|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 275, Issue 5, 3137-3143, February 4, 2000
Molecular and Biochemical Evidence for the Involvement of
Calcium/Calmodulin in Auxin Action*
Tianbao
Yang and
B. W.
Poovaiah
From the Laboratory of Plant Molecular Biology and Physiology,
Department of Horticulture, Washington State University,
Pullman, Washington 99164-6414
 |
ABSTRACT |
The use of 35S-labeled
calmodulin (CaM) to screen a corn root cDNA expression library has
led to the isolation of a CaM-binding protein, encoded by a cDNA
with sequence similarity to small auxin up RNAs (SAURs), a
class of early auxin-responsive genes. The cDNA designated as
ZmSAUR1 (Zea mays SAURs) was expressed in
Escherichia coli, and the recombinant protein was purified
by CaM affinity chromatography. The CaM binding assay revealed that the
recombinant protein binds to CaM in a calcium-dependent
manner. Deletion analysis revealed that the CaM binding site was
located at the NH2-terminal domain. A synthetic peptide of
amino acids 20-45, corresponding to the potential CaM binding region,
was used for calcium-dependent mobility shift assays. The
synthetic peptide formed a stable complex with CaM only in the presence
of calcium. The CaM affinity assay indicated that ZmSAUR1 binds to CaM
with high affinity (Kd ~15 nM) in a
calcium-dependent manner. Comparison of the
NH2-terminal portions of all of the characterized SAURs
revealed that they all contain a stretch of the basic -amphiphilic
helix similar to the CaM binding region of ZmSAUR1. CaM binds to the
two synthetic peptides from the NH2-terminal regions of
Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1 and soybean 10A5, suggesting that this
is a general phenomenon for all SAURs. Northern analysis was carried
out using the total RNA isolated from auxin-treated corn coleoptile
segments. ZmSAUR1 gene expression began within 10 min,
increased rapidly between 10 and 60 min, and peaked around 60 min after
10 µM -naphthaleneacetic acid treatment. These results
indicate that ZmSAUR1 is an early auxin-responsive gene.
The CaM antagonist
N-(6-aminohexyl)5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide hydrochloride inhibited the auxin-induced cell elongation but not the
auxin-induced expression of ZmSAUR1. This suggests that calcium/CaM do not regulate ZmSAUR1 at the transcriptional
level. CaM binding to ZmSAUR1 in a calcium-dependent manner
suggests that calcium/CaM regulate ZmSAUR1 at the post-translational
level. Our data provide the first direct evidence for the involvement of calcium/CaM-mediated signaling in auxin-mediated signal transduction.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Plant hormone auxin plays a central role in growth and development
by controlling cell division, cell elongation, and cell differentiation
(1-4). Auxin-induced cell elongation, one of the fastest hormonal
responses known, has been used widely as a model system to study the
mechanism of auxin action (5-7). A vast array of cellular responses to
external and internal stimuli such as light and hormones involves
Ca2+ as a second messenger (8-12). Calmodulin
(CaM),1 a ubiquitous
Ca2+-binding protein in eukaryotes, is a primary
intracellular Ca2+ receptor that transduces the second
messenger Ca2+ signal by binding to and altering the
activity of the variety of other proteins (9, 13-15).
Recent evidence indicates that there is a close relationship between
the mechanism of auxin action and calcium signaling, but the
interaction between them has been controversial and is still unresolved
(3, 16). The effect of auxin on changes in cellular calcium levels has
been obtained using calcium-sensitive fluorescent dyes or
Ca2+-sensitive microelectrodes. Felle (17) reported a
decrease in free calcium in cells after auxin treatment, whereas
Gehring et al. (18) observed an increase in calcium levels
after auxin treatment. Depletion of calcium in tissues using calcium
chelators and CaM inhibitors has implicated a role for calcium in
the auxin signal transduction. Raghothama et al. (19) found
that CaM antagonists such as chlorpromazine, trifluoperazine,
fluphenazine, and W-7 inhibited the auxin-induced elongation of oat and
corn coleoptile segments. Gonzalez-Daros et al. (20)
observed that some, but not all, CaM inhibitors tested could inhibit
auxin-induced medium acidification by oat coleoptile segments.
Similarly, Reddy et al. (16) observed that the calcium
chelator EGTA and calcium channel blocker D-600 inhibited auxin-induced
elongation of pea epicotyl segments. Auxin has been linked with
Ca2+ transport (21), release of Ca2+ ion from
membrane vesicles (22), and phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis (23). It
was proposed that calcium acts as a second messenger in the
transduction of the hormone signal (8-12, 23). Auxin-calcium interaction in cellular processes could be regulated through CaM; however, no direct molecular and biochemical evidence for this interaction has been reported so far.
Here we report the isolation and characterization of a novel
CaM-binding protein that is encoded by a corn homolog of
SAURs (small auxin up RNAs); it is designated as
ZmSAUR1 (Zea mays SAURs). SAURs belong
to one group of the early auxin-response genes (4). Many early
auxin-responsive genes have been cloned and characterized (2, 4,
24-27). SAURs are one of the gene families in higher plants
which have been well characterized. Initially isolated from soybean
(28), SAUR genes have also been characterized from several
dicots such as mung bean (29), Arabidopsis (30), and apple
(31). In all cases examined, SAUR genes encode short
transcripts with highly conserved open reading frames that
accumulate rapidly and specifically after auxin treatment.
Soybean SAUR gene transcription can be detected as soon as
2.5 min after the application of auxin (28, 32). We have demonstrated
that corn ZmSAUR1 is a rapid auxin-responsive gene as well.
The results described here provide direct molecular and biochemical
evidence for the involvement of the Ca2+/CaM messenger
system in auxin action.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Preparation of 35S-Labeled
CaM--
35S-Labeled recombinant CaM was prepared as
described (33) using a potato CaM PCM6 cloned into the pET-3b
expression vector (34). The specificity of 35S-labeled CaM
was about 0.5 × 106 cpm/µg.
Screening the cDNA Expression Library and DNA Sequence
Analysis--
A corn root cDNA expression library ( ZAP II)
prepared in our laboratory was screened using 35S-labeled
PCM6 as described (33). Several positive clones were isolated from
2 × 105 recombinant phages. The cDNA clones were
sequenced on both strands. DNA sequences were analyzed using GCG
version 8.0 and 9.0 software (35).
Growth and Auxin Treatment of Corn Plants--
Corn (Zea
mays L. cv. Merit) seeds were sown in plastic trays filled with
vermiculite and kept in the dark for about 5 days at 24 °C. The
dark-grown coleoptiles were harvested under a dim green light, and 8-mm
segments, excluding the 3-mm tip, were excised. Coleoptile segments
were transferred into a beaker containing distilled water and kept
floating for a 4-h period. Sets of 10 presoaked coleoptile segments
were transferred into Petri dishes containing 10 ml of incubation
medium consisting of 10 mM KH2PO4 (pH 6.3), 1.5% w/v sucrose, 10 mM sodium citrate, and
0.1% v/v ethanol. NAA (Sigma), W-7 (Sigma), and W-5 (Sigma) treatments were carried out as described (19). After auxin treatment, the lengths
of the coleoptile segments were measured using a ruler under a dim
green light, or the samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction.
Southern Blot Analysis--
Corn genomic DNA was extracted as
described (36). 10 µg of DNA was digested with various restriction
enzymes, separated by electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose Tris acetate
gel, and transferred to Hybond N+ nylon membrane (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) with 0.4 M NaOH. Southern blot analysis
was carried out as described earlier (28) using a ZmSAUR1
probe covering the complete coding region from nucleotide 37 to 480 (see Fig. 1).
RNA Isolation and Northern Analysis--
Total RNA was isolated
from frozen tissue essentially as described (37). RNA samples (50 µg)
were denatured and separated on 1.5% formaldehyde-agarose gels. After
transfer to Hybond N+ filters, the blots were hybridized
using 32P-labeled ZmSAUR1 cDNA fragment
37-480 and washed as described earlier (38). Blots were stripped and
reprobed with a fragment of Arabidopsis 18 S rDNA, accession
no. X16077, nucleotides 158-1669.
Construction of DNA Templates Coding for Full and Truncated
ZmSAUR1 Proteins--
Templates coding for wild type ZmSAUR1 and
deletion m C and m N were produced by PCR amplification from the
original cDNA with ZmSAUR1-specific oligonucleotides
containing appropriate restriction sites (NdeI at the 5'-end
and BamHI at the 3'-end) for cloning into the downstream of
the His6 tag in a pET-14b expression vector (Novagen,
Inc.). The wild type and deletion mutant proteins of ZmSAUR1 were
expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) pLysS
according to the method of Studier et al. (39). The
nucleotide sequence of all cloned fragments derived by PCR
amplification was determined after cloning into the pET-14b vector,
using oligonucleotides designed for sequencing from both sides of the
pET-14b cloning sites as primers.
35S-Recombinant CaM Binding Assay--
Wild type and
truncated ZmSAUR1 proteins were extracted and purified essentially as
described (40). The amount of protein was estimated by the Bradford
(67) method using a protein assay kit (Bio-Rad). Proteins were
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE),
electrotransferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane
(Millipore), and treated with 35S-labeled recombinant CaM
with 1 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA as
described (40).
Peptide Binding to CaM--
The synthetic peptides were prepared
using an Applied Biosystems peptide synthesizer 431A in the Laboratory
of Bioanalysis and Biotechnology, Washington State University. Samples
containing 240 pmol (4 µg) of bovine CaM (Sigma) and different
amounts of purified synthetic peptides in 100 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.2) and either 1 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA in a total volume of 30 µl were incubated for
1 h at room temperature. The samples were analyzed by
nondenaturing PAGE as described (41).
 |
RESULTS |
Using the CaM binding screening approach, nine positive clones
from a corn root cDNA expression library were obtained. One of
these clones had high affinity to CaM. DNA sequencing indicated that
the 760-base pair cDNA clone contained a partial coding region and
a full 3'-untranslated region plus a poly(A)+ tail. The
clone was designated as ZmSAUR1 because it has high homology
to soybean SAUR genes. To get the full clone, a
cDNA-specific primer as indicated in Fig.
1 and the vector specific T3 primer were
used for PCR, and the longest amplified fragment was sequenced. The PCR
fragment was 60 base pairs longer than the cDNA clone at the
5'-end. An in-frame methionine residue was deduced in the downstream
region of an in-frame stop codon (Fig. 1). Thus, the ZmSAUR1
cDNA with the full coding region and 3'-untranslated region was
obtained.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences
of ZmSAUR1. The arrow indicates the
sequence corresponding to the antisense primer used for PCR cloning.
The underline indicates the CaM binding region and the amino
acid residues used for the synthetic peptide. The double
underline indicates the in-frame stop codon upstream of the first
Met.
|
|
Fig. 1 shows the nucleotide sequence and the deduced amino acid
sequence of ZmSAUR1. The cDNA codes for a polypeptide of
147 amino acids flanked by a 320-base pair untranslated region at the
3'-end and a 36-base pair untranslated region at the 5'-end. The
calculated molecular mass and the isoelectric point of the ZmSAUR1
polypeptide are 16.6 kDa and 7.22, respectively. The soybean SAUR genes encode proteins around 10 kDa in size with an
isoelectric point between 6 and 7. Like other characterized SAURs
(28-31), the amino acid sequence does not contain a typical signal
sequence, endoplasmic reticulum retention signal, or
N-glycosylation signal, suggesting that the ZmSAUR1 protein
does not enter the secretory pathway. However, it is possible that the
ZmSAUR1 protein is a nuclear protein because it contains two short
regions of basic amino acids (amino acids 33-37 and 67-69) that may
form a bipartite nuclear localization signal (42).
The deduced amino acid sequence of ZmSAUR1 is aligned in
Fig. 2 with those of soybean
SAUR 10A5, 15 A (32), mung bean SAUR ARG7 (29),
and Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1 (30). The size of ZmSAUR1 is larger
than other SAURs. However, searching the Arabidopsis genomic
sequences, a ZmSAUR1 homolog, SAUR-A2, with an even larger molecular
mass, was found (Fig. 2). The difference lies in the NH2-terminal 54 amino acids and about 30 amino acids in the
COOH terminus of ZmSAUR1, where soybean and other plant SAURs have less
similarity. In contrast, the sequences are highly similar within the
central portion (from 55 to 117 in ZmSAUR1) in all SAURs. Between these
residues, ZmSAUR1 is 70.6% similar (58.8% identical) to the soybean
10A5 and 72.5% similar (54.9% identical) to Arabidopsis
SAUR-AC1. Thus it seems likely that the central conserved portion of
these proteins is most important for whatever function they
fulfill.

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequence
of ZmSAUR1 with soybean, Arabidopsis,
and mung bean SAURs. The accession numbers of
soybean SAUR 10A5, 15A, Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1, SAUR-A2, and
mung bean SAUR ARG7 are P33079, P33081, S70188, AL021633, and D14414,
respectively.
|
|
To study further the properties of ZmSAUR1, the ZmSAUR1 protein was
expressed in E. coli, using the pET-14b expression vector. The recombinant protein was present mainly in the soluble fraction. The
following two experiments proved that CaM binds to the ZmSAUR1 protein.
First, the 18.8-kDa fusion protein (16.6-kDa ZmSAUR1 plus 2.2-kDa
NH2-terminal His6 tag) was purified by CaM
affinity chromatography to near homogeneity as judged by SDS-PAGE (data not shown). Second, 35S-labeled CaM binds to ZmSAUR1
protein only in the presence of Ca2+ (Fig.
3). After adding 2 mM EGTA,
no CaM binding was observed, suggesting that CaM binding to ZmSAUR1 is
calcium-dependent. The proteins from E. coli
transformed with the pET-14b vector did not show any CaM binding (data
not shown).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
CaM binding to ZmSAUR1 recombinant
protein. The ZmSAUR1 protein was expressed in E. coli,
and the cell extract was subjected to SDS-PAGE. The proteins were
transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and incubated
with 35S-labeled 50 nM CaM in buffer containing
either 2 mM EGTA or 1 mM CaCl2. The
protein size markers are shown on the left.
|
|
To map the CaM binding region of ZmSAUR1, two mutants were prepared
(Fig. 4A). The mutant m C
lacks the COOH-terminal 81 amino acid residues, which includes the
conserved central portion; the mutant m N lacks the
NH2-terminal 66 residues. The wild type ZmSAUR1 and the two
mutants were expressed in E. coli and purified as described
(see "Experimental Procedures"). These proteins were used for
35S-CaM binding assays in the presence and absence of
Ca2+. The binding of CaM to wild type and mutant m C was
similar, whereas CaM did not bind to the mutant m N (Fig.
4A), indicating that a CaM binding region is restricted to
the 66 amino acids of the NH2 terminus, where SAURs showed
the least similarity. CaM binding to wild type and m C of ZmSAUR1 was
prevented by the addition of 2 mM EGTA (data not shown),
indicating an absolute requirement of Ca2+ for CaM
binding.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Identification of the CaM binding site of
ZmSAUR1. A, schematic diagram of wild type
(WT) and two deletion mutants of ZmSAUR1 which were used for
35S-CaM binding assays. Mutant m C and m N represent
ZmSAUR1 lacking the COOH-terminal 81 amino acids and the
NH2-terminal 66 amino acids. E. coli-expressed
wild type and mutants were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE and transferred
onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The excised bands containing
the expressed proteins were subjected to a 35S-CaM binding
assay. The autoradiogram is shown on the right of each
diagram (boxed area). B, helical wheel projection
of the CaM binding sequence of ZmSAUR1 (left) and CCaMK
control (right). Hydrophobic amino acid residues are
boxed. Basic amino acid residues are marked with (+).
C, gel mobility shift assay showing CaM binding to the
synthetic peptide, corresponding to the amino acids 20-45 in ZmSAUR1
(listed on the top). Increasing amounts of the peptide
(peptide/CaM molar ratios indicated) were incubated with 240 pmol of
bovine CaM with 1 mM CaCl2; samples were
separated by nondenaturing PAGE. Arrows indicate the
positions of the free CaM and the peptide-CaM complex.
|
|
CaM is a protein capable of recognizing the basic amphiphilic
-helical domain of the target proteins (14, 41, 47). Helical wheel
projection of the peptide sequences predicted that the CaM binding
region was restricted further to amino acids 20-45 of ZmSAUR1. The
amino acid residues 32-45 formed a typical basic amphiphilic -helix
(Fig. 4B), similar to CCaMK, a plant
Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinase (40). A
peptide with 26 residues corresponding to the amino acids 20-45 was
incubated with bovine CaM, and complex formation was assessed by
nondenaturing PAGE in the presence or absence of Ca2+. The
results showed that the peptide is capable of forming a stable complex
with CaM in the presence of Ca2+ (Fig. 4C) but
not in the absence of Ca2+ (data not shown). Several ratios
of peptide to CaM were used. In the absence of the peptide, there was a
single band reflecting the pure CaM. As the peptide was added, another
band of low mobility appeared, representing the peptide-CaM complex.
When the ratio of peptide to CaM was equal, the CaM band disappeared,
and the intensity of the peptide-CaM complex increased. At a peptide to CaM molar ratio of 1.5, no free CaM was detected. At higher ratios (up
to 2.5), no new band appeared on the gel, nor did the peptide-CaM complex band change its intensity, suggesting that multivalent complexes were absent. These observations indicate that the peptide binds to Ca2+/CaM with a 1:1 stoichiometry.
Based on the primary structure of SAURs in Fig. 2, it seems that
ZmSAUR1 is very divergent isoform with a longer
NH2-terminal domain. However, using the helical wheel
projection method, we found that the NH2-terminal portions
in all of the SAURs listed in Fig. 2 as well as other SAURs in the data
base can form a basic amphiphilic -helix, suggesting that SAURs in
general are CaM-binding proteins. To prove this, two SAURs, 10A5 and
SAUR-AC1 from soybean and Arabidopsis,
respectively, were selected for further analysis. Both amino
acids 9-22 in soybean 10A5 and 3-16 in Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1 formed a basic -amphiphilic helix, just like ZmSAUR1 (Fig.
5A). Two peptides,
corresponding to 2-24 of 10A5 and 2-19 of SAUR-AC1, were synthesized,
and a similar gel mobility shift assay was used to study the CaM
binding efficiency. In the presence of calcium, like the peptide from
ZmSAUR1, both peptides formed a stable complex with CaM, visualized as
a larger size band instead of the smaller size band of CaM itself (Fig.
5B). Moreover, the two peptides bind to Ca2+/CaM
with a 1:1 stoichiometry, too; however, only one CaM band was detected
in the presence of EGTA (data not shown).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
CaM binding to the NH2-terminal
domain of soybean 10A5 and Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1.
A, helical wheel projection of the CaM binding sequence of
10A5 (left) and SAUR-AC1 (right). Hydrophobic
amino acid residues are boxed. Basic amino acid residues are
marked with (+). B, gel mobility shift assay showing CaM
binding to the synthetic peptides, corresponding to amino acids 2-24
of 10A5 (left) and 2-19 of SAUR-AC1 (right). The
amino acid sequences of the peptides are listed on the top.
Increasing amounts of the peptide (peptide/CaM molar ratios indicated)
were incubated with 240 pmol of bovine CaM with 1 mM
CaCl2; samples were separated by nondenaturing PAGE.
Arrows indicate the positions of the free CaM and the
peptide-CaM complex.
|
|
CaM binding affinity of ZmSAUR1 was studied using different
concentrations of 35S-labeled CaM. To eliminate nonspecific
CaM binding, bovine serum albumin was used as a negative control. The
average background count was subtracted from the counts of ZmSAUR1
protein samples when calculating the specific binding. Binding of
labeled CaM to ZmSAUR1 saturated at concentrations above 100 nM (Fig. 6), indicating the
presence of a saturable high affinity binding site in ZmSAUR1. From
Scatchard plot analysis of the saturation curve, the dissociation
constant (Kd) of CaM for ZmSAUR1 was estimated to be
about 15 nM. The binding of CaM to ZmSAUR1 was blocked
completely in the presence of 2 mM EGTA. Scatchard analysis also indicated that ZmSAUR1 has a single CaM binding site (Fig. 6).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Saturation curve of 35S-CaM
binding to purified ZmSAUR1. E. coli-expressed ZmSAUR1
protein (4 pmol) was spotted on an Immobilon membrane (Millipore) and
incubated with different amounts of 35S-labeled CaM. After
washing in the buffer without 35S-CaM, radioactivity of the
filter was measured using a liquid scintillation counter. The amount of
bound CaM at each point was represented as a percent of the maximal
binding. The inset shows a Scatchard plot of data indicating
that binding ratio of CaM to SAUR is 1:1. Bound/free and bound CaM are
expressed as B/F and B, respectively.
|
|
Most studies of SAUR gene expression in soybean have been
conducted using etiolated elongating hypocotyl sections that respond rapidly to auxin treatment (28, 32). An analogous system in corn is the
etiolated coleoptile segments. Corn coleoptile segments floated in 10 µM NAA solution showed a significant increase in length
from that of control without application of NAA (Fig.
7A). After about a 2-h
incubation, the elongation of coleoptiles was detectable. After 16 h, the coleoptile elongation increased by more than 50%; however,
coleoptiles in the medium without the NAA application elongated only
about 5%. To study the auxin induction kinetics of ZmSAUR1
expression, corn coleoptile segments were collected at different times
after incubation in the medium with 10 µM NAA for RNA
preparation. Northern analyses indicated that the level of
ZmSAUR1 is undetectable if NAA was not applied (Fig. 7B). Treatment with NAA led to a significant induction of
the ZmSAUR1 with a size of ~ 0.8 kilobase, which
coincides with the cDNA size of ZmSAUR1. The induction
began within 10 min, a sharp increase occurred between 20 and 60 min,
with half-maximal after 30 min and saturation in 60 min. This kinetics
of auxin induction is similar to Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1 (30),
in contrast to soybean SAUR mRNAs, in which the
induction happened in 2.5 min and peaked at 15 min (28, 32). This
demonstrates that ZmSAUR1 is indeed an early
auxin-responsive gene.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of auxin (10 µM NAA) on elongation of corn coleoptile
segments and the induction of ZmSAUR1.
A, three sets of 10 coleoptile segments were floated in test
solution in the dark for time periods indicated on the top (min).
Vertical bars represent S.E. B, autoradiograms of
Hybond N+ filter hybridized successively with
32P-labeled ZmSAUR1 cDNA fragment 37-480
(Fig. 1) and 18 S rDNA fragment 158-1669 (accession number
X16077).
|
|
Earlier studies in our laboratory revealed that W-7, a CaM antagonist,
inhibited auxin-induced coleoptile elongation. However, its structural
homolog W-5 (same as W-7 but lacking a Cl), which is 10 times less
active as a CaM antagonist with the same membrane affinity, did not
inhibit cell elongation significantly (19). To study the effect of W-7
on the ZmSAUR1 expression in response to auxin, coleoptile
segments were treated with auxin in the presence and absence of W-7.
The presence of 200 µM W-7 in the medium with 10 µM NAA totally inhibited auxin-induced elongation of
coleoptiles (Fig. 8A);
however, similar levels of auxin-induced ZmSAUR1 expression were detected in both treatments containing NAA plus W-7 and NAA plus
W-5 (Fig. 8B). Thus blocking the function of CaM does not affect the auxin-induced ZmSAUR1 expression, suggesting that
CaM does not regulate ZmSAUR1 at the transcriptional level.
The results also suggest that Ca2+/CaM interferes with
auxin-induced cell elongation; however, we cannot exclude the
possibility that W-7 inhibits the auxin-induced cell elongation by
blocking the function of CaM, as well as inhibiting the other enzymes
such as calcium-dependent protein kinase (43) and
mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase (44).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of CaM antagonist (W-7) on
auxin-induced cell elongation and expression of ZmSAUR1
in corn coleoptile. A , three sets of 10 coleoptile segments were floated in test solution with or without 10 mM NAA plus W-7 or W-5 for 1 h in the dark.
Vertical bars represent S.E. B, autoradiograms of
Hybond N+ filter hybridized successively with
32P-labeled ZmSAUR1 cDNA fragment 37-480
(Fig. 1) and 18 S rDNA fragment 158-1669 (accession number
X16077).
|
|
SAUR is a multigene family in soybean (28, 32) and
Arabidopsis (27, 30). Based on a data base search, more than
30 Arabidopsis SAUR genes that have been found to date are
scattered throughout genome. Genomic Southern analysis of corn genome
is shown in Fig. 9. A probe covering the
ZmSAUR1 coding region hybridizes to two or three bands of
corn genomic DNA under high stringency conditions. Under low stringency
conditions of hybridization, two or three additional bands were
detected (data not shown). Thus there are about two ZmSAUR1
gene loci and two more ZmSAUR1-related gene loci in the corn
genome. It is possible that in one locus there could be several similar
SAUR genes arranged in tandem. For example, a cluster of
SAURs, including five closely related genes, was found in
the soybean genome (32).

View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Southern blot analysis. The blot of corn
genomic DNA digested with the restriction enzymes as indicated was
hybridized with 32P-labeled ZmSAUR1 cDNA
fragment 37-480 (Fig. 1). The sizes of DNA markers (in kilobases; kb)
are shown on the left of the blot, and the restriction
enzymes used are: EcoRI (lane 1),
EcoRV (lane 2), XbaI (lane
3), XhoI (lane 4), and NheI
(lane 5).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
CaM contains four Ca2+ binding sites and is highly
conserved among plants and animals. Upon Ca2+ binding, CaM
undergoes conformational changes, which in turn transmit the
Ca2+ signal by binding to and activating numerous target
proteins (9, 13-15). In contrast to CaM sequences, which show
considerable conservation in plants and animals, the CaM binding
domains of CaM targets show extreme variability in sequence. However,
the majority of known target sites for CaM are composed of a stretch of
12-30 contiguous amino acids with positively charged amphiphilic characteristics and a propensity to form an -helix upon binding to
CaM. This affords a tremendous potential for variability in the primary
sequence, i.e. target diversity, for CaM binding sites (14,
40, 41, 45). Based on the notion of the structural feature of CaM
binding domain, the CaM binding region was mapped onto the
NH2-terminal domain of ZmSAUR1 (Fig. 4A).
Amino acid residues 32-45 in the NH2 terminus of ZmSAUR1
protein formed an -helix with a hydrophobic face as opposed to a basic, hydrophilic face (Fig. 4B). Particularly, amino acids
35-37 in ZmSAUR1 protein have a Trp-Lys-Lys motif, which is present in
other known CaM targets (41, 46). The Trp in the Trp-Lys-Lys motif can
be replaced by residues with large hydrophobic side chains such as Leu
and Phe, and the Lys can be replaced by Arg (41). Therefore, we
predicted that the CaM binding site should be in the
NH2-terminal domain. A synthetic peptide (amino acids 20-45) from the NH2-terminal domain binds to CaM in a
calcium-dependent manner (Fig. 4C).
Interestingly, the NH2-terminal domains of other SAURs
listed in Fig. 2 appear to have structural features for CaM binding
sites similar to those mentioned above, even though the
NH2-terminal domains in the primary sequences of SAURs are very diverse (Fig. 2). For example, in soybean 10A5, amino acids 9-22
can form an -amphiphilic helix (Fig. 5A), including a
Val-Arg-Arg motif in amino acids 9-11 (Fig. 2). Similarly, amino acids
3-16 in Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1 can also form an
-amphiphilic helix (Fig. 5A). The synthetic peptides
corresponding to these regions from soybean 10A5 and
Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1 bind to CaM in the presence of calcium,
but not with EGTA (Fig. 5B). By searching the data base,
about 50 SAURs were found. Almost all of the SAURs have the structure
of the basic amphiphilic -helix at the NH2-terminal portions. Thus it can be concluded that most SAUR proteins are CaM-binding proteins.
The SAUR genes have been isolated from several dicots such
as soybean (28), mung bean (29), Arabidopsis (30), and apple (31). Isolation of the ZmSAUR1, an SAUR homolog,
from corn, a monocot, indicates structural conservation and functional
significance among different SAURs in higher plants. The structural
feature of SAUR proteins appears to have at least two common domains. The central portions of SAURs share a high amino acid homology (Fig.
2); therefore they could be functional domains for this type of protein
(32). The NH2-terminal domain, with the -amphiphilic helical structure, can act as a regulatory domain to respond to the
Ca2+/CaM signaling. The CaM binding sites or closely
juxtaposed regions in other characterized CaM-binding proteins often
function as the autoinhibitory or pseudo-substrate domains. This region
maintains the targets in an inactive state in the absence of the
calcium signal (14) such as in plant glutamate decarboxylase (47), animal CaM kinase II (48), and plant
Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinase (40, 49).
The exact function of SAUR proteins is still unknown. However, in all
cases examined, SAUR genes encoded short transcripts with
highly conserved open reading frames that have been localized to
tissues that are targets of auxin-induced cell elongation (27, 50). In
excised soybean-elongating hypocotyl sections, auxin-induced cell
elongation was observed after a lag of about 12 min (51, 52). The
induction of ZmSAUR1 by auxin occurred within 10 min. The
rapid response of SAUR induction in response to auxin has been reported earlier. For example, soybean SAUR expression
in the hypocotyl sections was detected within 5 min after auxin
application (28, 32). Therefore, it is believed that SAURs play a role in rapid plant growth response such as cell elongation. Their spatial
and temporal expression patterns also suggest that they may be involved
in auxin-induced cell elongation (53, 54). For example, in
gravity-stimulated soybean seedlings or transgenic tobacco,
SAUR expression is maximal on the side of the plant where cells are destined to elongate and generate the tropic curvature (27,
53). Moreover, several auxin- and gravity-response mutants of
Arabidopsis, e.g. axr2-1, exhibit
decreased accumulation of SAUR-AC1 mRNA in elongating
etiolated seedlings (30, 55).
Tagawa and Bonner (56) reported that application of calcium and other
ions altered the response of coleoptile tissues to auxin. Calcium is
also known to affect auxin binding to corn coleoptile membrane
preparations (57). Cohen and Nadler (58) demonstrated that calcium
played a role in auxin-induced acidification of coleoptile cells. More
recently, much physiological evidence demonstrates that calcium and
calcium-binding proteins such as CaM affect cell elongation in corn and
oat coleoptiles, pea epicotyls, and soybean hypocotyls. It is believed
that Ca2+ and Ca2+/CaM are involved in
regulating various developmental events, including cell elongation in
plants (3, 8-15). Rapid changes in the cytosolic Ca2+
concentration were detected in corn coleoptiles after auxin treatment. Such changes were noticeable in both epidermal and cortical cells within 5 min after auxin application (18). It was suggested that the
increase of cytosolic Ca2+ would precede the change in
SAURs and that Ca2+ may therefore be a secondary messenger
involved in the accumulation of such SAURs (59) However, the
results described here suggest that Ca2+/CaM do not affect
the transcription of SAUR, but they may play a role in cell elongation
(Fig. 8). These results are consistent with an earlier study in this
laboratory of the effects of calcium on auxin action (16). Depletion of
calcium by a calcium chelator, calcium ionophore, or calcium channel
blocker inhibited the auxin-induced cell elongation of pea epicotyls
but not the induction of pIAA4/5 and pIAA6, which belong to the
AUX/IAA group of early auxin-inducible mRNAs
(24). It is not clear whether they are CaM target proteins.
It is likely that auxin rapidly induces the expression of early
auxin-responsive genes such as SAURs before cell elongation begins. The
auxin-inducible elements have been characterized in the promoters of
soybean SAURs (32, 54, 60) and Arabidopsis SAUR-AC1 (30). Identification of ZmSAUR1 as a
Ca2+/CaM-binding protein suggests that Ca2+/CaM
regulate the function of this early responsive gene(s) at the
post-translational level. The possibility also exists that CaM may
affect the cell elongation by regulating other CaM-binding proteins.
For example, Ca2+/CaM-regulated protein
phosphorylation/dephosphorylation may play a role in cell elongation.
Ca2+/CaM are known to regulate the phosphorylation of
soluble and membrane proteins in coleoptiles (61, 62). A
Ca2+/CaM-dependent protein kinase has been
cloned from plants (63). Recently, genes that encode for
Ca2+/CaM-dependent phosphatase calcineurin-like
proteins have been cloned from plants (64).
The finding that the SAUR gene family encodes for
Ca2+/CaM-binding proteins has important implications for
understanding the "cross-talk" between the calcium/CaM messenger
system and auxin signal transduction. First, the expression of
SAURs, and CaM in some cases (65, 66), is induced
rapidly by auxin. The free calcium level in the cell increases rapidly
after auxin treatment (18). Second, calcium binds to CaM, and
Ca2+/CaM binds to SAUR protein and modulates its functions
in the cell, for example cell elongation (27, 50). Thus understanding the role of SAURs in plant growth and development would be a major step
in the overall understanding of auxin-mediated growth and the role of
Ca2+/CaM-mediated signaling in plants.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We are grateful to Asgrow seed company, Twin
Falls, ID, for providing the corn seeds.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Science
Foundation Grant MCB 96-30337 and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Grant NAG-10-0061.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF148498.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 509-335-2487;
Fax: 509-335-8690; E-mail: poovaiah@wsu.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CaM, calmodulin;
NAA, -naphthaleneacetic acid;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
SAUR, small auxin up
RNA;
W-5, N-(6-aminohexyl)-1-naphthalenesulfonamide
hydrochloride;
W-7, N-(6-aminohexyl)5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide
hydrochloride.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hardin, J. W.,
Cherry, J. H.,
Morre, D. J.,
and Lembi, C. A.
(1972)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
69,
3146-3150[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1986)
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
4,
247-276
|
| 3.
|
Hobbie, L.,
Timpte, C.,
and Estelle, M.
(1994)
Plant Mol. Biol.
26,
1499-1519[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Abel, S.,
and Theologis, A.
(1996)
Plant Physiol.
111,
9-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Ray, P. M.
(1974)
Recent Adv. Phytochem.
7,
93-122
|
| 6.
|
Evans, M. L.
(1974)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.
25,
195-223
|
| 7.
|
Evans, M. L.
(1985)
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
2,
317-365[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Poovaiah, B. W.,
and Reddy, A. S. N.
(1987)
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
6,
47-103[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Poovaiah, B. W.,
and Reddy, A. S. N.
(1993)
CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
12,
185-211[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Bush, D. S.
(1995)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
46,
95-122[CrossRef]
|
| 11.
|
Trewavas, A. J.,
and Malho, R.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
1181-1195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Trewavas, A.
(1999)
Plant Physiol.
120,
428-433
|
| 13.
|
Roberts, D. M.,
and Harmon, A. C.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
43,
375-414[CrossRef]
|
| 14.
|
Snedden, W. A.,
and Fromm, H.
(1998)
Trends Plant Sci.
3,
299-304
|
| 15.
|
Zielinski, R.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
49,
697-725[CrossRef]
|
| 16.
|
Reddy, A. S. N.,
Koshiba, T.,
Theologis, A.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1988)
Plant Cell Physiol.
29,
1165-1170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Felle, H.
(1988)
Planta
174,
495-499[CrossRef]
|
| 18.
|
Gehring, C. A.,
Irving, H. R.,
and Parish, R. W.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9645-9649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Raghothama, K. G.,
Mizrahi, Y.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1985)
Plant Physiol.
79,
28-33[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Gonzalez-Daros, F.,
Carrasco-Luna, J.,
Calatayud, A.,
Salguero, J.,
and del Valle-Tascon, S.
(1993)
Physiol. Plant
87,
68-76[CrossRef]
|
| 21.
|
Kubowicz, B. D.,
Vanderhoef, L. N.,
and Hanson, J. B.
(1982)
Plant Physiol.
69,
187-191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Drobak, B. K.,
and Ferguson, I. B.
(1985)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
145,
1043-1047[CrossRef]
|
| 23.
|
Ettlinger, C.,
and Lehle, L.
(1988)
Nature
331,
176-178[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Theologis, A.,
Huynh, T. V.,
and Davis, R. W.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
183,
53-68[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Theologis, A.
(1986)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.
37,
407-438[CrossRef]
|
| 26.
|
Key, J. L.
(1989)
Bioessays
11,
52-58[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Guilfoyle, T. J.,
Hagen, G.,
Li, Y.,
Gee, M. A.,
Ulmason, T. N.,
and Martin, G.
(1992)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
20,
97-101[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
McClure, B. A.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1987)
Plant Mol. Biol.
9,
611-623[CrossRef]
|
| 29.
|
Yamamoto, K. T.,
Mori, H.,
and Imaseki, H.
(1992)
Plant Cell Physiol.
33,
93-97[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Gil, P.,
Liu, Y.,
Orbovic, V.,
Verkamp, E.,
Poff, K. L.,
and Green, P. J.
(1994)
Plant Physiol.
104,
777-784[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Watillon, B.,
Kettmann, R.,
Arredouani, A.,
Hecquet, J. F.,
Boxus, P.,
and Burny, A.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
36,
909-915[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
McClure, B. A.,
Hagen, G.,
Brown, C. S.,
Gee, M. A.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1989)
Plant Cell
1,
229-239[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Fromm, H.,
and Chua, N. H.
(1992)
Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.
10,
199-206
|
| 34.
|
Takezawa, D.,
Liu, Z.,
An, G.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1995)
Plant Mol. Biol.
27,
693-703[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Devereaux, J.,
Haeberli, P.,
and Smithies, O.
(1984)
Nucleic Acids Res.
12,
387-395
|
| 36.
|
Yang, T.,
Segal, G.,
Abbo, S.,
Feldman, M.,
and Fromm, H.
(1996)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
252,
684-694[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Longemann, J.,
Shell, J.,
and Willmitzer, L.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
163,
16-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Yang, T.,
Lev-Yadun, S.,
Feldman, M.,
and Fromm, H.
(1998)
Plant Mol. Biol.
37,
109-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Studier, F. W.,
Rosenberg, A. H.,
Dunn, J. J.,
and Dubendorf, J. W.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
185,
60-89[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Takezawa, D.,
Ramachandiran, S.,
Paranjape, V.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8126-8132[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Arazi, T.,
Baum, G.,
Snedden, W. A.,
Shelp, B.,
and Fromm, H.
(1995)
Plant Physiol.
108,
551-561[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Raikhel, N.
(1992)
Plant Physiol.
100,
1627-1632[Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Estrunch, J. J.,
Kadwell, S.,
Merlin, E.,
and Crossland, L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8837-8841[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Miernyk, J. A.,
Fang, T. K.,
and Randall, D. D.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
15338-15340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
O'Neil, K. T.,
and DeGrado, W. E.
(1990)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
15,
59-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Clore, G. M.,
Bax, A.,
Ikura, M.,
and Gronenborn, A. M.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
3,
838-845[CrossRef]
|
| 47.
|
Snedden, W. A.,
Koutsia, N.,
Baum, G.,
and Fromm, H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4148-4153[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Bricky, D. A.,
Bann, J. G.,
Fong, Y.,
Perrino, L.,
Brennan, R. G.,
and Soderling, T. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29047-29054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Ramachandiran, S.,
Takezawa, D.,
Wang, W.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1997)
J. Biochem.
121,
984-990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Gee, M. A.,
Hagen, G.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1991)
Plant Cell
3,
419-430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Vanderhoef, L. N.
(1980)
in
Plant Growth Substances
(Skoog, F., ed)
, pp. 90-96, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany
|
| 52.
|
Brummell, D. A.,
and Hall, J. L.
(1987)
Plant Cell Environ.
10,
523-543
|
| 53.
|
McClure, B. A.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1989)
Science
243,
91-93[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Li, Y.,
Hagen, G.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1991)
Plant Cell
3,
1167-1175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Timpte, C.,
Wilson, A. K.,
and Estelle, M.
(1994)
Genetics
138,
1239-1249[Abstract]
|
| 56.
|
Tagawa, T.,
and Bonner, J.
(1957)
Plant Physiol.
32,
207-212[Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Poovaiah, B. W.,
and Leopold, A. C.
(1976)
Plant Physiol.
58,
783-785[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Cohen, J. D.,
and Nadler, K. D.
(1976)
Plant Physiol.
57,
347-350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Gehring, C. A.,
Williams, D. A.,
Cody, S. H.,
and Parish, R. W.
(1990)
Nature
345,
528-530[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Li, Y.,
Liu, Z. B.,
Shi, X.,
Hagen, G.,
and Guilfoyle, T. J.
(1994)
Plant Physiol.
106,
37-43[Abstract]
|
| 61.
|
Veluthambi, K.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1984)
Science
223,
167-169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 62.
|
Veluthambi, K.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1984)
Plant Physiol.
76,
359-365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 63.
|
Patil, S.,
Takezawa, D.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4897-4901[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 64.
|
Kuda, J.,
Xu, Q.,
Harter, K.,
Gruissem, W.,
and Luan, S.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4718-4723[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 65.
|
Jena, P. K.,
Reddy, A. S. N.,
and Poovaiah, B. W.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
3644-3648[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 66.
|
Okamoto, H.,
Tanaka, Y.,
and Sakai, S.
(1995)
Plant Cell Physiol.
36,
1531-1539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 67.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2000 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kushwaha, A. Singh, and S. Chattopadhyay
Calmodulin7 Plays an Important Role as Transcriptional Regulator in Arabidopsis Seedling Development
PLANT CELL,
July 1, 2008;
20(7):
1747 - 1759.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-E. Park, J.-Y. Park, Y.-S. Kim, P. E. Staswick, J. Jeon, J. Yun, S.-Y. Kim, J. Kim, Y.-H. Lee, and C.-M. Park
GH3-mediated Auxin Homeostasis Links Growth Regulation with Stress Adaptation Response in Arabidopsis
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2007;
282(13):
10036 - 10046.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Ren, K. K. Mandadi, A. L. Boedeker, K. S. Rathore, and T. D. McKnight
Regulation of Telomerase in Arabidopsis by BT2, an Apparent Target of TELOMERASE ACTIVATOR1
PLANT CELL,
January 1, 2007;
19(1):
23 - 31.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Singla, A. Chugh, J. P. Khurana, and P. Khurana
An early auxin-responsive Aux/IAA gene from wheat (Triticum aestivum) is induced by epibrassinolide and differentially regulated by light and calcium
J. Exp. Bot.,
December 1, 2006;
57(15):
4059 - 4070.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Zegzouti, R. G. Anthony, N. Jahchan, L. Bogre, and S. K. Christensen
Phosphorylation and activation of PINOID by the phospholipid signaling kinase 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase 1 (PDK1) in Arabidopsis
PNAS,
April 18, 2006;
103(16):
6404 - 6409.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Sanchez, S. Weidmann, C. Arnould, A. R. Bernard, S. Gianinazzi, and V. Gianinazzi-Pearson
Pseudomonas fluorescens and Glomus mosseae Trigger DMI3-Dependent Activation of Genes Related to a Signal Transduction Pathway in Roots of Medicago truncatula
Plant Physiology,
October 1, 2005;
139(2):
1065 - 1077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. J. Nikiforova, C. O. Daub, H. Hesse, L. Willmitzer, and R. Hoefgen
Integrative gene-metabolite network with implemented causality deciphers informational fluxes of sulphur stress response
J. Exp. Bot.,
July 1, 2005;
56(417):
1887 - 1896.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Okushima, P. J. Overvoorde, K. Arima, J. M. Alonso, A. Chan, C. Chang, J. R. Ecker, B. Hughes, A. Lui, D. Nguyen, et al.
Functional Genomic Analysis of the AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR Gene Family Members in Arabidopsis thaliana: Unique and Overlapping Functions of ARF7 and ARF19
PLANT CELL,
February 1, 2005;
17(2):
444 - 463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yang, S. Chaudhuri, L. Yang, Y. Chen, and B. W. Poovaiah
Calcium/Calmodulin Up-regulates a Cytoplasmic Receptor-like Kinase in Plants
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 8, 2004;
279(41):
42552 - 42559.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Goda, S. Sawa, T. Asami, S. Fujioka, Y. Shimada, and S. Yoshida
Comprehensive Comparison of Auxin-Regulated and Brassinosteroid-Regulated Genes in Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology,
April 1, 2004;
134(4):
1555 - 1573.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Benjamins, C. S. G. Ampudia, P. J.J. Hooykaas, and R. Offringa
PINOID-Mediated Signaling Involves Calcium-Binding Proteins
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2003;
132(3):
1623 - 1630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Knauss, T. Rohrmeier, and L. Lehle
The Auxin-induced Maize Gene ZmSAUR2 Encodes a Short-lived Nuclear Protein Expressed in Elongating Tissues
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 20, 2003;
278(26):
23936 - 23943.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yang and B. W. Poovaiah
A Calmodulin-binding/CGCG Box DNA-binding Protein Family Involved in Multiple Signaling Pathways in Plants
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 15, 2002;
277(47):
45049 - 45058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yang and B. W. Poovaiah
Hydrogen peroxide homeostasis: Activation of plant catalase by calcium/calmodulin
PNAS,
March 19, 2002;
99(6):
4097 - 4102.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. S. Reddy, G. S. Ali, and A. S. N. Reddy
Genes Encoding Calmodulin-binding Proteins in the Arabidopsis Genome
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 15, 2002;
277(12):
9840 - 9852.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Rogg, J. Lasswell, and B. Bartel
A Gain-of-Function Mutation in IAA28 Suppresses Lateral Root Development
PLANT CELL,
March 1, 2001;
13(3):
465 - 480.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yang and B. W. Poovaiah
An Early Ethylene Up-regulated Gene Encoding a Calmodulin-binding Protein Involved in Plant Senescence and Death
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 1, 2000;
275(49):
38467 - 38473.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|