuclear
protein import pathway.4 As a
consequence, cell cycle regulatory proteins targeted for destruction by
ubiquitin ligases may get abnormally stabilized in yrb1-51
mutants, because the proteasome is not properly active.
It is also tempting to speculate that Yrb1p may have other important
functions than in Ran-mediated transport. Independently of their role
in nuclear transport, Ran and RanBP1 were found to be involved in the
formation of the mitotic spindle in mammalian cells. RanGTPase
apparently regulates the assembly of the mitotic spindle in a
transport-independent manner (47-49). It was also observed that RanBP1
levels oscillate during the cell cycle in mammalian cells and increased
levels of RanBP1 disrupted various cell cycle events, such as the
assembly of the mitotic spindle (41).
It is unknown whether yeast Yrb1p has additional functions
besides nucleocytoplasmic transport. Overexpression of YRB1
and of GSP1 (the yeast RanGTPase) leads to an increased
sensitivity toward the microtuble depolymerizing drug benomyl and to
increased chromosome nondisjunction (28). We found that cells arrested in mitosis because of the absence of Yrb1p displayed an abnormal mitotic spindle (Fig. 1C). Thus, abnormal levels of Yrb1p,
either increased or decreased, affect mitotic events, and these
observed phenotypes might indicate that RanBP1 is important for spindle function also in lower eukaryotes.
Although Yrb1p is localized predominantly in the cytoplasm and nuclear
envelope breakdown during mitosis does not occur in this organism
during mitosis, recent findings suggested that this Ran-binding protein
may have a function in the nucleus. It was shown that Yrb1p shuttles
between cytoplasm and nucleus (50, 51). However, it remains to be shown
whether its transient localization in the nucleus is important for
Yrb1p function.
Ubs1p, a Link of Yrb1p to Ubiquitin Ligase Activity?--
In a
screen for multi-copy suppressors of the yrb1-51 mutation,
we have identified the UBS1 gene that may represent a link between the Yrb1p and ubiquitin ligases. Interestingly, UBS1
was initially identified as a multi-copy suppressor of cdc34
mutants (45). Cdc34p is an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme associated with SCF, and mutants in this essential gene are defective in SCF function causing a drastic stabilization of SCF target proteins such as Sic1p.
Ubs1p has no homology to any other gene, and its function is unknown.
Because high levels of Ubs1p suppressed the lethality of
cdc34 mutants, it was suggested that Ubs1p represents a
putative positive regulator of Cdc34 (45). Interestingly, high copy
UBS1 plasmids suppressed only some cdc34
mutations but failed to suppress certain cdc34 mutations in
a specific region on the surface of the proteins. Because this surface
sequences resembled a region in Ubs1p itself, it was suggested that
Ubs1p might directly bind to Cdc34p and thereby regulate its activity
by interaction or by modification. However, such an interaction has not
yet been demonstrated.
A deletion of UBS1, which has no obvious effect on wild-type
cells, is deleterious to both cdc34 (45) and
yrb1-51 mutants at semipermissive temperatures. Thus, cells
in which either Cdc34p or Yrb1p function is partially impaired are
entirely dependent on Ubs1p. All these observations imply that Ubs1p
promotes the function of both Yrb1p and Cdc34p.
A GFP-Ubs1 fusion protein is localized to the nucleus (Fig.
7E), and this nuclear localization is at least partially
impaired in yrb1-51 mutants (data not shown). As suggested
by Prendergast et al. (45), Ubs1p might be an activator of
Cdc34p, and its nuclear import triggered by the RanGTP cycle may be
important for proper SCF function in the nucleus. However, this simple
explanation would not explain why high levels of Ubs1p also suppress
yrb1-51 mutant cells. An alternative model, in which Ubs1p
influences both nuclear transport and ubiquitin ligase activity, may be
more likely. For example, Ubs1p may have a role in promoting
nucleocytoplasmic transport and thereby accelerate nuclear localization
of proteins, which induce SCF activity. The presence of high levels of
this activatory protein then may cause suppression of a partially
inactive Yrb1p. Accelerated transport by high levels of Ubs1p may then cause the nuclear accumulation of proteins that promote Cdc34/SCF activity leading to suppression of the cdc34 mutant. Such a
model would explain why Ubs1p affects both yrb1 and
cdc34 mutants.
Nucleocytoplasmic Transport and the Regulation of Cell Cycle
Events--
Although it is possible that Yrb1p has essential roles
other than nuclear import and export, cell cycle defect of mutants in
several factors involved in nucleocytoplasmic transport, such as
srp1, sac3, and cse1 mutants, suggests
that functional transport is crucial for cell cycle progression.
Mutants in the importin-
It is tempting to speculate that proteolysis of cell cycle regulatory
proteins may be controlled by subcellular localization either of
components of the destruction machinery or of the target proteins
themselves. An example for regulated nuclear localization of a cell
cycle regulatory protein is the transcription factor Swi5p. Swi5p is
cytoplasmic until late anaphase, when it suddenly enters the nucleus
and induces the transcription of late mitotic genes (53, 54).
Phosphorylation of Swi5p by cyclin-dependent kinases
prevents nuclear entry, and only the appearance of an antagonizing
phosphatase, Cdc14p, allows nuclear import of Swi5p (55). Cdc14p is
itself a well characterized example for regulated localization during
the cell cycle. This phosphatase required for the mitotic exit is
localized to the nucleolus for most of the cell cycle, and thereby it
is kept inactive (56, 57). The release during anaphase allows Cdc14p to
reach its targets, Swi5p, Sic1p, and Cdh1p, and the dephosphorylation
of each of these proteins contributes to inactivation of
cyclin-dependent kinases and the mitotic exit (11).
In analogy to these proteins, the regulated localization of components
of the destruction machinery may be a possible mechanism to ensure a
precisely controlled degradation of target proteins, which is crucial
for faithful cell cycle progression. To identify such regulatory
proteins whose activity is controlled by nucleocytoplasmic transport is
a task for future experiment.
We thank Farah Sananbenesi for helpful
support and Ralph Pries for critical reading of the manuscript. We
acknowledge Cordula Enenkel for communicating results prior to
publication, M. Aebi for providing a high copy genomic library, and
Ingrid Bahr for photographs.
*
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Grants IR36/1-2 and KU1235/1-2 and by funds from the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie and the Volkswagen-Stiftung.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
49-551-393819; Fax: 49-551-393820; E-mail:
sirnige@gwdg.de.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 15, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M007925200
2
M. Künzler, J. Trueheart, C. Sette, E. Hurt, and J. Thorner, submitted for publication.
3
R. Pries, personal communication.
4
C. Enenkel, personal communication.
The abbreviations used are:
APC, anaphase-promoting complex;
CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase;
RanBP, Ran-binding protein;
SCF, Skp1/Cullin/F-box;
HA, hemagglutinin;
GFP, green fluorescent protein.
Yeast Ran-binding Protein Yrb1p Is Required for Efficient
Proteolysis of Cell Cycle Regulatory Proteins Pds1p and Sic1p*
,
,
, and
¶
Institute of Microbiology and Genetics,
Georg-August-University, Grisebachstrasse 8, D-37077 Göttingen,
Germany and § Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg,
Biochemie-Zentrum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
mutant.2 To make the mutant strain congenic with the W303
wild-type strain, yrb1-51 was backcrossed four times with
this strain. The YRB1 gene was disrupted by transformation
of a diploid wild-type strain with a plasmid in which an internal
BglII fragment of YRB1 was replaced by a
BamHI HIS3 fragment. To generate a haploid
yrb1::HIS3 GAL-YRB1 strain, a heterozygous
yrb1::HIS3/YRB1 strain was transformed with
plasmid pMK114, containing the GAL-YRB1 fusion gene. Haploid strains were obtained by tetrad dissection. The
ubs1::HIS3 disruption strain was derived from
wild-type strains by disrupting the UBS1 locus via
transformation with a SpeI-SalI fragment
containing the ubs1::HIS3 construct excised from
plasmid pMK147i. Strains containing HA-tagged versions of Pds1p (10)
and of Sic1p (6) were previously described.
-factor
by adding 0.5 or 5 µg/ml mating pheromone to bar1 or
BAR1 strains, respectively, for 2.5 h.
URA). Plasmid dependence of the
suppressing phenotype was tested by streaking the transformants on
medium containing 5-fluoroorotic acid. Transformants whose
survival at 32 °C was plasmid-dependent were tested for
growth at 37 °C. Surviving transformants were presumed to contain
the YRB1 gene and not further analyzed. From the remaining
clones, plasmids were isolated and transformed into Escherichia
coli. After propagation and reisolation, plasmids were transformed
back into the yrb1-51 strain. Transformants were retested
for plasmid dependent growth on
URA plates at 32 °C. Suppressing
plasmids were isolated and analyzed by restriction digestion, Southern
hybridization, and sequencing.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
cells were kept alive by a
YRB1 gene under the control of the GAL1-promoter.
These cells were dead on glucose medium but viable on
galactose-containing plates.
yrb1/GAL-YRB1 cells
show a distinct cell cycle arrest phenotype upon a shift to glucose
medium, cells were pregrown in galactose medium and then transferred to
glucose medium. 18 h after the promoter shut-off
yrb1/GAL-YRB1 cells mostly arrested either as
unbudded or as large budded cells (Fig. 1A). The ratio of unbudded to
large budded cells was approximately 1:1. The size of these cells
increased considerably, reminiscent of a cell cycle arrest phenotype
observed in other cell cycle mutants. Western analysis confirmed that
Yrb1p levels were drastically reduced at this time point (Fig.
1B).

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Depletion of Yrb1p is lethal and leads to the
accumulation of unbudded and large budded yeast cells.
yrb1
/GAL-YRB1 and wild-type cells were
pregrown in YEP+Raf+Gal medium, filtered and then transferred to
YEP+Glucose (YPD) medium. Samples were taken before (YEP+Raf+Gal) or
18 h after the glucose induced promoter shut off (18 h YPD).
A, samples were fixed with formaldehyde and photographed by
conventional light microscopy using Nomarski optics. Cells of the
yrb1
/GAL-YRB1 strain 18 h after transfer
to glucose medium are shown. B, immunoblotting of
yrb1
/GAL-YRB1 and wild-type strains before and
18 h after the transfer to glucose medium. Yrb1p levels were
monitored using an anti-Yrb1 antibody, and Swi6p was used as a loading
control. C, immunofluorescence microscopy of
yrb1
/GAL-YRB1 cells.
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining and anti-tubulin
antibodies were used to visualize nuclei or mitotic spindles,
respectively. yrb1
/GAL-YRB1 cells 18 h
after transfer to glucose medium are shown. Examples characteristic for
the population of cells arrested with short or elongated spindles
(metaphase or late anaphase/telophase cells, respectively) are
shown.
-factor at the permissive
temperature, shifted to 37 °C, and then transferred to medium
without
-factor. Whereas wild-type cells started to bud upon the
release from the G1 arrest, yrb1-51 mutants
failed to initiate budding (Fig.
2A). Furthermore, the
expression of the S phase cyclin gene CLB5, which was
rapidly induced in wild-type cells, was impaired in mutant cells (Fig. 2B). Thus, yrb1-51 cells are defective in budding
and the initiation of DNA replication, suggesting that Yrb1p is needed
for the passage through START.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Temperature-sensitive yrb1-51
are defective in the G1/S transition. Wild type
(YRB1) and yrb1-51 mutants were arrested at the
permissive temperature (25 °C) with
-factor for 2.5 h.
Cultures were then shifted to 37 °C for 1 h, then filtered, and
transferred to fresh medium without
-factor. Cultures were further
incubated at the restrictive temperature. A, the release
from the G1 arrest was monitored by counting the number of
budded cells at the indicated time points. B, transcription
of the CLB5 gene, encoding an S phase cyclin, was monitored
by Northern hybridization. CMD1 mRNA (calmodulin
mRNA) was used as a loading control.
-factor. Thereby,
cells capable to exit mitosis arrested in G1 phase and
started to form shmoos. Most wild-type cells completed mitosis
1 h after the removal of nocodazole and arrested in G1 phase (Fig. 3A). In contrast,
80% of yrb1 cells remained arrested as large budded cells
for at least 3.5 h. Degradation of both the mitotic cyclin Clb2p
and the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p, two substrates of the APC ubiquitin
ligase, was severely delayed in these mutants (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
yrb1-51 mutants are impaired in
progression through mitosis and in degradation of APC substrates.
Wild type (YRB1) and yrb1-51 mutants were
arrested at the permissive temperature (25 °C) with nocodazole for
2.5 h. Cultures were shifted to 37 °C for 1 h, filtered,
and transferred to fresh medium without nocodazole. Cultures were
further incubated at the restrictive temperature. To monitor cells that
were capable of exit mitosis,
-factor was added to block such cells
in G1 phase. A, the release from the metaphase
arrest was monitored by counting the number of large budded (mitotic)
and unbudded shmooing (G1) cells. B, the
abundance of the HA-tagged anaphase inhibitor protein Pds1p and the
mitotic cyclin Clb2p was analyzed by immunoblotting using either the HA
antibody to detect Pds1-HA protein or Clb2p antibodies, respectively.
Cdc28p was used as a loading control.
-factor, and Pds1p was transiently expressed. In wild-type cells,
only low levels of Pds1p accumulated, and this protein was rapidly
degraded after the promoter shut-off (Fig.
4A). In contrast, Pds1p was
stabilized in yrb1-51 mutant cells and was still detectable
after 60 min. This experiment showed that proteolytic degradation of
Pds1p is impaired in yrb1-51 mutant. This phenotype
therefore resembles the defect of mutants in the anaphase-promoting
complex, such as cdc16 or cdc23 mutants
(10).

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
yrb1-51 mutants are impaired in
APC-mediated proteolysis. A, Pds1p is stabilized in
yrb1-51 mutants. A wild-type (YRB1) and a
yrb1-51 strain, both containing an integrated
GAL-PDS1-HA construct, were pregrown in YEP+Raf medium at
25 °C and subsequently treated with
-factor for 3 h to
arrest cells in G1. 2% galactose was added to express the
GAL-PDS1-HA construct. After 30 min, the cultures were
shifted to 35 °C to inactivate the Yrb1p, and incubation was
continued for 30 min. Then, cells were filtered, transferred into
medium containing glucose (YEPD), and further incubated in the presence
of
-factor at 35 °C. Glucose repressed the GAL1
promoter. Samples were collected at the indicated time points after the
shift to YEPD medium (0 min time point). Levels of HA-tagged Pds1p were
determined by immunoblotting using 12CA5 (HA) antibodies. Cdc28p was
used as a loading control. To confirm that PDS1 expression
was indeed turned off in glucose medium, PDS1 mRNA
levels were analyzed by Northern hybridization. CMD1
mRNA was used as a loading control. More than 95% of the cells had
a shmoo-like appearance throughout the course of the experiment.
B, high levels of Clb2p are toxic for yrb1-51
mutants at permissive temperatures. A yrb1-51, a
cdc16-123, and a wild-type strain, all containing an
integrated GAL-CLB2 fusion, as well as a yrb1-51
strain without this construct, were streaked on a YEPD-plate and on a
YEP+Gal plate and photographed after an incubation for 3 days at
25 °C.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
yrb1-51 mutants are impaired in
proteolytic degradation of the CDK inhibitor Sic1. A wild-type
(YRB1) and a yrb1-51 strain, both containing an
integrated GAL-SIC1-HA construct, were pregrown in YEP+Raf
medium at 25 °C and subsequently treated with nocodazole for 2 h to arrest cells in mitosis. Then 2% galactose was added to express
the SIC1-HA gene. After 30 min, the cultures were shifted to
35 °C to inactivate the Yrb1p, and incubation was continued for
another 30 min. Then cells were filtered, transferred into medium
containing glucose (YEPD) to turn off the GAL1 promoter, and
further incubated in the presence of nocodazole at 35 °C. Samples
were collected at the indicated time points after the shift to YEPD
medium (0 min time point). Levels of HA-tagged Sic1p were determined by
immunoblotting using 12CA5 (HA) antibodies. Swi6p was used as a loading
control. To confirm that SIC1 expression was indeed turned
off in glucose medium, SIC1 mRNA levels were analyzed by
Northern hybridization. CMD1 mRNA was used as a loading
control. More than 95% of the cells were large budded throughout the
course of the experiment, and no spindle was visible when stained with
tubulin antibodies.
-factor pheromone and subsequently released to allow them to progress through the cell cycle.
Immunoblotting showed that levels of Yrb1p remained constant during the
cell cycle, whereas the abundance of a cell cycle-regulated control
protein, the mitotic cyclin Clb2p, showed a distinct fluctuation during
the course of the experiment (Fig. 6). A
mRNA expression analysis of all yeast genes during the cell cycle
previously identified all cell cycle regulated genes and revealed that
YRB1 mRNA is not distinctly fluctuating (42). These
findings indicate that the abundance of Yrb1p is not regulated during
the cell cycle and remains at constant levels. Similarly we found that
steady-state cytoplasmic localization of a Yrb1-GFP fusion protein did
not change significantly during the cell cycle (data not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Yrb1 protein levels are constant during the
cell cycle. A wild-type culture was pregrown in YEPD medium at
25 °C to midlog phase and subsequently treated with
-factor for
3 h to arrest cells in G1. Cells were then filtered,
washed, and synchronously released into fresh YEPD medium without
-factor. Yrb1p was analyzed with Yrb1 antibodies. Swi6p was used as
loading control and Clb2p was used as a control for a protein whose
abundance fluctuates during the cell cycle. Synchrony of the culture
was also verified by counting the number of budded cells (not
shown).
(43). The five plasmids of the third family contained the
SMY2 gene, which was previously identified as a suppressor
for a defective myosin protein (44). The suppressing activity of the
forth family comprising 13 plasmids was caused by the UBS1
gene. This gene has previously been identified in a screen for high
copy suppressors of a cdc34 mutant (45), which is defective
in the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34 required for SCF-mediated ubiquitination.

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
UBS1 is a high copy suppressor of both
cdc34-2 and yrb1-51 mutants.
A and B, a 2µ plasmid containing the
UBS1 gene suppresses the lethality of cdc34-2 and
yrb1-51 mutants. cdc34-2 (A) and
yrb1-51 (B) mutant strains were transformed
either with a high copy plasmid containing UBS1 or
YRB1 or with the empty vector plasmid. Transformants were
streaked on selective minimal medium and photographed after incubation
for 3 days at the indicated temperatures. C, the
UBS1 high copy plasmid does not affect stability of the
mutated Yrb1p in yrb1-51 mutants. yrb1-51 mutants
carrying high copy plasmids containing either the YRB1 gene,
the UBS1 gene, or no insert (YEp352) were pregrown at
25 °C and then shifted to 37 °C (0 min time point). Yrb1p was
visualized by Yrb1 antibodies. The asterisk marks an
unspecific band recognized by this antibody. D, synthetic
lethality of yrb1-51 and ubs1 mutations. A
yrb1-51 mutant strain and two yrb1-51 mutants
containing ubs1::HIS3 gene disruptions were
streaked on YEPD plates and photographed after 2 days of incubation at
the indicated temperature. E, subcellular localization of
Ubs1p. Localization of GFP-Ubs1p in a ubs1 disruption
strain. Cells expressing a GFP-Ubs1 fusion protein under the control of
the NOP1 promoter (32) were cultivated in selective medium
at 23 °C and viewed directly by fluorescence microscopy.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, were unable to properly
degrade Clb2p, suggesting that the nuclear import pathway is required for cyclin proteolysis (13). In contrast to yrb1-51,
srp1-31 arrest predominantly in G2/M phase upon
shift to their restrictive temperature, which may indicate that this
importin is particularly important for proteolysis during mitosis. Our
data imply that disruption of the Ran cycle stabilizes not only APC
substrates but also SCF targets. Furthermore, cells lacking functional
Yrb1p are impaired in the G1/S transition and in
progression through mitosis.
gene, SRP1, display defects in
mitosis and cyclin proteolysis (13). Sac3p, a protein localized to the
nuclear pore, is implicated in the progression through mitosis (15).
Cold-sensitive cse1-1 mutants, defective in the nuclear
export receptor gene of Srp1p, arrest as large budded cells (12), and
its mammalian homologue, CAS, was also implicated in mitosis
(52).
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Morgan, D. O.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
13,
261-291
2.
Hershko, A.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
788-799
3.
Jorgensen, P.,
and Tyers, M.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
2,
610-617
4.
Deshaies, R. J.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
15,
435-467
5.
Willems, A. R.,
Goh, T.,
Taylor, L.,
Chernushevich, I.,
Shevchenko, A.,
and Tyers, M.
(1999)
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond B. Biol. Sci.
354,
1533-1550
6.
Schwob, E.,
Bohm, T.,
Mendenhall, M. D.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1994)
Cell
79,
233-244
7.
Feldman, R. M.,
Correll, C. C.,
Kaplan, K. B.,
and Deshaies, R. J.
(1997)
Cell
91,
221-230
8.
Morgan, D. O.
(1999)
Nat. Cell Biol.
1,
E47-E53
9.
Zachariae, W.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
2039-2058
10.
Cohen-Fix, O.,
Peters, J. M.,
Kirschner, M. W.,
and Koshland, D.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
3081-3093
11.
Zachariae, W.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
708-716
12.
Xiao, Z.,
McGrew, J. T.,
Schroeder, A. J.,
and Fitzgerald-Hayes, M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4691-4702
13.
Loeb, J. D.,
Schlenstedt, G.,
Pellman, D.,
Kornitzer, D.,
Silver, P. A.,
and Fink, G. R.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
7647-7651
14.
Ouspenski, II
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
244,
171-183
15.
Jones, A. L.,
Quimby, B. B.,
Hood, J. K.,
Ferrigno, P.,
Keshava, P. H.,
Silver, P. A.,
and Corbett, A. H.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
3224-3229
16.
Goldfarb, D. S.
(1997)
Science
276,
1814-1816
17.
Gorlich, D.,
and Kutay, U.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.
15,
607-660
18.
Moore, M. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22857-22860
19.
Pemberton, L. F.,
Blobel, G.,
and Rosenblum, J. S.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
392-399
20.
Adam, S. A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
402-406
21.
Rexach, M.,
and Blobel, G.
(1995)
Cell
83,
683-692
22.
Gorlich, D.,
Pante, N.,
Kutay, U.,
Aebi, U.,
and Bischoff, F. R.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
5584-5594
23.
Fornerod, M.,
Ohno, M.,
Yoshida, M.,
and Mattaj, I. W.
(1997)
Cell
90,
1051-1060
24.
Coutavas, E.,
Ren, M.,
Oppenheim, J. D.,
D'Eustachio, P.,
and Rush, M. G.
(1993)
Nature
366,
585-587
25.
Bischoff, F. R.,
and Gorlich, D.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
419,
249-254
26.
Floer, M.,
Blobel, G.,
and Rexach, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19538-19546
27.
Butler, G.,
and Wolfe, K. H.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1219,
711-712
28.
Ouspenski, II,
Mueller, U. W.,
Matynia, A.,
Sazer, S.,
Elledge, S. J.,
and Brinkley, B. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1975-1978
29.
Schlenstedt, G.,
Saavedra, C.,
Loeb, J. D.,
Cole, C. N.,
and Silver, P. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
225-229
30.
Schlenstedt, G.,
Wong, D. H.,
Koepp, D. M.,
and Silver, P. A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5367-5378
31.
Hellmuth, K.,
Lau, D. M.,
Bischoff, F. R.,
Kunzler, M.,
Hurt, E.,
and Simos, G.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6374-6386
32.
Lau, D.,
Kunzler, M.,
Braunwarth, A.,
Hellmuth, K.,
Podtelejnikov, A.,
Mann, M.,
and Hurt, E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
467-471
33.
Rose, M. D.,
Winston, F.,
and Hieter, P.
(1990)
Laboratory Course Manual for Methods in Yeast Genetics
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
34.
te Heesen, S.,
Knauer, R.,
Lehle, L.,
and Aebi, M.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
279-284
35.
Surana, U.,
Amon, A.,
Dowzer, C.,
McGrew, J.,
Byers, B.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
1969-1978
36.
Cross, F. R.,
and Tinkelenberg, A. H.
(1991)
Cell
65,
875-883
37.
Pringle, J. R.,
Adams, A. E.,
Drubin, D. G.,
and Haarer, B. K.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
194,
565-602
38.
Katz, M. E.,
Ferguson, J.,
and Reed, S. I.
(1987)
Genetics
115,
627-636
39.
Irniger, S.,
Piatti, S.,
Michaelis, C.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1995)
Cell
81,
269-278
40.
Deshaies, R. J.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Genet Dev.
7,
7-16
41.
Battistoni, A.,
Guarguaglini, G.,
Degrassi, F.,
Pittoggi, C.,
Palena, A.,
Di Matteo, G.,
Pisano, C.,
Cundari, E.,
and Lavia, P.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
2345-2357
42.
Spellman, P. T.,
Sherlock, G.,
Zhang, M. Q.,
Iyer, V. R.,
Anders, K.,
Eisen, M. B.,
Brown, P. O.,
Botstein, D.,
and Futcher, B.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
3273-3297
43.
Schirmaier, F.,
and Philippsen, P.
(1984)
EMBO J.
3,
3311-3315
44.
Schaaff-Gerstenschlager, I.,
Baur, A.,
Boles, E.,
and Zimmermann, F. K.
(1993)
Yeast
9,
915-921
45.
Prendergast, J. A.,
Ptak, C.,
Kornitzer, D.,
Steussy, C. N.,
Hodgins, R.,
Goebl, M.,
and Ellison, M. J.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
677-684
46.
Kehlenbach, R. H.,
Dickmanns, A.,
Kehlenbach, A.,
Guan, T.,
and Gerace, L.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
645-657
47.
Carazo-Salas, R. E.,
Guarguaglini, G.,
Gruss, O. J.,
Segref, A.,
Karsenti, E.,
and Mattaj, I. W.
(1999)
Nature
400,
178-181
48.
Kalab, P.,
Pu, R. T.,
and Dasso, M.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
481-484
49.
Azuma, Y.,
and Dasso, M.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
302-307
50.
Kunzler, M.,
Gerstberger, T.,
Stutz, F.,
Bischoff, F. R.,
and Hurt, E.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
4295-4308
51.
Plafker, K.,
and Macara, I. G.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
3510-3521
52.
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Brinkmann, E.,
Howard, B. H.,
Pastan, I.,
and Brinkmann, U.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
9493-9500
53.
Moll, T.,
Tebb, G.,
Surana, U.,
Robitsch, H.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1991)
Cell
66,
743-758
54.
Knapp, D.,
Bhoite, L.,
Stillman, D. J.,
and Nasmyth, K.
(1996)
Mol. Cell Biol.
16,
5701-5707
55.
Visintin, R.,
Craig, K.,
Hwang, E. S.,
Prinz, S.,
Tyers, M.,
and Amon, A.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
2,
709-718
56.
Shou, W.,
Seol, J. H.,
Shevchenko, A.,
Baskerville, C.,
Moazed, D.,
Chen, Z. W.,
Jang, J.,
Charbonneau, H.,
and Deshaies, R. J.
(1999)
Cell
97,
233-244
57.
Visintin, R.,
Hwang, E. S.,
and Amon, A.
(1999)
Nature
398,
818-823
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Yi, J. L. Friedman, and P. A. Ferreira The Cyclophilin-like Domain of Ran-binding Protein-2 Modulates Selectively the Activity of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System and Protein Biogenesis J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2007; 282(48): 34770 - 34778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Melloy and S. L. Holloway Changes in the Localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Anaphase-Promoting Complex Upon Microtubule Depolymerization and Spindle Checkpoint Activation Genetics, July 1, 2004; 167(3): 1079 - 1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Asakawa and A. Toh-e A Defect of Kap104 Alleviates the Requirement of Mitotic Exit Network Gene Functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, December 1, 2002; 162(4): 1545 - 1556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pries, K. Bomeke, S. Irniger, O. Grundmann, and G. H. Braus Amino Acid-Dependent Gcn4p Stability Regulation Occurs Exclusively in the Yeast Nucleus Eukaryot. Cell, October 1, 2002; 1(5): 663 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kunzler and E. Hurt Targeting of Ran: variation on a common theme? J. Cell Sci., March 11, 2002; 114(18): 3233 - 3241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Kim, D. Arnold, A. Lloyd, and S. J. Roux Antisense Expression of an Arabidopsis Ran Binding Protein Renders Transgenic Roots Hypersensitive to Auxin and Alters Auxin-Induced Root Growth and Development by Arresting Mitotic Progress PLANT CELL, December 1, 2001; 13(12): 2619 - 2630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|