![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 275, Issue 50, 39718-39726, December 15, 2000
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
andFrom the Department of Applied Molecular Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
Received for publication, June 27, 2000, and in revised form, August 28, 2000
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prolactin (PRL) plays a central and crucial role
in the regulation of milk protein gene expression in mammary epithelial
cells. PRL binding to its cognate receptor leads to receptor
dimerization and activation of the tyrosine kinase Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), associated with the membrane-proximal, intracellular domain of
the receptor. In turn, JAK2 phosphorylates and activates STAT5, a
member of the signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) family. We have recently reported that 16 different protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTP) were expressed in lactating mouse mammary gland and
mammary epithelial cells (Aoki, N., Kawamura, M., Yamaguchi-Aoki, Y.,
Ohira, S., and Matsuda, T. (1999) J. Biochem.
(Tokyo) 125, 669-675). We investigated the involvement of
each PTP in PRL signaling. Among the 12 phosphatases including SHP-2
examined, a cytosolic phosphatase PTP1B was found to specifically
dephosphorylate STAT5a and STAT5b in transfected COS7 and in
vitro. Nuclear translocation of STAT5a and STAT5b was largely
inhibited upon overexpression of PTP1B. The PRL-dependent
transcriptional activation of the The polypeptide hormone prolactin is produced in the anterior
pituitary, regulates the activity of milk protein gene promoters in
mammary epithelial cells, and plays an important role in the growth and
differentiation of lymphocytes (1). It exhibits its activity via its
cognate receptor and the activation of intracellular signaling
molecules such as the Janus kinase
(JAK)1 signal transducers and
activators of transcription (STAT) pathway. The prolactin (PRL)
receptor, belonging to the hematopoietin receptor superfamily (2), does
not possess intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity but is associated with
the cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase JAK2 (3-5). Ligand binding leads to
dimerization of the receptor and activation of JAK2 (5). JAK2
phosphorylates not only the prolactin receptor but also the
transcription factor STAT5. Upon phosphorylation, STAT5 forms
homodimers, translocates to the nucleus, and specifically binds to the
promoter regions of target genes, thus activating transcription (6,
7).
Two closely related STAT5a and STAT5b have been identified and were
shown to be encoded by similar but different genes (8-11). STAT5a and
STAT5b share 93% identity at the amino acid level with the primary
differences found at their C termini (9-11). STAT5a was originally
identified as a critical mediator of PRL response in mammary epithelial
cells (12, 13). STAT5b was cloned from hematopoietic cells, mammary
gland, and liver (8-10, 14). It is now known that both STAT5a and
STAT5b are ubiquitously expressed in most cell lines and tissues at
comparable levels with a few exceptions (10).
STAT5a and STAT5b are also activated by other cytokines, including
growth hormone, erythropoietin, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (14, 15), thrombopoietin (16), interleukin (IL)-2
(17, 18), IL-3 (8, 14), IL-5 (14), IL-7, IL-15 (18), as well as
epidermal growth factor through its respective receptor tyrosine kinase
and by non-receptor tyrosine kinases Src and Bcr-Abl (19-21). These
studies indicate that STAT5a and STAT5b are involved in many different
signaling pathways. Gene disruption of individual genes in mice
revealed that both STAT5a and STAT5b play essential but often redundant
roles in the physiological responses associated with PRL (22). Although
they share high homology, it is also reported that STAT5a and STAT5b
may be differentially activated (23) and bind DNA sequences with
distinct specificities (24)
STAT5 undergoes a rapid and transient activation and deactivation cycle
through tyrosine phosphorylation upon cytokine stimulation (25). It is
generally thought that phosphatases attenuate or block tyrosine
phosphorylation-mediated signals and play a negative role. However,
since the finding that dephosphorylation of c-Src leads to the
activation (26), it is conceivable that the phosphatases could also
play a positive role in some signaling cascades. Actually, one of the
SH2-containing protein-tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), SHP-2, was shown
to be essential for interferon Recently, we found that 16 different PTPs including SHP-1 and SHP-2
were expressed in mammary glands and mammary epithelial cells and that
most of them were down-regulated in lactating mammary glands (30). To
extend these findings, in this study we investigated the involvement of
each PTP in PRL receptor-mediated signaling pathway by using expression
constructs for prolactin receptor, STAT5a/b, and each PTP, and we found
that both of the prolactin-induced tyrosine phosphorylations of STAT5a
and STAT5b and promoter activation of Materials, Antibodies, and Plasmid Constructs--
Ovine
prolactin (PRL) used for cell treatment was obtained from Sigma.
Polyclonal antibodies to STAT5 (C-17), recognizing both mSTAT5a and
mSTAT5b, HA epitope (Y-11), and Myc epitope (9E10) were purchased from
Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Monoclonal
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (4G10) were purchased from Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). Monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody
(M2) was obtained from Sigma. Protein A-Sepharose beads used for
immunoprecipitations were obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Mouse PTP1B (L40595) was amplified by reverse transcriptase-PCR using
the following primer sets: 5'-CCC-GCC-ATG-GAG-ATG-GAG-AAG-3' ()
and 5'-TGC-TCC-CAG-TCT-GTC-AGT-GA-3' (1682-1702). HA tagging to PTP1B
at its N terminus was done by PCR amplification using 5'-CCA-CCA-TGT-ACC-CAT-ACG-ACG-TCC-CAG-ACT-ACG-CTG-AGA-TGG-AGA-AGG-AGT-TC-3' and the above mentioned antisense primer. All the PCR products were
cloned into a mammalian expression vector, pTargeT vector (Promega),
and confirmed by sequencing on both strands. The HA-tagged PTP1B
mutants containing a cysteine to serine alteration at position 215 and
a aspartic acid to a alanine at position 181 were generated using
oligonucleotide primers, 5'-CGG-CGC-TGC-TGT-GGA-CCA-3' and 5'-GAC-TCC-AAA-GGC-AGG-CCA-AGT-3', respectively, according to the
protocol of Kunkel (31). The mutation was confirmed by DNA sequencing.
cDNAs encoding PTP Cell Culture and Transfection--
COS7 and COMMA-1D cells were
maintained in DMEM containing 10% FCS. Upon transfection experiments,
COS7 cells were inoculated at a density of 2 × 105
cells/6-cm dish and grown overnight in DMEM containing 10% FCS. Expression plasmids were transfected into the cells by the modified calcium phosphate precipitation method (33). After incubation under 3%
CO2, 97% air for 18 h, the transfected cells were
washed with phosphate-buffered saline twice and cultured in fresh DMEM containing 10% FCS for another 24 h under humidified 5%
CO2 and 95% air. Prior to PRL stimulation (5 µg/ml),
cells were serum-starved for 16 h. Luciferase and
Retrovirus-mediated Gene Delivery--
HA-tagged PTP1B was
ligated into pLXSN retroviral vector (CLONTECH) via
EcoRI site and introduced into Phoenix ecotropic packaging cells, which were obtained from Dr. Garry P. Nolan (Stanford
University), by the modified calcium phosphate precipitation method
(33). COMMA-1D cells were infected with the retrovirus-containing
culture medium and then selected in the presence of G418 (1 mg/ml). To eliminate clonal deviation, G418-resistant polyclonal cells were used
for experiments.
Cell Lysis and Western Blotting--
The transfected cells were
lysed with "lysis buffer" containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM
sodium phosphate, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM
sodium orthovanadate, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin. Proteins in
the cell lysate were separated by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions
according to the method of Laemmli (34) followed by blotting onto
nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond C+, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The
membranes were blocked in NET buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.05% Triton
X-100) containing 1% gelatin and then sequentially incubated with the
respective antibodies and peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or
-mouse IgG (Bio-Rad). The protein bands were visualized with an
enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
In Vitro Dephosphorylation Assay--
GST fusion proteins
containing full-length PTP1B were purified on glutathione-Sepharose
beads and eluted with neutralized glutathione. Enzymatic activities of
the GST fusion proteins were determined using
para-nitrophenyl phosphate, as described previously (35).
STAT5a and STAT5b immune complexes prepared from PRL-treated COS7 cells
that had been co-transfected with PRL receptor and STAT5a were washed
twice with dephosphorylation assay buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 5 mM dithiothreitol) and
incubated with the indicated amounts of GST-PTP1B fusion proteins in
dephosphorylation assay buffer for 30 min at 37 °C. Reactions were
terminated by adding SDS sample buffer.
Nuclear Translocation--
Procedures for obtaining nuclear
extracts were carried out as described previously (36) with some
modifications. Briefly, transiently co-transfected COS7 cells were
collected by centrifugation, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and
then lysed in the hypotonic buffer (10 mM HEPES-KOH, pH
7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM
Na3VO4, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin). Cells were
incubated for 15 min and then vortexed vigorously and centrifuged at
12,000 × g at 4 °C for 20 s. The pellet was
washed once with cold phosphate-buffered saline, and then the nuclear
extracts were obtained by adding a high salt buffer (25% glycerol, 420 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4,
20 mM NaF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin), shaking for 30 min at
4 °C, and then centrifuging at 12,000 × g for 5 min.
Identification of PTPs That Dephosphorylate PRL-induced
Phosphorylated STAT5a--
We have experienced that mammary epithelial
cell lines COMMA-1D, HC11, and primary mammary epithelial cells are
quite resistant to gene transfection. Therefore, to study the
involvement of each PTP identified in PRL receptor-mediated signaling,
co-transfection strategy was employed using COS7 cells. With this
strategy, SHP-2 was shown to be a positive regulator of PRL
receptor-mediated signal transduction pathway (29). Among the 16 PTPs
identified (30), the following 12 PTPs were examined: PTP1B, SHP-1,
SHP-2, PTP36, HCSF, PTP-BAS, PTP PTP1B Dephosphorylates PRL-activated STAT5a and STAT5b--
To
confirm the possible dephosphorylation of STAT5 by PTP1B, catalytically
inactive mutants of PTP1B were constructed and co-transfected into COS7
cells with PRL receptor and STAT5a or STAT5b. Upon overexpression of
PTP1B wild-type, PRL-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of both STAT5a
and STAT5b was largely abolished (Fig.
2A). Dephosphorylation
activity was not observed when the cells were co-transfected with
catalytically inactive Cys/Ser and Asp/Ala mutants of PTP1B
(Fig. 2A), suggesting that phosphatase activity is essential
for the dephosphorylation of STAT5 proteins.
To relate the expression level of PTP1B with the dephosphorylation of
STAT5a and STAT5b, various amounts of expression plasmids for PTP1B
were co-transfected into COS7 cells, and tyrosine phosphorylation of
STAT5a and STAT5b was assessed. Approximately 80% of STAT5a was
dephosphorylated when 0.1 µg of PTP1B was co-transfected (Fig. 2B, lane 3), and transfection with higher amounts of plasmid
(1 and 2 µg) abolished tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5a (Fig.
2B, lanes 2 and 1, respectively). Nearly the same
dephosphorylation of STAT5b was caused by expression of PTP1B wild-type
in a manner dependent of its expression level (Fig. 2B, lanes
5-8).
Prolactin binding to its cognate receptor results in the
autophosphorylation and activation of JAK2, and in turn JAK2 tyrosine phosphorylates both STAT5a and STAT5b. Tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2
is essential for its full activation (5). If PTP1B dephosphorylates
JAK2, tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5a and STAT5b should be reduced
accordingly. To know direct or indirect dephosphorylation activity of
PTP1B against STAT5, COS7 cells were co-transfected with PRL receptor
and PTP1B. Cells were serum-starved, stimulated with PRL for 30 min,
lysed, and then subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-JAK2
antibody followed by immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.
As clearly shown in Fig. 2C, no dephosphorylation of JAK2
was observed when PTP1B was co-transfected.
To confirm dephosphorylation action of PTP1B on STAT5a and STAT5b,
recombinant GST fusion proteins containing full-length PTP1B were
expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. GST-PTP1B wild-type exhibited catalytic activity against artificial substrate para-nitrophenyl phosphate, whereas Cys/Ser and Asp/Ala
mutants showed no activity (data not shown). COS7 cells that had been co-transfected with PRL receptor and STAT5a or STAT5b were stimulated with PRL and phosphorylated, STAT5a or STAT5b was immunoprecipitated. The indicated amounts of the recombinant GST-PTP1B fusion proteins were
added to the immune complexes and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. As
clearly illustrated in Fig.
3A, tyrosine phosphorylation level of STAT5a was reduced to approximately 50% by 1 µg of
GST-PTP1B wild-type and incubation with 10 µg of the fusion protein
resulted in complete dephosphorylation of STAT5a (upper
panels). In a similar manner, STAT5b was dephosphorylated by
GST-PTP1B wild-type (lower panels). Incubation of the immune
complexes with empty GST and GST fused to catalytically inactive
mutants of PTP1B resulted in no reduction in tyrosine phosphorylation
level of STAT5a and STAT5b. In addition, phosphorylated JAK2 was
immunoprecipitated from PRL-stimulated cells with anti-JAK2 antibody
and incubated with 10 µg of GST, GST-PTP1B wild-type, or its
mutants as above. No tyrosine dephosphorylation was observed, which is
consistent with the in vivo data shown in Fig.
2C.
We then examined the kinetics of STAT5a and STAT5b dephosphorylation by
PTP1B. Transfected COS7 cells were serum-starved and stimulated with
PRL for 2-60 min. STAT5a and STAT5b were immunoprecipitated and
assessed by phosphotyrosine immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 4A, PRL induced rapid tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT5a and STAT5b within 5 min in mock-transfected
COS7 cells, and the levels of tyrosine phosphorylation were kept high
even 60 min after PRL stimulation. This time course of tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT5a was quite similar to endogenous STAT5a/b of
mammary epithelial COMMA-1D cells (Fig. 4B). By
overexpressing PTP1B wild-type, dephosphorylation of STAT5a and STAT5b
already occurred 5 min after PRL stimulation, and only faint signals
were detected 30 and 60 min after PRL stimulation.
PTP1B Inhibited Nuclear Translocation of STAT5a and STAT5b--
It
has been reported that PTP1B is localized in endoplasmic reticulum
through its C-terminal hydrophobic amino acid residues (37). To address
the possibility that STAT5 might be dephosphorylated by PTP1B in
cytosol, subcellular localization of STAT5a and STAT5b following PRL
stimulation was examined. Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were
prepared after PRL stimulation for the times indicated, and STAT5
proteins were immunoprecipitated and immunoblotted with anti-STAT5
antibody. As shown in Fig. 5A,
the amounts of STAT5a as well as STAT5b in the nucleus increased within
5 min following PRL stimulation. Conversely, the amounts of cytoplasmic
STAT5a and STAT5b decreased. Such nuclear translocation of STAT5
proteins was observed in COMMA-1D cells in a similar kinetics (Fig.
5C). Upon overexpression of PTP1B wild-type, nuclear
translocation of STAT5a and STAT5b was disrupted, and most of them were
retained in cytosol, whereas the catalytically inactive mutants
exhibited no effect (data not shown).
Subcellular localization of PTP1B was also examined. Upon PRL
stimulation for the times indicated, PTP1B was immunoprecipitated and
immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody. Throughout the times following PRL
stimulation, most of PTP1B was present in cytosol and detected as an
expected 50-kDa protein, whereas only marginal amounts of PTP1B were
detected in the nuclear fraction (Fig. 5B).
Transcriptional Induction of the PTP1B Is a Negative Regulator in PRL Receptor-mediated Signaling in
Mammary Epithelial Cells--
As mentioned, mammary epithelial cells
are quite resistant to gene transfection. Therefore, it was required to
use virus-mediated gene infection strategy. PTP1B cDNA was ligated
into a retroviral vector and introduced into mammary epithelial
COMMA-1D cells. Cells were selected in cell culture medium containing
G418 and then directly used for experiments. As shown in Fig.
7A, nearly the same amounts of
HA-tagged PTP1B wild type, Cys/Ser, and Asp/Ala were expressed in the
cells. Cells were serum-starved and stimulated with PRL, and then
endogenous STAT5 was immunoprecipitated followed by immunoblotting with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. As was seen in reconstituted COS7 cells,
phosphorylation level of STAT5 was significantly low when PTP1B
wild-type was overexpressed, whereas overexpression of PTP1B mutants
caused no dephosphorylation of STAT5 in mammary epithelial cells (Fig.
7B). On the other hand, overexpression of PTP1B did not
affect the tyrosine phosphorylation level of JAK2 (Fig. 7C).
Moreover, STAT5 Is a Specific Substrate of PTP1B--
To confirm further
that STAT5 is a specific substrate of PTP1B, a co-precipitation study
was carried out using recombinant GST-PTP1B fusion proteins. COMMA-1D
cells were stimulated with PRL for 30 min following serum starvation
and lysed. The cell lysates were mixed with 10 µg of empty GST or
GST-PTP1B fusion proteins and were being rocked together with
GSH-Sepharose beads at 4 °C for 3 h. The GSH-Sepharose beads
were washed with the lysis buffer and dissolved in SDS sample buffer.
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (10% gel) and blotted onto
nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were probed with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. As shown in Fig.
8A, many
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins including a 97-kDa protein were
co-precipitated by GST-PTP1B Asp/Ala mutant, whereas much less proteins
were co-precipitated by the wild-type and the catalytically inactive
Cys/Ser mutant of PTP1B recombinant proteins. The 97-kDa band was
marginally detected in the Cys/Ser precipitates. The membranes were
stripped and reprobed with anti-STAT5 antibody. The
tyrosine-phosphorylated 97-kDa band co-precipitated with the PTP1B
Asp/Ala mutant was demonstrated to be STAT5 (Fig. 8A, lower
panel). STAT5 was also present in the precipitates of PTP1B
Cys/Ser mutant. Interestingly, STAT5 was detected in the precipitates
of PTP1B wild-type, although no tyrosine-phosphorylated band
corresponding to 97 kDa was detected by anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.
Other tyrosine-phosphorylated bands co-precipitated with GST fusion
proteins have not been well characterized so far. To confirm that, COS7
cells, which had been co-transfected with PRL receptor and STAT5a or
STAT5b, were stimulated with PRL and the lysates were precipitated with
the GST-PTP1B fusion proteins as above. As clearly shown in Fig.
8B, phosphorylated STAT5a or STAT5b was detected in the
precipitates of the Asp/Ala and to a lesser extent in Cys/Ser mutants,
whereas no signal was observed in the precipitates of the wild type.
The immunoblotting with anti-STAT5 also showed that the Asp/Ala mutant
precipitated the STAT5 most strongly. However, the anti-STAT5
immunoblotting also revealed that STAT5a and STAT5b were
co-precipitated by not only substrate-trapping mutants of PTP1B but
also the wild type, suggesting some contribution of
phosphotyrosine-independent interaction between STAT5 and PTP1B.
Although the mechanisms how STAT proteins become activated have
been well characterized, much less is known about their subsequent deactivation process. Recent publications have focused on the negative
regulation of STAT proteins, and several mechanisms have been
documented for deactivation of STAT5. A family of JAK kinase-binding protein or cytokine-inducible SH2-containing protein has been shown to
down-regulate STAT5 by inhibiting upstream JAK kinase activity or
preventing recruitment of STAT5 to cytokine receptors (38-43). It has
also been demonstrated that the function of STAT5 can be modulated by
the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (25, 44-46). Although tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT5 is the essential step for its full biological
functions (36), dephosphorylation of STAT5 has been largely unknown.
SHP-2 and structurally related SHP-1 have been shown to be widely
implicated in distinct JAK-STAT pathways. Positive involvement of SHP-2
in PRL receptor-mediated signaling pathway has been shown by two groups
(28, 29). Upon PRL stimulation, SHP-2 forms a trimeric complex with PRL
receptor and JAK2, and SHP-2 itself becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated.
Catalytically inactive mutants of SHP-2 inhibited the signaling pathway
in a dominant negative fashion, suggesting that the phosphatase
activity of SHP-2 is essential, possibly through dephosphorylating
essential tyrosine residues on JAK2 for its full activation (29). SHP-2
has also been shown to be involved positively in IL-2-mediated
signaling in NK cells (47), whereas it plays a negative role in gp130 signaling (48). It is also reported that SHP-1 is activated upon growth
hormone stimulation and might dephosphorylate STAT5b in rat liver cells
(49). Thus, SHP-2 and SHP-1 might play a positive or negative role
depending on the cells and tissue where they express.
In the present study, we showed that a cytosolic phosphatase PTP1B
dephosphorylated PRL-activated STAT5a and STAT5b in transfected COS7
cells as well as in vitro. In contrast, other cytoplasmic PTPs, especially SHP-1 and SHP-2, and receptor type PTPs had no effect
on the tyrosine phosphorylation level of STAT5a (Fig. 1) and STAT5b
(data not shown). Further detailed analyses revealed that catalytic
activity of PTP1B is essential for the dephosphorylation of STAT5a and
STAT5b and that PTP1B directly dephosphorylated STAT5a and STAT5b but
not JAK2, upstream regulator of STAT5 (Figs. 2 and 3). Additionally,
tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT5a and STAT5b were co-precipitated with the
substrate-trapping mutants of PTP1B (Fig. 8), and PRL-induced
transcriptional activation of STAT5a and STAT5b was disrupted when
PTP1B was overexpressed (Fig. 6). Moreover, PTP1B was shown to be a
negative regulator in PRL receptor-mediated signaling pathway leading
to up-regulation of Deactivation of tyrosine-phosphorylated nuclear STAT proteins involves
both tyrosine dephosphorylation and export from nuclear back to the
cytosol for a subsequent cycle of activation and inactivation (50). Our
data showed that nuclear translocation of STAT5a and STAT5b was largely
inhibited when PTP1B wild-type was overexpressed. Since tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT5 is essential for its dimerization, nuclear
translocation, and binding to its target genes, our data might simply
imply that PTP1B present in cytosol blocks the nuclear translocation by
trapping and dephosphorylating tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT5.
Our previous data showed that expression of PTP1B was largely
suppressed in lactating mammary gland producing a huge amount of milk
proteins under the control of PRL and that the expression level
returned to that in virgin mammary gland immediately after suckling
cessation and weaning of pups (30). This might partially support a
possible role of PTP1B in negative regulation of the JAK2-STAT5 pathway
leading to PTP1B was originally purified from the cytosolic fraction of human
placenta as a 37-kDa protein (51) and is now known to be ubiquitously
and abundantly expressed in various eukaryotic cells and be associated
with endoplasmic reticulum through its C-terminal hydrophobic 35-amino
acid region (37), although there is also evidence indicating its
association with the plasma membrane (52). We showed that most of
exogenously expressed PTP1B was recovered in cytosol, and its location,
amount, and size were unchanged following PRL stimulation. Constitutive
existence of endogenous PTP1B in cytosol might grant concomitant
tyrosine dephosphorylation of STAT5. It has been reported that PTP1B is
serine-phosphorylated upon
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate treatment through the action of protein kinase C (53) and CLK1 and CLK2 (54) and that PTP1B
undergoes tyrosine phosphorylation upon epidermal growth factor
stimulation (55). In our examination, no phosphorylation of tyrosine
and serine/threonine residues was detected by immunoblotting analysis
using anti-phosphotyrosine and anti-phosphoserine/threonine antibodies
(data not shown). Whether modulation of PTP1B occurs after PRL
stimulation remains to be determined.
Recently, Ali and Ali (56) have reported that STAT5 tyrosine
phosphorylation and nuclear translocation are regulated by two separate
pathways by using a variety of mutants of the PRL receptor Nb2 form
(56). Substitution of tyrosine 382 with alanine on the receptor did not
affect tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5, but both nuclear
translocation and binding to the target DNA sequence were inhibited.
This suggests potential involvement of PTPs, which dephosphorylate the
tyrosine residues on the PRL receptor, in PRL-mediated target gene
activation. Indeed, we have observed a receptor-type phosphatase PTP In conclusion, we demonstrated in this study for the first time the
specific tyrosine dephosphorylation of PRL-induced STAT5 by cytoplasmic
PTP1B. We further reported that nuclear translocation and
transcriptional activities of STAT5 were largely inhibited. In addition
to STAT5, it has been shown that the PRL receptor-mediated signaling
cascade also results in tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT3
(57). Whether PTP1B is also involved in negative regulation in other
JAK-STAT pathways is currently in progress in our laboratory.
-casein gene promoter was also
inhibited by PTP1B. Furthermore, retrovirus-mediated overexpression of
PTP1B resulted in dephosphorylation of endogenous STAT5 and
down-regulation of
-casein gene expression in mammary epithelial
COMMA-1D cells when the cells were treated with lactogenic hormones.
Endogenous tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT5 proteins in mammary epithelial
COMMA-1D cells as well as tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT5a and STAT5b
expressed in COS7 cells were co-precipitated by substrate-trapping
mutants of recombinant PTP1B. These results strongly suggest that PTP1B
dephosphorylates PRL-activated STAT5a and STAT5b, thereby negatively
regulating PRL-mediated signaling pathway.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
-induced gene transcription (27),
and recent publications have shown that SHP-2 contributes to
-casein
promoter activation in a positive manner (28, 29). However,
dephosphorylation of the activated JAK2 and STAT5 through the PRL
receptor and the involvement of the PTPs in a negative regulation have
poorly been understood.
-casein gene were abolished in
COS7 cells when cytosolic PTP1B was overexpressed. Nuclear
translocation of STAT5 was also inhibited by PTP1B. Overexpression of
PTP1B in mammary epithelial COMMA-1D cells also resulted in
dephosphorylation of PRL-activated STAT5 and down-regulation of
-casein gene expression upon lactogenic hormone treatment. STAT5a
and STAT5b were dephosphorylated by recombinant PTP1B in
vitro and were co-precipitated by substrate-trapping mutants of
PTP1B. These results strongly suggest that STAT5a and STAT5b are
specific substrates of PTP1B and are deactivated by the phosphatase in
PRL-mediated signaling pathway.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(M36033) and LAR (Z37988) were PCR-amplified,
cloned into a pTargeT vector, and then HA-tagged at the C termini.
Expression plasmid for HA-PTP36 was as described (32). Expression
plasmids for mouse prolactin receptor (pCMX-PL1), mouse STAT5a
(pXM-mSTAT5a) and STAT5b (pXM-mSTAT5b), and
-casein (
344/
1) Luc
(pZZ1) were kindly provided by Dr. B. Groner (Institute for
Experimental Cancer Research, Freiburg, Germany). Expression plasmid
and antiserum for JAK2 were kindly provided by Dr. J. N. Ihle (St.
Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN). Expression plasmid
for PTP-BAS/PTPL1 and PTP
was provided by Drs. C.-H. Heldin Heldin
(Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Sweden) and A. Ullrich
(Max-Planck-Institute for Biochemistry, Germany), respectively, and
HA-tagged at the C termini. PTP
/PTPRo-FLAG and PTP
HA were from
Drs. H. Abraham (Harvard University) and M. Ogata (Osaka University,
Japan), respectively. HA-SHP-1, HA-HCSF/PTP20, and PTP
-HA were from
Dr. H. Miyazaki (Tsukuba University, Japan). Myc-SHP-2 was provided by
Dr. H. Ohnishi (Mitsubishi Kasei, Japan).
-galactosidase activities were determined as described (29).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, PTP
, LAR, PTP
, PTP
, and
PTP
. COS7 cells were triple co-transfected with the expression
plasmids for PRL receptor, STAT5a, and the respective PTPs and were
stimulated with PRL following serum starvation. STAT5a was
immunoprecipitated, and its tyrosine phosphorylation level was assessed
by immunoblotting with the anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. As shown in
Fig. 1, A and B,
strong tyrosine phosphorylation was caused upon PRL stimulation when no
PTPs were transfected. When a cytosolic protein tyrosine phosphatase
PTP1B was co-transfected, tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5a was
strongly reduced and nearly undetectable. Although the expression level
of other PTPs was obvious (Fig. 1C), the other PTPs
including SHP-1 and SHP-2, on the other hand, exhibited apparently no
effect on the tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT5a, which was consistent
with previous reports (29).

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Identification of PTPs that
dephosphorylate prolactin-induced tyrosine-phosphorylated STAT5a.
COS7 cells were transiently co-transfected with expression plasmids for
prolactin receptor (1 µg), STAT5a (1 µg), and empty vector
(mock) or each PTP indicated (2 µg for each).
A, following starvation cells were left untreated (
) or
stimulated (+) with PRL (5 µg/ml) for 30 min and lysed followed by
immunoprecipitation with anti-STAT5 antibody. Immunoprecipitates were
separated by SDS-PAGE (10% gel), transferred to a nitrocellulose
membrane, and probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (upper
panel). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with anti-STAT5
antibody (lower panel). B, tyrosine
phosphorylation level of STAT5a was densitometrically normalized.
Phosphorylation level of STAT5a in mock transfectant stimulated with
PRL was set as 100%. Mean values and S.D. of three independent
experiments are shown. C, an aliquot of the total cell
lysates was immunoblotted with a mixture of anti-HA (for PTP1B, SHP-1,
PTP36, HCSF, PTP-BAS, PTP
, PTP
, LAR, PTP
, and PTP
),
anti-FLAG (for PTP
), and anti-Myc (for SHP-2) antibodies.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Dephosphorylation of STAT5a and STAT5b by
PTP1B in transfected COS7 cells. A, COS7 cells were
co-transfected with expression plasmids for PRL receptor (1 µg),
STAT5a or STAT5b (1 µg), and empty vector (mock) or each
HA-PTP1B wild type (WT), catalytically inactive Cys/Ser
(C/S) and Asp/Ala (D/A) mutants (2 µg for
each). Following serum starvation, cells were left untreated (
) or
stimulated (+) with PRL (5 µg/ml) for 30 min and lysed. STAT5a and
STAT5b were immunoprecipitated (IP), separated on SDS-PAGE,
transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Ab). The membrane was
stripped and reprobed with anti-STAT5 antibody. B, COS7
cells were co-transfected with expression plasmids for PRL receptor (1 µg), STAT5a or STAT5b (1 µg), and varying amounts of HA-PTP1B wild
type as indicated and stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) following serum
starvation. STAT5a and STAT5b were immunoprecipitated and processed as
mentioned above. An aliquot of total cell lysate was immunoblotted with
anti-HA antibody for the expression of HA-PTP1B. C, COS7
cells were co-transfected with expression plasmids for PRL receptor (2 µg) and empty vector (mock) or each of HA-PTP1B wild type,
catalytically inactive Cys/Ser and Asp/Ala mutants (2 µg for each),
serum-starved, and left untreated (
) or stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) as above. JAK2 was immunoprecipitated, separated by SDS-PAGE,
and immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. The membrane was
stripped and reprobed with anti-JAK2 antibody.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
In vitro dephosphorylation of
STAT5 by recombinant PTP1B. A, COS7 cells were
co-transfected with expression plasmids for PRL receptor (2 µg) and
STAT5a or STAT5b (2 µg) and stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) for 30 min following serum starvation. STAT5a and STAT5b were
immunoprecipitated, washed with lysis buffer, and then subjected to
in vitro dephosphorylation assay as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Following termination of the incubation,
proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Ab) (4G10). The same blot was
reprobed with anti-STAT5 antibody following stripping. B,
COS7 cells were co-tranfected with expression plasmids for PRL receptor
(2 µg) and JAK2 (2 µg) and stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) for 30 min following serum starvation. JAK2 was immunoprecipitated and
processed as above.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Time course of PRL-stimulated STAT5 tyrosine
phosphorylation. A, COS7 cells were co-transfected with
expression plasmids for PRL receptor (1 µg), STAT5a or STAT5b (1 µg), and empty vector (mock) or HA-PTP1B wild type (2 µg
for each). Following serum starvation, cells were left untreated (0 min) or stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) for the times indicated. Cells
were lysed, and STAT5a and STAT5b were immunoprecipitated
(IP), separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose
membrane, and probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody
(Ab). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with anti-STAT5
antibody. B, COMMA-1D cells were left untreated (0 min) or
stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) for the indicated times following serum
starvation and then processed as above.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Subcellular localization of STAT5 following
PRL stimulation. A, COS7 cells were transfected and
processed as described in the legend to Fig. 4, and cytoplasmic and
nuclear fractions were prepared as described under "Experimental
Procedures." STAT5a and STAT5b were immunoprecipitated, separated by
SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and probed with
anti-STAT5 antibody. B, an equivalent of the cytoplasmic and
nuclear fractions as above was separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted
with anti-HA antibody for localization of HA-PTP1B. C,
COMMA-1D cells were processed as described in legend to Fig. 4, and
cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions were prepared. Endogenous STAT5 was
immunoprecipitated, separated by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with
anti-STAT5 antibody.
-Casein Gene Promoter Was
Inhibited by PTP1B--
We then studied the effect of PTP1B on
PRL-induced transcriptional activation of the
-casein gene promoter.
PTP1B was transfected into COS7 cells together with PRL receptor,
STAT5a or STAT5b, and the
-casein gene promoter-luciferase
construct. A
-galactosidase gene was also included to normalize for
transfection efficiency. Luciferase activity was determined in extracts
from cells left untreated or stimulated with PRL. As shown in Fig.
6A, both STAT5a and STAT5b
together with the PRL receptor could strongly activate the
-casein
gene promoter upon PRL stimulation of the cells that had been
mock-tranfected with the empty plasmid without PTP (lanes 1, 2, 9, and 10). When PTP1B wild-type was co-expressed, such transcriptional induction was completely suppressed (lanes 4 and 12), whereas PTP1B Cys/Ser and Asp/Ala mutants exhibited
slightly higher
-casein promoter activation as compared with mock
transfectants (lanes 6, 8, 14, and 16).
Furthermore, expression of PTP1B wild type caused a
dose-dependent suppression of transactivation of STAT5a and
STAT5b by PRL (Fig. 6B). These results indicate that PTP1B
is a negative regulator of PRL-mediated
-casein promoter activation,
by dephosphorylating STAT5a and STAT5b.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Transcriptional induction of the
-casein gene promoter was inhibited by PTP1B.
A, COS7 cells were co-transfected with expression plasmids
for PRL receptor (1 µg), STAT5a or STAT5b (1 µg),
-casein gene
promoter-luciferase (1 µg), and empty vector (mock) or
each of the HA-PTP1B wild types (WT), catalytically inactive
Cys/Ser (C/S) and Asp/Ala (D/A) mutants (2 µg).
A
-galactosidase gene (0.4 µg) was also included to normalize for
transfection efficiency. Cells were induced with PRL for 15 h (+,
odd lanes) or left untreated (
, even lanes) and
then lysed for enzymatic assay. B, COS7 cells were
co-transfected with expression plasmids for PRL receptor (1 µg),
STAT5a or STAT5b (1 µg),
-casein gene promoter-luciferase (1 µg), and empty vector (mock) or various amounts of HA-PTP1B wild-type
(2, 1, 0.1, and 0 µg in lanes 3-6 and lanes
9-12, respectively) and processed as above. Luciferase activity
was represented as fold induction to that of mock transfectant without
PRL induction. Data are shown as mean values ± S.D. of three
independent experiments.
-casein gene expression was suppressed in PTP1B wild
type-expressing COMMA-1D cells, whereas that in PTP1B mutant-expressing
clones was comparable to that in mock-infected cells (Fig.
7D). These clearly indicate that PTP1B is a negative
regulator in PRL receptor-mediated signaling pathway in mammary
epithelial cells.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
PTP1B is a negative regulator in PRL
receptor-mediated signaling pathway in mammary epithelial COMMA-1D
cells. A, COMMA-1D cells were retrovirally infected
with HA-PTP1B wild type (WT), Cys/Ser (C/S), or
Asp/Ala (D/A) mutant and selected in the cell culture medium
supplemented with G418 (1 mg/ml). Polyclonal clones for each were
lysed, and aliquots were immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody
(Ab). B and C, COMMA-1D cells
expressing PTP1B were stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) for 30 min
following serum starvation. STAT5 (B) or JAK2 (C)
was immunoprecipitated (IP) and processed as mentioned in
the legend to Fig. 2. D, COMMA-1D cells expressing PTP1B
were treated with PRL (5 µg/ml) and hydrocortisone (0.1 µM) for 48 h. RNA was prepared and reverse
transcriptase-PCR amplification for
-casein and
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was carried
out as described (30).

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Substrate trapping mutants of PTP1B
co-precipitated with STAT5. A, recombinant GST-PTP1B
fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli and purified.
COMMA-1D cells were stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) for 30 min and
incubated with the indicated amounts of GST-PTP1B fusion proteins and
20 µl of GSH-Sepharose at 4 °C with rocking. Precipitates were
washed with lysis buffer, separated on SDS-PAGE, transferred onto
nitrocellulose membranes, and probed sequentially with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (4G10) and anti-STAT5 antibody.
B, PRL receptor (2 µg) and STAT5a or STAT5b (2 µg) were
co-expressed in COS7 cells, and the cells were serum-starved,
stimulated with PRL (5 µg/ml) for 30 min, and lysed. The lysates were
incubated with GST fusion proteins and processed as above.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-casein gene expression in mammary epithelial
COMMA-1D cells (Fig. 7). These results strongly and clearly suggest
that PTP1B is a principal PTP specifically dephosphorylating and
deactivating PRL-activated STAT5a and STAT5b.
-casein promoter activation, although most of the PTPs
identified in mammary gland and mammary epithelial cells were also
down-regulated in lactating mammary gland. Therefore, we cannot exclude
the possibility that other cytoplasmic as well as nuclear phosphatases
other than those examined in the present study dephosphorylate and
deactivate the PRL-activated STAT5 proteins.
dramatically inhibited PRL-mediated
-casein promoter activation
without affecting the phosphorylation level of
STAT5.2
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Drs. Berund Groner, James N. Ihle, Carl-Henrik Heldin, Hitoshi Miyazaki, Axel Ullrich, Hava Abraham, and Masato Ogata for provision of expression plasmids and antibodies. We also thank Dr. Garry P. Nolan for provision of Phoenix ecotropic packaging cells.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by grants from Japan Society for Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Agrochemistry.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Applied
Molecular Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan. Fax:
81-52-789-4128; E-mail: naoki@agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, September 18, 2000, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M005615200
2 N. Aoki and T. Matsuda, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: JAK, Janus kinase; STAT5, signal transducers and activators of transcription; PTP, protein-tyrosine phosphatase; PRL, prolactin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; ECL, enhanced chemiluminescence; HA, hemagglutinin; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; FCS, fetal calf serum; IL, interleukin.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | DeVlaming, V. L. (1979) in Hormones and Evolution (Barrington, E. J. W., ed) , pp. 561-642, Academic Press, New York |
| 2. | Bazan, F (1989) Biochem. Cell Biol. 164, 788-795 |
| 3. | Dusanter-Fourt, I., Muller, O., Ziemiecki, A., Mayeux, P., Drucker, B., Djiane, J., Wilks, A., Harpur, A. G., Fisher, S., and Gisselbrecht, S. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2583-2591 |
| 4. | Rui, H., Kirken, R. A., and Farrar, W. L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5364-5368 |
| 5. | Lebrun, J.-J., Ali, S., Sofer, L., Ullrich, A., and Kelly, P. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14021-14026 |
| 6. | Ihle, J. N. (1996) Cell 84, 331-334 |
| 7. | Heim, M. H. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 26, 1-12 |
| 8. | Azam, M., Erdjument-Bromege, H., Kreider, B. L., Xia, M., Quelle, F., Basu, R., Saris, C., Tempst, P., Ihle, J. N., and Schindler, C. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1402-1411 |
| 9. | Liu, X., Robinson, G. W., Gouilleux, F., Groner, B., and Hennighausen, L. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 8831-8835 |
| 10. | Rippberger, J. A., Fritz, S., Richter, K., Hocke, G. M., Lottspeich, F., and Fey, G. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29998-30006 |
| 11. | Kazansky, A. V., Raught, B., Lindsey, M., Wang, Y., and Rosen, J. M. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 1598-1609 |
| 12. | Schmitt-Ney, M., Doppler, W., Ball, R. K., and Groner, B. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 3745-3755 |
| 13. | Wakao, H., Gouilleux, F., and Groner, B. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2182-2191 |
| 14. | Mui, A.-F., Wakao, H., O'Farrel, A., Harada, N., and Miyajima, A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1166-1176 |
| 15. | Gouilleux, F., Pallard, C., Dusanter-Fourt, I., Wakao, H., Haldosen, L.-A., Norstedt, G., Levy, D., and Groner, B. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2005-2013 |
| 16. | Pallard, C., Gouilleux, F., Benit, L., Cocault, L., Souyri, M., Levy, D., Groner, B., Gisselbrecht, S., and Dusanter-Fourt, I. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2847-2856 |
| 17. | Gouilleux, F., Moritz, D., Humar, M., Moriggl, R., Berchtold, S., and Groner, B. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 5700-5708 |
| 18. | Lin, J., Migone, T., Tsang, M., Friedman, M., Wheatherbee, J., Zhon, L., Yamauchi, A., Bloom, E., Mietz, J., John, S., and Leonard, W. (1995) Immunity 2, 331-339 |
| 19. | Ruff-Jamison, S., Chen, K., and Cohen, S. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 4215-4218 |
| 20. | Frank, D., and Varticovski, L. (1996) Leukemia (Baltimore) 10, 1724-1730 |
| 21. | Ilaria, R., and van Ettens, R. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31704-31710 |
| 22. | Teglund, S., McKay, C., Schuetz, E., van Deursen, J. M., Stravopodis, D., Wang, D., Brown, M., Bodner, S., Grosfeld, G., and Ihle, J. N. (1998) Cell 93, 841-850 |
| 23. | Meinke, A., Barahmand-Pour, F., Wohrl, S., Stoiber, D., and Decker, T. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 6937-6944 |
| 24. | Boucheron, C., Dumon, S., Santos, S. C., Morrigl, R., Hennighausen, L., Gisselbrecht, S., and Gouilleux, F. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33936-33941 |
| 25. | Yu, C.-L., and Burakoff, S. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14017-14020 |
| 26. | Superti-Furga, G., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1995) BioEssays 17, 321-330 |
| 27. | David, M., Zhou, G., Pine, R., Dixon, J. E., and Larner, A. C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15862-15865 |
| 28. | Ali, S., Chen, Z., Lebrun, J. J., Vogel, W., Kharitonenkov, A., Kelly, P. A., and Ullrich, A. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 135-142 |
| 29. | Berchtold, S., Volarevic, S., Moriggl, R., Mercep, M., and Groner, B. (1998) Mol. Endocrinol. 12, 556-567 |
| 30. | Aoki, N., Kawamura, M., Yamaguchi-Aoki, Y., Ohira, S., and Matsuda, T. (1999) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 125, 669-675 |
| 31. | Kunkel, T. A. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 488-492 |
| 32. | Aoyama, K., Matsuda, T., and Aoki, N. (1999) Biochem. Cell Biol. 266, 523-531 |
| 33. | Chen, C., and Okayama, H. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2745-2752 |
| 34. | Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685 |
| 35. | Aoki, N., Yamaguchi-Aoki, Y., and Ullrich, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29422-29426 |
| 36. | Gouilleux, F., Wakao, H., Mundt, M., and Groner, B. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4361-4369 |
| 37. | Frangioni, J. V., Beahm, P. H., Shifrin, V., Jost, C. A., and Neel, B. G. (1992) Cell 68, 545-560 |
| 38. | Aman, M. J., Migone, T.-S., Sasaki, A., Ascherman, D. P., Zhu, M., Soldaini, E., Imada, K., Miyajima, A., Yoshimura, A., and Leonard, W. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 30266-30272 |
| 39. | Cohney, S. J., Sanden, D., Cacalano, N. A., Yoshimura, A., Mui, A., Migone, T. S., and Johnston, J. A. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4980-4988 |
| 40. | Tomic, S., Chughtai, N., and Ali, S. (1999) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 158, 45-54 |
| 41. | Pezet, A., Favre, H., Kelly, P. A., and Edery, M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 24497-24502 |
| 42. | Helman, D., Sandowski, Y., Cohen, Y., Matsumoto, A., Yoshimura, A., Merchav, S., and Gertler, A. (1998) FEBS Lett. 441, 287-291 |
| 43. | Verdier, F., Chretien, S., Muller, O., Varlet, P., Yoshimura, A., Gisselbrecht, S., Lacombe, C., and Mayeux, P. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28185-28190 |
| 44. | Matsumoto, A., Masuhara, M., Mitsui, K., Yokouchi, M., Ohtsubo, M., Misawa, H., Miyajima, A., and Yoshimura, A. (1997) Blood 89, 3148-3154 |
| 45. | Callus, B. A., and Mathey-Prevot, B. (1998) Blood 91, 3182-3192 |
| 46. | Wang, D., Moriggl, R., Stravopodis, D., Carpino, N., Marine, J.-C., Teglund, S., Feng, J., and Ihle, J. N. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 392-399 |
| 47. | Gadina, M., Stancato, L. M., Bacon, C. M., Larner, A. C., and O'Shea, J. J. (1998) J. Immunol. 160, 4657-4661 |
| 48. | Symes, A., Stahl, N., Reeves, S. A., Farruggella, T., Servidei, T., Gearan, T., Yancopoulos, G., and Fink, J. S. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 697-700 |
| 49. | Ram, P. A., and Waxman, D. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 17694-17702 |
| 50. | Haspel, R. L., Salditt-Georgieff, M., and Darnell, J. E., Jr. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6262-6268 |
| 51. | Tonks, N. K., Diltz, C. D., and Fischer, E. H. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 6722-6730 |
| 52. | Liu, F., Hill, D. E., and Chernoff, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31290-31295 |
| 53. | Flint, A., Gebbink, M. F. G. B., Franza, B. R., Hill, D. E., Jr., and Tonks, N. K. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 1937-1946 |
| 54. | Moeslein, F. M., Myers, M. P., and Landreth, G. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26697-26704 |
| 55. | Liu, F., and Chernoff, J. (1997) Biochem. J. 327, 139-145 |
| 56. | Ali, S., and Ali, S. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7709-7716 |
| 57. | DaSilva, L., Rui, H., Erwin, R. A., Howard, O. M., Kirken, R. A., Malabarba, M. G., Hacket, R. H., Larner, A. C., and Farrar, W. L. (1996) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 117, 131-140 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-H. Tan and M. T Nevalainen Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5A/B in prostate and breast cancers Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2008; 15(2): 367 - 390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Araki, J. Langenick, M. Gamper, R. A. Firtel, and J. G. Williams Evidence that DIF-1 and hyper-osmotic stress activate a Dictyostelium STAT by inhibiting a specific protein tyrosine phosphatase Development, April 1, 2008; 135(7): 1347 - 1353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Pilecka, C. Patrignani, R. Pescini, M.-L. Curchod, D. Perrin, Y. Xue, J. Yasenchak, A. Clark, M. C. Magnone, P. Zaratin, et al. Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase H1 Controls Growth Hormone Receptor Signaling and Systemic Growth J. Biol. Chem., November 30, 2007; 282(48): 35405 - 35415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hoyt, W. Zhu, F. Cerignoli, A. Alonso, T. Mustelin, and M. David Cutting Edge: Selective Tyrosine Dephosphorylation of Interferon-Activated Nuclear STAT5 by the VHR Phosphatase J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3402 - 3406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Lu, J. Chen, R. T. Sasmono, E. D. Hsi, K. A. Sarosiek, T. Tiganis, and I. S. Lossos T-Cell Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Distinctively Expressed in Activated-B-Cell-Like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas, Is the Nuclear Phosphatase of STAT6 Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2007; 27(6): 2166 - 2179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Okumura, N. Aoki, C. Sato, D. Nadano, and T. Matsuda Heterocomplex Formation and Cell-Surface Accumulation of Hen's Serum Zona Pellucida B1 (ZPB1)with ZPC Expressed by a Mammalian Cell Line (COS-7): A Possible Initiating Step of Egg-Envelope Matrix Construction Biol Reprod, January 1, 2007; 76(1): 9 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yagi, Y. Arimura, H. Takatori, H. Nakajima, I. Iwamoto, and T. Uchiyama Genetic background influences Th cell differentiation by controlling the capacity for IL-2-induced IL-4 production by naive CD4+ T cells Int. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 18(12): 1681 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||